Citation
Primary investigators
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen (UiB)
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
Coordinator, UiB
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
Sveinung Arnesen
|
NORCE
|
Susanne Bygnes
|
UiB
|
Endre Tvinnereim
|
UiB
|
Nina Serdarevic
|
UiB
|
Lise Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
Arjan Schakel
|
UiB
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
Kristine Bærøe
|
UiB
|
Producers
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project Team Member
|
Amund Eikrem
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project Team Member
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality Assurance
|
Study description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company Ideas 2 Evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates is available at www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic Coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of Analysis: Individual
Universe: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.
Methodology - Data Collection
Sampling Procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in five waves, wave 1, wave 3, wave 8, wave 11 and wave 14. In wave 1, 4.870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3, 5.623 members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8, 4245 new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8). In wave 11, 2069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11). In wave 14, 2036 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 14).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn. Equally, in wave 14, a gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
14 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment. Please refer to the Documentation Report from Wave 14. The report is available here: http://digsscore.uib.no/download-data-and-documentation
In wave 15, emails were sent out on May 21st, 2019.
E-mail with reminder was sent out three times, May 29th, June 9th and June 7th, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message. Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by e-mail.
Wave 15 ended June 10th.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent's geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
v-101
|
2020-08-28
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 15
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 15
|
NA
|
2019-12-10
|
r15km_a_open
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2019-12-10
|
r15arbeidolje1
|
Updated conditions and missing values.
|
NA
|
2019-12-10
|
r15_arbeidolje2
|
Updated conditions and missing values.
|
NA
|
2019-12-10
|
r15arbeidolje_2b
|
Updated conditions and missing values.
|
NA
|
2019-08-15
|
r15helse6
|
Flipped answer scale (0 - 100, 100 - 0). Added value labels on end points.
|
v-100
|
2019-06-21
|
NA
|
Initial release of round 15
|
Dataset contents
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 15 - v-101.sav
|
# Cases
|
8105
|
# Variables
|
440
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15interview_start
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15interview_end
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15group
Variable label:
|
[Subgroup in wave 15. Randomized ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Subgroup in wave 15. Randomized ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
g1 |
1375 |
17% |
0.1696484 |
2 |
g2 |
1317 |
16.2% |
0.1624923 |
3 |
g3 |
1336 |
16.5% |
0.1648365 |
4 |
g4 |
1347 |
16.6% |
0.1661937 |
5 |
g5 |
1360 |
16.8% |
0.1677977 |
6 |
g6 |
1370 |
16.9% |
0.1690315 |
r15rekruttert
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-14]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Wave 1 |
1743 |
21.5% |
0.2150524 |
3 |
Wave 3 |
1892 |
23.3% |
0.2334362 |
8 |
Wave 8 |
1864 |
23% |
0.2299815 |
11 |
Wave 11 |
1180 |
14.6% |
0.1455891 |
14 |
Wave 14 |
1426 |
17.6% |
0.1759408 |
r15browsertype
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15browserversion
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15mobil
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Other |
4924 |
60.8% |
0.6075262 |
1 |
Mobile |
3181 |
39.2% |
0.3924738 |
r15opplosning
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15enhetstype
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
PC |
5034 |
62.1% |
0.621098088 |
2 |
Touch |
3047 |
37.6% |
0.375940777 |
3 |
Generisk |
24 |
0.3% |
0.002961135 |
r15advancedwifeaturesenabled
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15getrenderingmode
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15padper14
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The municipality should finance hot lunches in kindergarten.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian municipalities should finance hot lunch every day to children in kindergartens.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
178 |
12.9% |
0.129454545 |
2 |
Agree |
282 |
20.5% |
0.205090909 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
303 |
22% |
0.220363636 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
217 |
15.8% |
0.157818182 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
146 |
10.6% |
0.106181818 |
6 |
Disagree |
198 |
14.4% |
0.144000000 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
49 |
3.6% |
0.035636364 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001454545 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper1_1
Variable label:
|
Prioritize spending on: Higher education.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Political decisions can be costly to implement, and it is often not possible to prioritize all decisions equally even if they are considered important.
What do you think the government should do with regard to the following issues:
|
Literal question:
|
Higher education
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Spend a lot more money |
52 |
3.8% |
0.037818182 |
2 |
Spend more money |
340 |
24.7% |
0.247272727 |
3 |
Spend a little more money |
381 |
27.7% |
0.277090909 |
4 |
Spend as much money as now |
511 |
37.2% |
0.371636364 |
5 |
Spend a little less money |
58 |
4.2% |
0.042181818 |
6 |
Spend less money |
14 |
1% |
0.010181818 |
7 |
Spend a lot less money |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003636364 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1% |
0.010181818 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper1_2
Variable label:
|
Prioritize spending on: Unemployment benefits.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Political decisions can be costly to implement, and it is often not possible to prioritize all decisions equally even if they are considered important.
What do you think the government should do with regard to the following issues:
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefits
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Spend a lot more money |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02327273 |
2 |
Spend more money |
174 |
12.7% |
0.12654545 |
3 |
Spend a little more money |
264 |
19.2% |
0.19200000 |
4 |
Spend as much money as now |
623 |
45.3% |
0.45309091 |
5 |
Spend a little less money |
193 |
14% |
0.14036364 |
6 |
Spend less money |
58 |
4.2% |
0.04218182 |
7 |
Spend a lot less money |
11 |
0.8% |
0.00800000 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.5% |
0.01454545 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper1_3
Variable label:
|
Prioritize spending on: Retirement pensions.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Political decisions can be costly to implement, and it is often not possible to prioritize all decisions equally even if they are considered important.
What do you think the government should do with regard to the following issues:
|
Literal question:
|
Retirement pensions
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Spend a lot more money |
154 |
11.2% |
0.112000000 |
2 |
Spend more money |
372 |
27.1% |
0.270545455 |
3 |
Spend a little more money |
422 |
30.7% |
0.306909091 |
4 |
Spend as much money as now |
361 |
26.3% |
0.262545455 |
5 |
Spend a little less money |
39 |
2.8% |
0.028363636 |
6 |
Spend less money |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008000000 |
7 |
Spend a lot less money |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003636364 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper2_1
Variable label:
|
How important issue for you: Higher education.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are these issues for you?
|
Literal question:
|
Higher education
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
303 |
22% |
0.22036364 |
2 |
Important |
660 |
48% |
0.48000000 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
278 |
20.2% |
0.20218182 |
4 |
Not very important |
84 |
6.1% |
0.06109091 |
5 |
Not important at all |
31 |
2.3% |
0.02254545 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.4% |
0.01381818 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper2_2
Variable label:
|
How important issue for you: Unemployment benefits.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are these issues for you?
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment benefits
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
110 |
8% |
0.08000000 |
2 |
Important |
464 |
33.7% |
0.33745455 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
471 |
34.3% |
0.34254545 |
4 |
Not very important |
238 |
17.3% |
0.17309091 |
5 |
Not important at all |
68 |
4.9% |
0.04945455 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.7% |
0.01745455 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper2_3
Variable label:
|
How important issue for you: Retirement pensions.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important are these issues for you?
|
Literal question:
|
Retirement pensions
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
440 |
32% |
0.320000000 |
2 |
Important |
651 |
47.3% |
0.473454545 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
237 |
17.2% |
0.172363636 |
4 |
Not very important |
33 |
2.4% |
0.024000000 |
5 |
Not important at all |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005090909 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005090909 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper9
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The number of municipalities should be reduced further through merging.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
From the year 2020, Norway will have 356 municipalities instead of 422 as of today. The number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
211 |
15.3% |
0.153454545 |
2 |
Agree |
240 |
17.5% |
0.174545455 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
266 |
19.3% |
0.193454545 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
197 |
14.3% |
0.143272727 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
148 |
10.8% |
0.107636364 |
6 |
Disagree |
186 |
13.5% |
0.135272727 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
122 |
8.9% |
0.088727273 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003636364 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper10
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Meat- and dairy production should be halved by 2050.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Research suggests that livestock husbandry may be negative for the environment. Meanwhile, meat and dairy products are an important source of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
Literal question:
|
Norway should halve today’s meat and dairy production by 2050.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
55 |
4% |
0.040000000 |
2 |
Agree |
123 |
8.9% |
0.089454545 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
185 |
13.5% |
0.134545455 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
154 |
11.2% |
0.112000000 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
207 |
15.1% |
0.150545455 |
6 |
Disagree |
367 |
26.7% |
0.266909091 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
279 |
20.3% |
0.202909091 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003636364 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper11
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The government should work to reduce wealth differences.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
Literal question:
|
The government should work to reduce the wealth differences in society to a greater extent.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
336 |
24.4% |
0.244363636 |
2 |
Agree |
352 |
25.6% |
0.256000000 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
283 |
20.6% |
0.205818182 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
155 |
11.3% |
0.112727273 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
104 |
7.6% |
0.075636364 |
6 |
Disagree |
107 |
7.8% |
0.077818182 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
32 |
2.3% |
0.023272727 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004363636 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper13
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norwegian municipalities should not have property taxes.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian municipalities should not have property taxes.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
334 |
24.3% |
0.242909091 |
2 |
Agree |
249 |
18.1% |
0.181090909 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
169 |
12.3% |
0.122909091 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
196 |
14.3% |
0.142545455 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
183 |
13.3% |
0.133090909 |
6 |
Disagree |
170 |
12.4% |
0.123636364 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
66 |
4.8% |
0.048000000 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005818182 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15padper15_ran1
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15padper15.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15padper15.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1373] [Invalid:6732] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
a neutral life-stance humanist school. The school should be an ordinary
Norwegian school that follows the national competence goals, and in addition
teaches humanistic values. |
314 |
22.9% |
0.2286963 |
2 |
a Muslim school. The school should be an ordinary Norwegian school that follows
the national competence goals, and in addition teaches Islam. |
374 |
27.2% |
0.2723962 |
3 |
a Christian school. The school should be an ordinary Norwegian school that
follows the national competence goals, and in addition teaches Christianity |
352 |
25.6% |
0.2563729 |
4 |
a Jewish school. The school should be an ordinary Norwegian school that follows
the national competence goals, and in addition teaches Judaism. |
333 |
24.3% |
0.2425346 |
Sysmiss |
|
6732 |
|
NA |
r15padper15_ran2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15padper15.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15padper15.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1373] [Invalid:6732] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[blank] |
303 |
22.1% |
0.2206846 |
2 |
, but 42% of all residents of the municipality are against the school |
365 |
26.6% |
0.2658412 |
3 |
, but 52% of all residents of the municipality are against the school |
349 |
25.4% |
0.2541879 |
4 |
, but 62% of all residents of the municipality are against the school |
356 |
25.9% |
0.2592862 |
Sysmiss |
|
6732 |
|
NA |
r15padper15_ran3
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15padper15.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15padper15.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1373] [Invalid:6732] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[blank] |
343 |
25% |
0.2498179 |
2 |
Some experts believe that such a school hinders social mobility. |
333 |
24.3% |
0.2425346 |
3 |
Some experts believe that the application is authorised by law. |
370 |
26.9% |
0.2694829 |
4 |
Some experts believe that faith-based schools are in line with religious
freedom. |
327 |
23.8% |
0.2381646 |
Sysmiss |
|
6732 |
|
NA |
r15padper15
Variable label:
|
Municipality should support or oppose an application for a belief based school.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that there is an application to the Norwegian Directorate of Education and Training to start [a neutral life-stance humanist school. The school should be an ordinary Norwegian school that follows the national competence goals, and in addition teaches humanistic values./a Muslim school. The school should be an ordinary Norwegian school that follows the national competence goals, and in addition teaches Islam./a Christian school. The school should be an ordinary Norwegian school that follows the national competence goals, and in addition teaches Christianity./a Jewish school. The school should be an ordinary Norwegian school that follows the national competence goals, and in addition teaches Judaism.]
It seems that there is sufficient demand for this type of school in the municipality where the school will be built [ /, but 42% of all residents of the municipality are against the school/, but 52% of all residents of the municipality are against the school/, but 62% of all residents of the municipality are against the school]
[/Some experts believe that such a school hinders social mobility/Some experts believe that the application is authorised by law./Some experts believe that faith-based schools are in line with religious freedom.]
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, should the municipal council support or protest against this application to the Directorate of Education and Training?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. Experiment. The question text depends on the values in r15padper15_ran1, r15padper15_ran2 and r15padper15_ran3.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The municipality should support the proposal |
547 |
39.8% |
0.39781818 |
2 |
The municipality should object to the proposal |
807 |
58.7% |
0.58690909 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.5% |
0.01527273 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15km_nato
Variable label:
|
Norway should or should not continue to be a member of NATO.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following alternatives is closest to your point of view:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norway should continue to be a member of NATO. |
1234 |
93.7% |
0.936977980 |
2 |
Norway should opt out of NATO. |
72 |
5.5% |
0.054669704 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008352316 |
98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15km_nato_open
Variable label:
|
Open [R15KM_NATO]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
If you have additional comments, please write them here:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15dvby3
Variable label:
|
How afraid of a new terrorist attack in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
61 |
4.6% |
0.046317388 |
2 |
To a great extent |
236 |
17.9% |
0.179195140 |
3 |
Somewhat |
617 |
46.8% |
0.468488990 |
4 |
Slightly |
367 |
27.9% |
0.278663629 |
5 |
Not at all |
32 |
2.4% |
0.024297646 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.003037206 |
98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15km66_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15km66.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 2. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15km66.]
1 = “Production of oil and gas is an important industry for Norway. The industry provides many jobs and considerable income for society. At the same time, burning fossil energy is the main cause of climate change and activities on the Norwegian continental shelf contribute about 1/4 of Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. Opening new areas is also controversial because it can affect life in the sea and at the ice edge. The political parties have different opinions about how the petroleum industry should be developed over the next 20 to 30 years. There is disagreement over both how large the industry should be and whether new areas should be opened.” 2 = “The political parties have different opinions about how the petroleum industry should be developed over the next 20 to 30 years. There is disagreement over how large the industry should be and whether new areas should be opened.”
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1315] [Invalid:6790] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Production of oil and gas is an important industry for Norway.[...] [See
interview instructions in codebook for full text] |
673 |
51.2% |
0.5117871 |
2 |
The political parties have different opinions about how the petroleum industry
should be developed over the next 20 to 30 years. [...] [See interviewer
instructions in codebook for full text]] |
642 |
48.8% |
0.4882129 |
Sysmiss |
|
6790 |
|
NA |
r15km66_ran2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 2. Background variable. Specifies the direction (order) of the response options to r15km66. The direction is randomized.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 2. Background variable. Specifies the direction (order) of the response options to r15km66. The direction is randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1315] [Invalid:6790] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Normal |
646 |
49.1% |
0.4912548 |
2 |
Reversed |
669 |
50.9% |
0.5087452 |
Sysmiss |
|
6790 |
|
NA |
r15km66
Variable label:
|
Discontinue/continue the oil industry. Answer list order randomized.
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Production of oil and gas is an important industry for Norway. The industry provides many jobs and considerable income for society. At the same time, burning fossil energy is the main cause of climate change and activities on the Norwegian continental shelf contribute about 1/4 of Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. Opening new areas is also controversial because it can affect life in the sea and at the ice edge. /The political parties have different opinions about how the petroleum industry should be developed over the next 20 to 30 years. There is disagreement over both how large the industry should be and whether new areas should be opened.]
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following alternatives is closest to your view?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2. The wording of the question depends on the randomized value in r15km66_ran. The order of the response options is randomized. See r15km66_ran2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be as developed as possible. We should
open up to new search areas and if possible facilitate further growth. |
82 |
6.2% |
0.062262718 |
2 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be as developed as it is today. We should
make environmental considerations like we do today, and open up new search areas
where environmentally justifiable, while encouraging to maintain the industry. |
422 |
32% |
0.320425209 |
3 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be less developed than today. We should
therefore not open up new areas, and searches should be limited to areas where
activity has already been established. |
374 |
28.4% |
0.283978740 |
4 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be considerably less developed than
today. We should therefore not allow searches for new resources, and we should
only permit production in existing fields until they have been depleted. |
312 |
23.7% |
0.236902050 |
5 |
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be discontinued. We should therefore
not allow searches for new fields. The production in existing fields should be
reduced considerably within the next 5 years and closed down within the course
of the time period. |
119 |
9% |
0.090356872 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.006074412 |
98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15kmmot
Variable label:
|
Have you changed your way of living because of climate change.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In previous surveys, we have seen that many Norwegian citizens are willing to change their way of life to limit harmful climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
Have you changed your way of life to help limit harmful climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 and r15kmmot = 1 or 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, a lot |
114 |
8.7% |
0.086560364 |
2 |
Yes, a little |
955 |
72.5% |
0.725132878 |
3 |
No |
242 |
18.4% |
0.183750949 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.004555809 |
98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15kmmot_open
Variable label:
|
Open, motivation for [R15KMMOT] if yes. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to tell us what has motivated you to change your way of life.
|
Post-question:
|
All replies would be welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you would prefer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 and r15kmmot = 1 or 2. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15kmmot_open2
Variable label:
|
Open, motivation for [R15KMMOT] if no. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to tell us what has motivated you to change your way of life.
|
Post-question:
|
All replies would be welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you would prefer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 and r15kmmot = 3. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15km_a
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCC’s report on the consequences of global warming.
|
Pre-question text:
|
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC is an international working group of scientists who regularly publish reports to summarize scientific assessment on climate change. In October 2018, they published a special report on the impact of global warming exceeding 1.5 degrees.
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard about this report?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
982 |
74.6% |
0.745634017 |
2 |
No |
327 |
24.8% |
0.248291572 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.006074412 |
98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15km_a_open
Variable label:
|
Open [R15KM_a]: What have you learned from or about the report [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What have you learned from or about this report?
|
Post-question:
|
All replies would be welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you prefer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 and r15km_a = 1. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15km_b
Variable label:
|
For/against: Radical action against climate change.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In many parts of the world, groups of citizens have been engaging in various forms of civil disobedience and protest with the aim of pressuring their governments and leaders to take more drastic measures against climate change and carbon emissions.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you support or oppose people engaging in non-violent civil disobedience and protests to pressure government representatives to act against climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly oppose |
37 |
2.8% |
0.028094153 |
2 |
Oppose |
62 |
4.7% |
0.047076689 |
3 |
Somewhat oppose |
105 |
8% |
0.079726651 |
4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
248 |
18.8% |
0.188306758 |
5 |
Somewhat support |
291 |
22.1% |
0.220956720 |
6 |
Support |
364 |
27.6% |
0.276385725 |
7 |
Strongly support |
202 |
15.3% |
0.153378891 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.006074412 |
98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15km_b2
Variable label:
|
How likely to participate in radical action against climate change next 12 months.
|
Literal question:
|
How likely would you be, over the next 12 months, to participate in a protest for increased action by the government against climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not likely at all |
392 |
29.8% |
0.297646166 |
2 |
Not likely |
556 |
42.2% |
0.422171602 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
235 |
17.8% |
0.178435839 |
4 |
Likely |
91 |
6.9% |
0.069096431 |
5 |
Very likely |
37 |
2.8% |
0.028094153 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.004555809 |
98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15km_c_1
Variable label:
|
For/against climate action: Public money to renewable energy.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Various policies might be used to reduce climate change or deal with its effects. To what extent do you support or oppose the following policies in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Using public money to extend renewable energy, such as wind and solar power.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly oppose |
40 |
3% |
0.030372058 |
2 |
Oppose |
37 |
2.8% |
0.028094153 |
3 |
Somewhat oppose |
49 |
3.7% |
0.037205771 |
4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
82 |
6.2% |
0.062262718 |
5 |
Somewhat support |
258 |
19.6% |
0.195899772 |
6 |
Support |
531 |
40.3% |
0.403189066 |
7 |
Strongly support |
308 |
23.4% |
0.233864844 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.009111617 |
98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15km_c_2
Variable label:
|
For/against climate action: Law demanding money from frequent flyers.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Various policies might be used to reduce climate change or deal with its effects. To what extent do you support or oppose the following policies in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
A law requiring additional charges on people who fly more than twice a year (a ‘frequent flyer levy’).
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly oppose |
206 |
15.6% |
0.156416097 |
2 |
Oppose |
248 |
18.8% |
0.188306758 |
3 |
Somewhat oppose |
129 |
9.8% |
0.097949886 |
4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
182 |
13.8% |
0.138192863 |
5 |
Somewhat support |
221 |
16.8% |
0.167805619 |
6 |
Support |
194 |
14.7% |
0.147304480 |
7 |
Strongly support |
127 |
9.6% |
0.096431283 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.8% |
0.007593014 |
98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15km_c_3
Variable label:
|
For/against climate action: Carbon tax on high-emission food items.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Various policies might be used to reduce climate change or deal with its effects. To what extent do you support or oppose the following policies in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
A carbon tax on food items with high emissions, such as beef and dairy products.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly oppose |
258 |
19.6% |
0.195899772 |
2 |
Oppose |
288 |
21.9% |
0.218678815 |
3 |
Somewhat oppose |
169 |
12.8% |
0.128321944 |
4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
170 |
12.9% |
0.129081245 |
5 |
Somewhat support |
199 |
15.1% |
0.151100987 |
6 |
Support |
147 |
11.2% |
0.111617312 |
7 |
Strongly support |
76 |
5.8% |
0.057706910 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.8% |
0.007593014 |
98 |
Not asked |
6788 |
|
NA |
r15meme1
Variable label:
|
Open: What do you think is required for a person to be counted as a Norwegian. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, what should a person have in place before they can be regarded as Norwegian?
|
Post-question:
|
You can write as much or as little as you want, preferably a few sentences, or just a few words if you would prefer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15meme2
Variable label:
|
Positive/negative to dual citizenship in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion regarding the possibility of dual citizenship in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
146 |
10.9% |
0.109281437 |
2 |
Positive |
348 |
26% |
0.260479042 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
164 |
12.3% |
0.122754491 |
4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
323 |
24.2% |
0.241766467 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
159 |
11.9% |
0.119011976 |
6 |
Negative |
114 |
8.5% |
0.085329341 |
7 |
Very negative |
77 |
5.8% |
0.057634731 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003742515 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme3
Variable label:
|
Dual citizenship applicable to you or your close family.
|
Literal question:
|
Is dual citizenship applicable to you or someone in your immediate family?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, for myself and someone in my family |
79 |
5.9% |
0.059131737 |
2 |
Yes, for myself |
30 |
2.2% |
0.022455090 |
3 |
Yes, for someone in my family |
232 |
17.4% |
0.173652695 |
4 |
No |
988 |
74% |
0.739520958 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005239521 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme4
Variable label:
|
For/against: Change that one parent must be a citizen for a child to become citizen at birth.
|
Literal question:
|
In order for a child to become a Norwegian citizen at birth, one parent must be a Norwegian citizen. Do you think this arrangement should be changed so that one automatically becomes a Norwegian citizen at birth, or should the current arrangement be maintained?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly support to change the arrangement |
89 |
6.7% |
0.06661677 |
2 |
Somewhat support to change the arrangement |
284 |
21.3% |
0.21257485 |
3 |
Somewhat support to maintain the arrangement |
412 |
30.8% |
0.30838323 |
4 |
Strongly support to maintain the arrangement |
535 |
40% |
0.40044910 |
97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.2% |
0.01197605 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme5
Variable label:
|
For/against: Change that non-citizens can vote at local elections.
|
Literal question:
|
Presently, one can vote in local and county council elections even if you are not a Norwegian citizen. Do you think this arrangement should be changed so that one must be a Norwegian citizen to vote in local elections, or should the current arrangement be maintained?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly support to change the arrangement |
329 |
24.6% |
0.24625749 |
2 |
Somewhat support to change the arrangement |
244 |
18.3% |
0.18263473 |
3 |
Somewhat support to maintain the arrangement |
350 |
26.2% |
0.26197605 |
4 |
Strongly support to maintain the arrangement |
396 |
29.6% |
0.29640719 |
97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.3% |
0.01272455 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme6a_1
Variable label:
|
I consider myself: Norwegian.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public statistics, legislation and social debate provide several different definitions of what it means to be Norwegian and what it means to be an immigrant in Norway. Here are some questions about how you see yourself and how you experience being seen by others regarding this. It is possible to tick more than one alternative.
|
Literal question:
|
I think of myself as:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian |
1263 |
94.5% |
0.945359281 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
71 |
5.3% |
0.053143713 |
r15meme6a_2
Variable label:
|
I consider myself: Immigrant to Norway.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public statistics, legislation and social debate provide several different definitions of what it means to be Norwegian and what it means to be an immigrant in Norway. Here are some questions about how you see yourself and how you experience being seen by others regarding this. It is possible to tick more than one alternative.
|
Literal question:
|
I think of myself as:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
An immigrant in Norway |
64 |
4.8% |
0.047904192 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1270 |
95.1% |
0.950598802 |
r15meme6a_3
Variable label:
|
I consider myself: Other.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public statistics, legislation and social debate provide several different definitions of what it means to be Norwegian and what it means to be an immigrant in Norway. Here are some questions about how you see yourself and how you experience being seen by others regarding this. It is possible to tick more than one alternative.
|
Literal question:
|
I think of myself as:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other: |
34 |
2.5% |
0.025449102 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1300 |
97.3% |
0.973053892 |
r15meme6a_3_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R15MEME6A_3].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public statistics, legislation and social debate provide several different definitions of what it means to be Norwegian and what it means to be an immigrant in Norway. Here are some questions about how you see yourself and how you experience being seen by others regarding this. It is possible to tick more than one alternative.
|
Literal question:
|
I think of myself as:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15meme6b_1
Variable label:
|
Others percieve me as: Norwegian.
|
Literal question:
|
Other people perceive me as:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian |
1260 |
94.3% |
0.943113772 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
74 |
5.5% |
0.055389222 |
r15meme6b_2
Variable label:
|
Others percieve me as: Immigrant to Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
Other people perceive me as:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
An immigrant in Norway |
68 |
5.1% |
0.050898204 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1266 |
94.8% |
0.947604790 |
r15meme6b_3
Variable label:
|
Others percieve me as: Other.
|
Literal question:
|
Other people perceive me as:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other: |
30 |
2.2% |
0.022455090 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1304 |
97.6% |
0.976047904 |
r15meme6b_3_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R15MEME6B_3].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Other people perceive me as:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15meme6c_1
Variable label:
|
I prefer to be perceived as: Norwegian.
|
Literal question:
|
I prefer to be perceived by other people as:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian |
1235 |
92.4% |
0.924401198 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
99 |
7.4% |
0.074101796 |
r15meme6c_2
Variable label:
|
I prefer to be perceived as: Immigrant to Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
I prefer to be perceived by other people as:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
An immigrant in Norway |
43 |
3.2% |
0.032185629 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1291 |
96.6% |
0.966317365 |
r15meme6c_3
Variable label:
|
I prefer to be perceived as: Other.
|
Literal question:
|
I prefer to be perceived by other people as:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Other: |
68 |
5.1% |
0.050898204 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001497006 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1266 |
94.8% |
0.947604790 |
r15meme6c_3_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R15MEME6C_3].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
I prefer to be perceived by other people as:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15meme7_a_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15meme7_a. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15meme7_a. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1334] [Invalid:6771] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
respected |
421 |
31.6% |
0.3155922 |
2 |
supported |
466 |
34.9% |
0.3493253 |
3 |
preserved |
447 |
33.5% |
0.3350825 |
Sysmiss |
|
6771 |
|
NA |
r15meme7_a
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Muslims in Norway have the right to have culture and tradition [respected/supported/preserved].
