Citation
Primary investigators
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
Coordinator, UiB
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
Sveinung Arnesen
|
NORCE
|
Hege Høivik Bye
|
UiB
|
Endre Tvinnereim
|
NORCE
|
Yvette Peters
|
UiB
|
Lise Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
Producers
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project Team Member
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality Assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in five waves, wave 1, wave 3, wave 8, wave 11 and wave 14. In wave 1, 4.870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3, 5.623 members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8, 4245 new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8). In wave 11, 2069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11). In wave 14, 2036 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 14).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn. Equally, in wave 14, a gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
14 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the register. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment.
Recruitment of new members to the panel was completed in several steps.
First, an invitation letter was sent to everyone in the sample. The invitation letter contained the following information: a) description of the project; b) current privacy and procedural privacy guidelines; c) timeframe for the project; d) participants right to opt out of the panel; e) contact information to the project mangers ; f) a unique login code and URL for the Norwegian Citizens' Panel's website; g) estimated time to complete the survey (15 minutes).
To maximize the recruitment rate, an incentive has been used in the form of a travel gift card. The value of the travel gift card is 25,000 NOK. To participate in the drawing of the gift card, it is required that the e-mail address is provided. Information about the lottery is included in all correspondence with the respondents.
The invitation letter was posted on January 15, 2019. A reminder was sent to those respondents who a) had not logged into the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. New respondents received only one reminder, either via a postcard or a text message. The text message was sent to respondents under the age of 60. The postcard was sent to respondents over the age of 60 and to those without a registered mobile number. Respondents were invited to participate in the Norwegian Citizens' Panel with reference to the invitation letter. The postcard was posted on January 22, 2019. The login code was also given in the postcard. The text message was sent out on January 24, 2019. The text message contained both a login code and a direct link to the survey.
Data collection among old panel members was done in parallel with the recruitment of new respondents. The invitation mail was sent out on January 15, 2019. The first, second, and third reminders were sent to the respondents' email, on January 23, January 28, and February 1, 2019, respectively. Panel members with a registered mobile number received the last reminder in form of a text message.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent's geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire. 3.3 percent of the net sample did not answer this question. Because of this, two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
v-101
|
2020-08-28
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 14
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 14
|
NA
|
2020-06-10
|
r14bk21_kodet
|
Value changed from 12 (unassigned) to 6 (other)
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r14pktilfreds1
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r14pktilfreds3
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r14pktilfreds4
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14bk33_kodet
|
Added variable based on r14bk33.
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14bk21_kodet
|
Added variable based on r14bk21.
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14bk26_kodet
|
Added variable based on r14bk26.
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14bk27_kodet
|
Added variable based on r14bk27.
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14pk43_1_kodet
|
Added variable based on r14bk43_1.
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14pk43_2_kodet
|
Added variable based on r14bk43_2.
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14p_moved
|
Added new variable.
|
NA
|
2019-03-27
|
r14bk40_recode
|
Added variable based on r14k40.
|
v-100
|
2019-02-27
|
NA
|
Initial release of round 14
|
Dataset contents
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 14 - v-101.sav
|
# Cases
|
8979
|
# Variables
|
150
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14interview_start
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14interview_end
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14rekruttert
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
Literal question:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-14]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Wave 1 |
1777 |
19.8% |
0.1979062 |
3 |
Wave 3 |
1930 |
21.5% |
0.2149460 |
8 |
Wave 8 |
1987 |
22.1% |
0.2212941 |
11 |
Wave 11 |
1249 |
13.9% |
0.1391023 |
14 |
Wave 14 |
2036 |
22.7% |
0.2267513 |
r14browsertype
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14browserversion
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14mobil
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondent use mobile ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
other |
5897 |
65.7% |
0.6567546 |
1 |
mobile phone |
3082 |
34.3% |
0.3432454 |
r14opplosning
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14enhetstype
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
PC |
6015 |
67% |
0.669896425 |
2 |
Touch |
2942 |
32.8% |
0.327653414 |
3 |
Generic |
22 |
0.2% |
0.002450161 |
r14advancedwifeaturesenabled
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14getrenderingmode
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14group
Variable label:
|
[Subgroup in wave 14. Partially randomized. Newly recruited respondents are designated to group 1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 are designated to group 4. The other respondents are randomized into groups 2, 3 or 4 (with only 12.5% probability of being randomized into group 4). ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Subgroup in wave 14. Partially randomized. Newly recruited respondents are designated to group 1. Respondents recruited in wave 1 are designated to group 4. The other respondents are randomized into groups 2, 3 or 4 (with only 12.5% probability of being randomized into group 4). ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
g1 |
2036 |
22.7% |
0.2267513 |
2 |
g2 |
2307 |
25.7% |
0.2569328 |
3 |
g3 |
2236 |
24.9% |
0.2490255 |
4 |
g4 |
2400 |
26.7% |
0.2672903 |
r14pk15_1
Variable label:
|
People can in general be trusted/ one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others.
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
42 |
0.5% |
0.004677581 |
1 |
1 |
58 |
0.6% |
0.006459517 |
2 |
2 |
128 |
1.4% |
0.014255485 |
3 |
3 |
301 |
3.4% |
0.033522664 |
4 |
4 |
315 |
3.5% |
0.035081858 |
5 |
5 |
820 |
9.1% |
0.091324201 |
6 |
6 |
994 |
11.1% |
0.110702751 |
7 |
7 |
2266 |
25.2% |
0.252366633 |
8 |
8 |
2496 |
27.8% |
0.277981958 |
9 |
9 |
1012 |
11.3% |
0.112707428 |
10 |
10 – Most people can be trusted |
523 |
5.8% |
0.058247021 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.3% |
0.002672903 |
r14pk53
Variable label:
|
How much confidence in Norwegian politicians.
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
114 |
1.3% |
0.012696291 |
2 |
To a great extent |
2593 |
28.9% |
0.288784943 |
3 |
To some extent |
4378 |
48.8% |
0.487582136 |
4 |
To a small extent |
1618 |
18% |
0.180198240 |
5 |
Not at all |
261 |
2.9% |
0.029067825 |
97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.2% |
0.001670565 |
r14pk54
Variable label:
|
How much confidence in Norwegian news media.
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
375 |
4.2% |
0.041764116 |
2 |
To a great extent |
4188 |
46.6% |
0.466421651 |
3 |
To some extent |
3512 |
39.1% |
0.391134870 |
4 |
To a small extent |
709 |
7.9% |
0.078962022 |
5 |
Not at all |
128 |
1.4% |
0.014255485 |
97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.7% |
0.007461855 |
r14pk12
Variable label:
|
How much confidence in Norwegian parliament (Stortinget).
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1, 3 or 4. Equivalent to r14pad2 but without “priming”.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
411 |
6.2% |
0.061600719 |
2 |
To a great extent |
2914 |
43.7% |
0.436750600 |
3 |
To some extent |
2493 |
37.4% |
0.373651079 |
4 |
To a small extent |
699 |
10.5% |
0.104766187 |
5 |
Not at all |
121 |
1.8% |
0.018135492 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
0.5% |
0.005095923 |
98 |
Not asked |
2307 |
|
NA |
r14pk9_1
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue for you personally: 1. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14pk9_2
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue for you personally: 2. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14pk9_3
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue for you personally: 3. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14pk43_1
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if municipal elections tomorrow.
|
Pre-question text:
|
This coming fall, local elections (municipal and county council elections) will be held.
|
Literal question:
|
If the municipal elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
292 |
3.3% |
0.032520325 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1992 |
22.2% |
0.221850986 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
675 |
7.5% |
0.075175409 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
343 |
3.8% |
0.038200245 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
744 |
8.3% |
0.082860007 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
890 |
9.9% |
0.099120169 |
7 |
The Green Party |
475 |
5.3% |
0.052901214 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
2070 |
23.1% |
0.230537922 |
9 |
The Red Party |
429 |
4.8% |
0.047778149 |
10 |
A joint list |
17 |
0.2% |
0.001893307 |
11 |
A local list |
188 |
2.1% |
0.020937744 |
12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
251 |
2.8% |
0.027954115 |
13 |
Would not vote |
194 |
2.2% |
0.021605969 |
14 |
Not entitled to vote |
54 |
0.6% |
0.006014033 |
15 |
Other: |
317 |
3.5% |
0.035304600 |
97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.5% |
0.005345807 |
r14pk43_1_15_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R14PK43_1]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
This coming fall, local elections (municipal and county council elections) will be held.
|
Literal question:
|
If the municipal elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14pk43_1_kodet
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if municipal elections tomorrow. [coded]
|
Pre-question text:
|
This coming fall, local elections (municipal and county council elections) will be held.
