Citation
Primary investigators
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen (UiB)
|
Sveinung Arnesen
|
Coordinator, NORCE
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
Lise Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
Susanne Bygnes
|
UiB
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
Kristine Bærøe
|
UiB
|
Cornelius Cappelen
|
UiB
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
UiB
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
Yvette Peters
|
UiB
|
Arjan Schakel
|
UiB
|
Endre Tvinnereim
|
UiB
|
Producers
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
Amund Eikrem
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company Ideas 2 Evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates is available at www.medborger.uib.no http://www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Enhet: Individual
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling Procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in six waves: In wave 1, 4.870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3, 5.623 members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8, 4245 new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8). In wave 11, 2069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11). In wave 14, 2036 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 14). In wave 16, 5163 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 16).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000 individuals. In wave 11 and 14, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn. In wave 16, the gross sample was 34 000.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
34 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment.
Recruitment of new members to the panel was completed in several steps.
First, an invitation letter was sent to everyone in the sample. The invitation letter contained the following information: a) description of the project; b) current privacy and procedural privacy guidelines; c) timeframe for the project; d) participants right to opt out of the panel; e) contact information to the project mangers ; f) a unique login code and URL for the Norwegian Citizens' Panel's website; g) estimated time to complete the survey (15 minutes).
To maximize the recruitment rate, an incentive has been used in the form of a travel gift card. The value of the travel gift card is 25,000 NOK. To participate in the drawing of the gift card, it is required that the e-mail address is provided. Information about the lottery is included in all correspondence with the respondents, with the exception of the final reminder via text message.
The invitation letter was posted on October 29, 2019. A reminder was sent to those respondents who a) had not logged into the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. New respondents received only one reminder, either via a postcard or a text message. The text message was sent to respondents under the age of 60. The postcard was sent to respondents over the age of 60 and to those without a registered mobile number. Respondents were invited to participate in the Norwegian Citizens' Panel with reference to the invitation letter. The postcard was posted on November 12, 2019. The login code was also given in the postcard. The text message was sent out on November 13, 2019. The text message contained both a login code and a direct link to the survey.
Data collection among old panel members was done in parallel with the recruitment of new respondents. The invitation mail was sent out on October 31, 2019. The first, second, and third reminders were sent to the respondents' email, on November 7, November 18, and November 21, 2019, respectively. Panel members with a registered mobile number received the last reminder in form of a text message.
Wave 16 ended November 27th.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent's geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
No changes registred.
Dataset contents
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 16 - v-101.sav
|
# Cases
|
12904
|
# Variables
|
490
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16interview_start
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16interview_end
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16rekruttert
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Wave1 |
1712 |
13.3% |
0.13267204 |
3 |
Wave3 |
1902 |
14.7% |
0.14739616 |
8 |
Wave8 |
1886 |
14.6% |
0.14615623 |
11 |
Wave11 |
1143 |
8.9% |
0.08857719 |
14 |
Wave14 |
1331 |
10.3% |
0.10314631 |
16 |
Wave16 |
4930 |
38.2% |
0.38205208 |
r16browsertype
Variable label:
|
[ Browertype used by respondent]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Browertype used by respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16browserversion
Variable label:
|
[ Browser version used by respondent]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Browser version used by respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16mobil
Variable label:
|
[ Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
other |
8018 |
62.1% |
0.6213577 |
1 |
mobile |
4886 |
37.9% |
0.3786423 |
r16opplosning
Variable label:
|
[ Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16enhetstype
Variable label:
|
[ Determines respondents device type.]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Determines respondents device type.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
PC |
8193 |
63.5% |
0.634919405 |
2 |
Touch |
4656 |
36.1% |
0.360818351 |
3 |
Generic |
55 |
0.4% |
0.004262244 |
r16advancedwifeaturesenabled
Variable label:
|
[ Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16getrenderingmode
Variable label:
|
[ Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16group
Variable label:
|
[Subgroup in wave 16. Partly randomized. Group 5 corresponds to group 1 in wave 15. Respondents recruited in wave 16 are randomized into groups 6 or 7, while other respondents are randomized into groups 1, 2, 3 or 4. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Subgroup in wave 16. Partly randomized. Group 5 corresponds to group 1 in wave 15. Respondents recruited in wave 16 are randomized into groups 6 or 7, while other respondents are randomized into groups 1, 2, 3 or 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
g1 |
1764 |
13.7% |
0.13670180 |
2 |
g2 |
1653 |
12.8% |
0.12809981 |
3 |
g3 |
1728 |
13.4% |
0.13391197 |
4 |
g4 |
1696 |
13.1% |
0.13143211 |
5 |
g5 |
1133 |
8.8% |
0.08780223 |
6 |
g6 |
2473 |
19.2% |
0.19164600 |
7 |
g7 |
2457 |
19% |
0.19040608 |
r16tdr1
Variable label:
|
In which county did you spend most of your upbringing?
|
Literal question:
|
In which county did you spend most of your upbringing?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-20]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Akershus (Viken from 2020) |
179 |
10.1% |
0.10147392 |
2 |
Aust-Agder (Agder from 2020) |
37 |
2.1% |
0.02097506 |
3 |
Buskerud (Viken from 2020) |
95 |
5.4% |
0.05385488 |
4 |
Finnmark (Troms and Finnmark fra 2020) |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01077098 |
5 |
Hedmark (Innlandet from 2020) |
61 |
3.5% |
0.03458050 |
6 |
Hordaland (Vestland from 2020) |
208 |
11.8% |
0.11791383 |
7 |
Møre og Romsdal |
95 |
5.4% |
0.05385488 |
8 |
Nord-Trøndelag (now Trøndelag) |
54 |
3.1% |
0.03061224 |
9 |
Nordland |
96 |
5.4% |
0.05442177 |
10 |
Oppland (Innlandet from 2020) |
64 |
3.6% |
0.03628118 |
11 |
Oslo |
167 |
9.5% |
0.09467120 |
12 |
Rogaland |
148 |
8.4% |
0.08390023 |
13 |
Sogn og Fjordane (Vestland from 2020) |
37 |
2.1% |
0.02097506 |
14 |
Sør-Trøndelag (now Trøndelag) |
109 |
6.2% |
0.06179138 |
15 |
Telemark (Vestfold and Telemark from 2020) |
57 |
3.2% |
0.03231293 |
16 |
Troms (Troms and Finnmark from 2020) |
68 |
3.9% |
0.03854875 |
17 |
Vest-Agder (Agder from 2020) |
54 |
3.1% |
0.03061224 |
18 |
Vestfold (Vestfold and Telemark from 2020) |
76 |
4.3% |
0.04308390 |
19 |
Østfold (Viken from 2020) |
79 |
4.5% |
0.04478458 |
20 |
Other |
61 |
3.5% |
0.03458050 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr3_1
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The neighbourhood/village you live in
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
Literal question:
|
The neighbourhood or village you live in
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong connection |
589 |
33.4% |
0.33390023 |
2 |
Connection |
614 |
34.8% |
0.34807256 |
3 |
Some connection |
350 |
19.8% |
0.19841270 |
4 |
Small connection |
150 |
8.5% |
0.08503401 |
5 |
No connection |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01587302 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
1.9% |
0.01870748 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr3_2
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The municipality you live in
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
Literal question:
|
The municipality you live in
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong connection |
611 |
34.6% |
0.346371882 |
2 |
Connection |
683 |
38.7% |
0.387188209 |
3 |
Some connection |
308 |
17.5% |
0.174603175 |
4 |
Small connection |
121 |
6.9% |
0.068594104 |
5 |
No connection |
17 |
1% |
0.009637188 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.4% |
0.013605442 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr3_3
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The county you live in
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
Literal question:
|
The county you live in
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong connection |
410 |
23.2% |
0.23242630 |
2 |
Connection |
668 |
37.9% |
0.37868481 |
3 |
Some connection |
372 |
21.1% |
0.21088435 |
4 |
Small connection |
226 |
12.8% |
0.12811791 |
5 |
No connection |
46 |
2.6% |
0.02607710 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
2.4% |
0.02380952 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr3_4
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The region (part of the country) you live in
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
Literal question:
|
The region (part of the country) you live in
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong connection |
532 |
30.2% |
0.30158730 |
2 |
Connection |
657 |
37.2% |
0.37244898 |
3 |
Some connection |
346 |
19.6% |
0.19614512 |
4 |
Small connection |
157 |
8.9% |
0.08900227 |
5 |
No connection |
35 |
2% |
0.01984127 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.1% |
0.02097506 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr3_5
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
Literal question:
|
Norway
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong connection |
1186 |
67.2% |
0.672335601 |
2 |
Connection |
440 |
24.9% |
0.249433107 |
3 |
Some connection |
75 |
4.3% |
0.042517007 |
4 |
Small connection |
23 |
1.3% |
0.013038549 |
5 |
No connection |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001133787 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.2% |
0.021541950 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr3_6
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: The Nordic countries
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
Literal question:
|
The Nordic countries
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong connection |
324 |
18.4% |
0.18367347 |
2 |
Connection |
724 |
41% |
0.41043084 |
3 |
Some connection |
438 |
24.8% |
0.24829932 |
4 |
Small connection |
183 |
10.4% |
0.10374150 |
5 |
No connection |
45 |
2.6% |
0.02551020 |
97 |
Not answered |
50 |
2.8% |
0.02834467 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr3_7
Variable label:
|
How strong is your connection to: Europe
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
Literal question:
|
Europe
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong connection |
321 |
18.2% |
0.18197279 |
2 |
Connection |
651 |
36.9% |
0.36904762 |
3 |
Some connection |
455 |
25.8% |
0.25793651 |
4 |
Small connection |
243 |
13.8% |
0.13775510 |
5 |
No connection |
50 |
2.8% |
0.02834467 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.5% |
0.02494331 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr20a
Variable label:
|
Has your municipality recently been merged with neighbouring municipalities?
|
Literal question:
|
Has your municipality recently been merged with one or more neighbouring municipalities? (or will be merged from 2020)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
656 |
37.2% |
0.37188209 |
2 |
No |
1029 |
58.3% |
0.58333333 |
3 |
Don't know |
76 |
4.3% |
0.04308390 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.00170068 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr20b
Variable label:
|
Do you support the merger of municipalities?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you support the merger of municipalities?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1086 |
61.6% |
0.61564626 |
2 |
No |
644 |
36.5% |
0.36507937 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
1.9% |
0.01927438 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr20c
Variable label:
|
Has your county authority recently been merged with neighbouring county authorities?
|
Literal question:
|
Has your county authority recently been merged with one or more neighbouring county authorities? (or will be merged from 2020)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1085 |
61.5% |
0.615079365 |
2 |
No |
531 |
30.1% |
0.301020408 |
3 |
Don't know |
143 |
8.1% |
0.081065760 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002834467 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr20d
Variable label:
|
Do you support the merger of county authorities?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you support the merger of county authorities?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
820 |
46.5% |
0.46485261 |
2 |
No |
912 |
51.7% |
0.51700680 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
1.8% |
0.01814059 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr_sentral
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban Norway
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion? Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
498 |
28.2% |
0.28231293 |
2 |
Agree |
491 |
27.8% |
0.27834467 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
382 |
21.7% |
0.21655329 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
165 |
9.4% |
0.09353741 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
88 |
5% |
0.04988662 |
6 |
Disagree |
109 |
6.2% |
0.06179138 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
1.8% |
0.01757370 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr18
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Should intervene to even out inequalities between different parts of the country
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following assertion: Central authorities should intervene with measures to even out economic inequalities that exist between different parts of the country?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
346 |
19.6% |
0.196145125 |
2 |
Agree |
613 |
34.8% |
0.347505669 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
485 |
27.5% |
0.274943311 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
161 |
9.1% |
0.091269841 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
84 |
4.8% |
0.047619048 |
6 |
Disagree |
59 |
3.3% |
0.033446712 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
0.7% |
0.006802721 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002267574 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr19
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Resource transfer from rich to poor parts of the country needed
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following assertion: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
326 |
18.5% |
0.184807256 |
2 |
Agree |
604 |
34.2% |
0.342403628 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
523 |
29.6% |
0.296485261 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
138 |
7.8% |
0.078231293 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
91 |
5.2% |
0.051587302 |
6 |
Disagree |
53 |
3% |
0.030045351 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
1.2% |
0.011904762 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004535147 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16polkom1_1
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Extremely dissatisfied |
16 |
0.3% |
0.003245436 |
1 |
1 |
29 |
0.6% |
0.005882353 |
2 |
2 |
59 |
1.2% |
0.011967546 |
3 |
3 |
155 |
3.1% |
0.031440162 |
4 |
4 |
169 |
3.4% |
0.034279919 |
5 |
5 |
400 |
8.1% |
0.081135903 |
6 |
6 |
495 |
10% |
0.100405680 |
7 |
7 |
1143 |
23.2% |
0.231845842 |
8 |
8 |
1622 |
32.9% |
0.329006085 |
9 |
9 |
596 |
12.1% |
0.120892495 |
10 |
10 - Extremely satisfied |
234 |
4.7% |
0.047464503 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.2% |
0.002434077 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16polkom2_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 6 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects either r16polkom2a or r16polkom2b.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 6 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects either r16polkom2a or r16polkom2b.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4930] [Invalid:7974] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Chooses R16POLKOM2a |
2435 |
49.4% |
0.4939148 |
2 |
Chooses R16POLKOM2b |
2495 |
50.6% |
0.5060852 |
Sysmiss |
|
7974 |
|
NA |
r16polkom2a
Variable label:
|
Open: Your thoughts when you hear the word democracy [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think of when you hear the word democracy?
|
Post-question:
|
You can write as much or as little as you want, preferably a few sentences, or just a few words if you would prefer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16polkom2_ran = 1. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16polkom2b
Variable label:
|
Open: Explanation [R16POLKOM2a] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
You have just answered a question about how satisfied you are with the way democracy works in Norway. You answered [r16polkom1_1] on a scale of 0 (Extremely dissatisfied) to 10 (Extremely satisfied).
|
Literal question:
|
Can you please explain this answer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16polkom2_ran = 2 and r16polkom1_1 is answered. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16polkom3
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: In general, immigrants are good for the Norwegian economy
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are different opinions about immigrants living in Norway. When we use the word “immigrants” we mean people from other countries who come to settle here. To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of these statements?
|
Literal question:
|
In general, immigrants are good for the Norwegian economy.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
350 |
7.1% |
0.070993915 |
2 |
Agree |
2131 |
43.2% |
0.432251521 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1604 |
32.5% |
0.325354970 |
4 |
Disagree |
670 |
13.6% |
0.135902637 |
5 |
Strongly disagree |
167 |
3.4% |
0.033874239 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001622718 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16polkom4
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: In general, Norwegian culture is undermined by immigrants
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are different opinions about immigrants living in Norway. When we use the word “immigrants” we mean people from other countries who come to settle here. To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of these statements?
|
Literal question:
|
In general, Norwegian culture is undermined by immigrants.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
233 |
4.7% |
0.047261663 |
2 |
Agree |
1004 |
20.4% |
0.203651116 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1112 |
22.6% |
0.225557809 |
4 |
Disagree |
1859 |
37.7% |
0.377079108 |
5 |
Strongly disagree |
715 |
14.5% |
0.145030426 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001419878 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16polkom5
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Increased crime is associated with immigrants
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are different opinions about immigrants living in Norway. When we use the word “immigrants” we mean people from other countries who come to settle here. To what extent do you agree or disagree with each of these statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Increased crime is associated with immigrants.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
568 |
11.5% |
0.115212982 |
2 |
Agree |
2082 |
42.2% |
0.422312373 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1385 |
28.1% |
0.280933063 |
4 |
Disagree |
720 |
14.6% |
0.146044625 |
5 |
Strongly disagree |
171 |
3.5% |
0.034685598 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.1% |
0.000811359 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16polkom6_1
Variable label:
|
Your opinion: Percentage of the Norwegian people that want to accept fewer refugees?
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, what percentage of the Norwegian people believe that it is a good proposal for Norway to accept fewer refugees?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0% |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002426203 |
1 |
10% |
42 |
1.7% |
0.016983421 |
2 |
20% |
153 |
6.2% |
0.061868176 |
3 |
30% |
335 |
13.5% |
0.135463000 |
4 |
40% |
336 |
13.6% |
0.135867368 |
5 |
50% |
366 |
14.8% |
0.147998383 |
6 |
60% |
483 |
19.5% |
0.195309341 |
7 |
70% |
429 |
17.3% |
0.173473514 |
8 |
80% |
242 |
9.8% |
0.097856854 |
9 |
90% |
64 |
2.6% |
0.025879499 |
10 |
100% |
11 |
0.4% |
0.004448039 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002426203 |
98 |
Not asked |
10431 |
|
NA |
r16polkom7_1
Variable label:
|
Your opinion: Percentage of politicians that want to accept fewer refugees
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, what percentage of politicians believe that it is a good proposal for Norway to accept fewer refugees?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0% |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001213101 |
1 |
10% |
126 |
5.1% |
0.050950263 |
2 |
20% |
295 |
11.9% |
0.119288314 |
3 |
30% |
397 |
16.1% |
0.160533765 |
4 |
40% |
452 |
18.3% |
0.182773959 |
5 |
50% |
470 |
19% |
0.190052568 |
6 |
60% |
330 |
13.3% |
0.133441165 |
7 |
70% |
211 |
8.5% |
0.085321472 |
8 |
80% |
118 |
4.8% |
0.047715326 |
9 |
90% |
38 |
1.5% |
0.015365952 |
10 |
100% |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001617469 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.2% |
0.011726648 |
98 |
Not asked |
10431 |
|
NA |
r16polkom10
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: To accept fewer refugees to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it is a good or bad proposal that Norway accepts fewer refugees?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good proposal |
249 |
10.1% |
0.100687424 |
2 |
Good proposal |
602 |
24.3% |
0.243429034 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
694 |
28.1% |
0.280630813 |
4 |
Bad proposal |
722 |
29.2% |
0.291953093 |
5 |
Very bad proposal |
202 |
8.2% |
0.081682167 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001617469 |
98 |
Not asked |
10431 |
|
NA |
r16polkom11
Variable label:
|
How important is the refugee question for you?
|
Literal question:
|
How important is the refugee question for you?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
286 |
11.6% |
0.115649009 |
2 |
Quite important |
1232 |
49.8% |
0.498180348 |
3 |
Neither important nor unimportant |
609 |
24.6% |
0.246259604 |
4 |
Not so important |
320 |
12.9% |
0.129397493 |
5 |
Not important at all |
14 |
0.6% |
0.005661140 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.5% |
0.004852406 |
98 |
Not asked |
10431 |
|
NA |
r16polkom8
Variable label:
|
Statement: The people, not politicians, should make the most important decisions
|
Literal question:
|
Please consider the following statements: The people, not the politicians, should make the most important political decisions.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
335 |
13.5% |
0.135463000 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
813 |
32.9% |
0.328750505 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
376 |
15.2% |
0.152042054 |
4 |
Somewhat disagree |
758 |
30.7% |
0.306510311 |
5 |
Completely disagree |
187 |
7.6% |
0.075616660 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001617469 |
98 |
Not asked |
10431 |
|
NA |
r16polkom9
Variable label:
|
Statement: Should be possible for ordinary people to initiate national referendums
|
Literal question:
|
It should be possible for ordinary people to take the initiative regarding national referendums.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
398 |
16.1% |
0.16093813 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
726 |
29.4% |
0.29357056 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
431 |
17.4% |
0.17428225 |
4 |
Somewhat disagree |
592 |
23.9% |
0.23938536 |
5 |
Completely disagree |
319 |
12.9% |
0.12899313 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.3% |
0.00283057 |
98 |
Not asked |
10431 |
|
NA |
r16polint
Variable label:
|
How interested are you in politics?
|
Literal question:
|
How interested are you in politics?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
645 |
13.1% |
0.130831643 |
2 |
Quite interested |
2269 |
46% |
0.460243408 |
3 |
Slightly interested |
1847 |
37.5% |
0.374645030 |
4 |
Not interested at all |
165 |
3.3% |
0.033468560 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.1% |
0.000811359 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16pk8_1
Variable label:
|
Your position on the political left-right scale
|
Pre-question text:
|
People often talk about “left wing” and “right wing” politics. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are very much politically left wing, while 10 represents those who are very much politically right wing.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 - Left wing |
81 |
1.6% |
0.016430020 |
2 |
1 |
192 |
3.9% |
0.038945233 |
3 |
2 |
596 |
12.1% |
0.120892495 |
4 |
3 |
810 |
16.4% |
0.164300203 |
5 |
4 |
547 |
11.1% |
0.110953347 |
6 |
5 |
835 |
16.9% |
0.169371197 |
7 |
6 |
546 |
11.1% |
0.110750507 |
8 |
7 |
633 |
12.8% |
0.128397566 |
9 |
8 |
443 |
9% |
0.089858012 |
10 |
9 |
125 |
2.5% |
0.025354970 |
11 |
10 - Right wing |
88 |
1.8% |
0.017849899 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
0.7% |
0.006896552 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng1
Variable label:
|
How often do you use a car as a means of transport during a typical month?
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you use a car as a means of transport during a typical month?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
616 |
14.9% |
0.1492971401 |
2 |
Daily |
1556 |
37.7% |
0.3771206980 |
3 |
Weekly |
1133 |
27.5% |
0.2746000969 |
4 |
A few times a month |
415 |
10.1% |
0.1005816772 |
5 |
Less than once a month |
229 |
5.6% |
0.0555016966 |
6 |
Never |
176 |
4.3% |
0.0426563257 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0% |
0.0002423655 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng2
Variable label:
|
How often do you use public transport during a typical month?
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you use public transport during a typical month?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
359 |
8.7% |
0.087009210 |
2 |
Daily |
321 |
7.8% |
0.077799321 |
3 |
Weekly |
578 |
14% |
0.140087252 |
4 |
A few times a month |
868 |
21% |
0.210373243 |
5 |
Less than once a month |
1451 |
35.2% |
0.351672322 |
6 |
Never |
521 |
12.6% |
0.126272419 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.7% |
0.006786234 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng3
Variable label:
|
How often do you cycle during a typical month?
|
Literal question:
|
How often do you cycle during a typical month?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
124 |
3% |
0.030053320 |
2 |
Daily |
282 |
6.8% |
0.068347067 |
3 |
Weekly |
475 |
11.5% |
0.115123606 |
4 |
A few times a month |
503 |
12.2% |
0.121909840 |
5 |
Less than once a month |
1038 |
25.2% |
0.251575376 |
6 |
Never |
1690 |
41% |
0.409597673 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.3% |
0.003393117 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng4_1
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Drive a petrol or diesel car
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or options you use most. I:
|
Literal question:
|
Drive a petrol or diesel car
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Drive a petrol or diesel car |
2155 |
52.2% |
0.5222976 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1971 |
47.8% |
0.4777024 |
r16bompeng4_2
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Drive a hybrid car
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or options you use most. I:
|
Literal question:
|
Drive a hybrid car
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Drive a hybrid car |
349 |
8.5% |
0.08458556 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
3777 |
91.5% |
0.91541444 |
r16bompeng4_3
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Drive an electric car
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or options you use most. I:
|
Literal question:
|
Drive an electric car
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Drive an electric car |
462 |
11.2% |
0.1119729 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
3664 |
88.8% |
0.8880271 |
r16bompeng4_4
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Take the bus
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or options you use most. I:
|
Literal question:
|
Take the bus
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Take the bus |
791 |
19.2% |
0.1917111 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
3335 |
80.8% |
0.8082889 |
r16bompeng4_5
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Take the tram or train
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or options you use most. I:
|
Literal question:
|
Take the tram or train
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Take the tram or train |
632 |
15.3% |
0.153175 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
3494 |
84.7% |
0.846825 |
r16bompeng4_6
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Take a boat
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or options you use most. I:
|
Literal question:
|
Take a boat
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Take a boat |
54 |
1.3% |
0.01308774 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
4072 |
98.7% |
0.98691226 |
r16bompeng4_7
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Walk
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or options you use most. I:
|
Literal question:
|
Walk
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Walk |
1589 |
38.5% |
0.3851188 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2537 |
61.5% |
0.6148812 |
r16bompeng4_8
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Cycle
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or options you use most. I:
|
Literal question:
|
Cycle
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Cycle |
702 |
17% |
0.1701406 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
3424 |
83% |
0.8298594 |
r16bompeng4_9
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Kick scooter
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or options you use most. I:
|
Literal question:
|
Kick scooter
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Kick scooter |
45 |
1.1% |
0.01090645 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
4081 |
98.9% |
0.98909355 |
r16bompeng4_10
Variable label:
|
Mode of transport to daily tasks: Other
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or options you use most. I:
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other: |
101 |
2.4% |
0.02447891 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
4025 |
97.6% |
0.97552109 |
r16bompeng4_10_other
Variable label:
|
Open [R16BOMPENG4_10] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you usually commute to your daily tasks? Select the option or options you use most. I:
|
Literal question:
|
Annet:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16bompeng5
Variable label:
|
Do you drive through tollbooths daily?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you drive a car through one or more tollbooths on your way to your daily tasks?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6 and r16bompeng4 = 1 | 2 | 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
999 |
35.4% |
0.3540042523 |
2 |
No |
1821 |
64.5% |
0.6452870305 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0007087172 |
98 |
Not asked |
10082 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng6
Variable label:
|
Approximately how much did you pay in road tolls last month?
|
Literal question:
|
Approximately how much did you pay in road tolls last month?
|
Post-question:
|
Include toll charges, not ferry charges.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
NOK 0 - 99,- |
1753 |
42.5% |
0.424866699 |
2 |
NOK 100 - 499,- |
1287 |
31.2% |
0.311924382 |
3 |
NOK 500 - 999,- |
636 |
15.4% |
0.154144450 |
4 |
NOK 1000 - 1499,- |
233 |
5.6% |
0.056471159 |
5 |
NOK 1500 - 1999,- |
92 |
2.2% |
0.022297625 |
6 |
NOK 2000 - 2499,- |
31 |
0.8% |
0.007513330 |
7 |
NOK 2500 - 2999,- |
16 |
0.4% |
0.003877848 |
8 |
NOK 3000 - 3499,- |
7 |
0.2% |
0.001696558 |
9 |
More than NOK 3500,- |
9 |
0.2% |
0.002181289 |
97 |
Not answered |
62 |
1.5% |
0.015026660 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng7
Variable label:
|
Has your road toll bill increased over the past year?
|
Literal question:
|
Has your road toll bill increased over the past year?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1592 |
38.6% |
0.38584586 |
2 |
No |
2439 |
59.1% |
0.59112942 |
97 |
Not answered |
95 |
2.3% |
0.02302472 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng8
Variable label:
|
What do you think about the level of toll charges in general?
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the level of toll charges in general?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Far too high |
1414 |
34.3% |
0.342704799 |
2 |
Slightly high |
1118 |
27.1% |
0.270964615 |
3 |
Just the right amount |
1011 |
24.5% |
0.245031508 |
4 |
Slightly low |
135 |
3.3% |
0.032719341 |
5 |
Far too low |
65 |
1.6% |
0.015753757 |
6 |
Don't know |
375 |
9.1% |
0.090887058 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001938924 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
r16bompeng9_1
Variable label:
|
Your view: All road tolls should be abolished, no matter what they are used for
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following statements best suits your view on road tolls?
|
Literal question:
|
All road tolls should be abolished, no matter what they are used for
|
Post-question:
|
Select the option or options that suit you best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All road tolls should be abolished, no matter what they are used for |
651 |
15.8% |
0.1577799 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
3475 |
84.2% |
0.8422201 |
r16bompeng9_2
Variable label:
|
Your view: Road tolls acceptable if used to fund roads, bridges and tunnels
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following statements best suits your view on road tolls?
|
Literal question:
|
Road tolls are acceptable if they are used to fund roads, bridges and tunnels
|
Post-question:
|
Select the option or options that suit you best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Road tolls are acceptable if they are used to fund roads, bridges and tunnels |
2415 |
58.5% |
0.5853127 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1711 |
41.5% |
0.4146873 |
r16bompeng9_3
Variable label:
|
Your view: Road tolls acceptable if used to curb traffic in the largest cities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following statements best suits your view on road tolls?
|
Literal question:
|
Road tolls are acceptable if they are used to curb traffic in the largest cities
|
Post-question:
|
Select the option or options that suit you best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Road tolls are acceptable if they are used to curb traffic in the largest cities |
1139 |
27.6% |
0.2760543 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2987 |
72.4% |
0.7239457 |
r16bompeng9_4
Variable label:
|
Your view: Road tolls acceptable if used for environmental initiatives
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following statements best suits your view on road tolls?
|
Literal question:
|
Road tolls are acceptable if they are used for public transport, bicycle paths and other environmental initiatives
|
Post-question:
|
Select the option or options that suit you best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Road tolls are acceptable if they are used for public transport, bicycle paths
and other environmental initiatives |
1548 |
37.5% |
0.3751818 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2578 |
62.5% |
0.6248182 |
r16bompeng9_5
Variable label:
|
Your view: Road tolls are acceptable no matter what they are used for
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following statements best suits your view on road tolls?
|
Literal question:
|
Road tolls are acceptable no matter what they are used for
|
Post-question:
|
Select the option or options that suit you best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Road tolls are acceptable no matter what they are used for |
194 |
4.7% |
0.0470189 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8778 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
3932 |
95.3% |
0.9529811 |
r16polkom12
Variable label:
|
Which of these political parties do you feel closest to?
