Citation
Primary investigators
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
UiB
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
UiB
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
Hege Høivik Bye
|
UiB
|
Lise Lund Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
Dag Elgesem
|
UiB
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
Arjan Hille Schakel
|
UiB
|
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø
|
NORCE
|
Yvette Peters
|
UiB
|
Bjørn Sætrevik
|
UiB
|
Soran Hajo Dahl
|
UiB
|
Ingrid Kvåle Faleide
|
UiB
|
Coordinating team
Name
|
Erla Løvseth
|
Ingrid Kvåle Faleide
|
Soran Hajo Dahl
|
Producers
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
Amund Eikrem
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
Joachim Wettergreen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Universe: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in seven waves:
In wave 1, 4 870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1).
In wave 3, 5 623 members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3).
In wave 8, 4 245 new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8).
In wave 11, 2 069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11).
In wave 14, 2 036 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 14).
In wave 16, 5 163 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 16).
In wave 18, 2 048 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 18).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry, while in wave 8 the gross sample amounted to 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, 14, and 18, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn. In wave 16, the gross sample was 34 000.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment. Please refer to documentation and other information from previous waves: https://nsd.no/nsddata/serier/norsk_medborgerpanel_eng.html
In wave 20, emails were sent out on 26th of January, 2021.
An e-mail with reminder was sent out three times, February 15th, February 19th, and February 25th, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message. Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by e-mail.
Wave 20 ended March 8th 2021.
Weighting
To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent's geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset. In other words, the weights are calculated using the whole dataset. NCP has an extensive use of (randomized) sub-groups, which might alter the demographic profile of the sub-group compared to the whole dataset. If custom weights are necessary, variable columns are included in the dataset that indicates the proportion size of strata in the population.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
v-101
|
2021-06-07
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 20
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r20tdr8_a_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r20tdr8_a that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r20tdr8_b_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r20tdr8_b that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r20pk204_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r20pk204 that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r20bk33_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r20bk33 that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r18bk21_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r18bk21 that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r17bk21_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r17bk21 that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_1_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r16k43_1 that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_2_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r16k43_2 that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16bk27_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r16bk27 that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r18bk21_kodet
|
Variable documentation inserted
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r17bk21_kodet
|
Variable documentation inserted
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_1_kodet
|
Variable documentation inserted
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_2_kodet
|
Variable documentation inserted
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16bk27_kodet
|
Variable documentation inserted
|
v-100
|
2021-03-22
|
NA
|
Initial release of round 20
|
NA
|
2021-02-11
|
r17oppvekstfylke
|
New variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years of age, based on registered municipality in r17oppvekstkom
|
NA
|
2021-02-11
|
r17oppvekstfylke
|
Variable documentation inserted
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14bk27_kodet
|
Added variable based on r14bk27.
|
NA
|
2019-03-27
|
r11bk40_recode
|
Added variable based on r11k40.
|
NA
|
2019-03-27
|
r14bk40_recode
|
Added variable based on r14k40.
|
Dataset contents
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 20 - v-101-O.sav
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
# Cases
|
10421
|
# Variables
|
253
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r20rekruttert
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-18]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Round 1 |
1525 |
14.6% |
0.14633912 |
3 |
Round 3 |
1661 |
15.9% |
0.15938969 |
8 |
Round 8 |
1574 |
15.1% |
0.15104117 |
11 |
Round 11 |
931 |
8.9% |
0.08933884 |
14 |
Round 14 |
915 |
8.8% |
0.08780347 |
16 |
Round 16 |
2640 |
25.3% |
0.25333461 |
18 |
Round 18 |
1175 |
11.3% |
0.11275309 |
r20group
Variable label:
|
[Randomization of sub-groups, with instructions. See value labels for details]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized for all respondents]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Group 1 - no instructions |
2297 |
22% |
0.2204203 |
2 |
Group 2 - r18group is not 2 or 4 |
1693 |
16.2% |
0.1624604 |
3 |
Group 3 - r18group is not 2 or 4 |
1695 |
16.3% |
0.1626523 |
4 |
Group 4 - r18group is not 1 or 3 |
1308 |
12.6% |
0.1255158 |
5 |
Group 5 - r18group is not 1 or 3 |
1218 |
11.7% |
0.1168794 |
6 |
Group 6 - r18group equals 6 |
2210 |
21.2% |
0.2120718 |
r20interview_start
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r20interview_end
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10052] [Invalid:369] [Range:-]
|
r20browsertype
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r20browserversion
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r20mobil
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Mobile |
4311 |
41.4% |
0.4136839 |
0 |
Other |
6110 |
58.6% |
0.5863161 |
r20opplosning
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r20enhetstype
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
PC |
6201 |
59.5% |
0.595048460 |
2 |
Touch |
4176 |
40.1% |
0.400729297 |
3 |
Generic |
44 |
0.4% |
0.004222244 |
r20advancedwifeaturesenabled
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r20getrenderingmode
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r20pk15
Variable label:
|
Whether people in general can be trusted
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
83 |
0.8% |
0.007964687 |
1 |
1 |
55 |
0.5% |
0.005277804 |
2 |
2 |
148 |
1.4% |
0.014202092 |
3 |
3 |
242 |
2.3% |
0.023222340 |
4 |
4 |
338 |
3.2% |
0.032434507 |
5 |
5 |
882 |
8.5% |
0.084636791 |
6 |
6 |
900 |
8.6% |
0.086364073 |
7 |
7 |
2283 |
21.9% |
0.219076864 |
8 |
8 |
2866 |
27.5% |
0.275021591 |
9 |
9 |
1259 |
12.1% |
0.120813741 |
10 |
10 - Most people can be trusted |
1268 |
12.2% |
0.121677382 |
97 |
Not answered |
97 |
0.9% |
0.009308128 |
r20pktilfreds1
Variable label:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
2825 |
27.1% |
0.271087228 |
2 |
Satisfied |
5994 |
57.5% |
0.575184723 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1245 |
11.9% |
0.119470300 |
4 |
Dissatisfied |
276 |
2.6% |
0.026484982 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
39 |
0.4% |
0.003742443 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.4% |
0.004030323 |
r20pk9_1
Variable label:
|
Open: The most important political issues for you personally (1)
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Post-question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20pk9_2
Variable label:
|
Open: The second most important political issues for you personally (2)
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Post-question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20pk9_3
Variable label:
|
Open: The third most important political issues for you personally (3)
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Post-question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20pk10
Variable label:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
Post-question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
2066 |
19.8% |
0.198253527 |
2 |
Good |
5328 |
51.1% |
0.511275309 |
3 |
Quite good |
1686 |
16.2% |
0.161788696 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
649 |
6.2% |
0.062278092 |
5 |
Quite bad |
486 |
4.7% |
0.046636599 |
6 |
Bad |
156 |
1.5% |
0.014969773 |
7 |
Very bad |
18 |
0.2% |
0.001727281 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.3% |
0.003070723 |
r20tdr17
Variable label:
|
Economic situation in [region] compared with the rest of Norway
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation in [region] with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation in [region] as better, worse or the same?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Better |
2459 |
23.6% |
0.23596584 |
2 |
Worse |
1626 |
15.6% |
0.15603109 |
3 |
The same |
6209 |
59.6% |
0.59581614 |
97 |
Not answered |
127 |
1.2% |
0.01218693 |
r20pktilfreds4
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with democracy in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
1811 |
17.4% |
0.173783706 |
2 |
Satisfied |
5883 |
56.5% |
0.564533154 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1980 |
19% |
0.190000960 |
4 |
Dissatisfied |
558 |
5.4% |
0.053545725 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
145 |
1.4% |
0.013914212 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
0.4% |
0.004222244 |
r20pktilfreds3
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the present government in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
932 |
8.9% |
0.089434795 |
2 |
Satisfied |
3614 |
34.7% |
0.346799731 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
3377 |
32.4% |
0.324057192 |
4 |
Dissatisfied |
1828 |
17.5% |
0.175415027 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
596 |
5.7% |
0.057192208 |
97 |
Not answered |
74 |
0.7% |
0.007101046 |
r20pk204
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
283 |
2.7% |
0.027156703 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
2429 |
23.3% |
0.233087036 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
573 |
5.5% |
0.054985126 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
294 |
2.8% |
0.028212264 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
998 |
9.6% |
0.095768160 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
1725 |
16.6% |
0.165531139 |
7 |
The Green Party |
592 |
5.7% |
0.056808368 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1825 |
17.5% |
0.175127147 |
9 |
The Red Party |
556 |
5.3% |
0.053353805 |
10 |
Would not vote |
160 |
1.5% |
0.015353613 |
11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
244 |
2.3% |
0.023414260 |
12 |
Not entitled to vote |
227 |
2.2% |
0.021782938 |
13 |
Other: |
432 |
4.1% |
0.041454755 |
97 |
Not answered |
83 |
0.8% |
0.007964687 |
r20pk204_kodet
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[Rekkefølge for svaralternativ: Randomisert]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
286 |
2.7% |
0.027444583 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
2429 |
23.3% |
0.233087036 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
573 |
5.5% |
0.054985126 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
294 |
2.8% |
0.028212264 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
998 |
9.6% |
0.095768160 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
1725 |
16.6% |
0.165531139 |
7 |
The Green Party |
592 |
5.7% |
0.056808368 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1825 |
17.5% |
0.175127147 |
9 |
The Red Party |
556 |
5.3% |
0.053353805 |
10 |
Would not vote |
160 |
1.5% |
0.015353613 |
11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
244 |
2.3% |
0.023414260 |
12 |
Not entitled to vote |
227 |
2.2% |
0.021782938 |
13 |
Other: |
429 |
4.1% |
0.041166875 |
97 |
Not answered |
83 |
0.8% |
0.007964687 |
r20pk204_13_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20tdr8_a
Variable label:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
328 |
3.1% |
0.031474906 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
2308 |
22.1% |
0.221475866 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
523 |
5% |
0.050187122 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
293 |
2.8% |
0.028116304 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
853 |
8.2% |
0.081853949 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
1442 |
13.8% |
0.138374436 |
7 |
The Green Party |
753 |
7.2% |
0.072257941 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
2156 |
20.7% |
0.206889934 |
9 |
The Red Party |
553 |
5.3% |
0.053065925 |
10 |
The People's Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
99 |
1% |
0.009500048 |
11 |
A joint party list |
14 |
0.1% |
0.001343441 |
12 |
A local list |
210 |
2% |
0.020151617 |
13 |
Would cast a blank vote |
202 |
1.9% |
0.019383936 |
14 |
Would not vote |
213 |
2% |
0.020439497 |
15 |
Not entitled to vote |
23 |
0.2% |
0.002207082 |
16 |
Other: |
358 |
3.4% |
0.034353709 |
97 |
Not answered |
93 |
0.9% |
0.008924287 |
r20tdr8_a_kodet
Variable label:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow? [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[Rekkefølge for svaralternativ: Randomisert]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler] [Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
328 |
3.1% |
0.031474906 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
2308 |
22.1% |
0.221475866 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
523 |
5% |
0.050187122 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
293 |
2.8% |
0.028116304 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
853 |
8.2% |
0.081853949 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
1443 |
13.8% |
0.138470396 |
7 |
The Green Party |
753 |
7.2% |
0.072257941 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
2156 |
20.7% |
0.206889934 |
9 |
The Red Party |
553 |
5.3% |
0.053065925 |
10 |
The People's Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
99 |
1% |
0.009500048 |
11 |
A joint party list |
14 |
0.1% |
0.001343441 |
12 |
A local list |
220 |
2.1% |
0.021111218 |
13 |
Would cast a blank vote |
202 |
1.9% |
0.019383936 |
14 |
Would not vote |
213 |
2% |
0.020439497 |
15 |
Not entitled to vote |
23 |
0.2% |
0.002207082 |
16 |
Other: |
347 |
3.3% |
0.033298148 |
97 |
Not answered |
93 |
0.9% |
0.008924287 |
r20tdr8_a_16_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for which party if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20tdr8_b
Variable label:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
301 |
2.9% |
0.028883984 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
2226 |
21.4% |
0.213607139 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
516 |
5% |
0.049515402 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
272 |
2.6% |
0.026101142 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
913 |
8.8% |
0.087611554 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
1536 |
14.7% |
0.147394684 |
7 |
The Green Party |
719 |
6.9% |
0.068995298 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1936 |
18.6% |
0.185778716 |
9 |
The Red Party |
498 |
4.8% |
0.047788120 |
10 |
The People's Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
92 |
0.9% |
0.008828327 |
11 |
A joint party list |
16 |
0.2% |
0.001535361 |
12 |
A local list |
71 |
0.7% |
0.006813166 |
13 |
Would cast a blank vote |
290 |
2.8% |
0.027828423 |
14 |
Would not vote |
461 |
4.4% |
0.044237597 |
15 |
Not entitled to vote |
73 |
0.7% |
0.007005086 |
16 |
Other: |
362 |
3.5% |
0.034737549 |
97 |
Not answered |
139 |
1.3% |
0.013338451 |
r20tdr8_b_kodet
Variable label:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow? [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[Rekkefølge for svaralternativ: Randomisert]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler] [Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
301 |
2.9% |
0.028883984 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
2226 |
21.4% |
0.213607139 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
517 |
5% |
0.049611362 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
272 |
2.6% |
0.026101142 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
913 |
8.8% |
0.087611554 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
1536 |
14.7% |
0.147394684 |
7 |
The Green Party |
719 |
6.9% |
0.068995298 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1936 |
18.6% |
0.185778716 |
9 |
The Red Party |
498 |
4.8% |
0.047788120 |
10 |
The People's Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
92 |
0.9% |
0.008828327 |
11 |
A joint party list |
16 |
0.2% |
0.001535361 |
12 |
A local list |
72 |
0.7% |
0.006909126 |
13 |
Would cast a blank vote |
290 |
2.8% |
0.027828423 |
14 |
Would not vote |
461 |
4.4% |
0.044237597 |
15 |
Not entitled to vote |
73 |
0.7% |
0.007005086 |
16 |
Other: |
360 |
3.5% |
0.034545629 |
97 |
Not answered |
139 |
1.3% |
0.013338451 |
r20tdr8_b_16_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for which party if county council elections were to take place tomorrow
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20pk6_1
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Christian Democratic Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1828 |
17.5% |
0.175415027 |
2 |
Really dislike |
2261 |
21.7% |
0.216965742 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2513 |
24.1% |
0.241147683 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1920 |
18.4% |
0.184243355 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1275 |
12.2% |
0.122349103 |
6 |
Really like |
379 |
3.6% |
0.036368871 |
7 |
Intensely like |
93 |
0.9% |
0.008924287 |
97 |
Not answered |
152 |
1.5% |
0.014585932 |
r20pk6_2
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
537 |
5.2% |
0.05153056 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1368 |
13.1% |
0.13127339 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1961 |
18.8% |
0.18817772 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1326 |
12.7% |
0.12724307 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2401 |
23% |
0.23040015 |
6 |
Really like |
2107 |
20.2% |
0.20218789 |
7 |
Intensely like |
570 |
5.5% |
0.05469725 |
97 |
Not answered |
151 |
1.4% |
0.01448997 |
r20pk6_3
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Progess Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
3357 |
32.2% |
0.32213799 |
2 |
Really dislike |
2236 |
21.5% |
0.21456674 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1589 |
15.2% |
0.15248057 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
978 |
9.4% |
0.09384896 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1317 |
12.6% |
0.12637943 |
6 |
Really like |
645 |
6.2% |
0.06189425 |
7 |
Intensely like |
154 |
1.5% |
0.01477785 |
97 |
Not answered |
145 |
1.4% |
0.01391421 |
r20pk6_4
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1121 |
10.8% |
0.107571250 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1525 |
14.6% |
0.146339123 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2227 |
21.4% |
0.213703100 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2692 |
25.8% |
0.258324537 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2041 |
19.6% |
0.195854525 |
6 |
Really like |
556 |
5.3% |
0.053353805 |
7 |
Intensely like |
70 |
0.7% |
0.006717206 |
97 |
Not answered |
189 |
1.8% |
0.018136455 |
r20pk6_5
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Socialist Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1304 |
12.5% |
0.12513195 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1587 |
15.2% |
0.15228865 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1697 |
16.3% |
0.16284426 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1757 |
16.9% |
0.16860186 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2031 |
19.5% |
0.19489492 |
6 |
Really like |
1473 |
14.1% |
0.14134920 |
7 |
Intensely like |
414 |
4% |
0.03972747 |
97 |
Not answered |
158 |
1.5% |
0.01516169 |
r20pk6_6
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
538 |
5.2% |
0.05162652 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1020 |
9.8% |
0.09787928 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1749 |
16.8% |
0.16783418 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2060 |
19.8% |
0.19767777 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2776 |
26.6% |
0.26638518 |
6 |
Really like |
1697 |
16.3% |
0.16284426 |
7 |
Intensely like |
435 |
4.2% |
0.04174264 |
97 |
Not answered |
146 |
1.4% |
0.01401017 |
r20pk6_7
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
2405 |
23.1% |
0.23078399 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1516 |
14.5% |
0.14547548 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1558 |
15% |
0.14950581 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1321 |
12.7% |
0.12676327 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2074 |
19.9% |
0.19902121 |
6 |
Really like |
1100 |
10.6% |
0.10555609 |
7 |
Intensely like |
286 |
2.7% |
0.02744458 |
97 |
Not answered |
161 |
1.5% |
0.01544957 |
r20pk6_8
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
452 |
4.3% |
0.04337396 |
2 |
Really dislike |
884 |
8.5% |
0.08482871 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1819 |
17.5% |
0.17455139 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1758 |
16.9% |
0.16869782 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
3141 |
30.1% |
0.30141061 |
6 |
Really like |
1866 |
17.9% |
0.17906151 |
7 |
Intensely like |
350 |
3.4% |
0.03358603 |
97 |
Not answered |
151 |
1.4% |
0.01448997 |
r20pk6_9
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Red Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
2242 |
21.5% |
0.21514250 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1667 |
16% |
0.15996545 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1482 |
14.2% |
0.14221284 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1763 |
16.9% |
0.16917762 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1850 |
17.8% |
0.17752615 |
6 |
Really like |
895 |
8.6% |
0.08588427 |
7 |
Intensely like |
340 |
3.3% |
0.03262643 |
97 |
Not answered |
182 |
1.7% |
0.01746473 |
r20pkdv5
Variable label:
|
How great an advantage/disadvantage that immigrants come to live in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very great advantage |
522 |
5% |
0.050091162 |
2 |
A great advantage |
2168 |
20.8% |
0.208041455 |
3 |
A slight advantage |
3991 |
38.3% |
0.382976682 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1489 |
14.3% |
0.142884560 |
5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1438 |
13.8% |
0.137990596 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
479 |
4.6% |
0.045964879 |
7 |
A very great disadvantage |
301 |
2.9% |
0.028883984 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.3% |
0.003166683 |
r20pkmeme9
Variable label:
|
Should be easier/harder for refugees to be granted residence in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here?