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
Literal question:
|
Muslims in Norway have the right to have their cultures and traditions [respected/supported/preserved].
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on the values of r15meme7_a_ran.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
123 |
9.2% |
0.092065868 |
2 |
Agree |
297 |
22.2% |
0.222305389 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
351 |
26.3% |
0.262724551 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
113 |
8.5% |
0.084580838 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
191 |
14.3% |
0.142964072 |
6 |
Disagree |
138 |
10.3% |
0.103293413 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
115 |
8.6% |
0.086077844 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005988024 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme7_b_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15meme7_b. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15meme7_b. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1334] [Invalid:6771] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
New school textbooks should be added |
268 |
20.1% |
0.2008996 |
2 |
school textbooks should be broadened |
264 |
19.8% |
0.1979010 |
3 |
school textbooks should be updated |
269 |
20.2% |
0.2016492 |
4 |
school textbooks should be changed |
242 |
18.1% |
0.1814093 |
5 |
school textbooks should be written |
291 |
21.8% |
0.2181409 |
Sysmiss |
|
6771 |
|
NA |
r15meme7_b
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: School books should be [added/broadened/updated/changed/written] to reflect religious diversity.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
Literal question:
|
[New school textbooks should be added/school textbooks should be broadened/school textbooks should be updated/school textbooks should be changed/school textbooks should be written] to reflect the new cultural and religious diversity in Norway.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on the values of r15meme7_b_ran.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
173 |
12.9% |
0.129491018 |
2 |
Agree |
388 |
29% |
0.290419162 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
303 |
22.7% |
0.226796407 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
117 |
8.8% |
0.087574850 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
126 |
9.4% |
0.094311377 |
6 |
Disagree |
127 |
9.5% |
0.095059880 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
94 |
7% |
0.070359281 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005988024 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme8_ran1
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15meme8. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15meme8. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1334] [Invalid:6771] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
should |
690 |
51.7% |
0.5172414 |
2 |
should be allowed to |
644 |
48.3% |
0.4827586 |
Sysmiss |
|
6771 |
|
NA |
r15meme8_ran2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15meme8. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15meme8. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1334] [Invalid:6771] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Christianity |
458 |
34.3% |
0.3433283 |
2 |
Islam |
454 |
34% |
0.3403298 |
3 |
Christianity, Islam and other religions |
422 |
31.6% |
0.3163418 |
Sysmiss |
|
6771 |
|
NA |
r15meme8
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Schools [should/should be allowed to] teach [Christianity/Islam/Christianity, Islam, and other religions].
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
Literal question:
|
Schools [should/should be allowed to] teach students about the history of and some of the ideas within [Christianity/Islam/Christianity, Islam and other religions].
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on the values of r15meme7_b_ran.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
343 |
25.7% |
0.256736527 |
2 |
Agree |
523 |
39.1% |
0.391467066 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
229 |
17.1% |
0.171407186 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
85 |
6.4% |
0.063622754 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
66 |
4.9% |
0.049401198 |
6 |
Disagree |
49 |
3.7% |
0.036676647 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
34 |
2.5% |
0.025449102 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005239521 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10a_1
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike group: Swedes.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. Please indicate how much you like or dislike each group:
|
Literal question:
|
Swedes
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002245509 |
2 |
Really dislike |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002994012 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006736527 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
586 |
43.9% |
0.438622754 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
150 |
11.2% |
0.112275449 |
6 |
Really like |
386 |
28.9% |
0.288922156 |
7 |
Intensely like |
161 |
12.1% |
0.120508982 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.8% |
0.027694611 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10a_2
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike group: Muslims.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. Please indicate how much you like or dislike each group:
|
Literal question:
|
Muslims
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
67 |
5% |
0.05014970 |
2 |
Really dislike |
79 |
5.9% |
0.05913174 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
197 |
14.7% |
0.14745509 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
628 |
47% |
0.47005988 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
135 |
10.1% |
0.10104790 |
6 |
Really like |
144 |
10.8% |
0.10778443 |
7 |
Intensely like |
49 |
3.7% |
0.03667665 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.8% |
0.02769461 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10a_3
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike group: Christians.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. Please indicate how much you like or dislike each group:
|
Literal question:
|
Christians
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002994012 |
2 |
Really dislike |
14 |
1% |
0.010479042 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
77 |
5.8% |
0.057634731 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
631 |
47.2% |
0.472305389 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
168 |
12.6% |
0.125748503 |
6 |
Really like |
281 |
21% |
0.210329341 |
7 |
Intensely like |
121 |
9.1% |
0.090568862 |
97 |
Not answered |
40 |
3% |
0.029940120 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10a_4
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike group: Immigrants.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. Please indicate how much you like or dislike each group:
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrants
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
15 |
1.1% |
0.01122754 |
2 |
Really dislike |
24 |
1.8% |
0.01796407 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
112 |
8.4% |
0.08383234 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
689 |
51.6% |
0.51571856 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
180 |
13.5% |
0.13473054 |
6 |
Really like |
231 |
17.3% |
0.17290419 |
7 |
Intensely like |
50 |
3.7% |
0.03742515 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
2.6% |
0.02619760 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10a_5
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike group: Jews.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. Please indicate how much you like or dislike each group:
|
Literal question:
|
Jews
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008233533 |
2 |
Really dislike |
17 |
1.3% |
0.012724551 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
58 |
4.3% |
0.043413174 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
751 |
56.2% |
0.562125749 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
146 |
10.9% |
0.109281437 |
6 |
Really like |
230 |
17.2% |
0.172155689 |
7 |
Intensely like |
83 |
6.2% |
0.062125749 |
97 |
Not answered |
40 |
3% |
0.029940120 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10a_6
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike group: Syrians.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. Please indicate how much you like or dislike each group:
|
Literal question:
|
Syrians
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
29 |
2.2% |
0.02170659 |
2 |
Really dislike |
39 |
2.9% |
0.02919162 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
113 |
8.5% |
0.08458084 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
738 |
55.2% |
0.55239521 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
135 |
10.1% |
0.10104790 |
6 |
Really like |
188 |
14.1% |
0.14071856 |
7 |
Intensely like |
54 |
4% |
0.04041916 |
97 |
Not answered |
40 |
3% |
0.02994012 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10a_7
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike group: Afghans.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below is a list of different groups. Please indicate how much you like or dislike each group:
|
Literal question:
|
Afghans
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
40 |
3% |
0.02994012 |
2 |
Really dislike |
40 |
3% |
0.02994012 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
117 |
8.8% |
0.08757485 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
758 |
56.7% |
0.56736527 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
124 |
9.3% |
0.09281437 |
6 |
Really like |
166 |
12.4% |
0.12425150 |
7 |
Intensely like |
52 |
3.9% |
0.03892216 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
2.9% |
0.02919162 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme10b
Variable label:
|
Open [R15MEME10A]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Please write any comments you have about the previous question here:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15meme9_1
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Important to be unprejudiced about muslims.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to muslims
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
223 |
16.7% |
0.16691617 |
2 |
Good |
429 |
32.1% |
0.32110778 |
3 |
Quite good |
192 |
14.4% |
0.14371257 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
311 |
23.3% |
0.23278443 |
5 |
Quite bad |
81 |
6.1% |
0.06062874 |
6 |
Bad |
42 |
3.1% |
0.03143713 |
7 |
Very bad |
21 |
1.6% |
0.01571856 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.8% |
0.02769461 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme9_2
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Feel guilt if I think negatively about muslims.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about muslims
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
72 |
5.4% |
0.05389222 |
2 |
Good |
182 |
13.6% |
0.13622754 |
3 |
Quite good |
163 |
12.2% |
0.12200599 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
517 |
38.7% |
0.38697605 |
5 |
Quite bad |
141 |
10.6% |
0.10553892 |
6 |
Bad |
131 |
9.8% |
0.09805389 |
7 |
Very bad |
83 |
6.2% |
0.06212575 |
97 |
Not answered |
47 |
3.5% |
0.03517964 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme9_3
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Try to be unprejudiced about muslims because of own conviction.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced in regard to muslims due to my own convictions.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
160 |
12% |
0.11976048 |
2 |
Good |
338 |
25.3% |
0.25299401 |
3 |
Quite good |
203 |
15.2% |
0.15194611 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
431 |
32.3% |
0.32260479 |
5 |
Quite bad |
67 |
5% |
0.05014970 |
6 |
Bad |
61 |
4.6% |
0.04565868 |
7 |
Very bad |
34 |
2.5% |
0.02544910 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
3.1% |
0.03143713 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15meme9_4
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Do not want to appear racist, not even to myself.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
330 |
24.7% |
0.24700599 |
2 |
Good |
392 |
29.3% |
0.29341317 |
3 |
Quite good |
159 |
11.9% |
0.11901198 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
305 |
22.8% |
0.22829341 |
5 |
Quite bad |
57 |
4.3% |
0.04266467 |
6 |
Bad |
33 |
2.5% |
0.02470060 |
7 |
Very bad |
15 |
1.1% |
0.01122754 |
97 |
Not answered |
45 |
3.4% |
0.03368263 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15polkom1a
Variable label:
|
Child rearing values: Independent/Respects adults.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Although there are many different qualities one believes children should have, there are always some qualities that everyone thinks are more important than others. You will now be presented with different pairs of such desirable qualities.
|
Literal question:
|
Please indicate which of the two you think is most important for a child to have.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1 or 2 or 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Is independent |
1301 |
32.3% |
0.3229891 |
2 |
Respects adults |
2046 |
50.8% |
0.5079444 |
97 |
Not answered |
681 |
16.9% |
0.1690665 |
98 |
Not asked |
4077 |
|
NA |
r15polkom1b
Variable label:
|
Child rearing values: Curious/Polite.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Although there are many different qualities one believes children should have, there are always some qualities that everyone thinks are more important than others. You will now be presented with different pairs of such desirable qualities.
|
Literal question:
|
Please indicate which of the two you think is most important for a child to have.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1 or 2 or 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Is curious |
2633 |
65.4% |
0.65367428 |
2 |
Is polite |
1032 |
25.6% |
0.25620655 |
97 |
Not answered |
363 |
9% |
0.09011917 |
98 |
Not asked |
4077 |
|
NA |
r15polkom1c
Variable label:
|
Child rearing values: Obedient/Independent.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Although there are many different qualities one believes children should have, there are always some qualities that everyone thinks are more important than others. You will now be presented with different pairs of such desirable qualities.
|
Literal question:
|
Please indicate which of the two you think is most important for a child to have.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1 or 2 or 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Is obedient |
410 |
10.2% |
0.1017875 |
2 |
Is independent |
3086 |
76.6% |
0.7661370 |
97 |
Not answered |
532 |
13.2% |
0.1320755 |
98 |
Not asked |
4077 |
|
NA |
r15polkom1d
Variable label:
|
Child rearing values: Considerate/behaved properly.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Although there are many different qualities one believes children should have, there are always some qualities that everyone thinks are more important than others. You will now be presented with different pairs of such desirable qualities.
|
Literal question:
|
Please indicate which of the two you think is most important for a child to have.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1 or 2 or 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Is considerate |
2329 |
57.8% |
0.57820258 |
2 |
Behaves properly |
1412 |
35.1% |
0.35054618 |
97 |
Not answered |
287 |
7.1% |
0.07125124 |
98 |
Not asked |
4077 |
|
NA |
r15polkom2_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1373] [Invalid:6732] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
a |
438 |
31.9% |
0.3190095 |
2 |
b |
466 |
33.9% |
0.3394028 |
3 |
c (no exposure) |
469 |
34.2% |
0.3415878 |
Sysmiss |
|
6732 |
|
NA |
r15polkom2a
Variable label:
|
Exposure to political conflict between Progress Party and Labour Party: Listhaug.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the text below carefully. Norway has experienced various political conflicts in recent times. Being involved in one of these conflicts, Sylvi Listhaug from the Progress Party wrote that “the Labour Party believes that the rights of terrorists are more important than the nation’s security. LIKE AND SHARE!”.
|
Literal question:
|
Were you previously aware of this comment?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1 and r15polkom2_ran = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
402 |
91.8% |
0.91780822 |
2 |
No |
36 |
8.2% |
0.08219178 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7667 |
|
NA |
r15polkom2b
Variable label:
|
Exposure to political conflict between Progress Party and Labour Party: Gahr Støre.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the text below carefully. Norway has experienced various political conflicts in recent times. Being involved in one of these conflicts, Jonas Gahr Støre from the Labour Party said that Sylvi Listhaug from the Progress Party “deliberately, calculatedly, kindles the hatred that took so many lives on the 22nd of July”.
|
Literal question:
|
Were you previously aware of this comment?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1 and r15polkom2_ran = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
364 |
78.1% |
0.781115880 |
2 |
No |
99 |
21.2% |
0.212446352 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.6% |
0.006437768 |
98 |
Not asked |
7639 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_1
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Labour Party voters.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
Labour party voters
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
40 |
2.9% |
0.02909091 |
2 |
Really dislike |
62 |
4.5% |
0.04509091 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
143 |
10.4% |
0.10400000 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
543 |
39.5% |
0.39490909 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
326 |
23.7% |
0.23709091 |
6 |
Really like |
192 |
14% |
0.13963636 |
7 |
Intensely like |
34 |
2.5% |
0.02472727 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
2.5% |
0.02545455 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_2
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Conservative Party voters.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
Conservative Party voters
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02327273 |
2 |
Really dislike |
90 |
6.5% |
0.06545455 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
222 |
16.1% |
0.16145455 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
533 |
38.8% |
0.38763636 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
263 |
19.1% |
0.19127273 |
6 |
Really like |
160 |
11.6% |
0.11636364 |
7 |
Intensely like |
42 |
3.1% |
0.03054545 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.4% |
0.02400000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_3
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Progress Party voters.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
Progress party voters
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
214 |
15.6% |
0.15563636 |
2 |
Really dislike |
238 |
17.3% |
0.17309091 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
290 |
21.1% |
0.21090909 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
380 |
27.6% |
0.27636364 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
132 |
9.6% |
0.09600000 |
6 |
Really like |
62 |
4.5% |
0.04509091 |
7 |
Intensely like |
25 |
1.8% |
0.01818182 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
2.5% |
0.02472727 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_4
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Christian Democratic Party voters.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
Christian Democratic Party Voters
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
107 |
7.8% |
0.077818182 |
2 |
Really dislike |
165 |
12% |
0.120000000 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
298 |
21.7% |
0.216727273 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
541 |
39.3% |
0.393454545 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
166 |
12.1% |
0.120727273 |
6 |
Really like |
55 |
4% |
0.040000000 |
7 |
Intensely like |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007272727 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.4% |
0.024000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_5
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Liberal Party voters.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
Liberal Party voters
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
75 |
5.5% |
0.05454545 |
2 |
Really dislike |
107 |
7.8% |
0.07781818 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
213 |
15.5% |
0.15490909 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
637 |
46.3% |
0.46327273 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
228 |
16.6% |
0.16581818 |
6 |
Really like |
61 |
4.4% |
0.04436364 |
7 |
Intensely like |
14 |
1% |
0.01018182 |
97 |
Not answered |
40 |
2.9% |
0.02909091 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_6
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Socialist Left Party voters.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
Socialist Left Party voters
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
111 |
8.1% |
0.08072727 |
2 |
Really dislike |
125 |
9.1% |
0.09090909 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
179 |
13% |
0.13018182 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
513 |
37.3% |
0.37309091 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
222 |
16.1% |
0.16145455 |
6 |
Really like |
153 |
11.1% |
0.11127273 |
7 |
Intensely like |
37 |
2.7% |
0.02690909 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
2.5% |
0.02545455 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_7
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Centre Party voters.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
Centre Party voters
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02327273 |
2 |
Really dislike |
56 |
4.1% |
0.04072727 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
177 |
12.9% |
0.12872727 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
631 |
45.9% |
0.45890909 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
273 |
19.9% |
0.19854545 |
6 |
Really like |
135 |
9.8% |
0.09818182 |
7 |
Intensely like |
31 |
2.3% |
0.02254545 |
97 |
Not answered |
40 |
2.9% |
0.02909091 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_8
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Green Party voters.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
Green Party voters
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
154 |
11.2% |
0.11200000 |
2 |
Really dislike |
152 |
11.1% |
0.11054545 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
190 |
13.8% |
0.13818182 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
463 |
33.7% |
0.33672727 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
220 |
16% |
0.16000000 |
6 |
Really like |
126 |
9.2% |
0.09163636 |
7 |
Intensely like |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02327273 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.8% |
0.02763636 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3_9
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Red Party voters.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the voters of various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
Red Party voters
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
161 |
11.7% |
0.11709091 |
2 |
Really dislike |
138 |
10% |
0.10036364 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
189 |
13.7% |
0.13745455 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
505 |
36.7% |
0.36727273 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
198 |
14.4% |
0.14400000 |
6 |
Really like |
115 |
8.4% |
0.08363636 |
7 |
Intensely like |
33 |
2.4% |
0.02400000 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
2.6% |
0.02618182 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom3b
Variable label:
|
Open [R15POLKOM3].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
If you have anything to add please write it here.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15polkom4_1
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike supporters of: Human Rights Service.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the supporters of various Norwegian political organisations.
|
Literal question:
|
Human Rights Service, An organisation that works towards Islamic influence and Muslim immigration to Norway
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
190 |
13.8% |
0.13818182 |
2 |
Really dislike |
220 |
16% |
0.16000000 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
206 |
15% |
0.14981818 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
376 |
27.3% |
0.27345455 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
125 |
9.1% |
0.09090909 |
6 |
Really like |
76 |
5.5% |
0.05527273 |
7 |
Intensely like |
58 |
4.2% |
0.04218182 |
8 |
Unaware of |
90 |
6.5% |
0.06545455 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
2.5% |
0.02472727 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom4_2
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike supporters of: The Norwegian Centre Against Racism.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the supporters of various Norwegian political organisations.
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian Centre against Racism, An organisation whose main objective is to fight racism and the discrimination of minorities in Norway
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
27 |
2% |
0.01963636 |
2 |
Really dislike |
48 |
3.5% |
0.03490909 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
88 |
6.4% |
0.06400000 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
435 |
31.6% |
0.31636364 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
265 |
19.3% |
0.19272727 |
6 |
Really like |
283 |
20.6% |
0.20581818 |
7 |
Intensely like |
154 |
11.2% |
0.11200000 |
8 |
Unaware of |
39 |
2.8% |
0.02836364 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
2.6% |
0.02618182 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom4_3
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike supporters of: Civita.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the supporters of various Norwegian political organisations.
|
Literal question:
|
Civita, A organisation which, among other things, doesn’t want the public sector to play a major role in Norway’s economy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
67 |
4.9% |
0.04872727 |
2 |
Really dislike |
158 |
11.5% |
0.11490909 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
255 |
18.5% |
0.18545455 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
518 |
37.7% |
0.37672727 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
121 |
8.8% |
0.08800000 |
6 |
Really like |
69 |
5% |
0.05018182 |
7 |
Intensely like |
19 |
1.4% |
0.01381818 |
8 |
Unaware of |
128 |
9.3% |
0.09309091 |
97 |
Not answered |
40 |
2.9% |
0.02909091 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom4_4
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike supporters of: Agenda.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the supporters of various Norwegian political organisations.
|
Literal question:
|
Agenda, An organisation which, among other things, wants the public sector to play a major role in Norway’s economy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
26 |
1.9% |
0.01890909 |
2 |
Really dislike |
46 |
3.3% |
0.03345455 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
125 |
9.1% |
0.09090909 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
540 |
39.3% |
0.39272727 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
241 |
17.5% |
0.17527273 |
6 |
Really like |
152 |
11.1% |
0.11054545 |
7 |
Intensely like |
56 |
4.1% |
0.04072727 |
8 |
Unaware of |
152 |
11.1% |
0.11054545 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.7% |
0.02690909 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom5_1
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike people who: Support a multicultural society.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike people who
|
Literal question:
|
Support a multicultural society
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
37 |
2.7% |
0.02690909 |
2 |
Really dislike |
47 |
3.4% |
0.03418182 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
136 |
9.9% |
0.09890909 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
367 |
26.7% |
0.26690909 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
334 |
24.3% |
0.24290909 |
6 |
Really like |
324 |
23.6% |
0.23563636 |
7 |
Intensely like |
97 |
7.1% |
0.07054545 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.4% |
0.02400000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom5_2
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike people who: Oppose a multicultural society.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike people who
|
Literal question:
|
Are against a multicultural society
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
204 |
14.8% |
0.14836364 |
2 |
Really dislike |
310 |
22.5% |
0.22545455 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
337 |
24.5% |
0.24509091 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
337 |
24.5% |
0.24509091 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
89 |
6.5% |
0.06472727 |
6 |
Really like |
44 |
3.2% |
0.03200000 |
7 |
Intensely like |
21 |
1.5% |
0.01527273 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.4% |
0.02400000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom5_3
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike people who: Think the state should drastically decrease income- and wealth taxation.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike people who
|
Literal question:
|
Believe the state must drastically lower income tax and wealth tax rates
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
84 |
6.1% |
0.06109091 |
2 |
Really dislike |
190 |
13.8% |
0.13818182 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
276 |
20.1% |
0.20072727 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
488 |
35.5% |
0.35490909 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
193 |
14% |
0.14036364 |
6 |
Really like |
87 |
6.3% |
0.06327273 |
7 |
Intensely like |
25 |
1.8% |
0.01818182 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02327273 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom5_4
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike people who: Think the state should drastically increase income- and wealth taxation.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike people who
|
Literal question:
|
Believe the state must drastically raise income tax and wealth tax rates
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
159 |
11.6% |
0.11563636 |
2 |
Really dislike |
205 |
14.9% |
0.14909091 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
278 |
20.2% |
0.20218182 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
421 |
30.6% |
0.30618182 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
183 |
13.3% |
0.13309091 |
6 |
Really like |
79 |
5.7% |
0.05745455 |
7 |
Intensely like |
18 |
1.3% |
0.01309091 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02327273 |
98 |
Not asked |
6730 |
|
NA |
r15polkom6_ran1
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15polkom6. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15polkom6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1323] [Invalid:6782] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Did you partake in the following last week? Read |
664 |
50.2% |
0.5018896 |
2 |
do you usually partake in the following during the week? Reading |
659 |
49.8% |
0.4981104 |
Sysmiss |
|
6782 |
|
NA |
r15polkom6_ran2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15polkom6. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15polkom6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1323] [Invalid:6782] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
news |
659 |
49.8% |
0.4981104 |
2 |
political news |
664 |
50.2% |
0.5018896 |
Sysmiss |
|
6782 |
|
NA |
r15polkom6
Variable label:
|
How often [last week/usually] do you read [news/political news].
|
Literal question:
|
How many days [Did you parttake in the following last week? Read/Do you usually parttake in the following during the week? Reading][news/political news] in the form of newspapers, online newspapers or on your mobile phone?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 3. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on the values of r15polkom6_ran1 and r15polkom6_ran2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
7 days |
868 |
65% |
0.64970060 |
2 |
6 days |
126 |
9.4% |
0.09431138 |
3 |
5 days |
99 |
7.4% |
0.07410180 |
4 |
4 days |
55 |
4.1% |
0.04116766 |
5 |
3 days |
57 |
4.3% |
0.04266467 |
6 |
2 days |
37 |
2.8% |
0.02769461 |
7 |
1 days |
43 |
3.2% |
0.03218563 |
8 |
0 days |
31 |
2.3% |
0.02320359 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.5% |
0.01497006 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r15km_bompeng1
Variable label:
|
Acceptable that the government finances infrastructure with road rolls.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you find it acceptable that the authorities use tolls to fund roads, bridges, tunnels and public transport?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
yes |
824 |
61.2% |
0.611729770 |
2 |
No |
421 |
31.3% |
0.312546399 |
3 |
Don't know |
71 |
5.3% |
0.052709725 |
4 |
No opinion |
15 |
1.1% |
0.011135857 |
5 |
No response |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008908686 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002969562 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15km_bompeng1_open
Variable label:
|
Open [R15KM_BOMPENG1].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Please could you write a little bit about why you chose this alternative as your answer.. Preferably a few sentences, or just a few words if you would prefer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4 and r15km_bompeng1 is answered. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15helse1
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with your life at the moment.
|
Pre-question text:
|
The next questions deal with your life and your health. This is part of a research project that focuses on quality of life and compares with international research. Therefore, these questions are a bit different than ones usually found in the Norwegian Citizen Panel, and have different response scales than the ones normally used. If you don’t want to answer a question, you can skip the question by clicking “next”. Click on next to proceed.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life at the present time?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Not pleased at all |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001484781 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005196733 |
2 |
2 |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008166295 |
3 |
3 |
24 |
1.8% |
0.017817372 |
4 |
4 |
48 |
3.6% |
0.035634744 |
5 |
5 |
90 |
6.7% |
0.066815145 |
6 |
6 |
122 |
9.1% |
0.090571641 |
7 |
7 |
268 |
19.9% |
0.198960653 |
8 |
8 |
409 |
30.4% |
0.303637713 |
9 |
9 |
181 |
13.4% |
0.134372680 |
10 |
10 - Very pleased |
180 |
13.4% |
0.133630290 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003711952 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse2
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you experience what you do in life as meaningful.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, to what extent do you experience that what you do in life is meaningful?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Not meaningful at all |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004454343 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003711952 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
1% |
0.010393467 |
3 |
3 |
26 |
1.9% |
0.019302153 |
4 |
4 |
45 |
3.3% |
0.033407572 |
5 |
5 |
81 |
6% |
0.060133630 |
6 |
6 |
134 |
9.9% |
0.099480327 |
7 |
7 |
275 |
20.4% |
0.204157387 |
8 |
8 |
370 |
27.5% |
0.274684484 |
9 |
9 |
178 |
13.2% |
0.132145509 |
10 |
10 - Very meaningful |
206 |
15.3% |
0.152932442 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005196733 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_1
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Happy.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent were you….?
|
Literal question:
|
Happy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Not at all |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005939124 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005196733 |
2 |
2 |
16 |
1.2% |
0.011878248 |
3 |
3 |
40 |
3% |
0.029695620 |
4 |
4 |
50 |
3.7% |
0.037119525 |
5 |
5 |
134 |
9.9% |
0.099480327 |
6 |
6 |
168 |
12.5% |
0.124721604 |
7 |
7 |
242 |
18% |
0.179658500 |
8 |
8 |
303 |
22.5% |
0.224944321 |
9 |
9 |
191 |
14.2% |
0.141796585 |
10 |
10 -To a great extent |
151 |
11.2% |
0.112100965 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
2.7% |
0.027468448 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_2
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Worried.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent were you….?
