Citation
Primary investigators
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
Mikael Andersson, Sveinung Arnesen, Lise Bjånesøy, Åsta Nordø, Endre Tvinnereim, Erik Knudsen
|
Scientific team, University of Bergen and UNI Research Rokkan Centre
|
Producers
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in two waves, wave 1 and wave 3. In wave 1 4.870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3 5.623 members were recruited. Prior to wave 5 the Norwegian Citizen Panel had 10,247 members. The sampling procedure of wave and wave 1 is identical. 25 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a online questionnaire. Existing members receivs e-mail invitations asking for their participation in the current wave.
New panel members were recruited in multiple steps.
First, letters were sent to everyone in the sample. The letters contained the following information: a) a description of the project, b) the Citizen Panel's policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the anonymity of the participants, c) the time-frame of the project, d) the participants' rights to opt of the panel at any time in the future, e) contact information for the people responsible for the project, f) a unique log-in id and the web address to the panel's web site and g) the estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes).
The invitation was emailed on the 01st of March 2016.
Three reminders were sent at the following dates: 04th of March, 08th of March, and 11th of March. The reminder was sent to those who a) had not entered the questionnaire, and b) had not completed the questionnaire.
Wave 6 was closed 19th of March.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix). When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent's geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer this question. Because of this, two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample.
Change Log
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
v-101
|
2020-06-16
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 6
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 6
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
r6p5_1
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
r6p5_2
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
NA
|
2018-02-18
|
r6p3
|
Updated the value of 1 respondent.
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r6p4_1
|
Corrected values of 4 respondents.
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r6p4_2
|
Corrected values of 4 respondents.
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r6_weight_2
|
Corrected values of 4 respondents.
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
r6p4_1
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
r6p4_2
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
NA
|
2017-02-02
|
r6km62a
|
Updated english variable documentation.
|
NA
|
2017-02-02
|
r6km62b
|
Updated english variable documentation.
|
NA
|
2017-02-01
|
r6lb1b
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2016-08-01
|
r6km66
|
Flipped answer scale if r6rankm66 = 2.
|
NA
|
2016-05-06
|
r6pad4c
|
Corrected variable documentation.
|
NA
|
2016-05-06
|
r6trans1
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2016-05-06
|
r6km66_open
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2016-05-06
|
r6km12
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2016-05-06
|
r6km62a
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2016-05-06
|
r6km62b
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
v-100
|
2016-04-15
|
NA
|
Initial release of round 6
|
Dataset contents
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 6 - v-101.sav
|
# Cases
|
4859
|
# Variables
|
645
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6u
Variable label:
|
Sub-group
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
U1 |
1190 |
24.5% |
0.2449064 |
2 |
U2 |
1249 |
25.7% |
0.2570488 |
3 |
U3 |
1164 |
24% |
0.2395555 |
4 |
U4 |
1256 |
25.8% |
0.2584894 |
r6rekruttert
Variable label:
|
Time of recruitment
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Wave 1 |
2208 |
45.4% |
0.4544145 |
3 |
Wave 3 |
2651 |
54.6% |
0.5455855 |
r6k13
Variable label:
|
How often do you discuss politics?
|
Literal question:
|
How often would you say that you discuss politics with others?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Often |
1473 |
30.3% |
0.303148796 |
2 |
Sometimes |
2584 |
53.2% |
0.531796666 |
3 |
Rarely |
740 |
15.2% |
0.152294711 |
4 |
Never |
53 |
1.1% |
0.010907594 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
0.2% |
0.001852233 |
r6tilfreds_1
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Life at the moment
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied are you with:
|
Literal question:
|
Life at the moment?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
1135 |
23.4% |
0.233587158 |
2 |
Satisfied |
2790 |
57.4% |
0.574192221 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
684 |
14.1% |
0.140769706 |
4 |
Slightly satisfied |
180 |
3.7% |
0.037044659 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
35 |
0.7% |
0.007203128 |
97 |
No Answer |
35 |
0.7% |
0.007203128 |
r6tilfreds_2
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Your personal economy
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied are you with:
|
Literal question:
|
Your personal economy?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
873 |
18% |
0.17966660 |
2 |
Satisfied |
2650 |
54.5% |
0.54537971 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
860 |
17.7% |
0.17699115 |
4 |
Slightly satisfied |
325 |
6.7% |
0.06688619 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
97 |
2% |
0.01996296 |
97 |
No Answer |
54 |
1.1% |
0.01111340 |
r6tilfreds_3
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: The government in Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied are you with:
|
Literal question:
|
The present government in Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
258 |
5.3% |
0.05309735 |
2 |
Satisfied |
1422 |
29.3% |
0.29265281 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1555 |
32% |
0.32002470 |
4 |
Slightly satisfied |
1120 |
23.1% |
0.23050010 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
450 |
9.3% |
0.09261165 |
97 |
No Answer |
54 |
1.1% |
0.01111340 |
r6tilfreds_4
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: How democracy works in Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask some questions about satisfaction. How satisfied are you with:
|
Literal question:
|
The way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
508 |
10.5% |
0.10454826 |
2 |
Satisfied |
2487 |
51.2% |
0.51183371 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1320 |
27.2% |
0.27166084 |
4 |
Slightly satisfied |
392 |
8.1% |
0.08067504 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
98 |
2% |
0.02016876 |
97 |
No Answer |
54 |
1.1% |
0.01111340 |
r6k10
Variable label:
|
Perception of the economic situation in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
Post-question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
431 |
8.9% |
0.088701379 |
2 |
Good |
2338 |
48.1% |
0.481168965 |
3 |
Quite good |
1113 |
22.9% |
0.229059477 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
452 |
9.3% |
0.093023256 |
5 |
Quite bad |
411 |
8.5% |
0.084585306 |
6 |
Bad |
80 |
1.6% |
0.016464293 |
7 |
Very bad |
16 |
0.3% |
0.003292859 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
0.4% |
0.003704466 |
r6k204
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party if parliamentary election tomorrow
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
221 |
4.5% |
0.045482610 |
2 |
The Progress party |
563 |
11.6% |
0.115867462 |
3 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
1149 |
23.6% |
0.236468409 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
251 |
5.2% |
0.051656719 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
255 |
5.2% |
0.052479934 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
246 |
5.1% |
0.050627701 |
7 |
The Green Party |
212 |
4.4% |
0.043630377 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1481 |
30.5% |
0.304795225 |
9 |
The Red Party |
138 |
2.8% |
0.028400906 |
10 |
Would not vote |
161 |
3.3% |
0.033134390 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
70 |
1.4% |
0.014406256 |
12 |
Other: |
83 |
1.7% |
0.017081704 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
0.6% |
0.005968306 |
r6k204_12_other
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party if parliamentary election tomorrow, other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6k6_1
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Christian Democrats
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
484 |
10% |
0.09960897 |
2 |
Really dislike |
773 |
15.9% |
0.15908623 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1108 |
22.8% |
0.22803046 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1218 |
25.1% |
0.25066886 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
891 |
18.3% |
0.18337106 |
6 |
Really like |
265 |
5.5% |
0.05453797 |
7 |
Intensely like |
57 |
1.2% |
0.01173081 |
97 |
No answer |
63 |
1.3% |
0.01296563 |
r6k6_2
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party of Norway
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
155 |
3.2% |
0.03189957 |
2 |
Really dislike |
525 |
10.8% |
0.10804692 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
955 |
19.7% |
0.19654250 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
631 |
13% |
0.12986211 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1235 |
25.4% |
0.25416752 |
6 |
Really like |
1033 |
21.3% |
0.21259518 |
7 |
Intensely like |
265 |
5.5% |
0.05453797 |
97 |
No answer |
60 |
1.2% |
0.01234822 |
r6k6_3
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Progress Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1332 |
27.4% |
0.27413048 |
2 |
Really dislike |
940 |
19.3% |
0.19345544 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
680 |
14% |
0.13994649 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
431 |
8.9% |
0.08870138 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
740 |
15.2% |
0.15229471 |
6 |
Really like |
490 |
10.1% |
0.10084380 |
7 |
Intensely like |
193 |
4% |
0.03972011 |
97 |
No answer |
53 |
1.1% |
0.01090759 |
r6k6_4
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
452 |
9.3% |
0.093023256 |
2 |
Really dislike |
664 |
13.7% |
0.136653632 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1025 |
21.1% |
0.210948755 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1156 |
23.8% |
0.237909035 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1103 |
22.7% |
0.227001441 |
6 |
Really like |
348 |
7.2% |
0.071619675 |
7 |
Intensely like |
46 |
0.9% |
0.009466969 |
97 |
No answer |
65 |
1.3% |
0.013377238 |
r6k6_5
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
821 |
16.9% |
0.16896481 |
2 |
Really dislike |
840 |
17.3% |
0.17287508 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
895 |
18.4% |
0.18419428 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
913 |
18.8% |
0.18789874 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
828 |
17% |
0.17040543 |
6 |
Really like |
414 |
8.5% |
0.08520272 |
7 |
Intensely like |
91 |
1.9% |
0.01872813 |
97 |
No answer |
57 |
1.2% |
0.01173081 |
r6k6_6
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
253 |
5.2% |
0.05206833 |
2 |
Really dislike |
544 |
11.2% |
0.11195719 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1050 |
21.6% |
0.21609385 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1663 |
34.2% |
0.34225149 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
943 |
19.4% |
0.19407285 |
6 |
Really like |
281 |
5.8% |
0.05783083 |
7 |
Intensely like |
59 |
1.2% |
0.01214242 |
97 |
No answer |
66 |
1.4% |
0.01358304 |
r6k6_7
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
971 |
20% |
0.19983536 |
2 |
Really dislike |
764 |
15.7% |
0.15723400 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
791 |
16.3% |
0.16279070 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
878 |
18.1% |
0.18069562 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
916 |
18.9% |
0.18851616 |
6 |
Really like |
402 |
8.3% |
0.08273307 |
7 |
Intensely like |
83 |
1.7% |
0.01708170 |
97 |
No answer |
54 |
1.1% |
0.01111340 |
r6k6_8
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
180 |
3.7% |
0.03704466 |
2 |
Really dislike |
367 |
7.6% |
0.07552994 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
741 |
15.3% |
0.15250051 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
749 |
15.4% |
0.15414694 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1365 |
28.1% |
0.28092200 |
6 |
Really like |
1148 |
23.6% |
0.23626261 |
7 |
Intensely like |
257 |
5.3% |
0.05289154 |
97 |
No answer |
52 |
1.1% |
0.01070179 |
r6k6_9
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Red Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1162 |
23.9% |
0.23914386 |
2 |
Really dislike |
919 |
18.9% |
0.18913357 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
725 |
14.9% |
0.14920766 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1072 |
22.1% |
0.22062153 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
635 |
13.1% |
0.13068533 |
6 |
Really like |
216 |
4.4% |
0.04445359 |
7 |
Intensely like |
53 |
1.1% |
0.01090759 |
97 |
No answer |
77 |
1.6% |
0.01584688 |
r6k9_1
Variable label:
|
[1] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally?
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue.
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6k9_2
Variable label:
|
[2] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally?
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue.
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6k9_3
Variable label:
|
[3] Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally?
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue.
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6ran3
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=1 or u=3]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=1 or u=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2354] [Invalid:2505] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
1140 |
48.4% |
0.4842821 |
2 |
2 |
1214 |
51.6% |
0.5157179 |
Sysmiss |
|
2505 |
|
NA |
r6km61a
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the words climate change [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the words climate change?
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 or u=3 and ran3=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6km61b
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the words environmental problems [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the words environmental problems?
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 or u=3 and ran3=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6km5
Variable label:
|
To what extent is it possible to prevent harmful climate change
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let us assume that climate change can be a major problem for the world in the future if nothing is done about it.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think it is possible to prevent harmful climate change?
|
Post-question:
|
Choose the statement that best matches your viewpoint:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 or u=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
It is impossible to prevent harmful climate change. |
125 |
10.5% |
0.105042017 |
2 |
It is possible, but very difficult, to prevent harmful climate change. |
787 |
66.1% |
0.661344538 |
3 |
It is possible and entirely realistic to prevent harmful climate change. |
261 |
21.9% |
0.219327731 |
4 |
It is easy to prevent harmful climate change. |
13 |
1.1% |
0.010924370 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003361345 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6km12
Variable label:
|
Climate change: what should be done [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think should be done about climate change?
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6dv30_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: The tax burden should be reduced
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
The tax burden should be reduced, even if it leads to cutbacks in the welfare state.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
122 |
2.5% |
0.02510805 |
2 |
Agree |
264 |
5.4% |
0.05433217 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
670 |
13.8% |
0.13788845 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
550 |
11.3% |
0.11319201 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
898 |
18.5% |
0.18481169 |
6 |
Disagree |
1352 |
27.8% |
0.27824655 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
973 |
20% |
0.20024696 |
97 |
No answer |
30 |
0.6% |
0.00617411 |
r6dv30_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Commercial private schools should be allowed
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Commercial private schools should be allowed.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
267 |
5.5% |
0.054949578 |
2 |
Agree |
777 |
16% |
0.159909446 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
958 |
19.7% |
0.197159909 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
704 |
14.5% |
0.144885779 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
709 |
14.6% |
0.145914797 |
6 |
Disagree |
742 |
15.3% |
0.152706318 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
668 |
13.7% |
0.137476847 |
97 |
No answer |
34 |
0.7% |
0.006997325 |
r6dv30_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Many public activities could be done better and cheaper by the private sector
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Many public activities could have been carried out both with better results and at lower cost, if they were operated by the private sector.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
290 |
6% |
0.059683062 |
2 |
Agree |
683 |
14.1% |
0.140563902 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
1219 |
25.1% |
0.250874666 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
599 |
12.3% |
0.123276394 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
675 |
13.9% |
0.138917473 |
6 |
Disagree |
833 |
17.1% |
0.171434452 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
531 |
10.9% |
0.109281745 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
0.6% |
0.005968306 |
r6dv31_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: The state should help reduce income disparities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
The government should contribute to reducing income differences in society.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
688 |
14.2% |
0.14159292 |
2 |
Agree |
1344 |
27.7% |
0.27660012 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
1332 |
27.4% |
0.27413048 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
539 |
11.1% |
0.11092817 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
449 |
9.2% |
0.09240584 |
6 |
Disagree |
323 |
6.6% |
0.06647458 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
105 |
2.2% |
0.02160938 |
97 |
No answer |
79 |
1.6% |
0.01625849 |
r6dv31_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different religions and beliefs
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different religions and beliefs.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
399 |
8.2% |
0.08211566 |
2 |
Agree |
1051 |
21.6% |
0.21629965 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
998 |
20.5% |
0.20539206 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
756 |
15.6% |
0.15558757 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
706 |
14.5% |
0.14529739 |
6 |
Disagree |
512 |
10.5% |
0.10537148 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
359 |
7.4% |
0.07388352 |
97 |
No answer |
78 |
1.6% |
0.01605269 |
r6dv31_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has committed to should be carried out abroad
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has committed to, should be carried out abroad.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
173 |
3.6% |
0.03560403 |
2 |
Agree |
355 |
7.3% |
0.07306030 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
608 |
12.5% |
0.12512863 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1127 |
23.2% |
0.23194073 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
846 |
17.4% |
0.17410990 |
6 |
Disagree |
1131 |
23.3% |
0.23276394 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
528 |
10.9% |
0.10866433 |
97 |
No answer |
91 |
1.9% |
0.01872813 |
r6dvh_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten and Vesterålen areas
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the area by Lofoten and Vesterålen.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1049 |
21.6% |
0.21588804 |
2 |
Agree |
869 |
17.9% |
0.17884338 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
586 |
12.1% |
0.12060095 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
850 |
17.5% |
0.17493311 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
574 |
11.8% |
0.11813130 |
6 |
Disagree |
560 |
11.5% |
0.11525005 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
311 |
6.4% |
0.06400494 |
97 |
No answer |
60 |
1.2% |
0.01234822 |
r6dvh_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
284 |
5.8% |
0.05844824 |
2 |
Agree |
667 |
13.7% |
0.13727104 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
847 |
17.4% |
0.17431570 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
414 |
8.5% |
0.08520272 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1023 |
21.1% |
0.21053715 |
6 |
Disagree |
886 |
18.2% |
0.18234205 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
684 |
14.1% |
0.14076971 |
97 |
No answer |
54 |
1.1% |
0.01111340 |
r6dvh_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2012 |
41.4% |
0.41407697 |
2 |
Agree |
1412 |
29.1% |
0.29059477 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
409 |
8.4% |
0.08417370 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
366 |
7.5% |
0.07532414 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
248 |
5.1% |
0.05103931 |
6 |
Disagree |
210 |
4.3% |
0.04321877 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
144 |
3% |
0.02963573 |
97 |
No answer |
58 |
1.2% |
0.01193661 |
r6oc_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: The difference between men’s and women’s behaviour is determined by genetic conditions
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you think that these statements are completely true or not true at all?
|
Literal question:
|
I think that the difference between men’s and women’s behaviour and personality is largely determined by genetic conditions.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1. Not true at all |
157 |
13.2% |
0.13193277 |
2 |
2. |
213 |
17.9% |
0.17899160 |
3 |
3. |
222 |
18.7% |
0.18655462 |
4 |
4. |
246 |
20.7% |
0.20672269 |
5 |
5. |
187 |
15.7% |
0.15714286 |
6 |
6. |
99 |
8.3% |
0.08319328 |
7 |
7. Completely true |
47 |
3.9% |
0.03949580 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
1.6% |
0.01596639 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6oc_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Intelligence is determined by genetic conditions
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you think that these statements are completely true or not true at all?
|
Literal question:
|
I find that intelligence is a property that is largely determined by genetic conditions.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1. Not true at all |
124 |
10.4% |
0.10420168 |
2 |
2. |
146 |
12.3% |
0.12268908 |
3 |
3. |
201 |
16.9% |
0.16890756 |
4 |
4. |
262 |
22% |
0.22016807 |
5 |
5. |
263 |
22.1% |
0.22100840 |
6 |
6. |
143 |
12% |
0.12016807 |
7 |
7. Completely true |
34 |
2.9% |
0.02857143 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
1.4% |
0.01428571 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6oc_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Genetic differences between Asians and Europeans a reason for the differences in abilities between individuals in these groups
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you think that these statements are completely true or not true at all?
|
Literal question:
|
I think that genetic differences between Asians and Europeans are an important reason for the differences in abilities between individuals from these groups.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1. Not true at all |
526 |
44.2% |
0.44201681 |
2 |
2. |
244 |
20.5% |
0.20504202 |
3 |
3. |
134 |
11.3% |
0.11260504 |
4 |
4. |
157 |
13.2% |
0.13193277 |
5 |
5. |
62 |
5.2% |
0.05210084 |
6 |
6. |
27 |
2.3% |
0.02268908 |
7 |
7. Completely true |
19 |
1.6% |
0.01596639 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6oc_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: Parents and children have similiar behaviour and character traits because they share genetic heredity
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you think that these statements are completely true or not true at all?
|
Literal question:
|
I think that the main reason why parents and children have such similar behaviour and such similar character traits is that they share genetic heredity.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1. Not true at all |
58 |
4.9% |
0.04873950 |
2 |
2. |
159 |
13.4% |
0.13361345 |
3 |
3. |
207 |
17.4% |
0.17394958 |
4 |
4. |
327 |
27.5% |
0.27478992 |
5 |
5. |
223 |
18.7% |
0.18739496 |
6 |
6. |
139 |
11.7% |
0.11680672 |
7 |
7. Completely true |
60 |
5% |
0.05042017 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
1.4% |
0.01428571 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6ran1
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=1]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1182] [Invalid:3677] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
588 |
49.7% |
0.4974619 |
2 |
2 |
594 |
50.3% |
0.5025381 |
Sysmiss |
|
3677 |
|
NA |
r6fr1_1
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Art and Culture, band and choir
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Art and culture, band and choir [Music, theatre and dance. Art, applied arts and architecture. History, literature and language. Museums, collections and libraries. Periodicals and media. Other cultural and artistic activities]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
78 |
13.3% |
0.1326531 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
510 |
86.7% |
0.8673469 |
r6fr1_2
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Athletics and sport
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport [All types of athletics, sports and exercise, rifle club, company sports and disabled sports]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Athletics and sport |
123 |
20.9% |
0.2091837 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
465 |
79.1% |
0.7908163 |
r6fr1_3
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity [Outdoor recreation and scouts. Car and boat clubs. Animal owner clubs. Pensioners’ clubs. Student societies. Social clubs - Rotary, Lions etc. Other hobbies and recreational activities]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
105 |
17.9% |
0.1785714 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
483 |
82.1% |
0.8214286 |
r6fr1_4
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Education, training and research
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research [Primary and lower secondary schools including the parent council in state schools, but voluntary work only in private schools. Upper secondary schools. Folk high schools. Universities and university colleges. Vocational/technical education. Adult education and further education. Research and development]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Education, training and research |
45 |
7.7% |
0.07653061 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
543 |
92.3% |
0.92346939 |
r6fr1_5
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Health, nursing and rescue work
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Health, nursing and rescue work [Hospital. Rehabilitation. Nursing home. Sheltered housing and home care services. Psychiatric institutions. Out-patient health services. Alternative medicine. Rescue work and ambulance services]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
31 |
5.3% |
0.05272109 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
557 |
94.7% |
0.94727891 |
r6fr1_6
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Social services and substance abuse care
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse care [Kindergartens. The Norwegian Red Cross. Blue Cross Norway. Norwegian People’s Aid. Family counselling. Crisis centres and telephones. Services for the disabled. Services for the elderly. Self-help and volunteer centres]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
38 |
6.5% |
0.06462585 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
550 |
93.5% |
0.93537415 |
r6fr1_7
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Nature, environmental and animal protection
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environmental and animal protection [Nature and environmental protection. Area preservation and area management. Animal protection. Veterinary services]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
14 |
2.4% |
0.02380952 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
574 |
97.6% |
0.97619048 |
r6fr1_8
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood [Meeting house]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
96 |
16.3% |
0.1632653 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
492 |
83.7% |
0.8367347 |
r6fr1_9
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Housing co-operatives and housing associations
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Housing co-operatives and housing associations [Homeowner associations]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
73 |
12.4% |
0.1241497 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
515 |
87.6% |
0.8758503 |
r6fr1_10
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Rights, support and advocacy work
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Rights, support and advocacy work [Disabled and ill. Women’s rights. Language societies. Ethnic minorities. Weak/exposed groups, prisoners, the poor. Campaigns and lobbying]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
22 |
3.7% |
0.03741497 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
566 |
96.3% |
0.96258503 |
r6fr1_11
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Political parties
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties [Youth political parties]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Political parties |
15 |
2.6% |
0.0255102 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
573 |
97.4% |
0.9744898 |
r6fr1_12
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work [International friendship and exchange programmes. International relief and development assistance. Human rights and peace work]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
22 |
3.7% |
0.03741497 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
566 |
96.3% |
0.96258503 |
r6fr1_13
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations [Employee organisations. Employer organisations. Trade and industry associations. Producers co-operatives. Pupil and student organisations.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
47 |
8% |
0.07993197 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
541 |
92% |
0.92006803 |
r6fr1_14
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway [Organisations linked to the Church of Norway. Mission. Protestant free church. Other religions. Belief organisations, also non-religious such as the Norwegian Humanist Association]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
43 |
7.3% |
0.07312925 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
545 |
92.7% |
0.92687075 |
r6fr1_15
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Immigrant organisations
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations [Organisations linked to country background, culture, identity outside Norway]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Immigrant organisations |
8 |
1.4% |
0.01360544 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
580 |
98.6% |
0.98639456 |
r6fr1_16
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Other, specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify |
11 |
1.9% |
0.01870748 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
577 |
98.1% |
0.98129252 |
r6fr1_16_other
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6fr1_17
Variable label:
|
No, not volunteering
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in any of the following areas:
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
207 |
35.2% |
0.3520408 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4271 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
381 |
64.8% |
0.6479592 |
r6fri40
Variable label:
|
Done voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations last 12 months
|
Literal question:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out any voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran1=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
278 |
46.8% |
0.468013468 |
2 |
No |
311 |
52.4% |
0.523569024 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.8% |
0.008417508 |
98 |
Not asked |
4265 |
|
NA |
r6frii2_1
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Art and Culture, band and choir
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Art and culture, band and choir [Music, theatre and dance. Art, applied arts and architecture. History, literature and language. Museums, collections and libraries. Periodicals and media. Other cultural and artistic activities]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
69 |
24.8% |
0.2482014 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
209 |
75.2% |
0.7517986 |
r6frii2_2
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Athletics and sport
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport [All types of athletics, sports and exercise, rifle club, company sports and disabled sports]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Athletics and sport |
98 |
35.3% |
0.352518 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
180 |
64.7% |
0.647482 |
r6frii2_3
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity [Outdoor recreation and scouts. Car and boat clubs. Animal owner clubs. Pensioners’ clubs. Student societies. Social clubs - Rotary, Lions etc. Other hobbies and recreational activities]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
68 |
24.5% |
0.2446043 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
210 |
75.5% |
0.7553957 |
r6frii2_4
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Education, training and research
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research [Primary and lower secondary schools including the parent council in state schools, but voluntary work only in private schools. Upper secondary schools. Folk high schools. Universities and university colleges. Vocational/technical education. Adult education and further education. Research and development]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Education, training and research |
40 |
14.4% |
0.1438849 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
238 |
85.6% |
0.8561151 |
r6frii2_5
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Health, nursing and rescue work
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Health, nursing and rescue work [Hospital. Rehabilitation. Nursing home. Sheltered housing and home care services. Psychiatric institutions. Out-patient health services. Alternative medicine. Rescue work and ambulance services]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
15 |
5.4% |
0.05395683 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
263 |
94.6% |
0.94604317 |
r6frii2_6
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Social services and substance abuse care
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse care [Kindergartens. The Norwegian Red Cross. Blue Cross Norway. Norwegian People’s Aid. Family counselling. Crisis centres and telephones. Services for the disabled. Services for the elderly. Self-help and volunteer centres]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
33 |
11.9% |
0.118705 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
245 |
88.1% |
0.881295 |
r6frii2_7
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Nature, environmental and animal protection
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environmental and animal protection [Nature and environmental protection. Area preservation and area management. Animal protection. Veterinary services]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
12 |
4.3% |
0.04316547 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
266 |
95.7% |
0.95683453 |
r6frii2_8
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood [Meeting house]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
56 |
20.1% |
0.2014388 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
222 |
79.9% |
0.7985612 |
r6frii2_9
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Housing co-operatives and housing associations
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Housing co-operatives and housing associations [Homeowner associations]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
28 |
10.1% |
0.1007194 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
250 |
89.9% |
0.8992806 |
r6frii2_10
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Rights, support and advocacy work
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Rights, support and advocacy work [Disabled and ill. Women’s rights. Language societies. Ethnic minorities. Weak/exposed groups, prisoners, the poor. Campaigns and lobbying]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
11 |
4% |
0.03956835 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
267 |
96% |
0.96043165 |
r6frii2_11
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Political parties
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties [Youth political parties]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Political parties |
16 |
5.8% |
0.05755396 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
262 |
94.2% |
0.94244604 |
r6frii2_12
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work [International friendship and exchange programmes. International relief and development assistance. Human rights and peace work]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work |
14 |
5% |
0.05035971 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
264 |
95% |
0.94964029 |
r6frii2_13
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations [Employee organisations. Employer organisations. Trade and industry associations. Producers co-operatives. Pupil and student organisations.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
21 |
7.6% |
0.07553957 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
257 |
92.4% |
0.92446043 |
r6frii2_14
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway [Organisations linked to the Church of Norway. Mission. Protestant free church. Other religions. Belief organisations, also non-religious such as the Norwegian Humanist Association]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway |
47 |
16.9% |
0.1690647 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
231 |
83.1% |
0.8309353 |
r6frii2_15
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Immigrant organisations
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations [Organisations linked to country background, culture, identity outside Norway]
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Immigrant organisations |
5 |
1.8% |
0.01798561 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
273 |
98.2% |
0.98201439 |
r6frii2_16
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Other, specify
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify |
12 |
4.3% |
0.04316547 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
266 |
95.7% |
0.95683453 |
r6frii2_16_other
Variable label:
|
Volunteering: Other, specify [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6frii2_17
Variable label:
|
No, not volunteering
|
Pre-question text:
|
In which areas have you carried out voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations in the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
No
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and R6FRI40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
2 |
0.7% |
0.007194245 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4581 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
276 |
99.3% |
0.992805755 |
r6friii1
Variable label:
|
How much time spent voluntering during an ordinary week, last year
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the last year as a whole, roughly how much time did you spend on voluntary work during an ordinary week?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I do not undertake voluntary work |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
2 |
Less than half an hour |
56 |
20.7% |
0.206642066 |
3 |
Between half an hour and one hour |
48 |
17.7% |
0.177121771 |
4 |
1 to 2 hours |
62 |
22.9% |
0.228782288 |
5 |
2 to 5 hours |
58 |
21.4% |
0.214022140 |
6 |
More than 5 hours |
41 |
15.1% |
0.151291513 |
7 |
Not sure |
5 |
1.8% |
0.018450185 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003690037 |
98 |
Not asked |
4588 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_1
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Art and Culture, band and choir
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
Art and culture, band and choir
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
3 |
2% |
0.02040816 |
2 |
More than half |
12 |
8.2% |
0.08163265 |
3 |
About half |
12 |
8.2% |
0.08163265 |
4 |
Less than half |
43 |
29.3% |
0.29251701 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
73 |
49.7% |
0.49659864 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.7% |
0.02721088 |
98 |
Not asked |
4712 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_2
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Athletics and sport
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
Athletics and sport
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
5 |
2.3% |
0.02262443 |
2 |
More than half |
13 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
3 |
About half |
25 |
11.3% |
0.11312217 |
4 |
Less than half |
57 |
25.8% |
0.25791855 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
118 |
53.4% |
0.53393665 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01357466 |
98 |
Not asked |
4638 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_3
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
3 |
1.7% |
0.01734104 |
2 |
More than half |
10 |
5.8% |
0.05780347 |
3 |
About half |
19 |
11% |
0.10982659 |
4 |
Less than half |
51 |
29.5% |
0.29479769 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
85 |
49.1% |
0.49132948 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
2.9% |
0.02890173 |
98 |
Not asked |
4686 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_4
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Education, training and research
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
Education, training and research
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
2 |
More than half |
9 |
10.6% |
0.10588235 |
3 |
About half |
11 |
12.9% |
0.12941176 |
4 |
Less than half |
19 |
22.4% |
0.22352941 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
39 |
45.9% |
0.45882353 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
8.2% |
0.08235294 |
98 |
Not asked |
4774 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_5
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Health, nursing and rescue work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
Health, nursing and rescue work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
1 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
2 |
More than half |
1 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
3 |
About half |
7 |
15.2% |
0.15217391 |
4 |
Less than half |
13 |
28.3% |
0.28260870 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
20 |
43.5% |
0.43478261 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
8.7% |
0.08695652 |
98 |
Not asked |
4813 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_6
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Social services and substance abuse care
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
Social services and substance abuse care
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
2 |
2.8% |
0.02816901 |
2 |
More than half |
4 |
5.6% |
0.05633803 |
3 |
About half |
4 |
5.6% |
0.05633803 |
4 |
Less than half |
14 |
19.7% |
0.19718310 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
43 |
60.6% |
0.60563380 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
5.6% |
0.05633803 |
98 |
Not asked |
4788 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_7
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Nature, environmental and animal protection
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
Nature, environmental and animal protection
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
1 |
3.8% |
0.03846154 |
2 |
More than half |
6 |
23.1% |
0.23076923 |
3 |
About half |
9 |
34.6% |
0.34615385 |
4 |
Less than half |
5 |
19.2% |
0.19230769 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
5 |
19.2% |
0.19230769 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4833 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_8
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ associations, community associations and local neighbourhood
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
2 |
1.3% |
0.01315789 |
2 |
More than half |
7 |
4.6% |
0.04605263 |
3 |
About half |
17 |
11.2% |
0.11184211 |
4 |
Less than half |
43 |
28.3% |
0.28289474 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
78 |
51.3% |
0.51315789 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
3.3% |
0.03289474 |
98 |
Not asked |
4707 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_9
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Housing co-operatives and housing associations
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
Housing co-operatives and housing associations
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
3 |
3% |
0.02970297 |
2 |
More than half |
4 |
4% |
0.03960396 |
3 |
About half |
17 |
16.8% |
0.16831683 |
4 |
Less than half |
17 |
16.8% |
0.16831683 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
57 |
56.4% |
0.56435644 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
3% |
0.02970297 |
98 |
Not asked |
4758 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_10
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Rights, support and advocacy work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
Rights, support and advocacy work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
2 |
More than half |
8 |
24.2% |
0.24242424 |
3 |
About half |
4 |
12.1% |
0.12121212 |
4 |
Less than half |
5 |
15.2% |
0.15151515 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
15 |
45.5% |
0.45454545 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
3% |
0.03030303 |
98 |
Not asked |
4826 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_11
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Political parties
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
Political parties
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
1 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
2 |
More than half |
4 |
12.9% |
0.12903226 |
3 |
About half |
5 |
16.1% |
0.16129032 |
4 |
Less than half |
11 |
35.5% |
0.35483871 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
9 |
29% |
0.29032258 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
98 |
Not asked |
4828 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_12
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
International exchange, emergency help, assistance and human rights work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
6 |
16.7% |
0.16666667 |
2 |
More than half |
2 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
3 |
About half |
5 |
13.9% |
0.13888889 |
4 |
Less than half |
10 |
27.8% |
0.27777778 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
11 |
30.6% |
0.30555556 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
98 |
Not asked |
4823 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_13
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
2 |
2.9% |
0.02941176 |
2 |
More than half |
3 |
4.4% |
0.04411765 |
3 |
About half |
14 |
20.6% |
0.20588235 |
4 |
Less than half |
27 |
39.7% |
0.39705882 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
21 |
30.9% |
0.30882353 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
1.5% |
0.01470588 |
98 |
Not asked |
4791 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_14
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
Religion and beliefs including the Church of Norway
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
1 |
1.1% |
0.01111111 |
2 |
More than half |
8 |
8.9% |
0.08888889 |
3 |
About half |
4 |
4.4% |
0.04444444 |
4 |
Less than half |
19 |
21.1% |
0.21111111 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
57 |
63.3% |
0.63333333 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
1.1% |
0.01111111 |
98 |
Not asked |
4769 |
|
NA |
r6friii2_15
Variable label:
|
How much voluntering done with the aid of internet/social media: Immigrant organisations
|
Pre-question text:
|
Approximately how much of the voluntary work you do for the organisations listed below is work that is done with the aid of the internet and/or social media? e.g. information work, organising events or activities, invitations to events
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant organisations
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. The respondents are only asked about the organisations they selected in R6FRII2 or R6FR1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All of it |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
2 |
More than half |
2 |
15.4% |
0.15384615 |
3 |
About half |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
4 |
Less than half |
5 |
38.5% |
0.38461538 |
5 |
None, or almost none |
5 |
38.5% |
0.38461538 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
98 |
Not asked |
4846 |
|
NA |
r6fri42_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Volunteers provide something different from what professionals offer
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are some statements below about organised voluntary work. To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Volunteers provide something different from what professionals offer, such as a different type of commitment or experience of life
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
1.3% |
0.01260504 |
2 |
Disagree |
31 |
2.6% |
0.02605042 |
3 |
Agree |
595 |
50% |
0.50000000 |
4 |
Strongly agree |
461 |
38.7% |
0.38739496 |
5 |
Don't know |
67 |
5.6% |
0.05630252 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6fri42_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Would be no need for voluntary work if the public sector took full responsibility
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are some statements below about organised voluntary work. To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
|
Literal question:
|
If the public sector took full responsibility, there would be no need for voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly disagree |
350 |
29.4% |
0.29411765 |
2 |
Disagree |
663 |
55.7% |
0.55714286 |
3 |
Agree |
71 |
6% |
0.05966387 |
4 |
Strongly agree |
32 |
2.7% |
0.02689076 |
5 |
Don't know |
54 |
4.5% |
0.04537815 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.7% |
0.01680672 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6fri42_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Moral responsibility to do voluntary work during your life
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are some statements below about organised voluntary work. To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Doing voluntary work during your life is a moral responsibility that everyone has
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly disagree |
49 |
4.1% |
0.04117647 |
2 |
Disagree |
184 |
15.5% |
0.15462185 |
3 |
Agree |
511 |
42.9% |
0.42941176 |
4 |
Strongly agree |
329 |
27.6% |
0.27647059 |
5 |
Don't know |
96 |
8.1% |
0.08067227 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6fri42_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: Voluntary work a threat to paid work
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are some statements below about organised voluntary work. To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Voluntary work is a threat to paid work and is used so as to be able to cut society’s expenses
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly disagree |
521 |
43.8% |
0.43781513 |
2 |
Disagree |
539 |
45.3% |
0.45294118 |
3 |
Agree |
39 |
3.3% |
0.03277311 |
4 |
Strongly agree |
25 |
2.1% |
0.02100840 |
5 |
Don't know |
44 |
3.7% |
0.03697479 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.8% |
0.01848739 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6fri42_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: Voluntary work helps people to have an active role in a democratic society
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are some statements below about organised voluntary work. To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Voluntary work helps people to have an active role in a democratic society
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
2 |
Disagree |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02521008 |
3 |
Agree |
523 |
43.9% |
0.43949580 |
4 |
Strongly agree |
540 |
45.4% |
0.45378151 |
5 |
Don't know |
55 |
4.6% |
0.04621849 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
r6ran2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=1]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1179] [Invalid:3680] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
581 |
49.3% |
0.4927905 |
2 |
2 |
598 |
50.7% |
0.5072095 |
Sysmiss |
|
3680 |
|
NA |
r6friva_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: I am enthusiastic about my voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I am enthusiastic about my voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
59 |
10.2% |
0.101549053 |
2 |
Agree |
204 |
35.1% |
0.351118761 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
99 |
17% |