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these political parties do you feel closest to?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Red Party |
107 |
6.5% |
0.06473079 |
2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
175 |
10.6% |
0.10586812 |
3 |
The Labour Party |
370 |
22.4% |
0.22383545 |
4 |
The Centre Party |
238 |
14.4% |
0.14398064 |
5 |
The Green Party |
96 |
5.8% |
0.05807623 |
6 |
The Liberal Party |
73 |
4.4% |
0.04416213 |
7 |
The Christian Democrats |
58 |
3.5% |
0.03508772 |
8 |
The Conservative Party |
372 |
22.5% |
0.22504537 |
9 |
The Progress Party |
142 |
8.6% |
0.08590442 |
97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.3% |
0.01330913 |
98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom13
Variable label:
|
Which of these political parties do you feel furthest from?
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these political parties do you feel furthest from?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The order of the response options is randomized (but adhers to the order of r16polkom12)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Red Party |
377 |
22.8% |
0.22807018 |
2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
63 |
3.8% |
0.03811252 |
3 |
The Labour Party |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
4 |
The Centre Party |
32 |
1.9% |
0.01935874 |
5 |
The Green Party |
228 |
13.8% |
0.13793103 |
6 |
The Liberal Party |
29 |
1.8% |
0.01754386 |
7 |
The Christian Democrats |
126 |
7.6% |
0.07622505 |
8 |
The Conservative Party |
40 |
2.4% |
0.02419843 |
9 |
The Progress Party |
715 |
43.3% |
0.43254688 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.5% |
0.01451906 |
98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom14
Variable label:
|
Which of these issues is most important to you?
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these issues is most important to you?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Whether begging should be legal |
18 |
1.1% |
0.010889292 |
2 |
Taxation policies |
340 |
20.6% |
0.205686630 |
3 |
Immigration policies |
304 |
18.4% |
0.183908046 |
4 |
The merger of municipalities |
127 |
7.7% |
0.076830006 |
5 |
Climate and environment |
712 |
43.1% |
0.430732002 |
6 |
None of these issues are important to me |
144 |
8.7% |
0.087114338 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004839685 |
98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_parti
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 and r16polkom12 is answered. Background variable. Assignes the largest party on the opposite side of the political spectrum. If the respondent answers Red Party, Socialist LeftParty, Labor Party, Green Party or Centre Party in r16polkom12, the value is set to “Conservative Party”. If the respondent answers Progress Party Conservative Party, Christian Democratic Party or Liberal Party in r16polkom12, the value is set to “Labor Party”.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 and r16polkom12 is answered. Background variable. Assignes the largest party on the opposite side of the political spectrum. If the respondent answers Red Party, Socialist Left Party, Labor Party, Green Party or Centre Party in r16polkom12, the value is set to “Conservative Party”. If the respondent answers Progress Party Conservative Party, Christian Democratic Party or Liberal Party in r16polkom12, the value is set to “Labor Party”.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1631] [Invalid:11273] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Labour Party |
645 |
39.5% |
0.3954629 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
986 |
60.5% |
0.6045371 |
Sysmiss |
|
11273 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_1
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Vote for [R16POLKOM12]
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale, the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you feel about a group.
|
Literal question:
|
People who vote for [R16POLKOM12]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom12 is answered. The wording of the question depends on the answer given in r16polkom12. The response scale is represented by a gradient color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003678725 |
1 |
10 |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004904966 |
2 |
20 |
17 |
1% |
0.010423053 |
3 |
30 |
7 |
0.4% |
0.004291845 |
4 |
40 |
19 |
1.2% |
0.011649295 |
5 |
50 |
144 |
8.8% |
0.088289393 |
6 |
60 |
88 |
5.4% |
0.053954629 |
7 |
70 |
237 |
14.5% |
0.145309626 |
8 |
80 |
430 |
26.4% |
0.263641937 |
9 |
90 |
298 |
18.3% |
0.182709994 |
10 |
100 |
344 |
21.1% |
0.210913550 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2% |
0.020232986 |
98 |
Not asked |
11273 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_2
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Vote for [R16POLKOM13]
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale, the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you feel about a group.
|
Literal question:
|
People who vote for [R16POLKOM13]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom13 is answered. The wording of the question depends on the answer given in r16polkom13. The response scale is represented by a gradient color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
575 |
35.3% |
0.352977287 |
1 |
10 |
360 |
22.1% |
0.220994475 |
2 |
20 |
255 |
15.7% |
0.156537753 |
3 |
30 |
121 |
7.4% |
0.074278699 |
4 |
40 |
74 |
4.5% |
0.045426642 |
5 |
50 |
133 |
8.2% |
0.081645181 |
6 |
60 |
19 |
1.2% |
0.011663597 |
7 |
70 |
18 |
1.1% |
0.011049724 |
8 |
80 |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007366483 |
9 |
90 |
10 |
0.6% |
0.006138735 |
10 |
100 |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009208103 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.3% |
0.022713321 |
98 |
Not asked |
11275 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_3
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Vote for [R16POLKOM15_parti]
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale, the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you feel about a group.
|
Literal question:
|
People who vote for [R16POLKOM15_parti]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom12 is answered and if the value (political party) is not the same as in r16polkom15_2. The wording of the question depends on the answer given in r16polkom12. See background variable r16polkom15_parti. The response scale is represented by a gradient color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
75 |
4.7% |
0.047348485 |
1 |
10 |
128 |
8.1% |
0.080808081 |
2 |
20 |
213 |
13.4% |
0.134469697 |
3 |
30 |
215 |
13.6% |
0.135732323 |
4 |
40 |
202 |
12.8% |
0.127525253 |
5 |
50 |
368 |
23.2% |
0.232323232 |
6 |
60 |
151 |
9.5% |
0.095328283 |
7 |
70 |
114 |
7.2% |
0.071969697 |
8 |
80 |
60 |
3.8% |
0.037878788 |
9 |
90 |
13 |
0.8% |
0.008207071 |
10 |
100 |
12 |
0.8% |
0.007575758 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.1% |
0.020833333 |
98 |
Not asked |
11320 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_4
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Are on the left wing of politics
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale, the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you feel about a group.
|
Literal question:
|
People who are on the left wing of Norwegian politics
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The response scale is represented by a gradient color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
60 |
3.6% |
0.03629764 |
1 |
10 |
74 |
4.5% |
0.04476709 |
2 |
20 |
125 |
7.6% |
0.07562008 |
3 |
30 |
137 |
8.3% |
0.08287961 |
4 |
40 |
158 |
9.6% |
0.09558379 |
5 |
50 |
325 |
19.7% |
0.19661222 |
6 |
60 |
152 |
9.2% |
0.09195402 |
7 |
70 |
171 |
10.3% |
0.10344828 |
8 |
80 |
201 |
12.2% |
0.12159710 |
9 |
90 |
110 |
6.7% |
0.06654567 |
10 |
100 |
91 |
5.5% |
0.05505142 |
97 |
Not answered |
49 |
3% |
0.02964307 |
98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_5
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Are on the right wing of politics
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale, the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you feel about a group.
|
Literal question:
|
People who are on the right wing of Norwegian politics
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The response scale is represented by a gradient color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
77 |
4.7% |
0.04658197 |
1 |
10 |
120 |
7.3% |
0.07259528 |
2 |
20 |
190 |
11.5% |
0.11494253 |
3 |
30 |
178 |
10.8% |
0.10768300 |
4 |
40 |
171 |
10.3% |
0.10344828 |
5 |
50 |
345 |
20.9% |
0.20871143 |
6 |
60 |
151 |
9.1% |
0.09134906 |
7 |
70 |
157 |
9.5% |
0.09497883 |
8 |
80 |
137 |
8.3% |
0.08287961 |
9 |
90 |
37 |
2.2% |
0.02238355 |
10 |
100 |
40 |
2.4% |
0.02419843 |
97 |
Not answered |
50 |
3% |
0.03024803 |
98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_6
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Completely disagree with you about immigration policies
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale, the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you feel about a group.
|
Literal question:
|
People who completely disagree with you about immigration policies
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The response scale is represented by a gradient color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
201 |
12.2% |
0.121597096 |
1 |
10 |
224 |
13.6% |
0.135511192 |
2 |
20 |
260 |
15.7% |
0.157289776 |
3 |
30 |
233 |
14.1% |
0.140955838 |
4 |
40 |
182 |
11% |
0.110102843 |
5 |
50 |
388 |
23.5% |
0.234724743 |
6 |
60 |
40 |
2.4% |
0.024198427 |
7 |
70 |
35 |
2.1% |
0.021173624 |
8 |
80 |
23 |
1.4% |
0.013914096 |
9 |
90 |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005444646 |
10 |
100 |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005444646 |
97 |
Not answered |
49 |
3% |
0.029643073 |
98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_7
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Completely disagree with you about climate policies
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale, the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you feel about a group.
|
Literal question:
|
People who completely disagree with you about climate policies
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The response scale is represented by a gradient color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
178 |
10.8% |
0.107683001 |
1 |
10 |
245 |
14.8% |
0.148215366 |
2 |
20 |
261 |
15.8% |
0.157894737 |
3 |
30 |
224 |
13.6% |
0.135511192 |
4 |
40 |
180 |
10.9% |
0.108892922 |
5 |
50 |
366 |
22.1% |
0.221415608 |
6 |
60 |
59 |
3.6% |
0.035692680 |
7 |
70 |
36 |
2.2% |
0.021778584 |
8 |
80 |
27 |
1.6% |
0.016333938 |
9 |
90 |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009074410 |
10 |
100 |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007259528 |
97 |
Not answered |
50 |
3% |
0.030248034 |
98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_8
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Completely disagree with you about taxation policies
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale, the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you feel about a group.
|
Literal question:
|
People who completely disagree with you about taxation policies
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The response scale is represented by a gradient color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
82 |
5% |
0.049606776 |
1 |
10 |
145 |
8.8% |
0.087719298 |
2 |
20 |
253 |
15.3% |
0.153055051 |
3 |
30 |
260 |
15.7% |
0.157289776 |
4 |
40 |
229 |
13.9% |
0.138535995 |
5 |
50 |
492 |
29.8% |
0.297640653 |
6 |
60 |
55 |
3.3% |
0.033272837 |
7 |
70 |
34 |
2.1% |
0.020568663 |
8 |
80 |
32 |
1.9% |
0.019358742 |
9 |
90 |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002419843 |
10 |
100 |
16 |
1% |
0.009679371 |
97 |
Not answered |
51 |
3.1% |
0.030852995 |
98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_9
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Completely disagree with you about begging
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale, the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you feel about a group.
|
Literal question:
|
People who completely disagree with you about whether begging should be legal
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The response scale is represented by a gradient color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
163 |
9.9% |
0.098608590 |
1 |
10 |
127 |
7.7% |
0.076830006 |
2 |
20 |
211 |
12.8% |
0.127646703 |
3 |
30 |
192 |
11.6% |
0.116152450 |
4 |
40 |
192 |
11.6% |
0.116152450 |
5 |
50 |
568 |
34.4% |
0.343617665 |
6 |
60 |
53 |
3.2% |
0.032062916 |
7 |
70 |
34 |
2.1% |
0.020568663 |
8 |
80 |
33 |
2% |
0.019963702 |
9 |
90 |
11 |
0.7% |
0.006654567 |
10 |
100 |
14 |
0.8% |
0.008469449 |
97 |
Not answered |
55 |
3.3% |
0.033272837 |
98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom15_10
Variable label:
|
Feel about people who: Completely disagree with you about the merger of municipalities
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rank the following groups. On the scale below, you will find an “emotional thermometer” where you can indicate how hot or cold you feel about different groups. The lower the number on the scale, the colder you feel about a group. The higher the number, the warmer you feel about a group.
|
Literal question:
|
People who completely disagree with you about the merger of municipalities
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The response scale is represented by a gradient color palette where “0” is dark blue and “100” is dark red. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
96 |
5.8% |
0.058076225 |
1 |
10 |
94 |
5.7% |
0.056866304 |
2 |
20 |
132 |
8% |
0.079854809 |
3 |
30 |
203 |
12.3% |
0.122807018 |
4 |
40 |
209 |
12.6% |
0.126436782 |
5 |
50 |
670 |
40.5% |
0.405323654 |
6 |
60 |
87 |
5.3% |
0.052631579 |
7 |
70 |
53 |
3.2% |
0.032062916 |
8 |
80 |
32 |
1.9% |
0.019358742 |
9 |
90 |
10 |
0.6% |
0.006049607 |
10 |
100 |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009074410 |
97 |
Not answered |
52 |
3.1% |
0.031457955 |
98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom16_enighet
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom16.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom16.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
completely agree with |
815 |
49.3% |
0.493043 |
2 |
completely disagree with |
838 |
50.7% |
0.506957 |
Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom16_sak
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom16.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom16.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
immigration policies |
350 |
21.2% |
0.2117362 |
2 |
taxation policies |
296 |
17.9% |
0.1790684 |
3 |
environmental policies |
331 |
20% |
0.2002420 |
4 |
the merger of municipalities |
324 |
19.6% |
0.1960073 |
5 |
the ban on begging |
352 |
21.3% |
0.2129462 |
Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom16_frekvens_nytte
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom16.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom16.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
, who often talks about this issue and has a lot of useful information about it? |
280 |
16.9% |
0.1693890 |
2 |
, who rarely talks about this issue, but still has a lot of useful information
about it? |
294 |
17.8% |
0.1778584 |
3 |
, who often talks about this issue, but has very little useful information about
it? |
278 |
16.8% |
0.1681791 |
4 |
, who rarely talks about this issue and has very little useful information about
it? |
278 |
16.8% |
0.1681791 |
5 |
and who often talks about this issue? |
266 |
16.1% |
0.1609195 |
6 |
, but who rarely talks about this issue? |
257 |
15.5% |
0.1554749 |
Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom16
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with daughter-/son-in-law who you [agree/disagree] regarding [issue] talked about [a lot / little] about
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied or dissatisfied would you be if you had a daughter or son who married a person who you [|agreement] regarding [|issue][|frequency_usefulness]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on the randomized values of r16polkom16_enighet, r16polkom16_sak and r16polkom16_frekvens_nytte.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
88 |
5.3% |
0.05323654 |
2 |
Satisfied |
248 |
15% |
0.15003025 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
81 |
4.9% |
0.04900181 |
4 |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied |
979 |
59.2% |
0.59225650 |
5 |
Somewhat dissatisfied |
152 |
9.2% |
0.09195402 |
6 |
Dissatisfied |
67 |
4.1% |
0.04053237 |
7 |
Very dissatisfied |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_kjonn
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom17_screening.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom17_screening.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
woman |
838 |
50.7% |
0.506957 |
2 |
man |
815 |
49.3% |
0.493043 |
Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_kjennskap
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom17_screening.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom17_screening.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
who you know well |
825 |
49.9% |
0.4990926 |
2 |
who is an acquaintance of yours |
828 |
50.1% |
0.5009074 |
Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_enighet
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom17_screening.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom17_screening.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
totally agrees with you |
824 |
49.8% |
0.4984876 |
2 |
totally disagrees with you |
829 |
50.2% |
0.5015124 |
Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_enighet2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom17_screening_2.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom17_screening_2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
totally agrees with you |
839 |
50.8% |
0.507562 |
2 |
totally disagrees with you |
814 |
49.2% |
0.492438 |
Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_sak
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom17a / r16polkom17b.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom17a / r16polkom17b.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” |
572 |
34.6% |
0.3460375 |
2 |
“Immigration threatens our Norwegian values and culture” |
522 |
31.6% |
0.3157895 |
3 |
“Immigration can both threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture” |
559 |
33.8% |
0.3381730 |
Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_liker
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom17a / r16polkom17b.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16polkom17a / r16polkom17b.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
3 |
383 |
23.2% |
0.2316999 |
2 |
12 |
442 |
26.7% |
0.2673926 |
3 |
225 |
410 |
24.8% |
0.2480339 |
4 |
3000 |
418 |
25.3% |
0.2528736 |
Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17ab_order
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects order of r16polkom17a and r16polkom17b.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects order of r16polkom17a and r16polkom17b.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
R16POLKOM17a first |
791 |
47.9% |
0.4785239 |
2 |
R16POLKOM17b first |
862 |
52.1% |
0.5214761 |
Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17cd_order
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects order of r16polkom17c and r16polkom17d.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects order of r16polkom17c and r16polkom17d.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:11251] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
R16POLKOM17c first |
791 |
47.9% |
0.4785239 |
2 |
R16POLKOM17d first |
862 |
52.1% |
0.5214761 |
Sysmiss |
|
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_screening
Variable label:
|
Have [woman/man] on Facebook [you know well/is an acquaintance] who politically [agrees/disagrees] with you
|
Pre-question text:
|
We wish to study the reading of news on Facebook. In order for our study to be similar to situations where you usually come across news shared by friends on Facebook, we would like you to indicate whether the profile we have described below fits the description of one of your Facebook friends.
Profile: A [woman/man] [who you know well/who is an acquaintance of yours] and who [totally agrees with you/totally disagrees with you] when it comes to politics.
|
Literal question:
|
Does this description fit one (or more) of your friends on Facebook?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. The wording of the question depends on the values of r16polkom17_kjonn, r16polkom17_kjennskap and r16polkom17_enighet.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
814 |
49.2% |
0.49243799 |
2 |
No |
412 |
24.9% |
0.24924380 |
3 |
Don't have a Facebook account |
405 |
24.5% |
0.24500907 |
97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.3% |
0.01330913 |
98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_screening_2
Variable label:
|
Have a friend on Facebook you politically [agree/disagree] with
|
Pre-question text:
|
You replied that the profile didn’t fit one of your Facebook friends. Below, we have created a new profile and therefore would like you to indicate whether this new profile fits the description of one of your Facebook friends.
Profile: A person that you [agree with / disagree with] when it comes to politics.
|
Literal question:
|
Does this description fit one (or more) of your friends on Facebook?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 2 The wording of the question depends on the value r16polkom17_enighet2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
201 |
48.8% |
0.48786408 |
2 |
No |
205 |
49.8% |
0.49757282 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
1.5% |
0.01456311 |
98 |
Not asked |
12492 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_screening_2a
Variable label:
|
The person is [Someone I know well/ An acquaintance]
|
Literal question:
|
The person is…
|
Post-question:
|
(choose only one answer)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 2 and r16polkom17_screening_2a = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Someone I know well |
93 |
46.3% |
0.46268657 |
2 |
An acquaintance |
103 |
51.2% |
0.51243781 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
2.5% |
0.02487562 |
98 |
Not asked |
12703 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_screening_2b
Variable label:
|
The person is [Female/Male]
|
Literal question:
|
The person is…
|
Post-question:
|
(choose only one answer)
If you wish, you can also enter the name of this specific person here. We do not store this information. [text box]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 2 and r16polkom17_screening_2a = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Female |
80 |
39.8% |
0.39800995 |
2 |
Male |
114 |
56.7% |
0.56716418 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
3.5% |
0.03482587 |
98 |
Not asked |
12703 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_p_kjonn
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Background variable. Assigns normative (gender) pronoun according to the respondent’s prior response.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Background variable. Assigns normative (gender) pronoun according to the respondent’s prior response.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1022] [Invalid:11882] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
her |
489 |
47.8% |
0.478473581 |
2 |
him |
526 |
51.5% |
0.514677104 |
3 |
this person |
7 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
Sysmiss |
|
11882 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17_p_kjonn2
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Background variable. Assigns accusative (gender) pronoun according to the respondent’s prior response.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Background variable. Assigns accusative (gender) pronoun according to the respondent’s prior response.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1022] [Invalid:11882] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
she |
489 |
47.8% |
0.478473581 |
2 |
he |
526 |
51.5% |
0.514677104 |
3 |
the person |
7 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
Sysmiss |
|
11882 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17a
Variable label:
|
How likely to have clicked on a debate article from a given Facebook post?
|
Pre-question text:
|
You replied that you have a friend on Facebook who is a [female/male], [you know well / is an acquaintance of yours] that [totally agrees with you / totally disagrees with you]. Imagine that you come across a post on Facebook that is shared and recommended by [R16POLKOM17_p_kjonn].
The headline of the debate article that [R16POLKOM17_p_kjonn2] has shared is [r16polkom17_sak].
There are [r16polkom17_liker] people who like the post.
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on and read this debate article if you had come across this post?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Experiment. The order of r16polkom17a and r16polkom17b is randomized. The wording of the question depends on randomized values or values assigned according to the respondent’s answers. The first sentence is primarily generated from one of two possible sets of variables.
If r16polkom17_screening = 1: r16polkom17_kjonn, r16polkom17_kjennskap, r16polkom17_enighet. If r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1: r16polkom17_screening_2b (gender), r16polkom17_screening_2a (familiarity), r16polkom17_enighet2.
Note that if r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1, but r16polkom17_screening_2a or r16polkom17_screening_2b is not answered, the first sentence is simply set as “You replied that you have a friend on Facebook who [totally agrees with you / totally disagrees with you].” (translated)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly likely |
132 |
13% |
0.1300492611 |
2 |
Likely |
244 |
24% |
0.2403940887 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
311 |
30.6% |
0.3064039409 |
4 |
Not very likely |
208 |
20.5% |
0.2049261084 |
5 |
Not at all likely |
119 |
11.7% |
0.1172413793 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0009852217 |
98 |
Not asked |
11889 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17b
Variable label:
|
How likely to change Facebook settings to see fewer posts from [her/him]?
|
Pre-question text:
|
You replied that you have a friend on Facebook who is a [female/male], [you know well / is an acquaintance of yours] that [totally agrees with you / totally disagrees with you]. Imagine that you come across a post on Facebook that is shared and recommended by [R16POLKOM17_p_kjonn].
The headline of the debate article that [R16POLKOM17_p_kjonn2] has shared is [r16polkom17_sak].
There are [r16polkom17_liker] people who like the post.
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would have changed your settings on Facebook so as to see fewer posts from [her / him / this person] in the future?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Experiment. The order of r16polkom17a and r16polkom17b is randomized. The wording of the question depends on randomized values or values assigned according to the respondent’s answers. The first sentence is primarily generated from one of two possible sets of variables.
If r16polkom17_screening = 1: r16polkom17_kjonn, r16polkom17_kjennskap, r16polkom17_enighet. If r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1: r16polkom17_screening_2b (gender), r16polkom17_screening_2a (familiarity), r16polkom17_enighet2. Note that if r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1, but r16polkom17_screening_2a or r16polkom17_screening_2b is not answered, the first sentence is simply set as “You replied that you have a friend on Facebook who [totally agrees with you / totally disagrees with you].” (translated)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly likely |
45 |
4.4% |
0.04433498 |
2 |
Likely |
77 |
7.6% |
0.07586207 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
131 |
12.9% |
0.12906404 |
4 |
Not very likely |
445 |
43.8% |
0.43842365 |
5 |
Not at all likely |
317 |
31.2% |
0.31231527 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11889 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17c
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The debate article probably contains useful information
|
Pre-question text:
|
Hvor enig eller uenig er du i følgende påstander om situasjonen på Facebook som du nettopp leste?
|
Literal question:
|
The debate article probably contains information that would have been useful for me to know.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Part of experiment. The order of r16polkom17c and r16polkom17d is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
27 |
2.7% |
0.026600985 |
2 |
Agree |
167 |
16.5% |
0.164532020 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
274 |
27% |
0.269950739 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
297 |
29.3% |
0.292610837 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
90 |
8.9% |
0.088669951 |
6 |
Disagree |
106 |
10.4% |
0.104433498 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
51 |
5% |
0.050246305 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002955665 |
98 |
Not asked |
11889 |
|
NA |
r16polkom17d
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The debate article would propably have aroused negative emotions in me
|
Pre-question text:
|
Hvor enig eller uenig er du i følgende påstander om situasjonen på Facebook som du nettopp leste?
|
Literal question:
|
The debate article would probably have aroused negative emotions in me (that would have caused you to be annoyed, provoked or angry when you read it)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and r16polkom17_screening = 1 or r16polkom17_screening_2 = 1. Part of experiment. The order of r16polkom17c and r16polkom17d is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
58 |
5.7% |
0.05714286 |
2 |
Agree |
150 |
14.8% |
0.14778325 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
255 |
25.1% |
0.25123153 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
313 |
30.8% |
0.30837438 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
64 |
6.3% |
0.06305419 |
6 |
Disagree |
115 |
11.3% |
0.11330049 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
54 |
5.3% |
0.05320197 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.6% |
0.00591133 |
98 |
Not asked |
11889 |
|
NA |
r16pktilfreds3
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
234 |
14.2% |
0.14156080 |
2 |
Satisfied |
898 |
54.3% |
0.54325469 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
376 |
22.7% |
0.22746521 |
4 |
Dissatisfied |
114 |
6.9% |
0.06896552 |
5 |
Very dissatisfied |
31 |
1.9% |
0.01875378 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16kmelbil
Variable label:
|
Open: First thoughts when you hear/read the word “electric car” [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What is the first thing you think of when you hear or read the word “electric car”?
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All replies are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you would prefer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16skolehelse1_1
Variable label:
|
Number of children of primary school age (5-13 years)
|
Pre-question text:
|
How many children do you have in the following age groups:
|
Literal question:
|
Primary school age (5-13 years)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No children |
1874 |
76.3% |
0.762718763 |
2 |
One child |
223 |
9.1% |
0.090761091 |
3 |
Two children |
145 |
5.9% |
0.059015059 |
4 |
Three or more children |
21 |
0.9% |
0.008547009 |
97 |
Not answered |
194 |
7.9% |
0.078958079 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse1_2
Variable label:
|
Number of children of lower secondary school age (12-16 years)
|
Pre-question text:
|
How many children do you have in the following age groups:
|
Literal question:
|
Lower secondary school age (12-16 years)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No children |
1980 |
80.6% |
0.805860806 |
2 |
One child |
185 |
7.5% |
0.075295075 |
3 |
Two children |
19 |
0.8% |
0.007733008 |
4 |
Three or more children |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
97 |
Not answered |
273 |
11.1% |
0.111111111 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse1_3
Variable label:
|
Number of children of secondary school age (15-19 years)
|
Pre-question text:
|
How many children do you have in the following age groups:
|
Literal question:
|
Upper secondary school age (15-19 years)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No children |
1962 |
79.9% |
0.798534799 |
2 |
One child |
190 |
7.7% |
0.077330077 |
3 |
Two children |
37 |
1.5% |
0.015059015 |
4 |
Three or more children |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002442002 |
97 |
Not answered |
262 |
10.7% |
0.106634107 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse2
Variable label:
|
Has your child been in contact with school health services during the last year?
|
Literal question:
|
Has/have your child/children been in contact with school health services during the last 12 months, as far as you know?
|
Post-question:
|
If this contact has only taken place through the regular vaccination programme, you can choose “no”.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7 and (r16skolehelse1_1 = 2 | 3 | 4 or r16skolehelse1_2 = 2 | 3 | 4 or r16skolehelse1_3 = 2 | 3 | 4). ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
253 |
42.2% |
0.421666667 |
2 |
No |
346 |
57.7% |
0.576666667 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001666667 |
98 |
Not asked |
12304 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse2a_1
Variable label:
|
Contact with school health services involves: Primary school age
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who did this contact involve?
|
Literal question:
|
Primary school age (5-13 years)
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7 and r16skolehelse1_1 = 2 | 3 | 4 and r16skolehelse2 = 1. The response option appears to the respondent if r16skolehelse1_1 = 2 | 3 | 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Primary school age (5-13 years) |
160 |
90.4% |
0.9039548 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
12727 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
17 |
9.6% |
0.0960452 |
r16skolehelse2a_2
Variable label:
|
Contact with school health services involves: Lower secondary school age
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who did this contact involve?
|
Literal question:
|
Lower secondary school age (12-16 years)
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7 and r16skolehelse1_2 = 2 | 3 | 4 and r16skolehelse2 = 1. The response option appears to the respondent if r16skolehelse1_2 = 2 | 3 | 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower secondary school age (12-16 years) |
66 |
64.7% |
0.6470588 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
12802 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
36 |
35.3% |
0.3529412 |
r16skolehelse2a_3
Variable label:
|
Contact with school health services involves: Upper secondary school age
|
Pre-question text:
|
Who did this contact involve?
|
Literal question:
|
Upper secondary school age (15-19 years)
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7 and r16skolehelse1_3 = 2 | 3 | 4 and r16skolehelse2 = 1. The response option appears to the respondent if r16skolehelse1_3 = 2 | 3 | 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Upper secondary school age (15-19 years) |
52 |
61.2% |
0.6117647 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
12819 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
33 |
38.8% |
0.3882353 |
r16skolehelse2b
Variable label:
|
Why have none of your children used school health services?
|
Literal question:
|
Why have none of your children used school health services:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7 and (r16skolehelse1_1 = 2 | 3 | 4 or r16skolehelse1_2 = 2 | 3 | 4 or r16skolehelse1_3 = 2 | 3 | 4) and r16skolehelse2 = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
None of them needed to |
286 |
82.7% |
0.826589595 |
2 |
The kind of help that school health services provide is unclear |
21 |
6.1% |
0.060693642 |
3 |
School health services do not cover our needs |
13 |
3.8% |
0.037572254 |
4 |
It is difficult to get access to the public health nurse |
4 |
1.2% |
0.011560694 |
5 |
Other: |
20 |
5.8% |
0.057803468 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.6% |
0.005780347 |
98 |
Not asked |
12558 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse2b_5_other
Variable label:
|
Open [R16SKOLEHELSE2B_5] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Why have none of your children used school health services:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7 and (r16skolehelse1_1 = 2 | 3 | 4 or r16skolehelse1_2 = 2 | 3 | 4 or r16skolehelse1_3 = 2 | 3 | 4) and r16skolehelse2 = 2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16skolehelse3
Variable label:
|
Your impression of the school health services offered to students today
|
Literal question:
|
What is your general impression of the school health services offered to students today?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
104 |
4.2% |
0.04232804 |
2 |
Good |
1116 |
45.4% |
0.45421245 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
868 |
35.3% |
0.35327635 |
4 |
Not very good |
188 |
7.7% |
0.07651608 |
5 |
Not good at all |
37 |
1.5% |
0.01505902 |
97 |
Not answered |
144 |
5.9% |
0.05860806 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse4_1
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Vaccines
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of these purposes?
|
Literal question:
|
Vaccines
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Vaccines |
1910 |
77.7% |
0.7773708 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
547 |
22.3% |
0.2226292 |
r16skolehelse4_2
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Sexuality and contraception
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of these purposes?
|
Literal question:
|
Sexuality and contraception
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Sexuality and contraception |
249 |
10.1% |
0.1013431 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2208 |
89.9% |
0.8986569 |
r16skolehelse4_3
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Questions related to mental health
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of these purposes?
|
Literal question:
|
Difficult thoughts or feelings, questions related to mental health
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Difficult thoughts or feelings, questions related to mental health |
142 |
5.8% |
0.05779406 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2315 |
94.2% |
0.94220594 |
r16skolehelse4_4
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Social/familial challenges
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of these purposes?
|
Literal question:
|
Social or familial challenges
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Social or familial challenges |
111 |
4.5% |
0.04517705 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2346 |
95.5% |
0.95482295 |
r16skolehelse4_5
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: General well-being
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of these purposes?
|
Literal question:
|
General well-being, interaction with others
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
General well-being, interaction with others |
161 |
6.6% |
0.06552707 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2296 |
93.4% |
0.93447293 |
r16skolehelse4_6
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Growth/development/physical health
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of these purposes?
|
Literal question:
|
Growth, development or physical health
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Growth, development or physical health |
315 |
12.8% |
0.1282051 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2142 |
87.2% |
0.8717949 |
r16skolehelse4_7
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Accident/injury at school
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of these purposes?
|
Literal question:
|
Accident/injury at school
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Accident/injury at school |
285 |
11.6% |
0.1159951 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2172 |
88.4% |
0.8840049 |
r16skolehelse4_8
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Intoxication
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of these purposes?
|
Literal question:
|
Intoxication
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intoxication |
22 |
0.9% |
0.008954009 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2435 |
99.1% |
0.991045991 |
r16skolehelse4_9
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Cannot remember
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of these purposes?
|
Literal question:
|
Cannot remember
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Cannot remember |
112 |
4.6% |
0.04558405 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2345 |
95.4% |
0.95441595 |
r16skolehelse4_10
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Never been in contact
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of these purposes?
|
Literal question:
|
Have never been in contact with school health services
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Have never been in contact with school health services |
307 |
12.5% |
0.1249491 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2150 |
87.5% |
0.8750509 |
r16skolehelse4_11
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Other
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of these purposes?
