Citation
Primary investigators
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
Sveinung Arnesen, Gisela Böhm, Dag Elgesem, Odd Gåsdal, Kristin Strømsnes, Endre Tvinnereim, and Jacob Aars
|
Scientific team, University of Bergen og Rokkansenteret
|
Producers
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in two waves, wave 1 and wave 3. In wave 1 4.870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3 5.623 members were recruited. Prior to wave 4 the Norwegian Citizen Panel had 10 463 members. The sampling procedure of wave and wave 1 is identical. 25 000 individuals over the age of 18 were randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, and e) age. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a online questionnaire. Existing members receivs e-mail invitations asking for their participation in the current wave.
New panel members were recruited in multiple steps.
First, letters were sent to everyone in the sample. The letters contained the following information: a) a description of the project, b) the Citizen Panel's policy on privacy and measures taken to protect the anonymity of the participants, c) the time-frame of the project, d) the participants' rights to opt of the panel at any time in the future, e) contact information for the people responsible for the project, f) a unique log-in id and the web address to the panel's web site and g) the estimated time required to complete the survey (20 minutes).
The invitation was emailed on the 09th of March 2015.
Three e-mail reminders were sent at the following dates: 12th of March, 16h of March, and 19th of March. The reminder was sent to those who a) had not entered the questionnaire, and b) had not completed the questionnaire. The fourth and last reminder was distributed as a text message on the 25th of March
Wave 4 was closed 08th of April.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report (table 8 in the appendix). When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent's geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire. Approximately 9 percent of the net sample did not answer this question. Because of this, two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample.
Change Log
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 4
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 4
|
NA
|
2020-06-10
|
r4_Answered_date
|
Corrected incoherent date format.
|
NA
|
2019-03-27
|
r4k40_recode
|
Added variable based on r4k40.
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
r4p5_1
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
NA
|
2018-04-13
|
r4p5_2
|
Changed from age intervals to birth year intervals.
|
NA
|
2018-02-22
|
r4p3
|
Updated the value of 1 respondent.
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r4p4_1
|
Corrected values of 42 respondents.
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r4p4_2
|
Corrected values of 42 respondents.
|
NA
|
2018-02-12
|
r4_weight_2
|
Corrected values of 42 respondents.
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
r4p4_1
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
NA
|
2017-06-14
|
r4p4_2
|
Updated value on 40 respondents.
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4km13a
|
Corrected value labels accordingly (1 = 7, 7 = 1)
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4km13b
|
Corrected value labels accordingly (1 = 7, 7 = 1)
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4km13c
|
Corrected value labels accordingly (1 = 7, 7 = 1)
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4km13d
|
Corrected value labels accordingly (1 = 7, 7 = 1)
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4pad17
|
Corrected value norwegian labels accordingly (1 = 5, 5 = 1)
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4_answered_date
|
New variable
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4p4_2
|
Updated value on 8 respondents
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4k25
|
Updated so that values and value labels are sequential.
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4dv45d
|
Updated norwegian variable documentation.
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4dv56c
|
Recoded ‘dont know’ from 99 to 3
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4oc24a
|
Corrected from 7-point answer scale to 5-point answer scale
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4oc24b
|
Corrected from 7-point answer scale to 5-point answer scale
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4pad12_1
|
Corrected value labels. ‘Strongly agree/disagree’ to ‘Totally agree/disagree’
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4pad12_2
|
Corrected value labels. ‘Strongly agree/disagree’ to ‘Totally agree/disagree’
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4pad14_1
|
Corrected value labels. ‘Somewhat dislike’ to ‘Significantly dislike’
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4pad14_2
|
Corrected value labels. ‘Somewhat dislike’ to ‘Significantly dislike’
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4pad14_3
|
Corrected value labels. ‘Somewhat dislike’ to ‘Significantly dislike’
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4dv48a
|
Updated variabledocumentation. ‘Schools’ to ‘School districts’
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4dv48b
|
Updated variabledocumentation. ‘Schools’ to ‘School districts’
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4dv48c
|
Updated variabledocumentation. ‘Schools’ to ‘School districts’
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4dv48d
|
Updated variabledocumentation. ‘Schools’ to ‘School districts’
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4oc9c
|
Corrected answer scale. Agree and disagree was swapped.
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4oc9d
|
Corrected answer scale. Agree and disagree was swapped.
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4oc10b
|
Corrected answer scale. Agree and disagree was swapped.
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4oc10c
|
Corrected answer scale. Agree and disagree was swapped.
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4oc10d
|
Corrected answer scale. ‘Government should see to it’ and ‘Government should not see to it’ was swapped
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4oc11a
|
Corrected answer scale. ‘Agree’ and ‘disagree’ was swapped.
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4km4g_1
|
Corrected english answer scale. ‘Highly negative’ on both end points. ‘Highly positive’ = 10
|
NA
|
2015-12-07
|
r4km4g_2
|
Corrected english answer scale. ‘Highly negative’ on both end points. ‘Highly positive’ = 10
|
NA
|
2015-07-06
|
r4km2
|
Flipped answer scale and adjusted value labels accordingly (1 = 7, 7 = 1)
|
NA
|
2015-06-04
|
r4dv48c
|
Modified english variable documentation
|
v-100
|
2015-04-24
|
NA
|
Initial release of round 4
|
Dataset contents
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 4 - v-101.sav
|
# Cases
|
6297
|
# Variables
|
608
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4Recruited
Variable label:
|
Time of recruitment
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Wave 1 |
2687 |
42.7% |
0.4267111 |
2 |
Wave 3 |
3610 |
57.3% |
0.5732889 |
r4_u
Variable label:
|
[Respondents are randomized in four groups]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
1558 |
24.7% |
0.2474194 |
2 |
|
1607 |
25.5% |
0.2552009 |
3 |
|
1548 |
24.6% |
0.2458313 |
4 |
|
1584 |
25.2% |
0.2515484 |
r4_Answered_date
Variable label:
|
Date and time for survey response
|
Technical description:
|
Date and time for survey response
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4k11
Variable label:
|
Satisfaction with democracy
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you about the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
1036 |
16.5% |
0.164522789 |
2 |
Satisfied |
3864 |
61.4% |
0.613625536 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1092 |
17.3% |
0.173415912 |
4 |
Slightly satisfied |
238 |
3.8% |
0.037795776 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
40 |
0.6% |
0.006352231 |
97 |
|
27 |
0.4% |
0.004287756 |
r4k204
Variable label:
|
Which party would you vote for if there was a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there was a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
295 |
4.7% |
0.046847705 |
2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
1349 |
21.4% |
0.214228998 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
410 |
6.5% |
0.065110370 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
371 |
5.9% |
0.058916945 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
304 |
4.8% |
0.048276957 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
245 |
3.9% |
0.038907416 |
7 |
The Green Party |
364 |
5.8% |
0.057805304 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
2345 |
37.2% |
0.372399555 |
9 |
The Red Party |
120 |
1.9% |
0.019056694 |
10 |
Would not vote |
199 |
3.2% |
0.031602350 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
146 |
2.3% |
0.023185644 |
12 |
Other: |
109 |
1.7% |
0.017309830 |
97 |
|
40 |
0.6% |
0.006352231 |
r4k204_12_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Which party would you vote for if there was a parliamentary election tomorrow? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there was a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4k43_1
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party in municipal elections
|
Literal question:
|
Municipal and county elections will be held during the autumn. If you are going to vote, which parties or lists will you vote for?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Red Party |
142 |
2.3% |
0.022550421 |
2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
283 |
4.5% |
0.044942036 |
3 |
The Labour Party |
1886 |
30% |
0.299507702 |
4 |
The Centre Party |
262 |
4.2% |
0.041607114 |
5 |
The Christian Democrats |
263 |
4.2% |
0.041765920 |
6 |
The Liberal Party |
329 |
5.2% |
0.052247102 |
7 |
The Conservative Party |
1311 |
20.8% |
0.208194378 |
8 |
The Progress Party |
352 |
5.6% |
0.055899635 |
9 |
The Green Party |
299 |
4.7% |
0.047482928 |
10 |
The Coastal Party |
8 |
0.1% |
0.001270446 |
11 |
Joint lists |
23 |
0.4% |
0.003652533 |
12 |
Other lists |
80 |
1.3% |
0.012704462 |
13 |
Haven't decided who to vote for |
817 |
13% |
0.129744323 |
14 |
Not entitled to vote |
50 |
0.8% |
0.007940289 |
15 |
Will not vote |
140 |
2.2% |
0.022232809 |
97 |
No answer |
52 |
0.8% |
0.008257901 |
r4k43_2
Variable label:
|
Would vote for following party in county elections
|
Literal question:
|
Municipal and county elections will be held during the autumn. If you are going to vote, which parties or lists will you vote for?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Red Party |
118 |
1.9% |
0.0187390821 |
2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
276 |
4.4% |
0.0438303954 |
3 |
The Labour Party |
1829 |
29% |
0.2904557726 |
4 |
The Centre Party |
213 |
3.4% |
0.0338256313 |
5 |
The Christian Democrats |
249 |
4% |
0.0395426394 |
6 |
The Liberal Party |
300 |
4.8% |
0.0476417342 |
7 |
The Conservative Party |
1199 |
19% |
0.1904081309 |
8 |
The Progress Party |
341 |
5.4% |
0.0541527712 |
9 |
The Green Party |
298 |
4.7% |
0.0473241226 |
10 |
The Coastal Party |
9 |
0.1% |
0.0014292520 |
11 |
Joint lists |
4 |
0.1% |
0.0006352231 |
12 |
Other lists |
42 |
0.7% |
0.0066698428 |
13 |
Haven't decided who to vote for |
853 |
13.5% |
0.1354613308 |
14 |
Not entitled to vote |
55 |
0.9% |
0.0087343179 |
15 |
Will not vote |
184 |
2.9% |
0.0292202636 |
97 |
No answer |
327 |
5.2% |
0.0519294902 |
r4k202
Variable label:
|
How satisfied are you with the current government?
