Citation
Primary investigators
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
Mette Andersson, Sveinung Arnesen, Gisela Böhm, Dag Elgesem, Odd Gåsdal, Kristin Strømsnes, Endre Tvinnereim, and Jacob Aars
|
Scientific Team, University of Bergen and Rokkansenteret
|
Producers
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Researcher
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Based on international literature the panel recruitment process was expected to have a success rate of approximately 14 percent. In order to reach our minimum target of 3 500 respondents we therefore had to draw a gross sample of 25 000 individuals.
The sample was drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. This register includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
25 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.
Furthermore, all individuals over the age of 95 were excluded from the sample. This amounted to 58 persons, thus leaving a net sample of 24 942 individuals before the recruitment process started.
In wave 1, 4 870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1).
Mode of Data Collection
Panel members were recruited per post in two steps.
First, letters were sent to everyone in the sample. The letters contained the following information; a) a description of the project, b) the Citizen Panel's policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the anonymity of the participators, c) the time-frame of the project, d) the participants' rights to opt out of the panel at any time in the future, e) contact information for the people responsible for the project, f) a unique log-in id and the web address to the panel's web site and g) the estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes).
In order to maximize the response rate, an incentive in the form of a travel gift card was included in the project. The value of the gift card was 25 000 NOK. To enter the lottery respondents were required to join the panel and provide their e-mail addresses. Respondents were asked to register on the panel's web site and log into the survey using the unique id-code provided in their personal letter. Information on the lottery was included in all correspondence with respondents.
The letter was posted on the 6th of November 2013.
A reminder post card was sent on the 22nd of November 2013 to those respondents who a) had not logged into the survey, or b) had neither completed the survey nor provided their e-mail address. Respondents were encouraged to join the panel, with reference to the letter sent two weeks prior. The unique log-in id provided in the original letter was also included in the post card.
A reminder e-mail was sent on the 25th of November to those respondents who had provided their e-mail addresses, but had not yet completed the survey.
Wave1 was closed on the 05th of January 2014.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix).
When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent's geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer this question. Because of this, two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset. We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample. An illustration of this is provided in table 5 which shows the effect of weight 2 on the distribution of self-reported level of education in the net sample:
Change Log
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 1
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 1
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
w01_k7
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
w01_k11
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
NA
|
2018-11-07
|
w01_k9_1_sak1_kod
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
NA
|
2018-11-07
|
w01_k9_2_sak2_kod
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
NA
|
2018-11-07
|
w01_k9_3_sak3_kod
|
Corrected missing values (97/98)
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
w01_p5_1
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
w01_p5_2
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
w01p4_1
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
w01p4_2
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
NA
|
2016-05-06
|
w01_k23
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2014-05-12
|
w01_dv36_recode
|
New variable w01_dv36 based on w01_dv36_recode
|
v-100
|
2014-01-17
|
NA
|
Initial release of round 1
|
Dataset contents
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 1 - v-101.sav
|
# Cases
|
4905
|
# Variables
|
332
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_u
Variable label:
|
Randomizes the respondents into two groups
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes the respondents into two groups. The two groups are asked questions common to them both, and questions unique to the group.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
u1 |
2471 |
50.4% |
0.5037717 |
2 |
u2 |
2434 |
49.6% |
0.4962283 |
w01_k1
Variable label:
|
Interest in politics
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
505 |
10.3% |
0.102956167 |
2 |
Interested |
2158 |
44% |
0.439959225 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
1671 |
34.1% |
0.340672783 |
4 |
Not interested |
490 |
10% |
0.099898063 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
73 |
1.5% |
0.014882773 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001630989 |
w01_k2
Variable label:
|
Voted in the elections
|
Literal question:
|
Did you vote at the parliamentary elections this autumn?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
4199 |
85.6% |
0.856065240 |
2 |
No |
682 |
13.9% |
0.139041794 |
3 |
Don't remember |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001427115 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
0.3% |
0.003465851 |
w01_k3
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
213 |
5.1% |
0.05072636 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1158 |
27.6% |
0.27577995 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
534 |
12.7% |
0.12717314 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
291 |
6.9% |
0.06930221 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
263 |
6.3% |
0.06263396 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
175 |
4.2% |
0.04167659 |
7 |
The Green Party |
171 |
4.1% |
0.04072398 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1188 |
28.3% |
0.28292451 |
9 |
Red |
80 |
1.9% |
0.01905216 |
10 |
Other: |
67 |
1.6% |
0.01595618 |
97 |
No answer |
59 |
1.4% |
0.01405096 |
98 |
Not asked |
706 |
|
NA |
w01_k3_10_other
Variable label:
|
Text: Voted for following party [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_k4
Variable label:
|
Time of choosing party
|
Literal question:
|
When did you decide to vote for the party or list you chose?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Before the election campaign |
2749 |
65.5% |
0.65467969 |
2 |
During the election campaign |
1041 |
24.8% |
0.24791617 |
3 |
On the day of the election |
335 |
8% |
0.07978090 |
97 |
No answer |
74 |
1.8% |
0.01762324 |
98 |
Not asked |
706 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_1
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: too small differences between parties
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
Literal question:
|
The differences between the parties are too minor
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
51 |
7.5% |
0.07478006 |
2 |
Important |
98 |
14.4% |
0.14369501 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
130 |
19.1% |
0.19061584 |
4 |
Not very important |
84 |
12.3% |
0.12316716 |
5 |
Not important at all |
125 |
18.3% |
0.18328446 |
97 |
No answer |
194 |
28.4% |
0.28445748 |
98 |
Not asked |
4223 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_2
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: not committed to important issues
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
Literal question:
|
I am not committed to any important issues
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
33 |
4.8% |
0.0483871 |
2 |
Important |
75 |
11% |
0.1099707 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
121 |
17.7% |
0.1774194 |
4 |
Not very important |
93 |
13.6% |
0.1363636 |
5 |
Not important at all |
157 |
23% |
0.2302053 |
97 |
No answer |
203 |
29.8% |
0.2976540 |
98 |
Not asked |
4223 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_3
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: not familiar with issues
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
Literal question:
|
I am not familiar enough with what the parties represent
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
89 |
13% |
0.13049853 |
2 |
Important |
135 |
19.8% |
0.19794721 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
97 |
14.2% |
0.14222874 |
4 |
Not very important |
63 |
9.2% |
0.09237537 |
5 |
Not important at all |
119 |
17.4% |
0.17448680 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
26.2% |
0.26246334 |
98 |
Not asked |
4223 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_4
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: lacking confidence in politicians
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
Literal question:
|
I lack confidence in politicians
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
118 |
17.3% |
0.17302053 |
2 |
Important |
116 |
17% |
0.17008798 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
101 |
14.8% |
0.14809384 |
4 |
Not very important |
55 |
8.1% |
0.08064516 |
5 |
Not important at all |
117 |
17.2% |
0.17155425 |
97 |
No answer |
175 |
25.7% |
0.25659824 |
98 |
Not asked |
4223 |
|
NA |
w01_k5_5
Variable label:
|
Reasons not to vote in elections: lack of time
|
Pre-question text:
|
There may be many reasons for people not voting at parliamentary elections. Indicate how important the following reasons were for you:
|
Literal question:
|
I didn’t have the time or opportunity
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
125 |
18.3% |
0.18328446 |
2 |
Important |
75 |
11% |
0.10997067 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
72 |
10.6% |
0.10557185 |
4 |
Not very important |
64 |
9.4% |
0.09384164 |
5 |
Not important at all |
184 |
27% |
0.26979472 |
97 |
No answer |
162 |
23.8% |
0.23753666 |
98 |
Not asked |
4223 |
|
NA |
w01_k6_1
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Christian Democratic Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly dislike |
338 |
6.9% |
0.06890928 |
2 |
Somewhat dislike |
571 |
11.6% |
0.11641182 |
3 |
Somewhat dislike |
1084 |
22.1% |
0.22099898 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1197 |
24.4% |
0.24403670 |
5 |
Somewhat like |
1015 |
20.7% |
0.20693170 |
6 |
Significantly like |
365 |
7.4% |
0.07441386 |
7 |
Strongly like |
73 |
1.5% |
0.01488277 |
97 |
No answer |
262 |
5.3% |
0.05341488 |
w01_k6_2
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Conservative Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly dislike |
118 |
2.4% |
0.02405708 |
2 |
Somewhat dislike |
375 |
7.6% |
0.07645260 |
3 |
Somewhat dislike |
728 |
14.8% |
0.14841998 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
642 |
13.1% |
0.13088685 |
5 |
Somewhat like |
1224 |
25% |
0.24954128 |
6 |
Significantly like |
1191 |
24.3% |
0.24281346 |
7 |
Strongly like |
392 |
8% |
0.07991845 |
97 |
No answer |
235 |
4.8% |
0.04791030 |
w01_k6_3
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Progress Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly dislike |
1086 |
22.1% |
0.22140673 |
2 |
Somewhat dislike |
827 |
16.9% |
0.16860347 |
3 |
Somewhat dislike |
677 |
13.8% |
0.13802243 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
484 |
9.9% |
0.09867482 |
5 |
Somewhat like |
838 |
17.1% |
0.17084608 |
6 |
Significantly like |
515 |
10.5% |
0.10499490 |
7 |
Strongly like |
236 |
4.8% |
0.04811417 |
97 |
No answer |
242 |
4.9% |
0.04933741 |
w01_k6_4
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly dislike |
135 |
2.8% |
0.02752294 |
2 |
Somewhat dislike |
296 |
6% |
0.06034659 |
3 |
Somewhat dislike |
792 |
16.1% |
0.16146789 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1426 |
29.1% |
0.29072375 |
5 |
Somewhat like |
1320 |
26.9% |
0.26911315 |
6 |
Significantly like |
533 |
10.9% |
0.10866463 |
7 |
Strongly like |
125 |
2.5% |
0.02548420 |
97 |
No answer |
278 |
5.7% |
0.05667686 |
w01_k6_5
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly dislike |
681 |
13.9% |
0.13883792 |
2 |
Somewhat dislike |
768 |
15.7% |
0.15657492 |
3 |
Somewhat dislike |
772 |
15.7% |
0.15739042 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
982 |
20% |
0.20020387 |
5 |
Somewhat like |
832 |
17% |
0.16962283 |
6 |
Significantly like |
441 |
9% |
0.08990826 |
7 |
Strongly like |
137 |
2.8% |
0.02793068 |
97 |
No answer |
292 |
6% |
0.05953109 |
w01_k6_6
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly dislike |
267 |
5.4% |
0.05443425 |
2 |
Somewhat dislike |
530 |
10.8% |
0.10805301 |
3 |
Somewhat dislike |
1049 |
21.4% |
0.21386340 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1559 |
31.8% |
0.31783894 |
5 |
Somewhat like |
917 |
18.7% |
0.18695209 |
6 |
Significantly like |
235 |
4.8% |
0.04791030 |
7 |
Strongly like |
57 |
1.2% |
0.01162080 |
97 |
No answer |
291 |
5.9% |
0.05932722 |
w01_k6_7
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly dislike |
349 |
7.1% |
0.07115189 |
2 |
Somewhat dislike |
391 |
8% |
0.07971458 |
3 |
Somewhat dislike |
630 |
12.8% |
0.12844037 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1588 |
32.4% |
0.32375127 |
5 |
Somewhat like |
1041 |
21.2% |
0.21223242 |
6 |
Significantly like |
478 |
9.7% |
0.09745158 |
7 |
Strongly like |
136 |
2.8% |
0.02772681 |
97 |
No answer |
292 |
6% |
0.05953109 |
w01_k6_8
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly dislike |
209 |
4.3% |
0.04260958 |
2 |
Somewhat dislike |
360 |
7.3% |
0.07339450 |
3 |
Somewhat dislike |
670 |
13.7% |
0.13659531 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
631 |
12.9% |
0.12864424 |
5 |
Somewhat like |
1236 |
25.2% |
0.25198777 |
6 |
Significantly like |
1168 |
23.8% |
0.23812436 |
7 |
Strongly like |
401 |
8.2% |
0.08175331 |
97 |
No answer |
230 |
4.7% |
0.04689093 |
w01_k6_9
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party: Red
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to assess how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
Red
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly dislike |
1076 |
21.9% |
0.21936799 |
2 |
Somewhat dislike |
794 |
16.2% |
0.16187564 |
3 |
Somewhat dislike |
743 |
15.1% |
0.15147808 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1205 |
24.6% |
0.24566769 |
5 |
Somewhat like |
548 |
11.2% |
0.11172273 |
6 |
Significantly like |
174 |
3.5% |
0.03547401 |
7 |
Strongly like |
69 |
1.4% |
0.01406728 |
97 |
No answer |
296 |
6% |
0.06034659 |
w01_k7
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with new Government
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the new Government of Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
287 |
5.9% |
0.05851172 |
2 |
Satisfied |
1564 |
31.9% |
0.31885831 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1475 |
30.1% |
0.30071356 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
1035 |
21.1% |
0.21100917 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
428 |
8.7% |
0.08725790 |
97 |
No answer |
116 |
2.4% |
0.02364934 |
w01_dt19
Variable label:
|
Anticipated red-green victory
|
Literal question:
|
If you consider the period prior to the parliamentary elections in September, did you expect the red-green government to continue after the election?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
428 |
17.6% |
0.1758422 |
2 |
No |
1952 |
80.2% |
0.8019721 |
97 |
Not asked |
54 |
2.2% |
0.0221857 |
98 |
No answer |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt20
Variable label:
|
Government coalition considered most likely
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, which government did you consider to be most likely?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Conservative Party |
94 |
4.8% |
0.04815574 |
2 |
The Conservative Party and the Progress Party |
675 |
34.6% |
0.34579918 |
3 |
The Conservative Party, the Progress Party, the Christian Democratic Party and
the Liberal Party |
616 |
31.6% |
0.31557377 |
4 |
The Conservative Party, the Progress Party and the Christian Democratic Party |
148 |
7.6% |
0.07581967 |
5 |
The Conservative Party, the Progress Party and the Liberal Party |
171 |
8.8% |
0.08760246 |
6 |
The Conservative Party, the Christian Democratic Party and the Liberal Party |
138 |
7.1% |
0.07069672 |
7 |
The Labour Party |
51 |
2.6% |
0.02612705 |
8 |
Other: |
20 |
1% |
0.01024590 |
97 |
No answer |
39 |
2% |
0.01997951 |
98 |
Not asked |
2953 |
|
NA |
w01_dt20_8_other
Variable label:
|
Text: Government coalition considered most likely [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, which government did you consider to be most likely?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_dt21
Variable label:
|
Would vote differently if premonition of outcome
|
Literal question:
|
Now that you know that a Conservative Party and Progress Party government was the outcome of the election, would you have changed your vote if you had known this in advance?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
196 |
8.1% |
0.08052588 |
2 |
No |
2142 |
88% |
0.88003287 |
97 |
No answer |
96 |
3.9% |
0.03944125 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt22
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party if knowledge of outcome
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would have voted for if this is the case?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
10 |
5.1% |
0.05102041 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
17 |
8.7% |
0.08673469 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
5 |
2.6% |
0.02551020 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
28 |
14.3% |
0.14285714 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
9 |
4.6% |
0.04591837 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
8 |
4.1% |
0.04081633 |
7 |
The Green Party |
18 |
9.2% |
0.09183673 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
96 |
49% |
0.48979592 |
9 |
Other: |
2 |
1% |
0.01020408 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.5% |
0.01530612 |
98 |
Not asked |
4709 |
|
NA |
w01_dt22_9_other
Variable label:
|
Text: Would vote for following party if knowledge of outcome [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would have voted for if this is the case?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_k8_1
Variable label:
|
Placement on the political spectrum
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics one often speaks of the “left wing” and “right wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are at the far left politically, while 10 represents those who are at the far right.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 Left |
88 |
1.8% |
0.01794088 |
1 |
1 |
127 |
2.6% |
0.02589195 |
2 |
2 |
351 |
7.2% |
0.07155963 |
3 |
3 |
629 |
12.8% |
0.12823649 |
4 |
4 |
503 |
10.3% |
0.10254842 |
5 |
5 |
683 |
13.9% |
0.13924567 |
6 |
6 |
649 |
13.2% |
0.13231397 |
7 |
7 |
716 |
14.6% |
0.14597350 |
8 |
8 |
485 |
9.9% |
0.09887870 |
9 |
9 |
183 |
3.7% |
0.03730887 |
10 |
10 Right |
162 |
3.3% |
0.03302752 |
97 |
No answer |
138 |
2.8% |
0.02813456 |
99 |
No response |
191 |
3.9% |
0.03893986 |
w01_k9_1
Variable label:
|
- Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_k9_1_sak1_kod
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - recoded
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
[Recode of w01_k9_1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4292] [Invalid:613] [Range:1001-900906]
|
w01_k9_2
Variable label:
|
- Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_k9_2_sak2_kod
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - recoded
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
[Recode of w01_k9_2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4279] [Invalid:626] [Range:1001-8008001]
|
w01_k9_3
Variable label:
|
- Text: Most important political issues [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_k9_3_sak3_kod
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues - recoded
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
[Recode of w01_k9_3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4290] [Invalid:615] [Range:1001-900906]
|
w01_dt16_1
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Christian Democractic Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 Left |
28 |
0.6% |
0.005708461 |
1 |
1 |
41 |
0.8% |
0.008358818 |
2 |
2 |
83 |
1.7% |
0.016921509 |
3 |
3 |
171 |
3.5% |
0.034862385 |
4 |
4 |
367 |
7.5% |
0.074821611 |
5 |
5 |
1000 |
20.4% |
0.203873598 |
6 |
6 |
1048 |
21.4% |
0.213659531 |
7 |
7 |
738 |
15% |
0.150458716 |
8 |
8 |
352 |
7.2% |
0.071763507 |
9 |
9 |
119 |
2.4% |
0.024260958 |
10 |
10 Right |
63 |
1.3% |
0.012844037 |
97 |
No answer |
895 |
18.2% |
0.182466871 |
w01_dt16_2