0.170395869 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
148 |
25.5% |
0.254733219 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
11 |
1.9% |
0.018932874 |
6 |
Disagree |
15 |
2.6% |
0.025817556 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
0.5% |
0.005163511 |
97 |
No answer |
42 |
7.2% |
0.072289157 |
98 |
Not asked |
4278 |
|
NA |
r6friva_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Always want to engage in voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I always want to engage in voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
29 |
5% |
0.04991394 |
2 |
Agree |
110 |
18.9% |
0.18932874 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
159 |
27.4% |
0.27366609 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
141 |
24.3% |
0.24268503 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
52 |
9% |
0.08950086 |
6 |
Disagree |
46 |
7.9% |
0.07917384 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
1.4% |
0.01376936 |
97 |
No answer |
36 |
6.2% |
0.06196213 |
98 |
Not asked |
4278 |
|
NA |
r6friva_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Time flies when I am doing voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Time flies when I am doing voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
32 |
5.5% |
0.055077453 |
2 |
Agree |
139 |
23.9% |
0.239242685 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
127 |
21.9% |
0.218588640 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
194 |
33.4% |
0.333907057 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
25 |
4.3% |
0.043029260 |
6 |
Disagree |
20 |
3.4% |
0.034423408 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
0.9% |
0.008605852 |
97 |
No answer |
39 |
6.7% |
0.067125645 |
98 |
Not asked |
4278 |
|
NA |
r6friva_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: I feel forced to participate more than I want to
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I feel forced to participate more than I want to
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
4 |
0.7% |
0.006884682 |
2 |
Agree |
21 |
3.6% |
0.036144578 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
69 |
11.9% |
0.118760757 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
163 |
28.1% |
0.280550775 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
94 |
16.2% |
0.161790017 |
6 |
Disagree |
146 |
25.1% |
0.251290878 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
7.9% |
0.079173838 |
97 |
No answer |
38 |
6.5% |
0.065404475 |
98 |
Not asked |
4278 |
|
NA |
r6friva_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: Doing voluntary work has a detrimental effect on other things
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I feel that doing voluntary work has a detrimental effect on other things
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
6 |
1% |
0.01032702 |
2 |
Agree |
36 |
6.2% |
0.06196213 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
99 |
17% |
0.17039587 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
158 |
27.2% |
0.27194492 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
67 |
11.5% |
0.11531842 |
6 |
Disagree |
148 |
25.5% |
0.25473322 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
5.3% |
0.05335628 |
97 |
No answer |
36 |
6.2% |
0.06196213 |
98 |
Not asked |
4278 |
|
NA |
r6friva_6
Variable label:
|
Statement: My involvement is not appreciated
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I feel that my involvement is not appreciated
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
4 |
0.7% |
0.006884682 |
2 |
Agree |
16 |
2.8% |
0.027538726 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
26 |
4.5% |
0.044750430 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
163 |
28.1% |
0.280550775 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
64 |
11% |
0.110154905 |
6 |
Disagree |
198 |
34.1% |
0.340791738 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
72 |
12.4% |
0.123924269 |
97 |
No answer |
38 |
6.5% |
0.065404475 |
98 |
Not asked |
4278 |
|
NA |
r6friiv1_1
Variable label:
|
Contribution to the refugee situation: Donation
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of the last year. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the following contributions in connection with the refugee situation? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Donation (e.g. money/clothing/equipment)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Donation (e.g. money/clothing/equipment) |
411 |
34.5% |
0.34537815 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1% |
0.01008403 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
767 |
64.5% |
0.64453782 |
r6friiv1_2
Variable label:
|
Contribution to the refugee situation: Physical contribution
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of the last year. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the following contributions in connection with the refugee situation? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Physical contribution (e.g. given out food/clothing/equipment directly to refugees)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Physical contribution (e.g. given out food/clothing/equipment directly to
refugees) |
37 |
3.1% |
0.03109244 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1% |
0.01008403 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1141 |
95.9% |
0.95882353 |
r6friiv1_3
Variable label:
|
Contribution to the refugee situation: Administrative contribution
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of the last year. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the following contributions in connection with the refugee situation? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Administrative contribution (e.g. coordinated action/information work)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Administrative contribution (e.g. coordinated action/information work) |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02521008 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1% |
0.01008403 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1148 |
96.5% |
0.96470588 |
r6friiv1_4
Variable label:
|
Contribution to the refugee situation: Other form of contribution
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of the last year. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the following contributions in connection with the refugee situation? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Other form of contribution; specify:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other form of contribution, specify: |
48 |
4% |
0.04033613 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1% |
0.01008403 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1130 |
95% |
0.94957983 |
r6friiv1_4_other
Variable label:
|
Contribution to the refugee situation: Other form of contribution [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of the last year. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the following contributions in connection with the refugee situation? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Other form of contribution; specify:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6friiv1_5
Variable label:
|
Contribution to the refugee situation: No
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many refugees and asylum seekers have come to Norway in the course of the last year. During the last 12 months, have you made any of the following contributions in connection with the refugee situation? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
No, none of these
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No, none of these |
707 |
59.4% |
0.59411765 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1% |
0.01008403 |
98 |
Not asked |
3669 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
471 |
39.6% |
0.39579832 |
r6friiv2_1
Variable label:
|
Contribution in Norway or abroad? Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
Did you make the contribution in Norway or abroad? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Norway
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norway |
437 |
95% |
0.95 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
23 |
5% |
0.05 |
r6friiv2_2
Variable label:
|
Contribution in Norway or abroad? Abroad
|
Pre-question text:
|
Did you make the contribution in Norway or abroad? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Abroad; specify country:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Abroad; specify country: |
30 |
6.5% |
0.06521739 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
430 |
93.5% |
0.93478261 |
r6friiv2_2_other
Variable label:
|
Contribution in Norway or abroad? Abroad [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Did you make the contribution in Norway or abroad? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Abroad; specify country:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6friiv3_1
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Gave money
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Gave money
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Gave money |
314 |
68.3% |
0.6826087 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
146 |
31.7% |
0.3173913 |
r6friiv3_2
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Gave clothing/equipment/food
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Gave clothing/equipment/food
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Gave clothing/equipment/food |
216 |
47% |
0.4695652 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
244 |
53% |
0.5304348 |
r6friiv3_3
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Gave out clothing/equipment/food directly to refugees
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Gave out clothing/equipment/food directly to refugees
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Gave out clothing/equipment/food directly to refugees |
14 |
3% |
0.03043478 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
446 |
97% |
0.96956522 |
r6friiv3_4
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Acted as visiting friend/social contact
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Acted as visiting friend/social contact
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Acted as visiting friend/social contact |
20 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
440 |
95.7% |
0.95652174 |
r6friiv3_5
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Helped with homework/lessons
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Helped with homework/lessons
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Helped with homework/lessons |
9 |
2% |
0.01956522 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
451 |
98% |
0.98043478 |
r6friiv3_6
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Organised gatherings
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Organised gatherings
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Organised gatherings |
13 |
2.8% |
0.02826087 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
447 |
97.2% |
0.97173913 |
r6friiv3_7
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Helped with teaching Norwegian/other teaching
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Helped with teaching Norwegian/other teaching
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Helped with teaching Norwegian/other teaching |
18 |
3.9% |
0.03913043 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
442 |
96.1% |
0.96086957 |
r6friiv3_8
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Helped with organisation and activities
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Helped with organisation and activities (e.g. at asylum seekers’ centre)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Helped with organisation and activities (e.g. at asylum seekers’ centre) |
18 |
3.9% |
0.03913043 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
442 |
96.1% |
0.96086957 |
r6friiv3_9
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Housed refugees at home
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Housed refugees at home
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Housed refugees at home |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01521739 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
453 |
98.5% |
0.98478261 |
r6friiv3_10
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Administered/coordinated volunteers
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Administered/coordinated volunteers
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Administered/coordinated volunteers |
12 |
2.6% |
0.02608696 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
448 |
97.4% |
0.97391304 |
r6friiv3_11
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Information work
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Information work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Information work |
21 |
4.6% |
0.04565217 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
439 |
95.4% |
0.95434783 |
r6friiv3_12
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Editing/moderating websites
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Editing/moderating websites (inc. social media)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Editing/moderating websites (inc. social media) |
2 |
0.4% |
0.004347826 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
458 |
99.6% |
0.995652174 |
r6friiv3_13
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Other
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify: |
17 |
3.7% |
0.03695652 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
443 |
96.3% |
0.96304348 |
r6friiv3_13_other
Variable label:
|
What kind of contribution: Other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
What kind of contribution was this? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6friiv4_1
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: A traditional voluntary organisation
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee situation? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
A traditional voluntary organisation (e.g. Red Cross, Norwegian People’s Aid)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A traditional voluntary organisation (e.g. Red Cross, Norwegian People's Aid) |
275 |
59.8% |
0.5978261 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
185 |
40.2% |
0.4021739 |
r6friiv4_2
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: A newly-formed initiative/organisation
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee situation? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
A newly-formed initiative/organisation (e.g. Refugees Welcome to Norway, Drop in the Ocean)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A newly-formed initiative/organisation (e.g. Refugees Welcome to Norway, Drop in
the Ocean) |
52 |
11.3% |
0.1130435 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
408 |
88.7% |
0.8869565 |
r6friiv4_3
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: A public body
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee situation? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
A public body (municipality, agency etc.)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A public body (municipality, agency etc.) |
35 |
7.6% |
0.07608696 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
425 |
92.4% |
0.92391304 |
r6friiv4_4
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: A private body
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee situation? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
A private body
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A private body |
69 |
15% |
0.15 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
391 |
85% |
0.85 |
r6friiv4_5
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: An asylum seekers’ centre
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee situation? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
An asylum seekers’ centre (public or private)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
An asylum seekers’ centre (public or private) |
22 |
4.8% |
0.04782609 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
438 |
95.2% |
0.95217391 |
r6friiv4_6
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: On own initiative/together with friends and family
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee situation? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Organised work on own initiative/together with friends and family
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Organised work on own initiative/together with friends and family |
42 |
9.1% |
0.09130435 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
418 |
90.9% |
0.90869565 |
r6friiv4_7
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Other
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee situation? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify: |
31 |
6.7% |
0.0673913 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
429 |
93.3% |
0.9326087 |
r6friiv4_7_other
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work for whom, refugee situation: Other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
For whom did you perform voluntary work in connection with the refugee situation? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6friiv5_1
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by an organisation
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by an organisation
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Was invited by an organisation |
120 |
26.1% |
0.2608696 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
340 |
73.9% |
0.7391304 |
r6friiv5_2
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via a Facebook group
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via a Facebook group; specify which group:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Was invited via a Facebook group; specify which group: |
20 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
440 |
95.7% |
0.95652174 |
r6friiv5_2_other
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via a Facebook group [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via a Facebook group; specify which group:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6friiv5_3
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via the municipality
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via the municipality in which I live
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Was invited via the municipality in which I live |
14 |
3% |
0.03043478 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
446 |
97% |
0.96956522 |
r6friiv5_4
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via an asylum seekers’ centre
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via an asylum seekers’ centre
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Was invited via an asylum seekers’ centre |
3 |
0.7% |
0.006521739 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
457 |
99.3% |
0.993478261 |
r6friiv5_5
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited via a private company
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited via a private company
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Was invited via a private company |
4 |
0.9% |
0.008695652 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
456 |
99.1% |
0.991304348 |
r6friiv5_6
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by my own workplace/place of study
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by my own workplace/place of study
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Was invited by my own workplace/place of study |
19 |
4.1% |
0.04130435 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
441 |
95.9% |
0.95869565 |
r6friiv5_7
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by close friends
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by close friends
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Was invited by close friends |
49 |
10.7% |
0.1065217 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
411 |
89.3% |
0.8934783 |
r6friiv5_8
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by acquaintances
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by acquaintances
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Was invited by acquaintances |
41 |
8.9% |
0.08913043 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
419 |
91.1% |
0.91086957 |
r6friiv5_9
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Invited by other persons
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Was invited by other persons
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Was invited by other persons |
21 |
4.6% |
0.04565217 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
439 |
95.4% |
0.95434783 |
r6friiv5_10
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Took the initiative myself
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Took the initiative myself
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Took the initiative myself |
189 |
41.1% |
0.4108696 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
271 |
58.9% |
0.5891304 |
r6friiv5_11
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Other
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other, specify: |
34 |
7.4% |
0.07391304 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
426 |
92.6% |
0.92608696 |
r6friiv5_11_other
Variable label:
|
How did you become a volunteer: Other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did it come about that you did voluntary work for refugees? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Other, specify:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6friiv6_1
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee situation as a volunteer: Through a voluntary organisation
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Through a voluntary organisation
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Through a voluntary organisation |
128 |
27.8% |
0.278260870 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
331 |
72% |
0.719565217 |
r6friiv6_2
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee situation as a volunteer: Coverage in media
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Advertising or coverage in newspapers, online newspapers, TV or radio
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Advertising or coverage in newspapers, online newspapers, TV or radio |
163 |
35.4% |
0.354347826 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
296 |
64.3% |
0.643478261 |
r6friiv6_3
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee situation as a volunteer: By e-mail
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
By e-mail
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
By e-mail |
28 |
6.1% |
0.060869565 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
431 |
93.7% |
0.936956522 |
r6friiv6_4
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee situation as a volunteer: On Facebook
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
On Facebook
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
On Facebook |
108 |
23.5% |
0.234782609 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
351 |
76.3% |
0.763043478 |
r6friiv6_5
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee situation as a volunteer: Other social media
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
On other social media (e.g. Twitter)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
On other social media (e.g. Twitter) |
8 |
1.7% |
0.017391304 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
451 |
98% |
0.980434783 |
r6friiv6_6
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee situation as a volunteer: Other websites
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
On other websites
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
On other websites |
19 |
4.1% |
0.041304348 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
440 |
95.7% |
0.956521739 |
r6friiv6_7
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee situation as a volunteer: By SMS text
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
By SMS text
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
By SMS text |
35 |
7.6% |
0.076086957 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
424 |
92.2% |
0.921739130 |
r6friiv6_8
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee situation as a volunteer: By telephone
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
By telephone
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
By telephone |
20 |
4.3% |
0.043478261 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
439 |
95.4% |
0.954347826 |
r6friiv6_9
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee situation as a volunteer: By face-to-face contact
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
By face-to-face contact
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
By face-to-face contact |
86 |
18.7% |
0.186956522 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
373 |
81.1% |
0.810869565 |
r6friiv6_10
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee situation as a volunteer: Other places
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Other places; specify:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other places; specify: |
24 |
5.2% |
0.052173913 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002173913 |
98 |
Not asked |
4399 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
435 |
94.6% |
0.945652174 |
r6friiv6_10_other
Variable label:
|
How did you find out about the possibility to contribute to the refugee situation as a volunteer: Other places [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
How did you find out about the possibility of making a contribution to the refugee situation as a volunteer? More than one answer possible
|
Literal question:
|
Other places; specify:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and if the respondents has answered positively on one or more categories in R6FRIIV1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6frivb_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: I am enthusiastic about my voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I am enthusiastic about my voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
53 |
8.9% |
0.08862876 |
2 |
Agree |
161 |
26.9% |
0.26923077 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
108 |
18.1% |
0.18060201 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
169 |
28.3% |
0.28260870 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
9 |
1.5% |
0.01505017 |
6 |
Disagree |
23 |
3.8% |
0.03846154 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
14 |
2.3% |
0.02341137 |
97 |
No answer |
61 |
10.2% |
0.10200669 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6frivb_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Always want to engage in voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I always want to engage in voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
28 |
4.7% |
0.04682274 |
2 |
Agree |
96 |
16.1% |
0.16053512 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
131 |
21.9% |
0.21906355 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
155 |
25.9% |
0.25919732 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
60 |
10% |
0.10033445 |
6 |
Disagree |
51 |
8.5% |
0.08528428 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
25 |
4.2% |
0.04180602 |
97 |
No answer |
52 |
8.7% |
0.08695652 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6frivb_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Time flies when I am doing voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Time flies when I am doing voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
31 |
5.2% |
0.05183946 |
2 |
Agree |
113 |
18.9% |
0.18896321 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
93 |
15.6% |
0.15551839 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
229 |
38.3% |
0.38294314 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
29 |
4.8% |
0.04849498 |
6 |
Disagree |
27 |
4.5% |
0.04515050 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
2% |
0.02006689 |
97 |
No answer |
64 |
10.7% |
0.10702341 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6frivb_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: I feel forced to participate more than I want to
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I feel forced to participate more than I want to
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
7 |
1.2% |
0.01170569 |
2 |
Agree |
25 |
4.2% |
0.04180602 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
51 |
8.5% |
0.08528428 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
180 |
30.1% |
0.30100334 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
67 |
11.2% |
0.11204013 |
6 |
Disagree |
146 |
24.4% |
0.24414716 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
59 |
9.9% |
0.09866221 |
97 |
No answer |
63 |
10.5% |
0.10535117 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6frivb_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: Doing voluntary work has a detrimental effect on other things
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I feel that doing voluntary work has a detrimental effect on other things
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
13 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
2 |
Agree |
44 |
7.4% |
0.07357860 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
91 |
15.2% |
0.15217391 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
161 |
26.9% |
0.26923077 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
56 |
9.4% |
0.09364548 |
6 |
Disagree |
130 |
21.7% |
0.21739130 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
43 |
7.2% |
0.07190635 |
97 |
No answer |
60 |
10% |
0.10033445 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6frivb_6
Variable label:
|
Statement: My involvement is not appreciated
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I feel that my involvement is not appreciated
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 and ran2=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
9 |
1.5% |
0.01505017 |
2 |
Agree |
12 |
2% |
0.02006689 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
23 |
3.8% |
0.03846154 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
184 |
30.8% |
0.30769231 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
56 |
9.4% |
0.09364548 |
6 |
Disagree |
176 |
29.4% |
0.29431438 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
71 |
11.9% |
0.11872910 |
97 |
No answer |
67 |
11.2% |
0.11204013 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6ran4
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1242] [Invalid:3617] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
596 |
48% |
0.4798712 |
2 |
2 |
646 |
52% |
0.5201288 |
Sysmiss |
|
3617 |
|
NA |
r6km62a
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the word antibiotics? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the word antibiotics?
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran4=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6km62b
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you hear/read the words antibiotics-resistant bacteria? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the words antibiotics-resistant bacteria?
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran4=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6km236
Variable label:
|
Concern about climate change
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very concerned |
141 |
11.3% |
0.112890312 |
2 |
Concerned |
408 |
32.7% |
0.326661329 |
3 |
Somewhat concerned |
447 |
35.8% |
0.357886309 |
4 |
Slightly concerned |
196 |
15.7% |
0.156925540 |
5 |
Not concerned at all |
48 |
3.8% |
0.038430745 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
0.7% |
0.007205765 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km9_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Technological innovations will resolve the climate problems
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Technological innovations will resolve the climate problems.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
37 |
3% |
0.02962370 |
2 |
Agree |
172 |
13.8% |
0.13771017 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
490 |
39.2% |
0.39231385 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
276 |
22.1% |
0.22097678 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
136 |
10.9% |
0.10888711 |
6 |
Disagree |
97 |
7.8% |
0.07766213 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
28 |
2.2% |
0.02241793 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
1% |
0.01040833 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km9_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Citizens of rich countries should cut their consumption
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
The citizens of rich countries like Norway should cut their consumption as part of the solution to the climate challenge.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
204 |
16.3% |
0.16333066 |
2 |
Agree |
373 |
29.9% |
0.29863891 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
381 |
30.5% |
0.30504404 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
106 |
8.5% |
0.08486789 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
67 |
5.4% |
0.05364291 |
6 |
Disagree |
73 |
5.8% |
0.05844676 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
2.5% |
0.02481986 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.1% |
0.01120897 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km63
Variable label:
|
Climate change, statement closest to your views
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following statements comes closest to your views regarding the reasons for climate change:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Climate change is only caused by natural processes |
15 |
1.2% |
0.012009608 |
2 |
Climate change is primarily caused by natural processes |
82 |
6.6% |
0.065652522 |
3 |
Climate change is caused partly by natural processes and partly by people |
606 |
48.5% |
0.485188151 |
4 |
Climate change is primarily caused by people |
484 |
38.8% |
0.387510008 |
5 |
Climate change is only caused by people |
28 |
2.2% |
0.022417934 |
6 |
There is no climate change |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001601281 |
7 |
Don't know |
20 |
1.6% |
0.016012810 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1% |
0.009607686 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km64
Variable label:
|
Climate change, positive/negative for Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change will affect each country in different ways.
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative do you think climate change will be for Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Only positive |
9 |
0.7% |
0.007205765 |
2 |
More positive than negative |
150 |
12% |
0.120096077 |
3 |
Neither positive nor negative |
289 |
23.1% |
0.231385108 |
4 |
More negative than positive |
729 |
58.4% |
0.583666934 |
5 |
Only negative |
50 |
4% |
0.040032026 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.8% |
0.017614091 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km21_1
Variable label:
|
Feelings when it comes to climate change: Hope
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Hope
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
79 |
6.3% |
0.06325060 |
2 |
Slightly |
213 |
17.1% |
0.17053643 |
3 |
Somewhat |
672 |
53.8% |
0.53803042 |
4 |
Strongly |
234 |
18.7% |
0.18734988 |
5 |
Very strongly |
15 |
1.2% |
0.01200961 |
97 |
No answer |
36 |
2.9% |
0.02882306 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km21_2
Variable label:
|
Feelings when it comes to climate change: Sadness
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Sadness
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
168 |
13.5% |
0.13450761 |
2 |
Slightly |
319 |
25.5% |
0.25540432 |
3 |
Somewhat |
533 |
42.7% |
0.42674139 |
4 |
Strongly |
162 |
13% |
0.12970376 |
5 |
Very strongly |
28 |
2.2% |
0.02241793 |
97 |
No answer |
39 |
3.1% |
0.03122498 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km21_3
Variable label:
|
Feelings when it comes to climate change: Fear
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
200 |
16% |
0.16012810 |
2 |
Slightly |
417 |
33.4% |
0.33386709 |
3 |
Somewhat |
475 |
38% |
0.38030424 |
4 |
Strongly |
94 |
7.5% |
0.07526021 |
5 |
Very strongly |
23 |
1.8% |
0.01841473 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
3.2% |
0.03202562 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km21_4
Variable label:
|
Feelings when it comes to climate change: Anger
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
300 |
24% |
0.24019215 |
2 |
Slightly |
411 |
32.9% |
0.32906325 |
3 |
Somewhat |
364 |
29.1% |
0.29143315 |
4 |
Strongly |
106 |
8.5% |
0.08486789 |
5 |
Very strongly |
23 |
1.8% |
0.01841473 |
97 |
No answer |
45 |
3.6% |
0.03602882 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km21_5
Variable label:
|
Feelings when it comes to climate change: Guilt
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Guilt
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
251 |
20.1% |
0.200960769 |
2 |
Slightly |
426 |
34.1% |
0.341072858 |
3 |
Somewhat |
472 |
37.8% |
0.377902322 |
4 |
Strongly |
50 |
4% |
0.040032026 |
5 |
Very strongly |
9 |
0.7% |
0.007205765 |
97 |
No answer |
41 |
3.3% |
0.032826261 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km65
Variable label:
|
For or against: Norway being part of Paris Agreement
|
Pre-question text:
|
In Paris in December 2015, most countries came to an international agreement to limit global warming to less than two degrees.
|
Literal question:
|
Are you for or against Norway being part of this agreement?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly against |
27 |
2.2% |
0.02161729 |
2 |
Somewhat against |
30 |
2.4% |
0.02401922 |
3 |
Neither for nor against |
197 |
15.8% |
0.15772618 |
4 |
Somewhat for |
295 |
23.6% |
0.23618895 |
5 |
Strongly for |
683 |
54.7% |
0.54683747 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
1.4% |
0.01361089 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
rankm66
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. A randomization variable that determines whether the answerlist in R6KM66 is displayed in order or in reversed order.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. A randomization variable that determines whether the answerlist in R6KM66 is displayed in order or in reversed order.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1242] [Invalid:3617] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In order |
621 |
50% |
0.5 |
2 |
In flipped order |
621 |
50% |
0.5 |
Sysmiss |
|
3617 |
|
NA |
r6km66
Variable label:
|
Attitude: Development in the petroleum industry
|
Pre-question text:
|
Production of oil and gas is an important industry for Norway. The industry provides many jobs and considerable income for society. At the same time, burning fossil energy is the main cause of climate change and activities on the Norwegian continental shelf contribute about 1/4 of Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. Opening new areas is also controversial because it can affect life in the sea and at the ice edge. The political parties have different opinions about how the petroleum industry should be developed over the next 20 to 30 years. There is disagreement over both how large the industry should be and whether new areas should be opened.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following alternatives is closest to your view?
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2. ranKM66 determines whether the answerlist in R6KM66 is displayed in order or in reversed order.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be as developed as possible. We should
open up to new search areas and if possible facilitate further growth. |
71 |
5.7% |
0.05684548 |
2 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be as developed as it is today. We should
make environmental considerations like we do today, and open up new search areas
where environmentally justifiable, while encouraging to maintain the industry. |
470 |
37.6% |
0.37630104 |
3 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be less developed than today. We should
therefore not open up new areas, and searches should be limited to areas where
activity has already been established. |
380 |
30.4% |
0.30424339 |
4 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be considerably less developed than
today. We should therefore not allow searches for new resources, and we should
only permit production in existing fields until they have been depleted. |
198 |
15.9% |
0.15852682 |
5 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be discontinued. We should therefore
not allow searches for new fields. The production in existing fields should be
reduced considerably within the next 5 years and closed down within the course
of the time period. |
86 |
6.9% |
0.06885508 |
97 |
No answer |
44 |
3.5% |
0.03522818 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km66_open
Variable label:
|
Thoughts about Norwegian oil and gas industry [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
If you would like to share some completely anonymous thoughts about the Norwegian oil and gas industry, you are welcome to do so here:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6ran5_1
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1237] [Invalid:3622] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
613 |
49.6% |
0.4955538 |
2 |
2 |
624 |
50.4% |
0.5044462 |
Sysmiss |
|
3622 |
|
NA |
r6ran5_2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1237] [Invalid:3622] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
626 |
50.6% |
0.5060631 |
2 |
2 |
611 |
49.4% |
0.4939369 |
Sysmiss |
|
3622 |
|
NA |
r6ran5_3
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1237] [Invalid:3622] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
628 |
50.8% |
0.5076799 |
2 |
2 |
609 |
49.2% |
0.4923201 |
Sysmiss |
|
3622 |
|
NA |
r6ran5_4
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1237] [Invalid:3622] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
632 |
51.1% |
0.5109135 |
2 |
2 |
605 |
48.9% |
0.4890865 |
Sysmiss |
|
3622 |
|
NA |
r6km67_1
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Tighten up the regulations governing permitted industrial CO2 emissions in Norway and Europe by cutting the number of quotas available to industry
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten up the regulations governing permitted industrial CO2 emissions in Norway and Europe by cutting the number of quotas available to industry.
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_1 or R6KM67_2 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
59 |
9.6% |
0.09624796 |
2 |
Positive |
184 |
30% |
0.30016313 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
184 |
30% |
0.30016313 |
4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
121 |
19.7% |
0.19738989 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
21 |
3.4% |
0.03425775 |
6 |
Negative |
16 |
2.6% |
0.02610114 |
7 |
Very negative |
7 |
1.1% |
0.01141925 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
3.4% |
0.03425775 |
98 |
Not asked |
4246 |
|
NA |
r6km67_2
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Tighten up the regulations governing total permitted industrial CO2 emissions in Europe
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten up the regulations governing total permitted industrial CO2 emissions in Norway and Europe.
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_1 or R6KM67_2 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
98 |
15.7% |
0.15705128 |
2 |
Positive |
227 |
36.4% |
0.36378205 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
166 |
26.6% |
0.26602564 |
4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
81 |
13% |
0.12980769 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
17 |
2.7% |
0.02724359 |
6 |
Negative |
9 |
1.4% |
0.01442308 |
7 |
Very negative |
10 |
1.6% |
0.01602564 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
98 |
Not asked |
4235 |
|
NA |
r6km67_3
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground.
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_3 or R6KM67_4 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
34 |
5.4% |
0.05431310 |
2 |
Positive |
136 |
21.7% |
0.21725240 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
133 |
21.2% |
0.21246006 |
4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
207 |
33.1% |
0.33067093 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
49 |
7.8% |
0.07827476 |
6 |
Negative |
29 |
4.6% |
0.04632588 |
7 |
Very negative |
15 |
2.4% |
0.02396166 |
97 |
No answer |
23 |
3.7% |
0.03674121 |
98 |
Not asked |
4233 |
|
NA |
r6km67_4
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground, such as the “moon landing” project at Mongstad
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground, such as the so-called “moon landing” project at Mongstad.
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_3 or R6KM67_4 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
30 |
4.9% |
0.04909984 |
2 |
Positive |
125 |
20.5% |
0.20458265 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
134 |
21.9% |
0.21931260 |
4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
195 |
31.9% |
0.31914894 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
47 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
6 |
Negative |
33 |
5.4% |
0.05400982 |
7 |
Very negative |
20 |
3.3% |
0.03273322 |
97 |
No answer |
27 |
4.4% |
0.04418985 |
98 |
Not asked |
4248 |
|
NA |
r6km67_5
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Increase funding for renewable energy
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Increase funding for research on and development of renewable energy
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_5 or R6KM67_6 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
271 |
43.2% |
0.431528662 |
2 |
Positive |
233 |
37.1% |
0.371019108 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
67 |
10.7% |
0.106687898 |
4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
31 |
4.9% |
0.049363057 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
4 |
0.6% |
0.006369427 |
6 |
Negative |
2 |
0.3% |
0.003184713 |
7 |
Very negative |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001592357 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
3% |
0.030254777 |
98 |
Not asked |
4231 |
|
NA |
r6km67_6
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Increase funding for renewable energy, even though this means less money for other purposes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Increase funding for research on and development of renewable energy, even if this means that less money is available for other important purposes.
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_5 or R6KM67_6 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
147 |
24.1% |
0.241379310 |
2 |
Positive |
212 |
34.8% |
0.348111658 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
168 |
27.6% |
0.275862069 |
4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
51 |
8.4% |
0.083743842 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
15 |
2.5% |
0.024630542 |
6 |
Negative |
2 |
0.3% |
0.003284072 |
7 |
Very negative |
4 |
0.7% |
0.006568144 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.6% |
0.016420361 |
98 |
Not asked |
4250 |
|
NA |
r6km67_7
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Increased government support for geothermal energy
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Increased government support for developing geothermal energy where one drills down to the geothermal energy under the Earth’s surface.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents are asked R6KM67_7, long as u=2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
216 |
17.3% |
0.172938351 |
2 |
Positive |
485 |
38.8% |
0.388310649 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
244 |
19.5% |
0.195356285 |
4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
221 |
17.7% |
0.176941553 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
19 |
1.5% |
0.015212170 |
6 |
Negative |
10 |
0.8% |
0.008006405 |
7 |
Very negative |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003202562 |
97 |
No answer |
50 |
4% |
0.040032026 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km67_8
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Attempt to change weather and climate
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Attempt to change the weather and climate by, for example, sending up sulphur particles to block the sunlight. This measure would probably reduce the temperature on Earth for a certain time, but would not help with problems such as ocean acidification
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_8 or R6KM67_9 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
2 |
Positive |
10 |
1.6% |
0.01582278 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
23 |
3.6% |
0.03639241 |
4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
131 |
20.7% |
0.20727848 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
100 |
15.8% |
0.15822785 |
6 |
Negative |
175 |
27.7% |
0.27689873 |
7 |
Very negative |
168 |
26.6% |
0.26582278 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
4% |
0.03955696 |
98 |
Not asked |
4227 |
|
NA |
r6km67_9
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative about: Attempt to change weather and climate, artificial volcano
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Attempt to change the weather and climate by, for example, sending up sulphur particles to block the sunlight. This could work as a kind of artificial volcano. During the course of history, major volcanic eruptions have reduced the temperature on Earth for a period. This measure would probably reduce the temperature on Earth for a certain time, but would not help with problems such as ocean acidification
|
Technical description:
|
[The questions in grid R6KM67 are randomized pairwise. R6KM67_8 or R6KM67_9 is displayed to the respondent, dependent on ran5_4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
2 |
Positive |
10 |
1.7% |
0.01652893 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
16 |
2.6% |
0.02644628 |
4 |
Neiter positive nor negative |
153 |
25.3% |
0.25289256 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
81 |
13.4% |
0.13388430 |
6 |
Negative |
169 |
27.9% |
0.27933884 |
7 |
Very negative |
161 |
26.6% |
0.26611570 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
2.5% |
0.02479339 |
98 |
Not asked |
4254 |
|
NA |
r6km68
Variable label:
|
Heard about this proposal to let part of the world’s coal, oil and gas stay in the ground/under the seabed?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people have said recently that only part of the world’s coal, oil and gas can be used if the climate is to be kept relatively stable, and have proposed that the rest must remain underground or below the seabed. Others have said that the world needs reliable, cheap energy and that we therefore need to continue to use coal, oil and gas.
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard about this proposal to let part of the world’s coal, oil and gas stay in the ground or under the seabed?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, I have heard about it. |
618 |
49.5% |
0.49479584 |
2 |
No, I have not heard about it. |
600 |
48% |
0.48038431 |
97 |
No answer |
31 |
2.5% |
0.02481986 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6km69
Variable label:
|
Good/bad decision that the Oil Fund should sell its investments in companies involved in coal
|
Pre-question text:
|
In 2015, the Norwegian parliament (the Storting) decided that the Government Pension Fund Global (the “Oil Fund”) should sell its investments in companies involved in coal mining and coal-fired power.
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, was this a good or a bad decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
234 |
18.7% |
0.18734988 |
2 |
Good |
435 |
34.8% |
0.34827862 |
3 |
Quite good |
191 |
15.3% |
0.15292234 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
255 |
20.4% |
0.20416333 |
5 |
Quite bad |
56 |
4.5% |
0.04483587 |
6 |
Bad |
29 |
2.3% |
0.02321857 |
7 |
Very bad |
13 |
1% |
0.01040833 |
97 |
No answer |
36 |
2.9% |
0.02882306 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6trans1
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you read/hear the words ‘transgender persons’? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you read or hear the words transgender person?
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6ran15
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1228] [Invalid:3631] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
340 |
27.7% |
0.2768730 |
2 |
2 |
305 |
24.8% |
0.2483713 |
3 |
3 |
289 |
23.5% |
0.2353420 |
4 |
4 |
294 |
23.9% |
0.2394137 |
Sysmiss |
|
3631 |
|
NA |
r6trans2a
Variable label:
|
Requirement for changing legal gender: Most common rules
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people have a gender identity or gender expression that differs from the norm for their biological gender. These are often called transgender persons. Many transgender persons wish to change their legal gender so that their official documents (passport, driving licence etc.) are in accordance with their perceived gender identity.
What is required for a person to be allowed to change legal gender varies from country to country. The list below gives the most common rules.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these rules do you think should apply in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran15=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Requirement for sterilisation, diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment |
7 |
2.1% |
0.02058824 |
2 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment |
44 |
12.9% |
0.12941176 |
3 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual |
63 |
18.5% |
0.18529412 |
4 |
No absolute requirements, the person decides |
186 |
54.7% |
0.54705882 |
5 |
It should not be possible to change legal gender |
28 |
8.2% |
0.08235294 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
3.5% |
0.03529412 |
98 |
Not asked |
4519 |
|
NA |
r6trans2b
Variable label:
|
Requirement for changing legal gender: Most common rules + where they apply
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people have a gender identity or gender expression that differs from the norm for their biological gender. These are often called transgender persons. Many transgender persons wish to change their legal gender so that their official documents (passport, driving licence etc.) are in accordance with their perceived gender identity.