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other |
64 |
2.6% |
0.02604803 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2393 |
97.4% |
0.97395197 |
r16skolehelse4_12
Variable label:
|
Your experience with school health services: Do not wish to answer
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of these purposes?
|
Literal question:
|
Do not wish to answer
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Do not wish to answer |
38 |
1.5% |
0.01546602 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2419 |
98.5% |
0.98453398 |
r16skolehelse4_11_other
Variable label:
|
Open [R16SKOLEHELSE4_11] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Try to remember: have you ever used school health services for any of these purposes?
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Post-question:
|
Possible to tick more than one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16skolehelse5_1
Variable label:
|
Your municipality should use more/less on: School health service
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public services can be expensive, and it is not always possible to prioritise all services equally, even if they are considered important. To what extent would you like your municipality to use more or fewer resources on the following schemes:
|
Literal question:
|
School health service
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Spend a lot more money |
442 |
18% |
0.179894180 |
2 |
Spend a little more money |
975 |
39.7% |
0.396825397 |
3 |
Spend as much money as now |
872 |
35.5% |
0.354904355 |
4 |
Spend a little less money |
47 |
1.9% |
0.019129019 |
5 |
Spend a lot less money |
16 |
0.7% |
0.006512007 |
97 |
Not answered |
105 |
4.3% |
0.042735043 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse5_2
Variable label:
|
Your municipality should use more/less on: School teachers
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public services can be expensive, and it is not always possible to prioritise all services equally, even if they are considered important. To what extent would you like your municipality to use more or fewer resources on the following schemes:
|
Literal question:
|
School teachers
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Spend a lot more money |
690 |
28.1% |
0.280830281 |
2 |
Spend a little more money |
1040 |
42.3% |
0.423280423 |
3 |
Spend as much money as now |
598 |
24.3% |
0.243386243 |
4 |
Spend a little less money |
36 |
1.5% |
0.014652015 |
5 |
Spend a lot less money |
9 |
0.4% |
0.003663004 |
97 |
Not answered |
84 |
3.4% |
0.034188034 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse5_3
Variable label:
|
Your municipality should use more/less on: Care for the elderly
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public services can be expensive, and it is not always possible to prioritise all services equally, even if they are considered important. To what extent would you like your municipality to use more or fewer resources on the following schemes:
|
Literal question:
|
Care for the elderly
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Spend a lot more money |
863 |
35.1% |
0.351241351 |
2 |
Spend a little more money |
1020 |
41.5% |
0.415140415 |
3 |
Spend as much money as now |
481 |
19.6% |
0.195767196 |
4 |
Spend a little less money |
33 |
1.3% |
0.013431013 |
5 |
Spend a lot less money |
13 |
0.5% |
0.005291005 |
97 |
Not answered |
47 |
1.9% |
0.019129019 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse5_4
Variable label:
|
Your municipality should use more/less on: Culture/leisure facilities for children/young people
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public services can be expensive, and it is not always possible to prioritise all services equally, even if they are considered important. To what extent would you like your municipality to use more or fewer resources on the following schemes:
|
Literal question:
|
Cultural and leisure facilities/activities for children and young people
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Spend a lot more money |
488 |
19.9% |
0.198616199 |
2 |
Spend a little more money |
891 |
36.3% |
0.362637363 |
3 |
Spend as much money as now |
849 |
34.6% |
0.345543346 |
4 |
Spend a little less money |
119 |
4.8% |
0.048433048 |
5 |
Spend a lot less money |
23 |
0.9% |
0.009361009 |
97 |
Not answered |
87 |
3.5% |
0.035409035 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16skolehelse5_5
Variable label:
|
Your municipality should use more/less on: Bicycle paths/public transport
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public services can be expensive, and it is not always possible to prioritise all services equally, even if they are considered important. To what extent would you like your municipality to use more or fewer resources on the following schemes:
|
Literal question:
|
Bicycle paths and public transport
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Spend a lot more money |
454 |
18.5% |
0.18477818 |
2 |
Spend a little more money |
784 |
31.9% |
0.31908832 |
3 |
Spend as much money as now |
803 |
32.7% |
0.32682133 |
4 |
Spend a little less money |
221 |
9% |
0.08994709 |
5 |
Spend a lot less money |
97 |
3.9% |
0.03947904 |
97 |
Not answered |
98 |
4% |
0.03988604 |
98 |
Not asked |
10447 |
|
NA |
r16km_ccs_anlegg
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16km_ccs_anlegg.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16km_ccs_anlegg.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4185] [Invalid:8719] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[blank] |
1029 |
24.6% |
0.2458781 |
2 |
from Norwegian installations/plants |
1066 |
25.5% |
0.2547192 |
3 |
from German installations/plants |
1023 |
24.4% |
0.2444444 |
4 |
from European installations/plants |
1067 |
25.5% |
0.2549582 |
Sysmiss |
|
8719 |
|
NA |
r16km_ccs_lagring
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16km_ccs_anlegg.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16km_ccs_anlegg.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4185] [Invalid:8719] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
the ground |
2059 |
49.2% |
0.4919952 |
2 |
the seabed |
2126 |
50.8% |
0.5080048 |
Sysmiss |
|
8719 |
|
NA |
r16km_ccs_territorium
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16km_ccs_anlegg.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3 or 7. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r16km_ccs_anlegg.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4185] [Invalid:8719] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[blank] |
1411 |
33.7% |
0.3371565 |
2 |
in Norwegian territory |
1375 |
32.9% |
0.3285544 |
3 |
in European territory |
1399 |
33.4% |
0.3342891 |
Sysmiss |
|
8719 |
|
NA |
r16km_ccs
Variable label:
|
Carbon capture: How would you feel about such a project?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Carbon capture and storage is a process of storing CO2 (carbon dioxide) captured at industrial installations and power plants that emit large amounts of CO2 during production processes. Captured CO2 is transported and stored deep under the ground so that it does not reach the atmosphere where it would contribute to climate change. This technology is already in use today. Research suggests that this technology can be further developed so that large amounts of CO2 can be captured and stored in the future. On a large scale, carbon capture and storage can play an important role in limiting climate change.
Imagine a proposal where large amounts of CO2 [blank/ from Norwegian installations/ plants from German installations/plants/ from European installations/plants] is to be stored deep below [the ground/ the seabed] [blank/ in Norwegian territory/ in European territory]
|
Literal question:
|
How would you feel about such a project?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 or 7. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on the randomized values of r16km_ccs_anlegg, r16km_ccs_lagring and r16km_ccs_territorium.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
1007 |
24.1% |
0.240621266 |
2 |
Slightly positive |
1274 |
30.4% |
0.304420550 |
3 |
Slightly negative |
677 |
16.2% |
0.161768220 |
4 |
Very negative |
444 |
10.6% |
0.106093190 |
5 |
No opinion/do not know |
778 |
18.6% |
0.185902031 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.1% |
0.001194743 |
98 |
Not asked |
8719 |
|
NA |
r16km_ccs_a
Variable label:
|
Carbon capture: How realistic to carry out such a project the next 5-10 years?
|
Literal question:
|
How realistic do you think it is that such a project will be carried out during the next 5-10 years?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 or 7 and r16km_ccs is answered. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Realistic |
2167 |
51.8% |
0.51842105 |
2 |
Not realistic |
1930 |
46.2% |
0.46172249 |
97 |
Not answered |
83 |
2% |
0.01985646 |
98 |
Not asked |
8724 |
|
NA |
r16km_ccs_b
Variable label:
|
Carbon capture: An effective means of limiting climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think carbon capture and storage will be an effective means of limiting climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1469 |
35.1% |
0.351015532 |
2 |
No |
947 |
22.6% |
0.226284349 |
3 |
Don't know |
1745 |
41.7% |
0.416965352 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.6% |
0.005734767 |
98 |
Not asked |
8719 |
|
NA |
r16km_ccs_open
Variable label:
|
Open: Comments on the questions about carbon capture [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments on the questions about carbon capture, please write them here.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 or 7. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16km_tech
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Technological innovations will solve climate problems
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statement below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following?
|
Literal question:
|
Technological innovations will solve climate problems.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
107 |
6.2% |
0.061921296 |
2 |
Agree |
296 |
17.1% |
0.171296296 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
754 |
43.6% |
0.436342593 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
223 |
12.9% |
0.129050926 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
177 |
10.2% |
0.102430556 |
6 |
Disagree |
130 |
7.5% |
0.075231481 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
38 |
2.2% |
0.021990741 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001736111 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16km_wind_a
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More land-based windmills should be built in Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please consider these statements about wind power in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
More land-based windmills should be built in Norway.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
167 |
9.7% |
0.096643519 |
2 |
Agree |
293 |
17% |
0.169560185 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
379 |
21.9% |
0.219328704 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
139 |
8% |
0.080439815 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
204 |
11.8% |
0.118055556 |
6 |
Disagree |
220 |
12.7% |
0.127314815 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
320 |
18.5% |
0.185185185 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003472222 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16km_wind_b
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More sea-based windmills should be built in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
More sea-based windmills should be built in Norway.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
426 |
24.7% |
0.246527778 |
2 |
Agree |
544 |
31.5% |
0.314814815 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
378 |
21.9% |
0.218750000 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
110 |
6.4% |
0.063657407 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
99 |
5.7% |
0.057291667 |
6 |
Disagree |
78 |
4.5% |
0.045138889 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
87 |
5% |
0.050347222 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003472222 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg1
Variable label:
|
What is your opinion regarding oil exploration in the Barents Sea?
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion regarding oil exploration in the Barents Sea?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
It should be permitted |
763 |
44.2% |
0.44155093 |
2 |
It should be prohibited |
940 |
54.4% |
0.54398148 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.4% |
0.01446759 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg2
Variable label:
|
How important is this matter to you personally?
|
Literal question:
|
How important is this matter to you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 and r16padproleg1 is answered. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
258 |
15.1% |
0.151497358 |
2 |
Important |
483 |
28.4% |
0.283617146 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
571 |
33.5% |
0.335290664 |
4 |
Not very important |
331 |
19.4% |
0.194362889 |
5 |
Not important at all |
54 |
3.2% |
0.031708749 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003523194 |
98 |
Not asked |
11201 |
|
NA |
r16meme5_1
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about rich people: Admiration
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about rich people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about rich people as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01179245 |
2 |
To a large extent |
120 |
7.1% |
0.07075472 |
3 |
To some extent |
611 |
36% |
0.36025943 |
4 |
To a small extent |
500 |
29.5% |
0.29481132 |
5 |
Not at all |
407 |
24% |
0.23997642 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.2% |
0.02240566 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme5_2
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about rich people: Compassion
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about rich people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about rich people as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
10 |
0.6% |
0.005896226 |
2 |
To a large extent |
55 |
3.2% |
0.032429245 |
3 |
To some extent |
298 |
17.6% |
0.175707547 |
4 |
To a small extent |
492 |
29% |
0.290094340 |
5 |
Not at all |
772 |
45.5% |
0.455188679 |
97 |
Not answered |
69 |
4.1% |
0.040683962 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme5_3
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about rich people: Feel sorry for them
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about rich people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about rich people as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Feel sorry for them
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004716981 |
2 |
To a large extent |
17 |
1% |
0.010023585 |
3 |
To some extent |
148 |
8.7% |
0.087264151 |
4 |
To a small extent |
454 |
26.8% |
0.267688679 |
5 |
Not at all |
1001 |
59% |
0.590212264 |
97 |
Not answered |
68 |
4% |
0.040094340 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme5_4
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about rich people: Anger
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about rich people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about rich people as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004716981 |
2 |
To a large extent |
33 |
1.9% |
0.019457547 |
3 |
To some extent |
150 |
8.8% |
0.088443396 |
4 |
To a small extent |
433 |
25.5% |
0.255306604 |
5 |
Not at all |
1007 |
59.4% |
0.593750000 |
97 |
Not answered |
65 |
3.8% |
0.038325472 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme5_5
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about rich people: Envy
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about rich people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about rich people as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
10 |
0.6% |
0.005896226 |
2 |
To a large extent |
42 |
2.5% |
0.024764151 |
3 |
To some extent |
341 |
20.1% |
0.201061321 |
4 |
To a small extent |
600 |
35.4% |
0.353773585 |
5 |
Not at all |
645 |
38% |
0.380306604 |
97 |
Not answered |
58 |
3.4% |
0.034198113 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme5_6
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about rich people: Bitterness
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about rich people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about rich people as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Bitterness
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007075472 |
2 |
To a large extent |
14 |
0.8% |
0.008254717 |
3 |
To some extent |
112 |
6.6% |
0.066037736 |
4 |
To a small extent |
413 |
24.4% |
0.243514151 |
5 |
Not at all |
1074 |
63.3% |
0.633254717 |
97 |
Not answered |
71 |
4.2% |
0.041863208 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme6_1
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about the middle class: Admiration
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about the middle class. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the middle class as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
16 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
2 |
To a large extent |
124 |
7.3% |
0.073113208 |
3 |
To some extent |
444 |
26.2% |
0.261792453 |
4 |
To a small extent |
430 |
25.4% |
0.253537736 |
5 |
Not at all |
641 |
37.8% |
0.377948113 |
97 |
Not answered |
41 |
2.4% |
0.024174528 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme6_2
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about the middle class: Compassion
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about the middle class. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the middle class as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
28 |
1.7% |
0.01650943 |
2 |
To a large extent |
106 |
6.2% |
0.06250000 |
3 |
To some extent |
353 |
20.8% |
0.20813679 |
4 |
To a small extent |
374 |
22.1% |
0.22051887 |
5 |
Not at all |
771 |
45.5% |
0.45459906 |
97 |
Not answered |
64 |
3.8% |
0.03773585 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme6_3
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about the middle class: Feel sorry for them
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about the middle class. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the middle class as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Feel sorry for them
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001768868 |
2 |
To a large extent |
20 |
1.2% |
0.011792453 |
3 |
To some extent |
122 |
7.2% |
0.071933962 |
4 |
To a small extent |
420 |
24.8% |
0.247641509 |
5 |
Not at all |
1055 |
62.2% |
0.622051887 |
97 |
Not answered |
76 |
4.5% |
0.044811321 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme6_4
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about the middle class: Anger
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about the middle class. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the middle class as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001179245 |
2 |
To a large extent |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003537736 |
3 |
To some extent |
42 |
2.5% |
0.024764151 |
4 |
To a small extent |
299 |
17.6% |
0.176297170 |
5 |
Not at all |
1267 |
74.7% |
0.747051887 |
97 |
Not answered |
80 |
4.7% |
0.047169811 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme6_5
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about the middle class: Envy
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about the middle class. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the middle class as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001768868 |
2 |
To a large extent |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002948113 |
3 |
To some extent |
55 |
3.2% |
0.032429245 |
4 |
To a small extent |
360 |
21.2% |
0.212264151 |
5 |
Not at all |
1196 |
70.5% |
0.705188679 |
97 |
Not answered |
77 |
4.5% |
0.045400943 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme6_6
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about the middle class: Bitterness
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about the middle class. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the middle class as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Bitterness
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001768868 |
2 |
To a large extent |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002948113 |
3 |
To some extent |
37 |
2.2% |
0.021816038 |
4 |
To a small extent |
258 |
15.2% |
0.152122642 |
5 |
Not at all |
1315 |
77.5% |
0.775353774 |
97 |
Not answered |
78 |
4.6% |
0.045990566 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme7_1
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about people who receive benefits: Admiration
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a few questions about what you personally feel about people who receive benefits. To what extent do you have the following feelings about people who receive benefits as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
16 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
2 |
To a large extent |
68 |
4% |
0.040094340 |
3 |
To some extent |
304 |
17.9% |
0.179245283 |
4 |
To a small extent |
388 |
22.9% |
0.228773585 |
5 |
Not at all |
842 |
49.6% |
0.496462264 |
97 |
Not answered |
78 |
4.6% |
0.045990566 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme7_2
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about people who receive benefits: Compassion
|
Pre-question text:
|
Nå kommer noen spørsmål om hva du personlig føler om folk som lever på trygd. I hvilken grad har du følgende følelser om folk som lever på trygd?
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
98 |
5.8% |
0.05778302 |
2 |
To a large extent |
364 |
21.5% |
0.21462264 |
3 |
To some extent |
866 |
51.1% |
0.51061321 |
4 |
To a small extent |
194 |
11.4% |
0.11438679 |
5 |
Not at all |
138 |
8.1% |
0.08136792 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
2.1% |
0.02122642 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme7_3
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about people who receive benefits: Feel sorry for them
|
Pre-question text:
|
Nå kommer noen spørsmål om hva du personlig føler om folk som lever på trygd. I hvilken grad har du følgende følelser om folk som lever på trygd?
|
Literal question:
|
Feel sorry for them
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
61 |
3.6% |
0.03596698 |
2 |
To a large extent |
257 |
15.2% |
0.15153302 |
3 |
To some extent |
883 |
52.1% |
0.52063679 |
4 |
To a small extent |
273 |
16.1% |
0.16096698 |
5 |
Not at all |
171 |
10.1% |
0.10082547 |
97 |
Not answered |
51 |
3% |
0.03007075 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme7_4
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about people who receive benefits: Anger
|
Pre-question text:
|
Nå kommer noen spørsmål om hva du personlig føler om folk som lever på trygd. I hvilken grad har du følgende følelser om folk som lever på trygd?
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001768868 |
2 |
To a large extent |
22 |
1.3% |
0.012971698 |
3 |
To some extent |
145 |
8.5% |
0.085495283 |
4 |
To a small extent |
373 |
22% |
0.219929245 |
5 |
Not at all |
1076 |
63.4% |
0.634433962 |
97 |
Not answered |
77 |
4.5% |
0.045400943 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme7_5
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about people who receive benefits: Envy
|
Pre-question text:
|
Nå kommer noen spørsmål om hva du personlig føler om folk som lever på trygd. I hvilken grad har du følgende følelser om folk som lever på trygd?
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005896226 |
2 |
To a large extent |
6 |
0.4% |
0.0035377358 |
3 |
To some extent |
34 |
2% |
0.0200471698 |
4 |
To a small extent |
132 |
7.8% |
0.0778301887 |
5 |
Not at all |
1442 |
85% |
0.8502358491 |
97 |
Not answered |
81 |
4.8% |
0.0477594340 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme7_6
Variable label:
|
Your feelings about people who receive benefits: Bitterness
|
Pre-question text:
|
Nå kommer noen spørsmål om hva du personlig føler om folk som lever på trygd. I hvilken grad har du følgende følelser om folk som lever på trygd?
|
Literal question:
|
Bitterness
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001179245 |
2 |
To a large extent |
22 |
1.3% |
0.012971698 |
3 |
To some extent |
98 |
5.8% |
0.057783019 |
4 |
To a small extent |
257 |
15.2% |
0.151533019 |
5 |
Not at all |
1236 |
72.9% |
0.728773585 |
97 |
Not answered |
81 |
4.8% |
0.047759434 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme1_1
Variable label:
|
Budget priorities: Education for unemployed people rather than unemployment benefits
|
Pre-question text:
|
Politics often involves having to prioritise different measures and schemes so that budgets are met. Below, you will see some political proposals about priorities, all of which will affect government budgets. We would like you to consider these and decide how good or bad each of the proposals are.
|
Literal question:
|
Authorities should prioritise the education and training of unemployed people rather than unemployment benefits.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Good proposal |
626 |
36.9% |
0.369103774 |
2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
662 |
39% |
0.390330189 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
260 |
15.3% |
0.153301887 |
4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
101 |
6% |
0.059551887 |
5 |
Bad proposal |
40 |
2.4% |
0.023584906 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.4% |
0.004127358 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme1_2
Variable label:
|
Budget priorities: More money in higher education, even if that means more taxes
|
Pre-question text:
|
Politics often involves having to prioritise different measures and schemes so that budgets are met. Below, you will see some political proposals about priorities, all of which will affect government budgets. We would like you to consider these and decide how good or bad each of the proposals are.
|
Literal question:
|
Authorities should invest more money in higher education even if it means that we have to pay more taxes.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Good proposal |
330 |
19.5% |
0.194575472 |
2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
557 |
32.8% |
0.328419811 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
470 |
27.7% |
0.277122642 |
4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
217 |
12.8% |
0.127948113 |
5 |
Bad proposal |
112 |
6.6% |
0.066037736 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.6% |
0.005896226 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme1_3
Variable label:
|
Budget priorities: Replace universal child benefit with free kindergartens/After-School Programmes
|
Pre-question text:
|
Politics often involves having to prioritise different measures and schemes so that budgets are met. Below, you will see some political proposals about priorities, all of which will affect government budgets. We would like you to consider these and decide how good or bad each of the proposals are.
|
Literal question:
|
Authorities should replace universal child benefit with free kindergartens and After-School Programmes for all children.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Good proposal |
441 |
26% |
0.260023585 |
2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
465 |
27.4% |
0.274174528 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
327 |
19.3% |
0.192806604 |
4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
239 |
14.1% |
0.140919811 |
5 |
Bad proposal |
216 |
12.7% |
0.127358491 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004716981 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme2_1
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Taxes should be increased for those who earn the most
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a number of political proposals that relate to the amount of money the government should receive and pay out. Therefore, the proposals will affect government budgets. We would like you to consider these and decide how good or bad each of the proposals are.
|
Literal question:
|
Taxes should be increased for those who earn the most.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Good proposal |
758 |
44.7% |
0.446933962 |
2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
531 |
31.3% |
0.313089623 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
210 |
12.4% |
0.123820755 |
4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
112 |
6.6% |
0.066037736 |
5 |
Bad proposal |
77 |
4.5% |
0.045400943 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004716981 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme2_2
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Inheritance tax should be reintroduced
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a number of political proposals that relate to the amount of money the government should receive and pay out. Therefore, the proposals will affect government budgets. We would like you to consider these and decide how good or bad each of the proposals are.
|
Literal question:
|
Inheritance tax should be reintroduced
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Good proposal |
149 |
8.8% |
0.087853774 |
2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
182 |
10.7% |
0.107311321 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
232 |
13.7% |
0.136792453 |
4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
274 |
16.2% |
0.161556604 |
5 |
Bad proposal |
846 |
49.9% |
0.498820755 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.8% |
0.007665094 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme2_3
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: The wealth tax should be abolished
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a number of political proposals that relate to the amount of money the government should receive and pay out. Therefore, the proposals will affect government budgets. We would like you to consider these and decide how good or bad each of the proposals are.
|
Literal question:
|
The wealth tax should be abolished.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Good proposal |
321 |
18.9% |
0.189268868 |
2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
274 |
16.2% |
0.161556604 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
302 |
17.8% |
0.178066038 |
4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
372 |
21.9% |
0.219339623 |
5 |
Bad proposal |
422 |
24.9% |
0.248820755 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002948113 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme2_4
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Fewer differences in the payment of old-age pensions
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a number of political proposals that relate to the amount of money the government should receive and pay out. Therefore, the proposals will affect government budgets. We would like you to consider these and decide how good or bad each of the proposals are.
|
Literal question:
|
There should be fewer differences in the payment of old-age pensions between those with low pensions and those with high pensions
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Good proposal |
403 |
23.8% |
0.237617925 |
2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
520 |
30.7% |
0.306603774 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
391 |
23.1% |
0.230542453 |
4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
238 |
14% |
0.140330189 |
5 |
Bad proposal |
135 |
8% |
0.079599057 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005306604 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme2_5
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Deductible mortgage interest should be retained
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are a number of political proposals that relate to the amount of money the government should receive and pay out. Therefore, the proposals will affect government budgets. We would like you to consider these and decide how good or bad each of the proposals are.
|
Literal question:
|
Deductible mortgage interest should be retained.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Good proposal |
976 |
57.5% |
0.575471698 |
2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
396 |
23.3% |
0.233490566 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
205 |
12.1% |
0.120872642 |
4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
78 |
4.6% |
0.045990566 |
5 |
Bad proposal |
29 |
1.7% |
0.017099057 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007075472 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme3_order
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects order of r16meme3_1 and r16meme3_2.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects order of r16meme3_1 and r16meme3_2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1696] [Invalid:11208] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
r16meme3_1 first |
861 |
50.8% |
0.5076651 |
2 |
r16meme3_2 first |
835 |
49.2% |
0.4923349 |
Sysmiss |
|
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme3_1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Large differences in income necessary to reward talent/effort
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Large differences in people’s incomes are necessary in order to reward talent and effort.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of r16meme3_1 and r16meme3_2 is randomized. See background variable.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
62 |
3.7% |
0.036556604 |
2 |
Agree |
217 |
12.8% |
0.127948113 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
523 |
30.8% |
0.308372642 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
172 |
10.1% |
0.101415094 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
277 |
16.3% |
0.163325472 |
6 |
Disagree |
268 |
15.8% |
0.158018868 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
174 |
10.3% |
0.102594340 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001768868 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme3_2
Variable label:
|
Agrees/disagrees: Should be slight differences in people’s living standards for society to be fair
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
In order for a society to be fair, there should be slight differences in people’s living standards.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of r16meme3_1 and r16meme3_2 is randomized. See background variable.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
271 |
16% |
0.159787736 |
2 |
Agree |
461 |
27.2% |
0.271816038 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
462 |
27.2% |
0.272405660 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
149 |
8.8% |
0.087853774 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
205 |
12.1% |
0.120872642 |
6 |
Disagree |
114 |
6.7% |
0.067216981 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
30 |
1.8% |
0.017688679 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002358491 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme4_order
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects the order of r16meme4_1 and r16meme4_2.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects the order of r16meme4_1 and r16meme4_2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1696] [Invalid:11208] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
r16meme4_1 first |
861 |
50.8% |
0.5076651 |
2 |
r16meme4_2 first |
835 |
49.2% |
0.4923349 |
Sysmiss |
|
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme4_1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Most unemployed people don’t really try to find a job
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Most unemployed people don’t really try to find a job.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of r16meme4_1 and r16meme4_2 is randomized. See background variable.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
24 |
1.4% |
0.014150943 |
2 |
Agree |
54 |
3.2% |
0.031839623 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
241 |
14.2% |
0.142099057 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
285 |
16.8% |
0.168042453 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
325 |
19.2% |
0.191627358 |
6 |
Disagree |
536 |
31.6% |
0.316037736 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
226 |
13.3% |
0.133254717 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002948113 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme4_2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Many receive benefits/services that they are not entitled to
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Many people receive benefits and services that they are not really entitled to.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of r16meme4_1 and r16meme4_2 is randomized. See background variable.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
89 |
5.2% |
0.052476415 |
2 |
Agree |
162 |
9.6% |
0.095518868 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
404 |
23.8% |
0.238207547 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
389 |
22.9% |
0.229363208 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
215 |
12.7% |
0.126768868 |
6 |
Disagree |
306 |
18% |
0.180424528 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
125 |
7.4% |
0.073702830 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003537736 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme8_1
Variable label:
|
Does the group have more/less money than deserved: Poor people
|
Pre-question text:
|
For each of the following groups, please answer if they have more money than they deserve, less money than they deserve or roughly the amount of money they deserve.
|
Literal question:
|
Poor people
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money than they deserve |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002948113 |
2 |
Somewhat more money than they deserve |
32 |
1.9% |
0.018867925 |
3 |
Roughly the amount of money they deserve |
218 |
12.9% |
0.128537736 |
4 |
Somewhat less money than they deserve |
714 |
42.1% |
0.420990566 |
5 |
Much less money than they deserve |
693 |
40.9% |
0.408608491 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
2% |
0.020047170 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme8_2
Variable label:
|
Does the group have more/less money than deserved: Rich people
|
Pre-question text:
|
For each of the following groups, please answer if they have more money than they deserve, less money than they deserve or roughly the amount of money they deserve.