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Conservative Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 Left |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001223242 |
1 |
1 |
10 |
0.2% |
0.002038736 |
2 |
2 |
14 |
0.3% |
0.002854230 |
3 |
3 |
15 |
0.3% |
0.003058104 |
4 |
4 |
31 |
0.6% |
0.006320082 |
5 |
5 |
81 |
1.7% |
0.016513761 |
6 |
6 |
167 |
3.4% |
0.034046891 |
7 |
7 |
630 |
12.8% |
0.128440367 |
8 |
8 |
1254 |
25.6% |
0.255657492 |
9 |
9 |
1157 |
23.6% |
0.235881753 |
10 |
10 Right |
730 |
14.9% |
0.148827727 |
97 |
No answer |
810 |
16.5% |
0.165137615 |
w01_dt16_3
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Progress Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 Left |
16 |
0.3% |
0.003261978 |
1 |
1 |
18 |
0.4% |
0.003669725 |
2 |
2 |
15 |
0.3% |
0.003058104 |
3 |
3 |
27 |
0.6% |
0.005504587 |
4 |
4 |
36 |
0.7% |
0.007339450 |
5 |
5 |
89 |
1.8% |
0.018144750 |
6 |
6 |
70 |
1.4% |
0.014271152 |
7 |
7 |
193 |
3.9% |
0.039347604 |
8 |
8 |
499 |
10.2% |
0.101732926 |
9 |
9 |
1033 |
21.1% |
0.210601427 |
10 |
10 Right |
2075 |
42.3% |
0.423037717 |
97 |
No answer |
834 |
17% |
0.170030581 |
w01_dt16_4
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 Left |
327 |
6.7% |
0.066666667 |
1 |
1 |
217 |
4.4% |
0.044240571 |
2 |
2 |
247 |
5% |
0.050356779 |
3 |
3 |
307 |
6.3% |
0.062589195 |
4 |
4 |
466 |
9.5% |
0.095005097 |
5 |
5 |
839 |
17.1% |
0.171049949 |
6 |
6 |
891 |
18.2% |
0.181651376 |
7 |
7 |
502 |
10.2% |
0.102344546 |
8 |
8 |
178 |
3.6% |
0.036289501 |
9 |
9 |
40 |
0.8% |
0.008154944 |
10 |
10 Right |
21 |
0.4% |
0.004281346 |
97 |
No answer |
870 |
17.7% |
0.177370031 |
w01_dt16_5
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 Left |
716 |
14.6% |
0.145973496 |
1 |
1 |
1340 |
27.3% |
0.273190622 |
2 |
2 |
1139 |
23.2% |
0.232212029 |
3 |
3 |
509 |
10.4% |
0.103771662 |
4 |
4 |
164 |
3.3% |
0.033435270 |
5 |
5 |
89 |
1.8% |
0.018144750 |
6 |
6 |
23 |
0.5% |
0.004689093 |
7 |
7 |
13 |
0.3% |
0.002650357 |
8 |
8 |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001223242 |
9 |
9 |
12 |
0.2% |
0.002446483 |
10 |
10 Right |
8 |
0.2% |
0.001630989 |
97 |
No answer |
886 |
18.1% |
0.180632008 |
w01_dt16_6
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 Left |
65 |
1.3% |
0.013251784 |
1 |
1 |
113 |
2.3% |
0.023037717 |
2 |
2 |
299 |
6.1% |
0.060958206 |
3 |
3 |
560 |
11.4% |
0.114169215 |
4 |
4 |
1058 |
21.6% |
0.215698267 |
5 |
5 |
1176 |
24% |
0.239755352 |
6 |
6 |
442 |
9% |
0.090112130 |
7 |
7 |
159 |
3.2% |
0.032415902 |
8 |
8 |
60 |
1.2% |
0.012232416 |
9 |
9 |
20 |
0.4% |
0.004077472 |
10 |
10 Right |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001427115 |
97 |
No answer |
946 |
19.3% |
0.192864424 |
w01_dt16_7
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 Left |
306 |
6.2% |
0.062385321 |
1 |
1 |
427 |
8.7% |
0.087054027 |
2 |
2 |
662 |
13.5% |
0.134964322 |
3 |
3 |
675 |
13.8% |
0.137614679 |
4 |
4 |
677 |
13.8% |
0.138022426 |
5 |
5 |
694 |
14.1% |
0.141488277 |
6 |
6 |
169 |
3.4% |
0.034454638 |
7 |
7 |
62 |
1.3% |
0.012640163 |
8 |
8 |
20 |
0.4% |
0.004077472 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
0.2% |
0.002038736 |
10 |
10 Right |
12 |
0.2% |
0.002446483 |
97 |
No answer |
1191 |
24.3% |
0.242813456 |
w01_dt16_8
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 Left |
138 |
2.8% |
0.028134557 |
1 |
1 |
264 |
5.4% |
0.053822630 |
2 |
2 |
612 |
12.5% |
0.124770642 |
3 |
3 |
996 |
20.3% |
0.203058104 |
4 |
4 |
926 |
18.9% |
0.188786952 |
5 |
5 |
653 |
13.3% |
0.133129460 |
6 |
6 |
268 |
5.5% |
0.054638124 |
7 |
7 |
101 |
2.1% |
0.020591233 |
8 |
8 |
42 |
0.9% |
0.008562691 |
9 |
9 |
25 |
0.5% |
0.005096840 |
10 |
10 Right |
24 |
0.5% |
0.004892966 |
97 |
No answer |
856 |
17.5% |
0.174515800 |
w01_dt16_9
Variable label:
|
Place party on political spectrum: Red
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics there is often talk of the left and right wings. Where would you place the following parties on a scale, where 0 indicates farthest to the left and 10 indicates farthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
Red
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 Left |
2508 |
51.1% |
0.511314985 |
1 |
1 |
728 |
14.8% |
0.148419980 |
2 |
2 |
256 |
5.2% |
0.052191641 |
3 |
3 |
100 |
2% |
0.020387360 |
4 |
4 |
76 |
1.5% |
0.015494393 |
5 |
5 |
89 |
1.8% |
0.018144750 |
6 |
6 |
29 |
0.6% |
0.005912334 |
7 |
7 |
21 |
0.4% |
0.004281346 |
8 |
8 |
17 |
0.3% |
0.003465851 |
9 |
9 |
15 |
0.3% |
0.003058104 |
10 |
10 Right |
19 |
0.4% |
0.003873598 |
97 |
No answer |
1047 |
21.3% |
0.213455657 |
w01_k10
Variable label:
|
Perception of current economic situation
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation in Norway? Do you believe it is:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
1832 |
37.3% |
0.373496432 |
2 |
Good |
2178 |
44.4% |
0.444036697 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
453 |
9.2% |
0.092354740 |
4 |
Neither good nor poor |
157 |
3.2% |
0.032008155 |
5 |
Somewhat poor |
101 |
2.1% |
0.020591233 |
6 |
Poor |
34 |
0.7% |
0.006931702 |
7 |
Very poor |
10 |
0.2% |
0.002038736 |
97 |
No answer |
140 |
2.9% |
0.028542304 |
w01_k11
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with the Norwegian democracy
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
858 |
17.5% |
0.174923547 |
2 |
Satisfied |
2757 |
56.2% |
0.562079511 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
894 |
18.2% |
0.182262997 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
188 |
3.8% |
0.038328236 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
43 |
0.9% |
0.008766565 |
97 |
No answer |
165 |
3.4% |
0.033639144 |
w01_k12_1
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Government
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The Government
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
136 |
2.8% |
0.02772681 |
2 |
High confidence |
1410 |
28.7% |
0.28746177 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1493 |
30.4% |
0.30438328 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
613 |
12.5% |
0.12497452 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
545 |
11.1% |
0.11111111 |
6 |
High mistrust |
223 |
4.5% |
0.04546381 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
90 |
1.8% |
0.01834862 |
8 |
Don't know |
92 |
1.9% |
0.01875637 |
97 |
No answer |
303 |
6.2% |
0.06177370 |
w01_k12_2
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Parliament
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
Parliament
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
256 |
5.2% |
0.052191641 |
2 |
High confidence |
1752 |
35.7% |
0.357186544 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1446 |
29.5% |
0.294801223 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
568 |
11.6% |
0.115800204 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
340 |
6.9% |
0.069317023 |
6 |
High mistrust |
102 |
2.1% |
0.020795107 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
42 |
0.9% |
0.008562691 |
8 |
Don't know |
92 |
1.9% |
0.018756371 |
97 |
No answer |
307 |
6.3% |
0.062589195 |
w01_k12_3
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Politicians
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
31 |
0.6% |
0.006320082 |
2 |
High confidence |
438 |
8.9% |
0.089296636 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1660 |
33.8% |
0.338430173 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
827 |
16.9% |
0.168603466 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
1027 |
20.9% |
0.209378186 |
6 |
High mistrust |
353 |
7.2% |
0.071967380 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
170 |
3.5% |
0.034658512 |
8 |
Don't know |
85 |
1.7% |
0.017329256 |
97 |
No answer |
314 |
6.4% |
0.064016310 |
w01_k12_4
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Parties
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
Parties
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
28 |
0.6% |
0.005708461 |
2 |
High confidence |
379 |
7.7% |
0.077268094 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1722 |
35.1% |
0.351070336 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
1079 |
22% |
0.219979613 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
887 |
18.1% |
0.180835882 |
6 |
High mistrust |
208 |
4.2% |
0.042405708 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
59 |
1.2% |
0.012028542 |
8 |
Don't know |
190 |
3.9% |
0.038735984 |
97 |
No answer |
353 |
7.2% |
0.071967380 |
w01_k12_5
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: The Sameting
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The Sameting
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
44 |
0.9% |
0.008970438 |
2 |
High confidence |
228 |
4.6% |
0.046483180 |
3 |
Some confidence |
357 |
7.3% |
0.072782875 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
1488 |
30.3% |
0.303363914 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
267 |
5.4% |
0.054434251 |
6 |
High mistrust |
192 |
3.9% |
0.039143731 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
179 |
3.6% |
0.036493374 |
8 |
Don't know |
1796 |
36.6% |
0.366156983 |
97 |
No answer |
354 |
7.2% |
0.072171254 |
w01_k12_6
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: The County Council
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The County Council
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
33 |
0.7% |
0.006727829 |
2 |
High confidence |
435 |
8.9% |
0.088685015 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1122 |
22.9% |
0.228746177 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
1404 |
28.6% |
0.286238532 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
589 |
12% |
0.120081549 |
6 |
High mistrust |
234 |
4.8% |
0.047706422 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
153 |
3.1% |
0.031192661 |
8 |
Don't know |
588 |
12% |
0.119877676 |
97 |
No answer |
347 |
7.1% |
0.070744139 |
w01_k12_7
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: The Municipal Council
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The municipal council
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
46 |
0.9% |
0.009378186 |
2 |
High confidence |
739 |
15.1% |
0.150662589 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1676 |
34.2% |
0.341692151 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
854 |
17.4% |
0.174108053 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
745 |
15.2% |
0.151885831 |
6 |
High mistrust |
243 |
5% |
0.049541284 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
110 |
2.2% |
0.022426096 |
8 |
Don't know |
183 |
3.7% |
0.037308869 |
97 |
No answer |
309 |
6.3% |
0.062996942 |
w01_k12_8
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: EU
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The EU
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
62 |
1.3% |
0.01264016 |
2 |
High confidence |
425 |
8.7% |
0.08664628 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1112 |
22.7% |
0.22670744 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
1003 |
20.4% |
0.20448522 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
855 |
17.4% |
0.17431193 |
6 |
High mistrust |
555 |
11.3% |
0.11314985 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
374 |
7.6% |
0.07624873 |
8 |
Don't know |
205 |
4.2% |
0.04179409 |
97 |
No answer |
314 |
6.4% |
0.06401631 |
w01_k12_9
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: UN
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The UN
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
324 |
6.6% |
0.06605505 |
2 |
High confidence |
1497 |
30.5% |
0.30519878 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1356 |
27.6% |
0.27645260 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
703 |
14.3% |
0.14332314 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
320 |
6.5% |
0.06523955 |
6 |
High mistrust |
126 |
2.6% |
0.02568807 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
74 |
1.5% |
0.01508665 |
8 |
Don't know |
185 |
3.8% |
0.03771662 |
97 |
No answer |
320 |
6.5% |
0.06523955 |
w01_dt5_1
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Courts
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The Courts/Judiciary
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
644 |
13.1% |
0.13129460 |
2 |
High confidence |
2124 |
43.3% |
0.43302752 |
3 |
Some confidence |
962 |
19.6% |
0.19612640 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
399 |
8.1% |
0.08134557 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
287 |
5.9% |
0.05851172 |
6 |
High mistrust |
85 |
1.7% |
0.01732926 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
61 |
1.2% |
0.01243629 |
8 |
Don't know |
101 |
2.1% |
0.02059123 |
97 |
No answer |
242 |
4.9% |
0.04933741 |
w01_dt5_2
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Police
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The Police
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
311 |
6.3% |
0.063404689 |
2 |
High confidence |
1884 |
38.4% |
0.384097859 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1360 |
27.7% |
0.277268094 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
385 |
7.8% |
0.078491335 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
434 |
8.8% |
0.088481142 |
6 |
High mistrust |
174 |
3.5% |
0.035474006 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
96 |
2% |
0.019571865 |
8 |
Don't know |
34 |
0.7% |
0.006931702 |
97 |
No answer |
227 |
4.6% |
0.046279307 |
w01_dt5_3
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Media
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
Media
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
32 |
0.7% |
0.006523955 |
2 |
High confidence |
327 |
6.7% |
0.066666667 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1264 |
25.8% |
0.257696228 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
927 |
18.9% |
0.188990826 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
1313 |
26.8% |
0.267686035 |
6 |
High mistrust |
552 |
11.3% |
0.112538226 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
211 |
4.3% |
0.043017329 |
8 |
Don't know |
44 |
0.9% |
0.008970438 |
97 |
No answer |
235 |
4.8% |
0.047910296 |
w01_dt5_4
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: Scientists
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
Scientists
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
351 |
7.2% |
0.071559633 |
2 |
High confidence |
1813 |
37% |
0.369622834 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1398 |
28.5% |
0.285015291 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
651 |
13.3% |
0.132721713 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
239 |
4.9% |
0.048725790 |
6 |
High mistrust |
53 |
1.1% |
0.010805301 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
31 |
0.6% |
0.006320082 |
8 |
Don't know |
114 |
2.3% |
0.023241590 |
97 |
No answer |
255 |
5.2% |
0.051987768 |
w01_dt5_5
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: NAV
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
NAV
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
59 |
1.2% |
0.01202854 |
2 |
High confidence |
495 |
10.1% |
0.10091743 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1282 |
26.1% |
0.26136595 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
880 |
17.9% |
0.17940877 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
901 |
18.4% |
0.18369011 |
6 |
High mistrust |
504 |
10.3% |
0.10275229 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
409 |
8.3% |
0.08338430 |
8 |
Don't know |
146 |
3% |
0.02976555 |
97 |
No answer |
229 |
4.7% |
0.04668705 |
w01_dt5_6
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: The banking sector
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The banking sector
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
143 |
2.9% |
0.02915392 |
2 |
High confidence |
1286 |
26.2% |
0.26218145 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1357 |
27.7% |
0.27665647 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
787 |
16% |
0.16044852 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
685 |
14% |
0.13965341 |
6 |
High mistrust |
227 |
4.6% |
0.04627931 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
100 |
2% |
0.02038736 |
8 |
Don't know |
80 |
1.6% |
0.01630989 |
97 |
No answer |
240 |
4.9% |
0.04892966 |
w01_dt5_7
Variable label:
|
Trust in institution or player: The health services
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which level of confidence do you have to the following institutions and players?
|
Literal question:
|
The health services
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
206 |
4.2% |
0.041997961 |
2 |
High confidence |
1730 |
35.3% |
0.352701325 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1529 |
31.2% |
0.311722732 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
358 |
7.3% |
0.072986748 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
566 |
11.5% |
0.115392457 |
6 |
High mistrust |
189 |
3.9% |
0.038532110 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
76 |
1.5% |
0.015494393 |
8 |
Don't know |
26 |
0.5% |
0.005300714 |
97 |
No answer |
225 |
4.6% |
0.045871560 |
w01_k31_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: The state should reduce income inequality
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
The state should contribute to reducing inequalities in income in society
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
867 |
17.7% |
0.17675841 |
2 |
Agree |
1152 |
23.5% |
0.23486239 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1205 |
24.6% |
0.24566769 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
459 |
9.4% |
0.09357798 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
497 |
10.1% |
0.10132518 |
6 |
Disagree |
375 |
7.6% |
0.07645260 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
151 |
3.1% |
0.03078491 |
97 |
No answer |
199 |
4.1% |
0.04057085 |
w01_k31_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Better with diversity of religions
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different religions and views on life.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
462 |
9.4% |
0.09418960 |
2 |
Agree |
957 |
19.5% |
0.19510703 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1001 |
20.4% |
0.20407747 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
645 |
13.1% |
0.13149847 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
730 |
14.9% |
0.14882773 |
6 |
Disagree |
542 |
11% |
0.11049949 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
366 |
7.5% |
0.07461774 |
97 |
No answer |
202 |
4.1% |
0.04118247 |
w01_k31_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Emission reductions should be made abroad
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Most of the emission reductions Norway is committed to should be made abroad.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
175 |
3.6% |
0.03567788 |
2 |
Agree |
388 |
7.9% |
0.07910296 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
611 |
12.5% |
0.12456677 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1389 |
28.3% |
0.28318043 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
788 |
16.1% |
0.16065240 |
6 |
Disagree |
868 |
17.7% |
0.17696228 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
446 |
9.1% |
0.09092762 |
97 |
No answer |
240 |
4.9% |
0.04892966 |
w01_k14_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politics is complicated
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me have no understanding of what it’s about.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
275 |
5.6% |
0.05606524 |
2 |
Agree |
665 |
13.6% |
0.13557594 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1340 |
27.3% |
0.27319062 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
444 |
9.1% |
0.09051988 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
697 |
14.2% |
0.14209990 |
6 |
Disagree |
947 |
19.3% |
0.19306830 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
339 |
6.9% |
0.06911315 |
97 |
No answer |
198 |
4% |
0.04036697 |
w01_k14_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Can vote, not much else to influence
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
People like me can vote, but there is nothing else we can do to influence politics.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
278 |
5.7% |
0.05667686 |
2 |
Agree |
640 |
13% |
0.13047910 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
759 |
15.5% |
0.15474006 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
354 |
7.2% |
0.07217125 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
984 |
20.1% |
0.20061162 |
6 |
Disagree |
1184 |
24.1% |
0.24138634 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
501 |
10.2% |
0.10214067 |
97 |
No answer |
205 |
4.2% |
0.04179409 |
w01_k15_99
Variable label:
|
Trust people
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now to a more general question:
|
Literal question:
|
Would you agree that most people in general can be trusted, or do you believe that one can’t be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
Technical description:
|
0 means “Can’t be careful enough” and 10 means “Most people can be trusted.”