What is required for a person to be allowed to change legal gender varies from country to country. The list below gives the most common rules and examples of where these rules apply.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these rules do you think should apply in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran15=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Requirement for sterilisation, diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment
(practised in Romania and Slovenia for example). |
3 |
1% |
0.009836066 |
2 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment (practised in
Sweden, Spain and Estonia for example). |
41 |
13.4% |
0.134426230 |
3 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual (practised in Austria, the Netherlands
and Germany for example). |
72 |
23.6% |
0.236065574 |
4 |
No absolute requirements, the person decides after reaching the age of 16
(practised in Denmark, Argentina and Malta for example). |
144 |
47.2% |
0.472131148 |
5 |
It should not be possible to change legal gender |
27 |
8.9% |
0.088524590 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
5.9% |
0.059016393 |
98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6trans2c
Variable label:
|
Requirement for changing legal gender: Most common rules + where they apply (Norway included)
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people have a gender identity or gender expression that differs from the norm for their biological gender. These are often called transgender persons. Many transgender persons wish to change their legal gender so that their official documents (passport, driving licence etc.) are in accordance with their perceived gender identity.
What is required for a person to be allowed to change legal gender varies from country to country. The list below gives the most common rules and examples of where these rules apply.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these rules do you think should apply in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran15=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Requirement for sterilisation, diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment
(the current practice in Norway) |
50 |
17.3% |
0.17301038 |
2 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment (practised in
Sweden, Spain and Estonia for example). |
39 |
13.5% |
0.13494810 |
3 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual (practised in Austria, the Netherlands
and Germany for example). |
38 |
13.1% |
0.13148789 |
4 |
No absolute requirements, the person decides after reaching the age of 16
(practised in Denmark, Argentina and Malta for example). |
128 |
44.3% |
0.44290657 |
5 |
It should not be possible to change legal gender |
23 |
8% |
0.07958478 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
3.8% |
0.03806228 |
98 |
Not asked |
4570 |
|
NA |
r6trans2d
Variable label:
|
Requirement for changing legal gender: Most common rules + where they apply (Norway included) + changing the rules in Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people have a gender identity or gender expression that differs from the norm for their biological gender. These are often called transgender persons. Many transgender persons wish to change their legal gender so that their official documents (passport, driving licence etc.) are in accordance with their perceived gender identity.
What is required for a person to be allowed to change legal gender varies from country to country. The list below gives the most common rules and examples of where these rules apply. In Norway a process is currently under way to change the rules. The proposed law is that persons aged over 16 should decide their legal gender themselves.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these rules do you think should apply in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran15=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Requirement for sterilisation, diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment
(practised in Norway, Romania and Slovenia for example). |
11 |
3.7% |
0.03741497 |
2 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual and medical treatment (practised in
Sweden, Spain and Estonia for example). |
18 |
6.1% |
0.06122449 |
3 |
Requirement for diagnosis as transsexual (practised in Austria, the Netherlands
and Germany for example). |
30 |
10.2% |
0.10204082 |
4 |
No absolute requirements, the person decides after reaching the age of 16
(practised in Denmark, Argentina and Malta for example). This is the new
proposal in Norway. |
193 |
65.6% |
0.65646259 |
5 |
It should not be possible to change legal gender |
27 |
9.2% |
0.09183673 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
5.1% |
0.05102041 |
98 |
Not asked |
4565 |
|
NA |
r6ran16
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1225] [Invalid:3634] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
426 |
34.8% |
0.3477551 |
2 |
2 |
413 |
33.7% |
0.3371429 |
3 |
3 |
386 |
31.5% |
0.3151020 |
Sysmiss |
|
3634 |
|
NA |
r6trans3a
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Should introduce the possibility of putting “A” in passport
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce the possibility of putting “A” (for annet - other) as a third gender alternative in the passport, in addition to “M” (man) and “K” (kvinne - woman)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran16=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
34 |
8% |
0.079812207 |
2 |
Agree |
64 |
15% |
0.150234742 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
35 |
8.2% |
0.082159624 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
102 |
23.9% |
0.239436620 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
35 |
8.2% |
0.082159624 |
6 |
Disagree |
76 |
17.8% |
0.178403756 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
76 |
17.8% |
0.178403756 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.9% |
0.009389671 |
98 |
Not asked |
4433 |
|
NA |
r6trans3b
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Should introduce the possibility of putting “A” in passport, working to secure a change
|
Pre-question text:
|
Organisations for transgender persons are working to secure a change in which persons who do not identify as either a man or a woman have a third alternative (A for annet - other) in passports and other official documents.
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce the possibility of putting “A” (for annet - other) as a third gender alternative in the passport, in addition to “M” (man) and “K” (kvinne - woman)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran16=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
27 |
6.5% |
0.06537530 |
2 |
Agree |
68 |
16.5% |
0.16464891 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
50 |
12.1% |
0.12106538 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
96 |
23.2% |
0.23244552 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
40 |
9.7% |
0.09685230 |
6 |
Disagree |
62 |
15% |
0.15012107 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
58 |
14% |
0.14043584 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
2.9% |
0.02905569 |
98 |
Not asked |
4446 |
|
NA |
r6trans3c
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Should introduce the possibility of putting “A” in passport, working to secure a change, number of countries have introduced it
|
Pre-question text:
|
Organisations for transgender persons are working to secure a change in which persons who do not identify as either a man or a woman have a third alternative (A for annet - other) in passports and other official documents. A number of countries have introduced such an arrangement.
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce the possibility of putting “A” (for annet - other) as a third gender alternative in the passport, in addition to “M” (man) and “K” (kvinne - woman)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran16=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
35 |
9.1% |
0.09067358 |
2 |
Agree |
72 |
18.7% |
0.18652850 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
39 |
10.1% |
0.10103627 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
112 |
29% |
0.29015544 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
24 |
6.2% |
0.06217617 |
6 |
Disagree |
54 |
14% |
0.13989637 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
45 |
11.7% |
0.11658031 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.3% |
0.01295337 |
98 |
Not asked |
4473 |
|
NA |
r6ran17
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1222] [Invalid:3637] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
392 |
32.1% |
0.3207856 |
2 |
2 |
436 |
35.7% |
0.3567921 |
3 |
3 |
394 |
32.2% |
0.3224223 |
Sysmiss |
|
3637 |
|
NA |
r6leg1a
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Risk of persecution because of sexual orientation should be a basis for a residence permit
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some persons who seek asylum receive a residence permit in Norway because they risk persecution in their home country because of their sexual orientation (homosexual/lesbian/bisexual) or gender identity (transgender).
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that the risk of persecution because of sexual orientation or gender identity should be a basis for a residence permit in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran17=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
51 |
13% |
0.13010204 |
2 |
Agree |
105 |
26.8% |
0.26785714 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
89 |
22.7% |
0.22704082 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
53 |
13.5% |
0.13520408 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
35 |
8.9% |
0.08928571 |
6 |
Disagree |
26 |
6.6% |
0.06632653 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
29 |
7.4% |
0.07397959 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1% |
0.01020408 |
98 |
Not asked |
4467 |
|
NA |
r6leg1b
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Risk of persecution because of sexual orientation should be a basis for a residence permit, accordance with current Norwegian law
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some persons who seek asylum receive a residence permit in Norway because they risk persecution in their home country because of their sexual orientation (homosexual/lesbian/bisexual) or gender identity (transgender). This is in accordance with current Norwegian law.
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that the risk of persecution because of sexual orientation or gender identity should be a basis for a residence permit in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran17=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
79 |
18.1% |
0.181192661 |
2 |
Agree |
125 |
28.7% |
0.286697248 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
81 |
18.6% |
0.185779817 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
47 |
10.8% |
0.107798165 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
32 |
7.3% |
0.073394495 |
6 |
Disagree |
43 |
9.9% |
0.098623853 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
25 |
5.7% |
0.057339450 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.9% |
0.009174312 |
98 |
Not asked |
4423 |
|
NA |
r6leg1c
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Risk of persecution because of sexual orientation should be a basis for a residence permit, accordance with current Norwegian law + similiar laws in other European countries
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some persons who seek asylum receive a residence permit in Norway because they risk persecution in their home country because of their sexual orientation (homosexual/lesbian/bisexual) or gender identity (transgender). This is in accordance with current Norwegian law. There are similar laws in many other European countries.
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that the risk of persecution because of sexual orientation or gender identity should be a basis for a residence permit in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran17=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
74 |
18.8% |
0.18781726 |
2 |
Agree |
124 |
31.5% |
0.31472081 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
86 |
21.8% |
0.21827411 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
39 |
9.9% |
0.09898477 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
26 |
6.6% |
0.06598985 |
6 |
Disagree |
27 |
6.9% |
0.06852792 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
3% |
0.03045685 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.5% |
0.01522843 |
98 |
Not asked |
4465 |
|
NA |
r6leg2_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Should prioritise asylum seekers who are homosexual/lesbian/transgender
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should prioritise accepting asylum seekers who are homosexual/lesbian/bisexual/transgender because they are particularly vulnerable to maltreatment and discrimination in refugee camps in their neighbouring countries.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
58 |
4.6% |
0.04643715 |
2 |
Agree |
201 |
16.1% |
0.16092874 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
268 |
21.5% |
0.21457166 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
282 |
22.6% |
0.22578062 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
127 |
10.2% |
0.10168135 |
6 |
Disagree |
152 |
12.2% |
0.12169736 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
117 |
9.4% |
0.09367494 |
97 |
No answer |
44 |
3.5% |
0.03522818 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6leg2_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Should be possible to send asylum seekers who are homosexual/lesbain/transgender if they can avoid persecution and discrimination by hiding their orientation
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
It should be possible to send asylum seekers who are homosexual/lesbian/bisexual/transgender back to their home countries if they can avoid persecution and discrimination there by hiding their orientation.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
60 |
4.8% |
0.04803843 |
2 |
Agree |
117 |
9.4% |
0.09367494 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
135 |
10.8% |
0.10808647 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
254 |
20.3% |
0.20336269 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
220 |
17.6% |
0.17614091 |
6 |
Disagree |
267 |
21.4% |
0.21377102 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
145 |
11.6% |
0.11609287 |
97 |
No answer |
51 |
4.1% |
0.04083267 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6leg2_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Those who state sexual orientation as the reason they have left are telling the truth
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
There is reason to believe that most of those who state sexual orientation as the reason they have left their home country and are seeking asylum in Norway are telling the truth.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
38 |
3% |
0.03042434 |
2 |
Agree |
217 |
17.4% |
0.17373899 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
161 |
12.9% |
0.12890312 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
460 |
36.8% |
0.36829464 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
160 |
12.8% |
0.12810248 |
6 |
Disagree |
110 |
8.8% |
0.08807046 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
56 |
4.5% |
0.04483587 |
97 |
No answer |
47 |
3.8% |
0.03763010 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r6ran18
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1222] [Invalid:3637] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
387 |
31.7% |
0.3166939 |
2 |
2 |
433 |
35.4% |
0.3543372 |
3 |
3 |
402 |
32.9% |
0.3289689 |
Sysmiss |
|
3637 |
|
NA |
r6dv73a
Variable label:
|
Opinion of: Right of reservation from abortion
|
Pre-question text:
|
The question of health personnel being able to reserve themselves from taking part in abortions is controversial in many countries.
In Norway a proposal has been put forward to increase the possibility of general practitioners reserving themselves from giving referrals for abortion.
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion of this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran18=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree. Doctors should be fully allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
34 |
8.8% |
0.0878553 |
2 |
Partly agree. Doctors should in some cases be allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
84 |
21.7% |
0.2170543 |
3 |
Strongly disagree. Doctors should not be allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
264 |
68.2% |
0.6821705 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.3% |
0.0129199 |
98 |
Not asked |
4472 |
|
NA |
r6dv73b
Variable label:
|
Opinion of: Right of reservation from abortion, anti-abortion-activists wants to make it hard for women to obtain legal abortion
|
Pre-question text:
|
The question of health personnel being able to reserve themselves from taking part in abortions is controversial in many countries.
Anti-abortion activists worldwide are working to strengthen the right to reservation and that health personnel and institutions should reserve themselves, so as to make it difficult for women to obtain legal abortions. In many parts of Latin America it is practically impossible to obtain a legal abortion because so many have used the right to reservation.
In Norway a proposal has been put forward to increase the possibility of general practitioners reserving themselves from giving referrals for abortion.
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion of this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran18=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree. Doctors should be fully allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
44 |
10.2% |
0.10161663 |
2 |
Partly agree. Doctors should in some cases be allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
100 |
23.1% |
0.23094688 |
3 |
Strongly disagree. Doctors should not be allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
279 |
64.4% |
0.64434180 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
2.3% |
0.02309469 |
98 |
Not asked |
4426 |
|
NA |
r6dv73c
Variable label:
|
Opinion of: Right of reservation from abortion, campaigners for a strong right of reservation concerned about doctors being compelled to act counter to their religious/ethical convictions
|
Pre-question text:
|
The question of health personnel being able to reserve themselves from taking part in abortions is controversial in many countries.
Campaigners for a strong right of reservation are concerned about doctors and other health workers being compelled to act counter to their religious or ethical convictions or having to give up their jobs.
In Norway a proposal has been put forward to increase the possibility of general practitioners reserving themselves from giving referrals for abortion.
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion of this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=2 and ran18=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree. Doctors should be fully allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
51 |
12.7% |
0.12686567 |
2 |
Partly agree. Doctors should in some cases be allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
95 |
23.6% |
0.23631841 |
3 |
Strongly disagree. Doctors should not be allowed to reserve themselves from
referring patients for abortions. |
250 |
62.2% |
0.62189055 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.5% |
0.01492537 |
98 |
Not asked |
4457 |
|
NA |
r6ran6
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1163] [Invalid:3696] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
383 |
32.9% |
0.3293207 |
2 |
2 |
378 |
32.5% |
0.3250215 |
3 |
3 |
402 |
34.6% |
0.3456578 |
Sysmiss |
|
3696 |
|
NA |
r6pad1a
Variable label:
|
Likelihood of taking vaccine
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a new infectious disease has arisen in the world and that it is on its way to Norway. Those who are infected get flu-like symptoms, but usually become completely well again. A few deaths have been recorded due to the virus, and there is a fear that it might mutate and become dangerous for many more people. A vaccine against the disease has been developed, but has not been fully tested with regard to side effects.
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would take the vaccine in such a situation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran6=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
23 |
6% |
0.06005222 |
2 |
Likely |
58 |
15.1% |
0.15143603 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
103 |
26.9% |
0.26892950 |
4 |
Slightly likely |
151 |
39.4% |
0.39425587 |
5 |
Not likely at all |
48 |
12.5% |
0.12532637 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4476 |
|
NA |
r6pad1b
Variable label:
|
Likelihood of taking vaccine, part of the population not vaccinated and is dependent on most of the population taking it
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a new infectious disease has arisen in the world and that it is on its way to Norway. Those who are infected get flu-like symptoms, but usually become completely well again. A few deaths have been recorded due to the virus, and there is a fear that it might mutate and become dangerous for many more people. A vaccine against the disease has been developed, but has not been fully tested with regard to side effects.
There will always be part of the population that is not vaccinated due to their young age, allergy or poor health. This group is entirely dependent on most of the population being vaccinated, so that they are not infected.
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would take the vaccine in such a situation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran6=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
89 |
23.5% |
0.235449735 |
2 |
Likely |
103 |
27.2% |
0.272486772 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
106 |
28% |
0.280423280 |
4 |
Slightly likely |
54 |
14.3% |
0.142857143 |
5 |
Not likely at all |
24 |
6.3% |
0.063492063 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.5% |
0.005291005 |
98 |
Not asked |
4481 |
|
NA |
r6pad1c
Variable label:
|
Likelihood of taking vaccine, your own body stimulates rapid mobilisation against disease by taking the vaccine
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a new infectious disease has arisen in the world and that it is on its way to Norway. Those who are infected get flu-like symptoms, but usually become completely well again. A few deaths have been recorded due to the virus, and there is a fear that it might mutate and become dangerous for many more people. A vaccine against the disease has been developed, but has not been fully tested with regard to side effects.
The vaccine stimulates your body to rapid mobilisation against the disease, thus keeping you healthy.
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would take the vaccine in such a situation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran6=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
47 |
11.7% |
0.116915423 |
2 |
Likely |
73 |
18.2% |
0.181592040 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
116 |
28.9% |
0.288557214 |
4 |
Slightly likely |
122 |
30.3% |
0.303482587 |
5 |
Not likely at all |
43 |
10.7% |
0.106965174 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002487562 |
98 |
Not asked |
4457 |
|
NA |
r6ran7
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1163] [Invalid:3696] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
305 |
26.2% |
0.2622528 |
2 |
2 |
292 |
25.1% |
0.2510748 |
3 |
3 |
274 |
23.6% |
0.2355976 |
4 |
4 |
292 |
25.1% |
0.2510748 |
Sysmiss |
|
3696 |
|
NA |
r6pad2a_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Interested to read about issue
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about the article:
|
Literal question:
|
This is an issue I would be very interested to read about on a normal day.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=1. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
7 |
2.3% |
0.02295082 |
2 |
Agree |
36 |
11.8% |
0.11803279 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
50 |
16.4% |
0.16393443 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
50 |
16.4% |
0.16393443 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
40 |
13.1% |
0.13114754 |
6 |
Disagree |
65 |
21.3% |
0.21311475 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
49 |
16.1% |
0.16065574 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.6% |
0.02622951 |
98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6pad2a_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Issue is about the Conservative Party and Erna Solberg
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about the article:
|
Literal question:
|
This issue is about the Conservative political party and prime minister Erna Solberg.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=1. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
13 |
4.3% |
0.04262295 |
2 |
Agree |
59 |
19.3% |
0.19344262 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
50 |
16.4% |
0.16393443 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
77 |
25.2% |
0.25245902 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
34 |
11.1% |
0.11147541 |
6 |
Disagree |
42 |
13.8% |
0.13770492 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
22 |
7.2% |
0.07213115 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.6% |
0.02622951 |
98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6pad2b_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Interested to read about issue
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about the article:
|
Literal question:
|
This is an issue I would be very interested to read about on a normal day.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=2. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
2 |
Agree |
23 |
7.9% |
0.078767123 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
42 |
14.4% |
0.143835616 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
62 |
21.2% |
0.212328767 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
29 |
9.9% |
0.099315068 |
6 |
Disagree |
74 |
25.3% |
0.253424658 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
53 |
18.2% |
0.181506849 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.4% |
0.023972603 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad2b_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Issue is about the Conservative Party and Erna Solberg
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about the article:
|
Literal question:
|
This issue is about the Conservative political party and prime minister Erna Solberg.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=2. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
21 |
7.2% |
0.07191781 |
2 |
Agree |
60 |
20.5% |
0.20547945 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
43 |
14.7% |
0.14726027 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
74 |
25.3% |
0.25342466 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
28 |
9.6% |
0.09589041 |
6 |
Disagree |
36 |
12.3% |
0.12328767 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
26 |
8.9% |
0.08904110 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01369863 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad2c_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Interested to read about issue
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about the article:
|
Literal question:
|
This is an issue I would be very interested to read about on a normal day.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=3. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
10 |
3.6% |
0.03649635 |
2 |
Agree |
28 |
10.2% |
0.10218978 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
40 |
14.6% |
0.14598540 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
36 |
13.1% |
0.13138686 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
34 |
12.4% |
0.12408759 |
6 |
Disagree |
67 |
24.5% |
0.24452555 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
48 |
17.5% |
0.17518248 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
4% |
0.04014599 |
98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6pad2c_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Issue is about the Conservative Party and Erna Solberg
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about the article:
|
Literal question:
|
This issue is about the Conservative political party and prime minister Erna Solberg.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=3. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
29 |
10.6% |
0.10583942 |
2 |
Agree |
45 |
16.4% |
0.16423358 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
46 |
16.8% |
0.16788321 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
53 |
19.3% |
0.19343066 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
28 |
10.2% |
0.10218978 |
6 |
Disagree |
53 |
19.3% |
0.19343066 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
4.4% |
0.04379562 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02919708 |
98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6pad2d_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Interested to read about issue
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about the article:
|
Literal question:
|
This is an issue I would be very interested to read about on a normal day.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=4. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01712329 |
2 |
Agree |
38 |
13% |
0.13013699 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
35 |
12% |
0.11986301 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
69 |
23.6% |
0.23630137 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
40 |
13.7% |
0.13698630 |
6 |
Disagree |
64 |
21.9% |
0.21917808 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
38 |
13% |
0.13013699 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1% |
0.01027397 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad2d_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Issue is about the Conservative Party and Erna Solberg
|
Pre-question text:
|
This is a hypothetical example of the introduction to an issue in Norwegian online newspapers. To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about the article:
|
Literal question:
|
This issue is about the Conservative political party and prime minister Erna Solberg.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=4. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
16 |
5.5% |
0.05479452 |
2 |
Agree |
50 |
17.1% |
0.17123288 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
46 |
15.8% |
0.15753425 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
85 |
29.1% |
0.29109589 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
30 |
10.3% |
0.10273973 |
6 |
Disagree |
45 |
15.4% |
0.15410959 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
5.1% |
0.05136986 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01712329 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3a_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the information in the Norwegian online newspapers
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
I generally trust the information that is given in the Norwegian online newspapers that I read.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
2 |
Agree |
47 |
15.4% |
0.15409836 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
98 |
32.1% |
0.32131148 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
48 |
15.7% |
0.15737705 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
68 |
22.3% |
0.22295082 |
6 |
Disagree |
32 |
10.5% |
0.10491803 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
2.6% |
0.02622951 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01311475 |
98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6pad3a_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the journalists’ work
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the journalists’ work in general.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
2 |
Agree |
45 |
14.8% |
0.147540984 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
89 |
29.2% |
0.291803279 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
43 |
14.1% |
0.140983607 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
80 |
26.2% |
0.262295082 |
6 |
Disagree |
40 |
13.1% |
0.131147541 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
1.6% |
0.016393443 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1% |
0.009836066 |
98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6pad3a_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the newspaper to mark what is advertising and what is editorial
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the newspapers to clearly mark what is advertising and what is editorial.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006557377 |
2 |
Agree |
41 |
13.4% |
0.134426230 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
58 |
19% |
0.190163934 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
52 |
17% |
0.170491803 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
89 |
29.2% |
0.291803279 |
6 |
Disagree |
42 |
13.8% |
0.137704918 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
14 |
4.6% |
0.045901639 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.3% |
0.022950820 |
98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6pad3a_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: If just seen a real piece, trusts other news from the same newspaper
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
If the piece I just saw had been real, I would have trusted other news from the same newspaper.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
2 |
Agree |
28 |
9.2% |
0.09180328 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
67 |
22% |
0.21967213 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
94 |
30.8% |
0.30819672 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
60 |
19.7% |
0.19672131 |
6 |
Disagree |
38 |
12.5% |
0.12459016 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
7 |
2.3% |
0.02295082 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
3.6% |
0.03606557 |
98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6pad3a_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: Easy to see what is advertising and what is editorial in Norwegian online newspapers
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
It is easy to see the difference between what is advertising and what is editorial in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
8 |
2.6% |
0.02622951 |
2 |
Agree |
47 |
15.4% |
0.15409836 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
83 |
27.2% |
0.27213115 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
37 |
12.1% |
0.12131148 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
85 |
27.9% |
0.27868852 |
6 |
Disagree |
32 |
10.5% |
0.10491803 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
1.6% |
0.01639344 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.6% |
0.02622951 |
98 |
Not asked |
4554 |
|
NA |
r6pad3b_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the information in the Norwegian online newspapers
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
I generally trust the information that is given in the Norwegian online newspapers that I read.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003424658 |
2 |
Agree |
49 |
16.8% |
0.167808219 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
93 |
31.8% |
0.318493151 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
38 |
13% |
0.130136986 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
63 |
21.6% |
0.215753425 |
6 |
Disagree |
35 |
12% |
0.119863014 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
2.7% |
0.027397260 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.7% |
0.017123288 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3b_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the journalists’ work
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the journalists’ work in general.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
2 |
Agree |
44 |
15.1% |
0.150684932 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
85 |
29.1% |
0.291095890 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
38 |
13% |
0.130136986 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
59 |
20.2% |
0.202054795 |
6 |
Disagree |
47 |
16.1% |
0.160958904 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
3.1% |
0.030821918 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.7% |
0.027397260 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3b_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the newspaper to mark what is advertising and what is editorial
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the newspapers to clearly mark what is advertising and what is editorial.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
7 |
2.4% |
0.02397260 |
2 |
Agree |
30 |
10.3% |
0.10273973 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
54 |
18.5% |
0.18493151 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
43 |
14.7% |
0.14726027 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
83 |
28.4% |
0.28424658 |
6 |
Disagree |
54 |
18.5% |
0.18493151 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
5.1% |
0.05136986 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02054795 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3b_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: If just seen a real piece, trusts other news from the same newspaper
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
If the piece I just saw had been real, I would have trusted other news from the same newspaper.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
2 |
Agree |
21 |
7.2% |
0.071917808 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
58 |
19.9% |
0.198630137 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
104 |
35.6% |
0.356164384 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
53 |
18.2% |
0.181506849 |
6 |
Disagree |
36 |
12.3% |
0.123287671 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
10 |
3.4% |
0.034246575 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.7% |
0.027397260 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3b_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: Easy to see what is advertising and what is editorial in Norwegian online newspapers
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
It is easy to see the difference between what is advertising and what is editorial in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003424658 |
2 |
Agree |
35 |
12% |
0.119863014 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
84 |
28.8% |
0.287671233 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
43 |
14.7% |
0.147260274 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
80 |
27.4% |
0.273972603 |
6 |
Disagree |
36 |
12.3% |
0.123287671 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
2.7% |
0.027397260 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.7% |
0.017123288 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3c_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the information in the Norwegian online newspapers
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw. This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent an advertisement. Several Norwegian newspapers have introduced such advertisements that look like editorial.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
I generally trust the information that is given in the Norwegian online newspapers that I read.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=3. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
2 |
Agree |
34 |
12.4% |
0.12408759 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
70 |
25.5% |
0.25547445 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
43 |
15.7% |
0.15693431 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
78 |
28.5% |
0.28467153 |
6 |
Disagree |
40 |
14.6% |
0.14598540 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6pad3c_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the journalists’ work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw. This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent an advertisement. Several Norwegian newspapers have introduced such advertisements that look like editorial.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the journalists’ work in general.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=3. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
6 |
2.2% |
0.02189781 |
2 |
Agree |
43 |
15.7% |
0.15693431 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
56 |
20.4% |
0.20437956 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
49 |
17.9% |
0.17883212 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
74 |
27% |
0.27007299 |
6 |
Disagree |
37 |
13.5% |
0.13503650 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
6 |
2.2% |
0.02189781 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6pad3c_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the newspaper to mark what is advertising and what is editorial
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw. This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent an advertisement. Several Norwegian newspapers have introduced such advertisements that look like editorial.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the newspapers to clearly mark what is advertising and what is editorial.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=3. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02919708 |
2 |
Agree |
32 |
11.7% |
0.11678832 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
60 |
21.9% |
0.21897810 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
41 |
15% |
0.14963504 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
58 |
21.2% |
0.21167883 |
6 |
Disagree |
60 |
21.9% |
0.21897810 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
4.4% |
0.04379562 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6pad3c_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: If just seen a real piece, trusts other news from the same newspaper
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw. This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent an advertisement. Several Norwegian newspapers have introduced such advertisements that look like editorial.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
If the piece I just saw had been real, I would have trusted other news from the same newspaper.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=3. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
2 |
Agree |
16 |
5.8% |
0.05839416 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
56 |
20.4% |
0.20437956 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
99 |
36.1% |
0.36131387 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
51 |
18.6% |
0.18613139 |
6 |
Disagree |
36 |
13.1% |
0.13138686 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
3.3% |
0.03284672 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.5% |
0.01459854 |
98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6pad3c_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: Easy to see what is advertising and what is editorial in Norwegian online newspapers
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw. This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent an advertisement. Several Norwegian newspapers have introduced such advertisements that look like editorial.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
It is easy to see the difference between what is advertising and what is editorial in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=3. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003649635 |
2 |
Agree |
25 |
9.1% |
0.091240876 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
62 |
22.6% |
0.226277372 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
30 |
10.9% |
0.109489051 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
82 |
29.9% |
0.299270073 |
6 |
Disagree |
54 |
19.7% |
0.197080292 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
17 |
6.2% |
0.062043796 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.010948905 |
98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6pad3d_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the information in the Norwegian online newspapers
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw. This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent a portrait interview. Several Norwegian newspapers write such portrait interviews.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
I generally trust the information that is given in the Norwegian online newspapers that I read.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=4. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
3 |
1% |
0.01027397 |
2 |
Agree |
38 |
13% |
0.13013699 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
74 |
25.3% |
0.25342466 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
58 |
19.9% |
0.19863014 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
57 |
19.5% |
0.19520548 |
6 |
Disagree |
43 |
14.7% |
0.14726027 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
11 |
3.8% |
0.03767123 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.7% |
0.02739726 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3d_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the journalists’ work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw. This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent a portrait interview. Several Norwegian newspapers write such portrait interviews.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the journalists’ work in general.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=4. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01369863 |
2 |
Agree |
33 |
11.3% |
0.11301370 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
74 |
25.3% |
0.25342466 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
49 |
16.8% |
0.16780822 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
65 |
22.3% |
0.22260274 |
6 |
Disagree |
47 |
16.1% |
0.16095890 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
14 |
4.8% |
0.04794521 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02054795 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3d_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Trusts the newspaper to mark what is advertising and what is editorial
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw. This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent a portrait interview. Several Norwegian newspapers write such portrait interviews.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
I trust the newspapers to clearly mark what is advertising and what is editorial.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=4. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01712329 |
2 |
Agree |
33 |
11.3% |
0.11301370 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
39 |
13.4% |
0.13356164 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
62 |
21.2% |
0.21232877 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
81 |
27.7% |
0.27739726 |
6 |
Disagree |
52 |
17.8% |
0.17808219 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
11 |
3.8% |
0.03767123 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
3.1% |
0.03082192 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3d_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: If just seen a real piece, trusts other news from the same newspaper
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw. This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent a portrait interview. Several Norwegian newspapers write such portrait interviews.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
If the piece I just saw had been real, I would have trusted other news from the same newspaper.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=4. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
2 |
Agree |
29 |
9.9% |
0.09931507 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
53 |
18.2% |
0.18150685 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
113 |
38.7% |
0.38698630 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
52 |
17.8% |
0.17808219 |
6 |
Disagree |
29 |
9.9% |
0.09931507 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
3.1% |
0.03082192 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.4% |
0.02397260 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad3d_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: Easy to see what is advertising and what is editorial in Norwegian online newspapers
|
Pre-question text:
|
Notice the text box above. It is taken from the piece you just saw. This means that the hypothetical article you just saw would represent a portrait interview. Several Norwegian newspapers write such portrait interviews.
To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements about Norwegian online newspapers:
|
Literal question:
|
It is easy to see the difference between what is advertising and what is editorial in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran7=4. Note: Respondents are exposed to visual stimulation (picture). See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01369863 |
2 |
Agree |
35 |
12% |
0.11986301 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
67 |
22.9% |
0.22945205 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
67 |
22.9% |
0.22945205 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
77 |
26.4% |
0.26369863 |
6 |
Disagree |
28 |
9.6% |
0.09589041 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02054795 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.7% |
0.02739726 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_randomQorder
Variable label:
|
Part of conjunction experiment. Determines whether R6PAD8A is asked first, second, or third.
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. Determines whether R6PAD8A is asked first, second, or third.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
First |
347 |
29.9% |
0.2993960 |
2 |
Second |
402 |
34.7% |
0.3468507 |
3 |
Third |
410 |
35.4% |
0.3537532 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b_randomQorder
Variable label:
|
Part of conjunction experiment. Determines whether R6PAD8B is asked first, second, or third.
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. Determines whether R6PAD8B is asked first, second, or third.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
First |
434 |
37.4% |
0.3744607 |
2 |
Second |
358 |
30.9% |
0.3088870 |
3 |
Third |
367 |
31.7% |
0.3166523 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_randomQorder
Variable label:
|
Part of conjunction experiment. Determines whether R6PAD8C is asked first, second, or third.