|
Literal question:
|
If the municipal elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[This variable contains the values of r14pk43_1 plus coded values of r14pk43_1_15_other]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
292 |
3.3% |
0.032520325 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1993 |
22.2% |
0.221962357 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
675 |
7.5% |
0.075175409 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
343 |
3.8% |
0.038200245 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
744 |
8.3% |
0.082860007 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
892 |
9.9% |
0.099342911 |
7 |
The Green Party |
475 |
5.3% |
0.052901214 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
2070 |
23.1% |
0.230537922 |
9 |
The Red Party |
429 |
4.8% |
0.047778149 |
10 |
A joint list |
17 |
0.2% |
0.001893307 |
11 |
A local list |
213 |
2.4% |
0.023722018 |
12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
251 |
2.8% |
0.027954115 |
13 |
Would not vote |
194 |
2.2% |
0.021605969 |
14 |
Not entitled to vote |
54 |
0.6% |
0.006014033 |
15 |
Other: |
289 |
3.2% |
0.032186212 |
97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.5% |
0.005345807 |
r14pk43_2
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if county council elections tomorrow.
|
Literal question:
|
And if the county council elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
286 |
3.2% |
0.031852099 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1960 |
21.8% |
0.218287114 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
675 |
7.5% |
0.075175409 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
318 |
3.5% |
0.035415971 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
743 |
8.3% |
0.082748636 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
881 |
9.8% |
0.098117830 |
7 |
The Green Party |
456 |
5.1% |
0.050785165 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
2069 |
23% |
0.230426551 |
9 |
The Red Party |
412 |
4.6% |
0.045884842 |
10 |
A joint list |
23 |
0.3% |
0.002561532 |
11 |
A local list |
88 |
1% |
0.009800646 |
12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
289 |
3.2% |
0.032186212 |
13 |
Would not vote |
327 |
3.6% |
0.036418309 |
14 |
Not entitled to vote |
86 |
1% |
0.009577904 |
15 |
Other: |
291 |
3.2% |
0.032408954 |
97 |
Not answered |
75 |
0.8% |
0.008352823 |
r14pk43_2_15_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R14PK43_2]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
And if the county council elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14pk43_2_kodet
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if county council elections tomorrow. [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
And if the county council elections were tomorrow, what would you vote for?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[This variable contains the values of r14pk43_2 plus coded values of r14pk43_2_15_other]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
286 |
3.2% |
0.031852099 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1960 |
21.8% |
0.218287114 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
675 |
7.5% |
0.075175409 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
318 |
3.5% |
0.035415971 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
743 |
8.3% |
0.082748636 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
881 |
9.8% |
0.098117830 |
7 |
The Green Party |
456 |
5.1% |
0.050785165 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
2069 |
23% |
0.230426551 |
9 |
The Red Party |
412 |
4.6% |
0.045884842 |
10 |
A joint list |
23 |
0.3% |
0.002561532 |
11 |
A local list |
96 |
1.1% |
0.010691614 |
12 |
Would cast a blank vote |
289 |
3.2% |
0.032186212 |
13 |
Would not vote |
327 |
3.6% |
0.036418309 |
14 |
Not entitled to vote |
87 |
1% |
0.009689275 |
15 |
Other: |
282 |
3.1% |
0.031406615 |
97 |
Not answered |
75 |
0.8% |
0.008352823 |
r14pk204
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if parliamentary elections tomorrow.
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
288 |
3.2% |
0.032074841 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1950 |
21.7% |
0.217173405 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
772 |
8.6% |
0.085978394 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
314 |
3.5% |
0.034970487 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
750 |
8.4% |
0.083528233 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
890 |
9.9% |
0.099120169 |
7 |
The Green Party |
424 |
4.7% |
0.047221294 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
2180 |
24.3% |
0.242788729 |
9 |
The Red Party |
469 |
5.2% |
0.052232988 |
10 |
Would not vote |
152 |
1.7% |
0.016928388 |
11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
251 |
2.8% |
0.027954115 |
12 |
Not entitled to vote |
222 |
2.5% |
0.024724357 |
13 |
Other: |
253 |
2.8% |
0.028176857 |
97 |
Not answered |
64 |
0.7% |
0.007127743 |
r14pk204_13_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R14PK204]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14pk8_1
Variable label:
|
Placement political left-right scale.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 - Left |
110 |
1.2% |
0.01225081 |
2 |
1 |
370 |
4.1% |
0.04120726 |
3 |
2 |
1024 |
11.4% |
0.11404388 |
4 |
3 |
1378 |
15.3% |
0.15346921 |
5 |
4 |
1071 |
11.9% |
0.11927832 |
6 |
5 |
1398 |
15.6% |
0.15569663 |
7 |
6 |
944 |
10.5% |
0.10513420 |
8 |
7 |
1161 |
12.9% |
0.12930170 |
9 |
8 |
946 |
10.5% |
0.10535694 |
10 |
9 |
293 |
3.3% |
0.03263170 |
11 |
10 - Right |
194 |
2.2% |
0.02160597 |
97 |
Not answered |
90 |
1% |
0.01002339 |
r14pk6_1
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Christian Democratic Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1558 |
17.4% |
0.173515982 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1917 |
21.3% |
0.213498162 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2241 |
25% |
0.249582359 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1387 |
15.4% |
0.154471545 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1232 |
13.7% |
0.137209043 |
6 |
Really like |
408 |
4.5% |
0.045439359 |
7 |
Intensely like |
84 |
0.9% |
0.009355162 |
97 |
Not answered |
152 |
1.7% |
0.016928388 |
r14pk6_2
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Conservative Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
488 |
5.4% |
0.05434904 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1278 |
14.2% |
0.14233211 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1695 |
18.9% |
0.18877381 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1049 |
11.7% |
0.11682815 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2041 |
22.7% |
0.22730816 |
6 |
Really like |
1857 |
20.7% |
0.20681590 |
7 |
Intensely like |
421 |
4.7% |
0.04688718 |
97 |
Not answered |
150 |
1.7% |
0.01670565 |
r14pk6_3
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Progress Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
2847 |
31.7% |
0.31707317 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1713 |
19.1% |
0.19077848 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1195 |
13.3% |
0.13308832 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
752 |
8.4% |
0.08375097 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1313 |
14.6% |
0.14623009 |
6 |
Really like |
777 |
8.7% |
0.08653525 |
7 |
Intensely like |
233 |
2.6% |
0.02594944 |
97 |
Not answered |
149 |
1.7% |
0.01659428 |
r14pk6_4
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Liberal Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
898 |
10% |
0.10001114 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1447 |
16.1% |
0.16115380 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2053 |
22.9% |
0.22864462 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2057 |
22.9% |
0.22909010 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1779 |
19.8% |
0.19812897 |
6 |
Really like |
503 |
5.6% |
0.05601960 |
7 |
Intensely like |
72 |
0.8% |
0.00801871 |
97 |
Not answered |
170 |
1.9% |
0.01893307 |
r14pk6_5
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Socialist Left Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1154 |
12.9% |
0.12852211 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1440 |
16% |
0.16037421 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1497 |
16.7% |
0.16672235 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1553 |
17.3% |
0.17295913 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1681 |
18.7% |
0.18721461 |
6 |
Really like |
1149 |
12.8% |
0.12796525 |
7 |
Intensely like |
325 |
3.6% |
0.03619557 |
97 |
Not answered |
180 |
2% |
0.02004678 |
r14pk6_6
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Centre Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
530 |
5.9% |
0.05902662 |
2 |
Really dislike |
928 |
10.3% |
0.10335227 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1661 |
18.5% |
0.18498719 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2221 |
24.7% |
0.24735494 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2204 |
24.5% |
0.24546163 |
6 |
Really like |
1012 |
11.3% |
0.11270743 |
7 |
Intensely like |
244 |
2.7% |
0.02717452 |
97 |
Not answered |
179 |
2% |
0.01993540 |
r14pk6_7
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Green Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1588 |
17.7% |
0.17685711 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1316 |
14.7% |
0.14656421 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1440 |
16% |
0.16037421 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1441 |
16% |
0.16048558 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1947 |
21.7% |
0.21683929 |
6 |
Really like |
881 |
9.8% |
0.09811783 |
7 |
Intensely like |
203 |
2.3% |
0.02260831 |
97 |
Not answered |
163 |
1.8% |
0.01815347 |
r14pk6_8
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Labour Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
422 |
4.7% |
0.04699855 |
2 |
Really dislike |
750 |
8.4% |
0.08352823 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1513 |
16.9% |
0.16850429 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1318 |
14.7% |
0.14678695 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2505 |
27.9% |
0.27898430 |
6 |
Really like |
1925 |
21.4% |
0.21438913 |
7 |
Intensely like |
407 |
4.5% |
0.04532799 |
97 |
Not answered |
139 |
1.5% |
0.01548057 |
r14pk6_9
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Red Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1858 |
20.7% |
0.20692727 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1497 |
16.7% |
0.16672235 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1279 |
14.2% |
0.14244348 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1611 |
17.9% |
0.17941864 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1479 |
16.5% |
0.16471767 |
6 |
Really like |
809 |
9% |
0.09009912 |
7 |
Intensely like |
258 |
2.9% |
0.02873371 |
97 |
Not answered |
188 |
2.1% |
0.02093774 |
r14bk35
Variable label:
|
Description of the area you live in.