|
Post-question:
|
Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much easier |
416 |
4% |
0.039919394 |
2 |
Easier |
1438 |
13.8% |
0.137990596 |
3 |
Somewhat easier |
2363 |
22.7% |
0.226753670 |
4 |
Same as today |
3374 |
32.4% |
0.323769312 |
5 |
Slightly more difficult |
1312 |
12.6% |
0.125899626 |
6 |
More difficult |
780 |
7.5% |
0.074848863 |
7 |
Much more difficult |
663 |
6.4% |
0.063621533 |
97 |
Not answered |
75 |
0.7% |
0.007197006 |
r20pk101
Variable label:
|
Your opinion on Norway’s preconditions for integrating refugees
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
789 |
7.6% |
0.075712504 |
2 |
Good |
3177 |
30.5% |
0.304865176 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
2222 |
21.3% |
0.213223299 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
1134 |
10.9% |
0.108818731 |
5 |
Somewhat poor |
1726 |
16.6% |
0.165627099 |
6 |
Poor |
953 |
9.1% |
0.091449957 |
7 |
Very poor |
348 |
3.3% |
0.033394108 |
97 |
Not answered |
72 |
0.7% |
0.006909126 |
r20meme50
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008510638 |
2 |
Really dislike |
26 |
2.2% |
0.022127660 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
96 |
8.2% |
0.081702128 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
350 |
29.8% |
0.297872340 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
305 |
26% |
0.259574468 |
6 |
Really like |
300 |
25.5% |
0.255319149 |
7 |
Intensely like |
78 |
6.6% |
0.066382979 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008510638 |
98 |
Not asked |
9246 |
|
NA |
r20pk12
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very high degree |
1268 |
12.2% |
0.121677382 |
2 |
A high degree |
5714 |
54.8% |
0.548315901 |
3 |
Some degree |
2739 |
26.3% |
0.262834661 |
4 |
A low degree |
542 |
5.2% |
0.052010364 |
5 |
Not at all |
130 |
1.2% |
0.012474810 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.3% |
0.002686882 |
r20pk53
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very high degree |
430 |
4.1% |
0.041262835 |
2 |
A high degree |
4387 |
42.1% |
0.420976874 |
3 |
Some degree |
4377 |
42% |
0.420017273 |
4 |
A low degree |
954 |
9.2% |
0.091545917 |
5 |
Not at all |
223 |
2.1% |
0.021399098 |
97 |
Not answered |
50 |
0.5% |
0.004798004 |
r20pk54
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very high degree |
726 |
7% |
0.069667019 |
2 |
A high degree |
4663 |
44.7% |
0.447461856 |
3 |
Some degree |
3810 |
36.6% |
0.365607907 |
4 |
A low degree |
889 |
8.5% |
0.085308512 |
5 |
Not at all |
288 |
2.8% |
0.027636503 |
97 |
Not answered |
45 |
0.4% |
0.004318204 |
r20pk_sentral
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1649 |
15.8% |
0.158238173 |
2 |
Agree |
2664 |
25.6% |
0.255637655 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
2922 |
28% |
0.280395356 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1509 |
14.5% |
0.144803762 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
758 |
7.3% |
0.072737741 |
6 |
Disagree |
674 |
6.5% |
0.064677094 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
186 |
1.8% |
0.017848575 |
97 |
Not answered |
59 |
0.6% |
0.005661645 |
r20pk60
Variable label:
|
Proposition: The Government should work more to significantly reduce income differences
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income differences in society.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
3110 |
29.8% |
0.298435851 |
2 |
Agree |
3086 |
29.6% |
0.296132809 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
2187 |
21% |
0.209864696 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1001 |
9.6% |
0.096056041 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
559 |
5.4% |
0.053641685 |
6 |
Disagree |
321 |
3.1% |
0.030803186 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
90 |
0.9% |
0.008636407 |
97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.6% |
0.006429325 |
r20pkmeme21
Variable label:
|
Assertion: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
146 |
1.4% |
0.014010172 |
2 |
Agree |
370 |
3.6% |
0.035505230 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1326 |
12.7% |
0.127243067 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1036 |
9.9% |
0.099414644 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1161 |
11.1% |
0.111409654 |
6 |
Disagree |
3073 |
29.5% |
0.294885328 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
3250 |
31.2% |
0.311870262 |
97 |
Not answered |
59 |
0.6% |
0.005661645 |
r20pk52
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More measures to protect citizens from terrorist threats, even at the expense of privacy
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
109 |
9.3% |
0.092765957 |
2 |
Agree |
249 |
21.2% |
0.211914894 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
357 |
30.4% |
0.303829787 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
161 |
13.7% |
0.137021277 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
148 |
12.6% |
0.125957447 |
6 |
Disagree |
98 |
8.3% |
0.083404255 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
45 |
3.8% |
0.038297872 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.7% |
0.006808511 |
98 |
Not asked |
9246 |
|
NA |
r20pkby3
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very high degree |
282 |
2.7% |
0.027060743 |
2 |
A high degree |
1257 |
12.1% |
0.120621821 |
3 |
Some degree |
4692 |
45% |
0.450244698 |
4 |
A low degree |
3654 |
35.1% |
0.350638135 |
5 |
Not at all |
481 |
4.6% |
0.046156799 |
97 |
Not answered |
55 |
0.5% |
0.005277804 |
r20pk103
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very great advantage |
1122 |
10.8% |
0.10766721 |
2 |
A great advantage |
3013 |
28.9% |
0.28912772 |
3 |
A slight advantage |
3281 |
31.5% |
0.31484502 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1133 |
10.9% |
0.10872277 |
5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1014 |
9.7% |
0.09730352 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
495 |
4.8% |
0.04750024 |
7 |
A very great disadvantage |
238 |
2.3% |
0.02283850 |
97 |
Not answered |
125 |
1.2% |
0.01199501 |
r20pkkm2
Variable label:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all concerned |
546 |
5.2% |
0.052394204 |
2 |
Not very concerned |
1614 |
15.5% |
0.154879570 |
3 |
Slightly concerned |
3223 |
30.9% |
0.309279340 |
4 |
Very concerned |
3266 |
31.3% |
0.313405623 |
5 |
Extremely concerned |
1723 |
16.5% |
0.165339219 |
97 |
Not answered |
49 |
0.5% |
0.004702044 |
r20kmtech
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Technological innovations will solve climate problems
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statement below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following?
|
Literal question:
|
Technological innovations will solve climate problems.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
51 |
2% |
0.020190024 |
2 |
Agree |
272 |
10.8% |
0.107680127 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
990 |
39.2% |
0.391923990 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
545 |
21.6% |
0.215756136 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
304 |
12% |
0.120348377 |
6 |
Disagree |
270 |
10.7% |
0.106888361 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
78 |
3.1% |
0.030878860 |
97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.6% |
0.006334125 |
98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20pkkm42
Variable label:
|
Proposal: From 2025, all new private vehicles should be either electric or run on hydrogen
|
Pre-question text:
|
The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
|
Post-question:
|
See National Transport Plan 2018-2029, page 16 accessible here (external url)
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run
on hydrogen |
3274 |
31.4% |
0.31417330 |
2 |
In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars
which run on diesel or petrol. |
7038 |
67.5% |
0.67536705 |
97 |
Not answered |
109 |
1% |
0.01045965 |
r20pkkm4
Variable label:
|
Whether we should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten/Vesterålen/Senja areas
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with this?
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja areas.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
3343 |
32.1% |
0.320794549 |
2 |
Agree |
2020 |
19.4% |
0.193839363 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1208 |
11.6% |
0.115919777 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1448 |
13.9% |
0.138950197 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
936 |
9% |
0.089818635 |
6 |
Disagree |
840 |
8.1% |
0.080606468 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
551 |
5.3% |
0.052874004 |
97 |
Not answered |
75 |
0.7% |
0.007197006 |
r20skepsis
Variable label:
|
Your view on climate change
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes your view on climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I don’t believe that the climate is changing. |
58 |
0.6% |
0.005565685 |
2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
403 |
3.9% |
0.038671912 |
3 |
I believe that the climate is changing, but that it is only to a small extent
due to human action |
2341 |
22.5% |
0.224642549 |
4 |
I believe that the climate is changing, and that it is to a large extent due to
human action. |
7512 |
72.1% |
0.720852126 |
97 |
Not answered |
107 |
1% |
0.010267729 |
r20pk_vekst
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Economic growth should be safeguarded through development of industry, regardless of environmental interests
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
287 |
2.8% |
0.027540543 |
2 |
Agree |
870 |
8.3% |
0.083485270 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
2099 |
20.1% |
0.201420209 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1253 |
12% |
0.120237981 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
2274 |
21.8% |
0.218213223 |
6 |
Disagree |
2327 |
22.3% |
0.223299108 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1227 |
11.8% |
0.117743019 |
97 |
Not answered |
84 |
0.8% |
0.008060647 |
r20km20_efficacy
Variable label:
|
To what extent it is possible to do something to prevent harmful climate change
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let’s assume that climate change could become a major threat to the world in the future if no action is taken.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you believe it is possible to do something to prevent harmful climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 1]
[Asked on the same page as r20km20_efficacy2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
There is nothing we can do to prevent harmful climate change |
94 |
4.1% |
0.040922943 |
2 |
It is possible, but very difficult to do something to prevent harmful climate
change |
1019 |
44.4% |
0.443622116 |
3 |
It is possible and completely realistic to do something to prevent harmful
climate change |
1071 |
46.6% |
0.466260340 |
4 |
It is easy to prevent harmful climate change |
14 |
0.6% |
0.006094906 |
5 |
I do not consider climate change to be a problem |
79 |
3.4% |
0.034392686 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.9% |
0.008707009 |
98 |
Not asked |
8124 |
|
NA |
r20km20_efficacy2
Variable label:
|
Has the Corona pandemic changed your views on the possibilities to prevent harmful climate change?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Action to stop the spread of COVID-19 has required political decision-making on both a national and international scale, and we have had to make major changes to our lifestyle.
|
Literal question:
|
Has the Corona pandemic changed your views on whether it is possible to do something to prevent harmful climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 1]
[Asked on the same page as r20km20_efficacy]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I am much more confident now that something can be done |
223 |
9.7% |
0.09708315 |
2 |
I am slightly more confident now that something can be done |
814 |
35.4% |
0.35437527 |
3 |
I am slightly less confident now that something can be done |
136 |
5.9% |
0.05920766 |
4 |
I am much less confident now that something can be done |
24 |
1% |
0.01044841 |
5 |
No, the Corona pandemic has not changed my views |
1070 |
46.6% |
0.46582499 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01306051 |
98 |
Not asked |
8124 |
|
NA |
r20polkom1_ran
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses if respondent is asked r20polkom1a, r20polkom1b or neither (control)]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2287] [Invalid:8134] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
r20polkom1a |
781 |
34.1% |
0.3414954 |
2 |
r20polkom1b |
728 |
31.8% |
0.3183209 |
3 |
[NONE - control] |
778 |
34% |
0.3401836 |
Sysmiss |
|
8134 |
|
NA |
r20polkom1a
Variable label:
|
Political conflict: Whether you have heard/read certain statements by politicians relating to the terrorist attacks on 22 July
|
Pre-question text:
|
[PAGE 1 - intro]
The terrorist attacks on July 22, 2011 are at times covered in the news. You will now be presented with excerpts from such a case. Please read the text on the next page carefully.
[PAGE 2 - question]
Miriam Einangshaug, Utøya survivor and local body politician for the Green Party Norway wrote in a debate contribution on 9 March 2020: “If the Progress Party (FrP) feels it is so terribly problematic that parallels are drawn to terrorists and right-wing extremists, they should perhaps refrain from allowing persons who maintain such views to assume positions of power. They have to stop adopting policy that takes them more in the direction of right-wing nationalism. No. We learned nothing from 22 July.”
In response, Siv Jensen, at that time leader of the Progress Party, wrote that: “What is harmful here is comparing the completely legitimate views held by most people on this subject with the view of the world held by right-wing terrorists. How can it be that all those advocating a restrictive immigration policy are lumped together with right-wing terrorists after tragic events, but when Islamists commit terrorism, we are told not to treat all Muslims as one?”
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard/read these or similar statements in which politicians express such opinions relating to the terrorist attacks on 22 July?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20polkom1_ran = 1 & r20group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
390 |
49.9% |
0.499359795 |
2 |
No |
246 |
31.5% |
0.314980794 |
3 |
Don’t know |
141 |
18.1% |
0.180537772 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.5% |
0.005121639 |
98 |
Not asked |
9640 |
|
NA |
r20polkom1b
Variable label:
|
Political unity: Whether you have heard/read certain statements by politicians relating to the terrorist attacks on 22 July
|
Pre-question text:
|
[PAGE 1 - intro]
The terrorist attacks on July 22, 2011 are at times covered in the news. You will now be presented with excerpts from such a case. Please read the text on the next page carefully.
[PAGE 2 - question]
In a speech on 22 July 2020, Prime Minister Erna Solberg of the Conservative Party said that “The evil of terrorists shall never silence us. Shall never be allowed to threaten our freedom. Because our response is that we will not be oppressed. Our response is that we will fight together. Our response is to defend our sense of community and our democracy when others try to divide us. When met with evil, let this be our message.”
During the same event, Leader of the Labour Party’s Youth Organisation (AUF) and Utøya survivor, Ina Libak, said that: “Hate kills. But we know that the best antidote to hate is love, hope and community. Love for each other. The hope for a better future and a community for everyone. Love, hope and community can never be exhausted.”