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. Determines whether R6PAD8C is asked first, second, or third.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
First |
378 |
32.6% |
0.3261432 |
2 |
Second |
399 |
34.4% |
0.3442623 |
3 |
Third |
382 |
33% |
0.3295945 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep1_age
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8a: age
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8A variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
22 years |
173 |
14.9% |
0.1492666 |
2 |
30 years |
172 |
14.8% |
0.1484038 |
3 |
40 years |
167 |
14.4% |
0.1440897 |
4 |
50 years |
152 |
13.1% |
0.1311475 |
5 |
60 years |
164 |
14.2% |
0.1415013 |
6 |
70 years |
165 |
14.2% |
0.1423641 |
7 |
80 years |
166 |
14.3% |
0.1432269 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep1_gender
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8a: gender
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8A variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Female |
566 |
48.8% |
0.488352 |
2 |
Male |
593 |
51.2% |
0.511648 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep1_region
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8a: region
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8A variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nord-Norge |
203 |
17.5% |
0.1751510 |
2 |
Midt-Norge |
186 |
16% |
0.1604832 |
3 |
Vestlandet |
189 |
16.3% |
0.1630716 |
4 |
Sørlandet |
214 |
18.5% |
0.1846419 |
5 |
Østlandet |
180 |
15.5% |
0.1553063 |
6 |
Oslo-området |
187 |
16.1% |
0.1613460 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep1_relationship
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8a: relationship
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8A variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Married |
407 |
35.1% |
0.3511648 |
2 |
Living alone |
400 |
34.5% |
0.3451251 |
3 |
Cohabitant |
352 |
30.4% |
0.3037101 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep1_education
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8a: education
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8A variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Elementary school |
294 |
25.4% |
0.2536670 |
2 |
High school |
288 |
24.8% |
0.2484901 |
3 |
University |
292 |
25.2% |
0.2519413 |
4 |
Ph.D. |
285 |
24.6% |
0.2459016 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep1_religion
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8a: religion
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8A variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
None |
380 |
32.8% |
0.3278689 |
2 |
Christianity |
380 |
32.8% |
0.3278689 |
3 |
Islam |
399 |
34.4% |
0.3442623 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep1_work
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8a: work
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8A variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nursery employee |
180 |
15.5% |
0.1553063 |
2 |
Farmer |
193 |
16.7% |
0.1665229 |
3 |
Oil worker |
195 |
16.8% |
0.1682485 |
4 |
Self-employed |
182 |
15.7% |
0.1570319 |
5 |
IT-consultant |
211 |
18.2% |
0.1820535 |
6 |
No work experience |
198 |
17.1% |
0.1708369 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep2_age
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8a: age
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8A variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
22 years |
158 |
13.6% |
0.1363244 |
2 |
30 years |
143 |
12.3% |
0.1233822 |
3 |
40 years |
186 |
16% |
0.1604832 |
4 |
50 years |
169 |
14.6% |
0.1458154 |
5 |
60 years |
157 |
13.5% |
0.1354616 |
6 |
70 years |
166 |
14.3% |
0.1432269 |
7 |
80 years |
180 |
15.5% |
0.1553063 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep2_gender
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8a: gender
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8A variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Female |
586 |
50.6% |
0.5056083 |
2 |
Male |
573 |
49.4% |
0.4943917 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep2_region
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8a: region
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8A variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nord-Norge |
208 |
17.9% |
0.1794651 |
2 |
Midt-Norge |
175 |
15.1% |
0.1509922 |
3 |
Vestlandet |
188 |
16.2% |
0.1622088 |
4 |
Sørlandet |
200 |
17.3% |
0.1725626 |
5 |
Østlandet |
196 |
16.9% |
0.1691113 |
6 |
Oslo-området |
192 |
16.6% |
0.1656601 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep2_relationship
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8a: relationship
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8A variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Married |
399 |
34.4% |
0.3442623 |
2 |
Living alone |
372 |
32.1% |
0.3209664 |
3 |
Cohabitant |
388 |
33.5% |
0.3347714 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep2_education
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8a: education
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8A variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Elementary school |
286 |
24.7% |
0.2467645 |
2 |
High school |
277 |
23.9% |
0.2389991 |
3 |
University |
274 |
23.6% |
0.2364107 |
4 |
Ph.D. |
322 |
27.8% |
0.2778257 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep2_religion
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8a: religion
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8A variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
None |
391 |
33.7% |
0.3373598 |
2 |
Christianity |
384 |
33.1% |
0.3313201 |
3 |
Islam |
384 |
33.1% |
0.3313201 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a_rep2_work
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8a: work
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8A variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8A and rep2_8A are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nursery employee |
164 |
14.2% |
0.1415013 |
2 |
Farmer |
199 |
17.2% |
0.1716997 |
3 |
Oil worker |
194 |
16.7% |
0.1673857 |
4 |
Self-employed |
183 |
15.8% |
0.1578947 |
5 |
IT-consultant |
230 |
19.8% |
0.1984469 |
6 |
No work experience |
189 |
16.3% |
0.1630716 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b_rep1_stance_1
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8b: stance 1
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8B variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8B and rep2_8B are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
161 |
13.9% |
0.1389129 |
2 |
Agree |
166 |
14.3% |
0.1432269 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
155 |
13.4% |
0.1337360 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
176 |
15.2% |
0.1518550 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
155 |
13.4% |
0.1337360 |
6 |
Disagree |
165 |
14.2% |
0.1423641 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
181 |
15.6% |
0.1561691 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b_rep1_stance_2
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8b: stance 2
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8B variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8B and rep2_8B are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
182 |
15.7% |
0.1570319 |
2 |
Agree |
167 |
14.4% |
0.1440897 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
164 |
14.2% |
0.1415013 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
171 |
14.8% |
0.1475410 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
157 |
13.5% |
0.1354616 |
6 |
Disagree |
139 |
12% |
0.1199310 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
179 |
15.4% |
0.1544435 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b_rep1_stance_3
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8b: stance 3
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8B variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8B and rep2_8B are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
172 |
14.8% |
0.1484038 |
2 |
Agree |
158 |
13.6% |
0.1363244 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
168 |
14.5% |
0.1449525 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
170 |
14.7% |
0.1466782 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
179 |
15.4% |
0.1544435 |
6 |
Disagree |
164 |
14.2% |
0.1415013 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
148 |
12.8% |
0.1276963 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b_rep2_stance_1
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8b: stance 1
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8B variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8B and rep2_8B are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
165 |
14.2% |
0.1423641 |
2 |
Agree |
169 |
14.6% |
0.1458154 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
159 |
13.7% |
0.1371872 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
169 |
14.6% |
0.1458154 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
158 |
13.6% |
0.1363244 |
6 |
Disagree |
167 |
14.4% |
0.1440897 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
172 |
14.8% |
0.1484038 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b_rep2_stance_2
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8b: stance 2
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8B variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8B and rep2_8B are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
185 |
16% |
0.1596204 |
2 |
Agree |
182 |
15.7% |
0.1570319 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
152 |
13.1% |
0.1311475 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
161 |
13.9% |
0.1389129 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
165 |
14.2% |
0.1423641 |
6 |
Disagree |
152 |
13.1% |
0.1311475 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
162 |
14% |
0.1397757 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b_rep2_stance_3
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8b: stance 3
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8B variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8B and rep2_8B are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
149 |
12.9% |
0.1285591 |
2 |
Agree |
163 |
14.1% |
0.1406385 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
166 |
14.3% |
0.1432269 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
169 |
14.6% |
0.1458154 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
179 |
15.4% |
0.1544435 |
6 |
Disagree |
171 |
14.8% |
0.1475410 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
162 |
14% |
0.1397757 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_age
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8c: age
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
22 years |
148 |
12.8% |
0.1276963 |
2 |
30 years |
154 |
13.3% |
0.1328732 |
3 |
40 years |
179 |
15.4% |
0.1544435 |
4 |
50 years |
162 |
14% |
0.1397757 |
5 |
60 years |
171 |
14.8% |
0.1475410 |
6 |
70 years |
177 |
15.3% |
0.1527179 |
7 |
80 years |
168 |
14.5% |
0.1449525 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_gender
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8c: gender
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Female |
598 |
51.6% |
0.515962 |
2 |
Male |
561 |
48.4% |
0.484038 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_region
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8c: region
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nord-Norge |
182 |
15.7% |
0.1570319 |
2 |
Midt-Norge |
190 |
16.4% |
0.1639344 |
3 |
Vestlandet |
198 |
17.1% |
0.1708369 |
4 |
Sørlandet |
218 |
18.8% |
0.1880932 |
5 |
Østlandet |
194 |
16.7% |
0.1673857 |
6 |
Oslo-området |
177 |
15.3% |
0.1527179 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_relationship
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8c: relationship
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Married |
393 |
33.9% |
0.3390854 |
2 |
Living alone |
382 |
33% |
0.3295945 |
3 |
Cohabitant |
384 |
33.1% |
0.3313201 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_education
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8c: education
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Elementary school |
280 |
24.2% |
0.2415876 |
2 |
High school |
276 |
23.8% |
0.2381363 |
3 |
University |
295 |
25.5% |
0.2545298 |
4 |
Ph.D. |
308 |
26.6% |
0.2657463 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_religion
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8c: religion
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
None |
418 |
36.1% |
0.3606557 |
2 |
Christianity |
368 |
31.8% |
0.3175151 |
3 |
Islam |
373 |
32.2% |
0.3218292 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_work
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8c: work
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nursery employee |
170 |
14.7% |
0.1466782 |
2 |
Farmer |
213 |
18.4% |
0.1837791 |
3 |
Oil worker |
190 |
16.4% |
0.1639344 |
4 |
Self-employed |
198 |
17.1% |
0.1708369 |
5 |
IT-consultant |
209 |
18% |
0.1803279 |
6 |
No work experience |
179 |
15.4% |
0.1544435 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_stance_1
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8c: stance 1
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
125 |
10.8% |
0.1078516 |
2 |
Agree |
182 |
15.7% |
0.1570319 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
168 |
14.5% |
0.1449525 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
165 |
14.2% |
0.1423641 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
177 |
15.3% |
0.1527179 |
6 |
Disagree |
173 |
14.9% |
0.1492666 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
169 |
14.6% |
0.1458154 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_stance_2
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8c: stance 2
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
159 |
13.7% |
0.1371872 |
2 |
Agree |
157 |
13.5% |
0.1354616 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
159 |
13.7% |
0.1371872 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
204 |
17.6% |
0.1760138 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
158 |
13.6% |
0.1363244 |
6 |
Disagree |
168 |
14.5% |
0.1449525 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
154 |
13.3% |
0.1328732 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep1_stance_3
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 1 in r6pad8c: stance 3
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep1_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
159 |
13.7% |
0.1371872 |
2 |
Agree |
160 |
13.8% |
0.1380500 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
166 |
14.3% |
0.1432269 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
164 |
14.2% |
0.1415013 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
181 |
15.6% |
0.1561691 |
6 |
Disagree |
167 |
14.4% |
0.1440897 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
162 |
14% |
0.1397757 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_age
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8c: age
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
22 years |
173 |
14.9% |
0.1492666 |
2 |
30 years |
173 |
14.9% |
0.1492666 |
3 |
40 years |
160 |
13.8% |
0.1380500 |
4 |
50 years |
142 |
12.3% |
0.1225194 |
5 |
60 years |
176 |
15.2% |
0.1518550 |
6 |
70 years |
183 |
15.8% |
0.1578947 |
7 |
80 years |
152 |
13.1% |
0.1311475 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_gender
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8c: gender
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Female |
601 |
51.9% |
0.5185505 |
2 |
Male |
558 |
48.1% |
0.4814495 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_region
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8c: region
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nord-Norge |
191 |
16.5% |
0.1647972 |
2 |
Midt-Norge |
198 |
17.1% |
0.1708369 |
3 |
Vestlandet |
175 |
15.1% |
0.1509922 |
4 |
Sørlandet |
197 |
17% |
0.1699741 |
5 |
Østlandet |
220 |
19% |
0.1898188 |
6 |
Oslo-området |
178 |
15.4% |
0.1535807 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_relationship
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8c: relationship
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Married |
371 |
32% |
0.3201035 |
2 |
Living alone |
374 |
32.3% |
0.3226920 |
3 |
Cohabitant |
414 |
35.7% |
0.3572045 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_education
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8c: education
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Elementary school |
280 |
24.2% |
0.2415876 |
2 |
High school |
304 |
26.2% |
0.2622951 |
3 |
University |
273 |
23.6% |
0.2355479 |
4 |
Ph.D. |
302 |
26.1% |
0.2605695 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_religion
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8c: religion
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
None |
396 |
34.2% |
0.3416739 |
2 |
Christianity |
378 |
32.6% |
0.3261432 |
3 |
Islam |
385 |
33.2% |
0.3321829 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_work
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8c: work
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nursery employee |
173 |
14.9% |
0.1492666 |
2 |
Farmer |
198 |
17.1% |
0.1708369 |
3 |
Oil worker |
190 |
16.4% |
0.1639344 |
4 |
Self-employed |
207 |
17.9% |
0.1786022 |
5 |
IT-consultant |
190 |
16.4% |
0.1639344 |
6 |
No work experience |
201 |
17.3% |
0.1734254 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_stance_1
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8c: stance 1
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
169 |
14.6% |
0.1458154 |
2 |
Agree |
168 |
14.5% |
0.1449525 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
139 |
12% |
0.1199310 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
185 |
16% |
0.1596204 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
150 |
12.9% |
0.1294219 |
6 |
Disagree |
184 |
15.9% |
0.1587575 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
164 |
14.2% |
0.1415013 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c_rep2_stance_2
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8c: stance 2
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
187 |
16.1% |
0.1613460 |
2 |
Agree |
164 |
14.2% |
0.1415013 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
163 |
14.1% |
0.1406385 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
160 |
13.8% |
0.1380500 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
151 |
13% |
0.1302847 |
6 |
Disagree |
158 |
13.6% |
0.1363244 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
176 |
15.2% |
0.1518550 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pac8c_rep2_stance_3
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representative. Background variable for representative 2 in r6pad8c: stance 3
|
Technical description:
|
[Part of conjunction experiment. The rep2_8C variables constitutes the full background of one of six representatives. rep1_8C and rep2_8C are presented together. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1159] [Invalid:3700] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
169 |
14.6% |
0.1458154 |
2 |
Agree |
157 |
13.5% |
0.1354616 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
178 |
15.4% |
0.1535807 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
162 |
14% |
0.1397757 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
166 |
14.3% |
0.1432269 |
6 |
Disagree |
167 |
14.4% |
0.1440897 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
160 |
13.8% |
0.1380500 |
Sysmiss |
|
3700 |
|
NA |
r6pad8a
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representatives with demographic characteristics.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Choice of political representive 1 of 3
|
Literal question:
|
Below we are presenting you with two hypothetical members of parliament with differing characteristics. Let us say that you have to choose one of these to represent you in parliament. Please read the description of each representative carefully. Then, please indicate which representative you would prefer to represent you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. Note: Part of conjunction experiment. Collects the preference of the respondents when they are asked to choose between representative 1 and representative 2. The order of which R6PAD8A-C is asked, is randomized. The contents of the question is also randomly determined, based on the r6pad8a_rep variables. See appendix for question layout. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I prefer representative 1 |
549 |
47.2% |
0.47164948 |
2 |
I prefer representative 2 |
557 |
47.9% |
0.47852234 |
97 |
No answer |
58 |
5% |
0.04982818 |
98 |
Not asked |
3695 |
|
NA |
r6pad8b
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representatives with political characteristics.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Choice of political representive 2 of 3
|
Literal question:
|
Below we are presenting you with two hypothetical members of parliament with differing characteristics. Let us say that you have to choose one of these to represent you in parliament. Please read the description of each representative carefully. Then, please indicate which representative you would prefer to represent you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. Note: Part of conjunction experiment. Collects the preference of the respondents when they are asked to choose between representative 1 and representative 2. The order of which R6PAD8A-C is asked, is randomized. The contents of the question is randomly determined, based on the r6pad8n_rep variables. See appendix for question layout. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I prefer representative 1 |
566 |
48.6% |
0.4862543 |
2 |
I prefer representative 2 |
536 |
46% |
0.4604811 |
97 |
No answer |
62 |
5.3% |
0.0532646 |
98 |
Not asked |
3695 |
|
NA |
r6pad8c
Variable label:
|
Choice of hypothetical political representatives with demographic and political characteristics.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Choice of political representive 3 of 3
|
Literal question:
|
Below we are presenting you with two hypothetical members of parliament with differing characteristics. Let us say that you have to choose one of these to represent you in parliament. Please read the description of each representative carefully. Then, please indicate which representative you would prefer to represent you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3. Note: Part of conjunction experiment. Collects the preference of the respondents when they are asked to choose between representative 1 and representative 2. The order of which R6PAD8A-C is asked, is randomized. The contents of the question is also randomly determined, based on the r6pad8c_rep variables. See appendix for question layout. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I prefer representative 1 |
559 |
48% |
0.48024055 |
2 |
I prefer representative 2 |
545 |
46.8% |
0.46821306 |
97 |
No answer |
60 |
5.2% |
0.05154639 |
98 |
Not asked |
3695 |
|
NA |
r6ran11
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1152] [Invalid:3707] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
561 |
48.7% |
0.4869792 |
2 |
2 |
591 |
51.3% |
0.5130208 |
Sysmiss |
|
3707 |
|
NA |
r6pad9a
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Accept more Syrian refugees
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran11=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
50 |
8.9% |
0.089126560 |
2 |
Agree |
115 |
20.5% |
0.204991087 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
134 |
23.9% |
0.238859180 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
70 |
12.5% |
0.124777184 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
79 |
14.1% |
0.140819964 |
6 |
Disagree |
50 |
8.9% |
0.089126560 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
60 |
10.7% |
0.106951872 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.5% |
0.005347594 |
98 |
Not asked |
4298 |
|
NA |
r6pad9b
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Accept more Syrian refugees than what has been agreed
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that Norway should accept more Syrian refugees over the next two years than has been agreed?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran11=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
47 |
8% |
0.079526227 |
2 |
Agree |
111 |
18.8% |
0.187817259 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
118 |
20% |
0.199661591 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
81 |
13.7% |
0.137055838 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
71 |
12% |
0.120135364 |
6 |
Disagree |
63 |
10.7% |
0.106598985 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
98 |
16.6% |
0.165820643 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.3% |
0.003384095 |
98 |
Not asked |
4268 |
|
NA |
r6ran12
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1152] [Invalid:3707] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
548 |
47.6% |
0.4756944 |
2 |
2 |
604 |
52.4% |
0.5243056 |
Sysmiss |
|
3707 |
|
NA |
r6pad10a
Variable label:
|
Reasoning for answer about Syrian refugees [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Can you write the reason for your answer about Syrian refugees?
|
Post-question:
|
We want all types of answers. A couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran12=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6pad11
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you have a strong opinion on this question?
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent would you say that you have a strong opinion on this question?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
148 |
12.7% |
0.127147766 |
2 |
To a great extent |
381 |
32.7% |
0.327319588 |
3 |
Somewhat |
504 |
43.3% |
0.432989691 |
4 |
Slightly |
101 |
8.7% |
0.086769759 |
5 |
Not at all |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006013746 |
97 |
No answer |
23 |
2% |
0.019759450 |
98 |
Not asked |
3695 |
|
NA |
r6pad12
Variable label:
|
How good is your knowledge about the refugee question?
|
Literal question:
|
How good do you feel that your knowledge about the refugee question is?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good knowledge |
52 |
4.5% |
0.04467354 |
2 |
Good knowledge |
469 |
40.3% |
0.40292096 |
3 |
Some knowledge |
542 |
46.6% |
0.46563574 |
4 |
Not much knowledge |
65 |
5.6% |
0.05584192 |
5 |
No knowledge at all |
3 |
0.3% |
0.00257732 |
97 |
No answer |
33 |
2.8% |
0.02835052 |
98 |
Not asked |
3695 |
|
NA |
r6ran32
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1150] [Invalid:3709] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
587 |
51% |
0.5104348 |
2 |
2 |
563 |
49% |
0.4895652 |
Sysmiss |
|
3709 |
|
NA |
r6pad13a
Variable label:
|
How many of Norway’s citizens: Agrees that the country should accept more Syrian refugees
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to guess, how many of Norway’s citizens do you think would agree that the country should accept more Syrian refugees?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Almost all |
7 |
1.2% |
0.01192504 |
2 |
About 2 out of 3 |
71 |
12.1% |
0.12095400 |
3 |
About half |
220 |
37.5% |
0.37478705 |
4 |
About 1 out of 3 |
235 |
40% |
0.40034072 |
5 |
Almost none |
44 |
7.5% |
0.07495741 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.7% |
0.01703578 |
98 |
Not asked |
4272 |
|
NA |
r6pad13b
Variable label:
|
How many of the people you know: Agrees that the country should accept more Syrian refugees
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to guess, how many of the people you know do you think would agree that the country should accept more Syrian refugees?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran32=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Almost all |
26 |
4.6% |
0.04618117 |
2 |
About 2 out of 3 |
80 |
14.2% |
0.14209591 |
3 |
About half |
179 |
31.8% |
0.31793961 |
4 |
About 1 out of 3 |
151 |
26.8% |
0.26820604 |
5 |
Almost none |
120 |
21.3% |
0.21314387 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.2% |
0.01243339 |
98 |
Not asked |
4296 |
|
NA |
r6pad10b
Variable label:
|
Reasoning for answer about Syrian refugees [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Can you write the reason for your answer about Syrian refugees?
|
Post-question:
|
We want all types of answers. A couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran12=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6pad14
Variable label:
|
Opinion of: Municipalities that have entered into contracts with companies that provide and maintain for example bus shelters in return for the companies being allowed to advertise
|
Pre-question text:
|
Several Norwegian municipalities have in recent years entered into contracts with companies that provide and maintain bus shelters, city bicycles and public lavatories in return for the companies being allowed to advertise in connection with these.
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion of this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and if the respondent is inhabitant in a defined group of municipalities. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I am opposed to municipal funding of bus shelters, city bicycles and public
lavatories with the aid of advertising |
142 |
24.7% |
0.24652778 |
2 |
I support municipal funding of bus shelters, city bicycles and public lavatories
with the aid of advertising |
419 |
72.7% |
0.72743056 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
2.6% |
0.02604167 |
98 |
Not asked |
4283 |
|
NA |
r6ran9
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1147] [Invalid:3712] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
292 |
25.5% |
0.2545772 |
2 |
2 |
289 |
25.2% |
0.2519616 |
3 |
3 |
270 |
23.5% |
0.2353967 |
4 |
4 |
296 |
25.8% |
0.2580645 |
Sysmiss |
|
3712 |
|
NA |
r6pad4a
Variable label:
|
Drawn out to win cash prize. Decision 1: How much do you want to give to a random person?
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you and two other participants can be drawn out to win an extra cash prize of 1,000 kroner. If you are drawn out, you must all make two decisions.
As decision 1, you must choose how much of the 1,000 kroner you would give a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel. As decision 2, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the one of the other two persons who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Decision 1: If you were drawn out, how much of the 1,000 kroner would you give to a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 kr |
73 |
25% |
0.25000000 |
2 |
250 kr |
43 |
14.7% |
0.14726027 |
3 |
500 kr |
128 |
43.8% |
0.43835616 |
4 |
750 kr |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
5 |
1000 kr |
24 |
8.2% |
0.08219178 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
8.2% |
0.08219178 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad4a_beslutning2
Variable label:
|
Drawn out to win cash prize. Wish/doesn’t wish to go to decision 2
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=1. Asked on the same page as R6PAD4A]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I do not wish to go to Decision 2 |
95 |
32.5% |
0.3253425 |
2 |
Go on to Decision 2 |
142 |
48.6% |
0.4863014 |
97 |
No answer |
55 |
18.8% |
0.1883562 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6pad4a1_1
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 0 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=1, and R6PAD4A_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 0 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2000]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
67 |
47.2% |
0.471830986 |
98 |
Not asked |
4717 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
69 |
48.6% |
0.485915493 |
500 |
|
4 |
2.8% |
0.028169014 |
900 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
2000 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
r6pad4a1_2
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 250 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=1, and R6PAD4A_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 250 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1750]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
68 |
47.9% |
0.478873239 |
98 |
Not asked |
4717 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
52 |
36.6% |
0.366197183 |
50 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
100 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
200 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
250 |
|
17 |
12% |
0.119718310 |
300 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
1750 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
r6pad4a1_3
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 500 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=1, and R6PAD4A_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 500 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1500]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
64 |
45.1% |
0.450704225 |
98 |
Not asked |
4717 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
55 |
38.7% |
0.387323944 |
167 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
200 |
|
2 |
1.4% |
0.014084507 |
250 |
|
3 |
2.1% |
0.021126761 |
400 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
450 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
500 |
|
14 |
9.9% |
0.098591549 |
1500 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
r6pad4a1_4
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 750 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=1, and R6PAD4A_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 750 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1250]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
69 |
48.6% |
0.485915493 |
98 |
Not asked |
4717 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
30 |
21.1% |
0.211267606 |
100 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
200 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
250 |
|
23 |
16.2% |
0.161971831 |
300 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
350 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
375 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
417 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
500 |
|
5 |
3.5% |
0.035211268 |
600 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
700 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
750 |
|
6 |
4.2% |
0.042253521 |
1250 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
r6pad4a1_5
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 1 000 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=1, and R6PAD4A_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 1 000 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1000]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
58 |
40.8% |
0.408450704 |
98 |
Not asked |
4717 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
32 |
22.5% |
0.225352113 |
50 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
200 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
250 |
|
2 |
1.4% |
0.014084507 |
300 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
400 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
500 |
|
33 |
23.2% |
0.232394366 |
667 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
700 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
750 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
900 |
|
1 |
0.7% |
0.007042254 |
1000 |
|
9 |
6.3% |
0.063380282 |
r6pad4b
Variable label:
|
Drawn out to win cash prize. Decision 1: If drawn out, how much do you want to give to a random person?
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you and two other participants can be drawn out to win an extra cash prize of 1,000 kroner. If you are drawn out, you must all make two decisions. As decision 1, you must choose how much of the 1,000 kroner you would give a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel.
As decision 2, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the one of the other two persons who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Decision 1: If you were drawn out, how much of the 1,000 kroner would you give to a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 kr |
61 |
21.1% |
0.21107266 |
2 |
250 kr |
44 |
15.2% |
0.15224913 |
3 |
500 kr |
124 |
42.9% |
0.42906574 |
4 |
750 kr |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01730104 |
5 |
1000 kr |
15 |
5.2% |
0.05190311 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
13.8% |
0.13840830 |
98 |
Not asked |
4570 |
|
NA |
r6pad4b_beslutning2
Variable label:
|
Drawn out to win cash prize. Wish/doesn’t wish to go to decision 2
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=2. Asked on the same page as R6PAD4B]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I do not wish to go to Decision 2 |
78 |
27% |
0.2698962 |
2 |
Go on to Decision 2 |
160 |
55.4% |
0.5536332 |
97 |
No answer |
51 |
17.6% |
0.1764706 |
98 |
Not asked |
4570 |
|
NA |
r6pad4b1_1
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 0 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=2, and R6PAD4B_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 0 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2000]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
63 |
39.4% |
0.39375 |
98 |
Not asked |
4699 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
41 |
25.6% |
0.25625 |
10 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
200 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
250 |
|
13 |
8.1% |
0.08125 |
500 |
|
27 |
16.9% |
0.16875 |
750 |
|
4 |
2.5% |
0.02500 |
1000 |
|
9 |
5.6% |
0.05625 |
2000 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
r6pad4b1_2
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 250 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=2, and R6PAD4B_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 250 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1000]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
83 |
51.9% |
0.51875 |
98 |
Not asked |
4699 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
31 |
19.4% |
0.19375 |
50 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
100 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
125 |
|
3 |
1.9% |
0.01875 |
150 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
200 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
250 |
|
24 |
15% |
0.15000 |
259 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
500 |
|
5 |
3.1% |
0.03125 |
750 |
|
7 |
4.4% |
0.04375 |
1000 |
|
2 |
1.2% |
0.01250 |
r6pad4b1_3
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 500 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=2, and R6PAD4B_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 500 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1000]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
81 |
50.6% |
0.50625 |
98 |
Not asked |
4699 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
47 |
29.4% |
0.29375 |
100 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
200 |
|
2 |
1.2% |
0.01250 |
250 |
|
5 |
3.1% |
0.03125 |
300 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
350 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
500 |
|
20 |
12.5% |
0.12500 |
900 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
1000 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
r6pad4b1_4
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 750 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=2, and R6PAD4B_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 750 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-250-1200]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
88 |
55% |
0.55000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4699 |
|
NA |
-250 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
0 |
|
46 |
28.8% |
0.28750 |
200 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
250 |
|
11 |
6.9% |
0.06875 |
300 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
350 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
375 |
|
2 |
1.2% |
0.01250 |
500 |
|
4 |
2.5% |
0.02500 |
600 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
750 |
|
2 |
1.2% |
0.01250 |
1000 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
1200 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
r6pad4b1_5
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 1 000 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3, ran9=2, and R6PAD4B_beslutning2 =2. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 1 000 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-500-1800]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
87 |
54.4% |
0.54375 |
98 |
Not asked |
4699 |
|
NA |
-500 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
0 |
|
53 |
33.1% |
0.33125 |
200 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
250 |
|
2 |
1.2% |
0.01250 |
450 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
500 |
|
8 |
5% |
0.05000 |
800 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
950 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
1000 |
|
4 |
2.5% |
0.02500 |
1800 |
|
1 |
0.6% |
0.00625 |
r6pad4c
Variable label:
|
Drawn out to win cash prize. Decision 1: If drawn out, how much do you want to give to a random person?
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you and two other participants can be drawn out to win an extra cash prize of 1,000 kroner. If you are drawn out, you must all make two decisions.
As decision 1, you must choose how much of the 1,000 kroner you would give a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel. As decision 2, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the one of the other two persons who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Decision 1: If you were drawn out, how much of the 1,000 kroner would you give to a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 kr |
75 |
27.8% |
0.27777778 |
2 |
250 kr |
35 |
13% |
0.12962963 |
3 |
500 kr |
123 |
45.6% |
0.45555556 |
4 |
750 kr |
4 |
1.5% |
0.01481481 |
5 |
1000 kr |
20 |
7.4% |
0.07407407 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
4.8% |
0.04814815 |
98 |
Not asked |
4589 |
|
NA |
r6pad4c1_1
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 0 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=3. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 0 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1000]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
131 |
48.5% |
0.485185185 |
98 |
Not asked |
4589 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
124 |
45.9% |
0.459259259 |
100 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
250 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
500 |
|
8 |
3% |
0.029629630 |
1000 |
|
5 |
1.9% |
0.018518519 |
r6pad4c1_2
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 250 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=3. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 250 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-750]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
146 |
54.1% |
0.540740741 |
98 |
Not asked |
4589 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
86 |
31.9% |
0.318518519 |
50 |
|
3 |
1.1% |
0.011111111 |
100 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
125 |
|
4 |
1.5% |
0.014814815 |
150 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
200 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.007407407 |
250 |
|
15 |
5.6% |
0.055555556 |
259 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
350 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
500 |
|
6 |
2.2% |
0.022222222 |
750 |
|
4 |
1.5% |
0.014814815 |
r6pad4c1_3
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 500 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=3. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 500 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-500500]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
136 |
50.4% |
0.503703704 |
98 |
Not asked |
4589 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
84 |
31.1% |
0.311111111 |
100 |
|
3 |
1.1% |
0.011111111 |
150 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
200 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.007407407 |
250 |
|
15 |
5.6% |
0.055555556 |
300 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
400 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
500 |
|
26 |
9.6% |
0.096296296 |
500500 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
r6pad4c1_4
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 750 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=3. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 750 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1000]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
148 |
54.8% |
0.548148148 |
98 |
Not asked |
4589 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
49 |
18.1% |
0.181481481 |
50 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
90 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
100 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.007407407 |
150 |
|
3 |
1.1% |
0.011111111 |
200 |
|
3 |
1.1% |
0.011111111 |
250 |
|
35 |
13% |
0.129629630 |
300 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
350 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.007407407 |
375 |
|
5 |
1.9% |
0.018518519 |
400 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
500 |
|
9 |
3.3% |
0.033333333 |
600 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
750 |
|
8 |
3% |
0.029629630 |
1000 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
r6pad4c1_5
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the most has 1 000 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has kept most of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=3. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 1 000 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1000]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
129 |
47.8% |
0.477777778 |
98 |
Not asked |
4589 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
60 |
22.2% |
0.222222222 |
100 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
200 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
250 |
|
8 |
3% |
0.029629630 |
300 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
350 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
400 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.007407407 |
500 |
|
44 |
16.3% |
0.162962963 |
700 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
750 |
|
5 |
1.9% |
0.018518519 |
900 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
999 |
|
1 |
0.4% |
0.003703704 |
1000 |
|
15 |
5.6% |
0.055555556 |
r6pad4d
Variable label:
|
Drawn out to win cash prize. Decision 1: If drawn out, how much do you want to give to a random person?
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you and two other participants can be drawn out to win an extra cash prize of 1,000 kroner. If you are drawn out, you must all make two decisions. As decision 1, you must choose how much of the 1,000 kroner you would give a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel. As decision 2, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the one of the other two persons who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Decision 1: If you were drawn out, how much of the 1,000 kroner would you give to a randomly selected member of the Norwegian Citizen Panel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 kr |
75 |
25.3% |
0.25337838 |
2 |
250 kr |
52 |
17.6% |
0.17567568 |
3 |
500 kr |
131 |
44.3% |
0.44256757 |
4 |
750 kr |
3 |
1% |
0.01013514 |
5 |
1000 kr |
25 |
8.4% |
0.08445946 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
3.4% |
0.03378378 |
98 |
Not asked |
4563 |
|
NA |
r6pad4d1_1
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 0 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=4. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 0 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1000]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
111 |
37.5% |
0.375000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4563 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
93 |
31.4% |
0.314189189 |
1 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
100 |
|
4 |
1.4% |
0.013513514 |
200 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
250 |
|
13 |
4.4% |
0.043918919 |
420 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
500 |
|
40 |
13.5% |
0.135135135 |
550 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
750 |
|
6 |
2% |
0.020270270 |
800 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
1000 |
|
24 |
8.1% |
0.081081081 |
r6pad4d1_2
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 250 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=4. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 250 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-750250]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
146 |
49.3% |
0.493243243 |
98 |
Not asked |
4563 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
64 |
21.6% |
0.216216216 |
1 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
100 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
125 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
200 |
|
4 |
1.4% |
0.013513514 |
250 |
|
51 |
17.2% |
0.172297297 |
300 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
350 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
420 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
500 |
|
7 |
2.4% |
0.023648649 |
750 |
|
15 |
5.1% |
0.050675676 |
750250 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
r6pad4d1_3
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 500 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=4. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 500 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-500]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
153 |
51.7% |
0.516891892 |
98 |
Not asked |
4563 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
90 |
30.4% |
0.304054054 |
50 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
150 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
200 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
250 |
|
11 |
3.7% |
0.037162162 |
400 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
420 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
500 |
|
37 |
12.5% |
0.125000000 |
r6pad4d1_4
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 750 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=4. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 750 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-750]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
166 |
56.1% |
0.560810811 |
98 |
Not asked |
4563 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
90 |
30.4% |
0.304054054 |
25 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
125 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
200 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
250 |
|
19 |
6.4% |
0.064189189 |
375 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
420 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
500 |
|
4 |
1.4% |
0.013513514 |
600 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
750 |
|
10 |
3.4% |
0.033783784 |
r6pad4d1_5
Variable label:
|
Decision 2: If the one who got to keep the least has 1 000 kr, reduce the prize with:
|
Pre-question text:
|
Decision 2: In this decision, you can choose to reduce the final prize of the person who has given least of his or her 1,000 kroner.
|
Literal question:
|
Then I wish to reduce the prize to this person by the following amount:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran9=4. Note: Respondents are presented with a sum of 1 000 kr]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1000]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
97 |
No answer |
159 |
53.7% |
0.537162162 |
98 |
Not asked |
4563 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
110 |
37.2% |
0.371621622 |
200 |
|
2 |
0.7% |
0.006756757 |
250 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
300 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
420 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
500 |
|
5 |
1.7% |
0.016891892 |
750 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
800 |
|
1 |
0.3% |
0.003378378 |
1000 |
|
15 |
5.1% |
0.050675676 |
r6ran10
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1145] [Invalid:3714] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
544 |
47.5% |
0.4751092 |
2 |
2 |
601 |
52.5% |
0.5248908 |
Sysmiss |
|
3714 |
|
NA |
r6pad5a1
Variable label:
|
Take a decision
|
Pre-question text:
|
Vi vil nå be deg om å svare på et spørsmål som handler om å ta en beslutning. Vi trekker ut 4 personer som blir betalt ut fra beslutningen de tar. Du er helt anonym og skal kun ta én beslutning.
Du kan velge å gå til venstre eller høyre. Du blir tilfeldig plassert med en annen person som skal ta det samme valget. Hvor mye du tjener avhenger av valgene dere tar:
Hvis begge går til venstre , får dere 800 kroner hver. Hvis du går til venstre og den andre går til høyre, får du 0 kroner og den andre får 1200 kroner Hvis du går til høyre og den andre går til venstre, får du 1200 kroner og den andre får 0 kroner Hvis begge går til høyre, får dere 400 kroner hver.
Uansett hva den andre personen velger, tjener du mest ved å gå til høyre. Den samlede betalingen er høyest hvis begge går til venstre.
|
Literal question:
|
Please take a decision.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran10=1. Note: Respondents are asked to read a text on the previous page which contextualises the decision they are asked to make. The text is different from the one presented before R6PAD5B1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I choose to go to the left |
330 |
60.7% |
0.60661765 |
2 |
I choose to go to the right |
188 |
34.6% |
0.34558824 |
97 |
No answer |
26 |
4.8% |
0.04779412 |
98 |
Not asked |
4315 |
|
NA |
r6pad5b1
Variable label:
|
Before the next question, take a decision
|
Pre-question text:
|
Vi vil nå be deg om å svare på et spørsmål som handler om å ta en beslutning. Vi trekker ut 4 personer som blir betalt ut fra beslutningen de tar. Du er helt anonym og skal kun ta én beslutning.
Du kan velge å gå til venstre eller høyre. Du blir tilfeldig plassert med en annen person som skal ta det samme valget. Hvor mye du tjener avhenger av valgene dere tar:
Hvis begge går til venstre, får dere 800 kroner hver. Hvis du går til venstre og den andre går til høyre, får du 0 kroner og den andre får 1200 kroner Hvis du går til høyre og den andre går til venstre, får du 1200 kroner og den andre får 0 kroner Hvis begge går til høyre, får dere 400 kroner hver
Uansett hva den andre personen velger, tjener du mest ved å gå til høyre. Den samlede betalingen er høyest hvis begge går til venstre.
|
Literal question:
|
Before you go on to the next question, please take a decision.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran10=2. Note: Respondents are asked to read a text on the previous page which contextualises the decision they are asked to make. The text is different from the one presented before R6PAD5A1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I choose to go to the left |
341 |
56.7% |
0.56738769 |
2 |
I choose to go to the right |
220 |
36.6% |
0.36605657 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
6.7% |
0.06655574 |
98 |
Not asked |
4258 |
|
NA |
r6pad6_background1
Variable label:
|
R6PAD6 background variable: age
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. List of values that are randomly selected into the question. All randomizations are independent of each other. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2317] [Invalid:2542] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
22-year-old |
328 |
14.2% |
0.1415624 |
2 |
30-year-old |
337 |
14.5% |
0.1454467 |
3 |
40-year-old |
314 |
13.6% |
0.1355201 |
4 |
50-year-old |
334 |
14.4% |
0.1441519 |
5 |
60-year-old |
328 |
14.2% |
0.1415624 |
6 |
70-year-old |
345 |
14.9% |
0.1488994 |
7 |
80-year-old |
331 |
14.3% |
0.1428571 |
Sysmiss |
|
2542 |
|
NA |
r6pad6_background2
Variable label:
|
R6PAD6 background variable: gender
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. List of values that are randomly selected into the question. All randomizations are independent of each other. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2317] [Invalid:2542] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
woman |
1175 |
50.7% |
0.5071213 |
2 |
man |
1142 |
49.3% |
0.4928787 |
Sysmiss |
|
2542 |
|
NA |
r6pad6_background3
Variable label:
|
R6PAD6 background variable: region
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. List of values that are randomly selected into the question. All randomizations are independent of each other. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2317] [Invalid:2542] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nord-Norge |
368 |
15.9% |
0.1588261 |
2 |
Midt-Norge |
388 |
16.7% |
0.1674579 |
3 |
Vestlandet |
414 |
17.9% |
0.1786793 |
4 |
Sørlandet |
378 |
16.3% |
0.1631420 |
5 |
Østlandet |
378 |
16.3% |
0.1631420 |
6 |
Oslo-området |
391 |
16.9% |
0.1687527 |
Sysmiss |
|
2542 |
|
NA |
r6pad6_background4
Variable label:
|
R6PAD6 background variable: education
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. List of values that are randomly selected into the question. All randomizations are independent of each other. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2317] [Invalid:2542] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
primary education |
810 |
35% |
0.3495900 |
2 |
secondary school education |
785 |
33.9% |
0.3388002 |
3 |
university education |
722 |
31.2% |
0.3116098 |
Sysmiss |
|
2542 |
|
NA |
r6pad6_background5
Variable label:
|
R6PAD6 background variable: wage
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. List of values that are randomly selected into the question. All randomizations are independent of each other. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2317] [Invalid:2542] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
75 000 |
298 |
12.9% |
0.1286146 |
2 |
225 000 |
282 |
12.2% |
0.1217091 |
3 |
350 000 |
285 |
12.3% |
0.1230039 |
4 |
450 000 |
298 |
12.9% |
0.1286146 |
5 |
550 000 |
317 |
13.7% |
0.1368148 |
6 |
650 000 |
262 |
11.3% |
0.1130773 |
7 |
850 000 |
292 |
12.6% |
0.1260250 |
8 |
above 1 000 000 |
283 |
12.2% |
0.1221407 |
Sysmiss |
|
2542 |
|
NA |
r6pad6_background6
Variable label:
|
R6PAD6 background variable: choice
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. List of values that are randomly selected into the question. All randomizations are independent of each other. See R6PAD8 in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2317] [Invalid:2542] [Range:1-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
give away 0 of the 2000 kroners |
239 |
10.3% |
0.10315063 |
2 |
give away 500 of the 2000 kroners |
215 |
9.3% |
0.09279240 |
3 |
give away 1000 of the 2000 kroners |
226 |
9.8% |
0.09753992 |
4 |
give away 1500 of the 2000 kroners |
212 |
9.1% |
0.09149763 |
5 |
give away 2000 of the 2000 kroners |
235 |
10.1% |
0.10142426 |
6 |
keep 0 of the 2000 kroners him/herself |
217 |
9.4% |
0.09365559 |
7 |
keep 500 of the 2000 kroners him/herself |
236 |
10.2% |
0.10185585 |
8 |
keep 1000 of the 2000 kroners him/herself |
247 |
10.7% |
0.10660337 |
9 |
keep 1500 of the 2000 kroners him/herself |
236 |
10.2% |
0.10185585 |
10 |
keep 2000 of the 2000 kroners him/herself |
254 |
11% |
0.10962451 |
Sysmiss |
|
2542 |
|
NA |
r6pad6
Variable label:
|
To what extent is this choice acceptable?
|
Pre-question text:
|
As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, in the last round you were included in a draw for an extra monetary prize. 2 people were drawn out: person A and person B. Person A received 2,000 kroner and had to choose how much to share with person B.