|
Literal question:
|
Rich people
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money than they deserve |
475 |
28% |
0.280070755 |
2 |
Somewhat more money than they deserve |
634 |
37.4% |
0.373820755 |
3 |
Roughly the amount of money they deserve |
523 |
30.8% |
0.308372642 |
4 |
Somewhat less money than they deserve |
21 |
1.2% |
0.012382075 |
5 |
Much less money than they deserve |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002948113 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.2% |
0.022405660 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme8_3
Variable label:
|
Does the group have more/less money than deserved: The middle class
|
Pre-question text:
|
For each of the following groups, please answer if they have more money than they deserve, less money than they deserve or roughly the amount of money they deserve.
|
Literal question:
|
The middle class
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money than they deserve |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003537736 |
2 |
Somewhat more money than they deserve |
127 |
7.5% |
0.074882075 |
3 |
Roughly the amount of money they deserve |
1316 |
77.6% |
0.775943396 |
4 |
Somewhat less money than they deserve |
190 |
11.2% |
0.112028302 |
5 |
Much less money than they deserve |
21 |
1.2% |
0.012382075 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
2.1% |
0.021226415 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme8_4
Variable label:
|
Does the group have more/less money than deserved: The working class
|
Pre-question text:
|
For each of the following groups, please answer if they have more money than they deserve, less money than they deserve or roughly the amount of money they deserve.
|
Literal question:
|
The working class
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money than they deserve |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002948113 |
2 |
Somewhat more money than they deserve |
49 |
2.9% |
0.028891509 |
3 |
Roughly the amount of money they deserve |
963 |
56.8% |
0.567806604 |
4 |
Somewhat less money than they deserve |
563 |
33.2% |
0.331957547 |
5 |
Much less money than they deserve |
74 |
4.4% |
0.043632075 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
2.5% |
0.024764151 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme8_5
Variable label:
|
Does the group have more/less money than deserved: People who receive benefits
|
Pre-question text:
|
For each of the following groups, please answer if they have more money than they deserve, less money than they deserve or roughly the amount of money they deserve.
|
Literal question:
|
People who receive benefits
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. The order of the response options is randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money than they deserve |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01179245 |
2 |
Somewhat more money than they deserve |
97 |
5.7% |
0.05719340 |
3 |
Roughly the amount of money they deserve |
644 |
38% |
0.37971698 |
4 |
Somewhat less money than they deserve |
705 |
41.6% |
0.41568396 |
5 |
Much less money than they deserve |
190 |
11.2% |
0.11202830 |
97 |
Not answered |
40 |
2.4% |
0.02358491 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16meme9
Variable label:
|
Where do you place yourself on a ladder that illustrates the hierarchy of society?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that this is a ladder that shows how Norwegian society is divided. At the top of the ladder are people who are best placed in society - those who have the most money, the most education and jobs that gain the most respect. At the bottom of the ladder are people who are worst placed - those who have the least money, have little or no education, have jobs that gain the least respect or don’t have jobs at all. The higher you are on this ladder, the closer you are to those who are at the very top. The lower you are, the closer you are to those at the very bottom.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a ladder?
|
Post-question:
|
Mark the step that you think you are standing on at this point in your life compared to others in Norwegian society.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4. Respondents are shown an illustration of a ladder with numbered response options from 10 to 1.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003537736 |
2 |
2 |
30 |
1.8% |
0.017688679 |
3 |
3 |
49 |
2.9% |
0.028891509 |
4 |
4 |
139 |
8.2% |
0.081957547 |
5 |
5 |
258 |
15.2% |
0.152122642 |
6 |
6 |
459 |
27.1% |
0.270636792 |
7 |
7 |
480 |
28.3% |
0.283018868 |
8 |
8 |
222 |
13.1% |
0.130896226 |
9 |
9 |
42 |
2.5% |
0.024764151 |
10 |
10 |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001179245 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005306604 |
98 |
Not asked |
11208 |
|
NA |
r16kreft6
Variable label:
|
We would now like to know how many children you have at present?
|
Literal question:
|
We would now like to know how many children you have at present?
|
Post-question:
|
Click “Next” if you do not wish to answer this question.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 or 4 and r16P1 = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
415 |
24% |
0.23960739 |
1 |
1 |
239 |
13.8% |
0.13799076 |
2 |
2 |
639 |
36.9% |
0.36893764 |
3 |
3 |
329 |
19% |
0.18995381 |
4 |
4 or more |
79 |
4.6% |
0.04561201 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.8% |
0.01789838 |
98 |
Not asked |
11172 |
|
NA |
r16km_skog2_a
Variable label:
|
Image evaluation: Which landscape did you like best? (grazed/overgrown/spruce forests)
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now display three sets with three landscape images in each set. The image montages below show how the same landscape will typically look when it is grazed, when it becomes overgrown on its own accord or when it is planted with spruce forests. (This is screen 1 of 3.) You will get the opportunity to write comments after set no. 3.
|
Literal question:
|
Which landscape image do you like best?
|
Post-question:
|
(Note: The images consist of one photograph underneath with manipulated landscapes on top. You will get the opportunity to write comments later.)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Respondents are shown a set of pictures of landscapes (set #1). Please contact Endre Tvinnereim (entv@norceresearch.no) for more information.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Picture 1: Grazed |
903 |
79.7% |
0.796999117 |
2 |
Picture 2: Overgrown |
136 |
12% |
0.120035305 |
3 |
Picture 3: Spruce forests |
59 |
5.2% |
0.052074139 |
4 |
Do not know/no opinion/do not wish to answer |
24 |
2.1% |
0.021182701 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1% |
0.009708738 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_skog2_b
Variable label:
|
Image evaluation: Which landscape did you like best? (grazed/overgrown/spruce forests)
|
Pre-question text:
|
The images below show how the same landscape will typically look when it is grazed, when it becomes overgrown on its own accord or when it is planted with spruce forests.
|
Literal question:
|
Which landscape image do you like best?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Respondents are shown a set of pictures of landscapes (set #2). Please contact Endre Tvinnereim (entv@norceresearch.no) for more information.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Picture 1: Grazed |
861 |
76% |
0.759929391 |
2 |
Picture 2: Overgrown |
168 |
14.8% |
0.148278906 |
3 |
Picture 3: Spruce forests |
78 |
6.9% |
0.068843778 |
4 |
Do not know/no opinion/do not wish to answer |
19 |
1.7% |
0.016769638 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006178288 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_skog2_c
Variable label:
|
Image evaluation: Which landscape did you like best? (grazed/overgrown/spruce forests)
|
Pre-question text:
|
The images below show how the same landscape will typically look when it is grazed, when it becomes overgrown on its own accord or when it is planted with spruce forests.
|
Literal question:
|
Which landscape image do you like best?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Respondents are shown a set of pictures of landscapes (set #3). Please contact Endre Tvinnereim (entv@norceresearch.no) for more information.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Picture 1: Grazed |
761 |
67.2% |
0.671668138 |
2 |
Picture 2: Overgrown |
274 |
24.2% |
0.241835834 |
3 |
Picture 3: Spruce forests |
72 |
6.4% |
0.063548102 |
4 |
Do not know/no opinion/do not wish to answer |
17 |
1.5% |
0.015004413 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007943513 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_skog2_d
Variable label:
|
Open: Explain preferred landscape [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Here you can explain your choices:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Respondents are shown a set of pictures of landscapes (set #3).]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16km_skog3_1
Variable label:
|
Betydningfullt for deg: How nice the landscape looked
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the most?
|
Literal question:
|
How nice the landscape looked
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c is answered ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
How nice the landscape looked |
541 |
47.9% |
0.4787611 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
589 |
52.1% |
0.5212389 |
r16km_skog3_2
Variable label:
|
Important for you: Accessibility in the landscape
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the most?
|
Literal question:
|
Accessibility in the landscape
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c is answered ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Accessibility in the landscape |
481 |
42.6% |
0.4256637 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
649 |
57.4% |
0.5743363 |
r16km_skog3_3
Variable label:
|
Important for you: That the landscape is used for forestry
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the most?
|
Literal question:
|
That the landscape is used for forestry
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c is answered ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
That the landscape is used for forestry |
67 |
5.9% |
0.05929204 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1063 |
94.1% |
0.94070796 |
r16km_skog3_4
Variable label:
|
Important for you: That the landscape is used for grazing
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the most?
|
Literal question:
|
That the landscape is used for grazing
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c is answered ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
That the landscape is used for grazing |
640 |
56.6% |
0.5663717 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
490 |
43.4% |
0.4336283 |
r16km_skog3_5
Variable label:
|
Important for you: Natural diversity
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the most?
|
Literal question:
|
Natural diversity
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c is answered ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Natural diversity |
371 |
32.8% |
0.3283186 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
759 |
67.2% |
0.6716814 |
r16km_skog3_6
Variable label:
|
Important for you: Cultivated landscape
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the most?
|
Literal question:
|
Cultivated landscape
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c is answered ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Cultivated landscape |
532 |
47.1% |
0.4707965 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
598 |
52.9% |
0.5292035 |
r16km_skog3_7
Variable label:
|
Important for you: Absorption of greenhouse gases in vegetation
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the most?
|
Literal question:
|
Absorption of greenhouse gases in vegetation
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c is answered ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Absorption of greenhouse gases in vegetation |
130 |
11.5% |
0.1150442 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1000 |
88.5% |
0.8849558 |
r16km_skog3_8
Variable label:
|
Important for you: Risk of forest fire
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the most?
|
Literal question:
|
Risk of forest fire
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c is answered ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Risk of forest fire |
21 |
1.9% |
0.01858407 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1109 |
98.1% |
0.98141593 |
r16km_skog3_9
Variable label:
|
Important for you: Other factors
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the most?
|
Literal question:
|
Other factors
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c is answered ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other factors |
46 |
4.1% |
0.04070796 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1084 |
95.9% |
0.95929204 |
r16km_skog3_10
Variable label:
|
Important for you: Don’t know
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was important for you when you chose the landscape you liked the most?
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t know
|
Post-question:
|
Select up to 3 options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16km_skog2_a, r16km_skog2_b or r16km_skog2_c is answered ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Don't know |
14 |
1.2% |
0.01238938 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11774 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1116 |
98.8% |
0.98761062 |
r16km_skog4_1
Variable label:
|
Grew up nearby: Planted spruce forest
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, we would like you to provide some background information. When you were growing up, did you live near any of the following types of landscapes?
|
Literal question:
|
Planted spruce forest
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Planted spruce forest |
378 |
33.4% |
0.3336275 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
755 |
66.6% |
0.6663725 |
r16km_skog4_2
Variable label:
|
Grew up nearby: Grazing pasture
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, we would like you to provide some background information. When you were growing up, did you live near any of the following types of landscapes?
|
Literal question:
|
Grazing pasture
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Grazing pasture |
533 |
47% |
0.4704325 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
600 |
53% |
0.5295675 |
r16km_skog4_3
Variable label:
|
Grew up nearby: Grazing pasture overgrown with forest
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, we would like you to provide some background information. When you were growing up, did you live near any of the following types of landscapes?
|
Literal question:
|
Grazing pasture overgrown with forest, or that is about to become overgrown
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Grazing pasture overgrown with forest, or that is about to become overgrown |
292 |
25.8% |
0.2577229 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
841 |
74.2% |
0.7422771 |
r16km_skog4_4
Variable label:
|
Grew up nearby: Agriculture
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, we would like you to provide some background information. When you were growing up, did you live near any of the following types of landscapes?
|
Literal question:
|
Agriculture
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agriculture |
556 |
49.1% |
0.4907326 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
577 |
50.9% |
0.5092674 |
r16km_skog4_5
Variable label:
|
Grew up nearby: Deciduous forest
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, we would like you to provide some background information. When you were growing up, did you live near any of the following types of landscapes?
|
Literal question:
|
Deciduous forest
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Deciduous forest |
384 |
33.9% |
0.3389232 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
749 |
66.1% |
0.6610768 |
r16km_skog4_6
Variable label:
|
Grew up nearby: None of these
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, we would like you to provide some background information. When you were growing up, did you live near any of the following types of landscapes?
|
Literal question:
|
None of these
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
None of these |
253 |
22.3% |
0.223301 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
880 |
77.7% |
0.776699 |
r16km_skog4_7
Variable label:
|
Grew up nearby: Don’t know
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, we would like you to provide some background information. When you were growing up, did you live near any of the following types of landscapes?
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t know
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Don't know |
8 |
0.7% |
0.0070609 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1125 |
99.3% |
0.9929391 |
r16km_skog5
Variable label:
|
Are you a member of an outdoor/recreational/ environmental organisation?
|
Literal question:
|
Are you a member of an outdoor/recreational and/or environmental organisation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
256 |
22.6% |
0.225948808 |
2 |
No |
872 |
77% |
0.769638129 |
3 |
Don't know |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001765225 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002647838 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_skog6_1
Variable label:
|
You/your family work in: Agriculture that involves grazing livestock
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you, or others in your family, work in any of these industries?
|
Literal question:
|
Agriculture that involves grazing livestock
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agriculture that involves grazing livestock |
122 |
10.8% |
0.1076787 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1011 |
89.2% |
0.8923213 |
r16km_skog6_2
Variable label:
|
You/your family work in: Agriculture that doesn’t involve grazing livestock
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you, or others in your family, work in any of these industries?
|
Literal question:
|
Agriculture that doesn’t involve grazing livestock
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agriculture that doesn't involve grazing livestock |
65 |
5.7% |
0.05736981 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1068 |
94.3% |
0.94263019 |
r16km_skog6_3
Variable label:
|
You/your family work in: Tourist industry
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you, or others in your family, work in any of these industries?
|
Literal question:
|
Tourist industry
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Tourist industry |
37 |
3.3% |
0.03265666 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1096 |
96.7% |
0.96734334 |
r16km_skog6_4
Variable label:
|
You/your family work in: Forestry
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you, or others in your family, work in any of these industries?
|
Literal question:
|
Forestry
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Forestry |
78 |
6.9% |
0.06884378 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1055 |
93.1% |
0.93115622 |
r16km_skog6_5
Variable label:
|
You/your family work in: Research or education within agriculture/tourist industry/forestry
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you, or others in your family, work in any of these industries?
|
Literal question:
|
Research or education within the above areas
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Research or education within the above areas |
30 |
2.6% |
0.02647838 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1103 |
97.4% |
0.97352162 |
r16km_skog6_6
Variable label:
|
You/your family work in: Not in agriculture/tourist industry/forestry
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you, or others in your family, work in any of these industries?
|
Literal question:
|
No, neither I nor anyone else in my family work in any of the industries above
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No, neither I nor anyone else in my family work in any of the industries above |
897 |
79.2% |
0.7917034 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
236 |
20.8% |
0.2082966 |
r16km_skog6_7
Variable label:
|
You/your family work in: Don’t know
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you, or others in your family, work in any of these industries?
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t know
|
Post-question:
|
Mark all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Don't know |
4 |
0.4% |
0.00353045 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1129 |
99.6% |
0.99646955 |
r16km_privacy_1
Variable label:
|
How worried about: Internet companies use of private data
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of some current issues being discussed in the media. We would like to know how much you personally worry about each of these issues.
|
Literal question:
|
How internet companies use private/personal data
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the issue that you are personally worried about the most, then the issue that worries you the second most and so on, until you have ranked all five issues. If you change your mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Ranking where 1 is “most worried” and 5 is “least worried”. The order of the response options is randomized. Should be viewed in conjuction with r16km_privacy_none which appeared as an independent response option just below the rankings.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
171 |
15.1% |
0.15092674 |
2 |
2 |
274 |
24.2% |
0.24183583 |
3 |
3 |
283 |
25% |
0.24977935 |
4 |
4 |
142 |
12.5% |
0.12533098 |
5 |
5 |
109 |
9.6% |
0.09620477 |
97 |
Not answered |
154 |
13.6% |
0.13592233 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_privacy_2
Variable label:
|
How worried about: The financial situation
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of some current issues being discussed in the media. We would like to know how much you personally worry about each of these issues.
|
Literal question:
|
The financial situation
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the issue that you are personally worried about the most, then the issue that worries you the second most and so on, until you have ranked all five issues. If you change your mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Ranking where 1 is “most worried” and 5 is “least worried”. The order of the response options is randomized. Should be viewed in conjuction with r16km_privacy_none which appeared as an independent response option just below the rankings.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
88 |
7.8% |
0.0776699 |
2 |
2 |
177 |
15.6% |
0.1562224 |
3 |
3 |
228 |
20.1% |
0.2012357 |
4 |
4 |
249 |
22% |
0.2197705 |
5 |
5 |
171 |
15.1% |
0.1509267 |
97 |
Not answered |
220 |
19.4% |
0.1941748 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_privacy_3
Variable label:
|
How worried about: Climate change
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of some current issues being discussed in the media. We would like to know how much you personally worry about each of these issues.
|
Literal question:
|
Climate change
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the issue that you are personally worried about the most, then the issue that worries you the second most and so on, until you have ranked all five issues. If you change your mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Ranking where 1 is “most worried” and 5 is “least worried”. The order of the response options is randomized. Should be viewed in conjuction with r16km_privacy_none which appeared as an independent response option just below the rankings.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
507 |
44.7% |
0.44748455 |
2 |
2 |
219 |
19.3% |
0.19329214 |
3 |
3 |
113 |
10% |
0.09973522 |
4 |
4 |
80 |
7.1% |
0.07060900 |
5 |
5 |
94 |
8.3% |
0.08296558 |
97 |
Not answered |
120 |
10.6% |
0.10591350 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_privacy_4
Variable label:
|
How worried about: Immigration
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of some current issues being discussed in the media. We would like to know how much you personally worry about each of these issues.
|
Literal question:
|
Immigration
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the issue that you are personally worried about the most, then the issue that worries you the second most and so on, until you have ranked all five issues. If you change your mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Ranking where 1 is “most worried” and 5 is “least worried”. The order of the response options is randomized. Should be viewed in conjuction with r16km_privacy_none which appeared as an independent response option just below the rankings.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
118 |
10.4% |
0.1041483 |
2 |
2 |
104 |
9.2% |
0.0917917 |
3 |
3 |
127 |
11.2% |
0.1120918 |
4 |
4 |
189 |
16.7% |
0.1668138 |
5 |
5 |
344 |
30.4% |
0.3036187 |
97 |
Not answered |
251 |
22.2% |
0.2215357 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_privacy_5
Variable label:
|
How worried about: Terrorism
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of some current issues being discussed in the media. We would like to know how much you personally worry about each of these issues.
|
Literal question:
|
Terrorism
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the issue that you are personally worried about the most, then the issue that worries you the second most and so on, until you have ranked all five issues. If you change your mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Ranking where 1 is “most worried” and 5 is “least worried”. The order of the response options is randomized. Should be viewed in conjuction with r16km_privacy_none which appeared as an independent response option just below the rankings.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
208 |
18.4% |
0.18358341 |
2 |
2 |
255 |
22.5% |
0.22506620 |
3 |
3 |
205 |
18.1% |
0.18093557 |
4 |
4 |
177 |
15.6% |
0.15622242 |
5 |
5 |
100 |
8.8% |
0.08826125 |
97 |
Not answered |
188 |
16.6% |
0.16593116 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16km_privacy_none
Variable label:
|
How worried about: Not worried about any of the issues
|
Literal question:
|
Not worried about any of the issues
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. Shown on the same page as r16km_privacy_1, r16km_privacy_2, r16km_privacy_3, r16km_privacy_4 and r16km_privacy_5.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not worried about any of the issues |
33 |
2.9% |
0.02912621 |
97 |
Not answered |
1092 |
96.4% |
0.96381289 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
8 |
0.7% |
0.00706090 |
r16km_privacy_open
Variable label:
|
Open: Worried about other issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Is there one issue that you are very worried about but isn’t on the list? If this is the case, you can write it in the box below.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16pkby3
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
52 |
4.6% |
0.0458958517 |
2 |
Slightly |
403 |
35.6% |
0.3556928508 |
3 |
Somewhat |
512 |
45.2% |
0.4518976169 |
4 |
To a great extent |
136 |
12% |
0.1200353045 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
29 |
2.6% |
0.0255957635 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008826125 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16dv39
Variable label:
|
How often do you now think/read/talk about something related to 22 July?
|
Pre-question text:
|
It’s now been more than eight years since the attacks of 22 July 201.
|
Literal question:
|
When it comes to you personally, how often would you say that you now think about, read or talk about something that is related to 22 July?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Daily |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001765225 |
2 |
Weekly |
36 |
3.2% |
0.031774051 |
3 |
A couple of times a month |
233 |
20.6% |
0.205648720 |
4 |
Less often, but it happens |
775 |
68.4% |
0.684024713 |
5 |
Never |
84 |
7.4% |
0.074139453 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002647838 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16k43_1
Variable label:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections this autumn?
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections this autumn?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
435 |
3.4% |
0.033710477 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
2456 |
19% |
0.190328580 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
673 |
5.2% |
0.052154371 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
502 |
3.9% |
0.038902666 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1021 |
7.9% |
0.079122753 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
1548 |
12% |
0.119962802 |
7 |
The Green Party |
1116 |
8.6% |
0.086484811 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
2662 |
20.6% |
0.206292622 |
9 |
The Red Party |
616 |
4.8% |
0.047737136 |
10 |
The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative) |
268 |
2.1% |
0.020768754 |
11 |
A joint party list |
25 |
0.2% |
0.001937384 |
12 |
A local party list |
208 |
1.6% |
0.016119033 |
13 |
Voted blank |
130 |
1% |
0.010074396 |
14 |
Did not vote |
825 |
6.4% |
0.063933664 |
15 |
Not entitled to vote |
67 |
0.5% |
0.005192188 |
16 |
Other: |
281 |
2.2% |
0.021776193 |
97 |
Not answered |
71 |
0.6% |
0.005502170 |
r16k43_1_16_other
Variable label:
|
Open [R16K43_1_16] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Hvilke parti/liste stemte du på ved kommunevalget nå i høst?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16k43_2
Variable label:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council election this autumn?
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council election this autumn?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. The order of the response options is randomized (but adhers to the order of r16k43_1).]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
453 |
3.5% |
0.0351053937 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
2413 |
18.7% |
0.1869962802 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
683 |
5.3% |
0.0529293242 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
454 |
3.5% |
0.0351828890 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
965 |
7.5% |
0.0747830130 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
1606 |
12.4% |
0.1244575325 |
7 |
The Green Party |
1086 |
8.4% |
0.0841599504 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
2456 |
19% |
0.1903285803 |
9 |
The Red Party |
581 |
4.5% |
0.0450247985 |
10 |
The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative) |
234 |
1.8% |
0.0181339120 |
11 |
A joint party list |
9 |
0.1% |
0.0006974582 |
12 |
A local party list |
68 |
0.5% |
0.0052696838 |
13 |
Voted blank |
195 |
1.5% |
0.0151115933 |
14 |
Did not vote |
1175 |
9.1% |
0.0910570366 |
15 |
Not entitled to vote |
121 |
0.9% |
0.0093769374 |
16 |
Other: |
277 |
2.1% |
0.0214662120 |
97 |
Not answered |
128 |
1% |
0.0099194048 |
r16k43_2_16_other
Variable label:
|
Open [R16K43_2_16] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Hvilke parti/liste stemte du på ved fylkesvalget nå i høst?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16pk204
Variable label:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
375 |
2.9% |
0.029060756 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
2568 |
19.9% |
0.199008060 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
821 |
6.4% |
0.063623683 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
364 |
2.8% |
0.028208308 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
1162 |
9% |
0.090049597 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
2069 |
16% |
0.160337880 |
7 |
The Green Party |
934 |
7.2% |
0.072380657 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
2540 |
19.7% |
0.196838190 |
9 |
The Red Party |
743 |
5.8% |
0.057579045 |
10 |
Would not vote |
235 |
1.8% |
0.018211407 |
11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
299 |
2.3% |
0.023171110 |
12 |
Not entitled to vote |
282 |
2.2% |
0.021853689 |
13 |
Other: |
432 |
3.3% |
0.033477991 |
97 |
Not answered |
80 |
0.6% |
0.006199628 |
r16pk204_13_other
Variable label:
|
Open [R16K204_13] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16tdr23_1
Variable label:
|
How important when voting: I always vote for this party
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why one chooses to vote in local elections. How important are the following reasons for you personally:
|
Literal question:
|
I always vote for this party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
316 |
9.2% |
0.09247878 |
2 |
Important |
705 |
20.6% |
0.20632133 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
655 |
19.2% |
0.19168862 |
4 |
Slightly important |
440 |
12.9% |
0.12876793 |
5 |
Not important at all |
1101 |
32.2% |
0.32221247 |
97 |
Not answered |
200 |
5.9% |
0.05853088 |
98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr23_2
Variable label:
|
How important when voting: I wish to indicate general support to one party
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why one chooses to vote in local elections. How important are the following reasons for you personally:
|
Literal question:
|
I wish to indicate general support to one party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
607 |
17.8% |
0.17764121 |
2 |
Important |
1251 |
36.6% |
0.36611062 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
638 |
18.7% |
0.18671349 |
4 |
Slightly important |
365 |
10.7% |
0.10681885 |
5 |
Not important at all |
366 |
10.7% |
0.10711150 |
97 |
Not answered |
190 |
5.6% |
0.05560433 |
98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr23_3
Variable label:
|
How important when voting: I wish to exercise my civic duty
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why one chooses to vote in local elections. How important are the following reasons for you personally:
|
Literal question:
|
I wish to exercise my civic duty
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
1708 |
50% |
0.49985367 |
2 |
Important |
1035 |
30.3% |
0.30289728 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
242 |
7.1% |
0.07082236 |
4 |
Slightly important |
137 |
4% |
0.04009365 |
5 |
Not important at all |
128 |
3.7% |
0.03745976 |
97 |
Not answered |
167 |
4.9% |
0.04887328 |
98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr23_4
Variable label:
|
How important when voting: I wish to influence municipal policies
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why one chooses to vote in local elections. How important are the following reasons for you personally:
|
Literal question:
|
I wish to influence municipal policies
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
1551 |
45.4% |
0.45390694 |
2 |
Important |
1265 |
37% |
0.37020778 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
329 |
9.6% |
0.09628329 |
4 |
Slightly important |
103 |
3% |
0.03014340 |
5 |
Not important at all |
63 |
1.8% |
0.01843723 |
97 |
Not answered |
106 |
3.1% |
0.03102136 |
98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr23_5
Variable label:
|
How important when voting: I wish to influence county authority policies
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why one chooses to vote in local elections. How important are the following reasons for you personally:
|
Literal question:
|
I wish to influence county authority policies
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
1082 |
31.7% |
0.31665203 |
2 |
Important |
1178 |
34.5% |
0.34474685 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
615 |
18% |
0.17998244 |
4 |
Slightly important |
233 |
6.8% |
0.06818847 |
5 |
Not important at all |
149 |
4.4% |
0.04360550 |
97 |
Not answered |
160 |
4.7% |
0.04682470 |
98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr23_6
Variable label:
|
How important when voting: Andre grunner
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why one chooses to vote in local elections. How important are the following reasons for you personally:
|
Literal question:
|
Other reasons:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
181 |
5.3% |
0.05297044 |
2 |
Important |
310 |
9.1% |
0.09072286 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
352 |
10.3% |
0.10301434 |
4 |
Slightly important |
128 |
3.7% |
0.03745976 |
5 |
Not important at all |
422 |
12.4% |
0.12350015 |
97 |
Not answered |
2024 |
59.2% |
0.59233246 |
98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr23_6_other
Variable label:
|
Open [R16TDR23_6] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why one chooses to vote in local elections. How important are the following reasons for you personally:
|
Literal question:
|
Other reasons:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16tdr23b
Variable label:
|
How important: Your home municipality represented in the new municipality
|
Literal question:
|
During this autumn’s election, how important was it for you to make sure that your home municipality would be represented in the new municipality’s governing bodies?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 and r16tdr20a = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
207 |
31.6% |
0.315548780 |
2 |
Important |
233 |
35.5% |
0.355182927 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
94 |
14.3% |
0.143292683 |
4 |
Slightly important |
28 |
4.3% |
0.042682927 |
5 |
Not important at all |
89 |
13.6% |
0.135670732 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.8% |
0.007621951 |
98 |
Not asked |
12248 |
|
NA |
r16tdr23c
Variable label:
|
How important: Your home county authority represented in the new county authority
|
Literal question:
|
During this autumn’s election, how important was it for you to make sure that your home county authority would be represented in the new county authority’s governing bodies?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 and r16tdr20c = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
314 |
28.9% |
0.28940092 |
2 |
Important |
348 |
32.1% |
0.32073733 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
174 |
16% |
0.16036866 |
4 |
Slightly important |
77 |
7.1% |
0.07096774 |
5 |
Not important at all |
152 |
14% |
0.14009217 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.8% |
0.01843318 |
98 |
Not asked |
11819 |
|
NA |
r16tdr24_1
Variable label:
|
You vote in local elections to: To reward/punish local politicians
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons to vote for specific local or county council representatives. Below you will find some of these reasons. How important are these reasons for you when choosing a political party or party list during local elections:
|
Literal question:
|
I use my vote to reward or punish local politicians regarding their behaviour or decisions they made over the past 4 years.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
378 |
11.1% |
0.11062335 |
2 |
Important |
852 |
24.9% |
0.24934153 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
670 |
19.6% |
0.19607843 |
4 |
Slightly important |
462 |
13.5% |
0.13520632 |
5 |
Not important at all |
964 |
28.2% |
0.28211882 |
97 |
Not answered |
91 |
2.7% |
0.02663155 |
98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr24_2
Variable label:
|
You vote in local elections to: To reward/punish county authority politicians
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons to vote for specific local or county council representatives. Below you will find some of these reasons. How important are these reasons for you when choosing a political party or party list during local elections:
|
Literal question:
|
I use my vote to reward or punish county authority politicians regarding their behaviour or decisions they made over the past 4 years.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
251 |
7.3% |
0.07345625 |
2 |
Important |
657 |
19.2% |
0.19227392 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
681 |
19.9% |
0.19929763 |
4 |
Slightly important |
525 |
15.4% |
0.15364355 |
5 |
Not important at all |
1180 |
34.5% |
0.34533216 |
97 |
Not answered |
123 |
3.6% |
0.03599649 |
98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr24_3
Variable label:
|
You vote in local elections to: To reward/punish national politicians
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons to vote for specific local or county council representatives. Below you will find some of these reasons. How important are these reasons for you when choosing a political party or party list during local elections:
|
Literal question:
|
I use my vote to reward or punish national politicians regarding their behaviour or decisions they made over the past 2 years.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
361 |
10.6% |
0.10564823 |
2 |
Important |
782 |
22.9% |
0.22885572 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
648 |
19% |
0.18964004 |
4 |
Slightly important |
482 |
14.1% |
0.14105941 |
5 |
Not important at all |
1005 |
29.4% |
0.29411765 |
97 |
Not answered |
139 |
4.1% |
0.04067896 |
98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr24_4
Variable label:
|
You vote in local elections to: To enure the municipality’s interests are safeguarded
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons to vote for specific local or county council representatives. Below you will find some of these reasons. How important are these reasons for you when choosing a political party or party list during local elections:
|
Literal question:
|
I use my vote to ensure that the municipality’s elected officials act in the best interests of my municipality over the next four years.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
1663 |
48.7% |
0.48668423 |
2 |
Important |
1285 |
37.6% |
0.37606087 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
244 |
7.1% |
0.07140767 |
4 |
Slightly important |
65 |
1.9% |
0.01902253 |
5 |
Not important at all |
103 |
3% |
0.03014340 |
97 |
Not answered |
57 |
1.7% |
0.01668130 |
98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr24_5
Variable label:
|
You vote in local elections to: To enure the county’s interests are safeguarded
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons to vote for specific local or county council representatives. Below you will find some of these reasons. How important are these reasons for you when choosing a political party or party list during local elections:
|
Literal question:
|
I use my vote to ensure that the county authority’s elected officials act in the best interests of my county over the next four years.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
1255 |
36.7% |
0.36728124 |
2 |
Important |
1274 |
37.3% |
0.37284167 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
450 |
13.2% |
0.13169447 |
4 |
Slightly important |
164 |
4.8% |
0.04799532 |
5 |
Not important at all |
176 |
5.2% |
0.05150717 |
97 |
Not answered |
98 |
2.9% |
0.02868013 |
98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr24_6
Variable label:
|
You vote in local elections to: Government policies must have support among locally elected officials
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons to vote for specific local or county council representatives. Below you will find some of these reasons. How important are these reasons for you when choosing a political party or party list during local elections:
|
Literal question:
|
I use my vote to ensure that government policies have support among elected officials in my county authority/municipality over the next two years.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 or 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
823 |
24.1% |
0.24085455 |
2 |
Important |
1055 |
30.9% |
0.30875037 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
507 |
14.8% |
0.14837577 |
4 |
Slightly important |
259 |
7.6% |
0.07579748 |
5 |
Not important at all |
656 |
19.2% |
0.19198127 |
97 |
Not answered |
117 |
3.4% |
0.03424056 |
98 |
Not asked |
9487 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_1
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: Road tolls
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the local elections?