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A city |
2060 |
22.9% |
0.229424212 |
2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
2026 |
22.6% |
0.225637599 |
3 |
A small or medium sized town |
2407 |
26.8% |
0.268069941 |
4 |
A village |
1496 |
16.7% |
0.166610981 |
5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
963 |
10.7% |
0.107250251 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.3% |
0.003007016 |
r14pkby2
Variable label:
|
Local environment has gotten safer or more unsafe past couple of years.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much safer |
157 |
1.7% |
0.017485243 |
2 |
Somewhat safer |
672 |
7.5% |
0.074841296 |
3 |
No change in safety |
6177 |
68.8% |
0.687938523 |
4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
1744 |
19.4% |
0.194230983 |
5 |
Much more unsafe |
167 |
1.9% |
0.018598953 |
97 |
Not answered |
62 |
0.7% |
0.006905001 |
r14kmb_1
Variable label:
|
Experienced flooding near where you live in the past year.
|
Literal question:
|
Have you in the past year experienced flooding near where you live?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
2055 |
85.6% |
0.85625000 |
2 |
Yes, I was directly affected – for example in terms of damage to personal
property, power outages, lost the Internet connection |
43 |
1.8% |
0.01791667 |
3 |
Yes, but I was not directly affected |
293 |
12.2% |
0.12208333 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.4% |
0.00375000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6579 |
|
NA |
r14kmb_2_1
Variable label:
|
How likely climate change contributed to flooding near where you live.
|
Literal question:
|
How likely do you think it is that climate change contributed to the flooding near where you live?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 4 and r14kmb_1 = 2 or 3 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very unlikely |
19 |
5.7% |
0.05654762 |
2 |
2 |
40 |
11.9% |
0.11904762 |
3 |
3 |
24 |
7.1% |
0.07142857 |
4 |
4 |
67 |
19.9% |
0.19940476 |
5 |
5 |
89 |
26.5% |
0.26488095 |
6 |
6 |
56 |
16.7% |
0.16666667 |
7 |
7 - Very likely |
40 |
11.9% |
0.11904762 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.3% |
0.00297619 |
98 |
Not asked |
8643 |
|
NA |
r14pktilfreds1
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with your life.
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
2800 |
31.2% |
0.311838735 |
2 |
Satisfied |
4873 |
54.3% |
0.542710770 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1033 |
11.5% |
0.115046219 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
204 |
2.3% |
0.022719679 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
38 |
0.4% |
0.004232097 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
0.3% |
0.003452500 |
r14pk_egeninnsats
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: People should work hard to get ahead without counting on help from others.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
People should work hard to get ahead through their own efforts without counting on help from others.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
586 |
8.4% |
0.084401556 |
2 |
Agree |
1889 |
27.2% |
0.272072591 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
2358 |
34% |
0.339622642 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
669 |
9.6% |
0.096356042 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
867 |
12.5% |
0.124873974 |
6 |
Disagree |
431 |
6.2% |
0.062076912 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
117 |
1.7% |
0.016851505 |
97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.4% |
0.003744779 |
98 |
Not asked |
2036 |
|
NA |
r14pkmeme21
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
174 |
1.9% |
0.019378550 |
2 |
Agree |
426 |
4.7% |
0.047444036 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1480 |
16.5% |
0.164829046 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
883 |
9.8% |
0.098340572 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1141 |
12.7% |
0.127074284 |
6 |
Disagree |
2632 |
29.3% |
0.293128411 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
2197 |
24.5% |
0.244682036 |
97 |
Not answered |
46 |
0.5% |
0.005123065 |
r14pk14
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated people like me do not understand it.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
392 |
4.4% |
0.043657423 |
2 |
Agree |
1088 |
12.1% |
0.121171623 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
2734 |
30.4% |
0.304488250 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
909 |
10.1% |
0.101236218 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1137 |
12.7% |
0.126628801 |
6 |
Disagree |
2004 |
22.3% |
0.223187437 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
668 |
7.4% |
0.074395812 |
97 |
Not answered |
47 |
0.5% |
0.005234436 |
r14pk13
Variable label:
|
How much say in what the government does does the political system in Norway allow people like you.
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
79 |
0.9% |
0.008798307 |
2 |
To a great extent |
958 |
10.7% |
0.106693396 |
3 |
To some extent |
3929 |
43.8% |
0.437576568 |
4 |
To a small extent |
3236 |
36% |
0.360396481 |
5 |
Not at all |
711 |
7.9% |
0.079184764 |
97 |
Not answered |
66 |
0.7% |
0.007350484 |
r14pk1
Variable label:
|
How interested in politics.
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
1137 |
12.7% |
0.126628801 |
2 |
Interested |
4007 |
44.6% |
0.446263504 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
2897 |
32.3% |
0.322641720 |
4 |
Not very interested |
733 |
8.2% |
0.081634926 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
147 |
1.6% |
0.016371534 |
97 |
Not answered |
58 |
0.6% |
0.006459517 |
r14pktilfreds3
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the present government in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
212 |
2.4% |
0.023610647 |
2 |
Satisfied |
2118 |
23.6% |
0.235883729 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2682 |
29.9% |
0.298696960 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
2563 |
28.5% |
0.285443813 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
1318 |
14.7% |
0.146786947 |
97 |
Not answered |
86 |
1% |
0.009577904 |
r14pktilfreds4
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the way democracy works in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
955 |
10.6% |
0.10635928 |
2 |
Satisfied |
4300 |
47.9% |
0.47889520 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2514 |
28% |
0.27998664 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
892 |
9.9% |
0.09934291 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
218 |
2.4% |
0.02427887 |
97 |
Not answered |
100 |
1.1% |
0.01113710 |
r14pk102
Variable label:
|
How positive or negative to Norwegian EU membership.
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative are you towards Norwegian EU membership?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
295 |
4.2% |
0.042488838 |
2 |
Positive |
975 |
14% |
0.140429209 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
878 |
12.6% |
0.126458303 |
4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
918 |
13.2% |
0.132219502 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
1134 |
16.3% |
0.163329973 |
6 |
Negative |
1523 |
21.9% |
0.219357626 |
7 |
Very negative |
1177 |
17% |
0.169523261 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.6% |
0.006193288 |
98 |
Not asked |
2036 |
|
NA |
r14pk103
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is EEA agreement for Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
How much of an advantage or disadvantage would you say the EEA Agreement represents for Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very great advantage |
571 |
8.2% |
0.08224111 |
2 |
A great advantage |
1810 |
26.1% |
0.26069422 |
3 |
An advantage to some extent |
2239 |
32.2% |
0.32248308 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
836 |
12% |
0.12040905 |
5 |
A disadvantage to some extent |
921 |
13.3% |
0.13265159 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
321 |
4.6% |
0.04623362 |
7 |
A very great disadvantage |
142 |
2% |
0.02045225 |
97 |
Not answered |
103 |
1.5% |
0.01483509 |
98 |
Not asked |
2036 |
|
NA |
r14kmc_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes the order of r14kmc_1 and r14kmc_2 if r14group = 3. Randomizes if r14group = 3]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes the order of r14kmc_1 and r14kmc_2 if r14group = 3. Randomizes if r14group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2230] [Invalid:6749] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Group 1: First gets "How serious a threat is climate change overall?" |
1089 |
48.8% |
0.4883408 |
2 |
Group 2: First gets "How serious a threat is climate change to you personally?" |
1141 |
51.2% |
0.5116592 |
Sysmiss |
|
6749 |
|
NA |
r14kmc_1
Variable label:
|
How serious a threat is climate change: Overall.
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat is climate change overall?
|
Technical description:
|
[The order of r14kmc_1 and r14kmc_2 depends on the value in r14kmc_ran. Asked if r14group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very serious |
900 |
40.3% |
0.402504472 |
2 |
Serious |
777 |
34.7% |
0.347495528 |
3 |
Somewhat serious |
406 |
18.2% |
0.181574240 |
4 |
Not very serious |
99 |
4.4% |
0.044275492 |
5 |
Not a threat |
40 |
1.8% |
0.017889088 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.006261181 |
98 |
Not asked |
6743 |
|
NA |
r14kmc_2
Variable label:
|
How serious a threat is climate change: To you personally.