Who was actually drawn out is secret, but imagine that the person who received the money was a [age] [gender] from [region], with [education] and an annual income of [wage] kroner. The person chose to [choice].
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think that this choice is acceptable?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 OR u=3 and Note: the question wording is dependent on values given in the R6PAD6_background variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
640 |
27.2% |
0.27187766 |
2 |
To a great extent |
655 |
27.8% |
0.27824979 |
3 |
Somewhat |
467 |
19.8% |
0.19838573 |
4 |
Slightly |
290 |
12.3% |
0.12319456 |
5 |
Not at all |
195 |
8.3% |
0.08283772 |
97 |
No answer |
107 |
4.5% |
0.04545455 |
98 |
Not asked |
2505 |
|
NA |
r6pad7
Variable label:
|
Reasoning for your answer about how acceptable this choice was [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Can you give a reason for your answer about how acceptable this choice was?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 or u=3]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6dv26
Variable label:
|
How should the government tighten up on various social security schemes?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine a situation in which the government is forced to tighten up on various social security schemes such as sickness benefit and unemployment benefit.
|
Literal question:
|
There are three main ways of tightening up and we ask you to put a cross against the alternative that you think the government should choose:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Raise the requirements for receiving benefit (this means having to work longer
before being able to receive benefit and will mean that some who could have
previously received benefit will not receive any benefit at all). |
432 |
34.4% |
0.34394904 |
2 |
Decrease the duration of benefit (this means not being able to receive benefit
for as long as previously). |
325 |
25.9% |
0.25875796 |
3 |
Decrease the level of benefit (this means that everyone receiving benefit get a
bit less than they would have done previously). |
456 |
36.3% |
0.36305732 |
97 |
No answer |
43 |
3.4% |
0.03423567 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r65dv5
Variable label:
|
How great an advantage/disadvantage that immigrants come here?
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very great advantage |
25 |
2% |
0.019904459 |
2 |
Great advantage |
152 |
12.1% |
0.121019108 |
3 |
An advantage to some extent |
466 |
37.1% |
0.371019108 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
164 |
13.1% |
0.130573248 |
5 |
A disadvantage to some extent |
279 |
22.2% |
0.222133758 |
6 |
Great disadvantage |
103 |
8.2% |
0.082006369 |
7 |
Very great disadvantage |
59 |
4.7% |
0.046974522 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
0.6% |
0.006369427 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv6
Variable label:
|
How important is immigration policy to you personally?
|
Literal question:
|
How important is immigration policy to you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
200 |
15.9% |
0.159235669 |
2 |
Important |
550 |
43.8% |
0.437898089 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
413 |
32.9% |
0.328821656 |
4 |
Slightly important |
81 |
6.4% |
0.064490446 |
5 |
Not important at all |
9 |
0.7% |
0.007165605 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002388535 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv7
Variable label:
|
Party with the best immigration policy
|
Literal question:
|
Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Labour Party |
225 |
17.9% |
0.17914013 |
2 |
The Progress Party |
329 |
26.2% |
0.26194268 |
3 |
The Conservative Party |
193 |
15.4% |
0.15366242 |
4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
88 |
7% |
0.07006369 |
5 |
The Centre Party |
22 |
1.8% |
0.01751592 |
6 |
The Christian Democrats |
75 |
6% |
0.05971338 |
7 |
The Liberal Party |
68 |
5.4% |
0.05414013 |
8 |
The Red Party |
24 |
1.9% |
0.01910828 |
9 |
The Green Party |
15 |
1.2% |
0.01194268 |
10 |
Other |
6 |
0.5% |
0.00477707 |
11 |
None |
179 |
14.3% |
0.14251592 |
97 |
No answer |
32 |
2.5% |
0.02547771 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv7_10_other
Variable label:
|
Party with the best immigration policy, other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6dv29_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Begging should be prohibited
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be prohibited in Norway
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
218 |
17.4% |
0.173566879 |
2 |
Agree |
229 |
18.2% |
0.182324841 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
225 |
17.9% |
0.179140127 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
164 |
13.1% |
0.130573248 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
147 |
11.7% |
0.117038217 |
6 |
Disagree |
187 |
14.9% |
0.148885350 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
81 |
6.4% |
0.064490446 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003980892 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv29_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in the world than to people in this country
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in the world than to people in this country
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
114 |
9.1% |
0.090764331 |
2 |
Agree |
203 |
16.2% |
0.161624204 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
206 |
16.4% |
0.164012739 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
402 |
32% |
0.320063694 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
125 |
10% |
0.099522293 |
6 |
Disagree |
147 |
11.7% |
0.117038217 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
49 |
3.9% |
0.039012739 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
0.8% |
0.007961783 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv29_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norway will lose its identity if more Muslims are allowed to live here
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Norway will end up losing its identity if more Muslims are allowed to live here
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
144 |
11.5% |
0.114649682 |
2 |
Agree |
151 |
12% |
0.120222930 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
230 |
18.3% |
0.183121019 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
173 |
13.8% |
0.137738854 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
148 |
11.8% |
0.117834395 |
6 |
Disagree |
272 |
21.7% |
0.216560510 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
129 |
10.3% |
0.102707006 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
0.7% |
0.007165605 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6ran19
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1254] [Invalid:3605] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
266 |
21.2% |
0.2121212 |
2 |
2 |
318 |
25.4% |
0.2535885 |
3 |
3 |
337 |
26.9% |
0.2687400 |
4 |
4 |
333 |
26.6% |
0.2655502 |
Sysmiss |
|
3605 |
|
NA |
r6dv60a
Variable label:
|
Party’s reaction, politician expresses hate: Formal apology
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that an elected politician in Norway expresses hate against immigrants on his Facebook page. The political party he belongs to reacts to this by demanding a formal apology.
The politician protests against the reaction and believes it is too severe.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the party’s reaction?
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much too severe |
5 |
1.9% |
0.018796992 |
2 |
Too severe |
9 |
3.4% |
0.033834586 |
3 |
Slightly too severe |
17 |
6.4% |
0.063909774 |
4 |
Just right |
131 |
49.2% |
0.492481203 |
5 |
Slightly too mild |
26 |
9.8% |
0.097744361 |
6 |
Too mild |
44 |
16.5% |
0.165413534 |
7 |
Much too mild |
32 |
12% |
0.120300752 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.8% |
0.007518797 |
98 |
Not asked |
4593 |
|
NA |
r6dv60b
Variable label:
|
Party’s reaction, politician expresses hate: A fine of 1 000 kr
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that an elected politician in Norway expresses hate against immigrants on his Facebook page. The political party he belongs to reacts to this by imposing a small fine of 1,000 kroner.
The politician protests against the reaction and believes it is too severe.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the party’s reaction?
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much too severe |
10 |
3.1% |
0.03144654 |
2 |
Too severe |
15 |
4.7% |
0.04716981 |
3 |
Slightly too severe |
9 |
2.8% |
0.02830189 |
4 |
Just right |
57 |
17.9% |
0.17924528 |
5 |
Slightly too mild |
28 |
8.8% |
0.08805031 |
6 |
Too mild |
74 |
23.3% |
0.23270440 |
7 |
Much too mild |
115 |
36.2% |
0.36163522 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
3.1% |
0.03144654 |
98 |
Not asked |
4541 |
|
NA |
r6dv60c
Variable label:
|
Party’s reaction, politician expresses hate: A fine of 100 000 kr
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that an elected politician in Norway expresses hate against immigrants on his Facebook page. The political party he belongs to reacts to this by imposing a large fine of 100,000 kroner.
The politician protests against the reaction and believes it is too severe.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the party’s reaction?
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much too severe |
29 |
8.6% |
0.08605341 |
2 |
Too severe |
54 |
16% |
0.16023739 |
3 |
Slightly too severe |
64 |
19% |
0.18991098 |
4 |
Just right |
125 |
37.1% |
0.37091988 |
5 |
Slightly too mild |
9 |
2.7% |
0.02670623 |
6 |
Too mild |
25 |
7.4% |
0.07418398 |
7 |
Much too mild |
19 |
5.6% |
0.05637982 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
3.6% |
0.03560831 |
98 |
Not asked |
4522 |
|
NA |
r6dv60d
Variable label:
|
Party’s reaction, politician expresses hate: Exclusion from the party for life
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that an elected politician in Norway expresses hate against immigrants on his Facebook page. The political party he belongs to reacts to this by excluding him from the party for life.
The politician protests against the reaction and believes it is too severe.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the party’s reaction?
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran19=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much too severe |
15 |
4.5% |
0.045045045 |
2 |
Too severe |
36 |
10.8% |
0.108108108 |
3 |
Slightly too severe |
71 |
21.3% |
0.213213213 |
4 |
Just right |
189 |
56.8% |
0.567567568 |
5 |
Slightly too mild |
10 |
3% |
0.030030030 |
6 |
Too mild |
6 |
1.8% |
0.018018018 |
7 |
Much too mild |
5 |
1.5% |
0.015015015 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003003003 |
98 |
Not asked |
4526 |
|
NA |
r6dv61_1
Variable label:
|
Feeling about the party’s reaction: Anger
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two different parties were involved in the example you just read about: The politician who wrote the Facebook piece and his party who reacted to it. We ask you to think about the persons in the party who decided what the reaction should be. To what extent do you have the following feelings about their decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
477 |
38% |
0.37977707 |
2 |
Slightly |
308 |
24.5% |
0.24522293 |
3 |
Somewhat |
231 |
18.4% |
0.18391720 |
4 |
To a great extent |
90 |
7.2% |
0.07165605 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
21 |
1.7% |
0.01671975 |
97 |
No answer |
129 |
10.3% |
0.10270701 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv61_2
Variable label:
|
Feeling about the party’s reaction: Frustration
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two different parties were involved in the example you just read about: The politician who wrote the Facebook piece and his party who reacted to it. We ask you to think about the persons in the party who decided what the reaction should be. To what extent do you have the following feelings about their decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Frustration
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
355 |
28.3% |
0.28264331 |
2 |
Slightly |
254 |
20.2% |
0.20222930 |
3 |
Somewhat |
310 |
24.7% |
0.24681529 |
4 |
To a great extent |
172 |
13.7% |
0.13694268 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
61 |
4.9% |
0.04856688 |
97 |
No answer |
104 |
8.3% |
0.08280255 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv61_3
Variable label:
|
Feeling about the party’s reaction: Enthusiasm
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two different parties were involved in the example you just read about: The politician who wrote the Facebook piece and his party who reacted to it. We ask you to think about the persons in the party who decided what the reaction should be. To what extent do you have the following feelings about their decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Enthusiasm
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
436 |
34.7% |
0.34713376 |
2 |
Slightly |
301 |
24% |
0.23964968 |
3 |
Somewhat |
287 |
22.9% |
0.22850318 |
4 |
To a great extent |
78 |
6.2% |
0.06210191 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
18 |
1.4% |
0.01433121 |
97 |
No answer |
136 |
10.8% |
0.10828025 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6ran20
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1250] [Invalid:3609] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
254 |
20.3% |
0.2032 |
2 |
2 |
251 |
20.1% |
0.2008 |
3 |
3 |
240 |
19.2% |
0.1920 |
4 |
4 |
249 |
19.9% |
0.1992 |
5 |
5 |
256 |
20.5% |
0.2048 |
Sysmiss |
|
3609 |
|
NA |
r6dv63a
Variable label:
|
Reasonable that No to the EU receives support
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group No to the EU has applied for annual public support for its activities out of the national pot.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it would be reasonable for this group to receive public support?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No, it is unreasonable |
117 |
46.1% |
0.4606299 |
2 |
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year
in public support: |
124 |
48.8% |
0.4881890 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
5.1% |
0.0511811 |
98 |
Not asked |
4605 |
|
NA |
r6dv63a_2_other
Variable label:
|
Yes, reasonable that No to the EU recieves the following amount yearly: [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group No to the EU has applied for annual public support for its activities out of the national pot.
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year in public support:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6dv63b
Variable label:
|
Reasonable that HRS receives support
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group Human Rights Service (HRS), fronted by Hege Storhaug, has applied for annual public support for its activities out of the national pot.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it would be reasonable for this group to receive public support?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No, it is unreasonable |
128 |
51% |
0.50996016 |
2 |
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year
in public support: |
104 |
41.4% |
0.41434263 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
7.6% |
0.07569721 |
98 |
Not asked |
4608 |
|
NA |
r6dv63b_2_other
Variable label:
|
Yes, reasonable that HRS recieves the following amount yearly: [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group Human Rights Service (HRS), fronted by Hege Storhaug, has applied for annual public support for its activities out of the national pot.
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year in public support:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6dv63c
Variable label:
|
Reasonable that SIAN receives support
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group SIAN (Stop the Islamisation of Norway) has applied for annual public support for its activities out of the national pot.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it would be reasonable for this group to receive public support?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No, it is unreasonable |
168 |
70% |
0.700 |
2 |
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year
in public support: |
66 |
27.5% |
0.275 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.5% |
0.025 |
98 |
Not asked |
4619 |
|
NA |
r6dv63c_2_other
Variable label:
|
Yes, reasonable that SIAN recieves the following amount yearly: [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group SIAN (Stop the Islamisation of Norway) has applied for annual public support for its activities out of the national pot.
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year in public support:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=3]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6dv63d
Variable label:
|
Reasonable that PEGIDA Norway receives support
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group PEGIDA Norway (Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of Europe) has applied for annual public support for its activities out of the national pot.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it would be reasonable for this group to receive public support?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No, it is unreasonable |
192 |
77.1% |
0.77108434 |
2 |
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year
in public support: |
45 |
18.1% |
0.18072289 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
4.8% |
0.04819277 |
98 |
Not asked |
4610 |
|
NA |
r6dv63d_2_other
Variable label:
|
Yes, reasonable that PEGIDA Norway recieves the following amount yearly: [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to various voluntary groups. Imagine that the group PEGIDA Norway (Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of Europe) has applied for annual public support for its activities out of the national pot.
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year in public support:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6dv63e
Variable label:
|
Reasonable that The Norwegian Resistance Movement receives support
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to various voluntary groups. Imagine that the neo-Nazi group The Norwegian Resistance Movement has applied for annual public support for its activities out of the national pot.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it would be reasonable for this group to receive public support?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No, it is unreasonable |
245 |
95.7% |
0.95703125 |
2 |
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year
in public support: |
8 |
3.1% |
0.03125000 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.2% |
0.01171875 |
98 |
Not asked |
4603 |
|
NA |
r6dv63e_2_other
Variable label:
|
Yes, reasonable that The Norwegian Resistance Movement recieves the following amount yearly: [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Each year, the Norwegian government gives some financial support to various voluntary groups. Imagine that the neo-Nazi group The Norwegian Resistance Movement has applied for annual public support for its activities out of the national pot.
|
Literal question:
|
Yes, it would be reasonable for the group to receive the following amount a year in public support:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran20=5]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6lb1b
Variable label:
|
Thoughts when you read/hear the words ‘asylum seeker’? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you read or hear the words asylum seeker?
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6dv64
Variable label:
|
Does it worry you that last year, more asylum seekers came than anticipated?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Last year, more asylum seekers came to Norway than anticipated.
|
Literal question:
|
Is this something that worries you?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, to a very great extent |
198 |
15.8% |
0.15764331 |
2 |
Yes, to a great extent |
270 |
21.5% |
0.21496815 |
3 |
Yes, somewhat |
461 |
36.7% |
0.36703822 |
4 |
No, not much |
256 |
20.4% |
0.20382166 |
5 |
No, not at all |
49 |
3.9% |
0.03901274 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.8% |
0.01751592 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv65
Variable label:
|
Norwegian authorities’ handling of the asylum situation
|
Literal question:
|
How do you feel that the Norwegian authorities have handled the asylum situation so far?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
25 |
2% |
0.01990446 |
2 |
Well |
177 |
14.1% |
0.14092357 |
3 |
Quite well |
279 |
22.2% |
0.22213376 |
4 |
Neither well nor badly |
187 |
14.9% |
0.14888535 |
5 |
Quite badly |
300 |
23.9% |
0.23885350 |
6 |
Badly |
197 |
15.7% |
0.15684713 |
7 |
Very badly |
68 |
5.4% |
0.05414013 |
97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.8% |
0.01831210 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv66
Variable label:
|
Do you have an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many new asylum seekers’ centres have been established in Norway in the last year.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
611 |
48.6% |
0.48646497 |
2 |
Yes, my neighbourhood has got a new asylum seekers’ centre in the last year |
261 |
20.8% |
0.20780255 |
3 |
Yes, my neighbourhood has had an asylum seekers’ centre for more than a year |
209 |
16.6% |
0.16640127 |
4 |
Don't know |
154 |
12.3% |
0.12261146 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.7% |
0.01671975 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv67aja
Variable label:
|
Opinion about having an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion about having an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66 = 2 or 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
It is OK |
278 |
59.1% |
0.591489362 |
2 |
It is not OK |
89 |
18.9% |
0.189361702 |
3 |
It doesn't matter |
100 |
21.3% |
0.212765957 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.6% |
0.006382979 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv67anei
Variable label:
|
Opinion about getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion about getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66 = 1 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
It is OK |
328 |
42.9% |
0.42875817 |
2 |
It is not OK |
226 |
29.5% |
0.29542484 |
3 |
It doesn't matter |
202 |
26.4% |
0.26405229 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.2% |
0.01176471 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv67b
Variable label:
|
How strong are your views about this?
|
Literal question:
|
How strong are your views about this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very strong |
130 |
10.4% |
0.10350318 |
2 |
Strong |
338 |
26.9% |
0.26910828 |
3 |
Fairly strong |
402 |
32% |
0.32006369 |
4 |
Not very strong |
258 |
20.5% |
0.20541401 |
5 |
Not strong at all |
97 |
7.7% |
0.07722930 |
97 |
No answer |
31 |
2.5% |
0.02468153 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_1
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Followed matters on TV, radio etc.
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Followed matters concerning the asylum seekers’ centre on TV, radio, newspapers etc.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
85 |
18.1% |
0.18085106 |
2 |
A good fit |
231 |
49.1% |
0.49148936 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
85 |
18.1% |
0.18085106 |
4 |
A bad fit |
23 |
4.9% |
0.04893617 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
19 |
4% |
0.04042553 |
6 |
Not relevant |
21 |
4.5% |
0.04468085 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.3% |
0.01276596 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_2
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Followed discussions in social media
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Followed discussions about the asylum seekers’ centre in social media, such as Facebook
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
26 |
5.5% |
0.05531915 |
2 |
A good fit |
118 |
25.1% |
0.25106383 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
80 |
17% |
0.17021277 |
4 |
A bad fit |
72 |
15.3% |
0.15319149 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
80 |
17% |
0.17021277 |
6 |
Not relevant |
89 |
18.9% |
0.18936170 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.1% |
0.01063830 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_3
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Attended information meetings
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Attended information meetings about the asylum seekers’ centre
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
8 |
1.7% |
0.01702128 |
2 |
A good fit |
21 |
4.5% |
0.04468085 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
39 |
8.3% |
0.08297872 |
4 |
A bad fit |
64 |
13.6% |
0.13617021 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
176 |
37.4% |
0.37446809 |
6 |
Not relevant |
157 |
33.4% |
0.33404255 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.1% |
0.01063830 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_4
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Full name, written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre in social media
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre using my full name in social media or similar
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
6 |
1.3% |
0.01276596 |
2 |
A good fit |
23 |
4.9% |
0.04893617 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
31 |
6.6% |
0.06595745 |
4 |
A bad fit |
38 |
8.1% |
0.08085106 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
180 |
38.3% |
0.38297872 |
6 |
Not relevant |
185 |
39.4% |
0.39361702 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01489362 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_5
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Full name, written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre in social media
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre using my full name in social media or similar
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
2 |
A good fit |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01489362 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
20 |
4.3% |
0.04255319 |
4 |
A bad fit |
22 |
4.7% |
0.04680851 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
239 |
50.9% |
0.50851064 |
6 |
Not relevant |
177 |
37.7% |
0.37659574 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.1% |
0.01063830 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_6
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Anonymously, written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre in comments area
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre in the comments area or similar, without giving my name
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
1 |
0.2% |
0.00212766 |
2 |
A good fit |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
17 |
3.6% |
0.03617021 |
4 |
A bad fit |
18 |
3.8% |
0.03829787 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
244 |
51.9% |
0.51914894 |
6 |
Not relevant |
183 |
38.9% |
0.38936170 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01489362 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_7
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Anonymously, written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre in comments area
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre in the comments area or similar, without giving my name
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
2 |
0.4% |
0.004255319 |
2 |
A good fit |
7 |
1.5% |
0.014893617 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
27 |
5.7% |
0.057446809 |
4 |
A bad fit |
30 |
6.4% |
0.063829787 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
211 |
44.9% |
0.448936170 |
6 |
Not relevant |
187 |
39.8% |
0.397872340 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.3% |
0.012765957 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_8
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Participated in protests to stop it being set up
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in protests to stop the asylum seekers’ centre being set up
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
1 |
0.2% |
0.00212766 |
2 |
A good fit |
9 |
1.9% |
0.01914894 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
11 |
2.3% |
0.02340426 |
4 |
A bad fit |
19 |
4% |
0.04042553 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
268 |
57% |
0.57021277 |
6 |
Not relevant |
155 |
33% |
0.32978723 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01489362 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_9
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Taken the initiative to protest to stop it being set up
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Taken the initiative to protest to stop the asylum seekers’ centre being set up
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
2 |
A good fit |
6 |
1.3% |
0.01276596 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
15 |
3.2% |
0.03191489 |
4 |
A bad fit |
22 |
4.7% |
0.04680851 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
272 |
57.9% |
0.57872340 |
6 |
Not relevant |
150 |
31.9% |
0.31914894 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.1% |
0.01063830 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_10
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Participated in voluntary work to help the asylum seekers
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in voluntary work to help the asylum seekers
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
12 |
2.6% |
0.02553191 |
2 |
A good fit |
41 |
8.7% |
0.08723404 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
54 |
11.5% |
0.11489362 |
4 |
A bad fit |
50 |
10.6% |
0.10638298 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
170 |
36.2% |
0.36170213 |
6 |
Not relevant |
132 |
28.1% |
0.28085106 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.3% |
0.02340426 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_11
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Taken the initiative in activities for the asylum seekers
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Taken the initiative in activities for the asylum seekers
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
8 |
1.7% |
0.01702128 |
2 |
A good fit |
23 |
4.9% |
0.04893617 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
63 |
13.4% |
0.13404255 |
4 |
A bad fit |
53 |
11.3% |
0.11276596 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
181 |
38.5% |
0.38510638 |
6 |
Not relevant |
132 |
28.1% |
0.28085106 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
2.1% |
0.02127660 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_12
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Said hello to some of the asylum seekers
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Said hello to some of the asylum seekers
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
41 |
8.7% |
0.08723404 |
2 |
A good fit |
119 |
25.3% |
0.25319149 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
64 |
13.6% |
0.13617021 |
4 |
A bad fit |
30 |
6.4% |
0.06382979 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
114 |
24.3% |
0.24255319 |
6 |
Not relevant |
96 |
20.4% |
0.20425532 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.3% |
0.01276596 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_13
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Become friends with some of the asylum seekers
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Become friends with some of the asylum seekers
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
12 |
2.6% |
0.02553191 |
2 |
A good fit |
25 |
5.3% |
0.05319149 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
89 |
18.9% |
0.18936170 |
4 |
A bad fit |
43 |
9.1% |
0.09148936 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
175 |
37.2% |
0.37234043 |
6 |
Not relevant |
118 |
25.1% |
0.25106383 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.7% |
0.01702128 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_14
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Given gifts to the asylum seekers’ centre
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Given gifts to the asylum seekers’ centre
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
22 |
4.7% |
0.04680851 |
2 |
A good fit |
72 |
15.3% |
0.15319149 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
50 |
10.6% |
0.10638298 |
4 |
A bad fit |
33 |
7% |
0.07021277 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
168 |
35.7% |
0.35744681 |
6 |
Not relevant |
117 |
24.9% |
0.24893617 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.7% |
0.01702128 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_15
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Avoided the centre and the asylum seekers
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Avoided the centre and the asylum seekers as far as possible
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
14 |
3% |
0.02978723 |
2 |
A good fit |
20 |
4.3% |
0.04255319 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
71 |
15.1% |
0.15106383 |
4 |
A bad fit |
37 |
7.9% |
0.07872340 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
212 |
45.1% |
0.45106383 |
6 |
Not relevant |
108 |
23% |
0.22978723 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.7% |
0.01702128 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_16
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Tolerated the establishment
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Tolerated the establishment of the asylum seekers’ centre
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
89 |
18.9% |
0.18936170 |
2 |
A good fit |
181 |
38.5% |
0.38510638 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
96 |
20.4% |
0.20425532 |
4 |
A bad fit |
12 |
2.6% |
0.02553191 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
24 |
5.1% |
0.05106383 |
6 |
Not relevant |
61 |
13% |
0.12978723 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.5% |
0.01489362 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_17
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Other
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
2 |
0.4% |
0.004255319 |
2 |
A good fit |
5 |
1.1% |
0.010638298 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
23 |
4.9% |
0.048936170 |
4 |
A bad fit |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002127660 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
6 |
1.3% |
0.012765957 |
6 |
Not relevant |
53 |
11.3% |
0.112765957 |
97 |
No answer |
380 |
80.9% |
0.808510638 |
98 |
Not asked |
4389 |
|
NA |
r6dv68ja_17_other
Variable label:
|
Reaction to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. How have you reacted to getting an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions fit your personal reactions.
I have:
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=2 or R6SV66=3]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6dv68nei_1
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Followed matters on TV, radio etc.
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Followed matters concerning the asylum seekers’ centre on TV, radio, newspapers etc.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
141 |
18.4% |
0.18431373 |
2 |
A good fit |
393 |
51.4% |
0.51372549 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
139 |
18.2% |
0.18169935 |
4 |
A bad fit |
36 |
4.7% |
0.04705882 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
18 |
2.4% |
0.02352941 |
6 |
Not relevant |
24 |
3.1% |
0.03137255 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.8% |
0.01830065 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_2
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Followed discussions in social media
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Followed discussions about the asylum seekers’ centre in social media, such as Facebook
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
58 |
7.6% |
0.07581699 |
2 |
A good fit |
203 |
26.5% |
0.26535948 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
134 |
17.5% |
0.17516340 |
4 |
A bad fit |
141 |
18.4% |
0.18431373 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
104 |
13.6% |
0.13594771 |
6 |
Not relevant |
108 |
14.1% |
0.14117647 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_3
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Attended information meetings
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Attended information meetings about the asylum seekers’ centre
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
83 |
10.8% |
0.10849673 |
2 |
A good fit |
242 |
31.6% |
0.31633987 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
178 |
23.3% |
0.23267974 |
4 |
A bad fit |
103 |
13.5% |
0.13464052 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
89 |
11.6% |
0.11633987 |
6 |
Not relevant |
51 |
6.7% |
0.06666667 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.5% |
0.02483660 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_4
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Full name, written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre in social media
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre using my full name in social media or similar
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
20 |
2.6% |
0.02614379 |
2 |
A good fit |
79 |
10.3% |
0.10326797 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
178 |
23.3% |
0.23267974 |
4 |
A bad fit |
136 |
17.8% |
0.17777778 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
191 |
25% |
0.24967320 |
6 |
Not relevant |
144 |
18.8% |
0.18823529 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_5
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Full name, written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre in social media
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre using my full name in social media or similar
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
4 |
0.5% |
0.005228758 |
2 |
A good fit |
15 |
2% |
0.019607843 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
71 |
9.3% |
0.092810458 |
4 |
A bad fit |
123 |
16.1% |
0.160784314 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
371 |
48.5% |
0.484967320 |
6 |
Not relevant |
164 |
21.4% |
0.214379085 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.2% |
0.022222222 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_6
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Anonymously, written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre in comments area
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Written something negative about the asylum seekers’ centre in the comments area or similar, without giving my name
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
5 |
0.7% |
0.006535948 |
2 |
A good fit |
8 |
1% |
0.010457516 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
52 |
6.8% |
0.067973856 |
4 |
A bad fit |
98 |
12.8% |
0.128104575 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
418 |
54.6% |
0.546405229 |
6 |
Not relevant |
164 |
21.4% |
0.214379085 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
2.6% |
0.026143791 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_7
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Anonymously, written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre in comments area
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Written something positive about the asylum seekers’ centre in the comments area or similar, without giving my name
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
6 |
0.8% |
0.007843137 |
2 |
A good fit |
31 |
4.1% |
0.040522876 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
153 |
20% |
0.200000000 |
4 |
A bad fit |
120 |
15.7% |
0.156862745 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
277 |
36.2% |
0.362091503 |
6 |
Not relevant |
160 |
20.9% |
0.209150327 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.4% |
0.023529412 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_8
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Participated in protests to stop it being set up
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in protests to stop the asylum seekers’ centre being set up
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
17 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
2 |
A good fit |
33 |
4.3% |
0.04313725 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
66 |
8.6% |
0.08627451 |
4 |
A bad fit |
127 |
16.6% |
0.16601307 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
404 |
52.8% |
0.52810458 |
6 |
Not relevant |
100 |
13.1% |
0.13071895 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.4% |
0.02352941 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_9
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Taken the initiative to protest to stop it being set up
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Taken the initiative to protest to stop the asylum seekers’ centre being set up
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
6 |
0.8% |
0.007843137 |
2 |
A good fit |
13 |
1.7% |
0.016993464 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
63 |
8.2% |
0.082352941 |
4 |
A bad fit |
105 |
13.7% |
0.137254902 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
454 |
59.3% |
0.593464052 |
6 |
Not relevant |
105 |
13.7% |
0.137254902 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.5% |
0.024836601 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_10
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Participated in voluntary work to help the asylum seekers
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in voluntary work to help the asylum seekers
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
27 |
3.5% |
0.03529412 |
2 |
A good fit |
199 |
26% |
0.26013072 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
283 |
37% |
0.36993464 |
4 |
A bad fit |
82 |
10.7% |
0.10718954 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
110 |
14.4% |
0.14379085 |
6 |
Not relevant |
45 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.5% |
0.02483660 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_11
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Taken the initiative in activities for the asylum seekers
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Taken the initiative in activities for the asylum seekers
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
17 |
2.2% |
0.02222222 |
2 |
A good fit |
106 |
13.9% |
0.13856209 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
336 |
43.9% |
0.43921569 |
4 |
A bad fit |
112 |
14.6% |
0.14640523 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
123 |
16.1% |
0.16078431 |
6 |
Not relevant |
49 |
6.4% |
0.06405229 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
2.9% |
0.02875817 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_12
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Said hello to some of the asylum seekers
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Said hello to some of the asylum seekers
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
94 |
12.3% |
0.12287582 |
2 |
A good fit |
345 |
45.1% |
0.45098039 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
205 |
26.8% |
0.26797386 |
4 |
A bad fit |
27 |
3.5% |
0.03529412 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
47 |
6.1% |
0.06143791 |
6 |
Not relevant |
28 |
3.7% |
0.03660131 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.5% |
0.02483660 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_13
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Become friends with some of the asylum seekers
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Become friends with some of the asylum seekers
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
28 |
3.7% |
0.03660131 |
2 |
A good fit |
191 |
25% |
0.24967320 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
343 |
44.8% |
0.44836601 |
4 |
A bad fit |
75 |
9.8% |
0.09803922 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
61 |
8% |
0.07973856 |
6 |
Not relevant |
44 |
5.8% |
0.05751634 |
97 |
No answer |
23 |
3% |
0.03006536 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_14
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Given gifts to the asylum seekers’ centre
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Given gifts to the asylum seekers’ centre
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
50 |
6.5% |
0.06535948 |
2 |
A good fit |
265 |
34.6% |
0.34640523 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
221 |
28.9% |
0.28888889 |
4 |
A bad fit |
70 |
9.2% |
0.09150327 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
89 |
11.6% |
0.11633987 |
6 |
Not relevant |
50 |
6.5% |
0.06535948 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
2.6% |
0.02614379 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_15
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Avoided the centre and the asylum seekers
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Avoided the centre and the asylum seekers as far as possible
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
26 |
3.4% |
0.03398693 |
2 |
A good fit |
63 |
8.2% |
0.08235294 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
170 |
22.2% |
0.22222222 |
4 |
A bad fit |
154 |
20.1% |
0.20130719 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
270 |
35.3% |
0.35294118 |
6 |
Not relevant |
62 |
8.1% |
0.08104575 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
2.6% |
0.02614379 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_16
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Tolerated the establishment
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Tolerated the establishment of the asylum seekers’ centre
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
118 |
15.4% |
0.15424837 |
2 |
A good fit |
341 |
44.6% |
0.44575163 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
178 |
23.3% |
0.23267974 |
4 |
A bad fit |
40 |
5.2% |
0.05228758 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
41 |
5.4% |
0.05359477 |
6 |
Not relevant |
22 |
2.9% |
0.02875817 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
3.3% |
0.03267974 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_17
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Other
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002614379 |
2 |
A good fit |
9 |
1.2% |
0.011764706 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
42 |
5.5% |
0.054901961 |
4 |
A bad fit |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003921569 |
5 |
A very bad fit |
6 |
0.8% |
0.007843137 |
6 |
Not relevant |
68 |
8.9% |
0.088888889 |
97 |
No answer |
635 |
83% |
0.830065359 |
98 |
Not asked |
4094 |
|
NA |
r6dv68nei_17_other
Variable label:
|
Reaction if you get an asylum seekers’ centre close-by: Other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have reacted to the establishment of an asylum seekers’ centre in their neighbourhood in different ways. If you should get an asylum seekers’ centre close to where you live, how do you think you would react?
Please mark how well or badly the following descriptions would fit your personal reactions.