|
Literal question:
|
Road tolls
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
232 |
13.2% |
0.13151927 |
2 |
Important |
289 |
16.4% |
0.16383220 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
307 |
17.4% |
0.17403628 |
4 |
Slightly important |
277 |
15.7% |
0.15702948 |
5 |
Not important at all |
605 |
34.3% |
0.34297052 |
97 |
Not answered |
54 |
3.1% |
0.03061224 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_2
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: The merger of municipalities
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the local elections?
|
Literal question:
|
The merger of municipalities
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
186 |
10.5% |
0.10544218 |
2 |
Important |
355 |
20.1% |
0.20124717 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
350 |
19.8% |
0.19841270 |
4 |
Slightly important |
275 |
15.6% |
0.15589569 |
5 |
Not important at all |
538 |
30.5% |
0.30498866 |
97 |
Not answered |
60 |
3.4% |
0.03401361 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_3
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: Environment/climate
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the local elections?
|
Literal question:
|
Environment/climate
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
506 |
28.7% |
0.28684807 |
2 |
Important |
601 |
34.1% |
0.34070295 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
349 |
19.8% |
0.19784580 |
4 |
Slightly important |
164 |
9.3% |
0.09297052 |
5 |
Not important at all |
96 |
5.4% |
0.05442177 |
97 |
Not answered |
48 |
2.7% |
0.02721088 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_4
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: School
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the local elections?
|
Literal question:
|
School
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
627 |
35.5% |
0.35544218 |
2 |
Important |
708 |
40.1% |
0.40136054 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
214 |
12.1% |
0.12131519 |
4 |
Slightly important |
98 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
5 |
Not important at all |
73 |
4.1% |
0.04138322 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.5% |
0.02494331 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_5
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: Care for the elderly
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the local elections?
|
Literal question:
|
Care for the elderly
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
641 |
36.3% |
0.36337868 |
2 |
Important |
695 |
39.4% |
0.39399093 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
231 |
13.1% |
0.13095238 |
4 |
Slightly important |
100 |
5.7% |
0.05668934 |
5 |
Not important at all |
60 |
3.4% |
0.03401361 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.1% |
0.02097506 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_6
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: Public transport
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the local elections?
|
Literal question:
|
Public transport
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
459 |
26% |
0.26020408 |
2 |
Important |
678 |
38.4% |
0.38435374 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
317 |
18% |
0.17970522 |
4 |
Slightly important |
138 |
7.8% |
0.07823129 |
5 |
Not important at all |
116 |
6.6% |
0.06575964 |
97 |
Not answered |
56 |
3.2% |
0.03174603 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_7
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: Culture/sports
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the local elections?
|
Literal question:
|
Culture/sports
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
241 |
13.7% |
0.13662132 |
2 |
Important |
653 |
37% |
0.37018141 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
471 |
26.7% |
0.26700680 |
4 |
Slightly important |
231 |
13.1% |
0.13095238 |
5 |
Not important at all |
108 |
6.1% |
0.06122449 |
97 |
Not answered |
60 |
3.4% |
0.03401361 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr25_8
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the local elections: Property tax
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the local elections?
|
Literal question:
|
Property tax
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
290 |
16.4% |
0.16439909 |
2 |
Important |
403 |
22.8% |
0.22845805 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
389 |
22.1% |
0.22052154 |
4 |
Slightly important |
261 |
14.8% |
0.14795918 |
5 |
Not important at all |
367 |
20.8% |
0.20804989 |
97 |
Not answered |
54 |
3.1% |
0.03061224 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr26_1
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the county council election: Road tolls
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the county council election?
|
Literal question:
|
Road tolls
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
219 |
12.4% |
0.12414966 |
2 |
Important |
274 |
15.5% |
0.15532880 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
319 |
18.1% |
0.18083900 |
4 |
Slightly important |
258 |
14.6% |
0.14625850 |
5 |
Not important at all |
613 |
34.8% |
0.34750567 |
97 |
Not answered |
81 |
4.6% |
0.04591837 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr26_2
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the county council election: The merger of county authorities
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the county council election?
|
Literal question:
|
The merger of county authorities
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
210 |
11.9% |
0.11904762 |
2 |
Important |
336 |
19% |
0.19047619 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
351 |
19.9% |
0.19897959 |
4 |
Slightly important |
247 |
14% |
0.14002268 |
5 |
Not important at all |
530 |
30% |
0.30045351 |
97 |
Not answered |
90 |
5.1% |
0.05102041 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr26_3
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the county council election: Environment/climate
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the county council election?
|
Literal question:
|
Environment/climate
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
461 |
26.1% |
0.26133787 |
2 |
Important |
577 |
32.7% |
0.32709751 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
338 |
19.2% |
0.19160998 |
4 |
Slightly important |
152 |
8.6% |
0.08616780 |
5 |
Not important at all |
146 |
8.3% |
0.08276644 |
97 |
Not answered |
90 |
5.1% |
0.05102041 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr26_4
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the county council election: School/education
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the county council election?
|
Literal question:
|
School/education
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
577 |
32.7% |
0.32709751 |
2 |
Important |
679 |
38.5% |
0.38492063 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
224 |
12.7% |
0.12698413 |
4 |
Slightly important |
96 |
5.4% |
0.05442177 |
5 |
Not important at all |
108 |
6.1% |
0.06122449 |
97 |
Not answered |
80 |
4.5% |
0.04535147 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr26_5
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the county council election: Culture/sports
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the county council election?
|
Literal question:
|
Culture/sports
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
174 |
9.9% |
0.09863946 |
2 |
Important |
649 |
36.8% |
0.36791383 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
448 |
25.4% |
0.25396825 |
4 |
Slightly important |
224 |
12.7% |
0.12698413 |
5 |
Not important at all |
180 |
10.2% |
0.10204082 |
97 |
Not answered |
89 |
5% |
0.05045351 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr26_6
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the county council election: Industrial and regional policy
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the county council election?
|
Literal question:
|
Industrial and regional policy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
401 |
22.7% |
0.22732426 |
2 |
Important |
694 |
39.3% |
0.39342404 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
339 |
19.2% |
0.19217687 |
4 |
Slightly important |
109 |
6.2% |
0.06179138 |
5 |
Not important at all |
139 |
7.9% |
0.07879819 |
97 |
Not answered |
82 |
4.6% |
0.04648526 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr26_7
Variable label:
|
How important for you in the county council election: Jobs
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important would you say the following issues were regarding your vote in the county council election?
|
Literal question:
|
Jobs
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
556 |
31.5% |
0.31519274 |
2 |
Important |
670 |
38% |
0.37981859 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
250 |
14.2% |
0.14172336 |
4 |
Slightly important |
98 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
5 |
Not important at all |
116 |
6.6% |
0.06575964 |
97 |
Not answered |
74 |
4.2% |
0.04195011 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr22
Variable label:
|
Which level of governance would you say safeguards your interests best?
|
Literal question:
|
On a general basis, which level of governance would you say safeguards your interests best?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
National level |
585 |
33.2% |
0.331632653 |
2 |
County Authority |
46 |
2.6% |
0.026077098 |
3 |
Municipality |
525 |
29.8% |
0.297619048 |
4 |
All three equally well |
421 |
23.9% |
0.238662132 |
5 |
None of them safeguard my interests |
171 |
9.7% |
0.096938776 |
97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.9% |
0.009070295 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr16
Variable label:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation in Norway? Do you believe it is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
714 |
40.5% |
0.4047619048 |
2 |
Good |
815 |
46.2% |
0.4620181406 |
3 |
Quite good |
156 |
8.8% |
0.0884353741 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
37 |
2.1% |
0.0209750567 |
5 |
Quite bad |
28 |
1.6% |
0.0158730159 |
6 |
Bad |
8 |
0.5% |
0.0045351474 |
7 |
Very bad |
5 |
0.3% |
0.0028344671 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005668934 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr17
Variable label:
|
The economic situation [in your region of the country], compared to the rest of Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation [in your region of the country] with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation in your region of the country as better, worse or the same?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Better |
626 |
35.5% |
0.354875283 |
2 |
Worse |
244 |
13.8% |
0.138321995 |
3 |
The same |
877 |
49.7% |
0.497165533 |
97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1% |
0.009637188 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr17_b
Variable label:
|
What is the economic situation [in your region of the country] compared to the rest of Norway a result of?
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say this is primarily the result of:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1 and r16tdr17 is answered. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Government policy |
431 |
24.7% |
0.24670864 |
2 |
County authority policy |
64 |
3.7% |
0.03663423 |
3 |
Municipal policy |
146 |
8.4% |
0.08357184 |
4 |
Norwegian politics in general |
836 |
47.9% |
0.47853463 |
5 |
The development is not the result of policies at any level |
251 |
14.4% |
0.14367487 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01087579 |
98 |
Not asked |
11157 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Most of the elected local officials are proficient people
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally disagree.
|
Literal question:
|
Here, most elected local officials are proficient people who know what they are doing
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
176 |
10% |
0.099773243 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
1105 |
62.6% |
0.626417234 |
3 |
Somewhat disagree |
392 |
22.2% |
0.222222222 |
4 |
Completely disagree |
80 |
4.5% |
0.045351474 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006235828 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The local council representatives soon lose contact with ordinary people
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally disagree.
|
Literal question:
|
The local council representatives we choose soon lose contact with ordinary people
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
164 |
9.3% |
0.09297052 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
629 |
35.7% |
0.35657596 |
3 |
Somewhat disagree |
795 |
45.1% |
0.45068027 |
4 |
Completely disagree |
155 |
8.8% |
0.08786848 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01190476 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_3
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Elected local officials put their personal interests aside
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally disagree.
|
Literal question:
|
Here, elected local officials put their personal interests aside when they make political decisions
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
87 |
4.9% |
0.04931973 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
799 |
45.3% |
0.45294785 |
3 |
Somewhat disagree |
686 |
38.9% |
0.38888889 |
4 |
Completely disagree |
149 |
8.4% |
0.08446712 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
2.4% |
0.02437642 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_4
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Local politicians safeguard the municipality’s interests
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally disagree.
|
Literal question:
|
Here, local politicians safeguard the interests of the entire municipality
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
144 |
8.2% |
0.08163265 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
1031 |
58.4% |
0.58446712 |
3 |
Somewhat disagree |
458 |
26% |
0.25963719 |
4 |
Completely disagree |
104 |
5.9% |
0.05895692 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.5% |
0.01530612 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_5
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The local council rarely consider ordinary people’s opinions
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally disagree.
|
Literal question:
|
Members of the local council who make decisions rarely take into account the thoughts and opinions of ordinary people
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
165 |
9.4% |
0.09353741 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
551 |
31.2% |
0.31235828 |
3 |
Somewhat disagree |
852 |
48.3% |
0.48299320 |
4 |
Completely disagree |
168 |
9.5% |
0.09523810 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01587302 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_6
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I can entrust local politicians with the responsibility of the municipality
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally disagree.
|
Literal question:
|
I feel that I can safely entrust local politicians with the responsibility of governing the municipality
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
207 |
11.7% |
0.11734694 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
960 |
54.4% |
0.54421769 |
3 |
Somewhat disagree |
427 |
24.2% |
0.24206349 |
4 |
Completely disagree |
142 |
8% |
0.08049887 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01587302 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_7
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Politicians must be closely watched in this municipality
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally disagree.
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians must be closely watched in this municipality, otherwise they will abuse their power
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
209 |
11.8% |
0.11848073 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
559 |
31.7% |
0.31689342 |
3 |
Somewhat disagree |
758 |
43% |
0.42970522 |
4 |
Completely disagree |
196 |
11.1% |
0.11111111 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
2.4% |
0.02380952 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_8
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Politicians keep their promises in this municipality
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally disagree.
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians keep their promises in this municipality
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
29 |
1.6% |
0.01643991 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
966 |
54.8% |
0.54761905 |
3 |
Somewhat disagree |
591 |
33.5% |
0.33503401 |
4 |
Completely disagree |
135 |
7.7% |
0.07653061 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
2.4% |
0.02437642 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr27_9
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: It doesn’t matter who one votes for
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have listed some statements. We would like to know if you completely agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree, or totally disagree.
|
Literal question:
|
It doesn’t matter who one votes for, it won’t have any effect on what is happening in the municipality
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
91 |
5.2% |
0.05158730 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
449 |
25.5% |
0.25453515 |
3 |
Somewhat disagree |
691 |
39.2% |
0.39172336 |
4 |
Completely disagree |
506 |
28.7% |
0.28684807 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.5% |
0.01530612 |
98 |
Not asked |
11140 |
|
NA |
r16tdr14
Variable label:
|
How much confidence would you say you have in local politicians?
|
Literal question:
|
How much confidence would you say you have in local politicians?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
21 |
1.3% |
0.01270417 |
2 |
High confidence |
549 |
33.2% |
0.33212341 |
3 |
Some confidence |
824 |
49.8% |
0.49848760 |
4 |
Low confidence |
220 |
13.3% |
0.13309135 |
5 |
No confidence at all |
39 |
2.4% |
0.02359347 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11251 |
|
NA |
r16valg2017
Variable label:
|
Did you vote in the general election in 2017?
|
Literal question:
|
Did you vote in the general election in 2017?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and did not answer r10k3 or r11bk3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
419 |
89.9% |
0.899141631 |
2 |
No |
19 |
4.1% |
0.040772532 |
3 |
I did not have the right to vote |
20 |
4.3% |
0.042918455 |
4 |
Cannot remember |
3 |
0.6% |
0.006437768 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
1.1% |
0.010729614 |
98 |
Not asked |
12438 |
|
NA |
r16valg2015
Variable label:
|
Did you vote in the local elections in 2015?
|
Literal question:
|
Did you vote in the local elections in 2015?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 and did not answer r5k2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
919 |
88.8% |
0.887922705 |
2 |
No |
49 |
4.7% |
0.047342995 |
3 |
I did not have the right to vote |
21 |
2% |
0.020289855 |
4 |
Cannot remember |
36 |
3.5% |
0.034782609 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
1% |
0.009661836 |
98 |
Not asked |
11869 |
|
NA |
r16km_eu
Variable label:
|
How much do you oppose or support Norwegian membership in the EU?
|
Literal question:
|
Now thinking about the European Union, how much do you oppose or support Norwegian membership in the EU?
|
Post-question:
|
Please select your answer on the scale below.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - I completely oppose Norwegian EU membership |
478 |
27.7% |
0.276620370 |
1 |
1 |
122 |
7.1% |
0.070601852 |
2 |
2 |
141 |
8.2% |
0.081597222 |
3 |
3 |
140 |
8.1% |
0.081018519 |
4 |
4 |
90 |
5.2% |
0.052083333 |
5 |
5 |
196 |
11.3% |
0.113425926 |
6 |
6 |
91 |
5.3% |
0.052662037 |
7 |
7 |
107 |
6.2% |
0.061921296 |
8 |
8 |
116 |
6.7% |
0.067129630 |
9 |
9 |
58 |
3.4% |
0.033564815 |
10 |
10 - I completely support Norwegian EU membership |
185 |
10.7% |
0.107060185 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002314815 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16km_hc_1
Variable label:
|
During the last year you have: Been hunting
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the activities below?
|
Literal question:
|
Hunting
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Hunting |
147 |
8.5% |
0.08506944 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1581 |
91.5% |
0.91493056 |
r16km_hc_2
Variable label:
|
During the last year you have: Been fishing
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the activities below?
|
Literal question:
|
Fishing
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Fishing |
575 |
33.3% |
0.3327546 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1153 |
66.7% |
0.6672454 |
r16km_hc_3
Variable label:
|
During the last year you have: Been hiking in the forest
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the activities below?
|
Literal question:
|
Hiking in the forest
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Hiking in the forest |
1557 |
90.1% |
0.90104167 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
171 |
9.9% |
0.09895833 |
r16km_hc_4
Variable label:
|
During the last year you have: Been hiking in the mountains
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the activities below?
|
Literal question:
|
Hiking in the mountains
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Hiking in the mountains |
1147 |
66.4% |
0.6637731 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
581 |
33.6% |
0.3362269 |
r16km_hc_5
Variable label:
|
During the last year you have: Been on boat trip (leisure boat)
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the activities below?
|
Literal question:
|
Boat trip (leisure boat)
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Boat trip (leisure boat) |
823 |
47.6% |
0.4762731 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
905 |
52.4% |
0.5237269 |
r16km_oilwork_1
Variable label:
|
Connection to the oil and gas industry: I work in the oil or gas industry
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to find out about your connection to the oil and gas industry. Do you, or someone in your close family, work in the oil or gas industry?
|
Literal question:
|
I work in the oil or gas industry
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I work in the oil or gas industry |
38 |
2.2% |
0.02199074 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1690 |
97.8% |
0.97800926 |
r16km_oilwork_2
Variable label:
|
Connection to the oil and gas industry: My job is connected to the industry
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to find out about your connection to the oil and gas industry. Do you, or someone in your close family, work in the oil or gas industry?
|
Literal question:
|
My job is closely connected to the oil or gas industry
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
My job is closely connected to the oil or gas industry |
42 |
2.4% |
0.02430556 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1686 |
97.6% |
0.97569444 |
r16km_oilwork_3
Variable label:
|
Connection to the oil and gas industry: I have previously worked in the industry
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to find out about your connection to the oil and gas industry. Do you, or someone in your close family, work in the oil or gas industry?
|
Literal question:
|
I have previously worked in the oil/gas industry, or have been closely connected to it
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I have previously worked in the oil/gas industry, or have been closely connected
to it |
113 |
6.5% |
0.06539352 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1615 |
93.5% |
0.93460648 |
r16km_oilwork_4
Variable label:
|
Connection to the oil and gas industry: Someone in my household works in the industry
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to find out about your connection to the oil and gas industry. Do you, or someone in your close family, work in the oil or gas industry?
|
Literal question:
|
One or more of the others in my household work in the oil/gas industry, or are closely connected to it
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
One or more of the others in my household work in the oil/gas industry, or are
closely connected to it |
65 |
3.8% |
0.03761574 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1663 |
96.2% |
0.96238426 |
r16km_oilwork_5
Variable label:
|
Connection to the oil and gas industry: A close relative works in the industry
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to find out about your connection to the oil and gas industry. Do you, or someone in your close family, work in the oil or gas industry?
|
Literal question:
|
A close relative works in the oil/gas industry, or is closely connected to it
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A close relative works in the oil/gas industry, or is closely connected to it |
288 |
16.7% |
0.1666667 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1440 |
83.3% |
0.8333333 |
r16km_oilwork_6
Variable label:
|
Connection to the oil and gas industry: I/my family do not work in the industry
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to find out about your connection to the oil and gas industry. Do you, or someone in your close family, work in the oil or gas industry?
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
Post-question:
|
Several answers are possible.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1251 |
72.4% |
0.7239583 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
477 |
27.6% |
0.2760417 |
r16padproleg3
Variable label:
|
What is your attitude toward gender quotas in working life?
|
Literal question:
|
What is your attitude toward gender quotas in working life?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I am for gender quotas in working life |
857 |
49.6% |
0.49594907 |
2 |
I am against gender quotas in working life |
836 |
48.4% |
0.48379630 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
2% |
0.02025463 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg4
Variable label:
|
How important is this matter to you personally?
|
Literal question:
|
How important is this matter to you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 and r16padproleg3 is answered. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
111 |
6.6% |
0.065564087 |
2 |
Important |
404 |
23.9% |
0.238629652 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
632 |
37.3% |
0.373301831 |
4 |
Not very important |
458 |
27.1% |
0.270525694 |
5 |
Not important at all |
86 |
5.1% |
0.050797401 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001181335 |
98 |
Not asked |
11211 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg5a
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Supreme Court generally makes unbiased decisions
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement: As a general rule, we can rely on the Supreme Court to make unbiased decisions.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. The order of r16padproleg5a, r16padproleg5b and r16padproleg5c is randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
305 |
17.7% |
0.176504630 |
2 |
To a large extent |
874 |
50.6% |
0.505787037 |
3 |
To some extent |
469 |
27.1% |
0.271412037 |
4 |
To a small extent |
47 |
2.7% |
0.027199074 |
5 |
Not at all |
22 |
1.3% |
0.012731481 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006365741 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg5b
Variable label:
|
Should Supreme Court judges with unpopular decisions possibly be removed from their position?
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement: It should be possible to remove Supreme Court judges from their position, who consistently make decisions that most people disagree with.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. The order of r16padproleg5a, r16padproleg5b and r16padproleg5c is randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
105 |
6.1% |
0.06076389 |
2 |
To a large extent |
235 |
13.6% |
0.13599537 |
3 |
To some extent |
591 |
34.2% |
0.34201389 |
4 |
To a small extent |
424 |
24.5% |
0.24537037 |
5 |
Not at all |
347 |
20.1% |
0.20081019 |
97 |
Not answered |
26 |
1.5% |
0.01504630 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg5c
Variable label:
|
Should Supreme Court appointments also be approved by the Norwegian Parliament?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Currently, Supreme Court judges are appointed by the Government on recommendation by an independent judicial appointments board . This is to ensure judicial neutrality. However, it has been suggested that Supreme Court appointments must also be approved by the Norwegian Parliament. This is due to the fact that Supreme Court decisions often have political consequences, and it is therefore important to have some degree of political control over the appointment process.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you say that you agree with this suggestion?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. The order of r16padproleg5a, r16padproleg5b and r16padproleg5c is randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
97 |
5.6% |
0.056134259 |
2 |
To a large extent |
276 |
16% |
0.159722222 |
3 |
To some extent |
522 |
30.2% |
0.302083333 |
4 |
To a small extent |
400 |
23.1% |
0.231481481 |
5 |
Not at all |
418 |
24.2% |
0.241898148 |
97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.9% |
0.008680556 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg6_majoritet
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects majority for r16padproleg6.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects majority for r16padproleg6.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[blank] |
426 |
24.7% |
0.2465278 |
2 |
unanimously |
409 |
23.7% |
0.2366898 |
3 |
by a large majority of 17 to 2 judges |
451 |
26.1% |
0.2609954 |
4 |
by a small majority of 10 to 9 judges |
442 |
25.6% |
0.2557870 |
Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg6_utfall
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects outcome for r16padproleg6.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects outcome for r16padproleg6.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
the Norwegian government’s decision is not in breach of the Constitution, and
that oil exploration in the Barents Sea can be continued. |
854 |
49.4% |
0.494213 |
2 |
the Norwegian government’s decision is in breach of the Constitution, and that
oil exploration in the Barents Sea must cease. |
874 |
50.6% |
0.505787 |
Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7_kjonn1
Variable label:
|
[Randomiserer dersom r16group = 3. Bakgrunnsvariabel. Velger tilfeldig kjønn til r16padproleg6.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects gender for r16padproleg6.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
female |
887 |
51.3% |
0.5133102 |
2 |
male |
841 |
48.7% |
0.4866898 |
Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7_kjonn2
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
woman |
841 |
48.7% |
0.4866898 |
2 |
man |
887 |
51.3% |
0.5133102 |
Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7_kjonn3
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
female |
841 |
48.7% |
0.4866898 |
2 |
male |
887 |
51.3% |
0.5133102 |
Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7_kjonn4
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
male |
841 |
48.7% |
0.4866898 |
2 |
female |
887 |
51.3% |
0.5133102 |
Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7_kjonn5
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 3. Background variable. Value is set to opposite gender as specified in r16padproleg7_kjonn1.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
male |
841 |
48.7% |
0.4866898 |
2 |
female |
887 |
51.3% |
0.5133102 |
Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7_rep
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects panel of judges for r16padproleg6.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects panel of judges for r16padproleg6.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
consisting of five male judges |
439 |
25.4% |
0.2540509 |
2 |
consisting of five female judges |
406 |
23.5% |
0.2349537 |
3 |
consisting of three male and two female judges |
444 |
25.7% |
0.2569444 |
4 |
consisting of three female and two male judges |
439 |
25.4% |
0.2540509 |
Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7_utfall
Variable label:
|
[Randomiserer dersom r16group = 3. Bakgrunnsvariabel. Betinget randomisering. Dersom r16padproleg7_kjonn1 = 1 velges tilfeldig verdi 3 eller 4. Dersom r16padproleg7_kjonn1 = 2 velges tilfeldig verdi 1 eller 2. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 3. Background variable. Conditional randomization. If r16padproleg7_kjonn1 = 1, value 3 or 4 is randomly selected. If r16padproleg7_kjonn1 = 2, value 1 or 2 is randomly selected.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1728] [Invalid:11176] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
gender did play a role during the appointment process and therefore the female
applicant was subjected to unlawful gender discrimination |
397 |
23% |
0.2297454 |
2 |
gender did not play a role during the appointment process and therefore the
female applicant was not subjected to unlawful gender discrimination |
444 |
25.7% |
0.2569444 |
3 |
gender did play a role during the appointment process and therefore the male
applicant was subjected to unlawful gender discrimination |
434 |
25.1% |
0.2511574 |
4 |
gender did not play a role during the appointment process and therefore the male
applicant was not subjected to unlawful gender discrimination |
453 |
26.2% |
0.2621528 |
Sysmiss |
|
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7a
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree with Supreme Court decision regarding gender discrimination in employment
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the Supreme Court presides over a case that aims to establish whether gender played a role when a [r16padproleg7_kjonn1] applicant was employed rather than a [r16padproleg7_kjonn2], and whether this was in breach of the Gender Equality Act.
In the case, a [r16padproleg7_kjonn3] applicant believes that they were disregarded during the appointment process and that the employer gave a [r16padproleg7_kjonn4] applicant unlawful preferential treatment on the basis of their gender. However, the other party, the employer, believes that the [r16padproleg7_kjonn5] candidate who was employed was the best applicant for the position and therefore no unlawful gender discrimination has taken place.
In the final ruling, the Supreme Court panel [r16padproleg7_rep] unanimously decided that [r16padproleg7_utfall].
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think this is an acceptable ruling made by the Supreme Court?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on partially randomized values. See background variables. The order of r16padproleg7a + r16padproleg7b and r16padproleg6 is randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
358 |
20.7% |
0.20717593 |
2 |
To a large extent |
624 |
36.1% |
0.36111111 |
3 |
To some extent |
375 |
21.7% |
0.21701389 |
4 |
To a small extent |
235 |
13.6% |
0.13599537 |
5 |
Not at all |
107 |
6.2% |
0.06192130 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.7% |
0.01678241 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg7b
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you think this is a fair ruling made by the Supreme Court?