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Can't be careful enough |
79 |
1.6% |
0.01610601 |
1 |
1 |
60 |
1.2% |
0.01223242 |
2 |
2 |
122 |
2.5% |
0.02487258 |
3 |
3 |
223 |
4.5% |
0.04546381 |
4 |
4 |
266 |
5.4% |
0.05423038 |
5 |
5 |
527 |
10.7% |
0.10744139 |
6 |
6 |
516 |
10.5% |
0.10519878 |
7 |
7 |
1079 |
22% |
0.21997961 |
8 |
8 |
961 |
19.6% |
0.19592253 |
9 |
9 |
435 |
8.9% |
0.08868502 |
10 |
10 - Most people can be trusted |
409 |
8.3% |
0.08338430 |
97 |
No answer |
228 |
4.6% |
0.04648318 |
w01_k16_1
Variable label:
|
Has an opinion on most issues
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do the following statements apply to you as a person?
|
Literal question:
|
I have an opinion on most things
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Apply very well |
525 |
10.7% |
0.107033639 |
2 |
Apply well |
1776 |
36.2% |
0.362079511 |
3 |
Apply somewhat well |
1610 |
32.8% |
0.328236493 |
4 |
Apply neither well nor poorly |
457 |
9.3% |
0.093170234 |
5 |
Apply somewhat poorly |
261 |
5.3% |
0.053211009 |
6 |
Apply poorly |
85 |
1.7% |
0.017329256 |
7 |
Apply very poorly |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001223242 |
97 |
No answer |
185 |
3.8% |
0.037716616 |
w01_k16_2
Variable label:
|
Strong opinions, also regarding new issues
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do the following statements apply to you as a person?
|
Literal question:
|
I have strong opinions, either positive or negative, including on issues that are new to me
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Apply very well |
191 |
3.9% |
0.03893986 |
2 |
Apply well |
749 |
15.3% |
0.15270133 |
3 |
Apply somewhat well |
1335 |
27.2% |
0.27217125 |
4 |
Apply neither well nor poorly |
1055 |
21.5% |
0.21508665 |
5 |
Apply somewhat poorly |
787 |
16% |
0.16044852 |
6 |
Apply poorly |
453 |
9.2% |
0.09235474 |
7 |
Apply very poorly |
104 |
2.1% |
0.02120285 |
97 |
No answer |
231 |
4.7% |
0.04709480 |
w01_ran1
Variable label:
|
Randomizes independently from U
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes into three groups and selects one of the following questions: KM1, KM2, KM3
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4780] [Invalid:125] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
1607 |
33.6% |
0.3361925 |
2 |
|
1601 |
33.5% |
0.3349372 |
3 |
|
1572 |
32.9% |
0.3288703 |
Sysmiss |
|
125 |
|
NA |
w01_km1
Variable label:
|
Heard the argument: Climate change a threat, but we should continue to extract oil as usual
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard or read the following statement?
|
Literal question:
|
Climate change is a very serious threat, and a lot more must be done to prevent it. Norway should nevertheless continue to produce as much oil as we currently do, because the world needs energy.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, I have heard or read this. |
609 |
76.5% |
0.76507538 |
2 |
No, I have not heard or read this |
175 |
22% |
0.21984925 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.5% |
0.01507538 |
98 |
Not asked |
4109 |
|
NA |
w01_km2
Variable label:
|
Heard the argument: Climate change a threat and we should reduce oil extraction
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard or read the following statement?
|
Literal question:
|
Climate change is a very serious threat, and a lot more must be done to prevent it. This means that Norway should produce less oil than we currently do, because a large share of the world’s fossil fuel must remain unused.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, I have heard or read this. |
653 |
82.2% |
0.82241814 |
2 |
No, I have not heard or read this |
127 |
16% |
0.15994962 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.8% |
0.01763224 |
98 |
Not asked |
4111 |
|
NA |
w01_km3
Variable label:
|
Heard the argument: Climate change is not a threat and we should continue to extract oil as usual
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you heard or read the following statement?
|
Literal question:
|
Climate change is a not a serious threat, and too much is being done to prevent it. This means that Norway should continue to produce as much oil as we currently do, because the world needs energy.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, I have heard or read this. |
490 |
62.3% |
0.62340967 |
2 |
No, I have not heard or read this |
280 |
35.6% |
0.35623410 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
2% |
0.02035623 |
98 |
Not asked |
4119 |
|
NA |
w01_km36
Variable label:
|
Concerned about climate change
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very concerned |
753 |
15.4% |
0.15351682 |
2 |
Concerned |
1558 |
31.8% |
0.31763507 |
3 |
Somewhat concerned |
1576 |
32.1% |
0.32130479 |
4 |
Not particularly concerned |
680 |
13.9% |
0.13863405 |
5 |
Not concerned |
167 |
3.4% |
0.03404689 |
97 |
No answer |
171 |
3.5% |
0.03486239 |
w01_km37
Variable label:
|
Agreement with statement
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the below statements do you most agree with?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norway should continue to produce as much oil as we currently do. |
2293 |
46.7% |
0.46748216 |
2 |
Norway should produce less oil than we currently do |
2056 |
41.9% |
0.41916412 |
3 |
Norway should produce more oil than we currently do |
316 |
6.4% |
0.06442406 |
97 |
No answer |
240 |
4.9% |
0.04892966 |
w01_km4
Variable label:
|
Statement fits view on climate change
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following statements best describes your view on climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
Choose one option.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I believe that the climate is not changing. |
35 |
0.7% |
0.007135576 |
2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
311 |
6.3% |
0.063404689 |
3 |
I believe that the climate is changing, but that it has little to do with human
action. |
1056 |
21.5% |
0.215290520 |
4 |
I believe that the climate is changing, and that it to a large extent is due to
human action. |
3299 |
67.3% |
0.672579001 |
97 |
No answer |
204 |
4.2% |
0.041590214 |
w01_km35
Variable label:
|
How many share your view on climate change
|
Literal question:
|
The last question you answered was about your view on climate change. Which proportion of the Norwegian population do you believe shares your views on the issue?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All, or nearly all |
100 |
4% |
0.040469446 |
2 |
Many (more than half) |
1117 |
45.2% |
0.452043707 |
3 |
Around half |
781 |
31.6% |
0.316066370 |
4 |
Some (fewer than half) |
356 |
14.4% |
0.144071226 |
5 |
None, or nearly none |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002428167 |
97 |
No answer |
111 |
4.5% |
0.044921085 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_ran2
Variable label:
|
Randomizes independently from U
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes into two groups and selects one of the following questions: KM5 or KM6
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4775] [Invalid:130] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
r1 |
2371 |
49.7% |
0.4965445 |
2 |
r2 |
2404 |
50.3% |
0.5034555 |
Sysmiss |
|
130 |
|
NA |
w01_km5
Variable label:
|
How serious is climate change
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat is climate change overall?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very serious |
622 |
26.2% |
0.26233657 |
2 |
Serious |
991 |
41.8% |
0.41796710 |
3 |
Somewhat serious |
556 |
23.5% |
0.23450021 |
4 |
Not very serious |
142 |
6% |
0.05989034 |
5 |
Not a threat |
24 |
1% |
0.01012231 |
97 |
No answer |
36 |
1.5% |
0.01518347 |
98 |
Not asked |
2534 |
|
NA |
w01_km6
Variable label:
|
Climate change is serious to me personally
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat is climate change to you personally?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very serious |
138 |
5.7% |
0.05740433 |
2 |
Serious |
517 |
21.5% |
0.21505824 |
3 |
Somewhat serious |
833 |
34.7% |
0.34650582 |
4 |
Not very serious |
664 |
27.6% |
0.27620632 |
5 |
Not a threat |
227 |
9.4% |
0.09442596 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
1% |
0.01039933 |
98 |
Not asked |
2501 |
|
NA |
w01_km7
Variable label:
|
Possible to do something about climate change
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s assume that climate change may become a major threat to the world in the future if no action is taken. To which extent do you believe that it is possible to do anything to prevent harmful climate changes?
|
Technical description:
|
Select the statement that is closest to your view:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
It is impossible to do anything to prevent harmful climate change. |
253 |
5.2% |
0.05158002 |
2 |
It is possible, but very difficult to do something to prevent harmful climate
change. |
2661 |
54.3% |
0.54250765 |
3 |
It is possible and completely realistic to do something to prevent harmful
climate change. |
1434 |
29.2% |
0.29235474 |
4 |
It is easy to prevent harmful climate change. |
64 |
1.3% |
0.01304791 |
97 |
No answer |
493 |
10.1% |
0.10050968 |
w01_ran3sel_1
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_1
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_1
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1189] [Invalid:3716] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
1189 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
3716 |
|
NA |
w01_ran3sel_2
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_2
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_2
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1211] [Invalid:3694] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
1211 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
3694 |
|
NA |
w01_ran3sel_3
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_3
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_3
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1204] [Invalid:3701] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
1204 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
3701 |
|
NA |
w01_ran3sel_4
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_4
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_4
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1196] [Invalid:3709] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
1196 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
3709 |
|
NA |
w01_ran3sel_5
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_5
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_5
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1197] [Invalid:3708] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
1197 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
3708 |
|
NA |
w01_ran3sel_6
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_6
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_6
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1203] [Invalid:3702] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
1203 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
3702 |
|
NA |
w01_ran3sel_7
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_7
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_7
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1225] [Invalid:3680] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
1225 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
3680 |
|
NA |
w01_ran3sel_8
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_8
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_8
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1175] [Invalid:3730] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
1175 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
3730 |
|
NA |
w01_ran3sel_9
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_9
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1: selects KM13_9
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2400] [Invalid:2505] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
2400 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
2505 |
|
NA |
w01_km13_1
Variable label:
|
Measure: Tighten rules on CO2 emissions by qutoa reductions
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten the rules for how much CO2 industry in Norway and Europe may discharge by cutting the total number of quotas these may use.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
163 |
13.7% |
0.13708999 |
2 |
Positive |
402 |
33.8% |
0.33809924 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
300 |
25.2% |
0.25231287 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
162 |
13.6% |
0.13624895 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
47 |
4% |
0.03952902 |
6 |
Negative |
38 |
3.2% |
0.03195963 |
7 |
Very negative |
23 |
1.9% |
0.01934399 |
97 |
No answer |
54 |
4.5% |
0.04541632 |
98 |
Not asked |
3716 |
|
NA |
w01_km13_2
Variable label:
|
Measure: Tighten rules on CO2 emissions by limiting amount
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten the rules for how much CO2 industry in Norway and Europe may discharge overall.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
199 |
16.4% |
0.164327002 |
2 |
Positive |
484 |
40% |
0.399669694 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
292 |
24.1% |
0.241123039 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
121 |
10% |
0.099917424 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
39 |
3.2% |
0.032204789 |
6 |
Negative |
16 |
1.3% |
0.013212221 |
7 |
Very negative |
10 |
0.8% |
0.008257638 |
97 |
No answer |
50 |
4.1% |
0.041288192 |
98 |
Not asked |
3694 |
|
NA |
w01_km13_3
Variable label:
|
Measure: Capture and store CO2
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
76 |
6.3% |
0.06312292 |
2 |
Positive |
244 |
20.3% |
0.20265781 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
272 |
22.6% |
0.22591362 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
343 |
28.5% |
0.28488372 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
87 |
7.2% |
0.07225914 |
6 |
Negative |
82 |
6.8% |
0.06810631 |
7 |
Very negative |
36 |
3% |
0.02990033 |
97 |
No answer |
64 |
5.3% |
0.05315615 |
98 |
Not asked |
3701 |
|
NA |
w01_km13_4
Variable label:
|
Measure: Capture and store CO2, like on Mognstad
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground, such as the so-called “mission to the moon” project at Mongstad
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
74 |
6.2% |
0.06187291 |
2 |
Positive |
230 |
19.2% |
0.19230769 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
272 |
22.7% |
0.22742475 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
336 |
28.1% |
0.28093645 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
98 |
8.2% |
0.08193980 |
6 |
Negative |
69 |
5.8% |
0.05769231 |
7 |
Very negative |
39 |
3.3% |
0.03260870 |
97 |
No answer |
78 |
6.5% |
0.06521739 |
98 |
Not asked |
3709 |
|
NA |
w01_km13_5
Variable label:
|
Measure: Reduce tax incentives regarding oilfield exploration
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Reduce tax incentives for oil exploration on the Norwegian continental shelf.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
71 |
5.9% |
0.05931495 |
2 |
Positive |
166 |
13.9% |
0.13868003 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
227 |
19% |
0.18964077 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
398 |
33.2% |
0.33249791 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
148 |
12.4% |
0.12364244 |
6 |
Negative |
82 |
6.9% |
0.06850459 |
7 |
Very negative |
36 |
3% |
0.03007519 |
97 |
No answer |
69 |
5.8% |
0.05764411 |
98 |
Not asked |
3708 |
|
NA |
w01_km13_6
Variable label:
|
Measure: Tighten tax regulation regarding oilfield exploration
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten the tax regulations for oil exploration on the Norwegian continental shelf.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
79 |
6.6% |
0.06566916 |
2 |
Positive |
149 |
12.4% |
0.12385702 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
210 |
17.5% |
0.17456359 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
358 |
29.8% |
0.29758936 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
154 |
12.8% |
0.12801330 |
6 |
Negative |
112 |
9.3% |
0.09310058 |
7 |
Very negative |
59 |
4.9% |
0.04904406 |
97 |
No answer |
82 |
6.8% |
0.06816293 |
98 |
Not asked |
3702 |
|
NA |
w01_km13_7
Variable label:
|
Measure: Prevent harmful effects of storms and precipitation
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen efforts to prevent the harmful effects of storms and precipitation.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
151 |
12.3% |
0.12326531 |
2 |
Positive |
401 |
32.7% |
0.32734694 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
277 |
22.6% |
0.22612245 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
239 |
19.5% |
0.19510204 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
49 |
4% |
0.04000000 |
6 |
Negative |
24 |
2% |
0.01959184 |
7 |
Very negative |
16 |
1.3% |
0.01306122 |
97 |
No answer |
68 |
5.6% |
0.05551020 |
98 |
Not asked |
3680 |
|
NA |
w01_km13_8
Variable label:
|
Measure: Prevent harmful effects of storms and precipitation, even at the cost of other issues
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen efforts to prevent the harmful effects of storms and precipitation, even if this is at the cost of other important causes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
41 |
3.5% |
0.03489362 |
2 |
Positive |
203 |
17.3% |
0.17276596 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
327 |
27.8% |
0.27829787 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
322 |
27.4% |
0.27404255 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
122 |
10.4% |
0.10382979 |
6 |
Negative |
67 |
5.7% |
0.05702128 |
7 |
Very negative |
19 |
1.6% |
0.01617021 |
97 |
No answer |
74 |
6.3% |
0.06297872 |
98 |
Not asked |
3730 |
|
NA |
w01_km13_9
Variable label:
|
Measure: Change the climate by blocking the sunlight
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would now like to ask your opinion on certain measures that have been proposed to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement on whether these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you towards the measures mentioned here?
|
Literal question:
|
Attempt to alter the weather and climate by e.g. launching sulphur particles that block sunlight
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
14 |
0.6% |
0.005833333 |
2 |
Positive |
37 |
1.5% |
0.015416667 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
76 |
3.2% |
0.031666667 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
632 |
26.3% |
0.263333333 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
304 |
12.7% |
0.126666667 |
6 |
Negative |
569 |
23.7% |
0.237083333 |
7 |
Very negative |
620 |
25.8% |
0.258333333 |
97 |
No answer |
148 |
6.2% |
0.061666667 |
98 |
Not asked |
2505 |
|
NA |
w01_km17
Variable label:
|
If nothing is done about climate change weather will be more extreme
|
Literal question:
|
If nothing is done to prevent it, do you believe global warming will lead to more harmful extreme weather over the next 100 years, or do you believe global warming will not lead to this?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Global warming will lead to more harmful extreme weather |
2021 |
81.8% |
0.81788749 |
2 |
Global warming will not lead to more harmful extreme weather |
285 |
11.5% |
0.11533792 |
97 |
No answer |
165 |
6.7% |
0.06677459 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_km20
Variable label:
|
Moral obligation to prevent climate change
|
Literal question:
|
To which degree do you view it as a moral duty for individuals to contribute to prevent climate change?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
520 |
21% |
0.21044112 |
2 |
To a great degree |
893 |
36.1% |
0.36139215 |
3 |
To some degree |
728 |
29.5% |
0.29461756 |
4 |
To a small degree |
163 |
6.6% |
0.06596520 |
5 |
Not at all |
47 |
1.9% |
0.01902064 |
97 |
No answer |
120 |
4.9% |
0.04856333 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_km22
Variable label:
|
Knowledge about climate change
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how good is your knowledge on climate change?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good knowledge |
55 |
2.2% |
0.022258195 |
2 |
Good knowledge |
530 |
21.4% |
0.214488062 |
3 |
Some knowledge |
1362 |
55.1% |
0.551193849 |
4 |
Little knowledge |
391 |
15.8% |
0.158235532 |
5 |
No knowledge |
24 |
1% |
0.009712667 |
97 |
No answer |
109 |
4.4% |
0.044111696 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_km22k
Variable label:
|
Comment: Knowledge about climate change [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments to the question, you may enter them here:
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_km23
Variable label:
|
Discussion on climate change is characterized by conflict and disagreement
|
Literal question:
|
To which degree do you think discussion concerning climate change is characterized by conflict and disagreement?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
326 |
13.2% |
0.131930393 |
2 |
To a great degree |
1096 |
44.4% |
0.443545123 |
3 |
To some degree |
839 |
34% |
0.339538648 |
4 |
To a small degree |
80 |
3.2% |
0.032375556 |
5 |
Not at all |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002428167 |
97 |
No answer |
124 |
5% |
0.050182113 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_km26
Variable label:
|
Diversity of opinion on climate change in the media
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how great is the diversity in opinion on climate change that emerges in the media?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very great diversity |
43 |
1.7% |
0.01740186 |
2 |
Great diversity |
578 |
23.4% |
0.23391340 |
3 |
Some diversity |
1134 |
45.9% |
0.45892351 |
4 |
Little diversity |
504 |
20.4% |
0.20396601 |
5 |
No diversity at all |
34 |
1.4% |
0.01375961 |
97 |
No answer |
178 |
7.2% |
0.07203561 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_ran4
Variable label:
|
Randomiserer dersom U=1
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 into two groups and selects one of the following questions: KM27 or KM28
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2389] [Invalid:2516] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
1183 |
49.5% |
0.4951863 |
2 |
|
1206 |
50.5% |
0.5048137 |
Sysmiss |
|
2516 |
|
NA |
w01_km27
Variable label:
|
Scientists agree on climate change
|
Literal question:
|
To which degree do you have the impression that scientists agree on climate change?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
95 |
8% |
0.08030431 |
2 |
To a great degree |
393 |
33.2% |
0.33220626 |
3 |
To some degree |
477 |
40.3% |
0.40321217 |
4 |
To a small degree |
156 |
13.2% |
0.13186813 |
5 |
Not at all |
34 |
2.9% |
0.02874049 |
97 |
No answer |
28 |
2.4% |
0.02366864 |
98 |
Not asked |
3722 |
|
NA |
w01_km28_2_1
Variable label:
|
Proportion of scientist that agree on climate change
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, which proportion of climate scientists agree that global warming is a direct consequence of humans using coal, oil and gas?
