Citation
Primary investigators
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
Mette Andersson, Sveinung Arnesen, Gisela Böhm, Dag Elgesem, Odd Gåsdal, Kristin Strømsnes, Endre Tvinnereim, and Jacob Aars
|
Scientific team, University of Bergen og Rokkansenteret
|
Producers
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality Assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in two waves, wave 1 and wave 3. In wave 1 4.870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3 5.623 members are recruited. The sampling procedure of wave 3 equals that of wave 1. A gross sample of 25 000 individuals was drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. This register includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration. 25 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway. Furthermore, all individuals over the age of 95 were excluded from the sample. This amounted to 58 persons, thus leaving a net sample of 24 928 individuals before the recruitment process started.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a online questionnaire with postal recruitment.
Panel members were recruited in multiple steps.
First, letters were sent to everyone in the sample. The letters contained the following information: a) a description of the project, b) the Citizen Panel's policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the anonymity of the participants, c) the time-frame of the project, d) the participants' rights to opt of the panel at any time in the future, e) contact information for the people responsible for the project, f) a unique log-in id and the web address to the panel's web site and g) the estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes).
In order to maximize the response rate, an incentive in the form of a travel gift card is included in the project. The value of the gift card is 25 000 NOK. To enter the lottery respondents were required to join the panel and provide their email addresses. Respondents were asked to register on the panel's web site and log into the survey using the unique ID-code provided in their personal letter. Information on the lottery was included in all correspondence with respondents.
The letter was posted 13th of October 2014.
A reminder post card was sent on the 23rd of October 2014 to those respondents who a) had not logged into the survey, or b) had neither completed the survey nor provided their email address. Respondents were encouraged to join the panel, with reference to the invitation letter. The unique log-in ID provided in the original letter was also included in the post card.
Thereafter, respondent that had not responded to the survey received a text message 13th of November. The log-in ID was given in the text message.
The final step reached out to a subsample of 2 000 individuals with registered phone number. The sample was contacted by phone. The respondents were informed of the Norwegian Citizen Panel and encouraged to opt in. Those who responded positively had the opportunity to receive log-in credentials by email.
943 respondents were contacted in total. 649 did not want to opt in. 103 wanted to opt in, but did not want to receive email with log-in credentials. 191 respondents wanted to participate, and received an email.
In addition, 144 respondents refused to answer questions asked by interviewer. Interviewer could not have a conversation with 59 respondents due to either age, sickness, or communication problems.
For various reasons the interviewer did not make contact with the remaining respondents.
Data collection among existing panel members was conducted in parallel with the recruitment of, and data collection among, new members. The existing panel panel members also received reminder cards posted on the 13th of October.
Existing panel members with registered phone number also received a reminder as a text message. Panel members without registered phone number received the reminder as an email. All panel members that had not responded to the survey received a last reminder by email. The email was sent 21st of November.
Wave 3 was closed 27th of November
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix). When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent's geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer this question. Because of this, two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample.
Change Log
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 3
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 3
|
NA
|
2019-01-08
|
w03_r3km1
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2019-01-08
|
w03_r3km2
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
w03_p5_1
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
w03_p5_2
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
w03_r3k3_2
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
NA
|
2018-02-17
|
w03_p3
|
Updated the value of 1 respondent.
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
w03_p4_1
|
Corrected values of 55 respondents.
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
w03_p4_2
|
Corrected values of 55 respondents.
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
w03_weight_2
|
Corrected values of 55 respondents.
|
NA
|
2017-11-28
|
w03_r3k3
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
w03p4_1
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
w03p4_2
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
NA
|
2017-02-01
|
r3lb1a
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2017-02-01
|
r3lb1b
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2017-02-01
|
r3lb1c
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2016-12-15
|
w03startdatetime
|
New variable.
|
NA
|
2016-12-15
|
w03completedatetime
|
New variable.
|
v-100
|
2014-12-12
|
NA
|
Initial release of round 3
|
Dataset contents
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 3 - v-101.sav
|
# Cases
|
8515
|
# Variables
|
762
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_u
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes the respondents in five groups]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
1701 |
20% |
0.1997651 |
2 |
2 |
1719 |
20.2% |
0.2018790 |
3 |
3 |
1667 |
19.6% |
0.1957722 |
4 |
4 |
1722 |
20.2% |
0.2022314 |
5 |
5 |
1706 |
20% |
0.2003523 |
w03startDateTime
Variable label:
|
Date and time for when the questionnaire was opened
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03completeDateTime
Variable label:
|
Date and time for when the questionnaire was completed
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03recruited_w03
Variable label:
|
= 1 if the respondent was recruited in w03
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
|
2927 |
34.4% |
0.3437463 |
1 |
|
5588 |
65.6% |
0.6562537 |
w03recruited_w01
Variable label:
|
= 1 if the respondent was recruited in w01
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
|
5588 |
65.6% |
0.6562537 |
1 |
|
2927 |
34.4% |
0.3437463 |
w03respondent_w01
Variable label:
|
=1 if the the respondent participated in w01
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
|
5598 |
65.7% |
0.6574281 |
1 |
|
2917 |
34.3% |
0.3425719 |
w03respondent_w02
Variable label:
|
=1 if the respondent participated in w02
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
|
5934 |
69.7% |
0.6968878 |
1 |
|
2581 |
30.3% |
0.3031122 |
w03respondent_w03
Variable label:
|
=1 if the respondent participates in w03
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
8515 |
100% |
1 |
w03_r3k1
Variable label:
|
General interest in politics
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested in politics?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
844 |
9.9% |
0.099119201 |
2 |
Interested |
3702 |
43.5% |
0.434762184 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
2922 |
34.3% |
0.343159131 |
4 |
Slightly interested |
884 |
10.4% |
0.103816794 |
5 |
Not interested |
139 |
1.6% |
0.016324134 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
0.3% |
0.002818555 |
w03_ran1
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if the respondent is newly recruited, and selects the pair of R3K3_1 or R3K204_1 in that order, or R3K204_2 and R3K3_2 in that order. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:5588] [Invalid:2927] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
2791 |
49.9% |
0.4994631 |
2 |
2 |
2797 |
50.1% |
0.5005369 |
Sysmiss |
|
2927 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k3_1
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party last parliamentary election
|
Literal question:
|
What party did you vote for at the last parliamentary election?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents were ran1=1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
125 |
4.5% |
0.04478681 |
2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
710 |
25.4% |
0.25438911 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
265 |
9.5% |
0.09494805 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
165 |
5.9% |
0.05911860 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
150 |
5.4% |
0.05374418 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
106 |
3.8% |
0.03797922 |
7 |
The Green Party |
90 |
3.2% |
0.03224651 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
731 |
26.2% |
0.26191329 |
9 |
The Red Party |
54 |
1.9% |
0.01934790 |
10 |
Did not vote |
145 |
5.2% |
0.05195271 |
11 |
Was not entitled to vote |
172 |
6.2% |
0.06162666 |
12 |
Other |
38 |
1.4% |
0.01361519 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
1.4% |
0.01433178 |
98 |
Not asked |
5724 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k3_1_12_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Voted for following party last parliamentary election [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What party did you vote for at the last parliamentary election?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents were ran1=1 are asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3k204_1
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow
|
Literal question:
|
What party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents were ran1=1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
125 |
4.5% |
0.04478681 |
2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
595 |
21.3% |
0.21318524 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
220 |
7.9% |
0.07882479 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
153 |
5.5% |
0.05481906 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
123 |
4.4% |
0.04407023 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
105 |
3.8% |
0.03762092 |
7 |
The Green Party |
132 |
4.7% |
0.04729488 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
998 |
35.8% |
0.35757793 |
9 |
The Red Party |
43 |
1.5% |
0.01540666 |
10 |
Would not vote |
92 |
3.3% |
0.03296310 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
76 |
2.7% |
0.02723038 |
12 |
Other: |
60 |
2.1% |
0.02149767 |
97 |
No answer |
69 |
2.5% |
0.02472232 |
98 |
Not asked |
5724 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k204_1_12_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for following party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents were ran1=1 are asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3k204_2
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow
|
Literal question:
|
What party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents where ran1=2 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
143 |
5.2% |
0.051680520 |
2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
598 |
21.6% |
0.216118540 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
211 |
7.6% |
0.076255873 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
167 |
6% |
0.060354174 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
104 |
3.8% |
0.037585833 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
106 |
3.8% |
0.038308638 |
7 |
The Green Party |
142 |
5.1% |
0.051319118 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1004 |
36.3% |
0.362847850 |
9 |
The Red Party |
40 |
1.4% |
0.014456090 |
10 |
Did not vote |
113 |
4.1% |
0.040838453 |
11 |
Was not entitled to vote |
87 |
3.1% |
0.031441995 |
12 |
Other |
49 |
1.8% |
0.017708710 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001084207 |
98 |
Not asked |
5748 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k204_2_12_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for following party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents where ran1=2 are asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3k3_2
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party last parliamentary election
|
Literal question:
|
What party did you vote for at the last parliamentary election?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents where ran1=2 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
129 |
4.7% |
0.047080292 |
2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
681 |
24.9% |
0.248540146 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
253 |
9.2% |
0.092335766 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
179 |
6.5% |
0.065328467 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
154 |
5.6% |
0.056204380 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
101 |
3.7% |
0.036861314 |
7 |
The Green Party |
79 |
2.9% |
0.028832117 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
725 |
26.5% |
0.264598540 |
9 |
The Red Party |
35 |
1.3% |
0.012773723 |
10 |
Did not vote |
161 |
5.9% |
0.058759124 |
11 |
Was not entitled to vote |
198 |
7.2% |
0.072262774 |
12 |
Other |
39 |
1.4% |
0.014233577 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002189781 |
98 |
Not asked |
5775 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k3_2_12_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Voted for following party last parliamentary election [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What party did you vote for at the last parliamentary election?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents where ran1=2 are asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3k202
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with current government
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the current government?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
254 |
3% |
0.029829712 |
2 |
Satisfied |
2190 |
25.7% |
0.257193188 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2742 |
32.2% |
0.322019965 |
4 |
Slightly satisfied |
2275 |
26.7% |
0.267175573 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
973 |
11.4% |
0.114268937 |
97 |
No answer |
81 |
1% |
0.009512625 |
w03_r3k6_1
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Christian Democrats
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
662 |
7.8% |
0.07774516 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1110 |
13% |
0.13035819 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1892 |
22.2% |
0.22219612 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2203 |
25.9% |
0.25871991 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1651 |
19.4% |
0.19389313 |
6 |
Really like |
481 |
5.6% |
0.05648855 |
7 |
Intensely like |
107 |
1.3% |
0.01256606 |
97 |
No answer |
409 |
4.8% |
0.04803288 |
w03_r3k6_2
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Conservative Party of Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party of Norway
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
365 |
4.3% |
0.04286553 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1075 |
12.6% |
0.12624780 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1483 |
17.4% |
0.17416324 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1013 |
11.9% |
0.11896653 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2090 |
24.5% |
0.24544921 |
6 |
Really like |
1730 |
20.3% |
0.20317087 |
7 |
Intensely like |
369 |
4.3% |
0.04333529 |
97 |
No answer |
390 |
4.6% |
0.04580153 |
w03_r3k6_3
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Progress Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
2075 |
24.4% |
0.24368761 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1614 |
19% |
0.18954786 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1223 |
14.4% |
0.14362889 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
870 |
10.2% |
0.10217264 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1406 |
16.5% |
0.16512038 |
6 |
Really like |
716 |
8.4% |
0.08408691 |
7 |
Intensely like |
219 |
2.6% |
0.02571932 |
97 |
No answer |
392 |
4.6% |
0.04603641 |
w03_r3k6_4
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
308 |
3.6% |
0.03617146 |
2 |
Really dislike |
656 |
7.7% |
0.07704052 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1434 |
16.8% |
0.16840869 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2472 |
29% |
0.29031122 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2283 |
26.8% |
0.26811509 |
6 |
Really like |
800 |
9.4% |
0.09395185 |
7 |
Intensely like |
138 |
1.6% |
0.01620669 |
97 |
No answer |
424 |
5% |
0.04979448 |
w03_r3k6_5
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1120 |
13.2% |
0.13153259 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1340 |
15.7% |
0.15736935 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1450 |
17% |
0.17028773 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1791 |
21% |
0.21033470 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1542 |
18.1% |
0.18109219 |
6 |
Really like |
690 |
8.1% |
0.08103347 |
7 |
Intensely like |
156 |
1.8% |
0.01832061 |
97 |
No answer |
426 |
5% |
0.05002936 |
w03_r3k6_6
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
461 |
5.4% |
0.05413975 |
2 |
Really dislike |
975 |
11.5% |
0.11450382 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1717 |
20.2% |
0.20164416 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2794 |
32.8% |
0.32812683 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1578 |
18.5% |
0.18532002 |
6 |
Really like |
449 |
5.3% |
0.05273048 |
7 |
Intensely like |
98 |
1.2% |
0.01150910 |
97 |
No answer |
443 |
5.2% |
0.05202584 |
w03_r3k6_7
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
478 |
5.6% |
0.05613623 |
2 |
Really dislike |
695 |
8.2% |
0.08162067 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1055 |
12.4% |
0.12389900 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2712 |
31.8% |
0.31849677 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2024 |
23.8% |
0.23769818 |
6 |
Really like |
871 |
10.2% |
0.10229008 |
7 |
Intensely like |
243 |
2.9% |
0.02853787 |
97 |
No answer |
437 |
5.1% |
0.05132120 |
w03_r3k6_8
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
244 |
2.9% |
0.02865531 |
2 |
Really dislike |
511 |
6% |
0.06001174 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1076 |
12.6% |
0.12636524 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1101 |
12.9% |
0.12930123 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2315 |
27.2% |
0.27187317 |
6 |
Really like |
2310 |
27.1% |
0.27128597 |
7 |
Intensely like |
594 |
7% |
0.06975925 |
97 |
No answer |
364 |
4.3% |
0.04274809 |
w03_r3k6_9
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Red Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1729 |
20.3% |
0.20305344 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1516 |
17.8% |
0.17803876 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1289 |
15.1% |
0.15137992 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2165 |
25.4% |
0.25425719 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
952 |
11.2% |
0.11180270 |
6 |
Really like |
307 |
3.6% |
0.03605402 |
7 |
Intensely like |
98 |
1.2% |
0.01150910 |
97 |
No answer |
459 |
5.4% |
0.05390487 |
w03_r3k8_1
Variable label:
|
Placement on political left-right scale
|
Literal question:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those that are politically on the far left, and10 represents those that are politically on the far right.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left wing |
151 |
1.8% |
0.01773341 |
2 |
1 |
257 |
3% |
0.03018203 |
3 |
2 |
701 |
8.2% |
0.08232531 |
4 |
3 |
1192 |
14% |
0.13998826 |
5 |
4 |
1033 |
12.1% |
0.12131533 |
6 |
5 |
1437 |
16.9% |
0.16876101 |
7 |
6 |
990 |
11.6% |
0.11626541 |
8 |
7 |
1196 |
14% |
0.14045802 |
9 |
8 |
868 |
10.2% |
0.10193776 |
10 |
9 |
262 |
3.1% |
0.03076923 |
11 |
10 Right wing |
195 |
2.3% |
0.02290076 |
97 |
No answer |
233 |
2.7% |
0.02736348 |
w03_r3k9_1
Variable label:
|
- Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3k9_2
Variable label:
|
- Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3k9_3
Variable label:
|
- Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3dt16_1
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Christian Democrats
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 means furthest to the left and 10 means furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left wing |
15 |
0.5% |
0.005124701 |
2 |
1 |
17 |
0.6% |
0.005807995 |
3 |
2 |
70 |
2.4% |
0.023915272 |
4 |
3 |
127 |
4.3% |
0.043389136 |
5 |
4 |
264 |
9% |
0.090194739 |
6 |
5 |
720 |
24.6% |
0.245985651 |
7 |
6 |
720 |
24.6% |
0.245985651 |
8 |
7 |
471 |
16.1% |
0.160915613 |
9 |
8 |
221 |
7.6% |
0.075503929 |
10 |
9 |
70 |
2.4% |
0.023915272 |
11 |
10 Right wing |
27 |
0.9% |
0.009224462 |
97 |
No answer |
205 |
7% |
0.070037581 |
98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_2
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Conservative Party of Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party of Norway
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left wing |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001708234 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002049880 |
3 |
2 |
8 |
0.3% |
0.002733174 |
4 |
3 |
15 |
0.5% |
0.005124701 |
5 |
4 |
18 |
0.6% |
0.006149641 |
6 |
5 |
67 |
2.3% |
0.022890331 |
7 |
6 |
103 |
3.5% |
0.035189614 |
8 |
7 |
404 |
13.8% |
0.138025282 |
9 |
8 |
833 |
28.5% |
0.284591732 |
10 |
9 |
802 |
27.4% |
0.274000683 |
11 |
10 Right wing |
465 |
15.9% |
0.158865733 |
97 |
No answer |
201 |
6.9% |
0.068670994 |
98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_3
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Progress Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left wing |
12 |
0.4% |
0.004099761 |
2 |
1 |
13 |
0.4% |
0.004441408 |
3 |
2 |
11 |
0.4% |
0.003758114 |
4 |
3 |
19 |
0.6% |
0.006491288 |
5 |
4 |
27 |
0.9% |
0.009224462 |
6 |
5 |
87 |
3% |
0.029723266 |
7 |
6 |
63 |
2.2% |
0.021523744 |
8 |
7 |
128 |
4.4% |
0.043730782 |
9 |
8 |
333 |
11.4% |
0.113768364 |
10 |
9 |
726 |
24.8% |
0.248035531 |
11 |
10 Right wing |
1295 |
44.2% |
0.442432525 |
97 |
No answer |
213 |
7.3% |
0.072770755 |
98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_4
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left wing |
205 |
7% |
0.070037581 |
2 |
1 |
137 |
4.7% |
0.046805603 |
3 |
2 |
206 |
7% |
0.070379228 |
4 |
3 |
269 |
9.2% |
0.091902972 |
5 |
4 |
332 |
11.3% |
0.113426717 |
6 |
5 |
597 |
20.4% |
0.203963102 |
7 |
6 |
546 |
18.7% |
0.186539119 |
8 |
7 |
289 |
9.9% |
0.098735907 |
9 |
8 |
99 |
3.4% |
0.033823027 |
10 |
9 |
24 |
0.8% |
0.008199522 |
11 |
10 Right wing |
12 |
0.4% |
0.004099761 |
97 |
No answer |
211 |
7.2% |
0.072087462 |
98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_5
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left wing |
393 |
13.4% |
0.1342671677 |
2 |
1 |
920 |
31.4% |
0.3143149983 |
3 |
2 |
792 |
27.1% |
0.2705842159 |
4 |
3 |
347 |
11.9% |
0.1185514178 |
5 |
4 |
118 |
4% |
0.0403143150 |
6 |
5 |
94 |
3.2% |
0.0321147933 |
7 |
6 |
22 |
0.8% |
0.0075162282 |
8 |
7 |
15 |
0.5% |
0.0051247011 |
9 |
8 |
8 |
0.3% |
0.0027331739 |
10 |
9 |
6 |
0.2% |
0.0020498804 |
11 |
10 Right wing |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0006832935 |
97 |
No answer |
210 |
7.2% |
0.0717458148 |
98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_6
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left wing |
31 |
1.1% |
0.010591049 |
2 |
1 |
56 |
1.9% |
0.019132217 |
3 |
2 |
170 |
5.8% |
0.058079945 |
4 |
3 |
340 |
11.6% |
0.116159891 |
5 |
4 |
654 |
22.3% |
0.223436966 |
6 |
5 |
904 |
30.9% |
0.308848650 |
7 |
6 |
355 |
12.1% |
0.121284592 |
8 |
7 |
117 |
4% |
0.039972668 |
9 |
8 |
50 |
1.7% |
0.017082337 |
10 |
9 |
15 |
0.5% |
0.005124701 |
11 |
10 Right wing |
11 |
0.4% |
0.003758114 |
97 |
No answer |
224 |
7.7% |
0.076528869 |
98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_7
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left wing |
152 |
5.2% |
0.051930304 |
2 |
1 |
286 |
9.8% |
0.097710967 |
3 |
2 |
430 |
14.7% |
0.146908097 |
4 |
3 |
534 |
18.2% |
0.182439358 |
5 |
4 |
548 |
18.7% |
0.187222412 |
6 |
5 |
572 |
19.5% |
0.195421934 |
7 |
6 |
112 |
3.8% |
0.038264435 |
8 |
7 |
32 |
1.1% |
0.010932696 |
9 |
8 |
17 |
0.6% |
0.005807995 |
10 |
9 |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002049880 |
11 |
10 Right wing |
7 |
0.2% |
0.002391527 |
97 |
No answer |
231 |
7.9% |
0.078920396 |
98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_8
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left wing |
65 |
2.2% |
0.022207038 |
2 |
1 |
149 |
5.1% |
0.050905364 |
3 |
2 |
369 |
12.6% |
0.126067646 |
4 |
3 |
648 |
22.1% |
0.221387086 |
5 |
4 |
634 |
21.7% |
0.216604031 |
6 |
5 |
509 |
17.4% |
0.173898189 |
7 |
6 |
205 |
7% |
0.070037581 |
8 |
7 |
93 |
3.2% |
0.031773147 |
9 |
8 |
29 |
1% |
0.009907755 |
10 |
9 |
11 |
0.4% |
0.003758114 |
11 |
10 Right wing |
13 |
0.4% |
0.004441408 |
97 |
No answer |
202 |
6.9% |
0.069012641 |
98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dt16_9
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Red Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
I politikken snakkes det iblant om venstresiden og høyresiden. Hvor vil du plassere følgende partier på en skala, der 0 betyr lengst til venstre og 10 betyr lengst til høyre?
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left wing |
1577 |
53.9% |
0.538776905 |
2 |
1 |
548 |
18.7% |
0.187222412 |
3 |
2 |
193 |
6.6% |
0.065937820 |
4 |
3 |
114 |
3.9% |
0.038947728 |
5 |
4 |
53 |
1.8% |
0.018107277 |
6 |
5 |
124 |
4.2% |
0.042364195 |
7 |
6 |
25 |
0.9% |
0.008541168 |
8 |
7 |
25 |
0.9% |
0.008541168 |
9 |
8 |
10 |
0.3% |
0.003416467 |
10 |
9 |
7 |
0.2% |
0.002391527 |
11 |
10 Right wing |
23 |
0.8% |
0.007857875 |
97 |
No answer |
228 |
7.8% |
0.077895456 |
98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k10
Variable label:
|
Perception of current economic situation in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
Do you think it is:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
3202 |
37.6% |
0.376042278 |
2 |
Good |
3937 |
46.2% |
0.462360540 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
774 |
9.1% |
0.090898415 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
259 |
3% |
0.030416911 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
150 |
1.8% |
0.017615972 |
6 |
Bad |
61 |
0.7% |
0.007163829 |
7 |
Very bad |
23 |
0.3% |
0.002701116 |
97 |
No answer |
109 |
1.3% |
0.012800940 |
w03_r3k11
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with the way democracy works in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you about the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
1500 |
17.6% |
0.17615972 |
2 |
Satisfied |
4884 |
57.4% |
0.57357604 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1548 |
18.2% |
0.18179683 |
4 |
Slightly satisfied |
357 |
4.2% |
0.04192601 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
89 |
1% |
0.01045214 |
97 |
No answer |
137 |
1.6% |
0.01608925 |
w03_r3k14_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politics is sometimes so convoluted that people like me do not understand what it is about
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Politics is sometimes so convoluted that people like me do not understand what it is about.
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
282 |
5% |
0.05046528 |
2 |
Agree |
721 |
12.9% |
0.12902649 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
1627 |
29.1% |
0.29115963 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
468 |
8.4% |
0.08375089 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
776 |
13.9% |
0.13886901 |
6 |
Disagree |
1211 |
21.7% |
0.21671439 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
403 |
7.2% |
0.07211883 |
97 |
No answer |
100 |
1.8% |
0.01789549 |
98 |
Not asked |
2927 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k14_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: People like me can probably vote, but we cannot do anything else to influence politics
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
People like me can probably vote, but we cannot do anything else to influence politics.
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
376 |
6.7% |
0.06728704 |
2 |
Agree |
753 |
13.5% |
0.13475304 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
875 |
15.7% |
0.15658554 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
432 |
7.7% |
0.07730852 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1136 |
20.3% |
0.20329277 |
6 |
Disagree |
1372 |
24.6% |
0.24552613 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
530 |
9.5% |
0.09484610 |
97 |
No answer |
114 |
2% |
0.02040086 |
98 |
Not asked |
2927 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k15
Variable label:
|
Most people can be trusted
|
Literal question:
|
And now a more general question. Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
Technical description:
|
0 means “Cannot be careful enough” and 10 means “Most people can be trusted”.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Cannot be careful enough |
119 |
2.1% |
0.021295634 |
2 |
1 |
67 |
1.2% |
0.011989979 |
3 |
2 |
126 |
2.3% |
0.022548318 |
4 |
3 |
312 |
5.6% |
0.055833930 |
5 |
4 |
316 |
5.7% |
0.056549749 |
6 |
5 |
692 |
12.4% |
0.123836793 |
7 |
6 |
637 |
11.4% |
0.113994273 |
8 |
7 |
1252 |
22.4% |
0.224051539 |
9 |
8 |
1081 |
19.3% |
0.193450251 |
10 |
9 |
419 |
7.5% |
0.074982105 |
11 |
10 Most people can be trusted |
524 |
9.4% |
0.093772369 |
97 |
No answer |
43 |
0.8% |
0.007695061 |
98 |
Not asked |
2927 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k16_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: I have an opinion about most things
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements fit you as a person?
|
Literal question:
|
I have an opinion about most things
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
815 |
9.6% |
0.095713447 |
2 |
A good fit |
3218 |
37.8% |
0.377921315 |
3 |
A somewhat good fit |
2828 |
33.2% |
0.332119789 |
4 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
914 |
10.7% |
0.107339988 |
5 |
A somewhat bad fit |
444 |
5.2% |
0.052143277 |
6 |
A bad fit |
119 |
1.4% |
0.013975338 |
7 |
A very bad fit |
20 |
0.2% |
0.002348796 |
97 |
No answer |
157 |
1.8% |
0.018438050 |
w03_r3k16_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: I have strong opinions, either positive or negative, also about issues that are new to me
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements fit you as a person?
|
Literal question:
|
I have strong opinions, either positive or negative, also about issues that are new to me.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
288 |
3.4% |
0.03382267 |
2 |
A good fit |
1267 |
14.9% |
0.14879624 |
3 |
A somewhat good fit |
2495 |
29.3% |
0.29301233 |
4 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
1973 |
23.2% |
0.23170875 |
5 |
A somewhat bad fit |
1293 |
15.2% |
0.15184968 |
6 |
A bad fit |
756 |
8.9% |
0.08878450 |
7 |
A very bad fit |
159 |
1.9% |
0.01867293 |
97 |
No answer |
284 |
3.3% |
0.03335291 |
w03_r3k17_1
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: TV
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
Literal question:
|
TV
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
1472 |
17.3% |
0.17287140 |
2 |
Daily |
3912 |
45.9% |
0.45942454 |
3 |
Several times a week |
1728 |
20.3% |
0.20293600 |
4 |
Less often |
1014 |
11.9% |
0.11908397 |
5 |
Never |
236 |
2.8% |
0.02771580 |
97 |
No answer |
153 |
1.8% |
0.01796829 |
w03_r3k17_2
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Radio
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
Literal question:
|
Radio
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
1700 |
20% |
0.19964768 |
2 |
Daily |
2683 |
31.5% |
0.31509102 |
3 |
Several times a week |
1740 |
20.4% |
0.20434527 |
4 |
Less often |
1640 |
19.3% |
0.19260129 |
5 |
Never |
426 |
5% |
0.05002936 |
97 |
No answer |
326 |
3.8% |
0.03828538 |
w03_r3k17_3
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Printed newspaper
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
Literal question:
|
Printed newspaper
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
510 |
6% |
0.05989430 |
2 |
Daily |
3336 |
39.2% |
0.39177921 |
3 |
Several times a week |
1533 |
18% |
0.18003523 |
4 |
Less often |
2287 |
26.9% |
0.26858485 |
5 |
Never |
538 |
6.3% |
0.06318262 |
97 |
No answer |
311 |
3.7% |
0.03652378 |
w03_r3k17_4
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Online newspaper
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
Literal question:
|
Online newspaper
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
2878 |
33.8% |
0.33799178 |
2 |
Daily |
2521 |
29.6% |
0.29606577 |
3 |
Several times a week |
1403 |
16.5% |
0.16476806 |
4 |
Less often |
1087 |
12.8% |
0.12765708 |
5 |
Never |
291 |
3.4% |
0.03417499 |
97 |
No answer |
335 |
3.9% |
0.03934234 |
w03_r3k17_5
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Facebook
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
Literal question:
|
Facebook
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
1338 |
15.7% |
0.1571345 |
2 |
Daily |
1726 |
20.3% |
0.2027011 |
3 |
Several times a week |
1097 |
12.9% |
0.1288315 |
4 |
Less often |
1196 |
14% |
0.1404580 |
5 |
Never |
2638 |
31% |
0.3098062 |
97 |
No answer |
520 |
6.1% |
0.0610687 |
w03_r3k17_6
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Twitter
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
Literal question:
|
Twitter
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
151 |
1.8% |
0.01773341 |
2 |
Daily |
167 |
2% |
0.01961245 |
3 |
Several times a week |
262 |
3.1% |
0.03076923 |
4 |
Less often |
958 |
11.3% |
0.11250734 |
5 |
Never |
6273 |
73.7% |
0.73669994 |
97 |
No answer |
704 |
8.3% |
0.08267763 |
w03_r3k17_7
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Other websites
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
Literal question:
|
Other websites
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
614 |
7.2% |
0.07210804 |
2 |
Daily |
1099 |
12.9% |
0.12906635 |
3 |
Several times a week |
1733 |
20.4% |
0.20352319 |
4 |
Less often |
2280 |
26.8% |
0.26776277 |
5 |
Never |
2086 |
24.5% |
0.24497945 |
97 |
No answer |
703 |
8.3% |
0.08256019 |
w03_km36
Variable label:
|
How serious a threat is climate change for you personally?
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat is climate change for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U does not equal 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very serious |
954 |
14% |
0.14037669 |
2 |
Serious |
2209 |
32.5% |
0.32504414 |
3 |
Somewhat serious |
2164 |
31.8% |
0.31842260 |
4 |
Slightly serious |
1018 |
15% |
0.14979400 |
5 |
Slightly serious |
357 |
5.3% |
0.05253090 |
97 |
No answer |
94 |
1.4% |
0.01383167 |
98 |
Not asked |
1719 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv30_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: The tax burden should be reduced, even if it leads to cutbacks in the welfare state.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
The tax burden should be reduced, even if it leads to cutbacks in the welfare state.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
263 |
3.1% |
0.03088667 |
2 |
Agree |
632 |
7.4% |
0.07422196 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
1224 |
14.4% |
0.14374633 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
801 |
9.4% |
0.09406929 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1395 |
16.4% |
0.16382854 |
6 |
Disagree |
2244 |
26.4% |
0.26353494 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1782 |
20.9% |
0.20927775 |
97 |
No answer |
174 |
2% |
0.02043453 |
w03_r3dv30_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Commercial private schools should be allowed.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Commercial private schools should be allowed.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
531 |
6.2% |
0.06236054 |
2 |
Agree |
1508 |
17.7% |
0.17709924 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
1569 |
18.4% |
0.18426307 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1147 |
13.5% |
0.13470346 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1179 |
13.8% |
0.13846154 |
6 |
Disagree |
1281 |
15% |
0.15044040 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1105 |
13% |
0.12977099 |
97 |
No answer |
195 |
2.3% |
0.02290076 |
w03_r3dv30_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Many public activities could have been carried out both with better results and at lower cost, if they were operated by the private sector.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Many public activities could have been carried out both with better results and at lower cost, if they were operated by the private sector.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
600 |
7% |
0.07046389 |
2 |
Agree |
1404 |
16.5% |
0.16488550 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
2097 |
24.6% |
0.24627129 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
948 |
11.1% |
0.11133294 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1159 |
13.6% |
0.13611274 |
6 |
Disagree |
1317 |
15.5% |
0.15466823 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
819 |
9.6% |
0.09618321 |
97 |
No answer |
171 |
2% |
0.02008221 |
w03_r3k31_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: The government should contribute to reducing income differences in society.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
The government should contribute to reducing income differences in society.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
418 |
14.3% |
0.14280834 |
2 |
Agree |
765 |
26.1% |
0.26135975 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
793 |
27.1% |
0.27092586 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
274 |
9.4% |
0.09361121 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
300 |
10.2% |
0.10249402 |
6 |
Disagree |
223 |
7.6% |
0.07618722 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
1.6% |
0.01571575 |
97 |
No answer |
108 |
3.7% |
0.03689785 |
98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k31_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different religions and beliefs.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different religions and beliefs.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8514] [Invalid:1] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
261 |
8.9% |
0.08916980 |
2 |
Agree |
634 |
21.7% |
0.21660403 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
616 |
21% |
0.21045439 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
411 |
14% |
0.14041681 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
417 |
14.2% |
0.14246669 |
6 |
Disagree |
324 |
11.1% |
0.11069354 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
160 |
5.5% |
0.05466348 |
97 |
No answer |
104 |
3.6% |
0.03553126 |
98 |
Not asked |
5587 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k31_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has committed to, should be carried out abroad.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has committed to, should be carried out abroad.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
70 |
2.4% |
0.02391527 |
2 |
Agree |
219 |
7.5% |
0.07482064 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
350 |
12% |
0.11957636 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
679 |
23.2% |
0.23197813 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
542 |
18.5% |
0.18517253 |
6 |
Disagree |
700 |
23.9% |
0.23915272 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
252 |
8.6% |
0.08609498 |
97 |
No answer |
115 |
3.9% |
0.03928937 |
98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dvh_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the area by Lofoten and Vesterålen.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the area by Lofoten and Vesterålen.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1692 |
19.9% |
0.19870816 |
2 |
Agree |
1416 |
16.6% |
0.16629477 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
1050 |
12.3% |
0.12331180 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1519 |
17.8% |
0.17839107 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
946 |
11.1% |
0.11109806 |
6 |
Disagree |
1086 |
12.8% |
0.12753964 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
583 |
6.8% |
0.06846741 |
97 |
No answer |
223 |
2.6% |
0.02618908 |
w03_r3dvh_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
713 |
8.4% |
0.08373459 |
2 |
Agree |
1566 |
18.4% |
0.18391075 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
1533 |
18% |
0.18003523 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
828 |
9.7% |
0.09724016 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1587 |
18.6% |
0.18637698 |
6 |
Disagree |
1235 |
14.5% |
0.14503817 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
862 |
10.1% |
0.10123312 |
97 |
No answer |
191 |
2.2% |
0.02243100 |
w03_r3dvh_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
3560 |
41.8% |
0.41808573 |
2 |
Agree |
2313 |
27.2% |
0.27163829 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
715 |
8.4% |
0.08396947 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
596 |
7% |
0.06999413 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
460 |
5.4% |
0.05402231 |
6 |
Disagree |
369 |
4.3% |
0.04333529 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
306 |
3.6% |
0.03593658 |
97 |
No answer |
196 |
2.3% |
0.02301820 |
w03_r3fr1_1
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Art and culture, band and choir
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Art and culture, band and choir [Music, theatre and dance. Art, applied arts and architecture. History, literature and language. Museums, collections and libraries. Periodicals and media. Other cultural and artistic activities]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
247 |
14.5% |
0.14520870 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1434 |
84.3% |
0.84303351 |
w03_r3fr1_2
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Athletics and sport
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport [All types of athletics, sports and exercise, rifle club, company sports and disabled sports]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Athletics and sport |
395 |
23.2% |
0.23221634 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1286 |
75.6% |
0.75602587 |
w03_r3fr1_3
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity [Outdoor recreation and scouts. Car and boat clubs. Animal owner clubs. Pensioners’ clubs. Student societies. Social clubs - Rotary, Lions etc. Other hobbies and recreational activities]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Hobby, fritid, utendørsaktivitet |
304 |
17.9% |
0.17871840 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1377 |
81% |
0.80952381 |
w03_r3fr1_4
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Education, training and research
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research [Primary and lower secondary schools including the parent council in state schools, but voluntary work only in private schools. Upper secondary schools. Folk high schools. Universities and University colleges. Vocational/technical education. Adult education and further education. Research and development]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Education, training and research |
214 |
12.6% |
0.12580835 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1467 |
86.2% |
0.86243386 |
w03_r3fr1_5
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Health, nursing and rescue work
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Health, nursing and rescue work [Hospital. Rehabilitation. Nursing home. Sheltered housing and home care services. Psychiatric institutions. Out-patient health services. Alternative medicine. Rescue work and ambulance services]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
87 |
5.1% |
0.05114638 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1594 |
93.7% |
0.93709583 |
w03_r3fr1_6
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Social services and substance abuse care
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse care [Kindergartens. The Norwegian Red Cross. Blue Cross Norway. Norwegian People’s Aid. Family counselling. Crisis centres and telephones. Services for the disabled. Services for the elderly. Self-help and volunteer centres]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
112 |
6.6% |
0.06584362 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1569 |
92.2% |
0.92239859 |
w03_r3fr1_7
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Nature, environmental and animal protection
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environmental and animal protection [Nature and environmental protection. Area preservation and area management. Animal protection. Veterinary services]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
56 |
3.3% |
0.03292181 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1625 |
95.5% |
0.95532040 |
w03_r3fr1_8
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood [Meeting house]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
236 |
13.9% |
0.13874192 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1445 |
85% |
0.84950029 |
w03_r3fr1_9
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Housing co-operatives and housing associations
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Housing co-operatives and housing associations [Homeowner associations]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
195 |
11.5% |
0.11463845 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1486 |
87.4% |
0.87360376 |
w03_r3fr1_10
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Rights, support and advocacy work
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Rights, support and advocacy work [Disabled and ill. Women’s rights. Language societies. Ethnic minorities. Weak/exposed groups, prisoners, the poor. Campaigns and lobbying]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
52 |
3.1% |
0.03057025 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1629 |
95.8% |
0.95767196 |
w03_r3fr1_11
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Political parties
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties [Youth political parties]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Political parties |
46 |
2.7% |
0.02704292 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1635 |
96.1% |
0.96119929 |
w03_r3fr1_12
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work [International friendship and exchange programmes. International relief and development assistance. Human rights and peace work]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
87 |
5.1% |
0.05114638 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1594 |
93.7% |
0.93709583 |
w03_r3fr1_13
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations [Employee organisations. Employer organisations. Trade and industry associations. Producers co-operatives. Pupil and student organisations.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
122 |
7.2% |
0.07172252 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1559 |
91.7% |
0.91651969 |
w03_r3fr1_14
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway [Organisations linked to the Church of Norway. Mission. Protestant free church. Other religions. Belief organisations, also non-religious such as the Norwegian Humanist Association]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
137 |
8.1% |
0.08054086 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1544 |
90.8% |
0.90770135 |
w03_r3fr1_15
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Immigrant organisations
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations [Organisations linked to country background, culture, identity outside Norway]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Immigrant organisations |
15 |
0.9% |
0.008818342 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.011757790 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1666 |
97.9% |
0.979423868 |
w03_r3fr1_16
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Other, specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1681] [Invalid:6834] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify |
44 |
2.6% |
0.0261749 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1637 |
97.4% |
0.9738251 |
Sysmiss |
|
6834 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr1_17
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: No
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
577 |
33.9% |
0.33921223 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1104 |
64.9% |
0.64902998 |
w03_r3fr1_16_other
Variable label:
|
Work for voluntary organisations: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work tasks for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr2_1
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Art and culture, band and choir
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Art and culture, band and choir [Music, theatre and dance. Art, applied arts and architecture. History, literature and language. Museums, collections and libraries. Periodicals and media. Other cultural and artistic activities]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
250 |
14.7% |
0.14697237 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1430 |
84.1% |
0.84068195 |
w03_r3fr2_2
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Athletics and sport
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport [All types of athletics, sports and exercise, rifle club, company sports and disabled sports]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Athletics and sport |
434 |
25.5% |
0.25514403 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1246 |
73.3% |
0.73251029 |
w03_r3fr2_3
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity [Outdoor recreation and scouts. Car and boat clubs. Animal owner clubs. Pensioners’ clubs. Student societies. Social clubs - Rotary, Lions etc. Other hobbies and recreational activities]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
354 |
20.8% |
0.20811287 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1326 |
78% |
0.77954145 |
w03_r3fr2_4
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Education, training and research
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research [Primary and lower secondary schools including the parent council in state schools, but voluntary work only in private schools. Upper secondary schools. Folk high schools. Universities and University colleges. Vocational/technical education. Adult education and further education. Research and development]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Education, training and research |
100 |
5.9% |
0.05878895 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1580 |
92.9% |
0.92886537 |
w03_r3fr2_5
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Health, nursing and rescue work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Health, nursing and rescue work [Hospital. Rehabilitation. Nursing home. Sheltered housing and home care services. Psychiatric institutions. Out-patient health services. Alternative medicine. Rescue work and ambulance services]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
98 |
5.8% |
0.05761317 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1582 |
93% |
0.93004115 |
w03_r3fr2_6
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Social services and substance abuse care
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse care [Kindergartens. The Norwegian Red Cross. Blue Cross Norway. Norwegian People’s Aid. Family counselling. Crisis centres and telephones. Services for the disabled. Services for the elderly. Self-help and volunteer centres]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
98 |
5.8% |
0.05761317 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1582 |
93% |
0.93004115 |
w03_r3fr2_7
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Nature, environmental and animal protection
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environmental and animal protection [Nature and environmental protection. Area preservation and area management. Animal protection. Veterinary services]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
99 |
5.8% |
0.05820106 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1581 |
92.9% |
0.92945326 |
w03_r3fr2_8
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood [Meeting house]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
232 |
13.6% |
0.13639036 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1448 |
85.1% |
0.85126396 |
w03_r3fr2_9
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Housing co-operatives and housing associations
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Housing co-operatives and housing associations [Homeowner associations]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
222 |
13.1% |
0.13051146 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1458 |
85.7% |
0.85714286 |
w03_r3fr2_10
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Rights, support and advocacy work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Rights, support and advocacy work [Disabled and ill. Women’s rights. Language societies. Ethnic minorities. Weak/exposed groups, prisoners, the poor. Campaigns and lobbying]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
62 |
3.6% |
0.03644915 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1618 |
95.1% |
0.95120517 |
w03_r3fr2_11
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Political parties
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties [Youth political parties]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Political parties |
96 |
5.6% |
0.05643739 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1584 |
93.1% |
0.93121693 |
w03_r3fr2_12
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work [International friendship and exchange programmes. International relief and development assistance. Human rights and peace work]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
143 |
8.4% |
0.08406820 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1537 |
90.4% |
0.90358613 |
w03_r3fr2_13
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations [Employee organisations. Employer organisations. Trade and industry associations. Producers co-operatives. Pupil and student organisations.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
350 |
20.6% |
0.20576132 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1330 |
78.2% |
0.78189300 |
w03_r3fr2_14
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway [Organisations linked to the Church of Norway. Mission. Protestant free church. Other religions. Belief organisations, also non-religious such as the Norwegian Humanist Association]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
249 |
14.6% |
0.14638448 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1431 |
84.1% |
0.84126984 |
w03_r3fr2_15
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Immigrant organisations
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations [Organisations linked to country background, culture, identity outside Norway]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Immigrant organisations |
18 |
1.1% |
0.01058201 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1662 |
97.7% |
0.97707231 |
w03_r3fr2_16
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Other, specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1680] [Invalid:6835] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify |
33 |
2% |
0.01964286 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1647 |
98% |
0.98035714 |
Sysmiss |
|
6835 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr2_17
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: No
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
432 |
25.4% |
0.25396825 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1248 |
73.4% |
0.73368607 |
w03_r3fr2_16_other
Variable label:
|
Member of voluntary organisations: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Are you a member of a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr3_1
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Art and culture, band and choir
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Art and culture, band and choir [Music, theatre and dance. Art, applied arts and architecture. History, literature and language. Museums, collections and libraries. Periodicals and media. Other cultural and artistic activities]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
109 |
6.4% |
0.06407995 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1571 |
92.4% |
0.92357437 |
w03_r3fr3_2
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Athletics and sport
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport [All types of athletics, sports and exercise, rifle club, company sports and disabled sports]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Athletics and sport |
122 |
7.2% |
0.07172252 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1558 |
91.6% |
0.91593180 |
w03_r3fr3_3
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity [Outdoor recreation and scouts. Car and boat clubs. Animal owner clubs. Pensioners’ clubs. Student societies. Social clubs - Rotary, Lions etc. Other hobbies and recreational activities]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
114 |
6.7% |
0.06701940 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1566 |
92.1% |
0.92063492 |
w03_r3fr3_4
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Education, training and research
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research [Primary and lower secondary schools including the parent council in state schools, but voluntary work only in private schools. Upper secondary schools. Folk high schools. Universities and University colleges. Vocational/technical education. Adult education and further education. Research and development]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Education, training and research |
49 |
2.9% |
0.02880658 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1631 |
95.9% |
0.95884774 |
w03_r3fr3_5
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Health, nursing and rescue work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Health, nursing and rescue work [Hospital. Rehabilitation. Nursing home. Sheltered housing and home care services. Psychiatric institutions. Out-patient health services. Alternative medicine. Rescue work and ambulance services]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
26 |
1.5% |
0.01528513 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1654 |
97.2% |
0.97236919 |
w03_r3fr3_6
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Social services and substance abuse care
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse care [Kindergartens. The Norwegian Red Cross. Blue Cross Norway. Norwegian People’s Aid. Family counselling. Crisis centres and telephones. Services for the disabled. Services for the elderly. Self-help and volunteer centres]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
24 |
1.4% |
0.01410935 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1656 |
97.4% |
0.97354497 |
w03_r3fr3_7
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Nature, environmental and animal protection
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environmental and animal protection [Nature and environmental protection. Area preservation and area management. Animal protection. Veterinary services]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
13 |
0.8% |
0.007642563 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.012345679 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1667 |
98% |
0.980011758 |
w03_r3fr3_8
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood [Meeting house]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
69 |
4.1% |
0.04056437 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1611 |
94.7% |
0.94708995 |
w03_r3fr3_9
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Housing co-operatives and housing associations
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Housing co-operatives and housing associations [Homeowner associations]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
60 |
3.5% |
0.03527337 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1620 |
95.2% |
0.95238095 |
w03_r3fr3_10
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Rights, support and advocacy work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Rights, support and advocacy work [Disabled and ill. Women’s rights. Language societies. Ethnic minorities. Weak/exposed groups, prisoners, the poor. Campaigns and lobbying]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
18 |
1.1% |
0.01058201 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1662 |
97.7% |
0.97707231 |
w03_r3fr3_11
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Political parties
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties [Youth political parties]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Political parties |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01646091 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1652 |
97.1% |
0.97119342 |
w03_r3fr3_12
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work [International friendship and exchange programmes. International relief and development assistance. Human rights and peace work]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
12 |
0.7% |
0.007054674 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.012345679 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1668 |
98.1% |
0.980599647 |
w03_r3fr3_13
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations [Employee organisations. Employer organisations. Trade and industry associations. Producers co-operatives. Pupil and student organisations.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
88 |
5.2% |
0.05173427 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1592 |
93.6% |
0.93592005 |
w03_r3fr3_14
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway [Organisations linked to the Church of Norway. Mission. Protestant free church. Other religions. Belief organisations, also non-religious such as the Norwegian Humanist Association]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
75 |
4.4% |
0.04409171 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1605 |
94.4% |
0.94356261 |
w03_r3fr3_15
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Immigrant organisations
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations [Organisations linked to country background, culture, identity outside Norway]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Immigrant organisations |
7 |
0.4% |
0.004115226 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.012345679 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1673 |
98.4% |
0.983539095 |
w03_r3fr3_16
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Other, specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1680] [Invalid:6835] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify |
26 |
1.5% |
0.01547619 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1654 |
98.5% |
0.98452381 |
Sysmiss |
|
6835 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr3_17
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: No
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
941 |
55.3% |
0.55320400 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
739 |
43.4% |
0.43445032 |
w03_r3fr3_16_other
Variable label:
|
Elected position in a voluntary organisation: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you hold an elected position of trust in a voluntary organisation in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr4
Variable label:
|
Why don’t you participate in voluntary work? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Why don’t you participate in voluntary work?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_ran75
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=1, a organization is selected in R3FR1, and selects one of the following questions: R3FR5 or R3FR6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1680] [Invalid:6835] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
1 |
643 |
38.3% |
0.3827381 |
1 |
2 |
1037 |
61.7% |
0.6172619 |
Sysmiss |
|
6835 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr5
Variable label:
|
Time spent on voluntary work
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the last year as a whole, roughly how much time did you spend on voluntary work in an ordinary week?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran75=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Less than half an hour |
382 |
36.8% |
0.368370299 |
2 |
Between half an hour and one hour |
188 |
18.1% |
0.181292189 |
3 |
1 to 2 hours |
202 |
19.5% |
0.194792671 |
4 |
2 to 5 hours |
145 |
14% |
0.139826422 |
5 |
More than 5 hours |
110 |
10.6% |
0.106075217 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1% |
0.009643202 |
98 |
Not asked |
7478 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr6
Variable label:
|
Time spent participating in member activities in a voluntary organisation
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the last year as a whole, roughly how much time did you spend participating in member activities in a voluntary organisation?