|
Literal question:
|
Worried
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Not at all |
111 |
8.2% |
0.08240535 |
1 |
1 |
140 |
10.4% |
0.10393467 |
2 |
2 |
206 |
15.3% |
0.15293244 |
3 |
3 |
203 |
15.1% |
0.15070527 |
4 |
4 |
114 |
8.5% |
0.08463252 |
5 |
5 |
155 |
11.5% |
0.11507053 |
6 |
6 |
118 |
8.8% |
0.08760208 |
7 |
7 |
108 |
8% |
0.08017817 |
8 |
8 |
68 |
5% |
0.05048255 |
9 |
9 |
37 |
2.7% |
0.02746845 |
10 |
10 -To a great extent |
28 |
2.1% |
0.02078693 |
97 |
Not answered |
59 |
4.4% |
0.04380104 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_3
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Down or sad.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent were you….?
|
Literal question:
|
Down or sad
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Not at all |
324 |
24.1% |
0.24053452 |
1 |
1 |
222 |
16.5% |
0.16481069 |
2 |
2 |
189 |
14% |
0.14031180 |
3 |
3 |
146 |
10.8% |
0.10838901 |
4 |
4 |
72 |
5.3% |
0.05345212 |
5 |
5 |
108 |
8% |
0.08017817 |
6 |
6 |
81 |
6% |
0.06013363 |
7 |
7 |
66 |
4.9% |
0.04899777 |
8 |
8 |
30 |
2.2% |
0.02227171 |
9 |
9 |
18 |
1.3% |
0.01336303 |
10 |
10 -To a great extent |
18 |
1.3% |
0.01336303 |
97 |
Not answered |
73 |
5.4% |
0.05419451 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_4
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Irritated.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent were you….?
|
Literal question:
|
Irritated
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Not at all |
172 |
12.8% |
0.127691166 |
1 |
1 |
198 |
14.7% |
0.146993318 |
2 |
2 |
232 |
17.2% |
0.172234595 |
3 |
3 |
188 |
14% |
0.139569414 |
4 |
4 |
136 |
10.1% |
0.100965108 |
5 |
5 |
110 |
8.2% |
0.081662955 |
6 |
6 |
88 |
6.5% |
0.065330364 |
7 |
7 |
89 |
6.6% |
0.066072754 |
8 |
8 |
36 |
2.7% |
0.026726058 |
9 |
9 |
18 |
1.3% |
0.013363029 |
10 |
10 -To a great extent |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006681514 |
97 |
Not answered |
71 |
5.3% |
0.052709725 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_5
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Lonely.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent were you….?
|
Literal question:
|
Lonely
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Not at all |
589 |
43.7% |
0.43726800 |
1 |
1 |
187 |
13.9% |
0.13882702 |
2 |
2 |
133 |
9.9% |
0.09873794 |
3 |
3 |
77 |
5.7% |
0.05716407 |
4 |
4 |
55 |
4.1% |
0.04083148 |
5 |
5 |
68 |
5% |
0.05048255 |
6 |
6 |
53 |
3.9% |
0.03934670 |
7 |
7 |
50 |
3.7% |
0.03711952 |
8 |
8 |
26 |
1.9% |
0.01930215 |
9 |
9 |
19 |
1.4% |
0.01410542 |
10 |
10 -To a great extent |
16 |
1.2% |
0.01187825 |
97 |
Not answered |
74 |
5.5% |
0.05493690 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_6
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Enthusiastic.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent were you….?
|
Literal question:
|
Enthusiastic
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Not at all |
13 |
1% |
0.009651076 |
1 |
1 |
26 |
1.9% |
0.019302153 |
2 |
2 |
32 |
2.4% |
0.023756496 |
3 |
3 |
70 |
5.2% |
0.051967335 |
4 |
4 |
110 |
8.2% |
0.081662955 |
5 |
5 |
184 |
13.7% |
0.136599852 |
6 |
6 |
173 |
12.8% |
0.128433556 |
7 |
7 |
240 |
17.8% |
0.178173719 |
8 |
8 |
223 |
16.6% |
0.165553081 |
9 |
9 |
128 |
9.5% |
0.095025984 |
10 |
10 -To a great extent |
82 |
6.1% |
0.060876021 |
97 |
Not answered |
66 |
4.9% |
0.048997773 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_7
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Calm and relaxed.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent were you….?
|
Literal question:
|
Calm and relaxed
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Not at all |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008166295 |
1 |
1 |
24 |
1.8% |
0.017817372 |
2 |
2 |
50 |
3.7% |
0.037119525 |
3 |
3 |
67 |
5% |
0.049740163 |
4 |
4 |
93 |
6.9% |
0.069042316 |
5 |
5 |
204 |
15.1% |
0.151447661 |
6 |
6 |
164 |
12.2% |
0.121752042 |
7 |
7 |
215 |
16% |
0.159613957 |
8 |
8 |
228 |
16.9% |
0.169265033 |
9 |
9 |
134 |
9.9% |
0.099480327 |
10 |
10 -To a great extent |
95 |
7.1% |
0.070527097 |
97 |
Not answered |
62 |
4.6% |
0.046028211 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse3_8
Variable label:
|
Last 7 days, to what extent were you: Anxious.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about how you have felt during the last 7 days. To what extent were you….?
|
Literal question:
|
Anxious
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Not at all |
395 |
29.3% |
0.29324425 |
1 |
1 |
269 |
20% |
0.19970304 |
2 |
2 |
158 |
11.7% |
0.11729770 |
3 |
3 |
110 |
8.2% |
0.08166295 |
4 |
4 |
65 |
4.8% |
0.04825538 |
5 |
5 |
98 |
7.3% |
0.07275427 |
6 |
6 |
58 |
4.3% |
0.04305865 |
7 |
7 |
61 |
4.5% |
0.04528582 |
8 |
8 |
34 |
2.5% |
0.02524128 |
9 |
9 |
16 |
1.2% |
0.01187825 |
10 |
10 -To a great extent |
17 |
1.3% |
0.01262064 |
97 |
Not answered |
66 |
4.9% |
0.04899777 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse4_1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: My social relations are supportive and rewarding.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the assertions below?
|
Literal question:
|
My social relationships are supportive and rewarding.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Completely disagree |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006681514 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005196733 |
2 |
2 |
17 |
1.3% |
0.012620638 |
3 |
3 |
36 |
2.7% |
0.026726058 |
4 |
4 |
43 |
3.2% |
0.031922791 |
5 |
5 |
139 |
10.3% |
0.103192279 |
6 |
6 |
140 |
10.4% |
0.103934670 |
7 |
7 |
242 |
18% |
0.179658500 |
8 |
8 |
266 |
19.7% |
0.197475872 |
9 |
9 |
175 |
13% |
0.129918337 |
10 |
10 - Completely agree |
249 |
18.5% |
0.184855234 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.8% |
0.017817372 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse4_2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I contribute actively to other peoples’ happiness and life quality.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the assertions below?
|
Literal question:
|
I actively contribute to the happiness and quality of life of others.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Completely disagree |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003711952 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005939124 |
2 |
2 |
30 |
2.2% |
0.022271715 |
3 |
3 |
35 |
2.6% |
0.025983667 |
4 |
4 |
43 |
3.2% |
0.031922791 |
5 |
5 |
161 |
12% |
0.119524870 |
6 |
6 |
180 |
13.4% |
0.133630290 |
7 |
7 |
247 |
18.3% |
0.183370453 |
8 |
8 |
291 |
21.6% |
0.216035635 |
9 |
9 |
148 |
11% |
0.109873794 |
10 |
10 - Completely agree |
173 |
12.8% |
0.128433556 |
97 |
Not answered |
26 |
1.9% |
0.019302153 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse5_mobil
Variable label:
|
[ Specifies whether the respondent uses a mobile device.]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Specifies whether the respondent uses a mobile device.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1344] [Invalid:6761] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not mobile |
845 |
62.9% |
0.6287202 |
1 |
Mobile |
499 |
37.1% |
0.3712798 |
Sysmiss |
|
6761 |
|
NA |
r15helse5_walk
Variable label:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY: MOBILITY
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY.
|
Literal question:
|
MOBILITY
|
Technical description:
|
© EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D™ is a trade mark of the EuroQol Research Foundation.
[Asked if r15group = 4. The wording of the question is somewhat simplified if r15helse5_mobil = 1. Contact Bjarne Robberstad for further details (Bjarne.Robberstad@uib.no)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I have no problems in walking about |
1062 |
78.8% |
0.788418708 |
2 |
I have slight problems in walking about |
181 |
13.4% |
0.134372680 |
3 |
I have moderate problems in walking about |
64 |
4.8% |
0.047512992 |
4 |
I have severe problems in walking about |
28 |
2.1% |
0.020786934 |
5 |
I am unable to walk about |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003711952 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005196733 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse5_care
Variable label:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY: SELF-CARE
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY.
|
Literal question:
|
SELF-CARE
|
Technical description:
|
© EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D™ is a trade mark of the EuroQol Research Foundation.
[Asked if r15group = 4. The wording of the question is somewhat simplified if r15helse5_mobil = 1. Contact Bjarne Robberstad for further details (Bjarne.Robberstad@uib.no)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I have no problems washing or dressing myself |
1286 |
95.5% |
0.9547141797 |
2 |
I have slight problems washing or dressing myself |
39 |
2.9% |
0.0289532294 |
3 |
I have moderate problems washing or dressing myself |
6 |
0.4% |
0.0044543430 |
4 |
I have severe problems washing or dressing myself |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007423905 |
5 |
I am unable to wash or dress myself |
3 |
0.2% |
0.0022271715 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.0089086860 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse5_activities
Variable label:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY: VANLIGE AKTIVITETER
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY.
|
Literal question:
|
USUAL ACTIVITIES
|
Technical description:
|
© EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D™ is a trade mark of the EuroQol Research Foundation.
[Asked if r15group = 4. The wording of the question is somewhat simplified if r15helse5_mobil = 1. Contact Bjarne Robberstad for further details (Bjarne.Robberstad@uib.no)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I have no problems doing my usual activities |
1047 |
77.7% |
0.777282851 |
2 |
I have slight problems doing my usual activities |
225 |
16.7% |
0.167037862 |
3 |
I have moderate problems doing my usual activities |
46 |
3.4% |
0.034149963 |
4 |
I have severe problems doing my usual activities |
17 |
1.3% |
0.012620638 |
5 |
I am unable to do my usual activities |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002227171 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006681514 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse5_pain
Variable label:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY: SMERTER/UBEHAG
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY.
|
Literal question:
|
PAIN / DISCOMFORT
|
Technical description:
|
© EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D™ is a trade mark of the EuroQol Research Foundation.
[Asked if r15group = 4. The wording of the question is somewhat simplified if r15helse5_mobil = 1. Contact Bjarne Robberstad for further details (Bjarne.Robberstad@uib.no)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I have no pain or discomfort |
507 |
37.6% |
0.376391982 |
2 |
I have slight pain or discomfort |
627 |
46.5% |
0.465478842 |
3 |
I have moderate pain or discomfort |
156 |
11.6% |
0.115812918 |
4 |
I have severe pain or discomfort |
39 |
2.9% |
0.028953229 |
5 |
I have extreme pain or discomfort |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005939124 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007423905 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse5_anxiety
Variable label:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY: ANGST/DEPRESJON
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please click the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY.
|
Literal question:
|
ANXIETY / DEPRESSION
|
Technical description:
|
© EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D™ is a trade mark of the EuroQol Research Foundation.
[Asked if r15group = 4. The wording of the question is somewhat simplified if r15helse5_mobil = 1. Contact Bjarne Robberstad for further details (Bjarne.Robberstad@uib.no)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I am not anxious or depressed |
904 |
67.1% |
0.671121010 |
2 |
I am slightly anxious or depressed |
304 |
22.6% |
0.225686711 |
3 |
I am moderately anxious or depressed |
104 |
7.7% |
0.077208612 |
4 |
I am severely anxious or depressed |
23 |
1.7% |
0.017074981 |
5 |
I am extremely anxious or depressed |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001484781 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007423905 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15helse6
Variable label:
|
Please click on the scale to indicate how your health is TODAY.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know how good or bad your health is TODAY. This scale is numbered from 0 to 100. 100 means the best health you can imagine. 0 means the worst health you can imagine.
|
Literal question:
|
Please click on the scale to indicate how your health is TODAY.
|
Technical description:
|
© EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D™ is a trade mark of the EuroQol Research Foundation.
[Asked if r15group = 4. The respondent answers by clicking on a vertical “slider”.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1342] [Invalid:6763] [Range:0-100]
|
r15polinpad1_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15polinpad1_1, r15polinpad1_2, r15polinpad1_3.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects value for r15polinpad1_1, r15polinpad1_2, r15polinpad1_3.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1343] [Invalid:6762] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[Blank] |
332 |
24.7% |
0.2472077 |
2 |
Therefore, the representative reads local news and is aware of the electorate’s
political opinions in their county |
363 |
27% |
0.2702904 |
3 |
Therefore, the representative creates a forum on social media instead of
arranging a meeting at the county house. The representatives read and write down
the electorate’s opinions |
329 |
24.5% |
0.2449739 |
4 |
Therefore, the representative arranges an open meeting at the county house
instead of creating a forum on social media. The representatives read and write
down the electorate´s opinions |
319 |
23.8% |
0.2375279 |
Sysmiss |
|
6762 |
|
NA |
r15polinpad1_1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree on decision legitimacy: Representative should follow majority even if party disagrees.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Parliamentary representatives from your county are to adopt a new health reform. The individual representatives are not obligated to consult the electorate before voting takes place, but vote based on personal conviction. [(blank)/Despite this, the representative from your county wishes to consult the electorate. [Therefore, the representative reads local news and is aware of the electorate’s political opinions in their county/ Therefore, the representative creates a forum on social media instead of arranging a meeting at the county house. The representatives read and write down the electorate’s opinions / Therefore, the representative arranges an open meeting at the county house instead of creating a forum on social media. The representatives read and write down the electorate’s opinions]] To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
Literal question:
|
The representatives should follow the opinion of the majority in their county, even if this goes against party opinion.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on the values of r15polinpad1_ran.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
196 |
14.6% |
0.14550854 |
2 |
Agree |
369 |
27.4% |
0.27394209 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
298 |
22.1% |
0.22123237 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
148 |
11% |
0.10987379 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
128 |
9.5% |
0.09502598 |
6 |
Disagree |
137 |
10.2% |
0.10170750 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
32 |
2.4% |
0.02375650 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
2.9% |
0.02895323 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15polinpad1_2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree on decision legitimacy: Process is legitimate no matter how the representative votes.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Parliamentary representatives from your county are to adopt a new health reform. The individual representatives are not obligated to consult the electorate before voting takes place, but vote based on personal conviction. [(blank)/Despite this, the representative from your county wishes to consult the electorate. [Therefore, the representative reads local news and is aware of the electorate’s political opinions in their county/ Therefore, the representative creates a forum on social media instead of arranging a meeting at the county house. The representatives read and write down the electorate’s opinions / Therefore, the representative arranges an open meeting at the county house instead of creating a forum on social media. The representatives read and write down the electorate’s opinions]] To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
Literal question:
|
Regardless of how the representative votes in Parliament, the decision-making process is legitimate.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on the values of r15polinpad1_ran.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
85 |
6.3% |
0.06310319 |
2 |
Agree |
395 |
29.3% |
0.29324425 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
235 |
17.4% |
0.17446177 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
296 |
22% |
0.21974759 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
134 |
9.9% |
0.09948033 |
6 |
Disagree |
91 |
6.8% |
0.06755754 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
34 |
2.5% |
0.02524128 |
97 |
Not answered |
77 |
5.7% |
0.05716407 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15polinpad1_3
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree on decision legitimacy: The representative’s decision is fair and reflects voter interests.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Parliamentary representatives from your county are to adopt a new health reform. The individual representatives are not obligated to consult the electorate before voting takes place, but vote based on personal conviction. [(blank)/Despite this, the representative from your county wishes to consult the electorate. [Therefore, the representative reads local news and is aware of the electorate’s political opinions in their county/ Therefore, the representative creates a forum on social media instead of arranging a meeting at the county house. The representatives read and write down the electorate’s opinions / Therefore, the representative arranges an open meeting at the county house instead of creating a forum on social media. The representatives read and write down the electorate’s opinions]] To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
Literal question:
|
The representative’s decision is justified and reflects the interests of the electorate.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on the values of r15polinpad1_ran.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
48 |
3.6% |
0.03563474 |
2 |
Agree |
234 |
17.4% |
0.17371938 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
272 |
20.2% |
0.20193022 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
336 |
24.9% |
0.24944321 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
220 |
16.3% |
0.16332591 |
6 |
Disagree |
124 |
9.2% |
0.09205642 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
3.4% |
0.03414996 |
97 |
Not answered |
67 |
5% |
0.04974016 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1a_ran1
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects age for r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects age for r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
21 years old |
314 |
23.4% |
0.2343284 |
2 |
30 years old |
337 |
25.1% |
0.2514925 |
3 |
41 years old |
340 |
25.4% |
0.2537313 |
4 |
55 years old |
349 |
26% |
0.2604478 |
Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1a_ran2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects gender til r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects gender til r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
male |
677 |
50.5% |
0.5052239 |
2 |
female |
663 |
49.5% |
0.4947761 |
Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1a_ran2b
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Selects gender pronoun based on the value of r15padproleg1a_ran2 for r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Selects gender pronoun based on the value of r15padproleg1a_ran2 for r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
he |
677 |
50.5% |
0.5052239 |
2 |
she |
663 |
49.5% |
0.4947761 |
Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1a_ran3
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects reasoning for r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects reasoning for r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
their ethnicity |
179 |
13.4% |
0.1335821 |
2 |
their origins |
199 |
14.9% |
0.1485075 |
3 |
the colour of their skin |
223 |
16.6% |
0.1664179 |
4 |
their nationality |
186 |
13.9% |
0.1388060 |
5 |
their religion |
190 |
14.2% |
0.1417910 |
6 |
their sexual orientation |
178 |
13.3% |
0.1328358 |
7 |
their political opinions |
185 |
13.8% |
0.1380597 |
Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1a_ran4
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects identification documents for r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects identification documents for r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The asylum seeker had valid ID documents (passport) from their home country |
706 |
52.7% |
0.5268657 |
2 |
The asylum seeker did not have valid ID documents (passport) from their home
country |
634 |
47.3% |
0.4731343 |
Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1b_ran5
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects quantity for r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects quantity for r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The vast majority |
261 |
19.5% |
0.1947761 |
2 |
Many |
272 |
20.3% |
0.2029851 |
3 |
Some |
267 |
19.9% |
0.1992537 |
4 |
Few |
258 |
19.3% |
0.1925373 |
5 |
Almost none |
282 |
21% |
0.2104478 |
Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1b_ran6
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects adjudication procedure for r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects adjudication procedure for r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
automatically processed by a computer programme |
709 |
52.9% |
0.5291045 |
2 |
manually processed by a bureaucrat |
631 |
47.1% |
0.4708955 |
Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1b_ran7
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects outcome for r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects outcome for r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
approved |
642 |
47.9% |
0.4791045 |
2 |
not approved |
698 |
52.1% |
0.5208955 |
Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1b_ran8
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects number of wrongful decisions til r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 4. Background variable. Randomly selects number of wrongful decisions til r15padproleg1a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:6765] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
none |
197 |
14.7% |
0.1470149 |
2 |
one out of a hundred |
189 |
14.1% |
0.1410448 |
3 |
one out of fifty |
179 |
13.4% |
0.1335821 |
4 |
one out of twenty |
191 |
14.3% |
0.1425373 |
5 |
one out of ten |
180 |
13.4% |
0.1343284 |
6 |
one out of five |
195 |
14.6% |
0.1455224 |
7 |
one out of three |
209 |
15.6% |
0.1559701 |
Sysmiss |
|
6765 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1a
Variable label:
|
Asylum application should/should not be approved.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Bureaucratic decisions are increasingly being made automatically, that is, without humans being involved. For example, The Norwegian Directorate of Immigration uses a robot to make certain decisions about asylum residency. We are interested in finding out about what circumstances people think decisions can be left to computers and when they can be left to people. Please consider the following scenario and assess whether you think the decision should be made automatically or manually processed by a bureaucrat. Please note that the scenario does not refer to an actual event that has taken place at The Norwegian Directorate of Immigration: A [21 years old/30 years old/41 years old/55 years old] [male/female] has applied for protection (asylum), and is to have their application assessed by The Norwegian Directorate of Immigration. The asylum seeker is applying for protection because [he/she] due to [their ethnicity / their origins / the colour of their skin / their nationality / their religion / their sexual orientation / their political opinions] fears persecution in the home country [he/she] states they come from. [The asylum seeker had valid ID documents (passport) from their home country / The asylum seeker did not have valid ID documents (passport) from their home country]
|
Literal question:
|
Firstly, could you please state your opinion regarding the asylum application. Based on this information, do you think that the asylum seeker should be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on the values of r15padproleg1a_ran1, r15padproleg1a_ran2, r15padproleg1a_ran2b, r15padproleg1a_ran3,r15padproleg1a_ran4. The values are randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
659 |
48.9% |
0.48923534 |
2 |
No |
624 |
46.3% |
0.46325167 |
97 |
Not answered |
64 |
4.8% |
0.04751299 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15padproleg1b
Variable label:
|
Manual or automatic review of asylum application.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Furthermore, imagine that [The vast majority / Many / Some / Few / Almost none] that come from the asylum seeker’s home country have been granted asylum in Norway during the last year, after having their application [automatically processed by a computer programme/manualle processed by a bureaucrat] that evaluates the real danger of persecution that the asylum seekers face in their home country in the future. It has become apparent that among those who [approved/not approved] asylum during the past year from that country, [none/one out of a hundred/one out of fifty/one out of twenty/one out of ten/one out of five/one out of three]decisions were subsequently overturned due to processing errors.
|
Literal question:
|
Based on this information, how do you think the asylum seeker’s application should be processed?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 4. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on the values of r15padproleg1b_ran5, r15padproleg1b_ran6, r15padproleg1b_ran7, r15padproleg1b_ran8. The values are randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
It should be processed manually by a bureaucrat |
1078 |
80% |
0.80029696 |
2 |
It should be processed automatically by a robot |
235 |
17.4% |
0.17446177 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
2.5% |
0.02524128 |
98 |
Not asked |
6758 |
|
NA |
r15polkom8_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Randomly selects variant of r15polkom8. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Randomly selects variant of r15polkom8. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
T11 |
251 |
18.5% |
0.1845588 |
2 |
T12 |
213 |
15.7% |
0.1566176 |
3 |
T13 |
231 |
17% |
0.1698529 |
4 |
T21 |
198 |
14.6% |
0.1455882 |
5 |
T22 |
224 |
16.5% |
0.1647059 |
6 |
T23 |
243 |
17.9% |
0.1786765 |
Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15polkom8_t11
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How satisfied with democracy in Norway: Very-not at all, word options.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom8_ran = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
64 |
25.5% |
0.254980080 |
2 |
Quite satisfied |
155 |
61.8% |
0.617529880 |
3 |
Not satisfied |
28 |
11.2% |
0.111553785 |
4 |
Not satisfied at all |
3 |
1.2% |
0.011952191 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003984064 |
98 |
Not asked |
7854 |
|
NA |
r15polkom8_t12
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How satisfied with democracy in Norway: Extremely-not at all, word options.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom8_ran = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Extremely satisfied |
6 |
2.8% |
0.028169014 |
2 |
Very satisfied |
74 |
34.7% |
0.347417840 |
3 |
Satisfied |
80 |
37.6% |
0.375586854 |
4 |
Quite satisfied |
25 |
11.7% |
0.117370892 |
5 |
Somewhat satisfied |
15 |
7% |
0.070422535 |
6 |
Not satisfied |
11 |
5.2% |
0.051643192 |
7 |
Not satisfied at all |
2 |
0.9% |
0.009389671 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7892 |
|
NA |
r15polkom8_t13
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How satisfied with democracy in Norway: Extremely-not at all, number options.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom8_ran = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 Extremely satisfied |
19 |
8.2% |
0.08225108 |
2 |
2 |
90 |
39% |
0.38961039 |
3 |
3 |
55 |
23.8% |
0.23809524 |
4 |
4 |
27 |
11.7% |
0.11688312 |
5 |
5 |
28 |
12.1% |
0.12121212 |
6 |
6 |
9 |
3.9% |
0.03896104 |
7 |
7 Not satisfied at all |
3 |
1.3% |
0.01298701 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7874 |
|
NA |
r15polkom8_t21
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How pleased with democracy in Norway: Very-not at all, word options.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how pleased are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom8_ran = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very pleased |
46 |
23.2% |
0.23232323 |
2 |
Quite pleased |
127 |
64.1% |
0.64141414 |
3 |
Not pleased |
21 |
10.6% |
0.10606061 |
4 |
Not pleased at all |
2 |
1% |
0.01010101 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
1% |
0.01010101 |
98 |
Not asked |
7907 |
|
NA |
r15polkom8_t22
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How pleased with democracy in Norway: Extremely-not at all, number options.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how pleased are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom8_ran = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 Extremely pleased |
24 |
10.7% |
0.10714286 |
2 |
2 |
81 |
36.2% |
0.36160714 |
3 |
3 |
50 |
22.3% |
0.22321429 |
4 |
4 |
33 |
14.7% |
0.14732143 |
5 |
5 |
21 |
9.4% |
0.09375000 |
6 |
6 |
12 |
5.4% |
0.05357143 |
7 |
7 Not pleased at all |
3 |
1.3% |
0.01339286 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7881 |
|
NA |
r15polkom8_t23
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How pleased with democracy in Norway: Extremely-not at all, word options.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how pleased are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom8_ran = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Extremely pleased |
7 |
2.9% |
0.02880658 |
2 |
Very pleased |
77 |
31.7% |
0.31687243 |
3 |
Pleased |
94 |
38.7% |
0.38683128 |
4 |
Quite pleased |
24 |
9.9% |
0.09876543 |
5 |
Somewhat pleased |
27 |
11.1% |
0.11111111 |
6 |
Not pleased |
10 |
4.1% |
0.04115226 |
7 |
Not pleased at all |
4 |
1.6% |
0.01646091 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7862 |
|
NA |
r15polkom9_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Randomly selects variant of r15polkom9. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Randomly selects variant of r15polkom9. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
T11 |
251 |
18.5% |
0.1845588 |
2 |
T12 |
213 |
15.7% |
0.1566176 |
3 |
T13 |
231 |
17% |
0.1698529 |
4 |
T21 |
198 |
14.6% |
0.1455882 |
5 |
T22 |
224 |
16.5% |
0.1647059 |
6 |
T23 |
243 |
17.9% |
0.1786765 |
Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15polkom9_t11
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How satisfied with personal economy: Very-not at all, word options.
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with your current personal financial situation? Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom9_ran = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very pleased |
57 |
22.7% |
0.22709163 |
2 |
Quite pleased |
161 |
64.1% |
0.64143426 |
3 |
Not pleased |
30 |
12% |
0.11952191 |
4 |
Not pleased at all |
3 |
1.2% |
0.01195219 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7854 |
|
NA |
r15polkom9_t12
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How satisfied with personal economy: Extremely-not at all, word options.