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard/read these or similar statements in which politicians express such opinions relating to the terrorist attacks on 22 July?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20polkom1_ran = 2 & r20group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
496 |
68.1% |
0.681318681 |
2 |
No |
130 |
17.9% |
0.178571429 |
3 |
Don’t know |
100 |
13.7% |
0.137362637 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002747253 |
98 |
Not asked |
9693 |
|
NA |
r20polkom2
Variable label:
|
Do the terrorist attacks on 22 July 2011 generate political conflict today?
|
Literal question:
|
To what degree do you feel that the terrorist attacks on 22 July 2011 generate political conflict today?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 1]
[Asked on the same page as r20polkom3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very high degree |
22 |
1% |
0.00957771 |
2 |
A high degree |
104 |
4.5% |
0.04527645 |
3 |
Some degree |
827 |
36% |
0.36003483 |
4 |
A low degree |
1079 |
47% |
0.46974314 |
5 |
Not at all |
241 |
10.5% |
0.10491946 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1% |
0.01044841 |
98 |
Not asked |
8124 |
|
NA |
r20polkom3
Variable label:
|
How serious do you feel the political conflict relating to the terrorist attacks on 22 July 2011 is today?
|
Literal question:
|
How serious do you feel this political conflict is today?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r20polkom2 = 1 | r20polkom2 = 2 | r20polkom2 = 3) & r20group = 1]
[Asked on the same page as r20polkom2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very serious |
17 |
1.8% |
0.017838405 |
2 |
Serious |
199 |
20.9% |
0.208814271 |
3 |
Fairly serious |
473 |
49.6% |
0.496327387 |
4 |
Not very serious |
251 |
26.3% |
0.263378804 |
5 |
Not serious at all |
5 |
0.5% |
0.005246590 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.8% |
0.008394544 |
98 |
Not asked |
9468 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsfamiliar
Variable label:
|
Have you heard that CO2 can be captured and stored, so called carbon capture and storage?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard that CO2 (carbon dioxide) can be captured and stored, so called carbon capture and storage (CCS)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No, I have not heard about this |
350 |
13.9% |
0.138558987 |
2 |
Yes, I have heard a little about this |
1439 |
57% |
0.569675376 |
3 |
Yes, I have heard a lot about this |
717 |
28.4% |
0.283847981 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.8% |
0.007917656 |
98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsvignette_ran
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r20kmccsvignette]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 4,5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2512] [Invalid:7909] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Carbon capture and storage can be used to significantly reduce CO2 emissions
by 2050, thus helping us achieve the goal of keeping global warming below 2
degrees. |
677 |
27% |
0.2695064 |
2 |
Carbon capture and storage are necessary if we are both to sustain our current
lifestyles and at the same time significantly reduce emissions of CO2 by 2050.
Without this technology, we will have to make drastic changes to our lifestyles
in order to achieve the goal of keeping global warming below 2 degrees. |
623 |
24.8% |
0.2480096 |
3 |
Carbon capture and storage are absolutely essential in sustaining certain
types of services that are of critical importance for society, such as waste
incineration. Without this technology, we lack the processes to both handle
waste in an eco-friendly manner and help us significantly reduce CO2 emission by
2050, so that we can achieve the goal of keeping global warming below 2 degrees. |
608 |
24.2% |
0.2420382 |
4 |
Carbon capture and storage can generate technological developments and new jobs
in Norway. This is valuable as there will be a loss of jobs in sectors with high
emissions if we are to significantly reduce our CO2 emissions by 2050. This
technology helps us transform our economy, while allowing us to achieve the goal
of keeping global warming below 2 degrees. |
604 |
24% |
0.2404459 |
Sysmiss |
|
7909 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsvignette
Variable label:
|
Are you for or against capture and long-term storage of CO2 under the seabed in the North Sea?
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the Paris Agreement of 2015, the majority of countries worldwide agreed to keep the increase in global average temperature to between 1.5 and 2 degrees. To achieve this goal, CO2 emissions (carbon dioxide) must be reduced to zero by 2050. Carbon capture and storage (often abbreviated to CCS) is a process in which CO2 is captured and stored deep under the ground. This helps us reduce CO2 emissions to the atmosphere, a common cause of climate change.
[r20kmccsvignette_ran]
We have good areas for storage of CO2 under the seabed in the North Sea off the coast of Norway. CO2 captured in European countries can be transported by ship and stored there. This could help Norway and several European countries reduce their emissions to zero by 2050.
|
Literal question:
|
Are you for or against capture and long-term storage of CO2 under the seabed in the North Sea?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
[Display order of answer list: Random direction (1 -> 5, 5 -> 1)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly for |
222 |
8.8% |
0.08788599 |
2 |
For |
966 |
38.2% |
0.38242280 |
3 |
Against |
327 |
12.9% |
0.12945368 |
4 |
Strongly against |
132 |
5.2% |
0.05225653 |
5 |
No opinion / don’t know |
843 |
33.4% |
0.33372922 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
1.4% |
0.01425178 |
98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsrisks_1
Variable label:
|
Fits your views of the technology: CCS is safe for life in the sea
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are several statements regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS). How do these statements fit your views of this technology?
|
Literal question:
|
CCS is safe for life in the sea
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
63 |
2.5% |
0.02494062 |
2 |
Agree |
524 |
20.7% |
0.20744260 |
3 |
Disagree |
391 |
15.5% |
0.15479018 |
4 |
Strongly disagree |
140 |
5.5% |
0.05542359 |
5 |
No opinion |
1291 |
51.1% |
0.51108472 |
97 |
Not answered |
117 |
4.6% |
0.04631829 |
98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsrisks_2
Variable label:
|
Fits your views of the technology: CO2 transport represents a risk
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are several statements regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS). How do these statements fit your views of this technology?
|
Literal question:
|
CO2 transport represents a risk
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
72 |
2.9% |
0.02850356 |
2 |
Agree |
554 |
21.9% |
0.21931908 |
3 |
Disagree |
506 |
20% |
0.20031671 |
4 |
Strongly disagree |
169 |
6.7% |
0.06690420 |
5 |
No opinion |
1111 |
44% |
0.43982581 |
97 |
Not answered |
114 |
4.5% |
0.04513064 |
98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsrisks_3
Variable label:
|
Fits your views of the technology: Realistic to believe that full-scale introduction of CCS will be successful
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are several statements regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS). How do these statements fit your views of this technology?
|
Literal question:
|
It is realistic to believe that full-scale introduction of CCS will be successful
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
51 |
2% |
0.02019002 |
2 |
Agree |
776 |
30.7% |
0.30720507 |
3 |
Disagree |
310 |
12.3% |
0.12272367 |
4 |
Strongly disagree |
143 |
5.7% |
0.05661124 |
5 |
No opinion |
1127 |
44.6% |
0.44615994 |
97 |
Not answered |
119 |
4.7% |
0.04711006 |
98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsrisks_4
Variable label:
|
Fits your views of the technology: CCS is good for the climate
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are several statements regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS). How do these statements fit your views of this technology?
|
Literal question:
|
CCS is good for the climate
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
147 |
5.8% |
0.05819477 |
2 |
Agree |
985 |
39% |
0.38994458 |
3 |
Disagree |
235 |
9.3% |
0.09303246 |
4 |
Strongly disagree |
111 |
4.4% |
0.04394299 |
5 |
No opinion |
930 |
36.8% |
0.36817102 |
97 |
Not answered |
118 |
4.7% |
0.04671417 |
98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsrisks_5
Variable label:
|
Fits your views of the technology: Storage of CO2 underground seems frightening
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are several statements regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS). How do these statements fit your views of this technology?
|
Literal question:
|
Storage of CO2 underground seems frightening
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
133 |
5.3% |
0.05265241 |
2 |
Agree |
698 |
27.6% |
0.27632621 |
3 |
Disagree |
647 |
25.6% |
0.25613618 |
4 |
Strongly disagree |
268 |
10.6% |
0.10609660 |
5 |
No opinion |
669 |
26.5% |
0.26484561 |
97 |
Not answered |
111 |
4.4% |
0.04394299 |
98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20kmccsrisks_6
Variable label:
|
Fits your views of the technology: CCS inhibits the green shift
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below are several statements regarding carbon capture and storage (CCS). How do these statements fit your views of this technology?
|
Literal question:
|
CCS inhibits the green shift
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 4,5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
70 |
2.8% |
0.02771180 |
2 |
Agree |
388 |
15.4% |
0.15360253 |
3 |
Disagree |
733 |
29% |
0.29018211 |
4 |
Strongly disagree |
204 |
8.1% |
0.08076010 |
5 |
No opinion |
1013 |
40.1% |
0.40102930 |
97 |
Not answered |
118 |
4.7% |
0.04671417 |
98 |
Not asked |
7895 |
|
NA |
r20_psykpr_1
Variable label:
|
How high risk that: you will become infected by the coronavirus
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high do you consider the risk that during the outbreak…
|
Literal question:
|
… you will become infected by the coronavirus?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very low |
418 |
18.9% |
0.189140271 |
2 |
Somewhat low |
864 |
39.1% |
0.390950226 |
3 |
Medium |
704 |
31.9% |
0.318552036 |
4 |
Somewhat high |
177 |
8% |
0.080090498 |
5 |
Very high |
31 |
1.4% |
0.014027149 |
97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.7% |
0.007239819 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20_psykpr_2
Variable label:
|
How high risk that: an average adult in Norway will become infected
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high do you consider the risk that during the outbreak…
|
Literal question:
|
… an average adult in Norway will become infected?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very low |
140 |
6.3% |
0.06334842 |
2 |
Somewhat low |
723 |
32.7% |
0.32714932 |
3 |
Medium |
1027 |
46.5% |
0.46470588 |
4 |
Somewhat high |
250 |
11.3% |
0.11312217 |
5 |
Very high |
40 |
1.8% |
0.01809955 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.4% |
0.01357466 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykc1_1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I worry that I will get infected by the coronavirus
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
I worry that I will get infected by the coronavirus.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
296 |
13.4% |
0.133936652 |
2 |
Disagree |
704 |
31.9% |
0.318552036 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
540 |
24.4% |
0.244343891 |
4 |
Agree |
577 |
26.1% |
0.261085973 |
5 |
Completely agree |
74 |
3.3% |
0.033484163 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.008597285 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykc1_2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I worry that someone in my family will get infected by the coronavirus
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
I worry that someone in my family will get infected by the coronavirus.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
133 |
6% |
0.060180995 |
2 |
Disagree |
362 |
16.4% |
0.163800905 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
373 |
16.9% |
0.168778281 |
4 |
Agree |
1038 |
47% |
0.469683258 |
5 |
Completely agree |
285 |
12.9% |
0.128959276 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.008597285 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykc2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I will deal with the challenges that I will face due to the coronavirus outbreak
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
I am optimistic that I will deal with the challenges that I will face due to the coronavirus outbreak.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
36 |
1.6% |
0.016289593 |
2 |
Disagree |
76 |
3.4% |
0.034389140 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
339 |
15.3% |
0.153393665 |
4 |
Agree |
1292 |
58.5% |
0.584615385 |
5 |
Completely agree |
448 |
20.3% |
0.202714932 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.008597285 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykac1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I do my best to follow the health authorities’ advice to limit the risk of infection
|
Literal question:
|
I do my best to follow the health authorities’ advice to limit the risk of infection (wash my hands frequently, avoid travel and situations involving contact with other people, keep distance and avoid touching things).
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
59 |
2.7% |
0.026696833 |
2 |
Disagree |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004524887 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
42 |
1.9% |
0.019004525 |
4 |
Agree |
722 |
32.7% |
0.326696833 |
5 |
Completely agree |
1356 |
61.4% |
0.613574661 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1% |
0.009502262 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykac_ran
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r20cov_psykac_1-3]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2201] [Invalid:8220] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
strangers |
1117 |
50.7% |
0.5074966 |
2 |
those who are not members of my closest family |
1084 |
49.3% |
0.4925034 |
Sysmiss |
|
8220 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykac_1
Variable label:
|
The last two weeks I have: washed my hands every time I have been out
|
Pre-question text:
|
The last two weeks I have…
|
Literal question:
|
…washed my hands every time I have been out
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Always |
1292 |
58.5% |
0.5846153846 |
2 |
Almost always |
623 |
28.2% |
0.2819004525 |
3 |
Often |
194 |
8.8% |
0.0877828054 |
4 |
Sometimes |
66 |
3% |
0.0298642534 |
5 |
Rarely |
10 |
0.5% |
0.0045248869 |
6 |
Almost never |
7 |
0.3% |
0.0031674208 |
7 |
Never |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009049774 |
97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.7% |
0.0072398190 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykac_2
Variable label:
|
The last two weeks I have: kept a distance of 1 metre [from all strangers/those who are not members of my closest family]
|
Pre-question text:
|
The last two weeks I have…
|
Literal question:
|
…kept a distance of 1 metre [from all strangers/those who are not members of my closest family]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Always |
1082 |
49% |
0.4895927602 |
2 |
Almost always |
893 |
40.4% |
0.4040723982 |
3 |
Often |
192 |
8.7% |
0.0868778281 |
4 |
Sometimes |
19 |
0.9% |
0.0085972851 |
5 |
Rarely |
5 |
0.2% |
0.0022624434 |
6 |
Almost never |
1 |
0% |
0.0004524887 |
7 |
Never |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009049774 |
97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.7% |
0.0072398190 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_psykac_3
Variable label:
|
The last two weeks I have: avoided all social situations with [strangers/those who are not members of my closest family]
|
Pre-question text:
|
The last two weeks I have…
|
Literal question:
|
…avoided all social situations with [strangers/those who are not members of my closest family]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Always |
1109 |
50.2% |
0.5018099548 |
2 |
Almost always |
683 |
30.9% |
0.3090497738 |
3 |
Often |
293 |
13.3% |
0.1325791855 |
4 |
Sometimes |
71 |
3.2% |
0.0321266968 |
5 |
Rarely |
24 |
1.1% |
0.0108597285 |
6 |
Almost never |
9 |
0.4% |
0.0040723982 |
7 |
Never |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009049774 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.9% |
0.0085972851 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_belastning_1
Variable label:
|
Has been a burden to you: obliged to work from home
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent have these infection control measures been a burden or inconvenience for you during the Corona pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
… obliged to work from home
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
1391 |
62.9% |
0.62941176 |
2 |
A low degree |
331 |
15% |
0.14977376 |
3 |
Some degree |
279 |
12.6% |
0.12624434 |
4 |
A high degree |
80 |
3.6% |
0.03619910 |
5 |
A very high degree |
41 |
1.9% |
0.01855204 |
97 |
Not answered |
88 |
4% |
0.03981900 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_belastning_2
Variable label:
|
Has been a burden to you: schools and kindergartens closed
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent have these infection control measures been a burden or inconvenience for you during the Corona pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
… schools and kindergartens closed
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
1476 |
66.8% |
0.66787330 |
2 |
A low degree |
265 |
12% |
0.11990950 |
3 |
Some degree |
241 |
10.9% |
0.10904977 |
4 |
A high degree |
86 |
3.9% |
0.03891403 |
5 |
A very high degree |
56 |
2.5% |
0.02533937 |
97 |
Not answered |
86 |
3.9% |
0.03891403 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_belastning_3
Variable label:
|
Has been a burden to you: obligation to wear a face mask
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent have these infection control measures been a burden or inconvenience for you during the Corona pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
… obligation to wear a face mask
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
1095 |
49.5% |
0.49547511 |
2 |
A low degree |
662 |
30% |
0.29954751 |
3 |
Some degree |
297 |
13.4% |
0.13438914 |
4 |
A high degree |
77 |
3.5% |
0.03484163 |
5 |
A very high degree |
48 |
2.2% |
0.02171946 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.4% |
0.01402715 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_belastning_4
Variable label:
|
Has been a burden to you: restrictions on social gatherings
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent have these infection control measures been a burden or inconvenience for you during the Corona pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
… restrictions on social gatherings
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
450 |
20.4% |
0.20361991 |
2 |
A low degree |
507 |
22.9% |
0.22941176 |
3 |
Some degree |
755 |
34.2% |
0.34162896 |
4 |
A high degree |
338 |
15.3% |
0.15294118 |
5 |
A very high degree |
136 |
6.2% |
0.06153846 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.1% |
0.01085973 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_belastning_5
Variable label:
|
Has been a burden to you: advice regarding washing hands and keeping distance
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent have these infection control measures been a burden or inconvenience for you during the Corona pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
… advice regarding washing hands and keeping distance
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
1469 |
66.5% |
0.66470588 |
2 |
A low degree |
521 |
23.6% |
0.23574661 |
3 |
Some degree |
140 |
6.3% |
0.06334842 |
4 |
A high degree |
32 |
1.4% |
0.01447964 |
5 |
A very high degree |
23 |
1% |
0.01040724 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.1% |
0.01131222 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_belastning_6
Variable label:
|
Has been a burden to you: travel restrictions
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent have these infection control measures been a burden or inconvenience for you during the Corona pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
… travel restrictions
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
663 |
30% |
0.30000000 |
2 |
A low degree |
521 |
23.6% |
0.23574661 |
3 |
Some degree |
577 |
26.1% |
0.26108597 |
4 |
A high degree |
271 |
12.3% |
0.12262443 |
5 |
A very high degree |
154 |
7% |
0.06968326 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.1% |
0.01085973 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20cov_belastning_7
Variable label:
|
Has been a burden to you: quarantine and obligatory isolation
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent have these infection control measures been a burden or inconvenience for you during the Corona pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
… quarantine and obligatory isolation after travel or suspected infection
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
1538 |
69.6% |
0.69592760 |
2 |
A low degree |
335 |
15.2% |
0.15158371 |
3 |
Some degree |
172 |
7.8% |
0.07782805 |
4 |
A high degree |
54 |
2.4% |
0.02443439 |
5 |
A very high degree |
51 |
2.3% |
0.02307692 |
97 |
Not answered |
60 |
2.7% |
0.02714932 |
98 |
Not asked |
8211 |
|
NA |
r20pk14
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Sometimes politics is so complicated that it’s hard to understand
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
38 |
3.2% |
0.032340426 |
2 |
Agree |
117 |
10% |
0.099574468 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
303 |
25.8% |
0.257872340 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
102 |
8.7% |
0.086808511 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
141 |
12% |
0.120000000 |
6 |
Disagree |
323 |
27.5% |
0.274893617 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
140 |
11.9% |
0.119148936 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.9% |
0.009361702 |
98 |
Not asked |
9246 |
|
NA |
r20pk13
Variable label:
|
Whether the political system in Norway allows you to have a say
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very high degree |
13 |
1.1% |
0.01106383 |
2 |
A high degree |
157 |
13.4% |
0.13361702 |
3 |
Some degree |
559 |
47.6% |
0.47574468 |
4 |
A low degree |
362 |
30.8% |
0.30808511 |
5 |
Not at all |
69 |
5.9% |
0.05872340 |
97 |
Not answered |
15 |
1.3% |
0.01276596 |
98 |
Not asked |
9246 |
|
NA |
r20bk35
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 18]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A city |
2387 |
25.8% |
0.258165693 |
2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
1849 |
20% |
0.199978369 |
3 |
A small or medium sized town |
2545 |
27.5% |
0.275254164 |
4 |
A village |
1414 |
15.3% |
0.152930997 |
5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
984 |
10.6% |
0.106424400 |
97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.7% |
0.007246377 |
98 |
Not asked |
1175 |
|
NA |
r20pk8
Variable label:
|
Your position on the political left-right scale
|
Pre-question text:
|
People often talk about “left wing” and “right wing” politics. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are very much politically left wing, while 10 represents those who are very much politically right wing.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 18]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Left wing |
154 |
1.7% |
0.01665585 |
1 |
1 |
398 |
4.3% |
0.04304564 |
2 |
2 |
1009 |
10.9% |
0.10912827 |
3 |
3 |
1372 |
14.8% |
0.14838849 |
4 |
4 |
1063 |
11.5% |
0.11496864 |
5 |
5 |
1351 |
14.6% |
0.14611724 |
6 |
6 |
1060 |
11.5% |
0.11464417 |
7 |
7 |
1307 |
14.1% |
0.14135843 |
8 |
8 |
1027 |
11.1% |
0.11107506 |
9 |
9 |
232 |
2.5% |
0.02509193 |
10 |
10 - Right wing |
137 |
1.5% |
0.01481722 |
97 |
Not answered |
136 |
1.5% |
0.01470906 |
98 |
Not asked |
1175 |
|
NA |
r20oc_h2
Variable label:
|
Your position on the economic left-right scale
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about right-wing economics and left-wing economics.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means left-wing in relation to economic issues and 10 means right-wing in relation to economic issues?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Left wing |
88 |
2.6% |
0.02597403 |
1 |
1 |
140 |
4.1% |
0.04132231 |
2 |
2 |
327 |
9.7% |
0.09651712 |
3 |
3 |
446 |
13.2% |
0.13164109 |
4 |
4 |
359 |
10.6% |
0.10596222 |
5 |
5 |
603 |
17.8% |
0.17798111 |
6 |
6 |
384 |
11.3% |
0.11334120 |
7 |
7 |
449 |
13.3% |
0.13252656 |
8 |
8 |
327 |
9.7% |
0.09651712 |
9 |
9 |
101 |
3% |
0.02981110 |
10 |
10 - Right wing |
60 |
1.8% |
0.01770956 |
97 |
Not answered |
104 |
3.1% |
0.03069658 |
98 |
Not asked |
7033 |
|
NA |
r20bkhelse
Variable label:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
1441 |
13.8% |
0.138278476 |
2 |
Very good |
3692 |
35.4% |
0.354284618 |
3 |
Good |
3641 |
34.9% |
0.349390653 |
4 |
Somewhat good |
1272 |
12.2% |
0.122061223 |
5 |
Poor |
290 |
2.8% |
0.027828423 |
97 |
Not answered |
85 |
0.8% |
0.008156607 |
r20bk33
Variable label:
|
Which description best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days?