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the current government?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
162 |
2.6% |
0.025726536 |
2 |
Satisfied |
1567 |
24.9% |
0.248848658 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1984 |
31.5% |
0.315070669 |
4 |
Slightly satisfied |
1733 |
27.5% |
0.275210418 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
834 |
13.2% |
0.132444021 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
0.3% |
0.002699698 |
r4k6_1
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Christian Democrats
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
436 |
6.9% |
0.06923932 |
2 |
Really dislike |
783 |
12.4% |
0.12434493 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1572 |
25% |
0.24964269 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1533 |
24.3% |
0.24344926 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1339 |
21.3% |
0.21264094 |
6 |
Really like |
438 |
7% |
0.06955693 |
7 |
Intensely like |
71 |
1.1% |
0.01127521 |
97 |
No answer |
125 |
2% |
0.01985072 |
r4k6_2
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Conservative Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
274 |
4.4% |
0.04351278 |
2 |
Really dislike |
819 |
13% |
0.13006193 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1290 |
20.5% |
0.20485946 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
765 |
12.1% |
0.12148642 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1517 |
24.1% |
0.24090837 |
6 |
Really like |
1224 |
19.4% |
0.19437828 |
7 |
Intensely like |
278 |
4.4% |
0.04414801 |
97 |
No answer |
130 |
2.1% |
0.02064475 |
r4k6_3
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Progress Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1951 |
31% |
0.30983008 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1227 |
19.5% |
0.19485469 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
916 |
14.5% |
0.14546609 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
571 |
9.1% |
0.09067810 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
932 |
14.8% |
0.14800699 |
6 |
Really like |
418 |
6.6% |
0.06638082 |
7 |
Intensely like |
151 |
2.4% |
0.02397967 |
97 |
No answer |
131 |
2.1% |
0.02080356 |
r4k6_4
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
314 |
5% |
0.04986502 |
2 |
Really dislike |
602 |
9.6% |
0.09560108 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1243 |
19.7% |
0.19739559 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1821 |
28.9% |
0.28918533 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1516 |
24.1% |
0.24074956 |
6 |
Really like |
552 |
8.8% |
0.08766079 |
7 |
Intensely like |
82 |
1.3% |
0.01302207 |
97 |
No answer |
167 |
2.7% |
0.02652057 |
r4k6_5
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
952 |
15.1% |
0.15118310 |
2 |
Really dislike |
959 |
15.2% |
0.15229474 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1167 |
18.5% |
0.18532635 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1297 |
20.6% |
0.20597110 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1117 |
17.7% |
0.17738606 |
6 |
Really like |
516 |
8.2% |
0.08194378 |
7 |
Intensely like |
131 |
2.1% |
0.02080356 |
97 |
No answer |
158 |
2.5% |
0.02509131 |
r4k6_6
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
501 |
8% |
0.07956170 |
2 |
Really dislike |
801 |
12.7% |
0.12720343 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1292 |
20.5% |
0.20517707 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2031 |
32.3% |
0.32253454 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1115 |
17.7% |
0.17706845 |
6 |
Really like |
304 |
4.8% |
0.04827696 |
7 |
Intensely like |
71 |
1.1% |
0.01127521 |
97 |
No answer |
182 |
2.9% |
0.02890265 |
r4k6_7
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
459 |
7.3% |
0.07289185 |
2 |
Really dislike |
526 |
8.4% |
0.08353184 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
767 |
12.2% |
0.12180403 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2098 |
33.3% |
0.33317453 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1419 |
22.5% |
0.22534540 |
6 |
Really like |
669 |
10.6% |
0.10624107 |
7 |
Intensely like |
187 |
3% |
0.02969668 |
97 |
No answer |
172 |
2.7% |
0.02731459 |
r4k6_8
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
239 |
3.8% |
0.03795458 |
2 |
Really dislike |
368 |
5.8% |
0.05844053 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
766 |
12.2% |
0.12164523 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
837 |
13.3% |
0.13292044 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1666 |
26.5% |
0.26457043 |
6 |
Really like |
1710 |
27.2% |
0.27155788 |
7 |
Intensely like |
571 |
9.1% |
0.09067810 |
97 |
No answer |
140 |
2.2% |
0.02223281 |
r4k6_9
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Red Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to ask you to consider how much you like or dislike the various political parties in Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1444 |
22.9% |
0.22931555 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1052 |
16.7% |
0.16706368 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
889 |
14.1% |
0.14117834 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1639 |
26% |
0.26028267 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
745 |
11.8% |
0.11831031 |
6 |
Really like |
273 |
4.3% |
0.04335398 |
7 |
Intensely like |
83 |
1.3% |
0.01318088 |
97 |
No answer |
172 |
2.7% |
0.02731459 |
r4k8_1
Variable label:
|
Placement on political scale
|
Literal question:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are politically on the far left, and 10 represents those who are politically on the far right. Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
43 |
1.6% |
0.01600298 |
2 |
1 |
65 |
2.4% |
0.02419055 |
3 |
2 |
213 |
7.9% |
0.07927056 |
4 |
3 |
418 |
15.6% |
0.15556383 |
5 |
4 |
391 |
14.6% |
0.14551544 |
6 |
5 |
362 |
13.5% |
0.13472274 |
7 |
6 |
331 |
12.3% |
0.12318571 |
8 |
7 |
360 |
13.4% |
0.13397841 |
9 |
8 |
250 |
9.3% |
0.09304057 |
10 |
9 |
68 |
2.5% |
0.02530703 |
11 |
10 Right |
47 |
1.7% |
0.01749163 |
97 |
No answer |
94 |
3.5% |
0.03498325 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
45 |
1.7% |
0.01674730 |
r4k9_1
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues personally [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue. [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4k9_2
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues personally [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue. [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4k9_3
Variable label:
|
- Most important political issues personally [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or topics for you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 is the next most important and 3 is the third most important issue. [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4k10
Variable label:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
Do you think it is:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
1681 |
26.7% |
0.266952517 |
2 |
Good |
3368 |
53.5% |
0.534857869 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
818 |
13% |
0.129903128 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
214 |
3.4% |
0.033984437 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
148 |
2.4% |
0.023503256 |
6 |
Bad |
39 |
0.6% |
0.006193425 |
7 |
Very bad |
12 |
0.2% |
0.001905669 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
0.3% |
0.002699698 |
r4dv30_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: The tax burden should be reduced, even if it leads to cutbacks in the welfare state.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
The tax burden should be reduced, even if it leads to cutbacks in the welfare state.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
184 |
2.9% |
0.029220264 |
2 |
Agree |
423 |
6.7% |
0.067174845 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
868 |
13.8% |
0.137843418 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
638 |
10.1% |
0.101318088 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1008 |
16% |
0.160076227 |
6 |
Disagree |
1739 |
27.6% |
0.276163252 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1379 |
21.9% |
0.218993171 |
97 |
No answer |
58 |
0.9% |
0.009210735 |
r4dv30_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Commercial private schools should be allowed.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Commercial private schools should be allowed.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
373 |
5.9% |
0.059234556 |
2 |
Agree |
1040 |
16.5% |
0.165158012 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1250 |
19.9% |
0.198507226 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
853 |
13.5% |
0.135461331 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
905 |
14.4% |
0.143719231 |
6 |
Disagree |
997 |
15.8% |
0.158329363 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
822 |
13.1% |
0.130538352 |
97 |
No answer |
57 |
0.9% |
0.009051929 |
r4dv30_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Many public activities could have been carried out both with better results and at a lower cost, if they were run by the private sector.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Many public activities could have been carried out both with better results and at a lower cost, if they were run by the private sector.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
447 |
7.1% |
0.070986184 |
2 |
Agree |
972 |
15.4% |
0.154359219 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1501 |
23.8% |
0.238367477 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
733 |
11.6% |
0.116404637 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
895 |
14.2% |
0.142131174 |
6 |
Disagree |
1043 |
16.6% |
0.165634429 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
656 |
10.4% |
0.104176592 |
97 |
No answer |
50 |
0.8% |
0.007940289 |
r4dv31_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: The government should contribute towards reducing income differences in society.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
The government should contribute towards reducing income differences in society.
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
372 |
13.8% |
0.13844436 |
2 |
Agree |
696 |
25.9% |
0.25902493 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
776 |
28.9% |
0.28879792 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
300 |
11.2% |
0.11164868 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
252 |
9.4% |
0.09378489 |
6 |
Disagree |
193 |
7.2% |
0.07182732 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
64 |
2.4% |
0.02381838 |
97 |
No answer |
34 |
1.3% |
0.01265352 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4dv31_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different religions and beliefs.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
It is better for a country if there is a diversity of different religions and beliefs.
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
251 |
9.3% |
0.09341273 |
2 |
Agree |
586 |
21.8% |
0.21808709 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
591 |
22% |
0.21994790 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
402 |
15% |
0.14960923 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
369 |
13.7% |
0.13732787 |
6 |
Disagree |
290 |
10.8% |
0.10792706 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
158 |
5.9% |
0.05880164 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
1.5% |
0.01488649 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4dv31_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has committed to, should be carried out abroad.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Most of the reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases that Norway has committed to, should be carried out abroad.
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
79 |
2.9% |
0.02940082 |
2 |
Agree |
183 |
6.8% |
0.06810569 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
359 |
13.4% |
0.13360625 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
590 |
22% |
0.21957574 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
518 |
19.3% |
0.19278005 |
6 |
Disagree |
642 |
23.9% |
0.23892817 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
271 |
10.1% |
0.10085597 |
97 |
No answer |
45 |
1.7% |
0.01674730 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4dvh_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten and Vesterålen areas.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten and Vesterålen areas.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1330 |
21.1% |
0.21121169 |
2 |
Agree |
1136 |
18% |
0.18040337 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
782 |
12.4% |
0.12418612 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1060 |
16.8% |
0.16833413 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
790 |
12.5% |
0.12545657 |
6 |
Disagree |
752 |
11.9% |
0.11942195 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
381 |
6.1% |
0.06050500 |
97 |
No answer |
66 |
1% |
0.01048118 |
r4dvh_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Refugees should have the same rights to social assistance as Norwegians have, even if they are not Norwegian citizens
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
548 |
8.7% |
0.08702557 |
2 |
Agree |
1128 |
17.9% |
0.17913292 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1176 |
18.7% |
0.18675560 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
662 |
10.5% |
0.10512943 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1128 |
17.9% |
0.17913292 |
6 |
Disagree |
955 |
15.2% |
0.15165952 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
633 |
10.1% |
0.10052406 |
97 |
No answer |
67 |
1.1% |
0.01063999 |
r4dvh_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How much do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Heterosexual and homosexual couples should have equal rights.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2639 |
41.9% |
0.41908845 |
2 |
Agree |
1711 |
27.2% |
0.27171669 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
550 |
8.7% |
0.08734318 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
513 |
8.1% |
0.08146737 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
319 |
5.1% |
0.05065904 |
6 |
Disagree |
284 |
4.5% |
0.04510084 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
215 |
3.4% |
0.03414324 |
97 |
No answer |
66 |
1% |
0.01048118 |
r4dt16_1
Variable label:
|
Place parties on political scale: The Christian Democrats
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
16 |
0.6% |
0.005954596 |
2 |
1 |
34 |
1.3% |
0.012653517 |
3 |
2 |
52 |
1.9% |
0.019352438 |
4 |
3 |
116 |
4.3% |
0.043170822 |
5 |
4 |
274 |
10.2% |
0.101972460 |
6 |
5 |
585 |
21.8% |
0.217714924 |
7 |
6 |
696 |
25.9% |
0.259024935 |
8 |
7 |
386 |
14.4% |
0.143654633 |
9 |
8 |
158 |
5.9% |
0.058801638 |
10 |
9 |
50 |
1.9% |
0.018608113 |
11 |
10 Right |
38 |
1.4% |
0.014142166 |
97 |
No answer |
222 |
8.3% |
0.082620022 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
60 |
2.2% |
0.022329736 |
r4dt16_2
Variable label:
|
Place parties on political scale: The Conservative Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
4 |
0.1% |
0.001488649 |
2 |
1 |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002232974 |
3 |
2 |
8 |
0.3% |
0.002977298 |
4 |
3 |
13 |
0.5% |
0.004838109 |
5 |
4 |
9 |
0.3% |
0.003349460 |
6 |
5 |
37 |
1.4% |
0.013770004 |
7 |
6 |
152 |
5.7% |
0.056568664 |
8 |
7 |
468 |
17.4% |
0.174171939 |
9 |
8 |
778 |
29% |
0.289542240 |
10 |
9 |
608 |
22.6% |
0.226274656 |
11 |
10 Right |
369 |
13.7% |
0.137327875 |
97 |
No answer |
203 |
7.6% |
0.075548939 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
32 |
1.2% |
0.011909192 |
r4dt16_3
Variable label:
|
Place parties on political scale: The Progress Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
9 |
0.3% |
0.003349460 |
2 |
1 |
8 |
0.3% |
0.002977298 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
0.1% |
0.001488649 |
4 |
3 |
23 |
0.9% |
0.008559732 |
5 |
4 |
34 |
1.3% |
0.012653517 |
6 |
5 |
31 |
1.2% |
0.011537030 |
7 |
6 |
43 |
1.6% |
0.016002977 |
8 |
7 |
117 |
4.4% |
0.043542985 |
9 |
8 |
348 |
13% |
0.129512467 |
10 |
9 |
608 |
22.6% |
0.226274656 |
11 |
10 Right |
1223 |
45.5% |
0.455154447 |
97 |
No answer |
203 |
7.6% |
0.075548939 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
36 |
1.3% |
0.013397841 |
r4dt16_4
Variable label:
|
Place parties on political scale: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
173 |
6.4% |
0.064384071 |
2 |
1 |
108 |
4% |
0.040193524 |
3 |
2 |
188 |
7% |
0.069966505 |
4 |
3 |
223 |
8.3% |
0.082992185 |
5 |
4 |
309 |
11.5% |
0.114998139 |
6 |
5 |
475 |
17.7% |
0.176777075 |
7 |
6 |
515 |
19.2% |
0.191663565 |
8 |
7 |
272 |
10.1% |
0.101228135 |
9 |
8 |
95 |
3.5% |
0.035355415 |
10 |
9 |
24 |
0.9% |
0.008931894 |
11 |
10 Right |
17 |
0.6% |
0.006326758 |
97 |
No answer |
232 |
8.6% |
0.086341645 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
56 |
2.1% |
0.020841087 |
r4dt16_5
Variable label:
|
Place parties on political scale: The Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
385 |
14.3% |
0.143282471 |
2 |
1 |
678 |
25.2% |
0.252326014 |
3 |
2 |
775 |
28.8% |
0.288425754 |
4 |
3 |
398 |
14.8% |
0.148120581 |
5 |
4 |
86 |
3.2% |
0.032005955 |
6 |
5 |
37 |
1.4% |
0.013770004 |
7 |
6 |
14 |
0.5% |
0.005210272 |
8 |
7 |
9 |
0.3% |
0.003349460 |
9 |
8 |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002232974 |
10 |
9 |
3 |
0.1% |
0.001116487 |
11 |
10 Right |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002232974 |
97 |
No answer |
230 |
8.6% |
0.085597320 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
60 |
2.2% |
0.022329736 |
r4dt16_6
Variable label:
|
Place parties on political scale: The Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
37 |
1.4% |
0.013770004 |
2 |
1 |
72 |
2.7% |
0.026795683 |
3 |
2 |
142 |
5.3% |
0.052847041 |
4 |
3 |
315 |
11.7% |
0.117231113 |
5 |
4 |
686 |
25.5% |
0.255303312 |
6 |
5 |
688 |
25.6% |
0.256047637 |
7 |
6 |
302 |
11.2% |
0.112393003 |
8 |
7 |
99 |
3.7% |
0.036844064 |
9 |
8 |
29 |
1.1% |
0.010792706 |
10 |
9 |
11 |
0.4% |
0.004093785 |
11 |
10 Right |
10 |
0.4% |
0.003721623 |
97 |
No answer |
231 |
8.6% |
0.085969483 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
65 |
2.4% |
0.024190547 |
r4dt16_7
Variable label:
|
Place parties on political scale: The Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
184 |
6.8% |
0.068477856 |
2 |
1 |
261 |
9.7% |
0.097134351 |
3 |
2 |
398 |
14.8% |
0.148120581 |
4 |
3 |
447 |
16.6% |
0.166356531 |
5 |
4 |
444 |
16.5% |
0.165240045 |
6 |
5 |
388 |
14.4% |
0.144398958 |
7 |
6 |
91 |
3.4% |
0.033866766 |
8 |
7 |
35 |
1.3% |
0.013025679 |
9 |
8 |
14 |
0.5% |
0.005210272 |
10 |
9 |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002232974 |
11 |
10 Right |
9 |
0.3% |
0.003349460 |
97 |
No answer |
304 |
11.3% |
0.113137328 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
106 |
3.9% |
0.039449200 |
r4dt16_8
Variable label:
|
Place parties on political scale: The Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
54 |
2% |
0.020096762 |
2 |
1 |
111 |
4.1% |
0.041310011 |
3 |
2 |
261 |
9.7% |
0.097134351 |
4 |
3 |
631 |
23.5% |
0.234834388 |
5 |
4 |
671 |
25% |
0.249720878 |
6 |
5 |
446 |
16.6% |
0.165984369 |
7 |
6 |
169 |
6.3% |
0.062895422 |
8 |
7 |
51 |
1.9% |
0.018980275 |
9 |
8 |
22 |
0.8% |
0.008187570 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
0.3% |
0.003349460 |
11 |
10 Right |
14 |
0.5% |
0.005210272 |
97 |
No answer |
207 |
7.7% |
0.077037588 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
41 |
1.5% |
0.015258653 |
r4dt16_9
Variable label:
|
Place parties on political scale: The Red Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people sometimes talk about the left wing and the right wing. Where would you place the following parties on a scale where 0 represents furthest to the left and 10 represents furthest to the right?