|
Technical description:
|
(e.g. involved in training, exercises, membership meetings, social gatherings or similar)
[Asked if ran75=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Less than half an hour |
247 |
23.8% |
0.23818708 |
2 |
Between half an hour and one hour |
103 |
9.9% |
0.09932498 |
3 |
1 to 2 hours |
143 |
13.8% |
0.13789778 |
4 |
2 to 5 hours |
169 |
16.3% |
0.16297011 |
5 |
More than 5 hours |
335 |
32.3% |
0.32304725 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
3.9% |
0.03857281 |
98 |
Not asked |
7478 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr7_1
Variable label:
|
Asked to: Be a member of an organisation
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about the last five years, has anyone asked you to …
|
Literal question:
|
Be a member of an organisation
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
582 |
34.2% |
0.34215168 |
2 |
Yes, once |
266 |
15.6% |
0.15637860 |
3 |
Yes, 2-3 times |
435 |
25.6% |
0.25573192 |
4 |
Yes, more than 3 times |
302 |
17.8% |
0.17754262 |
97 |
No answer |
116 |
6.8% |
0.06819518 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr7_2
Variable label:
|
Asked to: Sit on the board of an organisation
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about the last five years, has anyone asked you to …
|
Literal question:
|
Sit on the board of an organisation
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
834 |
49% |
0.49029982 |
2 |
Yes, once |
381 |
22.4% |
0.22398589 |
3 |
Yes, 2-3 times |
264 |
15.5% |
0.15520282 |
4 |
Yes, more than 3 times |
97 |
5.7% |
0.05702528 |
97 |
No answer |
125 |
7.3% |
0.07348618 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr7_3
Variable label:
|
Asked to: Do voluntary work for an organisation
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about the last five years, has anyone asked you to …
|
Literal question:
|
Do voluntary work for an organisation
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
800 |
47% |
0.47031158 |
2 |
Yes, once |
268 |
15.8% |
0.15755438 |
3 |
Yes, 2-3 times |
300 |
17.6% |
0.17636684 |
4 |
Yes, more than 3 times |
199 |
11.7% |
0.11699001 |
97 |
No answer |
134 |
7.9% |
0.07877719 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr7_4
Variable label:
|
Asked to: Give money to a voluntary organisation
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about the last five years, has anyone asked you to …
|
Literal question:
|
Give money to a voluntary organisation
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
124 |
7.3% |
0.07289830 |
2 |
Yes, once |
84 |
4.9% |
0.04938272 |
3 |
Yes, 2-3 times |
290 |
17% |
0.17048795 |
4 |
Yes, more than 3 times |
1146 |
67.4% |
0.67372134 |
97 |
No answer |
57 |
3.4% |
0.03350970 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_ran2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=1, and selects one of the following questions: R3FR8 or R3FR28]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1680] [Invalid:6835] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
838 |
49.9% |
0.4988095 |
2 |
2 |
842 |
50.1% |
0.5011905 |
Sysmiss |
|
6835 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr8
Variable label:
|
Opportunities are to participate in voluntary work in your local neighbourhood
|
Literal question:
|
How good or bad do you think the opportunities are to participate in voluntary work in your local neighbourhood?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
242 |
28.9% |
0.288782816 |
2 |
Good |
288 |
34.4% |
0.343675418 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
99 |
11.8% |
0.118138425 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
150 |
17.9% |
0.178997613 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
28 |
3.3% |
0.033412888 |
6 |
Bad |
12 |
1.4% |
0.014319809 |
7 |
Very bad |
8 |
1% |
0.009546539 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.013126492 |
98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr9_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: One has a moral duty to participate in voluntary work at some point in life
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
One has a moral duty to participate in voluntary work at some point in life
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
255 |
15% |
0.14991182 |
2 |
Agree |
447 |
26.3% |
0.26278660 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
330 |
19.4% |
0.19400353 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
284 |
16.7% |
0.16696061 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
89 |
5.2% |
0.05232216 |
6 |
Disagree |
151 |
8.9% |
0.08877131 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
86 |
5.1% |
0.05055850 |
97 |
No answer |
59 |
3.5% |
0.03468548 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr9_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: One has a moral duty to donate money to important causes if one can afford it
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
One has a moral duty to donate money to important causes if one can afford it
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
301 |
17.7% |
0.17695473 |
2 |
Agree |
512 |
30.1% |
0.30099941 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
325 |
19.1% |
0.19106408 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
211 |
12.4% |
0.12404468 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
97 |
5.7% |
0.05702528 |
6 |
Disagree |
119 |
7% |
0.06995885 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
83 |
4.9% |
0.04879483 |
97 |
No answer |
53 |
3.1% |
0.03115814 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr9_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: One becomes happy from voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
One becomes happy from voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
336 |
19.8% |
0.197530864 |
2 |
Agree |
617 |
36.3% |
0.362727807 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
326 |
19.2% |
0.191651969 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
297 |
17.5% |
0.174603175 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
20 |
1.2% |
0.011757790 |
6 |
Disagree |
26 |
1.5% |
0.015285126 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
17 |
1% |
0.009994121 |
97 |
No answer |
62 |
3.6% |
0.036449148 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr9_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: One becomes happy from donating money to important causes
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
One becomes happy from donating money to important causes
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
264 |
15.5% |
0.15520282 |
2 |
Agree |
512 |
30.1% |
0.30099941 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
391 |
23% |
0.22986479 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
355 |
20.9% |
0.20870076 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
46 |
2.7% |
0.02704292 |
6 |
Disagree |
50 |
2.9% |
0.02939447 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01175779 |
97 |
No answer |
63 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr10_1
Variable label:
|
Scarcity: Time
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you say that you have a scarcity of …
|
Literal question:
|
Time
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
212 |
12.5% |
0.12463257 |
2 |
To a great extent |
389 |
22.9% |
0.22868901 |
3 |
To some extent |
555 |
32.6% |
0.32627866 |
4 |
To a slight extent |
373 |
21.9% |
0.21928277 |
5 |
Not at all |
126 |
7.4% |
0.07407407 |
97 |
No answer |
46 |
2.7% |
0.02704292 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr10_2
Variable label:
|
Scarcity: Money
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you say that you have a scarcity of …
|
Literal question:
|
Money
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
100 |
5.9% |
0.05878895 |
2 |
To a great extent |
167 |
9.8% |
0.09817754 |
3 |
To some extent |
520 |
30.6% |
0.30570253 |
4 |
To a slight extent |
674 |
39.6% |
0.39623751 |
5 |
Not at all |
196 |
11.5% |
0.11522634 |
97 |
No answer |
44 |
2.6% |
0.02586714 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_ran3
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=1 and ran75=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1037] [Invalid:7478] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
179 |
17.3% |
0.1726133 |
2 |
2 |
180 |
17.4% |
0.1735776 |
3 |
3 |
168 |
16.2% |
0.1620058 |
4 |
4 |
172 |
16.6% |
0.1658631 |
5 |
5 |
176 |
17% |
0.1697203 |
6 |
6 |
162 |
15.6% |
0.1562199 |
Sysmiss |
|
7478 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr11_1_1
Variable label:
|
Reasons for doing voluntary work: As a voluntary worker I show compassion for those who are worse off than I am
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following reasons for voluntary work are important for you?
|
Literal question:
|
As a voluntary worker I show compassion for those who are worse off than I am
|
Technical description:
|
Choose the statements that you think are important reasons for why you do voluntary work.
[Asked if U=1 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
As a voluntary worker I show compassion for those who are worse off than I am |
79 |
44.1% |
0.4413408 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8336 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
100 |
55.9% |
0.5586592 |
w03_r3fr11_1_2
Variable label:
|
Reasons for doing voluntary work: It is good to have a certificate showing that I did voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following reasons for voluntary work are important for you?
|
Literal question:
|
It is good to have a certificate showing that I did voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
It is good to have a certificate showing that I did voluntary work |
18 |
10.1% |
0.1005587 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8336 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
161 |
89.9% |
0.8994413 |
w03_r3fr11_1_3
Variable label:
|
Reasons for doing voluntary work: It gives me meaning when I do voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following reasons for voluntary work are important for you?
|
Literal question:
|
It gives me meaning when I do voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
It gives me meaning when I do voluntary work |
79 |
44.1% |
0.4413408 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8336 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
100 |
55.9% |
0.5586592 |
w03_r3fr11_1_4
Variable label:
|
Reasons for doing voluntary work: As a volunteer I learn something through practical experience
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the following reasons for voluntary work are important for you?
|
Literal question:
|
As a volunteer I learn something through practical experience
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
As a volunteer I learn something through practical experience |
104 |
58.1% |
0.5810056 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8336 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
75 |
41.9% |
0.4189944 |
w03_r3fr11_2_1
Variable label:
|
Number of reasons of doing voluntary work: Help, certificate, meaningful, practical experience
|
Literal question:
|
How many of the following reasons for voluntary work are important for you? You do not need to state what reasons are important, just how many.
It is important for me to help others It is good to have a certificate showing that I did voluntary work It gives me meaning when I do voluntary work As a volunteer I learn something through practical experience
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 |
5 |
2.8% |
0.02777778 |
2 |
1 |
32 |
17.8% |
0.17777778 |
3 |
2 |
63 |
35% |
0.35000000 |
4 |
3 |
49 |
27.2% |
0.27222222 |
5 |
4 |
29 |
16.1% |
0.16111111 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.1% |
0.01111111 |
98 |
Not asked |
8335 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr11_3_1
Variable label:
|
Number of reasons of doing voluntary work: Certificate, meaningful, practical experience
|
Literal question:
|
How many of the following reasons for voluntary work are important for you? You do not need to state what reasons are important, just how many.
It is good to have a certificate showing that I did voluntary work It gives me meaning when I do voluntary work As a volunteer I learn something through practical experience
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran3=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 |
16 |
9.5% |
0.09523810 |
2 |
1 |
46 |
27.4% |
0.27380952 |
3 |
2 |
73 |
43.5% |
0.43452381 |
4 |
3 |
27 |
16.1% |
0.16071429 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
98 |
Not asked |
8347 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr11_4_1
Variable label:
|
Number of reasons of doing voluntary work: Help, meaningful, practical experience
|
Literal question:
|
How many of the following reasons for voluntary work are important for you? You do not need to state what reasons are important, just how many.
It is important for me to help others It gives me meaning when I do voluntary work As a volunteer I learn something through practical experience
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran3=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 |
7 |
4.1% |
0.04069767 |
2 |
1 |
35 |
20.3% |
0.20348837 |
3 |
2 |
74 |
43% |
0.43023256 |
4 |
3 |
54 |
31.4% |
0.31395349 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
98 |
Not asked |
8343 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr11_5_1
Variable label:
|
Number of reasons of doing voluntary work: Help, certificate, practical experience
|
Literal question:
|
How many of the following reasons for voluntary work are important for you? You do not need to state what reasons are important, just how many.
It is important for me to help others It is good to have a certificate showing that I did voluntary work As a volunteer I learn something through practical experience
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=1 og ran3=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 |
7 |
4% |
0.03977273 |
2 |
1 |
52 |
29.5% |
0.29545455 |
3 |
2 |
91 |
51.7% |
0.51704545 |
4 |
3 |
24 |
13.6% |
0.13636364 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.1% |
0.01136364 |
98 |
Not asked |
8339 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr11_6_1
Variable label:
|
Number of reasons of doing voluntary work: Help, certificate, meaningful
|
Literal question:
|
How many of the following reasons for voluntary work are important for you? You do not need to state what reasons are important, just how many.
It is important for me to help others It is good to have a certificate showing that I did voluntary work It gives me meaning when I do voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=1 og ran3=6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 |
12 |
7.4% |
0.07407407 |
2 |
1 |
68 |
42% |
0.41975309 |
3 |
2 |
62 |
38.3% |
0.38271605 |
4 |
3 |
17 |
10.5% |
0.10493827 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.9% |
0.01851852 |
98 |
Not asked |
8353 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr12
Variable label:
|
Stopped doing voluntary work
|
Literal question:
|
If you think back over the last five years, have you stopped doing voluntary work for an organisation you previously did voluntary work for?
|
Technical description:
|
(Answer yes even if you continue to do voluntary work within other organisations)
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
513 |
30.2% |
0.30158730 |
2 |
No |
1105 |
65% |
0.64961787 |
97 |
No answer |
83 |
4.9% |
0.04879483 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr13
Variable label:
|
Stopped doing voluntary work, what organization
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the organisation that you most recently stopped doing voluntary work for, what type of organisation was it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=1 og R3FR12=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
46 |
9% |
0.089668616 |
2 |
Athletics and sport |
80 |
15.6% |
0.155945419 |
3 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
36 |
7% |
0.070175439 |
4 |
Education, training and research |
31 |
6% |
0.060428850 |
5 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
14 |
2.7% |
0.027290448 |
6 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
14 |
2.7% |
0.027290448 |
7 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
6 |
1.2% |
0.011695906 |
8 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
35 |
6.8% |
0.068226121 |
9 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
19 |
3.7% |
0.037037037 |
10 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
5 |
1% |
0.009746589 |
11 |
Political parties |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003898635 |
12 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
5 |
1% |
0.009746589 |
13 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
15 |
2.9% |
0.029239766 |
14 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
26 |
5.1% |
0.050682261 |
15 |
Immigrant organisations |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003898635 |
16 |
Other, specify |
3 |
0.6% |
0.005847953 |
97 |
No answer |
174 |
33.9% |
0.339181287 |
98 |
Not asked |
8002 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr13_16_other
Variable label:
|
Stopped doing voluntary work, what organization: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the organisation that you most recently stopped doing voluntary work for, what type of organisation was it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr14
Variable label:
|
How long did you do voluntary work for this organisation?
|
Literal question:
|
How long did you do voluntary work for this organisation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Less than a month |
25 |
4.9% |
0.04873294 |
2 |
One month-six months |
13 |
2.5% |
0.02534113 |
3 |
Six months-one year |
34 |
6.6% |
0.06627680 |
4 |
1-2 years |
100 |
19.5% |
0.19493177 |
5 |
3-5 years |
149 |
29% |
0.29044834 |
6 |
6-10 years |
101 |
19.7% |
0.19688109 |
7 |
11-25 years |
58 |
11.3% |
0.11306043 |
8 |
More than 25 years |
20 |
3.9% |
0.03898635 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
2.5% |
0.02534113 |
98 |
Not asked |
8002 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr15_1
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work: Changed life situation
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you stop doing voluntary work for this organisation?
|
Literal question:
|
Changed life situation (work, situation at home, relocation, children being older etc.)
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Changed life situation (work, situation at home, relocation, children being
older etc.) |
298 |
58.1% |
0.580896686 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003898635 |
98 |
Not asked |
8002 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
213 |
41.5% |
0.415204678 |
w03_r3fr15_2
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work: Changed interest or motivation
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you stop doing voluntary work for this organisation?
|
Literal question:
|
Changed interest or motivation
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Changed interest or motivation |
112 |
21.8% |
0.218323587 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003898635 |
98 |
Not asked |
8002 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
399 |
77.8% |
0.777777778 |
w03_r3fr15_3
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work: Conditions related to the organisation or the voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you stop doing voluntary work for this organisation?
|
Literal question:
|
Conditions related to the organisation or the voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Conditions related to the organisation or the voluntary work |
74 |
14.4% |
0.144249513 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003898635 |
98 |
Not asked |
8002 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
437 |
85.2% |
0.851851852 |
w03_r3fr15_4
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work: Something else, please specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you stop doing voluntary work for this organisation?
|
Literal question:
|
Something else, please specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Something else, please specify |
83 |
16.2% |
0.161793372 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003898635 |
98 |
Not asked |
8002 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
428 |
83.4% |
0.834307992 |
w03_r3fr15_4_other
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work: Something else, please specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you stop doing voluntary work for this organisation?
|
Literal question:
|
Something else, please specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr16_1
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Not enough time
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about your life situation that resulted in you stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Not enough time
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not enough time |
101 |
33.9% |
0.3389262 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8217 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
197 |
66.1% |
0.6610738 |
w03_r3fr16_2
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Moved away from the area
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about your life situation that resulted in you stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Moved away from the area
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Moved away from the area |
72 |
24.2% |
0.2416107 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8217 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
226 |
75.8% |
0.7583893 |
w03_r3fr16_3
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Children stopped doing the activities
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about your life situation that resulted in you stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Children stopped doing the activities
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Children stopped doing the activities |
102 |
34.2% |
0.3422819 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8217 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
196 |
65.8% |
0.6577181 |
w03_r3fr16_4
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Health problems or old age
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about your life situation that resulted in you stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Health problems or old age
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Health problems or old age |
55 |
18.5% |
0.1845638 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8217 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
243 |
81.5% |
0.8154362 |
w03_r3fr16_5
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Other, specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about your life situation that resulted in you stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify: |
27 |
9.1% |
0.09060403 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8217 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
271 |
90.9% |
0.90939597 |
w03_r3fr16_5_other
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about your life situation that resulted in you stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_1=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr17_1
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Wanted/had to spend more time at home
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you have less time or would rather use the time on something else?
|
Literal question:
|
Wanted/had to spend more time at home
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR16_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Wanted/had to spend more time at home |
31 |
30.7% |
0.3069307 |
97 |
No answer |
37 |
36.6% |
0.3663366 |
98 |
Not asked |
8414 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
33 |
32.7% |
0.3267327 |
w03_r3fr17_2
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Wanted/had to spend more time at work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you have less time or would rather use the time on something else?
|
Literal question:
|
Wanted/had to spend more time at work
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR16_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Wanted/had to spend more time at work |
39 |
38.6% |
0.3861386 |
97 |
No answer |
37 |
36.6% |
0.3663366 |
98 |
Not asked |
8414 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
25 |
24.8% |
0.2475248 |
w03_r3fr17_3
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Wanted/had to spend more time participating in another organisation
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you have less time or would rather use the time on something else?
|
Literal question:
|
Wanted/had to spend more time participating in another organisation
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR16_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Wanted/had to spend more time participating in another organisation |
3 |
3% |
0.02970297 |
97 |
No answer |
37 |
36.6% |
0.36633663 |
98 |
Not asked |
8414 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
61 |
60.4% |
0.60396040 |
w03_r3fr17_4
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Wanted/had to spend more time at other recreational activities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you have less time or would rather use the time on something else?
|
Literal question:
|
Wanted/had to spend more time at other recreational activities
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR16_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Wanted/had to spend more time at other recreational activities |
10 |
9.9% |
0.0990099 |
97 |
No answer |
37 |
36.6% |
0.3663366 |
98 |
Not asked |
8414 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
54 |
53.5% |
0.5346535 |
w03_r3fr17_5
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Other, specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you have less time or would rather use the time on something else?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR16_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify: |
3 |
3% |
0.02970297 |
97 |
No answer |
37 |
36.6% |
0.36633663 |
98 |
Not asked |
8414 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
61 |
60.4% |
0.60396040 |
w03_r3fr17_5_other
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did you have less time or would rather use the time on something else?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR16_1=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr18_1
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Lost interest
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
Literal question:
|
Lost interest
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lost interest |
49 |
43.8% |
0.4375 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
63 |
56.2% |
0.5625 |
w03_r3fr18_2
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Received too little recognition
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
Literal question:
|
Received too little recognition
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Received too little recognition |
14 |
12.5% |
0.125 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
98 |
87.5% |
0.875 |
w03_r3fr18_3
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Could not do what I enjoy doing
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
Literal question:
|
Could not do what I enjoy doing
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Could not do what I enjoy doing |
5 |
4.5% |
0.04464286 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
107 |
95.5% |
0.95535714 |
w03_r3fr18_4
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: The activity was too tiresome or boring
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
Literal question:
|
The activity was too tiresome or boring
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The activity was too tiresome or boring |
21 |
18.8% |
0.1875 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
91 |
81.2% |
0.8125 |
w03_r3fr18_5
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Did not experience it as being useful enough
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
Literal question:
|
Did not experience it as being useful enough
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Did not experience it as being useful enough |
22 |
19.6% |
0.1964286 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
90 |
80.4% |
0.8035714 |
w03_r3fr18_6
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Did not experience it as being interesting or challenging enough
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
Literal question:
|
Did not experience it as being interesting or challenging enough
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Did not experience it as being interesting or challenging enough |
18 |
16.1% |
0.1607143 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
94 |
83.9% |
0.8392857 |
w03_r3fr18_7
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Was given too much work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
Literal question:
|
Was given too much work
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Was given too much work |
19 |
17% |
0.1696429 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
93 |
83% |
0.8303571 |
w03_r3fr18_8
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Was given too little work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
Literal question:
|
Was given too little work
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Was given too little work |
1 |
0.9% |
0.008928571 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
111 |
99.1% |
0.991071429 |
w03_r3fr18_9
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Other, specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify: |
18 |
16.1% |
0.1607143 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
94 |
83.9% |
0.8392857 |
w03_r3fr18_9_other
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, motivation: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why did your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work change?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_2=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr19_1
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: The organisation was closed down or was not relevant any more
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
The organisation was closed down or was not relevant any more
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The organisation was closed down or was not relevant any more |
13 |
17.6% |
0.1756757 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
61 |
82.4% |
0.8243243 |
w03_r3fr19_2
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Could not do what I enjoyed doing
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
Could not do what I enjoyed doing
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Could not do what I enjoyed doing |
5 |
6.8% |
0.06756757 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
69 |
93.2% |
0.93243243 |
w03_r3fr19_3
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Too bureaucratic organisation
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
Too bureaucratic organisation
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Too bureaucratic organisation |
10 |
13.5% |
0.1351351 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
64 |
86.5% |
0.8648649 |
w03_r3fr19_4
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Not structured enough
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
Not structured enough
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not structured enough |
16 |
21.6% |
0.2162162 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
58 |
78.4% |
0.7837838 |
w03_r3fr19_5
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Too much responsibility on too few people
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
Too much responsibility on too few people
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Too much responsibility on too few people |
17 |
23% |
0.2297297 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
57 |
77% |
0.7702703 |
w03_r3fr19_6
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Not enough training or guidance
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
Not enough training or guidance
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not enough training or guidance |
4 |
5.4% |
0.05405405 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
70 |
94.6% |
0.94594595 |
w03_r3fr19_7
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Conflicts with employees
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
Conflicts with employees
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Conflicts with employees |
6 |
8.1% |
0.08108108 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
68 |
91.9% |
0.91891892 |
w03_r3fr19_8
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Conflicts with other volunteers
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
Conflicts with other volunteers
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Conflicts with other volunteers |
11 |
14.9% |
0.1486486 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
63 |
85.1% |
0.8513514 |
w03_r3fr19_9
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Poor social environment
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
Poor social environment
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Poor social environment |
11 |
14.9% |
0.1486486 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
63 |
85.1% |
0.8513514 |
w03_r3fr19_10
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Received too little recognition
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
Received too little recognition
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Received too little recognition |
9 |
12.2% |
0.1216216 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
65 |
87.8% |
0.8783784 |
w03_r3fr19_11
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Too tiresome or boring
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
Too tiresome or boring
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Too tiresome or boring |
6 |
8.1% |
0.08108108 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
68 |
91.9% |
0.91891892 |
w03_r3fr19_12
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Too expensive
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
Too expensive
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Too expensive |
2 |
2.7% |
0.02702703 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
72 |
97.3% |
0.97297297 |
w03_r3fr19_13
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: The voluntary work was a one-time occurrence
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
The voluntary work was a one-time occurrence
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The voluntary work was a one-time occurrence |
12 |
16.2% |
0.1621622 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
62 |
83.8% |
0.8378378 |
w03_r3fr19_14
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Other, specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify: |
11 |
14.9% |
0.1486486 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8441 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
63 |
85.1% |
0.8513514 |
w03_r3fr19_14_other
Variable label:
|
Cause for quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
What was it about the voluntary work or the organisation that caused you to stop?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR15_3=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr20
Variable label:
|
Sometimes consider stopping doing voluntary work
|
Literal question:
|
Do you sometimes consider stopping doing voluntary work for one or more organisations where you are currently active?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR12=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
161 |
14.6% |
0.1457014 |
2 |
No |
820 |
74.2% |
0.7420814 |
97 |
No answer |
124 |
11.2% |
0.1122172 |
98 |
Not asked |
7410 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr21
Variable label:
|
What organisation are you considering stopping doing voluntary work for?
|
Literal question:
|
What organisation are you considering stopping doing voluntary work for?
|
Technical description:
|
If you are considering stopping doing voluntary work for several organisations, we would like you to think about the organisation where you have done the most voluntary work during the last year.
[Asked if U=1, antallorg=1 and R3FR20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
6 |
5.6% |
0.056074766 |
2 |
Athletics and sport |
25 |
23.4% |
0.233644860 |
3 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
11 |
10.3% |
0.102803738 |
4 |
Education, training and research |
7 |
6.5% |
0.065420561 |
5 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
2 |
1.9% |
0.018691589 |
6 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
4 |
3.7% |
0.037383178 |
7 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
8 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
5 |
4.7% |
0.046728972 |
9 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
8 |
7.5% |
0.074766355 |
10 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
2 |
1.9% |
0.018691589 |
11 |
Political parties |
2 |
1.9% |
0.018691589 |
12 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
2 |
1.9% |
0.018691589 |
13 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
4 |
3.7% |
0.037383178 |
14 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
4 |
3.7% |
0.037383178 |
15 |
Immigrant organisations |
1 |
0.9% |
0.009345794 |
16 |
Other, specify |
2 |
1.9% |
0.018691589 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
20.6% |
0.205607477 |
98 |
Not asked |
8408 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr21_16_other
Variable label:
|
Other, specify: What organisation are you considering stopping doing voluntary work for? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What organisation are you considering stopping doing voluntary work for?
|
Technical description:
|
If you are considering stopping doing voluntary work for several organisations, we would like you to think about the organisation where you have done the most voluntary work during the last year.
[Asked if U=1 and antallorg=1 and R3FR20=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr22
Variable label:
|
How long have you been doing voluntary work within this organisation?
|
Literal question:
|
How long have you been doing voluntary work within this organisation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and antallorg=1 and R3FR20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Less than a month |
6 |
5.6% |
0.05607477 |
2 |
One month-six months |
2 |
1.9% |
0.01869159 |
3 |
Six months-one year |
10 |
9.3% |
0.09345794 |
4 |
1-2 years |
9 |
8.4% |
0.08411215 |
5 |
3-5 years |
36 |
33.6% |
0.33644860 |
6 |
6-10 years |
17 |
15.9% |
0.15887850 |
7 |
11-25 years |
18 |
16.8% |
0.16822430 |
8 |
More than 25 years |
6 |
5.6% |
0.05607477 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.8% |
0.02803738 |
98 |
Not asked |
8408 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr23_1
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work: Changed life situation
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Changed life situation (work, situation at home, relocation, children being older etc.)
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Changed life situation (work, situation at home, relocation, children being
older etc.) |
71 |
44.1% |
0.4409938 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8354 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
90 |
55.9% |
0.5590062 |
w03_r3fr23_2
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work: Changed interest or motivation
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Changed interest or motivation
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Changed interest or motivation |
78 |
48.4% |
0.484472 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8354 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
83 |
51.6% |
0.515528 |
w03_r3fr23_3
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work: Conditions related to the organisation or the voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Conditions related to the organisation or the voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Conditions related to the organisation or the voluntary work |
27 |
16.8% |
0.1677019 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8354 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
134 |
83.2% |
0.8322981 |
w03_r3fr23_4
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work: Something else, please specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Something else, please specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Something else, please specify |
32 |
19.9% |
0.1987578 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8354 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
129 |
80.1% |
0.8012422 |
w03_r3fr23_4_other
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work: Something else, please specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why are you considering stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Something else, please specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR20=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr24_1
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Not enough time
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Not enough time
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not enough time |
37 |
52.1% |
0.5211268 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8444 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
34 |
47.9% |
0.4788732 |
w03_r3fr24_2
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Moving away from the area
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Moving away from the area
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Moving away from the area |
9 |
12.7% |
0.1267606 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8444 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
62 |
87.3% |
0.8732394 |
w03_r3fr24_3
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Children stopping doing the activities
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Children stopping doing the activities
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Children stopping doing the activities |
14 |
19.7% |
0.1971831 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8444 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
57 |
80.3% |
0.8028169 |
w03_r3fr24_4
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Children stopping doing the activities
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Children stopping doing the activities
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Health problems or old age |
15 |
21.1% |
0.2112676 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8444 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
56 |
78.9% |
0.7887324 |
w03_r3fr24_5
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Other, specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify: |
9 |
12.7% |
0.1267606 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8444 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
62 |
87.3% |
0.8732394 |
w03_r3fr24_5_other
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, changed life situation: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about your life situation that is causing you to consider stopping doing voluntary work?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_1=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr25_1
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Want/have to spend more time at home
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you have less time or would rather use the time on something else?
|
Literal question:
|
Want/have to spend more time at home
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR24_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Want/have to spend more time at home |
20 |
54.1% |
0.5405405 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8478 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
17 |
45.9% |
0.4594595 |
w03_r3fr25_2
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Want/have to spend more time at work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you have less time or would rather use the time on something else?
|
Literal question:
|
Want/have to spend more time at work
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR24_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Want/have to spend more time at work |
18 |
48.6% |
0.4864865 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8478 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
19 |
51.4% |
0.5135135 |
w03_r3fr25_3
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Want/have to spend more time participating in another organisation
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you have less time or would rather use the time on something else?
|
Literal question:
|
Want/have to spend more time participating in another organisation
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR24_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Want/have to spend more time participating in another organisation |
4 |
10.8% |
0.1081081 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8478 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
33 |
89.2% |
0.8918919 |
w03_r3fr25_4
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Want/have to spend more time at other recreational activities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you have less time or would rather use the time on something else?