I would have:
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6SV66=1 or R6SV66=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6dv69
Variable label:
|
Thoughts about getting asylum seekers in your neighbourhood [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
If you would like to share some completely anonymous thoughts about getting asylum seekers in your neighbourhood, you are welcome to do so here:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6ran21
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1238] [Invalid:3621] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
640 |
51.7% |
0.5169628 |
2 |
2 |
598 |
48.3% |
0.4830372 |
Sysmiss |
|
3621 |
|
NA |
r6dv12aa_1
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are asylum seekers: Competent
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how asylum seekers are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are asylum seekers:
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
34 |
5.3% |
0.0531250 |
2 |
Slightly |
221 |
34.5% |
0.3453125 |
3 |
Somewhat |
312 |
48.8% |
0.4875000 |
4 |
To a great extent |
52 |
8.1% |
0.0812500 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
5 |
0.8% |
0.0078125 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.5% |
0.0250000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12aa_2
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are asylum seekers: Warm
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how asylum seekers are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are asylum seekers:
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
23 |
3.6% |
0.0359375 |
2 |
Slightly |
156 |
24.4% |
0.2437500 |
3 |
Somewhat |
351 |
54.8% |
0.5484375 |
4 |
To a great extent |
81 |
12.7% |
0.1265625 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
7 |
1.1% |
0.0109375 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
3.4% |
0.0343750 |
98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ab_1
Variable label:
|
Personal view, to what extent are asylum seekers: Competent
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you personally see asylum seekers. As you see it, to what extent are asylum seekers:
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
17 |
2.8% |
0.02842809 |
2 |
Slightly |
73 |
12.2% |
0.12207358 |
3 |
Somewhat |
298 |
49.8% |
0.49832776 |
4 |
To a great extent |
170 |
28.4% |
0.28428094 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
16 |
2.7% |
0.02675585 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
4% |
0.04013378 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ab_2
Variable label:
|
Personal view, to what extent are asylum seekers: Warm
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you personally see asylum seekers. As you see it, to what extent are asylum seekers:
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
18 |
3% |
0.03010033 |
2 |
Slightly |
51 |
8.5% |
0.08528428 |
3 |
Somewhat |
287 |
48% |
0.47993311 |
4 |
To a great extent |
194 |
32.4% |
0.32441472 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
23 |
3.8% |
0.03846154 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
4.2% |
0.04180602 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_1
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers: Contempt
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Contempt
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
43 |
6.7% |
0.0671875 |
2 |
Slightly |
175 |
27.3% |
0.2734375 |
3 |
Somewhat |
318 |
49.7% |
0.4968750 |
4 |
To a great extent |
67 |
10.5% |
0.1046875 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
9 |
1.4% |
0.0140625 |
97 |
No answer |
28 |
4.4% |
0.0437500 |
98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_2
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers: Disgust
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Disgust
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
57 |
8.9% |
0.0890625 |
2 |
Slightly |
216 |
33.8% |
0.3375000 |
3 |
Somewhat |
284 |
44.4% |
0.4437500 |
4 |
To a great extent |
47 |
7.3% |
0.0734375 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
6 |
0.9% |
0.0093750 |
97 |
No answer |
30 |
4.7% |
0.0468750 |
98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_3
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers: Admiration
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
94 |
14.7% |
0.1468750 |
2 |
Slightly |
321 |
50.2% |
0.5015625 |
3 |
Somewhat |
179 |
28% |
0.2796875 |
4 |
To a great extent |
8 |
1.2% |
0.0125000 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
3 |
0.5% |
0.0046875 |
97 |
No answer |
35 |
5.5% |
0.0546875 |
98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_4
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers: Pride
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Pride
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
120 |
18.8% |
0.1875000 |
2 |
Slightly |
327 |
51.1% |
0.5109375 |
3 |
Somewhat |
137 |
21.4% |
0.2140625 |
4 |
To a great extent |
14 |
2.2% |
0.0218750 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
3 |
0.5% |
0.0046875 |
97 |
No answer |
39 |
6.1% |
0.0609375 |
98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_5
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers: Feel sorry for
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Feel sorry for
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
8 |
1.2% |
0.0125000 |
2 |
Slightly |
50 |
7.8% |
0.0781250 |
3 |
Somewhat |
309 |
48.3% |
0.4828125 |
4 |
To a great extent |
225 |
35.2% |
0.3515625 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
19 |
3% |
0.0296875 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
4.5% |
0.0453125 |
98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_6
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers: Sympathy
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Sympathy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
8 |
1.2% |
0.0125000 |
2 |
Slightly |
51 |
8% |
0.0796875 |
3 |
Somewhat |
356 |
55.6% |
0.5562500 |
4 |
To a great extent |
185 |
28.9% |
0.2890625 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
11 |
1.7% |
0.0171875 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
4.5% |
0.0453125 |
98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_7
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers: Envy
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
281 |
43.9% |
0.4390625 |
2 |
Slightly |
205 |
32% |
0.3203125 |
3 |
Somewhat |
98 |
15.3% |
0.1531250 |
4 |
To a great extent |
25 |
3.9% |
0.0390625 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
97 |
No answer |
31 |
4.8% |
0.0484375 |
98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_8
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers: Jealousy
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Jealousy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
246 |
38.4% |
0.3843750 |
2 |
Slightly |
229 |
35.8% |
0.3578125 |
3 |
Somewhat |
110 |
17.2% |
0.1718750 |
4 |
To a great extent |
22 |
3.4% |
0.0343750 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
2 |
0.3% |
0.0031250 |
97 |
No answer |
31 |
4.8% |
0.0484375 |
98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_9
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers: Anger
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
59 |
9.2% |
0.0921875 |
2 |
Slightly |
178 |
27.8% |
0.2781250 |
3 |
Somewhat |
272 |
42.5% |
0.4250000 |
4 |
To a great extent |
91 |
14.2% |
0.1421875 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
7 |
1.1% |
0.0109375 |
97 |
No answer |
33 |
5.2% |
0.0515625 |
98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_10
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers: Fear
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
21 |
3.3% |
0.0328125 |
2 |
Slightly |
65 |
10.2% |
0.1015625 |
3 |
Somewhat |
298 |
46.6% |
0.4656250 |
4 |
To a great extent |
182 |
28.4% |
0.2843750 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
46 |
7.2% |
0.0718750 |
97 |
No answer |
28 |
4.4% |
0.0437500 |
98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12ba_11
Variable label:
|
People generally, to what extent do they feel this about asylum seekers: Worry
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Worry
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
17 |
2.7% |
0.0265625 |
2 |
Slightly |
66 |
10.3% |
0.1031250 |
3 |
Somewhat |
298 |
46.6% |
0.4656250 |
4 |
To a great extent |
185 |
28.9% |
0.2890625 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
47 |
7.3% |
0.0734375 |
97 |
No answer |
27 |
4.2% |
0.0421875 |
98 |
Not asked |
4219 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_1
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Contempt
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Contempt
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
382 |
63.9% |
0.638795987 |
2 |
Slightly |
136 |
22.7% |
0.227424749 |
3 |
Somewhat |
43 |
7.2% |
0.071906355 |
4 |
To a great extent |
13 |
2.2% |
0.021739130 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
5 |
0.8% |
0.008361204 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
3.2% |
0.031772575 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_2
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Disgust
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Disgust
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
417 |
69.7% |
0.697324415 |
2 |
Slightly |
120 |
20.1% |
0.200668896 |
3 |
Somewhat |
27 |
4.5% |
0.045150502 |
4 |
To a great extent |
13 |
2.2% |
0.021739130 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
3 |
0.5% |
0.005016722 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
3% |
0.030100334 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_3
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Admiration
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
101 |
16.9% |
0.16889632 |
2 |
Slightly |
151 |
25.3% |
0.25250836 |
3 |
Somewhat |
249 |
41.6% |
0.41638796 |
4 |
To a great extent |
67 |
11.2% |
0.11204013 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
8 |
1.3% |
0.01337793 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
3.7% |
0.03678930 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_4
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Pride
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Pride
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
163 |
27.3% |
0.272575251 |
2 |
Slightly |
218 |
36.5% |
0.364548495 |
3 |
Somewhat |
145 |
24.2% |
0.242474916 |
4 |
To a great extent |
32 |
5.4% |
0.053511706 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
4 |
0.7% |
0.006688963 |
97 |
No answer |
36 |
6% |
0.060200669 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_5
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Feel sorry for
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Feel sorry for
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
27 |
4.5% |
0.04515050 |
2 |
Slightly |
58 |
9.7% |
0.09698997 |
3 |
Somewhat |
257 |
43% |
0.42976589 |
4 |
To a great extent |
190 |
31.8% |
0.31772575 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
53 |
8.9% |
0.08862876 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_6
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Sympathy
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Sympathy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
24 |
4% |
0.04013378 |
2 |
Slightly |
37 |
6.2% |
0.06187291 |
3 |
Somewhat |
238 |
39.8% |
0.39799331 |
4 |
To a great extent |
225 |
37.6% |
0.37625418 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
60 |
10% |
0.10033445 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
2.3% |
0.02341137 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_7
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Envy
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
511 |
85.5% |
0.854515050 |
2 |
Slightly |
58 |
9.7% |
0.096989967 |
3 |
Somewhat |
8 |
1.3% |
0.013377926 |
4 |
To a great extent |
3 |
0.5% |
0.005016722 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
3% |
0.030100334 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_8
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Jealousy
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Jealousy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
532 |
89% |
0.889632107 |
2 |
Slightly |
46 |
7.7% |
0.076923077 |
3 |
Somewhat |
3 |
0.5% |
0.005016722 |
4 |
To a great extent |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001672241 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.7% |
0.026755853 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_9
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Anger
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
454 |
75.9% |
0.759197324 |
2 |
Slightly |
99 |
16.6% |
0.165551839 |
3 |
Somewhat |
19 |
3.2% |
0.031772575 |
4 |
To a great extent |
5 |
0.8% |
0.008361204 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
4 |
0.7% |
0.006688963 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.8% |
0.028428094 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_10
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Fear
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
267 |
44.6% |
0.44648829 |
2 |
Slightly |
176 |
29.4% |
0.29431438 |
3 |
Somewhat |
107 |
17.9% |
0.17892977 |
4 |
To a great extent |
20 |
3.3% |
0.03344482 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
10 |
1.7% |
0.01672241 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
3% |
0.03010033 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6dv12bb_11
Variable label:
|
Personally, to what extent do you feel this about asylum seekers: Worry
|
Pre-question text:
|
There are now some questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Worry
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
221 |
37% |
0.36956522 |
2 |
Slightly |
196 |
32.8% |
0.32775920 |
3 |
Somewhat |
121 |
20.2% |
0.20234114 |
4 |
To a great extent |
30 |
5% |
0.05016722 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
11 |
1.8% |
0.01839465 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
3.2% |
0.03177258 |
98 |
Not asked |
4261 |
|
NA |
r6ran22
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1235] [Invalid:3624] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
314 |
25.4% |
0.2542510 |
2 |
2 |
310 |
25.1% |
0.2510121 |
3 |
3 |
303 |
24.5% |
0.2453441 |
4 |
4 |
308 |
24.9% |
0.2493927 |
Sysmiss |
|
3624 |
|
NA |
r6dv13a_1
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are refugees: Competent
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how refugees are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are refugees:
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
21 |
6.7% |
0.066878981 |
2 |
Slightly |
133 |
42.4% |
0.423566879 |
3 |
Somewhat |
128 |
40.8% |
0.407643312 |
4 |
To a great extent |
16 |
5.1% |
0.050955414 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003184713 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
4.8% |
0.047770701 |
98 |
Not asked |
4545 |
|
NA |
r6dv13a_2
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are refugees: Warm
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how refugees are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are refugees:
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
14 |
4.5% |
0.044585987 |
2 |
Slightly |
96 |
30.6% |
0.305732484 |
3 |
Somewhat |
164 |
52.2% |
0.522292994 |
4 |
To a great extent |
21 |
6.7% |
0.066878981 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003184713 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
5.7% |
0.057324841 |
98 |
Not asked |
4545 |
|
NA |
r6dv13b_1
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are Roma people: Competent
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how Roma people are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are Roma people:
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
86 |
27.7% |
0.27741935 |
2 |
Slightly |
148 |
47.7% |
0.47741935 |
3 |
Somewhat |
54 |
17.4% |
0.17419355 |
4 |
To a great extent |
12 |
3.9% |
0.03870968 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
98 |
Not asked |
4549 |
|
NA |
r6dv13b_2
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are Roma people: Warm
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how Roma people are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are Roma people:
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
48 |
15.5% |
0.15483871 |
2 |
Slightly |
144 |
46.5% |
0.46451613 |
3 |
Somewhat |
90 |
29% |
0.29032258 |
4 |
To a great extent |
18 |
5.8% |
0.05806452 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
3.2% |
0.03225806 |
98 |
Not asked |
4549 |
|
NA |
r6dv13c_1
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are Muslims: Competent
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how Muslims are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are Muslims:
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
13 |
4.3% |
0.04290429 |
2 |
Slightly |
78 |
25.7% |
0.25742574 |
3 |
Somewhat |
163 |
53.8% |
0.53795380 |
4 |
To a great extent |
36 |
11.9% |
0.11881188 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
3 |
1% |
0.00990099 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
3.3% |
0.03300330 |
98 |
Not asked |
4556 |
|
NA |
r6dv13c_2
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are Muslims: Warm
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how Muslims are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are Muslims:
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
13 |
4.3% |
0.04290429 |
2 |
Slightly |
94 |
31% |
0.31023102 |
3 |
Somewhat |
155 |
51.2% |
0.51155116 |
4 |
To a great extent |
28 |
9.2% |
0.09240924 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.00330033 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
4% |
0.03960396 |
98 |
Not asked |
4556 |
|
NA |
r6dv13d_1
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are the followers of the Prohpet’s Ummah: Competent
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how followers of the Muslim fundamentalist group the Prophet’s Ummah are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are followers of the Muslim fundamentalist group the Prophet’s Ummah:
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
130 |
42.2% |
0.422077922 |
2 |
Slightly |
87 |
28.2% |
0.282467532 |
3 |
Somewhat |
51 |
16.6% |
0.165584416 |
4 |
To a great extent |
17 |
5.5% |
0.055194805 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003246753 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
7.1% |
0.071428571 |
98 |
Not asked |
4551 |
|
NA |
r6dv13d_2
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are the followers of the Prohpet’s Ummah: Warm
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how followers of the Muslim fundamentalist group the Prophet’s Ummah are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are followers of the Muslim fundamentalist group the Prophet’s Ummah:
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran22=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
180 |
58.4% |
0.58441558 |
2 |
Slightly |
82 |
26.6% |
0.26623377 |
3 |
Somewhat |
21 |
6.8% |
0.06818182 |
4 |
To a great extent |
3 |
1% |
0.00974026 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
7.1% |
0.07142857 |
98 |
Not asked |
4551 |
|
NA |
r6ran23
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1230] [Invalid:3629] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
303 |
24.6% |
0.2463415 |
2 |
2 |
320 |
26% |
0.2601626 |
3 |
3 |
307 |
25% |
0.2495935 |
4 |
4 |
300 |
24.4% |
0.2439024 |
Sysmiss |
|
3629 |
|
NA |
r6dv14a_1
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of The Liberal Party: Competent
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the of the Liberal political party are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are members of the of the Liberal political party:
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
9 |
3% |
0.02970297 |
2 |
Slightly |
57 |
18.8% |
0.18811881 |
3 |
Somewhat |
148 |
48.8% |
0.48844884 |
4 |
To a great extent |
66 |
21.8% |
0.21782178 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01320132 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
6.3% |
0.06270627 |
98 |
Not asked |
4556 |
|
NA |
r6dv14a_2
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of The Liberal Party: Warm
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the of the Liberal political party are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are members of the of the Liberal political party:
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
7 |
2.3% |
0.02310231 |
2 |
Slightly |
40 |
13.2% |
0.13201320 |
3 |
Somewhat |
150 |
49.5% |
0.49504950 |
4 |
To a great extent |
83 |
27.4% |
0.27392739 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
3 |
1% |
0.00990099 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
6.6% |
0.06600660 |
98 |
Not asked |
4556 |
|
NA |
r6dv14b_1
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of The Progress Party: Competent
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the Progress Party are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are members of the Progress Party:
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
20 |
6.2% |
0.062500 |
2 |
Slightly |
84 |
26.2% |
0.262500 |
3 |
Somewhat |
142 |
44.4% |
0.443750 |
4 |
To a great extent |
59 |
18.4% |
0.184375 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
2 |
0.6% |
0.006250 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
4.1% |
0.040625 |
98 |
Not asked |
4539 |
|
NA |
r6dv14b_2
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of The Progress Party: Warm
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the Progress Party are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are members of the Progress Party:
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
30 |
9.4% |
0.093750 |
2 |
Slightly |
108 |
33.8% |
0.337500 |
3 |
Somewhat |
138 |
43.1% |
0.431250 |
4 |
To a great extent |
28 |
8.8% |
0.087500 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003125 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
4.7% |
0.046875 |
98 |
Not asked |
4539 |
|
NA |
r6dv14c_1
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of HRS: Competent
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the of the Human Rights Service, fronted by Hege Storhaug, are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are members of the Human Rights Service, fronted by Hege Storhaug:
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
22 |
7.2% |
0.07166124 |
2 |
Slightly |
67 |
21.8% |
0.21824104 |
3 |
Somewhat |
123 |
40.1% |
0.40065147 |
4 |
To a great extent |
46 |
15% |
0.14983713 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
9 |
2.9% |
0.02931596 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
13% |
0.13029316 |
98 |
Not asked |
4552 |
|
NA |
r6dv14c_2
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of HRS: Warm
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the of the Human Rights Service, fronted by Hege Storhaug, are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are members of the Human Rights Service, fronted by Hege Storhaug:
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
34 |
11.1% |
0.11074919 |
2 |
Slightly |
90 |
29.3% |
0.29315961 |
3 |
Somewhat |
97 |
31.6% |
0.31596091 |
4 |
To a great extent |
37 |
12.1% |
0.12052117 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
5 |
1.6% |
0.01628664 |
97 |
No answer |
44 |
14.3% |
0.14332248 |
98 |
Not asked |
4552 |
|
NA |
r6dv14d_1
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of The Norwegian Resistance Movement: Competent
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the of the neo-Nazi group The Norwegian Resistance Movement are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are members of the of the neo-Nazi group The Norwegian Resistance Movement:
|
Literal question:
|
Competent (skilful, self-assured, clever)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
133 |
44.3% |
0.443333333 |
2 |
Slightly |
111 |
37% |
0.370000000 |
3 |
Somewhat |
31 |
10.3% |
0.103333333 |
4 |
To a great extent |
8 |
2.7% |
0.026666667 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003333333 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
5.3% |
0.053333333 |
98 |
Not asked |
4559 |
|
NA |
r6dv14d_2
Variable label:
|
Regarded by Norwegians, to what extent are members of The Norwegian Resistance Movement: Warm
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how members of the of the neo-Nazi group The Norwegian Resistance Movement are regarded by people in Norway generally. As people generally see it, to what extent are members of the of the neo-Nazi group The Norwegian Resistance Movement:
|
Literal question:
|
Warm (friendly, kind, honest)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran23=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
166 |
55.3% |
0.553333333 |
2 |
Slightly |
92 |
30.7% |
0.306666667 |
3 |
Somewhat |
25 |
8.3% |
0.083333333 |
4 |
To a great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003333333 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003333333 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
5% |
0.050000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4559 |
|
NA |
r6ran24
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1228] [Invalid:3631] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
325 |
26.5% |
0.2646580 |
2 |
2 |
299 |
24.3% |
0.2434853 |
3 |
3 |
313 |
25.5% |
0.2548860 |
4 |
4 |
291 |
23.7% |
0.2369707 |
Sysmiss |
|
3631 |
|
NA |
r6dv70a
Variable label:
|
Reaction other political parties, politician found guilty of expressing hate against colleague: Formal apology
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a politician in Norway has been found guilty in a local court of having written a Tweet that expressed hate against a colleague with an immigrant background. The leaders of the other political parties demand a formal apology from the politician and his party.
The politician and his party protest against the reaction.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the reaction of the leaders of the other political parties?
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran24=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much too severe |
9 |
2.8% |
0.02769231 |
2 |
Too severe |
13 |
4% |
0.04000000 |
3 |
Slightly too severe |
25 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
4 |
Just right |
193 |
59.4% |
0.59384615 |
5 |
Slightly too mild |
29 |
8.9% |
0.08923077 |
6 |
Too mild |
31 |
9.5% |
0.09538462 |
7 |
Much too mild |
14 |
4.3% |
0.04307692 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
3.4% |
0.03384615 |
98 |
Not asked |
4534 |
|
NA |
r6dv70b
Variable label:
|
Reaction other political parties, politician found guilty of expressing hate against colleague: Exclusion from party for life
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a politician in Norway has been found guilty in a local court of having written a Tweet that expressed hate against a colleague with an immigrant background. The leaders of the other political parties demand that the party excludes him for life.
The politician and his party protest against the reaction.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the reaction of the leaders of the other political parties?
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran24=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much too severe |
17 |
5.7% |
0.05685619 |
2 |
Too severe |
50 |
16.7% |
0.16722408 |
3 |
Slightly too severe |
60 |
20.1% |
0.20066890 |
4 |
Just right |
152 |
50.8% |
0.50836120 |
5 |
Slightly too mild |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01672241 |
6 |
Too mild |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01672241 |
7 |
Much too mild |
3 |
1% |
0.01003344 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.3% |
0.02341137 |
98 |
Not asked |
4560 |
|
NA |
r6dv70c
Variable label:
|
Reaction other political parties, politician expressing hate against colleague: Formal apology
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a politician in Norway has written a Tweet that expressed hate against a colleague with an immigrant background. The leaders of the other political parties demand a formal apology from the politician and his party.
The politician and his party protest against the reaction.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the reaction of the leaders of the other political parties?
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran24=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much too severe |
6 |
1.9% |
0.01916933 |
2 |
Too severe |
22 |
7% |
0.07028754 |
3 |
Slightly too severe |
16 |
5.1% |
0.05111821 |
4 |
Just right |
186 |
59.4% |
0.59424920 |
5 |
Slightly too mild |
26 |
8.3% |
0.08306709 |
6 |
Too mild |
27 |
8.6% |
0.08626198 |
7 |
Much too mild |
24 |
7.7% |
0.07667732 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.9% |
0.01916933 |
98 |
Not asked |
4546 |
|
NA |
r6dv70d
Variable label:
|
Reaction other political parties, politician expressing hate against colleague: Exclusion from party for life
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a politician in Norway has written a Tweet that expressed hate against a colleague with an immigrant background. The leaders of the other political parties demand that the party excludes him for life.
The politician and his party protest against the reaction.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the reaction of the leaders of the other political parties?
|
Post-question:
|
The reaction is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran24=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much too severe |
21 |
7.2% |
0.07216495 |
2 |
Too severe |
52 |
17.9% |
0.17869416 |
3 |
Slightly too severe |
69 |
23.7% |
0.23711340 |
4 |
Just right |
124 |
42.6% |
0.42611684 |
5 |
Slightly too mild |
7 |
2.4% |
0.02405498 |
6 |
Too mild |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01718213 |
7 |
Much too mild |
7 |
2.4% |
0.02405498 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02061856 |
98 |
Not asked |
4568 |
|
NA |
r6dv71_1
Variable label:
|
Feelings about demand: Enthusiasm
|
Pre-question text:
|
Three different parties were involved in the example you just read about: The politician who had written the Tweet, his party and the leaders of the other political parties who reacted to it. Please think about the leaders of the political parties who put forward the demand against the politician and his party. To what extent do you have the following feelings about their demand?
|
Literal question:
|
Enthusiasm
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
293 |
23.3% |
0.23328025 |
2 |
Slightly |
294 |
23.4% |
0.23407643 |
3 |
Somewhat |
337 |
26.8% |
0.26831210 |
4 |
To a great extent |
170 |
13.5% |
0.13535032 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
37 |
2.9% |
0.02945860 |
97 |
No answer |
125 |
10% |
0.09952229 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv71_2
Variable label:
|
Feelings about demand: Anger
|
Pre-question text:
|
Three different parties were involved in the example you just read about: The politician who had written the Tweet, his party and the leaders of the other political parties who reacted to it. Please think about the leaders of the political parties who put forward the demand against the politician and his party. To what extent do you have the following feelings about their demand?
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
478 |
38.1% |
0.38057325 |
2 |
Slightly |
299 |
23.8% |
0.23805732 |
3 |
Somewhat |
225 |
17.9% |
0.17914013 |
4 |
To a great extent |
98 |
7.8% |
0.07802548 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
26 |
2.1% |
0.02070064 |
97 |
No answer |
130 |
10.4% |
0.10350318 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6dv71_3
Variable label:
|
Feelings about demand: Frustraion
|
Pre-question text:
|
Three different parties were involved in the example you just read about: The politician who had written the Tweet, his party and the leaders of the other political parties who reacted to it. Please think about the leaders of the political parties who put forward the demand against the politician and his party. To what extent do you have the following feelings about their demand?
|
Literal question:
|
Frustration
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
416 |
33.1% |
0.33121019 |
2 |
Slightly |
273 |
21.7% |
0.21735669 |
3 |
Somewhat |
259 |
20.6% |
0.20621019 |
4 |
To a great extent |
148 |
11.8% |
0.11783439 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
35 |
2.8% |
0.02786624 |
97 |
No answer |
125 |
10% |
0.09952229 |
98 |
Not asked |
3603 |
|
NA |
r6ran25
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1224] [Invalid:3635] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
267 |
21.8% |
0.2181373 |
2 |
2 |
240 |
19.6% |
0.1960784 |
3 |
3 |
242 |
19.8% |
0.1977124 |
4 |
4 |
257 |
21% |
0.2099673 |
5 |
5 |
218 |
17.8% |
0.1781046 |
Sysmiss |
|
3635 |
|
NA |
r6dv72a
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Stricter rules needed for asylum in order to secure women’s safety
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Stricter rules for asylum are needed in order to secure women’s safety in Norwegian society.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran25=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
41 |
15.4% |
0.153558052 |
2 |
Agree |
38 |
14.2% |
0.142322097 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
64 |
24% |
0.239700375 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
46 |
17.2% |
0.172284644 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
23 |
8.6% |
0.086142322 |
6 |
Disagree |
43 |
16.1% |
0.161048689 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
10 |
3.7% |
0.037453184 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.007490637 |
98 |
Not asked |
4592 |
|
NA |
r6dv72b
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree, statement HRS: Stricter rules needed for asylum in order to secure women’s safety
|
Pre-question text:
|
Representatives of the Human Rights Service, fronted by Hege Storhaug, have said that stricter rules for asylum are needed in order to secure women’s safety in Norwegian society.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran25=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
29 |
12.1% |
0.12083333 |
2 |
Agree |
34 |
14.2% |
0.14166667 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
61 |
25.4% |
0.25416667 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
39 |
16.2% |
0.16250000 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
13 |
5.4% |
0.05416667 |
6 |
Disagree |
35 |
14.6% |
0.14583333 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
25 |
10.4% |
0.10416667 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.7% |
0.01666667 |
98 |
Not asked |
4619 |
|
NA |
r6dv72c
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree, statement PEGIDA: Stricter rules needed for asylum in order to secure women’s safety
|
Pre-question text:
|
Representatives of the PEGIDA Norway (Patriotic Europeans against the Islamisation of Europe), fronted by Max Hermansen, have said that stricter rules for asylum are needed in order to secure women’s safety in Norwegian society.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran25=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
29 |
12% |
0.11983471 |
2 |
Agree |
22 |
9.1% |
0.09090909 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
50 |
20.7% |
0.20661157 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
28 |
11.6% |
0.11570248 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
16 |
6.6% |
0.06611570 |
6 |
Disagree |
49 |
20.2% |
0.20247934 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
40 |
16.5% |
0.16528926 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
3.3% |
0.03305785 |
98 |
Not asked |
4617 |
|
NA |
r6dv72d
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree, statement The Norwegian Resistance Movement: Stricter rules needed for asylum in order to secure women’s safety
|
Pre-question text:
|
Representatives of the neo-Nazi group The Norwegian Resistance Movement have said that stricter rules for asylum are needed in order to secure women’s safety in Norwegian society.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran25=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
5.4% |
0.054474708 |
2 |
Agree |
16 |
6.2% |
0.062256809 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
49 |
19.1% |
0.190661479 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
33 |
12.8% |
0.128404669 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
13 |
5.1% |
0.050583658 |
6 |
Disagree |
65 |
25.3% |
0.252918288 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
66 |
25.7% |
0.256809339 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003891051 |
98 |
Not asked |
4602 |
|
NA |
r6dv72e
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree, statement Progress Party : Stricter rules needed for asylum in order to secure women’s safety
|
Pre-question text:
|
Representatives of the Progress Party have said that stricter rules for asylum are needed in order to secure women’s safety in Norwegian society.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran25=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
35 |
16.1% |
0.16055046 |
2 |
Agree |
34 |
15.6% |
0.15596330 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
36 |
16.5% |
0.16513761 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
23 |
10.6% |
0.10550459 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
23 |
10.6% |
0.10550459 |
6 |
Disagree |
37 |
17% |
0.16972477 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
27 |
12.4% |
0.12385321 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01376147 |
98 |
Not asked |
4641 |
|
NA |
r6ran26
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1224] [Invalid:3635] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
292 |
23.9% |
0.2385621 |
2 |
2 |
323 |
26.4% |
0.2638889 |
3 |
3 |
309 |
25.2% |
0.2524510 |
4 |
4 |
300 |
24.5% |
0.2450980 |
Sysmiss |
|
3635 |
|
NA |
r6dv25a
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Immigrants are entitled to have their traditions respected
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrants to Norway are entitled to have their traditions and cultures respected.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran26=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
15 |
5.1% |
0.05136986 |
2 |
Agree |
84 |
28.8% |
0.28767123 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
88 |
30.1% |
0.30136986 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
21 |
7.2% |
0.07191781 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
44 |
15.1% |
0.15068493 |
6 |
Disagree |
26 |
8.9% |
0.08904110 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
2.7% |
0.02739726 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02054795 |
98 |
Not asked |
4567 |
|
NA |
r6dv25b
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Immigrants are entitled to have their traditions protected
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrants to Norway are entitled to have their traditions and cultures protected.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran26=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
6 |
1.9% |
0.01857585 |
2 |
Agree |
39 |
12.1% |
0.12074303 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
89 |
27.6% |
0.27554180 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
44 |
13.6% |
0.13622291 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
56 |
17.3% |
0.17337461 |
6 |
Disagree |
57 |
17.6% |
0.17647059 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
20 |
6.2% |
0.06191950 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
3.7% |
0.03715170 |
98 |
Not asked |
4536 |
|
NA |
r6dv25c
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Muslims are entitled to have their traditions respected
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Muslims in Norway are entitled to have their traditions and cultures respected.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran26=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
20 |
6.5% |
0.06472492 |
2 |
Agree |
76 |
24.6% |
0.24595469 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
99 |
32% |
0.32038835 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
28 |
9.1% |
0.09061489 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
42 |
13.6% |
0.13592233 |
6 |
Disagree |
24 |
7.8% |
0.07766990 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
5.2% |
0.05177994 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01294498 |
98 |
Not asked |
4550 |
|
NA |
r6dv25d
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Muslims are entitled to have their traditions protected
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Muslims in Norway are entitled to have their traditions and cultures protected.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran26=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
8 |
2.7% |
0.026666667 |
2 |
Agree |
34 |
11.3% |
0.113333333 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
76 |
25.3% |
0.253333333 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
51 |
17% |
0.170000000 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
66 |
22% |
0.220000000 |
6 |
Disagree |
36 |
12% |
0.120000000 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
27 |
9% |
0.090000000 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006666667 |
98 |
Not asked |
4559 |
|
NA |
r6ran27
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1224] [Invalid:3635] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
322 |
26.3% |
0.2630719 |
2 |
2 |
268 |
21.9% |
0.2189542 |
3 |
3 |
304 |
24.8% |
0.2483660 |
4 |
4 |
330 |
27% |
0.2696078 |
Sysmiss |
|
3635 |
|
NA |
r6dv52a
Variable label:
|
Should asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years be granted residence, even if rejected appeals?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran27=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
65 |
20.2% |
0.20186335 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
132 |
41% |
0.40993789 |
3 |
Don't know |
122 |
37.9% |
0.37888199 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.9% |
0.00931677 |
98 |
Not asked |
4537 |
|
NA |
r6dv52b
Variable label:
|
Should asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and participated in local communities be granted residence, even if rejected appeals?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have participated actively in their local communities while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran27=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
101 |
37.7% |
0.37686567 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
80 |
29.9% |
0.29850746 |
3 |
Don't know |
83 |
31% |
0.30970149 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.5% |
0.01492537 |
98 |
Not asked |
4591 |
|
NA |
r6dv52c
Variable label:
|
Should Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years be granted residence, even if rejected appeals?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran27=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
48 |
15.8% |
0.15789474 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
135 |
44.4% |
0.44407895 |
3 |
Don't know |
113 |
37.2% |
0.37171053 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
98 |
Not asked |
4555 |
|
NA |
r6dv52d
Variable label:
|
Should Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and participated in local communities be granted residence, even if rejected appeals?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have participated actively in their local communities while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran27=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
97 |
29.4% |
0.293939394 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
114 |
34.5% |
0.345454545 |
3 |
Don't know |
118 |
35.8% |
0.357575758 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003030303 |
98 |
Not asked |
4529 |
|
NA |
r6dv53a
Variable label:
|
How strong are your views about asylum seekers not being granted residence?
|
Literal question:
|
How strong are your views about asylum seekers not being granted residence?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6DV52A-D=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very strong |
131 |
28.4% |
0.284164859 |
2 |
Fairly strong |
161 |
34.9% |
0.349240781 |
3 |
Not very strong |
99 |
21.5% |
0.214750542 |
4 |
Not strong at all |
69 |
15% |
0.149674620 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002169197 |
98 |
Not asked |
4398 |
|
NA |
r6dv53b
Variable label:
|
How strong are your views about asylum seekers being granted residence?
|
Literal question:
|
How strong are your views about asylum seekers being granted residence?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and R6DV52A-D=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very strong |
77 |
24.8% |
0.247588424 |
2 |
Fairly strong |
132 |
42.4% |
0.424437299 |
3 |
Not very strong |
79 |
25.4% |
0.254019293 |
4 |
Not strong at all |
20 |
6.4% |
0.064308682 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1% |
0.009646302 |
98 |
Not asked |
4548 |
|
NA |
r6ran28
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1223] [Invalid:3636] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
339 |
27.7% |
0.2771872 |
2 |
2 |
274 |
22.4% |
0.2240392 |
3 |
3 |
301 |
24.6% |
0.2461161 |
4 |
4 |
309 |
25.3% |
0.2526574 |
Sysmiss |
|
3636 |
|
NA |
r6dv54a
Variable label:
|
Confidence/lack of confidence: Muslims when they say they wish to be part of Norwegian society
|
Literal question:
|
How much confidence or lack of confidence do you have in Muslims when they say that they wish to be part of Norwegian society?
|
Post-question:
|
I have:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran28=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Great confidence |
68 |
20.1% |
0.200589971 |
2 |
Some confidence |
117 |
34.5% |
0.345132743 |
3 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
72 |
21.2% |
0.212389381 |
4 |
Some lack of confidence |
55 |
16.2% |
0.162241888 |
5 |
Great lack of confidence |
24 |
7.1% |
0.070796460 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.9% |
0.008849558 |
98 |
Not asked |
4520 |
|
NA |
r6dv54b
Variable label:
|
Confidence/lack of confidence: Muslim leaders when they say they wish to be part of Norwegian society
|
Literal question:
|
How much confidence or lack of confidence do you have in Muslim leaders when they say that they wish to be part of Norwegian society?
|
Post-question:
|
I have:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran28=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Great confidence |
31 |
11.3% |
0.11313869 |
2 |
Some confidence |
78 |
28.5% |
0.28467153 |
3 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
57 |
20.8% |
0.20802920 |
4 |
Some lack of confidence |
70 |
25.5% |
0.25547445 |
5 |
Great lack of confidence |
36 |
13.1% |
0.13138686 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.00729927 |
98 |
Not asked |
4585 |
|
NA |
r6dv54c
Variable label:
|
Confidence/lack of confidence: Muslim fundamentalists when they say that they wish to be part of Norwegian society
|
Literal question:
|
How much confidence or lack of confidence do you have in Muslim fundamentalists when they say that they wish to be part of Norwegian society?
|
Post-question:
|
I have:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran28=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Great confidence |
5 |
1.7% |
0.016611296 |
2 |
Some confidence |
16 |
5.3% |
0.053156146 |
3 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
34 |
11.3% |
0.112956811 |
4 |
Some lack of confidence |
117 |
38.9% |
0.388704319 |
5 |
Great lack of confidence |
126 |
41.9% |
0.418604651 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1% |
0.009966777 |
98 |
Not asked |
4558 |
|
NA |
r6dv54d
Variable label:
|
Confidence/lack of confidence: Moderate Muslims when they say that they wish to be part of Norwegian society
|
Literal question:
|
How much confidence or lack of confidence do you have in moderate Muslims when they say that they wish to be part of Norwegian society?