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with your current personal financial situation? Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom9_ran = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Extremely satisfied |
10 |
4.7% |
0.04694836 |
2 |
Very satisfied |
60 |
28.2% |
0.28169014 |
3 |
Satisfied |
87 |
40.8% |
0.40845070 |
4 |
Quite satisfied |
25 |
11.7% |
0.11737089 |
5 |
Somewhat satisfied |
15 |
7% |
0.07042254 |
6 |
Not satisfied |
11 |
5.2% |
0.05164319 |
7 |
Not satisfied at all |
5 |
2.3% |
0.02347418 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7892 |
|
NA |
r15polkom9_t13
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How satisfied with personal economy: Extremely-not at all, number options.
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with your current personal financial situation? Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom9_ran = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 Extremely satisfied |
30 |
13% |
0.12987013 |
2 |
2 |
73 |
31.6% |
0.31601732 |
3 |
3 |
61 |
26.4% |
0.26406926 |
4 |
4 |
29 |
12.6% |
0.12554113 |
5 |
5 |
25 |
10.8% |
0.10822511 |
6 |
6 |
10 |
4.3% |
0.04329004 |
7 |
7 Not satisfied at all |
3 |
1.3% |
0.01298701 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7874 |
|
NA |
r15polkom9_t21
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How pleased with personal economy: Very-not at all, word options.
|
Literal question:
|
How pleased are you with your current personal financial situation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom9_ran = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very pleased |
55 |
27.8% |
0.277777778 |
2 |
Quite pleased |
120 |
60.6% |
0.606060606 |
3 |
Not pleased |
18 |
9.1% |
0.090909091 |
4 |
Not pleased at all |
4 |
2% |
0.020202020 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005050505 |
98 |
Not asked |
7907 |
|
NA |
r15polkom9_t22
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How pleased with personal economy: Extremely-not a tall, number options.
|
Literal question:
|
How pleased are you with your current personal financial situation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom9_ran = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 Extremely pleased |
27 |
12.1% |
0.12053571 |
2 |
2 |
63 |
28.1% |
0.28125000 |
3 |
3 |
64 |
28.6% |
0.28571429 |
4 |
4 |
35 |
15.6% |
0.15625000 |
5 |
5 |
23 |
10.3% |
0.10267857 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
2.7% |
0.02678571 |
7 |
7 Not pleased at all |
6 |
2.7% |
0.02678571 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7881 |
|
NA |
r15polkom9_t23
Variable label:
|
Word intensity: How pleased with personal economy: Extremely-not at all, word options.
|
Literal question:
|
How pleased are you with your current personal financial situation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom9_ran = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Extremely pleased |
10 |
4.1% |
0.041152263 |
2 |
Very pleased |
70 |
28.8% |
0.288065844 |
3 |
Pleased |
81 |
33.3% |
0.333333333 |
4 |
Quite pleased |
35 |
14.4% |
0.144032922 |
5 |
Somewhat pleased |
26 |
10.7% |
0.106995885 |
6 |
Not pleased |
17 |
7% |
0.069958848 |
7 |
Not pleased at all |
3 |
1.2% |
0.012345679 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.4% |
0.004115226 |
98 |
Not asked |
7862 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Randomly selects variant of r15polkom10. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Randomly selects variant of r15polkom10. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
T11 |
152 |
11.2% |
0.1117647 |
2 |
T12 |
143 |
10.5% |
0.1051471 |
3 |
T13 |
137 |
10.1% |
0.1007353 |
4 |
T21 |
150 |
11% |
0.1102941 |
5 |
T22 |
139 |
10.2% |
0.1022059 |
6 |
T23 |
165 |
12.1% |
0.1213235 |
7 |
T31 |
148 |
10.9% |
0.1088235 |
8 |
T32 |
166 |
12.2% |
0.1220588 |
9 |
T33 |
160 |
11.8% |
0.1176471 |
Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t11
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How fortunate are you, 1-5.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how fortunate would you say you are?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very unfortunate |
5 |
3.3% |
0.03289474 |
2 |
2 |
9 |
5.9% |
0.05921053 |
3 |
3 |
31 |
20.4% |
0.20394737 |
4 |
4 |
66 |
43.4% |
0.43421053 |
5 |
5 - Very fortunate |
41 |
27% |
0.26973684 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7953 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t12
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How fortunate are you, 1-7.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how fortunate would you say you are?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very unfortunate |
6 |
4.2% |
0.04195804 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
2.8% |
0.02797203 |
3 |
3 |
12 |
8.4% |
0.08391608 |
4 |
4 |
22 |
15.4% |
0.15384615 |
5 |
5 |
37 |
25.9% |
0.25874126 |
6 |
6 |
34 |
23.8% |
0.23776224 |
7 |
7 - Very fortunate |
28 |
19.6% |
0.19580420 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7962 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t13
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How fortunate are you, 1-11.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how fortunate would you say you are?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very unfortunate |
1 |
0.7% |
0.00729927 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1.5% |
0.01459854 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02189781 |
4 |
4 |
5 |
3.6% |
0.03649635 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
3.6% |
0.03649635 |
6 |
6 |
14 |
10.2% |
0.10218978 |
7 |
7 |
16 |
11.7% |
0.11678832 |
8 |
8 |
23 |
16.8% |
0.16788321 |
9 |
9 |
31 |
22.6% |
0.22627737 |
10 |
10 |
24 |
17.5% |
0.17518248 |
11 |
11 - Very fortunate |
12 |
8.8% |
0.08759124 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.7% |
0.00729927 |
98 |
Not asked |
7968 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t21
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How happy are you, 1-5.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how happy would you say you are?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very unhappy |
6 |
4% |
0.0400000 |
2 |
2 |
17 |
11.3% |
0.1133333 |
3 |
3 |
29 |
19.3% |
0.1933333 |
4 |
4 |
75 |
50% |
0.5000000 |
5 |
5 - Very happy |
23 |
15.3% |
0.1533333 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7955 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t22
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How happy are you, 1-7.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how happy would you say you are?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very unhappy |
4 |
2.9% |
0.02877698 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02158273 |
3 |
3 |
14 |
10.1% |
0.10071942 |
4 |
4 |
22 |
15.8% |
0.15827338 |
5 |
5 |
48 |
34.5% |
0.34532374 |
6 |
6 |
37 |
26.6% |
0.26618705 |
7 |
7 - Very happy |
11 |
7.9% |
0.07913669 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7966 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t23
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How happy are you, 1-11.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how happy would you say you are?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very unhappy |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
1.2% |
0.012121212 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
2.4% |
0.024242424 |
4 |
4 |
1 |
0.6% |
0.006060606 |
5 |
5 |
9 |
5.5% |
0.054545455 |
6 |
6 |
20 |
12.1% |
0.121212121 |
7 |
7 |
22 |
13.3% |
0.133333333 |
8 |
8 |
33 |
20% |
0.200000000 |
9 |
9 |
41 |
24.8% |
0.248484848 |
10 |
10 |
27 |
16.4% |
0.163636364 |
11 |
11 - Very happy |
5 |
3% |
0.030303030 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.6% |
0.006060606 |
98 |
Not asked |
7940 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t31
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How privileged are you, 1-5.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how privileged would you say you are?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very unprivileged |
9 |
6.1% |
0.06081081 |
2 |
2 |
18 |
12.2% |
0.12162162 |
3 |
3 |
33 |
22.3% |
0.22297297 |
4 |
4 |
43 |
29.1% |
0.29054054 |
5 |
5 - Very privileged |
45 |
30.4% |
0.30405405 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7957 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t32
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How privileged are you, 1-7.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how privileged would you say you are?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 8. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very unprivileged |
3 |
1.8% |
0.01807229 |
2 |
2 |
12 |
7.2% |
0.07228916 |
3 |
3 |
13 |
7.8% |
0.07831325 |
4 |
4 |
21 |
12.7% |
0.12650602 |
5 |
5 |
54 |
32.5% |
0.32530120 |
6 |
6 |
37 |
22.3% |
0.22289157 |
7 |
7 - Very privileged |
26 |
15.7% |
0.15662651 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7939 |
|
NA |
r15polkom10_t33
Variable label:
|
Scale difference. How privileged are you, 1-11.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how privileged would you say you are?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5 and r15polkom10_ran = 9. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very unprivileged |
2 |
1.3% |
0.01250 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
5% |
0.05000 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
2.5% |
0.02500 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
5% |
0.05000 |
5 |
5 |
4 |
2.5% |
0.02500 |
6 |
6 |
10 |
6.2% |
0.06250 |
7 |
7 |
13 |
8.1% |
0.08125 |
8 |
8 |
37 |
23.1% |
0.23125 |
9 |
9 |
37 |
23.1% |
0.23125 |
10 |
10 |
17 |
10.6% |
0.10625 |
11 |
11 - Very privileged |
20 |
12.5% |
0.12500 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7945 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_ran1
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects tactic(1) for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects tactic(1) for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
protest |
289 |
21.2% |
0.2125000 |
2 |
sabotage |
271 |
19.9% |
0.1992647 |
3 |
hostage taking |
281 |
20.7% |
0.2066176 |
4 |
shooting |
248 |
18.2% |
0.1823529 |
5 |
bombing |
271 |
19.9% |
0.1992647 |
Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_ran3
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects target for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects target for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
a military facility |
214 |
15.7% |
0.1573529 |
2 |
a police station |
235 |
17.3% |
0.1727941 |
3 |
a school |
224 |
16.5% |
0.1647059 |
4 |
a church |
226 |
16.6% |
0.1661765 |
5 |
a mosque |
241 |
17.7% |
0.1772059 |
6 |
a synagogue |
220 |
16.2% |
0.1617647 |
Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_ran4
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects persons for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects persons for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
364 |
26.8% |
0.2676471 |
2 |
One person |
333 |
24.5% |
0.2448529 |
3 |
Two people |
312 |
22.9% |
0.2294118 |
4 |
Ten people |
351 |
25.8% |
0.2580882 |
Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_ran5
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Collects values from r15pad_terror1_ran1.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects tactic(2) for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
the protest |
289 |
21.2% |
0.2125000 |
2 |
the sabotage |
271 |
19.9% |
0.1992647 |
3 |
the hostage taking |
281 |
20.7% |
0.2066176 |
4 |
the shooting |
248 |
18.2% |
0.1823529 |
5 |
the bombing |
271 |
19.9% |
0.1992647 |
Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_ran6
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects adjective for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects adjective for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
one |
269 |
19.8% |
0.1977941 |
2 |
one Christian |
275 |
20.2% |
0.2022059 |
3 |
one Muslim |
273 |
20.1% |
0.2007353 |
4 |
one left-wing extremist |
257 |
18.9% |
0.1889706 |
5 |
one right-wing extremist |
286 |
21% |
0.2102941 |
Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_ran7
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects subject for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects subject for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
organisation |
354 |
26% |
0.2602941 |
2 |
group |
350 |
25.7% |
0.2573529 |
3 |
individual |
328 |
24.1% |
0.2411765 |
4 |
individual of unsound mind |
328 |
24.1% |
0.2411765 |
Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_ran8
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects motivation for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects motivation for r15pad_terror1_a.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
there was no clear motivation behind the incident |
457 |
33.6% |
0.3360294 |
2 |
the incident was carried out with the aim of changing government policy |
440 |
32.4% |
0.3235294 |
3 |
the motivation behind the incident came from a hatred towards the target |
463 |
34% |
0.3404412 |
Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_a
Variable label:
|
Terrorism experiment: Is the event a terrorist act.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Could you please now imagine that an incident has taken place in the Nordic region and then consider some questions about the incident below. The incident involves a [protest / sabotage / hostage taking / shooting / bombing] that targeted [a military facility / a police station /a school / a church / a mosque / a synagogue ] in Norway. [Noone/One person/Two people/Ten people] were killed in [the protest / the sabotage / the hostage taking / the shooting / the bombing], which was performed by [one / one Christian / one Muslim / one left-wing extremist / one right-wing extremist] [organisation / group / individual / individual of unsound mind ]. News coverage suggests [there was no clear motivation behind the incident / the incident was carried out with the aim of changing government policy / the motivation behind the incident came from a hatred towards the target ].
|
Literal question:
|
Would you classify this incident as an act of terrorism?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. Experiment. The respondent is presented with a fictitious event. The description of the incident depends on randomized values. See background variables.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, this is terrorism |
918 |
67.5% |
0.675000000 |
2 |
No, this is not terrorism |
432 |
31.8% |
0.317647059 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007352941 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_b_1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Suspecting [R15PAD_TERROR1_A] authorities may: Detain indefinately without trial.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that this incident was imminent. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities should have the right to:
|
Literal question:
|
Hold people in custody as long as they want without charging them
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
89 |
6.5% |
0.065441176 |
2 |
Agree |
156 |
11.5% |
0.114705882 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
209 |
15.4% |
0.153676471 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
90 |
6.6% |
0.066176471 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
174 |
12.8% |
0.127941176 |
6 |
Disagree |
364 |
26.8% |
0.267647059 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
265 |
19.5% |
0.194852941 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
1% |
0.009558824 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_b_2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Suspecting [R15PAD_TERROR1_A] authorities may: Wire tap phone calls.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that this incident was imminent. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities should have the right to:
|
Literal question:
|
Listen in on people’s telephone conversations
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
185 |
13.6% |
0.136029412 |
2 |
Agree |
344 |
25.3% |
0.252941176 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
367 |
27% |
0.269852941 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
99 |
7.3% |
0.072794118 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
141 |
10.4% |
0.103676471 |
6 |
Disagree |
136 |
10% |
0.100000000 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
76 |
5.6% |
0.055882353 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008823529 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_b_3
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Suspecting [R15PAD_TERROR1_A] authorities may: Stop and search people on the street.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that this incident was imminent. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities should have the right to:
|
Literal question:
|
Randomly stop and search people on the street
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
84 |
6.2% |
0.06176471 |
2 |
Agree |
174 |
12.8% |
0.12794118 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
293 |
21.5% |
0.21544118 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
131 |
9.6% |
0.09632353 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
172 |
12.6% |
0.12647059 |
6 |
Disagree |
305 |
22.4% |
0.22426471 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
185 |
13.6% |
0.13602941 |
97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.2% |
0.01176471 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_b_4
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Suspecting [R15PAD_TERROR1_A] authorities may: Monitor emails and internet communication.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that this incident was imminent. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities should have the right to:
|
Literal question:
|
Conduct surveillance of people’s Email and Internet communications
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
116 |
8.5% |
0.085294118 |
2 |
Agree |
235 |
17.3% |
0.172794118 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
371 |
27.3% |
0.272794118 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
139 |
10.2% |
0.102205882 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
175 |
12.9% |
0.128676471 |
6 |
Disagree |
190 |
14% |
0.139705882 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
122 |
9% |
0.089705882 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008823529 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_b_5
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Suspecting [R15PAD_TERROR1_A] authorities may: Monitor/bug rooms.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that this incident was imminent. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities should have the right to:
|
Literal question:
|
Conduct surveillance/wire tapping of rooms
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
111 |
8.2% |
0.08161765 |
2 |
Agree |
272 |
20% |
0.20000000 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
371 |
27.3% |
0.27279412 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
139 |
10.2% |
0.10220588 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
164 |
12.1% |
0.12058824 |
6 |
Disagree |
177 |
13% |
0.13014706 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
109 |
8% |
0.08014706 |
97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.3% |
0.01250000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_b_6
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Suspecting [R15PAD_TERROR1_A] authorities may: Cordon off parts of the city.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that this incident was imminent. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities should have the right to:
|
Literal question:
|
Cordon off parts of the city
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
165 |
12.1% |
0.12132353 |
2 |
Agree |
432 |
31.8% |
0.31764706 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
363 |
26.7% |
0.26691176 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
138 |
10.1% |
0.10147059 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
104 |
7.6% |
0.07647059 |
6 |
Disagree |
97 |
7.1% |
0.07132353 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
45 |
3.3% |
0.03308824 |
97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.2% |
0.01176471 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror1_b_7
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Suspecting [R15PAD_TERROR1_A] authorities may: Let armed police or the army patrol the streets.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that the authorities suspected that this incident was imminent. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities should have the right to:
|
Literal question:
|
Let armed police or the army patrol the streets
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
227 |
16.7% |
0.166911765 |
2 |
Agree |
383 |
28.2% |
0.281617647 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
332 |
24.4% |
0.244117647 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
104 |
7.6% |
0.076470588 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
129 |
9.5% |
0.094852941 |
6 |
Disagree |
108 |
7.9% |
0.079411765 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
66 |
4.9% |
0.048529412 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008088235 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror2_ran1
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects victim for r15pad_terror2.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects victim for r15pad_terror2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
you personally |
453 |
33.3% |
0.3330882 |
2 |
Norway |
451 |
33.2% |
0.3316176 |
3 |
Europe |
456 |
33.5% |
0.3352941 |
Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror2_ran2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects time frame for r15pad_terror2.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects time frame for r15pad_terror2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
today |
680 |
50% |
0.5 |
2 |
in the future |
680 |
50% |
0.5 |
Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror2
Variable label:
|
How great threat is terrorism for [you/Europe][today/in the future]
|
Literal question:
|
Overall, how serious a threat do you perceive terrorism to be for [you personally /Norway/Europe] [today/in the future]?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on the values of r15pad_terror2_ran1 and r15pad_terror2_ran2. The values are randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very serious |
89 |
6.5% |
0.0654411765 |
2 |
Serious |
330 |
24.3% |
0.2426470588 |
3 |
Somewhat serious |
478 |
35.1% |
0.3514705882 |
4 |
Not very serious |
372 |
27.4% |
0.2735294118 |
5 |
Not a threat |
90 |
6.6% |
0.0661764706 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007352941 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror3
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Preserving safety should limit individual freedoms.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree that the safeguarding of society’s security should be at the expense of individuals’ freedom (such as protection of privacy and the right to privacy)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
70 |
5.1% |
0.051470588 |
2 |
Agree |
245 |
18% |
0.180147059 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
504 |
37.1% |
0.370588235 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
109 |
8% |
0.080147059 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
183 |
13.5% |
0.134558824 |
6 |
Disagree |
166 |
12.2% |
0.122058824 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
78 |
5.7% |
0.057352941 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003676471 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror5
Variable label:
|
How important are counter-terrorist measures for you.
|
Literal question:
|
How important are anti-terrorism measures for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
211 |
15.5% |
0.155147059 |
2 |
Importnat |
538 |
39.6% |
0.395588235 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
365 |
26.8% |
0.268382353 |
4 |
Slightly important |
188 |
13.8% |
0.138235294 |
5 |
Not important at all |
54 |
4% |
0.039705882 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002941176 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror6
Variable label:
|
Which party has the best counter-terrorism policies.
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party do you think has the best policies aimed at combating terrorist attacks in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Labour Party |
213 |
15.7% |
0.156617647 |
2 |
The Progress Party |
163 |
12% |
0.119852941 |
3 |
The Conservative Party |
259 |
19% |
0.190441176 |
4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
47 |
3.5% |
0.034558824 |
5 |
The Centre Party |
31 |
2.3% |
0.022794118 |
6 |
The Christian Democrats |
15 |
1.1% |
0.011029412 |
7 |
The Liberal Party |
14 |
1% |
0.010294118 |
8 |
The Red Party |
22 |
1.6% |
0.016176471 |
9 |
The Green Party |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003676471 |
10 |
Other (write here) |
35 |
2.6% |
0.025735294 |
11 |
None |
510 |
37.5% |
0.375000000 |
97 |
Not answered |
46 |
3.4% |
0.033823529 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror6_10_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R15PAD_TERROR6]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party do you think has the best policies aimed at combating terrorist attacks in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15pad_terror8_1
Variable label:
|
How capable of handling terrorist attacks: International organizations.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In your opinion, how good or bad are the following actors in Norway regarding their ability to deal with the risk of terrorist attacks?
|
Literal question:
|
International organizations
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Extremely good |
14 |
1% |
0.01029412 |
2 |
Very good |
156 |
11.5% |
0.11470588 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
456 |
33.5% |
0.33529412 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
471 |
34.6% |
0.34632353 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
115 |
8.5% |
0.08455882 |
6 |
Very bad |
57 |
4.2% |
0.04191176 |
7 |
Extremely bad |
19 |
1.4% |
0.01397059 |
97 |
Not answered |
72 |
5.3% |
0.05294118 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror8_2
Variable label:
|
How capable of handling terrorist attacks: National authorities.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In your opinion, how good or bad are the following actors in Norway regarding their ability to deal with the risk of terrorist attacks?
|
Literal question:
|
National authorities
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Extremely good |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008088235 |
2 |
Very good |
235 |
17.3% |
0.172794118 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
678 |
49.9% |
0.498529412 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
216 |
15.9% |
0.158823529 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
138 |
10.1% |
0.101470588 |
6 |
Very bad |
28 |
2.1% |
0.020588235 |
7 |
Extremely bad |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006617647 |
97 |
Not answered |
45 |
3.3% |
0.033088235 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror8_3
Variable label:
|
How capable of handling terrorist attacks: Local authorities.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In your opinion, how good or bad are the following actors in Norway regarding their ability to deal with the risk of terrorist attacks?
|
Literal question:
|
Local authorities
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Extremely good |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003676471 |
2 |
Very good |
63 |
4.6% |
0.046323529 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
390 |
28.7% |
0.286764706 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
427 |
31.4% |
0.313970588 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
273 |
20.1% |
0.200735294 |
6 |
Very bad |
115 |
8.5% |
0.084558824 |
7 |
Extremely bad |
29 |
2.1% |
0.021323529 |
97 |
Not answered |
58 |
4.3% |
0.042647059 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror8_4
Variable label:
|
How capable of handling terrorist attacks: Police.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In your opinion, how good or bad are the following actors in Norway regarding their ability to deal with the risk of terrorist attacks?
|
Literal question:
|
The police
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Extremely good |
24 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
2 |
Very good |
280 |
20.6% |
0.20588235 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
641 |
47.1% |
0.47132353 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
198 |
14.6% |
0.14558824 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
118 |
8.7% |
0.08676471 |
6 |
Very bad |
41 |
3% |
0.03014706 |
7 |
Extremely bad |
15 |
1.1% |
0.01102941 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
3.2% |
0.03161765 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror8_5
Variable label:
|
How capable of handling terrorist attacks: Voluntary organizations.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In your opinion, how good or bad are the following actors in Norway regarding their ability to deal with the risk of terrorist attacks?
|
Literal question:
|
NGOs
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Extremely good |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005147059 |
2 |
Very good |
60 |
4.4% |
0.044117647 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
255 |
18.8% |
0.187500000 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
552 |
40.6% |
0.405882353 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
198 |
14.6% |
0.145588235 |
6 |
Very bad |
171 |
12.6% |
0.125735294 |
7 |
Extremely bad |
58 |
4.3% |
0.042647059 |
97 |
Not answered |
59 |
4.3% |
0.043382353 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror8_6
Variable label:
|
How capable of handling terrorist attacks: The individual citizen.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In your opinion, how good or bad are the following actors in Norway regarding their ability to deal with the risk of terrorist attacks?
|
Literal question:
|
Individual citizens
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Extremely good |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005882353 |
2 |
Very good |
34 |
2.5% |
0.025000000 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
197 |
14.5% |
0.144852941 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
489 |
36% |
0.359558824 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
256 |
18.8% |
0.188235294 |
6 |
Very bad |
225 |
16.5% |
0.165441176 |
7 |
Extremely bad |
99 |
7.3% |
0.072794118 |
97 |
Not answered |
52 |
3.8% |
0.038235294 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror10_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects event for r15pad_terror10.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects event for r15pad_terror10.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1351] [Invalid:6754] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
natural disasters |
686 |
50.8% |
0.507772 |
2 |
terrorist attacks |
665 |
49.2% |
0.492228 |
Sysmiss |
|
6754 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror10
Variable label:
|
For/against: 100 million NOK per life saved on measures to limit damages from [natural disasters/terrorist attacks].
|
Pre-question text:
|
Presently, there is great deal of attention focused on [natural disasters/terrorist attacks]. The state can put various measures in place to reduce the risk of [natural disasters/terrorist attacks], but there is controversy over how much money the state should prioritize to spend on such measures.
|
Literal question:
|
If the state can expect to save one human life by spending NOK 100 million on measures to reduce the risk of [natural disasters/terrorist attacks], do you think the state should prioritize these measures? These measures should be carried out if they have to be funded through increased taxes among the population?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. Experiment. The wording of the question depends on the values of r15pad_terror10_ran. The value is randomized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I support it very strongly |
97 |
7.1% |
0.07132353 |
2 |
I support it strongly |
230 |
16.9% |
0.16911765 |
3 |
I support it somewhat |
363 |
26.7% |
0.26691176 |
4 |
I neither support it nor oppose it |
316 |
23.2% |
0.23235294 |
5 |
I oppose it somewhat |
205 |
15.1% |
0.15073529 |
6 |
I oppose it strongly |
94 |
6.9% |
0.06911765 |
7 |
I oppose it very strongly |
25 |
1.8% |
0.01838235 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
2.2% |
0.02205882 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror11pre
Variable label:
|
How has immigration from muslim countries affected the risk of terrorist attacks in the receiving countries.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Over the past twenty years, there have been high levels of immigration from Muslim countries in Africa, Asia and the Middle East to Europe. There are differences in how strict certain countries are regarding their immigration policies. There are also differences regarding which countries Muslims typically prefer to emigrate to. By gathering large amounts of data, researchers can use these differences to study the correlation between Muslim immigration and terrorism. A US research team recently used data from 174 countries during the period of 1995-2015 to study how the probability of terrorism changed as a result of increased immigration from Muslim countries.
|
Literal question:
|
During the period of 1995-2015, how do you think increased immigration from Muslim-majority countries influenced recipient countries?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
It led to a lot more terrorism |
141 |
10.4% |
0.103676471 |
2 |
It led to somewhat more terrorism |
510 |
37.5% |
0.375000000 |
3 |
It did not lead to any more or any less terrorism |
649 |
47.7% |
0.477205882 |
4 |
It led to less terrorism |
26 |
1.9% |
0.019117647 |
5 |
It led to a lot less terrorism |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005147059 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
2% |
0.019852941 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror11_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects if the respondent is shown a text prior to answering r15pad_terror11posta.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects if the respondent is shown a text prior to answering r15pad_terror11posta.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1343] [Invalid:6762] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
For your information, the researchers who analysed the correlation between
immigration from Muslim countries and terrorist attacks in recipient countries,
found that increased Muslim immigration had no impact on terrorism in recipient
countries. |
691 |
51.5% |
0.5145197 |
2 |
[Control] |
652 |
48.5% |
0.4854803 |
Sysmiss |
|
6762 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror11_usedback
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent has used the back button.]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent has used the back button.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:56] [Invalid:8049] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Back button used |
56 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
8049 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror11posta
Variable label:
|
Will the risk of terrorist attacks in Norway increase if we accept more immigrants from muslim countries.