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
1275 |
47.5% |
0.4745068850 |
2 |
1 |
637 |
23.7% |
0.2370673614 |
3 |
2 |
159 |
5.9% |
0.0591737998 |
4 |
3 |
51 |
1.9% |
0.0189802754 |
5 |
4 |
33 |
1.2% |
0.0122813547 |
6 |
5 |
33 |
1.2% |
0.0122813547 |
7 |
6 |
12 |
0.4% |
0.0044659472 |
8 |
7 |
5 |
0.2% |
0.0018608113 |
9 |
8 |
11 |
0.4% |
0.0040937849 |
10 |
9 |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0007443245 |
11 |
10 Right |
23 |
0.9% |
0.0085597320 |
97 |
No answer |
316 |
11.8% |
0.1176032750 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
130 |
4.8% |
0.0483810942 |
r4dv29_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Begging should be prohibited in Norway.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 or DV29 is asked in wave 1 or DV202 is asked in wave 2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
429 |
16.8% |
0.168037603 |
2 |
Agree |
499 |
19.5% |
0.195456326 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
436 |
17.1% |
0.170779475 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
347 |
13.6% |
0.135918527 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
263 |
10.3% |
0.103016060 |
6 |
Disagree |
343 |
13.4% |
0.134351743 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
215 |
8.4% |
0.084214649 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
0.8% |
0.008225617 |
98 |
Not asked |
3744 |
|
NA |
r4dv29_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norway will end up losing its identity if more Muslims are allowed to live here.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Norway will end up losing its identity if more Muslims are allowed to live here.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 or DV29 is asked in wave 1 or DV202 is asked in wave 2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
246 |
9.6% |
0.096357227 |
2 |
Agree |
328 |
12.8% |
0.128476302 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
516 |
20.2% |
0.202115159 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
340 |
13.3% |
0.133176655 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
339 |
13.3% |
0.132784959 |
6 |
Disagree |
501 |
19.6% |
0.196239718 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
267 |
10.5% |
0.104582844 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
0.6% |
0.006267137 |
98 |
Not asked |
3744 |
|
NA |
r4dv29_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in the world than to people in this country.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian Muslims have greater loyalty to other Muslims in the world than to people in this country.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 or DV29 is asked in wave 1 or DV202 is asked in wave 2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
184 |
7.2% |
0.072072072 |
2 |
Agree |
392 |
15.4% |
0.153544849 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
474 |
18.6% |
0.185663925 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
763 |
29.9% |
0.298864081 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
294 |
11.5% |
0.115158637 |
6 |
Disagree |
339 |
13.3% |
0.132784959 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
89 |
3.5% |
0.034860948 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
0.7% |
0.007050529 |
98 |
Not asked |
3744 |
|
NA |
r4dv29_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is better for a country if most people share the same traditions and customs.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
It is better for a country if most people share the same traditions and customs.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if u=4 or DV29 is asked in wave 1 or DV202 is asked in wave 2.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
134 |
5.2% |
0.052487270 |
2 |
Agree |
293 |
11.5% |
0.114766941 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
514 |
20.1% |
0.201331767 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
378 |
14.8% |
0.148061105 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
436 |
17.1% |
0.170779475 |
6 |
Disagree |
574 |
22.5% |
0.224833529 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
205 |
8% |
0.080297689 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
0.7% |
0.007442225 |
98 |
Not asked |
3744 |
|
NA |
r4ran2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1558] [Invalid:4739] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
404 |
25.9% |
0.2593068 |
2 |
2 |
410 |
26.3% |
0.2631579 |
3 |
3 |
373 |
23.9% |
0.2394095 |
4 |
4 |
371 |
23.8% |
0.2381258 |
Sysmiss |
|
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri1a
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work: carried out any voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now turn to some questions about voluntary work.
|
Literal question:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out any voluntary, unpaid work for voluntary organisations?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
177 |
43.8% |
0.438118812 |
2 |
No |
225 |
55.7% |
0.556930693 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004950495 |
98 |
Not asked |
5893 |
|
NA |
r4fri1b
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work: made any voluntary contributions to voluntary organisations
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now turn to some questions about voluntary work.
|
Literal question:
|
During the last 12 months have you made any voluntary contributions to voluntary organisations?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran2=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
188 |
45.9% |
0.458536585 |
2 |
No |
221 |
53.9% |
0.539024390 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002439024 |
98 |
Not asked |
5887 |
|
NA |
r4fri1c
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work: carried out any voluntary work for voluntary organisations
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now turn to some questions about voluntary work.
|
Literal question:
|
During the last 12 months have you carried out any voluntary work for voluntary organisations?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran2=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
175 |
46.9% |
0.4691689 |
2 |
No |
198 |
53.1% |
0.5308311 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
5924 |
|
NA |
r4fri1d
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work: undertaken any voluntary contracts for voluntary organisations
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now turn to some questions about voluntary work.
|
Literal question:
|
During the last 12 months have you undertaken any voluntary contracts for voluntary organisations?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and ran2=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
178 |
48% |
0.479784367 |
2 |
No |
191 |
51.5% |
0.514824798 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.5% |
0.005390836 |
98 |
Not asked |
5926 |
|
NA |
r4fri2
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work: time spent on voluntary work during an ordinary week
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about the last year as a whole, roughly how much time did you spend on voluntary work during an ordinary week?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I do not undertake voluntary work |
609 |
39.1% |
0.39088575 |
2 |
Less than half an hour |
309 |
19.8% |
0.19833119 |
3 |
Between half an hour and one hour |
184 |
11.8% |
0.11810013 |
4 |
1 to 2 hours |
202 |
13% |
0.12965340 |
5 |
2 to 5 hours |
127 |
8.2% |
0.08151476 |
6 |
More than 5 hours |
111 |
7.1% |
0.07124519 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
1% |
0.01026958 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri3
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work: time spent for an average Norwegian
|
Literal question:
|
Roughly speaking how much time do you think an average Norwegian spends on voluntary work during an ordinary week?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
2 |
Less than half an hour |
652 |
41.8% |
0.41848524 |
3 |
Between half an hour and one hour |
467 |
30% |
0.29974326 |
4 |
1 to 2 hours |
295 |
18.9% |
0.18934531 |
5 |
2 to 5 hours |
78 |
5% |
0.05006418 |
6 |
More than 5 hours |
22 |
1.4% |
0.01412067 |
97 |
No answer |
44 |
2.8% |
0.02824134 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri4_1
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work: I am enthusiastic about my voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I am enthusiastic about my voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
154 |
9.9% |
0.09884467 |
2 |
Agree |
432 |
27.7% |
0.27727856 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
187 |
12% |
0.12002567 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
497 |
31.9% |
0.31899872 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
40 |
2.6% |
0.02567394 |
6 |
Disagree |
51 |
3.3% |
0.03273427 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
39 |
2.5% |
0.02503209 |
97 |
No answer |
158 |
10.1% |
0.10141207 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri4_2
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work: I always want to engage in voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I always want to engage in voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
83 |
5.3% |
0.05327343 |
2 |
Agree |
273 |
17.5% |
0.17522465 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
340 |
21.8% |
0.21822850 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
386 |
24.8% |
0.24775353 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
148 |
9.5% |
0.09499358 |
6 |
Disagree |
120 |
7.7% |
0.07702182 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
43 |
2.8% |
0.02759949 |
97 |
No answer |
165 |
10.6% |
0.10590501 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri4_3
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work: Time flies when I am doing voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Time flies when I am doing voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
81 |
5.2% |
0.05198973 |
2 |
Agree |
319 |
20.5% |
0.20474968 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
259 |
16.6% |
0.16623877 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
566 |
36.3% |
0.36328626 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
70 |
4.5% |
0.04492940 |
6 |
Disagree |
41 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
49 |
3.1% |
0.03145058 |
97 |
No answer |
173 |
11.1% |
0.11103979 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri4_4
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work: I feel forced to participate more than I want to
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I feel forced to participate more than I want to
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
23 |
1.5% |
0.01476252 |
2 |
Agree |
43 |
2.8% |
0.02759949 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
160 |
10.3% |
0.10269576 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
522 |
33.5% |
0.33504493 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
167 |
10.7% |
0.10718870 |
6 |
Disagree |
320 |
20.5% |
0.20539153 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
158 |
10.1% |
0.10141207 |
97 |
No answer |
165 |
10.6% |
0.10590501 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri4_5
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work: I feel that doing voluntary work has a detrimental effect on other things
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I feel that doing voluntary work has a detrimental effect on other things
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
38 |
2.4% |
0.02439024 |
2 |
Agree |
98 |
6.3% |
0.06290116 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
256 |
16.4% |
0.16431322 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
478 |
30.7% |
0.30680359 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
169 |
10.8% |
0.10847240 |
6 |
Disagree |
272 |
17.5% |
0.17458280 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
88 |
5.6% |
0.05648267 |
97 |
No answer |
159 |
10.2% |
0.10205392 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri4_6
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work: I feel that my involvement is not appreciated
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you consider your involvement in voluntary work, to what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I feel that my involvement is not appreciated
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
16 |
1% |
0.01026958 |
2 |
Agree |
36 |
2.3% |
0.02310655 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
88 |
5.6% |
0.05648267 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
534 |
34.3% |
0.34274711 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
152 |
9.8% |
0.09756098 |
6 |
Disagree |
389 |
25% |
0.24967908 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
171 |
11% |
0.10975610 |
97 |
No answer |
172 |
11% |
0.11039795 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri5
Variable label:
|
I hvor stor grad er du tilfreds med livet nå om dagen?