|
Technical description:
|
Please pick a number between 0% and 100% below.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-999]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 % |
1 |
0% |
0.0002038736 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
0.2% |
0.0022426096 |
20 |
20 |
13 |
0.3% |
0.0026503568 |
30 |
30 |
37 |
0.8% |
0.0075433231 |
40 |
40 |
41 |
0.8% |
0.0083588175 |
50 |
50 |
100 |
2% |
0.0203873598 |
60 |
60 |
135 |
2.8% |
0.0275229358 |
70 |
70 |
209 |
4.3% |
0.0426095821 |
80 |
80 |
214 |
4.4% |
0.0436289501 |
90 |
90 |
228 |
4.6% |
0.0464831804 |
100 |
100 % |
49 |
1% |
0.0099898063 |
998 |
Not asked |
3699 |
75.4% |
0.7541284404 |
999 |
No response |
168 |
3.4% |
0.0342507645 |
w01_km28k
Variable label:
|
Comment: Proportion of scientist that agree on climate change [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
If you have comments to the question, you may enter them here:
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_ran5
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 into two groups and selects one of the following questions: KM29 or KM30
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2387] [Invalid:2518] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
1159 |
48.6% |
0.4855467 |
2 |
|
1228 |
51.4% |
0.5144533 |
Sysmiss |
|
2518 |
|
NA |
w01_km29
Variable label:
|
Norway commited through international agreements to cut emissions
|
Literal question:
|
As you may know, government leaders from all over the world met in November to negotiate a new international agreement to limit the emissions of greenhouse gases. To which extent do you agree that Norway commits itself in such international agreements?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
409 |
35.3% |
0.35289042 |
2 |
Agree |
433 |
37.4% |
0.37359793 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
157 |
13.5% |
0.13546160 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
77 |
6.6% |
0.06643658 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
31 |
2.7% |
0.02674720 |
6 |
Disagree |
17 |
1.5% |
0.01466782 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
1.4% |
0.01380500 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
1.6% |
0.01639344 |
98 |
Not asked |
3746 |
|
NA |
w01_km30
Variable label:
|
Norway commited through international agreements to cut emissions, even if China does not
|
Literal question:
|
As you may know, government leaders from all over the world met in November to negotiate a new international agreement to limit the emissions of greenhouse gases. To which extent do you agree that Norway commits itself in such international agreements, even if it means that Norway does this before other countries such as e.g. China?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
262 |
21.3% |
0.21335505 |
2 |
Agree |
426 |
34.7% |
0.34690554 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
248 |
20.2% |
0.20195440 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
98 |
8% |
0.07980456 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
81 |
6.6% |
0.06596091 |
6 |
Disagree |
54 |
4.4% |
0.04397394 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
37 |
3% |
0.03013029 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.8% |
0.01791531 |
98 |
Not asked |
3677 |
|
NA |
w01_dt1_1
Variable label:
|
Authorities have a right to: indefinite detainment
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
|
Literal question:
|
Keep individuals in custody as long as they want without a judicial process
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
123 |
5% |
0.04977742 |
2 |
Agree |
164 |
6.6% |
0.06636989 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
291 |
11.8% |
0.11776609 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
167 |
6.8% |
0.06758397 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
293 |
11.9% |
0.11857548 |
6 |
Disagree |
517 |
20.9% |
0.20922703 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
724 |
29.3% |
0.29299879 |
8 |
Dont wan't to respond |
40 |
1.6% |
0.01618778 |
97 |
No answer |
152 |
6.2% |
0.06151356 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_dt1_2
Variable label:
|
Authorities have a right to: tapping phone calls
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
|
Literal question:
|
Tap people’s phone calls
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
289 |
11.7% |
0.11695670 |
2 |
Agree |
524 |
21.2% |
0.21205989 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
580 |
23.5% |
0.23472278 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
194 |
7.9% |
0.07851072 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
236 |
9.6% |
0.09550789 |
6 |
Disagree |
250 |
10.1% |
0.10117361 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
220 |
8.9% |
0.08903278 |
8 |
Dont wan't to respond |
28 |
1.1% |
0.01133144 |
97 |
No answer |
150 |
6.1% |
0.06070417 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_dt1_3
Variable label:
|
Authorities have a right to: randomly stop and search people on the street
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
|
Literal question:
|
Randomly stop and search people on the street
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
192 |
7.8% |
0.07770134 |
2 |
Agree |
353 |
14.3% |
0.14285714 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
464 |
18.8% |
0.18777823 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
176 |
7.1% |
0.07122622 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
321 |
13% |
0.12990692 |
6 |
Disagree |
369 |
14.9% |
0.14933225 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
421 |
17% |
0.17037637 |
8 |
Dont wan't to respond |
25 |
1% |
0.01011736 |
97 |
No answer |
150 |
6.1% |
0.06070417 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_dt1_4
Variable label:
|
Authorities have a right to: arrest people without suspision
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
|
Literal question:
|
Arrest people without specific suspicion
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
124 |
5% |
0.05018211 |
2 |
Agree |
202 |
8.2% |
0.08174828 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
326 |
13.2% |
0.13193039 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
235 |
9.5% |
0.09510320 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
334 |
13.5% |
0.13516795 |
6 |
Disagree |
544 |
22% |
0.22015378 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
515 |
20.8% |
0.20841764 |
8 |
Dont wan't to respond |
38 |
1.5% |
0.01537839 |
97 |
No answer |
153 |
6.2% |
0.06191825 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_dt1_5
Variable label:
|
Authorities have a right to: monitor electronic communication
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
|
Literal question:
|
Monitor electronic communication (beyond telephones)
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
386 |
15.6% |
0.15621206 |
2 |
Agree |
664 |
26.9% |
0.26871712 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
576 |
23.3% |
0.23310401 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
157 |
6.4% |
0.06353703 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
185 |
7.5% |
0.07486847 |
6 |
Disagree |
180 |
7.3% |
0.07284500 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
149 |
6% |
0.06029947 |
8 |
Dont wan't to respond |
26 |
1.1% |
0.01052206 |
97 |
No answer |
148 |
6% |
0.05989478 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_dt1_6
Variable label:
|
Authorities have a right to: monitor/bug room
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
|
Literal question:
|
Monitor/bug rooms
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
373 |
15.1% |
0.15095103 |
2 |
Agree |
564 |
22.8% |
0.22824767 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
618 |
25% |
0.25010117 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
188 |
7.6% |
0.07608256 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
209 |
8.5% |
0.08458114 |
6 |
Disagree |
170 |
6.9% |
0.06879806 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
168 |
6.8% |
0.06798867 |
8 |
Dont wan't to respond |
29 |
1.2% |
0.01173614 |
97 |
No answer |
152 |
6.2% |
0.06151356 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_dt1_7
Variable label:
|
Authorities have a right to: cordon off large part of the city
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
|
Literal question:
|
Cordon off large parts of the city
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
411 |
16.6% |
0.16632942 |
2 |
Agree |
728 |
29.5% |
0.29461756 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
552 |
22.3% |
0.22339134 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
229 |
9.3% |
0.09267503 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
132 |
5.3% |
0.05341967 |
6 |
Disagree |
149 |
6% |
0.06029947 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
87 |
3.5% |
0.03520842 |
8 |
Dont wan't to respond |
29 |
1.2% |
0.01173614 |
97 |
No answer |
154 |
6.2% |
0.06232295 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_dt1_8
Variable label:
|
Authorities have a right to: patrol the streets with armed military or police
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now we shall go on to another topic. Imagine that the authorities suspected that a terrorist attack was imminent. To which extent do you agree that the authorities should be entitled to:
|
Literal question:
|
Allow armed police or military personnel to patrol the streets
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
490 |
19.8% |
0.198300283 |
2 |
Agree |
729 |
29.5% |
0.295022258 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
514 |
20.8% |
0.208012950 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
139 |
5.6% |
0.056252529 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
174 |
7% |
0.070416835 |
6 |
Disagree |
143 |
5.8% |
0.057871307 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
121 |
4.9% |
0.048968029 |
8 |
Dont wan't to respond |
17 |
0.7% |
0.006879806 |
97 |
No answer |
144 |
5.8% |
0.058276002 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_dt1k
Variable label:
|
Comment: Authorities have a right to [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments to the question, enter them here:
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_dt2
Variable label:
|
Willing to accept that maintaining the safety of society must be at the cost of civil liberties
|
Literal question:
|
How willing are you to accept that maintaining the safety of society must be at the cost of the freedom of individuals (such as privacy)?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
180 |
7.3% |
0.07284500 |
2 |
Willing |
601 |
24.3% |
0.24322137 |
3 |
Somewhat willing |
899 |
36.4% |
0.36382032 |
4 |
Not very willing |
500 |
20.2% |
0.20234723 |
5 |
Not willing at all |
157 |
6.4% |
0.06353703 |
97 |
No answer |
134 |
5.4% |
0.05422906 |
98 |
Not asked |
2434 |
|
NA |
w01_ran7
Variable label:
|
Randomizes independently from U
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes into two groups and selects one of the following questions: DT3 and DT4
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4750] [Invalid:155] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
2351 |
49.5% |
0.4949474 |
2 |
|
2399 |
50.5% |
0.5050526 |
Sysmiss |
|
155 |
|
NA |
w01_dt3_1
Variable label:
|
Trust in central government to handle: natural disasters
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that central Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
|
Literal question:
|
Natural disasters such as landslides, floods and hurricanes
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
78 |
3.3% |
0.03317737 |
2 |
High confidence |
668 |
28.4% |
0.28413441 |
3 |
Some confidence |
864 |
36.8% |
0.36750319 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
245 |
10.4% |
0.10421097 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
271 |
11.5% |
0.11527010 |
6 |
High mistrust |
103 |
4.4% |
0.04381114 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01276053 |
8 |
Don't know |
27 |
1.1% |
0.01148447 |
97 |
No answer |
65 |
2.8% |
0.02764781 |
98 |
Not asked |
2554 |
|
NA |
w01_dt3_2
Variable label:
|
Trust in central government to handle: transportation accident
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that central Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
|
Literal question:
|
Accidents in connection with aviation, railroads, roads and shipping
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
85 |
3.6% |
0.03615483 |
2 |
High confidence |
824 |
35% |
0.35048915 |
3 |
Some confidence |
826 |
35.1% |
0.35133986 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
187 |
8% |
0.07954062 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
223 |
9.5% |
0.09485325 |
6 |
High mistrust |
84 |
3.6% |
0.03572948 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
26 |
1.1% |
0.01105912 |
8 |
Don't know |
31 |
1.3% |
0.01318588 |
97 |
No answer |
65 |
2.8% |
0.02764781 |
98 |
Not asked |
2554 |
|
NA |
w01_dt3_3
Variable label:
|
Trust in central government to handle: contagious disease
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that central Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
|
Literal question:
|
Contagion in connection with food, drinking water or epidemics (for example bird flu, swine flu, E.coli)
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
74 |
3.1% |
0.03147597 |
2 |
High confidence |
611 |
26% |
0.25988941 |
3 |
Some confidence |
799 |
34% |
0.33985538 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
266 |
11.3% |
0.11314334 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
341 |
14.5% |
0.14504466 |
6 |
High mistrust |
119 |
5.1% |
0.05061676 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
40 |
1.7% |
0.01701404 |
8 |
Don't know |
34 |
1.4% |
0.01446193 |
97 |
No answer |
67 |
2.8% |
0.02849851 |
98 |
Not asked |
2554 |
|
NA |
w01_dt3_4
Variable label:
|
Trust in central government to handle: failure in critical infratructure
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that central Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
|
Literal question:
|
Failure in critical infrastructure (such as power supply, electronic communication, telecommunication, oil and fuel supply)
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
46 |
2% |
0.01956614 |
2 |
High confidence |
505 |
21.5% |
0.21480221 |
3 |
Some confidence |
796 |
33.9% |
0.33857933 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
285 |
12.1% |
0.12122501 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
402 |
17.1% |
0.17099107 |
6 |
High mistrust |
139 |
5.9% |
0.05912378 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
60 |
2.6% |
0.02552105 |
8 |
Don't know |
52 |
2.2% |
0.02211825 |
97 |
No answer |
66 |
2.8% |
0.02807316 |
98 |
Not asked |
2554 |
|
NA |
w01_dt3_5
Variable label:
|
Trust in central government to handle: terrorist attack
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that central Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
|
Literal question:
|
Terrorist attacks
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01276053 |
2 |
High confidence |
284 |
12.1% |
0.12079966 |
3 |
Some confidence |
766 |
32.6% |
0.32581880 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
242 |
10.3% |
0.10293492 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
481 |
20.5% |
0.20459379 |
6 |
High mistrust |
294 |
12.5% |
0.12505317 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
155 |
6.6% |
0.06592939 |
8 |
Don't know |
34 |
1.4% |
0.01446193 |
97 |
No answer |
65 |
2.8% |
0.02764781 |
98 |
Not asked |
2554 |
|
NA |
w01_dt4_1
Variable label:
|
Trust in local government to handle: natural disaster
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that local Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
|
Literal question:
|
Natural disasters such as landslides, floods and hurricanes
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
48 |
2% |
0.02000834 |
2 |
High confidence |
583 |
24.3% |
0.24301792 |
3 |
Some confidence |
918 |
38.3% |
0.38265944 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
286 |
11.9% |
0.11921634 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
311 |
13% |
0.12963735 |
6 |
High mistrust |
117 |
4.9% |
0.04877032 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
46 |
1.9% |
0.01917466 |
8 |
Don't know |
30 |
1.3% |
0.01250521 |
97 |
No answer |
60 |
2.5% |
0.02501042 |
98 |
Not asked |
2506 |
|
NA |
w01_dt4_2
Variable label:
|
Trust in local government to handle: transportation accident
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that local Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
|
Literal question:
|
Accidents in connection with aviation, railroads, roads and shipping
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
63 |
2.6% |
0.02626094 |
2 |
High confidence |
698 |
29.1% |
0.29095456 |
3 |
Some confidence |
856 |
35.7% |
0.35681534 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
261 |
10.9% |
0.10879533 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
308 |
12.8% |
0.12838683 |
6 |
High mistrust |
94 |
3.9% |
0.03918299 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
33 |
1.4% |
0.01375573 |
8 |
Don't know |
25 |
1% |
0.01042101 |
97 |
No answer |
61 |
2.5% |
0.02542726 |
98 |
Not asked |
2506 |
|
NA |
w01_dt4_3
Variable label:
|
Trust in local government to handle: contagious disease
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that local Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
|
Literal question:
|
Contagion in connection with food, drinking water or epidemics (for example bird flu, swine flu, E.coli)
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
56 |
2.3% |
0.02334306 |
2 |
High confidence |
532 |
22.2% |
0.22175907 |
3 |
Some confidence |
853 |
35.6% |
0.35556482 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
258 |
10.8% |
0.10754481 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
381 |
15.9% |
0.15881617 |
6 |
High mistrust |
160 |
6.7% |
0.06669446 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
62 |
2.6% |
0.02584410 |
8 |
Don't know |
38 |
1.6% |
0.01583993 |
97 |
No answer |
59 |
2.5% |
0.02459358 |
98 |
Not asked |
2506 |
|
NA |
w01_dt4_4
Variable label:
|
Trust in local government to handle: failure in critical infrastructure
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that local Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
|
Literal question:
|
Failure in critical infrastructure (such as power supply, electronic communication, telecommunication, oil and fuel supply)
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
40 |
1.7% |
0.01667361 |
2 |
High confidence |
462 |
19.3% |
0.19258024 |
3 |
Some confidence |
826 |
34.4% |
0.34431013 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
319 |
13.3% |
0.13297207 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
407 |
17% |
0.16965402 |
6 |
High mistrust |
164 |
6.8% |
0.06836182 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
63 |
2.6% |
0.02626094 |
8 |
Don't know |
54 |
2.3% |
0.02250938 |
97 |
No answer |
64 |
2.7% |
0.02667778 |
98 |
Not asked |
2506 |
|
NA |
w01_dt4_5
Variable label:
|
Trust in local government to handle: terrorist attack
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you have confidence or mistrust that local Norwegian authorities are capable of handling various forms of accidents and disasters?
|
Literal question:
|
Terrorist attacks
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
23 |
1% |
0.009587328 |
2 |
High confidence |
199 |
8.3% |
0.082951230 |
3 |
Some confidence |
594 |
24.8% |
0.247603168 |
4 |
Neither confidence nor mistrust |
314 |
13.1% |
0.130887870 |
5 |
Some mistrust |
531 |
22.1% |
0.221342226 |
6 |
High mistrust |
408 |
17% |
0.170070863 |
7 |
Very high mistrust |
224 |
9.3% |
0.093372238 |
8 |
Don't know |
48 |
2% |
0.020008337 |
97 |
No answer |
58 |
2.4% |
0.024176740 |
98 |
Not asked |
2506 |
|
NA |
w01_dt6_1
Variable label:
|
People are considerate and helpful
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that people usually try to be considerate to others and helpful, or that they mainly look out for themselves? Indicate your opinion using the scale below.
|
Technical description:
|
0 means “Mainly look out for themselves” and 10 means “Are considerate to others and helpful”.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Mainly look out for themselves |
24 |
1% |
0.009860312 |
1 |
1 |
36 |
1.5% |
0.014790468 |
2 |
2 |
85 |
3.5% |
0.034921939 |
3 |
3 |
193 |
7.9% |
0.079293344 |
4 |
4 |
229 |
9.4% |
0.094083813 |
5 |
5 |
400 |
16.4% |
0.164338537 |
6 |
6 |
403 |
16.6% |
0.165571076 |
7 |
7 |
535 |
22% |
0.219802794 |
8 |
8 |
269 |
11.1% |
0.110517666 |
9 |
9 |
101 |
4.1% |
0.041495481 |
10 |
10 - Are considerate to others and helpful |
43 |
1.8% |
0.017666393 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
99 |
No response |
116 |
4.8% |
0.047658176 |
w01_dt7_1
Variable label:
|
People are exploitative
|
Literal question:
|
Do you believe that most people would try to take advantage of you if they had the chance, or do you think they would try to be kind? Indicate your opinion below.
|
Technical description:
|
0 means “Would try to take advantage” and 10 means “Would try to be kind”.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Would try to take advantage |
23 |
0.9% |
0.009449466 |
1 |
1 |
32 |
1.3% |
0.013147083 |
2 |
2 |
84 |
3.5% |
0.034511093 |
3 |
3 |
133 |
5.5% |
0.054642564 |
4 |
4 |
184 |
7.6% |
0.075595727 |
5 |
5 |
368 |
15.1% |
0.151191454 |
6 |
6 |
368 |
15.1% |
0.151191454 |
7 |
7 |
517 |
21.2% |
0.212407560 |
8 |
8 |
374 |
15.4% |
0.153656532 |
9 |
9 |
136 |
5.6% |
0.055875103 |
10 |
10 - Would try to be kind |
71 |
2.9% |
0.029170090 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
99 |
No response |
144 |
5.9% |
0.059161873 |
w01_dv30_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: lower taxes even if it means cuts to welfare
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Tax rates should be lowered, even if it leads to cutbacks in the welfare state.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
98 |
4% |
0.04026294 |
2 |
Agree |
182 |
7.5% |
0.07477403 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
374 |
15.4% |
0.15365653 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
287 |
11.8% |
0.11791290 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
439 |
18% |
0.18036154 |
6 |
Disagree |
530 |
21.8% |
0.21774856 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
400 |
16.4% |
0.16433854 |
97 |
No answer |
124 |
5.1% |
0.05094495 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dv30_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: allow commercialized private schools
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Commercial private schools should be permitted.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
174 |
7.1% |
0.07148726 |
2 |
Agree |
412 |
16.9% |
0.16926869 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
483 |
19.8% |
0.19843878 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
330 |
13.6% |
0.13557929 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
313 |
12.9% |
0.12859491 |
6 |
Disagree |
302 |
12.4% |
0.12407560 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
296 |
12.2% |
0.12161052 |
97 |
No answer |
124 |
5.1% |
0.05094495 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dv30_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: public services cheaper and better if left to private actors
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Many public services could be carried out both better and cheaper if they were left to private parties.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
208 |
8.5% |
0.08545604 |
2 |
Agree |
408 |
16.8% |
0.16762531 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
584 |
24% |
0.23993426 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
258 |
10.6% |
0.10599836 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
316 |
13% |
0.12982744 |
6 |
Disagree |
337 |
13.8% |
0.13845522 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
201 |
8.3% |
0.08258012 |
97 |
No answer |
122 |
5% |
0.05012325 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt8_1
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: contacted local politician
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Contacted a local politician
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
4156 |
84.7% |
0.84729867 |
1 |
Selected |
570 |
11.6% |
0.11620795 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_2
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: contacted national politician
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Contacted a national politician
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
4520 |
92.2% |
0.92150866 |
1 |
Selected |
206 |
4.2% |
0.04199796 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_3
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: contacted voluntary organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Contacted a voluntary organization or association
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
4136 |
84.3% |
0.84322120 |
1 |
Selected |
590 |
12% |
0.12028542 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_4
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: contacted a public official at the national level
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Contacted a public official at the national level
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
4579 |
93.4% |
0.93353721 |
1 |
Selected |
147 |
3% |
0.02996942 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_5
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: contacted a public official at the local level
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Contacted a public official at the local level
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
4250 |
86.6% |
0.86646279 |
1 |
Selected |
476 |
9.7% |
0.09704383 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_6
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: participated in work in a political party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in work in a political party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
4505 |
91.8% |
0.91845056 |
1 |
Selected |
221 |
4.5% |
0.04505607 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_7
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: participated in work for protest group
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in work in a political action group, local protest group or similar
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
4544 |
92.6% |
0.92640163 |
1 |
Selected |
182 |
3.7% |
0.03710499 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_8
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: participated in work for voluntary organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in work in a voluntary organization or association
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
3721 |
75.9% |
0.75861366 |
1 |
Selected |
1005 |
20.5% |
0.20489297 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_9
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: worn or posted champaign sticker or emblem
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Worn or posted a campaign sticker or emblem
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
4467 |
91.1% |
0.91070336 |
1 |
Selected |
259 |
5.3% |
0.05280326 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_10
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: signed a petition
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Signed an appeal, a petition, action list or similar
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
3379 |
68.9% |
0.68888889 |
1 |
Selected |
1347 |
27.5% |
0.27461774 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_11
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: participated in public protest
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in a public demonstration
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
4502 |
91.8% |
0.91783894 |
1 |
Selected |
224 |
4.6% |
0.04566769 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_12
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: boycotted certain products
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Boycotted specific products
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
3479 |
70.9% |
0.70927625 |
1 |
Selected |
1247 |
25.4% |
0.25423038 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_13
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: consciously puchased specific products for political reasons
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Consciously purchased specific products for political, moral or environmental reasons
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
3132 |
63.9% |
0.63853211 |
1 |
Selected |
1594 |
32.5% |
0.32497452 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_14
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: provided financial support
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Provided financial support
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2908 |
59.3% |
0.59286442 |
1 |
Selected |
1818 |
37.1% |
0.37064220 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_15
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: collected money
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Collected money
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
4344 |
88.6% |
0.88562691 |
1 |
Selected |
382 |
7.8% |
0.07787971 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_16
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: contacted or appeared in media
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Contacted or appeared in the media
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
4432 |
90.4% |
0.90356779 |
1 |
Selected |
294 |
6% |
0.05993884 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_17
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: contacted lawyer
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Contacted a lawyer or legal advisor
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
4534 |
92.4% |
0.92436290 |
1 |
Selected |
192 |
3.9% |
0.03914373 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_18
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: participated in public meeting
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in a public meeting
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
4029 |
82.1% |
0.82140673 |
1 |
Selected |
697 |
14.2% |
0.14209990 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt8_19
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: participated in political meeting
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the course of the last 12 months, have you as an individual done any of the following to try to influence a political decision?