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Blank / For your information, the researchers who analysed the correlation between immigration from Muslim countries and terrorist attacks in recipient countries, found that increased Muslim immigration had no impact on terrorism in recipient countries.]
|
Literal question:
|
Over the next ten years, do you think the risk of terror in Norway will increase if we choose to accept more immigrants from Muslim countries in Africa, Asia and the Middle East? The risk of terror will…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. If r15pad_terror11_ran = 1, the respondent was shown a text before the question was asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Increase greatly |
86 |
6.3% |
0.063235294 |
2 |
Increase |
207 |
15.2% |
0.152205882 |
3 |
Increase somewhat |
385 |
28.3% |
0.283088235 |
4 |
Neither increase nor decrease |
633 |
46.5% |
0.465441176 |
5 |
Decrease somewhat |
14 |
1% |
0.010294118 |
6 |
Decrease |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007352941 |
7 |
Decrease greatly |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001470588 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.7% |
0.016911765 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror11postb
Variable label:
|
Should Norway accept more of fewer immigrants than today?
|
Literal question:
|
There is an ongoing debate in Norway about how many refugees we should receive. Do you think Norway should receive more or fewer refugees than it does today?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. If r15pad_terror11_ran = 1, the respondent was shown a text before the question was asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Receive many more |
39 |
2.9% |
0.02867647 |
2 |
Receive more |
188 |
13.8% |
0.13823529 |
3 |
Receive a few more |
282 |
20.7% |
0.20735294 |
4 |
Neither receive any more nor any less |
385 |
28.3% |
0.28308824 |
5 |
Receive a few less |
173 |
12.7% |
0.12720588 |
6 |
Receive fewer |
136 |
10% |
0.10000000 |
7 |
Receive many fewer |
126 |
9.3% |
0.09264706 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
2.3% |
0.02279412 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15pad_terror11postc
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norway should reduce the share of immigrants with muslim backgrounds.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people believe Norway should reduce the proportion of Muslim refugees we receive.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norway should reduce the proportion of refugees with Muslim backgrounds?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 5. If r15pad_terror11_ran = 1, the respondent was shown a text before the question was asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
156 |
11.5% |
0.11470588 |
2 |
Agree |
146 |
10.7% |
0.10735294 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
226 |
16.6% |
0.16617647 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
312 |
22.9% |
0.22941176 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
144 |
10.6% |
0.10588235 |
6 |
Disagree |
221 |
16.2% |
0.16250000 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
131 |
9.6% |
0.09632353 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
1.8% |
0.01764706 |
98 |
Not asked |
6745 |
|
NA |
r15tdr1
Variable label:
|
Where did you grow up?
|
Literal question:
|
Where did you grow up?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-20]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Østfold |
61 |
4.5% |
0.044525547 |
2 |
Akershus |
113 |
8.2% |
0.082481752 |
3 |
Oslo |
139 |
10.1% |
0.101459854 |
4 |
Hedmark |
43 |
3.1% |
0.031386861 |
5 |
Oppland |
49 |
3.6% |
0.035766423 |
6 |
Buskerud |
52 |
3.8% |
0.037956204 |
7 |
Vestfold |
45 |
3.3% |
0.032846715 |
8 |
Telemark |
47 |
3.4% |
0.034306569 |
9 |
Aust-Agder |
33 |
2.4% |
0.024087591 |
10 |
Vest-Agder |
50 |
3.6% |
0.036496350 |
11 |
Rogaland |
111 |
8.1% |
0.081021898 |
12 |
Hordaland |
165 |
12% |
0.120437956 |
13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
47 |
3.4% |
0.034306569 |
14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
67 |
4.9% |
0.048905109 |
15 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
78 |
5.7% |
0.056934307 |
16 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
21 |
1.5% |
0.015328467 |
17 |
Nordland |
87 |
6.4% |
0.063503650 |
18 |
Troms |
63 |
4.6% |
0.045985401 |
19 |
Finnmark |
16 |
1.2% |
0.011678832 |
20 |
Other |
81 |
5.9% |
0.059124088 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001459854 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr1_20_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R15TDR1].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Where did you grow up?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15tdr2
Variable label:
|
How many years have you lived in the country you live in now.
|
Literal question:
|
How many years have you lived in the county you now live in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1366] [Invalid:6739] [Range:0-90]
|
r15tdr3_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects region for r15tdr3_5.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group = 5. Background variable. Randomly selects region for r15tdr3_5.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1370] [Invalid:6735] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Scandinavia |
685 |
50% |
0.5 |
2 |
The Nordic countries |
685 |
50% |
0.5 |
Sysmiss |
|
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr3_1
Variable label:
|
How strong affinity to: Your municipality.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please could you say something about what sort of affinity you have to each of the following entities:
|
Literal question:
|
How strong is your affinity to the municipality you live in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong affinity |
553 |
40.4% |
0.403649635 |
2 |
Affinity |
522 |
38.1% |
0.381021898 |
3 |
Some affinity |
190 |
13.9% |
0.138686131 |
4 |
No particular affinity |
82 |
6% |
0.059854015 |
5 |
No affinity at all |
20 |
1.5% |
0.014598540 |
6 |
Don't know |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001459854 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000729927 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr3_2
Variable label:
|
How strong affinity to: Your county.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please could you say something about what sort of affinity you have to each of the following entities:
|
Literal question:
|
How strong is your affinity to the county you live in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong affinity |
434 |
31.7% |
0.316788321 |
2 |
Affinity |
516 |
37.7% |
0.376642336 |
3 |
Some affinity |
255 |
18.6% |
0.186131387 |
4 |
No particular affinity |
121 |
8.8% |
0.088321168 |
5 |
No affinity at all |
32 |
2.3% |
0.023357664 |
6 |
Don't know |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008759124 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr3_3
Variable label:
|
How strong affinity to: Your region of the country.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please could you say something about what sort of affinity you have to each of the following entities:
|
Literal question:
|
How strong is your affinity to the region of the country you live in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong affinity |
624 |
45.5% |
0.455474453 |
2 |
Affinity |
486 |
35.5% |
0.354744526 |
3 |
Some affinity |
169 |
12.3% |
0.123357664 |
4 |
No particular affinity |
58 |
4.2% |
0.042335766 |
5 |
No affinity at all |
19 |
1.4% |
0.013868613 |
6 |
Don't know |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000729927 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr3_4
Variable label:
|
How strong affinity to: Norway.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please could you say something about what sort of affinity you have to each of the following entities:
|
Literal question:
|
How strong is your affinity to Noway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong affinity |
1009 |
73.6% |
0.736496350 |
2 |
Affinity |
286 |
20.9% |
0.208759124 |
3 |
Some affinity |
52 |
3.8% |
0.037956204 |
4 |
No particular affinity |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005109489 |
5 |
No affinity at all |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002189781 |
6 |
Don't know |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000729927 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008759124 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr3_5
Variable label:
|
How strong affinity to: [Scandinavia/The Nordic countries].
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please could you say something about what sort of affinity you have to each of the following entities:
|
Literal question:
|
How strong is your affinity to [Scandinavia/The Nordic countries]?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. The wording of the question depends on the randomized value of r15tdr3_ran. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong affinity |
462 |
33.7% |
0.337226277 |
2 |
Affinity |
618 |
45.1% |
0.451094891 |
3 |
Some affinity |
219 |
16% |
0.159854015 |
4 |
No particular affinity |
42 |
3.1% |
0.030656934 |
5 |
No affinity at all |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007299270 |
6 |
Don't know |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004379562 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr3_7
Variable label:
|
How strong affinity to: Europe.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please could you say something about what sort of affinity you have to each of the following entities:
|
Literal question:
|
How strong is your affinity to Europe?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong affinity |
389 |
28.4% |
0.283941606 |
2 |
Affinity |
585 |
42.7% |
0.427007299 |
3 |
Some affinity |
277 |
20.2% |
0.202189781 |
4 |
No particular affinity |
80 |
5.8% |
0.058394161 |
5 |
No affinity at all |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
6 |
Don't know |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr4a
Variable label:
|
Do you have one or more geographical identities.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We all have different identities. Identity can, among other things, be related to gender, age, class, religion and profession. Many also have identities related to a geographical area such as a district, city, municipality, county or region of the country.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have one or more of these geographical identities?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
890 |
65% |
0.649635036 |
2 |
No |
473 |
34.5% |
0.345255474 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005109489 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr4b
Variable label:
|
Open [R15TDR4A].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Please could you say something about which geographic identities you have? - You can mention more than one if you prefer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6 and r15tdr4a = 1. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15tdr5
Variable label:
|
How interested in local politics.
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how interested are you in local politics?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
137 |
10% |
0.100000000 |
2 |
Interested |
654 |
47.7% |
0.477372263 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
401 |
29.3% |
0.292700730 |
4 |
Not very interested |
148 |
10.8% |
0.108029197 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
29 |
2.1% |
0.021167883 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000729927 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr6
Variable label:
|
How interested in county politics.
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how interested are you in county politics?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
56 |
4.1% |
0.040875912 |
2 |
Interested |
396 |
28.9% |
0.289051095 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
515 |
37.6% |
0.375912409 |
4 |
Not very interested |
332 |
24.2% |
0.242335766 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
64 |
4.7% |
0.046715328 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005109489 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr7_1
Variable label:
|
How important to vote: Municipal elections.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important is it for you to vote in…
|
Literal question:
|
Municipal elections
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important to vote |
827 |
60.4% |
0.603649635 |
2 |
Important to vote |
373 |
27.2% |
0.272262774 |
3 |
Somewhat important to vote |
93 |
6.8% |
0.067883212 |
4 |
Not very important to vote |
56 |
4.1% |
0.040875912 |
5 |
Not important to vote at all |
15 |
1.1% |
0.010948905 |
6 |
I do not have the right to vote |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002919708 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001459854 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr7_2
Variable label:
|
How important to vote: County elections.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How important is it for you to vote in…
|
Literal question:
|
County council elections
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important to vote |
556 |
40.6% |
0.405839416 |
2 |
Important to vote |
415 |
30.3% |
0.302919708 |
3 |
Somewhat important to vote |
192 |
14% |
0.140145985 |
4 |
Not very important to vote |
145 |
10.6% |
0.105839416 |
5 |
Not important to vote at all |
41 |
3% |
0.029927007 |
6 |
I do not have the right to vote |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008029197 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007299270 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr8a
Variable label:
|
Would vote for this party if municipal elections next week.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Local elections will take place this September (municipal council and county council elections).
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were municipal elections next week?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
56 |
4.1% |
0.040875912 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
272 |
19.9% |
0.198540146 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
82 |
6% |
0.059854015 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
53 |
3.9% |
0.038686131 |
5 |
The Social Left Party |
93 |
6.8% |
0.067883212 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
160 |
11.7% |
0.116788321 |
7 |
The Green Party |
81 |
5.9% |
0.059124088 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
308 |
22.5% |
0.224817518 |
9 |
The Red Party |
85 |
6.2% |
0.062043796 |
10 |
A joint list |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000729927 |
11 |
A local list |
26 |
1.9% |
0.018978102 |
12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
35 |
2.6% |
0.025547445 |
13 |
Would not vote |
22 |
1.6% |
0.016058394 |
14 |
Not entitled to vote |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004379562 |
15 |
Other: |
77 |
5.6% |
0.056204380 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr8a_15_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R15TDR8A]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Local elections will take place this September (municipal council and county council elections).
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were municipal elections next week?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15tdr8b
Variable label:
|
Would vote for this party if county elections next week.
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were county council elections next week?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
53 |
3.9% |
0.038686131 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
267 |
19.5% |
0.194890511 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
77 |
5.6% |
0.056204380 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
43 |
3.1% |
0.031386861 |
5 |
The Social Left Party |
89 |
6.5% |
0.064963504 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
150 |
10.9% |
0.109489051 |
7 |
The Green Party |
78 |
5.7% |
0.056934307 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
316 |
23.1% |
0.230656934 |
9 |
The Red Party |
79 |
5.8% |
0.057664234 |
10 |
A joint list |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000729927 |
11 |
A local list |
18 |
1.3% |
0.013138686 |
12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
43 |
3.1% |
0.031386861 |
13 |
Would not vote |
53 |
3.9% |
0.038686131 |
14 |
Not entitled to vote |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007299270 |
15 |
Other: |
75 |
5.5% |
0.054744526 |
97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.3% |
0.013138686 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr8b_15_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R15TDR8B]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were county council elections next week?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15tdr9_2
Variable label:
|
How important for you: Decisions made by municipal government.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public tasks are resolved at different levels in Norway. Some of the most important municipal tasks are primary and lower secondary schools, kindergartens, primary healthcare, care and nursing, public transport and a variety of technical services: sewage, drains, water and waste disposal. The county authorities are responsible for upper secondary education and regional development, while central authorities are responsible for the police, defence, higher education and a variety of social security services. Based on this, how important are the decisions made at the different levels for you personally?
|
Literal question:
|
How important are the decisions made by the municipal council for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
529 |
38.6% |
0.386131387 |
2 |
Important |
618 |
45.1% |
0.451094891 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
168 |
12.3% |
0.122627737 |
4 |
Slightly important |
42 |
3.1% |
0.030656934 |
5 |
Not important at all |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005839416 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003649635 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr9_4
Variable label:
|
How important for you: Decisions made by county government.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public tasks are resolved at different levels in Norway. Some of the most important municipal tasks are primary and lower secondary schools, kindergartens, primary healthcare, care and nursing, public transport and a variety of technical services: sewage, drains, water and waste disposal. The county authorities are responsible for upper secondary education and regional development, while central authorities are responsible for the police, defence, higher education and a variety of social security services. Based on this, how important are the decisions made at the different levels for you personally?
|
Literal question:
|
How important are the decisions made by the county council for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
213 |
15.5% |
0.155474453 |
2 |
Important |
580 |
42.3% |
0.423357664 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
402 |
29.3% |
0.293430657 |
4 |
Slightly important |
154 |
11.2% |
0.112408759 |
5 |
Not important at all |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008759124 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006569343 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr9_6
Variable label:
|
How important for you: Decisions made by Parliament.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Public tasks are resolved at different levels in Norway. Some of the most important municipal tasks are primary and lower secondary schools, kindergartens, primary healthcare, care and nursing, public transport and a variety of technical services: sewage, drains, water and waste disposal. The county authorities are responsible for upper secondary education and regional development, while central authorities are responsible for the police, defence, higher education and a variety of social security services. Based on this, how important are the decisions made at the different levels for you personally?
|
Literal question:
|
How important are the decisions made by the Norwegian Parliament for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
479 |
35% |
0.349635036 |
2 |
Important |
635 |
46.4% |
0.463503650 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
199 |
14.5% |
0.145255474 |
4 |
Slightly important |
38 |
2.8% |
0.027737226 |
5 |
Not important at all |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005839416 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008029197 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr10_2
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with services from: Municipality.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the previous question, task allocation between the levels of governance in Norway was presented, we wish to repeat this before the next question: Public tasks are resolved at different levels in Norway. Some of the most important municipal tasks are primary and lower secondary schools, kindergartens, primary healthcare, care and nursing, public transport and a variety of technical services: sewage, drains, water and waste disposal. The county authorities are responsible for upper secondary education, dental health and regional development, while central authorities are responsible for the police, defence, higher education and a variety of social security services. Based on this, how satisfied are you with the services provided at the different levels?
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the services provided by your municipality?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
127 |
9.3% |
0.092700730 |
2 |
Satisfied |
761 |
55.5% |
0.555474453 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
357 |
26.1% |
0.260583942 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
84 |
6.1% |
0.061313869 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
15 |
1.1% |
0.010948905 |
6 |
Don't know |
18 |
1.3% |
0.013138686 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005839416 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr10_4
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with services from: County.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the previous question, task allocation between the levels of governance in Norway was presented, we wish to repeat this before the next question: Public tasks are resolved at different levels in Norway. Some of the most important municipal tasks are primary and lower secondary schools, kindergartens, primary healthcare, care and nursing, public transport and a variety of technical services: sewage, drains, water and waste disposal. The county authorities are responsible for upper secondary education, dental health and regional development, while central authorities are responsible for the police, defence, higher education and a variety of social security services. Based on this, how satisfied are you with the services provided at the different levels?
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the services provided by your county authority?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
36 |
2.6% |
0.026277372 |
2 |
Satisfied |
575 |
42% |
0.419708029 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
484 |
35.3% |
0.353284672 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
108 |
7.9% |
0.078832117 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
25 |
1.8% |
0.018248175 |
6 |
Don't know |
131 |
9.6% |
0.095620438 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008029197 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr10_6
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with services from: State.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the previous question, task allocation between the levels of governance in Norway was presented, we wish to repeat this before the next question: Public tasks are resolved at different levels in Norway. Some of the most important municipal tasks are primary and lower secondary schools, kindergartens, primary healthcare, care and nursing, public transport and a variety of technical services: sewage, drains, water and waste disposal. The county authorities are responsible for upper secondary education, dental health and regional development, while central authorities are responsible for the police, defence, higher education and a variety of social security services. Based on this, how satisfied are you with the services provided at the different levels?
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the services provided by the state?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
47 |
3.4% |
0.034306569 |
2 |
Satisfied |
614 |
44.8% |
0.448175182 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
508 |
37.1% |
0.370802920 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
143 |
10.4% |
0.104379562 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
31 |
2.3% |
0.022627737 |
6 |
Don't know |
16 |
1.2% |
0.011678832 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008029197 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr11
Variable label:
|
Municipalities should have more, fewer, or as many tasks as today.
|
Pre-question text:
|
From the 1st of January 2020, Norway will receive a new municipal and county structure. Many municipalities and county authorities will be merged. The distribution of tasks between the administrative levels will also change somewhat as a result of these reforms. If one level is assigned certain new tasks, it usually means that another level loses responsibility for certain tasks.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following assertions is closest to your point of view:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Municipalities should receive fewer tasks |
246 |
18% |
0.179562044 |
2 |
The distribution of tasks between state, county authority and municipality
should remain as it is today |
431 |
31.5% |
0.314598540 |
3 |
Municipalities should receive more tasks |
389 |
28.4% |
0.283941606 |
4 |
Don't know |
292 |
21.3% |
0.213138686 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008759124 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr12
Variable label:
|
Counties should have more, fewer, as many tasks as today, or be shut down.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following assertions is closest to your point of view:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
County authorities should receive fewer tasks |
195 |
14.2% |
0.14233577 |
2 |
The distribution of tasks between state, county authority and municipality
should remain as it is today |
347 |
25.3% |
0.25328467 |
3 |
County authorities should receive more tasks |
180 |
13.1% |
0.13138686 |
4 |
County authorities should be closed down |
333 |
24.3% |
0.24306569 |
5 |
Don't know |
296 |
21.6% |
0.21605839 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.4% |
0.01386861 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr13
Variable label:
|
Most important reason for party choice in municipal elections.
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons why people vote for a particular political party or party list during elections.
|
Literal question:
|
Regarding the municipal elections in September, which of the four considerations mentioned below will be most important to you when you decide on which political party or party list to vote for?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Local issues |
563 |
41.1% |
0.41094891 |
2 |
Candidates on the party list |
138 |
10.1% |
0.10072993 |
3 |
National issues |
219 |
16% |
0.15985401 |
4 |
General confidence in the party/party list |
434 |
31.7% |
0.31678832 |
97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.2% |
0.01167883 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr14
Variable label:
|
How great trust in municipality politicians.
|
Literal question:
|
How much confidence would you say you have in municipal politicians?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
23 |
1.7% |
0.016788321 |
2 |
High confidence |
415 |
30.3% |
0.302919708 |
3 |
Some confidence |
689 |
50.3% |
0.502919708 |
4 |
Low confidence |
196 |
14.3% |
0.143065693 |
5 |
No confidence at all |
34 |
2.5% |
0.024817518 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr15_ran
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable. Randomly selects either r15tdr15a or r15tdr15b.]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Randomly selects either r15tdr15a or r15tdr15b.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1360] [Invalid:6745] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
What is important in order for you to have confidence in municipal politicians? |
687 |
50.5% |
0.5051471 |
2 |
What would you say creates the mistrust of municipal politicians? |
673 |
49.5% |
0.4948529 |
Sysmiss |
|
6745 |
|
NA |
r15tdr15a
Variable label:
|
What is important for you to have trust in municipality politicians [Open].[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What is important in order for you to have confidence in municipal politicians?
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. We wish to receive all kinds of answers, a few sentences or just a few words if you would prefer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6 and r15tdr15_ran = 1. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15tdr15b
Variable label:
|
What creates lack of trust in municipality politicians [Open]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What would you say creates the mistrust of municipal politicians?
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. We wish to receive all kinds of answers, a few sentences or just a few words if you would prefer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6 and r15tdr15_ran = 2. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15tdr16
Variable label:
|
Perception of economic situation in Norway today.
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation in Norway? Do you believe it is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
491 |
35.8% |
0.358394161 |
2 |
Good |
688 |
50.2% |
0.502189781 |
3 |
Quite good |
110 |
8% |
0.080291971 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
41 |
3% |
0.029927007 |
5 |
Quite bad |
21 |
1.5% |
0.015328467 |
6 |
Bad |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002919708 |
7 |
Very bad |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001459854 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009489051 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr17
Variable label:
|
Economic situation in [region of country] compared with the rest of Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation [in your region of the country] with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation [in your region of the country] as better, worse or the same?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Better |
432 |
31.5% |
0.31532847 |
2 |
Worse |
190 |
13.9% |
0.13868613 |
3 |
The same |
726 |
53% |
0.52992701 |
97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.6% |
0.01605839 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr18
Variable label:
|
Central authorities should intervene to even out economic differences between parts of the country.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following assertion:
|
Literal question:
|
Central authorities should intervene with measures to even out economic inequalities that exist between different parts of the country?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
224 |
16.4% |
0.16350365 |
2 |
Agree |
459 |
33.5% |
0.33503650 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
372 |
27.2% |
0.27153285 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
157 |
11.5% |
0.11459854 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
78 |
5.7% |
0.05693431 |
6 |
Disagree |
47 |
3.4% |
0.03430657 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
18 |
1.3% |
0.01313869 |
97 |
Not answered |
15 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr19
Variable label:
|
Economic resources should be transferred from rich to poor parts of the country to secure equal quality of public services.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following assertion:
|
Literal question:
|
Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
242 |
17.7% |
0.17664234 |
2 |
Agree |
472 |
34.5% |
0.34452555 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
378 |
27.6% |
0.27591241 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
132 |
9.6% |
0.09635036 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
77 |
5.6% |
0.05620438 |
6 |
Disagree |
28 |
2% |
0.02043796 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
18 |
1.3% |
0.01313869 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.7% |
0.01678832 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr20a
Variable label:
|
Has your municipality recently been or is about to be merged with neighboring municipalities.
|
Literal question:
|
Has your municipality recently been merged with one or more neighbouring municipalities? (or will be merged from 2020)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
476 |
34.7% |
0.34744526 |
2 |
No |
776 |
56.6% |
0.56642336 |
3 |
Don't know |
102 |
7.4% |
0.07445255 |
97 |
Not answered |
16 |
1.2% |
0.01167883 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr20b
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Good that my municipality has been/is being merged with neighboring municipalities.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
Literal question:
|
It is good that my municipality has/will be merged with one or more neighbouring municipalities
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6 and r15tdr20a = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
76 |
16% |
0.159663866 |
2 |
Agree |
111 |
23.3% |
0.233193277 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
73 |
15.3% |
0.153361345 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
80 |
16.8% |
0.168067227 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
52 |
10.9% |
0.109243697 |
6 |
Disagree |
40 |
8.4% |
0.084033613 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
42 |
8.8% |
0.088235294 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.4% |
0.004201681 |
98 |
Not asked |
7629 |
|
NA |
r15tdr20c
Variable label:
|
Has your county recently been or is about to be merged with neighboring counties.
|
Literal question:
|
Has your county authority recently been merged with one or more neighbouring county authorities? (or will be merged from 2020)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
773 |
56.4% |
0.56423358 |
2 |
No |
392 |
28.6% |
0.28613139 |
3 |
Don't know |
184 |
13.4% |
0.13430657 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.5% |
0.01532847 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr20d
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Good that my county has been/is being merged with neighboring counties.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion:
|
Literal question:
|
It is good that my county authority will be merged with one or more county authorities.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6 and r15tdr20c = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
89 |
11.5% |
0.115135834 |
2 |
Agree |
137 |
17.7% |
0.177231565 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
96 |
12.4% |
0.124191462 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
129 |
16.7% |
0.166882277 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
70 |
9.1% |
0.090556274 |
6 |
Disagree |
103 |
13.3% |
0.133247089 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
142 |
18.4% |
0.183699871 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.9% |
0.009055627 |
98 |
Not asked |
7332 |
|
NA |
r15tdr21a
Variable label:
|
How important to vote in general elections.
|
Literal question:
|
How important is it for you to vote in the general election?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important to vote |
902 |
65.8% |
0.658394161 |
2 |
Important to vote |
316 |
23.1% |
0.230656934 |
3 |
Somewhat important to vote |
49 |
3.6% |
0.035766423 |
4 |
Not very important to vote |
29 |
2.1% |
0.021167883 |
5 |
Not important to vote at all |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006569343 |
6 |
I do not have the right to vote |
48 |
3.5% |
0.035036496 |
97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.2% |
0.012408759 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr21b
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if parliamentary elections next week.