|
Literal question:
|
Want/have to spend more time at other recreational activities
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR24_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Want/have to spend more time at other recreational activities |
17 |
45.9% |
0.4594595 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8478 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
20 |
54.1% |
0.5405405 |
w03_r3fr25_5
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Other, specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you have less time or would rather use the time on something else?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR24_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify |
2 |
5.4% |
0.05405405 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8478 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
35 |
94.6% |
0.94594595 |
w03_r3fr25_5_other
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, lack of time: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why do you have less time or would rather use the time on something else?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR24_1=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr26_1
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Lost interest
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
Literal question:
|
Lost interest
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lost interest |
28 |
35.9% |
0.3589744 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
50 |
64.1% |
0.6410256 |
w03_r3fr26_2
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Receiving too little recognition
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
Literal question:
|
Receiving too little recognition
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Receiving too little recognition |
8 |
10.3% |
0.1025641 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
70 |
89.7% |
0.8974359 |
w03_r3fr26_3
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Cannot do what I enjoy doing
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
Literal question:
|
Cannot do what I enjoy doing
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Cannot do what I enjoy doing |
6 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
72 |
92.3% |
0.92307692 |
w03_r3fr26_4
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: The activity is too tiresome or boring
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
Literal question:
|
The activity is too tiresome or boring
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The activity is too tiresome or boring |
15 |
19.2% |
0.1923077 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
63 |
80.8% |
0.8076923 |
w03_r3fr26_5
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Don’t feel it is useful enough
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t feel it is useful enough
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Don't feel it is useful enough |
16 |
20.5% |
0.2051282 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
62 |
79.5% |
0.7948718 |
w03_r3fr26_6
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Don’t feel it is interesting or challenging enough
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
Literal question:
|
Don’t feel it is interesting or challenging enough
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Don't feel it is interesting or challenging enough |
9 |
11.5% |
0.1153846 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
69 |
88.5% |
0.8846154 |
w03_r3fr26_7
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Given too much work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
Literal question:
|
Given too much work
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Given too much work |
15 |
19.2% |
0.1923077 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
63 |
80.8% |
0.8076923 |
w03_r3fr26_8
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Given too little work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
Literal question:
|
Given too little work
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-0]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Given too little work |
0 |
0% |
0 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
78 |
100% |
1 |
w03_r3fr26_9
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Other, specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify: |
17 |
21.8% |
0.2179487 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8437 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
61 |
78.2% |
0.7820513 |
w03_r3fr26_9_other
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, motivation: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Why has your motivation or interest in doing voluntary work changed?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_2=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr27_1
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: The organisation is being closed down or is not relevant any more
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
The organisation is being closed down or is not relevant any more
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The organisation is being closed down or is not relevant any more |
2 |
7.4% |
0.07407407 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
25 |
92.6% |
0.92592593 |
w03_r3fr27_2
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Cannot do what I enjoyed doing
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
Cannot do what I enjoyed doing
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Cannot do what I enjoyed doing |
1 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
26 |
96.3% |
0.96296296 |
w03_r3fr27_3
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Too bureaucratic organisation
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
Too bureaucratic organisation
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Cannot do what I enjoyed doing |
1 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
26 |
96.3% |
0.96296296 |
w03_r3fr27_4
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Not structured enough
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
Not structured enough
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not structured enough |
14 |
51.9% |
0.5185185 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
13 |
48.1% |
0.4814815 |
w03_r3fr27_5
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Too much responsibility on too few people
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
Too much responsibility on too few people
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Too much responsibility on too few people |
9 |
33.3% |
0.3333333 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
18 |
66.7% |
0.6666667 |
w03_r3fr27_6
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Not good enough training or guidance
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
Not good enough training or guidance
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not good enough training or guidance |
1 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
26 |
96.3% |
0.96296296 |
w03_r3fr27_7
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Conflicts with employees
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
Conflicts with employees
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Conflicts with employees |
2 |
7.4% |
0.07407407 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
25 |
92.6% |
0.92592593 |
w03_r3fr27_8
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Conflicts with other volunteers
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
Conflicts with other volunteers
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Conflicts with other volunteers |
6 |
22.2% |
0.2222222 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
21 |
77.8% |
0.7777778 |
w03_r3fr27_9
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Poor social environment
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
Poor social environment
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Poor social environment |
4 |
14.8% |
0.1481481 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
23 |
85.2% |
0.8518519 |
w03_r3fr27_10
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Receiving too little recognition
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
Receiving too little recognition
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Poor social environment |
3 |
11.1% |
0.1111111 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
24 |
88.9% |
0.8888889 |
w03_r3fr27_11
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Is too tiresome or boring
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
Is too tiresome or boring
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Is too tiresome or boring |
4 |
14.8% |
0.1481481 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
23 |
85.2% |
0.8518519 |
w03_r3fr27_12
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Is too expensive
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
Is too expensive
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Is too expensive |
1 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
26 |
96.3% |
0.96296296 |
w03_r3fr27_13
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: The voluntary work was a one-time occurrence
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
The voluntary work was a one-time occurrence
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The voluntary work was a one-time occurrence |
1 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
26 |
96.3% |
0.96296296 |
w03_r3fr27_14
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Other, specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify: |
4 |
14.8% |
0.1481481 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8488 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
23 |
85.2% |
0.8518519 |
w03_r3fr27_14_other
Variable label:
|
Considering quitting voluntary work, work or organisation: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is it about the voluntary work or the organisation that is making you consider stopping?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
(more than one answer possible)
[Asked if U=1 and R3FR23_3=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3fr28
Variable label:
|
Opportunities to participate in voluntary work in local neighbourhood
|
Literal question:
|
How good or bad do you think the opportunities are to participate in voluntary work in your local neighbourhood?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran2=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
253 |
30% |
0.300475059 |
2 |
Good |
260 |
30.9% |
0.308788599 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
97 |
11.5% |
0.115201900 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
148 |
17.6% |
0.175771971 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
30 |
3.6% |
0.035629454 |
6 |
Bad |
22 |
2.6% |
0.026128266 |
7 |
Very bad |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008313539 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
3% |
0.029691211 |
98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr29
Variable label:
|
Parents active within associations and organisations
|
Literal question:
|
If you think back to your childhood, to what extent were your parents active within associations and organisations?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
149 |
8.8% |
0.08759553 |
2 |
To a great extent |
320 |
18.8% |
0.18812463 |
3 |
To some extent |
520 |
30.6% |
0.30570253 |
4 |
To a slight extent |
436 |
25.6% |
0.25631981 |
5 |
Not at all |
225 |
13.2% |
0.13227513 |
97 |
No answer |
51 |
3% |
0.02998236 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr30_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: In my local neighbourhood most people participate with voluntary work when it is needed
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
In my local neighbourhood most people participate with voluntary work when it is needed
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
57 |
3.4% |
0.03350970 |
2 |
Agree |
327 |
19.2% |
0.19223986 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
425 |
25% |
0.24985303 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
412 |
24.2% |
0.24221046 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
209 |
12.3% |
0.12286890 |
6 |
Disagree |
160 |
9.4% |
0.09406232 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
30 |
1.8% |
0.01763668 |
97 |
No answer |
81 |
4.8% |
0.04761905 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr30_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Voluntary work makes little contribution to solving problems in society
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Voluntary work makes little contribution to solving problems in society
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
52 |
3.1% |
0.03057025 |
2 |
Agree |
192 |
11.3% |
0.11287478 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
245 |
14.4% |
0.14403292 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
243 |
14.3% |
0.14285714 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
316 |
18.6% |
0.18577307 |
6 |
Disagree |
443 |
26% |
0.26043504 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
127 |
7.5% |
0.07466196 |
97 |
No answer |
83 |
4.9% |
0.04879483 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr30_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Voluntary work interests me to a small extent
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Voluntary work interests me to a small extent
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01116990 |
2 |
Agree |
102 |
6% |
0.05996473 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
159 |
9.3% |
0.09347443 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
319 |
18.8% |
0.18753674 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
359 |
21.1% |
0.21105232 |
6 |
Disagree |
499 |
29.3% |
0.29335685 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
157 |
9.2% |
0.09229865 |
97 |
No answer |
87 |
5.1% |
0.05114638 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr30_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: I want to do more voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
I want to do more voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
56 |
3.3% |
0.03292181 |
2 |
Agree |
290 |
17% |
0.17048795 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
396 |
23.3% |
0.23280423 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
486 |
28.6% |
0.28571429 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
160 |
9.4% |
0.09406232 |
6 |
Disagree |
170 |
10% |
0.09994121 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
52 |
3.1% |
0.03057025 |
97 |
No answer |
91 |
5.3% |
0.05349794 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_1
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Satisfying
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
|
Literal question:
|
Satisfying
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
171 |
10.1% |
0.100529101 |
2 |
Well |
623 |
36.6% |
0.366255144 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
397 |
23.3% |
0.233392122 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
244 |
14.3% |
0.143445032 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
26 |
1.5% |
0.015285126 |
6 |
Poorly |
15 |
0.9% |
0.008818342 |
7 |
Very poorly |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005291005 |
97 |
No answer |
216 |
12.7% |
0.126984127 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_2
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Rewarding
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
|
Literal question:
|
Rewarding
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
260 |
15.3% |
0.152851264 |
2 |
Well |
710 |
41.7% |
0.417401529 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
358 |
21% |
0.210464433 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
141 |
8.3% |
0.082892416 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
18 |
1.1% |
0.010582011 |
6 |
Poorly |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005291005 |
7 |
Very poorly |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005291005 |
97 |
No answer |
196 |
11.5% |
0.115226337 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_3
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Exciting
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
|
Literal question:
|
Exciting
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
128 |
7.5% |
0.075249853 |
2 |
Well |
453 |
26.6% |
0.266313933 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
425 |
25% |
0.249853028 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
363 |
21.3% |
0.213403880 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
81 |
4.8% |
0.047619048 |
6 |
Poorly |
25 |
1.5% |
0.014697237 |
7 |
Very poorly |
15 |
0.9% |
0.008818342 |
97 |
No answer |
211 |
12.4% |
0.124044680 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_4
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Important
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
|
Literal question:
|
Important
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
402 |
23.6% |
0.236331570 |
2 |
Well |
676 |
39.7% |
0.397413286 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
281 |
16.5% |
0.165196943 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
119 |
7% |
0.069958848 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
19 |
1.1% |
0.011169900 |
6 |
Poorly |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003527337 |
7 |
Very poorly |
9 |
0.5% |
0.005291005 |
97 |
No answer |
189 |
11.1% |
0.111111111 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_5
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Fun
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
|
Literal question:
|
Fun
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
119 |
7% |
0.069958848 |
2 |
Well |
480 |
28.2% |
0.282186949 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
474 |
27.9% |
0.278659612 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
337 |
19.8% |
0.198118754 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
54 |
3.2% |
0.031746032 |
6 |
Poorly |
20 |
1.2% |
0.011757790 |
7 |
Very poorly |
10 |
0.6% |
0.005878895 |
97 |
No answer |
207 |
12.2% |
0.121693122 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_6
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Challenging
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
|
Literal question:
|
Challenging
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
142 |
8.3% |
0.08348031 |
2 |
Well |
498 |
29.3% |
0.29276896 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
417 |
24.5% |
0.24514991 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
321 |
18.9% |
0.18871252 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
69 |
4.1% |
0.04056437 |
6 |
Poorly |
25 |
1.5% |
0.01469724 |
7 |
Very poorly |
18 |
1.1% |
0.01058201 |
97 |
No answer |
211 |
12.4% |
0.12404468 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_7
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Disappointing
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
|
Literal question:
|
Disappointing
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
10 |
0.6% |
0.005878895 |
2 |
Well |
40 |
2.4% |
0.023515579 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
82 |
4.8% |
0.048206937 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
436 |
25.6% |
0.256319812 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
279 |
16.4% |
0.164021164 |
6 |
Poorly |
436 |
25.6% |
0.256319812 |
7 |
Very poorly |
175 |
10.3% |
0.102880658 |
97 |
No answer |
243 |
14.3% |
0.142857143 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_8
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Emotionally exhausting
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
|
Literal question:
|
Emotionally exhausting
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01116990 |
2 |
Well |
68 |
4% |
0.03997648 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
190 |
11.2% |
0.11169900 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
472 |
27.7% |
0.27748383 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
192 |
11.3% |
0.11287478 |
6 |
Poorly |
355 |
20.9% |
0.20870076 |
7 |
Very poorly |
171 |
10.1% |
0.10052910 |
97 |
No answer |
234 |
13.8% |
0.13756614 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_9
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Physically tiring
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
|
Literal question:
|
Physically tiring
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
17 |
1% |
0.009994121 |
2 |
Well |
102 |
6% |
0.059964727 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
242 |
14.2% |
0.142269253 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
489 |
28.7% |
0.287477954 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
187 |
11% |
0.109935332 |
6 |
Poorly |
306 |
18% |
0.179894180 |
7 |
Very poorly |
128 |
7.5% |
0.075249853 |
97 |
No answer |
230 |
13.5% |
0.135214580 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_10
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Frustrating
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
|
Literal question:
|
Frustrating
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
14 |
0.8% |
0.008230453 |
2 |
Well |
78 |
4.6% |
0.045855379 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
206 |
12.1% |
0.121105232 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
418 |
24.6% |
0.245737801 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
221 |
13% |
0.129923574 |
6 |
Poorly |
356 |
20.9% |
0.209288654 |
7 |
Very poorly |
159 |
9.3% |
0.093474427 |
97 |
No answer |
249 |
14.6% |
0.146384480 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_11
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Depressing
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
|
Literal question:
|
Depressing
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
7 |
0.4% |
0.004115226 |
2 |
Well |
29 |
1.7% |
0.017048795 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
65 |
3.8% |
0.038212816 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
349 |
20.5% |
0.205173427 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
192 |
11.3% |
0.112874780 |
6 |
Poorly |
438 |
25.7% |
0.257495591 |
7 |
Very poorly |
372 |
21.9% |
0.218694885 |
97 |
No answer |
249 |
14.6% |
0.146384480 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_12
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Time consuming
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
|
Literal question:
|
Time consuming
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
149 |
8.8% |
0.08759553 |
2 |
Well |
419 |
24.6% |
0.24632569 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
400 |
23.5% |
0.23515579 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
306 |
18% |
0.17989418 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
88 |
5.2% |
0.05173427 |
6 |
Poorly |
91 |
5.3% |
0.05349794 |
7 |
Very poorly |
38 |
2.2% |
0.02233980 |
97 |
No answer |
210 |
12.3% |
0.12345679 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr31_13
Variable label:
|
Description of voluntary work: Easy
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think about how you view voluntary work, how well or poorly do you think these descriptions fit?
|
Literal question:
|
Easy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
37 |
2.2% |
0.02175191 |
2 |
Well |
207 |
12.2% |
0.12169312 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
285 |
16.8% |
0.16754850 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
660 |
38.8% |
0.38800705 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
151 |
8.9% |
0.08877131 |
6 |
Poorly |
97 |
5.7% |
0.05702528 |
7 |
Very poorly |
25 |
1.5% |
0.01469724 |
97 |
No answer |
239 |
14.1% |
0.14050558 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr32
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with life
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you satisfied with life at the moment?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
295 |
17.3% |
0.173427396 |
2 |
To a great extent |
909 |
53.4% |
0.534391534 |
3 |
To some extent |
357 |
21% |
0.209876543 |
4 |
To a slight extent |
74 |
4.4% |
0.043503821 |
5 |
Not at all |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006466784 |
97 |
No answer |
55 |
3.2% |
0.032333921 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr33
Variable label:
|
How meaningful life is
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, to what extent do you think that what you are doing in life is meaningful?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
268 |
15.8% |
0.157554380 |
2 |
To a great extent |
834 |
49% |
0.490299824 |
3 |
To some extent |
422 |
24.8% |
0.248089359 |
4 |
To a slight extent |
78 |
4.6% |
0.045855379 |
5 |
Not at all |
14 |
0.8% |
0.008230453 |
97 |
No answer |
85 |
5% |
0.049970606 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr34_1
Variable label:
|
Feelings on a scale from 0 to 10: Happy
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale from 0-10, yesterday to what extent were you:
|
Literal question:
|
Happy
|
Technical description:
|
0 means that you did not feel it at all yesterday, while 10 means that you felt it all the time.
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 - not at all |
24 |
1.4% |
0.01410935 |
2 |
1 |
30 |
1.8% |
0.01763668 |
3 |
2 |
53 |
3.1% |
0.03115814 |
4 |
3 |
77 |
4.5% |
0.04526749 |
5 |
4 |
79 |
4.6% |
0.04644327 |
6 |
5 |
199 |
11.7% |
0.11699001 |
7 |
6 |
232 |
13.6% |
0.13639036 |
8 |
7 |
323 |
19% |
0.18988830 |
9 |
8 |
363 |
21.3% |
0.21340388 |
10 |
9 |
150 |
8.8% |
0.08818342 |
11 |
10 - all the time |
78 |
4.6% |
0.04585538 |
97 |
No answer |
93 |
5.5% |
0.05467372 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr34_2
Variable label:
|
Feelings on a scale from 0 to 10: Worried
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale from 0-10, yesterday to what extent were you:
|
Literal question:
|
Worried
|
Technical description:
|
0 means that you did not feel it at all yesterday, while 10 means that you felt it all the time.
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 - not at all |
214 |
12.6% |
0.12580835 |
2 |
1 |
201 |
11.8% |
0.11816578 |
3 |
2 |
252 |
14.8% |
0.14814815 |
4 |
3 |
188 |
11.1% |
0.11052322 |
5 |
4 |
168 |
9.9% |
0.09876543 |
6 |
5 |
183 |
10.8% |
0.10758377 |
7 |
6 |
136 |
8% |
0.07995297 |
8 |
7 |
88 |
5.2% |
0.05173427 |
9 |
8 |
77 |
4.5% |
0.04526749 |
10 |
9 |
33 |
1.9% |
0.01940035 |
11 |
10 - all the time |
23 |
1.4% |
0.01352146 |
97 |
No answer |
138 |
8.1% |
0.08112875 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr34_3
Variable label:
|
Feelings on a scale from 0 to 10: Depressed
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale from 0-10, yesterday to what extent were you:
|
Literal question:
|
Depressed
|
Technical description:
|
0 means that you did not feel it at all yesterday, while 10 means that you felt it all the time.
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 - not at all |
823 |
48.4% |
0.483833039 |
2 |
1 |
223 |
13.1% |
0.131099353 |
3 |
2 |
144 |
8.5% |
0.084656085 |
4 |
3 |
97 |
5.7% |
0.057025279 |
5 |
4 |
64 |
3.8% |
0.037624927 |
6 |
5 |
59 |
3.5% |
0.034685479 |
7 |
6 |
43 |
2.5% |
0.025279248 |
8 |
7 |
46 |
2.7% |
0.027042916 |
9 |
8 |
24 |
1.4% |
0.014109347 |
10 |
9 |
13 |
0.8% |
0.007642563 |
11 |
10 - all the time |
14 |
0.8% |
0.008230453 |
97 |
No answer |
151 |
8.9% |
0.088771311 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr35_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: In most ways my life is close to ideal
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
|
Literal question:
|
In most ways my life is close to ideal
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
82 |
4.8% |
0.04820694 |
2 |
Agree |
437 |
25.7% |
0.25690770 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
500 |
29.4% |
0.29394474 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
247 |
14.5% |
0.14520870 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
161 |
9.5% |
0.09465021 |
6 |
Disagree |
129 |
7.6% |
0.07583774 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
53 |
3.1% |
0.03115814 |
97 |
No answer |
92 |
5.4% |
0.05408583 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr35_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: My circumstances are excellent
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
|
Literal question:
|
My circumstances are excellent
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
151 |
8.9% |
0.08877131 |
2 |
Agree |
586 |
34.5% |
0.34450323 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
397 |
23.3% |
0.23339212 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
188 |
11.1% |
0.11052322 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
147 |
8.6% |
0.08641975 |
6 |
Disagree |
99 |
5.8% |
0.05820106 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
1.8% |
0.01822457 |
97 |
No answer |
102 |
6% |
0.05996473 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr35_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: So far I have got what I most wanted in life
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
|
Literal question:
|
So far I have got what I most wanted in life
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
200 |
11.8% |
0.11757790 |
2 |
Agree |
619 |
36.4% |
0.36390359 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
357 |
21% |
0.20987654 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
156 |
9.2% |
0.09171076 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
127 |
7.5% |
0.07466196 |
6 |
Disagree |
107 |
6.3% |
0.06290417 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
41 |
2.4% |
0.02410347 |
97 |
No answer |
94 |
5.5% |
0.05526161 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr35_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: So far I have got what I most wanted in life
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
|
Literal question:
|
So far I have got what I most wanted in life
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
255 |
15% |
0.14991182 |
2 |
Agree |
757 |
44.5% |
0.44503233 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
307 |
18% |
0.18048207 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
97 |
5.7% |
0.05702528 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
106 |
6.2% |
0.06231628 |
6 |
Disagree |
61 |
3.6% |
0.03586126 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01646091 |
97 |
No answer |
90 |
5.3% |
0.05291005 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr35_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: If I could relive my life, I would not really change anything
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
|
Literal question:
|
If I could relive my life, I would not really change anything
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
78 |
4.6% |
0.04585538 |
2 |
Agree |
265 |
15.6% |
0.15579071 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
346 |
20.3% |
0.20340976 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
182 |
10.7% |
0.10699588 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
327 |
19.2% |
0.19223986 |
6 |
Disagree |
261 |
15.3% |
0.15343915 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
147 |
8.6% |
0.08641975 |
97 |
No answer |
95 |
5.6% |
0.05584950 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_1
Variable label:
|
Happy with: Your standard of living?
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
Your standard of living?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very happy |
416 |
24.5% |
0.24456202 |
2 |
Happy |
909 |
53.4% |
0.53439153 |
3 |
Somewhat happy |
234 |
13.8% |
0.13756614 |
4 |
Slightly happy |
54 |
3.2% |
0.03174603 |
5 |
Not happy at all |
21 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
67 |
3.9% |
0.03938859 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_2
Variable label:
|
Happy with: Your health?
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
Your health?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very happy |
329 |
19.3% |
0.19341564 |
2 |
Happy |
725 |
42.6% |
0.42621987 |
3 |
Somewhat happy |
345 |
20.3% |
0.20282187 |
4 |
Slightly happy |
159 |
9.3% |
0.09347443 |
5 |
Not happy at all |
74 |
4.4% |
0.04350382 |
6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
69 |
4.1% |
0.04056437 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_3
Variable label:
|
Happy with: What you are achieving in life?
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
What you are achieving in life?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very happy |
187 |
11% |
0.10993533 |
2 |
Happy |
824 |
48.4% |
0.48442093 |
3 |
Somewhat happy |
466 |
27.4% |
0.27395650 |
4 |
Slightly happy |
110 |
6.5% |
0.06466784 |
5 |
Not happy at all |
26 |
1.5% |
0.01528513 |
6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
88 |
5.2% |
0.05173427 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_4
Variable label:
|
Happy with: Your personal relationships?
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
Your personal relationships?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very happy |
268 |
15.8% |
0.15755438 |
2 |
Happy |
819 |
48.1% |
0.48148148 |
3 |
Somewhat happy |
397 |
23.3% |
0.23339212 |
4 |
Slightly happy |
98 |
5.8% |
0.05761317 |
5 |
Not happy at all |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01646091 |
6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
91 |
5.3% |
0.05349794 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_5
Variable label:
|
Happy with: How safe you feel?
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
How safe you feel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very happy |
431 |
25.3% |
0.25338036 |
2 |
Happy |
892 |
52.4% |
0.52439741 |
3 |
Somewhat happy |
214 |
12.6% |
0.12580835 |
4 |
Slightly happy |
71 |
4.2% |
0.04174015 |
5 |
Not happy at all |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01116990 |
6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
74 |
4.4% |
0.04350382 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_6
Variable label:
|
Happy with: The feeling of being part of a neighbourhood community?
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
The feeling of being part of a neighbourhood community?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very happy |
139 |
8.2% |
0.081716637 |
2 |
Happy |
619 |
36.4% |
0.363903586 |
3 |
Somewhat happy |
538 |
31.6% |
0.316284539 |
4 |
Slightly happy |
225 |
13.2% |
0.132275132 |
5 |
Not happy at all |
67 |
3.9% |
0.039388595 |
6 |
Not relevant |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006466784 |
97 |
No answer |
102 |
6% |
0.059964727 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_7
Variable label:
|
Happy with: The prospects for safety in the future?
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
The prospects for safety in the future?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very happy |
229 |
13.5% |
0.13462669 |
2 |
Happy |
828 |
48.7% |
0.48677249 |
3 |
Somewhat happy |
382 |
22.5% |
0.22457378 |
4 |
Slightly happy |
139 |
8.2% |
0.08171664 |
5 |
Not happy at all |
41 |
2.4% |
0.02410347 |
6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
82 |
4.8% |
0.04820694 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_8
Variable label:
|
Happy with: The amount of time you have to do the things you like to do?
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
The amount of time you have to do the things you like to do?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very happy |
145 |
8.5% |
0.08524397 |
2 |
Happy |
652 |
38.3% |
0.38330394 |
3 |
Somewhat happy |
479 |
28.2% |
0.28159906 |
4 |
Slightly happy |
273 |
16% |
0.16049383 |
5 |
Not happy at all |
77 |
4.5% |
0.04526749 |
6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
75 |
4.4% |
0.04409171 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_9
Variable label:
|
Happy with: The quality of nature and the environment in your local area?
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
The quality of nature and the environment in your local area?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very happy |
588 |
34.6% |
0.345679012 |
2 |
Happy |
780 |
45.9% |
0.458553792 |
3 |
Somewhat happy |
202 |
11.9% |
0.118753674 |
4 |
Slightly happy |
44 |
2.6% |
0.025867137 |
5 |
Not happy at all |
10 |
0.6% |
0.005878895 |
6 |
Not relevant |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
97 |
No answer |
77 |
4.5% |
0.045267490 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr36_10
Variable label:
|
Happy with: Your job?
|
Pre-question text:
|
How happy are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
Your job?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very happy |
274 |
16.1% |
0.16108172 |
2 |
Happy |
615 |
36.2% |
0.36155203 |
3 |
Somewhat happy |
239 |
14.1% |
0.14050558 |
4 |
Slightly happy |
91 |
5.3% |
0.05349794 |
5 |
Not happy at all |
49 |
2.9% |
0.02880658 |
6 |
Not relevant |
332 |
19.5% |
0.19517931 |
97 |
No answer |
101 |
5.9% |
0.05937684 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_r3fr37
Variable label:
|
Life situation in five years’ time
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about your life situation in five years’ time, do you think it will be …
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Worse than it is at the moment |
114 |
6.7% |
0.06701940 |
2 |
Similar to how it is now |
950 |
55.8% |
0.55849500 |
3 |
Better than it is at the moment |
575 |
33.8% |
0.33803645 |
97 |
No answer |
62 |
3.6% |
0.03644915 |
98 |
Not asked |
6814 |
|
NA |
w03_ran5
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1711] [Invalid:6804] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
888 |
51.9% |
0.5189947 |
2 |
2 |
823 |
48.1% |
0.4810053 |
Sysmiss |
|
6804 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km1
Variable label:
|
Text: What do you think when you hear or read the word “climate change”? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we are going to ask some questions about climate and the environment.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the word “climate change”?
|
Technical description:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers, a couple of sentences would be nice, or just a few words if that is better for you.
[Asked if U=2 and ran5=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3km2
Variable label:
|
Text: What do you think when you hear or read the words “global warming”? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the words “global warming”?
|
Technical description:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers, a couple of sentences would be nice, or just a few words if that is better for you.
[Asked if U=2 and ran5=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3km22
Variable label:
|
Possible to prevent harmful climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s now assume that climate change can be a major problem for the world in the future if nothing is done about it. To what extent do you think it is possible to do something to prevent harmful climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
Choose the statement that best matches your viewpoint:
[Asked if u=2 or if the respondent has answered w01_km7 (panel effect)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
It is not possible to do something to prevent harmful climate change. |
189 |
4.8% |
0.047884469 |
2 |
It is possible, but very difficult, to do something to prevent harmful climate
change. |
2140 |
54.2% |
0.542183937 |
3 |
It is possible and entirely realistic to do something to prevent harmful climate
change. |
1476 |
37.4% |
0.373954902 |
4 |
It is easy to prevent harmful climate change. |
27 |
0.7% |
0.006840638 |
97 |
No answer |
115 |
2.9% |
0.029136053 |
98 |
Not asked |
4568 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_r3km20
Variable label:
|
Statement that best describes own viewpoint on climate change
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following statements best describes your viewpoint on climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
Select one of the alternatives.
[Asked if u=2 or if the respondent has answered w01_km7 (panel effect)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I think that the climate is not changing. |
21 |
0.5% |
0.005160973 |
2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
238 |
5.8% |
0.058491030 |
3 |
I think that the climate is changing, but it is only to a small extent linked to
human influences. |
1003 |
24.6% |
0.246497911 |
4 |
I think that the climate is changing, and that it is largely a result of human
influences. |
2654 |
65.2% |
0.652248710 |
97 |
No answer |
153 |
3.8% |
0.037601376 |
98 |
Not asked |
4446 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km25
Variable label:
|
Overall, how serious a threat is climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
Overall, how serious a threat is climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very serious |
527 |
30.7% |
0.30657359 |
2 |
Serious |
705 |
41% |
0.41012216 |
3 |
Somewhat serious |
365 |
21.2% |
0.21233275 |
4 |
Slightly serious |
68 |
4% |
0.03955788 |
5 |
Not a threat |
26 |
1.5% |
0.01512507 |
97 |
No answer |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01628854 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_r3km26
Variable label:
|
How serious a threat is climate change for you personally?
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat is climate change for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very serious |
120 |
7% |
0.06980803 |
2 |
Serious |
387 |
22.5% |
0.22513089 |
3 |
Somewhat serious |
576 |
33.5% |
0.33507853 |
4 |
Slightly serious |
423 |
24.6% |
0.24607330 |
5 |
Not a threat |
159 |
9.2% |
0.09249564 |
97 |
No answer |
54 |
3.1% |
0.03141361 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km27
Variable label:
|
To what extent do we follow the Constitution regarding environmental protection
|
Literal question:
|
Since 1992 the Constitution of Norway has contained the following provision: “Every person has the right to an environment that is conducive to health and to a natural environment whose productivity and diversity are maintained. Natural resources shall be managed on the basis of comprehensive long-term considerations which will safeguard this right for future generations as well.” To what extent do you think current Norwegian policies meet the aims of this provision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01628854 |
2 |
To a great extent |
291 |
16.9% |
0.16928447 |
3 |
To some extent |
927 |
53.9% |
0.53926702 |
4 |
To a slight extent |
378 |
22% |
0.21989529 |
5 |
Not at all |
52 |
3% |
0.03025015 |
97 |
No answer |
43 |
2.5% |
0.02501454 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km28_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Humans will eventually find out enough about how nature works to be able to control it.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Humans will eventually find out enough about how nature works to be able to control it.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
19 |
1.1% |
0.01105294 |
2 |
Agree |
134 |
7.8% |
0.07795230 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
272 |
15.8% |
0.15823153 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
301 |
17.5% |
0.17510180 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
234 |
13.6% |
0.13612565 |
6 |
Disagree |
399 |
23.2% |
0.23211169 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
272 |
15.8% |
0.15823153 |
97 |
No answer |
88 |
5.1% |
0.05119255 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km28_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: All ecological systems, regardless of how small and insignificant they are, have the right to exist.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
All ecological systems, regardless of how small and insignificant they are, have the right to exist.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
477 |
27.7% |
0.27748691 |
2 |
Agree |
605 |
35.2% |
0.35194881 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
288 |
16.8% |
0.16753927 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
149 |
8.7% |
0.08667830 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
77 |
4.5% |
0.04479348 |
6 |
Disagree |
53 |
3.1% |
0.03083188 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00814427 |
97 |
No answer |
56 |
3.3% |
0.03257708 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km28_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Nature primarily has value when it can be utilised to satisfy humans’ material needs.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree/disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Nature primarily has value when it can be utilised to satisfy humans’ material needs.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
29 |
1.7% |
0.01687027 |
2 |
Agree |
72 |
4.2% |
0.04188482 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
118 |
6.9% |
0.06864456 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
136 |
7.9% |
0.07911576 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
190 |
11.1% |
0.11052938 |
6 |
Disagree |
529 |
30.8% |
0.30773706 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
560 |
32.6% |
0.32577080 |
97 |
No answer |
85 |
4.9% |
0.04944735 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km29
Variable label:
|
How broad is the diversity of opinions on climate change that is conveyed by the media?
|
Literal question:
|
How broad is the diversity of opinions on climate change that is conveyed by the media?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very broad diversity |
30 |
1.7% |
0.01745201 |
2 |
Broad diversity |
351 |
20.4% |
0.20418848 |
3 |
Some diversity |
782 |
45.5% |
0.45491565 |
4 |
Little diversity |
441 |
25.7% |
0.25654450 |
5 |
No diversity at all |
35 |
2% |
0.02036067 |
97 |
No answer |
80 |
4.7% |
0.04653869 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km30
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you see it as a moral duty for the individual to contribute to preventing climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you see it as a moral duty for the individual to contribute to preventing climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
335 |
19.5% |
0.194880745 |
2 |
To a great extent |
763 |
44.4% |
0.443862711 |
3 |
To some extent |
456 |
26.5% |
0.265270506 |
4 |
To a slight extent |
97 |
5.6% |
0.056428156 |
5 |
Not at all |
16 |
0.9% |
0.009307737 |
97 |
No answer |
52 |
3% |
0.030250145 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_1
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Hope
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Hope
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
73 |
4.2% |
0.04246655 |
2 |
Slightly |
247 |
14.4% |
0.14368819 |
3 |
Somewhat |
869 |
50.6% |
0.50552647 |
4 |
Strongly |
375 |
21.8% |
0.21815009 |
5 |
Very strongly |
53 |
3.1% |
0.03083188 |
97 |
No answer |
102 |
5.9% |
0.05933682 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_2
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Worry
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Worry
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
241 |
14% |
0.14019779 |
2 |
Slightly |
461 |
26.8% |
0.26817917 |
3 |
Somewhat |
677 |
39.4% |
0.39383362 |
4 |
Strongly |
199 |
11.6% |
0.11576498 |
5 |
Very strongly |
44 |
2.6% |
0.02559628 |
97 |
No answer |
97 |
5.6% |
0.05642816 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_3
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Gloom
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Gloom
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
248 |
14.4% |
0.14426992 |
2 |
Slightly |
421 |
24.5% |
0.24490983 |
3 |
Somewhat |
650 |
37.8% |
0.37812682 |
4 |
Strongly |
235 |
13.7% |
0.13670739 |
5 |
Very strongly |
66 |
3.8% |
0.03839442 |
97 |
No answer |
99 |
5.8% |
0.05759162 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_4
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Anger
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
375 |
21.8% |
0.21815009 |
2 |
Slightly |
542 |
31.5% |
0.31529959 |
3 |
Somewhat |
518 |
30.1% |
0.30133799 |
4 |
Strongly |
137 |
8% |
0.07969750 |
5 |
Very strongly |
36 |
2.1% |
0.02094241 |
97 |
No answer |
111 |
6.5% |
0.06457243 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_5
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Guilt
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Guilt
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
274 |
15.9% |
0.15939500 |
2 |
Slightly |
595 |
34.6% |
0.34613147 |
3 |
Somewhat |
646 |
37.6% |
0.37579988 |
4 |
Strongly |
92 |
5.4% |
0.05351949 |
5 |
Very strongly |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00814427 |
97 |
No answer |
98 |
5.7% |
0.05700989 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_6
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Interest
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Interest
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
39 |
2.3% |
0.02268761 |
2 |
Slightly |
122 |
7.1% |
0.07097150 |
3 |
Somewhat |
755 |
43.9% |
0.43920884 |
4 |
Strongly |
610 |
35.5% |
0.35485748 |
5 |
Very strongly |
97 |
5.6% |
0.05642816 |
97 |
No answer |
96 |
5.6% |
0.05584642 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_7
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Sympathy
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Sympathy
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
137 |
8% |
0.07969750 |
2 |
Slightly |
262 |
15.2% |
0.15241419 |
3 |
Somewhat |
743 |
43.2% |
0.43222804 |
4 |
Strongly |
395 |
23% |
0.22978476 |
5 |
Very strongly |
61 |
3.5% |
0.03548575 |
97 |
No answer |
121 |
7% |
0.07038976 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km31_8
Variable label:
|
Feelings related to climate change: Tired of it
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Tired of it
|
Technical description:
|
Please rank each feeling on the scale provided, which goes from “not at all” (1) to “very strongly” (5):
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
443 |
25.8% |
0.25770797 |
2 |
Slightly |
517 |
30.1% |
0.30075625 |
3 |
Somewhat |
497 |
28.9% |
0.28912158 |
4 |
Strongly |
118 |
6.9% |
0.06864456 |
5 |
Very strongly |
38 |
2.2% |
0.02210588 |
97 |
No answer |
106 |
6.2% |
0.06166376 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_ran6
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1696] [Invalid:6819] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
851 |
50.2% |
0.5017689 |
2 |
2 |
845 |
49.8% |
0.4982311 |
Sysmiss |
|
6819 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km32
Variable label:
|
Right or wrong not conduct an impact assessment study on the oil activities outside Lofoten and Vesterålen: Possible job creation
|
Literal question:
|
One argument for oil activities outside Lofoten and Vesterålen is that they will create more new jobs in North Norway. Following the election, the Solberg government decided that it will not conduct an impact assessment study on the oil activities outside Lofoten and Vesterålen over the next four years. As you see it, was this a good or a bad decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran6=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
150 |
17.6% |
0.17626322 |
2 |
Good |
227 |
26.7% |
0.26674501 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
79 |
9.3% |
0.09283196 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
155 |
18.2% |
0.18213866 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
90 |
10.6% |
0.10575793 |
6 |
Bad |
88 |
10.3% |
0.10340776 |
7 |
Very bad |
36 |
4.2% |
0.04230317 |
97 |
No answer |
26 |
3.1% |
0.03055229 |
98 |
Not asked |
7664 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km33
Variable label:
|
Right or wrong not conduct an impact assessment study on the oil activities outside Lofoten and Vesterålen: Increased emissions, endanger fishing
|
Literal question:
|
One argument against the oil activities outside Lofoten and Vesterålen is that they will increase greenhouse gas emissions and be a danger to the fish. Following the election, the Solberg government decided that it will not conduct an impact assessment study on the oil activities outside Lofoten and Vesterålen over the next four years. As you see it, was this a good or a bad decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran6=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
168 |
19.9% |
0.19881657 |
2 |
Good |
212 |
25.1% |
0.25088757 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
75 |
8.9% |
0.08875740 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
143 |
16.9% |
0.16923077 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
83 |
9.8% |
0.09822485 |
6 |
Bad |
84 |
9.9% |
0.09940828 |
7 |
Very bad |
53 |
6.3% |
0.06272189 |
97 |
No answer |
27 |
3.2% |
0.03195266 |
98 |
Not asked |
7670 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km36
Variable label:
|
Largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the world? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, what is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the world?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_ran7
Variable label:
|
ran7
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1693] [Invalid:6822] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
841 |
49.7% |
0.4967513 |
2 |
2 |
852 |
50.3% |
0.5032487 |
Sysmiss |
|
6822 |
|
NA |
w03_ran7a
Variable label:
|
ran7a
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:841] [Invalid:7674] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
425 |
50.5% |
0.5053508 |
2 |
2 |
416 |
49.5% |
0.4946492 |
Sysmiss |
|
7674 |
|
NA |
w03_ran7b
Variable label:
|
ran7b
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:852] [Invalid:7663] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
415 |
48.7% |
0.4870892 |
2 |
2 |
437 |
51.3% |
0.5129108 |
Sysmiss |
|
7663 |
|
NA |
w03_klimamulti_1
Variable label:
|
1 (klimamulti)
|
Technical description:
|
[Result of randomization (see R3K37_1 through 4). Selects R3KM37_1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1693] [Invalid:6822] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Selected |
841 |
49.7% |
0.4967513 |
0 |
|
852 |
50.3% |
0.5032487 |
Sysmiss |
|
6822 |
|
NA |
w03_klimamulti_2
Variable label:
|
2 (klimamulti)
|
Technical description:
|
[Result of randomization (see R3K37_1 through 4). Selects R3KM37_2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1693] [Invalid:6822] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Selected |
852 |
50.3% |
0.5032487 |
0 |
|
841 |
49.7% |
0.4967513 |
Sysmiss |
|
6822 |
|
NA |
w03_klimamulti_3
Variable label:
|
3 (klimamulti)
|
Technical description:
|
[Result of randomization (see R3K37_1 through 4). Selects R3KM37_3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1693] [Invalid:6822] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Selected |
840 |
49.6% |
0.4961607 |
0 |
|
853 |
50.4% |
0.5038393 |
Sysmiss |
|
6822 |
|
NA |
w03_klimamulti_4
Variable label:
|
4 (klimamulti)
|
Technical description:
|
[Result of randomization (see R3K37_1 through 4). Selects R3KM37_4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1693] [Invalid:6822] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Selected |
853 |
50.4% |
0.5038393 |
0 |
|
840 |
49.6% |
0.4961607 |
Sysmiss |
|
6822 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km37_1
Variable label:
|
Measures against climate change: Increased government support for developing wind power on land
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts think that the measures mentioned below will work, while others think that these are not good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you to the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Increased government support for developing wind power on land.
|
Technical description:
|
[R3KM37_1 through 4 are randomized, with the following possible combinations: R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_3, R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_4, R3KM37_2 & R3KM37_3, R3KM37_2 & R3KM37_4. Not R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_2 or R3KM37_3 & R3KM37_4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
40 |
4.8% |
0.04756243 |
2 |
Negative |
55 |
6.5% |
0.06539834 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
47 |
5.6% |
0.05588585 |
4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
96 |
11.4% |
0.11414982 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
179 |
21.3% |
0.21284185 |
6 |
Positive |
283 |
33.7% |
0.33650416 |
7 |
Very positive |
115 |
13.7% |
0.13674197 |
97 |
No answer |
26 |
3.1% |
0.03091558 |
98 |
Not asked |
7674 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km37_2
Variable label:
|
Measures against climate change: Increased government support for developing wind power at sea
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts think that the measures mentioned below will work, while others think that these are not good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you to the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Increased government support for developing wind power at sea (offshore wind power).
|
Technical description:
|
[R3KM37_1 through 4 are randomized, with the following possible combinations: R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_3, R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_4, R3KM37_2 & R3KM37_3, R3KM37_2 & R3KM37_4. Not R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_2 or R3KM37_3 & R3KM37_4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
20 |
2.3% |
0.02347418 |
2 |
Negative |
27 |
3.2% |
0.03169014 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
42 |
4.9% |
0.04929577 |
4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
78 |
9.2% |
0.09154930 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
191 |
22.4% |
0.22417840 |
6 |
Positive |
336 |
39.4% |
0.39436620 |
7 |
Very positive |
140 |
16.4% |
0.16431925 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.1% |
0.02112676 |
98 |
Not asked |
7663 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km37_3
Variable label:
|
Measures against climate change: Increased government support for developing biofuel plants
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts think that the measures mentioned below will work, while others think that these are not good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you to the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Increased government support for developing biofuel plants (e.g. wood, pellets and biogas).
|
Technical description:
|
[R3KM37_1 through 4 are randomized, with the following possible combinations: R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_3, R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_4, R3KM37_2 & R3KM37_3, R3KM37_2 & R3KM37_4. Not R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_2 or R3KM37_3 & R3KM37_4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
23 |
2.7% |
0.02738095 |
2 |
Negative |
24 |
2.9% |
0.02857143 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
57 |
6.8% |
0.06785714 |
4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
158 |
18.8% |
0.18809524 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
243 |
28.9% |
0.28928571 |
6 |
Positive |
229 |
27.3% |
0.27261905 |
7 |
Very positive |
76 |
9% |
0.09047619 |
97 |
No answer |
30 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
98 |
Not asked |
7675 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km37_4
Variable label:
|
Measures against climate change: Increased government support for developing geothermal energy
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts think that the measures mentioned below will work, while others think that these are not good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you to the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Increased government support for developing geothermal energy where one drills down to the geothermal energy under the Earth’s surface.