|
Literal question:
|
Participated at a political meeting or event
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
4311 |
87.9% |
0.87889908 |
1 |
Selected |
415 |
8.5% |
0.08460754 |
97 |
No answer |
179 |
3.6% |
0.03649337 |
w01_dt9_1
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: in community: participated in public meeting
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you in the past 12 months participated in any of the following activities to improve conditions in your own neighbourhood or community?
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in or taken the initiative to a public meeting to discuss issues related to conditions in the community
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2093 |
86% |
0.85990140 |
1 |
Selected |
260 |
10.7% |
0.10682005 |
97 |
No answer |
81 |
3.3% |
0.03327855 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt9_2
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: in community: participated in voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you in the past 12 months participated in any of the following activities to improve conditions in your own neighbourhood or community?
|
Literal question:
|
Participated in or taken the initiative for voluntary work to fix or improve something in the community
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1414 |
58.1% |
0.58093673 |
1 |
Selected |
939 |
38.6% |
0.38578472 |
97 |
No answer |
81 |
3.3% |
0.03327855 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt9_3
Variable label:
|
Has in the last 12 months: in community: been involved in association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you in the past 12 months participated in any of the following activities to improve conditions in your own neighbourhood or community?
|
Literal question:
|
Become involved in a residents’ association, neighbourhood association or similar organizations in the community
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1734 |
71.2% |
0.71240756 |
1 |
Selected |
619 |
25.4% |
0.25431389 |
97 |
No answer |
81 |
3.3% |
0.03327855 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_1
Variable label:
|
Membership: Sports or outdoor organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Sports or outdoor organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1656 |
68% |
0.68036154 |
1 |
Selected |
694 |
28.5% |
0.28512736 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_2
Variable label:
|
Membership: Humanitarian aid organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Humanitarian aid organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1914 |
78.6% |
0.78635990 |
1 |
Selected |
436 |
17.9% |
0.17912901 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_3
Variable label:
|
Membership: Religious or other belief organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Religious or other belief organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2074 |
85.2% |
0.85209532 |
1 |
Selected |
276 |
11.3% |
0.11339359 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_4
Variable label:
|
Membership: Political party
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Political party
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2145 |
88.1% |
0.88126541 |
1 |
Selected |
205 |
8.4% |
0.08422350 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_5
Variable label:
|
Membership: Temperance organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Temperance organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2332 |
95.8% |
0.958093673 |
1 |
Selected |
18 |
0.7% |
0.007395234 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.034511093 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_6
Variable label:
|
Membership: Language organization or similar
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Language organization or similar
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2323 |
95.4% |
0.95439606 |
1 |
Selected |
27 |
1.1% |
0.01109285 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_7
Variable label:
|
Membership: Environmental protection/animal welfare organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Environmental protection/animal welfare organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2199 |
90.3% |
0.90345111 |
1 |
Selected |
151 |
6.2% |
0.06203780 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_8
Variable label:
|
Membership: Residents’ association/neighbourhood association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ association/neighbourhood association/community association
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1797 |
73.8% |
0.73829088 |
1 |
Selected |
553 |
22.7% |
0.22719803 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_9
Variable label:
|
Membership: Housing cooperative
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Housing cooperative
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1913 |
78.6% |
0.78594906 |
1 |
Selected |
437 |
18% |
0.17953985 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_10
Variable label:
|
Membership: House owner association and land owner association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
House owner association and land owner association
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1985 |
81.6% |
0.81552999 |
1 |
Selected |
365 |
15% |
0.14995892 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_11
Variable label:
|
Membership: Cultural association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Cultural association (music, dance, theatre, hobby, etc.)
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2002 |
82.3% |
0.82251438 |
1 |
Selected |
348 |
14.3% |
0.14297453 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_12
Variable label:
|
Membership: Lodge
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Lodge
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2280 |
93.7% |
0.93672966 |
1 |
Selected |
70 |
2.9% |
0.02875924 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_13
Variable label:
|
Membership: Consumer organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Consumer organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2273 |
93.4% |
0.93385374 |
1 |
Selected |
77 |
3.2% |
0.03163517 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_14
Variable label:
|
Membership: Car association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Car association
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1901 |
78.1% |
0.78101890 |
1 |
Selected |
449 |
18.4% |
0.18447001 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_15
Variable label:
|
Membership: Patient association or interest organization for the disabled
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Patient association or interest organization for the disabled
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2233 |
91.7% |
0.91741988 |
1 |
Selected |
117 |
4.8% |
0.04806902 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_16
Variable label:
|
Membership: Pensioner association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Pensioner association
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2215 |
91% |
0.91002465 |
1 |
Selected |
135 |
5.5% |
0.05546426 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_17
Variable label:
|
Membership: Parents’ association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Parents’ association
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2244 |
92.2% |
0.92193919 |
1 |
Selected |
106 |
4.4% |
0.04354971 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_18
Variable label:
|
Membership: Immigrant association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant association
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2331 |
95.8% |
0.957682827 |
1 |
Selected |
19 |
0.8% |
0.007806081 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.034511093 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_19
Variable label:
|
Membership: Employee organization/trade union
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Employee organization/trade union
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1477 |
60.7% |
0.60682005 |
1 |
Selected |
873 |
35.9% |
0.35866886 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_20
Variable label:
|
Membership: Business and employer organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Business and employer organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2238 |
91.9% |
0.91947412 |
1 |
Selected |
112 |
4.6% |
0.04601479 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_21
Variable label:
|
Membership: Agricultural or fisheries organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Agricultural or fisheries organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2271 |
93.3% |
0.93303205 |
1 |
Selected |
79 |
3.2% |
0.03245686 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt10_22
Variable label:
|
Membership: Other
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we have listed some types of organizations. Could you place a checkmark if you are a member of any of these?
|
Literal question:
|
Other organizations/associations
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1863 |
76.5% |
0.76540674 |
1 |
Selected |
487 |
20% |
0.20008217 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
3.5% |
0.03451109 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_1
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Sports or outdoor organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Sports or outdoor organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
534 |
21.9% |
0.21939195 |
1 |
Selected |
160 |
6.6% |
0.06573541 |
97 |
No answer |
1740 |
71.5% |
0.71487264 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_2
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Humanitarian aid organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Humanitarian aid organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
404 |
16.6% |
0.16598192 |
1 |
Selected |
32 |
1.3% |
0.01314708 |
97 |
No answer |
1998 |
82.1% |
0.82087099 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_3
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Religious or other belief organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Religious or other belief organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
196 |
8.1% |
0.08052588 |
1 |
Selected |
80 |
3.3% |
0.03286771 |
97 |
No answer |
2158 |
88.7% |
0.88660641 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_4
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Political party
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Political party
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
158 |
6.5% |
0.06491372 |
1 |
Selected |
47 |
1.9% |
0.01930978 |
97 |
No answer |
2229 |
91.6% |
0.91577650 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_5
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Temperance organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Temperance organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
14 |
0.6% |
0.005751849 |
1 |
Selected |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001643385 |
97 |
No answer |
2416 |
99.3% |
0.992604766 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_6
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Language organization or similar
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Language organization or similar
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
25 |
1% |
0.0102711586 |
1 |
Selected |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0008216927 |
97 |
No answer |
2407 |
98.9% |
0.9889071487 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_7
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Environmental protection/animal welfare organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Environmental protection/animal welfare organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
133 |
5.5% |
0.054642564 |
1 |
Selected |
18 |
0.7% |
0.007395234 |
97 |
No answer |
2283 |
93.8% |
0.937962202 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_8
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Residents’ association/neighbourhood association/community association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Residents’ association/neighbourhood association/community association
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
426 |
17.5% |
0.17502054 |
1 |
Selected |
127 |
5.2% |
0.05217749 |
97 |
No answer |
1881 |
77.3% |
0.77280197 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_9
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Housing cooperative
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Housing cooperative
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
348 |
14.3% |
0.14297453 |
1 |
Selected |
89 |
3.7% |
0.03656532 |
97 |
No answer |
1997 |
82% |
0.82046015 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_10
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: House owner association and land owner association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
House owner association and land owner association
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
342 |
14.1% |
0.140509449 |
1 |
Selected |
23 |
0.9% |
0.009449466 |
97 |
No answer |
2069 |
85% |
0.850041085 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_11
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Cultural association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Cultural association (music, dance, theatre, hobby, etc.)
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
262 |
10.8% |
0.10764174 |
1 |
Selected |
86 |
3.5% |
0.03533279 |
97 |
No answer |
2086 |
85.7% |
0.85702547 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_12
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Lodge
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Lodge
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
51 |
2.1% |
0.020953164 |
1 |
Selected |
19 |
0.8% |
0.007806081 |
97 |
No answer |
2364 |
97.1% |
0.971240756 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_13
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Consumer organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Consumer organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
75 |
3.1% |
0.0308134758 |
1 |
Selected |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0008216927 |
97 |
No answer |
2357 |
96.8% |
0.9683648316 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_14
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Car association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Car association
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
437 |
18% |
0.179539852 |
1 |
Selected |
12 |
0.5% |
0.004930156 |
97 |
No answer |
1985 |
81.6% |
0.815529992 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_15
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Patient association or interest organization for the disabled
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Patient association or interest organization for the disabled
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
103 |
4.2% |
0.042317173 |
1 |
Selected |
14 |
0.6% |
0.005751849 |
97 |
No answer |
2317 |
95.2% |
0.951930978 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_16
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Pensioner association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Pensioner association
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
113 |
4.6% |
0.04642564 |
1 |
Selected |
22 |
0.9% |
0.00903862 |
97 |
No answer |
2299 |
94.5% |
0.94453574 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_17
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Parents’ association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Parents’ association
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
64 |
2.6% |
0.02629417 |
1 |
Selected |
42 |
1.7% |
0.01725555 |
97 |
No answer |
2328 |
95.6% |
0.95645029 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_18
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Immigrant association
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrant association
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004519310 |
1 |
Selected |
8 |
0.3% |
0.003286771 |
97 |
No answer |
2415 |
99.2% |
0.992193919 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_19
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Employee organization/trade union
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Employee organization/trade union
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
766 |
31.5% |
0.31470830 |
1 |
Selected |
107 |
4.4% |
0.04396056 |
97 |
No answer |
1561 |
64.1% |
0.64133114 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_20
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Business and employer organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Business and employer organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
83 |
3.4% |
0.03410025 |
1 |
Selected |
29 |
1.2% |
0.01191454 |
97 |
No answer |
2322 |
95.4% |
0.95398521 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_21
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Agricultural or fisheries organization
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Agricultural or fisheries organization
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
65 |
2.7% |
0.026705012 |
1 |
Selected |
14 |
0.6% |
0.005751849 |
97 |
No answer |
2355 |
96.8% |
0.967543139 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt11_22
Variable label:
|
Position of trust: Other
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have a position of trust in any of these organizations?
|
Literal question:
|
Other organizations/associations
|
Technical description:
|
Check if yes.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
373 |
15.3% |
0.15324569 |
1 |
Selected |
114 |
4.7% |
0.04683648 |
97 |
No answer |
1947 |
80% |
0.79991783 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt12
Variable label:
|
Would attempt to influence political process regarding controversial measure
|
Literal question:
|
Let’s assume that the Storting is discussing a new measure that you consider to be completely unreasonable. How likely is it that you would attempt to do something to affect the outcome?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
79 |
3.2% |
0.03245686 |
2 |
Likely |
250 |
10.3% |
0.10271159 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
683 |
28.1% |
0.28060805 |
4 |
Not very likely |
1016 |
41.7% |
0.41741988 |
5 |
Not likely at all |
267 |
11% |
0.10969597 |
97 |
No answer |
139 |
5.7% |
0.05710764 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dt13
Variable label:
|
Means to influence political process
|
Literal question:
|
If you wanted to affect the outcome of an issue, what would be your favoured procedure?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Would write a letter to the newspaper |
340 |
14% |
0.13968776 |
2 |
Would work to get media coverage elsewhere |
219 |
9% |
0.08997535 |
3 |
Would discuss the matter with the party or other organization I am a member of |
147 |
6% |
0.06039441 |
4 |
Would contact a politician |
261 |
10.7% |
0.10723090 |
5 |
Would contact an employee of the ministry concerned |
100 |
4.1% |
0.04108463 |
6 |
Would organize a petition |
89 |
3.7% |
0.03656532 |
7 |
Would organize a demonstration |
28 |
1.2% |
0.01150370 |
8 |
Not sure |
923 |
37.9% |
0.37921118 |
9 |
Other ways |
121 |
5% |
0.04971241 |
97 |
No answer |
206 |
8.5% |
0.08463435 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_km34
Variable label:
|
Norway morally obligated to reduce emissions
|
Literal question:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement: “Rich countries like Norway have a moral obligation to show international leadership by reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.”