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there was a general election next week?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
48 |
3.5% |
0.03503650 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
268 |
19.6% |
0.19562044 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
96 |
7% |
0.07007299 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
44 |
3.2% |
0.03211679 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
100 |
7.3% |
0.07299270 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
181 |
13.2% |
0.13211679 |
7 |
The Green Party |
68 |
5% |
0.04963504 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
306 |
22.3% |
0.22335766 |
9 |
The Red Party |
94 |
6.9% |
0.06861314 |
10 |
Would not vote |
15 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
33 |
2.4% |
0.02408759 |
12 |
Not entitled to vote |
31 |
2.3% |
0.02262774 |
13 |
Other: |
59 |
4.3% |
0.04306569 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
2% |
0.01970803 |
98 |
Not asked |
6735 |
|
NA |
r15tdr21b_13_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R15TDR21B]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there was a general election next week?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 6. ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15pk6_1
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Christian democratic party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
914 |
16.9% |
0.16944753 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1160 |
21.5% |
0.21505376 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1283 |
23.8% |
0.23785688 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
905 |
16.8% |
0.16777901 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
750 |
13.9% |
0.13904338 |
6 |
Really like |
193 |
3.6% |
0.03578050 |
7 |
Intensely like |
56 |
1% |
0.01038191 |
97 |
Not answered |
133 |
2.5% |
0.02465703 |
98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_2
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Conservative party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
326 |
6% |
0.06043752 |
2 |
Really dislike |
808 |
15% |
0.14979607 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1009 |
18.7% |
0.18705970 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
660 |
12.2% |
0.12235818 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1282 |
23.8% |
0.23767149 |
6 |
Really like |
977 |
18.1% |
0.18112718 |
7 |
Intensely like |
204 |
3.8% |
0.03781980 |
97 |
Not answered |
128 |
2.4% |
0.02373007 |
98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_3
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Progress party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1759 |
32.6% |
0.32610308 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1022 |
18.9% |
0.18946978 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
775 |
14.4% |
0.14367816 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
469 |
8.7% |
0.08694846 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
769 |
14.3% |
0.14256581 |
6 |
Really like |
382 |
7.1% |
0.07081943 |
7 |
Intensely like |
92 |
1.7% |
0.01705599 |
97 |
Not answered |
126 |
2.3% |
0.02335929 |
98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_4
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Liberal party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
601 |
11.1% |
0.111420096 |
2 |
Really dislike |
889 |
16.5% |
0.164812755 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1212 |
22.5% |
0.224694105 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1224 |
22.7% |
0.226918799 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1043 |
19.3% |
0.193362996 |
6 |
Really like |
239 |
4.4% |
0.044308491 |
7 |
Intensely like |
40 |
0.7% |
0.007415647 |
97 |
Not answered |
146 |
2.7% |
0.027067112 |
98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_5
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Socialist left party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
674 |
12.5% |
0.12495365 |
2 |
Really dislike |
862 |
16% |
0.15980719 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
855 |
15.9% |
0.15850945 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
964 |
17.9% |
0.17871709 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1074 |
19.9% |
0.19911012 |
6 |
Really like |
646 |
12% |
0.11976270 |
7 |
Intensely like |
188 |
3.5% |
0.03485354 |
97 |
Not answered |
131 |
2.4% |
0.02428624 |
98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_6
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Centre party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
285 |
5.3% |
0.05283648 |
2 |
Really dislike |
569 |
10.5% |
0.10548758 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
919 |
17% |
0.17037449 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1200 |
22.2% |
0.22246941 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1426 |
26.4% |
0.26436782 |
6 |
Really like |
666 |
12.3% |
0.12347052 |
7 |
Intensely like |
193 |
3.6% |
0.03578050 |
97 |
Not answered |
136 |
2.5% |
0.02521320 |
98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_7
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Green party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
914 |
16.9% |
0.16944753 |
2 |
Really dislike |
723 |
13.4% |
0.13403782 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
848 |
15.7% |
0.15721172 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
844 |
15.6% |
0.15647015 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1235 |
22.9% |
0.22895810 |
6 |
Really like |
554 |
10.3% |
0.10270671 |
7 |
Intensely like |
143 |
2.7% |
0.02651094 |
97 |
Not answered |
133 |
2.5% |
0.02465703 |
98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_8
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Labour party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
264 |
4.9% |
0.04894327 |
2 |
Really dislike |
469 |
8.7% |
0.08694846 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
960 |
17.8% |
0.17797553 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
802 |
14.9% |
0.14868372 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1544 |
28.6% |
0.28624397 |
6 |
Really like |
1018 |
18.9% |
0.18872822 |
7 |
Intensely like |
204 |
3.8% |
0.03781980 |
97 |
Not answered |
133 |
2.5% |
0.02465703 |
98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15pk6_9
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: Red party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties. Click the desired response.
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group = 2 or 4 or 5 or 6. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1104 |
20.5% |
0.20467186 |
2 |
Really dislike |
801 |
14.8% |
0.14849833 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
731 |
13.6% |
0.13552095 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
967 |
17.9% |
0.17927327 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1011 |
18.7% |
0.18743048 |
6 |
Really like |
472 |
8.8% |
0.08750463 |
7 |
Intensely like |
167 |
3.1% |
0.03096033 |
97 |
Not answered |
141 |
2.6% |
0.02614016 |
98 |
Not asked |
2711 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_1
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Afforestation contributes to reducing global warming.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants, soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change. We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
Afforestation helps to reduce global warming.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible (r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I think this is probably right |
530 |
62.6% |
0.626477541 |
2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
39 |
4.6% |
0.046099291 |
3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
232 |
27.4% |
0.274231678 |
4 |
Don't know |
38 |
4.5% |
0.044917258 |
5 |
No response |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001182033 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007092199 |
98 |
Not asked |
7259 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_2
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Afforestation in Norway can bind as much climate gas as the Norwegian energy industry produces.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants, soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change. We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
Afforestation in Norway can absorb as much greenhouse gas annually as is emitted from Norwegian energy production.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible (r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I think this is probably right |
120 |
14.9% |
0.148883375 |
2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
154 |
19.1% |
0.191066998 |
3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
418 |
51.9% |
0.518610422 |
4 |
Don't know |
96 |
11.9% |
0.119106700 |
5 |
No response |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003722084 |
97 |
Not answered |
15 |
1.9% |
0.018610422 |
98 |
Not asked |
7299 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_3
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Afforestation has no negative consequences for climate and environment.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants, soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change. We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
Afforestation to help the climate has no negative consequences for nature and the environment.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible (r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I think this is probably right |
364 |
45% |
0.450495050 |
2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
110 |
13.6% |
0.136138614 |
3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
267 |
33% |
0.330445545 |
4 |
Don't know |
53 |
6.6% |
0.065594059 |
5 |
No response |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003712871 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1.4% |
0.013613861 |
98 |
Not asked |
7297 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_4
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Planted forest binds more climate gas than other nature types.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants, soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change. We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
Planted spruce forests have a greater ability to absorb and store greenhouse gases than other types of nature (e.g. natural forests, marshland, open cultivated landscapes).
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible (r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I think this is probably right |
170 |
20.7% |
0.207317073 |
2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
123 |
15% |
0.150000000 |
3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
421 |
51.3% |
0.513414634 |
4 |
Don't know |
94 |
11.5% |
0.114634146 |
5 |
No response |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002439024 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
1.2% |
0.012195122 |
98 |
Not asked |
7285 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_5
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Natural forests have equal gas-binding capabilities as planted forests.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants, soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change. We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
Today, open areas in Norway are becoming overgrown with mixed forests. These natural forests have the same capacity to absorb and store greenhouse gases as planted pine forests.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible (r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I think this is probably right |
275 |
33.3% |
0.333333333 |
2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
72 |
8.7% |
0.087272727 |
3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
374 |
45.3% |
0.453333333 |
4 |
Don't know |
92 |
11.2% |
0.111515152 |
5 |
No response |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003636364 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1.1% |
0.010909091 |
98 |
Not asked |
7280 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_6
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: In forests, more gas is bound underground than in wood over the ground.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants, soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change. We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
In forests, larger amounts of greenhouse gases are trapped and bound underground, in roots and soil, than in the wood of trees above the ground.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible (r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I think this is probably right |
144 |
18.3% |
0.182509506 |
2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
80 |
10.1% |
0.101394170 |
3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
430 |
54.5% |
0.544993663 |
4 |
Don't know |
119 |
15.1% |
0.150823828 |
5 |
No response |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002534854 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1.8% |
0.017743980 |
98 |
Not asked |
7316 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_7
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Natural forests have greater biodiversity than planted forests.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants, soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change. We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
Natural forests have a greater diversity of plants and animals (biodiversity) than planted forests.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible (r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I think this is probably right |
575 |
67.9% |
0.678866588 |
2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
44 |
5.2% |
0.051948052 |
3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
165 |
19.5% |
0.194805195 |
4 |
Don't know |
49 |
5.8% |
0.057851240 |
5 |
No response |
2 |
0.2% |
0.002361275 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.4% |
0.014167651 |
98 |
Not asked |
7258 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_8
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Planted spruce forest has equal biodiversity to open cultural landscapes.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants, soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change. We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
Planted spruce forests have just as much diversity regarding plants and animals as open cultivated landscapes.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible (r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I think this is probably right |
115 |
14.2% |
0.141800247 |
2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
348 |
42.9% |
0.429099877 |
3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
256 |
31.6% |
0.315659679 |
4 |
Don't know |
79 |
9.7% |
0.097410604 |
5 |
No response |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001233046 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
1.5% |
0.014796547 |
98 |
Not asked |
7294 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_9
Variable label:
|
Forests- and climate knowledge: Afforestation in Norway is an beneficial to the climate as planting it in tropical regions.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements regarding forests and climate change. The state is currently planning to use afforestation in Norway to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere (specifically carbon dioxide or CO2). Generally speaking, the idea is that when trees grow, they absorb carbon dioxide from the air and store the carbon in their wood. At the same time, the complex connections between plants, soil and the climate are being researched, since there is so much that still isn’t known. Please consider these four statements. We will then ask you what you think about planting forests to reduce climate change. We are interested in finding out what you think is a correct or incorrect description of the role that Norwegian forests can play, based on what you have already heard or read about forests and climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
Planting forests in Norway has the same climate benefits as planting forests in tropical regions.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4). The respondent is asked 4 randomly selected questions of 9 possible (r15kmhc_1 to r15kmhc_9). See missing code.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I think this is probably right |
163 |
20.1% |
0.200738916 |
2 |
I think this is probably wrong |
172 |
21.2% |
0.211822660 |
3 |
I need more knowledge to have an opinion on this |
361 |
44.5% |
0.444581281 |
4 |
Don't know |
102 |
12.6% |
0.125615764 |
5 |
No response |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003694581 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1.4% |
0.013546798 |
98 |
Not asked |
7293 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_b
Variable label:
|
For/against: Afforestation in Norway to reduce climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, do you support or oppose the planting of forests in Norway to reduce climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4) ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly oppose |
23 |
1.2% |
0.01244589 |
2 |
Oppose |
77 |
4.2% |
0.04166667 |
3 |
Somewhat oppose |
110 |
6% |
0.05952381 |
4 |
Neither support nor oppose |
458 |
24.8% |
0.24783550 |
5 |
Somewhat support |
347 |
18.8% |
0.18777056 |
6 |
Support |
644 |
34.8% |
0.34848485 |
7 |
Strongly support |
170 |
9.2% |
0.09199134 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1% |
0.01028139 |
98 |
Not asked |
6257 |
|
NA |
r15kmhc_open
Variable label:
|
Comment [R15KMHC]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
You can comment here:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4) ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15kmhc_c_1
Variable label:
|
Have you during the last 12 months: Hunting.
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the activities below?
|
Literal question:
|
Hunting
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4) ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Hunting |
133 |
7.2% |
0.071969697 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.8% |
0.007575758 |
98 |
Not asked |
6257 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1701 |
92% |
0.920454545 |
r15kmhc_c_2
Variable label:
|
Have you during the last 12 months: Fishing.
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the activities below?
|
Literal question:
|
Fishing
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4) ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Fishing |
560 |
30.3% |
0.303030303 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.8% |
0.007575758 |
98 |
Not asked |
6257 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1274 |
68.9% |
0.689393939 |
r15kmhc_c_3
Variable label:
|
Have you during the last 12 months: Hiked in the forest.
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the activities below?
|
Literal question:
|
Hiking in the forest
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4) ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Hiking in the forest |
1626 |
88% |
0.879870130 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.8% |
0.007575758 |
98 |
Not asked |
6257 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
208 |
11.3% |
0.112554113 |
r15kmhc_c_4
Variable label:
|
Have you during the last 12 months: Hiked in the mountain.
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the activities below?
|
Literal question:
|
Hiking in the mountains
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4) ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Hiking in the mountains |
1188 |
64.3% |
0.642857143 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.8% |
0.007575758 |
98 |
Not asked |
6257 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
646 |
35% |
0.349567100 |
r15kmhc_c_5
Variable label:
|
Have you during the last 12 months: Boat trip (leisure boat).
|
Pre-question text:
|
During the last 12 months, have you participated in one or more of the activities below?
|
Literal question:
|
Boat trip (leisure boat)
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick as many boxes as you like.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if 15group != 6 & (r12group = 3 | r12group = 4) ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Boat trip (leisure boat) |
822 |
44.5% |
0.444805195 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.8% |
0.007575758 |
98 |
Not asked |
6257 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1012 |
54.8% |
0.547619048 |
r15byrakrat_conjoint_ran0a
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects measure in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects measure in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
increased privatisation of the municipality’s care and nursing services |
1445 |
51.4% |
0.5136865 |
2 |
increased use of tolls |
1368 |
48.6% |
0.4863135 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint_ran0b
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects subject in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects subject in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
care and nursing services |
1445 |
51.4% |
0.5136865 |
2 |
transportation |
1368 |
48.6% |
0.4863135 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint_ran0c
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects question in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects question in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Which of these municipal employees do you think is best suited to lead the
expert group? |
1398 |
49.7% |
0.4969783 |
2 |
If the group had been led by one of them, which recommendation would you trust
the most? |
1415 |
50.3% |
0.5030217 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint_ran0c2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Specifies the response options based on the value in r15byrakrat_conjoint_ran0c for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Specifies the response options based on the value in r15byrakrat_conjoint_ran0c for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Municipal employee |
1398 |
49.7% |
0.4969783 |
2 |
The recommendation from the group led by municipal employee |
1415 |
50.3% |
0.5030217 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran11
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects education for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects education for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Has higher education |
1453 |
51.7% |
0.5165304 |
2 |
Does not have higher education |
1360 |
48.3% |
0.4834696 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran12
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects gender for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects gender for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Male |
1397 |
49.7% |
0.4966228 |
2 |
Female |
1416 |
50.3% |
0.5033772 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran13
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects age for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects age for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
35 years old |
669 |
23.8% |
0.2378244 |
2 |
45 years old |
711 |
25.3% |
0.2527551 |
3 |
55 years old |
731 |
26% |
0.2598649 |
4 |
65 years old |
702 |
25% |
0.2495556 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran14
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects professional experience for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects professional experience for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
has only worked in the public sector |
661 |
23.5% |
0.2349804 |
2 |
has mainly worked in the public sector |
731 |
26% |
0.2598649 |
3 |
has mainly worked in the private sector |
714 |
25.4% |
0.2538215 |
4 |
has only worked in the private sector |
707 |
25.1% |
0.2513331 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran15
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects occupational position for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects occupational position for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Is a top manager in the municipality |
924 |
32.8% |
0.3284749 |
2 |
Is a mid-level manager for the municipality |
900 |
32% |
0.3199431 |
3 |
Does not have managerial responsibilities |
989 |
35.2% |
0.3515819 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran16
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects political engagement for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects political involvement for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
has previously been active in the mayor's political party |
577 |
20.5% |
0.2051191 |
2 |
is active in the mayor's political party |
518 |
18.4% |
0.1841450 |
3 |
has previously been active in a political party other than the mayor's party |
572 |
20.3% |
0.2033416 |
4 |
is active in a political party other than the mayor's party |
576 |
20.5% |
0.2047636 |
5 |
has never been active in a political party |
570 |
20.3% |
0.2026306 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran17
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects area of expertise for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects area of expertise for person 1 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
has mostly worked with [care and nursing services / transport] |
940 |
33.4% |
0.3341628 |
2 |
has worked on various tasks in his/her previous career |
900 |
32% |
0.3199431 |
3 |
has mostly worked on school and education |
973 |
34.6% |
0.3458941 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran21
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects education for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects education for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Has higher education |
1332 |
47.4% |
0.4735158 |
2 |
Does not have higher education |
1481 |
52.6% |
0.5264842 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran22
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects gender for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects gender for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Male |
1392 |
49.5% |
0.4948454 |
2 |
Female |
1421 |
50.5% |
0.5051546 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran23
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects age for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects age for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
35 years old |
670 |
23.8% |
0.2381799 |
2 |
45 years old |
692 |
24.6% |
0.2460007 |
3 |
55 years old |
727 |
25.8% |
0.2584429 |
4 |
65 years old |
724 |
25.7% |
0.2573765 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran24
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects professional experience for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects professional experience for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
has only worked in the public sector |
701 |
24.9% |
0.2492001 |
2 |
has mainly worked in the public sector |
694 |
24.7% |
0.2467117 |
3 |
has mainly worked in the private sector |
707 |
25.1% |
0.2513331 |
4 |
has only worked in the private sector |
711 |
25.3% |
0.2527551 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran25
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects occupational position for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects occupational position for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Is a top manager in the municipality |
966 |
34.3% |
0.3434056 |
2 |
Is a mid-level manager for the municipality |
952 |
33.8% |
0.3384287 |
3 |
Does not have managerial responsibilities |
895 |
31.8% |
0.3181657 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran26
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects political engagement for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects political involvementfor person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
has previously been active in the mayor's political party |
570 |
20.3% |
0.2026306 |
2 |
is active in the mayor's political party |
592 |
21% |
0.2104515 |
3 |
has previously been active in a political party other than the mayor's party |
569 |
20.2% |
0.2022752 |
4 |
is active in a political party other than the mayor's party |
533 |
18.9% |
0.1894774 |
5 |
has never been active in a political party |
549 |
19.5% |
0.1951653 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_ran27
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects area of expertise for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Background variable. Randomly selects area of expertise for person 2 in r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2813] [Invalid:5292] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
has mostly worked with [care and nursing services / transport] |
981 |
34.9% |
0.348738 |
2 |
has worked on various tasks in his/her previous career |
918 |
32.6% |
0.326342 |
3 |
has mostly worked on school and education |
914 |
32.5% |
0.324920 |
Sysmiss |
|
5292 |
|
NA |
r15byrakrat_conjoint1_respons
Variable label:
|
Bureaucrat recruitment, conjoint-experiment.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that your municipality is considering [increased privatisation of the municipality’s care and nursing services / increased use of tolls]. An expert group shall provide a professionally based recommendation about what the municipality should do. The local newspaper reports that the choice of chairperson for the expert group is between two municipal employees. Please read the description of both of these municipal employees carefully and consider the question below.
[Table with characteristics of two different persons: Education, gender, age, professional experience, occupational position, political involvement, area of expertise]
|
Literal question:
|
[Which of these municipal employees do you think is best suited to lead the expert group? / If the group had been led by one of them, which recommendation would you trust the most?]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15rekruttert != 1 or 3 and r15group =! 6 and question about forest is not answered (kmhc). Conjoint-Experiment. Respondents are exposed to two people with varying characteristics. The characteristics of the persons and the question asked the respondent are chosen at random. See background variables.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[Municipal employee 1 / The recommendation from the group led by municipal
employee 1] |
1336 |
47% |
0.47009148 |
2 |
[Municipal employee 2 / The recommendation from the group led by municipal
employee 2] |
1379 |
48.5% |
0.48522167 |
97 |
Not answered |
127 |
4.5% |
0.04468684 |
98 |
Not asked |
5263 |
|
NA |
r15polkom7_overskrift1
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom7_1.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom7_1.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2500] [Invalid:5605] [Range:7-1440]
|
r15polkom7_overskrift2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom7_2.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom7_2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2500] [Invalid:5605] [Range:9-1440]
|
r15polkom7_overskrift3
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom7_3.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom7_3.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2500] [Invalid:5605] [Range:7-1440]
|
r15polkom7_overskrift4
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom7_4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3) Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom7_4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2500] [Invalid:5605] [Range:7-1439]
|
r15polkom7_1
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM7_OVERSKRIFT1].
|
Pre-question text:
|
Our aim is to study people’s routines pertaining to the media. Below are some headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer to read?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3). Displays randomly selected headlines as specified by r15polkom7_overskrift1. In total, the respondent is shown 4 randomly selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[The value of r15polkom7_overskrift1] |
1169 |
46.3% |
0.46260388 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.2% |
0.01187178 |
98 |
Not asked |
5578 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1328 |
52.6% |
0.52552434 |
r15polkom7_2
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM7_OVERSKRIFT2].
|
Pre-question text:
|
Our aim is to study people’s routines pertaining to the media. Below are some headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer to read?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3). Displays randomly selected headlines as specified by r15polkom7_overskrift2. In total, the respondent is shown 4 randomly selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[The value of r15polkom7_overskrift2] |
1155 |
45.7% |
0.45706371 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.2% |
0.01187178 |
98 |
Not asked |
5578 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1342 |
53.1% |
0.53106450 |
r15polkom7_3
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM7_OVERSKRIFT3].
|
Pre-question text:
|
Our aim is to study people’s routines pertaining to the media. Below are some headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer to read?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3). Displays randomly selected headlines as specified by r15polkom7_overskrift3. In total, the respondent is shown 4 randomly selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[The value of r15polkom7_overskrift3] |
1115 |
44.1% |
0.44123467 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.2% |
0.01187178 |
98 |
Not asked |
5578 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1382 |
54.7% |
0.54689355 |
r15polkom7_4
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM2_OVERSKRIFT4].
|
Pre-question text:
|
Our aim is to study people’s routines pertaining to the media. Below are some headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer to read?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3). Displays randomly selected headlines as specified by r15polkom7_overskrift4. In total, the respondent is shown 4 randomly selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[The value of r15polkom7_overskrift4] |
1140 |
45.1% |
0.45112782 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.2% |
0.01187178 |
98 |
Not asked |
5578 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1357 |
53.7% |
0.53700040 |
r15polkom7_ignored
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to proceed without giving a response to r15polkom7. If yes, the respondent received the following prompt and encouraged to answer: “Are you sure you do not want to choose news items, press ‘next’ if you still do not want to answer the question.” (translated)]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to proceed without giving a response to r15polkom7. If yes, the respondent received the following prompt and encouraged to answer: “Are you sure you do not want to choose news items, press ‘next’ if you still do not want to answer the question.” (translated)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:85] [Invalid:8020] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Respondent clicked "Next" without answering, was prompted to respond |
85 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
8020 |
|
NA |
r15polkom72_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3) Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent is to receive r15polkom72. The selection is random, but with 33% probability of getting r15polkom72.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if (r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3) Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent is to receive r15polkom72. The selection is random, but with 33% probability of getting r15polkom72.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2497] [Invalid:5608] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Respondent gets r15polkom72 |
803 |
32.2% |
0.3215859 |
2 |
Respondenten does not get r15polkom72 |
1694 |
67.8% |
0.6784141 |
Sysmiss |
|
5608 |
|
NA |
r15polkom72_overskrift1
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom72_1.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom72_1.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:803] [Invalid:7302] [Range:11-1437]
|
r15polkom72_overskrift2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom72_2.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom72_2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:803] [Invalid:7302] [Range:9-1438]
|
r15polkom72_overskrift3
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom72_3.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom72_3.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:803] [Invalid:7302] [Range:9-1437]
|
r15polkom72_overskrift4
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom72_4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1 Background variable. Randomly selects headline for r15polkom72_4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:803] [Invalid:7302] [Range:7-1439]
|
r15polkom72_1
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM72_OVERSKRIFT1].
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are some more headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer to read?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1. Displays randomly selected headlines as specified by r15polkom72_overskrift1. In total, the respondent is shown 4 randomly selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[The value of r15polkom72_overskrift1] |
388 |
48.3% |
0.483188 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7302 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
415 |
51.7% |
0.516812 |
r15polkom72_2
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM72_OVERSKRIFT2].
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are some more headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer to read?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1. Displays randomly selected headlines as specified by r15polkom72_overskrift2. In total, the respondent is shown 4 randomly selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[The value of r15polkom72_overskrift2] |
350 |
43.6% |
0.4358655 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7302 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
453 |
56.4% |
0.5641345 |
r15polkom72_3
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM72_OVERSKRIFT3].
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are some more headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer to read?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1. Displays randomly selected headlines as specified by r15polkom72_overskrift3. In total, the respondent is shown 4 randomly selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[The value of r15polkom72_overskrift3] |
380 |
47.3% |
0.4732254 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7302 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
423 |
52.7% |
0.5267746 |
r15polkom72_4
Variable label:
|
Headlines, would read which articles [R15POLKOM72_OVERSKRIFT4].
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are some more headings that one would expect to find in Norwegian online newspapers.
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s say that you had to read two of them, which two would you prefer to read?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ((r15group != 6 & r12group != 3) & (r15rekruttert = 1 or 3)) & r15polkom72_ran = 1. Displays randomly selected headlines as specified by r15polkom72_overskrift4. In total, the respondent is shown 4 randomly selected headlines. See background variables.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[The value of r15polkom72_overskrift4] |
367 |
45.7% |
0.4570361 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7302 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
436 |
54.3% |
0.5429639 |
r15polkom72_ignored
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to proceed without giving a response to r15polkom72. If yes, the respondent received the following prompt and encouraged to answer: “Are you sure you do not want to choose news items, press ‘next’ if you still do not want to answer the question.” (translated)]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to proceed without giving a response to r15polkom72. If yes, the respondent received the following prompt and encouraged to answer: “Are you sure you do not want to choose news items, press ‘next’ if you still do not want to answer the question.” (translated)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:41] [Invalid:8064] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Respondent clicked "Next" without answering, was prompted to respond |
41 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
8064 |
|
NA |
r15arbeidolje1
Variable label:
|
Work(ed) in or near the oil- and gas industry.
|
Literal question:
|
[Do/did] you work in the oil or gas industry, or is your job closely associated with it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15rekruttert = 14 and r14bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 9. Respondents who are not unemployed or retired did not receive an alternative 3.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, I [work/worked] in the oil or gas industry |
50 |
4.1% |
0.04132231 |
2 |
Yes, my job [is/was] closely associated with the oil or gas industry |
38 |
3.1% |
0.03140496 |
3 |
No, but previously I have worked in the oil/gas industry, or have been closely
associated with it |
48 |
4% |
0.03966942 |
4 |
No |
1044 |
86.3% |
0.86280992 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
2.5% |
0.02479339 |
98 |
Not asked |
6895 |
|
NA |
r15_arbeidolje2
Variable label:
|
Started first job in or near oil- and gas industry when.
|
Literal question:
|
When did you start your first job in the oil or gas industry (or your first job closely associated with the oil and gas industry)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15rekruttert = 14 and (r14bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 9) and (r15arbeidolje1 = 1 | 2 | 3) ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Before 1980 |
14 |
10.3% |
0.102941176 |
2 |
1980-89 |
40 |
29.4% |
0.294117647 |
3 |
1990-99 |
31 |
22.8% |
0.227941176 |
4 |
2000-2009 |
30 |
22.1% |
0.220588235 |
5 |
After 2009 |
20 |
14.7% |
0.147058824 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.7% |
0.007352941 |
98 |
Not asked |
7969 |
|
NA |
r15arbeidolje_2b
Variable label:
|
Comment [R15_ARBEIDOLJE2]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
If you have additional comments, please write them here:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15rekruttert = 14 and (r14bk33 = 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 9) and (r15arbeidolje1 = 1 | 2 ) ] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r15bfi10_1
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Reserved.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is reserved
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
1423 |
17.6% |
0.17557064 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
1909 |
23.6% |
0.23553362 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1349 |
16.6% |
0.16644047 |
4 |
Agree a little |
2704 |
33.4% |
0.33362122 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
469 |
5.8% |
0.05786552 |
97 |
Not answered |
251 |
3.1% |
0.03096854 |
r15bfi10_2
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Generally trusting.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is generally trusting
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
173 |
2.1% |
0.02134485 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
671 |
8.3% |
0.08278840 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
942 |
11.6% |
0.11622455 |
4 |
Agree a little |
3786 |
46.7% |
0.46711906 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
2324 |
28.7% |
0.28673658 |
97 |
Not answered |
209 |
2.6% |
0.02578655 |
r15bfi10_3
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Tendency to be lazy.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… tend to be lazy
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
2693 |
33.2% |
0.33226403 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
2188 |
27% |
0.26995682 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1316 |
16.2% |
0.16236891 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1455 |
18% |
0.17951882 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
233 |
2.9% |
0.02874769 |
97 |
Not answered |
220 |
2.7% |
0.02714374 |
r15bfi10_4
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Relaxed, handles stress well.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is relaxed, handles stress well
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
349 |
4.3% |
0.04305984 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1521 |
18.8% |
0.18766194 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1308 |
16.1% |
0.16138186 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
3228 |
39.8% |
0.39827267 |
5 |
Completely agree |
1487 |
18.3% |
0.18346700 |
97 |
Not answered |
212 |
2.6% |
0.02615669 |
r15bfi10_5
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Few artistic interests.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… has few artistic interests
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
2285 |
28.2% |
0.28192474 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
2491 |
30.7% |
0.30734115 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1265 |
15.6% |
0.15607650 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
1415 |
17.5% |
0.17458359 |
5 |
Completely agree |
429 |
5.3% |
0.05293029 |
97 |
Not answered |
220 |
2.7% |
0.02714374 |
r15bfi10_6
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Outgoing, sociable.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is outgoing, sociable
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
332 |
4.1% |
0.04096237 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1210 |
14.9% |
0.14929056 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1260 |
15.5% |
0.15545959 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
3014 |
37.2% |
0.37186922 |
5 |
Completely agree |
2092 |
25.8% |
0.25811228 |
97 |
Not answered |
197 |
2.4% |
0.02430598 |
r15bfi10_7
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Tends to find fault with others.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… tends to find fault with others
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
1310 |
16.2% |
0.16162862 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
2324 |
28.7% |
0.28673658 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
2254 |
27.8% |
0.27809994 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
1807 |
22.3% |
0.22294880 |
5 |
Completely agree |
203 |
2.5% |
0.02504627 |
97 |
Not answered |
207 |
2.6% |
0.02553979 |
r15bfi10_8
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Does a thorough job.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… do a thorough job
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
116 |
1.4% |
0.01431215 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
185 |
2.3% |
0.02282542 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
739 |
9.1% |
0.09117829 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
3305 |
40.8% |
0.40777298 |
5 |
Completely agree |
3560 |
43.9% |
0.43923504 |
97 |
Not answered |
200 |
2.5% |
0.02467613 |
r15bfi10_9
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Easily nervous.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… get nervous easily
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
2312 |
28.5% |
0.28525601 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
2321 |
28.6% |
0.28636644 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1444 |
17.8% |
0.17816163 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
1476 |
18.2% |
0.18210981 |
5 |
Completely agree |
334 |
4.1% |
0.04120913 |
97 |
Not answered |
218 |
2.7% |
0.02689698 |
r15bfi10_10
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Active imagination.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… has an active imagination
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
487 |
6% |
0.06008637 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
1134 |
14% |
0.13991363 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
2037 |
25.1% |
0.25132634 |
4 |
Agree a little |
2707 |
33.4% |
0.33399136 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
1541 |
19% |
0.19012955 |
97 |
Not answered |
199 |
2.5% |
0.02455275 |
r15econklimaeksperiment_1a
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, hidden partner.
|
Pre-question text:
|
You and another person in this round of the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be randomly selected and paired. You will receive two thousand kroner in a joint account. You and the other person can transfer up to one thousand kroner each from the joint account to each of your personal accounts.