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat is climate change to you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
[The order of r14kmc_1 and r14kmc_2 depends on the value in r14kmc_ran. Asked if r14group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very serious |
214 |
9.6% |
0.095706619 |
2 |
Serious |
600 |
26.8% |
0.268336315 |
3 |
Somewhat serious |
729 |
32.6% |
0.326028623 |
4 |
Not very serious |
511 |
22.9% |
0.228533095 |
5 |
Not a threat |
164 |
7.3% |
0.073345259 |
97 |
Not answered |
18 |
0.8% |
0.008050089 |
98 |
Not asked |
6743 |
|
NA |
r14kma_1
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCCs report on impact of global warming exceeding 1.5 degrees.
|
Pre-question text:
|
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC is an international working group of scientists who regularly publish reports to summarize scientific assessment on climate change. In October 2018, they published a special report on the impact of global warming exceeding 1.5 degrees.
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard about this report?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 3 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1752 |
78.4% |
0.783542039 |
2 |
No |
470 |
21% |
0.210196780 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.006261181 |
98 |
Not asked |
6743 |
|
NA |
r14kma_2_1
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCCs report where: Social media.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where did you hear about the report?
|
Literal question:
|
In social media, such as Twitter or Facebook
|
Post-question:
|
You can select multiple options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In social media, such as Twitter or Facebook |
393 |
22.4% |
0.2243150685 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005707763 |
98 |
Not asked |
7227 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1358 |
77.5% |
0.7751141553 |
r14kma_2_2
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCCs report where: Newspapers or TV.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where did you hear about the report?
|
Literal question:
|
In newspapers or on TV
|
Post-question:
|
You can select multiple options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In newspapers or on TV |
1656 |
94.5% |
0.9452054795 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005707763 |
98 |
Not asked |
7227 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
95 |
5.4% |
0.0542237443 |
r14kma_2_3
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCCs report where: Scientific publication.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where did you hear about the report?
|
Literal question:
|
In a scientific publication
|
Post-question:
|
You can select multiple options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In a scientific publication |
140 |
8% |
0.0799086758 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005707763 |
98 |
Not asked |
7227 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1611 |
92% |
0.9195205479 |
r14kma_2_4
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCCs report where: Have read official summary for policymakers.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where did you hear about the report?
|
Literal question:
|
I have read the official summary for policymakers
|
Post-question:
|
You can select multiple options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I have read the official summary for policymakers |
68 |
3.9% |
0.0388127854 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005707763 |
98 |
Not asked |
7227 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1683 |
96.1% |
0.9606164384 |
r14kma_2_5
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCCs report where: Have read parts of the report.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where did you hear about the report?
|
Literal question:
|
I have read parts of the report
|
Post-question:
|
You can select multiple options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I have read parts of the report |
114 |
6.5% |
0.0650684932 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005707763 |
98 |
Not asked |
7227 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1637 |
93.4% |
0.9343607306 |
r14kma_2_6
Variable label:
|
Heard about IPCCs report where: Have read report in full.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where did you hear about the report?
|
Literal question:
|
I have read the report in full
|
Post-question:
|
You can select multiple options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 3 and r14kma_1 = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I have read the report in full |
4 |
0.2% |
0.0022831050 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005707763 |
98 |
Not asked |
7227 |
|
NA |
0 |
|
1747 |
99.7% |
0.9971461187 |
r14pkkm42
Variable label:
|
All new cars sold from 2025 should/should not be electric.
|
Pre-question text:
|
The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run
on hydrogen |
3358 |
37.4% |
0.37398374 |
2 |
In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars
which run on diesel or petrol. |
5511 |
61.4% |
0.61376545 |
97 |
Not answered |
110 |
1.2% |
0.01225081 |
r14pkkm4
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Should not allow oil and gas extraction in Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with this?
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja areas.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2870 |
32% |
0.319634703 |
2 |
Agree |
1600 |
17.8% |
0.178193563 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1045 |
11.6% |
0.116382671 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1286 |
14.3% |
0.143223076 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
799 |
8.9% |
0.088985410 |
6 |
Disagree |
811 |
9% |
0.090321862 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
501 |
5.6% |
0.055796859 |
97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.7% |
0.007461855 |
r14pkkm2
Variable label:
|
How concerned about climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all concerned |
313 |
3.5% |
0.034859116 |
2 |
Not very conceerned |
1162 |
12.9% |
0.129413075 |
3 |
Slightly concerned |
2687 |
29.9% |
0.299253814 |
4 |
Very concerned |
2984 |
33.2% |
0.332330995 |
5 |
Extremely concerned |
1780 |
19.8% |
0.198240339 |
97 |
Not answered |
53 |
0.6% |
0.005902662 |
r14pk_vekst
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Economic growth should be secured through development of industry, despite conflict with environmental interests.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
153 |
2.2% |
0.022036584 |
2 |
Agree |
500 |
7.2% |
0.072014979 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1308 |
18.8% |
0.188391185 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
867 |
12.5% |
0.124873974 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1627 |
23.4% |
0.234336742 |
6 |
Disagree |
1641 |
23.6% |
0.236353161 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
802 |
11.6% |
0.115512027 |
97 |
Not answered |
45 |
0.6% |
0.006481348 |
98 |
Not asked |
2036 |
|
NA |
r14pkmeme9
Variable label:
|
Should be easier/harder for refugees to be granted residence in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much easier |
215 |
2.4% |
0.023944760 |
2 |
Easier |
859 |
9.6% |
0.095667669 |
3 |
Somewhat easier |
1620 |
18% |
0.180420982 |
4 |
Same as today |
3200 |
35.6% |
0.356387126 |
5 |
Slightly more difficult |
1383 |
15.4% |
0.154026061 |
6 |
More difficult |
884 |
9.8% |
0.098451943 |
7 |
Much more difficult |
734 |
8.2% |
0.081746297 |
97 |
Not answered |
84 |
0.9% |
0.009355162 |
r14pkdv5
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here.
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very great advantage |
204 |
2.3% |
0.022719679 |
2 |
Great advantage |
1158 |
12.9% |
0.128967591 |
3 |
Slightly advantageous |
3193 |
35.6% |
0.355607529 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1655 |
18.4% |
0.184318966 |
5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1740 |
19.4% |
0.193785499 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
588 |
6.5% |
0.065486134 |
7 |
Very great disadvantage |
352 |
3.9% |
0.039202584 |
97 |
Not answered |
89 |
1% |
0.009912017 |
r14pk101
Variable label:
|
How goood or poor are preconditions for integrating refugees in Norwegian society.
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
387 |
4.3% |
0.04310057 |
2 |
Good |
2341 |
26.1% |
0.26071946 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
2001 |
22.3% |
0.22285332 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
1061 |
11.8% |
0.11816461 |
5 |
Somewhat poor |
1733 |
19.3% |
0.19300590 |
6 |
Poor |
1047 |
11.7% |
0.11660541 |
7 |
Very poor |
282 |
3.1% |
0.03140662 |
97 |
Not answered |
127 |
1.4% |
0.01414411 |
r14pk10
Variable label:
|
Perception of current economic situation in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway? Do you think it is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
2115 |
23.6% |
0.235549616 |
2 |
Good |
4852 |
54% |
0.540371979 |
3 |
Quite good |
1237 |
13.8% |
0.137765898 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
354 |
3.9% |
0.039425326 |
5 |
Quite bad |
249 |
2.8% |
0.027731373 |
6 |
Bad |
71 |
0.8% |
0.007907339 |
7 |
Very bad |
21 |
0.2% |
0.002338791 |
97 |
Not answered |
80 |
0.9% |
0.008909678 |
r14pk100
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: The people should be conferred by referendums if municipalities are merged in future.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
When municipalities are to be merged in the future, the public shuld be allowed to have their say on the matter through referendums.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2369 |
26.4% |
0.26383784 |
2 |
Agree |
2443 |
27.2% |
0.27207930 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1416 |
15.8% |
0.15770130 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
796 |
8.9% |
0.08865130 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
703 |
7.8% |
0.07829380 |
6 |
Disagree |
876 |
9.8% |
0.09756098 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
285 |
3.2% |
0.03174073 |
97 |
Not answered |
91 |
1% |
0.01013476 |
r14pk_sentral
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Government show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 or 3 or 4 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1471 |
21.2% |
0.211868069 |
2 |
Agree |
1758 |
25.3% |
0.253204667 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1530 |
22% |
0.220365836 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
958 |
13.8% |
0.137980700 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
450 |
6.5% |
0.064813481 |
6 |
Disagree |
562 |
8.1% |
0.080944837 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
150 |
2.2% |
0.021604494 |
97 |
Not answered |
64 |
0.9% |
0.009217917 |
98 |
Not asked |
2036 |
|
NA |
r14pk60
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Government should work more to reduce income differences in society.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income differences in society.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2634 |
29.3% |
0.29335115 |
2 |
Agree |
2565 |
28.6% |
0.28566656 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1738 |
19.4% |
0.19356276 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
883 |
9.8% |
0.09834057 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
559 |
6.2% |
0.06225638 |
6 |
Disagree |
392 |
4.4% |
0.04365742 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
101 |
1.1% |
0.01124847 |
97 |
Not answered |
107 |
1.2% |
0.01191669 |
r14pk29
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2029 |
22.6% |
0.22597171 |
2 |
Agree |
1961 |
21.8% |
0.21839849 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1442 |
16.1% |
0.16059695 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1293 |
14.4% |
0.14400267 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
783 |
8.7% |
0.08720347 |
6 |
Disagree |
971 |
10.8% |
0.10814122 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
397 |
4.4% |
0.04421428 |
97 |
Not answered |
103 |
1.1% |
0.01147121 |
r14pkdv55
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Should be able to send children to muslim schools which follow national curriculum and teach Islam.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Christian faith.