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
508 |
20.9% |
0.20870994 |
2 |
Agree |
680 |
27.9% |
0.27937551 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
572 |
23.5% |
0.23500411 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
251 |
10.3% |
0.10312243 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
114 |
4.7% |
0.04683648 |
6 |
Disagree |
98 |
4% |
0.04026294 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
68 |
2.8% |
0.02793755 |
97 |
No answer |
143 |
5.9% |
0.05875103 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_grup
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into two groups and selects pairwise the following questions: DV1 - DV14
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2344] [Invalid:2561] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
1163 |
49.6% |
0.4961604 |
2 |
|
1181 |
50.4% |
0.5038396 |
Sysmiss |
|
2561 |
|
NA |
w01_dv1
Variable label:
|
Benefit for Norway that people from other countries settles down here
|
Literal question:
|
How great an advantage or disadvantage would you say it is for Norway that people from other countries come to live here?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very great advantage |
37 |
3.2% |
0.03181427 |
2 |
Great advantage |
177 |
15.2% |
0.15219261 |
3 |
A certain advantage |
420 |
36.1% |
0.36113500 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor disadvantage |
172 |
14.8% |
0.14789338 |
5 |
A certain disadvantage |
215 |
18.5% |
0.18486672 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
73 |
6.3% |
0.06276870 |
7 |
A very great disadvantage |
37 |
3.2% |
0.03181427 |
97 |
No answer |
32 |
2.8% |
0.02751505 |
98 |
Not asked |
3742 |
|
NA |
w01_dv2
Variable label:
|
Benefit for Norway that immigrants settles down here
|
Literal question:
|
How great an advantage or disadvantage would you say it is for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very great advantage |
37 |
3.1% |
0.03132938 |
2 |
Great advantage |
181 |
15.3% |
0.15325995 |
3 |
A certain advantage |
402 |
34% |
0.34038950 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor disadvantage |
169 |
14.3% |
0.14309907 |
5 |
A certain disadvantage |
237 |
20.1% |
0.20067739 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
72 |
6.1% |
0.06096528 |
7 |
A very great disadvantage |
48 |
4.1% |
0.04064352 |
97 |
No answer |
35 |
3% |
0.02963590 |
98 |
Not asked |
3724 |
|
NA |
w01_dv3
Variable label:
|
Policies aimed at people from other countries that settle down personally important
|
Literal question:
|
How important are policies aimed at people from other countries who come to live in Norway to you personally?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
194 |
16.7% |
0.16680997 |
2 |
Important |
442 |
38% |
0.38005159 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
349 |
30% |
0.30008598 |
4 |
Not very important |
114 |
9.8% |
0.09802236 |
5 |
Not important at all |
24 |
2.1% |
0.02063629 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
3.4% |
0.03439381 |
98 |
Not asked |
3742 |
|
NA |
w01_dv4
Variable label:
|
Immigration policy imporant personally
|
Literal question:
|
How important is immigration policy to you personally?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
156 |
13.2% |
0.13209145 |
2 |
Important |
433 |
36.7% |
0.36663844 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
444 |
37.6% |
0.37595258 |
4 |
Not very important |
115 |
9.7% |
0.09737511 |
5 |
Not important at all |
18 |
1.5% |
0.01524132 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.3% |
0.01270110 |
98 |
Not asked |
3724 |
|
NA |
w01_dv5
Variable label:
|
Party with best policy regarding settlement of foreigners
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party do you believe has the best policy aimed at people who come from other countries to live in Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Labour Party |
239 |
20.6% |
0.205503009 |
2 |
The Progress Party |
247 |
21.2% |
0.212381771 |
3 |
The Conservative Party |
174 |
15% |
0.149613070 |
4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
111 |
9.5% |
0.095442820 |
5 |
The Centre Party |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007738607 |
6 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
61 |
5.2% |
0.052450559 |
7 |
The Liberal Party |
75 |
6.4% |
0.064488392 |
8 |
Red |
24 |
2.1% |
0.020636285 |
9 |
The Green Party |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005159071 |
10 |
Others (Note) |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006018917 |
11 |
None |
121 |
10.4% |
0.104041273 |
97 |
No answer |
89 |
7.7% |
0.076526225 |
98 |
Not asked |
3742 |
|
NA |
w01_dv5_10_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Party with best policy regarding settlement of foreigners [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party do you believe has the best policy aimed at people who come from other countries to live in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_dv6
Variable label:
|
Party with the best immigration policy
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, which political party has the best immigration policy?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Labour Party |
222 |
18.8% |
0.18797629 |
2 |
The Progress Party |
277 |
23.5% |
0.23454699 |
3 |
The Conservative Party |
203 |
17.2% |
0.17188823 |
4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
81 |
6.9% |
0.06858594 |
5 |
The Centre Party |
12 |
1% |
0.01016088 |
6 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
62 |
5.2% |
0.05249788 |
7 |
The Liberal Party |
61 |
5.2% |
0.05165114 |
8 |
Red |
27 |
2.3% |
0.02286198 |
9 |
The Green Party |
7 |
0.6% |
0.00592718 |
10 |
Others (Note) |
12 |
1% |
0.01016088 |
11 |
None |
141 |
11.9% |
0.11939035 |
97 |
No answer |
76 |
6.4% |
0.06435224 |
98 |
Not asked |
3724 |
|
NA |
w01_dv6_10_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Party with best immigration policy [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, which political party has the best immigration policy?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_dv7
Variable label:
|
Share of foreigners in community
|
Literal question:
|
If you consider people in your community or school district, around how many have come from a different country to live there or have at least one parent who has come from another country?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All, or nearly all |
12 |
1% |
0.01031814 |
2 |
Many (more than half) |
48 |
4.1% |
0.04127257 |
3 |
Around half |
69 |
5.9% |
0.05932932 |
4 |
Some (fewer than half) |
756 |
65% |
0.65004299 |
5 |
None, or nearly none |
234 |
20.1% |
0.20120378 |
97 |
No answer |
44 |
3.8% |
0.03783319 |
98 |
Not asked |
3742 |
|
NA |
w01_dv8
Variable label:
|
Share of immigrants in community
|
Literal question:
|
If you consider people in your community or school district, around how many have immigrated or have at least one parent who has immigrated?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All, or nearly all |
10 |
0.8% |
0.008467401 |
2 |
Many (more than half) |
59 |
5% |
0.049957663 |
3 |
Around half |
84 |
7.1% |
0.071126164 |
4 |
Some (fewer than half) |
695 |
58.8% |
0.588484335 |
5 |
None, or nearly none |
284 |
24% |
0.240474174 |
97 |
No answer |
49 |
4.1% |
0.041490262 |
98 |
Not asked |
3724 |
|
NA |
w01_dv9
Variable label:
|
Encounters with foreigners in daily life
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine people you randomly encounter in your daily life, for example on the bus, at the shop or in your neighbourhood. How often would you say that you encounter people who have come from other countries to live here?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
725 |
62.3% |
0.623387790 |
2 |
Weekly |
218 |
18.7% |
0.187446260 |
3 |
A few times a month |
124 |
10.7% |
0.106620808 |
4 |
More seldom, but it has occurred |
53 |
4.6% |
0.045571797 |
5 |
Never |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004299226 |
97 |
No answer |
38 |
3.3% |
0.032674119 |
98 |
Not asked |
3742 |
|
NA |
w01_dv10
Variable label:
|
Encounters with immigrants in daily life
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine people you randomly encounter in your daily life, for example on the bus, at the shop or in your neighbourhood. How often would you say you encounter immigrants?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
866 |
73.3% |
0.7332768840 |
2 |
Weekly |
191 |
16.2% |
0.1617273497 |
3 |
A few times a month |
76 |
6.4% |
0.0643522439 |
4 |
More seldom, but it has occurred |
31 |
2.6% |
0.0262489416 |
5 |
Never |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0008467401 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.4% |
0.0135478408 |
98 |
Not asked |
3724 |
|
NA |
w01_dv11
Variable label:
|
Experience of meeting foreigners
|
Literal question:
|
How good or bad an experience have these short, random encounters been?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
87 |
7.5% |
0.074806535 |
2 |
Good |
375 |
32.2% |
0.322441960 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
93 |
8% |
0.079965606 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
471 |
40.5% |
0.404987102 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
53 |
4.6% |
0.045571797 |
6 |
Bad |
24 |
2.1% |
0.020636285 |
7 |
Very bad |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005159071 |
97 |
No answer |
54 |
4.6% |
0.046431642 |
98 |
Not asked |
3742 |
|
NA |
w01_dv12
Variable label:
|
Experience of meeting immigrants
|
Literal question:
|
How good or bad an experience have these short, random encounters been?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
98 |
8.3% |
0.08298052 |
2 |
Good |
377 |
31.9% |
0.31922100 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
81 |
6.9% |
0.06858594 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
519 |
43.9% |
0.43945809 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
46 |
3.9% |
0.03895004 |
6 |
Bad |
28 |
2.4% |
0.02370872 |
7 |
Very bad |
8 |
0.7% |
0.00677392 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
2% |
0.02032176 |
98 |
Not asked |
3724 |
|
NA |
w01_dv13
Variable label:
|
Share of friends that are foreigners
|
Literal question:
|
How many of your close friends have come from another country to live in Norway or have parents (mother, father or both parents) who have come from another country to live in Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All, or nearly all |
11 |
0.9% |
0.009458298 |
2 |
Many (more than half) |
46 |
4% |
0.039552880 |
3 |
Around half |
66 |
5.7% |
0.056749785 |
4 |
Some (fewer than half) |
454 |
39% |
0.390369733 |
5 |
None, or nearly none |
557 |
47.9% |
0.478933792 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
2.5% |
0.024935512 |
98 |
Not asked |
3742 |
|
NA |
w01_dv14
Variable label:
|
Share of friends that are immigrants
|
Literal question:
|
How many of your close friends have immigrated to Norway or have parents (mother, father or both parents) who have immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All, or nearly all |
9 |
0.8% |
0.00762066 |
2 |
Many (more than half) |
47 |
4% |
0.03979678 |
3 |
Around half |
57 |
4.8% |
0.04826418 |
4 |
Some (fewer than half) |
411 |
34.8% |
0.34801016 |
5 |
None, or nearly none |
638 |
54% |
0.54022015 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
1.6% |
0.01608806 |
98 |
Not asked |
3724 |
|
NA |
w01_grup2
Variable label:
|
Randomizes independently from U
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into six groups and selects one the following questions: DV15- DV20
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4709] [Invalid:196] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
788 |
16.7% |
0.1673391 |
2 |
|
754 |
16% |
0.1601189 |
3 |
|
778 |
16.5% |
0.1652155 |
4 |
|
817 |
17.3% |
0.1734976 |
5 |
|
789 |
16.8% |
0.1675515 |
6 |
|
783 |
16.6% |
0.1662773 |
Sysmiss |
|
196 |
|
NA |
w01_dv15
Variable label:
|
Claim: Immigrans has to apply for more jobs than Norwegians, according to 1800 job applications
|
Literal question:
|
Research based on 1,800 job applications concludes that Norwegians with immigrant backgrounds must apply for far more jobs than others in order to be called for an interview. To which extent do you agree that this is the case in Norway just now?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
178 |
22.6% |
0.22588832 |
2 |
Agree |
294 |
37.3% |
0.37309645 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
132 |
16.8% |
0.16751269 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
85 |
10.8% |
0.10786802 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
26 |
3.3% |
0.03299492 |
6 |
Disagree |
31 |
3.9% |
0.03934010 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
17 |
2.2% |
0.02157360 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
3.2% |
0.03172589 |
98 |
Not asked |
4117 |
|
NA |
w01_dv16
Variable label:
|
Claim: Immigrans has to apply for more jobs than Norwegians, according to 42 interviews
|
Literal question:
|
Research based on 42 interviews with employers concludes that Norwegians with immigrant backgrounds must apply for far more jobs than others in order to be called for an interview. To which extent do you agree that this is the case in Norway just now?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
158 |
21% |
0.20954907 |
2 |
Agree |
306 |
40.6% |
0.40583554 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
141 |
18.7% |
0.18700265 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
75 |
9.9% |
0.09946950 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
22 |
2.9% |
0.02917772 |
6 |
Disagree |
27 |
3.6% |
0.03580902 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
10 |
1.3% |
0.01326260 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
2% |
0.01989390 |
98 |
Not asked |
4151 |
|
NA |
w01_dv17
Variable label:
|
Claim: Immigrans has to apply for more jobs than Norwegians, according to research
|
Literal question:
|
Research concludes that Norwegians with immigrant backgrounds must apply for far more jobs than others in order to be called for an interview. To which extent do you agree that this is the case in Norway just now?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
175 |
22.5% |
0.22493573 |
2 |
Agree |
302 |
38.8% |
0.38817481 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
134 |
17.2% |
0.17223650 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
96 |
12.3% |
0.12339332 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
29 |
3.7% |
0.03727506 |
6 |
Disagree |
21 |
2.7% |
0.02699229 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
1.2% |
0.01156812 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.5% |
0.01542416 |
98 |
Not asked |
4127 |
|
NA |
w01_dv18
Variable label:
|
Claim: Immigrans has to apply for more jobs than Norwegians, according to a governmental ministry
|
Literal question:
|
A governmental ministry concludes that Norwegians with immigrant backgrounds must apply for far more jobs than others in order to be called for an interview. To which extent do you agree that this is the case in Norway just now?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
201 |
24.6% |
0.24602203 |
2 |
Agree |
308 |
37.7% |
0.37698898 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
142 |
17.4% |
0.17380661 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
84 |
10.3% |
0.10281518 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
26 |
3.2% |
0.03182375 |
6 |
Disagree |
25 |
3.1% |
0.03059976 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
2% |
0.01958384 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01835985 |
98 |
Not asked |
4088 |
|
NA |
w01_dv19
Variable label:
|
Claim: Immigrans has to apply for more jobs than Norwegians, according to The Norwegian Centre against Racism
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian Centre against Racism concludes that Norwegians with immigrant backgrounds must apply for far more jobs than others in order to be called for an interview. To which extent do you agree that this is the case in Norway just now?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
178 |
22.6% |
0.22560203 |
2 |
Agree |
296 |
37.5% |
0.37515843 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
128 |
16.2% |
0.16223067 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
117 |
14.8% |
0.14828897 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
14 |
1.8% |
0.01774398 |
6 |
Disagree |
26 |
3.3% |
0.03295311 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
1.9% |
0.01901141 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.9% |
0.01901141 |
98 |
Not asked |
4116 |
|
NA |
w01_dv20
Variable label:
|
Claim: Immigrans has to apply for more jobs than Norwegians, according to public debate
|
Literal question:
|
Social debate participants conclude that Norwegians with immigrant backgrounds must apply for far more jobs than others in order to be called for an interview. To which extent do you agree that this is the case in Norway just now?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
163 |
20.8% |
0.20817369 |
2 |
Agree |
313 |
40% |
0.39974457 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
136 |
17.4% |
0.17369093 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
109 |
13.9% |
0.13920817 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
21 |
2.7% |
0.02681992 |
6 |
Disagree |
17 |
2.2% |
0.02171137 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.9% |
0.01915709 |
98 |
Not asked |
4122 |
|
NA |
w01_grup3
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into four groups and selects one the following questions: DV21-25
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2338] [Invalid:2567] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
642 |
27.5% |
0.2745937 |
2 |
|
559 |
23.9% |
0.2390932 |
3 |
|
591 |
25.3% |
0.2527802 |
4 |
|
546 |
23.4% |
0.2335329 |
Sysmiss |
|
2567 |
|
NA |
w01_dv21
Variable label:
|
Allow Muslim schools
|
Literal question:
|
Some Muslims in Norway wish to send their children to Islamic schools that follow the Norwegian curriculum but additionally teach Islam. To which extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway should be permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
2.2% |
0.02180685 |
2 |
Agree |
47 |
7.3% |
0.07320872 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
64 |
10% |
0.09968847 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
83 |
12.9% |
0.12928349 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
95 |
14.8% |
0.14797508 |
6 |
Disagree |
139 |
21.7% |
0.21651090 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
181 |
28.2% |
0.28193146 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
3% |
0.02959502 |
98 |
Not asked |
4263 |
|
NA |
w01_dv22
Variable label:
|
Allow Muslim schools, even though it may disrupt integration, according to public debate
|
Literal question:
|
Some Muslims in Norway wish to send their children to Islamic schools that follow the Norwegian curriculum but additionally teach Islam. Some participants in the social debate have argued against such schools because they believe they obstruct integration. To which extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway should be permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
19 |
3.4% |
0.03398927 |
2 |
Agree |
35 |
6.3% |
0.06261181 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
43 |
7.7% |
0.07692308 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
62 |
11.1% |
0.11091234 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
91 |
16.3% |
0.16279070 |
6 |
Disagree |
134 |
24% |
0.23971377 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
164 |
29.3% |
0.29338104 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
2% |
0.01967800 |
98 |
Not asked |
4346 |
|
NA |
w01_dv23
Variable label:
|
Allow Muslim schools, even though it may disrupt integration, according to Progress Party
|
Literal question:
|
Some Muslims in Norway wish to send their children to Islamic schools that follow the Norwegian curriculum but additionally teach Islam. Certain Progress Party politicians have argued against such schools because they believe they obstruct integration. To which extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway should be permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
20 |
3.4% |
0.03384095 |
2 |
Agree |
47 |
8% |
0.07952623 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
77 |
13% |
0.13028765 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
70 |
11.8% |
0.11844332 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
86 |
14.6% |
0.14551607 |
6 |
Disagree |
119 |
20.1% |
0.20135364 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
160 |
27.1% |
0.27072758 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
2% |
0.02030457 |
98 |
Not asked |
4314 |
|
NA |
w01_dv24
Variable label:
|
Allow Muslim schools, even though it may disrupt integration, according to Labour Party
|
Literal question:
|
Some Muslims in Norway wish to send their children to Islamic schools that follow the Norwegian curriculum but additionally teach Islam. Certain Labour Party politicians have argued against such schools because they believe they obstruct integration. To which extent do you agree or disagree that Muslims in Norway should be permitted to send their children to Islamic schools?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
18 |
3.3% |
0.03296703 |
2 |
Agree |
29 |
5.3% |
0.05311355 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
48 |
8.8% |
0.08791209 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
57 |
10.4% |
0.10439560 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
84 |
15.4% |
0.15384615 |
6 |
Disagree |
136 |
24.9% |
0.24908425 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
163 |
29.9% |
0.29853480 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
2% |
0.02014652 |
98 |
Not asked |
4359 |
|
NA |
w01_grup4
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=2
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into four groups and selects one the following questions: DV25-28
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2335] [Invalid:2570] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
579 |
24.8% |
0.2479657 |
2 |
|
619 |
26.5% |
0.2650964 |
3 |
|
564 |
24.2% |
0.2415418 |
4 |
|
573 |
24.5% |
0.2453961 |
Sysmiss |
|
2570 |
|
NA |
w01_dv25
Variable label:
|
Claim: Muslim culture should be respected
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Muslims in Norway are entitled to respect for their traditions and culture.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
61 |
10.5% |
0.10535406 |
2 |
Agree |
140 |
24.2% |
0.24179620 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
162 |
28% |
0.27979275 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
51 |
8.8% |
0.08808290 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
67 |
11.6% |
0.11571675 |
6 |
Disagree |
36 |
6.2% |
0.06217617 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
48 |
8.3% |
0.08290155 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
2.4% |
0.02417962 |
98 |
Not asked |
4326 |
|
NA |
w01_dv26
Variable label:
|
Claim: Muslim culture should be protected
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Muslims in Norway are entitled to protection of their traditions and culture.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
13 |
2.1% |
0.02100162 |
2 |
Agree |
52 |
8.4% |
0.08400646 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
150 |
24.2% |
0.24232633 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
79 |
12.8% |
0.12762520 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
129 |
20.8% |
0.20840065 |
6 |
Disagree |
99 |
16% |
0.15993538 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
88 |
14.2% |
0.14216478 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.5% |
0.01453958 |
98 |
Not asked |
4286 |
|
NA |
w01_dv27
Variable label:
|
Claim: Immigrant culture should be respected
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrants in Norway are entitled to respect for their traditions and culture.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
47 |
8.3% |
0.08333333 |
2 |
Agree |
161 |
28.5% |
0.28546099 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
174 |
30.9% |
0.30851064 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
44 |
7.8% |
0.07801418 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
72 |
12.8% |
0.12765957 |
6 |
Disagree |
28 |
5% |
0.04964539 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
28 |
5% |
0.04964539 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.8% |
0.01773050 |
98 |
Not asked |
4341 |
|
NA |
w01_dv28
Variable label:
|
Claim: Immigrant culture should be protected
|
Pre-question text:
|
To which extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Immigrants in Norway are entitled to protection of their traditions and culture.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