|
Technical description:
|
[R3KM37_1 through 4 are randomized, with the following possible combinations: R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_3, R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_4, R3KM37_2 & R3KM37_3, R3KM37_2 & R3KM37_4. Not R3KM37_1 & R3KM37_2 or R3KM37_3 & R3KM37_4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008206331 |
2 |
Negative |
23 |
2.7% |
0.026963658 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
10 |
1.2% |
0.011723329 |
4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
147 |
17.2% |
0.172332943 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
195 |
22.9% |
0.228604924 |
6 |
Positive |
326 |
38.2% |
0.382180539 |
7 |
Very positive |
121 |
14.2% |
0.141852286 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
2.8% |
0.028135991 |
98 |
Not asked |
7662 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km41_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Technological innovations will resolve the climate problems.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Technological innovations will resolve the climate problems.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 or if the respondent is recruited in wave 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
116 |
2.8% |
0.02844532 |
2 |
Agree |
514 |
12.6% |
0.12604218 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
1508 |
37% |
0.36978911 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
906 |
22.2% |
0.22216773 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
466 |
11.4% |
0.11427170 |
6 |
Disagree |
299 |
7.3% |
0.07332026 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
92 |
2.3% |
0.02256008 |
97 |
No answer |
177 |
4.3% |
0.04340363 |
98 |
Not asked |
4437 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km41_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Citizens of rich countries like Norway should cut their consumption as part of the solution to the climate challenge.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Citizens of rich countries like Norway should cut their consumption as part of the solution to the climate challenge.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 or if the respondent is recruited in wave 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
638 |
15.6% |
0.15644924 |
2 |
Agree |
1209 |
29.6% |
0.29646886 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
1145 |
28.1% |
0.28077489 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
416 |
10.2% |
0.10201079 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
219 |
5.4% |
0.05370280 |
6 |
Disagree |
197 |
4.8% |
0.04830799 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
109 |
2.7% |
0.02672879 |
97 |
No answer |
145 |
3.6% |
0.03555665 |
98 |
Not asked |
4437 |
|
NA |
w03_ran8
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1687] [Invalid:6828] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
147 |
8.7% |
0.08713693 |
2 |
2 |
138 |
8.2% |
0.08180202 |
3 |
3 |
148 |
8.8% |
0.08772970 |
4 |
4 |
145 |
8.6% |
0.08595139 |
5 |
5 |
129 |
7.6% |
0.07646710 |
6 |
6 |
169 |
10% |
0.10017783 |
7 |
7 |
132 |
7.8% |
0.07824541 |
8 |
8 |
128 |
7.6% |
0.07587433 |
9 |
9 |
137 |
8.1% |
0.08120925 |
10 |
10 |
133 |
7.9% |
0.07883817 |
11 |
11 |
143 |
8.5% |
0.08476586 |
12 |
12 |
138 |
8.2% |
0.08180202 |
Sysmiss |
|
6828 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1a2a3a
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected citizens, not diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
1 |
0.7% |
0.006802721 |
2 |
Willing |
15 |
10.2% |
0.102040816 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
35 |
23.8% |
0.238095238 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
65 |
44.2% |
0.442176871 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
27 |
18.4% |
0.183673469 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.7% |
0.027210884 |
98 |
Not asked |
8368 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1b2a3a
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically elected citizens, not diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the citizens of Norway. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
2 |
1.4% |
0.01449275 |
2 |
Willing |
17 |
12.3% |
0.12318841 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
32 |
23.2% |
0.23188406 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
60 |
43.5% |
0.43478261 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
24 |
17.4% |
0.17391304 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
98 |
Not asked |
8377 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1c2a3a
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts, not diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities consider to be experts in the area. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
5 |
3.4% |
0.03378378 |
2 |
Willing |
42 |
28.4% |
0.28378378 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
41 |
27.7% |
0.27702703 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
47 |
31.8% |
0.31756757 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
11 |
7.4% |
0.07432432 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.4% |
0.01351351 |
98 |
Not asked |
8367 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1a2b3a
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected citizens, diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
5 |
3.4% |
0.03448276 |
2 |
Willing |
43 |
29.7% |
0.29655172 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
37 |
25.5% |
0.25517241 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
47 |
32.4% |
0.32413793 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
9 |
6.2% |
0.06206897 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.8% |
0.02758621 |
98 |
Not asked |
8370 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1b2b3a
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically elected citizens, diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the citizens of Norway. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
4 |
3.1% |
0.03100775 |
2 |
Willing |
48 |
37.2% |
0.37209302 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
41 |
31.8% |
0.31782946 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
26 |
20.2% |
0.20155039 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
7 |
5.4% |
0.05426357 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.3% |
0.02325581 |
98 |
Not asked |
8386 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1c2b3a
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts, diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities consider to be experts in the area. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
4 |
2.4% |
0.02366864 |
2 |
Willing |
62 |
36.7% |
0.36686391 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
55 |
32.5% |
0.32544379 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
37 |
21.9% |
0.21893491 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
7 |
4.1% |
0.04142012 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.4% |
0.02366864 |
98 |
Not asked |
8346 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1a2a3b
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected citizens, not diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
13 |
9.8% |
0.09848485 |
2 |
Willing |
28 |
21.2% |
0.21212121 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
39 |
29.5% |
0.29545455 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
32 |
24.2% |
0.24242424 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
16 |
12.1% |
0.12121212 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
3% |
0.03030303 |
98 |
Not asked |
8383 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1b2a3b
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically elected citizens, not diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the citizens of Norway. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=8]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
11 |
8.6% |
0.0859375 |
2 |
Willing |
37 |
28.9% |
0.2890625 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
30 |
23.4% |
0.2343750 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
30 |
23.4% |
0.2343750 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
16 |
12.5% |
0.1250000 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
3.1% |
0.0312500 |
98 |
Not asked |
8387 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1c2a3b
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts, not diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities consider to be experts in the area. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=9]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
19 |
13.9% |
0.13868613 |
2 |
Willing |
55 |
40.1% |
0.40145985 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
37 |
27% |
0.27007299 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
12 |
8.8% |
0.08759124 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
9 |
6.6% |
0.06569343 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
3.6% |
0.03649635 |
98 |
Not asked |
8378 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1a2b3b
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected citizens, diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=10]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
17 |
12.8% |
0.12781955 |
2 |
Willing |
49 |
36.8% |
0.36842105 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
35 |
26.3% |
0.26315789 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
22 |
16.5% |
0.16541353 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
7 |
5.3% |
0.05263158 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.3% |
0.02255639 |
98 |
Not asked |
8382 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1b2b3b
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically elected citizens, diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the citizens of Norway. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
19 |
13.3% |
0.13286713 |
2 |
Willing |
57 |
39.9% |
0.39860140 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
31 |
21.7% |
0.21678322 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
14 |
9.8% |
0.09790210 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
14 |
9.8% |
0.09790210 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
5.6% |
0.05594406 |
98 |
Not asked |
8372 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad311_1c2b3b
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts, diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities consider to be experts in the area. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran8=12]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
25 |
18.1% |
0.18115942 |
2 |
Willing |
49 |
35.5% |
0.35507246 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
36 |
26.1% |
0.26086957 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
20 |
14.5% |
0.14492754 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
5 |
3.6% |
0.03623188 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
98 |
Not asked |
8377 |
|
NA |
w03_ran9
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2, except respondents recruited in wave 1 that earlier have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1412] [Invalid:7103] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
120 |
8.5% |
0.08498584 |
2 |
2 |
138 |
9.8% |
0.09773371 |
3 |
3 |
117 |
8.3% |
0.08286119 |
4 |
4 |
122 |
8.6% |
0.08640227 |
5 |
5 |
125 |
8.9% |
0.08852691 |
6 |
6 |
111 |
7.9% |
0.07861190 |
7 |
7 |
101 |
7.2% |
0.07152975 |
8 |
8 |
125 |
8.9% |
0.08852691 |
9 |
9 |
106 |
7.5% |
0.07507082 |
10 |
10 |
114 |
8.1% |
0.08073654 |
11 |
11 |
125 |
8.9% |
0.08852691 |
12 |
12 |
108 |
7.6% |
0.07648725 |
Sysmiss |
|
7103 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1a2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, cannot affect outcome
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You do not have the opportunity to influence this decision, but it is still interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
10 |
8.3% |
0.08333333 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
95 |
79.2% |
0.79166667 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
15 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8395 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1b2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You do have the opportunity to influence this decision, and it is therefore interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=2. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
12 |
8.7% |
0.08695652 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
115 |
83.3% |
0.83333333 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
8 |
5.8% |
0.05797101 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
98 |
Not asked |
8377 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1c2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 1000 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of a thousand selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=3. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
8 |
6.8% |
0.06837607 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
98 |
83.8% |
0.83760684 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
9 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.7% |
0.01709402 |
98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1d2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 100 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of a hundred selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=4. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
7 |
5.7% |
0.057377049 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
104 |
85.2% |
0.852459016 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
10 |
8.2% |
0.081967213 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008196721 |
98 |
Not asked |
8393 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1e2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 10 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of ten selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=5. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
7 |
5.6% |
0.056 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
112 |
89.6% |
0.896 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
4 |
3.2% |
0.032 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.6% |
0.016 |
98 |
Not asked |
8390 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1f2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 3 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of three selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=6. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
4 |
3.6% |
0.03603604 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
95 |
85.6% |
0.85585586 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
9 |
8.1% |
0.08108108 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.7% |
0.02702703 |
98 |
Not asked |
8404 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1a2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, cannot affect outcome
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You do not have the opportunity to influence this decision, but it is still interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=7. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
11 |
10.9% |
0.10891089 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
74 |
73.3% |
0.73267327 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
15 |
14.9% |
0.14851485 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
1% |
0.00990099 |
98 |
Not asked |
8414 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1b2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation:: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You do have the opportunity to influence this decision, and it is therefore interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=8. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
12 |
9.6% |
0.096 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
103 |
82.4% |
0.824 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
9 |
7.2% |
0.072 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008 |
98 |
Not asked |
8390 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1c2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 1000 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of a thousand selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=9. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
5 |
4.7% |
0.047169811 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
87 |
82.1% |
0.820754717 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
13 |
12.3% |
0.122641509 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
98 |
Not asked |
8409 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1d2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 100 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of a hundred selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=10. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
9 |
7.9% |
0.07894737 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
91 |
79.8% |
0.79824561 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
14 |
12.3% |
0.12280702 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8401 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1e2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 10 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of ten selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=11. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
10 |
8% |
0.080 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
109 |
87.2% |
0.872 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
4 |
3.2% |
0.032 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.6% |
0.016 |
98 |
Not asked |
8390 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad312_1f2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 3 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of three selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran9=12. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
8 |
7.4% |
0.07407407 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
89 |
82.4% |
0.82407407 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
11 |
10.2% |
0.10185185 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8407 |
|
NA |
w03_ran10
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2, except respondents recruited in wave 1 that earlier have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1411] [Invalid:7104] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
358 |
25.4% |
0.2537208 |
2 |
2 |
343 |
24.3% |
0.2430900 |
3 |
3 |
334 |
23.7% |
0.2367116 |
4 |
4 |
376 |
26.6% |
0.2664777 |
Sysmiss |
|
7104 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad313_1a2a
Variable label:
|
Acceptable decision: Draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel. To what extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran10=1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
34 |
9.5% |
0.09497207 |
2 |
To a great extent |
55 |
15.4% |
0.15363128 |
3 |
To some extent |
114 |
31.8% |
0.31843575 |
4 |
To a slight extent |
87 |
24.3% |
0.24301676 |
5 |
Not at all |
61 |
17% |
0.17039106 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2% |
0.01955307 |
98 |
Not asked |
8157 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad313_1b2a
Variable label:
|
Acceptable decision: A donation of NOK 5,000 given to Doctors without borders
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a donation of NOK 5,000 to Doctors without borders. To what extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran10=2. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
231 |
67.3% |
0.67346939 |
2 |
To a great extent |
78 |
22.7% |
0.22740525 |
3 |
To some extent |
16 |
4.7% |
0.04664723 |
4 |
To a slight extent |
5 |
1.5% |
0.01457726 |
5 |
Not at all |
8 |
2.3% |
0.02332362 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.5% |
0.01457726 |
98 |
Not asked |
8172 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad313_1a2b
Variable label:
|
Willing to accept decision: Draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel. How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran10=3. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
31 |
9.3% |
0.09281437 |
2 |
Willing |
127 |
38% |
0.38023952 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
73 |
21.9% |
0.21856287 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
64 |
19.2% |
0.19161677 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
28 |
8.4% |
0.08383234 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
3.3% |
0.03293413 |
98 |
Not asked |
8181 |
|
NA |
w03_u2_pad313_1b2b
Variable label:
|
Willing to accept decision: A donation of NOK 5,000 given to Doctors without borders
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a donation of NOK 5,000 to Doctors without borders. How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran10=4. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
274 |
72.9% |
0.72872340 |
2 |
Willing |
75 |
19.9% |
0.19946809 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
11 |
2.9% |
0.02925532 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
8 |
2.1% |
0.02127660 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
4 |
1.1% |
0.01063830 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.1% |
0.01063830 |
98 |
Not asked |
8139 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4ea
Variable label:
|
Upsetting: Labour migrants from EU countries have access to the same welfare benefits as Norwegians
|
Literal question:
|
Does it upset you that labour migrants from EU countries have access to the same welfare benefits as Norwegians do?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2. R3CC4a and R3CC4b is asked on the same page, in a randomized order]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
753 |
43.8% |
0.43804538 |
2 |
No |
888 |
51.7% |
0.51657941 |
97 |
No answer |
78 |
4.5% |
0.04537522 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4eb
Variable label:
|
Upsetting: Those who are ill due to smoking receive treatment that is equally good and expensive as non-smoking patients
|
Literal question:
|
Does it upset you that those who are ill due to smoking receive treatment that is equally good and expensive as non-smoking patients?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2. R3CC4a and R3CC4b is asked on the same page, in a randomized order]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
269 |
15.6% |
0.15648633 |
2 |
No |
1380 |
80.3% |
0.80279232 |
97 |
No answer |
70 |
4.1% |
0.04072135 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc7
Variable label:
|
Number of conditions that are upsetting [List 1]
|
Literal question:
|
Indicate how many of these four situations upset you. We are only interested in how many upset you, not which ones.
That new Norwegian roads are often funded by collecting tolls That sportspeople earn tens of millions of kroner That many do not believe in climate change caused by human activities That we have to pay the NRK licence fee That the government has now reduced the paternal quota (“paternity leave”)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2. Situasjonene i R3CC7 er listet i randomisert rekkefølge]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
77 |
4.5% |
0.04479348 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
2 |
2 |
280 |
16.3% |
0.16288540 |
3 |
3 |
528 |
30.7% |
0.30715532 |
4 |
4 |
472 |
27.5% |
0.27457824 |
5 |
5 |
210 |
12.2% |
0.12216405 |
97 |
No answer |
69 |
4% |
0.04013962 |
98 |
Not asked |
6796 |
|
NA |
6 |
6 |
83 |
4.8% |
0.04828389 |
w03_ran11
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1673] [Invalid:6842] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
430 |
25.7% |
0.2570233 |
2 |
2 |
407 |
24.3% |
0.2432756 |
3 |
3 |
424 |
25.3% |
0.2534369 |
4 |
4 |
412 |
24.6% |
0.2462642 |
Sysmiss |
|
6842 |
|
NA |
w03_ro1a
Variable label:
|
Prediction about oil consumption: Plenty of oil in 25 years or used up in 15 years
|
Literal question:
|
Some people say that we will still have plenty of oil 25 years from now. Others say that at the rate we are using our oil, it will all be used up in 15 years. Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran11=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
There will be plenty of oil in 25 years |
322 |
74.9% |
0.7488372 |
2 |
Oil will be used up in 15 years |
92 |
21.4% |
0.2139535 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
3.7% |
0.0372093 |
98 |
Not asked |
8085 |
|
NA |
w03_ro1b
Variable label:
|
Prediction about oil consumption: Used up all oil in 15 years or plenty in 25 years
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now a few general questions regarding our society in Norway. We would like to ask you for your personal opinion about these issues.
|
Literal question:
|
Some people say that that at the rate we are using our oil, it will be all used up in 15 years. Others say that we will still have plenty of oil 25 years from now. Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran11=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oil will be used up in 15 years |
57 |
14% |
0.14004914 |
2 |
There will be plenty of oil in 25 years |
330 |
81.1% |
0.81081081 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
4.9% |
0.04914005 |
98 |
Not asked |
8108 |
|
NA |
w03_ro1c
Variable label:
|
Prediction about oil consumption: Plenty of oil in 25 years or used up in 15 years
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now a few general questions regarding our society in the Norway. We would like to ask you for your personal opinion about these issues.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right? We will still have plenty of oil 25 years from now, or at the rate we are using our oil, it will all be used up in 15 years.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran11=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
There will be plenty of oil in 25 years |
330 |
77.8% |
0.77830189 |
2 |
Oil will be used up in 15 years |
86 |
20.3% |
0.20283019 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.9% |
0.01886792 |
98 |
Not asked |
8091 |
|
NA |
w03_ro1d
Variable label:
|
Prediction about oil consumption: Used up all oil in 15 years or plenty in 25 years
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now a few general questions regarding our society in the United States. We would like to ask you for your personal opinion about these issues.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right? At the rate we are using our oil, it will be all used up in 15 years, or we will still have plenty of oil 25 years from now.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran11=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oil will be used up in 15 years |
80 |
19.4% |
0.19417476 |
2 |
There will be plenty of oil in 25 years |
321 |
77.9% |
0.77912621 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.7% |
0.02669903 |
98 |
Not asked |
8103 |
|
NA |
w03_ran12
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1673] [Invalid:6842] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
451 |
27% |
0.2695756 |
2 |
2 |
426 |
25.5% |
0.2546324 |
3 |
3 |
396 |
23.7% |
0.2367005 |
4 |
4 |
400 |
23.9% |
0.2390915 |
Sysmiss |
|
6842 |
|
NA |
w03_ro2a
Variable label:
|
Determining gasoline and oil prices: Each company sets its own prices to meet the competition.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with this idea of how gasoline and oil prices are decided? Each company sets its own prices to meet the competition.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran12=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agree |
248 |
55% |
0.54988914 |
2 |
Disagree |
186 |
41.2% |
0.41241685 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
3.8% |
0.03769401 |
98 |
Not asked |
8064 |
|
NA |
w03_ro2b
Variable label:
|
Determining gasoline and oil prices: The oil companies get together and set prices for their products.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with this idea of how gasoline and oil prices are decided? The oil companies get together and set prices for their products.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran12=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agree |
125 |
29.3% |
0.29342723 |
2 |
Disagree |
279 |
65.5% |
0.65492958 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
5.2% |
0.05164319 |
98 |
Not asked |
8089 |
|
NA |
w03_ro2c
Variable label:
|
Determining gasoline and oil prices: Each company sets its own prices to meet the competition, or the oil companies get together and set prices for their products.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these statements comes closest to your own idea of how gasoline and oil prices are decided? Each company sets its own prices to meet the competition, or the oil companies get together and set prices for their products.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran12=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Each company sets its own prices |
131 |
33.1% |
0.33080808 |
2 |
Oil companies get together |
250 |
63.1% |
0.63131313 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
3.8% |
0.03787879 |
98 |
Not asked |
8119 |
|
NA |
w03_ro2d
Variable label:
|
Determining gasoline and oil prices: The oil companies get together and set prices for their products, or each company sets its own prices to meet the competition.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these statements comes closest to your own idea of how gasoline and oil prices are decided? The oil companies get together and set prices for their products, or each company sets its own prices to meet the competition.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran12=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oil companies get together |
258 |
64.5% |
0.645 |
2 |
Each company sets its own prices |
128 |
32% |
0.320 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
3.5% |
0.035 |
98 |
Not asked |
8115 |
|
NA |
w03_ran13
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1672] [Invalid:6843] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
440 |
26.3% |
0.2631579 |
2 |
2 |
393 |
23.5% |
0.2350478 |
3 |
3 |
434 |
26% |
0.2595694 |
4 |
4 |
405 |
24.2% |
0.2422249 |
Sysmiss |
|
6843 |
|
NA |
w03_ro3a
Variable label:
|
Public housing: Government should provide adequate housing or each person should provide for it themselves
|
Literal question:
|
Some people feel the government should see to it that all people have adequate housing, while others feel each person should provide for his or her own housing. Which comes closest to how you feel about this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran13=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Government should see to adequate housing |
226 |
51.4% |
0.51363636 |
2 |
Let each person provide for own housing |
199 |
45.2% |
0.45227273 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
3.4% |
0.03409091 |
98 |
Not asked |
8075 |
|
NA |
w03_ro3b
Variable label:
|
Public housing: Each person should provide for it themselves or the government should provide adequate housing
|
Literal question:
|
Some people feel each person should provide for his or her own housing, while others feel the government should see to it that all people have adequate housing. Which comes closest to how you feel about this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran13=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Let each person provide for own housing |
239 |
60.8% |
0.60814249 |
2 |
Government should see to adequate housing |
134 |
34.1% |
0.34096692 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
5.1% |
0.05089059 |
98 |
Not asked |
8122 |
|
NA |
w03_ro3c
Variable label:
|
Public housing: Government should provide adequate housing or each person should provide for it themselves
|
Literal question:
|
Which comes closest to how you feel about this? The government should see to it that all people have adequate housing, or each person should provide for his or her own housing.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran13=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Government should see to adequate housing |
219 |
50.5% |
0.50460829 |
2 |
Let each person provide for own housing |
193 |
44.5% |
0.44470046 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
5.1% |
0.05069124 |
98 |
Not asked |
8081 |
|
NA |
w03_ro3d
Variable label:
|
Public housing: Each person should provide for it themselves or the government should provide adequate housing
|
Literal question:
|
Which comes closest to how you feel about this? Each person should provide for his or her own housing, or the government should see to it that all people have adequate housing.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran13=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Let each person provide for own housing |
240 |
59.3% |
0.59259259 |
2 |
Government should see to adequate housing |
152 |
37.5% |
0.37530864 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
3.2% |
0.03209877 |
98 |
Not asked |
8110 |
|
NA |
w03_pad301_1
Variable label:
|
Confidence in institutions: The law courts
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have in the following institutions and entities?
|
Literal question:
|
The law courts
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
226 |
13.6% |
0.13557289 |
2 |
High confidence |
829 |
49.7% |
0.49730054 |
3 |
Some confidence |
307 |
18.4% |
0.18416317 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
124 |
7.4% |
0.07438512 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
64 |
3.8% |
0.03839232 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
26 |
1.6% |
0.01559688 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
20 |
1.2% |
0.01199760 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
2.4% |
0.02399520 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
31 |
1.9% |
0.01859628 |
w03_pad301_2
Variable label:
|
Confidence in institutions: The police
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have in the following institutions and entities?
|
Literal question:
|
The police
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
157 |
9.4% |
0.09418116 |
2 |
High confidence |
869 |
52.1% |
0.52129574 |
3 |
Some confidence |
373 |
22.4% |
0.22375525 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
85 |
5.1% |
0.05098980 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
85 |
5.1% |
0.05098980 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
36 |
2.2% |
0.02159568 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
21 |
1.3% |
0.01259748 |
97 |
No answer |
38 |
2.3% |
0.02279544 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
3 |
0.2% |
0.00179964 |
w03_pad301_3
Variable label:
|
Confidence in institutions: Media
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have in the following institutions and entities?
|
Literal question:
|
Media
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
13 |
0.8% |
0.00779844 |
2 |
High confidence |
156 |
9.4% |
0.09358128 |
3 |
Some confidence |
521 |
31.3% |
0.31253749 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
328 |
19.7% |
0.19676065 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
414 |
24.8% |
0.24835033 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
131 |
7.9% |
0.07858428 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
61 |
3.7% |
0.03659268 |
97 |
No answer |
39 |
2.3% |
0.02339532 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
4 |
0.2% |
0.00239952 |
w03_pad301_4
Variable label:
|
Confidence in institutions: Researchers
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have in the following institutions and entities?
|
Literal question:
|
Researchers
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
134 |
8% |
0.08038392 |
2 |
High confidence |
679 |
40.7% |
0.40731854 |
3 |
Some confidence |
473 |
28.4% |
0.28374325 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
200 |
12% |
0.11997600 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
82 |
4.9% |
0.04919016 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
18 |
1.1% |
0.01079784 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
10 |
0.6% |
0.00599880 |
97 |
No answer |
46 |
2.8% |
0.02759448 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
25 |
1.5% |
0.01499700 |
w03_pad301_5
Variable label:
|
Confidence in institutions: NAV
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have in the following institutions and entities?
|
Literal question:
|
NAV
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
22 |
1.3% |
0.01319736 |
2 |
High confidence |
223 |
13.4% |
0.13377325 |
3 |
Some confidence |
460 |
27.6% |
0.27594481 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
329 |
19.7% |
0.19736053 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
301 |
18.1% |
0.18056389 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
148 |
8.9% |
0.08878224 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
102 |
6.1% |
0.06118776 |
97 |
No answer |
41 |
2.5% |
0.02459508 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
41 |
2.5% |
0.02459508 |
w03_pad301_6
Variable label:
|
Confidence in institutions: The banking industry
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have in the following institutions and entities?
|
Literal question:
|
The banking industry
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
78 |
4.7% |
0.04679064 |
2 |
High confidence |
486 |
29.2% |
0.29154169 |
3 |
Some confidence |
487 |
29.2% |
0.29214157 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
239 |
14.3% |
0.14337133 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
227 |
13.6% |
0.13617277 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
67 |
4% |
0.04019196 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
30 |
1.8% |
0.01799640 |
97 |
No answer |
38 |
2.3% |
0.02279544 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
15 |
0.9% |
0.00899820 |
w03_pad301_7
Variable label:
|
Confidence in institutions: The national health service
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have in the following institutions and entities?
|
Literal question:
|
The national health service
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
127 |
7.6% |
0.07618476 |
2 |
High confidence |
782 |
46.9% |
0.46910618 |
3 |
Some confidence |
465 |
27.9% |
0.27894421 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
95 |
5.7% |
0.05698860 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
108 |
6.5% |
0.06478704 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
31 |
1.9% |
0.01859628 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
17 |
1% |
0.01019796 |
97 |
No answer |
41 |
2.5% |
0.02459508 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
1 |
0.1% |
0.00059988 |
w03_ran14
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1653] [Invalid:6862] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
848 |
51.3% |
0.5130067 |
2 |
2 |
805 |
48.7% |
0.4869933 |
Sysmiss |
|
6862 |
|
NA |
w03_pad303_1
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the national level: Crises caused by nature such as landslides, floods, hurricanes
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities at the national level are capable of handling different types of accidents and crises?
|
Literal question:
|
Crises caused by nature such as landslides, floods, hurricanes
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
29 |
3.4% |
0.034198113 |
2 |
High confidence |
348 |
41% |
0.410377358 |
3 |
Some confidence |
290 |
34.2% |
0.341981132 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
60 |
7.1% |
0.070754717 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
80 |
9.4% |
0.094339623 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
20 |
2.4% |
0.023584906 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005896226 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.012971698 |
98 |
Not asked |
7667 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
5 |
0.6% |
0.005896226 |
w03_pad303_2
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the national level: Accidents in connection with aircraft, railways, roads and shipping traffic
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities at the national level are capable of handling different types of accidents and crises?
|
Literal question:
|
Accidents in connection with aircraft, railways, roads and shipping traffic
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
35 |
4.1% |
0.041273585 |
2 |
High confidence |
373 |
44% |
0.439858491 |
3 |
Some confidence |
289 |
34.1% |
0.340801887 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
64 |
7.5% |
0.075471698 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
51 |
6% |
0.060141509 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
16 |
1.9% |
0.018867925 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001179245 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.014150943 |
98 |
Not asked |
7667 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008254717 |
w03_pad303_3
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the national level: Infections in connection with food, drinking water or epidemics
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities at the national level are capable of handling different types of accidents and crises?
|
Literal question:
|
Infections in connection with food, drinking water or epidemics (for example bird flu, swine flu, E.coli)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
36 |
4.2% |
0.042452830 |
2 |
High confidence |
308 |
36.3% |
0.363207547 |
3 |
Some confidence |
302 |
35.6% |
0.356132075 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
71 |
8.4% |
0.083726415 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
79 |
9.3% |
0.093160377 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
27 |
3.2% |
0.031839623 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
8 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.012971698 |
98 |
Not asked |
7667 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007075472 |
w03_pad303_4
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the national level: Failure of critical infrastructure
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities at the national level are capable of handling different types of accidents and crises?
|
Literal question:
|
Failure of critical infrastructure (such as power supply, electronic communication, telecommunication, oil and fuel supplies)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01768868 |
2 |
High confidence |
249 |
29.4% |
0.29363208 |
3 |
Some confidence |
295 |
34.8% |
0.34787736 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
93 |
11% |
0.10966981 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
129 |
15.2% |
0.15212264 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
30 |
3.5% |
0.03537736 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01415094 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01415094 |
98 |
Not asked |
7667 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
13 |
1.5% |
0.01533019 |
w03_pad303_5
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the national level: Terrorist attack
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities at the national level are capable of handling different types of accidents and crises?
|
Literal question:
|
Terrorist attack
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
17 |
2% |
0.020047170 |
2 |
High confidence |
184 |
21.7% |
0.216981132 |
3 |
Some confidence |
320 |
37.7% |
0.377358491 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
86 |
10.1% |
0.101415094 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
132 |
15.6% |
0.155660377 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
59 |
7% |
0.069575472 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
31 |
3.7% |
0.036556604 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.012971698 |
98 |
Not asked |
7667 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
8 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
w03_pad304_1
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the local level: Crises caused by nature such as landslides, floods, hurricanes
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities at the local level are capable of handling different types of accidents and crises?
|
Literal question:
|
Crises caused by nature such as landslides, floods, hurricanes
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
33 |
4.1% |
0.040993789 |
2 |
High confidence |
255 |
31.7% |
0.316770186 |
3 |
Some confidence |
300 |
37.3% |
0.372670807 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
87 |
10.8% |
0.108074534 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
74 |
9.2% |
0.091925466 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
26 |
3.2% |
0.032298137 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
12 |
1.5% |
0.014906832 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.2% |
0.012422360 |
98 |
Not asked |
7710 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
8 |
1% |
0.009937888 |
w03_pad304_2
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the local level: Accidents in connection with aircraft, railways, roads and shipping traffic
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities at the local level are capable of handling different types of accidents and crises?
|
Literal question:
|
Accidents in connection with aircraft, railways, roads and shipping traffic
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
35 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
2 |
High confidence |
302 |
37.5% |
0.37515528 |
3 |
Some confidence |
256 |
31.8% |
0.31801242 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
78 |
9.7% |
0.09689441 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
84 |
10.4% |
0.10434783 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
18 |
2.2% |
0.02236025 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01118012 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.5% |
0.01490683 |
98 |
Not asked |
7710 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
11 |
1.4% |
0.01366460 |
w03_pad304_3
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the local level: Infections in connection with food, drinking water or epidemics
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities at the local level are capable of handling different types of accidents and crises?
|
Literal question:
|
Infections in connection with food, drinking water or epidemics (for example bird flu, swine flu, E.coli)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
30 |
3.7% |
0.037267081 |
2 |
High confidence |
237 |
29.4% |
0.294409938 |
3 |
Some confidence |
252 |
31.3% |
0.313043478 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
107 |
13.3% |
0.132919255 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
97 |
12% |
0.120496894 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
40 |
5% |
0.049689441 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
24 |
3% |
0.029813665 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.4% |
0.013664596 |
98 |
Not asked |
7710 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
7 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
w03_pad304_4
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the local level: Failure of critical infrastructure
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities at the local level are capable of handling different types of accidents and crises?
|
Literal question:
|
Failure of critical infrastructure (such as power supply, electronic communication, telecommunication, oil and fuel supplies)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
17 |
2.1% |
0.02111801 |
2 |
High confidence |
209 |
26% |
0.25962733 |
3 |
Some confidence |
264 |
32.8% |
0.32795031 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
109 |
13.5% |
0.13540373 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
123 |
15.3% |
0.15279503 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
35 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
22 |
2.7% |
0.02732919 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.5% |
0.01490683 |
98 |
Not asked |
7710 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
14 |
1.7% |
0.01739130 |
w03_pad304_5
Variable label:
|
Confidence in authorities at the local level: Terrorist attack
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence or lack of it do you have that Norwegian authorities at the local level are capable of handling different types of accidents and crises?
|
Literal question:
|
Terrorist attack
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran14=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
18 |
2.2% |
0.02236025 |
2 |
High confidence |
118 |
14.7% |
0.14658385 |
3 |
Some confidence |
253 |
31.4% |
0.31428571 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
102 |
12.7% |
0.12670807 |
5 |
Some lack of confidence |
145 |
18% |
0.18012422 |
6 |
A high lack of confidence |
92 |
11.4% |
0.11428571 |
7 |
A severe lack of confidence |
54 |
6.7% |
0.06708075 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.2% |
0.01242236 |
98 |
Not asked |
7710 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
13 |
1.6% |
0.01614907 |
w03_pad307
Variable label:
|
Parliament discussing a new unreasonable measure, likelihood of trying to influence the outcome?
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that Parliament was discussing a new measure that you thought was completely unreasonable. How likely is it that you would try to do something to influence the outcome?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
59 |
3.5% |
0.03539292 |
2 |
Likely |
219 |
13.1% |
0.13137373 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
496 |
29.8% |
0.29754049 |
4 |
Slightly likely |
718 |
43.1% |
0.43071386 |
5 |
Not likely at all |
140 |
8.4% |
0.08398320 |
97 |
No answer |
35 |
2.1% |
0.02099580 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad308
Variable label:
|
Preferred approach to political influence
|
Literal question:
|
If you wanted to influence the outcome of an issue, what would be your preferred approach?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Would write a letter to the editor of a newspaper |
255 |
15.3% |
0.15296941 |
2 |
Would work to obtain media coverage in another way |
156 |
9.4% |
0.09358128 |
3 |
Would discuss the issue in the party or organisation that I am a member of |
133 |
8% |
0.07978404 |
4 |
Would contact a politician |
248 |
14.9% |
0.14877025 |
5 |
Would contact an employee in the ministry responsible |
73 |
4.4% |
0.04379124 |
6 |
Would organise a petition |
81 |
4.9% |
0.04859028 |
7 |
Would organise action |
40 |
2.4% |
0.02399520 |
8 |
Not sure |
567 |
34% |
0.34013197 |
9 |
Not sure |
59 |
3.5% |
0.03539292 |
97 |
No answer |
55 |
3.3% |
0.03299340 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad309_1
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Contacted a politician at the local level
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if yes.
|
Literal question:
|
Contacted a politician at the local level
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Contacted a politician at the local level |
164 |
9.8% |
0.09838032 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1489 |
89.3% |
0.89322136 |
w03_pad309_2
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Contacted a politician at the national level
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if yes.
|
Literal question:
|
Contacted a politician at the national level
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Contacted a politician at the national level |
64 |
3.8% |
0.03839232 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1589 |
95.3% |
0.95320936 |
w03_pad309_3
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Shown a political viewpoint in social media or other websites
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if yes.
|
Literal question:
|
Shown a political viewpoint in social media or other websites
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Shown a political viewpoint in social media or other websites |
311 |
18.7% |
0.18656269 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1342 |
80.5% |
0.80503899 |
w03_pad309_4
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Participated in work in a voluntary organisation or association
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if yes.
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in work in a voluntary organisation or association
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Participated in work in a voluntary organisation or association |
282 |
16.9% |
0.16916617 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1371 |
82.2% |
0.82243551 |
w03_pad309_5
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Worn or hung up a campaign message or emblem
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if yes.
|
Literal question:
|
Worn or hung up a campaign message or emblem
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Worn or hung up a campaign message or emblem |
72 |
4.3% |
0.04319136 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1581 |
94.8% |
0.94841032 |
w03_pad309_6
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Signed a petition, a formal written request, an action list or similar
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if yes.
|
Literal question:
|
Signed a petition, a formal written request, an action list or similar.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Signed a petition, a formal written request, an action list or similar. |
497 |
29.8% |
0.29814037 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1156 |
69.3% |
0.69346131 |
w03_pad309_7
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Participated in a public demonstration
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if yes.
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in a public demonstration
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Participated in a public demonstration |
135 |
8.1% |
0.08098380 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1518 |
91.1% |
0.91061788 |
w03_pad309_8
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Boycotted specific products
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if yes.
|
Literal question:
|
Boycotted specific products
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Boycotted specific products |
467 |
28% |
0.28014397 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1186 |
71.1% |
0.71145771 |
w03_pad309_9
Variable label:
|
Influenced a political decision: Consciously purchased specific products for political, moral or eco-friendly reasons
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you as a private person done any of the following in an attempt to influence a political decision? Indicate if yes.
|
Literal question:
|
Consciously purchased specific products for political, moral or eco-friendly reasons
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Consciously purchased specific products for political, moral or eco-friendly
reasons |
552 |
33.1% |
0.33113377 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.8% |
0.00839832 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1101 |
66% |
0.66046791 |
w03_pad310_1
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: The same level of education as you have
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the qualities below are for this person?
|
Literal question:
|
The same level of education as you have
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
34 |
2% |
0.02039592 |
2 |
Important |
140 |
8.4% |
0.08398320 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
309 |
18.5% |
0.18536293 |
4 |
Slightly important |
544 |
32.6% |
0.32633473 |
5 |
Not important at all |
537 |
32.2% |
0.32213557 |
97 |
No answer |
103 |
6.2% |
0.06178764 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_2
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: From the same part of the country as you are
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the qualities below are for this person?
|
Literal question:
|
From the same part of the country as you are
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
51 |
3.1% |
0.03059388 |
2 |
Important |
169 |
10.1% |
0.10137972 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
276 |
16.6% |
0.16556689 |
4 |
Slightly important |
430 |
25.8% |
0.25794841 |
5 |
Not important at all |
648 |
38.9% |
0.38872226 |
97 |
No answer |
93 |
5.6% |
0.05578884 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_3
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: The same gender as you are
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the qualities below are for this person?
|
Literal question:
|
The same gender as you are
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
8 |
0.5% |
0.00479904 |
2 |
Important |
44 |
2.6% |
0.02639472 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
90 |
5.4% |
0.05398920 |
4 |
Slightly important |
452 |
27.1% |
0.27114577 |
5 |
Not important at all |
969 |
58.1% |
0.58128374 |
97 |
No answer |
104 |
6.2% |
0.06238752 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_4
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: The same religious belief as you have
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the qualities below are for this person?
|
Literal question:
|
The same religious belief as you have
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
57 |
3.4% |
0.03419316 |
2 |
Important |
151 |
9.1% |
0.09058188 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
273 |
16.4% |
0.16376725 |
4 |
Slightly important |
473 |
28.4% |
0.28374325 |
5 |
Not important at all |
610 |
36.6% |
0.36592681 |
97 |
No answer |
103 |
6.2% |
0.06178764 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_5
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: About the same age as you
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the qualities below are for this person?
|
Literal question:
|
About the same age as you
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
15 |
0.9% |
0.00899820 |
2 |
Important |
97 |
5.8% |
0.05818836 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
296 |
17.8% |
0.17756449 |
4 |
Slightly important |
537 |
32.2% |
0.32213557 |
5 |
Not important at all |
623 |
37.4% |
0.37372525 |
97 |
No answer |
99 |
5.9% |
0.05938812 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_6
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: The same ethnic background as you have
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the qualities below are for this person?
|
Literal question:
|
The same ethnic background as you have
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
69 |
4.1% |
0.04139172 |
2 |
Important |
190 |
11.4% |
0.11397720 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
262 |
15.7% |
0.15716857 |
4 |
Slightly important |
440 |
26.4% |
0.26394721 |
5 |
Not important at all |
610 |
36.6% |
0.36592681 |
97 |
No answer |
96 |
5.8% |
0.05758848 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_7
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: The same political viewpoint as you have
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the qualities below are for this person?
|
Literal question:
|
The same political viewpoint as you have
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
341 |
20.5% |
0.20455909 |
2 |
Important |
642 |
38.5% |
0.38512298 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
389 |
23.3% |
0.23335333 |
4 |
Slightly important |
120 |
7.2% |
0.07198560 |
5 |
Not important at all |
96 |
5.8% |
0.05758848 |
97 |
No answer |
79 |
4.7% |
0.04739052 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_8
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: The same type of work experience as you have
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the qualities below are for this person?
|
Literal question:
|
The same type of work experience as you have
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
38 |
2.3% |
0.02279544 |
2 |
Important |
150 |
9% |
0.08998200 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
340 |
20.4% |
0.20395921 |
4 |
Slightly important |
538 |
32.3% |
0.32273545 |
5 |
Not important at all |
501 |
30.1% |
0.30053989 |
97 |
No answer |
100 |
6% |
0.05998800 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad310_9
Variable label:
|
Personal qualities in a national representative: The same sexual orientation as you have
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you could choose one politician who would represent your interests in the national authorities in Norway, how important do you think the qualities below are for this person?
|
Literal question:
|
The same sexual orientation as you have
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
27 |
1.6% |
0.01619676 |
2 |
Important |
63 |
3.8% |
0.03779244 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
72 |
4.3% |
0.04319136 |
4 |
Slightly important |
347 |
20.8% |
0.20815837 |
5 |
Not important at all |
1050 |
63% |
0.62987403 |
97 |
No answer |
108 |
6.5% |
0.06478704 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_ran15
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1652] [Invalid:6863] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
162 |
9.8% |
0.09806295 |
2 |
2 |
157 |
9.5% |
0.09503632 |
3 |
3 |
128 |
7.7% |
0.07748184 |
4 |
4 |
142 |
8.6% |
0.08595642 |
5 |
5 |
135 |
8.2% |
0.08171913 |
6 |
6 |
135 |
8.2% |
0.08171913 |
7 |
7 |
138 |
8.4% |
0.08353511 |
8 |
8 |
112 |
6.8% |
0.06779661 |
9 |
9 |
136 |
8.2% |
0.08232446 |
10 |
10 |
146 |
8.8% |
0.08837772 |
11 |
11 |
124 |
7.5% |
0.07506053 |
12 |
12 |
137 |
8.3% |
0.08292978 |
Sysmiss |
|
6863 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1a2a3a
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected citizens, not diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
4 |
2.5% |
0.02469136 |
2 |
Willing |
17 |
10.5% |
0.10493827 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
41 |
25.3% |
0.25308642 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
64 |
39.5% |
0.39506173 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
32 |
19.8% |
0.19753086 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.5% |
0.02469136 |
98 |
Not asked |
8353 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1b2a3a
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically elected citizens, not diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the citizens of Norway. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
6 |
3.8% |
0.03821656 |
2 |
Willing |
30 |
19.1% |
0.19108280 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
42 |
26.8% |
0.26751592 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
61 |
38.9% |
0.38853503 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
16 |
10.2% |
0.10191083 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.3% |
0.01273885 |
98 |
Not asked |
8358 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1c2a3a
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts, not diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities consider to be experts in the area. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
1 |
0.8% |
0.0078125 |
2 |
Willing |
21 |
16.4% |
0.1640625 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
46 |
35.9% |
0.3593750 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
46 |
35.9% |
0.3593750 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
9 |
7% |
0.0703125 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
3.9% |
0.0390625 |
98 |
Not asked |
8387 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1a2b3a
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected citizens, diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
5 |
3.5% |
0.03521127 |
2 |
Willing |
49 |
34.5% |
0.34507042 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
43 |
30.3% |
0.30281690 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
30 |
21.1% |
0.21126761 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
12 |
8.5% |
0.08450704 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.1% |
0.02112676 |
98 |
Not asked |
8373 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1b2b3a
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically elected citizens, diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the citizens of Norway. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
2 |
Willing |
54 |
40% |
0.40000000 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
36 |
26.7% |
0.26666667 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
34 |
25.2% |
0.25185185 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
98 |
Not asked |
8380 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1c2b3a
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts, diversified ::: Against personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities consider to be experts in the area. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached goes against your wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
9 |
6.7% |
0.066666667 |
2 |
Willing |
44 |
32.6% |
0.325925926 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
53 |
39.3% |
0.392592593 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
25 |
18.5% |
0.185185185 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
3 |
2.2% |
0.022222222 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.7% |
0.007407407 |
98 |
Not asked |
8380 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1a2a3b
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected citizens, not diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
16 |
11.6% |
0.11594203 |
2 |
Willing |
46 |
33.3% |
0.33333333 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
38 |
27.5% |
0.27536232 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
21 |
15.2% |
0.15217391 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
11 |
8% |
0.07971014 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
98 |
Not asked |
8377 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1b2a3b
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically elected citizens, not diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the citizens of Norway. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=8]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
18 |
16.1% |
0.16071429 |
2 |
Willing |
41 |
36.6% |
0.36607143 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
27 |
24.1% |
0.24107143 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
16 |
14.3% |
0.14285714 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
5 |
4.5% |
0.04464286 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
4.5% |
0.04464286 |
98 |
Not asked |
8403 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1c2a3b
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts, not diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities consider to be experts in the area. The group does not reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=9]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
23 |
16.9% |
0.16911765 |
2 |
Willing |
63 |
46.3% |
0.46323529 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
29 |
21.3% |
0.21323529 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
9 |
6.6% |
0.06617647 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
5 |
3.7% |
0.03676471 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
5.1% |
0.05147059 |
98 |
Not asked |
8379 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1a2b3b
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred randomly selected citizens, diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred randomly selected citizens. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=10]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
28 |
19.2% |
0.19178082 |
2 |
Willing |
54 |
37% |
0.36986301 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
25 |
17.1% |
0.17123288 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
20 |
13.7% |
0.13698630 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
15 |
10.3% |
0.10273973 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.7% |
0.02739726 |
98 |
Not asked |
8369 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1b2b3b
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred democratically elected citizens, diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people selected by the citizens of Norway. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
29 |
23.4% |
0.23387097 |
2 |
Willing |
55 |
44.4% |
0.44354839 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
27 |
21.8% |
0.21774194 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
4 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
5 |
4% |
0.04032258 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
98 |
Not asked |
8391 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad311_1c2b3b
Variable label:
|
Group deciding over Oil fund spending: One hundred appointed experts, diversified ::: In line with personal wishes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to consider this scenario: A political decision is to be made about how some of the money in the Oil fund will be used. This decision is made by a group of one hundred people that the authorities consider to be experts in the area. The group does reflect the Norwegian population in terms of age composition, education, gender, place of residence, sexual orientation, ethnic background, work experience and religion. The decision that was reached is in line with your own wishes.