|
Post-question:
|
I have:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran28=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Great confidence |
93 |
30.1% |
0.30097087 |
2 |
Some confidence |
106 |
34.3% |
0.34304207 |
3 |
Neither confidence nor lack of it |
57 |
18.4% |
0.18446602 |
4 |
Some lack of confidence |
35 |
11.3% |
0.11326861 |
5 |
Great lack of confidence |
12 |
3.9% |
0.03883495 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.9% |
0.01941748 |
98 |
Not asked |
4550 |
|
NA |
r6ran29
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1223] [Invalid:3636] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
289 |
23.6% |
0.2363042 |
2 |
2 |
326 |
26.7% |
0.2665576 |
3 |
3 |
299 |
24.4% |
0.2444808 |
4 |
4 |
309 |
25.3% |
0.2526574 |
Sysmiss |
|
3636 |
|
NA |
r6dv43a
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Prophet’s Ummah rent local meeting room
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the Muslim fundamentalist group, Prophet’s Ummah, has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that the Prophet’s Ummah should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran29=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01730104 |
2 |
Agree |
21 |
7.3% |
0.07266436 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
15 |
5.2% |
0.05190311 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
41 |
14.2% |
0.14186851 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
35 |
12.1% |
0.12110727 |
6 |
Disagree |
65 |
22.5% |
0.22491349 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
100 |
34.6% |
0.34602076 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.4% |
0.02422145 |
98 |
Not asked |
4570 |
|
NA |
r6dv43b
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: SIAN rent local meeting room
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the anti-Islamic group, Stop the Islamisation of Norway (SIAN), has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that SIAN should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran29=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
17 |
5.2% |
0.05214724 |
2 |
Agree |
51 |
15.6% |
0.15644172 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
57 |
17.5% |
0.17484663 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
80 |
24.5% |
0.24539877 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
41 |
12.6% |
0.12576687 |
6 |
Disagree |
42 |
12.9% |
0.12883436 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
33 |
10.1% |
0.10122699 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.5% |
0.01533742 |
98 |
Not asked |
4533 |
|
NA |
r6dv43c
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Muslim congregation rent local meeting room
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a Muslim congregation has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that such a Muslim congregation should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran29=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
50 |
16.7% |
0.16722408 |
2 |
Agree |
106 |
35.5% |
0.35451505 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
38 |
12.7% |
0.12709030 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
54 |
18.1% |
0.18060201 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
21 |
7% |
0.07023411 |
6 |
Disagree |
8 |
2.7% |
0.02675585 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
17 |
5.7% |
0.05685619 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.7% |
0.01672241 |
98 |
Not asked |
4560 |
|
NA |
r6dv43d
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Free Church congregation rent local meeting room
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that a Free Church congregation has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that such a Free Church congregation should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 and ran29=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
38 |
12.3% |
0.122977346 |
2 |
Agree |
106 |
34.3% |
0.343042071 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
52 |
16.8% |
0.168284790 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
85 |
27.5% |
0.275080906 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
9 |
2.9% |
0.029126214 |
6 |
Disagree |
11 |
3.6% |
0.035598706 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003236246 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.3% |
0.022653722 |
98 |
Not asked |
4550 |
|
NA |
r6k33
Variable label:
|
What applies best to what you have been doing for the last 7 days
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
|
Post-question:
|
Mark one alternative.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Paid work (or temporarily absent) |
2839 |
58.4% |
0.584276600 |
2 |
Studying (not paid for by an employer) |
240 |
4.9% |
0.049392879 |
3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
85 |
1.7% |
0.017493311 |
4 |
Unemployed. Want a job, but not actively seeking work |
33 |
0.7% |
0.006791521 |
5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
155 |
3.2% |
0.031899568 |
6 |
Retired |
1066 |
21.9% |
0.219386705 |
7 |
Civilian or military service |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001646429 |
8 |
At home, looking after children or others |
46 |
0.9% |
0.009466969 |
9 |
Other |
263 |
5.4% |
0.054126363 |
97 |
No answer |
124 |
2.6% |
0.025519654 |
r6k33_9_other
Variable label:
|
What applies best to what you have been doing for the last 7 days, other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days. Other
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6k34_1
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Public central administration
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Public central administration/authority |
300 |
10.6% |
0.105671 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2539 |
89.4% |
0.894329 |
r6k34_2
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Kindergarten/school/teaching
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Kindergarten/school/teaching |
385 |
13.6% |
0.1356111 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2454 |
86.4% |
0.8643889 |
r6k34_3
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Health services
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Health services |
367 |
12.9% |
0.1292709 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2472 |
87.1% |
0.8707291 |
r6k34_4
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Social services/child protection
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Social services/child protection |
65 |
2.3% |
0.02289539 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2774 |
97.7% |
0.97710461 |
r6k34_5
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Nursing and care services
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Nursing and care services |
141 |
5% |
0.04966538 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2698 |
95% |
0.95033462 |
r6k34_6
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Defence/police/judicial system/security
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Defence/police/judicial system/security |
77 |
2.7% |
0.02712223 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2762 |
97.3% |
0.97287777 |
r6k34_7
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Agriculture/forestry/fishing
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agriculture/forestry/fishing |
69 |
2.4% |
0.02430433 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2770 |
97.6% |
0.97569567 |
r6k34_8
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Industry/technology
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Industry/technology |
225 |
7.9% |
0.07925326 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2614 |
92.1% |
0.92074674 |
r6k34_9
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Building/construction
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Building/construction |
222 |
7.8% |
0.07819655 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2617 |
92.2% |
0.92180345 |
r6k34_10
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Retailing/shop
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Retailing/shop |
147 |
5.2% |
0.0517788 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2692 |
94.8% |
0.9482212 |
r6k34_11
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Transport/communications
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Transport/communications |
141 |
5% |
0.04966538 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2698 |
95% |
0.95033462 |
r6k34_12
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Culture/sport/organisations
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Culture/sport/organisations |
101 |
3.6% |
0.03557591 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2738 |
96.4% |
0.96442409 |
r6k34_13
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Media/advertising
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Media/advertising/PR/information |
77 |
2.7% |
0.02712223 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2762 |
97.3% |
0.97287777 |
r6k34_14
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Research/analysis
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Research/analysis |
115 |
4.1% |
0.04050722 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2724 |
95.9% |
0.95949278 |
r6k34_15
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Travel/hotels
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Travel/hotels |
33 |
1.2% |
0.01162381 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2806 |
98.8% |
0.98837619 |
r6k34_16
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Restaurants/catering
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Restaurants/catering |
25 |
0.9% |
0.008805918 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2814 |
99.1% |
0.991194082 |
r6k34_17
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Telecommunications/IT
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Telecommunications/IT |
146 |
5.1% |
0.05142656 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2693 |
94.9% |
0.94857344 |
r6k34_18
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Banking/insurance/finance
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Banking/insurance/finance |
105 |
3.7% |
0.03698485 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2734 |
96.3% |
0.96301515 |
r6k34_19
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Commercial services
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Commercial services |
165 |
5.8% |
0.05811906 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2674 |
94.2% |
0.94188094 |
r6k34_20
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Oil/gas
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oil/gas |
160 |
5.6% |
0.05635787 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2679 |
94.4% |
0.94364213 |
r6k34_21
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Other
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in?
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other |
188 |
6.6% |
0.0662205 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2020 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
2651 |
93.4% |
0.9337795 |
r6k34_21_other
Variable label:
|
What industry do you work in: Other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What industry do you (your company) work in? Other
|
Post-question:
|
It is possible to mark more than one answer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R6K33=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r6k35
Variable label:
|
Best description of the area you live in
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A city |
1280 |
26.3% |
0.26342869 |
2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
886 |
18.2% |
0.18234205 |
3 |
A small or medium sized town |
1279 |
26.3% |
0.26322289 |
4 |
A village |
757 |
15.6% |
0.15579337 |
5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
526 |
10.8% |
0.10825273 |
97 |
No answer |
131 |
2.7% |
0.02696028 |
r6k26
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest level of completed education?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondents has not answered this question in previous waves]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
1 |
1.7% |
0.01666667 |
3 |
Lower secondary school (grunnskole, 7-årig folkeskole, framhaldskole, realskole) |
6 |
10% |
0.10000000 |
4 |
County college certificate |
1 |
1.7% |
0.01666667 |
5 |
Upper secondary/end of formal schooling, humanities subjects, university
preparatory course, 1-year Post-leaving Certificate course (VK2, VG stage 3,
gymnas) (5) |
6 |
10% |
0.10000000 |
6 |
Upper secondary/end of formal schooling, vocational subjects/courses (VK2, VK3,
VG stage 3, vocational certificate, journeyman's certificate) |
7 |
11.7% |
0.11666667 |
7 |
Preliminary course for university/college without credits |
1 |
1.7% |
0.01666667 |
8 |
Certificate for additional further education (technical college) |
1 |
1.7% |
0.01666667 |
9 |
University/college, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (2 and 2½ year
associate degree) |
4 |
6.7% |
0.06666667 |
10 |
Completed 3-4 years of college education (Bachelor, BA, B.Sc., teacher's
training college, nursing college, nursery teacher, engineer, business
economist, etc.) |
8 |
13.3% |
0.13333333 |
11 |
Completed 3-4 years of university education (Bachelor, BA, B.Sc.) |
5 |
8.3% |
0.08333333 |
12 |
Completed 5-6 years of college education (Master’s, main subject) |
8 |
13.3% |
0.13333333 |
13 |
Completed 5-6 years of university education (Master’s, main subject), longer
professional education (Bachelor of Divinity, Bachelor of Psychology, Bachelor
of Medicine, Bachelor of Veterinary Medicine, Master of Science, architect,
business economist) |
2 |
3.3% |
0.03333333 |
14 |
Researcher (Ph.D) |
1 |
1.7% |
0.01666667 |
15 |
None of these |
2 |
3.3% |
0.03333333 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
11.7% |
0.11666667 |
98 |
Not asked |
4799 |
|
NA |
r6P1
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Male |
2456 |
50.5% |
0.5054538 |
2 |
Female |
2403 |
49.5% |
0.4945462 |
r6P2
Variable label:
|
Region
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
1387 |
28.5% |
0.28544968 |
2 |
Østlandet |
1181 |
24.3% |
0.24305413 |
3 |
Sørlandet |
231 |
4.8% |
0.04754065 |
4 |
Vestlandet |
1264 |
26% |
0.26013583 |
5 |
Trøndelag |
446 |
9.2% |
0.09178843 |
6 |
Nord-Norge |
350 |
7.2% |
0.07203128 |
R6P3
Variable label:
|
County
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-19]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Akershus |
602 |
12.4% |
0.123893805 |
2 |
Oslo |
785 |
16.2% |
0.161555876 |
3 |
Østfold |
260 |
5.4% |
0.053508952 |
4 |
Vestfold |
244 |
5% |
0.050216094 |
5 |
Hedmark |
145 |
3% |
0.029841531 |
6 |
Oppland |
142 |
2.9% |
0.029224120 |
7 |
Buskerud |
256 |
5.3% |
0.052685738 |
8 |
Telemark |
134 |
2.8% |
0.027577691 |
9 |
Vest-Agder |
145 |
3% |
0.029841531 |
10 |
Aust-Agder |
86 |
1.8% |
0.017699115 |
11 |
Rogaland |
417 |
8.6% |
0.085820128 |
12 |
Hordaland |
556 |
11.4% |
0.114426837 |
13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
73 |
1.5% |
0.015023667 |
14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
218 |
4.5% |
0.044865199 |
15 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
348 |
7.2% |
0.071619675 |
16 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
98 |
2% |
0.020168759 |
17 |
Nordland |
186 |
3.8% |
0.038279481 |
18 |
Troms |
120 |
2.5% |
0.024696440 |
19 |
Finmark |
44 |
0.9% |
0.009055361 |
r6P4_1
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No education/elementary school |
430 |
8.8% |
0.08849558 |
2 |
Upper secondary eduction |
1439 |
29.6% |
0.29615147 |
3 |
University/university college |
2806 |
57.7% |
0.57748508 |
97 |
No answer |
184 |
3.8% |
0.03786787 |
r6P4_2
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
21 |
0.4% |
0.004321877 |
2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
31 |
0.6% |
0.006379914 |
3 |
Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school,
secondary school) |
378 |
7.8% |
0.077793785 |
4 |
College certificate |
43 |
0.9% |
0.008849558 |
5 |
Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education
programme, one-year post admission |
615 |
12.7% |
0.126569253 |
6 |
Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes
(qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination) |
595 |
12.2% |
0.122453180 |
7 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
63 |
1.3% |
0.012965631 |
8 |
Diploma from addition to upper secondary education (vocational, technical
college) |
166 |
3.4% |
0.034163408 |
9 |
University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years
(university college graduate 2 and 2½ year) |
465 |
9.6% |
0.095698703 |
10 |
Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's
college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist,
etc.) |
991 |
20.4% |
0.203951430 |
11 |
Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor) |
321 |
6.6% |
0.066062976 |
12 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master) |
363 |
7.5% |
0.074706730 |
13 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further
professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian,
engineer, architect, senior business economist) |
570 |
11.7% |
0.117308088 |
14 |
Research level (Ph.D.) |
96 |
2% |
0.019757152 |
15 |
None of these |
136 |
2.8% |
0.027989298 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.001029018 |
r6P5_1
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1939 or earlier |
190 |
3.9% |
0.03910270 |
2 |
1940-1949 |
865 |
17.8% |
0.17802017 |
3 |
1950-1959 |
1117 |
23% |
0.22988269 |
4 |
1960-1969 |
1000 |
20.6% |
0.20580366 |
5 |
1970-1979 |
794 |
16.3% |
0.16340811 |
6 |
1980-1989 |
590 |
12.1% |
0.12142416 |
7 |
1990 or later |
303 |
6.2% |
0.06235851 |
r6P5_2
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1959 or earlier |
2172 |
44.7% |
0.44700556 |
2 |
1960-1989 |
2384 |
49.1% |
0.49063593 |
3 |
1990 or later |
303 |
6.2% |
0.06235851 |
r6Weight_1
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2 and P1. See documentation report
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-3]
|
r6Weight_2
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4_1 and P1. See documentation report
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-26]
|
w01_k3
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
109 |
5.4% |
0.054336989 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
529 |
26.4% |
0.263708873 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
243 |
12.1% |
0.121136590 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
154 |
7.7% |
0.076769691 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
147 |
7.3% |
0.073280160 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
84 |
4.2% |
0.041874377 |
7 |
The Green Party |
93 |
4.6% |
0.046360917 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
560 |
27.9% |
0.279162512 |
9 |
Red |
42 |
2.1% |
0.020937188 |
10 |
Other: |
27 |
1.3% |
0.013459621 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
0.9% |
0.008973081 |
98 |
Not asked |
2853 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k3_1
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party last parliamentary election
|
Literal question:
|
What party did you vote for at the last parliamentary election?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents were ran1=1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
66 |
5.1% |
0.051202483 |
2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
335 |
26% |
0.259891389 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
136 |
10.6% |
0.105508146 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
84 |
6.5% |
0.065166796 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
80 |
6.2% |
0.062063615 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
49 |
3.8% |
0.038013964 |
7 |
The Green Party |
51 |
4% |
0.039565555 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
342 |
26.5% |
0.265321955 |
9 |
The Red Party |
26 |
2% |
0.020170675 |
10 |
Did not vote |
40 |
3.1% |
0.031031808 |
11 |
Was not entitled to vote |
56 |
4.3% |
0.043444531 |
12 |
Other |
16 |
1.2% |
0.012412723 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
0.6% |
0.006206362 |
98 |
Not asked |
3570 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k3_2
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party last parliamentary election
|
Literal question:
|
What party did you vote for at the last parliamentary election?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents where ran1=2 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
60 |
4.6% |
0.04626060 |
2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
325 |
25.1% |
0.25057826 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
112 |
8.6% |
0.08635312 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
90 |
6.9% |
0.06939090 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
103 |
7.9% |
0.07941403 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
56 |
4.3% |
0.04317656 |
7 |
The Green Party |
45 |
3.5% |
0.03469545 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
350 |
27% |
0.26985351 |
9 |
The Red Party |
20 |
1.5% |
0.01542020 |
10 |
Did not vote |
49 |
3.8% |
0.03777949 |
11 |
Was not entitled to vote |
67 |
5.2% |
0.05165767 |
12 |
Other |
19 |
1.5% |
0.01464919 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.1% |
0.00077101 |
98 |
Not asked |
3562 |
|
NA |
c3k3
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party last parliamentary election [Most recent available data from w01_k3, w03_r3k3_1, w03_r3k3_2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable. There are minor differences in question language.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
235 |
5.1% |
0.051175958 |
2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
1189 |
25.9% |
0.258928571 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
491 |
10.7% |
0.106925087 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
328 |
7.1% |
0.071428571 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
330 |
7.2% |
0.071864111 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
189 |
4.1% |
0.041158537 |
7 |
The Green Party |
189 |
4.1% |
0.041158537 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1252 |
27.3% |
0.272648084 |
9 |
The Red Party |
88 |
1.9% |
0.019163763 |
10 |
Did not vote |
116 |
2.5% |
0.025261324 |
11 |
Was not entitled to vote |
123 |
2.7% |
0.026785714 |
12 |
Other |
35 |
0.8% |
0.007621951 |
97 |
No answer |
27 |
0.6% |
0.005879791 |
98 |
Not asked |
267 |
|
NA |
w01_k14_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politics is complicated
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me have no understanding of what it’s about.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
89 |
4% |
0.04047294 |
2 |
Agree |
253 |
11.5% |
0.11505230 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
604 |
27.5% |
0.27467030 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
184 |
8.4% |
0.08367440 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
339 |
15.4% |
0.15416098 |
6 |
Disagree |
530 |
24.1% |
0.24101864 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
172 |
7.8% |
0.07821737 |
97 |
No answer |
28 |
1.3% |
0.01273306 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2660 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k14_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politics is sometimes so convoluted that people like me do not understand what it is about
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Politics is sometimes so convoluted that people like me do not understand what it is about.
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
114 |
4.4% |
0.043829296 |
2 |
Agree |
269 |
10.3% |
0.103421761 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
738 |
28.4% |
0.283737024 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
205 |
7.9% |
0.078815840 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
387 |
14.9% |
0.148788927 |
6 |
Disagree |
663 |
25.5% |
0.254901961 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
207 |
8% |
0.079584775 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
0.7% |
0.006920415 |
98 |
Not asked |
2258 |
|
NA |
c3k14_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politics is sometimes so convoluted that people like me do not understand what it is about [Most recent available data from w01_k14_1, w03_r3k14_1]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Politics is sometimes so convoluted that people like me do not understand what it is about.
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
203 |
4.2% |
0.042291667 |
2 |
Agree |
522 |
10.9% |
0.108750000 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
1342 |
28% |
0.279583333 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
389 |
8.1% |
0.081041667 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
726 |
15.1% |
0.151250000 |
6 |
Disagree |
1193 |
24.9% |
0.248541667 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
379 |
7.9% |
0.078958333 |
97 |
No answer |
46 |
1% |
0.009583333 |
98 |
Not asked |
59 |
|
NA |
w01_k14_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Can vote, not much else to influence
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
People like me can vote, but there is nothing else we can do to influence politics.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
94 |
4.3% |
0.04274670 |
2 |
Agree |
251 |
11.4% |
0.11414279 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
318 |
14.5% |
0.14461119 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
140 |
6.4% |
0.06366530 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
479 |
21.8% |
0.21782628 |
6 |
Disagree |
636 |
28.9% |
0.28922237 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
251 |
11.4% |
0.11414279 |
97 |
No answer |
30 |
1.4% |
0.01364256 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2660 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k14_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: People like me can probably vote, but we cannot do anything else to influence politics
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
People like me can probably vote, but we cannot do anything else to influence politics.
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
143 |
5.5% |
0.05497885 |
2 |
Agree |
286 |
11% |
0.10995771 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
386 |
14.8% |
0.14840446 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
179 |
6.9% |
0.06881968 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
566 |
21.8% |
0.21760861 |
6 |
Disagree |
719 |
27.6% |
0.27643214 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
294 |
11.3% |
0.11303345 |
97 |
No answer |
28 |
1.1% |
0.01076509 |
98 |
Not asked |
2258 |
|
NA |
c3k14_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: People like me can probably vote, but we cannot do anything else to influence politics [Most recent available data from w01_k14_2, w03_r3k14_2]
|
Pre-question text:
|
People like me can probably vote, but we cannot do anything else to influence politics.
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
237 |
4.9% |
0.04937500 |
2 |
Agree |
537 |
11.2% |
0.11187500 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
704 |
14.7% |
0.14666667 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
319 |
6.6% |
0.06645833 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1045 |
21.8% |
0.21770833 |
6 |
Disagree |
1355 |
28.2% |
0.28229167 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
545 |
11.4% |
0.11354167 |
97 |
No answer |
58 |
1.2% |
0.01208333 |
98 |
Not asked |
59 |
|
NA |
w01_k25_1
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your current income?
|
Literal question:
|
Gross annual income is:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-8500000]
|
w01_k25_recode
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income [Recoded from continuous to discrete scale: w01_k25]
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:integer] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
< 150 000 |
210 |
9.5% |
0.09549795 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
316 |
14.4% |
0.14370168 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
369 |
16.8% |
0.16780355 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
419 |
19.1% |
0.19054116 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
268 |
12.2% |
0.12187358 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
153 |
7% |
0.06957708 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
181 |
8.2% |
0.08231014 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
77 |
3.5% |
0.03501592 |
97 |
No answer |
206 |
9.4% |
0.09367894 |
98 |
Not asked |
2660 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k25
Variable label:
|
Current income
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
< 150 000 |
256 |
9.2% |
0.09175627 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
383 |
13.7% |
0.13727599 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
477 |
17.1% |
0.17096774 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
564 |
20.2% |
0.20215054 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
404 |
14.5% |
0.14480287 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
206 |
7.4% |
0.07383513 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
229 |
8.2% |
0.08207885 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
102 |
3.7% |
0.03655914 |
97 |
No answer |
169 |
6.1% |
0.06057348 |
98 |
Not asked |
2069 |
|
NA |
r4k25
Variable label:
|
Current income
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
< 150 000 |
18 |
13.7% |
0.13740458 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
18 |
13.7% |
0.13740458 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
21 |
16% |
0.16030534 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
8 |
6.1% |
0.06106870 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
18 |
13.7% |
0.13740458 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
4 |
3.1% |
0.03053435 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
5 |
3.8% |
0.03816794 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
4 |
3.1% |
0.03053435 |
97 |
No answer |
35 |
26.7% |
0.26717557 |
98 |
Not asked |
4728 |
|
NA |
r5k25
Variable label:
|
What is your current income?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
< 150 000 |
11 |
13.4% |
0.13414634 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
9 |
11% |
0.10975610 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
9 |
11% |
0.10975610 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
9 |
11% |
0.10975610 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
9 |
11% |
0.10975610 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
1 |
1.2% |
0.01219512 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
4 |
4.9% |
0.04878049 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
2 |
2.4% |
0.02439024 |
97 |
No answer |
28 |
34.1% |
0.34146341 |
98 |
Not asked |
4777 |
|
NA |
c5k25
Variable label:
|
What is your current income? [Most recent available data from w01_k25, r3k25, r4k25, r5k25]
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable. w01_k25 recoded to discrete scale.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
< 150 000 |
471 |
9.7% |
0.09711340 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
726 |
15% |
0.14969072 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
876 |
18.1% |
0.18061856 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1000 |
20.6% |
0.20618557 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
699 |
14.4% |
0.14412371 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
364 |
7.5% |
0.07505155 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
419 |
8.6% |
0.08639175 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
184 |
3.8% |
0.03793814 |
97 |
No answer |
111 |
2.3% |
0.02288660 |
98 |
Not asked |
9 |
|
NA |
w01_k27
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Are/have you:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Never been married |
269 |
12.2% |
0.1223283311 |
2 |
Married |
1241 |
56.4% |
0.5643474307 |
3 |
Legally registered partner |
3 |
0.1% |
0.0013642565 |
4 |
Cohabitant |
357 |
16.2% |
0.1623465211 |
5 |
Divorces/separated |
161 |
7.3% |
0.0732150978 |
6 |
Former cohabitant |
53 |
2.4% |
0.0241018645 |
7 |
Former legally registered partner |
1 |
0% |
0.0004547522 |
8 |
Widow/widower |
46 |
2.1% |
0.0209185994 |
9 |
Other |
21 |
1% |
0.0095497954 |
97 |
No answer |
47 |
2.1% |
0.0213733515 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2660 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k27
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Click on what is most suitable to you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Never been married |
297 |
11.3% |
0.1128419453 |
2 |
Married |
1420 |
54% |
0.5395136778 |
3 |
Legally registered partner |
7 |
0.3% |
0.0026595745 |
4 |
Cohabitant |
483 |
18.4% |
0.1835106383 |
5 |
Divorced/separated |
202 |
7.7% |
0.0767477204 |
6 |
Former cohabitant |
100 |
3.8% |
0.0379939210 |
7 |
Former legally registered partner |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0007598784 |
8 |
Widow/widower |
67 |
2.5% |
0.0254559271 |
9 |
Other: |
20 |
0.8% |
0.0075987842 |
97 |
No answer |
34 |
1.3% |
0.0129179331 |
98 |
Not asked |
2227 |
|
NA |
r4k27
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Please click whichever alternative is most applicable.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Never been married, had a partner or legally registered partner |
6 |
11.5% |
0.11538462 |
2 |
Married |
28 |
53.8% |
0.53846154 |
3 |
Legally registered partner |
1 |
1.9% |
0.01923077 |
4 |
Partner |
9 |
17.3% |
0.17307692 |
5 |
Divorced/separated |
4 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
6 |
Former partner |
1 |
1.9% |
0.01923077 |
7 |
Former legally registered partner |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
8 |
Widow/widower |
2 |
3.8% |
0.03846154 |
9 |
Other: |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
1.9% |
0.01923077 |
98 |
Not asked |
4807 |
|
NA |
r5k27
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Please click whichever alternative is most applicable.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Never been married, had a partner or legally registered partner |
3 |
9.4% |
0.09375 |
2 |
Married |
15 |
46.9% |
0.46875 |
3 |
Legally registered partner |
0 |
0% |
0.00000 |
4 |
Partner |
7 |
21.9% |
0.21875 |
5 |
Divorced/separated |
3 |
9.4% |
0.09375 |
6 |
Former partner |
1 |
3.1% |
0.03125 |
7 |
Former legally registered partner |
0 |
0% |
0.00000 |
8 |
Widow/widower |
1 |
3.1% |
0.03125 |
9 |
Other: |
0 |
0% |
0.00000 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
6.2% |
0.06250 |
98 |
Not asked |
4827 |
|
NA |
c5k27
Variable label:
|
Marital status [Most recent available data from w01_k27, w03_r3k27, r5k27]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Marital status. Please click whichever alternative is most applicable.
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Never been married, had a partner or legally registered partner |
575 |
11.9% |
0.1185567010 |
2 |
Married |
2704 |
55.8% |
0.5575257732 |
3 |
Legally registered partner |
11 |
0.2% |
0.0022680412 |
4 |
Partner |
856 |
17.6% |
0.1764948454 |
5 |
Divorced/separated |
370 |
7.6% |
0.0762886598 |
6 |
Former partner |
155 |
3.2% |
0.0319587629 |
7 |
Former legally registered partner |
3 |
0.1% |
0.0006185567 |
8 |
Widow/widower |
116 |
2.4% |
0.0239175258 |
9 |
Other: |
41 |
0.8% |
0.0084536082 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
0.4% |
0.0039175258 |
98 |
Not asked |
9 |
|
NA |
w01_k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
2054 |
93.4% |
0.93406094 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
100 |
4.5% |
0.04547522 |
97 |
No answer |
45 |
2% |
0.02046385 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2660 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
2457 |
93.5% |
0.93457588 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
139 |
5.3% |
0.05287181 |
97 |
No answer |
33 |
1.3% |
0.01255230 |
98 |
Not asked |
2230 |
|
NA |
r4k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
46 |
82.1% |
0.82142857 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
7 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
5.4% |
0.05357143 |
98 |
Not asked |
4803 |
|
NA |
r5k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
29 |
87.9% |
0.87878788 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
2 |
6.1% |
0.06060606 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
6.1% |
0.06060606 |
98 |
Not asked |
4826 |
|
NA |
c5k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality [Most recent available data from w01_k28, w03_r3k28, r5k28]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
4586 |
94.6% |
0.945567010 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
248 |
5.1% |
0.051134021 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
0.3% |
0.003298969 |
98 |
Not asked |
9 |
|
NA |
w01_k29
Variable label:
|
Parents immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1971 |
89.6% |
0.896316508 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
110 |
5% |
0.050022738 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
11 |
0.5% |
0.005002274 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
31 |
1.4% |
0.014097317 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
29 |
1.3% |
0.013187813 |
97 |
No answer |
47 |
2.1% |
0.021373352 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2660 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
2360 |
89.7% |
0.896656535 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
141 |
5.4% |
0.053571429 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
16 |
0.6% |
0.006079027 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
47 |
1.8% |
0.017857143 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
37 |
1.4% |
0.014057751 |
97 |
No answer |
31 |
1.2% |
0.011778116 |
98 |
Not asked |
2227 |
|
NA |
r4k29
Variable label:
|
Mother or father immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
45 |
83.3% |
0.83333333 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
4 |
7.4% |
0.07407407 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
1 |
1.9% |
0.01851852 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
2 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
98 |
Not asked |
4805 |
|
NA |
r5k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
26 |
78.8% |
0.78787879 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
5 |
15.2% |
0.15151515 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
6.1% |
0.06060606 |
98 |
Not asked |
4826 |
|
NA |
c5k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway? [Most recent available data from w01_k29, w03_r3k29, r5k29]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
4402 |
90.8% |
0.907628866 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
260 |
5.4% |
0.053608247 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
28 |
0.6% |
0.005773196 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
80 |
1.6% |
0.016494845 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
66 |
1.4% |
0.013608247 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.3% |
0.002886598 |
98 |
Not asked |
9 |
|
NA |
w01_k21
Variable label:
|
Type of business
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
113 |
8.3% |
0.0830882353 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
407 |
29.9% |
0.2992647059 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
88 |
6.5% |
0.0647058824 |
4 |
Private business |
609 |
44.8% |
0.4477941176 |
5 |
Self-employed |
90 |
6.6% |
0.0661764706 |
6 |
Other: |
52 |
3.8% |
0.0382352941 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007352941 |
98 |
Not asked |
3499 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k21
Variable label:
|
Respondents business
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
181 |
10.6% |
0.106470588 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
507 |
29.8% |
0.298235294 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
91 |
5.4% |
0.053529412 |
4 |
Private business |
771 |
45.4% |
0.453529412 |
5 |
Private business |
104 |
6.1% |
0.061176471 |
6 |
Other: |
44 |
2.6% |
0.025882353 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001176471 |
98 |
Not asked |
3159 |
|
NA |
r4k21
Variable label:
|
Works in following business
|
Literal question:
|
What type of company do you work for?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Government, county or municipal administration |
5 |
14.7% |
0.14705882 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school or the health service) |
7 |
20.6% |
0.20588235 |
3 |
Publicly owned company |
1 |
2.9% |
0.02941176 |
4 |
Private company |
17 |
50% |
0.50000000 |
5 |
Self-employed |
4 |
11.8% |
0.11764706 |
6 |
Other: |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4825 |
|
NA |
c4k21
Variable label:
|
Works in following business [Most recent available data from w01_k21, w03_r3k21, r4k21]
|
Pre-question text:
|
What type of company do you work for?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Government, county or municipal administration |
299 |
9.7% |
0.0966386555 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school or the health service) |
921 |
29.8% |
0.2976729153 |
3 |
Publicly owned company |
180 |
5.8% |
0.0581771170 |
4 |
Private company |
1397 |
45.2% |
0.4515190692 |
5 |
Self-employed |
198 |
6.4% |
0.0639948287 |
6 |
Other: |
96 |
3.1% |
0.0310277957 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.1% |
0.0009696186 |
98 |
Not asked |
1765 |
|
NA |
w02_hp1
Variable label:
|
About health condition
|
Literal question:
|
Finally, we would like to ask you a few questions about yourself: In general, would you say your health is:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
275 |
13.9% |
0.138608871 |
2 |
Very good |
791 |
39.9% |
0.398689516 |
3 |
Good |
648 |
32.7% |
0.326612903 |
4 |
Somewhat good |
206 |
10.4% |
0.103830645 |
5 |
Poor |
50 |
2.5% |
0.025201613 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.7% |
0.007056452 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2875 |
|
NA |
w03_r3hp1
Variable label:
|
Health condition
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, would you say that your health is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
541 |
20.8% |
0.20799692 |
2 |
Very good |
1020 |
39.2% |
0.39215686 |
3 |
Good |
694 |
26.7% |
0.26682045 |
4 |
Quite good |
235 |
9% |
0.09034987 |
5 |
Poor |
80 |
3.1% |
0.03075740 |
97 |
No answer |
31 |
1.2% |
0.01191849 |
98 |
Not asked |
2258 |
|
NA |
c3hp1
Variable label:
|
Health condition [Most recent available data from w02_hp1, w03_r3hp1]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Generally speaking, would you say that your health is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable. There are minor differences in question language.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
816 |
17.8% |
0.177971647 |
2 |
Very good |
1811 |
39.5% |
0.394983642 |
3 |
Good |
1342 |
29.3% |
0.292693566 |
4 |
Quite good |
441 |
9.6% |
0.096183206 |
5 |
Poor |
130 |
2.8% |
0.028353326 |
97 |
No answer |
45 |
1% |
0.009814613 |
98 |
Not asked |
274 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k16_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: I have an opinion about most things
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements fit you as a person?
|
Literal question:
|
I have an opinion about most things
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
411 |
9.1% |
0.090828729 |
2 |
A good fit |
1776 |
39.2% |
0.392486188 |
3 |
A somewhat good fit |
1540 |
34% |
0.340331492 |
4 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
468 |
10.3% |
0.103425414 |
5 |
A somewhat bad fit |
222 |
4.9% |
0.049060773 |
6 |
A bad fit |
50 |
1.1% |
0.011049724 |
7 |
A very bad fit |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001767956 |
97 |
No answer |
50 |
1.1% |
0.011049724 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
334 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k16_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: I have strong opinions, either positive or negative, also about issues that are new to me
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements fit you as a person?
|
Literal question:
|
I have strong opinions, either positive or negative, also about issues that are new to me.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very good fit |
122 |
2.7% |
0.02696133 |
2 |
A good fit |
621 |
13.7% |
0.13723757 |
3 |
A somewhat good fit |
1375 |
30.4% |
0.30386740 |
4 |
Neither a good nor bad fit |
1049 |
23.2% |
0.23182320 |
5 |
A somewhat bad fit |
739 |
16.3% |
0.16331492 |
6 |
A bad fit |
423 |
9.3% |
0.09348066 |
7 |
A very bad fit |
81 |
1.8% |
0.01790055 |
97 |
No answer |
115 |
2.5% |
0.02541436 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
334 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k17_1
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: TV
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
Literal question:
|
TV
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
788 |
17.4% |
0.17414365 |
2 |
Daily |
2183 |
48.2% |
0.48243094 |
3 |
Several times a week |
889 |
19.6% |
0.19646409 |
4 |
Less often |
502 |
11.1% |
0.11093923 |
5 |
Never |
112 |
2.5% |
0.02475138 |
97 |
No answer |
51 |
1.1% |
0.01127072 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
334 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k17_2
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Radio
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
Literal question:
|
Radio
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
992 |
21.9% |
0.21922652 |
2 |
Daily |
1506 |
33.3% |
0.33281768 |
3 |
Several times a week |
915 |
20.2% |
0.20220994 |
4 |
Less often |
792 |
17.5% |
0.17502762 |
5 |
Never |
196 |
4.3% |
0.04331492 |
97 |
No answer |
124 |
2.7% |
0.02740331 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
334 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k17_3
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Printed newspaper
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
Literal question:
|
Printed newspaper
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
286 |
6.3% |
0.06320442 |
2 |
Daily |
1991 |
44% |
0.44000000 |
3 |
Several times a week |
751 |
16.6% |
0.16596685 |
4 |
Less often |
1138 |
25.1% |
0.25149171 |
5 |
Never |
240 |
5.3% |
0.05303867 |
97 |
No answer |
119 |
2.6% |
0.02629834 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
334 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k17_4
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Online newspaper
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
Literal question:
|
Online newspaper
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
1561 |
34.5% |
0.34497238 |
2 |
Daily |
1373 |
30.3% |
0.30342541 |
3 |
Several times a week |
764 |
16.9% |
0.16883978 |
4 |
Less often |
568 |
12.6% |
0.12552486 |
5 |
Never |
147 |
3.2% |
0.03248619 |
97 |
No answer |
112 |
2.5% |
0.02475138 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
334 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k17_5
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Facebook
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
Literal question:
|
Facebook
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
643 |
14.2% |
0.14209945 |
2 |
Daily |
851 |
18.8% |
0.18806630 |
3 |
Several times a week |
565 |
12.5% |
0.12486188 |
4 |
Less often |
664 |
14.7% |
0.14674033 |
5 |
Never |
1574 |
34.8% |
0.34784530 |
97 |
No answer |
228 |
5% |
0.05038674 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
334 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k17_6
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Twitter
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
Literal question:
|
Twitter
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
76 |
1.7% |
0.01679558 |
2 |
Daily |
84 |
1.9% |
0.01856354 |
3 |
Several times a week |
136 |
3% |
0.03005525 |
4 |
Less often |
511 |
11.3% |
0.11292818 |
5 |
Never |
3420 |
75.6% |
0.75580110 |
97 |
No answer |
298 |
6.6% |
0.06585635 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
334 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k17_7
Variable label:
|
Use of media to get news: Other websites
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media to stay updated on the news?