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-14]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
100% furloughed by employer |
56 |
0.5% |
0.0053737645 |
2 |
Partially furloughed by employer |
57 |
0.5% |
0.0054697246 |
3 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
4615 |
44.3% |
0.4428557720 |
4 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
319 |
3.1% |
0.0306112657 |
5 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
324 |
3.1% |
0.0310910661 |
6 |
Self-employed |
438 |
4.2% |
0.0420305153 |
7 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
273 |
2.6% |
0.0261971020 |
8 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
104 |
1% |
0.0099798484 |
9 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
41 |
0.4% |
0.0039343633 |
10 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
524 |
5% |
0.0502830822 |
11 |
Retired |
3267 |
31.4% |
0.3135015833 |
12 |
In military service |
5 |
0% |
0.0004798004 |
13 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
43 |
0.4% |
0.0041262835 |
14 |
Other: |
272 |
2.6% |
0.0261011419 |
97 |
Not answered |
83 |
0.8% |
0.0079646867 |
r20bk33_kodet
Variable label:
|
Which description best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days? [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-14]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
100% furloughed by employer |
57 |
0.5% |
0.0054697246 |
2 |
Partially furloughed by employer |
58 |
0.6% |
0.0055656847 |
3 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
4637 |
44.5% |
0.4449668938 |
4 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
330 |
3.2% |
0.0316668266 |
5 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
360 |
3.5% |
0.0345456290 |
6 |
Self-employed |
451 |
4.3% |
0.0432779964 |
7 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
294 |
2.8% |
0.0282122637 |
8 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
117 |
1.1% |
0.0112273294 |
9 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
44 |
0.4% |
0.0042222435 |
10 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
566 |
5.4% |
0.0543134056 |
11 |
Retired |
3313 |
31.8% |
0.3179157470 |
12 |
In military service |
6 |
0.1% |
0.0005757605 |
13 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
48 |
0.5% |
0.0046060839 |
14 |
Other: |
53 |
0.5% |
0.0050858843 |
97 |
Not answered |
87 |
0.8% |
0.0083485270 |
r20bk33_14_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Which description best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20permittert
Variable label:
|
Have you been furloughed or have you lost your job due to the Corona pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you been furloughed or have you lost your job due to the Corona pandemic?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, I am 100% furloughed now |
83 |
0.8% |
0.007964687 |
2 |
Yes, I have been 100% furloughed, but not any longer |
210 |
2% |
0.020151617 |
3 |
Yes, I am partially furloughed now |
82 |
0.8% |
0.007868727 |
4 |
Yes, I have been partially furloughed, but not any longer |
256 |
2.5% |
0.024565781 |
5 |
Yes, I lost my job and am unemployed |
53 |
0.5% |
0.005085884 |
6 |
Yes, I lost my job but am no longer unemployed |
46 |
0.4% |
0.004414164 |
7 |
No |
9431 |
90.5% |
0.904999520 |
97 |
Not answered |
260 |
2.5% |
0.024949621 |
r20permittert_b
Variable label:
|
How long in total have you been on furlough/unemployed due to the Corona pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
How long in total have you been on furlough/unemployed due to the Corona pandemic?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r20permittert = 1 | r20permittert = 2 | r20permittert = 3 | r20permittert = 4 | r20permittert = 5 | r20permittert = 6)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Less than one month |
127 |
17.4% |
0.173972603 |
2 |
Between 1 to 3 months |
330 |
45.2% |
0.452054795 |
3 |
Between 3 to 6 months |
112 |
15.3% |
0.153424658 |
4 |
More than 6 months |
154 |
21.1% |
0.210958904 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
1% |
0.009589041 |
98 |
Not asked |
9691 |
|
NA |
r20bk26
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
21 |
0.2% |
0.002015162 |
2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
449 |
4.3% |
0.043086076 |
3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
890 |
8.5% |
0.085404472 |
4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1206 |
11.6% |
0.115727857 |
5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
969 |
9.3% |
0.092985318 |
6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
868 |
8.3% |
0.083293350 |
7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
2189 |
21% |
0.210056616 |
8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
762 |
7.3% |
0.073121581 |
9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
751 |
7.2% |
0.072066021 |
10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
1798 |
17.3% |
0.172536225 |
11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
284 |
2.7% |
0.027252663 |
12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
123 |
1.2% |
0.011803090 |
97 |
Not answered |
111 |
1.1% |
0.010651569 |
r20bk26_12_other
Variable label:
|
Other: What is your highest completed education?
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Literal question:
|
None of the above (please enter):
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20bk25
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income?
|
Post-question:
|
Gross annual income is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
<150 000 |
411 |
3.9% |
0.03943959 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
1162 |
11.2% |
0.11150561 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
1574 |
15.1% |
0.15104117 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1662 |
15.9% |
0.15948565 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
1777 |
17.1% |
0.17052106 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
1319 |
12.7% |
0.12657135 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
1493 |
14.3% |
0.14326840 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
745 |
7.1% |
0.07149026 |
97 |
Not answered |
278 |
2.7% |
0.02667690 |
r20pk1
Variable label:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
1563 |
15% |
0.149985606 |
2 |
Interested |
4655 |
44.7% |
0.446694175 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
3242 |
31.1% |
0.311102581 |
4 |
Not very interested |
740 |
7.1% |
0.071010460 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
126 |
1.2% |
0.012090970 |
97 |
Not answered |
95 |
0.9% |
0.009116208 |
r20och4_ran
Variable label:
|
[Experiment: Randomly choose if respondent is asked r20och5a, r20och5b, and r20och5c, or r20och6a, r20och6b, and r20och6c]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 2,3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3365] [Invalid:7056] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
r20och5a, r20och5b, and r20och5c |
1614 |
48% |
0.4796434 |
2 |
r20och6a, r20och6b, and r20och6c |
1751 |
52% |
0.5203566 |
Sysmiss |
|
7056 |
|
NA |
r20och4a_ran1
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r20och5]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 2,3 and r20och4_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1614] [Invalid:8807] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Norwegian Labour Party wins the election, and their leader becomes Prime
Minister in a red-green majority government consisting of the Norwegian Labour
Party, the Centre Party and the Socialist Left Party |
828 |
51.3% |
0.5130112 |
2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway wins the election, and their leader becomes
Prime Minister in a conservative majority government consisting of the
Conservative Party of Norway, the Progress Party and the Liberal Party of Norway |
786 |
48.7% |
0.4869888 |
Sysmiss |
|
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och4a_ran2
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r20och5]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 2,3 and r20och4_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1614] [Invalid:8807] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
the Labour-led |
828 |
51.3% |
0.5130112 |
2 |
Conservative-led |
786 |
48.7% |
0.4869888 |
Sysmiss |
|
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och4b_ran1
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r20och6]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 2,3 and r20och4_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1751] [Invalid:8670] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Progress Party does very well in the election and becomes responsible for
immigration in a majority government consisting of the Conservative Party of
Norway and the Progress Party |
892 |
50.9% |
0.5094232 |
2 |
The Socialist Left Party does very well in the election and becomes responsible
for immigration in a majority government consisting of the Norwegian Labour
Party and the Socialist Left Party |
859 |
49.1% |
0.4905768 |
Sysmiss |
|
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och4b_ran2
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r20och6]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r20group = 2,3 and r20och4_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1751] [Invalid:8670] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
blue |
892 |
50.9% |
0.5094232 |
2 |
red |
859 |
49.1% |
0.4905768 |
Sysmiss |
|
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_1
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare funding: The Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2] government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
365 |
22.6% |
0.22614622 |
1 |
1 |
66 |
4.1% |
0.04089219 |
2 |
2 |
96 |
5.9% |
0.05947955 |
3 |
3 |
111 |
6.9% |
0.06877323 |
4 |
4 |
101 |
6.3% |
0.06257745 |
5 |
5 |
165 |
10.2% |
0.10223048 |
6 |
6 |
131 |
8.1% |
0.08116481 |
7 |
7 |
121 |
7.5% |
0.07496902 |
8 |
8 |
122 |
7.6% |
0.07558860 |
9 |
9 |
92 |
5.7% |
0.05700124 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
98 |
6.1% |
0.06071871 |
97 |
Not answered |
146 |
9% |
0.09045849 |
98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_2
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare funding: The Progress Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2] government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
886 |
54.9% |
0.54894672 |
1 |
1 |
75 |
4.6% |
0.04646840 |
2 |
2 |
70 |
4.3% |
0.04337051 |
3 |
3 |
69 |
4.3% |
0.04275093 |
4 |
4 |
53 |
3.3% |
0.03283767 |
5 |
5 |
74 |
4.6% |
0.04584882 |
6 |
6 |
57 |
3.5% |
0.03531599 |
7 |
7 |
54 |
3.3% |
0.03345725 |
8 |
8 |
47 |
2.9% |
0.02912020 |
9 |
9 |
26 |
1.6% |
0.01610905 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
36 |
2.2% |
0.02230483 |
97 |
Not answered |
167 |
10.3% |
0.10346964 |
98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_3
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare funding: The Conservative Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2] government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
493 |
30.5% |
0.30545229 |
1 |
1 |
79 |
4.9% |
0.04894672 |
2 |
2 |
102 |
6.3% |
0.06319703 |
3 |
3 |
96 |
5.9% |
0.05947955 |
4 |
4 |
92 |
5.7% |
0.05700124 |
5 |
5 |
133 |
8.2% |
0.08240397 |
6 |
6 |
84 |
5.2% |
0.05204461 |
7 |
7 |
112 |
6.9% |
0.06939281 |
8 |
8 |
108 |
6.7% |
0.06691450 |
9 |
9 |
72 |
4.5% |
0.04460967 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
103 |
6.4% |
0.06381660 |
97 |
Not answered |
140 |
8.7% |
0.08674102 |
98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_4
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare funding: The Christian Democrats
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2] government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
856 |
53% |
0.530359356 |
1 |
1 |
112 |
6.9% |
0.069392813 |
2 |
2 |
109 |
6.8% |
0.067534077 |
3 |
3 |
93 |
5.8% |
0.057620818 |
4 |
4 |
57 |
3.5% |
0.035315985 |
5 |
5 |
93 |
5.8% |
0.057620818 |
6 |
6 |
37 |
2.3% |
0.022924411 |
7 |
7 |
28 |
1.7% |
0.017348203 |
8 |
8 |
14 |
0.9% |
0.008674102 |
9 |
9 |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009293680 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
25 |
1.5% |
0.015489467 |
97 |
Not answered |
175 |
10.8% |
0.108426270 |
98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_5
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare funding: The Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2] government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
776 |
48.1% |
0.48079306 |
1 |
1 |
85 |
5.3% |
0.05266419 |
2 |
2 |
95 |
5.9% |
0.05885998 |
3 |
3 |
87 |
5.4% |
0.05390335 |
4 |
4 |
66 |
4.1% |
0.04089219 |
5 |
5 |
106 |
6.6% |
0.06567534 |
6 |
6 |
61 |
3.8% |
0.03779430 |
7 |
7 |
56 |
3.5% |
0.03469641 |
8 |
8 |
43 |
2.7% |
0.02664188 |
9 |
9 |
25 |
1.5% |
0.01548947 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
30 |
1.9% |
0.01858736 |
97 |
Not answered |
184 |
11.4% |
0.11400248 |
98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_6
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare funding: The Red Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2] government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
813 |
50.4% |
0.50371747 |
1 |
1 |
95 |
5.9% |
0.05885998 |
2 |
2 |
82 |
5.1% |
0.05080545 |
3 |
3 |
72 |
4.5% |
0.04460967 |
4 |
4 |
40 |
2.5% |
0.02478315 |
5 |
5 |
86 |
5.3% |
0.05328377 |
6 |
6 |
61 |
3.8% |
0.03779430 |
7 |
7 |
58 |
3.6% |
0.03593556 |
8 |
8 |
49 |
3% |
0.03035936 |
9 |
9 |
36 |
2.2% |
0.02230483 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
51 |
3.2% |
0.03159851 |
97 |
Not answered |
171 |
10.6% |
0.10594796 |
98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_7
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare funding: The Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2] government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
471 |
29.2% |
0.29182156 |
1 |
1 |
82 |
5.1% |
0.05080545 |
2 |
2 |
110 |
6.8% |
0.06815366 |
3 |
3 |
106 |
6.6% |
0.06567534 |
4 |
4 |
126 |
7.8% |
0.07806691 |
5 |
5 |
153 |
9.5% |
0.09479554 |
6 |
6 |
99 |
6.1% |
0.06133829 |
7 |
7 |
93 |
5.8% |
0.05762082 |
8 |
8 |
84 |
5.2% |
0.05204461 |
9 |
9 |
45 |
2.8% |
0.02788104 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
77 |
4.8% |
0.04770756 |
97 |
Not answered |
168 |
10.4% |
0.10408922 |
98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_8
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare funding: The Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2] government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
617 |
38.2% |
0.38228005 |
1 |
1 |
99 |
6.1% |
0.06133829 |
2 |
2 |
87 |
5.4% |
0.05390335 |
3 |
3 |
92 |
5.7% |
0.05700124 |
4 |
4 |
74 |
4.6% |
0.04584882 |
5 |
5 |
121 |
7.5% |
0.07496902 |
6 |
6 |
64 |
4% |
0.03965304 |
7 |
7 |
75 |
4.6% |
0.04646840 |
8 |
8 |
99 |
6.1% |
0.06133829 |
9 |
9 |
59 |
3.7% |
0.03655514 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
54 |
3.3% |
0.03345725 |
97 |
Not answered |
173 |
10.7% |
0.10718711 |
98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_9
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare funding: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2] government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
684 |
42.4% |
0.423791822 |
1 |
1 |
110 |
6.8% |
0.068153656 |
2 |
2 |
139 |
8.6% |
0.086121437 |
3 |
3 |
129 |
8% |
0.079925651 |
4 |
4 |
104 |
6.4% |
0.064436183 |
5 |
5 |
112 |
6.9% |
0.069392813 |
6 |
6 |
52 |
3.2% |
0.032218092 |
7 |
7 |
48 |
3% |
0.029739777 |
8 |
8 |
30 |
1.9% |
0.018587361 |
9 |
9 |
18 |
1.1% |
0.011152416 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007434944 |
97 |
Not answered |
176 |
10.9% |
0.109045849 |
98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_10
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare funding: Other parties/lists
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2] government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
Other parties or lists
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
1039 |
64.4% |
0.643742255 |
1 |
1 |
53 |
3.3% |
0.032837670 |
2 |
2 |
45 |
2.8% |
0.027881041 |
3 |
3 |
34 |
2.1% |
0.021065675 |
4 |
4 |
21 |
1.3% |
0.013011152 |
5 |
5 |
73 |
4.5% |
0.045229244 |
6 |
6 |
10 |
0.6% |
0.006195787 |
7 |
7 |
11 |
0.7% |
0.006815366 |
8 |
8 |
7 |
0.4% |
0.004337051 |
9 |
9 |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007434944 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
19 |
1.2% |
0.011771995 |
97 |
Not answered |
290 |
18% |
0.179677819 |
98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5a_11
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government cuts welfare funding: blank/not voted
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4a_ran1].