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you satisfied with life at the moment?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
279 |
17.9% |
0.179075738 |
2 |
To a great degree |
875 |
56.2% |
0.561617458 |
3 |
To some degree |
325 |
20.9% |
0.208600770 |
4 |
To a small degree |
54 |
3.5% |
0.034659820 |
5 |
Not at all |
14 |
0.9% |
0.008985879 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
0.7% |
0.007060334 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri6
Variable label:
|
All in all, to what extent do you think that what you are doing in life is meaningful?
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, to what extent do you think that what you are doing in life is meaningful?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
264 |
16.9% |
0.16944801 |
2 |
To a great degree |
843 |
54.1% |
0.54107831 |
3 |
To some degree |
343 |
22% |
0.22015404 |
4 |
To a small degree |
59 |
3.8% |
0.03786906 |
5 |
Not at all |
18 |
1.2% |
0.01155327 |
97 |
No answer |
31 |
2% |
0.01989730 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri7_1
Variable label:
|
0-10: HAPPY
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale of 0-10, to what extent did you feel happy, worried or depressed yesterday?
|
Literal question:
|
HAPPY
|
Technical description:
|
0 means that you did not feel it at all yesterday, while 10 means that you felt it all the time.
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Not at all |
14 |
0.9% |
0.008985879 |
2 |
1 |
35 |
2.2% |
0.022464698 |
3 |
2 |
50 |
3.2% |
0.032092426 |
4 |
3 |
55 |
3.5% |
0.035301669 |
5 |
4 |
89 |
5.7% |
0.057124519 |
6 |
5 |
188 |
12.1% |
0.120667522 |
7 |
6 |
228 |
14.6% |
0.146341463 |
8 |
7 |
309 |
19.8% |
0.198331194 |
9 |
8 |
295 |
18.9% |
0.189345315 |
10 |
9 |
154 |
9.9% |
0.098844673 |
11 |
10 all the time |
66 |
4.2% |
0.042362003 |
12 |
No answer |
18 |
1.2% |
0.011553273 |
97 |
No answer |
57 |
3.7% |
0.036585366 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri7_2
Variable label:
|
0-10: WORRIED
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale of 0-10, to what extent did you feel happy, worried or depressed yesterday?
|
Literal question:
|
WORRIED
|
Technical description:
|
0 means that you did not feel it at all yesterday, while 10 means that you felt it all the time.
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Not at all |
210 |
13.5% |
0.134788190 |
2 |
1 |
223 |
14.3% |
0.143132221 |
3 |
2 |
270 |
17.3% |
0.173299101 |
4 |
3 |
196 |
12.6% |
0.125802311 |
5 |
4 |
145 |
9.3% |
0.093068036 |
6 |
5 |
127 |
8.2% |
0.081514763 |
7 |
6 |
76 |
4.9% |
0.048780488 |
8 |
7 |
67 |
4.3% |
0.043003851 |
9 |
8 |
36 |
2.3% |
0.023106547 |
10 |
9 |
22 |
1.4% |
0.014120668 |
11 |
10 all the time |
14 |
0.9% |
0.008985879 |
12 |
No answer |
19 |
1.2% |
0.012195122 |
97 |
No answer |
153 |
9.8% |
0.098202824 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri7_3
Variable label:
|
0-10: DEPRESSED
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale of 0-10, to what extent did you feel happy, worried or depressed yesterday?
|
Literal question:
|
DEPRESSED
|
Technical description:
|
0 means that you did not feel it at all yesterday, while 10 means that you felt it all the time.
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Not at all |
788 |
50.6% |
0.505776637 |
2 |
1 |
197 |
12.6% |
0.126444159 |
3 |
2 |
102 |
6.5% |
0.065468549 |
4 |
3 |
70 |
4.5% |
0.044929397 |
5 |
4 |
45 |
2.9% |
0.028883184 |
6 |
5 |
39 |
2.5% |
0.025032092 |
7 |
6 |
31 |
2% |
0.019897304 |
8 |
7 |
25 |
1.6% |
0.016046213 |
9 |
8 |
15 |
1% |
0.009627728 |
10 |
9 |
6 |
0.4% |
0.003851091 |
11 |
10 all the time |
8 |
0.5% |
0.005134788 |
12 |
No answer |
34 |
2.2% |
0.021822850 |
97 |
No answer |
198 |
12.7% |
0.127086008 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri8_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: In most ways my life is almost ideal
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
|
Literal question:
|
In most ways my life is almost ideal
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
93 |
6% |
0.05969191 |
2 |
Agree |
443 |
28.4% |
0.28433890 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
478 |
30.7% |
0.30680359 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
215 |
13.8% |
0.13799743 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
154 |
9.9% |
0.09884467 |
6 |
Disagree |
90 |
5.8% |
0.05776637 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
43 |
2.8% |
0.02759949 |
97 |
No answer |
42 |
2.7% |
0.02695764 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri8_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: My circumstances are excellent
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
|
Literal question:
|
My circumstances are excellent
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
158 |
10.1% |
0.10141207 |
2 |
Agree |
580 |
37.2% |
0.37227214 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
398 |
25.5% |
0.25545571 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
131 |
8.4% |
0.08408216 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
150 |
9.6% |
0.09627728 |
6 |
Disagree |
76 |
4.9% |
0.04878049 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
23 |
1.5% |
0.01476252 |
97 |
No answer |
42 |
2.7% |
0.02695764 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri8_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: So far I have got most of the things I have wanted in life
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
|
Literal question:
|
So far I have got most of the things I have wanted in life
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
204 |
13.1% |
0.13093710 |
2 |
Agree |
571 |
36.6% |
0.36649551 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
386 |
24.8% |
0.24775353 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
127 |
8.2% |
0.08151476 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
136 |
8.7% |
0.08729140 |
6 |
Disagree |
76 |
4.9% |
0.04878049 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
22 |
1.4% |
0.01412067 |
97 |
No answer |
36 |
2.3% |
0.02310655 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri8_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: I am satisfied with my life
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
|
Literal question:
|
I am satisfied with my life
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
230 |
14.8% |
0.14762516 |
2 |
Agree |
760 |
48.8% |
0.48780488 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
297 |
19.1% |
0.19062901 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
81 |
5.2% |
0.05198973 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
96 |
6.2% |
0.06161746 |
6 |
Disagree |
42 |
2.7% |
0.02695764 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
18 |
1.2% |
0.01155327 |
97 |
No answer |
34 |
2.2% |
0.02182285 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri8_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: If I could relive my life, I would not really change anything
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about your life:
|
Literal question:
|
If I could relive my life, I would not really change anything
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
68 |
4.4% |
0.04364570 |
2 |
Agree |
252 |
16.2% |
0.16174583 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
369 |
23.7% |
0.23684211 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
171 |
11% |
0.10975610 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
367 |
23.6% |
0.23555841 |
6 |
Disagree |
196 |
12.6% |
0.12580231 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
99 |
6.4% |
0.06354300 |
97 |
No answer |
36 |
2.3% |
0.02310655 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri9_1
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Your standard of living
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
Your standard of living?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
406 |
26.1% |
0.260590501 |
2 |
Satisfied |
876 |
56.2% |
0.562259307 |
3 |
Slightly satisfied |
193 |
12.4% |
0.123876765 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
50 |
3.2% |
0.032092426 |
5 |
Not at all satisfied |
11 |
0.7% |
0.007060334 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.4% |
0.014120668 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri9_2
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Your health
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
Your health?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
323 |
20.7% |
0.20731707 |
2 |
Satisfied |
709 |
45.5% |
0.45507060 |
3 |
Slightly satisfied |
327 |
21% |
0.20988447 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
115 |
7.4% |
0.07381258 |
5 |
Not at all satisfied |
59 |
3.8% |
0.03786906 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
1.6% |
0.01604621 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri9_3
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: What you are achieving in life
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
What you are achieving in life?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
162 |
10.4% |
0.10397946 |
2 |
Satisfied |
871 |
55.9% |
0.55905006 |
3 |
Slightly satisfied |
378 |
24.3% |
0.24261874 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
86 |
5.5% |
0.05519897 |
5 |
Not at all satisfied |
24 |
1.5% |
0.01540436 |
97 |
No answer |
37 |
2.4% |
0.02374840 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri9_4
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Your personal relationships
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
Your personal relationships?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
247 |
15.9% |
0.15853659 |
2 |
Satisfied |
834 |
53.5% |
0.53530167 |
3 |
Slightly satisfied |
349 |
22.4% |
0.22400513 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
75 |
4.8% |
0.04813864 |
5 |
Not at all satisfied |
19 |
1.2% |
0.01219512 |
97 |
No answer |
34 |
2.2% |
0.02182285 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri9_5
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: How safe you feel
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
How safe you feel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
416 |
26.7% |
0.26700899 |
2 |
Satisfied |
839 |
53.9% |
0.53851091 |
3 |
Slightly satisfied |
213 |
13.7% |
0.13671374 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
44 |
2.8% |
0.02824134 |
5 |
Not at all satisfied |
17 |
1.1% |
0.01091142 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
1.9% |
0.01861361 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri9_6
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: The feeling of being part of a neighbourhood community
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
The feeling of being part of a neighbourhood community?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
143 |
9.2% |
0.09178434 |
2 |
Satisfied |
600 |
38.5% |
0.38510911 |
3 |
Slightly satisfied |
519 |
33.3% |
0.33311938 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
184 |
11.8% |
0.11810013 |
5 |
Not at all satisfied |
54 |
3.5% |
0.03465982 |
97 |
No answer |
58 |
3.7% |
0.03722721 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri9_7
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: The prospects for safety in the future
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
The prospects for safety in the future?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
208 |
13.4% |
0.13350449 |
2 |
Satisfied |
831 |
53.3% |
0.53337612 |
3 |
Slightly satisfied |
354 |
22.7% |
0.22721438 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
94 |
6% |
0.06033376 |
5 |
Not at all satisfied |
40 |
2.6% |
0.02567394 |
97 |
No answer |
31 |
2% |
0.01989730 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri9_8
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: The amount of time you have to do the things you like doing
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
The amount of time you have to do the things you like doing?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
160 |
10.3% |
0.10269576 |
2 |
Satisfied |
706 |
45.3% |
0.45314506 |
3 |
Slightly satisfied |
434 |
27.9% |
0.27856226 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
187 |
12% |
0.12002567 |
5 |
Not at all satisfied |
45 |
2.9% |
0.02888318 |
97 |
No answer |
26 |
1.7% |
0.01668806 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri9_9
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: The quality of nature and the environment in your local area
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
The quality of nature and the environment in your local area?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
553 |
35.5% |
0.354942234 |
2 |
Satisfied |
755 |
48.5% |
0.484595635 |
3 |
Slightly satisfied |
170 |
10.9% |
0.109114249 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
38 |
2.4% |
0.024390244 |
5 |
Not at all satisfied |
12 |
0.8% |
0.007702182 |
97 |
No answer |
30 |
1.9% |
0.019255456 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri9_10
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with: Your job
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with …
|
Literal question:
|
Your job?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
238 |
15.3% |
0.15275995 |
2 |
Satisfied |
625 |
40.1% |
0.40115533 |
3 |
Slightly satisfied |
240 |
15.4% |
0.15404365 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
60 |
3.9% |
0.03851091 |
5 |
Not at all satisfied |
33 |
2.1% |
0.02118100 |
6 |
Not relevant |
316 |
20.3% |
0.20282413 |
97 |
No answer |
46 |
3% |
0.02952503 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri10
Variable label:
|
Your life, five years in the future
|
Literal question:
|
If you think about your life situation in five years’ time, do you think it will be …
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Worse than it is at the moment |
97 |
6.2% |
0.06225931 |
2 |
Similar to how it is now |
974 |
62.5% |
0.62516046 |
3 |
Better than it is at the moment |
461 |
29.6% |
0.29589217 |
97 |
No answer |
26 |
1.7% |
0.01668806 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri11
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how good is your health?