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think this is a fair ruling made by the Supreme Court?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on partially randomized values. See background variables. The order of r16padproleg7a + r16padproleg7b and r16padproleg6 is randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
312 |
18.1% |
0.18055556 |
2 |
To a large extent |
603 |
34.9% |
0.34895833 |
3 |
To some extent |
414 |
24% |
0.23958333 |
4 |
To a small extent |
256 |
14.8% |
0.14814815 |
5 |
Not at all |
102 |
5.9% |
0.05902778 |
97 |
Not answered |
41 |
2.4% |
0.02372685 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16padproleg6
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree with Supreme Court decision regarding oil exploration in the Barents Sea
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine how you would react to the following hypothetical situation if it really occurred: In 2016, Greenpeace and Nature and Youth served the Norwegian government with a court summons in order to stop decisions regarding further oil exploration in the Barents Sea. The case was heard in Oslo City Court in 2017 and will be heard in the Court of Appeal during the autumn of 2019. Imagine that the case finally ends up in the Supreme Court. On the basis of the principal nature of the matter, it is decided that the case shall be heard in a plenary session consisting of nineteen judges. In the final ruling, the Supreme Court decided [r16padproleg6_majoritet] that [r16padproleg6_utfall].
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think this is an acceptable ruling made by the Supreme Court?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized values. See background variables. The order of r16padproleg7a + r16padproleg7b and r16padproleg6 is randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
344 |
19.9% |
0.19907407 |
2 |
To a large extent |
562 |
32.5% |
0.32523148 |
3 |
To some extent |
401 |
23.2% |
0.23206019 |
4 |
To a small extent |
248 |
14.4% |
0.14351852 |
5 |
Not at all |
130 |
7.5% |
0.07523148 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
2.5% |
0.02488426 |
98 |
Not asked |
11176 |
|
NA |
r16trygd_system
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects welfare scheme for r16trygd.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects welfare scheme for r16trygd.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:3381] [Invalid:9523] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
unemployment benefit |
817 |
24.2% |
0.2416445 |
2 |
sickness benefit |
868 |
25.7% |
0.2567288 |
3 |
disability benefit |
818 |
24.2% |
0.2419403 |
4 |
work assessment allowance |
878 |
26% |
0.2596865 |
Sysmiss |
|
9523 |
|
NA |
r16trygd_beskrivelse
Variable label:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Selects description for r16trygd based on r16trygd_system.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Assigned if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Selects description for r16trygd based on r16trygd_system.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:3381] [Invalid:9523] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Unemployment benefit provides unemployed people with financial support while
they are looking for jobs |
817 |
24.2% |
0.2416445 |
2 |
Sickness benefit replaces employment income when people are unable to work
because of illness or injury |
868 |
25.7% |
0.2567288 |
3 |
Disability benefit is provided if you have permanent loss of income due to
illness or injury |
818 |
24.2% |
0.2419403 |
4 |
Work assessment allowance ensures people income during periods when they require
help from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration due to illness or
injury. |
878 |
26% |
0.2596865 |
Sysmiss |
|
9523 |
|
NA |
r16trygd_nasjonalitet
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects nationality for r16trygd.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects nationality for r16trygd.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:3381] [Invalid:9523] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian |
1170 |
34.6% |
0.3460515 |
2 |
Polish work immigrant |
1081 |
32% |
0.3197279 |
3 |
Syrian immigrant |
1130 |
33.4% |
0.3342206 |
Sysmiss |
|
9523 |
|
NA |
r16trygd_inntekt
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects income for r16trygd.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects income for r16trygd.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:3381] [Invalid:9523] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
NOK 250 000 |
1154 |
34.1% |
0.3413191 |
2 |
NOK 550 000 |
1101 |
32.6% |
0.3256433 |
3 |
NOK 850 000 |
1126 |
33.3% |
0.3330376 |
Sysmiss |
|
9523 |
|
NA |
r16trygd_risiko
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects risk for r16trygd.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects risk for r16trygd.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:3381] [Invalid:9523] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
95 percent |
678 |
20.1% |
0.2005324 |
2 |
75 percent |
717 |
21.2% |
0.2120674 |
3 |
50 percent |
659 |
19.5% |
0.1949127 |
4 |
25 percent |
652 |
19.3% |
0.1928424 |
5 |
5 percent |
675 |
20% |
0.1996451 |
Sysmiss |
|
9523 |
|
NA |
r16trygd_kjonn
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects gender for r16trygd.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects gender for r16trygd.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:3381] [Invalid:9523] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
he |
1715 |
50.7% |
0.5072464 |
2 |
she |
1666 |
49.3% |
0.4927536 |
Sysmiss |
|
9523 |
|
NA |
r16trygd_alder
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects age for r16trygd.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 2 or 3. Background variable. Randomly selects age for r16trygd.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:3381] [Invalid:9523] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
25 year old |
1183 |
35% |
0.3498965 |
2 |
40 year old |
1091 |
32.3% |
0.3226856 |
3 |
55 year old |
1107 |
32.7% |
0.3274179 |
Sysmiss |
|
9523 |
|
NA |
r16trygd
Variable label:
|
If you had to decide, would you grant [r16trygd_system] to this person?
|
Pre-question text:
|
[r16trygd_beskrivelse]. Sometimes, however, some people receive [r16trygd_system] that they are not entitled to. This may be due to lack of information or misinformation.
Imagine an [r16trygd_alder] [r16trygd_nasjonalitet] who has worked in Norway with annual earnings before tax of [r16trygd_inntekt]. Now, [r16trygd_kjonn] applies for [r16trygd_system]. The Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration has collected all the available information, but is still uncertain if [r16trygd_kjonn] is entitled to [r16trygd_system]. If [r16trygd_kjonn] is granted [r16trygd_system], there is a chance that [r16trygd_kjonn] will receive [r16trygd_system] that [r16trygd_kjonn] isn’t entitled to. Imagine that there is a [r16trygd_risiko] chance of this.
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to decide, would you grant [r16trygd_system] to this person?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 2 or 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized values. See background variables.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1224 |
36.2% |
0.362023070 |
2 |
No |
1013 |
30% |
0.299615498 |
3 |
Don't know |
1131 |
33.5% |
0.334516415 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.4% |
0.003845016 |
98 |
Not asked |
9523 |
|
NA |
r16kreft1
Variable label:
|
Is it okay for you to answer questions related to cancer?
|
Literal question:
|
Is it okay for you to answer questions related to cancer? The questions are general and deal with your perception of cancer, not any personal experiences.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 and kjonn = 2 or r16group = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
2464 |
95.9% |
0.959128065 |
2 |
No, I do not wish to answer questions related to cancer |
90 |
3.5% |
0.035033087 |
97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.6% |
0.005838848 |
98 |
Not asked |
10335 |
|
NA |
r16kreft2_1
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Newspapers and magazines
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian, cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about gynaecological cancers from?
|
Literal question:
|
Newspapers and magazines
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response options.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Newspapers and magazines |
552 |
34.1% |
0.3407407 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1068 |
65.9% |
0.6592593 |
r16kreft2_2
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Books and movies
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian, cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about gynaecological cancers from?
|
Literal question:
|
Books and movies
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response options.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Books and movies |
33 |
2% |
0.02037037 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1587 |
98% |
0.97962963 |
r16kreft2_3
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Friends/family who have had cancer
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian, cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about gynaecological cancers from?
|
Literal question:
|
Friends, family or acquaintances who have had cancer
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response options.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Friends, family or acquaintances who have had cancer |
333 |
20.6% |
0.2055556 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1287 |
79.4% |
0.7944444 |
r16kreft2_4
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Health professionals
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian, cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about gynaecological cancers from?
|
Literal question:
|
Health professionals
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response options.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Health professionals |
329 |
20.3% |
0.2030864 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1291 |
79.7% |
0.7969136 |
r16kreft2_5
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Information brochures
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian, cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about gynaecological cancers from?
|
Literal question:
|
Information brochures
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response options.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Information brochures |
262 |
16.2% |
0.1617284 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1358 |
83.8% |
0.8382716 |
r16kreft2_6
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Work and education
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian, cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about gynaecological cancers from?
|
Literal question:
|
Work and education
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response options.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Work and education |
209 |
12.9% |
0.1290123 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1411 |
87.1% |
0.8709877 |
r16kreft2_7
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: TV and radio
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian, cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about gynaecological cancers from?
|
Literal question:
|
TV and radio
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response options.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
TV and radio |
480 |
29.6% |
0.2962963 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1140 |
70.4% |
0.7037037 |
r16kreft2_8
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Social media and blogs
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian, cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about gynaecological cancers from?
|
Literal question:
|
Social media and blogs
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response options.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Social media and blogs |
145 |
9% |
0.08950617 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1475 |
91% |
0.91049383 |
r16kreft2_9
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Searching the internet
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian, cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about gynaecological cancers from?
|
Literal question:
|
Searching the internet
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response options.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Searching the internet |
235 |
14.5% |
0.1450617 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1385 |
85.5% |
0.8549383 |
r16kreft2_10
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Friends/family/acquaintances
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian, cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about gynaecological cancers from?
|
Literal question:
|
Friends, family or acquaintances
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response options.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Friends, family or acquaintances |
355 |
21.9% |
0.2191358 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1265 |
78.1% |
0.7808642 |
r16kreft2_11
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Other
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian, cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about gynaecological cancers from?
|
Literal question:
|
Other (fill out)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response options.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other |
25 |
1.5% |
0.0154321 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1595 |
98.5% |
0.9845679 |
r16kreft2_12
Variable label:
|
Sources of information about gynaecological cancer: Have not heard/read about this
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian, cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about gynaecological cancers from?
|
Literal question:
|
I have not heard or read about gynaecological cancers/I have no knowledge about gynaecological cancers
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. The order of the response options is randomized - with the exception of the last two response options.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I have not heard or read about gynaecological cancers/I have no knowledge about
gynaecological cancers |
220 |
13.6% |
0.1358025 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11284 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1400 |
86.4% |
0.8641975 |
r16kreft2_11_other
Variable label:
|
Open [R16KREFT2_11] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Gynaecological cancers are malignant, cancerous tumours that start in a woman’s reproductive system and include womb (uterine), ovarian, cervical, vaginal and vulval cancer. To the extent you have read or heard of gynaecological cancer, where did you get information about gynaecological cancers from?
|
Literal question:
|
Other (fill out)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick the three (up to three of the) main sources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16kreft3_1
Variable label:
|
Most prevalent gynaecological cancer, do you think: Ovarian cancer
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which types of gynaecological cancers are most prevalent, do you think?
|
Literal question:
|
Ovarian cancer
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the type of cancer you think is most prevalent, then the one you think is second most prevalent, and so on, until you have ranked all five types. If you change your mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1 and r16kreft2_12 != 1. Ranking where 1 is “most prevalent” and 5 is “least prevalent”. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
87 |
6.2% |
0.062142857 |
2 |
2 |
522 |
37.3% |
0.372857143 |
3 |
3 |
403 |
28.8% |
0.287857143 |
4 |
4 |
34 |
2.4% |
0.024285714 |
5 |
5 |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005714286 |
97 |
Not answered |
346 |
24.7% |
0.247142857 |
98 |
Not asked |
11504 |
|
NA |
r16kreft3_2
Variable label:
|
Most prevalent gynaecological cancer, do you think: Cervical cancer
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which types of gynaecological cancers are most prevalent, do you think?
|
Literal question:
|
Cervical cancer
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the type of cancer you think is most prevalent, then the one you think is second most prevalent, and so on, until you have ranked all five types. If you change your mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1 and r16kreft2_12 != 1. Ranking where 1 is “most prevalent” and 5 is “least prevalent”. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
1119 |
79.9% |
0.7992857143 |
2 |
2 |
131 |
9.4% |
0.0935714286 |
3 |
3 |
48 |
3.4% |
0.0342857143 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007142857 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
0.3% |
0.0028571429 |
97 |
Not answered |
97 |
6.9% |
0.0692857143 |
98 |
Not asked |
11504 |
|
NA |
r16kreft3_3
Variable label:
|
Most prevalent gynaecological cancer, do you think: Womb (uterine) cancer
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which types of gynaecological cancers are most prevalent, do you think?
|
Literal question:
|
Womb (uterine) cancer
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the type of cancer you think is most prevalent, then the one you think is second most prevalent, and so on, until you have ranked all five types. If you change your mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1 and r16kreft2_12 != 1. Ranking where 1 is “most prevalent” and 5 is “least prevalent”. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
163 |
11.6% |
0.116428571 |
2 |
2 |
385 |
27.5% |
0.275000000 |
3 |
3 |
472 |
33.7% |
0.337142857 |
4 |
4 |
45 |
3.2% |
0.032142857 |
5 |
5 |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009285714 |
97 |
Not answered |
322 |
23% |
0.230000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
11504 |
|
NA |
r16kreft3_4
Variable label:
|
Most prevalent gynaecological cancer, do you think: Vulval cancer
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which types of gynaecological cancers are most prevalent, do you think?
|
Literal question:
|
Vulval cancer
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the type of cancer you think is most prevalent, then the one you think is second most prevalent, and so on, until you have ranked all five types. If you change your mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1 and r16kreft2_12 != 1. Ranking where 1 is “most prevalent” and 5 is “least prevalent”. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002857143 |
2 |
2 |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003571429 |
3 |
3 |
18 |
1.3% |
0.012857143 |
4 |
4 |
125 |
8.9% |
0.089285714 |
5 |
5 |
773 |
55.2% |
0.552142857 |
97 |
Not answered |
475 |
33.9% |
0.339285714 |
98 |
Not asked |
11504 |
|
NA |
r16kreft3_5
Variable label:
|
Most prevalent gynaecological cancer, do you think: Vaginal cancer
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which types of gynaecological cancers are most prevalent, do you think?
|
Literal question:
|
Vaginal cancer
|
Post-question:
|
This is what to do: Firstly, click on the type of cancer you think is most prevalent, then the one you think is second most prevalent, and so on, until you have ranked all five types. If you change your mind, you can click through them again in order to change your rankings.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 4 and r14kreft1 = 1 and r16kreft2_12 != 1. Ranking where 1 is “most prevalent” and 5 is “least prevalent”. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002857143 |
2 |
2 |
11 |
0.8% |
0.007857143 |
3 |
3 |
74 |
5.3% |
0.052857143 |
4 |
4 |
721 |
51.5% |
0.515000000 |
5 |
5 |
123 |
8.8% |
0.087857143 |
97 |
Not answered |
467 |
33.4% |
0.333571429 |
98 |
Not asked |
11504 |
|
NA |
r16kreft4
Variable label:
|
To what extent would you react negatively to have your uterus and ovaries removed
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some types of cancer are treated by removing the uterus and ovaries.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you react negatively to this type of treatment at the age you are now?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 3 or 4 and kjonn = 2 and r16kreft1 = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
209 |
12.5% |
0.125224685 |
2 |
To a large extent |
129 |
7.7% |
0.077291791 |
3 |
To some extent |
242 |
14.5% |
0.144997004 |
4 |
To a small extent |
439 |
26.3% |
0.263031756 |
5 |
Not at all |
647 |
38.8% |
0.387657280 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001797484 |
98 |
Not asked |
11235 |
|
NA |
r16padper1
Variable label:
|
Which interests should elected representatives emphasize when making political resolutions?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Elected representatives can emphasize different interests when they make political resolutions.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the three statements below do you think should be emphasized? Elected representatives should follow
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
... the voters’ (changing) political attitudes as precise as possible |
94 |
8.3% |
0.082965578 |
2 |
... the party platform that they were elected on, as precise as possible |
898 |
79.3% |
0.792586055 |
3 |
... their own principles, experiences and sense of justice |
134 |
11.8% |
0.118270079 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006178288 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16padper2
Variable label:
|
How should elected representatives who disagree with their party vote?
|
Pre-question text:
|
The views of an elected representative and their party may sometimes differ from one another.
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think the elected representatives should vote in such a situation? According to…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
... the party's view |
567 |
50% |
0.500441306 |
2 |
... their own conviction |
557 |
49.2% |
0.491615181 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007943513 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16padper3
Variable label:
|
How should elected representatives who disagree with their party’s voters vote?
|
Pre-question text:
|
The views of an elected representative and their party’s voters may sometimes differ from one another.
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think the elected representatives should vote in such a situation? According to…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
... the views of the party’s voters |
674 |
59.5% |
0.59488085 |
2 |
... their own conviction |
440 |
38.8% |
0.38834951 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.7% |
0.01676964 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16padper4
Variable label:
|
Which group should an elected representative represent?
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following groups do you think that you as an elected representative should mainly represent?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Those who voted for the party of the elected representative |
609 |
53.8% |
0.537511033 |
2 |
All voters in the county or municipality where they are elected |
480 |
42.4% |
0.423654016 |
3 |
Voters with the same background and experience as them |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007943513 |
4 |
Those who have voted for them personally |
21 |
1.9% |
0.018534863 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.2% |
0.012356575 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16padper5
Variable label:
|
What motive should be normative for voters when they vote?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Voters may have different motives for their choice of party.
|
Literal question:
|
What motive among the three below do you think should be normative for voters when they vote? Voters should vote for the party that…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
... they think has conducted a policy that they agree with the most |
544 |
48% |
0.480141218 |
2 |
... has political plans that are closest to their own political views |
571 |
50.4% |
0.503971756 |
3 |
... has elected representatives with the same background and experience as
themselves |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008826125 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.7% |
0.007060900 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16padper6
Variable label:
|
How should the voter contribute to play an important role in policy making?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Voters can sometimes play an important role in the parties’ policy making.
|
Literal question:
|
In what way do you think the voters’ input is most important? Voters contribute…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
... to develop the future party programme |
241 |
21.3% |
0.21270962 |
2 |
... by expressing their political opinions in the period between elections |
712 |
62.8% |
0.62842012 |
3 |
... in the selection of possible representatives who are similar to the voters
themselves |
163 |
14.4% |
0.14386584 |
97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.5% |
0.01500441 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16meme10_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects either r16meme10a, r16meme10b, r16meme10ce or r16meme10d.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r16group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects either r16meme10a, r16meme10b, r16meme10ce or r16meme10d.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1133] [Invalid:11771] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Chooses r16meme10a |
274 |
24.2% |
0.2418358 |
2 |
Chooses r16meme10b |
290 |
25.6% |
0.2559576 |
3 |
Chooses r16meme10c |
275 |
24.3% |
0.2427184 |
4 |
Chooses r16meme10d |
294 |
25.9% |
0.2594881 |
Sysmiss |
|
11771 |
|
NA |
r16meme10a
Variable label:
|
How should the number of asylum applications per country be determined? (question variant 1)
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask you about your thoughts regarding asylum seekers in Europe (i.e. people who have left their homeland and are requesting lawful asylum in Europe because they fear persecution in their own homeland). European countries have adopted joint regulations for granting asylum to refugees. We are interested in your views regarding a number of alternatives within asylum policy that are currently being debated. In accordance with applicable law, asylum seekers, as a general rule, must submit an application to the European country in which they first arrive (i.e. “country of arrival”). The aim of this policy is to maximise efficiency. Some, however, have pointed out that the applicable regulations cause an unfair burden on borderlands that increasingly serve as places of arrival for asylum seekers. Therefore, they either recommend allocating asylum applications evenly across all countries or based on each country’s capacity.
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think the number of asylum applications per country should be determined? The number of asylum applications allocated to each European country should be…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16meme10_ran = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
based on the country of arrival (i.e. asylum seekers must submit their
application to the European country in which they first arrive). |
51 |
18.6% |
0.18613139 |
2 |
equal allocation for all European countries (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated
so that each European country receives the same number of asylum applications). |
18 |
6.6% |
0.06569343 |
3 |
proportional to the country’s capacity (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated to
the different European countries based on the country’s population, financial
situation (gross domestic product), unemployment rate and number of previous
applications). |
203 |
74.1% |
0.74087591 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.7% |
0.00729927 |
98 |
Not asked |
12630 |
|
NA |
r16meme10b
Variable label:
|
How should the number of asylum applications per country be determined? (question variant 2)
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask you about your thoughts regarding asylum seekers in Europe (i.e. people who have left their homeland and are requesting lawful asylum in Europe because they fear persecution in their own homeland). European countries have adopted joint regulations for granting asylum to refugees. We are interested in your views regarding a number of alternatives within asylum policy that are currently being debated. In accordance with applicable law, asylum seekers, as a general rule, must submit an application to the European country in which they first arrive (i.e. “country of arrival”). The aim of this policy is to maximise efficiency. Some, however, have pointed out that the applicable regulations cause an unfair burden on borderlands that increasingly serve as places of arrival for asylum seekers. Therefore, they either recommend allocating asylum applications evenly across all countries or based on each country’s capacity.
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think the number of asylum applications per country should be determined? The number of asylum applications allocated to each European country should be…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16meme10_ran = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
based on the country of arrival (i.e. asylum seekers must submit their
application to the European country in which they first arrive). This meant that
in 2015, approximately 31 100 applications were allocated to Norway. |
49 |
16.9% |
0.16896552 |
2 |
equal allocation for all European countries (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated
so that each European country receives the same number of asylum applications).
This means that in 2015, approximately 43 200 applications would have been
assigned to Norway. |
21 |
7.2% |
0.07241379 |
3 |
proportional to the country’s capacity (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated to
the different European countries based on the country’s population, financial
situation (gross domestic product), unemployment rate and number of previous
applications). [...] |
213 |
73.4% |
0.73448276 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
2.4% |
0.02413793 |
98 |
Not asked |
12614 |
|
NA |
r16meme10c
Variable label:
|
How should the number of asylum applications per country be determined? (question variant 3)
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask you about your thoughts regarding asylum seekers in Europe (i.e. people who have left their homeland and are requesting lawful asylum in Europe because they fear persecution in their own homeland). European countries have adopted joint regulations for granting asylum to refugees. We are interested in your views regarding a number of alternatives within asylum policy that are currently being debated. In accordance with applicable law, asylum seekers, as a general rule, must submit an application to the European country in which they first arrive (i.e. “country of arrival”). The aim of this policy is to maximise efficiency. Some, however, have pointed out that the applicable regulations cause an unfair burden on borderlands that increasingly serve as places of arrival for asylum seekers. Therefore, they either recommend allocating asylum applications evenly across all countries or based on each country’s capacity.
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think the number of asylum applications per country should be determined? The number of asylum applications allocated to each European country should be…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16meme10_ran = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
based on the country of arrival (i.e. asylum seekers must submit their
application to the European country in which they first arrive). This meant that
in 2018, approximately 2 700 applications were allocated to Norway. |
82 |
29.8% |
0.29818182 |
2 |
equal allocation for all European countries (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated
so that each European country receives the same number of asylum applications).
This means that in 2018, approximately 20 800 applications would have been
assigned to Norway. |
7 |
2.5% |
0.02545455 |
3 |
proportional to the country’s capacity (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated to
the different European countries based on the country’s population and financial
situation (gross domestic product)). This means that in 2018, approximately 10
100 [...] |
182 |
66.2% |
0.66181818 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
1.5% |
0.01454545 |
98 |
Not asked |
12629 |
|
NA |
r16meme10d
Variable label:
|
How should the number of asylum applications per country be determined? (question variant 4)
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask you about your thoughts regarding asylum seekers in Europe (i.e. people who have left their homeland and are requesting lawful asylum in Europe because they fear persecution in their own homeland). European countries have adopted joint regulations for granting asylum to refugees. We are interested in your views regarding a number of alternatives within asylum policy that are currently being debated. In accordance with applicable law, asylum seekers, as a general rule, must submit an application to the European country in which they first arrive (i.e. “country of arrival”). The aim of this policy is to maximise efficiency. Some, however, have pointed out that the applicable regulations cause an unfair burden on borderlands that increasingly serve as places of arrival for asylum seekers. Therefore, they either recommend allocating asylum applications evenly across all countries or based on each country’s capacity. In UN meetings, many have advocated that proportional distribution based on capacity is much fairer than current regulations.
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think the number of asylum applications per country should be determined? The number of asylum applications allocated to each European country should be…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16meme10_ran = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
based on the country of arrival (i.e. asylum seekers must submit their
application to the European country in which they first arrive). This meant that
in 2018, approximately 2 700 applications were allocated to Norway. |
94 |
32% |
0.31972789 |
2 |
equal allocation for all European countries (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated
so that each European country receives the same number of asylum applications).
This means that in 2018, approximately 20 800 applications would have been
assigned to Norway. |
10 |
3.4% |
0.03401361 |
3 |
proportional to the country’s capacity (i.e. asylum seekers are allocated to
the different European countries based on the country’s population and financial
situation (gross domestic product)). This means that in 2018, approximately 10
100 [...] |
185 |
62.9% |
0.62925170 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01700680 |
98 |
Not asked |
12610 |
|
NA |
r16meme11
Variable label:
|
Should European countries increase/reduce the number of people granted asylum?
|
Pre-question text:
|
In 2018, Europe received approximately 664 820 asylum applications, and approximately 333 355 people were granted asylum in Europe that year. As a result of ongoing unrest in the Middle East, Africa, Eastern Europe and elsewhere, the number of asylum applications is expected to rise.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that European countries should increase or reduce the number of people who are granted asylum?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Increase to a large extent |
63 |
5.6% |
0.055604590 |
2 |
Increase |
373 |
32.9% |
0.329214475 |
3 |
Neither increase nor decrease |
411 |
36.3% |
0.362753751 |
4 |
Reduce |
163 |
14.4% |
0.143865843 |
5 |
Reduce to a large extent |
117 |
10.3% |
0.103265666 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005295675 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16meme12
Variable label:
|
Should Norway increase/reduce the number of people granted asylum?
|
Pre-question text:
|
In 2018, Norway received 2 660 asylum applications and granted asylum to 1 755 people. As a result of ongoing unrest in the Middle East, Africa, Eastern Europe and elsewhere, the number of asylum applications is expected to rise.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Norway should increase or reduce the number of people who are granted asylum?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Increase to a large extent |
98 |
8.6% |
0.086496028 |
2 |
Increase |
415 |
36.6% |
0.366284201 |
3 |
Neither increase nor decrease |
381 |
33.6% |
0.336275375 |
4 |
Reduce |
128 |
11.3% |
0.112974404 |
5 |
Reduce to a large extent |
100 |
8.8% |
0.088261253 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1% |
0.009708738 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16meme13_1
Variable label:
|
Do you have one or more refugees among your closest neighbours?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are some questions about your neighbourhood. We would like to know if there are people with refugee backgrounds living close to where you live, in other words, people who came to Norway as refugees at some point and are now living here.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have one or more refugees among your closest neighbours?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
387 |
34.2% |
0.341571050 |
2 |
No |
554 |
48.9% |
0.488967343 |
3 |
Don't know |
190 |
16.8% |
0.167696381 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001765225 |
98 |
Not asked |
11771 |
|
NA |
r16meme13_2a
Variable label:
|
What do you think about having one or more refugees among your closest neighbours?
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about having one or more refugees among your closest neighbours?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16meme13_1 = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
It is okay |
278 |
71.8% |
0.718346253 |
2 |
It is not okay |
24 |
6.2% |
0.062015504 |
3 |
It does not matter |
82 |
21.2% |
0.211886305 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.8% |
0.007751938 |
98 |
Not asked |
12517 |
|
NA |
r16meme13_2b
Variable label:
|
What do you think about getting one or more refugees among your closest neighbours?