|
Literal question:
|
Other websites
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
304 |
6.7% |
0.06718232 |
2 |
Daily |
573 |
12.7% |
0.12662983 |
3 |
Several times a week |
956 |
21.1% |
0.21127072 |
4 |
Less often |
1238 |
27.4% |
0.27359116 |
5 |
Never |
1157 |
25.6% |
0.25569061 |
97 |
No answer |
297 |
6.6% |
0.06563536 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
334 |
|
NA |
c3km26
Variable label:
|
How serious a threat is climate change for you personally? [Combined data from w03_km36, w03_u2_r3km26]
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very serious |
572 |
12.6% |
0.126408840 |
2 |
Serious |
1404 |
31% |
0.310276243 |
3 |
Somewhat serious |
1438 |
31.8% |
0.317790055 |
4 |
Slightly serious |
796 |
17.6% |
0.175911602 |
5 |
Not a threat |
273 |
6% |
0.060331492 |
97 |
No answer |
42 |
0.9% |
0.009281768 |
98 |
Not asked |
334 |
|
NA |
r4k40
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious community?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:integer] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
0 |
|
NaN |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
0 |
|
NaN |
3 |
An orthodox church (Greek, Russian, other) |
0 |
|
NaN |
4 |
Other protestant faiths (e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists,
etc.) |
0 |
|
NaN |
5 |
Other Christian faiths (e.g. Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons) |
0 |
|
NaN |
6 |
The Mosaic faith (Jewish) |
0 |
|
NaN |
7 |
Islam (Muslim) |
0 |
|
NaN |
8 |
Eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism,
Confucianism) |
0 |
|
NaN |
9 |
Other non-Christian religions |
0 |
|
NaN |
10 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
0 |
|
NaN |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
|
NaN |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
4859 |
|
NA |
r5k40
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious community?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:integer] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
0 |
|
NaN |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
0 |
|
NaN |
3 |
An orthodox church (Greek, Russian, other) |
0 |
|
NaN |
4 |
Other protestant faiths (e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists,
etc.) |
0 |
|
NaN |
5 |
Other Christian faiths (e.g. Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons) |
0 |
|
NaN |
6 |
The Mosaic faith (Jewish) |
0 |
|
NaN |
7 |
Islam (Muslim) |
0 |
|
NaN |
8 |
Eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism,
Confucianism) |
0 |
|
NaN |
9 |
Other non-Christian religions |
0 |
|
NaN |
10 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
0 |
|
NaN |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
|
NaN |
98 |
Not asked |
4859 |
|
NA |
c5k40
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [Most recent available data from r4k40_recode, r5k40_recode]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious community?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
3075 |
66.7% |
0.666738942 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
52 |
1.1% |
0.011274935 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
178 |
3.9% |
0.038594970 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
46 |
1% |
0.009973981 |
5 |
Islam |
23 |
0.5% |
0.004986990 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
1197 |
26% |
0.259540330 |
97 |
No answer |
41 |
0.9% |
0.008889853 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
247 |
|
NA |
r4k41
Variable label:
|
Attending religious meetings
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say that you attend religions meetings at the moment?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Daily |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001428912 |
2 |
More than once a week |
71 |
1.7% |
0.016908788 |
3 |
Once a week |
129 |
3.1% |
0.030721600 |
4 |
At least once a month |
199 |
4.7% |
0.047392236 |
5 |
Only at special festivals |
880 |
21% |
0.209573708 |
6 |
Less often |
1034 |
24.6% |
0.246249107 |
7 |
Never |
1880 |
44.8% |
0.447725649 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
660 |
|
NA |
r5k41
Variable label:
|
Attend religious meetings
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say that you attend religions meetings at the moment?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Daily |
1 |
0.3% |
0.002531646 |
2 |
More than once a week |
4 |
1% |
0.010126582 |
3 |
Once a week |
8 |
2% |
0.020253165 |
4 |
At least once a month |
18 |
4.6% |
0.045569620 |
5 |
Only at special festivals |
104 |
26.3% |
0.263291139 |
6 |
Less often |
81 |
20.5% |
0.205063291 |
7 |
Never |
158 |
40% |
0.400000000 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
5.3% |
0.053164557 |
98 |
Not asked |
4464 |
|
NA |
c5k41
Variable label:
|
Attend religious meetings [Most recent available data from r4k41, r5k41]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say that you attend religions meetings at the moment?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Daily |
7 |
0.2% |
0.001523727 |
2 |
More than once a week |
75 |
1.6% |
0.016325642 |
3 |
Once a week |
137 |
3% |
0.029821506 |
4 |
At least once a month |
217 |
4.7% |
0.047235525 |
5 |
Only at special festivals |
984 |
21.4% |
0.214192425 |
6 |
Less often |
1115 |
24.3% |
0.242707880 |
7 |
Never |
2038 |
44.4% |
0.443622116 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
0.5% |
0.004571180 |
98 |
Not asked |
265 |
|
NA |
r4k42
Variable label:
|
Living with children under 16 years
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you, and if so, how many?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
None |
3181 |
76.1% |
0.7608227697 |
2 |
1 |
425 |
10.2% |
0.1016503229 |
3 |
2 |
445 |
10.6% |
0.1064338675 |
4 |
3 |
114 |
2.7% |
0.0272662043 |
5 |
4 |
14 |
0.3% |
0.0033484812 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
0% |
0.0002391772 |
7 |
6 or more |
1 |
0% |
0.0002391772 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000000 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
678 |
|
NA |
r5k42
Variable label:
|
Living with children under 16
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you, and if so, how many?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
None |
279 |
67.6% |
0.675544794 |
2 |
1 |
44 |
10.7% |
0.106537530 |
3 |
2 |
46 |
11.1% |
0.111380145 |
4 |
3 |
18 |
4.4% |
0.043583535 |
5 |
4 |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002421308 |
7 |
6 or more |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
6.1% |
0.060532688 |
98 |
Not asked |
4446 |
|
NA |
c5k42
Variable label:
|
Living with children under 16 [Most recent available data from r4k42, r5k42]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you, and if so, how many?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
None |
3460 |
75.3% |
0.7531562908 |
2 |
1 |
469 |
10.2% |
0.1020896822 |
3 |
2 |
491 |
10.7% |
0.1068785372 |
4 |
3 |
132 |
2.9% |
0.0287331302 |
5 |
4 |
14 |
0.3% |
0.0030474532 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
0% |
0.0004353505 |
7 |
6 or more |
1 |
0% |
0.0002176752 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
0.5% |
0.0054418807 |
98 |
Not asked |
265 |
|
NA |
r5k1
Variable label:
|
Interest in politics
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
503 |
12% |
0.119619501 |
2 |
Interested |
2066 |
49.1% |
0.491319857 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
1300 |
30.9% |
0.309155767 |
4 |
Not very interested |
292 |
6.9% |
0.069441141 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
38 |
0.9% |
0.009036861 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001426873 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5k2
Variable label:
|
Voted in local elections
|
Literal question:
|
Did you vote in the local government elections this autumn?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, I voted in both the municipal and county council elections |
3400 |
80.9% |
0.808561237 |
2 |
Yes, but I only voted in the municipal council election |
348 |
8.3% |
0.082758621 |
3 |
Yes, but I only voted in the county council election |
10 |
0.2% |
0.002378121 |
4 |
No |
411 |
9.8% |
0.097740785 |
97 |
No answer |
36 |
0.9% |
0.008561237 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5k43_1
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party at local elections
|
Pre-question text:
|
What party did you vote for in the local election?
|
Literal question:
|
Municipal council election
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0 and R5K2<=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Red Party |
125 |
3.3% |
0.0329641350 |
2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
231 |
6.1% |
0.0609177215 |
3 |
The Labour Party |
1148 |
30.3% |
0.3027426160 |
4 |
The Christian Democrats |
178 |
4.7% |
0.0469409283 |
5 |
The Liberal Party |
268 |
7.1% |
0.0706751055 |
6 |
The Conservative Party |
903 |
23.8% |
0.2381329114 |
7 |
The Progress Party |
281 |
7.4% |
0.0741033755 |
8 |
The Green Party |
216 |
5.7% |
0.0569620253 |
9 |
The Centre Party |
268 |
7.1% |
0.0706751055 |
10 |
Other party/local list |
123 |
3.2% |
0.0324367089 |
11 |
Did not vote |
8 |
0.2% |
0.0021097046 |
12 |
Not entitled to vote |
1 |
0% |
0.0002637131 |
97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.0110759494 |
98 |
Not asked |
1067 |
|
NA |
r5k43_2
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party at county council election
|
Pre-question text:
|
What party did you vote for in the local election?
|
Literal question:
|
County council election
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0 and R5K2<=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Red Party |
100 |
2.6% |
0.026406126 |
2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
200 |
5.3% |
0.052812252 |
3 |
The Labour Party |
1083 |
28.6% |
0.285978347 |
4 |
The Christian Democrats |
182 |
4.8% |
0.048059150 |
5 |
The Liberal Party |
214 |
5.7% |
0.056509110 |
6 |
The Conservative Party |
811 |
21.4% |
0.214153684 |
7 |
The Progress Party |
258 |
6.8% |
0.068127806 |
8 |
The Green Party |
235 |
6.2% |
0.062054397 |
9 |
The Centre Party |
205 |
5.4% |
0.054132559 |
10 |
Other party/local list |
68 |
1.8% |
0.017956166 |
11 |
Did not vote |
86 |
2.3% |
0.022709269 |
12 |
Not entitled to vote |
9 |
0.2% |
0.002376551 |
97 |
No answer |
336 |
8.9% |
0.088724584 |
98 |
Not asked |
1072 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4a_1
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The parliament
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The parliament
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
41 |
12.7% |
0.126543210 |
2 |
High trust |
182 |
56.2% |
0.561728395 |
3 |
Some trust |
81 |
25% |
0.250000000 |
4 |
Low trust |
14 |
4.3% |
0.043209877 |
5 |
No trust at all |
3 |
0.9% |
0.009259259 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.9% |
0.009259259 |
98 |
Not asked |
4535 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4b_1
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The parliament
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The parliament
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
42 |
11.7% |
0.117318436 |
2 |
High trust |
202 |
56.4% |
0.564245810 |
3 |
Some trust |
86 |
24% |
0.240223464 |
4 |
Low trust |
22 |
6.1% |
0.061452514 |
5 |
No trust at all |
2 |
0.6% |
0.005586592 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.1% |
0.011173184 |
98 |
Not asked |
4501 |
|
NA |
r5k12_1
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The parliament
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence do you have in the following institutions and entities?
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian parliament
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
204 |
6.4% |
0.063869756 |
2 |
High trust |
1612 |
50.5% |
0.504696306 |
3 |
Some trust |
1106 |
34.6% |
0.346274264 |
4 |
Low trust |
209 |
6.5% |
0.065435191 |
5 |
No trust at all |
40 |
1.3% |
0.012523482 |
97 |
No answer |
23 |
0.7% |
0.007201002 |
98 |
Not asked |
1665 |
|
NA |
c5k12_1
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The parliament [Combined data from r5ocrecsm4a_1, r5ocrecsm4b_1]
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The parliament
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
287 |
7.4% |
0.074045408 |
2 |
High trust |
1996 |
51.5% |
0.514963880 |
3 |
Some trust |
1273 |
32.8% |
0.328431373 |
4 |
Low trust |
245 |
6.3% |
0.063209494 |
5 |
No trust at all |
45 |
1.2% |
0.011609907 |
97 |
No answer |
30 |
0.8% |
0.007739938 |
98 |
Not asked |
983 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4a_2
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The county council
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The county council
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
3 |
0.9% |
0.009259259 |
2 |
High trust |
115 |
35.5% |
0.354938272 |
3 |
Some trust |
149 |
46% |
0.459876543 |
4 |
Low trust |
45 |
13.9% |
0.138888889 |
5 |
No trust at all |
5 |
1.5% |
0.015432099 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.2% |
0.021604938 |
98 |
Not asked |
4535 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4b_2
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The county council
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The county council
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
12 |
3.4% |
0.03351955 |
2 |
High trust |
106 |
29.6% |
0.29608939 |
3 |
Some trust |
168 |
46.9% |
0.46927374 |
4 |
Low trust |
58 |
16.2% |
0.16201117 |
5 |
No trust at all |
5 |
1.4% |
0.01396648 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
2.5% |
0.02513966 |
98 |
Not asked |
4501 |
|
NA |
r5k12_2
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The county council
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence do you have in the following institutions and entities?
|
Literal question:
|
The county council
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
45 |
1.4% |
0.01408892 |
2 |
High trust |
873 |
27.3% |
0.27332498 |
3 |
Some trust |
1665 |
52.1% |
0.52128992 |
4 |
Low trust |
457 |
14.3% |
0.14308078 |
5 |
No trust at all |
87 |
2.7% |
0.02723857 |
97 |
No answer |
67 |
2.1% |
0.02097683 |
98 |
Not asked |
1665 |
|
NA |
c5k12_2
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The county council [Combined data from r5ocrecsm4a_2, r5ocrecsm4b_2]
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The county council
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
60 |
1.5% |
0.01547988 |
2 |
High trust |
1094 |
28.2% |
0.28224974 |
3 |
Some trust |
1982 |
51.1% |
0.51135191 |
4 |
Low trust |
560 |
14.4% |
0.14447884 |
5 |
No trust at all |
97 |
2.5% |
0.02502580 |
97 |
No answer |
83 |
2.1% |
0.02141383 |
98 |
Not asked |
983 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4a_3
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The municipal council
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The municipal council
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
7 |
2.2% |
0.02160494 |
2 |
High trust |
124 |
38.3% |
0.38271605 |
3 |
Some trust |
148 |
45.7% |
0.45679012 |
4 |
Low trust |
34 |
10.5% |
0.10493827 |
5 |
No trust at all |
6 |
1.9% |
0.01851852 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.5% |
0.01543210 |
98 |
Not asked |
4535 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4b_3
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The municipal council
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The municipal council
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
13 |
3.6% |
0.03631285 |
2 |
High trust |
136 |
38% |
0.37988827 |
3 |
Some trust |
153 |
42.7% |
0.42737430 |
4 |
Low trust |
42 |
11.7% |
0.11731844 |
5 |
No trust at all |
8 |
2.2% |
0.02234637 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.7% |
0.01675978 |
98 |
Not asked |
4501 |
|
NA |
r5k12_3
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The municipal council
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence do you have in the following institutions and entities?
|
Literal question:
|
The municipal council
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
46 |
1.4% |
0.014402004 |
2 |
High trust |
1059 |
33.2% |
0.331559173 |
3 |
Some trust |
1590 |
49.8% |
0.497808391 |
4 |
Low trust |
418 |
13.1% |
0.130870382 |
5 |
No trust at all |
53 |
1.7% |
0.016593613 |
97 |
No answer |
28 |
0.9% |
0.008766437 |
98 |
Not asked |
1665 |
|
NA |
c5k12_3
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The municipal council [Combined data from r5ocrecsm4a_3, r5ocrecsm4b_3]
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The municipal council
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
66 |
1.7% |
0.01702786 |
2 |
High trust |
1319 |
34% |
0.34029928 |
3 |
Some trust |
1891 |
48.8% |
0.48787410 |
4 |
Low trust |
494 |
12.7% |
0.12745098 |
5 |
No trust at all |
67 |
1.7% |
0.01728586 |
97 |
No answer |
39 |
1% |
0.01006192 |
98 |
Not asked |
983 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4a_4
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The EU
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The EU
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
6 |
1.9% |
0.01851852 |
2 |
High trust |
56 |
17.3% |
0.17283951 |
3 |
Some trust |
144 |
44.4% |
0.44444444 |
4 |
Low trust |
79 |
24.4% |
0.24382716 |
5 |
No trust at all |
34 |
10.5% |
0.10493827 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.5% |
0.01543210 |
98 |
Not asked |
4535 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4b_4
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The EU
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The EU
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
2 |
0.6% |
0.005586592 |
2 |
High trust |
65 |
18.2% |
0.181564246 |
3 |
Some trust |
143 |
39.9% |
0.399441341 |
4 |
Low trust |
102 |
28.5% |
0.284916201 |
5 |
No trust at all |
37 |
10.3% |
0.103351955 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
2.5% |
0.025139665 |
98 |
Not asked |
4501 |
|
NA |
r5k12_4
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The EU
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence do you have in the following institutions and entities?
|
Literal question:
|
The EU
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
29 |
0.9% |
0.009079524 |
2 |
High trust |
536 |
16.8% |
0.167814652 |
3 |
Some trust |
1421 |
44.5% |
0.444896681 |
4 |
Low trust |
901 |
28.2% |
0.282091421 |
5 |
No trust at all |
267 |
8.4% |
0.083594239 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
1.3% |
0.012523482 |
98 |
Not asked |
1665 |
|
NA |
c5k12_4
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The EU [Combined data from r5ocrecsm4a_4, r5ocrecsm4b_4]
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The EU
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
37 |
1% |
0.009545924 |
2 |
High trust |
657 |
17% |
0.169504644 |
3 |
Some trust |
1708 |
44.1% |
0.440660475 |
4 |
Low trust |
1082 |
27.9% |
0.279153767 |
5 |
No trust at all |
338 |
8.7% |
0.087203302 |
97 |
No answer |
54 |
1.4% |
0.013931889 |
98 |
Not asked |
983 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4a_5
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The judiciary
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The judiciary
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
88 |
27.2% |
0.271604938 |
2 |
High trust |
166 |
51.2% |
0.512345679 |
3 |
Some trust |
55 |
17% |
0.169753086 |
4 |
Low trust |
7 |
2.2% |
0.021604938 |
5 |
No trust at all |
3 |
0.9% |
0.009259259 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.5% |
0.015432099 |
98 |
Not asked |
4535 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4b_5
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The judiciary
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The judiciary
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
93 |
26% |
0.25977654 |
2 |
High trust |
171 |
47.8% |
0.47765363 |
3 |
Some trust |
66 |
18.4% |
0.18435754 |
4 |
Low trust |
17 |
4.7% |
0.04748603 |
5 |
No trust at all |
4 |
1.1% |
0.01117318 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2% |
0.01955307 |
98 |
Not asked |
4501 |
|
NA |
r5k12_5
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The judiciary
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence do you have in the following institutions and entities?
|
Literal question:
|
The law courts
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
755 |
23.6% |
0.236380714 |
2 |
High trust |
1844 |
57.7% |
0.577332498 |
3 |
Some trust |
452 |
14.2% |
0.141515341 |
4 |
Low trust |
106 |
3.3% |
0.033187226 |
5 |
No trust at all |
13 |
0.4% |
0.004070131 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
0.8% |
0.007514089 |
98 |
Not asked |
1665 |
|
NA |
c5k12_5
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The judiciary [Combined data from r5ocrecsm4a_5, r5ocrecsm4b_5]
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The judiciary
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
936 |
24.1% |
0.241486068 |
2 |
High trust |
2181 |
56.3% |
0.562693498 |
3 |
Some trust |
573 |
14.8% |
0.147832817 |
4 |
Low trust |
130 |
3.4% |
0.033539732 |
5 |
No trust at all |
20 |
0.5% |
0.005159959 |
97 |
No answer |
36 |
0.9% |
0.009287926 |
98 |
Not asked |
983 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4a_6
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: Politicians
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
2 |
0.6% |
0.00617284 |
2 |
High trust |
62 |
19.1% |
0.19135802 |
3 |
Some trust |
175 |
54% |
0.54012346 |
4 |
Low trust |
73 |
22.5% |
0.22530864 |
5 |
No trust at all |
8 |
2.5% |
0.02469136 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
4535 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4b_6
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: Politicians
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
2 |
0.6% |
0.005586592 |
2 |
High trust |
56 |
15.6% |
0.156424581 |
3 |
Some trust |
195 |
54.5% |
0.544692737 |
4 |
Low trust |
88 |
24.6% |
0.245810056 |
5 |
No trust at all |
11 |
3.1% |
0.030726257 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.7% |
0.016759777 |
98 |
Not asked |
4501 |
|
NA |
r5k12_6
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: Politicians
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence do you have in the following institutions and entities?
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
11 |
0.3% |
0.003443957 |
2 |
High trust |
626 |
19.6% |
0.195992486 |
3 |
Some trust |
1791 |
56.1% |
0.560738885 |
4 |
Low trust |
641 |
20.1% |
0.200688791 |
5 |
No trust at all |
93 |
2.9% |
0.029117095 |
97 |
No answer |
32 |
1% |
0.010018785 |
98 |
Not asked |
1665 |
|
NA |
c5k12_6
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: Politicians [Combined data from r5ocrecsm4a_6, r5ocrecsm4b_6]
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
15 |
0.4% |
0.003869969 |
2 |
High trust |
744 |
19.2% |
0.191950464 |
3 |
Some trust |
2161 |
55.8% |
0.557533540 |
4 |
Low trust |
802 |
20.7% |
0.206914345 |
5 |
No trust at all |
112 |
2.9% |
0.028895769 |
97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.1% |
0.010835913 |
98 |
Not asked |
983 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4a_7
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The police
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The police
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
36 |
11.1% |
0.111111111 |
2 |
High trust |
208 |
64.2% |
0.641975309 |
3 |
Some trust |
63 |
19.4% |
0.194444444 |
4 |
Low trust |
12 |
3.7% |
0.037037037 |
5 |
No trust at all |
2 |
0.6% |
0.006172840 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.9% |
0.009259259 |
98 |
Not asked |
4535 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4b_7
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The police
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The police
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
65 |
18.2% |
0.18156425 |
2 |
High trust |
180 |
50.3% |
0.50279330 |
3 |
Some trust |
85 |
23.7% |
0.23743017 |
4 |
Low trust |
19 |
5.3% |
0.05307263 |
5 |
No trust at all |
5 |
1.4% |
0.01396648 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.1% |
0.01117318 |
98 |
Not asked |
4501 |
|
NA |
r5k12_7
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The police
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much confidence do you have in the following institutions and entities?
|
Literal question:
|
The police
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=1 OR u=2 OR u=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
435 |
13.6% |
0.136192862 |
2 |
High trust |
1847 |
57.8% |
0.578271760 |
3 |
Some trust |
725 |
22.7% |
0.226988103 |
4 |
Low trust |
144 |
4.5% |
0.045084534 |
5 |
No trust at all |
19 |
0.6% |
0.005948654 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
0.8% |
0.007514089 |
98 |
Not asked |
1665 |
|
NA |
c5k12_7
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions: The police [Combined data from r5ocrecsm4a_7, r5ocrecsm4b_7]
|
Pre-question text:
|
How high is your trust in the following institutions?
|
Literal question:
|
The police
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high trust |
536 |
13.8% |
0.138286894 |
2 |
High trust |
2235 |
57.7% |
0.576625387 |
3 |
Some trust |
873 |
22.5% |
0.225232198 |
4 |
Low trust |
175 |
4.5% |
0.045149639 |
5 |
No trust at all |
26 |
0.7% |
0.006707946 |
97 |
No answer |
31 |
0.8% |
0.007997936 |
98 |
Not asked |
983 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4c_1
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions on a scale: The parliament
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please indicate on a score of 0-10 how much you personally trust each of these institutions. 0 means you do not trust the institution at all and 10 means you have complete trust.
|
Literal question:
|
The parliament
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Not trust at all |
2 |
0.6% |
0.006079027 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
0.9% |
0.009118541 |
3 |
2 |
8 |
2.4% |
0.024316109 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
1.5% |
0.015197568 |
5 |
4 |
24 |
7.3% |
0.072948328 |
6 |
5 |
36 |
10.9% |
0.109422492 |
7 |
6 |
38 |
11.6% |
0.115501520 |
8 |
7 |
57 |
17.3% |
0.173252280 |
9 |
8 |
93 |
28.3% |
0.282674772 |
10 |
9 |
32 |
9.7% |
0.097264438 |
11 |
10 Complete trust |
30 |
9.1% |
0.091185410 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003039514 |
98 |
Not asked |
4530 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4c_2
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions on a scale: The judiciary
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please indicate on a score of 0-10 how much you personally trust each of these institutions. 0 means you do not trust the institution at all and 10 means you have complete trust.
|
Literal question:
|
The judiciary
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Not trust at all |
4 |
1.2% |
0.012158055 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0.6% |
0.006079027 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
0.6% |
0.006079027 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
1.8% |
0.018237082 |
5 |
4 |
11 |
3.3% |
0.033434650 |
6 |
5 |
25 |
7.6% |
0.075987842 |
7 |
6 |
24 |
7.3% |
0.072948328 |
8 |
7 |
55 |
16.7% |
0.167173252 |
9 |
8 |
87 |
26.4% |
0.264437690 |
10 |
9 |
70 |
21.3% |
0.212765957 |
11 |
10 Complete trust |
43 |
13.1% |
0.130699088 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4530 |
|
NA |
r5ocrecsm4c_3
Variable label:
|
Trust in institutions on a scale: The police
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please indicate on a score of 0-10 how much you personally trust each of these institutions. 0 means you do not trust the institution at all and 10 means you have complete trust.
|
Literal question:
|
The police
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=3 and ran20=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Not trust at all |
3 |
0.9% |
0.009118541 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
0.6% |
0.006079027 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
1.5% |
0.015197568 |
4 |
3 |
9 |
2.7% |
0.027355623 |
5 |
4 |
16 |
4.9% |
0.048632219 |
6 |
5 |
31 |
9.4% |
0.094224924 |
7 |
6 |
47 |
14.3% |
0.142857143 |
8 |
7 |
54 |
16.4% |
0.164133739 |
9 |
8 |
91 |
27.7% |
0.276595745 |
10 |
9 |
39 |
11.9% |
0.118541033 |
11 |
10 Complete trust |
31 |
9.4% |
0.094224924 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003039514 |
98 |
Not asked |
4530 |
|
NA |
r5k15_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Most people can be trusted
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
Technical description:
|
State your opinion on the scale below. This goes from 0 to 10, where 0 means “Cannot be careful enough” and 10 means “Most people can be trusted”.
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Cannot be careful enough |
45 |
1.1% |
0.010701546 |
2 |
1 |
29 |
0.7% |
0.006896552 |
3 |
2 |
60 |
1.4% |
0.014268728 |
4 |
3 |
145 |
3.4% |
0.034482759 |
5 |
4 |
172 |
4.1% |
0.040903686 |
6 |
5 |
451 |
10.7% |
0.107253270 |
7 |
6 |
502 |
11.9% |
0.119381688 |
8 |
7 |
1078 |
25.6% |
0.256361474 |
9 |
8 |
941 |
22.4% |
0.223781213 |
10 |
9 |
392 |
9.3% |
0.093222354 |
11 |
10 Most people can be trusted |
375 |
8.9% |
0.089179548 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
0.4% |
0.003567182 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5k8_1
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those that are politically on the far left, and10 represents those that are politically on the far right.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you position yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
64 |
1.5% |
0.015219976 |
2 |
1 |
129 |
3.1% |
0.030677765 |
3 |
2 |
348 |
8.3% |
0.082758621 |
4 |
3 |
592 |
14.1% |
0.140784780 |
5 |
4 |
522 |
12.4% |
0.124137931 |
6 |
5 |
669 |
15.9% |
0.159096314 |
7 |
6 |
504 |
12% |
0.119857313 |
8 |
7 |
642 |
15.3% |
0.152675386 |
9 |
8 |
458 |
10.9% |
0.108917955 |
10 |
9 |
140 |
3.3% |
0.033293698 |
11 |
10 Right |
103 |
2.4% |
0.024494649 |
97 |
No answer |
34 |
0.8% |
0.008085612 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5dt16_1
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Christian Democrats
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
34 |
0.8% |
0.008085612 |
2 |
1 |
36 |
0.9% |
0.008561237 |
3 |
2 |
102 |
2.4% |
0.024256837 |
4 |
3 |
213 |
5.1% |
0.050653983 |
5 |
4 |
476 |
11.3% |
0.113198573 |
6 |
5 |
1145 |
27.2% |
0.272294887 |
7 |
6 |
952 |
22.6% |
0.226397146 |
8 |
7 |
641 |
15.2% |
0.152437574 |
9 |
8 |
269 |
6.4% |
0.063971463 |
10 |
9 |
95 |
2.3% |
0.022592152 |
11 |
10 Right |
47 |
1.1% |
0.011177170 |
97 |
No answer |
195 |
4.6% |
0.046373365 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5dt16_2
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Conservative Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
3 |
0.1% |
0.0007134364 |
2 |
1 |
7 |
0.2% |
0.0016646849 |
3 |
2 |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0011890606 |
4 |
3 |
13 |
0.3% |
0.0030915577 |
5 |
4 |
22 |
0.5% |
0.0052318668 |
6 |
5 |
100 |
2.4% |
0.0237812128 |
7 |
6 |
187 |
4.4% |
0.0444708680 |
8 |
7 |
627 |
14.9% |
0.1491082045 |
9 |
8 |
1274 |
30.3% |
0.3029726516 |
10 |
9 |
1112 |
26.4% |
0.2644470868 |
11 |
10 Right |
685 |
16.3% |
0.1629013080 |
97 |
No answer |
170 |
4% |
0.0404280618 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5dt16_3
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Progress Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
16 |
0.4% |
0.003804994 |
2 |
1 |
7 |
0.2% |
0.001664685 |
3 |
2 |
20 |
0.5% |
0.004756243 |
4 |
3 |
21 |
0.5% |
0.004994055 |
5 |
4 |
34 |
0.8% |
0.008085612 |
6 |
5 |
120 |
2.9% |
0.028537455 |
7 |
6 |
84 |
2% |
0.019976219 |
8 |
7 |
178 |
4.2% |
0.042330559 |
9 |
8 |
483 |
11.5% |
0.114863258 |
10 |
9 |
1012 |
24.1% |
0.240665874 |
11 |
10 Right |
2059 |
49% |
0.489655172 |
97 |
No answer |
171 |
4.1% |
0.040665874 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5dt16_4
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
313 |
7.4% |
0.074435196 |
2 |
1 |
183 |
4.4% |
0.043519620 |
3 |
2 |
283 |
6.7% |
0.067300832 |
4 |
3 |
384 |
9.1% |
0.091319857 |
5 |
4 |
450 |
10.7% |
0.107015458 |
6 |
5 |
838 |
19.9% |
0.199286564 |
7 |
6 |
831 |
19.8% |
0.197621879 |
8 |
7 |
485 |
11.5% |
0.115338882 |
9 |
8 |
170 |
4% |
0.040428062 |
10 |
9 |
66 |
1.6% |
0.015695600 |
11 |
10 Right |
25 |
0.6% |
0.005945303 |
97 |
No answer |
177 |
4.2% |
0.042092747 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5dt16_5
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
616 |
14.6% |
0.1464922711 |
2 |
1 |
1389 |
33% |
0.3303210464 |
3 |
2 |
1197 |
28.5% |
0.2846611177 |
4 |
3 |
509 |
12.1% |
0.1210463734 |
5 |
4 |
136 |
3.2% |
0.0323424495 |
6 |
5 |
131 |
3.1% |
0.0311533888 |
7 |
6 |
23 |
0.5% |
0.0054696790 |
8 |
7 |
6 |
0.1% |
0.0014268728 |
9 |
8 |
12 |
0.3% |
0.0028537455 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
0.2% |
0.0021403092 |
11 |
10 Right |
3 |
0.1% |
0.0007134364 |
97 |
No answer |
174 |
4.1% |
0.0413793103 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5dt16_6
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
47 |
1.1% |
0.011177170 |
2 |
1 |
73 |
1.7% |
0.017360285 |
3 |
2 |
210 |
5% |
0.049940547 |
4 |
3 |
501 |
11.9% |
0.119143876 |
5 |
4 |
940 |
22.4% |
0.223543401 |
6 |
5 |
1383 |
32.9% |
0.328894174 |
7 |
6 |
525 |
12.5% |
0.124851367 |
8 |
7 |
231 |
5.5% |
0.054934602 |
9 |
8 |
65 |
1.5% |
0.015457788 |
10 |
9 |
20 |
0.5% |
0.004756243 |
11 |
10 Right |
10 |
0.2% |
0.002378121 |
97 |
No answer |
200 |
4.8% |
0.047562426 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5dt16_7
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
372 |
8.8% |
0.088466112 |
2 |
1 |
471 |
11.2% |
0.112009512 |
3 |
2 |
610 |
14.5% |
0.145065398 |
4 |
3 |
762 |
18.1% |
0.181212842 |
5 |
4 |
742 |
17.6% |
0.176456599 |
6 |
5 |
785 |
18.7% |
0.186682521 |
7 |
6 |
138 |
3.3% |
0.032818074 |
8 |
7 |
54 |
1.3% |
0.012841855 |
9 |
8 |
19 |
0.5% |
0.004518430 |
10 |
9 |
12 |
0.3% |
0.002853746 |
11 |
10 Right |
15 |
0.4% |
0.003567182 |
97 |
No answer |
225 |
5.4% |
0.053507729 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5dt16_8
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
90 |
2.1% |
0.021403092 |
2 |
1 |
178 |
4.2% |
0.042330559 |
3 |
2 |
533 |
12.7% |
0.126753864 |
4 |
3 |
931 |
22.1% |
0.221403092 |
5 |
4 |
955 |
22.7% |
0.227110583 |
6 |
5 |
797 |
19% |
0.189536266 |
7 |
6 |
314 |
7.5% |
0.074673008 |
8 |
7 |
128 |
3% |
0.030439952 |
9 |
8 |
68 |
1.6% |
0.016171225 |
10 |
9 |
21 |
0.5% |
0.004994055 |
11 |
10 Right |
12 |
0.3% |
0.002853746 |
97 |
No answer |
178 |
4.2% |
0.042330559 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5dt16_9
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale: The Red Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
2495 |
59.3% |
0.593341260 |
2 |
1 |
795 |
18.9% |
0.189060642 |
3 |
2 |
266 |
6.3% |
0.063258026 |
4 |
3 |
127 |
3% |
0.030202140 |
5 |
4 |
79 |
1.9% |
0.018787158 |
6 |
5 |
146 |
3.5% |
0.034720571 |
7 |
6 |
30 |
0.7% |
0.007134364 |
8 |
7 |
30 |
0.7% |
0.007134364 |
9 |
8 |
17 |
0.4% |
0.004042806 |
10 |
9 |
19 |
0.5% |
0.004518430 |
11 |
10 Right |
18 |
0.4% |
0.004280618 |
97 |
No answer |
183 |
4.4% |
0.043519620 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5nfc_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: I prefer complicated rather than easy tasks
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
I prefer complicated rather than easy tasks
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
278 |
6.6% |
0.066111772 |
2 |
Agree |
1134 |
27% |
0.269678954 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1277 |
30.4% |
0.303686088 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1000 |
23.8% |
0.237812128 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
302 |
7.2% |
0.071819263 |
6 |
Disagree |
132 |
3.1% |
0.031391201 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
26 |
0.6% |
0.006183115 |
97 |
No answer |
56 |
1.3% |
0.013317479 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5nfc_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: I really like tasks where the idea is to come up with new solutions
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
I really like tasks where the idea is to come up with new solutions.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
588 |
14% |
0.139833532 |
2 |
Agree |
1794 |
42.7% |
0.426634958 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1149 |
27.3% |
0.273246136 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
470 |
11.2% |
0.111771700 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
111 |
2.6% |
0.026397146 |
6 |
Disagree |
32 |
0.8% |
0.007609988 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001902497 |
97 |
No answer |
53 |
1.3% |
0.012604043 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5nfc_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: I would prefer a task that is intellectual and complex rather than one that needs little thought
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
I would prefer a task that is intellectual and complex rather than one that needs little thought.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
479 |
11.4% |
0.113912010 |
2 |
Agree |
1410 |
33.5% |
0.335315101 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1050 |
25% |
0.249702735 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
815 |
19.4% |
0.193816885 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
252 |
6% |
0.059928656 |
6 |
Disagree |
122 |
2.9% |
0.029013080 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
18 |
0.4% |
0.004280618 |
97 |
No answer |
59 |
1.4% |
0.014030916 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5nte_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: I have an opinion about most things
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
I have an opinion about most things
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
248 |
5.9% |
0.058977408 |
2 |
Agree |
1173 |
27.9% |
0.278953627 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1583 |
37.6% |
0.376456599 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
523 |
12.4% |
0.124375743 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
446 |
10.6% |
0.106064209 |
6 |
Disagree |
186 |
4.4% |
0.044233056 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
0.5% |
0.004994055 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
0.6% |
0.005945303 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |
r5nte_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: I think it is important to have a view on whether something is right or wrong
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
I think it is important to have a view on whether something is right or wrong
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4859] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
874 |
20.8% |
0.207847800 |
2 |
Agree |
1855 |
44.1% |
0.441141498 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
899 |
21.4% |
0.213793103 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
320 |
7.6% |
0.076099881 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
160 |
3.8% |
0.038049941 |
6 |
Disagree |
58 |
1.4% |
0.013793103 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
14 |
0.3% |
0.003329370 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
0.6% |
0.005945303 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
654 |
|
NA |