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how good is your health?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
237 |
15.2% |
0.15211810 |
2 |
Very good |
704 |
45.2% |
0.45186136 |
3 |
Fairly good |
495 |
31.8% |
0.31771502 |
4 |
Poor |
93 |
6% |
0.05969191 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
1.9% |
0.01861361 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri12
Variable label:
|
Suffer from chronic illnesses or health problem
|
Literal question:
|
Do you suffer from any chronic illnesses or health problems which are expected to last for at least six months or more?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
593 |
38.1% |
0.38061617 |
2 |
No |
872 |
56% |
0.55969191 |
3 |
Do not wish to reply |
64 |
4.1% |
0.04107831 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
1.9% |
0.01861361 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri13
Variable label:
|
Have been prevented from undertaking any activities due to health problems
|
Literal question:
|
During the last six months have you been prevented from undertaking any activities that people usually do due to health problems?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, very inhibited |
94 |
6% |
0.06033376 |
2 |
Yes, inhibited |
375 |
24.1% |
0.24069320 |
3 |
No, not inhibited |
1045 |
67.1% |
0.67073171 |
97 |
No answer |
44 |
2.8% |
0.02824134 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri14
Variable label:
|
Have participated in any protests or demonstrations during the past year
|
Literal question:
|
Have you participated in any protests or demonstrations during the past year in an attempt to bring about improvements in society?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
224 |
14.4% |
0.14377407 |
2 |
No |
1305 |
83.8% |
0.83761232 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
1.9% |
0.01861361 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri15
Variable label:
|
Who organized the most recent protest or demonstration that you participated in
|
Literal question:
|
If you cast your mind back to the most recent protest or demonstration that you participated in, who was it organised by?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and R4FRI14=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A voluntary organisation, union or party |
188 |
83.9% |
0.839285714 |
2 |
Individuals or a non-organised group or network |
34 |
15.2% |
0.151785714 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.9% |
0.008928571 |
98 |
Not asked |
6073 |
|
NA |
r4fri16
Variable label:
|
Type of organisation, union or party
|
Literal question:
|
What type of organisation, union or party was it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and R4FRI15=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
2 |
1.1% |
0.010638298 |
2 |
Athletics and sport |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005319149 |
3 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005319149 |
4 |
Education, training and research |
13 |
6.9% |
0.069148936 |
5 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
2 |
1.1% |
0.010638298 |
6 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
3 |
1.6% |
0.015957447 |
7 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
19 |
10.1% |
0.101063830 |
8 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
4 |
2.1% |
0.021276596 |
9 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
10 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
25 |
13.3% |
0.132978723 |
11 |
Political parties |
17 |
9% |
0.090425532 |
12 |
International exchange, emergency help, aid and human rights work |
21 |
11.2% |
0.111702128 |
13 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
66 |
35.1% |
0.351063830 |
14 |
Religion and faiths, including the Church of Norway |
2 |
1.1% |
0.010638298 |
15 |
Immigrant organisations |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
16 |
Other |
11 |
5.9% |
0.058510638 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005319149 |
98 |
Not asked |
6109 |
|
NA |
r4fri16_16_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Type of organisation, union or party [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What type of organisation, union or party was it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4fri17
Variable label:
|
How did you first hear about this protest?
|
Literal question:
|
How did you first hear about this protest?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and R4FRI14=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Through an organisation, union or party which I am a member of |
91 |
40.6% |
0.406250000 |
2 |
Through colleagues at work or fellow students |
12 |
5.4% |
0.053571429 |
3 |
Through social networks, friends and acquaintances |
62 |
27.7% |
0.276785714 |
4 |
Through the media |
47 |
21% |
0.209821429 |
5 |
In a different way |
11 |
4.9% |
0.049107143 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.004464286 |
98 |
Not asked |
6073 |
|
NA |
r4fri18
Variable label:
|
In what way did you first hear about this protest?
|
Literal question:
|
In what way did you first hear about this protest?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and R4FRI14=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Talking face to face |
31 |
13.8% |
0.138392857 |
2 |
Telephone conversation |
5 |
2.2% |
0.022321429 |
3 |
SMS |
9 |
4% |
0.040178571 |
4 |
Posters/notices |
8 |
3.6% |
0.035714286 |
5 |
Newspapers/magazines |
23 |
10.3% |
0.102678571 |
6 |
Online newspapers |
9 |
4% |
0.040178571 |
7 |
E-mail |
47 |
21% |
0.209821429 |
8 |
Facebook |
54 |
24.1% |
0.241071429 |
9 |
Other social media |
5 |
2.2% |
0.022321429 |
10 |
TV/radio |
17 |
7.6% |
0.075892857 |
11 |
Other |
14 |
6.2% |
0.062500000 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.9% |
0.008928571 |
98 |
Not asked |
6073 |
|
NA |
r4fri19
Variable label:
|
Active within non-profit organizations in youth
|
Literal question:
|
If you think back to your youth, to what extent were you actively involved with associations and organisations?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very involved |
380 |
24.4% |
0.24390244 |
2 |
Slightly involved |
550 |
35.3% |
0.35301669 |
3 |
Not very involved |
376 |
24.1% |
0.24133504 |
4 |
Not at all involved |
199 |
12.8% |
0.12772786 |
5 |
Don't know |
31 |
2% |
0.01989730 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.4% |
0.01412067 |
98 |
Not asked |
4739 |
|
NA |
r4fri20
Variable label:
|
Which memberships are important
|
Literal question:
|
You have previously stated that you are a member of one or more of the voluntary organisations listed below. Which membership category do you consider to be the most important one for you?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to be member in more than one voluntary organization.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
69 |
12.2% |
0.121908127 |
2 |
Athletics and sport |
110 |
19.4% |
0.194346290 |
3 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
65 |
11.5% |
0.114840989 |
4 |
Education, training and research |
13 |
2.3% |
0.022968198 |
5 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
16 |
2.8% |
0.028268551 |
6 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
11 |
1.9% |
0.019434629 |
7 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
27 |
4.8% |
0.047703180 |
8 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
37 |
6.5% |
0.065371025 |
9 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
20 |
3.5% |
0.035335689 |
10 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
13 |
2.3% |
0.022968198 |
11 |
Political parties |
25 |
4.4% |
0.044169611 |
12 |
International exchange, emergency help, aid and human rights work |
40 |
7.1% |
0.070671378 |
13 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
61 |
10.8% |
0.107773852 |
14 |
Religion and faiths, including the Church of Norway |
45 |
8% |
0.079505300 |
15 |
Immigrant organisations |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001766784 |
16 |
Other |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
2.3% |
0.022968198 |
98 |
Not asked |
5731 |
|
NA |
r4fri21_1
Variable label:
|
Text: Reason for joining [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
You have previously stated that you are a member of a voluntary organisation operating in the following area: “f(‘w03_FR2’)”. What was the most important reason for your decision to join this organisation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to be member in one voluntary organization.] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4fri21_2
Variable label:
|
Text: Reason for joining [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What was the most important reason for your decision to join this organisation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if R4FRI20 is answered] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4fri22
Variable label:
|
Category of voluntary work [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
You have previously stated that you have undertaken voluntary work one or more of the voluntary organisations listed below. Which category encompasses the organisation for which you have done most voluntary work during the past year?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for more than one voluntary organization.] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Art and culture, band and choir |
61 |
13.2% |
0.132321041 |
2 |
Athletics and sport |
112 |
24.3% |
0.242950108 |
3 |
Hobbies, recreation, outdoor activity |
50 |
10.8% |
0.108459870 |
4 |
Education, training and research |
21 |
4.6% |
0.045553145 |
5 |
Health, nursing and rescue work |
19 |
4.1% |
0.041214751 |
6 |
Social services and substance abuse care |
11 |
2.4% |
0.023861171 |
7 |
Nature, environmental and animal protection |
7 |
1.5% |
0.015184382 |
8 |
Residents' associations, community associations and local neighbourhood |
37 |
8% |
0.080260304 |
9 |
Housing co-operatives and housing associations |
31 |
6.7% |
0.067245119 |
10 |
Rights, support and advocacy work |
8 |
1.7% |
0.017353579 |
11 |
Political parties |
12 |
2.6% |
0.026030369 |
12 |
International exchange, emergency help, aid and human rights work |
12 |
2.6% |
0.026030369 |
13 |
Vocational, industry and trade unions and associations |
25 |
5.4% |
0.054229935 |
14 |
Religion and faiths, including the Church of Norway |
43 |
9.3% |
0.093275488 |
15 |
Immigrant organisations |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002169197 |
16 |
Other |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.4% |
0.023861171 |
98 |
Not asked |
5836 |
|
NA |
r4fri23_1
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work, duration
|
Literal question:
|
You have previously stated that you have undertaken voluntary work for a voluntary organisation operating in the following area: “f(‘w03_FR2’)”. How long did you do voluntary work for this organisation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for more than one voluntary organization.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Less than a month |
27 |
10% |
0.10037175 |
2 |
One month-six months |
13 |
4.8% |
0.04832714 |
3 |
Six months-one year |
14 |
5.2% |
0.05204461 |
4 |
1-2 years |
49 |
18.2% |
0.18215613 |
5 |
3-5 years |
48 |
17.8% |
0.17843866 |
6 |
6-10 years |
27 |
10% |
0.10037175 |
7 |
11-25 years |
41 |
15.2% |
0.15241636 |
8 |
More than 25 years |
23 |
8.6% |
0.08550186 |
97 |
No answer |
27 |
10% |
0.10037175 |
98 |
Not asked |
6028 |
|
NA |
r4fri23_2
Variable label:
|
Voluntary work, duration
|
Literal question:
|
How long did you do voluntary work for this organisation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if R4FRI22 is answered]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Less than a month |
20 |
1.3% |
0.012928248 |
2 |
One month-six months |
12 |
0.8% |
0.007756949 |
3 |
Six months-one year |
26 |
1.7% |
0.016806723 |
4 |
1-2 years |
67 |
4.3% |
0.043309632 |
5 |
3-5 years |
93 |
6% |
0.060116354 |
6 |
6-10 years |
81 |
5.2% |
0.052359405 |
7 |
11-25 years |
83 |
5.4% |
0.053652230 |
8 |
More than 25 years |
59 |
3.8% |
0.038138332 |
97 |
No answer |
1106 |
71.5% |
0.714932127 |
98 |
Not asked |
4750 |
|
NA |
r4fri24_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: I feel better about myself or more meaningful
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? When I do voluntary work for this organisation….
|
Literal question:
|
I feel better about myself or more meaningful
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
37 |
5.1% |
0.050684932 |
2 |
Agree |
201 |
27.5% |
0.275342466 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
195 |
26.7% |
0.267123288 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
218 |
29.9% |
0.298630137 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
20 |
2.7% |
0.027397260 |
6 |
Disagree |
15 |
2.1% |
0.020547945 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
97 |
No answer |
39 |
5.3% |
0.053424658 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri24_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: I feel that I learn new and interesting things
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? When I do voluntary work for this organisation….
|
Literal question:
|
I feel that I learn new and interesting things
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
64 |
8.8% |
0.087671233 |
2 |
Agree |
257 |
35.2% |
0.352054795 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
209 |
28.6% |
0.286301370 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
117 |
16% |
0.160273973 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
25 |
3.4% |
0.034246575 |
6 |
Disagree |
13 |
1.8% |
0.017808219 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
5.5% |
0.054794521 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri24_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: I obtain experiences which could be useful for undertaking non-voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? When I do voluntary work for this organisation….
|
Literal question:
|
I obtain experiences which could be useful for undertaking non-voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
52 |
7.1% |
0.07123288 |
2 |
Agree |
194 |
26.6% |
0.26575342 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
153 |
21% |
0.20958904 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
186 |
25.5% |
0.25479452 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
43 |
5.9% |
0.05890411 |
6 |
Disagree |
40 |
5.5% |
0.05479452 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
1.2% |
0.01232877 |
97 |
No answer |
53 |
7.3% |
0.07260274 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri24_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: I have the opportunity to do something tangible about an issue which interests me
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? When I do voluntary work for this organisation….
|
Literal question:
|
I have the opportunity to do something tangible about an issue which interests me
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
98 |
13.4% |
0.134246575 |
2 |
Agree |
293 |
40.1% |
0.401369863 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
164 |
22.5% |
0.224657534 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
106 |
14.5% |
0.145205479 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
17 |
2.3% |
0.023287671 |
6 |
Disagree |
8 |
1.1% |
0.010958904 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
97 |
No answer |
39 |
5.3% |
0.053424658 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri24_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: I have the opportunity to spend time with friends or acquaintances
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? When I do voluntary work for this organisation….
|
Literal question:
|
I have the opportunity to spend time with friends or acquaintances
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
93 |
12.7% |
0.127397260 |
2 |
Agree |
286 |
39.2% |
0.391780822 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
164 |
22.5% |
0.224657534 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
99 |
13.6% |
0.135616438 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
23 |
3.2% |
0.031506849 |
6 |
Disagree |
19 |
2.6% |
0.026027397 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
6 |
0.8% |
0.008219178 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
5.5% |
0.054794521 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri24_6
Variable label:
|
Statement: I forget any problems that otherwise affect my life
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? When I do voluntary work for this organisation….