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
282 |
3.1% |
0.03140662 |
2 |
Agree |
1022 |
11.4% |
0.11382114 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1100 |
12.3% |
0.12250807 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1380 |
15.4% |
0.15369195 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1085 |
12.1% |
0.12083751 |
6 |
Disagree |
1759 |
19.6% |
0.19590155 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
2244 |
25% |
0.24991647 |
97 |
Not answered |
107 |
1.2% |
0.01191669 |
r14pk_guns
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Norwegian police should be armed.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norwegian police should be armed?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1069 |
11.9% |
0.11905557 |
2 |
Agree |
1769 |
19.7% |
0.19701526 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
2129 |
23.7% |
0.23710881 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
870 |
9.7% |
0.09689275 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1040 |
11.6% |
0.11582582 |
6 |
Disagree |
1195 |
13.3% |
0.13308832 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
805 |
9% |
0.08965364 |
97 |
Not answered |
102 |
1.1% |
0.01135984 |
r14pkby3
Variable label:
|
How afraid of a new terrorist attack in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
443 |
4.9% |
0.04933734 |
2 |
To a great extent |
1393 |
15.5% |
0.15513977 |
3 |
Somewhat |
3929 |
43.8% |
0.43757657 |
4 |
Slightly |
2701 |
30.1% |
0.30081301 |
5 |
Not at all |
412 |
4.6% |
0.04588484 |
97 |
Not answered |
101 |
1.1% |
0.01124847 |
r14pk52
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Authorities should introduce measures to protect from terrorism even at the expense of privacy.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
875 |
9.7% |
0.09744960 |
2 |
Agree |
2109 |
23.5% |
0.23488139 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
2506 |
27.9% |
0.27909567 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1062 |
11.8% |
0.11827598 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
986 |
11% |
0.10981178 |
6 |
Disagree |
939 |
10.5% |
0.10457735 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
399 |
4.4% |
0.04443702 |
97 |
Not answered |
103 |
1.1% |
0.01147121 |
r14pad1_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if r14group = 2. The respondent is shown a randomly selected vignette.]
|
Literal question:
|
Vignette 1 Read the text below, and click or tap “next”. In recent years, there have been several terrorist attacks, including in Norway. Norwegian authorities consider terror to be one of the main threats to Norwegian society.
Vignette 2 Read the text below, and click or tap “next”. In recent years, there have been several terrorist attacks, including in Norway. Norwegian authorities consider terror to be one of the main threats to Norwegian society, and have for several years worked systematically to build capacity for preventing terrorism and terrorist incidents, and the ability to manage in the event of a terrorist incident and its aftermath. Several public reports and sources point to the fact that the government’s capacity and readiness has increased in several areas.
Vignette 3 Read the text below, and click or tap “next”. In recent years, there have been several terrorist attacks, including in Norway. Norwegian authorities consider terror to be one of the main threats to Norwegian society, and have for several years worked systematically to build capacity for preventing terrorism and terrorist incidents, and the ability to manage in the event of a terrorist incident and its aftermath. Several public reports and sources point to the fact that the government’s capacity (and readiness) is still inadequate.
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomizes if r14group = 2. The respondent is shown a randomly selected vignette.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2287] [Invalid:6692] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Vignette 1 |
738 |
32.3% |
0.3226935 |
2 |
Vignette 2 |
746 |
32.6% |
0.3261915 |
3 |
Vignette 3 |
803 |
35.1% |
0.3511150 |
Sysmiss |
|
6692 |
|
NA |
r14pad2
Variable label:
|
Degree of confidence in Stortinget (Parliament).
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Randomly chosen vignette. See r14pad1_ran]]
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Storting (Parliament)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2. The order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4 is randomized. See r14pad_order. The respondent was shown a randomly selected vignette before r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4. See r14pad1_ran.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
70 |
3% |
0.03034244 |
2 |
High confidence |
965 |
41.8% |
0.41829215 |
3 |
Some confidence |
965 |
41.8% |
0.41829215 |
4 |
Low confidence |
250 |
10.8% |
0.10836584 |
5 |
No confidence |
28 |
1.2% |
0.01213697 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.3% |
0.01257044 |
98 |
Not asked |
6672 |
|
NA |
r14pad3
Variable label:
|
Degree of confidence in the Government.
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Randomly chosen vignette. See r14pad1_ran]]
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Government?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2. The order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4 is randomized. See r14pad_order. The respondent was shown a randomly selected vignette before r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4. See r14pad1_ran.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
46 |
2% |
0.01993932 |
2 |
High confidence |
699 |
30.3% |
0.30299090 |
3 |
Some confidence |
1003 |
43.5% |
0.43476376 |
4 |
Low confidence |
453 |
19.6% |
0.19635891 |
5 |
No confidence |
78 |
3.4% |
0.03381014 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.2% |
0.01213697 |
98 |
Not asked |
6672 |
|
NA |
r14pad4
Variable label:
|
Degree of confidence in the police.
|
Pre-question text:
|
[Randomly chosen vignette. See r14pad1_ran]]
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the police?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2. The order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4 is randomized. See r14pad_order. The respondent was shown a randomly selected vignette before r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4. See r14pad1_ran.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
188 |
8.1% |
0.081491114 |
2 |
High confidence |
1324 |
57.4% |
0.573905505 |
3 |
Some confidence |
641 |
27.8% |
0.277850022 |
4 |
Low confidence |
105 |
4.6% |
0.045513654 |
5 |
No confidence |
21 |
0.9% |
0.009102731 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.2% |
0.012136974 |
98 |
Not asked |
6672 |
|
NA |
r14pad_order
Variable label:
|
[Background variable. Specifies the order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4. The order is randomized]
|
Technical description:
|
[ Background variable. Specifies the order of r14pad2, r14pad3 and r14pad4. The order is randomized.
1 = r14pad2 2 = r14pad3 3 = r14pad4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14pad5
Variable label:
|
What capacity do Norwegian authorities have toward preventing and managing terrorist incidents and their aftermath.
|
Literal question:
|
What capacity do you think the Norwegian authorities have when it comes to preventing terrorism and terrorist incidents, and managing terrorists incidents and their aftermath?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 2 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very large capacity |
20 |
0.9% |
0.008669267 |
2 |
A large capacity |
474 |
20.5% |
0.205461638 |
3 |
Some capacity |
1292 |
56% |
0.560034677 |
4 |
Small capacity |
480 |
20.8% |
0.208062419 |
5 |
No capacity |
13 |
0.6% |
0.005635024 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.2% |
0.012136974 |
98 |
Not asked |
6672 |
|
NA |
r14pkklasse
Variable label:
|
To which social class do you belong.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
27 |
1.3% |
0.013261297 |
2 |
Working class |
322 |
15.8% |
0.158153242 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
220 |
10.8% |
0.108055010 |
4 |
Middle class |
1041 |
51.1% |
0.511296660 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
303 |
14.9% |
0.148821218 |
6 |
Upper class |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003438114 |
7 |
Don't know |
79 |
3.9% |
0.038801572 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
1.8% |
0.018172888 |
98 |
Not asked |
6943 |
|
NA |
r14bk33
Variable label:
|
Main occupation last seven days.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
4195 |
46.7% |
0.4672012474 |
2 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
383 |
4.3% |
0.0426550841 |
3 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
319 |
3.6% |
0.0355273416 |
4 |
Self-employed |
424 |
4.7% |
0.0472212941 |
5 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
407 |
4.5% |
0.0453279875 |
6 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
81 |
0.9% |
0.0090210491 |
7 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
27 |
0.3% |
0.0030070164 |
8 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
437 |
4.9% |
0.0486691168 |
9 |
Retired |
2308 |
25.7% |
0.2570442143 |
10 |
In military service |
6 |
0.1% |
0.0006682259 |
11 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
56 |
0.6% |
0.0062367747 |
12 |
Other: |
240 |
2.7% |
0.0267290344 |
97 |
Not answered |
96 |
1.1% |
0.0106916138 |
r14bk33_12_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R14BK33]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14bk33_kodet
Variable label:
|
Main occupation last seven days. [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
[This variable contains the values of r14bk33 plus coded values of r14bk33_12_other]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
4225 |
47.1% |
0.4705423767 |
2 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
391 |
4.4% |
0.0435460519 |
3 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
339 |
3.8% |
0.0377547611 |
4 |
Self-employed |
429 |
4.8% |
0.0477781490 |
5 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
431 |
4.8% |
0.0480008910 |
6 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
82 |
0.9% |
0.0091324201 |
7 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
27 |
0.3% |
0.0030070164 |
8 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
454 |
5.1% |
0.0505624234 |
9 |
Retired |
2342 |
26.1% |
0.2608308275 |
10 |
In military service |
7 |
0.1% |
0.0007795968 |
11 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
58 |
0.6% |
0.0064595166 |
12 |
Other: |
99 |
1.1% |
0.0110257267 |
97 |
Not answered |
95 |
1.1% |
0.0105802428 |
r14bk21
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in.