After the election, oil prices fall dramatically, and unemployment rises sharply. In the face of this economic crisis, the [r20och4a_ran2] government chooses to cut welfare funding. This includes cuts to unemployment benefits and pensions, as well as more expensive kindergarten fees.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the face of the economic crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
Blank/Not voted
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
1046 |
64.8% |
0.648079306 |
1 |
1 |
34 |
2.1% |
0.021065675 |
2 |
2 |
17 |
1.1% |
0.010532838 |
3 |
3 |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009293680 |
4 |
4 |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009293680 |
5 |
5 |
55 |
3.4% |
0.034076828 |
6 |
6 |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004956629 |
7 |
7 |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007434944 |
8 |
8 |
10 |
0.6% |
0.006195787 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004956629 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
31 |
1.9% |
0.019206939 |
97 |
Not answered |
363 |
22.5% |
0.224907063 |
98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5b
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the way democracy works, if the government cuts welfare funding?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about the government’s decision to cut welfare funding in the face of the economic crisis.
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means extremely dissatisfied and 10 means extremely satisfied, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Extremely dissatisfied |
62 |
3.8% |
0.03841388 |
1 |
1 |
45 |
2.8% |
0.02788104 |
2 |
2 |
92 |
5.7% |
0.05700124 |
3 |
3 |
93 |
5.8% |
0.05762082 |
4 |
4 |
107 |
6.6% |
0.06629492 |
5 |
5 |
233 |
14.4% |
0.14436183 |
6 |
6 |
210 |
13% |
0.13011152 |
7 |
7 |
313 |
19.4% |
0.19392813 |
8 |
8 |
314 |
19.5% |
0.19454771 |
9 |
9 |
75 |
4.6% |
0.04646840 |
10 |
10 - Extremely satisfied |
24 |
1.5% |
0.01486989 |
97 |
Not answered |
46 |
2.9% |
0.02850062 |
98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5c
Variable label:
|
Can you remember which party the Prime Minister represented in the short text you just read?
|
Literal question:
|
Can you, without checking, remember which party the Prime Minister represented in the short text you just read?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Labour Party |
638 |
39.5% |
0.3952912020 |
2 |
The Progress Party |
11 |
0.7% |
0.0068153656 |
3 |
The Conservative Party |
785 |
48.6% |
0.4863692689 |
4 |
The Christian Democrats |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006195787 |
5 |
The Green Party |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0012391574 |
6 |
The Red Party |
3 |
0.2% |
0.0018587361 |
7 |
The Centre Party |
4 |
0.2% |
0.0024783147 |
8 |
The Socialist Left Party |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0012391574 |
9 |
The Liberal Party |
3 |
0.2% |
0.0018587361 |
10 |
Other parties or lists |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000000 |
11 |
Do not remember |
141 |
8.7% |
0.0873605948 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.5% |
0.0148698885 |
98 |
Not asked |
8807 |
|
NA |
r20och5c_check
Variable label:
|
[Marks if the respondent navigates backwards in questionnaire after seen r20och5c]
|
Technical description:
|
[Registers if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:112] [Invalid:10309] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Has navigated backwards |
112 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
10309 |
|
NA |
r20och5c_seen
Variable label:
|
[Marks if the respondent has seen question r20och5c]
|
Technical description:
|
[Registers if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 1 & r20och4_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1610] [Invalid:8811] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1610 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
8811 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_1
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens immigration policy: The Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
… The Labour Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
395 |
22.6% |
0.22558538 |
1 |
1 |
55 |
3.1% |
0.03141062 |
2 |
2 |
115 |
6.6% |
0.06567676 |
3 |
3 |
110 |
6.3% |
0.06282125 |
4 |
4 |
123 |
7% |
0.07024557 |
5 |
5 |
199 |
11.4% |
0.11364934 |
6 |
6 |
108 |
6.2% |
0.06167904 |
7 |
7 |
136 |
7.8% |
0.07766990 |
8 |
8 |
127 |
7.3% |
0.07252998 |
9 |
9 |
67 |
3.8% |
0.03826385 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
97 |
5.5% |
0.05539692 |
97 |
Not answered |
219 |
12.5% |
0.12507139 |
98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_2
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens immigration policy: The Progress Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
… The Progress Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
925 |
52.8% |
0.52826956 |
1 |
1 |
63 |
3.6% |
0.03597944 |
2 |
2 |
72 |
4.1% |
0.04111936 |
3 |
3 |
65 |
3.7% |
0.03712164 |
4 |
4 |
52 |
3% |
0.02969732 |
5 |
5 |
75 |
4.3% |
0.04283267 |
6 |
6 |
40 |
2.3% |
0.02284409 |
7 |
7 |
45 |
2.6% |
0.02569960 |
8 |
8 |
57 |
3.3% |
0.03255283 |
9 |
9 |
45 |
2.6% |
0.02569960 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
64 |
3.7% |
0.03655054 |
97 |
Not answered |
248 |
14.2% |
0.14163335 |
98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_3
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens immigration policy: The Conservative Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
… The Conservative Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
462 |
26.4% |
0.26384923 |
1 |
1 |
75 |
4.3% |
0.04283267 |
2 |
2 |
96 |
5.5% |
0.05482581 |
3 |
3 |
95 |
5.4% |
0.05425471 |
4 |
4 |
94 |
5.4% |
0.05368361 |
5 |
5 |
148 |
8.5% |
0.08452313 |
6 |
6 |
106 |
6.1% |
0.06053684 |
7 |
7 |
130 |
7.4% |
0.07424329 |
8 |
8 |
108 |
6.2% |
0.06167904 |
9 |
9 |
102 |
5.8% |
0.05825243 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
121 |
6.9% |
0.06910337 |
97 |
Not answered |
214 |
12.2% |
0.12221588 |
98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_4
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens immigration policy: The Christian Democrats
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
… The Christian Democrats
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
891 |
50.9% |
0.508852085 |
1 |
1 |
109 |
6.2% |
0.062250143 |
2 |
2 |
122 |
7% |
0.069674472 |
3 |
3 |
92 |
5.3% |
0.052541405 |
4 |
4 |
53 |
3% |
0.030268418 |
5 |
5 |
88 |
5% |
0.050256996 |
6 |
6 |
38 |
2.2% |
0.021701885 |
7 |
7 |
34 |
1.9% |
0.019417476 |
8 |
8 |
26 |
1.5% |
0.014848658 |
9 |
9 |
12 |
0.7% |
0.006853227 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
29 |
1.7% |
0.016561965 |
97 |
Not answered |
257 |
14.7% |
0.146773272 |
98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_5
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens immigration policy: The Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
… The Green Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
781 |
44.6% |
0.44603084 |
1 |
1 |
81 |
4.6% |
0.04625928 |
2 |
2 |
100 |
5.7% |
0.05711022 |
3 |
3 |
87 |
5% |
0.04968589 |
4 |
4 |
76 |
4.3% |
0.04340377 |
5 |
5 |
125 |
7.1% |
0.07138778 |
6 |
6 |
56 |
3.2% |
0.03198172 |
7 |
7 |
58 |
3.3% |
0.03312393 |
8 |
8 |
59 |
3.4% |
0.03369503 |
9 |
9 |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01599086 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
32 |
1.8% |
0.01827527 |
97 |
Not answered |
268 |
15.3% |
0.15305540 |
98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_6
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens immigration policy: The Red Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
… The Red Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
867 |
49.5% |
0.49514563 |
1 |
1 |
76 |
4.3% |
0.04340377 |
2 |
2 |
94 |
5.4% |
0.05368361 |
3 |
3 |
80 |
4.6% |
0.04568818 |
4 |
4 |
64 |
3.7% |
0.03655054 |
5 |
5 |
85 |
4.9% |
0.04854369 |
6 |
6 |
42 |
2.4% |
0.02398629 |
7 |
7 |
47 |
2.7% |
0.02684180 |
8 |
8 |
53 |
3% |
0.03026842 |
9 |
9 |
34 |
1.9% |
0.01941748 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
49 |
2.8% |
0.02798401 |
97 |
Not answered |
260 |
14.8% |
0.14848658 |
98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_7
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens immigration policy: The Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
… The Centre Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
502 |
28.7% |
0.28669332 |
1 |
1 |
82 |
4.7% |
0.04683038 |
2 |
2 |
120 |
6.9% |
0.06853227 |
3 |
3 |
115 |
6.6% |
0.06567676 |
4 |
4 |
110 |
6.3% |
0.06282125 |
5 |
5 |
164 |
9.4% |
0.09366077 |
6 |
6 |
110 |
6.3% |
0.06282125 |
7 |
7 |
86 |
4.9% |
0.04911479 |
8 |
8 |
84 |
4.8% |
0.04797259 |
9 |
9 |
58 |
3.3% |
0.03312393 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
71 |
4.1% |
0.04054826 |
97 |
Not answered |
249 |
14.2% |
0.14220445 |
98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_8
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens immigration policy: The Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
… The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
670 |
38.3% |
0.38263849 |
1 |
1 |
94 |
5.4% |
0.05368361 |
2 |
2 |
98 |
5.6% |
0.05596802 |
3 |
3 |
82 |
4.7% |
0.04683038 |
4 |
4 |
75 |
4.3% |
0.04283267 |
5 |
5 |
103 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
6 |
6 |
72 |
4.1% |
0.04111936 |
7 |
7 |
84 |
4.8% |
0.04797259 |
8 |
8 |
88 |
5% |
0.05025700 |
9 |
9 |
70 |
4% |
0.03997716 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
69 |
3.9% |
0.03940605 |
97 |
Not answered |
246 |
14% |
0.14049115 |
98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_9
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens immigration policy: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
… The Liberal Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
698 |
39.9% |
0.398629355 |
1 |
1 |
89 |
5.1% |
0.050828098 |
2 |
2 |
162 |
9.3% |
0.092518561 |
3 |
3 |
127 |
7.3% |
0.072529983 |
4 |
4 |
101 |
5.8% |
0.057681325 |
5 |
5 |
123 |
7% |
0.070245574 |
6 |
6 |
67 |
3.8% |
0.038263849 |
7 |
7 |
41 |
2.3% |
0.023415191 |
8 |
8 |
34 |
1.9% |
0.019417476 |
9 |
9 |
17 |
1% |
0.009708738 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
20 |
1.1% |
0.011422045 |
97 |
Not answered |
272 |
15.5% |
0.155339806 |
98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_10
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens immigration policy: Other parties/lists
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
… Other parties or lists
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
1079 |
61.6% |
0.616219303 |
1 |
1 |
53 |
3% |
0.030268418 |
2 |
2 |
50 |
2.9% |
0.028555111 |
3 |
3 |
33 |
1.9% |
0.018846374 |
4 |
4 |
22 |
1.3% |
0.012564249 |
5 |
5 |
78 |
4.5% |
0.044545974 |
6 |
6 |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006282125 |
7 |
7 |
13 |
0.7% |
0.007424329 |
8 |
8 |
17 |
1% |
0.009708738 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005139920 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
20 |
1.1% |
0.011422045 |
97 |
Not answered |
366 |
20.9% |
0.209023415 |
98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6a_11
Variable label:
|
Votes for in general election tomorrow, if the government softens immigration policy: Blank/Not voted
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Page 1 - context]
There will be a general election this autumn. Imagine that there is a general election this autumn. [r20och4b_ran1].
After the election, the conflict in Syria flares up again and Norway experiences a dramatic increase in the number of asylum seekers.
In the face of this refugee crisis, [r20och4b_ran2] government chooses to soften its immigration policy so that very many asylum seekers are allowed to stay in Norway.
[Page 2 - question]
Think about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in the face of the refugee crisis. Then, imagine that a general election is to take place tomorrow.
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means definitely not and 10 means definitely, how likely is it that you would vote for …
|
Literal question:
|
… Blank/Not voted
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
[Display order of questions in grid: Randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Definitely not |
1089 |
62.2% |
0.621930326 |
1 |
1 |
40 |
2.3% |
0.022844089 |
2 |
2 |
18 |
1% |
0.010279840 |
3 |
3 |
23 |
1.3% |
0.013135351 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004568818 |
5 |
5 |
74 |
4.2% |
0.042261565 |
6 |
6 |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005139920 |
7 |
7 |
18 |
1% |
0.010279840 |
8 |
8 |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006282125 |
9 |
9 |
14 |
0.8% |
0.007995431 |
10 |
10 - Definitely |
24 |
1.4% |
0.013706453 |
97 |
Not answered |
423 |
24.2% |
0.241576242 |
98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6b
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the way democracy works, if the government softens immigration policy?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think again about the government’s decision to soften immigration policy in the face of the refugee crisis.