|
Literal question:
|
I forget any problems that otherwise affect my life
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
31 |
4.2% |
0.04246575 |
2 |
Agree |
95 |
13% |
0.13013699 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
124 |
17% |
0.16986301 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
241 |
33% |
0.33013699 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
47 |
6.4% |
0.06438356 |
6 |
Disagree |
100 |
13.7% |
0.13698630 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
49 |
6.7% |
0.06712329 |
97 |
No answer |
43 |
5.9% |
0.05890411 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri25_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: The work I do has clearly defined targets
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the work that you do for this organisation?
|
Literal question:
|
The work I do has clearly defined targets
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
70 |
9.6% |
0.095890411 |
2 |
Agree |
297 |
40.7% |
0.406849315 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
179 |
24.5% |
0.245205479 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
100 |
13.7% |
0.136986301 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
18 |
2.5% |
0.024657534 |
6 |
Disagree |
11 |
1.5% |
0.015068493 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001369863 |
97 |
No answer |
54 |
7.4% |
0.073972603 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri25_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is easy for me to find out if I am doing my work well
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the work that you do for this organisation?
|
Literal question:
|
It is easy for me to find out if I am doing my work well
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
46 |
6.3% |
0.063013699 |
2 |
Agree |
289 |
39.6% |
0.395890411 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
176 |
24.1% |
0.241095890 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
125 |
17.1% |
0.171232877 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
29 |
4% |
0.039726027 |
6 |
Disagree |
7 |
1% |
0.009589041 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004109589 |
97 |
No answer |
55 |
7.5% |
0.075342466 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri25_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: The work I do is extremely useful
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the work that you do for this organisation?
|
Literal question:
|
The work I do is extremely useful
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
61 |
8.4% |
0.083561644 |
2 |
Agree |
283 |
38.8% |
0.387671233 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
191 |
26.2% |
0.261643836 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
113 |
15.5% |
0.154794521 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
18 |
2.5% |
0.024657534 |
6 |
Disagree |
5 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002739726 |
97 |
No answer |
57 |
7.8% |
0.078082192 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri25_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: I am interested in the future of the organisation
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the work that you do for this organisation?
|
Literal question:
|
I am interested in the future of the organisation
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
109 |
14.9% |
0.149315068 |
2 |
Agree |
336 |
46% |
0.460273973 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
113 |
15.5% |
0.154794521 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
103 |
14.1% |
0.141095890 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
7 |
1% |
0.009589041 |
6 |
Disagree |
5 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002739726 |
97 |
No answer |
55 |
7.5% |
0.075342466 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri25_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: The organisation’s values are very similar to my own values
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the work that you do for this organisation?
|
Literal question:
|
The organisation’s values are very similar to my own values
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
92 |
12.6% |
0.126027397 |
2 |
Agree |
287 |
39.3% |
0.393150685 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
120 |
16.4% |
0.164383562 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
158 |
21.6% |
0.216438356 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
14 |
1.9% |
0.019178082 |
6 |
Disagree |
6 |
0.8% |
0.008219178 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
97 |
No answer |
53 |
7.3% |
0.072602740 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri25_6
Variable label:
|
Statement: I am proud of being able to say that I am associated with this organisation
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the work that you do for this organisation?
|
Literal question:
|
I am proud of being able to say that I am associated with this organisation
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
116 |
15.9% |
0.15890411 |
2 |
Agree |
285 |
39% |
0.39041096 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
115 |
15.8% |
0.15753425 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
138 |
18.9% |
0.18904110 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
9 |
1.2% |
0.01232877 |
6 |
Disagree |
11 |
1.5% |
0.01506849 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
56 |
7.7% |
0.07671233 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri26_1
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with organization: manages its volunteers
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which the organisation…
|
Literal question:
|
manages its volunteers
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
47 |
6.4% |
0.06438356 |
2 |
To a great degree |
273 |
37.4% |
0.37397260 |
3 |
To some degree |
286 |
39.2% |
0.39178082 |
4 |
To a small degree |
50 |
6.8% |
0.06849315 |
5 |
Not at all |
17 |
2.3% |
0.02328767 |
97 |
No answer |
57 |
7.8% |
0.07808219 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri26_2
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with organization: provide volunteers with training
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which the organisation…
|
Literal question:
|
provide volunteers with training
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
39 |
5.3% |
0.05342466 |
2 |
To a great degree |
217 |
29.7% |
0.29726027 |
3 |
To some degree |
301 |
41.2% |
0.41232877 |
4 |
To a small degree |
86 |
11.8% |
0.11780822 |
5 |
Not at all |
25 |
3.4% |
0.03424658 |
97 |
No answer |
62 |
8.5% |
0.08493151 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri26_3
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with organization: solves problems which arise in connection with voluntary work
|
Pre-question text:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which the organisation…
|
Literal question:
|
solves problems which arise in connection with voluntary work
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
40 |
5.5% |
0.05479452 |
2 |
To a great degree |
269 |
36.8% |
0.36849315 |
3 |
To some degree |
286 |
39.2% |
0.39178082 |
4 |
To a small degree |
52 |
7.1% |
0.07123288 |
5 |
Not at all |
15 |
2.1% |
0.02054795 |
97 |
No answer |
68 |
9.3% |
0.09315068 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri27
Variable label:
|
Satisfied with organization, overall
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with your experience of being a volunteer with this organisation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
83 |
11.4% |
0.11369863 |
2 |
To a great degree |
354 |
48.5% |
0.48493151 |
3 |
To some degree |
202 |
27.7% |
0.27671233 |
4 |
To a small degree |
25 |
3.4% |
0.03424658 |
5 |
Not at all |
11 |
1.5% |
0.01506849 |
97 |
No answer |
55 |
7.5% |
0.07534247 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4fri28
Variable label:
|
How likely is it that you will still be working as a volunteer for this organisation two years from now?
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you will still be working as a volunteer for this organisation two years from now?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=1 and if the respondent reported in wave 3 to have undertaken voluntary work for at least one voluntary organization. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
168 |
23% |
0.23013699 |
2 |
Likely |
220 |
30.1% |
0.30136986 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
135 |
18.5% |
0.18493151 |
4 |
Not very likely |
99 |
13.6% |
0.13561644 |
5 |
Not likely at all |
59 |
8.1% |
0.08082192 |
97 |
No answer |
49 |
6.7% |
0.06712329 |
98 |
Not asked |
5567 |
|
NA |
r4ran3
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1607] [Invalid:4690] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
811 |
50.5% |
0.5046671 |
2 |
2 |
796 |
49.5% |
0.4953329 |
Sysmiss |
|
4690 |
|
NA |
r4km2_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: The world would be more peaceful if wealth was more evenly distributed between countries.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know something about your views about society in general, but especially about climate issues.
First we will ask you about society. Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
The world would be more peaceful if wealth was more evenly distributed between countries.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly disagree |
23 |
2.8% |
0.02836005 |
2 |
Disagree |
67 |
8.3% |
0.08261406 |
3 |
Disagree somewhat |
56 |
6.9% |
0.06905055 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
100 |
12.3% |
0.12330456 |
5 |
Agree somewhat |
218 |
26.9% |
0.26880395 |
6 |
Agree |
221 |
27.3% |
0.27250308 |
7 |
Strongly Agree |
117 |
14.4% |
0.14426634 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01109741 |
98 |
Not asked |
5486 |
|
NA |
r4km2_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Society needs more justice so that wealth can be distributed more evenly.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know something about your views about society in general, but especially about climate issues.
First we will ask you about society. Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Society needs more justice so that wealth can be distributed more evenly.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
2% |
0.01972873 |
2 |
Disagree |
49 |
6% |
0.06041924 |
3 |
Disagree somewhat |
92 |
11.3% |
0.11344020 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
98 |
12.1% |
0.12083847 |
5 |
Agree somewhat |
262 |
32.3% |
0.32305795 |
6 |
Agree |
190 |
23.4% |
0.23427867 |
7 |
Strongly Agree |
91 |
11.2% |
0.11220715 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.6% |
0.01602959 |
98 |
Not asked |
5486 |
|
NA |
r4km2_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: I support tax reforms which would make companies and people on high incomes pay more tax.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know something about your views about society in general, but especially about climate issues.
First we will ask you about society. Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
I support tax reforms which would make companies and people on high incomes pay more tax.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly disagree |
22 |
2.7% |
0.02712700 |
2 |
Disagree |
79 |
9.7% |
0.09741060 |
3 |
Disagree somewhat |
71 |
8.8% |
0.08754624 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
77 |
9.5% |
0.09494451 |
5 |
Agree somewhat |
269 |
33.2% |
0.33168927 |
6 |
Agree |
197 |
24.3% |
0.24290999 |
7 |
Strongly Agree |
84 |
10.4% |
0.10357583 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.5% |
0.01479655 |
98 |
Not asked |
5486 |
|
NA |
r4km2_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: Everyone should have equal opportunities for succeeding or failing without the authorities becoming involved.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know something about your views about society in general, but especially about climate issues.
First we will ask you about society. Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Everyone should have equal opportunities for succeeding or failing without the authorities becoming involved.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly disagree |
25 |
3.1% |
0.03082614 |
2 |
Disagree |
51 |
6.3% |
0.06288533 |
3 |
Disagree somewhat |
119 |
14.7% |
0.14673243 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
180 |
22.2% |
0.22194821 |
5 |
Agree somewhat |
191 |
23.6% |
0.23551171 |
6 |
Agree |
181 |
22.3% |
0.22318126 |
7 |
Strongly Agree |
44 |
5.4% |
0.05425401 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
2.5% |
0.02466091 |
98 |
Not asked |
5486 |
|
NA |
r4km2_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: Market competition is almost always the best way of meeting people’s requirements.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know something about your views about society in general, but especially about climate issues.
First we will ask you about society. Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Market competition is almost always the best way of meeting people’s requirements.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly disagree |
44 |
5.4% |
0.05425401 |
2 |
Disagree |
145 |
17.9% |
0.17879162 |
3 |
Disagree somewhat |
167 |
20.6% |
0.20591862 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
162 |
20% |
0.19975339 |
5 |
Agree somewhat |
169 |
20.8% |
0.20838471 |
6 |
Agree |
90 |
11.1% |
0.11097411 |
7 |
Strongly Agree |
17 |
2.1% |
0.02096178 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.1% |
0.02096178 |
98 |
Not asked |
5486 |
|
NA |
r4km2_6
Variable label:
|
Statement: If the system is fair the cleverest people should earn the most money.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like to know something about your views about society in general, but especially about climate issues.
First we will ask you about society. Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
If the system is fair the cleverest people should earn the most money.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly disagree |
40 |
4.9% |
0.04932182 |
2 |
Disagree |
86 |
10.6% |
0.10604192 |
3 |
Disagree somewhat |
92 |
11.3% |
0.11344020 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
129 |
15.9% |
0.15906289 |
5 |
Agree somewhat |
280 |
34.5% |
0.34525277 |
6 |
Agree |
124 |
15.3% |
0.15289766 |
7 |
Strongly Agree |
46 |
5.7% |
0.05672010 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.7% |
0.01726264 |
98 |
Not asked |
5486 |
|
NA |
r4ran4
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:808] [Invalid:5489] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
176 |
21.8% |
0.2178218 |
2 |
2 |
147 |
18.2% |
0.1819307 |
3 |
3 |
140 |
17.3% |
0.1732673 |
4 |
4 |
184 |
22.8% |
0.2277228 |
5 |
5 |
161 |
19.9% |
0.1992574 |
Sysmiss |
|
5489 |
|
NA |
R4KM3a
Variable label:
|
Vignette 1
|
Literal question:
|
We are interested in knowing how people perceive and interpret texts about climate issues. Below you will find a text about this very subject. We would ask you to read through the whole text and then answer a few questions. We are keen to know what you think about the content and we understand that you will not remember all the details.