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14bk33 = 1 or 2 or 3 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
566 |
11.6% |
0.115580968 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1570 |
32.1% |
0.320604452 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
332 |
6.8% |
0.067796610 |
4 |
Private business |
2262 |
46.2% |
0.461915458 |
5 |
Self-employed |
24 |
0.5% |
0.004900960 |
6 |
Other: |
136 |
2.8% |
0.027772105 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001429447 |
98 |
Not asked |
4082 |
|
NA |
r14bk21_6_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R14BK21]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14bk21_kodet
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in. [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14bk33 = 1 or 2 or 3 ]
[This variable contains the values of r14bk21 plus coded values of r14bk21_6_other]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
568 |
11.6% |
0.115989381 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1579 |
32.2% |
0.322442312 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
345 |
7% |
0.070451297 |
4 |
Private business |
2275 |
46.5% |
0.464570145 |
5 |
Self-employed |
29 |
0.6% |
0.005921993 |
6 |
Other: |
94 |
1.9% |
0.019195426 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.1% |
0.001429447 |
98 |
Not asked |
4082 |
|
NA |
r14bk26
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education.
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004911591 |
2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
upper secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or
lower secondary school) |
123 |
6% |
0.060412574 |
3 |
Secondary education – general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School, business college) |
254 |
12.5% |
0.124754420 |
4 |
Secondary education – vocational line of study/education programme (e.g. VK2,
VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam, business college) |
289 |
14.2% |
0.141944990 |
5 |
Craft training/shorter education programmes (e.g. vocational school, technical
school/college, maritime vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot
training, secretary school, home industry school/handicrafts school, master
craftsman certificate |
175 |
8.6% |
0.085952849 |
6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (e.g. university
college graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
156 |
7.7% |
0.076620825 |
7 |
College – 3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, maritime
subjects, military subjects etc.) |
376 |
18.5% |
0.184675835 |
8 |
University – 3-4 year education (BA, cand.mag.) |
131 |
6.4% |
0.064341847 |
9 |
University college – 5-6 year education (MA, hovedfag or longer vocational
education on a university college level) |
119 |
5.8% |
0.058447937 |
10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors or a longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, chartered
engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics) |
286 |
14% |
0.140471513 |
11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
39 |
1.9% |
0.019155206 |
12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
40 |
2% |
0.019646365 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
1.9% |
0.018664047 |
98 |
Not asked |
6943 |
|
NA |
r14bk26_12_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R14BK26]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14bk26_kodet
Variable label:
|
What is your highest completed education. [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Post-question:
|
If you have obtained multiple qualifications of the same level, select the one that is the most relevant to you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
[This variable contains the values of r14bk26 plus coded values of r14bk26_12_other]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004911591 |
2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school,
upper secondary school, 7-year elementary school, secondary modern school or
lower secondary school) |
125 |
6.1% |
0.061394892 |
3 |
Secondary education – general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School, business college) |
259 |
12.7% |
0.127210216 |
4 |
Secondary education – vocational line of study/education programme (e.g. VK2,
VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam, business college) |
292 |
14.3% |
0.143418468 |
5 |
Craft training/shorter education programmes (e.g. vocational school, technical
school/college, maritime vocational school, officer candidate school, pilot
training, secretary school, home industry school/handicrafts school, master
craftsman certificate |
178 |
8.7% |
0.087426326 |
6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (e.g. university
college graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
158 |
7.8% |
0.077603143 |
7 |
College – 3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, maritime
subjects, military subjects etc.) |
379 |
18.6% |
0.186149312 |
8 |
University – 3-4 year education (BA, cand.mag.) |
138 |
6.8% |
0.067779961 |
9 |
University college – 5-6 year education (MA, hovedfag or longer vocational
education on a university college level) |
119 |
5.8% |
0.058447937 |
10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors or a longer professional education
(e.g. MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, chartered
engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economics) |
288 |
14.1% |
0.141453831 |
11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
39 |
1.9% |
0.019155206 |
12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
13 |
0.6% |
0.006385069 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
1.9% |
0.018664047 |
98 |
Not asked |
6943 |
|
NA |
r14bkhelse
Variable label:
|
How is your health.
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
1425 |
15.9% |
0.15870364 |
2 |
Very good |
3306 |
36.8% |
0.36819245 |
3 |
Good |
2912 |
32.4% |
0.32431228 |
4 |
Somewhat good |
948 |
10.6% |
0.10557969 |
5 |
Poor |
294 |
3.3% |
0.03274307 |
97 |
Not answered |
94 |
1% |
0.01046887 |
r14bk25
Variable label:
|
What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
<150 000 |
584 |
6.5% |
0.06504065 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
1149 |
12.8% |
0.12796525 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
1376 |
15.3% |
0.15324646 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1603 |
17.9% |
0.17852768 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
1463 |
16.3% |
0.16293574 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
962 |
10.7% |
0.10713888 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
1108 |
12.3% |
0.12339904 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
495 |
5.5% |
0.05512863 |
97 |
Not answered |
239 |
2.7% |
0.02661766 |
r14bk27
Variable label:
|
Marital status.
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Single |
1178 |
13.1% |
0.131195011 |
2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
520 |
5.8% |
0.057912908 |
3 |
Cohabitant |
1510 |
16.8% |
0.168170175 |
4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
4911 |
54.7% |
0.546942867 |
5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
465 |
5.2% |
0.051787504 |
6 |
Widow/widower |
268 |
3% |
0.029847422 |
7 |
Other: |
23 |
0.3% |
0.002561532 |
97 |
Not answered |
104 |
1.2% |
0.011582582 |
r14bk27_7_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R14BK27]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14bk27_kodet
Variable label:
|
Marital status. [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[This variable contains the values of r14bk27 plus coded values of r14bk27_7_other]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Single |
1183 |
13.2% |
0.1317518655 |
2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
522 |
5.8% |
0.0581356498 |
3 |
Cohabitant |
1512 |
16.8% |
0.1683929168 |
4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
4917 |
54.8% |
0.5476110925 |
5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
465 |
5.2% |
0.0517875042 |
6 |
Widow/widower |
268 |
3% |
0.0298474218 |
7 |
Other: |
8 |
0.1% |
0.0008909678 |
97 |
Not answered |
104 |
1.2% |
0.0115825816 |
r14bk40
Variable label:
|
Belong to a religion or religious denomination. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
[Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:8979] [Range:-]
|
r14bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Belong to a religion or religious denomination. [Recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
[Recoded from source variable r14bk40]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
1199 |
58.9% |
0.588899804 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
41 |
2% |
0.020137525 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
92 |
4.5% |
0.045186640 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
18 |
0.9% |
0.008840864 |
5 |
Islam |
33 |
1.6% |
0.016208251 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
610 |
30% |
0.299607073 |
97 |
No answer |
43 |
2.1% |
0.021119843 |
98 |
Not asked |
6943 |
|
NA |
r14bk41
Variable label:
|
How often attend religious meetings, aside from special occasions.