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 means extremely dissatisfied and 10 means extremely satisfied, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Extremely dissatisfied |
34 |
1.9% |
0.01941748 |
1 |
1 |
38 |
2.2% |
0.02170188 |
2 |
2 |
61 |
3.5% |
0.03483724 |
3 |
3 |
83 |
4.7% |
0.04740148 |
4 |
4 |
72 |
4.1% |
0.04111936 |
5 |
5 |
192 |
11% |
0.10965163 |
6 |
6 |
217 |
12.4% |
0.12392918 |
7 |
7 |
362 |
20.7% |
0.20673901 |
8 |
8 |
444 |
25.4% |
0.25356939 |
9 |
9 |
148 |
8.5% |
0.08452313 |
10 |
10 - Extremely satisfied |
46 |
2.6% |
0.02627070 |
97 |
Not answered |
54 |
3.1% |
0.03083952 |
98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6c
Variable label:
|
Can you remember which party was responsible for immigration in the short text you just read?
|
Literal question:
|
Can you, without checking, remember which party was responsible for immigration in the short text you just read?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Labour Party |
56 |
3.2% |
0.0319817247 |
2 |
The Progress Party |
621 |
35.5% |
0.3546544832 |
3 |
The Conservative Party |
161 |
9.2% |
0.0919474586 |
4 |
The Christian Democrats |
44 |
2.5% |
0.0251284980 |
5 |
The Green Party |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0011422045 |
6 |
The Red Party |
15 |
0.9% |
0.0085665334 |
7 |
The Centre Party |
16 |
0.9% |
0.0091376356 |
8 |
The Socialist Left Party |
635 |
36.3% |
0.3626499143 |
9 |
The Liberal Party |
16 |
0.9% |
0.0091376356 |
10 |
Other parties or lists |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005711022 |
11 |
Do not remember |
151 |
8.6% |
0.0862364363 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
1.9% |
0.0188463735 |
98 |
Not asked |
8670 |
|
NA |
r20och6c_check
Variable label:
|
[Marks if the respondent navigates backwards in questionnaire after seen r20och6c]
|
Technical description:
|
[Registers if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:94] [Invalid:10327] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Has navigated backwards |
94 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
10327 |
|
NA |
r20och6c_seen
Variable label:
|
[Marks if the respondent has seen question r20och6c]
|
Technical description:
|
[Registers if r20group = 2,3 & r20och4_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1746] [Invalid:8675] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1746 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
8675 |
|
NA |
r20avslutt
Variable label:
|
Open: Feedback about the survey
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10421] [Range:-]
|
r20P1
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Male |
5276 |
50.6% |
0.5062854 |
2 |
Female |
5145 |
49.4% |
0.4937146 |
r20P2
Variable label:
|
Region
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oslo |
1664 |
16% |
0.15967757 |
2 |
Østlandet |
3769 |
36.2% |
0.36167354 |
3 |
Sørlandet |
505 |
4.8% |
0.04845984 |
4 |
Vestlandet |
2830 |
27.2% |
0.27156703 |
5 |
Trøndelag |
851 |
8.2% |
0.08166203 |
6 |
Nord-Norge |
802 |
7.7% |
0.07695998 |
r20P3
Variable label:
|
County
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:3-54]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
3 |
Oslo |
1664 |
16% |
0.15967757 |
11 |
Rogaland |
969 |
9.3% |
0.09298532 |
15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
423 |
4.1% |
0.04059111 |
18 |
Nordland |
393 |
3.8% |
0.03771231 |
30 |
Viken |
2449 |
23.5% |
0.23500624 |
34 |
Innlandet |
575 |
5.5% |
0.05517705 |
38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
745 |
7.1% |
0.07149026 |
42 |
Agder |
505 |
4.8% |
0.04845984 |
46 |
Vestland |
1438 |
13.8% |
0.13799060 |
50 |
Trøndelag |
851 |
8.2% |
0.08166203 |
54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
409 |
3.9% |
0.03924767 |
r20P3_2
Variable label:
|
Constituencies parliament election 2021
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-19]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
3 |
Østfold |
503 |
4.8% |
0.048267921 |
1 |
Akershus |
1457 |
14% |
0.139813837 |
2 |
Oslo |
1664 |
16% |
0.159677574 |
5 |
Hedmark |
314 |
3% |
0.030131465 |
6 |
Oppland |
261 |
2.5% |
0.025045581 |
7 |
Buskerud |
489 |
4.7% |
0.046924479 |
4 |
Vestfold |
486 |
4.7% |
0.046636599 |
8 |
Telemark |
259 |
2.5% |
0.024853661 |
10 |
Aust-Agder |
186 |
1.8% |
0.017848575 |
9 |
Vest-Agder |
319 |
3.1% |
0.030611266 |
11 |
Rogaland |
969 |
9.3% |
0.092985318 |
12 |
Hordaland |
1268 |
12.2% |
0.121677382 |
13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
170 |
1.6% |
0.016313214 |
14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
423 |
4.1% |
0.040591114 |
16 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
675 |
6.5% |
0.064773054 |
15 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
176 |
1.7% |
0.016888974 |
17 |
Nordland |
393 |
3.8% |
0.037712312 |
18 |
Troms |
309 |
3% |
0.029651665 |
19 |
Finnmark |
100 |
1% |
0.009596008 |
r20P4_1
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No education/elementary school |
487 |
4.7% |
0.04673256 |
2 |
Upper secondary education |
3100 |
29.7% |
0.29747625 |
3 |
University/University college |
6701 |
64.3% |
0.64302850 |
97 |
Not answered |
133 |
1.3% |
0.01276269 |
r20P4_2
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
21 |
0.2% |
0.0020151617 |
2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
466 |
4.5% |
0.0447173976 |
3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
903 |
8.7% |
0.0866519528 |
4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1218 |
11.7% |
0.1168793782 |
5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
979 |
9.4% |
0.0939449189 |
6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
875 |
8.4% |
0.0839650705 |
7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
2209 |
21.2% |
0.2119758181 |
8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
768 |
7.4% |
0.0736973419 |
9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
756 |
7.3% |
0.0725458209 |
10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
1808 |
17.3% |
0.1734958257 |
11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
285 |
2.7% |
0.0273486230 |
12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
126 |
1.2% |
0.0120909702 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.1% |
0.0006717206 |
r20P5_1
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1939 or earlier |
276 |
2.6% |
0.02648498 |
2 |
1940-1949 |
1813 |
17.4% |
0.17397563 |
3 |
1950-1959 |
2635 |
25.3% |
0.25285481 |
4 |
1960-1969 |
2345 |
22.5% |
0.22502639 |
5 |
1970-1979 |
1606 |
15.4% |
0.15411189 |
6 |
1980-1989 |
1023 |
9.8% |
0.09816716 |
7 |
1990 or later |
723 |
6.9% |
0.06937914 |
r20P5_2
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1959 or earlier |
4724 |
45.3% |
0.45331542 |
2 |
1960-1989 |
4974 |
47.7% |
0.47730544 |
3 |
1990 or later |
723 |
6.9% |
0.06937914 |
r20Weight1_stratapop
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata constructed with P1, P2, and P5_2
|
Technical description:
|
[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation report.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-0]
|
r20Weight1
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, and P5_2. See documentation report.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-8]
|
r20Weight2_stratapop
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata constructed with P1, P2, P4_1, and P5_2
|
Technical description:
|
[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation report.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10288] [Invalid:133] [Range:0-0]
|
r20Weight2
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1, and P5_2. See documentation report.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-55]
|
r17oppvekstfylke
Variable label:
|
Respondents home county at 15 years of age
|
Technical description:
|
[Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r17oppvekstkom]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
3 |
Oslo |
758 |
10.9% |
0.10861155 |
11 |
Rogaland |
602 |
8.6% |
0.08625878 |
15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
414 |
5.9% |
0.05932082 |
18 |
Nordland |
403 |
5.8% |
0.05774466 |
30 |
Viken |
1412 |
20.2% |
0.20232125 |
34 |
Innlandet |
470 |
6.7% |
0.06734489 |
38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
543 |
7.8% |
0.07780484 |
42 |
Agder |
346 |
5% |
0.04957730 |
46 |
Vestland |
1079 |
15.5% |
0.15460668 |
50 |
Trøndelag |
617 |
8.8% |
0.08840808 |
54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
335 |
4.8% |
0.04800115 |
98 |
|
3442 |
|
NA |
r14bk27_kodet
Variable label:
|
Marital status. [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[This variable contains the values of r14bk27 plus coded values of r14bk27_7_other]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Single |
649 |
11.4% |
0.1139996487 |
2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
286 |
5% |
0.0502371333 |
3 |
Cohabitant |
877 |
15.4% |
0.1540488319 |
4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
3348 |
58.8% |
0.5880906376 |
5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
303 |
5.3% |
0.0532232566 |
6 |
Widow/widower |
190 |
3.3% |
0.0333743193 |
7 |
Other: |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008782716 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
0.6% |
0.0061479009 |
98 |
Not asked |
4728 |
|
NA |
r16bk27_kodet
Variable label:
|
Martial status [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom r16group = 6 eller 7. ]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Single |
305 |
11.7% |
0.117397998 |
2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
121 |
4.7% |
0.046574288 |
3 |
Cohabitant |
392 |
15.1% |
0.150885296 |
4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
1517 |
58.4% |
0.583910701 |
5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
163 |
6.3% |
0.062740570 |
6 |
Widow/widower |
91 |
3.5% |
0.035026944 |
7 |
Other |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001539646 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001924557 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
w01_k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1427 |
93.9% |
0.93881579 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
68 |
4.5% |
0.04473684 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
1.6% |
0.01644737 |
98 |
Not asked |
8901 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1552 |
94.2% |
0.94231937 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
78 |
4.7% |
0.04735883 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
1% |
0.01032180 |
98 |
Not asked |
8774 |
|
NA |
r4k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
26 |
83.9% |
0.8387097 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
5 |
16.1% |
0.1612903 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10390 |
|
NA |
r5k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
12 |
100% |
1 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
0 |
0% |
0 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
10409 |
|
NA |
r8k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship.
|
Literal question:
|
Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1459 |
94.4% |
0.944336570 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
72 |
4.7% |
0.046601942 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.9% |
0.009061489 |
98 |
Not asked |
8876 |
|
NA |
r11bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
853 |
93.5% |
0.935307018 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
54 |
5.9% |
0.059210526 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.5% |
0.005482456 |
98 |
Not asked |
9509 |
|
NA |
r14bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
846 |
94.2% |
0.942093541 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
46 |
5.1% |
0.051224944 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.7% |
0.006681514 |
98 |
Not asked |
9523 |
|
NA |
r16bk28
Variable label:
|
Your citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
2434 |
93.7% |
0.93687452 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
164 |
6.3% |
0.06312548 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r18bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship.
|
Post-question:
|
Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1107 |
94.5% |
0.945345858 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
60 |
5.1% |
0.051238258 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003415884 |
98 |
Not asked |
9250 |
|
NA |
w01_k29
Variable label:
|
Parents immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1373 |
90.3% |
0.903289474 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
66 |
4.3% |
0.043421053 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
8 |
0.5% |
0.005263158 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
27 |
1.8% |
0.017763158 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
20 |
1.3% |
0.013157895 |
97 |
No answer |
26 |
1.7% |
0.017105263 |
98 |
Not asked |
8901 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1494 |
90.6% |
0.906003639 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
84 |
5.1% |
0.050939964 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001819284 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
26 |
1.6% |
0.015767132 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
22 |
1.3% |
0.013341419 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.012128563 |
98 |
Not asked |
8772 |
|
NA |
r4k29
Variable label:
|
Mother or father immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
26 |
76.5% |
0.76470588 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
3 |
8.8% |
0.08823529 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
1 |
2.9% |
0.02941176 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
3 |
8.8% |
0.08823529 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
1 |
2.9% |
0.02941176 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10387 |
|
NA |
r5k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
12 |
100% |
1 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
0 |
0% |
0 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
0 |
0% |
0 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
10409 |
|
NA |
r11bk29
Variable label:
|
Immigration background
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 3 or rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
2042 |
90.5% |
0.905141844 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
131 |
5.8% |
0.058067376 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002216312 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
43 |
1.9% |
0.019060284 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
26 |
1.2% |
0.011524823 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.4% |
0.003989362 |
98 |
Not asked |
8165 |
|
NA |
r14bk29
Variable label:
|
Have you or any of your parents immigrated to Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
801 |
89.2% |
0.891982183 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
56 |
6.2% |
0.062360802 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
6 |
0.7% |
0.006681514 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
23 |
2.6% |
0.025612472 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005567929 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.8% |
0.007795100 |
98 |
Not asked |
9523 |
|
NA |
r16bk29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
2322 |
89.4% |
0.8937644342 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
177 |
6.8% |
0.0681293303 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
9 |
0.3% |
0.0034642032 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
46 |
1.8% |
0.0177059276 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
43 |
1.7% |
0.0165511932 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0% |
0.0003849115 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r18bk29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1058 |
90.4% |
0.903501281 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
66 |
5.6% |
0.056362084 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004269855 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
19 |
1.6% |
0.016225448 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
14 |
1.2% |
0.011955594 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007685739 |
98 |
Not asked |
9250 |
|
NA |
r18bk35
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A city |
303 |
25.9% |
0.258753202 |
2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
233 |
19.9% |
0.198975235 |
3 |
A small or medium sized town |
355 |
30.3% |
0.303159693 |
4 |
A village |
170 |
14.5% |
0.145175064 |
5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
101 |
8.6% |
0.086251067 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007685739 |
98 |
Not asked |
9250 |
|
NA |
r10k3_kodet
Variable label:
|
Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
[This variable contains the values of r10k3 plus coded values of r10k3_12_other]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
177 |
4.4% |
0.044261065 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
944 |
23.6% |
0.236059015 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
439 |
11% |
0.109777444 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
205 |
5.1% |
0.051262816 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
357 |
8.9% |
0.089272318 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
350 |
8.8% |
0.087521880 |
7 |
The Green Party |
178 |
4.5% |
0.044511128 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
885 |
22.1% |
0.221305326 |
9 |
The Red Party |
159 |
4% |
0.039759940 |
10 |
Did not vote |
68 |
1.7% |
0.017004251 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
153 |
3.8% |
0.038259565 |
12 |
Other: |
66 |
1.7% |
0.016504126 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
0.5% |
0.004501125 |
98 |
Not asked |
6422 |
|
NA |
r16k43_1_kodet
Variable label:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections this autumn? [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections this autumn?
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondentene spurt. Rekkefølgen på svaralternativene er randomisert. ]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
291 |
3.6% |
0.035522461 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1655 |
20.2% |
0.202026367 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
424 |
5.2% |
0.051757812 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
305 |
3.7% |
0.037231445 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
702 |
8.6% |
0.085693359 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
977 |
11.9% |
0.119262695 |
7 |
The Green Party |
747 |
9.1% |
0.091186523 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1675 |
20.4% |
0.204467773 |
9 |
The Red Party |
407 |
5% |
0.049682617 |
10 |
The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative) |
173 |
2.1% |
0.021118164 |
11 |
A joint party list |
13 |
0.2% |
0.001586914 |
12 |
A local party list |
152 |
1.9% |
0.018554688 |
13 |
Voted blank |
64 |
0.8% |
0.007812500 |
14 |
Did not vote |
403 |
4.9% |
0.049194336 |
15 |
Not entitled to vote |
24 |
0.3% |
0.002929688 |
16 |
Other: |
154 |
1.9% |
0.018798828 |
97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.3% |
0.003173828 |
98 |
Not asked |
2229 |
|
NA |
r16k43_2_kodet
Variable label:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council election this autumn? [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council election this autumn?
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondentene spurt. Rekkefølgen på svaralternativene er randomisert (men tilsvarer rekkefølgen til r16k43_1).]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
298 |
3.6% |
0.0363769531 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1620 |
19.8% |
0.1977539062 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
448 |
5.5% |
0.0546875000 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
276 |
3.4% |
0.0336914062 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
675 |
8.2% |
0.0823974609 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
1043 |
12.7% |
0.1273193359 |
7 |
The Green Party |
717 |
8.8% |
0.0875244141 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1544 |
18.8% |
0.1884765625 |
9 |
The Red Party |
378 |
4.6% |
0.0461425781 |
10 |
The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative) |
153 |
1.9% |
0.0186767578 |
11 |
A joint party list |
2 |
0% |
0.0002441406 |
12 |
A local party list |
39 |
0.5% |
0.0047607422 |
13 |
Voted blank |
106 |
1.3% |
0.0129394531 |
14 |
Did not vote |
603 |
7.4% |
0.0736083984 |
15 |
Not entitled to vote |
62 |
0.8% |
0.0075683594 |
16 |
Other: |
161 |
2% |
0.0196533203 |
97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.8% |
0.0081787109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2229 |
|
NA |
r17bk21_kodet
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work/worked in? [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
[Which type of business do you work in?/ What was the kind of business where you worked in your previous main occupation?]