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about getting one or more refugees among your closest neighbours?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 5 and r16meme13_1 = 2 or 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
It is okay |
448 |
60.2% |
0.60215054 |
2 |
It is not okay |
79 |
10.6% |
0.10618280 |
3 |
It does not matter |
212 |
28.5% |
0.28494624 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.7% |
0.00672043 |
98 |
Not asked |
12160 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_1
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Reserved
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
…is reserved
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
988 |
20% |
0.20040568 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
1147 |
23.3% |
0.23265720 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
873 |
17.7% |
0.17707911 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1499 |
30.4% |
0.30405680 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
298 |
6% |
0.06044625 |
97 |
Not answered |
125 |
2.5% |
0.02535497 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_2
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Generally trusting
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
…is generally trusting
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
149 |
3% |
0.03022312 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
399 |
8.1% |
0.08093306 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
527 |
10.7% |
0.10689655 |
4 |
Agree a little |
2147 |
43.5% |
0.43549696 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
1617 |
32.8% |
0.32799189 |
97 |
Not answered |
91 |
1.8% |
0.01845842 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_3
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Tends to be lazy
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
…tends to be lazy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
1769 |
35.9% |
0.35882353 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
1247 |
25.3% |
0.25294118 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
779 |
15.8% |
0.15801217 |
4 |
Agree a little |
831 |
16.9% |
0.16855984 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
198 |
4% |
0.04016227 |
97 |
Not answered |
106 |
2.2% |
0.02150101 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_4
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Relaxed, handles stress well
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… is relaxed, handles stress well
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
212 |
4.3% |
0.04300203 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
884 |
17.9% |
0.17931034 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
801 |
16.2% |
0.16247465 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1908 |
38.7% |
0.38701826 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
1033 |
21% |
0.20953347 |
97 |
Not answered |
92 |
1.9% |
0.01866126 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_5
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Has few artistic interests
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… has few artistic interests
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
1418 |
28.8% |
0.28762677 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
1395 |
28.3% |
0.28296146 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
786 |
15.9% |
0.15943205 |
4 |
Agree a little |
875 |
17.7% |
0.17748479 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
354 |
7.2% |
0.07180527 |
97 |
Not answered |
102 |
2.1% |
0.02068966 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_6
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Outgoing, sociable
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… is outgoing, sociable
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
229 |
4.6% |
0.04645030 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
625 |
12.7% |
0.12677485 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
784 |
15.9% |
0.15902637 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1731 |
35.1% |
0.35111562 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
1485 |
30.1% |
0.30121704 |
97 |
Not answered |
76 |
1.5% |
0.01541582 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_7
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Tends to find fault with others
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… tends to find fault with others
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
830 |
16.8% |
0.16835700 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
1396 |
28.3% |
0.28316430 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1344 |
27.3% |
0.27261663 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1070 |
21.7% |
0.21703854 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
176 |
3.6% |
0.03569980 |
97 |
Not answered |
114 |
2.3% |
0.02312373 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_8
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Does a thorough job
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… does a thorough job
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
92 |
1.9% |
0.01866126 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
99 |
2% |
0.02008114 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
364 |
7.4% |
0.07383367 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1822 |
37% |
0.36957404 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
2459 |
49.9% |
0.49878296 |
97 |
Not answered |
94 |
1.9% |
0.01906694 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_9
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Get nervous easily
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… get nervous easily
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
1333 |
27% |
0.27038540 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
1308 |
26.5% |
0.26531440 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
912 |
18.5% |
0.18498986 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1018 |
20.6% |
0.20649087 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
257 |
5.2% |
0.05212982 |
97 |
Not answered |
102 |
2.1% |
0.02068966 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_10
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Has an active imagination
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… has an active imagination
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
384 |
7.8% |
0.07789047 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
618 |
12.5% |
0.12535497 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1141 |
23.1% |
0.23144016 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1614 |
32.7% |
0.32738337 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
1073 |
21.8% |
0.21764706 |
97 |
Not answered |
100 |
2% |
0.02028398 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk26
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
21 |
0.4% |
0.004259635 |
2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
upper secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or
lower secondary school) |
299 |
6.1% |
0.060649087 |
3 |
Secondary education – general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School, business college) |
518 |
10.5% |
0.105070994 |
4 |
Secondary education – vocational line of study/education programme (e.g. VK2,
VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam, business college) |
749 |
15.2% |
0.151926978 |
5 |
Craft training/shorter education programmes (e.g. vocational school, technical
school/college, maritime vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot
training, secretary school, home industry school/handicrafts school, master
craftsman certificate tr |
465 |
9.4% |
0.094320487 |
6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (e.g. university
college graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
352 |
7.1% |
0.071399594 |
7 |
College – 3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, maritime
subjects, military subjects etc.) |
979 |
19.9% |
0.198580122 |
8 |
University – 3-4 year education (BA, cand.mag.) |
359 |
7.3% |
0.072819473 |
9 |
University college – 5-6 year education (MA, hovedfag or longer vocational
education on a university college level) |
298 |
6% |
0.060446247 |
10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors or a longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, chartered
engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics) |
671 |
13.6% |
0.136105477 |
11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
102 |
2.1% |
0.020689655 |
12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
111 |
2.3% |
0.022515213 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001217039 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk26_12_other
Variable label:
|
Open [R16BK26_12] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
None of the above (please enter):
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16bk25
Variable label:
|
What is your current income? (Gross annual income)
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
< 150 000 |
484 |
9.8% |
0.09817444 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
624 |
12.7% |
0.12657201 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
680 |
13.8% |
0.13793103 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
842 |
17.1% |
0.17079108 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
795 |
16.1% |
0.16125761 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
513 |
10.4% |
0.10405680 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
625 |
12.7% |
0.12677485 |
8 |
> 1 000 000 |
286 |
5.8% |
0.05801217 |
97 |
Not answered |
81 |
1.6% |
0.01643002 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk33
Variable label:
|
Which of the descriptions applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days?
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
2337 |
47.4% |
0.474036511 |
2 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
231 |
4.7% |
0.046855984 |
3 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
218 |
4.4% |
0.044219067 |
4 |
Self-employed |
212 |
4.3% |
0.043002028 |
5 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
323 |
6.6% |
0.065517241 |
6 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
67 |
1.4% |
0.013590264 |
7 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
32 |
0.6% |
0.006490872 |
8 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
261 |
5.3% |
0.052941176 |
9 |
Retired |
1037 |
21% |
0.210344828 |
10 |
In military service |
11 |
0.2% |
0.002231237 |
11 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other Persons |
34 |
0.7% |
0.006896552 |
12 |
Other: |
162 |
3.3% |
0.032860041 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.1% |
0.001014199 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk33_12_other
Variable label:
|
Open [R16BK33_12] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16bk21
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
324 |
11.6% |
0.116295765 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
849 |
30.5% |
0.304737976 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
170 |
6.1% |
0.061019383 |
4 |
Private business |
1324 |
47.5% |
0.475233309 |
5 |
Self-employed |
17 |
0.6% |
0.006101938 |
6 |
Other: |
97 |
3.5% |
0.034816942 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001794688 |
98 |
Not asked |
10118 |
|
NA |
r16bk21_6_other
Variable label:
|
Open [R16BK21_6] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16arbeidolje1
Variable label:
|
[Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely associated with it?
|
Literal question:
|
[Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely associated with it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9. Respondents who are currently employed were not given an response option 5. Retired respondents were not given an response option 3. The wording of the question is in present tense for the employed, while in past tense for the retirees. See r16bk33.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, I [work/worked] in the oil or gas industry |
193 |
4.8% |
0.047831475 |
2 |
Yes, my job [is/was] closely associated with the oil or gas industry |
172 |
4.3% |
0.042627014 |
3 |
No, but previously I have worked in the oil/gas industry, or have been closely
associated with it |
133 |
3.3% |
0.032961586 |
4 |
No |
3513 |
87.1% |
0.870631970 |
5 |
I have not been employed |
14 |
0.3% |
0.003469641 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.2% |
0.002478315 |
98 |
Not asked |
8869 |
|
NA |
r16_arbeidolje2
Variable label:
|
When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry?
|
Literal question:
|
When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry (or your first job closely associated with the oil and gas industry)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 and r16arbeidolje1 = 1 | 2 | 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Before 1980 |
79 |
15.9% |
0.15863454 |
2 |
1980-89 |
107 |
21.5% |
0.21485944 |
3 |
1990-99 |
101 |
20.3% |
0.20281124 |
4 |
2000-2009 |
127 |
25.5% |
0.25502008 |
5 |
After 2009 |
79 |
15.9% |
0.15863454 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
1% |
0.01004016 |
98 |
Not asked |
12406 |
|
NA |
r16arbeidolje_2b
Variable label:
|
Open: Additional coments to work in the oil/gas industry [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
If you have additional comments, please write them here:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 and r16arbeidolje1 = 1 | 2 | 3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16bk35
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A city |
1223 |
24.8% |
0.248073022 |
2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
949 |
19.2% |
0.192494929 |
3 |
A small or medium sized town |
1419 |
28.8% |
0.287829615 |
4 |
A village |
805 |
16.3% |
0.163286004 |
5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
525 |
10.6% |
0.106490872 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.2% |
0.001825558 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk27
Variable label:
|
Martial status
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Single |
742 |
15.1% |
0.150507099 |
2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
307 |
6.2% |
0.062271805 |
3 |
Cohabitant |
898 |
18.2% |
0.182150101 |
4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
2551 |
51.7% |
0.517444219 |
5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
262 |
5.3% |
0.053144016 |
6 |
Widow/widower |
140 |
2.8% |
0.028397566 |
7 |
Other |
17 |
0.3% |
0.003448276 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.3% |
0.002636917 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk27_7_other
Variable label:
|
Open: Civil status [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16bk42
Variable label:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
None |
3700 |
75.1% |
0.7505070994 |
1 |
1 |
481 |
9.8% |
0.0975659229 |
2 |
2 |
543 |
11% |
0.1101419878 |
3 |
3 |
155 |
3.1% |
0.0314401623 |
4 |
4 |
24 |
0.5% |
0.0048681542 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0010141988 |
6 |
6 or more |
2 |
0% |
0.0004056795 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.4% |
0.0040567951 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bkhelse
Variable label:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
841 |
17.1% |
0.170588235 |
2 |
Very good |
1778 |
36.1% |
0.360649087 |
3 |
Good |
1466 |
29.7% |
0.297363083 |
4 |
Somewhat good |
647 |
13.1% |
0.131237323 |
5 |
Poor |
191 |
3.9% |
0.038742394 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001419878 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16pkklasse
Variable label:
|
Place yourself in a social class
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
63 |
1.3% |
0.012778905 |
2 |
Working class |
724 |
14.7% |
0.146855984 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
544 |
11% |
0.110344828 |
4 |
Middle class |
2500 |
50.7% |
0.507099391 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
836 |
17% |
0.169574037 |
6 |
Upper class |
23 |
0.5% |
0.004665314 |
7 |
Don't know |
231 |
4.7% |
0.046855984 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.2% |
0.001825558 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk40
Variable label:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12904] [Range:-]
|
r16bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. Recoded from source variable r16bk40]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
2908 |
59% |
0.589858012 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
94 |
1.9% |
0.019066937 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
215 |
4.4% |
0.043610548 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
71 |
1.4% |
0.014401623 |
5 |
Islam |
94 |
1.9% |
0.019066937 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities |
1534 |
31.1% |
0.311156187 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.3% |
0.002839757 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk41
Variable label:
|
How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001622718 |
2 |
More than once a week |
77 |
1.6% |
0.015618661 |
3 |
Once a week |
101 |
2% |
0.020486815 |
4 |
Once or a few times a month |
167 |
3.4% |
0.033874239 |
5 |
Several times a year |
502 |
10.2% |
0.101825558 |
6 |
Once a year |
698 |
14.2% |
0.141582150 |
7 |
Less than once a year |
827 |
16.8% |
0.167748479 |
8 |
Never |
2533 |
51.4% |
0.513793103 |
97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.3% |
0.003448276 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk28
Variable label:
|
Your citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
4533 |
91.9% |
0.919472617 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
391 |
7.9% |
0.079310345 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001217039 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk28_2_other
Variable label:
|
Open: Citizenship of a different country [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16bk29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
4315 |
87.5% |
0.875253550 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
409 |
8.3% |
0.082961460 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
40 |
0.8% |
0.008113590 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
75 |
1.5% |
0.015212982 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
84 |
1.7% |
0.017038540 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001419878 |
98 |
Not asked |
7974 |
|
NA |
r16bk30
Variable label:
|
Open: Which country did you live in before you immigrated? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did you live in before you immigrated?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk29 = 2. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16bk30_1_1
Variable label:
|
Open: Which country did your mother live in before your parents immigrated? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did your parents (mother, father, or both) live in before they immigrated?
|
Literal question:
|
Mother
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk29 = 3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16bk30_1_2
Variable label:
|
Open: Which country did your father live in before your parents immigrated? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did your parents (mother, father, or both) live in before they immigrated?
|
Literal question:
|
Father
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk29 = 3. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16bk30_2
Variable label:
|
Open: In which country did your mother live before she immigrated? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
In which country did your mother live before she immigrated?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk29 = 4. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16bk30_3
Variable label:
|
Open: In which country did your father live before he immigrated? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
In which country did your father live before he immigrated?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7 and r16bk29 = 5. ]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r16P1
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Male |
6353 |
49.2% |
0.492328 |
2 |
Female |
6551 |
50.8% |
0.507672 |
r16P2
Variable label:
|
Region
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
3672 |
28.5% |
0.28456293 |
2 |
Østlandet |
2956 |
22.9% |
0.22907626 |
3 |
Sørlandet |
665 |
5.2% |
0.05153441 |
4 |
Vestlandet |
3498 |
27.1% |
0.27107874 |
5 |
Trøndelag |
1087 |
8.4% |
0.08423745 |
6 |
Nord-Norge |
1026 |
8% |
0.07951023 |
r16P3
Variable label:
|
County
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-18]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Akershus |
1680 |
13% |
0.13019219 |
2 |
Oslo |
1992 |
15.4% |
0.15437074 |
3 |
Østfold |
627 |
4.9% |
0.04858958 |
4 |
Vestfold |
608 |
4.7% |
0.04711717 |
5 |
Hedmark |
366 |
2.8% |
0.02836330 |
6 |
Oppland |
354 |
2.7% |
0.02743335 |
7 |
Buskerud |
648 |
5% |
0.05021699 |
8 |
Telemark |
353 |
2.7% |
0.02735586 |
9 |
Vest-Agder |
423 |
3.3% |
0.03278053 |
10 |
Aust-Agder |
242 |
1.9% |
0.01875387 |
11 |
Rogaland |
1194 |
9.3% |
0.09252945 |
12 |
Hordaland |
1539 |
11.9% |
0.11926534 |
13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
235 |
1.8% |
0.01821141 |
14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
530 |
4.1% |
0.04107254 |
15 |
Trøndelag |
1087 |
8.4% |
0.08423745 |
16 |
Nordland |
492 |
3.8% |
0.03812771 |
17 |
Troms |
392 |
3% |
0.03037818 |
18 |
Finmark |
142 |
1.1% |
0.01100434 |
r16P4_1
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No education/elementary school |
865 |
6.7% |
0.06703348 |
2 |
Upper secondary education |
4001 |
31% |
0.31005890 |
3 |
University/University college |
7622 |
59.1% |
0.59066956 |
97 |
Not answered |
416 |
3.2% |
0.03223807 |
r16P4_2
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
47 |
0.4% |
0.003642281 |
2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
818 |
6.3% |
0.063391197 |
3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
1384 |
10.7% |
0.107253565 |
4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1709 |
13.2% |
0.132439554 |
5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
908 |
7% |
0.070365778 |
6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
1095 |
8.5% |
0.084857409 |
7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
2650 |
20.5% |
0.205362678 |
8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
938 |
7.3% |
0.072690639 |
9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
839 |
6.5% |
0.065018599 |
10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
1826 |
14.2% |
0.141506510 |
11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
274 |
2.1% |
0.021233726 |
12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
312 |
2.4% |
0.024178549 |
97 |
Not answered |
104 |
0.8% |
0.008059516 |
r16P5_1
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1939 or earlier |
342 |
2.7% |
0.02650341 |
2 |
1940-1949 |
1998 |
15.5% |
0.15483571 |
3 |
1950-1959 |
2923 |
22.7% |
0.22651891 |
4 |
1960-1969 |
2759 |
21.4% |
0.21380967 |
5 |
1970-1979 |
2033 |
15.8% |
0.15754805 |
6 |
1980-1989 |
1505 |
11.7% |
0.11663050 |
7 |
1990 or later |
1344 |
10.4% |
0.10415375 |
r16P5_2
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1959 or earlier |
5263 |
40.8% |
0.4078580 |
2 |
1960-1989 |
6297 |
48.8% |
0.4879882 |
3 |
1990 or later |
1344 |
10.4% |
0.1041538 |
r16Weight1
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, and P1. See documentation report.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-3]
|
r16Weight2
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4, and P1. See documentation report.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-14]
|
w01_k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1609 |
94.2% |
0.94203747 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
74 |
4.3% |
0.04332553 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
1.5% |
0.01463700 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
11196 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1776 |
94.2% |
0.941675504 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
93 |
4.9% |
0.049310710 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
0.9% |
0.009013786 |
98 |
Not asked |
11018 |
|
NA |
r4k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
26 |
83.9% |
0.83870968 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
4 |
12.9% |
0.12903226 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
98 |
Not asked |
12873 |
|
NA |
r5k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
12 |
100% |
1 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
0 |
0% |
0 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
12892 |
|
NA |
r8k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship.
|
Literal question:
|
Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1742 |
94.2% |
0.94213088 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
93 |
5% |
0.05029746 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00757166 |
98 |
Not asked |
11055 |
|
NA |
r11bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1050 |
93.5% |
0.93499555 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
68 |
6.1% |
0.06055209 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.00445236 |
98 |
Not asked |
11781 |
|
NA |
r14bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1219 |
94.1% |
0.940586420 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
68 |
5.2% |
0.052469136 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006944444 |
98 |
Not asked |
11608 |
|
NA |
c14bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship. Are you: [Most recent available data from w01_k28, w03_r3k28, r4k28, r5k28, r8k28, r11bk28, r14bk28]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
7434 |
94.4% |
0.94447974 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
400 |
5.1% |
0.05081946 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.5% |
0.00470080 |
98 |
Not asked |
5033 |
|
NA |
w01_k29
Variable label:
|
Parents immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1550 |
90.7% |
0.907494145 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
79 |
4.6% |
0.046252927 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
8 |
0.5% |
0.004683841 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
28 |
1.6% |
0.016393443 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
18 |
1.1% |
0.010538642 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
1.5% |
0.014637002 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
11196 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1721 |
91.2% |
0.912029677 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
89 |
4.7% |
0.047164812 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
9 |
0.5% |
0.004769475 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
29 |
1.5% |
0.015368309 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
23 |
1.2% |
0.012188659 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
0.8% |
0.008479067 |
98 |
Not asked |
11017 |
|
NA |
r4k29
Variable label:
|
Mother or father immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
26 |
83.9% |
0.83870968 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
3 |
9.7% |
0.09677419 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
2 |
6.5% |
0.06451613 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
12873 |
|
NA |
r5k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
12 |
100% |
1 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
0 |
0% |
0 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
0 |
0% |
0 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
12892 |
|
NA |
r11bk29
Variable label:
|
Immigration background
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 3 or rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
2467 |
90.3% |
0.902671057 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
165 |
6% |
0.060373216 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
12 |
0.4% |
0.004390779 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
51 |
1.9% |
0.018660812 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
26 |
1% |
0.009513355 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.4% |
0.004390779 |
98 |
Not asked |
10171 |
|
NA |
r14bk29
Variable label:
|
Have you or any of your parents immigrated to Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1147 |
88.5% |
0.885030864 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
86 |
6.6% |
0.066358025 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006944444 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
32 |
2.5% |
0.024691358 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
13 |
1% |
0.010030864 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006944444 |
98 |
Not asked |
11608 |
|
NA |
c14bk29
Variable label:
|
Have you or any of your parents immigrated to Norway. [Most recent available data from w01_k29, w03_r3k29, r4k29, r5k29, r8k29, r11bk29, r14bk29]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
6923 |
90.7% |
0.907101677 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
422 |
5.5% |
0.055293501 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
38 |
0.5% |
0.004979036 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
142 |
1.9% |
0.018605870 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
80 |
1% |
0.010482180 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.4% |
0.003537736 |
98 |
Not asked |
5272 |
|
NA |
r10k3
Variable label:
|
Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election.
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
190 |
4.1% |
0.041349293 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1059 |
23% |
0.230467900 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
486 |
10.6% |
0.105767138 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
239 |
5.2% |
0.052013058 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
412 |
9% |
0.089662677 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
407 |
8.9% |
0.088574538 |
7 |
The Green Party |
207 |
4.5% |
0.045048966 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1043 |
22.7% |
0.226985854 |
9 |
The Red Party |
184 |
4% |
0.040043526 |
10 |
Did not vote |
93 |
2% |
0.020239391 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
168 |
3.7% |
0.036561480 |
12 |
Other: |
83 |
1.8% |
0.018063112 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
0.5% |
0.005223069 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
8309 |
|
NA |
r11bk3
Variable label:
|
Voted this party in parliamentary elections of 2017
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections in 2017?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
50 |
4.5% |
0.04452360 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
262 |
23.3% |
0.23330365 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
102 |
9.1% |
0.09082814 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
73 |
6.5% |
0.06500445 |
5 |
The Soialist Left Party |
76 |
6.8% |
0.06767587 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
105 |
9.3% |
0.09349955 |
7 |
The Green Party |
51 |
4.5% |
0.04541407 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
237 |
21.1% |
0.21104185 |
9 |
The Red Party |
43 |
3.8% |
0.03829029 |
10 |
Did not vote |
35 |
3.1% |
0.03116652 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
60 |
5.3% |
0.05342832 |
12 |
Other: |
24 |
2.1% |
0.02137133 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.00445236 |
98 |
Not asked |
11781 |
|
NA |
c11bk3
Variable label:
|
Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election. [Most recent available data from r10k3, r11bk3]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable. There are minor differences in question language.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
240 |
4.2% |
0.041972718 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1321 |
23.1% |
0.231024834 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
588 |
10.3% |
0.102833158 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
312 |
5.5% |
0.054564533 |
5 |
The Soialist Left Party |
488 |
8.5% |
0.085344526 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
512 |
9% |
0.089541798 |
7 |
The Green Party |
258 |
4.5% |
0.045120672 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1280 |
22.4% |
0.223854495 |
9 |
The Red Party |
227 |
4% |
0.039699196 |
10 |
Did not vote |
128 |
2.2% |
0.022385449 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
228 |
4% |
0.039874082 |
12 |
Other: |
107 |
1.9% |
0.018712837 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
0.5% |
0.005071703 |
98 |
Not asked |
7186 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_1
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
155 |
2.7% |
0.027121610 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
464 |
8.1% |
0.081189851 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1014 |
17.7% |
0.177427822 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2110 |
36.9% |
0.369203850 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1445 |
25.3% |
0.252843395 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
471 |
8.2% |
0.082414698 |
97 |
Not answered |
56 |
1% |
0.009798775 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7189 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_2
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
2765 |
48.4% |
0.483814523 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1196 |
20.9% |
0.209273841 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
797 |
13.9% |
0.139457568 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
548 |
9.6% |
0.095888014 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
257 |
4.5% |
0.044969379 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
109 |
1.9% |
0.019072616 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.8% |
0.007524059 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7189 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_3
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her]. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
16 |
0.3% |
0.002799650 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
65 |
1.1% |
0.011373578 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
359 |
6.3% |
0.062817148 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2125 |
37.2% |
0.371828521 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
2158 |
37.8% |
0.377602800 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
949 |
16.6% |
0.166054243 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.8% |
0.007524059 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7189 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_4
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
48 |
0.8% |
0.008398950 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
152 |
2.7% |
0.026596675 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
366 |
6.4% |
0.064041995 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1617 |
28.3% |
0.282939633 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
2146 |
37.6% |
0.375503062 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1340 |
23.4% |
0.234470691 |
97 |
Not answered |
46 |
0.8% |
0.008048994 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7189 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_5
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand things
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
24 |
0.4% |
0.004199475 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
104 |
1.8% |
0.018197725 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
484 |
8.5% |
0.084689414 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2026 |
35.5% |
0.354505687 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1990 |
34.8% |
0.348206474 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1048 |
18.3% |
0.183377078 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.7% |
0.006824147 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7189 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_6
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
541 |
9.5% |
0.094663167 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1221 |
21.4% |
0.213648294 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1973 |
34.5% |
0.345231846 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1438 |
25.2% |
0.251618548 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
408 |
7.1% |
0.071391076 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
93 |
1.6% |
0.016272966 |
97 |
Not answered |
41 |
0.7% |
0.007174103 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7189 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_7
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
208 |
3.6% |
0.036395451 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
727 |
12.7% |
0.127209099 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1674 |
29.3% |
0.292913386 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2189 |
38.3% |
0.383027122 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
704 |
12.3% |
0.123184602 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
171 |
3% |
0.029921260 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.007349081 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7189 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_8
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
611 |
10.7% |
0.106911636 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1254 |
21.9% |
0.219422572 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1882 |
32.9% |
0.329308836 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1406 |
24.6% |
0.246019248 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
421 |
7.4% |
0.073665792 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
98 |
1.7% |
0.017147857 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.8% |
0.007524059 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7189 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_9
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
621 |
10.9% |
0.108661417 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1165 |
20.4% |
0.203849519 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1881 |
32.9% |
0.329133858 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1553 |
27.2% |
0.271741032 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
392 |
6.9% |
0.068591426 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
59 |
1% |
0.010323710 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
0.8% |
0.007699038 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7189 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_10
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
90 |
1.6% |
0.015748031 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
296 |
5.2% |
0.051793526 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
815 |
14.3% |
0.142607174 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2008 |
35.1% |
0.351356080 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1667 |
29.2% |
0.291688539 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
800 |
14% |
0.139982502 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.7% |
0.006824147 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7189 |
|
NA |
r11bk42
Variable label:
|
How many children under 16 living at home
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
None |
4518 |
79.1% |
0.7905511811 |
2 |
1 |
508 |
8.9% |
0.0888888889 |
3 |
2 |
514 |
9% |
0.0899387577 |
4 |
3 |
123 |
2.2% |
0.0215223097 |
5 |
4 |
15 |
0.3% |
0.0026246719 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
0% |
0.0001749781 |
7 |
6 or more |
1 |
0% |
0.0001749781 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
0.6% |
0.0061242345 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7189 |
|
NA |
r11bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Recoded from source variable r11bk40]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
3697 |
64.7% |
0.646894138 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
69 |
1.2% |
0.012073491 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
211 |
3.7% |
0.036920385 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
34 |
0.6% |
0.005949256 |
5 |
Islam |
22 |
0.4% |
0.003849519 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
1643 |
28.7% |
0.287489064 |
97 |
No answer |
39 |
0.7% |
0.006824147 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7189 |
|
NA |
r14bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Belong to a religion or religious denomination. [Recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
[Recoded from source variable r14bk40]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
809 |
62.4% |
0.624228395 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
22 |
1.7% |
0.016975309 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
56 |
4.3% |
0.043209877 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005401235 |
5 |
Islam |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008487654 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
378 |
29.2% |
0.291666667 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
1% |
0.010030864 |
98 |
Not asked |
11608 |
|
NA |
c14bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Belong to a religion or religious denomination. [Most recent available data from r11bk40_recode, r14bk40_recode]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
4506 |
64.3% |
0.642704322 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
91 |
1.3% |
0.012979603 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
267 |
3.8% |
0.038083012 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
41 |
0.6% |
0.005847953 |
5 |
Islam |
33 |
0.5% |
0.004706889 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
2021 |
28.8% |
0.288261304 |
97 |
No answer |
52 |
0.7% |
0.007416916 |
98 |
Not asked |
5893 |
|
NA |
r11bk41
Variable label:
|
Attends religious meetings
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008748906 |
2 |
More than once a week |
90 |
1.6% |
0.0157480315 |
3 |
Once a week |
148 |
2.6% |
0.0258967629 |
4 |
At least once a month |
281 |
4.9% |
0.0491688539 |
5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
990 |
17.3% |
0.1732283465 |
6 |
Less frequently |
1247 |
21.8% |
0.2181977253 |
7 |
Never |
2916 |
51% |
0.5102362205 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
0.7% |
0.0066491689 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7189 |
|
NA |
r14bk41
Variable label:
|
How often attend religious meetings, aside from special occasions.
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001543210 |
2 |
More than once a week |
10 |
0.8% |
0.007716049 |
3 |
Once a week |
45 |
3.5% |
0.034722222 |
4 |
At least once a month |
72 |
5.6% |
0.055555556 |
5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
226 |
17.4% |
0.174382716 |
6 |
Less frequently |
302 |
23.3% |
0.233024691 |
7 |
Never |
628 |
48.5% |
0.484567901 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008487654 |
98 |
Not asked |
11608 |
|
NA |
c14bk41
Variable label:
|
How often attend religious meetings, aside from special occasions. [Most recent available data from r11bk41, r14bk41]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
7 |
0.1% |
0.000998431 |
2 |
More than once a week |
100 |
1.4% |
0.014263301 |
3 |
Once a week |
193 |
2.8% |
0.027528170 |
4 |
At least once a month |
353 |
5% |
0.050349451 |
5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
1216 |
17.3% |
0.173441734 |
6 |
Less frequently |
1549 |
22.1% |
0.220938525 |
7 |
Never |
3544 |
50.5% |
0.505491371 |
97 |
Not answered |
49 |
0.7% |
0.006989017 |
98 |
Not asked |
5893 |
|
NA |
r11pkklasse
Variable label:
|
Social class, self-placement
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
50 |
0.9% |
0.008748906 |
2 |
Working class |
733 |
12.8% |
0.128258968 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
532 |
9.3% |
0.093088364 |
4 |
Middle class |
3093 |
54.1% |
0.541207349 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
1084 |
19% |
0.189676290 |
6 |
Upper class |
31 |
0.5% |
0.005424322 |
7 |
Don't know |
158 |
2.8% |
0.027646544 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
0.6% |
0.005949256 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7189 |
|
NA |
r14pkklasse
Variable label:
|
To which social class do you belong.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
6 |
0.5% |
0.004629630 |
2 |
Working class |
186 |
14.4% |
0.143518519 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
137 |
10.6% |
0.105709877 |
4 |
Middle class |
702 |
54.2% |
0.541666667 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
217 |
16.7% |
0.167438272 |
6 |
Upper class |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001543210 |
7 |
Don't know |
37 |
2.9% |
0.028549383 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006944444 |
98 |
Not asked |
11608 |
|
NA |
c14pkklasse
Variable label:
|
To which social class do you belong. [Most recent available data from r11pkklasse, r14pkklasse]
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
56 |
0.8% |
0.007987448 |
2 |
Working class |
919 |
13.1% |
0.131079732 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
669 |
9.5% |
0.095421481 |
4 |
Middle class |
3795 |
54.1% |
0.541292255 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
1301 |
18.6% |
0.185565540 |
6 |
Upper class |
33 |
0.5% |
0.004706889 |
7 |
Don't know |
195 |
2.8% |
0.027813436 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.6% |
0.006133219 |
98 |
Not asked |
5893 |
|
NA |
r14bk26
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education.