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran15=12]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
42 |
30.7% |
0.30656934 |
2 |
Willing |
61 |
44.5% |
0.44525547 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
19 |
13.9% |
0.13868613 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
8 |
5.8% |
0.05839416 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
2 |
1.5% |
0.01459854 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
3.6% |
0.03649635 |
98 |
Not asked |
8378 |
|
NA |
w03_ran16
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3, except respondents recruited in wave 1 that earlier have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1368] [Invalid:7147] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
106 |
7.7% |
0.07748538 |
2 |
2 |
124 |
9.1% |
0.09064327 |
3 |
3 |
116 |
8.5% |
0.08479532 |
4 |
4 |
118 |
8.6% |
0.08625731 |
5 |
5 |
121 |
8.8% |
0.08845029 |
6 |
6 |
99 |
7.2% |
0.07236842 |
7 |
7 |
111 |
8.1% |
0.08114035 |
8 |
8 |
111 |
8.1% |
0.08114035 |
9 |
9 |
107 |
7.8% |
0.07821637 |
10 |
10 |
121 |
8.8% |
0.08845029 |
11 |
11 |
119 |
8.7% |
0.08698830 |
12 |
12 |
115 |
8.4% |
0.08406433 |
Sysmiss |
|
7147 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1a2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, cannot affect outcome
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You do not have the opportunity to influence this decision, but it is still interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=1. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette spørsmålet]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
8 |
7.5% |
0.075471698 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
91 |
85.8% |
0.858490566 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
6 |
5.7% |
0.056603774 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
0.009433962 |
98 |
Not asked |
8409 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1b2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You do have the opportunity to influence this decision, and it is therefore interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=2. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette spørsmålet]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
13 |
10.5% |
0.104838710 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
99 |
79.8% |
0.798387097 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
11 |
8.9% |
0.088709677 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008064516 |
98 |
Not asked |
8391 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1c2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 1000 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of a thousand selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=3. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette spørsmålet]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
11 |
9.5% |
0.09482759 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
97 |
83.6% |
0.83620690 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
7 |
6% |
0.06034483 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
0.00862069 |
98 |
Not asked |
8399 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1d2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 100 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of a hundred selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=4. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette spørsmålet]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
5 |
4.2% |
0.04237288 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
103 |
87.3% |
0.87288136 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
8 |
6.8% |
0.06779661 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.7% |
0.01694915 |
98 |
Not asked |
8397 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1e2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 10 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of ten selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=5. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette spørsmålet]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
9 |
7.4% |
0.07438017 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
103 |
85.1% |
0.85123967 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
9 |
7.4% |
0.07438017 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8394 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1f2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 3 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of three selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=6. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette spørsmålet]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
6 |
6.1% |
0.06060606 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
87 |
87.9% |
0.87878788 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
4 |
4% |
0.04040404 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
2% |
0.02020202 |
98 |
Not asked |
8416 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1a2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, cannot affect outcome
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You do not have the opportunity to influence this decision, but it is still interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=7. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette spørsmålet]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
17 |
15.3% |
0.15315315 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
87 |
78.4% |
0.78378378 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
7 |
6.3% |
0.06306306 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8404 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1b2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You do have the opportunity to influence this decision, and it is therefore interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=8. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette spørsmålet]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
14 |
12.6% |
0.12612613 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
88 |
79.3% |
0.79279279 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
7 |
6.3% |
0.06306306 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.8% |
0.01801802 |
98 |
Not asked |
8404 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1c2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 1000 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of a thousand selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=9. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette spørsmålet]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
9 |
8.4% |
0.08411215 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
87 |
81.3% |
0.81308411 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
7 |
6.5% |
0.06542056 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
3.7% |
0.03738318 |
98 |
Not asked |
8408 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1d2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 100 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of a hundred selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=10. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette spørsmålet]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
9 |
7.4% |
0.07438017 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
97 |
80.2% |
0.80165289 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
11 |
9.1% |
0.09090909 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
3.3% |
0.03305785 |
98 |
Not asked |
8394 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1e2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 10 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of ten selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=11. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette spørsmålet]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
8 |
6.7% |
0.067226891 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
101 |
84.9% |
0.848739496 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
9 |
7.6% |
0.075630252 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008403361 |
98 |
Not asked |
8396 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad312_1f2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 3 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of three selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3 og ran16=12. Respondenter rekruttert i runde 1 som har blitt eksponert for w01_DT14 eller w01_DT15, blir ikke spurt dette spørsmålet]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
3 |
2.6% |
0.02608696 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
106 |
92.2% |
0.92173913 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
6 |
5.2% |
0.05217391 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8400 |
|
NA |
w03_ran17
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3, except respondents recruited in wave 1 that earlier have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1368] [Invalid:7147] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
321 |
23.5% |
0.2346491 |
2 |
2 |
361 |
26.4% |
0.2638889 |
3 |
3 |
353 |
25.8% |
0.2580409 |
4 |
4 |
333 |
24.3% |
0.2434211 |
Sysmiss |
|
7147 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad313_1a2a
Variable label:
|
Acceptable decision: Draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel. To what extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran17=1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
24 |
7.5% |
0.07476636 |
2 |
To a great extent |
48 |
15% |
0.14953271 |
3 |
To some extent |
120 |
37.4% |
0.37383178 |
4 |
To a slight extent |
73 |
22.7% |
0.22741433 |
5 |
Not at all |
49 |
15.3% |
0.15264798 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.2% |
0.02180685 |
98 |
Not asked |
8194 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad313_1b2a
Variable label:
|
Acceptable decision: A donation of NOK 5,000 given to Doctors without borders
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a donation of NOK 5,000 to Doctors without borders. To what extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran17=2. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
228 |
63.2% |
0.631578947 |
2 |
To a great extent |
93 |
25.8% |
0.257617729 |
3 |
To some extent |
25 |
6.9% |
0.069252078 |
4 |
To a slight extent |
7 |
1.9% |
0.019390582 |
5 |
Not at all |
6 |
1.7% |
0.016620499 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.6% |
0.005540166 |
98 |
Not asked |
8154 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad313_1a2b
Variable label:
|
Willing to accept decision: Draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel. How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran17=3. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
36 |
10.2% |
0.10198300 |
2 |
Willing |
129 |
36.5% |
0.36543909 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
77 |
21.8% |
0.21813031 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
67 |
19% |
0.18980170 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
39 |
11% |
0.11048159 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.4% |
0.01416431 |
98 |
Not asked |
8162 |
|
NA |
w03_u3_pad313_1b2b
Variable label:
|
Willing to accept decision: A donation of NOK 5,000 given to Doctors without borders
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a donation of NOK 5,000 to Doctors without borders. How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran17=4. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
242 |
72.7% |
0.726726727 |
2 |
Willing |
66 |
19.8% |
0.198198198 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
11 |
3.3% |
0.033033033 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
2 |
0.6% |
0.006006006 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
5 |
1.5% |
0.015015015 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.1% |
0.021021021 |
98 |
Not asked |
8182 |
|
NA |
w03_pad315
Variable label:
|
Number of public officials in Norway involved in corruption
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how many public officials in Norway are involved in corruption?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Almost none |
179 |
10.7% |
0.10737852 |
2 |
Very few |
760 |
45.6% |
0.45590882 |
3 |
Some |
515 |
30.9% |
0.30893821 |
4 |
Quite a lot |
148 |
8.9% |
0.08878224 |
5 |
Almost all |
7 |
0.4% |
0.00419916 |
97 |
No answer |
58 |
3.5% |
0.03479304 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad316
Variable label:
|
Number of politicians in Norway involved in corruption
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how many politicians in Norway are involved in corruption?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Almost none |
340 |
20.4% |
0.2039592 |
2 |
Very few |
749 |
44.9% |
0.4493101 |
3 |
Some |
383 |
23% |
0.2297540 |
4 |
Quite a lot |
100 |
6% |
0.0599880 |
5 |
Almost all |
10 |
0.6% |
0.0059988 |
97 |
No answer |
85 |
5.1% |
0.0509898 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad318
Variable label:
|
Time spent reading VG online, on a mobile phone, or a tablet computer on an ordinary day
|
Literal question:
|
How much time do you spend reading VG online, on a mobile phone, or a tablet computer on an ordinary day?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Rarely or never |
568 |
34.1% |
0.34073185 |
2 |
Less than 30 minutes |
637 |
38.2% |
0.38212358 |
3 |
30 to 60 minutes |
337 |
20.2% |
0.20215957 |
4 |
1 to 2 hours |
68 |
4.1% |
0.04079184 |
5 |
2 to 3 hours |
16 |
1% |
0.00959808 |
6 |
3 to 4 hours |
7 |
0.4% |
0.00419916 |
7 |
More than 4 hours |
2 |
0.1% |
0.00119976 |
97 |
No answer |
32 |
1.9% |
0.01919616 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_ran18
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1648] [Invalid:6867] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
189 |
11.5% |
0.1146845 |
2 |
2 |
244 |
14.8% |
0.1480583 |
3 |
3 |
194 |
11.8% |
0.1177184 |
4 |
4 |
211 |
12.8% |
0.1280340 |
5 |
5 |
194 |
11.8% |
0.1177184 |
6 |
6 |
196 |
11.9% |
0.1189320 |
7 |
7 |
207 |
12.6% |
0.1256068 |
8 |
8 |
213 |
12.9% |
0.1292476 |
Sysmiss |
|
6867 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319aa
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Support for Progress Party drops on new poll |
86 |
45.5% |
0.45502646 |
2 |
Support for Labour Party surges on new poll |
88 |
46.6% |
0.46560847 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
7.9% |
0.07936508 |
98 |
Not asked |
8326 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319ab
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Support for Labour Party surges on new poll |
119 |
48.8% |
0.4877049 |
2 |
Support for Progress Party drops on new poll |
96 |
39.3% |
0.3934426 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
11.9% |
0.1188525 |
98 |
Not asked |
8271 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319ba
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Support for Labour Party drops on new poll |
86 |
44.3% |
0.4432990 |
2 |
Support for Progress Party surges on new poll |
84 |
43.3% |
0.4329897 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
12.4% |
0.1237113 |
98 |
Not asked |
8321 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319bb
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Support for Progress Party surges on new poll |
83 |
39.3% |
0.39336493 |
2 |
Support for Labour Party drops on new poll |
107 |
50.7% |
0.50710900 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
10% |
0.09952607 |
98 |
Not asked |
8304 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319ca
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No change in support for Labour Party on new poll |
98 |
50.5% |
0.5051546 |
2 |
No change in support for Progress Party on new poll |
51 |
26.3% |
0.2628866 |
97 |
No answer |
45 |
23.2% |
0.2319588 |
98 |
Not asked |
8321 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319cb
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No change in support for Progress Party on new poll |
75 |
38.3% |
0.3826531 |
2 |
No change in support for Labour Party on new poll |
83 |
42.3% |
0.4234694 |
97 |
No answer |
38 |
19.4% |
0.1938776 |
98 |
Not asked |
8319 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319da
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong growth in the Norwegian economy |
60 |
29% |
0.28985507 |
2 |
Sharp decline in the Norwegian economy |
139 |
67.1% |
0.67149758 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
3.9% |
0.03864734 |
98 |
Not asked |
8308 |
|
NA |
w03_pad319db
Variable label:
|
«See Appendix in codebook for screenshot of questions»
|
Literal question:
|
These fictional articles are typical stories at the top of Norwegian online newspapers’ front pages. Choose the article you would have clicked on and read more about if you had come across these articles on an ordinary day. You can only choose one of the articles.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran18=8]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Sharp decline in the Norwegian economy |
142 |
66.7% |
0.66666667 |
2 |
Strong growth in the Norwegian economy |
64 |
30% |
0.30046948 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
3.3% |
0.03286385 |
98 |
Not asked |
8302 |
|
NA |
w03_pad320
Variable label:
|
Positive or negative impression of NAV
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative is your impression of NAV?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
39 |
1.3% |
0.01332422 |
2 |
Positive |
423 |
14.5% |
0.14451657 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
556 |
19% |
0.18995559 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
646 |
22.1% |
0.22070379 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
692 |
23.6% |
0.23641954 |
6 |
Negative |
307 |
10.5% |
0.10488555 |
7 |
Very negative |
162 |
5.5% |
0.05534677 |
97 |
No answer |
102 |
3.5% |
0.03484797 |
98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_pad321
Variable label:
|
Been in personal contact with NAV
|
Literal question:
|
Have you personally been in contact with NAV?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1669 |
57% |
0.57020840 |
2 |
No |
1162 |
39.7% |
0.39699351 |
97 |
No answer |
96 |
3.3% |
0.03279809 |
98 |
Not asked |
5588 |
|
NA |
w03_pad322_1
Variable label:
|
Proposal: The authorities propose merging your municipality of residence with one or more neighbouring municipalities
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion on the following two imaginary suggestions?
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that the authorities propose merging your municipality of residence with one or more neighbouring municipalities.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good suggestion |
185 |
11.1% |
0.11097780 |
2 |
Good suggestion |
419 |
25.1% |
0.25134973 |
3 |
Somewhat good suggestion |
240 |
14.4% |
0.14397121 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad suggestion |
281 |
16.9% |
0.16856629 |
5 |
Somewhat bad suggestion |
164 |
9.8% |
0.09838032 |
6 |
Bad suggestion |
170 |
10.2% |
0.10197960 |
7 |
Very bad suggestion |
163 |
9.8% |
0.09778044 |
97 |
No answer |
45 |
2.7% |
0.02699460 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad322_2
Variable label:
|
Proposal: Your municipality proposes to supply, to a greater extent than it does currently, the municipal services in cooperation with one or more neighbouring municipalities
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion on the following two imaginary suggestions?
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that your municipality proposes to supply, to a greater extent than it does currently, the municipal services in cooperation with one or more neighbouring municipalities.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good suggestion |
191 |
11.5% |
0.11457708 |
2 |
Good suggestion |
504 |
30.2% |
0.30233953 |
3 |
Somewhat good suggestion |
332 |
19.9% |
0.19916017 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad suggestion |
262 |
15.7% |
0.15716857 |
5 |
Somewhat bad suggestion |
134 |
8% |
0.08038392 |
6 |
Bad suggestion |
103 |
6.2% |
0.06178764 |
7 |
Very bad suggestion |
78 |
4.7% |
0.04679064 |
97 |
No answer |
63 |
3.8% |
0.03779244 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad323
Variable label:
|
Willing to pay an extra NOK 1,000 in tax per year to maintain the current municipal structure
|
Literal question:
|
Some estimates suggest that the current municipal structure is causing society extra expense. If you could choose, are you willing to pay an extra NOK 1,000 in tax per year to maintain the current municipal structure?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
379 |
22.7% |
0.22735453 |
2 |
No |
882 |
52.9% |
0.52909418 |
97 |
No answer |
39 |
2.3% |
0.02339532 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
367 |
22% |
0.22015597 |
w03_pad325_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Inter-municipal cooperation increases the quality of public services
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with these two statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Cooperation between the municipalities on the supply of services (inter-municipal cooperation) gives better quality than if individual municipalities supply the services themselves
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
194 |
11.6% |
0.11637672 |
2 |
Agree |
478 |
28.7% |
0.28674265 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
406 |
24.4% |
0.24355129 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
300 |
18% |
0.17996401 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
109 |
6.5% |
0.06538692 |
6 |
Disagree |
91 |
5.5% |
0.05458908 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
29 |
1.7% |
0.01739652 |
97 |
No answer |
60 |
3.6% |
0.03599280 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad325_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Inter-municipal cooperation makes it harder for voters to know who is responsible for the contents of the policies that are implemented
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with these two statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Inter-municipal cooperation makes it harder for voters to know who is responsible for the contents of the policies that are implemented
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
70 |
4.2% |
0.04199160 |
2 |
Agree |
255 |
15.3% |
0.15296941 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
456 |
27.4% |
0.27354529 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
407 |
24.4% |
0.24415117 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
169 |
10.1% |
0.10137972 |
6 |
Disagree |
187 |
11.2% |
0.11217756 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
2.8% |
0.02759448 |
97 |
No answer |
77 |
4.6% |
0.04619076 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_pad327
Variable label:
|
What do you think results in the best services for you and your municipality?
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think results in the best services for you and your municipality?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
That the municipality supplies the services itself |
362 |
21.7% |
0.2171566 |
2 |
That the municipality cooperates more with other municipalities |
667 |
40% |
0.4001200 |
3 |
That the municipality merges with other municipalities |
382 |
22.9% |
0.2291542 |
97 |
No answer |
45 |
2.7% |
0.0269946 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
211 |
12.7% |
0.1265747 |
w03_ran19
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1643] [Invalid:6872] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
391 |
23.8% |
0.2379793 |
2 |
2 |
381 |
23.2% |
0.2318929 |
3 |
3 |
443 |
27% |
0.2696287 |
4 |
4 |
428 |
26% |
0.2604991 |
Sysmiss |
|
6872 |
|
NA |
w03_aq3a
Variable label:
|
Statement: Most men are better suited emotionally for politics than are most women.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Most men are better suited emotionally for politics than are most women.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran19=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agree |
46 |
11.8% |
0.11764706 |
2 |
Disagree |
340 |
87% |
0.86956522 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.3% |
0.01278772 |
98 |
Not asked |
8124 |
|
NA |
w03_aq3b
Variable label:
|
Statement: Most men are not better suited emotionally for politics than are most women.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Most men are not better suited emotionally for politics than are most women.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran19=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agree |
301 |
79% |
0.79002625 |
2 |
Disagree |
70 |
18.4% |
0.18372703 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
2.6% |
0.02624672 |
98 |
Not asked |
8134 |
|
NA |
w03_aq3c
Variable label:
|
Men and women, who is better suited emotionally for politics
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most men are better suited emotionally for politics than are most women, that men and women are equally suited, or that women are better suited than men in this area?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran19=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Men are better suited |
17 |
3.8% |
0.03837472 |
2 |
Men and women equally |
411 |
92.8% |
0.92776524 |
3 |
Women are better suited |
7 |
1.6% |
0.01580135 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.8% |
0.01805869 |
98 |
Not asked |
8072 |
|
NA |
w03_aq3d
Variable label:
|
Women and men, who is better suited emotionally for politics
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most women are better suited emotionally for politics than are most men, that men and women are equally suited, or that men are better suited than women in this area?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran19=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Women are better suited |
15 |
3.5% |
0.035046729 |
2 |
Men and women equally |
395 |
92.3% |
0.922897196 |
3 |
Men are better suited |
14 |
3.3% |
0.032710280 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.9% |
0.009345794 |
98 |
Not asked |
8087 |
|
NA |
w03_ran20
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1638] [Invalid:6877] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
828 |
50.5% |
0.5054945 |
2 |
2 |
810 |
49.5% |
0.4945055 |
Sysmiss |
|
6877 |
|
NA |
w03_qw1a
Variable label:
|
Person with anti-religious attitudes, allow the freedom to speak
|
Literal question:
|
There are some people who are against all churches and religion. If such a person wanted to make a speech in your (city/town/community) against churches and religion, should he be allowed the freedom to speak, or not?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, allowed to speak |
701 |
84.7% |
0.84661836 |
2 |
Not, not allowed |
106 |
12.8% |
0.12801932 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.5% |
0.02536232 |
98 |
Not asked |
7687 |
|
NA |
w03_qw1b
Variable label:
|
Person with anti-religious attitudes, allowed to speak
|
Literal question:
|
There are some people who are against all churches and religion. If such a person wanted to make a speech in your (city/town/community) against churches and religion, should he be allowed to speak, or not?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran20=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, allowed to speak |
671 |
82.8% |
0.82839506 |
2 |
Not, not allowed |
119 |
14.7% |
0.14691358 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
2.5% |
0.02469136 |
98 |
Not asked |
7705 |
|
NA |
w03_ran21
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1636] [Invalid:6879] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
793 |
48.5% |
0.4847188 |
2 |
2 |
843 |
51.5% |
0.5152812 |
Sysmiss |
|
6879 |
|
NA |
w03_ro4a
Variable label:
|
Average temperatures around the world higher in the last three years than before that, lower, or about the same
|
Literal question:
|
As far as you know, would you say that average temperatures around the world have been higher in the last three years than before that, lower, or about the same?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Higher |
623 |
78.6% |
0.785624212 |
2 |
Lower |
7 |
0.9% |
0.008827238 |
3 |
About the same |
147 |
18.5% |
0.185372005 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
2% |
0.020176545 |
98 |
Not asked |
7722 |
|
NA |
w03_ro4b
Variable label:
|
Average temperatures around the world lower in the last three years than before that, higher, or about the same
|
Literal question:
|
As far as you know, would you say that average temperatures around the world have been lower in the last three years than before that, higher, or about the same?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Higher |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01779359 |
2 |
Lower |
666 |
79% |
0.79003559 |
3 |
About the same |
140 |
16.6% |
0.16607355 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
2.6% |
0.02609727 |
98 |
Not asked |
7672 |
|
NA |
w03_ran22
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1636] [Invalid:6879] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
424 |
25.9% |
0.2591687 |
2 |
2 |
401 |
24.5% |
0.2451100 |
3 |
3 |
391 |
23.9% |
0.2389976 |
4 |
4 |
420 |
25.7% |
0.2567237 |
Sysmiss |
|
6879 |
|
NA |
w03_qb1a
Variable label:
|
Serious fuel shortage this winter: Law requiring people to lower the heat in their homes, or oppose such law
|
Literal question:
|
If there is a serious fuel shortage this winter, do you think there should be a law requiring people to lower the heat in their homes, or do you oppose such law?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran22=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be a law |
134 |
31.6% |
0.31603774 |
2 |
Oppose such a law |
275 |
64.9% |
0.64858491 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
3.5% |
0.03537736 |
98 |
Not asked |
8091 |
|
NA |
w03_qb1b
Variable label:
|
Serious fuel shortage this winter: Law requiring people to lower the heat in their homes
|
Literal question:
|
If there is a serious fuel shortage this winter, do you think there should be a law requiring people to lower the heat in their homes?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran22=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, should be a law |
107 |
26.7% |
0.26683292 |
2 |
No, not a law |
282 |
70.3% |
0.70324190 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
3% |
0.02992519 |
98 |
Not asked |
8114 |
|
NA |
w03_qb1c
Variable label:
|
Serious fuel shortage this winter: Law requiring people to lower the heat in their homes, or oppose such a law because it would be too difficult to enforce
|
Literal question:
|
If there is a serious fuel shortage this winter, do you think there should be a law requiring people to lower the heat in their homes, or do you oppose such a law because it would be too difficult to enforce?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran22=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be a law |
93 |
23.8% |
0.23785166 |
2 |
Oppose such a law |
285 |
72.9% |
0.72890026 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
3.3% |
0.03324808 |
98 |
Not asked |
8124 |
|
NA |
w03_qb1d
Variable label:
|
Serious fuel shortage this winter: Law requiring people to lower the heat in their homes, oppose or should there be such a law
|
Literal question:
|
If there is a serious fuel shortage this winter, do you oppose that there should be a law requiring people to lower the heat in their homes, or do you think there should be such law?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran22=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oppose such a law |
237 |
56.4% |
0.56428571 |
2 |
Should be a law |
177 |
42.1% |
0.42142857 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.4% |
0.01428571 |
98 |
Not asked |
8095 |
|
NA |
w03_ran23
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1634] [Invalid:6881] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
802 |
49.1% |
0.4908201 |
2 |
2 |
832 |
50.9% |
0.5091799 |
Sysmiss |
|
6881 |
|
NA |
w03_qo11a
Variable label:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she is married and does not want any more children?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she is married and does not want any more children?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran23=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
668 |
83.3% |
0.83291771 |
2 |
No |
110 |
13.7% |
0.13715711 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
3% |
0.02992519 |
98 |
Not asked |
7713 |
|
NA |
w03_qo12a
Variable label:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran23=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
688 |
85.8% |
0.85785536 |
2 |
No |
82 |
10.2% |
0.10224439 |
97 |
No answer |
32 |
4% |
0.03990025 |
98 |
Not asked |
7713 |
|
NA |
w03_qo12b
Variable label:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if there is a strong chance of serious defect in the baby?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran23=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
695 |
83.5% |
0.83533654 |
2 |
No |
114 |
13.7% |
0.13701923 |
97 |
No answer |
23 |
2.8% |
0.02764423 |
98 |
Not asked |
7683 |
|
NA |
w03_qo11b
Variable label:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she is married and does not want any more children?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it should be possible for a pregnant woman to obtain a legal abortion if she is married and does not want any more children?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran23=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
606 |
72.8% |
0.7283654 |
2 |
No |
200 |
24% |
0.2403846 |
97 |
No answer |
26 |
3.1% |
0.0312500 |
98 |
Not asked |
7683 |
|
NA |
w03_ran24
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1633] [Invalid:6882] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
836 |
51.2% |
0.5119412 |
2 |
2 |
797 |
48.8% |
0.4880588 |
Sysmiss |
|
6882 |
|
NA |
w03_ro6a
Variable label:
|
Agreee or disagree: Inequality continues to exist because it benefits the rich and powerful
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree that inequality continues to exist because it benefits the rich and powerful? Would you say…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran24=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
141 |
16.9% |
0.16866029 |
2 |
Agree |
332 |
39.7% |
0.39712919 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
210 |
25.1% |
0.25119617 |
4 |
Disagree |
102 |
12.2% |
0.12200957 |
5 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
3.7% |
0.03708134 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
2.4% |
0.02392344 |
98 |
Not asked |
7679 |
|
NA |
w03_ro6b
Variable label:
|
Disagree or agree: Inequality continues to exist because it benefits the rich and powerful
|
Literal question:
|
Do you disagree or agree that inequality continues to exist because it benefits the rich and powerful? Would you say…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran24=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly disagree |
118 |
14.8% |
0.14805521 |
2 |
Disagree |
321 |
40.3% |
0.40276035 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
201 |
25.2% |
0.25219573 |
4 |
Agree |
104 |
13% |
0.13048934 |
5 |
Strongly agree |
36 |
4.5% |
0.04516939 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.1% |
0.02132999 |
98 |
Not asked |
7718 |
|
NA |
w03_fin1
Variable label:
|
Should child benefit be increased?
|
Literal question:
|
There has recently been a discussion about if child benefit should be increased. What is your position on a proposal to increase child benefit? Should child benefit be increased?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
878 |
52.7% |
0.52669466 |
2 |
No |
680 |
40.8% |
0.40791842 |
97 |
No answer |
109 |
6.5% |
0.06538692 |
98 |
Not asked |
6848 |
|
NA |
w03_ran25
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1631] [Invalid:6884] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
819 |
50.2% |
0.5021459 |
2 |
2 |
812 |
49.8% |
0.4978541 |
Sysmiss |
|
6884 |
|
NA |
w03_fin1a
Variable label:
|
Increasing child benefit: Immigrant families are entitled to the same child benefit as Norwegian families
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now it is the case that newly arrived immigrant families are entitled to the same child benefit as Norwegian families.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you still think that child benefit should be increased?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3, FIN1=1, and ran25=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
384 |
84.8% |
0.847682119 |
2 |
No |
32 |
7.1% |
0.070640177 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002207506 |
98 |
Not asked |
8062 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
36 |
7.9% |
0.079470199 |
w03_fin1b
Variable label:
|
Increasing child benefit: Labour migrants from the EEA are entitled to the same child benefit as Norwegian families
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now it is the case that labour migrants from the European Economic Area are entitled to the same child benefit as Norwegian families even if they have children living in their home countries.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you still think that child benefit should be increased?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3, FIN1=1, and ran25=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
238 |
56% |
0.560000000 |
2 |
No |
115 |
27.1% |
0.270588235 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004705882 |
98 |
Not asked |
8090 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
70 |
16.5% |
0.164705882 |
w03_fin2a
Variable label:
|
Increasing child benefit: Only for children of Norwegian citizens
|
Literal question:
|
Would you have supported the proposal to increase child benefit if the scheme only applied to children of Norwegian citizens?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3, FIN1=2, and ran25=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
29 |
3.7% |
0.03722721 |
2 |
No |
269 |
34.5% |
0.34531451 |
97 |
No answer |
453 |
58.2% |
0.58151476 |
98 |
Not asked |
7736 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
28 |
3.6% |
0.03594352 |
w03_fin2b
Variable label:
|
Increasing child benefit: Only for children living in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Would you have supported the proposal to increase child benefit if the scheme only applied to children living in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom U=3, FIN1=2, og ran25=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
68 |
8.8% |
0.08751609 |
2 |
No |
222 |
28.6% |
0.28571429 |
97 |
No answer |
425 |
54.7% |
0.54697555 |
98 |
Not asked |
7738 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
62 |
8% |
0.07979408 |
w03_ran30
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1631] [Invalid:6884] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
812 |
49.8% |
0.4978541 |
2 |
2 |
819 |
50.2% |
0.5021459 |
Sysmiss |
|
6884 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc5
Variable label:
|
Number of conditions that are upsetting [List 2]
|
Literal question:
|
Indicate how many of these four situations upset you. We are only interested in how many upset you, not which ones.
That new Norwegian roads are often funded by collecting tolls That sportspeople earn tens of millions of kroner That many do not believe in climate change caused by human activities That we have to pay the NRK licence fee That those who are ill due to smoking receive treatment that is equally good and expensive as non-smoking patients
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran30=1. The situations in R3CC5 are listed in a randomized order. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
58 |
7.1% |
0.07142857 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
2 |
2 |
193 |
23.8% |
0.23768473 |
3 |
3 |
266 |
32.8% |
0.32758621 |
4 |
4 |
191 |
23.5% |
0.23522167 |
5 |
5 |
63 |
7.8% |
0.07758621 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01847291 |
98 |
Not asked |
7703 |
|
NA |
6 |
6 |
26 |
3.2% |
0.03201970 |
w03_r3cc6
Variable label:
|
Number of conditions that are upsetting [List 3]
|
Literal question:
|
Indicate how many of these four situations upset you. We are only interested in how many upset you, not which ones.
That new Norwegian roads are often funded by collecting tolls That sportspeople earn tens of millions of kroner That many do not believe in climate change caused by human activities That we have to pay the NRK licence fee That begging is legal in Norway
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran30=2. The situations in R3CC6 are listed in a randomized order. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
33 |
4% |
0.04029304 |
1 |
1 |
169 |
20.6% |
0.20634921 |
2 |
2 |
224 |
27.4% |
0.27350427 |
3 |
3 |
209 |
25.5% |
0.25518926 |
4 |
4 |
117 |
14.3% |
0.14285714 |
5 |
5 |
51 |
6.2% |
0.06227106 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
2% |
0.01953602 |
98 |
Not asked |
7696 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv1
Variable label:
|
Advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants settle here
|
Literal question:
|
Now we will ask some questions on immigration and integration. In your opinion, how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants settle here?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very great advantage |
56 |
3.3% |
0.03252033 |
2 |
Great advantage |
304 |
17.7% |
0.17653891 |
3 |
An advantage to some extent |
658 |
38.2% |
0.38211382 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
224 |
13% |
0.13008130 |
5 |
A disadvantage to some extent |
301 |
17.5% |
0.17479675 |
6 |
Great disadvantage |
93 |
5.4% |
0.05400697 |
7 |
Very great disadvantage |
52 |
3% |
0.03019744 |
97 |
No answer |
34 |
2% |
0.01974448 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv4
Variable label:
|
How important is immigration policy to you personally?
|
Literal question:
|
How important is immigration policy to you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
195 |
11.3% |
0.11324042 |
2 |
Important |
671 |
39% |
0.38966318 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
618 |
35.9% |
0.35888502 |
4 |
Slightly important |
182 |
10.6% |
0.10569106 |
5 |
Not important at all |
33 |
1.9% |
0.01916376 |
97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.3% |
0.01335656 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv6
Variable label:
|
Party with the best immigration policy
|
Literal question:
|
What party do you think has the best immigration policy?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Labour Party |
348 |
20.2% |
0.202090592 |
2 |
The Progress Party |
360 |
20.9% |
0.209059233 |
3 |
The Conservative Party |
264 |
15.3% |
0.153310105 |
4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
117 |
6.8% |
0.067944251 |
5 |
The Centre Party |
19 |
1.1% |
0.011033682 |
6 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
82 |
4.8% |
0.047619048 |
7 |
The Liberal Party |
98 |
5.7% |
0.056910569 |
8 |
Red |
22 |
1.3% |
0.012775842 |
9 |
The Green Party |
5 |
0.3% |
0.002903600 |
10 |
Other, please specify |
16 |
0.9% |
0.009291521 |
11 |
None |
268 |
15.6% |
0.155632985 |
97 |
No answer |
123 |
7.1% |
0.071428571 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv6_10_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Party with the best immigration policy [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What party do you think has the best immigration policy?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3d7
Variable label:
|
Number of immigrants in the local neighbourhood or school district
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the people in the local neighbourhood or school district where you live, roughly how many have immigrated or have at least one parent who has immigrated?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Everyone, or almost everyone |
14 |
0.8% |
0.008130081 |
2 |
Many (more than half) |
81 |
4.7% |
0.047038328 |
3 |
About half |
136 |
7.9% |
0.078977933 |
4 |
Some (fewer than half) |
1066 |
61.9% |
0.619047619 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
369 |
21.4% |
0.214285714 |
97 |
No answer |
56 |
3.3% |
0.032520325 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv10
Variable label:
|
Number of immigrants encountered on an ordinary day
|
Literal question:
|
Think about people you meet by chance on an ordinary day, for example on the bus, in the shops or in the local neighbourhood. How often would you say that you tend to meet immigrants?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Daily |
1190 |
69.1% |
0.69105691 |
2 |
Weekly |
316 |
18.4% |
0.18350755 |
3 |
A couple of times a month |
123 |
7.1% |
0.07142857 |
4 |
Less often, but it has happened |
47 |
2.7% |
0.02729384 |
5 |
Never |
3 |
0.2% |
0.00174216 |
97 |
No answer |
43 |
2.5% |
0.02497096 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv12
Variable label:
|
Good or bad experience encountered on an ordinary day
|
Literal question:
|
How good or bad an experience have these brief, chance meetings been?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and if R3DV10 is less than 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
132 |
7.9% |
0.078758950 |
2 |
Good |
601 |
35.9% |
0.358591885 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
133 |
7.9% |
0.079355609 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
696 |
41.5% |
0.415274463 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
85 |
5.1% |
0.050715990 |
6 |
Bad |
19 |
1.1% |
0.011336516 |
7 |
Very bad |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002386635 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003579952 |
98 |
Not asked |
6839 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv14
Variable label:
|
Number of immigrants in social circle
|
Literal question:
|
How many in your social circle have immigrated to Norway or have parents (mother, father or both parents) who have immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Everyone, or almost everyone |
16 |
0.9% |
0.009291521 |
2 |
Many (more than half) |
64 |
3.7% |
0.037166086 |
3 |
About half |
68 |
3.9% |
0.039488966 |
4 |
Some (fewer than half) |
594 |
34.5% |
0.344947735 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
943 |
54.8% |
0.547619048 |
97 |
No answer |
37 |
2.1% |
0.021486643 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv29_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Begging should be prohibited in Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 or if the respondent is recruited in wave 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1000 |
24.6% |
0.24636610 |
2 |
Agree |
869 |
21.4% |
0.21409214 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
700 |
17.2% |
0.17245627 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
454 |
11.2% |
0.11185021 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
330 |
8.1% |
0.08130081 |
6 |
Disagree |
370 |
9.1% |
0.09115546 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
201 |
5% |
0.04951959 |
97 |
No answer |
135 |
3.3% |
0.03325942 |
98 |
Not asked |
4456 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv29_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norway will end up losing its identity if more Muslims come to live here
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Norway will end up losing its identity if more Muslims come to live here.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 or if the respondent is recruited in wave 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
473 |
11.7% |
0.11653117 |
2 |
Agree |
491 |
12.1% |
0.12096576 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
836 |
20.6% |
0.20596206 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
580 |
14.3% |
0.14289234 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
490 |
12.1% |
0.12071939 |
6 |
Disagree |
732 |
18% |
0.18033999 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
324 |
8% |
0.07982262 |
97 |
No answer |
133 |
3.3% |
0.03276669 |
98 |
Not asked |
4456 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv29_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in the world than to people in this country
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in the world than to people in this country.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 or if the respondent is recruited in wave 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
416 |
10.2% |
0.10248830 |
2 |
Agree |
671 |
16.5% |
0.16531165 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
810 |
20% |
0.19955654 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1191 |
29.3% |
0.29342203 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
346 |
8.5% |
0.08524267 |
6 |
Disagree |
366 |
9% |
0.09016999 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
106 |
2.6% |
0.02611481 |
97 |
No answer |
153 |
3.8% |
0.03769401 |
98 |
Not asked |
4456 |
|
NA |
w03_ran26
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1706] [Invalid:6809] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
874 |
51.2% |
0.5123095 |
2 |
2 |
832 |
48.8% |
0.4876905 |
Sysmiss |
|
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv30a
Variable label:
|
Muslim immigrants to Norway are entitled to have their traditions and cultures protected
|
Literal question:
|
Muslim immigrants to Norway are entitled to have their traditions and cultures protected.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran26=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
33 |
3.8% |
0.03775744 |
2 |
Agree |
132 |
15.1% |
0.15102975 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
229 |
26.2% |
0.26201373 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
125 |
14.3% |
0.14302059 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
150 |
17.2% |
0.17162471 |
6 |
Disagree |
102 |
11.7% |
0.11670481 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
89 |
10.2% |
0.10183066 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.6% |
0.01601831 |
98 |
Not asked |
7641 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv30b
Variable label:
|
Muslim immigrants to Norway are entitled to have their traditions and cultures respected
|
Literal question:
|
Muslim immigrants to Norway are entitled to have their traditions and cultures respected.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran26=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
68 |
8.2% |
0.08173077 |
2 |
Agree |
223 |
26.8% |
0.26802885 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
243 |
29.2% |
0.29206731 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
79 |
9.5% |
0.09495192 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
107 |
12.9% |
0.12860577 |
6 |
Disagree |
47 |
5.6% |
0.05649038 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
56 |
6.7% |
0.06730769 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01081731 |
98 |
Not asked |
7683 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv35_1
Variable label:
|
Personal description: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions suit you:
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
302 |
17.5% |
0.17537747 |
2 |
Well |
591 |
34.3% |
0.34320557 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
326 |
18.9% |
0.18931475 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
297 |
17.2% |
0.17247387 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
83 |
4.8% |
0.04819977 |
6 |
Poorly |
34 |
2% |
0.01974448 |
7 |
Very poorly |
25 |
1.5% |
0.01451800 |
97 |
No answer |
64 |
3.7% |
0.03716609 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv35_2
Variable label:
|
Personal description: I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions suit you:
|
Literal question:
|
I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
369 |
21.4% |
0.21428571 |
2 |
Well |
565 |
32.8% |
0.32810685 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
236 |
13.7% |
0.13704994 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
307 |
17.8% |
0.17828107 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
83 |
4.8% |
0.04819977 |
6 |
Poorly |
47 |
2.7% |
0.02729384 |
7 |
Very poorly |
36 |
2.1% |
0.02090592 |
97 |
No answer |
79 |
4.6% |
0.04587689 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv35_3
Variable label:
|
Personal description: I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions suit you:
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
99 |
5.7% |
0.05749129 |
2 |
Well |
228 |
13.2% |
0.13240418 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
263 |
15.3% |
0.15272938 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
468 |
27.2% |
0.27177700 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
171 |
9.9% |
0.09930314 |
6 |
Poorly |
262 |
15.2% |
0.15214866 |
7 |
Very poorly |
154 |
8.9% |
0.08943089 |
97 |
No answer |
77 |
4.5% |
0.04471545 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv35_4
Variable label:
|
Personal description: I try to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants due to my own convictions
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions suit you:
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants due to my own convictions.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
281 |
16.3% |
0.16318235 |
2 |
Well |
594 |
34.5% |
0.34494774 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
322 |
18.7% |
0.18699187 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
311 |
18.1% |
0.18060395 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
76 |
4.4% |
0.04413473 |
6 |
Poorly |
37 |
2.1% |
0.02148664 |
7 |
Very poorly |
28 |
1.6% |
0.01626016 |
97 |
No answer |
73 |
4.2% |
0.04239257 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv36
Variable label:
|
Was directly affected ny attack on July 22th [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
As you know, Anders Behring Breivik carried out the biggest terrorist attack on Norwegian soil during peacetime on 22 July 2011. 77 people lost their lives. Many in Norway were directly affected either because they were closely related to or knew some of the victims, or were close to what happened in another way. What about you, were you directly affected?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents where U=4] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:8515] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3dv36_5_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Was directly affected ny attack on July 22th [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
As you know, Anders Behring Breivik carried out the biggest terrorist attack on Norwegian soil during peacetime on 22 July 2011. 77 people lost their lives. Many in Norway were directly affected either because they were closely related to or knew some of the victims, or were close to what happened in another way. What about you, were you directly affected?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents where U=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3dv37_1
Variable label:
|
Reaction: I remember where I was when I heard the news
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many had strong reactions in the wake of the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions match your reaction, as you remember it?
|
Literal question:
|
I remember where I was when I heard the news.
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents where U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
852 |
75.3% |
0.75265018 |
2 |
Well |
134 |
11.8% |
0.11837456 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
37 |
3.3% |
0.03268551 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
26 |
2.3% |
0.02296820 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
19 |
1.7% |
0.01678445 |
6 |
Poorly |
23 |
2% |
0.02031802 |
7 |
Very poorly |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01413428 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
2.2% |
0.02208481 |
98 |
Not asked |
7383 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv37_2
Variable label:
|
Reaction: I remember who I was with when I heard the news
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many had strong reactions in the wake of the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions match your reaction, as you remember it?
|
Literal question:
|
I remember who I was with when I heard the news.
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents where U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
825 |
72.9% |
0.72879859 |
2 |
Well |
128 |
11.3% |
0.11307420 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
39 |
3.4% |
0.03445230 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
38 |
3.4% |
0.03356890 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
24 |
2.1% |
0.02120141 |
6 |
Poorly |
32 |
2.8% |
0.02826855 |
7 |
Very poorly |
17 |
1.5% |
0.01501767 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
2.6% |
0.02561837 |
98 |
Not asked |
7383 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv37_3
Variable label:
|
Reaction: I discussed 22 July with friends and acquaintances
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many had strong reactions in the wake of the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions match your reaction, as you remember it?
|
Literal question:
|
I discussed 22 July with friends and acquaintances.