If the world continues to release climate gasses at the current rate, climate changes in Norway would cause substantial increases in precipitation. Norsk Næringsliv (Norwegian Trade and Industry) wishes to exploit this opportunity in order to promote investments in the development of hydroelectric power and wind power. Norway could then export more oil and gas and thus strengthen the Norwegian economy. But the radical Grønn Verden (Green World) environmental organisation is promoting its industry-hostile agenda in an attempt to curb the oil industry. However, Norsk Næringsliv wishes to reveal the undue political pressure being exerted by the environmental lobby. They have emphasised that Norway would not have to impose harmful restrictions on individuals and trade and industry if more oil and gas was extracted. At the same time Norway could then fund reductions in foreign emissions and continue with its economic growth.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and r4ran4=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:176] [Invalid:6121] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Exposed for vignette |
176 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
6121 |
|
NA |
R4KM3b
Variable label:
|
Vignette 2
|
Literal question:
|
We are interested in knowing how people perceive and interpret texts about climate issues. Below you will find a text about this very subject. We would ask you to read through the whole text and then answer a few questions. We are keen to know what you think about the content and we understand that you will not remember all the details.
If the world continues to release climate gasses at the current rate, climate changes in Norway would cause substantial increases in precipitation and dramatic rises in sea levels. People throughout the country would consequently be exposed to considerable risks and their lifestyle would suffer. Norsk Næringsliv wishes to combat climate change by using a quota trading system. This would allow companies to reduce their CO2 emissions by purchasing and selling climate quotas. However, the radical Grønn Verden environmental organisation is promoting its own destructive agenda. They are fighting to undermine free market forces. while Norsk Næringsliv wishes to reveal the undue political pressure being exerted by the environmental lobby. They have emphasised that climate quotas would remove the need for more controlled emissions which threaten growth. With the freedom to invest, Norwegian trade and industry could retain its economic growth and reduce CO2 emissions at the same time.
|
Post-question:
|
[Asked if U=2 and r4ran4=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:147] [Invalid:6150] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Exposed for vignette |
147 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
6150 |
|
NA |
R4KM3c
Variable label:
|
Vignette 3
|
Literal question:
|
We are interested in knowing how people perceive and interpret texts about climate issues. Below you will find a text about this very subject. We would ask you to read through the whole text and then answer a few questions. We are keen to know what you think about the content and we understand that you will not remember all the details.
If the world continues to release climate gasses at the current rate, climate changes in Norway would cause substantial increases in precipitation. The Grønn Verden environmental organisation wishes to exploit this opportunity to promote investments in hydroelectric power and wind power. Norway could then reduce its exports of oil and gas and thus reduce emissions. But the for-profit trade and industry organisation, Norsk Næringsliv, is promoting its own greedy agenda in order to strengthen the oil industry. However, Grønn Verden wishes to reveal the undue political pressure being exerted by the petroleum lobby. They have emphasised that developing a strong energy sector based on renewable sources of energy would help to ensure continued prosperity in Norway. We could then cut CO2 emissions at both national and international level without the energy requirements of individuals and trade and industry being affected.
|
Post-question:
|
[Asked if U=2 and r4ran4=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:140] [Invalid:6157] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Exposed for vignette |
140 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
6157 |
|
NA |
R4KM3d
Variable label:
|
Vignette 4
|
Literal question:
|
We are interested in knowing how people perceive and interpret texts about climate issues. Below you will find a text about this very subject. We would ask you to read through the whole text and then answer a few questions. We are keen to know what you think about the content and we understand that you will not remember all the details.
If the world continues to release climate gasses at the current rate, climate changes in Norway would cause substantial increases in precipitation and dramatic rises in sea levels. People throughout the country would consequently be exposed to considerable risks and their lifestyle would suffer. The Grønn Verden environmental organisation wants to combat climate change by introducing a tax on the climate gas, CO2, in order to reduce emissions. But the for-profit trade and industry organisation, Norsk Næringsliv, is promoting its own greedy agenda. They are fighting constantly against solutions such as taxing CO2 emissions in order to enrich themselves, However, Grønn Verden wishes to reveal the undue political pressure being exerted by the petroleum lobby. They have emphasised that a CO2 tax would remove the financial benefits enjoyed by climate-hostile businesses. By using the extra income generated by such a tax, society could redistribute wealth more fairly and support investments in renewable energy.
|
Post-question:
|
[Asked if U=2 and r4ran4=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:184] [Invalid:6113] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Exposed for vignette |
184 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
6113 |
|
NA |
R4KM3e
Variable label:
|
Vignette 5
|
Literal question:
|
We are interested in knowing how people perceive and interpret texts about climate issues. Below you will find a text about this very subject. We would ask you to read through the whole text and then answer a few questions. We are keen to know what you think about the content and we understand that you will not remember all the details.
The text contains the possible consequences of climate change which have been identified by climate research for Norway during this century if the world’s climate gas emissions remain at current levels.
Average precipitation will increase by 23%. Extreme precipitation will increase by up to 70%. The number of days with high precipitation will increase. The average air temperature will increase by 4.6 degrees. Winters will be 6 degrees warmer. The number of days with snow will be reduced by up to 3 months. There will be almost no snow along the coast and in low-lying areas. The sea level will increased by up to 50 cm in Oslo and by 80 cm in Bergen. The sea temperature in the North Sea and along the coast will increase by up to 2.5 degrees. The sea will become more acid (the pH level of the sea will drop) to a level which has not been seen during the last 20 million years. The Arctic will be ice-free during the summer.
|
Post-question:
|
[Asked if U=2 and r4ran4=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:161] [Invalid:6136] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Exposed for vignette |
161 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
6136 |
|
NA |
r4km4a_1
Variable label:
|
Response to text: In your opinion, how much of a threat does the text think that climate change poses?
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, how much of a threat does the text think that climate change poses?
|
Technical description:
|
Please answer by using a scale of zero (0) to , where zero represents “no threat whatsoever” and 10 represents “extreme threat”.
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Not threat whatsoever |
26 |
3.2% |
0.03205919 |
2 |
1 |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01849568 |
3 |
2 |
36 |
4.4% |
0.04438964 |
4 |
3 |
61 |
7.5% |
0.07521578 |
5 |
4 |
43 |
5.3% |
0.05302096 |
6 |
5 |
95 |
11.7% |
0.11713933 |
7 |
6 |
64 |
7.9% |
0.07891492 |
8 |
7 |
113 |
13.9% |
0.13933416 |
9 |
8 |
136 |
16.8% |
0.16769420 |
10 |
9 |
89 |
11% |
0.10974106 |
11 |
10 extreme threat |
70 |
8.6% |
0.08631319 |
97 |
No answer |
48 |
5.9% |
0.05918619 |
98 |
Not asked |
5486 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
15 |
1.8% |
0.01849568 |
r4km4b_1
Variable label:
|
Response to text: How much confidence do have about the veracity of the scenarios presented in the text?
|
Literal question:
|
How much confidence do have about the veracity of the scenarios presented in the text?
|
Technical description:
|
Please answer by using a scale of zero (0) to , where zero represents “no confidence” and 10 represents "“full confidence”.
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 no confidence |
63 |
7.8% |
0.07768187 |
2 |
1 |
42 |
5.2% |
0.05178792 |
3 |
2 |
64 |
7.9% |
0.07891492 |
4 |
3 |
84 |
10.4% |
0.10357583 |
5 |
4 |
83 |
10.2% |
0.10234279 |
6 |
5 |
134 |
16.5% |
0.16522811 |
7 |
6 |
76 |
9.4% |
0.09371147 |
8 |
7 |
94 |
11.6% |
0.11590629 |
9 |
8 |
59 |
7.3% |
0.07274969 |
10 |
9 |
19 |
2.3% |
0.02342787 |
11 |
10 full confidence |
16 |
2% |
0.01972873 |
97 |
No answer |
61 |
7.5% |
0.07521578 |
98 |
Not asked |
5486 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
16 |
2% |
0.01972873 |
r4km4c_1
Variable label:
|
Response to text: What is your overall reaction to the text you have read?
|
Literal question:
|
What is your overall reaction to the text you have read?
|
Technical description:
|
Please answer by using a scale of zero (0) to , where zero represents “highly negative” and 10 represents "“highly positive”. [Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 highly negative |
41 |
5.1% |
0.050554871 |
2 |
1 |
47 |
5.8% |
0.057953144 |
3 |
2 |
72 |
8.9% |
0.088779285 |
4 |
3 |
89 |
11% |
0.109741060 |
5 |
4 |
113 |
13.9% |
0.139334155 |
6 |
5 |
172 |
21.2% |
0.212083847 |
7 |
6 |
58 |
7.2% |
0.071516646 |
8 |
7 |
71 |
8.8% |
0.087546239 |
9 |
8 |
33 |
4.1% |
0.040690506 |
10 |
9 |
11 |
1.4% |
0.013563502 |
11 |
10 highly positive |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004932182 |
97 |
No answer |
74 |
9.1% |
0.091245376 |
98 |
Not asked |
5486 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
26 |
3.2% |
0.032059186 |
r4km4d_1
Variable label:
|
How much of a threat do you think climate change will pose to you personally during the next 50 years?
|
Literal question:
|
How much of a threat do you think climate change will pose to you personally during the next 50 years?
|
Technical description:
|
Please answer by using a scale of zero (0) to , where zero represents “no threat whatsoever” and 10 represents “extreme threat”. [Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Not threat whatsoever |
30 |
3.7% |
0.036991369 |
2 |
1 |
42 |
5.2% |
0.051787916 |
3 |
2 |
76 |
9.4% |
0.093711467 |
4 |
3 |
91 |
11.2% |
0.112207152 |
5 |
4 |
69 |
8.5% |
0.085080148 |
6 |
5 |
111 |
13.7% |
0.136868064 |
7 |
6 |
106 |
13.1% |
0.130702836 |
8 |
7 |
103 |
12.7% |
0.127003699 |
9 |
8 |
87 |
10.7% |
0.107274969 |
10 |
9 |
24 |
3% |
0.029593095 |
11 |
10 extreme threat |
26 |
3.2% |
0.032059186 |
97 |
No answer |
39 |
4.8% |
0.048088779 |
98 |
Not asked |
5486 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
7 |
0.9% |
0.008631319 |
r4km4e_1
Variable label:
|
Important for Norway to reduce climate gas emissions
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think it is for Norway to reduce climate gas emissions?
|
Technical description:
|
Please answer by using a scale of zero (0) to , where zero represents “not at all important” and 10 represents “extremely important”. [Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 not at all important |
18 |
2.2% |
0.022194821 |
2 |
1 |
17 |
2.1% |
0.020961776 |
3 |
2 |
26 |
3.2% |
0.032059186 |
4 |
3 |
45 |
5.5% |
0.055487053 |
5 |
4 |
34 |
4.2% |
0.041923551 |
6 |
5 |
67 |
8.3% |
0.082614057 |
7 |
6 |
58 |
7.2% |
0.071516646 |
8 |
7 |
115 |
14.2% |
0.141800247 |
9 |
8 |
137 |
16.9% |
0.168927250 |
10 |
9 |
89 |
11% |
0.109741060 |
11 |
10 extremely important |
163 |
20.1% |
0.200986436 |
97 |
No answer |
38 |
4.7% |
0.046855734 |
98 |
Not asked |
5486 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004932182 |
r4km4f_1
Variable label:
|
How much of a problem do you think climate change will be for Norway during the next 50 years?
|
Literal question:
|
How much of a problem do you think climate change will be for Norway during the next 50 years?
|
Technical description:
|
Please answer by using a scale of zero (0) to , where zero represents “absolutely no problem” and 10 represents “disastrous”. [Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 absolutely no problem |
12 |
1.5% |
0.014796547 |
2 |
1 |
11 |
1.4% |
0.013563502 |
3 |
2 |
41 |
5.1% |
0.050554871 |
4 |
3 |
65 |
8% |
0.080147965 |
5 |
4 |
66 |
8.1% |
0.081381011 |
6 |
5 |
106 |
13.1% |
0.130702836 |
7 |
6 |
120 |
14.8% |
0.147965475 |
8 |
7 |
178 |
21.9% |
0.219482121 |
9 |
8 |
118 |
14.5% |
0.145499383 |
10 |
9 |
41 |
5.1% |
0.050554871 |
11 |
10 highly negative |
13 |
1.6% |
0.016029593 |
97 |
No answer |
36 |
4.4% |
0.044389642 |
98 |
Not asked |
5486 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004932182 |
r4km4g_1
Variable label:
|
Reaction to organization: Grønn Verden
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two organisations are mentioned in the text that you have just read. Please quantify your reaction to these organisations on a scale of zero (0) to , where zero means “highly negative” and 10 means "“highly positive”.