17 |
3% |
0.02966841 |
2 |
Agree |
79 |
13.8% |
0.13787086 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
146 |
25.5% |
0.25479930 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
71 |
12.4% |
0.12390925 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
112 |
19.5% |
0.19546248 |
6 |
Disagree |
73 |
12.7% |
0.12739965 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
64 |
11.2% |
0.11169284 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.9% |
0.01919721 |
98 |
Not asked |
4332 |
|
NA |
w01_dv29_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees should be entitled to social services
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees should have the same right to social services as Norwegians, even if they are not Norwegian citizens.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
166 |
6.8% |
0.06820049 |
2 |
Agree |
513 |
21.1% |
0.21076417 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
438 |
18% |
0.17995070 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
212 |
8.7% |
0.08709942 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
328 |
13.5% |
0.13475760 |
6 |
Disagree |
359 |
14.7% |
0.14749384 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
245 |
10.1% |
0.10065735 |
97 |
No answer |
173 |
7.1% |
0.07107642 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dv29_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Begging should be banned
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be banned in Norway.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
833 |
34.2% |
0.34223500 |
2 |
Agree |
515 |
21.2% |
0.21158587 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
321 |
13.2% |
0.13188168 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
218 |
9% |
0.08956450 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
148 |
6.1% |
0.06080526 |
6 |
Disagree |
144 |
5.9% |
0.05916187 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
87 |
3.6% |
0.03574363 |
97 |
No answer |
168 |
6.9% |
0.06902219 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dv29_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norway will lose it’s identity if more Muslims come to live here
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Norway will lose its identity if more Muslims come to live here.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
284 |
11.7% |
0.11668036 |
2 |
Agree |
287 |
11.8% |
0.11791290 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
440 |
18.1% |
0.18077239 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
351 |
14.4% |
0.14420707 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
299 |
12.3% |
0.12284306 |
6 |
Disagree |
395 |
16.2% |
0.16228431 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
208 |
8.5% |
0.08545604 |
97 |
No answer |
170 |
7% |
0.06984388 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dv29_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norwegian muslims more loyal to other muslims
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian Muslims are more loyal to other Muslims in the world than to the people of this country.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
284 |
11.7% |
0.11668036 |
2 |
Agree |
389 |
16% |
0.15981923 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
452 |
18.6% |
0.18570255 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
733 |
30.1% |
0.30115037 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
158 |
6.5% |
0.06491372 |
6 |
Disagree |
167 |
6.9% |
0.06861134 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
69 |
2.8% |
0.02834840 |
97 |
No answer |
182 |
7.5% |
0.07477403 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dv29_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: Better for a country if most people share the same traditions and customs
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
It is better for a country if nearly everyone shares the same traditions and customs.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
214 |
8.8% |
0.08792112 |
2 |
Agree |
317 |
13% |
0.13023829 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
411 |
16.9% |
0.16885785 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
409 |
16.8% |
0.16803615 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
370 |
15.2% |
0.15201315 |
6 |
Disagree |
375 |
15.4% |
0.15406738 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
165 |
6.8% |
0.06778965 |
97 |
No answer |
173 |
7.1% |
0.07107642 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_dv33
Variable label:
|
Foreigners are better off compared to people like me
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how much better or worse off are the majority of people who have come to live in Norway compared to people like you?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much better |
12 |
1% |
0.01031814 |
2 |
Better |
32 |
2.8% |
0.02751505 |
3 |
Somewhat better |
54 |
4.6% |
0.04643164 |
4 |
Neither better nor worse |
348 |
29.9% |
0.29922614 |
5 |
Somewhat worse |
296 |
25.5% |
0.25451419 |
6 |
Worse |
300 |
25.8% |
0.25795357 |
7 |
Much worse |
70 |
6% |
0.06018917 |
97 |
No answer |
51 |
4.4% |
0.04385211 |
98 |
Not asked |
3742 |
|
NA |
w01_dv34
Variable label:
|
Immigrans are better off compared to people like me
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how much better or worse off are the majority of people who have immigrated to Norway compared to people like you?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much better |
12 |
1% |
0.01016088 |
2 |
Better |
40 |
3.4% |
0.03386960 |
3 |
Somewhat better |
52 |
4.4% |
0.04403048 |
4 |
Neither better nor worse |
399 |
33.8% |
0.33784928 |
5 |
Somewhat worse |
380 |
32.2% |
0.32176122 |
6 |
Worse |
205 |
17.4% |
0.17358171 |
7 |
Much worse |
41 |
3.5% |
0.03471634 |
97 |
No answer |
52 |
4.4% |
0.04403048 |
98 |
Not asked |
3724 |
|
NA |
w01_grup5
Variable label:
|
Randomizes independently from U
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=2 into two groups and selects one of the following questions: DV35 or DV38
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4693] [Invalid:212] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
2316 |
49.4% |
0.493501 |
2 |
|
2377 |
50.6% |
0.506499 |
Sysmiss |
|
212 |
|
NA |
w01_dv35_1
Variable label:
|
Fitting description: Important not to not have prejudices towards immigrants
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poor would you say that the following description fits you:
|
Literal question:
|
It is important to me personally to be unprejudiced towards immigrants.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
401 |
17.3% |
0.17314335 |
2 |
Good |
833 |
36% |
0.35967185 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
450 |
19.4% |
0.19430052 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
352 |
15.2% |
0.15198618 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
127 |
5.5% |
0.05483592 |
6 |
Bad |
34 |
1.5% |
0.01468048 |
7 |
Very bad |
32 |
1.4% |
0.01381693 |
97 |
No answer |
87 |
3.8% |
0.03756477 |
98 |
Not asked |
2589 |
|
NA |
w01_dv35_2
Variable label:
|
Fitting description: Don’t want to appear racist
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poor would you say that the following description fits you:
|
Literal question:
|
I would not like to be perceived as racist, not even unto myself.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
519 |
22.4% |
0.22409326 |
2 |
Good |
794 |
34.3% |
0.34283247 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
346 |
14.9% |
0.14939551 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
357 |
15.4% |
0.15414508 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
121 |
5.2% |
0.05224525 |
6 |
Bad |
54 |
2.3% |
0.02331606 |
7 |
Very bad |
26 |
1.1% |
0.01122625 |
97 |
No answer |
99 |
4.3% |
0.04274611 |
98 |
Not asked |
2589 |
|
NA |
w01_dv35_3
Variable label:
|
Fitting description: Feel guilty about negative feeling towards immigrants
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poor would you say that the following description fits you:
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I have negative feelings towards immigrants.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
176 |
7.6% |
0.07599309 |
2 |
Good |
368 |
15.9% |
0.15889465 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
358 |
15.5% |
0.15457686 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
577 |
24.9% |
0.24913644 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
272 |
11.7% |
0.11744387 |
6 |
Bad |
290 |
12.5% |
0.12521589 |
7 |
Very bad |
176 |
7.6% |
0.07599309 |
97 |
No answer |
99 |
4.3% |
0.04274611 |
98 |
Not asked |
2589 |
|
NA |
w01_dv35_4
Variable label:
|
Fitting description: Trying not to not have prejudices towards immigrants
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poor would you say that the following description fits you:
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants due to my own conviction.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
360 |
15.5% |
0.15544041 |
2 |
Good |
747 |
32.3% |
0.32253886 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
393 |
17% |
0.16968912 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
475 |
20.5% |
0.20509499 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
113 |
4.9% |
0.04879102 |
6 |
Bad |
77 |
3.3% |
0.03324698 |
7 |
Very bad |
48 |
2.1% |
0.02072539 |
97 |
No answer |
103 |
4.4% |
0.04447323 |
98 |
Not asked |
2589 |
|
NA |
w01_dv36_recode
Variable label:
|
Directly affected by July 22nd
|
Literal question:
|
As you know, Anders Behring Breivik perpetrated the worst terrorist attack on Norwegian soil in peacetime on Friday 22 July 2011. 77 people lost their lives A lot of people in Norway were directly affected either because they were closely related to or knew some of the victims, or they were close to the events in other ways. What about you, were you directly affected?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, I personally, a family member, close friend, or an acquaintance was in
danger during the attacks, or a family member, close friend or an acquaintance
was killed in the attacks |
695 |
14.2% |
0.14169215 |
2 |
No, I wasn't affected in this respect |
3631 |
74% |
0.74026504 |
3 |
Other |
262 |
5.3% |
0.05341488 |
97 |
No answer |
317 |
6.5% |
0.06462793 |
w01_dv36_5_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Directly affected by July 22nd [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_dv37_1
Variable label:
|
Reaction: Remember where I was when the news came
|
Pre-question text:
|
A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
|
Literal question:
|
I remember where I was when I got the news
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
2721 |
69.9% |
0.69894683 |
2 |
Good |
576 |
14.8% |
0.14795787 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
126 |
3.2% |
0.03236578 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
132 |
3.4% |
0.03390701 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
49 |
1.3% |
0.01258669 |
6 |
Bad |
88 |
2.3% |
0.02260468 |
7 |
Very bad |
109 |
2.8% |
0.02799897 |
97 |
No answer |
92 |
2.4% |
0.02363216 |
98 |
Not asked |
1012 |
|
NA |
w01_dv37_2
Variable label:
|
Reaction: Remember who I was with when the news came
|
Pre-question text:
|
A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
|
Literal question:
|
I remember who I was with when I got the news
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
2570 |
66% |
0.66015926 |
2 |
Good |
598 |
15.4% |
0.15360904 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
130 |
3.3% |
0.03339327 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
181 |
4.6% |
0.04649371 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
52 |
1.3% |
0.01335731 |
6 |
Bad |
116 |
3% |
0.02979707 |
7 |
Very bad |
130 |
3.3% |
0.03339327 |
97 |
No answer |
116 |
3% |
0.02979707 |
98 |
Not asked |
1012 |
|
NA |
w01_dv37_3
Variable label:
|
Reaction: Paid close attention to the news
|
Pre-question text:
|
A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
|
Literal question:
|
I followed the news with extra interest in the time following the events
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
2355 |
60.5% |
0.604931929 |
2 |
Good |
917 |
23.6% |
0.235550989 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
297 |
7.6% |
0.076290778 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
124 |
3.2% |
0.031852042 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
50 |
1.3% |
0.012843565 |
6 |
Bad |
30 |
0.8% |
0.007706139 |
7 |
Very bad |
41 |
1.1% |
0.010531724 |
97 |
No answer |
79 |
2% |
0.020292833 |
98 |
Not asked |
1012 |
|
NA |
w01_dv37_4
Variable label:
|
Reaction: Was saddend
|
Pre-question text:
|
A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
|
Literal question:
|
I was sad
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
2181 |
56% |
0.56023632 |
2 |
Good |
919 |
23.6% |
0.23606473 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
331 |
8.5% |
0.08502440 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
222 |
5.7% |
0.05702543 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
42 |
1.1% |
0.01078859 |
6 |
Bad |
45 |
1.2% |
0.01155921 |
7 |
Very bad |
46 |
1.2% |
0.01181608 |
97 |
No answer |
107 |
2.7% |
0.02748523 |
98 |
Not asked |
1012 |
|
NA |
w01_dv37_5
Variable label:
|
Reaction: Got angry
|
Pre-question text:
|
A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
|
Literal question:
|
I was angry
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
1553 |
39.9% |
0.39892114 |
2 |
Good |
804 |
20.7% |
0.20652453 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
494 |
12.7% |
0.12689443 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
521 |
13.4% |
0.13382995 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
142 |
3.6% |
0.03647573 |
6 |
Bad |
150 |
3.9% |
0.03853070 |
7 |
Very bad |
102 |
2.6% |
0.02620087 |
97 |
No answer |
127 |
3.3% |
0.03262266 |
98 |
Not asked |
1012 |
|
NA |
w01_dv37_6
Variable label:
|
Reaction: Discussed events with friends and relatives
|
Pre-question text:
|
A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
|
Literal question:
|
I discussed 22. July with friends and acquaintances
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
2106 |
54.1% |
0.540970974 |
2 |
Good |
1118 |
28.7% |
0.287182122 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
351 |
9% |
0.090161829 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
134 |
3.4% |
0.034420755 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
37 |
1% |
0.009504238 |
6 |
Bad |
24 |
0.6% |
0.006164911 |
7 |
Very bad |
29 |
0.7% |
0.007449268 |
97 |
No answer |
94 |
2.4% |
0.024145903 |
98 |
Not asked |
1012 |
|
NA |
w01_dv37_8
Variable label:
|
Reaction: Became more interested in politics
|
Pre-question text:
|
A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
|
Literal question:
|
I became more interested in politics
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
202 |
5.2% |
0.05188800 |
2 |
Good |
407 |
10.5% |
0.10454662 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
663 |
17% |
0.17030568 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
1579 |
40.6% |
0.40559979 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
227 |
5.8% |
0.05830979 |
6 |
Bad |
385 |
9.9% |
0.09889545 |
7 |
Very bad |
267 |
6.9% |
0.06858464 |
97 |
No answer |
163 |
4.2% |
0.04187002 |
98 |
Not asked |
1012 |
|
NA |
w01_dv37_10
Variable label:
|
Reaction: The attacks made no impression
|
Pre-question text:
|
A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
|
Literal question:
|
The attacks didn’t affect me much
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
191 |
4.9% |
0.04906242 |
2 |
Good |
151 |
3.9% |
0.03878757 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
67 |
1.7% |
0.01721038 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
110 |
2.8% |
0.02825584 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
139 |
3.6% |
0.03570511 |
6 |
Bad |
638 |
16.4% |
0.16388389 |
7 |
Very bad |
2397 |
61.6% |
0.61572052 |
97 |
No answer |
200 |
5.1% |
0.05137426 |
98 |
Not asked |
1012 |
|
NA |
w01_dv37_annet_1
Variable label:
|
Other: Reaction [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
A lot of people reacted strongly in the time after the terrorist attacks. How well or poorly do these descriptions describe your reaction, as you remember it?
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_dv371
Variable label:
|
Participated in remembrance services in the period following the attacks
|
Literal question:
|
Did you participate in the remembrance services in the period following the attacks?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1133 |
29.1% |
0.29103519 |
2 |
No |
2702 |
69.4% |
0.69406627 |
97 |
No answer |
58 |
1.5% |
0.01489854 |
98 |
Not asked |
1012 |
|
NA |
w01_dv372
Variable label:
|
Joined political party or association in the period following the attacks
|
Literal question:
|
Did you become a member of a political party or an association in the period after the terrorist attacks?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, and if so which: |
38 |
1% |
0.00976111 |
2 |
No |
3804 |
97.7% |
0.97713845 |
97 |
No answer |
51 |
1.3% |
0.01310044 |
98 |
Not asked |
1012 |
|
NA |
w01_dv372_1_other
Variable label:
|
Text: Joined political party or association in the period following the attacks [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Did you become a member of a political party or an association in the period after the terrorist attacks?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_dv39_recode
Variable label:
|
Think, read or talk about July 22nd
|
Literal question:
|
More than two years have passed since the attacks. As for you personally, how often would you say that you think, read or talk about things that have to do with 22 July nowadays?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Weekly or more often |
575 |
11.7% |
0.11722732 |
2 |
A few times a month |
1467 |
29.9% |
0.29908257 |
3 |
Seldom or never |
2537 |
51.7% |
0.51722732 |
97 |
No answer |
326 |
6.6% |
0.06646279 |
w01_dv38_1
Variable label:
|
Fitting description: Important not to not have prejudices towards immigrants
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following description fits you:
|
Literal question:
|
It is important to me personally to be unprejudiced towards immigrants.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
468 |
19.7% |
0.19688683 |
2 |
Well |
815 |
34.3% |
0.34286916 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
452 |
19% |
0.19015566 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
337 |
14.2% |
0.14177535 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
121 |
5.1% |
0.05090450 |
6 |
Poorly |
72 |
3% |
0.03029028 |
7 |
Very poorly |
35 |
1.5% |
0.01472444 |
97 |
No answer |
77 |
3.2% |
0.03239377 |
98 |
Not asked |
2528 |
|
NA |
w01_dv38_2
Variable label:
|
Fitting description: Don’t want to appear racist
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following description fits you:
|
Literal question:
|
I would not like to be perceived as racist, not even unto myself.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
551 |
23.2% |
0.23180480 |
2 |
Well |
841 |
35.4% |
0.35380732 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
352 |
14.8% |
0.14808582 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
327 |
13.8% |
0.13756836 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
120 |
5% |
0.05048380 |
6 |
Poorly |
58 |
2.4% |
0.02440050 |
7 |
Very poorly |
34 |
1.4% |
0.01430374 |
97 |
No answer |
94 |
4% |
0.03954565 |
98 |
Not asked |
2528 |
|
NA |
w01_dv38_3
Variable label:
|
Fitting description: Feel guilty about negative feeling towards immigrants
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following description fits you:
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I have negative feelings towards immigrants.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
169 |
7.1% |
0.07109802 |
2 |
Well |
367 |
15.4% |
0.15439630 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
377 |
15.9% |
0.15860328 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
558 |
23.5% |
0.23474968 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
280 |
11.8% |
0.11779554 |
6 |
Poorly |
332 |
14% |
0.13967186 |
7 |
Very poorly |
193 |
8.1% |
0.08119478 |
97 |
No answer |
101 |
4.2% |
0.04249053 |
98 |
Not asked |
2528 |
|
NA |
w01_dv38_4
Variable label:
|
Fitting description: Trying not to not have prejudices towards immigrants
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following description fits you:
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants due to my own conviction.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
380 |
16% |
0.15986538 |
2 |
Well |
711 |
29.9% |
0.29911653 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
426 |
17.9% |
0.17921750 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
494 |
20.8% |
0.20782499 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
123 |
5.2% |
0.05174590 |
6 |
Poorly |
88 |
3.7% |
0.03702146 |
7 |
Very poorly |
61 |
2.6% |
0.02566260 |
97 |
No answer |
94 |
4% |
0.03954565 |
98 |
Not asked |
2528 |
|
NA |
w01_k17_1
Variable label:
|
Usage of media channels for news: TV
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media channels to stay up to date on news?
|
Literal question:
|
TV
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
1235 |
25.2% |
0.25178389 |
2 |
Every day |
2152 |
43.9% |
0.43873598 |
3 |
Several times a week |
707 |
14.4% |
0.14413863 |
4 |
Less frequently |
390 |
8% |
0.07951070 |
5 |
Never |
99 |
2% |
0.02018349 |
97 |
No answer |
322 |
6.6% |
0.06564730 |
w01_k17_2
Variable label:
|
Usage of media channels for news: Radio
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media channels to stay up to date on news?
|
Literal question:
|
Radio
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
1293 |
26.4% |
0.26360856 |
2 |
Every day |
1447 |
29.5% |
0.29500510 |
3 |
Several times a week |
821 |
16.7% |
0.16738022 |
4 |
Less frequently |
705 |
14.4% |
0.14373089 |
5 |
Never |
207 |
4.2% |
0.04220183 |
97 |
No answer |
432 |
8.8% |
0.08807339 |
w01_k17_3
Variable label:
|
Usage of media channels for news: Newspaper
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media channels to stay up to date on news?
|
Literal question:
|
Printed newspapers
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
471 |
9.6% |
0.09602446 |
2 |
Every day |
1939 |
39.5% |
0.39531091 |
3 |
Several times a week |
793 |
16.2% |
0.16167176 |
4 |
Less frequently |
1077 |
22% |
0.21957187 |
5 |
Never |
199 |
4.1% |
0.04057085 |
97 |
No answer |
426 |
8.7% |
0.08685015 |
w01_k17_4
Variable label:
|
Usage of media channels for news: Online newspaper
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media channels to stay up to date on news?
|
Literal question:
|
Online newspapers
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
1759 |
35.9% |
0.35861366 |
2 |
Every day |
1286 |
26.2% |
0.26218145 |
3 |
Several times a week |
764 |
15.6% |
0.15575943 |
4 |
Less frequently |
503 |
10.3% |
0.10254842 |
5 |
Never |
156 |
3.2% |
0.03180428 |
97 |
No answer |
437 |
8.9% |
0.08909276 |
w01_k17_5
Variable label:
|
Usage of media channels for news: Facebook
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media channels to stay up to date on news?
|
Literal question:
|
Facebook
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
1003 |
20.4% |
0.2044852 |
2 |
Every day |
879 |
17.9% |
0.1792049 |
3 |
Several times a week |
506 |
10.3% |
0.1031600 |
4 |
Less frequently |
563 |
11.5% |
0.1147808 |
5 |
Never |
1362 |
27.8% |
0.2776758 |
97 |
No answer |
592 |
12.1% |
0.1206932 |
w01_k17_6
Variable label:
|
Usage of media channels for news: Twitter
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media channels to stay up to date on news?
|
Literal question:
|
Twitter
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
102 |
2.1% |
0.02079511 |
2 |
Every day |
98 |
2% |
0.01997961 |
3 |
Several times a week |
143 |
2.9% |
0.02915392 |
4 |
Less frequently |
483 |
9.8% |
0.09847095 |
5 |
Never |
3224 |
65.7% |
0.65728848 |
97 |
No answer |
855 |
17.4% |
0.17431193 |
w01_k17_7
Variable label:
|
Usage of media channels for news: Other websites
|
Pre-question text:
|
How often do you use these media channels to stay up to date on news?
|
Literal question:
|
Other websites
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Several times a day |
639 |
13% |
0.1302752 |
2 |
Every day |
960 |
19.6% |
0.1957187 |
3 |
Several times a week |
995 |
20.3% |
0.2028542 |
4 |
Less frequently |
961 |
19.6% |
0.1959225 |
5 |
Never |
619 |
12.6% |
0.1261978 |
97 |
No answer |
731 |
14.9% |
0.1490316 |
w01_k18_1
Variable label:
|
Interested in media content: International news
|
Pre-question text:
|
How interested are you in the following types of media content?