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents where U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
779 |
68.8% |
0.688162544 |
2 |
Well |
190 |
16.8% |
0.167844523 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
68 |
6% |
0.060070671 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
28 |
2.5% |
0.024734982 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
12 |
1.1% |
0.010600707 |
6 |
Poorly |
18 |
1.6% |
0.015901060 |
7 |
Very poorly |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005300353 |
97 |
No answer |
31 |
2.7% |
0.027385159 |
98 |
Not asked |
7383 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv371
Variable label:
|
Participated in commemorations in the wake of the terrorist attacks
|
Literal question:
|
Did you participate in commemorations in the wake of the terrorist attacks?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents where U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
318 |
28.1% |
0.28091873 |
2 |
No |
797 |
70.4% |
0.70406360 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
1.5% |
0.01501767 |
98 |
Not asked |
7383 |
|
NA |
w03_r3dv39
Variable label:
|
Currently think about, read or talk about something that is related to 22 July
|
Literal question:
|
It’s now been more than three years since the attacks. When it comes to you personally, how often would you say that you now think about, read or talk about something that is related to 22 July?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Daily |
11 |
0.6% |
0.006387921 |
2 |
Weekly |
142 |
8.2% |
0.082462253 |
3 |
A couple of times a month |
463 |
26.9% |
0.268873403 |
4 |
Less often, but it happens |
982 |
57% |
0.570267131 |
5 |
Never |
92 |
5.3% |
0.053426249 |
97 |
No answer |
32 |
1.9% |
0.018583043 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_ran27
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1706] [Invalid:6809] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
574 |
33.6% |
0.3364596 |
2 |
2 |
557 |
32.6% |
0.3264947 |
3 |
3 |
575 |
33.7% |
0.3370457 |
Sysmiss |
|
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2a_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Labour migration from Eastern Europe strengthens the Norwegian economy
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migration from Eastern Europe strengthens the Norwegian economy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
30 |
5.2% |
0.05226481 |
2 |
Agree |
111 |
19.3% |
0.19337979 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
152 |
26.5% |
0.26480836 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
137 |
23.9% |
0.23867596 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
60 |
10.5% |
0.10452962 |
6 |
Disagree |
47 |
8.2% |
0.08188153 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
28 |
4.9% |
0.04878049 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.6% |
0.01567944 |
98 |
Not asked |
7941 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2a_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Labour migrants misuse the Norwegian welfare benefits
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants misuse the Norwegian welfare benefits
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
45 |
7.8% |
0.07839721 |
2 |
Agree |
87 |
15.2% |
0.15156794 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
185 |
32.2% |
0.32229965 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
114 |
19.9% |
0.19860627 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
65 |
11.3% |
0.11324042 |
6 |
Disagree |
57 |
9.9% |
0.09930314 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
2.1% |
0.02090592 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.6% |
0.01567944 |
98 |
Not asked |
7941 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2a_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Labour migrants should not get the same access to national insurance benefits as Norwegians do
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants should not get the same access to national insurance benefits as Norwegians do
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
71 |
12.4% |
0.12369338 |
2 |
Agree |
85 |
14.8% |
0.14808362 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
130 |
22.6% |
0.22648084 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
93 |
16.2% |
0.16202091 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
73 |
12.7% |
0.12717770 |
6 |
Disagree |
84 |
14.6% |
0.14634146 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
26 |
4.5% |
0.04529617 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
2.1% |
0.02090592 |
98 |
Not asked |
7941 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2a_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: The government should use less money on national insurance benefits
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
The government should use less money on national insurance benefits
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
30 |
5.2% |
0.05226481 |
2 |
Agree |
63 |
11% |
0.10975610 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
120 |
20.9% |
0.20905923 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
105 |
18.3% |
0.18292683 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
91 |
15.9% |
0.15853659 |
6 |
Disagree |
107 |
18.6% |
0.18641115 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
8% |
0.08013937 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
2.1% |
0.02090592 |
98 |
Not asked |
7941 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2b_1
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the negativ press: Labour migration from Eastern Europe strengthens the Norwegian economy
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migrants from the European Economic Area are entitled to the same national insurance rights as Norwegian citizens. Many choose to send these benefits back to their home countries. Then we are talking quite simply about the export of national insurance benefits. If this is allowed to continue, people’s confidence in the welfare state will crumble away.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migration from Eastern Europe strengthens the Norwegian economy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
24 |
4.3% |
0.04308797 |
2 |
Agree |
120 |
21.5% |
0.21543986 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
159 |
28.5% |
0.28545781 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
113 |
20.3% |
0.20287253 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
52 |
9.3% |
0.09335727 |
6 |
Disagree |
46 |
8.3% |
0.08258528 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
27 |
4.8% |
0.04847397 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.9% |
0.02872531 |
98 |
Not asked |
7958 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2b_2
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the negativ press: Labour migrants misuse the Norwegian welfare benefits
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migrants from the European Economic Area are entitled to the same national insurance rights as Norwegian citizens. Many choose to send these benefits back to their home countries. Then we are talking quite simply about the export of national insurance benefits. If this is allowed to continue, people’s confidence in the welfare state will crumble away.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants from Eastern Europe misuse the Norwegian welfare benefits
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
52 |
9.3% |
0.093357271 |
2 |
Agree |
99 |
17.8% |
0.177737882 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
181 |
32.5% |
0.324955117 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
125 |
22.4% |
0.224416517 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
45 |
8.1% |
0.080789946 |
6 |
Disagree |
34 |
6.1% |
0.061041293 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
0.9% |
0.008976661 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.9% |
0.028725314 |
98 |
Not asked |
7958 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2b_3
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the negativ press: Labour migrants should not get the same access to national insurance benefits as Norwegians do
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migrants from the European Economic Area are entitled to the same national insurance rights as Norwegian citizens. Many choose to send these benefits back to their home countries. Then we are talking quite simply about the export of national insurance benefits. If this is allowed to continue, people’s confidence in the welfare state will crumble away.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants from Eastern Europe should not get the same access to national insurance benefits as Norwegians have
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
69 |
12.4% |
0.12387792 |
2 |
Agree |
91 |
16.3% |
0.16337522 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
115 |
20.6% |
0.20646320 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
99 |
17.8% |
0.17773788 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
80 |
14.4% |
0.14362657 |
6 |
Disagree |
66 |
11.8% |
0.11849192 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
2.7% |
0.02692998 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
3.9% |
0.03949731 |
98 |
Not asked |
7958 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2b_4
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the negativ press: The government should use less money on national insurance benefits
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migrants from the European Economic Area are entitled to the same national insurance rights as Norwegian citizens. Many choose to send these benefits back to their home countries. Then we are talking quite simply about the export of national insurance benefits. If this is allowed to continue, people’s confidence in the welfare state will crumble away.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
The government should use less money on national insurance benefits
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
38 |
6.8% |
0.06822262 |
2 |
Agree |
67 |
12% |
0.12028725 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
125 |
22.4% |
0.22441652 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
114 |
20.5% |
0.20466786 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
66 |
11.8% |
0.11849192 |
6 |
Disagree |
95 |
17.1% |
0.17055655 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
29 |
5.2% |
0.05206463 |
97 |
No answer |
23 |
4.1% |
0.04129264 |
98 |
Not asked |
7958 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2c_1
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the positive press: Labour migration from Eastern Europe strengthens the Norwegian economy
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migration from Eastern Europe has been good for Norway. We lack manpower. Without foreign workers there were many important tasks that would not have been resolved. We think that the government’s efforts to make it easier for foreigners to take work in Norway are important.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migration from Eastern Europe strengthens the Norwegian economy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
34 |
5.9% |
0.05913043 |
2 |
Agree |
157 |
27.3% |
0.27304348 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
173 |
30.1% |
0.30086957 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
98 |
17% |
0.17043478 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
48 |
8.3% |
0.08347826 |
6 |
Disagree |
34 |
5.9% |
0.05913043 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
3.7% |
0.03652174 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.7% |
0.01739130 |
98 |
Not asked |
7940 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2c_2
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the positive press: Labour migrants misuse the Norwegian welfare benefits
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migration from Eastern Europe has been good for Norway. We lack manpower. Without foreign workers there were many important tasks that would not have been resolved. We think that the government’s efforts to make it easier for foreigners to take work in Norway are important.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants from Eastern Europe misuse the Norwegian welfare benefits
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
58 |
10.1% |
0.10086957 |
2 |
Agree |
73 |
12.7% |
0.12695652 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
165 |
28.7% |
0.28695652 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
131 |
22.8% |
0.22782609 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
68 |
11.8% |
0.11826087 |
6 |
Disagree |
61 |
10.6% |
0.10608696 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
10 |
1.7% |
0.01739130 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.6% |
0.01565217 |
98 |
Not asked |
7940 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2c_3
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the positive press: Labour migrants should not get the same access to national insurance benefits as Norwegians do
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migration from Eastern Europe has been good for Norway. We lack manpower. Without foreign workers there were many important tasks that would not have been resolved. We think that the government’s efforts to make it easier for foreigners to take work in Norway are important.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants from Eastern Europe should not get the same access to national insurance benefits as Norwegians have
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
69 |
12% |
0.12000000 |
2 |
Agree |
72 |
12.5% |
0.12521739 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
133 |
23.1% |
0.23130435 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
102 |
17.7% |
0.17739130 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
89 |
15.5% |
0.15478261 |
6 |
Disagree |
78 |
13.6% |
0.13565217 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
3.7% |
0.03652174 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.9% |
0.01913043 |
98 |
Not asked |
7940 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc2c_4
Variable label:
|
Statement, given the positive press: The government should use less money on national insurance benefits
|
Pre-question text:
|
Not long ago, a national newspaper wrote the following:
“Labour migration from Eastern Europe has been good for Norway. We lack manpower. Without foreign workers there were many important tasks that would not have been resolved. We think that the government’s efforts to make it easier for foreigners to take work in Norway are important.”
To what extent do you agree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
The government should use less money on national insurance benefits
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
42 |
7.3% |
0.07304348 |
2 |
Agree |
87 |
15.1% |
0.15130435 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
115 |
20% |
0.20000000 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
128 |
22.3% |
0.22260870 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
76 |
13.2% |
0.13217391 |
6 |
Disagree |
77 |
13.4% |
0.13391304 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
38 |
6.6% |
0.06608696 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
2.1% |
0.02086957 |
98 |
Not asked |
7940 |
|
NA |
w03_ran28
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1703] [Invalid:6812] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
554 |
32.5% |
0.3253083 |
2 |
2 |
566 |
33.2% |
0.3323547 |
3 |
3 |
583 |
34.2% |
0.3423371 |
Sysmiss |
|
6812 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3a
Variable label:
|
National insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security: How much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian national insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security. All in all, how much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
45 |
8.1% |
0.08122744 |
2 |
A bit more money |
192 |
34.7% |
0.34657040 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
243 |
43.9% |
0.43862816 |
4 |
A bit less money |
62 |
11.2% |
0.11191336 |
5 |
Much less money |
6 |
1.1% |
0.01083032 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.1% |
0.01083032 |
98 |
Not asked |
7961 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3aa_1
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social goals: Social assistance
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following social goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Social assistance
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
34 |
6.1% |
0.06137184 |
2 |
A bit more money |
174 |
31.4% |
0.31407942 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
246 |
44.4% |
0.44404332 |
4 |
A bit less money |
78 |
14.1% |
0.14079422 |
5 |
Much less money |
14 |
2.5% |
0.02527076 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.4% |
0.01444043 |
98 |
Not asked |
7961 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3aa_2
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social goals: Unemployment benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following social goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
17 |
3.1% |
0.03068592 |
2 |
A bit more money |
124 |
22.4% |
0.22382671 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
290 |
52.3% |
0.52346570 |
4 |
A bit less money |
96 |
17.3% |
0.17328520 |
5 |
Much less money |
16 |
2.9% |
0.02888087 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
2% |
0.01985560 |
98 |
Not asked |
7961 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3aa_3
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social goals: Disability benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following social goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Disability benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
43 |
7.8% |
0.07761733 |
2 |
A bit more money |
176 |
31.8% |
0.31768953 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
224 |
40.4% |
0.40433213 |
4 |
A bit less money |
85 |
15.3% |
0.15342960 |
5 |
Much less money |
15 |
2.7% |
0.02707581 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
2% |
0.01985560 |
98 |
Not asked |
7961 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3aa_4
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social goals: Cash-for-care benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following social goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Cash-for-care benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
14 |
2.5% |
0.02527076 |
2 |
A bit more money |
68 |
12.3% |
0.12274368 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
194 |
35% |
0.35018051 |
4 |
A bit less money |
102 |
18.4% |
0.18411552 |
5 |
Much less money |
162 |
29.2% |
0.29241877 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
2.5% |
0.02527076 |
98 |
Not asked |
7961 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3aa_5
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social goals: Child benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following social goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
44 |
7.9% |
0.07942238 |
2 |
A bit more money |
185 |
33.4% |
0.33393502 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
245 |
44.2% |
0.44223827 |
4 |
A bit less money |
49 |
8.8% |
0.08844765 |
5 |
Much less money |
21 |
3.8% |
0.03790614 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.8% |
0.01805054 |
98 |
Not asked |
7961 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3b
Variable label:
|
National insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security, labour migrants from the EEA get the same access: How much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian national insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security. Labour migrants from the European Economic Area get the same access to the Norwegian national insurance scheme as Norwegians do.
All in all, how much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
20 |
3.5% |
0.03533569 |
2 |
A bit more money |
125 |
22.1% |
0.22084806 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
288 |
50.9% |
0.50883392 |
4 |
A bit less money |
77 |
13.6% |
0.13604240 |
5 |
Much less money |
28 |
4.9% |
0.04946996 |
97 |
No answer |
28 |
4.9% |
0.04946996 |
98 |
Not asked |
7949 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ba_1
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Social assistance
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Social assistance
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
35 |
6.2% |
0.06183746 |
2 |
A bit more money |
172 |
30.4% |
0.30388693 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
250 |
44.2% |
0.44169611 |
4 |
A bit less money |
71 |
12.5% |
0.12544170 |
5 |
Much less money |
19 |
3.4% |
0.03356890 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
3.4% |
0.03356890 |
98 |
Not asked |
7949 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ba_2
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Unemployment benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Social assistance
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
19 |
3.4% |
0.03356890 |
2 |
A bit more money |
101 |
17.8% |
0.17844523 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
316 |
55.8% |
0.55830389 |
4 |
A bit less money |
100 |
17.7% |
0.17667845 |
5 |
Much less money |
10 |
1.8% |
0.01766784 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
3.5% |
0.03533569 |
98 |
Not asked |
7949 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ba_3
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Disability benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Disability benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
38 |
6.7% |
0.06713781 |
2 |
A bit more money |
174 |
30.7% |
0.30742049 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
237 |
41.9% |
0.41872792 |
4 |
A bit less money |
71 |
12.5% |
0.12544170 |
5 |
Much less money |
23 |
4.1% |
0.04063604 |
97 |
No answer |
23 |
4.1% |
0.04063604 |
98 |
Not asked |
7949 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ba_4
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Cash-for-care benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Cash-for-care benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
15 |
2.7% |
0.02650177 |
2 |
A bit more money |
66 |
11.7% |
0.11660777 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
191 |
33.7% |
0.33745583 |
4 |
A bit less money |
116 |
20.5% |
0.20494700 |
5 |
Much less money |
155 |
27.4% |
0.27385159 |
97 |
No answer |
23 |
4.1% |
0.04063604 |
98 |
Not asked |
7949 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ba_5
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Child benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
40 |
7.1% |
0.07067138 |
2 |
A bit more money |
188 |
33.2% |
0.33215548 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
253 |
44.7% |
0.44699647 |
4 |
A bit less money |
52 |
9.2% |
0.09187279 |
5 |
Much less money |
15 |
2.7% |
0.02650177 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
3.2% |
0.03180212 |
98 |
Not asked |
7949 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3c
Variable label:
|
National insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security, asylum seekers have the same access: How much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian national insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security. Asylum seekers have the same access to the Norwegian national insurance scheme as Norwegians do as soon as they are granted asylum.
All in all, how much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
25 |
4.3% |
0.04288165 |
2 |
A bit more money |
139 |
23.8% |
0.23842196 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
274 |
47% |
0.46998285 |
4 |
A bit less money |
98 |
16.8% |
0.16809605 |
5 |
Much less money |
25 |
4.3% |
0.04288165 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
3.8% |
0.03773585 |
98 |
Not asked |
7932 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ca_1
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Social assistance
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Social assistance
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
30 |
5.1% |
0.05145798 |
2 |
A bit more money |
177 |
30.4% |
0.30360206 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
255 |
43.7% |
0.43739280 |
4 |
A bit less money |
82 |
14.1% |
0.14065180 |
5 |
Much less money |
18 |
3.1% |
0.03087479 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
3.6% |
0.03602058 |
98 |
Not asked |
7932 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ca_2
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Unemployment benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
19 |
3.3% |
0.03259005 |
2 |
A bit more money |
135 |
23.2% |
0.23156089 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
286 |
49.1% |
0.49056604 |
4 |
A bit less money |
110 |
18.9% |
0.18867925 |
5 |
Much less money |
11 |
1.9% |
0.01886792 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
3.8% |
0.03773585 |
98 |
Not asked |
7932 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ca_3
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Disability benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Disability benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
47 |
8.1% |
0.08061750 |
2 |
A bit more money |
182 |
31.2% |
0.31217839 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
231 |
39.6% |
0.39622642 |
4 |
A bit less money |
89 |
15.3% |
0.15265866 |
5 |
Much less money |
17 |
2.9% |
0.02915952 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.9% |
0.02915952 |
98 |
Not asked |
7932 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ca_4
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Cash-for-care benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Cash-for-care benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
18 |
3.1% |
0.03087479 |
2 |
A bit more money |
55 |
9.4% |
0.09433962 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
225 |
38.6% |
0.38593482 |
4 |
A bit less money |
113 |
19.4% |
0.19382504 |
5 |
Much less money |
153 |
26.2% |
0.26243568 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
3.3% |
0.03259005 |
98 |
Not asked |
7932 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_r3cc3ca_5
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Child benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
52 |
8.9% |
0.08919383 |
2 |
A bit more money |
174 |
29.8% |
0.29845626 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
267 |
45.8% |
0.45797599 |
4 |
A bit less money |
50 |
8.6% |
0.08576329 |
5 |
Much less money |
20 |
3.4% |
0.03430532 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
3.4% |
0.03430532 |
98 |
Not asked |
7932 |
|
NA |
w03_ran29
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1702] [Invalid:6813] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
818 |
48.1% |
0.480611 |
2 |
2 |
884 |
51.9% |
0.519389 |
Sysmiss |
|
6813 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4b
Variable label:
|
Number of conditions that are upsetting [List 4]
|
Literal question:
|
Indicate how many of these four situations upset you. We are only interested in how many upset you, not which ones.
That new Norwegian roads are often funded by collecting tolls That sports people earn tens of millions of kroner That many do not believe in climate change caused by human activities That we have to pay the NRK licence fee That labour migrants from EU countries have the same welfare benefits as Norwegians
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran29=1. The situations in R3CC4B are listed in a randomized order. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
29 |
3.5% |
0.03545232 |
1 |
1 |
142 |
17.4% |
0.17359413 |
2 |
2 |
252 |
30.8% |
0.30806846 |
3 |
3 |
200 |
24.4% |
0.24449878 |
4 |
4 |
134 |
16.4% |
0.16381418 |
5 |
5 |
49 |
6% |
0.05990220 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.5% |
0.01466993 |
98 |
Not asked |
7697 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4c
Variable label:
|
Number of conditions that are upsetting [List 5]
|
Literal question:
|
Indicate how many of these four situations upset you. We are only interested in how many upset you, not which ones.
That new Norwegian roads are often funded by collecting tolls That sportspeople earn tens of millions of kroner That many do not believe in climate change caused by human activities That we have to pay the NRK licence fee That refugees who have been granted asylum have the same welfare benefits as Norwegians
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran29=2. The situations in R3CC4C are listed in a randomized order. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
55 |
6.2% |
0.06221719 |
1 |
1 |
187 |
21.2% |
0.21153846 |
2 |
2 |
263 |
29.8% |
0.29751131 |
3 |
3 |
216 |
24.4% |
0.24434389 |
4 |
4 |
101 |
11.4% |
0.11425339 |
5 |
5 |
50 |
5.7% |
0.05656109 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01357466 |
98 |
Not asked |
7631 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc8_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees exploit our welfare system
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please tell us your viewpoint regarding the following statements
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees exploit our welfare system
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
195 |
11.3% |
0.11324042 |
2 |
Agree |
244 |
14.2% |
0.14169570 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
486 |
28.2% |
0.28222997 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
278 |
16.1% |
0.16144019 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
192 |
11.1% |
0.11149826 |
6 |
Disagree |
203 |
11.8% |
0.11788618 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
62 |
3.6% |
0.03600465 |
97 |
No answer |
62 |
3.6% |
0.03600465 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc8_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Labour migrants from the European Economic Area exploit our welfare system
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please tell us your viewpoint regarding the following statements
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants from the European Economic Area exploit our welfare system
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
156 |
9.1% |
0.09059233 |
2 |
Agree |
255 |
14.8% |
0.14808362 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
533 |
31% |
0.30952381 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
313 |
18.2% |
0.18176539 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
174 |
10.1% |
0.10104530 |
6 |
Disagree |
178 |
10.3% |
0.10336818 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
50 |
2.9% |
0.02903600 |
97 |
No answer |
63 |
3.7% |
0.03658537 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc8_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees contribute to maintaining our welfare system
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please tell us your viewpoint regarding the following statements
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees contribute to maintaining our welfare system
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
16 |
0.9% |
0.009291521 |
2 |
Agree |
108 |
6.3% |
0.062717770 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
265 |
15.4% |
0.153890825 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
514 |
29.8% |
0.298490128 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
318 |
18.5% |
0.184668990 |
6 |
Disagree |
283 |
16.4% |
0.164343786 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
141 |
8.2% |
0.081881533 |
97 |
No answer |
77 |
4.5% |
0.044715447 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc8_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: Labour migrants from the European Economic Area contribute to maintaining our welfare system
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please tell us your viewpoint regarding the following statements
|
Literal question:
|
Labour migrants from the European Economic Area contribute to maintaining our welfare system
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
37 |
2.1% |
0.02148664 |
2 |
Agree |
238 |
13.8% |
0.13821138 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
469 |
27.2% |
0.27235772 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
457 |
26.5% |
0.26538908 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
216 |
12.5% |
0.12543554 |
6 |
Disagree |
158 |
9.2% |
0.09175377 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
71 |
4.1% |
0.04123113 |
97 |
No answer |
76 |
4.4% |
0.04413473 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc8_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is fair that refugees have full access to the Norwegian welfare system.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please tell us your viewpoint regarding the following statements
|
Literal question:
|
It is fair that refugees have full access to the Norwegian welfare system.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
90 |
5.2% |
0.05226481 |
2 |
Agree |
264 |
15.3% |
0.15331010 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
277 |
16.1% |
0.16085947 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
253 |
14.7% |
0.14692218 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
388 |
22.5% |
0.22531940 |
6 |
Disagree |
214 |
12.4% |
0.12427410 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
166 |
9.6% |
0.09639954 |
97 |
No answer |
70 |
4.1% |
0.04065041 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc8_6
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is fair that labour migrants from the European Economic Area have full access to the Norwegian welfare system.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please tell us your viewpoint regarding the following statements
|
Literal question:
|
It is fair that labour migrants from the European Economic Area have full access to the Norwegian welfare system.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
72 |
4.2% |
0.04181185 |
2 |
Agree |
242 |
14.1% |
0.14053426 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
328 |
19% |
0.19047619 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
288 |
16.7% |
0.16724739 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
364 |
21.1% |
0.21138211 |
6 |
Disagree |
209 |
12.1% |
0.12137050 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
147 |
8.5% |
0.08536585 |
97 |
No answer |
72 |
4.2% |
0.04181185 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_ran31
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1698] [Invalid:6817] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
415 |
24.4% |
0.2444052 |
2 |
2 |
431 |
25.4% |
0.2538280 |
3 |
3 |
433 |
25.5% |
0.2550059 |
4 |
4 |
419 |
24.7% |
0.2467609 |
Sysmiss |
|
6817 |
|
NA |
w03_r3ib1a
Variable label:
|
Access to welfare: Immigrants who are not Norwegian citizens, but who live in Norway, should have the same access to welfare schemes as Norwegian citizens
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that immigrants who are not Norwegian citizens, but who live in Norway, should have the same access to welfare schemes as Norwegian citizens?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran31=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
35 |
8.4% |
0.08433735 |
2 |
Agree |
71 |
17.1% |
0.17108434 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
88 |
21.2% |
0.21204819 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
40 |
9.6% |
0.09638554 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
73 |
17.6% |
0.17590361 |
6 |
Disagree |
55 |
13.3% |
0.13253012 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
43 |
10.4% |
0.10361446 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
2.4% |
0.02409639 |
98 |
Not asked |
8100 |
|
NA |
w03_r3ib1b
Variable label:
|
Access to welfare: Immigrants who are not Norwegian citizens, but who have lived in Norway for the last year, should have the same access to welfare schemes as Norwegian citizens
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that immigrants who are not Norwegian citizens, but who have lived in Norway for the last year, should have the same access to welfare schemes as Norwegian citizens?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran31=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
3.2% |
0.03248260 |
2 |
Agree |
73 |
16.9% |
0.16937355 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
67 |
15.5% |
0.15545244 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
49 |
11.4% |
0.11368910 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
96 |
22.3% |
0.22273782 |
6 |
Disagree |
72 |
16.7% |
0.16705336 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
52 |
12.1% |
0.12064965 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.9% |
0.01856148 |
98 |
Not asked |
8084 |
|
NA |
w03_r3ib1c
Variable label:
|
Access to welfare: Immigrants who are not Norwegian citizens, but who have lived in Norway for the last three years, should have the same access to welfare schemes as Norwegian citizens
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that immigrants who are not Norwegian citizens, but who have lived in Norway for the last three years, should have the same access to welfare schemes as Norwegian citizens?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran31=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
38 |
8.8% |
0.087759815 |
2 |
Agree |
77 |
17.8% |
0.177829099 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
90 |
20.8% |
0.207852194 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
55 |
12.7% |
0.127020785 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
65 |
15% |
0.150115473 |
6 |
Disagree |
59 |
13.6% |
0.136258661 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
45 |
10.4% |
0.103926097 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.9% |
0.009237875 |
98 |
Not asked |
8082 |
|
NA |
w03_r3ib1d
Variable label:
|
Access to welfare: Immigrants who are not Norwegian citizens, but who have lived in Norway for the last seven years, should have the same access to welfare schemes as Norwegian citizens
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that immigrants who are not Norwegian citizens, but who have lived in Norway for the last seven years, should have the same access to welfare schemes as Norwegian citizens?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran31=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
49 |
11.7% |
0.116945107 |
2 |
Agree |
124 |
29.6% |
0.295942721 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
88 |
21% |
0.210023866 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
42 |
10% |
0.100238663 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
55 |
13.1% |
0.131264916 |
6 |
Disagree |
36 |
8.6% |
0.085918854 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
5% |
0.050119332 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1% |
0.009546539 |
98 |
Not asked |
8096 |
|
NA |
w03_ran33
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1697] [Invalid:6818] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
568 |
33.5% |
0.3347083 |
2 |
2 |
563 |
33.2% |
0.3317619 |
3 |
3 |
566 |
33.4% |
0.3335298 |
Sysmiss |
|
6818 |
|
NA |
w03_r3lb1a
Variable label:
|
What you think when you read or hear the word “immigrant” [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you read or hear the word “immigrant”? Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran33=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3lb1b
Variable label:
|
What you think when you read or hear the word “asylum seeker” [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you read or hear the word “asylum seeker”? Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran33=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3lb1c
Variable label:
|
What you think when you read or hear the word “labour migrants” [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you read or hear the word “labour migrants”? Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran33=3]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_ran34
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1696] [Invalid:6819] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
421 |
24.8% |
0.2482311 |
2 |
2 |
432 |
25.5% |
0.2547170 |
3 |
3 |
413 |
24.4% |
0.2435142 |
4 |
4 |
430 |
25.4% |
0.2535377 |
Sysmiss |
|
6819 |
|
NA |
w03_r3gi1a
Variable label:
|
Residence permit for rejected asylum seeker: The person has continued to live in Norway for 3 years without being legally resident because he or she sees the situation in their home country as difficult
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine a person who has applied for asylum and has been turned down. The person has continued to live in Norway for 3 years without being legally resident because he or she sees the situation in their home country as difficult. To what extent do you agree or disagree that this person should be granted a residence permit in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran34=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
17 |
4% |
0.04038005 |
2 |
Agree |
31 |
7.4% |
0.07363420 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
78 |
18.5% |
0.18527316 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
65 |
15.4% |
0.15439430 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
61 |
14.5% |
0.14489311 |
6 |
Disagree |
93 |
22.1% |
0.22090261 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
70 |
16.6% |
0.16627078 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.4% |
0.01425178 |
98 |
Not asked |
8094 |
|
NA |
w03_r3gi1b
Variable label:
|
Residence permit for rejected asylum seeker: The person has continued to live in Norway for 7 years without being legally resident because he or she sees the situation in their home country as difficult
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine a person who has applied for asylum and has been turned down. The person has continued to live in Norway for 7 years without being legally resident because he or she sees the situation in their home country as difficult. To what extent do you agree or disagree that this person should be granted a residence permit in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran34=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
23 |
5.3% |
0.05324074 |
2 |
Agree |
54 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
67 |
15.5% |
0.15509259 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
56 |
13% |
0.12962963 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
50 |
11.6% |
0.11574074 |
6 |
Disagree |
96 |
22.2% |
0.22222222 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
80 |
18.5% |
0.18518519 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.4% |
0.01388889 |
98 |
Not asked |
8083 |
|
NA |
w03_r3gi1c
Variable label:
|
Residence permit for rejected asylum seeker: The family has continued to live in Norway for 3 years without being legally resident because they see the situation in their home country as difficult
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine a child who has applied for asylum together with their family and has been turned down. The family has continued to live in Norway for 3 years without being legally resident because they see the situation in their home country as difficult. To what extent do you agree or disagree that this child should be granted a residence permit in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran34=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
65 |
15.7% |
0.15738499 |
2 |
Agree |
82 |
19.9% |
0.19854722 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
94 |
22.8% |
0.22760291 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
42 |
10.2% |
0.10169492 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
35 |
8.5% |
0.08474576 |
6 |
Disagree |
67 |
16.2% |
0.16222760 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
23 |
5.6% |
0.05569007 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.2% |
0.01210654 |
98 |
Not asked |
8102 |
|
NA |
w03_r3gi1d
Variable label:
|
Residence permit for rejected asylum seeker: The family has continued to live in Norway for 7 years without being legally resident because they see the situation in their home country as difficult
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine a child who has applied for asylum together with their family and has been turned down. The family has continued to live in Norway for 7 years without being legally resident because they see the situation in their home country as difficult. To what extent do you agree or disagree that this child should be granted a residence permit in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran34=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
100 |
23.3% |
0.23255814 |
2 |
Agree |
105 |
24.4% |
0.24418605 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
70 |
16.3% |
0.16279070 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
39 |
9.1% |
0.09069767 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
34 |
7.9% |
0.07906977 |
6 |
Disagree |
43 |
10% |
0.10000000 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
7.2% |
0.07209302 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.9% |
0.01860465 |
98 |
Not asked |
8085 |
|
NA |
w03_ran35
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1694] [Invalid:6821] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
419 |
24.7% |
0.2473436 |
2 |
2 |
417 |
24.6% |
0.2461629 |
3 |
3 |
383 |
22.6% |
0.2260921 |
4 |
4 |
475 |
28% |
0.2804014 |
Sysmiss |
|
6821 |
|
NA |
w03_r3bfi1a
Variable label:
|
Allow Islamic schools: Follows Norwegian curricula, but could impede integration according to people in the social debate
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslims in Norway want to send their children to Islamic schools that follow Norwegian curricula but also include Islamic teachings. Some people in social debate have argued against such schools because they think that the schools impede integration.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway shall be permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran35=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
6 |
1.4% |
0.014319809 |
2 |
Agree |
28 |
6.7% |
0.066825776 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
52 |
12.4% |
0.124105012 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
48 |
11.5% |
0.114558473 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
76 |
18.1% |
0.181384248 |
6 |
Disagree |
95 |
22.7% |
0.226730310 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
110 |
26.3% |
0.262529833 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1% |
0.009546539 |
98 |
Not asked |
8096 |
|
NA |
w03_r3bfi1b
Variable label:
|
Allow Islamic schools: Follows Norwegian curricula, but could impede integration according to people in the social debate. Others think that it a ban is discriminatory
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslims in Norway want to send their children to Islamic schools that follow Norwegian curricula but also include Islamic teachings. Some people in social debate have argued against such schools because they think that the schools impede integration. Others think that it is discriminatory against Muslims to not allow Islamic schools in Norway while Christian schools are permitted.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway shall be permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran35=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
9 |
2.2% |
0.02158273 |
2 |
Agree |
31 |
7.4% |
0.07434053 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
58 |
13.9% |
0.13908873 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
50 |
12% |
0.11990408 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
63 |
15.1% |
0.15107914 |
6 |
Disagree |
91 |
21.8% |
0.21822542 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
106 |
25.4% |
0.25419664 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
2.2% |
0.02158273 |
98 |
Not asked |
8098 |
|
NA |
w03_r3bfi1c
Variable label:
|
Allow Islamic schools: Follows Norwegian curricula, but could impede integration according the Progress Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslims in Norway want to send their children to Islamic schools that follow Norwegian curricula but also include Islamic teachings. Some Progress Party politicians have argued against such schools because they think that the schools impede integration.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway shall be permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran35=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
13 |
3.4% |
0.03394256 |
2 |
Agree |
46 |
12% |
0.12010444 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
52 |
13.6% |
0.13577023 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
40 |
10.4% |
0.10443864 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
61 |
15.9% |
0.15926893 |
6 |
Disagree |
72 |
18.8% |
0.18798956 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
92 |
24% |
0.24020888 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.8% |
0.01827676 |
98 |
Not asked |
8132 |
|
NA |
w03_r3bfi1d
Variable label:
|
Allow Islamic schools: Follows Norwegian curricula, but could impede integration according the Progress Party. Others think that it a ban is discriminatory
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some Muslims in Norway want to send their children to Islamic schools that follow Norwegian curricula but also include Islamic teachings. Some Progress Party politicians have argued against such schools because they think that the schools impede integration. Others think that it is discriminatory against Muslims to not allow Islamic schools in Norway while Christian schools are permitted.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway shall be permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran35=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
15 |
3.2% |
0.03157895 |
2 |
Agree |
34 |
7.2% |
0.07157895 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
67 |
14.1% |
0.14105263 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
57 |
12% |
0.12000000 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
76 |
16% |
0.16000000 |
6 |
Disagree |
92 |
19.4% |
0.19368421 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
126 |
26.5% |
0.26526316 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.7% |
0.01684211 |
98 |
Not asked |
8040 |
|
NA |
w03_ran36
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4, except respondents recruited in wave 1 that earlier have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1413] [Invalid:7102] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
114 |
8.1% |
0.08067941 |
2 |
2 |
119 |
8.4% |
0.08421798 |
3 |
3 |
123 |
8.7% |
0.08704883 |
4 |
4 |
117 |
8.3% |
0.08280255 |
5 |
5 |
122 |
8.6% |
0.08634112 |
6 |
6 |
105 |
7.4% |
0.07430998 |
7 |
7 |
130 |
9.2% |
0.09200283 |
8 |
8 |
121 |
8.6% |
0.08563340 |
9 |
9 |
121 |
8.6% |
0.08563340 |
10 |
10 |
114 |
8.1% |
0.08067941 |
11 |
11 |
117 |
8.3% |
0.08280255 |
12 |
12 |
110 |
7.8% |
0.07784855 |
Sysmiss |
|
7102 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1a2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, cannot affect outcome
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You do not have the opportunity to influence this decision, but it is still interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
7 |
6.1% |
0.06140351 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
95 |
83.3% |
0.83333333 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
11 |
9.6% |
0.09649123 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
0.00877193 |
98 |
Not asked |
8401 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1b2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You do have the opportunity to influence this decision, and it is therefore interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=2. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
3 |
2.5% |
0.02521008 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
111 |
93.3% |
0.93277311 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
3 |
2.5% |
0.02521008 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.7% |
0.01680672 |
98 |
Not asked |
8396 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1c2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 1000 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of a thousand selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=3. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
4 |
3.3% |
0.032520325 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
111 |
90.2% |
0.902439024 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
7 |
5.7% |
0.056910569 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008130081 |
98 |
Not asked |
8392 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1d2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 100 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of a hundred selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=4. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
11 |
9.4% |
0.09401709 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
102 |
87.2% |
0.87179487 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
4 |
3.4% |
0.03418803 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1e2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 10 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of ten selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=5. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
5 |
4.1% |
0.040983607 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
109 |
89.3% |
0.893442623 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
7 |
5.7% |
0.057377049 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008196721 |
98 |
Not asked |
8393 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1f2a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 3 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Consider the scenario that one of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of three selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=6. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
8 |
7.6% |
0.07619048 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
81 |
77.1% |
0.77142857 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
14 |
13.3% |
0.13333333 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.9% |
0.01904762 |
98 |
Not asked |
8410 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1a2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, cannot affect outcome
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You do not have the opportunity to influence this decision, but it is still interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=7. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
12 |
9.2% |
0.09230769 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
106 |
81.5% |
0.81538462 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
8 |
6.2% |
0.06153846 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
3.1% |
0.03076923 |
98 |
Not asked |
8385 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1b2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You do have the opportunity to influence this decision, and it is therefore interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=8. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
12 |
9.9% |
0.09917355 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
93 |
76.9% |
0.76859504 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
12 |
9.9% |
0.09917355 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
3.3% |
0.03305785 |
98 |
Not asked |
8394 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1c2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 1000 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of a thousand selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=9. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
10 |
8.3% |
0.08264463 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
104 |
86% |
0.85950413 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
7 |
5.8% |
0.05785124 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8394 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1d2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 100 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of a hundred selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=10. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
11 |
9.6% |
0.09649123 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
97 |
85.1% |
0.85087719 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
3 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
98 |
Not asked |
8401 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1e2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 10 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of ten selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=11. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
12 |
10.3% |
0.102564103 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
95 |
81.2% |
0.811965812 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
9 |
7.7% |
0.076923077 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
0.008547009 |
98 |
Not asked |
8398 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad312_1f2b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel, as compensation: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome, is among 3 participants
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine the scenario that participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel have NOK 5,000 available as compensation for participating. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You have the opportunity to influence this decision, and you are one of three selected respondents who get to vote on how the money is to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran36=12. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
5 |
4.5% |
0.045454545 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
96 |
87.3% |
0.872727273 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
8 |
7.3% |
0.072727273 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.9% |
0.009090909 |
98 |
Not asked |
8405 |
|
NA |
w03_ran37
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4, except respondents recruited in wave 1 that earlier have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1411] [Invalid:7104] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
343 |
24.3% |
0.2430900 |
2 |
2 |
349 |
24.7% |
0.2473423 |
3 |
3 |
366 |
25.9% |
0.2593905 |
4 |
4 |
353 |
25% |
0.2501772 |
Sysmiss |
|
7104 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad313_1a2a
Variable label:
|
Acceptable decision: Draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel. To what extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran37=1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
22 |
6.4% |
0.06413994 |
2 |
To a great extent |
63 |
18.4% |
0.18367347 |
3 |
To some extent |
110 |
32.1% |
0.32069971 |
4 |
To a slight extent |
84 |
24.5% |
0.24489796 |
5 |
Not at all |
56 |
16.3% |
0.16326531 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.3% |
0.02332362 |
98 |
Not asked |
8172 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad313_1b2a
Variable label:
|
Acceptable decision: A donation of NOK 5,000 given to Doctors without borders
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a donation of NOK 5,000 to Doctors without borders. To what extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran37=2. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
232 |
66.5% |
0.664756447 |
2 |
To a great extent |
78 |
22.3% |
0.223495702 |
3 |
To some extent |
23 |
6.6% |
0.065902579 |
4 |
To a slight extent |
7 |
2% |
0.020057307 |
5 |
Not at all |
2 |
0.6% |
0.005730659 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2% |
0.020057307 |
98 |
Not asked |
8166 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad313_1a2b
Variable label:
|
Willing to accept decision: Draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a draw for a travel gift card worth NOK 5,000 to participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel. How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran37=3. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
38 |
10.4% |
0.103825137 |
2 |
Willing |
121 |
33.1% |
0.330601093 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
61 |
16.7% |
0.166666667 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
86 |
23.5% |
0.234972678 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
57 |
15.6% |
0.155737705 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.8% |
0.008196721 |
98 |
Not asked |
8149 |
|
NA |
w03_u4_pad313_1b2b
Variable label:
|
Willing to accept decision: A donation of NOK 5,000 given to Doctors without borders
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that the decision ends up being a donation of NOK 5,000 to Doctors without borders. How willing are you to accept this decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran37=4. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
280 |
79.3% |
0.793201133 |
2 |
Willing |
49 |
13.9% |
0.138810198 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
12 |
3.4% |
0.033994334 |
4 |
Slightly willing |
4 |
1.1% |
0.011331445 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
1 |
0.3% |
0.002832861 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2% |
0.019830028 |
98 |
Not asked |
8162 |
|
NA |
w03_ran38
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1690] [Invalid:6825] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
412 |
24.4% |
0.2437870 |
2 |
2 |
377 |
22.3% |
0.2230769 |
3 |
3 |
465 |
27.5% |
0.2751479 |
4 |
4 |
436 |
25.8% |
0.2579882 |
Sysmiss |
|
6825 |
|
NA |
w03_wt1a
Variable label:
|
New power transmission line through your municipality
|
Pre-question text:
|
To safeguard the electricity supply and the use of clean, eco-friendly electricity throughout Norway, now and again the authorities must facilitate new power transmission lines. But these power transmission lines sometimes create conflict because the landscape will be changed. In addition, some people living near the new power transmission lines may be concerned about problems with health and safety associated with the lines.
Let’s say that the government had proposed building a new power transmission line that would be clearly visible in your municipality.
|
Literal question:
|
Would you support a government decision to build a power transmission line through your municipality?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran38=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
296 |
71.8% |
0.71844660 |
2 |
No |
104 |
25.2% |
0.25242718 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
2.9% |
0.02912621 |
98 |
Not asked |
8103 |
|
NA |
w03_wt1b
Variable label:
|
New power transmission line through your municipality, visible in up to several other nearby municipalities
|
Pre-question text:
|
To safeguard the electricity supply and the use of clean, eco-friendly electricity throughout Norway, now and again the authorities must facilitate new power transmission lines. But these power transmission lines sometimes create conflict because the landscape will be changed. In addition, some people living near the new power transmission lines may be concerned about problems with health and safety associated with the lines.
Let’s say that the government had proposed building a new power transmission line that would be clearly visible in your municipality. Moreover, it would be visible in up to several other nearby municipalities.
|
Literal question:
|
Would you support a government decision to build a power transmission line through your municipality?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran38=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
232 |
61.5% |
0.61538462 |
2 |
No |
128 |
34% |
0.33952255 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
4.5% |
0.04509284 |
98 |
Not asked |
8138 |
|
NA |
w03_wt1c
Variable label:
|
New power transmission line through your municipality, the government would offer money to your municipality to compensate for the negative effects
|
Pre-question text:
|
To safeguard the electricity supply and the use of clean, eco-friendly electricity throughout Norway, now and again the authorities must facilitate new power transmission lines. But these power transmission lines sometimes create conflict because the landscape will be changed. In addition, some people living near the new power transmission lines may be concerned about problems with health and safety associated with the lines.
Let’s say that the government had proposed building a new power transmission line that would be clearly visible in your municipality. In return the government would offer money to your municipality to compensate for the negative effects of the new power transmission line.
|
Literal question:
|
Would you support a government decision to build a power transmission line through your municipality?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran38=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
317 |
68.2% |
0.68172043 |
2 |
No |
136 |
29.2% |
0.29247312 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
2.6% |
0.02580645 |
98 |
Not asked |
8050 |
|
NA |
w03_wt1d
Variable label:
|
New power transmission line through your municipality, visible in up to several other nearby municipalities, the government would offer money to your municipality to compensate for the negative effects
|
Pre-question text:
|
To safeguard the electricity supply and the use of clean, eco-friendly electricity throughout Norway, now and again the authorities must facilitate new power transmission lines. But these power transmission lines sometimes create conflict because the landscape will be changed. In addition, some people living near the new power transmission lines may be concerned about problems with health and safety associated with the lines.