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003858025 |
2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
upper secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or
lower secondary school) |
59 |
4.6% |
0.045524691 |
3 |
Secondary education – general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School, business college) |
141 |
10.9% |
0.108796296 |
4 |
Secondary education – vocational line of study/education programme (e.g. VK2,
VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam, business college) |
159 |
12.3% |
0.122685185 |
5 |
Craft training/shorter education programmes (e.g. vocational school, technical
school/college, maritime vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot
training, secretary school, home industry school/handicrafts school, master
craftsman certificate |
117 |
9% |
0.090277778 |
6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (e.g. university
college graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
113 |
8.7% |
0.087191358 |
7 |
College – 3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, maritime
subjects, military subjects etc.) |
263 |
20.3% |
0.202932099 |
8 |
University – 3-4 year education (BA, cand.mag.) |
85 |
6.6% |
0.065586420 |
9 |
University college – 5-6 year education (MA, hovedfag or longer vocational
education on a university college level) |
93 |
7.2% |
0.071759259 |
10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors or a longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, chartered
engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics) |
196 |
15.1% |
0.151234568 |
11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
29 |
2.2% |
0.022376543 |
12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
26 |
2% |
0.020061728 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.8% |
0.007716049 |
98 |
Not asked |
11608 |
|
NA |
r14pk15_1
Variable label:
|
People can in general be trusted/ one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others.
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
26 |
0.4% |
0.003786224 |
1 |
1 |
33 |
0.5% |
0.004805592 |
2 |
2 |
91 |
1.3% |
0.013251784 |
3 |
3 |
193 |
2.8% |
0.028105432 |
4 |
4 |
226 |
3.3% |
0.032911024 |
5 |
5 |
599 |
8.7% |
0.087228775 |
6 |
6 |
738 |
10.7% |
0.107470511 |
7 |
7 |
1738 |
25.3% |
0.253094510 |
8 |
8 |
1982 |
28.9% |
0.288626766 |
9 |
9 |
811 |
11.8% |
0.118101063 |
10 |
10 – Most people can be trusted |
421 |
6.1% |
0.061307704 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.1% |
0.001310616 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk53
Variable label:
|
How much confidence in Norwegian politicians.
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
78 |
1.1% |
0.01135867 |
2 |
To a great extent |
2048 |
29.8% |
0.29823795 |
3 |
To some extent |
3399 |
49.5% |
0.49497597 |
4 |
To a small extent |
1168 |
17% |
0.17008883 |
5 |
Not at all |
164 |
2.4% |
0.02388234 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.1% |
0.00145624 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk54
Variable label:
|
How much confidence in Norwegian news media.
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
282 |
4.1% |
0.041065968 |
2 |
To a great extent |
3279 |
47.8% |
0.477501092 |
3 |
To some extent |
2670 |
38.9% |
0.388816077 |
4 |
To a small extent |
497 |
7.2% |
0.072375127 |
5 |
Not at all |
90 |
1.3% |
0.013106160 |
97 |
Not answered |
49 |
0.7% |
0.007135576 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk12
Variable label:
|
How much confidence in Norwegian parliament (Stortinget).
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1, 3 or 4. Equivalent to r14pad2 but without “priming”.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
299 |
6% |
0.059538033 |
2 |
To a great extent |
2271 |
45.2% |
0.452210275 |
3 |
To some extent |
1895 |
37.7% |
0.377339705 |
4 |
To a small extent |
471 |
9.4% |
0.093787336 |
5 |
Not at all |
67 |
1.3% |
0.013341298 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.4% |
0.003783353 |
98 |
Not asked |
7882 |
|
NA |
r14pk43_1
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if municipal elections tomorrow.
|
Pre-question text:
|
This coming fall, local elections (municipal and county council elections) will be held.
|
Literal question:
|
If the municipal elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
229 |
3.3% |
0.03334790 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1557 |
22.7% |
0.22673657 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
509 |
7.4% |
0.07412262 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
255 |
3.7% |
0.03713412 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
586 |
8.5% |
0.08533566 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
700 |
10.2% |
0.10193680 |
7 |
The Green Party |
357 |
5.2% |
0.05198777 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1573 |
22.9% |
0.22906655 |
9 |
The Red Party |
339 |
4.9% |
0.04936654 |
10 |
A joint list |
15 |
0.2% |
0.00218436 |
11 |
A local list |
152 |
2.2% |
0.02213485 |
12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
171 |
2.5% |
0.02490170 |
13 |
Would not vote |
121 |
1.8% |
0.01762050 |
14 |
Not entitled to vote |
30 |
0.4% |
0.00436872 |
15 |
Other: |
243 |
3.5% |
0.03538663 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
0.4% |
0.00436872 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk43_2
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if county council elections tomorrow.
|
Literal question:
|
And if the county council elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
227 |
3.3% |
0.033056648 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1531 |
22.3% |
0.222950342 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
513 |
7.5% |
0.074705111 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
231 |
3.4% |
0.033639144 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
585 |
8.5% |
0.085190039 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
695 |
10.1% |
0.101208679 |
7 |
The Green Party |
343 |
5% |
0.049949032 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1580 |
23% |
0.230085918 |
9 |
The Red Party |
323 |
4.7% |
0.047036552 |
10 |
A joint list |
17 |
0.2% |
0.002475608 |
11 |
A local list |
68 |
1% |
0.009902432 |
12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
204 |
3% |
0.029707296 |
13 |
Would not vote |
227 |
3.3% |
0.033056648 |
14 |
Not entitled to vote |
52 |
0.8% |
0.007572448 |
15 |
Other: |
222 |
3.2% |
0.032328528 |
97 |
Not answered |
49 |
0.7% |
0.007135576 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk204
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if parliamentary elections tomorrow.
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
229 |
3.3% |
0.03334790 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1534 |
22.3% |
0.22338721 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
587 |
8.5% |
0.08548129 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
225 |
3.3% |
0.03276540 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
595 |
8.7% |
0.08664628 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
716 |
10.4% |
0.10426678 |
7 |
The Green Party |
318 |
4.6% |
0.04630843 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1646 |
24% |
0.23969710 |
9 |
The Red Party |
369 |
5.4% |
0.05373526 |
10 |
Would not vote |
98 |
1.4% |
0.01427115 |
11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
169 |
2.5% |
0.02461046 |
12 |
Not entitled to vote |
156 |
2.3% |
0.02271734 |
13 |
Other: |
190 |
2.8% |
0.02766856 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
0.5% |
0.00509684 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk8_1
Variable label:
|
Placement political left-right scale.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 - Left |
82 |
1.2% |
0.011941168 |
2 |
1 |
286 |
4.2% |
0.041648464 |
3 |
2 |
786 |
11.4% |
0.114460463 |
4 |
3 |
1096 |
16% |
0.159603903 |
5 |
4 |
827 |
12% |
0.120431047 |
6 |
5 |
1005 |
14.6% |
0.146352119 |
7 |
6 |
735 |
10.7% |
0.107033639 |
8 |
7 |
904 |
13.2% |
0.131644095 |
9 |
8 |
737 |
10.7% |
0.107324887 |
10 |
9 |
221 |
3.2% |
0.032182904 |
11 |
10 - Right |
131 |
1.9% |
0.019076744 |
97 |
Not answered |
57 |
0.8% |
0.008300568 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_1
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Christian Democratic Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1196 |
17.4% |
0.17416630 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1484 |
21.6% |
0.21610601 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1751 |
25.5% |
0.25498762 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1020 |
14.9% |
0.14853648 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
965 |
14.1% |
0.14052716 |
6 |
Really like |
316 |
4.6% |
0.04601718 |
7 |
Intensely like |
55 |
0.8% |
0.00800932 |
97 |
Not answered |
80 |
1.2% |
0.01164992 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_2
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Conservative Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
356 |
5.2% |
0.05184214 |
2 |
Really dislike |
991 |
14.4% |
0.14431338 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1305 |
19% |
0.19003932 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
789 |
11.5% |
0.11489734 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1587 |
23.1% |
0.23110529 |
6 |
Really like |
1446 |
21.1% |
0.21057230 |
7 |
Intensely like |
318 |
4.6% |
0.04630843 |
97 |
Not answered |
75 |
1.1% |
0.01092180 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_3
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Progress Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
2234 |
32.5% |
0.325324013 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1361 |
19.8% |
0.198194262 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
891 |
13% |
0.129750983 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
547 |
8% |
0.079656327 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1002 |
14.6% |
0.145915247 |
6 |
Really like |
600 |
8.7% |
0.087374399 |
7 |
Intensely like |
164 |
2.4% |
0.023882336 |
97 |
Not answered |
68 |
1% |
0.009902432 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_4
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Liberal Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
707 |
10.3% |
0.102956167 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1162 |
16.9% |
0.169215087 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1643 |
23.9% |
0.239260230 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1510 |
22% |
0.219892238 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1346 |
19.6% |
0.196009902 |
6 |
Really like |
362 |
5.3% |
0.052715888 |
7 |
Intensely like |
48 |
0.7% |
0.006989952 |
97 |
Not answered |
89 |
1.3% |
0.012960536 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_5
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Socialist Left Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
907 |
13.2% |
0.13208097 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1137 |
16.6% |
0.16557449 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1141 |
16.6% |
0.16615698 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1113 |
16.2% |
0.16207951 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1308 |
19% |
0.19047619 |
6 |
Really like |
920 |
13.4% |
0.13397408 |
7 |
Intensely like |
249 |
3.6% |
0.03626038 |
97 |
Not answered |
92 |
1.3% |
0.01339741 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_6
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Centre Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
408 |
5.9% |
0.05941459 |
2 |
Really dislike |
740 |
10.8% |
0.10776176 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1283 |
18.7% |
0.18683559 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1625 |
23.7% |
0.23663900 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1724 |
25.1% |
0.25105577 |
6 |
Really like |
812 |
11.8% |
0.11824669 |
7 |
Intensely like |
180 |
2.6% |
0.02621232 |
97 |
Not answered |
95 |
1.4% |
0.01383428 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_7
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Green Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1225 |
17.8% |
0.17838940 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1034 |
15.1% |
0.15057521 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1143 |
16.6% |
0.16644823 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1069 |
15.6% |
0.15567205 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1515 |
22.1% |
0.22062036 |
6 |
Really like |
651 |
9.5% |
0.09480122 |
7 |
Intensely like |
148 |
2.2% |
0.02155235 |
97 |
Not answered |
82 |
1.2% |
0.01194117 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_8
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Labour Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
311 |
4.5% |
0.04528906 |
2 |
Really dislike |
598 |
8.7% |
0.08708315 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1149 |
16.7% |
0.16732197 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
990 |
14.4% |
0.14416776 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1972 |
28.7% |
0.28717053 |
6 |
Really like |
1469 |
21.4% |
0.21392165 |
7 |
Intensely like |
300 |
4.4% |
0.04368720 |
97 |
Not answered |
78 |
1.1% |
0.01135867 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_9
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Red Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1447 |
21.1% |
0.21071793 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1191 |
17.3% |
0.17343818 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
979 |
14.3% |
0.14256589 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1150 |
16.7% |
0.16746760 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1154 |
16.8% |
0.16805009 |
6 |
Really like |
644 |
9.4% |
0.09378186 |
7 |
Intensely like |
199 |
2.9% |
0.02897918 |
97 |
Not answered |
103 |
1.5% |
0.01499927 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pktilfreds1
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with your life.
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
2188 |
31.9% |
0.318625309 |
2 |
Satisfied |
3735 |
54.4% |
0.543905636 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
773 |
11.3% |
0.112567351 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
140 |
2% |
0.020387360 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
24 |
0.3% |
0.003494976 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001019368 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk_egeninnsats
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: People should work hard to get ahead without counting on help from others.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
People should work hard to get ahead through their own efforts without counting on help from others.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
453 |
8.1% |
0.081313947 |
2 |
Agree |
1495 |
26.8% |
0.268353976 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1903 |
34.2% |
0.341590379 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
545 |
9.8% |
0.097828038 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
719 |
12.9% |
0.129061210 |
6 |
Disagree |
344 |
6.2% |
0.061748340 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
98 |
1.8% |
0.017591097 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.3% |
0.002513014 |
98 |
Not asked |
7333 |
|
NA |
r14pkmeme21
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
111 |
1.6% |
0.016164264 |
2 |
Agree |
299 |
4.4% |
0.043541576 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1132 |
16.5% |
0.164846367 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
677 |
9.9% |
0.098587447 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
888 |
12.9% |
0.129314111 |
6 |
Disagree |
2069 |
30.1% |
0.301296054 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1672 |
24.3% |
0.243483326 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.3% |
0.002766856 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk14
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated people like me do not understand it.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
256 |
3.7% |
0.037279744 |
2 |
Agree |
748 |
10.9% |
0.108926751 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
2073 |
30.2% |
0.301878550 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
668 |
9.7% |
0.097276831 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
909 |
13.2% |
0.132372215 |
6 |
Disagree |
1653 |
24.1% |
0.240716470 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
547 |
8% |
0.079656327 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.2% |
0.001893112 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk13
Variable label:
|
How much say in what the government does does the political system in Norway allow people like you.
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
44 |
0.6% |
0.006407456 |
2 |
To a great extent |
736 |
10.7% |
0.107179263 |
3 |
To some extent |
3027 |
44.1% |
0.440803844 |
4 |
To a small extent |
2505 |
36.5% |
0.364788117 |
5 |
Not at all |
531 |
7.7% |
0.077326343 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.3% |
0.003494976 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk1
Variable label:
|
How interested in politics.
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
941 |
13.7% |
0.13703218 |
2 |
Interested |
3173 |
46.2% |
0.46206495 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
2186 |
31.8% |
0.31833406 |
4 |
Not very interested |
463 |
6.7% |
0.06742391 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
79 |
1.2% |
0.01150430 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.4% |
0.00364060 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pktilfreds3
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the present government in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
153 |
2.2% |
0.022280472 |
2 |
Satisfied |
1613 |
23.5% |
0.234891510 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2074 |
30.2% |
0.302024174 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
1974 |
28.7% |
0.287461774 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
1014 |
14.8% |
0.147662735 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.6% |
0.005679336 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pktilfreds4
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the way democracy works in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
716 |
10.4% |
0.104266783 |
2 |
Satisfied |
3324 |
48.4% |
0.484054172 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1931 |
28.1% |
0.281199942 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
690 |
10% |
0.100480559 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
158 |
2.3% |
0.023008592 |
97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.7% |
0.006989952 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk102
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative to Norwegian EU membership.
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
247 |
4.4% |
0.044336744 |
2 |
Positive |
785 |
14.1% |
0.140908275 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
708 |
12.7% |
0.127086699 |
4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
708 |
12.7% |
0.127086699 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
910 |
16.3% |
0.163345898 |
6 |
Negative |
1239 |
22.2% |
0.222401723 |
7 |
Very negative |
952 |
17.1% |
0.170884940 |
97 |
Not answered |
22 |
0.4% |
0.003949022 |
98 |
Not asked |
7333 |
|
NA |
r14pk103
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is EEA agreement for Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
How much of an advantage or disadvantage would you say the EEA Agreement represents for Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very great advantage |
473 |
8.5% |
0.08490397 |
2 |
A great advantage |
1485 |
26.7% |
0.26655897 |
3 |
An advantage to some extent |
1828 |
32.8% |
0.32812780 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
615 |
11% |
0.11039311 |
5 |
A disadvantage to some extent |
730 |
13.1% |
0.13103572 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
260 |
4.7% |
0.04667026 |
7 |
A very great disadvantage |
117 |
2.1% |
0.02100162 |
97 |
Not answered |
63 |
1.1% |
0.01130856 |
98 |
Not asked |
7333 |
|
NA |
r14pkkm42
Variable label:
|
All new cars sold from 2025 should/should not be electric.
|
Pre-question text:
|
The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run
on hydrogen |
2553 |
37.2% |
0.37177807 |
2 |
In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars
which run on diesel or petrol. |
4249 |
61.9% |
0.61875637 |
97 |
Not answered |
65 |
0.9% |
0.00946556 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pkkm4
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Should not allow oil and gas extraction in Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with this?
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja areas.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2295 |
33.4% |
0.334207077 |
2 |
Agree |
1207 |
17.6% |
0.175768167 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
787 |
11.5% |
0.114606087 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
938 |
13.7% |
0.136595311 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
640 |
9.3% |
0.093199359 |
6 |
Disagree |
623 |
9.1% |
0.090723751 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
350 |
5.1% |
0.050968400 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.4% |
0.003931848 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pkkm2
Variable label:
|
How concerned about climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all concerned |
210 |
3.1% |
0.030581040 |
2 |
Not very conceerned |
881 |
12.8% |
0.128294743 |
3 |
Slightly concerned |
2094 |
30.5% |
0.304936654 |
4 |
Very concerned |
2287 |
33.3% |
0.333042085 |
5 |
Extremely concerned |
1373 |
20% |
0.199941750 |
97 |
Not answered |
22 |
0.3% |
0.003203728 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk_vekst
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
120 |
2.2% |
0.021540118 |
2 |
Agree |
385 |
6.9% |
0.069107880 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1047 |
18.8% |
0.187937534 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
686 |
12.3% |
0.123137677 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1314 |
23.6% |
0.235864297 |
6 |
Disagree |
1354 |
24.3% |
0.243044337 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
642 |
11.5% |
0.115239634 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
0.4% |
0.004128523 |
98 |
Not asked |
7333 |
|
NA |
r14pkmeme9
Variable label:
|
Should be easier/harder for refugees to be granted residence in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much easier |
156 |
2.3% |
0.022717344 |
2 |
Easier |
688 |
10% |
0.100189311 |
3 |
Somewhat easier |
1276 |
18.6% |
0.185816223 |
4 |
Same as today |
2473 |
36% |
0.360128149 |
5 |
Slightly more difficult |
1050 |
15.3% |
0.152905199 |
6 |
More difficult |
646 |
9.4% |
0.094073103 |
7 |
Much more difficult |
544 |
7.9% |
0.079219455 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
0.5% |
0.004951216 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pkdv5
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here.
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very great advantage |
146 |
2.1% |
0.021261104 |
2 |
Great advantage |
890 |
13% |
0.129605359 |
3 |
Slightly advantageous |
2518 |
36.7% |
0.366681229 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1247 |
18.2% |
0.181593127 |
5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1306 |
19% |
0.190184942 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
443 |
6.5% |
0.064511431 |
7 |
Very great disadvantage |
274 |
4% |
0.039900976 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.6% |
0.006261832 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk101
Variable label:
|
How goood or poor are preconditions for integrating refugees in Norwegian society.
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
289 |
4.2% |
0.04208534 |
2 |
Good |
1831 |
26.7% |
0.26663754 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
1557 |
22.7% |
0.22673657 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
795 |
11.6% |
0.11577108 |
5 |
Somewhat poor |
1326 |
19.3% |
0.19309742 |
6 |
Poor |
801 |
11.7% |
0.11664482 |
7 |
Very poor |
203 |
3% |
0.02956167 |
97 |
Not answered |
65 |
0.9% |
0.00946556 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk10
Variable label:
|
Perception of current economic situation in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway? Do you think it is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
1697 |
24.7% |
0.247123926 |
2 |
Good |
3727 |
54.3% |
0.542740644 |
3 |
Quite good |
910 |
13.3% |
0.132517839 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
257 |
3.7% |
0.037425368 |
5 |
Quite bad |
183 |
2.7% |
0.026649192 |
6 |
Bad |
54 |
0.8% |
0.007863696 |
7 |
Very bad |
11 |
0.2% |
0.001601864 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.4% |
0.004077472 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk100
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: The people should be conferred by referendums if municipalities are merged in future.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
When municipalities are to be merged in the future, the public shuld be allowed to have their say on the matter through referendums.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1793 |
26.1% |
0.261103830 |
2 |
Agree |
1850 |
26.9% |
0.269404398 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1094 |
15.9% |
0.159312655 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
605 |
8.8% |
0.088102519 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
570 |
8.3% |
0.083005679 |
6 |
Disagree |
695 |
10.1% |
0.101208679 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
227 |
3.3% |
0.033056648 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.5% |
0.004805592 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk_sentral
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Government show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1197 |
21.5% |
0.214862682 |
2 |
Agree |
1409 |
25.3% |
0.252916891 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1239 |
22.2% |
0.222401723 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
732 |
13.1% |
0.131394723 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
364 |
6.5% |
0.065338359 |
6 |
Disagree |
474 |
8.5% |
0.085083468 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
123 |
2.2% |
0.022078621 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.6% |
0.005923533 |
98 |
Not asked |
7333 |
|
NA |
r14pk60
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Government should work more to reduce income differences in society.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income differences in society.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2058 |
30% |
0.299694190 |
2 |
Agree |
1975 |
28.8% |
0.287607398 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1336 |
19.5% |
0.194553662 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
659 |
9.6% |
0.095966215 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
433 |
6.3% |
0.063055191 |
6 |
Disagree |
293 |
4.3% |
0.042667832 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
70 |
1% |
0.010193680 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.6% |
0.006261832 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk29
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1497 |
21.8% |
0.217999126 |
2 |
Agree |
1550 |
22.6% |
0.225717198 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1130 |
16.5% |
0.164555119 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1005 |
14.6% |
0.146352119 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
586 |
8.5% |
0.085335663 |
6 |
Disagree |
762 |
11.1% |
0.110965487 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
294 |
4.3% |
0.042813456 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.6% |
0.006261832 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pkdv55
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Should be able to send children to muslim schools which follow national curriculum and teach Islam.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Christian faith.
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
195 |
2.8% |
0.028396680 |
2 |
Agree |
785 |
11.4% |
0.114314839 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
847 |
12.3% |
0.123343527 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1064 |
15.5% |
0.154943935 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
843 |
12.3% |
0.122761031 |
6 |
Disagree |
1360 |
19.8% |
0.198048638 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1729 |
25.2% |
0.251783894 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
0.6% |
0.006407456 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk_guns
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Norwegian police should be armed.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norwegian police should be armed?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
761 |
11.1% |
0.110819863 |
2 |
Agree |
1342 |
19.5% |
0.195427406 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1643 |
23.9% |
0.239260230 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
677 |
9.9% |
0.098587447 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
796 |
11.6% |
0.115916703 |
6 |
Disagree |
965 |
14.1% |
0.140527159 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
641 |
9.3% |
0.093344983 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.6% |
0.006116208 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pkby3
Variable label:
|
How afraid of a new terrorist attack in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
327 |
4.8% |
0.047619048 |
2 |
To a great extent |
1017 |
14.8% |
0.148099607 |
3 |
Somewhat |
3096 |
45.1% |
0.450851900 |
4 |
Slightly |
2104 |
30.6% |
0.306392894 |
5 |
Not at all |
286 |
4.2% |
0.041648464 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.5% |
0.005388088 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pk52
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Authorities should introduce measures to protect from terrorism even at the expense of privacy.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
643 |
9.4% |
0.093636231 |
2 |
Agree |
1638 |
23.9% |
0.238532110 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1941 |
28.3% |
0.282656182 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
792 |
11.5% |
0.115334207 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
777 |
11.3% |
0.113149847 |
6 |
Disagree |
731 |
10.6% |
0.106451143 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
303 |
4.4% |
0.044124072 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.6% |
0.006116208 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14pkby2
Variable label:
|
Local environment has gotten safer or more unsafe past couple of years.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much safer |
96 |
1.4% |
0.013979904 |
2 |
Somewhat safer |
458 |
6.7% |
0.066695791 |
3 |
No change in safety |
4844 |
70.5% |
0.705402650 |
4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
1312 |
19.1% |
0.191058686 |
5 |
Much more unsafe |
125 |
1.8% |
0.018203000 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.5% |
0.004659968 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14bk33
Variable label:
|
Main occupation last seven days.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
3142 |
45.8% |
0.457550604 |
2 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
275 |
4% |
0.040046600 |
3 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
230 |
3.3% |
0.033493520 |
4 |
Self-employed |
324 |
4.7% |
0.047182176 |
5 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
255 |
3.7% |
0.037134120 |
6 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
50 |
0.7% |
0.007281200 |
7 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
20 |
0.3% |
0.002912480 |
8 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
331 |
4.8% |
0.048201544 |
9 |
Retired |
1973 |
28.7% |
0.287316150 |
10 |
In military service |
2 |
0% |
0.000291248 |
11 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
42 |
0.6% |
0.006116208 |
12 |
Other: |
185 |
2.7% |
0.026940440 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
0.6% |
0.005533712 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14bk35
Variable label:
|
Description of the area you live in.
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A city |
1555 |
22.6% |
0.226445318 |
2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
1562 |
22.7% |
0.227464686 |
3 |
A small or medium sized town |
1832 |
26.7% |
0.266783166 |
4 |
A village |
1148 |
16.7% |
0.167176351 |
5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
764 |
11.1% |
0.111256735 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.1% |
0.000873744 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14bk21
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in.
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14bk33 = 1 or 2 or 3 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
432 |
11.8% |
0.1184535234 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1182 |
32.4% |
0.3241020016 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
250 |
6.9% |
0.0685494927 |
4 |
Private business |
1656 |
45.4% |
0.4540718399 |
5 |
Self-employed |
20 |
0.5% |
0.0054839594 |
6 |
Other: |
104 |
2.9% |
0.0285165890 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.1% |
0.0008225939 |
98 |
Not asked |
9257 |
|
NA |
r14bkhelse
Variable label:
|
How is your health.
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
1075 |
15.7% |
0.156545799 |
2 |
Very good |
2553 |
37.2% |
0.371778069 |
3 |
Good |
2259 |
32.9% |
0.328964613 |
4 |
Somewhat good |
743 |
10.8% |
0.108198631 |
5 |
Poor |
203 |
3% |
0.029561672 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
0.5% |
0.004951216 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14bk25
Variable label:
|
What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
<150 000 |
362 |
5.3% |
0.05271589 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
889 |
12.9% |
0.12945973 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
1068 |
15.6% |
0.15552643 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1237 |
18% |
0.18013689 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
1138 |
16.6% |
0.16572011 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
766 |
11.2% |
0.11154798 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
873 |
12.7% |
0.12712975 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
396 |
5.8% |
0.05766710 |
97 |
Not answered |
138 |
2% |
0.02009611 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r14bk27
Variable label:
|
Marital status.
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Single |
833 |
12.1% |
0.121304791 |
2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
352 |
5.1% |
0.051259648 |
3 |
Cohabitant |
1105 |
16.1% |
0.160914519 |
4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
3905 |
56.9% |
0.568661715 |
5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
386 |
5.6% |
0.056210864 |
6 |
Widow/widower |
229 |
3.3% |
0.033347896 |
7 |
Other: |
18 |
0.3% |
0.002621232 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.6% |
0.005679336 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6037 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_1
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Reserved.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is reserved
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
1154 |
17.4% |
0.17384754 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
1566 |
23.6% |
0.23591443 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1075 |
16.2% |
0.16194637 |
4 |
Agree a little |
2296 |
34.6% |
0.34588732 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
393 |
5.9% |
0.05920458 |
97 |
Not answered |
154 |
2.3% |
0.02319976 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6266 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_2
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Generally trusting.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is generally trusting
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
134 |
2% |
0.02018680 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
557 |
8.4% |
0.08391082 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
771 |
11.6% |
0.11614944 |
4 |
Agree a little |
3178 |
47.9% |
0.47875866 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
1882 |
28.4% |
0.28351913 |
97 |
Not answered |
116 |
1.7% |
0.01747514 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6266 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_3
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Tendency to be lazy.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… tend to be lazy
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
2245 |
33.8% |
0.33820428 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
1810 |
27.3% |
0.27267249 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1088 |
16.4% |
0.16390479 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1183 |
17.8% |
0.17821633 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
184 |
2.8% |
0.02771919 |
97 |
Not answered |
128 |
1.9% |
0.01928292 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6266 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_4
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Relaxed, handles stress well.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is relaxed, handles stress well
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
282 |
4.2% |
0.04248268 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1269 |
19.1% |
0.19117204 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1094 |
16.5% |
0.16480868 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
2685 |
40.4% |
0.40448930 |
5 |
Completely agree |
1187 |
17.9% |
0.17881892 |
97 |
Not answered |
121 |
1.8% |
0.01822838 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6266 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_5
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Few artistic interests.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… has few artistic interests
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
1886 |
28.4% |
0.28412172 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
2069 |
31.2% |
0.31169027 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1043 |
15.7% |
0.15712564 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
1185 |
17.9% |
0.17851763 |
5 |
Completely agree |
330 |
5% |
0.04971377 |
97 |
Not answered |
125 |
1.9% |
0.01883097 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6266 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_6
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Outgoing, sociable.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is outgoing, sociable
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
281 |
4.2% |
0.04233203 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1024 |
15.4% |
0.15426333 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1071 |
16.1% |
0.16134378 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
2460 |
37.1% |
0.37059355 |
5 |
Completely agree |
1694 |
25.5% |
0.25519735 |
97 |
Not answered |
108 |
1.6% |
0.01626996 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6266 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_7
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Tends to find fault with others.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… tends to find fault with others
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
1085 |
16.3% |
0.16345285 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1948 |
29.3% |
0.29346189 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1846 |
27.8% |
0.27809581 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
1486 |
22.4% |
0.22386261 |
5 |
Completely agree |
158 |
2.4% |
0.02380235 |
97 |
Not answered |
115 |
1.7% |
0.01732450 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6266 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_8
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Does a thorough job.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… do a thorough job
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
96 |
1.4% |
0.01446219 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
152 |
2.3% |
0.02289846 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
619 |
9.3% |
0.09325098 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
2748 |
41.4% |
0.41398011 |
5 |
Completely agree |
2913 |
43.9% |
0.43883700 |
97 |
Not answered |
110 |
1.7% |
0.01657126 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6266 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_9
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Easily nervous.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… get nervous easily
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
1929 |
29.1% |
0.29059958 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1944 |
29.3% |
0.29285929 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1196 |
18% |
0.18017475 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
1179 |
17.8% |
0.17761374 |
5 |
Completely agree |
265 |
4% |
0.03992166 |
97 |
Not answered |
125 |
1.9% |
0.01883097 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6266 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_10
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Active imagination.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… has an active imagination
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:12904] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
416 |
6.3% |
0.06266948 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
945 |
14.2% |
0.14236216 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1703 |
25.7% |
0.25655318 |
4 |
Agree a little |
2227 |
33.5% |
0.33549262 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
1238 |
18.7% |
0.18650196 |
97 |
Not answered |
109 |
1.6% |
0.01642061 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6266 |
|
NA |