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom Ikke stilt til de som har svart på r12arbeid. Heller ikke stilt til dem som oppga at de er pensjonster (r12arbeid==8) Videre vilkår: r17bk33 != 9 og (r17bk33 = 6|7|8|9|10|11 ELLER (r17bk33 = 5 og respondent over 28 år))]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
726 |
11.3% |
0.1133135633 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1927 |
30.1% |
0.3007647885 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
422 |
6.6% |
0.0658654597 |
4 |
Private business |
2657 |
41.5% |
0.4147026690 |
5 |
Family business |
92 |
1.4% |
0.0143592945 |
6 |
Self-employed |
412 |
6.4% |
0.0643046668 |
7 |
Other: |
112 |
1.7% |
0.0174808803 |
97 |
Not answered |
58 |
0.9% |
0.0090525987 |
98 |
Not asked |
4014 |
|
NA |
9 |
|
1 |
0% |
0.0001560793 |
r18bk21_kodet
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in? [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom r18group = 7 og r18bk21 = 1, 2 eller 3]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
75 |
11.5% |
0.114678899 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
221 |
33.8% |
0.337920489 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
43 |
6.6% |
0.065749235 |
4 |
Private business |
291 |
44.5% |
0.444954128 |
5 |
Self-employed |
6 |
0.9% |
0.009174312 |
6 |
Other: |
18 |
2.8% |
0.027522936 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
9767 |
|
NA |
r11pkklasse
Variable label:
|
Social class, self-placement
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
37 |
0.8% |
0.007524914 |
2 |
Working class |
560 |
11.4% |
0.113890584 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
470 |
9.6% |
0.095586740 |
4 |
Middle class |
2700 |
54.9% |
0.549115314 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
967 |
19.7% |
0.196664633 |
6 |
Upper class |
28 |
0.6% |
0.005694529 |
7 |
Don't know |
126 |
2.6% |
0.025625381 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
0.6% |
0.005897905 |
98 |
Not asked |
5504 |
|
NA |
r14pkklasse
Variable label:
|
To which social class do you belong.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
4 |
0.4% |
0.004454343 |
2 |
Working class |
109 |
12.1% |
0.121380846 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
87 |
9.7% |
0.096881960 |
4 |
Middle class |
505 |
56.2% |
0.562360802 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
161 |
17.9% |
0.179287305 |
6 |
Upper class |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002227171 |
7 |
Don't know |
24 |
2.7% |
0.026726058 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.7% |
0.006681514 |
98 |
Not asked |
9523 |
|
NA |
r16pkklasse
Variable label:
|
Place yourself in a social class
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
27 |
1% |
0.010392610 |
2 |
Working class |
311 |
12% |
0.119707467 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
255 |
9.8% |
0.098152425 |
4 |
Middle class |
1401 |
53.9% |
0.539260970 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
493 |
19% |
0.189761355 |
6 |
Upper class |
10 |
0.4% |
0.003849115 |
7 |
Don't know |
96 |
3.7% |
0.036951501 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001924557 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r18pkklasse
Variable label:
|
Placing yourself in which social class?
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
14 |
1.2% |
0.011955594 |
2 |
Working class |
147 |
12.6% |
0.125533732 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
101 |
8.6% |
0.086251067 |
4 |
Middle class |
652 |
55.7% |
0.556789069 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
199 |
17% |
0.169940222 |
6 |
Upper class |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004269855 |
7 |
Don't know |
42 |
3.6% |
0.035866781 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.9% |
0.009393681 |
98 |
Not asked |
9250 |
|
NA |
r18pk8
Variable label:
|
Place yourself on the political left-wing/right-wing scale
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Left |
41 |
3.5% |
0.035012810 |
1 |
1 |
71 |
6.1% |
0.060631939 |
2 |
2 |
133 |
11.4% |
0.113578138 |
3 |
3 |
174 |
14.9% |
0.148590948 |
4 |
4 |
132 |
11.3% |
0.112724167 |
5 |
5 |
162 |
13.8% |
0.138343296 |
6 |
6 |
112 |
9.6% |
0.095644748 |
7 |
7 |
155 |
13.2% |
0.132365500 |
8 |
8 |
119 |
10.2% |
0.101622545 |
9 |
9 |
40 |
3.4% |
0.034158839 |
10 |
10 - Right |
21 |
1.8% |
0.017933390 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.9% |
0.009393681 |
98 |
Not asked |
9250 |
|
NA |
r14pk14
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated people like me do not understand it.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
185 |
3.2% |
0.032496048 |
2 |
Agree |
584 |
10.3% |
0.102582118 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1696 |
29.8% |
0.297909714 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
575 |
10.1% |
0.101001230 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
745 |
13.1% |
0.130862463 |
6 |
Disagree |
1428 |
25.1% |
0.250834358 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
468 |
8.2% |
0.082206218 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.2% |
0.002107852 |
98 |
Not asked |
4728 |
|
NA |
r17pk14
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Sometimes politics is so complicated that it’s hard to understand
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 16]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
131 |
5.4% |
0.053998351 |
2 |
Agree |
312 |
12.9% |
0.128606760 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
628 |
25.9% |
0.258862325 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
227 |
9.4% |
0.093569662 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
325 |
13.4% |
0.133965375 |
6 |
Disagree |
547 |
22.5% |
0.225474031 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
242 |
10% |
0.099752679 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.005770816 |
98 |
Not asked |
7995 |
|
NA |
r14pk13
Variable label:
|
How much say in what the government does does the political system in Norway allow people like you.
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
37 |
0.6% |
0.006499210 |
2 |
To a great extent |
613 |
10.8% |
0.107676093 |
3 |
To some extent |
2542 |
44.7% |
0.446513262 |
4 |
To a small extent |
2040 |
35.8% |
0.358334797 |
5 |
Not at all |
440 |
7.7% |
0.077287897 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.4% |
0.003688741 |
98 |
Not asked |
4728 |
|
NA |
r17pk13
Variable label:
|
Whether the political system in Norway allow you to have a say
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 16]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
22 |
0.9% |
0.009068425 |
2 |
To a great extent |
255 |
10.5% |
0.105111294 |
3 |
To some extent |
1121 |
46.2% |
0.462077494 |
4 |
To a small extent |
800 |
33% |
0.329760923 |
5 |
Not at all |
208 |
8.6% |
0.085737840 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.8% |
0.008244023 |
98 |
Not asked |
7995 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_1
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
134 |
2.7% |
0.027252390 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
424 |
8.6% |
0.086231442 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
912 |
18.5% |
0.185478951 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1807 |
36.8% |
0.367500508 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1221 |
24.8% |
0.248322148 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
374 |
7.6% |
0.076062640 |
97 |
Not answered |
45 |
0.9% |
0.009151922 |
98 |
Not asked |
5504 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_2
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
2397 |
48.7% |
0.487492373 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1042 |
21.2% |
0.211917836 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
681 |
13.8% |
0.138499085 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
450 |
9.2% |
0.091519219 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
216 |
4.4% |
0.043929225 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
98 |
2% |
0.019930852 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.7% |
0.006711409 |
98 |
Not asked |
5504 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_3
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her]. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
15 |
0.3% |
0.003050641 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
55 |
1.1% |
0.011185682 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
330 |
6.7% |
0.067114094 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1868 |
38% |
0.379906447 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1836 |
37.3% |
0.373398414 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
779 |
15.8% |
0.158429937 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
0.7% |
0.006914785 |
98 |
Not asked |
5504 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_4
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
41 |
0.8% |
0.008338418 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
137 |
2.8% |
0.027862518 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
306 |
6.2% |
0.062233069 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1393 |
28.3% |
0.283302827 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1844 |
37.5% |
0.375025422 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1161 |
23.6% |
0.236119585 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
0.7% |
0.007118161 |
98 |
Not asked |
5504 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_5
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand things
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
15 |
0.3% |
0.003050641 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
100 |
2% |
0.020337604 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
375 |
7.6% |
0.076266016 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1752 |
35.6% |
0.356314826 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1751 |
35.6% |
0.356111450 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
892 |
18.1% |
0.181411430 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.7% |
0.006508033 |
98 |
Not asked |
5504 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_6
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
464 |
9.4% |
0.094366484 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1061 |
21.6% |
0.215781981 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1706 |
34.7% |
0.346959528 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1227 |
25% |
0.249542404 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
358 |
7.3% |
0.072808623 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
73 |
1.5% |
0.014846451 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.6% |
0.005694529 |
98 |
Not asked |
5504 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_7
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
175 |
3.6% |
0.035590807 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
655 |
13.3% |
0.133211308 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1480 |
30.1% |
0.300996543 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1844 |
37.5% |
0.375025422 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
599 |
12.2% |
0.121822249 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
131 |
2.7% |
0.026642262 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.7% |
0.006711409 |
98 |
Not asked |
5504 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_8
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
522 |
10.6% |
0.106162294 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1106 |
22.5% |
0.224933903 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1632 |
33.2% |
0.331909701 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1204 |
24.5% |
0.244864755 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
348 |
7.1% |
0.070774863 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
72 |
1.5% |
0.014643075 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.7% |
0.006711409 |
98 |
Not asked |
5504 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_9
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
499 |
10.1% |
0.101484645 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1000 |
20.3% |
0.203376042 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1646 |
33.5% |
0.334756966 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1339 |
27.2% |
0.272320521 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
347 |
7.1% |
0.070571487 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
53 |
1.1% |
0.010778930 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.7% |
0.006711409 |
98 |
Not asked |
5504 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_10
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
72 |
1.5% |
0.014643075 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
265 |
5.4% |
0.053894651 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
713 |
14.5% |
0.145007118 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1759 |
35.8% |
0.357738458 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1394 |
28.4% |
0.283506203 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
686 |
14% |
0.139515965 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.6% |
0.005694529 |
98 |
Not asked |
5504 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_1
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: Respect for parents and for older people is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that [he/she] should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
116 |
3.6% |
0.035980149 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
302 |
9.4% |
0.093672457 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
606 |
18.8% |
0.187965261 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1224 |
38% |
0.379652605 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
704 |
21.8% |
0.218362283 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
242 |
7.5% |
0.075062035 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
0.9% |
0.009305211 |
98 |
Not asked |
7197 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_2
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: Religious faith is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
1721 |
53.4% |
0.533808933 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
619 |
19.2% |
0.191997519 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
390 |
12.1% |
0.120967742 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
309 |
9.6% |
0.095843672 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
102 |
3.2% |
0.031637717 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
59 |
1.8% |
0.018300248 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.7% |
0.007444169 |
98 |
Not asked |
7197 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_3
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To help people around you is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
6 |
0.2% |
0.001861042 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
38 |
1.2% |
0.011786600 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
173 |
5.4% |
0.053660050 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1179 |
36.6% |
0.365694789 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1224 |
38% |
0.379652605 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
579 |
18% |
0.179590571 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.8% |
0.007754342 |
98 |
Not asked |
7197 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_4
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To have all people in the world be treated equally is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
20 |
0.6% |
0.006203474 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
79 |
2.5% |
0.024503722 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
176 |
5.5% |
0.054590571 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
849 |
26.3% |
0.263337469 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1198 |
37.2% |
0.371588089 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
878 |
27.2% |
0.272332506 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.7% |
0.007444169 |
98 |
Not asked |
7197 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_5
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To be interested in things and to be curious is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
13 |
0.4% |
0.004032258 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
59 |
1.8% |
0.018300248 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
276 |
8.6% |
0.085607940 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1036 |
32.1% |
0.321339950 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1139 |
35.3% |
0.353287841 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
674 |
20.9% |
0.209057072 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.8% |
0.008374690 |
98 |
Not asked |
7197 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_6
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To take risks and look for new experiences is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He’s/she’s] always looking for new experiences.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
336 |
10.4% |
0.104218362 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
738 |
22.9% |
0.228908189 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1103 |
34.2% |
0.342121588 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
760 |
23.6% |
0.235732010 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
211 |
6.5% |
0.065446650 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
53 |
1.6% |
0.016439206 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
0.7% |
0.007133995 |
98 |
Not asked |
7197 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_7
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To seek out opportunites to have fun is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
122 |
3.8% |
0.037841191 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
412 |
12.8% |
0.127791563 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
996 |
30.9% |
0.308933002 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1178 |
36.5% |
0.365384615 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
378 |
11.7% |
0.117245658 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
108 |
3.3% |
0.033498759 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
0.9% |
0.009305211 |
98 |
Not asked |
7197 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_8
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To be sucessful and to impress other people is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
365 |
11.3% |
0.113213400 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
690 |
21.4% |
0.214019851 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1130 |
35% |
0.350496278 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
702 |
21.8% |
0.217741935 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
235 |
7.3% |
0.072890819 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
76 |
2.4% |
0.023573201 |
97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.8% |
0.008064516 |
98 |
Not asked |
7197 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_9
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To take the lead and tell others what to do is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
362 |
11.2% |
0.112282878 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
691 |
21.4% |
0.214330025 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1044 |
32.4% |
0.323821340 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
860 |
26.7% |
0.266749380 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
201 |
6.2% |
0.062344913 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
41 |
1.3% |
0.012717122 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.8% |
0.007754342 |
98 |
Not asked |
7197 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_10
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To have things tidy and clean is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
49 |
1.5% |
0.015198511 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
178 |
5.5% |
0.055210918 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
460 |
14.3% |
0.142679901 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1151 |
35.7% |
0.357009926 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
884 |
27.4% |
0.274193548 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
476 |
14.8% |
0.147642680 |
97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.8% |
0.008064516 |
98 |
Not asked |
7197 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_1
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Reserved.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is reserved
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
983 |
17.8% |
0.17782200 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
1318 |
23.8% |
0.23842258 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
873 |
15.8% |
0.15792330 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1918 |
34.7% |
0.34696093 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
316 |
5.7% |
0.05716353 |
97 |
Not answered |
120 |
2.2% |
0.02170767 |
98 |
Not asked |
4893 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_2
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Generally trusting.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is generally trusting
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
103 |
1.9% |
0.01863242 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
463 |
8.4% |
0.08375543 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
641 |
11.6% |
0.11595514 |
4 |
Agree a little |
2630 |
47.6% |
0.47575977 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
1593 |
28.8% |
0.28816932 |
97 |
Not answered |
98 |
1.8% |
0.01772793 |
98 |
Not asked |
4893 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_3
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Tendency to be lazy.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… tend to be lazy
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
1880 |
34% |
0.34008683 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
1537 |
27.8% |
0.27803907 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
880 |
15.9% |
0.15918958 |
4 |
Agree a little |
985 |
17.8% |
0.17818379 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
150 |
2.7% |
0.02713459 |
97 |
Not answered |
96 |
1.7% |
0.01736614 |
98 |
Not asked |
4893 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_4
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Relaxed, handles stress well.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is relaxed, handles stress well
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
218 |
3.9% |
0.03943560 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1044 |
18.9% |
0.18885673 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
930 |
16.8% |
0.16823444 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
2218 |
40.1% |
0.40123010 |
5 |
Completely agree |
1023 |
18.5% |
0.18505789 |
97 |
Not answered |
95 |
1.7% |
0.01718524 |
98 |
Not asked |
4893 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_5
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Few artistic interests.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… has few artistic interests
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
1610 |
29.1% |
0.29124457 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1730 |
31.3% |
0.31295224 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
854 |
15.4% |
0.15448625 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
962 |
17.4% |
0.17402315 |
5 |
Completely agree |
274 |
5% |
0.04956585 |
97 |
Not answered |
98 |
1.8% |
0.01772793 |
98 |
Not asked |
4893 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_6
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Outgoing, sociable.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is outgoing, sociable
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
221 |
4% |
0.03997829 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
895 |
16.2% |
0.16190304 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
880 |
15.9% |
0.15918958 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
2047 |
37% |
0.37029667 |
5 |
Completely agree |
1402 |
25.4% |
0.25361795 |
97 |
Not answered |
83 |
1.5% |
0.01501447 |
98 |
Not asked |
4893 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_7
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Tends to find fault with others.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… tends to find fault with others
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
925 |
16.7% |
0.16732996 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1613 |
29.2% |
0.29178726 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1559 |
28.2% |
0.28201881 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
1221 |
22.1% |
0.22087554 |
5 |
Completely agree |