|
Literal question:
|
International news
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
1123 |
22.9% |
0.228950051 |
2 |
Interested |
2427 |
49.5% |
0.494801223 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
862 |
17.6% |
0.175739042 |
4 |
Not very interested |
135 |
2.8% |
0.027522936 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
24 |
0.5% |
0.004892966 |
97 |
No answer |
334 |
6.8% |
0.068093782 |
w01_k18_2
Variable label:
|
Interested in media content: Domestic news
|
Pre-question text:
|
How interested are you in the following types of media content?
|
Literal question:
|
Domestic news
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
1324 |
27% |
0.269928644 |
2 |
Interested |
2591 |
52.8% |
0.528236493 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
547 |
11.2% |
0.111518858 |
4 |
Not very interested |
78 |
1.6% |
0.015902141 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
23 |
0.5% |
0.004689093 |
97 |
No answer |
342 |
7% |
0.069724771 |
w01_k18_3
Variable label:
|
Interested in media content: Local news
|
Pre-question text:
|
How interested are you in the following types of media content?
|
Literal question:
|
Local news
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
1451 |
29.6% |
0.29582059 |
2 |
Interested |
2168 |
44.2% |
0.44199796 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
694 |
14.1% |
0.14148828 |
4 |
Not very interested |
217 |
4.4% |
0.04424057 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
36 |
0.7% |
0.00733945 |
97 |
No answer |
339 |
6.9% |
0.06911315 |
w01_k18_4
Variable label:
|
Interested in media content: Health/ consumer/ lifestyle
|
Pre-question text:
|
How interested are you in the following types of media content?
|
Literal question:
|
Health/ consumer/ lifestyle
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
718 |
14.6% |
0.14638124 |
2 |
Interested |
1785 |
36.4% |
0.36391437 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
1390 |
28.3% |
0.28338430 |
4 |
Not very interested |
547 |
11.2% |
0.11151886 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
112 |
2.3% |
0.02283384 |
97 |
No answer |
353 |
7.2% |
0.07196738 |
w01_k18_5
Variable label:
|
Interested in media content: Debate
|
Pre-question text:
|
How interested are you in the following types of media content?
|
Literal question:
|
Debate
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
628 |
12.8% |
0.12803262 |
2 |
Interested |
1694 |
34.5% |
0.34536188 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
1419 |
28.9% |
0.28929664 |
4 |
Not very interested |
628 |
12.8% |
0.12803262 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
173 |
3.5% |
0.03527013 |
97 |
No answer |
363 |
7.4% |
0.07400612 |
w01_k18_6
Variable label:
|
Interested in media content: Culture and feature
|
Pre-question text:
|
How interested are you in the following types of media content?
|
Literal question:
|
Culture and feature
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
415 |
8.5% |
0.08460754 |
2 |
Interested |
1327 |
27.1% |
0.27054027 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
1639 |
33.4% |
0.33414883 |
4 |
Not very interested |
929 |
18.9% |
0.18939857 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
205 |
4.2% |
0.04179409 |
97 |
No answer |
390 |
8% |
0.07951070 |
w01_k18_7
Variable label:
|
Interested in media content: Entertainment and celebrity news
|
Pre-question text:
|
How interested are you in the following types of media content?
|
Literal question:
|
Entertainment and celebrity news
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
169 |
3.4% |
0.03445464 |
2 |
Interested |
742 |
15.1% |
0.15127421 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
1403 |
28.6% |
0.28603466 |
4 |
Not very interested |
1631 |
33.3% |
0.33251784 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
571 |
11.6% |
0.11641182 |
97 |
No answer |
389 |
7.9% |
0.07930683 |
w01_k18_8
Variable label:
|
Interested in media content: Sports
|
Pre-question text:
|
How interested are you in the following types of media content?
|
Literal question:
|
Sports
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
715 |
14.6% |
0.14576962 |
2 |
Interested |
1005 |
20.5% |
0.20489297 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
956 |
19.5% |
0.19490316 |
4 |
Not very interested |
1103 |
22.5% |
0.22487258 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
760 |
15.5% |
0.15494393 |
97 |
No answer |
366 |
7.5% |
0.07461774 |
w01_k19_1
Variable label:
|
Profile on social network: Facebook
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
|
Literal question:
|
Facebook
|
Technical description:
|
Flere kryss mulig.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
697 |
28.6% |
0.28635990 |
1 |
Selected |
1619 |
66.5% |
0.66516023 |
97 |
No answer |
118 |
4.8% |
0.04847987 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_k19_2
Variable label:
|
Profile on social network: Twitter
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
|
Literal question:
|
Twitter
|
Technical description:
|
Flere kryss mulig.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1900 |
78.1% |
0.78060805 |
1 |
Selected |
416 |
17.1% |
0.17091208 |
97 |
No answer |
118 |
4.8% |
0.04847987 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_k19_3
Variable label:
|
Profile on social network: Instagram
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
|
Literal question:
|
Instagram
|
Technical description:
|
Flere kryss mulig.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1834 |
75.3% |
0.75349219 |
1 |
Selected |
482 |
19.8% |
0.19802794 |
97 |
No answer |
118 |
4.8% |
0.04847987 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_k19_4
Variable label:
|
Profile on social network: Youtube
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
|
Literal question:
|
YouTube
|
Technical description:
|
Flere kryss mulig.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1822 |
74.9% |
0.74856204 |
1 |
Selected |
494 |
20.3% |
0.20295809 |
97 |
No answer |
118 |
4.8% |
0.04847987 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_k19_5
Variable label:
|
Profile on social network: Flickr
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
|
Literal question:
|
Flickr
|
Technical description:
|
Flere kryss mulig.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2236 |
91.9% |
0.91865242 |
1 |
Selected |
80 |
3.3% |
0.03286771 |
97 |
No answer |
118 |
4.8% |
0.04847987 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_k19_6
Variable label:
|
Profile on social network: LinkedIn
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
|
Literal question:
|
LinkedIn
|
Technical description:
|
Flere kryss mulig.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1826 |
75% |
0.75020542 |
1 |
Selected |
490 |
20.1% |
0.20131471 |
97 |
No answer |
118 |
4.8% |
0.04847987 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_k19_7
Variable label:
|
Profile on social network: Myspace
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
|
Literal question:
|
Myspace
|
Technical description:
|
Flere kryss mulig.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2268 |
93.2% |
0.93179951 |
1 |
Selected |
48 |
2% |
0.01972062 |
97 |
No answer |
118 |
4.8% |
0.04847987 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_k19_8
Variable label:
|
Profile on social network: Origo
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
|
Literal question:
|
Origo
|
Technical description:
|
Flere kryss mulig.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2280 |
93.7% |
0.93672966 |
1 |
Selected |
36 |
1.5% |
0.01479047 |
97 |
No answer |
118 |
4.8% |
0.04847987 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_k19_9
Variable label:
|
Profile on social network: Biip
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
|
Literal question:
|
Biip
|
Technical description:
|
Flere kryss mulig.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2287 |
94% |
0.93960559 |
1 |
Selected |
29 |
1.2% |
0.01191454 |
97 |
No answer |
118 |
4.8% |
0.04847987 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_k19_10
Variable label:
|
Profile on social network: Other
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
Technical description:
|
Flere kryss mulig.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
2057 |
84.5% |
0.84511093 |
1 |
Selected |
259 |
10.6% |
0.10640920 |
97 |
No answer |
118 |
4.8% |
0.04847987 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_k19_11
Variable label:
|
Profile on social network: None
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which social network sites do you have a profile on?
|
Literal question:
|
None
|
Technical description:
|
Flere kryss mulig.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Not selected |
1829 |
75.1% |
0.75143796 |
1 |
Selected |
487 |
20% |
0.20008217 |
97 |
No answer |
118 |
4.8% |
0.04847987 |
98 |
Not asked |
2471 |
|
NA |
w01_k20
Variable label:
|
Description of employment
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the descriptions fits best with what you have done for the past 7 days?
|
Technical description:
|
Check one option.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In paid work (or temporarily absent) |
2890 |
58.9% |
0.589194699 |
2 |
In education (not paid for by employer) |
391 |
8% |
0.079714577 |
3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
100 |
2% |
0.020387360 |
4 |
Unemployed, want a job but not actively seeking work |
27 |
0.6% |
0.005504587 |
5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
174 |
3.5% |
0.035474006 |
6 |
Retired |
702 |
14.3% |
0.143119266 |
7 |
In civilian national service or military service |
12 |
0.2% |
0.002446483 |
8 |
Staying at home, looking after children or other persons |
90 |
1.8% |
0.018348624 |
9 |
Other |
207 |
4.2% |
0.042201835 |
97 |
No answer |
312 |
6.4% |
0.063608563 |
w01_k21
Variable label:
|
Type of business
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
246 |
8.5% |
0.085121107 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
811 |
28.1% |
0.280622837 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
191 |
6.6% |
0.066089965 |
4 |
Private business |
1385 |
47.9% |
0.479238754 |
5 |
Self-employed |
162 |
5.6% |
0.056055363 |
6 |
Other: |
88 |
3% |
0.030449827 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.2% |
0.002422145 |
98 |
Not asked |
2015 |
|
NA |
w01_k21_6_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Type of business [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_k23
Variable label:
|
Text: Description of profession [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What kind of work do you primarily do in your main profession?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_k23a
Variable label:
|
Text: Name or title of profession [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What is the name or title of your main profession?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_k23b
Variable label:
|
Responsible for supervising employees
|
Literal question:
|
Are you responsible for supervising the work of other employees in your main work?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1952 |
67.5% |
0.675432526 |
2 |
Yes, I supervise 10 or more employees |
342 |
11.8% |
0.118339100 |
3 |
Yes, I supervise 10 or less employees |
577 |
20% |
0.199653979 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
0.7% |
0.006574394 |
98 |
Not asked |
2015 |
|
NA |
w01_k24
Variable label:
|
Work in gas or oil manufacturing
|
Literal question:
|
Is your workplace in the oil and gas sector, or closely related to it?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, I work in the oil and gas sector |
146 |
5.1% |
0.050519031 |
2 |
Yes, my work is closely related to the oil and gas sector |
151 |
5.2% |
0.052249135 |
3 |
No |
2569 |
88.9% |
0.888927336 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
0.8% |
0.008304498 |
98 |
Not asked |
2015 |
|
NA |
w01_k25_1
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your current income?
|
Literal question:
|
Gross annual income is:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-8500000]
|
w01_k25_recode
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income [Recoded from continuous to discrete scale: w01_k25]
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:integer] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
< 150 000 |
550 |
11.2% |
0.11213048 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
685 |
14% |
0.13965341 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
756 |
15.4% |
0.15412844 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
880 |
17.9% |
0.17940877 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
505 |
10.3% |
0.10295617 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
271 |
5.5% |
0.05524975 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
340 |
6.9% |
0.06931702 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
139 |
2.8% |
0.02833843 |
97 |
No answer |
779 |
15.9% |
0.15881753 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
w01_k26
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
28 |
0.6% |
0.005708461 |
2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
28 |
0.6% |
0.005708461 |
3 |
Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school,
secondary school) |
449 |
9.2% |
0.091539246 |
4 |
College certificate |
58 |
1.2% |
0.011824669 |
5 |
Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education
programme, one-year post admission |
675 |
13.8% |
0.137614679 |
6 |
Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes
(qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination) |
616 |
12.6% |
0.125586137 |
7 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
57 |
1.2% |
0.011620795 |
8 |
Diploma from addition to upper secondary education (vocational, technical
college) |
176 |
3.6% |
0.035881753 |
9 |
University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years
(university college graduate 2 and 2½ year) |
395 |
8.1% |
0.080530071 |
10 |
Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's
college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist,
etc.) |
879 |
17.9% |
0.179204893 |
11 |
Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor) |
320 |
6.5% |
0.065239551 |
12 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master) |
257 |
5.2% |
0.052395515 |
13 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further
professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian,
engineer, architect, senior business economist) |
461 |
9.4% |
0.093985729 |
14 |
Research level (Ph.D.) |
70 |
1.4% |
0.014271152 |
15 |
None of these |
120 |
2.4% |
0.024464832 |
97 |
No answer |
316 |
6.4% |
0.064424057 |
w01_k27
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Are/have you:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Never been married |
679 |
13.8% |
0.1384301733 |
2 |
Married |
2475 |
50.5% |
0.5045871560 |
3 |
Legally registered partner |
7 |
0.1% |
0.0014271152 |
4 |
Cohabitant |
836 |
17% |
0.1704383282 |
5 |
Divorces/separated |
305 |
6.2% |
0.0621814475 |
6 |
Former cohabitant |
124 |
2.5% |
0.0252803262 |
7 |
Former legally registered partner |
1 |
0% |
0.0002038736 |
8 |
Widow/widower |
95 |
1.9% |
0.0193679918 |
9 |
Other |
79 |
1.6% |
0.0161060143 |
97 |
No answer |
304 |
6.2% |
0.0619775739 |
w01_k27_9_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Marital status [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Are/have you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
4260 |
86.9% |
0.86850153 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
352 |
7.2% |
0.07176351 |
97 |
No answer |
293 |
6% |
0.05973496 |
w01_k28_2_other
Variable label:
|
Text: Citizenship in other country [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Please indicate which country
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_k29
Variable label:
|
Parents immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
4096 |
83.5% |
0.835066259 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
329 |
6.7% |
0.067074414 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
32 |
0.7% |
0.006523955 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
72 |
1.5% |
0.014678899 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
70 |
1.4% |
0.014271152 |
97 |
No answer |
306 |
6.2% |
0.062385321 |
w01_k30_1
Variable label:
|
Text: Home country before immigration [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did you live in before immigrating?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_k30_2_1
Variable label:
|
Text: Parents home country, mother [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did you parents live in (mother, father or both) before they immigrated?
|
Literal question:
|
Mother:
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_k30_2_2
Variable label:
|
Text: Parents home country, father [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did you parents live in (mother, father or both) before they immigrated?
|
Literal question:
|
Father:
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_k30_3_1
Variable label:
|
Text: Mothers last home country [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did your mother live in before she immigrated?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_k30_4_1
Variable label:
|
Text: Fathers last home country [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did your father live in before he immigrated?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_ran6
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if U=1
|
Pre-question text:
|
Randomizes if U=1 into two groups and selects one of the following questions: DT14 or DT15
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2349] [Invalid:2556] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
1206 |
51.3% |
0.51341 |
2 |
|
1143 |
48.7% |
0.48659 |
Sysmiss |
|
2556 |
|
NA |
w01_dt14
Variable label:
|
Who should get 5000 kr, the participants have no say
|
Literal question:
|
One of the researchers linked to the Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 at his disposal. These funds will either be drawn as a travel gift card to one of the Citizen Panel’s participants, or they will be donated to the charitable organization Doctors Without Borders. The participants have no say on this decision, but it is nevertheless interesting to know your preference in how this money should be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A NOK 5,000 gift card drawn as a prize for one of the Citizen Panel's
participants |
137 |
11.4% |
0.11359867 |
2 |
A donation of NOK 5,000 given to the charitable organization Doctors Without
Borders |
964 |
79.9% |
0.79933665 |
3 |
No opinion |
89 |
7.4% |
0.07379768 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
1.3% |
0.01326700 |
98 |
Not asked |
3699 |
|
NA |
w01_dt15
Variable label:
|
Who should get 5000 kr, you as a participant have a say
|
Literal question:
|
One of the researchers linked to the Citizen Panel has NOK 5,000 at his disposal. These funds will either be drawn as a gift card to one of the Citizen Panel’s participants, or they will be donated to the charitable organization Doctors Without Borders. You as a participant have a say in this decision, and it is therefore interesting to know your preference in how this money should be used. What do you prefer?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A NOK 5,000 gift card drawn as a prize for one of the Citizen Panel's
participants |
118 |
10.3% |
0.103237095 |
2 |
A donation of NOK 5,000 given to the charitable organization Doctors Without
Borders |
950 |
83.1% |
0.831146107 |
3 |
No opinion |
69 |
6% |
0.060367454 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005249344 |
98 |
Not asked |
3762 |
|
NA |
w01_km31
Variable label:
|
Text: Thoughts on climate change [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Finally, a question on the climate.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear the words “climate change”? Please note the first thing that springs to mind. We appreciate all kinds of answers.
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_comment
Variable label:
|
Text: Comments or suggestions for the survey [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments or suggestions for the survey and the Citizen Panel, please write them here.
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
w01_P1
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Male |
2470 |
50.4% |
0.5035678 |
2 |
Female |
2435 |
49.6% |
0.4964322 |
w01_P2
Variable label:
|
Region
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
1346 |
27.4% |
0.27441386 |
2 |
Eastern Norway |
1202 |
24.5% |
0.24505607 |
3 |
Southern Norway |
257 |
5.2% |
0.05239551 |
4 |
Western Norway |
1336 |
27.2% |
0.27237513 |
5 |
Trøndelag |
391 |
8% |
0.07971458 |
6 |
Northern Norway |
373 |
7.6% |
0.07604485 |
w01_P3
Variable label:
|
County
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-19]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Akershus |
587 |
12% |
0.11967380 |
2 |
Oslo |
759 |
15.5% |
0.15474006 |
3 |
Østfold |
246 |
5% |
0.05015291 |
4 |
Vestfold |
229 |
4.7% |
0.04668705 |
5 |
Hedmark |
148 |
3% |
0.03017329 |
6 |
Oppland |
168 |
3.4% |
0.03425076 |
7 |
Buskerud |
261 |
5.3% |
0.05321101 |
8 |
Telemark |
150 |
3.1% |
0.03058104 |
9 |
Vest-Agder |
159 |
3.2% |
0.03241590 |
10 |
Aust-Agder |
98 |
2% |
0.01997961 |
11 |
Rogaland |
461 |
9.4% |
0.09398573 |
12 |
Hordaland |
574 |
11.7% |
0.11702345 |
13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
90 |
1.8% |
0.01834862 |
14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
211 |
4.3% |
0.04301733 |
15 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
290 |
5.9% |
0.05912334 |
16 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
101 |
2.1% |
0.02059123 |
17 |
Nordland |
189 |
3.9% |
0.03853211 |
18 |
Troms |
134 |
2.7% |
0.02731906 |
19 |
Finmark |
50 |
1% |
0.01019368 |
w01_P4
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No education/elementary school |
505 |
10.3% |
0.10295617 |
2 |
Upper secondary education |
1582 |
32.3% |
0.32252803 |
3 |
University/University college |
2382 |
48.6% |
0.48562691 |
97 |
No answer |
436 |
8.9% |
0.08888889 |
w01_P5_1
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1939 or earlier |
175 |
3.6% |
0.03567788 |
2 |
1940-1949 |
676 |
13.8% |
0.13781855 |
3 |
1950-1959 |
951 |
19.4% |
0.19388379 |
4 |
1960-1969 |
1005 |
20.5% |
0.20489297 |
5 |
1970-1979 |
867 |
17.7% |
0.17675841 |
6 |
1980-1989 |
773 |
15.8% |
0.15759429 |
7 |
1990 or later |
458 |
9.3% |
0.09337411 |
w01_P5_2
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1959 or earlier |
1802 |
36.7% |
0.36738022 |
2 |
1960-1989 |
2645 |
53.9% |
0.53924567 |
3 |
1990 or later |
458 |
9.3% |
0.09337411 |
w01_Weight1
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, and P1. See documentation report.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2]
|
w01_Weight2
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4, and P1. See documentation report
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4905] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-11]
|