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001964637 |
2 |
More than once a week |
23 |
1.1% |
0.011296660 |
3 |
Once a week |
67 |
3.3% |
0.032907662 |
4 |
At least once a month |
105 |
5.2% |
0.051571709 |
5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
343 |
16.8% |
0.168467583 |
6 |
Less frequently |
452 |
22.2% |
0.222003929 |
7 |
Never |
1000 |
49.1% |
0.491159136 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
2.1% |
0.020628684 |
98 |
Not asked |
6943 |
|
NA |
r14bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1862 |
91.5% |
0.91453831 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
135 |
6.6% |
0.06630648 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
1.9% |
0.01915521 |
98 |
Not asked |
6943 |
|
NA |
r14bk28_2_other
Variable label:
|
Other [R14BK28]. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14bk29
Variable label:
|
Have you or any of your parents immigrated to Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1755 |
86.2% |
0.861984283 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
133 |
6.5% |
0.065324165 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
19 |
0.9% |
0.009332024 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
53 |
2.6% |
0.026031434 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
32 |
1.6% |
0.015717092 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.2% |
0.021611002 |
98 |
Not asked |
6943 |
|
NA |
r14bk30
Variable label:
|
In which country did you live before you immigrated. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did you live in before you immigrated?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 and r14bk29 = 2][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14bk30_1_1
Variable label:
|
In which country did your parents live before they immigrated: Mother. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did your parents (mother, father, or both) live in before they immigrated?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 and r14bk29 = 3][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14bk30_1_2
Variable label:
|
In which country did your parents live before they immigrated: Father. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did your parents (mother, father, or both) live in before they immigrated?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 and r14bk29 = 3][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14bk30_2
Variable label:
|
In which country did your mother live before she immigrated. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
In which country did your mother live before she immigrated?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 and r14bk29 = 4][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14bk30_3
Variable label:
|
In which country did your father live before he immigrated. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
In which country did your father live before he immigrated?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 and r14bk29 = 5][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r14P1
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Male |
4496 |
50.1% |
0.5007239 |
2 |
Female |
4483 |
49.9% |
0.4992761 |
r14P2
Variable label:
|
Region
|
Technical description:
|
[The respondents were given the opportunity to update their residency information. See Documentation Report for Round 14]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
2566 |
28.6% |
0.28577793 |
2 |
Østlandet |
2049 |
22.8% |
0.22819913 |
3 |
Sørlandet |
468 |
5.2% |
0.05212162 |
4 |
Vestlandet |
2416 |
26.9% |
0.26907228 |
5 |
Trøndelag |
782 |
8.7% |
0.08709210 |
6 |
Nord-Norge |
698 |
7.8% |
0.07773694 |
r14P3
Variable label:
|
County
|
Technical description:
|
[The respondents were given the opportunity to update their residency information. See Documentation Report for Round 14]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-18]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Akershus |
1158 |
12.9% |
0.128967591 |
2 |
Oslo |
1408 |
15.7% |
0.156810335 |
3 |
Østfold |
441 |
4.9% |
0.049114601 |
4 |
Vestfold |
413 |
4.6% |
0.045996213 |
5 |
Hedmark |
261 |
2.9% |
0.029067825 |
6 |
Oppland |
265 |
3% |
0.029513309 |
7 |
Buskerud |
421 |
4.7% |
0.046887181 |
8 |
Telemark |
248 |
2.8% |
0.027620002 |
9 |
Vest-Agder |
302 |
3.4% |
0.033634035 |
10 |
Aust-Agder |
166 |
1.8% |
0.018487582 |
11 |
Rogaland |
798 |
8.9% |
0.088874039 |
12 |
Hordaland |
1089 |
12.1% |
0.121282994 |
13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
162 |
1.8% |
0.018042098 |
14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
367 |
4.1% |
0.040873148 |
15 |
Trøndelag |
782 |
8.7% |
0.087092104 |
16 |
Nordland |
341 |
3.8% |
0.037977503 |
17 |
Troms |
268 |
3% |
0.029847422 |
18 |
Finmark |
89 |
1% |
0.009912017 |
r14P_moved
Variable label:
|
Change of home municipality
|
Literal question:
|
Respondents where asked if they still live in the municipality as upon registration for the panel. If that was not the case, they were asked to state their home municipality.
Respondents who moved outside of Norway gets the value “1”, but they also asked a follow-up question asking them to state their home municipality in Norway, if they have one.
Change of home residence within the same municipality is not registered.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
No, the respondent has not changed home municipality. |
8436 |
94% |
0.93952556 |
1 |
Yes, the respondent has changed home municipality. |
543 |
6% |
0.06047444 |
r14P4_1
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No education/elementary school |
623 |
6.9% |
0.06938412 |
2 |
Upper secondary education |
2665 |
29.7% |
0.29680365 |
3 |
University/University college |
5358 |
59.7% |
0.59672569 |
97 |
Not answered |
333 |
3.7% |
0.03708654 |
r14P4_2
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
30 |
0.3% |
0.003341129 |
2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
593 |
6.6% |
0.066042989 |
3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
1044 |
11.6% |
0.116271300 |
4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1109 |
12.4% |
0.123510413 |
5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
512 |
5.7% |
0.057021940 |
6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
804 |
9% |
0.089542265 |
7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
1864 |
20.8% |
0.207595501 |
8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
645 |
7.2% |
0.071834280 |
9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
552 |
6.1% |
0.061476779 |
10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
1297 |
14.4% |
0.144448157 |
11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
196 |
2.2% |
0.021828711 |
12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
225 |
2.5% |
0.025058470 |
97 |
Not answered |
108 |
1.2% |
0.012028065 |
r14P5_1
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1939 or earlier |
249 |
2.8% |
0.02773137 |
2 |
1940-1949 |
1502 |
16.7% |
0.16727921 |
3 |
1950-1959 |
2088 |
23.3% |
0.23254260 |
4 |
1960-1969 |
1875 |
20.9% |
0.20882058 |
5 |
1970-1979 |
1418 |
15.8% |
0.15792404 |
6 |
1980-1989 |
1004 |
11.2% |
0.11181646 |
7 |
1990 or later |
843 |
9.4% |
0.09388573 |
r14P5_2
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1959 or earlier |
3839 |
42.8% |
0.42755318 |
2 |
1960-1989 |
4297 |
47.9% |
0.47856109 |
3 |
1990 or later |
843 |
9.4% |
0.09388573 |
r14Weight1
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, and P1. See documentation report.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-3]
|
r14Weight2
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4, and P1. See documentation report
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-24]
|
w01_k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1662 |
93.7% |
0.93686584 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
77 |
4.3% |
0.04340474 |
97 |
No answer |
35 |
2% |
0.01972943 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7205 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1805 |
94% |
0.94010417 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
92 |
4.8% |
0.04791667 |
97 |
No answer |
23 |
1.2% |
0.01197917 |
98 |
Not asked |
7059 |
|
NA |
r4k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
30 |
83.3% |
0.83333333 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
5 |
13.9% |
0.13888889 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
2.8% |
0.02777778 |
98 |
Not asked |
8943 |
|
NA |
r5k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
15 |
88.2% |
0.8823529 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
2 |
11.8% |
0.1176471 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8962 |
|
NA |
r8k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship.
|
Literal question:
|
Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1836 |
93.9% |
0.93865031 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
95 |
4.9% |
0.04856851 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
1.3% |
0.01278119 |
98 |
Not asked |
7023 |
|
NA |
r11bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1141 |
93.4% |
0.933715221 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
75 |
6.1% |
0.061374795 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.004909984 |
98 |
Not asked |
7757 |
|
NA |
c11bk28
Variable label:
|
Personal placement on political axis left-right [Most recent available data from w01_k28, w03_r3k28, r4k28, r5k28, r8k28, r11bk28]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
6489 |
94.3% |
0.943168605 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
346 |
5% |
0.050290698 |
97 |
Not answered |
45 |
0.7% |
0.006540698 |
98 |
Not asked |
2099 |
|
NA |
w01_k29
Variable label:
|
Parents immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1609 |
90.7% |
0.906989853 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
74 |
4.2% |
0.041713641 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
7 |
0.4% |
0.003945885 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
31 |
1.7% |
0.017474634 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
18 |
1% |
0.010146561 |
97 |
No answer |
35 |
2% |
0.019729425 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
7205 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1744 |
90.8% |
0.907860489 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
88 |
4.6% |
0.045809474 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
12 |
0.6% |
0.006246746 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
29 |
1.5% |
0.015096304 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
27 |
1.4% |
0.014055180 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.1% |
0.010931806 |
98 |
Not asked |
7058 |
|
NA |
r4k29
Variable label:
|
Mother or father immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
29 |
82.9% |
0.82857143 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
2 |
5.7% |
0.05714286 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
1 |
2.9% |
0.02857143 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
3 |
8.6% |
0.08571429 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8944 |
|
NA |
r5k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
14 |
87.5% |
0.875 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
2 |
12.5% |
0.125 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
0 |
0% |
0.000 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0.000 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0.000 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000 |
98 |
Not asked |
8963 |
|
NA |
r11bk29
Variable label:
|
Immigration background
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 3 or rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
2645 |
90.4% |
0.904273504 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
171 |
5.8% |
0.058461538 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
13 |
0.4% |
0.004444444 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
57 |
1.9% |
0.019487179 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
28 |
1% |
0.009572650 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.4% |
0.003760684 |
98 |
Not asked |
6054 |
|
NA |
c11bk29
Variable label:
|
Voted this party in parliamentary elections of 2017 [Most recent available data from w01_k29, w03_r3k29, r4k29, r5k29, r11bk29]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections in 2017?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
6041 |
91.2% |
0.911573864 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
337 |
5.1% |
0.050852573 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
33 |
0.5% |
0.004979629 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
120 |
1.8% |
0.018107741 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
73 |
1.1% |
0.011015542 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
0.3% |
0.003470650 |
98 |
Not asked |
2352 |
|
NA |
r10k3
Variable label:
|
Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election.