Let’s say that the government had proposed building a new power transmission line that would be clearly visible in your municipality. Moreover, it would be visible in up to several other nearby municipalities. In return the government would offer money to your municipality to compensate for the negative effects of the new power transmission line.
|
Literal question:
|
Would you support a government decision to build a power transmission line through your municipality?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran38=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
290 |
66.5% |
0.66513761 |
2 |
No |
135 |
31% |
0.30963303 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.5% |
0.02522936 |
98 |
Not asked |
8079 |
|
NA |
w03_wt2
Variable label:
|
How worried are you about the reliability of your electricity supply?
|
Literal question:
|
How worried are you about the reliability of your electricity supply?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very worried |
30 |
1.7% |
0.01742160 |
2 |
Worried |
150 |
8.7% |
0.08710801 |
3 |
Somewhat worried |
376 |
21.8% |
0.21835075 |
4 |
Slightly worried |
779 |
45.2% |
0.45238095 |
5 |
Not worried |
316 |
18.4% |
0.18350755 |
97 |
No answer |
71 |
4.1% |
0.04123113 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_wt3
Variable label:
|
Do you feel a duty as a citizen to help to ensure the reliable supply of electricity in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel a duty as a citizen to help to ensure the reliable supply of electricity in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
990 |
57.5% |
0.57491289 |
2 |
No |
627 |
36.4% |
0.36411150 |
97 |
No answer |
105 |
6.1% |
0.06097561 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_wt4
Variable label:
|
Would you think it is fair if your municipality was selected as a location for a new power transmission line?
|
Literal question:
|
Would you think it is fair if your municipality was selected as a location for a new power transmission line?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1187 |
68.9% |
0.68931475 |
2 |
No |
408 |
23.7% |
0.23693380 |
97 |
No answer |
127 |
7.4% |
0.07375145 |
98 |
Not asked |
6793 |
|
NA |
w03_ran39
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1680] [Invalid:6835] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
869 |
51.7% |
0.5172619 |
2 |
2 |
811 |
48.3% |
0.4827381 |
Sysmiss |
|
6835 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km34
Variable label:
|
Reduce, maintain or increase its oil production from the perspective of the climate: Emissions of CO2 from burning oil are a major contributor to climate change caused by human activities, but the world needs energy and Norwegian oil production is cleaner than in many other countries
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following arguments are often made: Emissions of CO2 from burning oil are a major contributor to climate change caused by human activities, but the world needs energy and Norwegian oil production is cleaner than in many other countries.
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, should Norway reduce, maintain or increase its oil production from the perspective of the climate?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran39=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Reduce |
310 |
35.7% |
0.35673188 |
2 |
Maintain |
481 |
55.4% |
0.55350978 |
3 |
Increase |
60 |
6.9% |
0.06904488 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.1% |
0.02071346 |
98 |
Not asked |
7646 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km35
Variable label:
|
Reduce, maintain or increase its oil production from the perspective of the climate: The world needs energy and Norwegian oil production is cleaner than in many other countries, but CO2 emissions from burning oil are a major contributor to climate change caused by human activities
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following arguments are often made: The world needs energy and Norwegian oil production is cleaner than in many other countries, but CO2 emissions from burning oil are a major contributor to climate change caused by human activities.
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, should Norway reduce, maintain or increase its oil production from the perspective of the climate?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran39=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Reduce |
289 |
35.6% |
0.35635018 |
2 |
Maintain |
440 |
54.3% |
0.54254007 |
3 |
Increase |
66 |
8.1% |
0.08138101 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
2% |
0.01972873 |
98 |
Not asked |
7704 |
|
NA |
w03_ran47
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1678] [Invalid:6837] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
420 |
25% |
0.2502980 |
2 |
2 |
442 |
26.3% |
0.2634088 |
3 |
3 |
421 |
25.1% |
0.2508939 |
4 |
4 |
395 |
23.5% |
0.2353993 |
Sysmiss |
|
6837 |
|
NA |
w03_no3a
Variable label:
|
The amount of corruption in government, no opinion
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that quite a few of the people running the government are corrupt, not very many are, hardly any of them are corrupt, or do you not have an opinion on that?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran47=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Quite a few |
29 |
6.9% |
0.06904762 |
2 |
Not many |
168 |
40% |
0.40000000 |
3 |
Hardly any |
142 |
33.8% |
0.33809524 |
4 |
No opinion |
75 |
17.9% |
0.17857143 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.4% |
0.01428571 |
98 |
Not asked |
8095 |
|
NA |
w03_no3b
Variable label:
|
The amount of corruption in government, not have enough information
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that quite a few of the people running the government are corrupt, not very many are, hardly any of them are corrupt, or do you not have enough information about the government to say?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran47=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Quite a few |
25 |
5.7% |
0.05656109 |
2 |
Not many |
152 |
34.4% |
0.34389140 |
3 |
Hardly any |
113 |
25.6% |
0.25565611 |
4 |
No opinion |
141 |
31.9% |
0.31900452 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.5% |
0.02488688 |
98 |
Not asked |
8073 |
|
NA |
w03_no3c
Variable label:
|
The amount of corruption in government, don’t know
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that quite a few of the people running the government are corrupt, not very many are, or hardly any of them are corrupt, or don’t you know?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran47=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Quite a few |
30 |
7.1% |
0.07125891 |
2 |
Not many |
166 |
39.4% |
0.39429929 |
3 |
Hardly any |
138 |
32.8% |
0.32779097 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.7% |
0.01662708 |
98 |
Not asked |
8094 |
|
NA |
99 |
I don’t know |
80 |
19% |
0.19002375 |
w03_no3d
Variable label:
|
The amount of corruption in government
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that quite a few of the people running the government are corrupt, not very many are, or hardly any of them are corrupt?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran47=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Quite a few |
36 |
9.1% |
0.09113924 |
2 |
Not many |
201 |
50.9% |
0.50886076 |
3 |
Hardly any |
148 |
37.5% |
0.37468354 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
2.5% |
0.02531646 |
98 |
Not asked |
8120 |
|
NA |
w03_pra1
Variable label:
|
Norway’s role in international politics: Active or reduced role
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it is best for Norway in the future to play an active role in international politics, or should Norway preferably have a reduced role?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Active role in international politics |
1277 |
74.9% |
0.74853458 |
2 |
Reduced role in international politics |
371 |
21.7% |
0.21746776 |
97 |
No answer |
58 |
3.4% |
0.03399766 |
98 |
Not asked |
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_mobil_klima
Variable label:
|
Tests if the respondent answers on a mobile phone
|
Technical description:
|
[mobil_klima = 1 if respondent is using mobile device]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1690] [Invalid:6825] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Does not answer on a phone |
1530 |
90.5% |
0.90532544 |
1 |
Answers on a phone |
160 |
9.5% |
0.09467456 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6825 |
|
NA |
w03_ran40
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1530] [Invalid:6985] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
181 |
11.8% |
0.1183007 |
2 |
2 |
214 |
14% |
0.1398693 |
3 |
3 |
189 |
12.4% |
0.1235294 |
4 |
4 |
199 |
13% |
0.1300654 |
5 |
5 |
190 |
12.4% |
0.1241830 |
6 |
6 |
183 |
12% |
0.1196078 |
7 |
7 |
189 |
12.4% |
0.1235294 |
8 |
8 |
185 |
12.1% |
0.1209150 |
Sysmiss |
|
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_1
Variable label:
|
1 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years. However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 30 and 100 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is entirely possible that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that the development can be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=1. Respondents using mobile device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0% |
0 |
1 |
Exposed |
181 |
100% |
1 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
8334 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_2
Variable label:
|
2 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years. However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 30 and 100 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is not entirely certain that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that the development can be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=2. Respondents using mobile device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0% |
0 |
1 |
Exposed |
214 |
100% |
1 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
8301 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_3
Variable label:
|
3 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years. However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 50 and 60 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is entirely possible that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that the development can be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=3. Respondents using mobile device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0% |
0 |
1 |
Exposed |
189 |
100% |
1 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
8326 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_4
Variable label:
|
4 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years. However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 50 and 60 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is not entirely certain that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that the development can be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=4. Respondents using mobile device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0% |
0 |
1 |
Exposed |
199 |
100% |
1 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
8316 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_5
Variable label:
|
5 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years. However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 30 and 100 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is entirely possible that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that the development must be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=5. Respondents using mobile device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0% |
0 |
1 |
Exposed |
190 |
100% |
1 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
8325 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_6
Variable label:
|
6 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years. However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 30 and 100 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is not entirely certain that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that the development must be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=6. Respondents using mobile device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0% |
0 |
1 |
Exposed |
183 |
100% |
1 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
8332 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_7
Variable label:
|
7 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years. However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 50 and 60 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is entirely possible that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that the development must be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=7. Respondents using mobile device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0% |
0 |
1 |
Exposed |
189 |
100% |
1 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
8326 |
|
NA |
w03_vignett_8
Variable label:
|
8 of 8 vignettes that respondents may be exposed to. Must be seen in conjunction with R3KM11 to R3KM19. See variable documentation.
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you read the following in the newspaper:
The global climate has been fairly stable for several thousand years. However during the last one hundred years the global temperature has risen. Emissions of greenhouse gases from energy production, industry and traffic are among the key reasons. An expert expects that the increased temperature will cause the sea level to rise by between 50 and 60 cm by the end of this century. He says that it is not entirely certain that the rise will be within this interval. He points out that the development must be stopped by immediately reducing emissions of greenhouse gases.
|
Technical description:
|
[Exposed if U=5 and ran40=8. Respondents using mobile device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not exposed |
0 |
0% |
0 |
1 |
Exposed |
185 |
100% |
1 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
8330 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km11_1
Variable label:
|
What probability do you think the expert has in mind when he says “it is entirely possible” that the sea level will rise as estimated?
|
Literal question:
|
What probability do you think the expert has in mind when he says “it is entirely possible” that the sea level will rise as estimated?
|
Technical description:
|
Indicate a figure between 0% and 100%
[Asked if U=5 and ran40=1 or ran40=3 or ran40=5 or ran40=7. Still exposed to vignette. Respondents using mobil device are not exposed to the experiment]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-21]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0% |
7 |
0.9% |
0.009345794 |
3 |
10 |
53 |
7.1% |
0.070761015 |
5 |
20 |
77 |
10.3% |
0.102803738 |
7 |
30 |
92 |
12.3% |
0.122830441 |
9 |
40 |
72 |
9.6% |
0.096128171 |
11 |
50 |
120 |
16% |
0.160213618 |
13 |
60 |
72 |
9.6% |
0.096128171 |
15 |
70 |
77 |
10.3% |
0.102803738 |
17 |
80 |
79 |
10.5% |
0.105473965 |
19 |
90 |
48 |
6.4% |
0.064085447 |
21 |
100 % |
15 |
2% |
0.020026702 |
97 |
No answer |
37 |
4.9% |
0.049399199 |
98 |
Not asked |
7766 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km12_1
Variable label:
|
What probability do you think the expert has in mind when he says “it is not entirely certain” that the sea level will rise as estimated?
|
Literal question:
|
What probability do you think the expert has in mind when he says “it is not entirely certain” that the sea level will rise as estimated?
|
Technical description:
|
Indicate a figure between 0% and 100%
[Asked if U=5 and ran40=2 or ran40=4 or ran40=6 or ran40=8. Still exposed to vignette. Respondents using mobil device are not exposed to the experiment]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-21]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0% |
6 |
0.8% |
0.007682458 |
3 |
10 |
36 |
4.6% |
0.046094750 |
5 |
20 |
62 |
7.9% |
0.079385403 |
7 |
30 |
111 |
14.2% |
0.142125480 |
9 |
40 |
90 |
11.5% |
0.115236876 |
11 |
50 |
169 |
21.6% |
0.216389245 |
13 |
60 |
68 |
8.7% |
0.087067862 |
15 |
70 |
86 |
11% |
0.110115237 |
17 |
80 |
64 |
8.2% |
0.081946223 |
19 |
90 |
51 |
6.5% |
0.065300896 |
21 |
100 % |
9 |
1.2% |
0.011523688 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
3.7% |
0.037131882 |
98 |
Not asked |
7734 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km13_1
Variable label:
|
How probable do YOU think it is that the sea level will rise as estimated?
|
Literal question:
|
How probable do YOU think it is that the sea level will rise as estimated?
|
Technical description:
|
Indicate a figure between 0% and 100%
[Asked if U=5 and respondents are still exposed to vignette. Respondents using mobil device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-21]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0% |
24 |
1.6% |
0.01568627 |
3 |
10 |
137 |
9% |
0.08954248 |
5 |
20 |
161 |
10.5% |
0.10522876 |
7 |
30 |
184 |
12% |
0.12026144 |
9 |
40 |
135 |
8.8% |
0.08823529 |
11 |
50 |
252 |
16.5% |
0.16470588 |
13 |
60 |
126 |
8.2% |
0.08235294 |
15 |
70 |
146 |
9.5% |
0.09542484 |
17 |
80 |
152 |
9.9% |
0.09934641 |
19 |
90 |
105 |
6.9% |
0.06862745 |
21 |
100 % |
29 |
1.9% |
0.01895425 |
97 |
No answer |
79 |
5.2% |
0.05163399 |
98 |
Not asked |
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km14
Variable label:
|
If the expert’s forecasts for the rise in sea level turn out to be wrong, do you think that the rise will be higher or lower than he has estimated?
|
Literal question:
|
If the expert’s forecasts for the rise in sea level turn out to be wrong, do you think that the rise will be higher or lower than he has estimated?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and respondents are still exposed to vignette. Respondents using mobil device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Higher |
360 |
23.5% |
0.23529412 |
2 |
Lower |
1115 |
72.9% |
0.72875817 |
97 |
No answer |
55 |
3.6% |
0.03594771 |
98 |
Not asked |
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km15
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you trust the expert?
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you trust the expert?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and respondents are still exposed to vignette. Respondents using mobil device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
56 |
3.7% |
0.03660131 |
2 |
To a great extent |
428 |
28% |
0.27973856 |
3 |
To some extent |
800 |
52.3% |
0.52287582 |
4 |
To a slight extent |
191 |
12.5% |
0.12483660 |
5 |
Not at all |
30 |
2% |
0.01960784 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
1.6% |
0.01633987 |
98 |
Not asked |
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km16
Variable label:
|
How correct do you think the expert’s forecasts for the rise in sea level are?
|
Literal question:
|
How correct do you think the expert’s forecasts for the rise in sea level are?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and respondents are still exposed to vignette. Respondents using mobil device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very correct |
41 |
2.7% |
0.02679739 |
2 |
Correct |
206 |
13.5% |
0.13464052 |
3 |
Quite correct |
808 |
52.8% |
0.52810458 |
4 |
Not very correct |
396 |
25.9% |
0.25882353 |
5 |
Not correct at all |
27 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
97 |
No answer |
52 |
3.4% |
0.03398693 |
98 |
Not asked |
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km17
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that human activity is causing the rise in sea level?
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that human activity is causing the rise in sea level?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and respondents are still exposed to vignette. Respondents using mobil device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
341 |
22.3% |
0.22287582 |
2 |
Likely |
526 |
34.4% |
0.34379085 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
495 |
32.4% |
0.32352941 |
4 |
Slightly likely |
118 |
7.7% |
0.07712418 |
5 |
Not likely at all |
16 |
1% |
0.01045752 |
97 |
No answer |
34 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
98 |
Not asked |
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km18
Variable label:
|
Urgency for reducing greenhouse gas emissions
|
Literal question:
|
What is the level of urgency for reducing greenhouse gas emissions?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and respondents are still exposed to vignette. Respondents using mobil device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very urgent |
419 |
27.4% |
0.27385621 |
2 |
Urgent |
560 |
36.6% |
0.36601307 |
3 |
Somewhat urgent |
316 |
20.7% |
0.20653595 |
4 |
Slightly urgent |
151 |
9.9% |
0.09869281 |
5 |
Not urgent |
50 |
3.3% |
0.03267974 |
97 |
No answer |
34 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
98 |
Not asked |
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km19
Variable label:
|
Willingness to change current lifestyle to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how willing are you to change your current lifestyle to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and respondents are still exposed to vignette. Respondents using mobil device are not exposed to the vignette or questions R3KM11-R3KM19]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
134 |
8.8% |
0.08758170 |
2 |
To a great degree |
492 |
32.2% |
0.32156863 |
3 |
To some degree |
694 |
45.4% |
0.45359477 |
4 |
To a small degree |
144 |
9.4% |
0.09411765 |
5 |
Not at all |
42 |
2.7% |
0.02745098 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
1.6% |
0.01568627 |
98 |
Not asked |
6985 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3km20
Variable label:
|
Statement that best describes viewpoint on climate change
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following statements best describes your viewpoint on climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
Select one of the alternatives.
[Asked if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I think that the climate is not changing. |
15 |
0.9% |
0.008792497 |
2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
129 |
7.6% |
0.075615475 |
3 |
I think that the climate is changing, but it is only to a small extent linked to
human influences. |
489 |
28.7% |
0.286635404 |
4 |
I think that the climate is changing, and that it is largely a result of human
influences. |
1023 |
60% |
0.599648300 |
97 |
No answer |
50 |
2.9% |
0.029308324 |
98 |
Not asked |
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_ran41
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1689] [Invalid:6826] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
842 |
49.9% |
0.4985198 |
2 |
2 |
847 |
50.1% |
0.5014802 |
Sysmiss |
|
6826 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km23
Variable label:
|
How concerned about climate change are you?
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned about climate change are you?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran41=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very concerned |
93 |
11% |
0.110451306 |
2 |
Concerned |
260 |
30.9% |
0.308788599 |
3 |
Somewhat concerned |
297 |
35.3% |
0.352731591 |
4 |
Slightly concerned |
146 |
17.3% |
0.173396675 |
5 |
Not concerned at all |
38 |
4.5% |
0.045130641 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
1% |
0.009501188 |
98 |
Not asked |
7673 |
|
NA |
w03_r3km24
Variable label:
|
How concerned about global warming are you?
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned about global warming are you?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran41=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very concerned |
84 |
9.9% |
0.09917355 |
2 |
Concerned |
277 |
32.7% |
0.32703660 |
3 |
Somewhat concerned |
307 |
36.2% |
0.36245573 |
4 |
Slightly concerned |
148 |
17.5% |
0.17473436 |
5 |
Not concerned at all |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02243211 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01416765 |
98 |
Not asked |
7668 |
|
NA |
w03_ran42
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1401] [Invalid:7114] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
708 |
50.5% |
0.5053533 |
2 |
2 |
693 |
49.5% |
0.4946467 |
Sysmiss |
|
7114 |
|
NA |
w03_pad314a
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, cannot affect outcome
|
Literal question:
|
One of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You as a participant do not have the opportunity to influence this decision, but it is still interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran42=1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
49 |
6.9% |
0.069209040 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
605 |
85.5% |
0.854519774 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
49 |
6.9% |
0.069209040 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.7% |
0.007062147 |
98 |
Not asked |
7807 |
|
NA |
w03_pad314b
Variable label:
|
5000 kr from Norwegian Citizen Panel: To Doctors without borders or random participant, can affect outcome
|
Literal question:
|
One of the researchers associated with the Norwegian Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 available. This money will either be raffled off as a gift card to one of the participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, or will be donated to the charity Doctors without borders. You as a participant have the opportunity to influence this decision, and it is therefore interesting to hear how you would like the money to be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran42=2. Respondents recruited in wave 1 that have been exposed for w01_DT14 or w01_DT15, are not asked this question]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A gift card worth NOK 5,000 is raffled to a participant in the Norwegian Citizen
Panel |
71 |
10.2% |
0.10245310 |
2 |
A gift of NOK 5,000 is donated to the charity Doctors without borders |
576 |
83.1% |
0.83116883 |
3 |
Have no opinion |
37 |
5.3% |
0.05339105 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.3% |
0.01298701 |
98 |
Not asked |
7822 |
|
NA |
w03_ran48
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1689] [Invalid:6826] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
827 |
49% |
0.4896388 |
2 |
2 |
862 |
51% |
0.5103612 |
Sysmiss |
|
6826 |
|
NA |
w03_ran32
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:827] [Invalid:7688] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
273 |
33% |
0.3301088 |
2 |
2 |
273 |
33% |
0.3301088 |
3 |
3 |
281 |
34% |
0.3397823 |
Sysmiss |
|
7688 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3a
Variable label:
|
National insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security: How much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian national insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security. All in all, how much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
25 |
9.2% |
0.091575092 |
2 |
A bit more money |
120 |
44% |
0.439560440 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
95 |
34.8% |
0.347985348 |
4 |
A bit less money |
25 |
9.2% |
0.091575092 |
5 |
Much less money |
2 |
0.7% |
0.007326007 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.2% |
0.021978022 |
98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3aa_1
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social goals: Social assistance
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following social goals
|
Literal question:
|
Social assistance
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
20 |
7.3% |
0.07326007 |
2 |
A bit more money |
87 |
31.9% |
0.31868132 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
108 |
39.6% |
0.39560440 |
4 |
A bit less money |
36 |
13.2% |
0.13186813 |
5 |
Much less money |
14 |
5.1% |
0.05128205 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02930403 |
98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3aa_2
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social goals: Unemployment benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following social goals
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
11 |
4% |
0.04029304 |
2 |
A bit more money |
54 |
19.8% |
0.19780220 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
145 |
53.1% |
0.53113553 |
4 |
A bit less money |
41 |
15% |
0.15018315 |
5 |
Much less money |
14 |
5.1% |
0.05128205 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02930403 |
98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3aa_3
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social goals: Disability benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following social goals
|
Literal question:
|
Disability benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
32 |
11.7% |
0.11721612 |
2 |
A bit more money |
88 |
32.2% |
0.32234432 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
104 |
38.1% |
0.38095238 |
4 |
A bit less money |
28 |
10.3% |
0.10256410 |
5 |
Much less money |
10 |
3.7% |
0.03663004 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
4% |
0.04029304 |
98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3aa_4
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social goals: Cash-for-care benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following social goals
|
Literal question:
|
Cash-for-care benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
14 |
5.1% |
0.05128205 |
2 |
A bit more money |
20 |
7.3% |
0.07326007 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
84 |
30.8% |
0.30769231 |
4 |
A bit less money |
67 |
24.5% |
0.24542125 |
5 |
Much less money |
80 |
29.3% |
0.29304029 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02930403 |
98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3aa_5
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following social goals: Child benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following social goals
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
31 |
11.4% |
0.11355311 |
2 |
A bit more money |
73 |
26.7% |
0.26739927 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
129 |
47.3% |
0.47252747 |
4 |
A bit less money |
22 |
8.1% |
0.08058608 |
5 |
Much less money |
10 |
3.7% |
0.03663004 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02930403 |
98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3b
Variable label:
|
National insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security, labour migrants from the EEA get the same access: How much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian national insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security. Labour migrants from the European Economic Area get the same access to the Norwegian national insurance scheme as Norwegians do.
All in all, how much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
20 |
7.3% |
0.07326007 |
2 |
A bit more money |
74 |
27.1% |
0.27106227 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
123 |
45.1% |
0.45054945 |
4 |
A bit less money |
40 |
14.7% |
0.14652015 |
5 |
Much less money |
9 |
3.3% |
0.03296703 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3ccba_1
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Social assistance
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
27 |
9.9% |
0.09890110 |
2 |
A bit more money |
86 |
31.5% |
0.31501832 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
107 |
39.2% |
0.39194139 |
4 |
A bit less money |
40 |
14.7% |
0.14652015 |
5 |
Much less money |
5 |
1.8% |
0.01831502 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02930403 |
98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3ccba_2
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Unemployment benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
14 |
5.1% |
0.05128205 |
2 |
A bit more money |
48 |
17.6% |
0.17582418 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
149 |
54.6% |
0.54578755 |
4 |
A bit less money |
49 |
17.9% |
0.17948718 |
5 |
Much less money |
6 |
2.2% |
0.02197802 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3ccba_3
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Disability benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Disability benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
21 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
2 |
A bit more money |
75 |
27.5% |
0.27472527 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
124 |
45.4% |
0.45421245 |
4 |
A bit less money |
37 |
13.6% |
0.13553114 |
5 |
Much less money |
7 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
3.3% |
0.03296703 |
98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3ccba_4
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Cash-for-care benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Cash-for-care benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
6 |
2.2% |
0.02197802 |
2 |
A bit more money |
28 |
10.3% |
0.10256410 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
92 |
33.7% |
0.33699634 |
4 |
A bit less money |
55 |
20.1% |
0.20146520 |
5 |
Much less money |
81 |
29.7% |
0.29670330 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
4% |
0.04029304 |
98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3ccba_5
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Child benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
19 |
7% |
0.06959707 |
2 |
A bit more money |
91 |
33.3% |
0.33333333 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
118 |
43.2% |
0.43223443 |
4 |
A bit less money |
29 |
10.6% |
0.10622711 |
5 |
Much less money |
7 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
3.3% |
0.03296703 |
98 |
Not asked |
8242 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3c
Variable label:
|
National insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security, asylum seekers have the same access: How much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian national insurance scheme aims to contribute to financial security. Asylum seekers have the same access to the Norwegian national insurance scheme as Norwegians do as soon as they are granted asylum.
All in all, how much money should be used on the welfare state?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
15 |
5.3% |
0.05338078 |
2 |
A bit more money |
69 |
24.6% |
0.24555160 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
146 |
52% |
0.51957295 |
4 |
A bit less money |
35 |
12.5% |
0.12455516 |
5 |
Much less money |
11 |
3.9% |
0.03914591 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.8% |
0.01779359 |
98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3ca_1
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Social assistance
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
22 |
7.8% |
0.07829181 |
2 |
A bit more money |
79 |
28.1% |
0.28113879 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
137 |
48.8% |
0.48754448 |
4 |
A bit less money |
30 |
10.7% |
0.10676157 |
5 |
Much less money |
9 |
3.2% |
0.03202847 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01423488 |
98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3ca_2
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Unemployment benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
11 |
3.9% |
0.03914591 |
2 |
A bit more money |
60 |
21.4% |
0.21352313 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
152 |
54.1% |
0.54092527 |
4 |
A bit less money |
48 |
17.1% |
0.17081851 |
5 |
Much less money |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01423488 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02135231 |
98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3ca_3
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Disability benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Disability benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
20 |
7.1% |
0.07117438 |
2 |
A bit more money |
92 |
32.7% |
0.32740214 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
116 |
41.3% |
0.41281139 |
4 |
A bit less money |
42 |
14.9% |
0.14946619 |
5 |
Much less money |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01423488 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.5% |
0.02491103 |
98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3ca_4
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Cash-for-care benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Cash-for-care benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
10 |
3.6% |
0.03558719 |
2 |
A bit more money |
30 |
10.7% |
0.10676157 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
94 |
33.5% |
0.33451957 |
4 |
A bit less money |
61 |
21.7% |
0.21708185 |
5 |
Much less money |
80 |
28.5% |
0.28469751 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02135231 |
98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
w03_u5_r3cc3ca_5
Variable label:
|
The government should use more or less money on the following goals: Child benefit
|
Pre-question text:
|
More specifically, we would like you to answer to what extent you think that the government should use more or less money on the following goals:
|
Literal question:
|
Child benefit
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran32=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
26 |
9.3% |
0.09252669 |
2 |
A bit more money |
74 |
26.3% |
0.26334520 |
3 |
Neither more nor less |
143 |
50.9% |
0.50889680 |
4 |
A bit less money |
23 |
8.2% |
0.08185053 |
5 |
Much less money |
11 |
3.9% |
0.03914591 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01423488 |
98 |
Not asked |
8234 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4a
Variable label:
|
Number of conditions that are upsetting [List 6]
|
Literal question:
|
Indicate how many of these four situations upset you. We are only interested in how many upset you, not which ones.
That new Norwegian roads are often funded by collecting tolls That sportspeople earn tens of millions of kroner That many do not believe in climate change caused by human activities That we have to pay the NRK licence fee
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 |
118 |
6.9% |
0.06916764 |
1 |
1 |
428 |
25.1% |
0.25087925 |
2 |
2 |
660 |
38.7% |
0.38686987 |
3 |
3 |
317 |
18.6% |
0.18581477 |
4 |
4 |
135 |
7.9% |
0.07913247 |
97 |
No answer |
48 |
2.8% |
0.02813599 |
98 |
Not asked |
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4da
Variable label:
|
Does it upset you that refugees who have been granted asylum have access to the same welfare benefits as Norwegians do?
|
Literal question:
|
Does it upset you that refugees who have been granted asylum have access to the same welfare benefits as Norwegians do?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
516 |
30.2% |
0.30246190 |
2 |
No |
1139 |
66.8% |
0.66764361 |
97 |
No answer |
51 |
3% |
0.02989449 |
98 |
Not asked |
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4db
Variable label:
|
Does it upset you that begging is legal in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Does it upset you that begging is legal in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
840 |
49.2% |
0.49237984 |
2 |
No |
814 |
47.7% |
0.47713951 |
97 |
No answer |
52 |
3% |
0.03048066 |
98 |
Not asked |
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_r3cc4dc
Variable label:
|
Does it upset you that the government has now reduced the paternal quota (“paternity leave”)?
|
Literal question:
|
Does it upset you that the government has now reduced the paternal quota (“paternity leave”)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
730 |
42.8% |
0.42790152 |
2 |
No |
923 |
54.1% |
0.54103165 |
97 |
No answer |
53 |
3.1% |
0.03106682 |
98 |
Not asked |
6809 |
|
NA |
w03_ran46
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1683] [Invalid:6832] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
825 |
49% |
0.4901961 |
2 |
2 |
858 |
51% |
0.5098039 |
Sysmiss |
|
6832 |
|
NA |
w03_pra1a
Variable label:
|
Increase, maintain or reduce the amount spent on financial assistance
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we would like to ask you about Norway’s financial assistance programs.
|
Literal question:
|
Some people think that the amount the Norwegian government spends on financial assistance should be increased, while others believe it should be maintained at the present level, or decreased. What is your opinion, do you think the Norwegian government should increase, maintain, or decrease the amount it spends on financial assistance?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Increased |
121 |
14.7% |
0.14666667 |
2 |
Maintained |
525 |
63.6% |
0.63636364 |
3 |
Decreased |
123 |
14.9% |
0.14909091 |
97 |
No answer |
56 |
6.8% |
0.06787879 |
98 |
Not asked |
7690 |
|
NA |
w03_pra1aa
Variable label:
|
Increase the amount spent on financial assistance, quite a bit or just a little
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think the Norwegian government should increase spending on financial assistance quite a bit or just a little?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1, and PRA1A=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Quite a bit |
77 |
63.6% |
0.636363636 |
2 |
Just a little |
43 |
35.5% |
0.355371901 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008264463 |
98 |
Not asked |
8394 |
|
NA |
w03_pra1ab
Variable label:
|
Reduce the amount spent on financial assistance, quite a bit or just a little
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think the Norwegian government should decrease spending on financial assistance quite a bit or just a little?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1, and PRA1A=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Quite a bit |
82 |
66.7% |
0.666666667 |
2 |
Just a little |
40 |
32.5% |
0.325203252 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.8% |
0.008130081 |
98 |
Not asked |
8392 |
|
NA |
w03_pra2aba
Variable label:
|
Norwegian authorities have a moral obligation to give aid to the poor in other countries
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree that the Norwegian government has a moral obligation to provide financial assistance to the poor in other countries?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1. PRA2Aba and PRA2Ba is asked on the same page, and the order is randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agree strongly |
354 |
42.9% |
0.42909091 |
2 |
Agree somewhat |
345 |
41.8% |
0.41818182 |
3 |
Disagree somewhat |
72 |
8.7% |
0.08727273 |
4 |
Disagree strongly |
40 |
4.8% |
0.04848485 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.7% |
0.01696970 |
98 |
Not asked |
7690 |
|
NA |
w03_pra2ba
Variable label:
|
Whom should receive economic assistance
|
Literal question:
|
To whom do you believe the Norwegian government has a greater moral obligation to provide economic assistance?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1. PRA2Aba and PRA2Ba is asked on the same page, and the order is randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The poor in other countries |
49 |
5.9% |
0.05939394 |
2 |
The poor in Norway |
282 |
34.2% |
0.34181818 |
3 |
The government has an equal moral obligation to assist both |
481 |
58.3% |
0.58303030 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.6% |
0.01575758 |
98 |
Not asked |
7690 |
|
NA |
w03_pra3a
Variable label:
|
The effectiveness of financial assistance to reduce poverty in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
How effective do you think Norway’s financial assistance programs have been at reducing poverty in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very effective |
98 |
11.9% |
0.11878788 |
2 |
Somewhat effective |
401 |
48.6% |
0.48606061 |
3 |
Not too effective |
272 |
33% |
0.32969697 |
4 |
Not at all effective |
27 |
3.3% |
0.03272727 |
97 |
No answer |
27 |
3.3% |
0.03272727 |
98 |
Not asked |
7690 |
|
NA |
w03_pra4a
Variable label:
|
The reason that most recipients of financial assistance are poor
|
Literal question:
|
Why do you think most recipients of financial assistance are poor?
|
Technical description:
|
Use the scale below where 1 is “Because they don’t work hard enough” and 7 is “Because of circumstances beyond their control.”
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 – Because they don't work hard enough |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01939394 |
2 |
2 |
27 |
3.3% |
0.03272727 |
3 |
3 |
102 |
12.4% |
0.12363636 |
4 |
4 |
217 |
26.3% |
0.26303030 |
5 |
5 |
235 |
28.5% |
0.28484848 |
6 |
6 |
141 |
17.1% |
0.17090909 |
7 |
7 – Because of circumstances beyond their control |
66 |
8% |
0.08000000 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.5% |
0.02545455 |
98 |
Not asked |
7690 |
|
NA |
w03_pra5a
Variable label:
|
Probability that recipients of financial assistance lacked basic necessities before they got help from the Norwegian authorities
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that the recipients of financial assistance lacked basic necessities such as shelter and nutritious food before receiving assistance from the Norwegian government?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
148 |
17.9% |
0.17939394 |
2 |
Somewhat likely |
446 |
54.1% |
0.54060606 |
3 |
Not too likely |
190 |
23% |
0.23030303 |
4 |
Not at all likely |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01090909 |
97 |
No answer |
32 |
3.9% |
0.03878788 |
98 |
Not asked |
7690 |
|
NA |
w03_pra1b
Variable label:
|
Increase, maintain or reduce amount spent on foreign aid
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we would like to ask you about Norway’s foreign aid programs.
|
Literal question:
|
Some people think that the amount the Norwegian government spends on foreign aid should be increased, while others believe it should be maintained at the present level, or decreased. What is your opinion, do you think the Norwegian government should increase, maintain, or decrease the amount it spends on foreign aid?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Increased |
188 |
21.9% |
0.21911422 |
2 |
Maintained |
461 |
53.7% |
0.53729604 |
3 |
Decreased |
195 |
22.7% |
0.22727273 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.6% |
0.01631702 |
98 |
Not asked |
7657 |
|
NA |
w03_pra1ba
Variable label:
|
Increase the amount spent on foreign aid a good deal, or just a little
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think the Norwegian government should increase spending on foreign aid quite a bit or just a little?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2, and PRA1B=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Quite a bit |
161 |
85.6% |
0.8563830 |
2 |
Just a little |
25 |
13.3% |
0.1329787 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.1% |
0.0106383 |
98 |
Not asked |
8327 |
|
NA |
w03_pra1bb
Variable label:
|
Reduce amount spent on foreign aid a good deal, or just a little
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think the Norwegian government should decrease spending on foreign aid quite a bit or just a little?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2, and PRA1B=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Quite a bit |
143 |
73.3% |
0.73333333 |
2 |
Just a little |
50 |
25.6% |
0.25641026 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1% |
0.01025641 |
98 |
Not asked |
8320 |
|
NA |
w03_pra2abb
Variable label:
|
Norwegian authorities have a moral obligation to give aid to the poor in other countries
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree that the Norwegian government has a moral obligation to provide financial assistance to the poor in other countries?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2. PRA2Abb and PRA2Bb is asked on the same page, and the order is randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agree strongly |
362 |
42.2% |
0.42191142 |
2 |
Agree somewhat |
346 |
40.3% |
0.40326340 |
3 |
Disagree somewhat |
93 |
10.8% |
0.10839161 |
4 |
Disagree strongly |
38 |
4.4% |
0.04428904 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.2% |
0.02214452 |
98 |
Not asked |
7657 |
|
NA |
w03_pra2bb
Variable label:
|
Whom should receive economic assistance
|
Literal question:
|
To whom do you believe the Norwegian government has a greater moral obligation to provide economic assistance?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2. PRA2Abb and PRA2Bb is asked on the same page, and the order is randomized]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The poor in other countries |
41 |
4.8% |
0.04778555 |
2 |
The poor in Norway |
290 |
33.8% |
0.33799534 |
3 |
The government has an equal moral obligation to assist both |
509 |
59.3% |
0.59324009 |
98 |
Not asked |
7657 |
|
NA |
97 |
|
18 |
2.1% |
0.02097902 |
w03_pra3b
Variable label:
|
The effectiveness of aid programs to reduce poverty in other countries
|
Literal question:
|
How effective do you think Norway’s foreign aid programs have been at reducing poverty in other countries?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very effective |
44 |
5.1% |
0.05128205 |
2 |
Somewhat effective |
420 |
49% |
0.48951049 |
3 |
Not too effective |
313 |
36.5% |
0.36480186 |
4 |
Not at all effective |
57 |
6.6% |
0.06643357 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
2.8% |
0.02797203 |
98 |
Not asked |
7657 |
|
NA |
w03_pra4b
Variable label:
|
The reason that most recipients of aid are poor
|
Literal question:
|
Why do you think most recipients of foreign aid are poor? Use the scale below where 1 is “Because they don’t work hard enough” and 7 is “Because of circumstances beyond their control.”
|
Technical description:
|
Use the scale below where 1 is “Because they don’t work hard enough” and 7 is “Because of circumstances beyond their control.”
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 – Because they don't work hard enough |
10 |
1.2% |
0.011655012 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
0.8% |
0.008158508 |
3 |
3 |
20 |
2.3% |
0.023310023 |
4 |
4 |
97 |
11.3% |
0.113053613 |
5 |
5 |
191 |
22.3% |
0.222610723 |
6 |
6 |
206 |
24% |
0.240093240 |
7 |
7 – Because of circumstances beyond their control |
310 |
36.1% |
0.361305361 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
2% |
0.019813520 |
98 |
Not asked |
7657 |
|
NA |
w03_pra5b
Variable label:
|
Probability that recipients of financial assistance lacked basic necessities before they got help from the Norwegian authorities
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that the recipients of foreign aid lacked basic necessities such as shelter and nutritious food before receiving assistance from the Norwegian government?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran46=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
399 |
46.5% |
0.465034965 |
2 |
Somewhat likely |
350 |
40.8% |
0.407925408 |
3 |
Not too likely |
72 |
8.4% |
0.083916084 |
4 |
Not at all likely |
3 |
0.3% |
0.003496503 |
97 |
No answer |
34 |
4% |
0.039627040 |
98 |
Not asked |
7657 |
|
NA |
w03_ran43
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1676] [Invalid:6839] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
565 |
33.7% |
0.3371122 |
2 |
2 |
556 |
33.2% |
0.3317422 |
3 |
3 |
555 |
33.1% |
0.3311456 |
Sysmiss |
|
6839 |
|
NA |
w03_wsj1a_1
Variable label:
|
Suspected terrorist attacks from the extreme right, the authorities entitled to: Hold people in custody as long as they want to without having them stand trial
|
Pre-question text:
|
The Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) states that they are receiving a growing number of notes of concern and tips on people who share Breivik’s right-wing extremist views. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack from right-wing extremists was imminent. Do you think the authorities should have the right to:
|
Literal question:
|
Hold people in custody as long as they want to without having them stand trial?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should definitely have the right to |
87 |
15.4% |
0.15398230 |
2 |
Should probably have the right to |
128 |
22.7% |
0.22654867 |
3 |
Should probably not have the right to |
121 |
21.4% |
0.21415929 |
4 |
Should definitely not have the right to |
176 |
31.2% |
0.31150442 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
3.2% |
0.03185841 |
98 |
Not asked |
7950 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
35 |
6.2% |
0.06194690 |
w03_wsj1a_2
Variable label:
|
Suspected terrorist attacks from the extreme right, the authorities entitled to: Randomly stop and search people on the street
|
Pre-question text:
|
The Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) states that they are receiving a growing number of notes of concern and tips on people who share Breivik’s right-wing extremist views. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack from right-wing extremists was imminent. Do you think the authorities should have the right to:
|
Literal question:
|
Randomly stop and search people on the street?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should definitely have the right to |
85 |
15% |
0.15044248 |
2 |
Should probably have the right to |
177 |
31.3% |
0.31327434 |
3 |
Should probably not have the right to |
116 |
20.5% |
0.20530973 |
4 |
Should definitely not have the right to |
144 |
25.5% |
0.25486726 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.8% |
0.02831858 |
98 |
Not asked |
7950 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
27 |
4.8% |
0.04778761 |
w03_wsj2b_1
Variable label:
|
Suspected terrorist attacks from Islamic extremism, the authorities entitled to: Hold people in custody as long as they want to without having them stand trial
|
Pre-question text:
|
The Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) states that politically motivated violence in the form of Islamic extremism represents a serious threat to security in Norway. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack from Islamists was imminent. Do you think the authorities should have the right to:
|
Literal question:
|
Hold people in custody as long as they want to without having them stand trial?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should definitely have the right to |
100 |
18% |
0.17985612 |
2 |
Should probably have the right to |
159 |
28.6% |
0.28597122 |
3 |
Should probably not have the right to |
118 |
21.2% |
0.21223022 |
4 |
Should definitely not have the right to |
149 |
26.8% |
0.26798561 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
2% |
0.01978417 |
98 |
Not asked |
7959 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
19 |
3.4% |
0.03417266 |
w03_wsj2b_2
Variable label:
|
Suspected terrorist attacks from Islamic extremism, the authorities entitled to: Randomly stop and search people on the street
|
Pre-question text:
|
The Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) states that politically motivated violence in the form of Islamic extremism represents a serious threat to security in Norway. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack from Islamists was imminent. Do you think the authorities should have the right to:
|
Literal question:
|
Randomly stop and search people on the street?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should definitely have the right to |
102 |
18.3% |
0.18345324 |
2 |
Should probably have the right to |
204 |
36.7% |
0.36690647 |
3 |
Should probably not have the right to |
106 |
19.1% |
0.19064748 |
4 |
Should definitely not have the right to |
108 |
19.4% |
0.19424460 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
2.7% |
0.02697842 |
98 |
Not asked |
7959 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
21 |
3.8% |
0.03776978 |
w03_wsj3c_1
Variable label:
|
Suspected terrorist attacks, authorities entitled to: Hold people in custody as long as they want to without having them stand trial
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. Do you think the authorities should have the right to:
|
Literal question:
|
Hold people in custody as long as they want to without having them stand trial?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should definitely have the right to |
88 |
15.9% |
0.15855856 |
2 |
Should probably have the right to |
155 |
27.9% |
0.27927928 |
3 |
Should probably not have the right to |
136 |
24.5% |
0.24504505 |
4 |
Should definitely not have the right to |
133 |
24% |
0.23963964 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
2.7% |
0.02702703 |
98 |
Not asked |
7960 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
28 |
5% |
0.05045045 |
w03_wsj3c_2
Variable label:
|
Suspected terrorist attacks, authorities entitled to: Randomly stop and search people on the street
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. Do you think the authorities should have the right to:
|
Literal question:
|
Randomly stop and search people on the street?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should definitely have the right to |
129 |
23.2% |
0.23243243 |
2 |
Should probably have the right to |
199 |
35.9% |
0.35855856 |
3 |
Should probably not have the right to |
111 |
20% |
0.20000000 |
4 |
Should definitely not have the right to |
77 |
13.9% |
0.13873874 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
2.5% |
0.02522523 |
98 |
Not asked |
7960 |
|
NA |
99 |
Don't know |
25 |
4.5% |
0.04504505 |
w03_wsj2_1
Variable label:
|
Concern that there will be new terrorist attacks in Norway in the near future
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you that there will be new terrorist attacks in Norway in the near future?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very concerned |
120 |
7.3% |
0.07250755 |
2 |
Quite concerned |
573 |
34.6% |
0.34622356 |
3 |
Not very concerned |
828 |
50% |
0.50030211 |
4 |
Not concerned at all |
97 |
5.9% |
0.05861027 |
5 |
Don't know |
37 |
2.2% |
0.02235650 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6860 |
|
NA |
w03_wsj2_2
Variable label:
|
Concern that future terrorist acts will affect you, your family or your friends
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you concerned that future terrorist actions will affect you, your family or your friends?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran43=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very concerned |
88 |
5.3% |
0.05330103 |
2 |
Quite concerned |
318 |
19.3% |
0.19261054 |
3 |
Not very concerned |
977 |
59.2% |
0.59176257 |
4 |
Not concerned at all |
230 |
13.9% |
0.13930951 |
5 |
Don't know |
38 |
2.3% |
0.02301635 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6864 |
|
NA |
w03_ran44
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1673] [Invalid:6842] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
835 |
49.9% |
0.4991034 |
2 |
2 |
838 |
50.1% |
0.5008966 |
Sysmiss |
|
6842 |
|
NA |
w03_ran45
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:835] [Invalid:7680] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
408 |
48.9% |
0.4886228 |
2 |
2 |
427 |
51.1% |
0.5113772 |
Sysmiss |
|
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat1a
Variable label:
|
For or against control to increase government control of food safety, severe symptoms
|
Pre-question text:
|
“Some point to recent cases of food recalls, such as the recall of green onions carrying e. coli and the recall of fish believed to cause a listeriosis outbreak, as evidence that we need greater FDA (Mattillsynet) oversight. Illnesses such as these can cause serious symptoms that can be life-threatening for some. Others say that while food borne diseases are a serious concern, the fact that few were harmed in even the worst incidents is evidence that FDA (Mattilsynet) oversight is working as intended and is effective at protecting the public from food borne diseases.”