For every one hundred kroner that is not transferred, we will add fifty kroner to the joint account. Half the amount in the joint account, as well as the money in your personal account, will constitute your final payout. You and the other person will receive half of the amount in the joint account regardless of what you both decide to do. We will now ask you to make two independent decisions. In the first decision, you don’t know how much the other person transfers to his or her personal account. In the second decision, you must choose how much you want to transfer to your private account given the other person’s choice. Which of the two decisions that will apply regarding the final payout will be randomly selected.
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private account? (0-1000)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:844] [Invalid:7261] [Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1a_ignor
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to proceed without giving a response to r15econklimaeksperiment_1a. If yes, the respondent received the following prompt and encouraged to answer: “Are you sure you do not want to answer the question? It is useful for the researchers if the question is answered in full. If you are sure you may skip ahead.” (translated)]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to proceed without giving a response to r15econklimaeksperiment_1a. If yes, the respondent received the following prompt and encouraged to answer: “Are you sure you do not want to answer the question? It is useful for the researchers if the question is answered in full. If you are sure you may skip ahead.” (translated)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:92] [Invalid:8013] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Respondent clicked "Next" without answering, was prompted to respond |
92 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
8013 |
|
NA |
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_1
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK 0
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private account given that the other person:
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 0 kroner from the joint account
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:612] [Invalid:7493] [Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_2
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK 100
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private account given that the other person:
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 100 kroner from the joint account
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:545] [Invalid:7560] [Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_3
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK 200
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private account given that the other person:
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 200 kroner from the joint account
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:531] [Invalid:7574] [Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_4
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK 300
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private account given that the other person:
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 300 kroner from the joint account
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:527] [Invalid:7578] [Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_5
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK 400
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private account given that the other person:
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 400 kroner from the joint account
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:527] [Invalid:7578] [Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_6
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK 500
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private account given that the other person:
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 500 kroner from the joint account
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:619] [Invalid:7486] [Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_7
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK 600
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private account given that the other person:
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 600 kroner from the joint account
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:521] [Invalid:7584] [Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_8
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK 700
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private account given that the other person:
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 700 kroner from the joint account
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:517] [Invalid:7588] [Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_9
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK 800
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private account given that the other person:
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 800 kroner from the joint account
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:516] [Invalid:7589] [Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_10
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK 900
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private account given that the other person:
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 900 kroner from the joint account
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:514] [Invalid:7591] [Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_11
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much, partner transfers NOK 1000
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you want to transfer from the joint account to your private account given that the other person:
|
Literal question:
|
has transferred 1000 kroner from the joint account
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:553] [Invalid:7552] [Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_1b_ignor
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to proceed without giving a response to r15econklimaeksperiment_1b. If yes, the respondent received the following prompt and encouraged to answer: “Are you sure you do not want to answer the question? It is useful for the researchers if the question is answered in full. If you are sure you may skip ahead.” (translated)]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to proceed without giving a response to r15econklimaeksperiment_1b. If yes, the respondent was shown the following warning: “Are you sure you do not want to answer the question? It is useful for the researchers if the question is answered in full. If you are sure you may skip ahead.” (translated)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:108] [Invalid:7997] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Respondent clicked "Next" without answering, was prompted to respond |
108 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
7997 |
|
NA |
r15econklimaeksperiment_2_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects text element for r15econklimaeksperiment_2_1 and r15econklimaeksperiment_2_2.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. Background variable. Randomly selects text element for r15econklimaeksperiment_2_1 and r15econklimaeksperiment_2_2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:905] [Invalid:7200] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[Blank] |
464 |
51.3% |
0.5127072 |
2 |
In 2015, 100,000 Norwegians collected in money, and Rainforest Foundation
Norway’s funds to preserve the rainforests increased by 183 million kroner. |
441 |
48.7% |
0.4872928 |
Sysmiss |
|
7200 |
|
NA |
r15econklimaeksperiment_2_1
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Transfer how much to Rainforest Foundation.
|
Pre-question text:
|
You and another person in this round of the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be randomly selected and paired. Each of you will receive one thousand kroner that can be transferred to a joint account. For every one hundred kroner that is transferred, we will add fifty kroner to the joint account. Each person’s payout is the amount that the person does not transfer. We will send the amount left in the joint account to Rainforest Foundation Norway. The amount affects how much rainforest will be preserved. [Blank / In 2015, 100,000 Norwegians collected in money, and Rainforest Foundation Norway’s funds to preserve the rainforests increased by 183 million kroner.]
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you like to contribute to Rainforest Foundation Norway? (0-1000) (1)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. The wording of the question depends on the randomized value of r15econklimaeksperiment_2_ran.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:841] [Invalid:7264] [Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_2_2
Variable label:
|
Economic climate experiment: Thinks partner transfers how much to Rainforest Foundation.
|
Pre-question text:
|
You and another person in this round of the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be randomly selected and paired. Each of you will receive one thousand kroner that can be transferred to a joint account. For every one hundred kroner that is transferred, we will add fifty kroner to the joint account. Each person’s payout is the amount that the person does not transfer. We will send the amount left in the joint account to Rainforest Foundation Norway. The amount affects how much rainforest will be preserved. [Blank / In 2015, 100,000 Norwegians collected in money, and Rainforest Foundation Norway’s funds to preserve the rainforests increased by 183 million kroner.]
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you think the other person has contributed? (0-1000)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r15group != 6 & r12group = 3. The wording of the question depends on the randomized value of r15econklimaeksperiment_2_ran.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:828] [Invalid:7277] [Range:0-1000]
|
r15econklimaeksperiment_2_ignore
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to proceed without giving a response to 15econklimaeksperiment_2. If yes, the respondent received the following prompt and encouraged to answer: “Are you sure you do not want to answer the question? It is useful for the researchers if the question is answered in full. If you are sure you may skip ahead.” (translated)]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies whether the respondent attempted to proceed without giving a response to 15econklimaeksperiment_2. If yes, the respondent received the following prompt and encouraged to answer: “Are you sure you do not want to answer the question? It is useful for the researchers if the question is answered in full. If you are sure you may skip ahead.” (translated)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:80] [Invalid:8025] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Respondent clicked "Next" without answering, was prompted to respond |
80 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
8025 |
|
NA |
r15econklimaeksperiment_rekkef
Variable label:
|
[ Specifies the order of r15econklimaeksperiment_1 and r15econklimaeksperiment_2.]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Specifies the order of r15econklimaeksperiment_1 and r15econklimaeksperiment_2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:908] [Invalid:7197] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
r15econklimaeksperiment_1 was shown first |
494 |
54.4% |
0.5440529 |
2 |
r15econklimaeksperiment_2 was shown first |
414 |
45.6% |
0.4559471 |
Sysmiss |
|
7197 |
|
NA |
r15P1
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Male |
4025 |
49.7% |
0.496607 |
2 |
Female |
4080 |
50.3% |
0.503393 |
r15P2
Variable label:
|
Region
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
2316 |
28.6% |
0.28574954 |
2 |
Østlandet |
1863 |
23% |
0.22985811 |
3 |
Sørlandet |
404 |
5% |
0.04984577 |
4 |
Vestlandet |
2204 |
27.2% |
0.27193091 |
5 |
Trøndelag |
685 |
8.5% |
0.08451573 |
6 |
Nord-Norge |
633 |
7.8% |
0.07809994 |
r15P3
Variable label:
|
County
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-18]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Akershus |
1053 |
13% |
0.12991980 |
2 |
Oslo |
1263 |
15.6% |
0.15582973 |
3 |
Østfold |
407 |
5% |
0.05021592 |
4 |
Vestfold |
366 |
4.5% |
0.04515731 |
5 |
Hedmark |
226 |
2.8% |
0.02788402 |
6 |
Oppland |
237 |
2.9% |
0.02924121 |
7 |
Buskerud |
397 |
4.9% |
0.04898211 |
8 |
Telemark |
230 |
2.8% |
0.02837754 |
9 |
Vest-Agder |
255 |
3.1% |
0.03146206 |
10 |
Aust-Agder |
149 |
1.8% |
0.01838371 |
11 |
Rogaland |
744 |
9.2% |
0.09179519 |
12 |
Hordaland |
985 |
12.2% |
0.12152992 |
13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
140 |
1.7% |
0.01727329 |
14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
335 |
4.1% |
0.04133251 |
15 |
Trøndelag |
685 |
8.5% |
0.08451573 |
16 |
Nordland |
311 |
3.8% |
0.03837138 |
17 |
Troms |
240 |
3% |
0.02961135 |
18 |
Finmark |
82 |
1% |
0.01011721 |
r15P4_1
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No education/elementary school |
544 |
6.7% |
0.06711906 |
2 |
Upper secondary education |
2297 |
28.3% |
0.28340531 |
3 |
University/University college |
4935 |
60.9% |
0.60888341 |
97 |
Not answered |
329 |
4.1% |
0.04059223 |
r15P4_2
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
23 |
0.3% |
0.002837754 |
2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
521 |
6.4% |
0.064281308 |
3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
888 |
11% |
0.109561999 |
4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
943 |
11.6% |
0.116347933 |
5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
466 |
5.7% |
0.057495373 |
6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
734 |
9.1% |
0.090561382 |
7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
1694 |
20.9% |
0.209006786 |
8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
603 |
7.4% |
0.074398519 |
9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
552 |
6.8% |
0.068106107 |
10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
1174 |
14.5% |
0.144848859 |
11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
178 |
2.2% |
0.021961752 |
12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
218 |
2.7% |
0.026896977 |
97 |
Not answered |
111 |
1.4% |
0.013695250 |
r15P5_1
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1939 or earlier |
226 |
2.8% |
0.02788402 |
2 |
1940-1949 |
1446 |
17.8% |
0.17840839 |
3 |
1950-1959 |
1971 |
24.3% |
0.24318322 |
4 |
1960-1969 |
1716 |
21.2% |
0.21172116 |
5 |
1970-1979 |
1236 |
15.2% |
0.15249846 |
6 |
1980-1989 |
875 |
10.8% |
0.10795805 |
7 |
1990 or later |
635 |
7.8% |
0.07834670 |
r15P5_2
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1959 or earlier |
3643 |
44.9% |
0.4494756 |
2 |
1960-1989 |
3827 |
47.2% |
0.4721777 |
3 |
1990 or later |
635 |
7.8% |
0.0783467 |
r15Weight1
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, and P1. See documentation report.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]
|
r15Weight2
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4, and P1. See documentation report
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-19]
|
w01_k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1642 |
94.3% |
0.94313613 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
77 |
4.4% |
0.04422746 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.3% |
0.01263642 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6364 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1756 |
94.1% |
0.94054633 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
92 |
4.9% |
0.04927691 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
1% |
0.01017675 |
98 |
Not asked |
6238 |
|
NA |
r4k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
29 |
87.9% |
0.87878788 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
3 |
9.1% |
0.09090909 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
3% |
0.03030303 |
98 |
Not asked |
8072 |
|
NA |
r5k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
15 |
93.8% |
0.9375 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
6.2% |
0.0625 |
98 |
Not asked |
8089 |
|
NA |
r8k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship.
|
Literal question:
|
Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1721 |
93.7% |
0.93736383 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
94 |
5.1% |
0.05119826 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.1% |
0.01143791 |
98 |
Not asked |
6269 |
|
NA |
r11bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1068 |
92.5% |
0.925476603 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
79 |
6.8% |
0.068457539 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006065858 |
98 |
Not asked |
6951 |
|
NA |
r14bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1298 |
93.8% |
0.937861272 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
75 |
5.4% |
0.054190751 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.007947977 |
98 |
Not asked |
6721 |
|
NA |
c14bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship. Are you: [Most recent available data from w01_k28, w03_r3k28, r4k28, r5k28, r8k28, r11bk28, r14bk28]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
7529 |
94.1% |
0.941478054 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
420 |
5.3% |
0.052519695 |
97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.6% |
0.006002251 |
98 |
Not asked |
108 |
|
NA |
w01_k29
Variable label:
|
Parents immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1577 |
90.6% |
0.905801264 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
81 |
4.7% |
0.046524986 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
7 |
0.4% |
0.004020678 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
30 |
1.7% |
0.017231476 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
23 |
1.3% |
0.013210798 |
97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.3% |
0.013210798 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
6364 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1694 |
90.7% |
0.906852248 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
91 |
4.9% |
0.048715203 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
8 |
0.4% |
0.004282655 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
30 |
1.6% |
0.016059957 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
25 |
1.3% |
0.013383298 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1.1% |
0.010706638 |
98 |
Not asked |
6237 |
|
NA |
r4k29
Variable label:
|
Mother or father immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
26 |
74.3% |
0.74285714 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
4 |
11.4% |
0.11428571 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
3 |
8.6% |
0.08571429 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
1 |
2.9% |
0.02857143 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
2.9% |
0.02857143 |
98 |
Not asked |
8070 |
|
NA |
r5k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
15 |
93.8% |
0.9375 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
6.2% |
0.0625 |
98 |
Not asked |
8089 |
|
NA |
r11bk29
Variable label:
|
Immigration background
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 3 or rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
2483 |
90.6% |
0.906204380 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
156 |
5.7% |
0.056934307 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
14 |
0.5% |
0.005109489 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
46 |
1.7% |
0.016788321 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
30 |
1.1% |
0.010948905 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.4% |
0.004014599 |
98 |
Not asked |
5365 |
|
NA |
r14bk29
Variable label:
|
Have you or any of your parents immigrated to Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1217 |
87.9% |
0.879335260 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
91 |
6.6% |
0.065751445 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006502890 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
37 |
2.7% |
0.026734104 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
17 |
1.2% |
0.012283237 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009393064 |
98 |
Not asked |
6721 |
|
NA |
c14bk29
Variable label:
|
Have you or any of your parents immigrated to Norway. [Most recent available data from w01_k29, w03_r3k29, r4k29, r5k29, r8k29, r11bk29, r14bk29]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
7012 |
90.5% |
0.905124564 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
423 |
5.5% |
0.054601781 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
38 |
0.5% |
0.004905125 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
146 |
1.9% |
0.018846005 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
96 |
1.2% |
0.012391894 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.4% |
0.004130631 |
98 |
Not asked |
358 |
|
NA |
r10k3
Variable label:
|
Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election.
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
204 |
4.4% |
0.044041451 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1076 |
23.2% |
0.232297064 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
485 |
10.5% |
0.104706390 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
254 |
5.5% |
0.054835924 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
405 |
8.7% |
0.087435233 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
413 |
8.9% |
0.089162349 |
7 |
The Green Party |
192 |
4.1% |
0.041450777 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1052 |
22.7% |
0.227115717 |
9 |
The Red Party |
181 |
3.9% |
0.039075993 |
10 |
Did not vote |
95 |
2.1% |
0.020509499 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
166 |
3.6% |
0.035837651 |
12 |
Other: |
81 |
1.7% |
0.017487047 |
97 |
No answer |
28 |
0.6% |
0.006044905 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
3473 |
|
NA |
r11bk3
Variable label:
|
Voted this party in parliamentary elections of 2017
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections in 2017?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
44 |
3.8% |
0.038128250 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
273 |
23.7% |
0.236568458 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
104 |
9% |
0.090121317 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
71 |
6.2% |
0.061525130 |
5 |
The Soialist Left Party |
83 |
7.2% |
0.071923744 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
99 |
8.6% |
0.085788562 |
7 |
The Green Party |
57 |
4.9% |
0.049393414 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
248 |
21.5% |
0.214904679 |
9 |
The Red Party |
39 |
3.4% |
0.033795494 |
10 |
Did not vote |
39 |
3.4% |
0.033795494 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
69 |
6% |
0.059792028 |
12 |
Other: |
25 |
2.2% |
0.021663778 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002599653 |
98 |
Not asked |
6951 |
|
NA |
c11bk3
Variable label:
|
Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election. [Most recent available data from r10k3, r11bk3]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable. There are minor differences in question language.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
248 |
4.3% |
0.04286208 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1349 |
23.3% |
0.23314898 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
589 |
10.2% |
0.10179744 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
325 |
5.6% |
0.05617007 |
5 |
The Soialist Left Party |
488 |
8.4% |
0.08434151 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
512 |
8.8% |
0.08848946 |
7 |
The Green Party |
249 |
4.3% |
0.04303491 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1300 |
22.5% |
0.22468026 |
9 |
The Red Party |
220 |
3.8% |
0.03802281 |
10 |
Did not vote |
134 |
2.3% |
0.02315935 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
235 |
4.1% |
0.04061528 |
12 |
Other: |
106 |
1.8% |
0.01832008 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
0.5% |
0.00535776 |
98 |
Not asked |
2319 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_1
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
152 |
2.6% |
0.026166294 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
458 |
7.9% |
0.078843174 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1038 |
17.9% |
0.178688242 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2161 |
37.2% |
0.372008952 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1456 |
25.1% |
0.250645550 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
491 |
8.5% |
0.084524014 |
97 |
Not answered |
53 |
0.9% |
0.009123773 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2296 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_2
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
2839 |
48.9% |
0.488724393 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1203 |
20.7% |
0.207092443 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
814 |
14% |
0.140127389 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
546 |
9.4% |
0.093992081 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
260 |
4.5% |
0.044758134 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
110 |
1.9% |
0.018936134 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.6% |
0.006369427 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2296 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_3
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her]. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
16 |
0.3% |
0.002754347 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
66 |
1.1% |
0.011361680 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
373 |
6.4% |
0.064210708 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2158 |
37.1% |
0.371492512 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
2194 |
37.8% |
0.377689792 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
963 |
16.6% |
0.165777242 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.7% |
0.006713720 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2296 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_4
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
46 |
0.8% |
0.007918747 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
148 |
2.5% |
0.025477707 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
357 |
6.1% |
0.061456361 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1639 |
28.2% |
0.282148390 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
2197 |
37.8% |
0.378206232 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1383 |
23.8% |
0.238078843 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.7% |
0.006713720 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2296 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_5
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand things
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
26 |
0.4% |
0.004475813 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
110 |
1.9% |
0.018936134 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
478 |
8.2% |
0.082286108 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2054 |
35.4% |
0.353589258 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
2034 |
35% |
0.350146325 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1071 |
18.4% |
0.184369082 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
0.6% |
0.006197280 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2296 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_6
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
557 |
9.6% |
0.095885695 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1264 |
21.8% |
0.217593390 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1994 |
34.3% |
0.343260458 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1436 |
24.7% |
0.247202617 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
424 |
7.3% |
0.072990188 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
100 |
1.7% |
0.017214667 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
0.6% |
0.005852987 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2296 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_7
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
214 |
3.7% |
0.03683939 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
737 |
12.7% |
0.12687210 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1712 |
29.5% |
0.29471510 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2214 |
38.1% |
0.38113273 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
724 |
12.5% |
0.12463419 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
172 |
3% |
0.02960923 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
0.6% |
0.00619728 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2296 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_8
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
623 |
10.7% |
0.10724737 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1281 |
22.1% |
0.22051988 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1921 |
33.1% |
0.33069375 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1401 |
24.1% |
0.24117748 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
444 |
7.6% |
0.07643312 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
103 |
1.8% |
0.01773111 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
0.6% |
0.00619728 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2296 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_9
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
625 |
10.8% |
0.107591668 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1211 |
20.8% |
0.208469616 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1920 |
33.1% |
0.330521604 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1548 |
26.6% |
0.266483044 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
398 |
6.9% |
0.068514374 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
70 |
1.2% |
0.012050267 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.6% |
0.006369427 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2296 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_10
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
90 |
1.5% |
0.015493200 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
300 |
5.2% |
0.051644001 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
840 |
14.5% |
0.144603202 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2028 |
34.9% |
0.349113445 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1709 |
29.4% |
0.294198657 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
807 |
13.9% |
0.138922362 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
0.6% |
0.006025133 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2296 |
|
NA |
r11bk42
Variable label:
|
How many children under 16 living at home
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
None |
4598 |
79.2% |
0.7915303839 |
2 |
1 |
524 |
9% |
0.0902048545 |
3 |
2 |
513 |
8.8% |
0.0883112412 |
4 |
3 |
120 |
2.1% |
0.0206576003 |
5 |
4 |
15 |
0.3% |
0.0025822000 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
0% |
0.0003442933 |
7 |
6 or more |
2 |
0% |
0.0003442933 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
0.6% |
0.0060251334 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2296 |
|
NA |
r11bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Recoded from source variable r11bk40]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
3782 |
65.1% |
0.651058702 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
67 |
1.2% |
0.011533827 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
207 |
3.6% |
0.035634360 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
37 |
0.6% |
0.006369427 |
5 |
Islam |
20 |
0.3% |
0.003442933 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
1656 |
28.5% |
0.285074884 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
0.7% |
0.006885867 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2296 |
|
NA |
r14bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Belong to a religion or religious denomination. [Recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
[Recoded from source variable r14bk40]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
847 |
61.2% |
0.611994220 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
22 |
1.6% |
0.015895954 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
64 |
4.6% |
0.046242775 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005057803 |
5 |
Islam |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009393064 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
418 |
30.2% |
0.302023121 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009393064 |
98 |
Not asked |
6721 |
|
NA |
c14bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Belong to a religion or religious denomination. [Most recent available data from r11bk40_recode, r14bk40_recode]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
4629 |
64.4% |
0.643542333 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
89 |
1.2% |
0.012373141 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
271 |
3.8% |
0.037675518 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
44 |
0.6% |
0.006117058 |
5 |
Islam |
33 |
0.5% |
0.004587794 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
2074 |
28.8% |
0.288335882 |
97 |
No answer |
53 |
0.7% |
0.007368275 |
98 |
Not asked |
912 |
|
NA |
r11bk41
Variable label:
|
Attends religious meetings
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001032880 |
2 |
More than once a week |
91 |
1.6% |
0.015665347 |
3 |
Once a week |
149 |
2.6% |
0.025649854 |
4 |
At least once a month |
272 |
4.7% |
0.046823894 |
5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
1010 |
17.4% |
0.173868136 |
6 |
Less frequently |
1274 |
21.9% |
0.219314856 |
7 |
Never |
2967 |
51.1% |
0.510759167 |
97 |
Not answered |
40 |
0.7% |
0.006885867 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2296 |
|
NA |
r14bk41
Variable label:
|
How often attend religious meetings, aside from special occasions.
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007225434 |
2 |
More than once a week |
18 |
1.3% |
0.0130057803 |
3 |
Once a week |
50 |
3.6% |
0.0361271676 |
4 |
At least once a month |
77 |
5.6% |
0.0556358382 |
5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
231 |
16.7% |
0.1669075145 |
6 |
Less frequently |
315 |
22.8% |
0.2276011561 |
7 |
Never |
679 |
49.1% |
0.4906069364 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.0093930636 |
98 |
Not asked |
6721 |
|
NA |
c14bk41
Variable label:
|
How often attend religious meetings, aside from special occasions. [Most recent available data from r11bk41, r14bk41]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
7 |
0.1% |
0.0009731684 |
2 |
More than once a week |
109 |
1.5% |
0.0151536216 |
3 |
Once a week |
199 |
2.8% |
0.0276657862 |
4 |
At least once a month |
349 |
4.9% |
0.0485193939 |
5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
1241 |
17.3% |
0.1725288475 |
6 |
Less frequently |
1589 |
22.1% |
0.2209092173 |
7 |
Never |
3646 |
50.7% |
0.5068816905 |
97 |
Not answered |
53 |
0.7% |
0.0073682747 |
98 |
Not asked |
912 |
|
NA |
r11pkklasse
Variable label:
|
Social class, self-placement
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
48 |
0.8% |
0.008263040 |
2 |
Working class |
716 |
12.3% |
0.123257015 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
552 |
9.5% |
0.095024961 |
4 |
Middle class |
3147 |
54.2% |
0.541745567 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
1117 |
19.2% |
0.192287829 |
6 |
Upper class |
30 |
0.5% |
0.005164400 |
7 |
Don't know |
164 |
2.8% |
0.028232054 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
0.6% |
0.006025133 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2296 |
|
NA |
r14pkklasse
Variable label:
|
To which social class do you belong.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
13 |
0.9% |
0.0093930636 |
2 |
Working class |
193 |
13.9% |
0.1394508671 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
150 |
10.8% |
0.1083815029 |
4 |
Middle class |
762 |
55.1% |
0.5505780347 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
210 |
15.2% |
0.1517341040 |
6 |
Upper class |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007225434 |
7 |
Don't know |
43 |
3.1% |
0.0310693642 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.9% |
0.0086705202 |
98 |
Not asked |
6721 |
|
NA |
c14pkklasse
Variable label:
|
To which social class do you belong. [Most recent available data from r11pkklasse, r14pkklasse]
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
61 |
0.8% |
0.008480467 |
2 |
Working class |
909 |
12.6% |
0.126372863 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
702 |
9.8% |
0.097594884 |
4 |
Middle class |
3909 |
54.3% |
0.543445016 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
1327 |
18.4% |
0.184484916 |
6 |
Upper class |
31 |
0.4% |
0.004309746 |
7 |
Don't know |
207 |
2.9% |
0.028777979 |
97 |
Not answered |
47 |
0.7% |
0.006534130 |
98 |
Not asked |
912 |
|
NA |
r14bk26
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education.