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
203 |
4.2% |
0.042291667 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1099 |
22.9% |
0.228958333 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
516 |
10.8% |
0.107500000 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
246 |
5.1% |
0.051250000 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
430 |
9% |
0.089583333 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
418 |
8.7% |
0.087083333 |
7 |
The Green Party |
215 |
4.5% |
0.044791667 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1108 |
23.1% |
0.230833333 |
9 |
The Red Party |
181 |
3.8% |
0.037708333 |
10 |
Did not vote |
98 |
2% |
0.020416667 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
181 |
3.8% |
0.037708333 |
12 |
Other: |
85 |
1.8% |
0.017708333 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
0.4% |
0.004166667 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
4179 |
|
NA |
r11bk3
Variable label:
|
Voted this party in parliamentary elections of 2017
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections in 2017?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
48 |
3.9% |
0.039279869 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
291 |
23.8% |
0.238134206 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
105 |
8.6% |
0.085924714 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
76 |
6.2% |
0.062193126 |
5 |
The Soialist Left Party |
85 |
7% |
0.069558101 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
112 |
9.2% |
0.091653028 |
7 |
The Green Party |
69 |
5.6% |
0.056464812 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
259 |
21.2% |
0.211947627 |
9 |
The Red Party |
40 |
3.3% |
0.032733224 |
10 |
Did not vote |
40 |
3.3% |
0.032733224 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
68 |
5.6% |
0.055646481 |
12 |
Other: |
23 |
1.9% |
0.018821604 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.004909984 |
98 |
Not asked |
7757 |
|
NA |
c11bk3
Variable label:
|
Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election. [Most recent available data from r10k3, r11bk3]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable. There are minor differences in question language.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
251 |
4.2% |
0.041680505 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1390 |
23.1% |
0.230820325 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
621 |
10.3% |
0.103121886 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
322 |
5.3% |
0.053470608 |
5 |
The Soialist Left Party |
515 |
8.6% |
0.085519761 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
530 |
8.8% |
0.088010628 |
7 |
The Green Party |
284 |
4.7% |
0.047160412 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1367 |
22.7% |
0.227000996 |
9 |
The Red Party |
221 |
3.7% |
0.036698771 |
10 |
Did not vote |
138 |
2.3% |
0.022915975 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
249 |
4.1% |
0.041348389 |
12 |
Other: |
108 |
1.8% |
0.017934241 |
97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.4% |
0.004317502 |
98 |
Not asked |
2957 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_1
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
171 |
2.8% |
0.028283162 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
485 |
8% |
0.080218326 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1052 |
17.4% |
0.173999338 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2231 |
36.9% |
0.369004300 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1543 |
25.5% |
0.255210056 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
507 |
8.4% |
0.083857096 |
97 |
Not answered |
57 |
0.9% |
0.009427721 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_2
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
2941 |
48.6% |
0.48643731 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1232 |
20.4% |
0.20377109 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
850 |
14.1% |
0.14058882 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
592 |
9.8% |
0.09791598 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
271 |
4.5% |
0.04482302 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
117 |
1.9% |
0.01935164 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.7% |
0.00711214 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_3
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her]. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
20 |
0.3% |
0.003307972 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
70 |
1.2% |
0.011577903 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
392 |
6.5% |
0.064836255 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2262 |
37.4% |
0.374131657 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
2247 |
37.2% |
0.371650678 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1008 |
16.7% |
0.166721800 |
97 |
Not answered |
47 |
0.8% |
0.007773735 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_4
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
51 |
0.8% |
0.008435329 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
167 |
2.8% |
0.027621568 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
379 |
6.3% |
0.062686073 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1734 |
28.7% |
0.286801191 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
2223 |
36.8% |
0.367681111 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1445 |
23.9% |
0.239000992 |
97 |
Not answered |
47 |
0.8% |
0.007773735 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_5
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand things
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
28 |
0.5% |
0.004631161 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
120 |
2% |
0.019847833 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
512 |
8.5% |
0.084684089 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2145 |
35.5% |
0.354780020 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
2103 |
34.8% |
0.347833278 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1096 |
18.1% |
0.181276877 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006946742 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_6
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
586 |
9.7% |
0.096923586 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1302 |
21.5% |
0.215348991 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
2086 |
34.5% |
0.345021502 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1496 |
24.7% |
0.247436322 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
433 |
7.2% |
0.071617598 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
102 |
1.7% |
0.016870658 |
97 |
Not answered |
41 |
0.7% |
0.006781343 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_7
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
222 |
3.7% |
0.03671849 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
763 |
12.6% |
0.12619914 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1762 |
29.1% |
0.29143235 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2321 |
38.4% |
0.38389018 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
762 |
12.6% |
0.12603374 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
173 |
2.9% |
0.02861396 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.7% |
0.00711214 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_8
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
654 |
10.8% |
0.108170691 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1327 |
21.9% |
0.219483956 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1972 |
32.6% |
0.326166060 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1478 |
24.4% |
0.244459147 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
464 |
7.7% |
0.076744955 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
106 |
1.8% |
0.017532253 |
97 |
Not answered |
45 |
0.7% |
0.007442937 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_9
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
660 |
10.9% |
0.109163083 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1243 |
20.6% |
0.205590473 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1993 |
33% |
0.329639431 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1617 |
26.7% |
0.267449553 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
426 |
7% |
0.070459808 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
63 |
1% |
0.010420112 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
0.7% |
0.007277539 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_10
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
90 |
1.5% |
0.014885875 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
310 |
5.1% |
0.051273569 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
855 |
14.1% |
0.141415812 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2125 |
35.1% |
0.351472048 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1788 |
29.6% |
0.295732716 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
841 |
13.9% |
0.139100232 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.6% |
0.006119749 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |
r11bk42
Variable label:
|
How many children under 16 living at home
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
None |
4768 |
78.9% |
0.7886205756 |
2 |
1 |
537 |
8.9% |
0.0888190539 |
3 |
2 |
550 |
9.1% |
0.0909692359 |
4 |
3 |
131 |
2.2% |
0.0216672180 |
5 |
4 |
19 |
0.3% |
0.0031425736 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
0% |
0.0003307972 |
7 |
6 or more |
2 |
0% |
0.0003307972 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.6% |
0.0061197486 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |
r11bk41
Variable label:
|
Attends religious meetings
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
6 |
0.1% |
0.0009923917 |
2 |
More than once a week |
93 |
1.5% |
0.0153820708 |
3 |
Once a week |
156 |
2.6% |
0.0258021833 |
4 |
At least once a month |
302 |
5% |
0.0499503804 |
5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
1048 |
17.3% |
0.1733377440 |
6 |
Less frequently |
1322 |
21.9% |
0.2186569633 |
7 |
Never |
3082 |
51% |
0.5097585180 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.6% |
0.0061197486 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |
r11bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Recoded from source variable r11bk40]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
3926 |
64.9% |
0.649354945 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
67 |
1.1% |
0.011081707 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
226 |
3.7% |
0.037380086 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
35 |
0.6% |
0.005788951 |
5 |
Islam |
24 |
0.4% |
0.003969567 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
1728 |
28.6% |
0.285808799 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
0.7% |
0.006615944 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |
r11pkklasse
Variable label:
|
Social class, self-placement
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
53 |
0.9% |
0.008766126 |
2 |
Working class |
756 |
12.5% |
0.125041350 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
570 |
9.4% |
0.094277208 |
4 |
Middle class |
3270 |
54.1% |
0.540853457 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
1158 |
19.2% |
0.191531591 |
6 |
Upper class |
28 |
0.5% |
0.004631161 |
7 |
Don't know |
174 |
2.9% |
0.028779358 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.6% |
0.006119749 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |
r11bk26
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:8979] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
16 |
0.3% |
0.002646378 |
2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
395 |
6.5% |
0.065332451 |
3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
666 |
11% |
0.110155475 |
4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
688 |
11.4% |
0.113794244 |
5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
322 |
5.3% |
0.053258353 |
6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
557 |
9.2% |
0.092127026 |
7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
1314 |
21.7% |
0.217333774 |
8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
447 |
7.4% |
0.073933179 |
9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
374 |
6.2% |
0.061859080 |
10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economy) |
923 |
15.3% |
0.152662918 |
11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
135 |
2.2% |
0.022328812 |
12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
169 |
2.8% |
0.027952365 |
97 |
Not answered |
40 |
0.7% |
0.006615944 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2933 |
|
NA |