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly do you favor or oppose increasing government regulation of food safety?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1, and ran45=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly favor |
91 |
22.3% |
0.223039216 |
2 |
Moderately favor |
114 |
27.9% |
0.279411765 |
3 |
Slightly favor |
95 |
23.3% |
0.232843137 |
4 |
Neither favor nor oppose |
71 |
17.4% |
0.174019608 |
5 |
Slightly oppose |
18 |
4.4% |
0.044117647 |
6 |
Moderately oppose |
11 |
2.7% |
0.026960784 |
7 |
Strongly oppose |
6 |
1.5% |
0.014705882 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004901961 |
98 |
Not asked |
8107 |
|
NA |
w03_mat1aa
Variable label:
|
Concern over how safe the food is
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about how safe food is?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1, and ran45=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not concerned at all |
57 |
14% |
0.139705882 |
2 |
Not too concerned |
177 |
43.4% |
0.433823529 |
3 |
Moderately concerned |
131 |
32.1% |
0.321078431 |
4 |
Very concerned |
32 |
7.8% |
0.078431373 |
5 |
Extremely concerned |
8 |
2% |
0.019607843 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.7% |
0.007352941 |
98 |
Not asked |
8107 |
|
NA |
w03_mat1b
Variable label:
|
For or against control to increase government control of food safety, severe symptoms including abdominal cramps, bloody diarrhea, nausea and vomiting
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some point to recent cases of food recalls, such as the recall of green onions contaminated with e. coli and the recall of fish believed to cause a listeriosis outbreak, as evidence that we need greater FDA (Mattillsynet) oversight. Bacterial and viral infections such as these can cause serious symptoms, including stomach cramps, bloody diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. In some cases these infections can be life-threatening. Others say that while food borne diseases are a serious concern, the fact that few were harmed in even the worst incidents is evidence that FDA (Mattilsynet) oversight is working as intended and is effective at protecting the public from food borne diseases.”
|
Literal question:
|
How strongly do you favor or oppose increasing government regulation of food safety?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1, and ran45=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly favor |
111 |
26% |
0.25995316 |
2 |
Moderately favor |
123 |
28.8% |
0.28805621 |
3 |
Slightly favor |
80 |
18.7% |
0.18735363 |
4 |
Neither favor nor oppose |
67 |
15.7% |
0.15690867 |
5 |
Slightly oppose |
18 |
4.2% |
0.04215457 |
6 |
Moderately oppose |
20 |
4.7% |
0.04683841 |
7 |
Strongly oppose |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.9% |
0.01873536 |
98 |
Not asked |
8088 |
|
NA |
w03_mat1bb
Variable label:
|
Concern over how safe the food is
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about how safe food is?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1, and ran45=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not concerned at all |
54 |
12.6% |
0.126463700 |
2 |
Not too concerned |
196 |
45.9% |
0.459016393 |
3 |
Moderately concerned |
139 |
32.6% |
0.325526932 |
4 |
Very concerned |
27 |
6.3% |
0.063231850 |
5 |
Extremely concerned |
4 |
0.9% |
0.009367681 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.6% |
0.016393443 |
98 |
Not asked |
8088 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3a_1
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Seeing some mold on old leftovers in your refrigerator
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following items describe a number of conditions. Please rate how disgusting you find the conditions in the items.
|
Literal question:
|
Seeing some mold on old leftovers in your refrigerator.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not disgusting at all |
140 |
16.8% |
0.16766467 |
2 |
Not too disgusting |
264 |
31.6% |
0.31616766 |
3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
274 |
32.8% |
0.32814371 |
4 |
Very disgusting |
105 |
12.6% |
0.12574850 |
5 |
Extremely disgusting |
34 |
4.1% |
0.04071856 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.2% |
0.02155689 |
98 |
Not asked |
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3a_2
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Standing close to a person who has body odor
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following items describe a number of conditions. Please rate how disgusting you find the conditions in the items.
|
Literal question:
|
Standing close to a person who has body odor.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not disgusting at all |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01796407 |
2 |
Not too disgusting |
77 |
9.2% |
0.09221557 |
3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
359 |
43% |
0.42994012 |
4 |
Very disgusting |
269 |
32.2% |
0.32215569 |
5 |
Extremely disgusting |
98 |
11.7% |
0.11736527 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
2% |
0.02035928 |
98 |
Not asked |
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3a_3
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Shaking hands with a stranger who has sweaty palms
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following items describe a number of conditions. Please rate how disgusting you find the conditions in the items.
|
Literal question:
|
Shaking hands with a stranger who has sweaty palms.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not disgusting at all |
68 |
8.1% |
0.08143713 |
2 |
Not too disgusting |
262 |
31.4% |
0.31377246 |
3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
371 |
44.4% |
0.44431138 |
4 |
Very disgusting |
98 |
11.7% |
0.11736527 |
5 |
Extremely disgusting |
20 |
2.4% |
0.02395210 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01916168 |
98 |
Not asked |
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3a_4
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Stepping on dog poop
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following items describe a number of conditions. Please rate how disgusting you find the conditions in the items.
|
Literal question:
|
Stepping on dog poop.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not disgusting at all |
22 |
2.6% |
0.02634731 |
2 |
Not too disgusting |
96 |
11.5% |
0.11497006 |
3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
290 |
34.7% |
0.34730539 |
4 |
Very disgusting |
281 |
33.7% |
0.33652695 |
5 |
Extremely disgusting |
125 |
15% |
0.14970060 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.5% |
0.02514970 |
98 |
Not asked |
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3a_5
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Accidentally touching a person’s bloody cut
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following items describe a number of conditions. Please rate how disgusting you find the conditions in the items.
|
Literal question:
|
Accidentally touching a person’s bloody cut.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not disgusting at all |
39 |
4.7% |
0.04670659 |
2 |
Not too disgusting |
144 |
17.2% |
0.17245509 |
3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
282 |
33.8% |
0.33772455 |
4 |
Very disgusting |
243 |
29.1% |
0.29101796 |
5 |
Extremely disgusting |
108 |
12.9% |
0.12934132 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.3% |
0.02275449 |
98 |
Not asked |
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3a_6
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Seeing a cockroach run across the floor
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following items describe a number of conditions. Please rate how disgusting you find the conditions in the items.
|
Literal question:
|
Seeing a cockroach run across the floor.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not disgusting at all |
114 |
13.7% |
0.13652695 |
2 |
Not too disgusting |
182 |
21.8% |
0.21796407 |
3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
235 |
28.1% |
0.28143713 |
4 |
Very disgusting |
185 |
22.2% |
0.22155689 |
5 |
Extremely disgusting |
101 |
12.1% |
0.12095808 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.2% |
0.02155689 |
98 |
Not asked |
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3a_7
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Sitting next to someone who has red sores on their arm
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following items describe a number of conditions. Please rate how disgusting you find the conditions in the items.
|
Literal question:
|
Sitting next to someone who has red sores on their arm.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not disgusting at all |
133 |
15.9% |
0.15928144 |
2 |
Not too disgusting |
309 |
37% |
0.37005988 |
3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
293 |
35.1% |
0.35089820 |
4 |
Very disgusting |
69 |
8.3% |
0.08263473 |
5 |
Extremely disgusting |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01796407 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01916168 |
98 |
Not asked |
7680 |
|
NA |
w03_mat4
Variable label:
|
Concern that vaccines can cause serious side effects in children
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you that vaccines can lead to serious side effects in children?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not concerned at all |
139 |
16.6% |
0.16587112 |
2 |
Not too concerned |
275 |
32.8% |
0.32816229 |
3 |
Moderately concerned |
322 |
38.4% |
0.38424821 |
4 |
Very concerned |
79 |
9.4% |
0.09427208 |
5 |
Extremely concerned |
12 |
1.4% |
0.01431981 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01312649 |
98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat5_1
Variable label:
|
Support for the following guidelines: Ban on the use of growth hormones for fish, poultry and cattle
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strongly would you support or oppose each of the following guidelines?
|
Literal question:
|
Ban on the use of growth hormones for fish, poultry and cattle.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly support |
369 |
44% |
0.44033413 |
2 |
Moderately support |
129 |
15.4% |
0.15393795 |
3 |
Support a little |
51 |
6.1% |
0.06085919 |
4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
84 |
10% |
0.10023866 |
5 |
Oppose a little |
32 |
3.8% |
0.03818616 |
6 |
Moderately oppose |
50 |
6% |
0.05966587 |
7 |
Strongly oppose |
108 |
12.9% |
0.12887828 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01789976 |
98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat5_2
Variable label:
|
Support for the following guidelines: Ban on genetically modified commodities, for example fruit and vegetables
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strongly would you support or oppose each of the following guidelines?
|
Literal question:
|
Ban on genetically modified commodities, for example fruit and vegetables.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly support |
302 |
36% |
0.36038186 |
2 |
Moderately support |
143 |
17.1% |
0.17064439 |
3 |
Support a little |
74 |
8.8% |
0.08830549 |
4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
88 |
10.5% |
0.10501193 |
5 |
Oppose a little |
45 |
5.4% |
0.05369928 |
6 |
Moderately oppose |
69 |
8.2% |
0.08233890 |
7 |
Strongly oppose |
101 |
12.1% |
0.12052506 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.9% |
0.01909308 |
98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat5_3
Variable label:
|
Support for the following guidelines: Providing government support to farmers who cultivate certified ecological foodstuffs
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strongly would you support or oppose each of the following guidelines?
|
Literal question:
|
Providing government support to farmers who cultivate certified ecological foodstuffs.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly support |
294 |
35.1% |
0.35083532 |
2 |
Moderately support |
191 |
22.8% |
0.22792363 |
3 |
Support a little |
129 |
15.4% |
0.15393795 |
4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
111 |
13.2% |
0.13245823 |
5 |
Oppose a little |
26 |
3.1% |
0.03102625 |
6 |
Moderately oppose |
33 |
3.9% |
0.03937947 |
7 |
Strongly oppose |
36 |
4.3% |
0.04295943 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.1% |
0.02147971 |
98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3b_1
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Seeing some mold on old leftovers in your refrigerator
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following points describe a variety of circumstances. State how disgusting you consider each of these circumstances to be.
|
Literal question:
|
Discovering mould on old leftovers in your own refrigerator.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not disgusting at all |
134 |
16% |
0.15990453 |
2 |
Not too disgusting |
279 |
33.3% |
0.33293556 |
3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
245 |
29.2% |
0.29236277 |
4 |
Very disgusting |
125 |
14.9% |
0.14916468 |
5 |
Extremely disgusting |
37 |
4.4% |
0.04415274 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.1% |
0.02147971 |
98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3b_2
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Standing close to a person who has body odor
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following points describe a variety of circumstances. State how disgusting you consider each of these circumstances to be.
|
Literal question:
|
Standing close to a person with unpleasant body odour.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not disgusting at all |
13 |
1.6% |
0.01551313 |
2 |
Not too disgusting |
109 |
13% |
0.13007160 |
3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
346 |
41.3% |
0.41288783 |
4 |
Very disgusting |
263 |
31.4% |
0.31384248 |
5 |
Extremely disgusting |
90 |
10.7% |
0.10739857 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
2% |
0.02028640 |
98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3b_3
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Shaking hands with a stranger who has sweaty palms
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following points describe a variety of circumstances. State how disgusting you consider each of these circumstances to be.
|
Literal question:
|
Shaking hands with a stranger who has sweaty hands.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not disgusting at all |
73 |
8.7% |
0.08711217 |
2 |
Not too disgusting |
268 |
32% |
0.31980907 |
3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
358 |
42.7% |
0.42720764 |
4 |
Very disgusting |
102 |
12.2% |
0.12171838 |
5 |
Extremely disgusting |
20 |
2.4% |
0.02386635 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
2% |
0.02028640 |
98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3b_4
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Stepping on dog poop
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following points describe a variety of circumstances. State how disgusting you consider each of these circumstances to be.
|
Literal question:
|
Stepping in dog faeces.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not disgusting at all |
25 |
3% |
0.02983294 |
2 |
Not too disgusting |
99 |
11.8% |
0.11813842 |
3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
289 |
34.5% |
0.34486874 |
4 |
Very disgusting |
295 |
35.2% |
0.35202864 |
5 |
Extremely disgusting |
109 |
13% |
0.13007160 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
2.5% |
0.02505967 |
98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3b_5
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Accidentally touching a person’s bloody cut
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following points describe a variety of circumstances. State how disgusting you consider each of these circumstances to be.
|
Literal question:
|
Stepping in dog faeces.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not disgusting at all |
45 |
5.4% |
0.05369928 |
2 |
Not too disgusting |
154 |
18.4% |
0.18377088 |
3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
272 |
32.5% |
0.32458234 |
4 |
Very disgusting |
229 |
27.3% |
0.27326969 |
5 |
Extremely disgusting |
119 |
14.2% |
0.14200477 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.3% |
0.02267303 |
98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3b_6
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Seeing a cockroach run across the floor
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following points describe a variety of circumstances. State how disgusting you consider each of these circumstances to be.
|
Literal question:
|
Seeing a cockroach run across the floor.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not disgusting at all |
124 |
14.8% |
0.14797136 |
2 |
Not too disgusting |
182 |
21.7% |
0.21718377 |
3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
256 |
30.5% |
0.30548926 |
4 |
Very disgusting |
164 |
19.6% |
0.19570406 |
5 |
Extremely disgusting |
97 |
11.6% |
0.11575179 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01789976 |
98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_mat3b_7
Variable label:
|
Disgusting conditions: Sitting next to someone who has red sores on their arm
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following points describe a variety of circumstances. State how disgusting you consider each of these circumstances to be.
|
Literal question:
|
Sitting next to a person who has red sores on the arm.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=5 and ran44=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not disgusting at all |
138 |
16.5% |
0.16467780 |
2 |
Not too disgusting |
313 |
37.4% |
0.37350835 |
3 |
Somewhat disgusting |
272 |
32.5% |
0.32458234 |
4 |
Very disgusting |
74 |
8.8% |
0.08830549 |
5 |
Extremely disgusting |
24 |
2.9% |
0.02863962 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
2% |
0.02028640 |
98 |
Not asked |
7677 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k20
Variable label:
|
Respondents background
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the descriptions fits best with what you have done for the past 7 days?
|
Technical description:
|
Check one option.
[Only asked new respondents, and old respodents where the information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In paid work (or temporarily absent) |
3547 |
62.6% |
0.626457082 |
2 |
In education (not paid for by employer) |
415 |
7.3% |
0.073295655 |
3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
113 |
2% |
0.019957612 |
4 |
Unemployed, want a job but not actively seeking work |
37 |
0.7% |
0.006534793 |
5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
203 |
3.6% |
0.035853055 |
6 |
Retired |
908 |
16% |
0.160367361 |
7 |
In civilian national service or military service |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001236312 |
8 |
Staying at home, looking after children or other persons |
74 |
1.3% |
0.013069587 |
9 |
Other |
166 |
2.9% |
0.029318262 |
97 |
No answer |
192 |
3.4% |
0.033910279 |
98 |
Not asked |
2853 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k21
Variable label:
|
Respondents business
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
344 |
9.7% |
0.096983366 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1014 |
28.6% |
0.285875388 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
187 |
5.3% |
0.052720609 |
4 |
Private business |
1701 |
48% |
0.479560192 |
5 |
Private business |
194 |
5.5% |
0.054694108 |
6 |
Other: |
97 |
2.7% |
0.027347054 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
0.3% |
0.002819284 |
98 |
Not asked |
4968 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k21_6_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Respondents business [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K20=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3k323
Variable label:
|
The name or title of the main occupation [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What is the name or title of your main job? Please write your full job title. Be as specific as you can.
|
Technical description:
|
Here are some examples: Nurse, Teacher at an upper secondary school, Shop worker
[Asked if R3K20=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3k323a
Variable label:
|
Main tasks or duties in the main occupation [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are your main tasks or duties in your main job? Please be as detailed as possible in your description.
|
Technical description:
|
Here are some examples: Provide help and medications at a senior citizens’ community centre. Create educational programmes, teach Norwegian and mathematics and grade papers. Sell shoes and help customers in the shop.
[Asked if R3K20=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3k23b
Variable label:
|
Responsible for directing other employees in the main job
|
Literal question:
|
Are you responsible for supervising the work of other employees in your main work?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
2405 |
67.8% |
0.678037778 |
2 |
Yes, I supervise 10 or more employees |
399 |
11.2% |
0.112489428 |
3 |
Yes, I supervise 10 or less employees |
719 |
20.3% |
0.202706513 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
0.7% |
0.006766281 |
98 |
Not asked |
4968 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k24
Variable label:
|
Workplace in oil or gas industry, or closely linked to it
|
Literal question:
|
Is your workplace in the oil and gas sector, or closely related to it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, I work in the oil and gas sector |
199 |
5.6% |
0.05610375 |
2 |
Yes, I work in the oil and gas sector |
182 |
5.1% |
0.05131097 |
3 |
No |
3124 |
88.1% |
0.88074429 |
97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.2% |
0.01184099 |
98 |
Not asked |
4968 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k25
Variable label:
|
Current income
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
< 150 000 |
704 |
11.8% |
0.11843876 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
906 |
15.2% |
0.15242261 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
992 |
16.7% |
0.16689098 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1084 |
18.2% |
0.18236878 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
734 |
12.3% |
0.12348587 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
379 |
6.4% |
0.06376178 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
435 |
7.3% |
0.07318304 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
177 |
3% |
0.02977793 |
97 |
No answer |
533 |
9% |
0.08967026 |
98 |
Not asked |
2571 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k26
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
38 |
0.7% |
0.006704305 |
2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
51 |
0.9% |
0.008997883 |
3 |
Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school,
secondary school) |
495 |
8.7% |
0.087332392 |
4 |
College certificate |
52 |
0.9% |
0.009174312 |
5 |
College certificate |
742 |
13.1% |
0.130910374 |
6 |
Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes
(qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination) |
777 |
13.7% |
0.137085392 |
7 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
55 |
1% |
0.009703599 |
8 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
197 |
3.5% |
0.034756528 |
9 |
University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years
(university college graduate 2 and 2½ year) |
501 |
8.8% |
0.088390967 |
10 |
Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's
college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist,
etc.) |
1007 |
17.8% |
0.177664079 |
11 |
Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor) |
357 |
6.3% |
0.062985180 |
12 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master) |
360 |
6.4% |
0.063514467 |
13 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further
professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian,
engineer, architect, senior business economist) |
566 |
10% |
0.099858857 |
14 |
Research level (Ph.D.) |
90 |
1.6% |
0.015878617 |
15 |
None of these |
145 |
2.6% |
0.025582216 |
97 |
No answer |
235 |
4.1% |
0.041460833 |
98 |
Not asked |
2847 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k27
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Click on what is most suitable to you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Never been married |
715 |
12.6% |
0.1262804663 |
2 |
Married |
2852 |
50.4% |
0.5037089368 |
3 |
Legally registered partner |
14 |
0.2% |
0.0024726245 |
4 |
Cohabitant |
1052 |
18.6% |
0.1858000706 |
5 |
Divorced/separated |
401 |
7.1% |
0.0708230307 |
6 |
Former cohabitant |
217 |
3.8% |
0.0383256800 |
7 |
Former legally registered partner |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008830802 |
8 |
Widow/widower |
132 |
2.3% |
0.0233133168 |
9 |
Other: |
74 |
1.3% |
0.0130695867 |
97 |
No answer |
200 |
3.5% |
0.0353232073 |
98 |
Not asked |
2853 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k27_9_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Marital status [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Click on what is most suitable to you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
5069 |
89.6% |
0.89637489 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
390 |
6.9% |
0.06896552 |
97 |
No answer |
196 |
3.5% |
0.03465959 |
98 |
Not asked |
2860 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k28_2_other
Variable label:
|
Citizenship: Other country [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
4879 |
86.2% |
0.862014134 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
390 |
6.9% |
0.068904594 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
31 |
0.5% |
0.005477032 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
96 |
1.7% |
0.016961131 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
67 |
1.2% |
0.011837456 |
97 |
No answer |
197 |
3.5% |
0.034805654 |
98 |
Not asked |
2855 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k30_1
Variable label:
|
Homeland before immigration to Norway [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did you live in before immigrating?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K29=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3k30_2_1
Variable label:
|
Mother: Homeland before immigration to Norway [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did you parents live in (mother, father or both) before they immigrated?
|
Literal question:
|
Mother:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K29=3 or R3K29=4 or R3K29=5]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3k30_2_2
Variable label:
|
Father: Homeland before immigration to Norway [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did you parents live in (mother, father or both) before they immigrated?
|
Literal question:
|
Father:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K29=3 or R3K29=4 or R3K29=5]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w03_r3hp1
Variable label:
|
Health condition
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, would you say that your health is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
1106 |
19.8% |
0.19792412 |
2 |
Very good |
2072 |
37.1% |
0.37079456 |
3 |
Good |
1519 |
27.2% |
0.27183250 |
4 |
Quite good |
498 |
8.9% |
0.08911954 |
5 |
Poor |
198 |
3.5% |
0.03543307 |
97 |
No answer |
195 |
3.5% |
0.03489621 |
98 |
Not asked |
2927 |
|
NA |
w03_P1
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Male |
4244 |
49.8% |
0.4984146 |
2 |
Female |
4271 |
50.2% |
0.5015854 |
w03_P2
Variable label:
|
Region
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
2345 |
27.5% |
0.27539636 |
2 |
Østlandet |
2079 |
24.4% |
0.24415737 |
3 |
Sørlandet |
415 |
4.9% |
0.04873752 |
4 |
Vestlandet |
2244 |
26.4% |
0.26353494 |
5 |
Trøndelag |
745 |
8.7% |
0.08749266 |
6 |
Nord-Norge |
687 |
8.1% |
0.08068115 |
w03_P3
Variable label:
|
County
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-19]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Akershus |
1052 |
12.4% |
0.123546682 |
2 |
Oslo |
1293 |
15.2% |
0.151849677 |
3 |
Østfold |
440 |
5.2% |
0.051673517 |
4 |
Vestfold |
434 |
5.1% |
0.050968878 |
5 |
Hedmark |
258 |
3% |
0.030299472 |
6 |
Oppland |
262 |
3.1% |
0.030769231 |
7 |
Buskerud |
424 |
5% |
0.049794480 |
8 |
Telemark |
261 |
3.1% |
0.030651791 |
9 |
Vest-Agder |
265 |
3.1% |
0.031121550 |
10 |
Aust-Agder |
150 |
1.8% |
0.017615972 |
11 |
Rogaland |
771 |
9.1% |
0.090546095 |
12 |
Hordaland |
960 |
11.3% |
0.112742220 |
13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
144 |
1.7% |
0.016911333 |
14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
369 |
4.3% |
0.043335291 |
15 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
584 |
6.9% |
0.068584850 |
16 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
161 |
1.9% |
0.018907810 |
17 |
Nordland |
351 |
4.1% |
0.041221374 |
18 |
Troms |
259 |
3% |
0.030416911 |
19 |
Finmark |
77 |
0.9% |
0.009042866 |
w03_P4_1
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No education/elementary school |
877 |
10.3% |
0.10299472 |
2 |
Upper secondary eduction |
2627 |
30.9% |
0.30851439 |
3 |
University/university college |
4467 |
52.5% |
0.52460364 |
97 |
No answer |
544 |
6.4% |
0.06388726 |
w03_P4_2
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education [obtained from w01_k26]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
55 |
0.6% |
0.006459190 |
2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
64 |
0.8% |
0.007516148 |
3 |
Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school,
secondary school) |
758 |
8.9% |
0.089019378 |
4 |
College certificate |
87 |
1% |
0.010217264 |
5 |
Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education
programme, one-year post admission |
1103 |
13% |
0.129536113 |
6 |
Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes
(qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination) |
1129 |
13.3% |
0.132589548 |
7 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
88 |
1% |
0.010334703 |
8 |
Diploma from addition to upper secondary education (vocational, technical
college) |
307 |
3.6% |
0.036054022 |
9 |
University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years
(university college graduate 2 and 2½ year) |
768 |
9% |
0.090193776 |
10 |
Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's
college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist,
etc.) |
1577 |
18.5% |
0.185202584 |
11 |
Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor) |
552 |
6.5% |
0.064826776 |
12 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master) |
540 |
6.3% |
0.063417499 |
13 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further
professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian,
engineer, architect, senior business economist) |
891 |
10.5% |
0.104638873 |
14 |
Research level (Ph.D.) |
139 |
1.6% |
0.016324134 |
15 |
None of these |
222 |
2.6% |
0.026071638 |
97 |
No answer |
235 |
2.8% |
0.027598356 |
w03_P5_1
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8514] [Invalid:1] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1939 or earlier |
311 |
3.7% |
0.03652807 |
2 |
1940-1949 |
1320 |
15.5% |
0.15503876 |
3 |
1950-1959 |
1785 |
21% |
0.20965469 |
4 |
1960-1969 |
1719 |
20.2% |
0.20190275 |
5 |
1970-1979 |
1459 |
17.1% |
0.17136481 |
6 |
1980-1989 |
1206 |
14.2% |
0.14164905 |
7 |
1990 or later |
714 |
8.4% |
0.08386187 |
Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
w03_P5_2
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8514] [Invalid:1] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1959 or earlier |
3416 |
40.1% |
0.40122152 |
2 |
1960-1989 |
4384 |
51.5% |
0.51491661 |
3 |
1990 or later |
714 |
8.4% |
0.08386187 |
Sysmiss |
|
1 |
|
NA |
w03_Weight_1
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2 and P1. See documentation report
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2]
|
w03_Weight_2
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4_1 and P1. See documentation report
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
w01_k3
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
151 |
5.8% |
0.057854406 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
713 |
27.3% |
0.273180077 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
299 |
11.5% |
0.114559387 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
194 |
7.4% |
0.074329502 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
184 |
7% |
0.070498084 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
116 |
4.4% |
0.044444444 |
7 |
The Green Party |
111 |
4.3% |
0.042528736 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
730 |
28% |
0.279693487 |
9 |
Red |
57 |
2.2% |
0.021839080 |
10 |
Other: |
34 |
1.3% |
0.013026820 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
0.8% |
0.008045977 |
98 |
Not asked |
5905 |
|
NA |
w01_k20
Variable label:
|
Description of employment
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the descriptions fits best with what you have done for the past 7 days?
|
Technical description:
|
Check one option.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In paid work (or temporarily absent) |
1797 |
61.6% |
0.616043881 |
2 |
In education (not paid for by employer) |
216 |
7.4% |
0.074048680 |
3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
38 |
1.3% |
0.013027083 |
4 |
Unemployed, want a job but not actively seeking work |
16 |
0.5% |
0.005485087 |
5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
104 |
3.6% |
0.035653068 |
6 |
Retired |
528 |
18.1% |
0.181007885 |
7 |
In civilian national service or military service |
4 |
0.1% |
0.001371272 |
8 |
Staying at home, looking after children or other persons |
44 |
1.5% |
0.015083990 |
9 |
Other |
106 |
3.6% |
0.036338704 |
97 |
No answer |
64 |
2.2% |
0.021940350 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k21
Variable label:
|
Type of business
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
159 |
8.8% |
0.088480801 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
529 |
29.4% |
0.294379521 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
120 |
6.7% |
0.066777963 |
4 |
Private business |
822 |
45.7% |
0.457429048 |
5 |
Self-employed |
105 |
5.8% |
0.058430718 |
6 |
Other: |
60 |
3.3% |
0.033388982 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001112966 |
98 |
Not asked |
6718 |
|
NA |
w01_k25_1
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your current income?
|
Literal question:
|
Gross annual income is:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-8500000]
|
w01_k25_recode
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income [Recoded from continuous to discrete scale: w01_k25]
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:integer] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
< 150 000 |
288 |
9.9% |
0.09873157 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
441 |
15.1% |
0.15118272 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
472 |
16.2% |
0.16181008 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
561 |
19.2% |
0.19232088 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
340 |
11.7% |
0.11655811 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
188 |
6.4% |
0.06444978 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
235 |
8.1% |
0.08056222 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
102 |
3.5% |
0.03496743 |
97 |
No answer |
290 |
9.9% |
0.09941721 |
98 |
Not asked |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k26
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
17 |
0.6% |
0.005827905 |
2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
13 |
0.4% |
0.004456634 |
3 |
Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school,
secondary school) |
263 |
9% |
0.090161124 |
4 |
College certificate |
35 |
1.2% |
0.011998629 |
5 |
Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education
programme, one-year post admission |
361 |
12.4% |
0.123757285 |
6 |
Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes
(qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination) |
352 |
12.1% |
0.120671923 |
7 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
33 |
1.1% |
0.011312993 |
8 |
Diploma from addition to upper secondary education (vocational, technical
college) |
110 |
3.8% |
0.037709976 |
9 |
University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years
(university college graduate 2 and 2½ year) |
267 |
9.2% |
0.091532396 |
10 |
Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's
college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist,
etc.) |
570 |
19.5% |
0.195406239 |
11 |
Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor) |
195 |
6.7% |
0.066849503 |
12 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master) |
180 |
6.2% |
0.061707233 |
13 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further
professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian,
engineer, architect, senior business economist) |
325 |
11.1% |
0.111415838 |
14 |
Research level (Ph.D.) |
49 |
1.7% |
0.016798080 |
15 |
None of these |
77 |
2.6% |
0.026396983 |
97 |
No answer |
70 |
2.4% |
0.023997257 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k27
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Are/have you:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Never been married |
369 |
12.6% |
0.126499829 |
2 |
Married |
1630 |
55.9% |
0.558793281 |
3 |
Legally registered partner |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001714090 |
4 |
Cohabitant |
481 |
16.5% |
0.164895441 |
5 |
Divorces/separated |
204 |
7% |
0.069934865 |
6 |
Former cohabitant |
71 |
2.4% |
0.024340075 |
7 |
Former legally registered partner |
1 |
0% |
0.000342818 |
8 |
Widow/widower |
62 |
2.1% |
0.021254714 |
9 |
Other |
30 |
1% |
0.010284539 |
97 |
No answer |
64 |
2.2% |
0.021940350 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
2700 |
92.6% |
0.92560850 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
160 |
5.5% |
0.05485087 |
97 |
No answer |
57 |
2% |
0.01954062 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k29
Variable label:
|
Parents immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
2584 |
88.6% |
0.885841618 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
169 |
5.8% |
0.057936236 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
17 |
0.6% |
0.005827905 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
45 |
1.5% |
0.015426808 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
40 |
1.4% |
0.013712719 |
97 |
No answer |
62 |
2.1% |
0.021254714 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k14_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politics is complicated
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me have no understanding of what it’s about.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
122 |
4.2% |
0.04182379 |
2 |
Agree |
364 |
12.5% |
0.12478574 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
813 |
27.9% |
0.27871100 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
255 |
8.7% |
0.08741858 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
437 |
15% |
0.14981145 |
6 |
Disagree |
649 |
22.2% |
0.22248886 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
231 |
7.9% |
0.07919095 |
97 |
No answer |
46 |
1.6% |
0.01576963 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k14_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Can vote, not much else to influence
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
People like me can vote, but there is nothing else we can do to influence politics.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
121 |
4.1% |
0.04148097 |
2 |
Agree |
340 |
11.7% |
0.11655811 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
449 |
15.4% |
0.15392527 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
194 |
6.7% |
0.06650668 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
639 |
21.9% |
0.21906068 |
6 |
Disagree |
798 |
27.4% |
0.27356874 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
330 |
11.3% |
0.11312993 |
97 |
No answer |
46 |
1.6% |
0.01576963 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k15_99
Variable label:
|
Trust people
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now to a more general question:
|
Literal question:
|
Would you agree that most people in general can be trusted, or do you believe that one can’t be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
Technical description:
|
0 means “Can’t be careful enough” and 10 means “Most people can be trusted.”
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Can't be careful enough |
40 |
1.4% |
0.01371272 |
1 |
1 |
31 |
1.1% |
0.01062736 |
2 |
2 |
55 |
1.9% |
0.01885499 |
3 |
3 |
115 |
3.9% |
0.03942407 |
4 |
4 |
146 |
5% |
0.05005142 |
5 |
5 |
257 |
8.8% |
0.08810422 |
6 |
6 |
323 |
11.1% |
0.11073020 |
7 |
7 |
679 |
23.3% |
0.23277340 |
8 |
8 |
644 |
22.1% |
0.22077477 |
9 |
9 |
296 |
10.1% |
0.10147412 |
10 |
10 - Most people can be trusted |
279 |
9.6% |
0.09564621 |
97 |
No answer |
52 |
1.8% |
0.01782653 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k12_1
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Government
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The Government
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
77 |
2.6% |
0.02639698 |
2 |
High confidence |
897 |
30.8% |
0.30750771 |
3 |
Some confidence |
965 |
33.1% |
0.33081933 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
349 |
12% |
0.11964347 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
326 |
11.2% |
0.11175866 |
6 |
High mistrust |
137 |
4.7% |
0.04696606 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
48 |
1.6% |
0.01645526 |
8 |
Don't know |
40 |
1.4% |
0.01371272 |
97 |
No answer |
78 |
2.7% |
0.02673980 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k12_2
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Parliament
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
Parliament
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
160 |
5.5% |
0.054850874 |
2 |
High confidence |
1168 |
40% |
0.400411382 |
3 |
Some confidence |
882 |
30.2% |
0.302365444 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
326 |
11.2% |
0.111758656 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
186 |
6.4% |
0.063764141 |
6 |
High mistrust |
61 |
2.1% |
0.020911896 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
16 |
0.5% |
0.005485087 |
8 |
Don't know |
39 |
1.3% |
0.013369901 |
97 |
No answer |
79 |
2.7% |
0.027082619 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k12_3
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Politicians
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
11 |
0.4% |
0.003770998 |
2 |
High confidence |
278 |
9.5% |
0.095303394 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1078 |
37% |
0.369557765 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
508 |
17.4% |
0.174151526 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
634 |
21.7% |
0.217346589 |
6 |
High mistrust |
211 |
7.2% |
0.072334590 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
85 |
2.9% |
0.029139527 |
8 |
Don't know |
31 |
1.1% |
0.010627357 |
97 |
No answer |
81 |
2.8% |
0.027768255 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k12_4
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Parties
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
Parties
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
12 |
0.4% |
0.004113816 |
2 |
High confidence |
240 |
8.2% |
0.082276311 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1112 |
38.1% |
0.381213576 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
667 |
22.9% |
0.228659582 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
536 |
18.4% |
0.183750429 |
6 |
High mistrust |
117 |
4% |
0.040109702 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
35 |
1.2% |
0.011998629 |
8 |
Don't know |
87 |
3% |
0.029825163 |
97 |
No answer |
111 |
3.8% |
0.038052794 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k12_5
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: The Sameting
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The Sameting
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
23 |
0.8% |
0.007884813 |
2 |
High confidence |
142 |
4.9% |
0.048680151 |
3 |
Some confidence |
232 |
8% |
0.079533768 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
914 |
31.3% |
0.313335619 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
166 |
5.7% |
0.056907782 |
6 |
High mistrust |
124 |
4.3% |
0.042509427 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
111 |
3.8% |
0.038052794 |
8 |
Don't know |
1100 |
37.7% |
0.377099760 |
97 |
No answer |
105 |
3.6% |
0.035995886 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k12_6
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: The County Council
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The County Council
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
18 |
0.6% |
0.006170723 |
2 |
High confidence |
259 |
8.9% |
0.088789853 |
3 |
Some confidence |
729 |
25% |
0.249914296 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
868 |
29.8% |
0.297565992 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
353 |
12.1% |
0.121014741 |
6 |
High mistrust |
153 |
5.2% |
0.052451148 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
90 |
3.1% |
0.030853617 |
8 |
Don't know |
344 |
11.8% |
0.117929379 |
97 |
No answer |
103 |
3.5% |
0.035310250 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k12_7
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: The Municipal Council
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The municipal council
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
29 |
1% |
0.009941721 |
2 |
High confidence |
476 |
16.3% |
0.163181351 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1090 |
37.4% |
0.373671580 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
501 |
17.2% |
0.171751800 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
452 |
15.5% |
0.154953720 |
6 |
High mistrust |
147 |
5% |
0.050394241 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
58 |
2% |
0.019883442 |
8 |
Don't know |
84 |
2.9% |
0.028796709 |
97 |
No answer |
80 |
2.7% |
0.027425437 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k12_8
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: EU
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The EU
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
32 |
1.1% |
0.01097017 |
2 |
High confidence |
260 |
8.9% |
0.08913267 |
3 |
Some confidence |
710 |
24.3% |
0.24340075 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
612 |
21% |
0.20980459 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
560 |
19.2% |
0.19197806 |
6 |
High mistrust |
352 |
12.1% |
0.12067192 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
211 |
7.2% |
0.07233459 |
8 |
Don't know |
99 |
3.4% |
0.03393898 |
97 |
No answer |
81 |
2.8% |
0.02776826 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k12_9
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: UN
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The UN
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
190 |
6.5% |
0.06513541 |
2 |
High confidence |
945 |
32.4% |
0.32396298 |
3 |
Some confidence |
884 |
30.3% |
0.30305108 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
424 |
14.5% |
0.14535482 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
196 |
6.7% |
0.06719232 |
6 |
High mistrust |
72 |
2.5% |
0.02468289 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
34 |
1.2% |
0.01165581 |
8 |
Don't know |
91 |
3.1% |
0.03119643 |
97 |
No answer |
81 |
2.8% |
0.02776826 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5598 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_1
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: too small differences between parties
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
Literal question:
|
The differences between the parties are too minor
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
21 |
7% |
0.07023411 |
2 |
Important |
50 |
16.7% |
0.16722408 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
55 |
18.4% |
0.18394649 |
4 |
Not very important |
35 |
11.7% |
0.11705686 |
5 |
Not important at all |
52 |
17.4% |
0.17391304 |
97 |
No answer |
86 |
28.8% |
0.28762542 |
98 |
Not asked |
8216 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_2
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: not committed to important issues
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
Literal question:
|
I am not committed to any important issues
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
16 |
5.4% |
0.05351171 |
2 |
Important |
30 |
10% |
0.10033445 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
54 |
18.1% |
0.18060201 |
4 |
Not very important |
41 |
13.7% |
0.13712375 |
5 |
Not important at all |
69 |
23.1% |
0.23076923 |
97 |
No answer |
89 |
29.8% |
0.29765886 |
98 |
Not asked |
8216 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_3
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: not familiar with issues
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
Literal question:
|
I am not familiar enough with what the parties represent
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
32 |
10.7% |
0.10702341 |
2 |
Important |
56 |
18.7% |
0.18729097 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
46 |
15.4% |
0.15384615 |
4 |
Not very important |
28 |
9.4% |
0.09364548 |
5 |
Not important at all |
54 |
18.1% |
0.18060201 |
97 |
No answer |
83 |
27.8% |
0.27759197 |
98 |
Not asked |
8216 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_4
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: lacking confidence in politicians
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
Literal question:
|
I lack confidence in politicians
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
48 |
16.1% |
0.16053512 |
2 |
Important |
51 |
17.1% |
0.17056856 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
44 |
14.7% |
0.14715719 |
4 |
Not very important |
29 |
9.7% |
0.09698997 |
5 |
Not important at all |
51 |
17.1% |
0.17056856 |
97 |
No answer |
76 |
25.4% |
0.25418060 |
98 |
Not asked |
8216 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_5
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: lack of time
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
Literal question:
|
I didn’t have the time or opportunity
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
52 |
17.4% |
0.17391304 |
2 |
Important |
26 |
8.7% |
0.08695652 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
32 |
10.7% |
0.10702341 |
4 |
Not very important |
28 |
9.4% |
0.09364548 |
5 |
Not important at all |
90 |
30.1% |
0.30100334 |
97 |
No answer |
71 |
23.7% |
0.23745819 |
98 |
Not asked |
8216 |
|
NA |
w02_k204
Variable label:
|
Party preference if elections tomorrow
|
Literal question:
|
What would you vote if there were an election to the Storting tomorrow?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Labour Party |
751 |
29.1% |
0.290972491 |
2 |
The Progress Party |
224 |
8.7% |
0.086788067 |
3 |
The Conservative Party |
646 |
25% |
0.250290585 |
4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
131 |
5.1% |
0.050755521 |
5 |
The Centre Party |
72 |
2.8% |
0.027896164 |
6 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
107 |
4.1% |
0.041456800 |
7 |
The Liberal Party |
174 |
6.7% |
0.067415730 |
8 |
Red |
50 |
1.9% |
0.019372336 |
9 |
The Green Party |
130 |
5% |
0.050368074 |
10 |
Other |
23 |
0.9% |
0.008911275 |
11 |
Would not vote |
43 |
1.7% |
0.016660209 |
12 |
Cannot vote |
63 |
2.4% |
0.024409144 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.3% |
0.002712127 |
99 |
Don't know |
160 |
6.2% |
0.061991476 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5934 |
|
NA |
w02_hp1
Variable label:
|
About health condition
|
Literal question:
|
Finally, we would like to ask you a few questions about yourself: In general, would you say your health is:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8515] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
362 |
14% |
0.140255715 |
2 |
Very good |
1018 |
39.4% |
0.394420767 |
3 |
Good |
852 |
33% |
0.330104611 |
4 |
Somewhat good |
262 |
10.2% |
0.101511042 |
5 |
Poor |
70 |
2.7% |
0.027121271 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
0.7% |
0.006586594 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5934 |
|
NA |