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002167630 |
2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
upper secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or
lower secondary school) |
69 |
5% |
0.049855491 |
3 |
Secondary education – general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School, business college) |
152 |
11% |
0.109826590 |
4 |
Secondary education – vocational line of study/education programme (e.g. VK2,
VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam, business college) |
172 |
12.4% |
0.124277457 |
5 |
Craft training/shorter education programmes (e.g. vocational school, technical
school/college, maritime vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot
training, secretary school, home industry school/handicrafts school, master
craftsman certificate |
128 |
9.2% |
0.092485549 |
6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (e.g. university
college graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
114 |
8.2% |
0.082369942 |
7 |
College – 3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, maritime
subjects, military subjects etc.) |
283 |
20.4% |
0.204479769 |
8 |
University – 3-4 year education (BA, cand.mag.) |
99 |
7.2% |
0.071531792 |
9 |
University college – 5-6 year education (MA, hovedfag or longer vocational
education on a university college level) |
91 |
6.6% |
0.065751445 |
10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors or a longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, chartered
engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics) |
204 |
14.7% |
0.147398844 |
11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
29 |
2.1% |
0.020953757 |
12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
27 |
2% |
0.019508671 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009393064 |
98 |
Not asked |
6721 |
|
NA |
r14pk15_1
Variable label:
|
People can in general be trusted/ one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others.
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
29 |
0.4% |
0.004103580 |
1 |
1 |
36 |
0.5% |
0.005094099 |
2 |
2 |
94 |
1.3% |
0.013301259 |
3 |
3 |
203 |
2.9% |
0.028725060 |
4 |
4 |
226 |
3.2% |
0.031979624 |
5 |
5 |
617 |
8.7% |
0.087307202 |
6 |
6 |
756 |
10.7% |
0.106976086 |
7 |
7 |
1806 |
25.6% |
0.255553983 |
8 |
8 |
2022 |
28.6% |
0.286118579 |
9 |
9 |
844 |
11.9% |
0.119428329 |
10 |
10 – Most people can be trusted |
422 |
6% |
0.059714164 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.2% |
0.001698033 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk53
Variable label:
|
How much confidence in Norwegian politicians.
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
81 |
1.1% |
0.011461724 |
2 |
To a great extent |
2114 |
29.9% |
0.299136833 |
3 |
To some extent |
3491 |
49.4% |
0.493986133 |
4 |
To a small extent |
1197 |
16.9% |
0.169378803 |
5 |
Not at all |
175 |
2.5% |
0.024762983 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.1% |
0.001273525 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk54
Variable label:
|
How much confidence in Norwegian news media.
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
286 |
4% |
0.040469789 |
2 |
To a great extent |
3379 |
47.8% |
0.478137824 |
3 |
To some extent |
2754 |
39% |
0.389698599 |
4 |
To a small extent |
502 |
7.1% |
0.071034385 |
5 |
Not at all |
92 |
1.3% |
0.013018254 |
97 |
Not answered |
54 |
0.8% |
0.007641149 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk12
Variable label:
|
How much confidence in Norwegian parliament (Stortinget).
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1, 3 or 4. Equivalent to r14pad2 but without “priming”.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
312 |
6% |
0.060196797 |
2 |
To a great extent |
2338 |
45.1% |
0.451090102 |
3 |
To some extent |
1942 |
37.5% |
0.374686475 |
4 |
To a small extent |
490 |
9.5% |
0.094539842 |
5 |
Not at all |
77 |
1.5% |
0.014856261 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.5% |
0.004630523 |
98 |
Not asked |
2922 |
|
NA |
r14pk43_1
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if municipal elections tomorrow.
|
Pre-question text:
|
This coming fall, local elections (municipal and county council elections) will be held.
|
Literal question:
|
If the municipal elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
229 |
3.2% |
0.032404132 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1623 |
23% |
0.229658978 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
522 |
7.4% |
0.073864440 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
266 |
3.8% |
0.037639734 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
591 |
8.4% |
0.083628131 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
719 |
10.2% |
0.101740484 |
7 |
The Green Party |
366 |
5.2% |
0.051790010 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1607 |
22.7% |
0.227394934 |
9 |
The Red Party |
344 |
4.9% |
0.048676949 |
10 |
A joint list |
16 |
0.2% |
0.002264044 |
11 |
A local list |
152 |
2.2% |
0.021508419 |
12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
182 |
2.6% |
0.025753502 |
13 |
Would not vote |
135 |
1.9% |
0.019102873 |
14 |
Not entitled to vote |
32 |
0.5% |
0.004528088 |
15 |
Other: |
251 |
3.6% |
0.035517193 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.5% |
0.004528088 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk43_2
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if county council elections tomorrow.
|
Literal question:
|
And if the county council elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
225 |
3.2% |
0.031838121 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1599 |
22.6% |
0.226262912 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
523 |
7.4% |
0.074005943 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
250 |
3.5% |
0.035375690 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
596 |
8.4% |
0.084335645 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
715 |
10.1% |
0.101174473 |
7 |
The Green Party |
351 |
5% |
0.049667469 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1602 |
22.7% |
0.226687420 |
9 |
The Red Party |
326 |
4.6% |
0.046129900 |
10 |
A joint list |
19 |
0.3% |
0.002688552 |
11 |
A local list |
67 |
0.9% |
0.009480685 |
12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
212 |
3% |
0.029998585 |
13 |
Would not vote |
246 |
3.5% |
0.034809679 |
14 |
Not entitled to vote |
56 |
0.8% |
0.007924155 |
15 |
Other: |
227 |
3.2% |
0.032121126 |
97 |
Not answered |
53 |
0.7% |
0.007499646 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk204
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if parliamentary elections tomorrow.
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
230 |
3.3% |
0.032545635 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1603 |
22.7% |
0.226828923 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
594 |
8.4% |
0.084052639 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
239 |
3.4% |
0.033819159 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
598 |
8.5% |
0.084618650 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
732 |
10.4% |
0.103580020 |
7 |
The Green Party |
333 |
4.7% |
0.047120419 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1685 |
23.8% |
0.238432149 |
9 |
The Red Party |
370 |
5.2% |
0.052356021 |
10 |
Would not vote |
105 |
1.5% |
0.014857790 |
11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
176 |
2.5% |
0.024904486 |
12 |
Not entitled to vote |
165 |
2.3% |
0.023347955 |
13 |
Other: |
196 |
2.8% |
0.027734541 |
97 |
Not answered |
41 |
0.6% |
0.005801613 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk8_1
Variable label:
|
Placement political left-right scale.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 - Left |
90 |
1.3% |
0.01273525 |
2 |
1 |
290 |
4.1% |
0.04103580 |
3 |
2 |
816 |
11.5% |
0.11546625 |
4 |
3 |
1096 |
15.5% |
0.15508702 |
5 |
4 |
860 |
12.2% |
0.12169237 |
6 |
5 |
1038 |
14.7% |
0.14687986 |
7 |
6 |
747 |
10.6% |
0.10570256 |
8 |
7 |
930 |
13.2% |
0.13159757 |
9 |
8 |
767 |
10.9% |
0.10853262 |
10 |
9 |
232 |
3.3% |
0.03282864 |
11 |
10 - Right |
143 |
2% |
0.02023489 |
97 |
Not answered |
58 |
0.8% |
0.00820716 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_1
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Christian Democratic Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1231 |
17.4% |
0.174189897 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1528 |
21.6% |
0.216216216 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1791 |
25.3% |
0.253431442 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1060 |
15% |
0.149992925 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
982 |
13.9% |
0.138955710 |
6 |
Really like |
319 |
4.5% |
0.045139380 |
7 |
Intensely like |
63 |
0.9% |
0.008914674 |
97 |
Not answered |
93 |
1.3% |
0.013159757 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_2
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Conservative Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
361 |
5.1% |
0.05108250 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1021 |
14.4% |
0.14447432 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1324 |
18.7% |
0.18734965 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
798 |
11.3% |
0.11291920 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1621 |
22.9% |
0.22937597 |
6 |
Really like |
1517 |
21.5% |
0.21465969 |
7 |
Intensely like |
333 |
4.7% |
0.04712042 |
97 |
Not answered |
92 |
1.3% |
0.01301825 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_3
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Progress Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
2279 |
32.2% |
0.32248479 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1371 |
19.4% |
0.19400028 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
932 |
13.2% |
0.13188057 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
550 |
7.8% |
0.07782652 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1057 |
15% |
0.14956842 |
6 |
Really like |
616 |
8.7% |
0.08716570 |
7 |
Intensely like |
174 |
2.5% |
0.02462148 |
97 |
Not answered |
88 |
1.2% |
0.01245224 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_4
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Liberal Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
747 |
10.6% |
0.105702561 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1172 |
16.6% |
0.165841234 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1647 |
23.3% |
0.233055045 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1578 |
22.3% |
0.223291354 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1394 |
19.7% |
0.197254846 |
6 |
Really like |
368 |
5.2% |
0.052073015 |
7 |
Intensely like |
55 |
0.8% |
0.007782652 |
97 |
Not answered |
106 |
1.5% |
0.014999292 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_5
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Socialist Left Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
938 |
13.3% |
0.13272959 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1178 |
16.7% |
0.16669025 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1173 |
16.6% |
0.16598274 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1143 |
16.2% |
0.16173765 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1331 |
18.8% |
0.18834017 |
6 |
Really like |
943 |
13.3% |
0.13343710 |
7 |
Intensely like |
249 |
3.5% |
0.03523419 |
97 |
Not answered |
112 |
1.6% |
0.01584831 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_6
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Centre Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
417 |
5.9% |
0.05900665 |
2 |
Really dislike |
763 |
10.8% |
0.10796661 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1331 |
18.8% |
0.18834017 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1658 |
23.5% |
0.23461157 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1781 |
25.2% |
0.25201641 |
6 |
Really like |
816 |
11.5% |
0.11546625 |
7 |
Intensely like |
191 |
2.7% |
0.02702703 |
97 |
Not answered |
110 |
1.6% |
0.01556530 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_7
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Green Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1262 |
17.9% |
0.17857648 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1067 |
15.1% |
0.15098344 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1155 |
16.3% |
0.16343569 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1104 |
15.6% |
0.15621905 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1554 |
22% |
0.21989529 |
6 |
Really like |
679 |
9.6% |
0.09608037 |
7 |
Intensely like |
148 |
2.1% |
0.02094241 |
97 |
Not answered |
98 |
1.4% |
0.01386727 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_8
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Labour Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
319 |
4.5% |
0.04513938 |
2 |
Really dislike |
606 |
8.6% |
0.08575067 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1219 |
17.2% |
0.17249186 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1028 |
14.5% |
0.14546484 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2013 |
28.5% |
0.28484505 |
6 |
Really like |
1491 |
21.1% |
0.21098061 |
7 |
Intensely like |
300 |
4.2% |
0.04245083 |
97 |
Not answered |
91 |
1.3% |
0.01287675 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk6_9
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Red Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1496 |
21.2% |
0.21168813 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1220 |
17.3% |
0.17263337 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1011 |
14.3% |
0.14305929 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1190 |
16.8% |
0.16838828 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1177 |
16.7% |
0.16654875 |
6 |
Really like |
650 |
9.2% |
0.09197679 |
7 |
Intensely like |
200 |
2.8% |
0.02830055 |
97 |
Not answered |
123 |
1.7% |
0.01740484 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pktilfreds1
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with your life.
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
2252 |
31.9% |
0.318664214 |
2 |
Satisfied |
3863 |
54.7% |
0.546625159 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
775 |
11% |
0.109664638 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
143 |
2% |
0.020234895 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
25 |
0.4% |
0.003537569 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.1% |
0.001273525 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk_egeninnsats
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: People should work hard to get ahead without counting on help from others.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
People should work hard to get ahead through their own efforts without counting on help from others.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
465 |
8.2% |
0.081822981 |
2 |
Agree |
1544 |
27.2% |
0.271687489 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1924 |
33.9% |
0.338553581 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
567 |
10% |
0.099771248 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
715 |
12.6% |
0.125813831 |
6 |
Disagree |
354 |
6.2% |
0.062291043 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
101 |
1.8% |
0.017772303 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.2% |
0.002287524 |
98 |
Not asked |
2422 |
|
NA |
r14pkmeme21
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
123 |
1.7% |
0.017404839 |
2 |
Agree |
309 |
4.4% |
0.043724353 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1185 |
16.8% |
0.167680770 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
709 |
10% |
0.100325456 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
892 |
12.6% |
0.126220461 |
6 |
Disagree |
2119 |
30% |
0.299844347 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1710 |
24.2% |
0.241969718 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.3% |
0.002830055 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk14
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated people like me do not understand it.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
264 |
3.7% |
0.037356728 |
2 |
Agree |
791 |
11.2% |
0.111928683 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
2156 |
30.5% |
0.305079949 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
711 |
10.1% |
0.100608462 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
904 |
12.8% |
0.127918494 |
6 |
Disagree |
1669 |
23.6% |
0.236168105 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
559 |
7.9% |
0.079100042 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.2% |
0.001839536 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk13
Variable label:
|
How much say in what the government does does the political system in Norway allow people like you.
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
55 |
0.8% |
0.007782652 |
2 |
To a great extent |
738 |
10.4% |
0.104429036 |
3 |
To some extent |
3127 |
44.2% |
0.442479128 |
4 |
To a small extent |
2577 |
36.5% |
0.364652611 |
5 |
Not at all |
547 |
7.7% |
0.077402009 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
0.3% |
0.003254563 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk1
Variable label:
|
How interested in politics.
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
946 |
13.4% |
0.133861610 |
2 |
Interested |
3281 |
46.4% |
0.464270553 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
2237 |
31.7% |
0.316541673 |
4 |
Not very interested |
492 |
7% |
0.069619358 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
86 |
1.2% |
0.012169237 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.4% |
0.003537569 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pktilfreds3
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the present government in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
166 |
2.3% |
0.023489458 |
2 |
Satisfied |
1695 |
24% |
0.239847177 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2107 |
29.8% |
0.298146314 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
2019 |
28.6% |
0.285694071 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
1036 |
14.7% |
0.146596859 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
0.6% |
0.006226121 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pktilfreds4
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the way democracy works in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
737 |
10.4% |
0.104287534 |
2 |
Satisfied |
3432 |
48.6% |
0.485637470 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1970 |
27.9% |
0.278760436 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
713 |
10.1% |
0.100891467 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
160 |
2.3% |
0.022640441 |
97 |
Not answered |
55 |
0.8% |
0.007782652 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk102
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative to Norwegian EU membership.
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
252 |
4.4% |
0.044342777 |
2 |
Positive |
805 |
14.2% |
0.141650537 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
735 |
12.9% |
0.129333099 |
4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
721 |
12.7% |
0.126869611 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
935 |
16.5% |
0.164525779 |
6 |
Negative |
1262 |
22.2% |
0.222065810 |
7 |
Very negative |
954 |
16.8% |
0.167869083 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
0.3% |
0.003343305 |
98 |
Not asked |
2422 |
|
NA |
r14pk103
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is EEA agreement for Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
How much of an advantage or disadvantage would you say the EEA Agreement represents for Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very great advantage |
490 |
8.6% |
0.08622207 |
2 |
A great advantage |
1521 |
26.8% |
0.26764033 |
3 |
An advantage to some extent |
1839 |
32.4% |
0.32359669 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
654 |
11.5% |
0.11508006 |
5 |
A disadvantage to some extent |
737 |
13% |
0.12968503 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
265 |
4.7% |
0.04663030 |
7 |
A very great disadvantage |
116 |
2% |
0.02041175 |
97 |
Not answered |
61 |
1.1% |
0.01073377 |
98 |
Not asked |
2422 |
|
NA |
r14pkkm42
Variable label:
|
All new cars sold from 2025 should/should not be electric.
|
Pre-question text:
|
The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run
on hydrogen |
2623 |
37.1% |
0.37116174 |
2 |
In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars
which run on diesel or petrol. |
4375 |
61.9% |
0.61907457 |
97 |
Not answered |
69 |
1% |
0.00976369 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pkkm4
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Should not allow oil and gas extraction in Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with this?
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja areas.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2357 |
33.4% |
0.33352200 |
2 |
Agree |
1225 |
17.3% |
0.17334088 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
822 |
11.6% |
0.11631527 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
978 |
13.8% |
0.13838970 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
648 |
9.2% |
0.09169379 |
6 |
Disagree |
637 |
9% |
0.09013726 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
371 |
5.2% |
0.05249752 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
0.4% |
0.00410358 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pkkm2
Variable label:
|
How concerned about climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all concerned |
216 |
3.1% |
0.030564596 |
2 |
Not very conceerned |
911 |
12.9% |
0.128909014 |
3 |
Slightly concerned |
2160 |
30.6% |
0.305645960 |
4 |
Very concerned |
2355 |
33.3% |
0.333238998 |
5 |
Extremely concerned |
1402 |
19.8% |
0.198386869 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
0.3% |
0.003254563 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk_vekst
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
119 |
2.1% |
0.020939645 |
2 |
Agree |
404 |
7.1% |
0.071089213 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1064 |
18.7% |
0.187225057 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
715 |
12.6% |
0.125813831 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1354 |
23.8% |
0.238254443 |
6 |
Disagree |
1356 |
23.9% |
0.238606370 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
649 |
11.4% |
0.114200246 |
97 |
Not answered |
22 |
0.4% |
0.003871195 |
98 |
Not asked |
2422 |
|
NA |
r14pkmeme9
Variable label:
|
Should be easier/harder for refugees to be granted residence in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much easier |
169 |
2.4% |
0.023913966 |
2 |
Easier |
697 |
9.9% |
0.098627423 |
3 |
Somewhat easier |
1303 |
18.4% |
0.184378095 |
4 |
Same as today |
2551 |
36.1% |
0.360973539 |
5 |
Slightly more difficult |
1083 |
15.3% |
0.153247488 |
6 |
More difficult |
672 |
9.5% |
0.095089854 |
7 |
Much more difficult |
559 |
7.9% |
0.079100042 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.5% |
0.004669591 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pkdv5
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here.
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very great advantage |
147 |
2.1% |
0.020800906 |
2 |
Great advantage |
925 |
13.1% |
0.130890052 |
3 |
Slightly advantageous |
2565 |
36.3% |
0.362954578 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1315 |
18.6% |
0.186076128 |
5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1343 |
19% |
0.190038206 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
455 |
6.4% |
0.064383755 |
7 |
Very great disadvantage |
275 |
3.9% |
0.038913259 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.6% |
0.005943116 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk101
Variable label:
|
How goood or poor are preconditions for integrating refugees in Norwegian society.
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
308 |
4.4% |
0.043582850 |
2 |
Good |
1876 |
26.5% |
0.265459176 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
1591 |
22.5% |
0.225130890 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
834 |
11.8% |
0.118013301 |
5 |
Somewhat poor |
1355 |
19.2% |
0.191736239 |
6 |
Poor |
818 |
11.6% |
0.115749257 |
7 |
Very poor |
218 |
3.1% |
0.030847602 |
97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.9% |
0.009480685 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk10
Variable label:
|
Perception of current economic situation in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway? Do you think it is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
1751 |
24.8% |
0.247771332 |
2 |
Good |
3836 |
54.3% |
0.542804585 |
3 |
Quite good |
936 |
13.2% |
0.132446583 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
273 |
3.9% |
0.038630253 |
5 |
Quite bad |
180 |
2.5% |
0.025470497 |
6 |
Bad |
51 |
0.7% |
0.007216641 |
7 |
Very bad |
12 |
0.2% |
0.001698033 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.4% |
0.003962077 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk100
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: The people should be conferred by referendums if municipalities are merged in future.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
When municipalities are to be merged in the future, the public shuld be allowed to have their say on the matter through referendums.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1825 |
25.8% |
0.258242536 |
2 |
Agree |
1917 |
27.1% |
0.271260790 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1132 |
16% |
0.160181124 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
633 |
9% |
0.089571247 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
570 |
8.1% |
0.080656573 |
6 |
Disagree |
730 |
10.3% |
0.103297014 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
228 |
3.2% |
0.032262629 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.5% |
0.004528088 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk_sentral
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Government show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1213 |
21.3% |
0.213443604 |
2 |
Agree |
1414 |
24.9% |
0.248812247 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1257 |
22.1% |
0.221185993 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
772 |
13.6% |
0.135843745 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
373 |
6.6% |
0.065634348 |
6 |
Disagree |
490 |
8.6% |
0.086222066 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
135 |
2.4% |
0.023755059 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
0.5% |
0.005102939 |
98 |
Not asked |
2422 |
|
NA |
r14pk60
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Government should work more to reduce income differences in society.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income differences in society.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2127 |
30.1% |
0.300976369 |
2 |
Agree |
2007 |
28.4% |
0.283996038 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1378 |
19.5% |
0.194990802 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
702 |
9.9% |
0.099334937 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
443 |
6.3% |
0.062685722 |
6 |
Disagree |
300 |
4.2% |
0.042450828 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
67 |
0.9% |
0.009480685 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.6% |
0.006084619 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk29
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1582 |
22.4% |
0.223857365 |
2 |
Agree |
1547 |
21.9% |
0.218904769 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1152 |
16.3% |
0.163011179 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1032 |
14.6% |
0.146030848 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
615 |
8.7% |
0.087024197 |
6 |
Disagree |
794 |
11.2% |
0.112353191 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
302 |
4.3% |
0.042733833 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.6% |
0.006084619 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pkdv55
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Should be able to send children to muslim schools which follow national curriculum and teach Islam.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Christian faith.
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
204 |
2.9% |
0.028866563 |
2 |
Agree |
806 |
11.4% |
0.114051224 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
886 |
12.5% |
0.125371445 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1096 |
15.5% |
0.155087024 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
861 |
12.2% |
0.121833876 |
6 |
Disagree |
1399 |
19.8% |
0.197962360 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1773 |
25.1% |
0.250884392 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.6% |
0.005943116 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk_guns
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Norwegian police should be armed.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norwegian police should be armed?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
812 |
11.5% |
0.114900241 |
2 |
Agree |
1400 |
19.8% |
0.198103863 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1690 |
23.9% |
0.239139663 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
683 |
9.7% |
0.096646385 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
809 |
11.4% |
0.114475732 |
6 |
Disagree |
968 |
13.7% |
0.136974671 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
663 |
9.4% |
0.093816329 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.6% |
0.005943116 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pkby2
Variable label:
|
Local environment has gotten safer or more unsafe past couple of years.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much safer |
98 |
1.4% |
0.013867270 |
2 |
Somewhat safer |
484 |
6.8% |
0.068487336 |
3 |
No change in safety |
4995 |
70.7% |
0.706806283 |
4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
1332 |
18.8% |
0.188481675 |
5 |
Much more unsafe |
125 |
1.8% |
0.017687845 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.5% |
0.004669591 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pkby3
Variable label:
|
How afraid of a new terrorist attack in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
313 |
4.4% |
0.044290364 |
2 |
To a great extent |
1081 |
15.3% |
0.152964483 |
3 |
Somewhat |
3140 |
44.4% |
0.444318664 |
4 |
Slightly |
2180 |
30.8% |
0.308476015 |
5 |
Not at all |
317 |
4.5% |
0.044856375 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
0.5% |
0.005094099 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14pk52
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Authorities should introduce measures to protect from terrorism even at the expense of privacy.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
672 |
9.5% |
0.095089854 |
2 |
Agree |
1704 |
24.1% |
0.241120702 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1996 |
28.2% |
0.282439508 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
802 |
11.3% |
0.113485213 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
789 |
11.2% |
0.111645677 |
6 |
Disagree |
751 |
10.6% |
0.106268572 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
314 |
4.4% |
0.044431866 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.6% |
0.005518608 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14bk33
Variable label:
|
Main occupation last seven days.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
3215 |
45.5% |
0.454931371 |
2 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
301 |
4.3% |
0.042592331 |
3 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
249 |
3.5% |
0.035234187 |
4 |
Self-employed |
320 |
4.5% |
0.045280883 |
5 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
267 |
3.8% |
0.037781237 |
6 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
53 |
0.7% |
0.007499646 |
7 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
20 |
0.3% |
0.002830055 |
8 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
346 |
4.9% |
0.048959955 |
9 |
Retired |
2029 |
28.7% |
0.287109099 |
10 |
In military service |
4 |
0.1% |
0.000566011 |
11 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
44 |
0.6% |
0.006226121 |
12 |
Other: |
184 |
2.6% |
0.026036508 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
0.5% |
0.004952597 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14bk35
Variable label:
|
Description of the area you live in.
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A city |
1600 |
22.6% |
0.22640441 |
2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
1616 |
22.9% |
0.22866846 |
3 |
A small or medium sized town |
1896 |
26.8% |
0.26828923 |
4 |
A village |
1176 |
16.6% |
0.16640724 |
5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
768 |
10.9% |
0.10867412 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.2% |
0.00155653 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14bk21
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in.
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14bk33 = 1 or 2 or 3 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
429 |
11.4% |
0.1139442231 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1253 |
33.3% |
0.3328021248 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
253 |
6.7% |
0.0671978752 |
4 |
Private business |
1704 |
45.3% |
0.4525896414 |
5 |
Self-employed |
17 |
0.5% |
0.0045152722 |
6 |
Other: |
106 |
2.8% |
0.0281540505 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.1% |
0.0007968127 |
98 |
Not asked |
4340 |
|
NA |
r14bkhelse
Variable label:
|
How is your health.
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
1120 |
15.8% |
0.158483090 |
2 |
Very good |
2592 |
36.7% |
0.366775152 |
3 |
Good |
2331 |
33% |
0.329842932 |
4 |
Somewhat good |
777 |
11% |
0.109947644 |
5 |
Poor |
214 |
3% |
0.030281590 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
0.5% |
0.004669591 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14bk25
Variable label:
|
What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
<150 000 |
381 |
5.4% |
0.05391255 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
908 |
12.8% |
0.12848451 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
1112 |
15.7% |
0.15735107 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1298 |
18.4% |
0.18367058 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
1148 |
16.2% |
0.16244517 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
785 |
11.1% |
0.11107967 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
883 |
12.5% |
0.12494694 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
399 |
5.6% |
0.05645960 |
97 |
Not answered |
153 |
2.2% |
0.02164992 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |
r14bk27
Variable label:
|
Marital status.
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8105] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Single |
854 |
12.1% |
0.120843356 |
2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
363 |
5.1% |
0.051365502 |
3 |
Cohabitant |
1152 |
16.3% |
0.163011179 |
4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
4035 |
57.1% |
0.570963634 |
5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
383 |
5.4% |
0.054195557 |
6 |
Widow/widower |
226 |
3.2% |
0.031979624 |
7 |
Other: |
16 |
0.2% |
0.002264044 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
0.5% |
0.005377105 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
1038 |
|
NA |