119 |
2.2% |
0.02152677 |
97 |
Not answered |
91 |
1.6% |
0.01646165 |
98 |
Not asked |
4893 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_8
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Does a thorough job.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… do a thorough job
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
80 |
1.4% |
0.01447178 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
122 |
2.2% |
0.02206946 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
495 |
9% |
0.08954414 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
2320 |
42% |
0.41968162 |
5 |
Completely agree |
2422 |
43.8% |
0.43813314 |
97 |
Not answered |
89 |
1.6% |
0.01609986 |
98 |
Not asked |
4893 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_9
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Easily nervous.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… get nervous easily
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
1667 |
30.2% |
0.30155572 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1635 |
29.6% |
0.29576700 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
969 |
17.5% |
0.17528944 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
947 |
17.1% |
0.17130970 |
5 |
Completely agree |
212 |
3.8% |
0.03835022 |
97 |
Not answered |
98 |
1.8% |
0.01772793 |
98 |
Not asked |
4893 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_10
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Active imagination.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… has an active imagination
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
328 |
5.9% |
0.05933430 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
793 |
14.3% |
0.14345152 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1410 |
25.5% |
0.25506512 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1894 |
34.3% |
0.34261939 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
1018 |
18.4% |
0.18415340 |
97 |
Not answered |
85 |
1.5% |
0.01537627 |
98 |
Not asked |
4893 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_1
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Reserved
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
…is reserved
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
493 |
19% |
0.18976135 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
648 |
24.9% |
0.24942263 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
430 |
16.6% |
0.16551193 |
4 |
Agree a little |
798 |
30.7% |
0.30715935 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
163 |
6.3% |
0.06274057 |
97 |
Not answered |
66 |
2.5% |
0.02540416 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_2
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Generally trusting
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
…is generally trusting
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
69 |
2.7% |
0.02655889 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
218 |
8.4% |
0.08391070 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
305 |
11.7% |
0.11739800 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1172 |
45.1% |
0.45111624 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
790 |
30.4% |
0.30408006 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
1.7% |
0.01693610 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_3
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Tends to be lazy
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
…tends to be lazy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
964 |
37.1% |
0.37105466 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
674 |
25.9% |
0.25943033 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
406 |
15.6% |
0.15627406 |
4 |
Agree a little |
407 |
15.7% |
0.15665897 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
96 |
3.7% |
0.03695150 |
97 |
Not answered |
51 |
2% |
0.01963048 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_4
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Relaxed, handles stress well
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… is relaxed, handles stress well
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
87 |
3.3% |
0.03348730 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
454 |
17.5% |
0.17474981 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
420 |
16.2% |
0.16166282 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1046 |
40.3% |
0.40261740 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
546 |
21% |
0.21016166 |
97 |
Not answered |
45 |
1.7% |
0.01732102 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_5
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Has few artistic interests
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… has few artistic interests
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
773 |
29.8% |
0.29753657 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
780 |
30% |
0.30023095 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
421 |
16.2% |
0.16204773 |
4 |
Agree a little |
423 |
16.3% |
0.16281755 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
153 |
5.9% |
0.05889145 |
97 |
Not answered |
48 |
1.8% |
0.01847575 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_6
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Outgoing, sociable
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… is outgoing, sociable
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
126 |
4.8% |
0.04849885 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
352 |
13.5% |
0.13548884 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
414 |
15.9% |
0.15935335 |
4 |
Agree a little |
923 |
35.5% |
0.35527329 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
747 |
28.8% |
0.28752887 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
1.4% |
0.01385681 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_7
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Tends to find fault with others
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… tends to find fault with others
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
442 |
17% |
0.17013087 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
778 |
29.9% |
0.29946112 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
755 |
29.1% |
0.29060816 |
4 |
Agree a little |
491 |
18.9% |
0.18899153 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
81 |
3.1% |
0.03117783 |
97 |
Not answered |
51 |
2% |
0.01963048 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_8
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Does a thorough job
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… does a thorough job
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
44 |
1.7% |
0.01693610 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
47 |
1.8% |
0.01809084 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
194 |
7.5% |
0.07467283 |
4 |
Agree a little |
971 |
37.4% |
0.37374904 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
1295 |
49.8% |
0.49846035 |
97 |
Not answered |
47 |
1.8% |
0.01809084 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_9
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Get nervous easily
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… get nervous easily
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
763 |
29.4% |
0.29368745 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
735 |
28.3% |
0.28290993 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
475 |
18.3% |
0.18283295 |
4 |
Agree a little |
471 |
18.1% |
0.18129330 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
106 |
4.1% |
0.04080062 |
97 |
Not answered |
48 |
1.8% |
0.01847575 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_10
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Has an active imagination
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… has an active imagination
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
198 |
7.6% |
0.07621247 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
322 |
12.4% |
0.12394149 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
630 |
24.2% |
0.24249423 |
4 |
Agree a little |
870 |
33.5% |
0.33487298 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
527 |
20.3% |
0.20284834 |
97 |
Not answered |
51 |
2% |
0.01963048 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_1
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Ideally some groups in society should be on top and others on the bottom
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
An ideal society requires some groups to be on top and others to be on the bottom
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
1538 |
31.9% |
0.31908714 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
905 |
18.8% |
0.18775934 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
622 |
12.9% |
0.12904564 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
640 |
13.3% |
0.13278008 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
596 |
12.4% |
0.12365145 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
398 |
8.3% |
0.08257261 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
94 |
2% |
0.01950207 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.6% |
0.00560166 |
98 |
Not asked |
5601 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_2
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups.
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
2875 |
59.6% |
0.596473029 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
563 |
11.7% |
0.116804979 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
314 |
6.5% |
0.065145228 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
526 |
10.9% |
0.109128631 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
332 |
6.9% |
0.068879668 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
154 |
3.2% |
0.031950207 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
27 |
0.6% |
0.005601660 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
0.6% |
0.006016598 |
98 |
Not asked |
5601 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_3
Variable label:
|
Assertion: No one group should dominate in society
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
No one group should dominate in society.
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
376 |
7.8% |
0.078008299 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
262 |
5.4% |
0.054356846 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
288 |
6% |
0.059751037 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
500 |
10.4% |
0.103734440 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
453 |
9.4% |
0.093983402 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
895 |
18.6% |
0.185684647 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
2015 |
41.8% |
0.418049793 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
0.6% |
0.006431535 |
98 |
Not asked |
5601 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_4
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top.
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
210 |
4.4% |
0.043568465 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
366 |
7.6% |
0.075933610 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
474 |
9.8% |
0.098340249 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
673 |
14% |
0.139626556 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
520 |
10.8% |
0.107883817 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
1001 |
20.8% |
0.207676349 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
1528 |
31.7% |
0.317012448 |
97 |
Not answered |
48 |
1% |
0.009958506 |
98 |
Not asked |
5601 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_5
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Equality between groups should not be our main goal
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
Equality between groups should not be our main goal.
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
1057 |
21.9% |
0.219294606 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
958 |
19.9% |
0.198755187 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
532 |
11% |
0.110373444 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
817 |
17% |
0.169502075 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
676 |
14% |
0.140248963 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
486 |
10.1% |
0.100829876 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
251 |
5.2% |
0.052074689 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.9% |
0.008921162 |
98 |
Not asked |
5601 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_6
Variable label:
|
Assertion: It is unjust to try to make groups equal
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
It is unjust to try to make groups equal.
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
1132 |
23.5% |
0.23485477 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
868 |
18% |
0.18008299 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
530 |
11% |
0.10995851 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
1000 |
20.7% |
0.20746888 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
629 |
13% |
0.13049793 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
422 |
8.8% |
0.08755187 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
181 |
3.8% |
0.03755187 |
97 |
Not answered |
58 |
1.2% |
0.01203320 |
98 |
Not asked |
5601 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_7
Variable label:
|
Assertion: We should equalize conditions for different groups
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
We should do what we can to equalize conditions for different groups.
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
42 |
0.9% |
0.008713693 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
124 |
2.6% |
0.025726141 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
282 |
5.9% |
0.058506224 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
469 |
9.7% |
0.097302905 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
887 |
18.4% |
0.184024896 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
1168 |
24.2% |
0.242323651 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
1812 |
37.6% |
0.375933610 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
0.7% |
0.007468880 |
98 |
Not asked |
5601 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_8
Variable label:
|
Assertion: We should give all groups an equal chance to succeed
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
We should work to give all groups an equal chance to succeed.
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
20 |
0.4% |
0.004149378 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
21 |
0.4% |
0.004356846 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
41 |
0.9% |
0.008506224 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
226 |
4.7% |
0.046887967 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
425 |
8.8% |
0.088174274 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
916 |
19% |
0.190041494 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
3144 |
65.2% |
0.652282158 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.6% |
0.005601660 |
98 |
Not asked |
5601 |
|
NA |
r16bk42
Variable label:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
None |
2061 |
79.3% |
0.793302540 |
1 |
1 |
224 |
8.6% |
0.086220169 |
2 |
2 |
223 |
8.6% |
0.085835258 |
3 |
3 |
66 |
2.5% |
0.025404157 |
4 |
4 |
15 |
0.6% |
0.005773672 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
6 |
6 or more |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.3% |
0.003464203 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r17bk42
Variable label:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert < 15]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
None |
4561 |
81.2% |
0.8118547526 |
1 |
1 |
469 |
8.3% |
0.0834816661 |
2 |
2 |
445 |
7.9% |
0.0792096832 |
3 |
3 |
102 |
1.8% |
0.0181559274 |
4 |
4 |
10 |
0.2% |
0.0017799929 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
0% |
0.0001779993 |
6 |
6 or more |
1 |
0% |
0.0001779993 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
0.5% |
0.0051619794 |
98 |
Not asked |
4803 |
|
NA |
r18bk42
Variable label:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 at home living with you, in that case how many?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
None |
912 |
77.9% |
0.778821520 |
1 |
1 |
100 |
8.5% |
0.085397096 |
2 |
2 |
115 |
9.8% |
0.098206661 |
3 |
3 |
32 |
2.7% |
0.027327071 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003415884 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000853971 |
6 |
6 or more |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.005977797 |
98 |
Not asked |
9250 |
|
NA |
r11bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Recoded from source variable r11bk40]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
3161 |
64.3% |
0.642871670 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
58 |
1.2% |
0.011795810 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
183 |
3.7% |
0.037217816 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
35 |
0.7% |
0.007118161 |
5 |
Islam |
12 |
0.2% |
0.002440513 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
1438 |
29.2% |
0.292454749 |
97 |
No answer |
30 |
0.6% |
0.006101281 |
98 |
Not asked |
5504 |
|
NA |
r14bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Belong to a religion or religious denomination. [Recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
[Recoded from source variable r14bk40]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
582 |
64.8% |
0.648106904 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
11 |
1.2% |
0.012249443 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
36 |
4% |
0.040089087 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001113586 |
5 |
Islam |
4 |
0.4% |
0.004454343 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
256 |
28.5% |
0.285077951 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
0.9% |
0.008908686 |
98 |
Not asked |
9523 |
|
NA |
r16bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. Recoded from source variable r16bk40]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
1605 |
61.8% |
0.617782910 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
33 |
1.3% |
0.012702079 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
100 |
3.8% |
0.038491147 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
19 |
0.7% |
0.007313318 |
5 |
Islam |
16 |
0.6% |
0.006158584 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities |
820 |
31.6% |
0.315627406 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001924557 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r18bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recoded from source variable r18bk40. Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
713 |
60.9% |
0.608881298 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
11 |
0.9% |
0.009393681 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
50 |
4.3% |
0.042698548 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
11 |
0.9% |
0.009393681 |
5 |
Islam |
11 |
0.9% |
0.009393681 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities |
368 |
31.4% |
0.314261315 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.6% |
0.005977797 |
98 |
Not asked |
9250 |
|
NA |
r11bk41
Variable label:
|
Attends religious meetings
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
5 |
0.1% |
0.001016880 |
2 |
More than once a week |
83 |
1.7% |
0.016880212 |
3 |
Once a week |
127 |
2.6% |
0.025828757 |
4 |
At least once a month |
239 |
4.9% |
0.048606874 |
5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
858 |
17.4% |
0.174496644 |
6 |
Less frequently |
1057 |
21.5% |
0.214968477 |
7 |
Never |
2517 |
51.2% |
0.511897498 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
0.6% |
0.006304657 |
98 |
Not asked |
5504 |
|
NA |
r14bk41
Variable label:
|
How often attend religious meetings, aside from special occasions.
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001113586 |
2 |
More than once a week |
6 |
0.7% |
0.006681514 |
3 |
Once a week |
33 |
3.7% |
0.036748330 |
4 |
At least once a month |
61 |
6.8% |
0.067928731 |
5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
156 |
17.4% |
0.173719376 |
6 |
Less frequently |
208 |
23.2% |
0.231625835 |
7 |
Never |
425 |
47.3% |
0.473273942 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.9% |
0.008908686 |
98 |
Not asked |
9523 |
|
NA |
r16bk41
Variable label:
|
How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
1 |
0% |
0.0003849115 |
2 |
More than once a week |
45 |
1.7% |
0.0173210162 |
3 |
Once a week |
49 |
1.9% |
0.0188606620 |
4 |
Once or a few times a month |
99 |
3.8% |
0.0381062356 |
5 |
Several times a year |
272 |
10.5% |
0.1046959199 |
6 |
Once a year |
364 |
14% |
0.1401077752 |
7 |
Less than once a year |
398 |
15.3% |
0.1531947652 |
8 |
Never |
1364 |
52.5% |
0.5250192456 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.2% |
0.0023094688 |
98 |
Not asked |
7823 |
|
NA |
r18bk41
Variable label:
|
How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
2 |
More than once a week |
13 |
1.1% |
0.011101623 |
3 |
Once a week |
25 |
2.1% |
0.021349274 |
4 |
Once or a few times a month |
45 |
3.8% |
0.038428693 |
5 |
Several times a year |
109 |
9.3% |
0.093082835 |
6 |
Once a year |
180 |
15.4% |
0.153714774 |
7 |
Less than once a year |
196 |
16.7% |
0.167378309 |
8 |
Never |
596 |
50.9% |
0.508966695 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.005977797 |
98 |
Not asked |
9250 |
|
NA |
r17pkby2
Variable label:
|
Whether your local environment has become safer the last couple of years
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much safer |
129 |
1.6% |
0.016036798 |
2 |
Somewhat safer |
610 |
7.6% |
0.075832919 |
3 |
No change in safety |
4783 |
59.5% |
0.594604674 |
4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
2191 |
27.2% |
0.272376927 |
5 |
Much more unsafe |
293 |
3.6% |
0.036424664 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
0.5% |
0.004724018 |
98 |
Not asked |
2377 |
|
NA |
r18pkby2
Variable label:
|
How much safer/unsafe has your local environment become the past years?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much safer |
27 |
2.3% |
0.023057216 |
2 |
Somewhat safer |
125 |
10.7% |
0.106746371 |
3 |
No change in safety |
755 |
64.5% |
0.644748079 |
4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
237 |
20.2% |
0.202391119 |
5 |
Much more unsafe |
24 |
2% |
0.020495303 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002561913 |
98 |
Not asked |
9250 |
|
NA |
r17pk52
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More measures to protect citizens from terrorist threats, even at the expense of privacy
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
746 |
9.3% |
0.092739930 |
2 |
Agree |
1731 |
21.5% |
0.215191447 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
2270 |
28.2% |
0.282197911 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
936 |
11.6% |
0.116360020 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
976 |
12.1% |
0.121332670 |
6 |
Disagree |
939 |
11.7% |
0.116732969 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
428 |
5.3% |
0.053207360 |
97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.2% |
0.002237693 |
98 |
Not asked |
2377 |
|
NA |
r17pkdv55
Variable label:
|
Assertion: It should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools
|
Pre-question text:
|
Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Christian faith.
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
127 |
1.6% |
0.015788165 |
2 |
Agree |
640 |
8% |
0.079562407 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
855 |
10.6% |
0.106290403 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
931 |
11.6% |
0.115738439 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
815 |
10.1% |
0.101317752 |
6 |
Disagree |
1166 |
14.5% |
0.144952760 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1348 |
16.8% |
0.167578319 |
8 |
Neither of these should be possible |
2141 |
26.6% |
0.266161114 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.3% |
0.002610641 |
98 |
Not asked |
2377 |
|
NA |
r17pk55
Variable label:
|
Assertion: The number of municipalities should be reduced further
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions:
|
Literal question:
|
Norway now has 356 municipalities instead of 422 as before. The number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10421] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
734 |
9.1% |
0.091248135 |
2 |
Agree |
1256 |
15.6% |
0.156141223 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1321 |
16.4% |
0.164221780 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1461 |
18.2% |
0.181626057 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
905 |
11.3% |
0.112506216 |
6 |
Disagree |
1380 |
17.2% |
0.171556440 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
958 |
11.9% |
0.119094978 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
0.4% |
0.003605172 |
98 |
Not asked |
2377 |
|
NA |