|
Literal question:
|
Grønn Verden
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 highly negative |
27 |
3.3% |
0.03329223 |
2 |
1 |
22 |
2.7% |
0.02712700 |
3 |
2 |
42 |
5.2% |
0.05178792 |
4 |
3 |
55 |
6.8% |
0.06781751 |
5 |
4 |
59 |
7.3% |
0.07274969 |
6 |
5 |
109 |
13.4% |
0.13440197 |
7 |
6 |
69 |
8.5% |
0.08508015 |
8 |
7 |
74 |
9.1% |
0.09124538 |
9 |
8 |
44 |
5.4% |
0.05425401 |
10 |
9 |
25 |
3.1% |
0.03082614 |
11 |
10 highly positive |
18 |
2.2% |
0.02219482 |
97 |
No answer |
243 |
30% |
0.29963009 |
98 |
Not asked |
5486 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
24 |
3% |
0.02959309 |
r4km4g_2
Variable label:
|
Reaction to organization: Norsk Næringsliv
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two organisations are mentioned in the text that you have just read. Please quantify your reaction to these organisations on a scale of zero (0) to , where zero means “highly negative” and 10 means "“highly positive”.
|
Literal question:
|
Norsk Næringsliv
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 highly negative |
37 |
4.6% |
0.045622688 |
2 |
1 |
35 |
4.3% |
0.043156597 |
3 |
2 |
53 |
6.5% |
0.065351418 |
4 |
3 |
66 |
8.1% |
0.081381011 |
5 |
4 |
103 |
12.7% |
0.127003699 |
6 |
5 |
132 |
16.3% |
0.162762022 |
7 |
6 |
51 |
6.3% |
0.062885327 |
8 |
7 |
41 |
5.1% |
0.050554871 |
9 |
8 |
20 |
2.5% |
0.024660912 |
10 |
9 |
4 |
0.5% |
0.004932182 |
11 |
10 highly positive |
6 |
0.7% |
0.007398274 |
97 |
No answer |
244 |
30.1% |
0.300863132 |
98 |
Not asked |
5486 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
19 |
2.3% |
0.023427867 |
r4km5_1_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Everyone should have equal opportunities for succeeding or failing without the authorities becoming involved.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Everyone should have equal opportunities for succeeding or failing without the authorities becoming involved.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
48 |
6% |
0.06030151 |
2 |
Agree |
207 |
26% |
0.26005025 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
189 |
23.7% |
0.23743719 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
172 |
21.6% |
0.21608040 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
91 |
11.4% |
0.11432161 |
6 |
Disagree |
59 |
7.4% |
0.07412060 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
17 |
2.1% |
0.02135678 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.6% |
0.01633166 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km5_1_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Market competition is almost always the best way of meeting people’s requirements.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Market competition is almost always the best way of meeting people’s requirements.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
23 |
2.9% |
0.02889447 |
2 |
Agree |
109 |
13.7% |
0.13693467 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
185 |
23.2% |
0.23241206 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
159 |
20% |
0.19974874 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
152 |
19.1% |
0.19095477 |
6 |
Disagree |
111 |
13.9% |
0.13944724 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
44 |
5.5% |
0.05527638 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.6% |
0.01633166 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km5_1_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: If the system is fair the cleverest people should earn the most money.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
If the system is fair the cleverest people should earn the most money.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
32 |
4% |
0.04020101 |
2 |
Agree |
161 |
20.2% |
0.20226131 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
258 |
32.4% |
0.32412060 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
127 |
16% |
0.15954774 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
106 |
13.3% |
0.13316583 |
6 |
Disagree |
73 |
9.2% |
0.09170854 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
29 |
3.6% |
0.03643216 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.3% |
0.01256281 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km5_1_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: The world would be more peaceful if wealth was more evenly distributed between countries
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
The world would be more peaceful if wealth was more evenly distributed between countries.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
104 |
13.1% |
0.13065327 |
2 |
Agree |
249 |
31.3% |
0.31281407 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
203 |
25.5% |
0.25502513 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
115 |
14.4% |
0.14447236 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
60 |
7.5% |
0.07537688 |
6 |
Disagree |
41 |
5.2% |
0.05150754 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
15 |
1.9% |
0.01884422 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01130653 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km5_1_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: Society needs more justice so that wealth can be distributed more evenly.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Society needs more justice so that wealth can be distributed more evenly.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
83 |
10.4% |
0.10427136 |
2 |
Agree |
217 |
27.3% |
0.27261307 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
224 |
28.1% |
0.28140704 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
130 |
16.3% |
0.16331658 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
84 |
10.6% |
0.10552764 |
6 |
Disagree |
38 |
4.8% |
0.04773869 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
1.5% |
0.01507538 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
1% |
0.01005025 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km5_1_6
Variable label:
|
Statement: I support tax reforms which would make companies and people on high incomes pay more tax.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
I support tax reforms which would make companies and people on high incomes pay more tax.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
74 |
9.3% |
0.09296482 |
2 |
Agree |
200 |
25.1% |
0.25125628 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
239 |
30% |
0.30025126 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
85 |
10.7% |
0.10678392 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
98 |
12.3% |
0.12311558 |
6 |
Disagree |
66 |
8.3% |
0.08291457 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
23 |
2.9% |
0.02889447 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.4% |
0.01381910 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km5_2_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: The best way of looking after future generations is to keep our customs.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
The best way of looking after future generations is to keep our customs.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
37 |
4.6% |
0.04648241 |
2 |
Agree |
130 |
16.3% |
0.16331658 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
258 |
32.4% |
0.32412060 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
123 |
15.5% |
0.15452261 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
134 |
16.8% |
0.16834171 |
6 |
Disagree |
82 |
10.3% |
0.10301508 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
19 |
2.4% |
0.02386935 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.6% |
0.01633166 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km5_2_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Society works best when people strictly obey all the laws and regulations.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Society works best when people strictly obey all the laws and regulations.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
76 |
9.5% |
0.09547739 |
2 |
Agree |
324 |
40.7% |
0.40703518 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
241 |
30.3% |
0.30276382 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
60 |
7.5% |
0.07537688 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
65 |
8.2% |
0.08165829 |
6 |
Disagree |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01130653 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
7 |
0.9% |
0.00879397 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.8% |
0.01758794 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km5_2_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Having respect for authority is one of the most important things that children can learn.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Having respect for authority is one of the most important things that children can learn.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
35 |
4.4% |
0.04396985 |
2 |
Agree |
128 |
16.1% |
0.16080402 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
267 |
33.5% |
0.33542714 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
106 |
13.3% |
0.13316583 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
120 |
15.1% |
0.15075377 |
6 |
Disagree |
94 |
11.8% |
0.11809045 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
33 |
4.1% |
0.04145729 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.6% |
0.01633166 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km5_2_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: Cooperation with other people rarely works.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Cooperation with other people rarely works.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003768844 |
2 |
Agree |
12 |
1.5% |
0.015075377 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
31 |
3.9% |
0.038944724 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
37 |
4.6% |
0.046482412 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
111 |
13.9% |
0.139447236 |
6 |
Disagree |
376 |
47.2% |
0.472361809 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
212 |
26.6% |
0.266331658 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.8% |
0.017587940 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km5_2_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: The future is too uncertain to allow us to make proper plans.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
The future is too uncertain to allow us to make proper plans.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
5 |
0.6% |
0.006281407 |
2 |
Agree |
22 |
2.8% |
0.027638191 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
69 |
8.7% |
0.086683417 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
81 |
10.2% |
0.101758794 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
168 |
21.1% |
0.211055276 |
6 |
Disagree |
353 |
44.3% |
0.443467337 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
83 |
10.4% |
0.104271357 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
1.9% |
0.018844221 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km5_2_6
Variable label:
|
Statement: I feel that life is a lottery.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
I feel that life is a lottery.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
13 |
1.6% |
0.01633166 |
2 |
Agree |
32 |
4% |
0.04020101 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
126 |
15.8% |
0.15829146 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
132 |
16.6% |
0.16582915 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
120 |
15.1% |
0.15075377 |
6 |
Disagree |
262 |
32.9% |
0.32914573 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
94 |
11.8% |
0.11809045 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.1% |
0.02135678 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4mobil_r4km6
Variable label:
|
[Tester om respondenten benytter en mobil enhet. Tester dersom U=2 og ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Non-mobile |
630 |
79.1% |
0.791457286 |
1 |
Mobile |
162 |
20.4% |
0.203517588 |
97 |
|
4 |
0.5% |
0.005025126 |
98 |
|
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km6
Variable label:
|
Image experiment: Which of these images best illustrates your understanding of how the climate system works.
|
Literal question:
|
People disagree about how the climate system works. The five images below illustrate five different perspectives. Each picture portrays the earth’s climate system as being a ball balancing on a line, and each one has a different ability to withstand man-made climate changes.
Which of these images best illustrates your understanding of how the climate system works.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2 & mobil_R4KM6 =0. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Respondents using mobile device are not exposed to the experiment. See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Gradual - The earth's climate is changing slowly. Climate change will gradually
result in dangerous consequences. |
290 |
46% |
0.46031746 |
2 |
Fragile - The climate on earth is delicately balanced. Small climate changes
will gradually create sudden and disastrous consequences. |
41 |
6.5% |
0.06507937 |
3 |
Stable - The earth's climate is very stable. Climate change will result in minor
or no consequences. |
15 |
2.4% |
0.02380952 |
4 |
Threshold - The earth's climate is stable within certain limits. If there are
minor climate changes the climate will return to a stable balance. If there are
major changes the consequences will be disastrous. |
180 |
28.6% |
0.28571429 |
5 |
Governed by chance - The earth's climate is governed by chance and
unpredictable. We do not know what will happen. |
87 |
13.8% |
0.13809524 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
2.7% |
0.02698413 |
98 |
Not asked |
5667 |
|
NA |
r4km7
Variable label:
|
Where would you place your views about the relationship between humans and nature on this scale?
|
Literal question:
|
Some people think that humans are at the centre of the whole organic system (nature). Others think that humans are just a small part of the organic system. These two views have been placed at either extreme of the scale below. Where would you place your views about the relationship between humans and nature on this scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 Humans are at the centre of the organic system |
83 |
5.2% |
0.05161692 |
2 |
2 |
149 |
9.3% |
0.09266169 |
3 |
3 |
291 |
18.1% |
0.18097015 |
4 |
4 |
363 |
22.6% |
0.22574627 |
5 |
5 |
322 |
20% |
0.20024876 |
6 |
6 |
170 |
10.6% |
0.10572139 |
7 |
7 Humans are a small part of the organic system |
195 |
12.1% |
0.12126866 |
97 |
No answer |
35 |
2.2% |
0.02176617 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4km8_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Humans are entitled to change their natural environment in order to satisfy their requirements .
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Humans are entitled to change their natural environment in order to satisfy their requirements .
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
27 |
1.7% |
0.01679104 |
2 |
Agree |
54 |
3.4% |
0.03358209 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
202 |
12.6% |
0.12562189 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
142 |
8.8% |
0.08830846 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
329 |
20.5% |
0.20460199 |
6 |
Disagree |
527 |
32.8% |
0.32773632 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
295 |
18.3% |
0.18345771 |
97 |
No answer |
32 |
2% |
0.01990050 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4km8_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: The so-called organic crisis" facing humanity has been highly exaggerated.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
The so-called organic crisis" facing humanity has been highly exaggerated.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
31 |
1.9% |
0.01927861 |
2 |
Agree |
84 |
5.2% |
0.05223881 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
284 |
17.7% |
0.17661692 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
201 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
284 |
17.7% |
0.17661692 |
6 |
Disagree |
471 |
29.3% |
0.29291045 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
219 |
13.6% |
0.13619403 |
97 |
No answer |
34 |
2.1% |
0.02114428 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4km8_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: The balance of nature is extremely sensitive and easy to disturb.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
The balance of nature is extremely sensitive and easy to disturb.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
200 |
12.4% |
0.12437811 |
2 |
Agree |
509 |
31.7% |
0.31654229 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
471 |
29.3% |
0.29291045 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
174 |
10.8% |
0.10820896 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
139 |
8.6% |
0.08644279 |
6 |
Disagree |
63 |
3.9% |
0.03917910 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
1.3% |
0.01305970 |
97 |
No answer |
31 |
1.9% |
0.01927861 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4km8_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: Norway needs economic growth in order to be able to protect the environment
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Norway needs economic growth in order to be able to protect the environment
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
31 |
1.9% |
0.01927861 |
2 |
Agree |
140 |
8.7% |
0.08706468 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
273 |
17% |
0.16977612 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
459 |
28.5% |
0.28544776 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
260 |
16.2% |
0.16169154 |
6 |
Disagree |
307 |
19.1% |
0.19092040 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
99 |
6.2% |
0.06156716 |
97 |
No answer |
39 |
2.4% |
0.02425373 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4km9_1
Variable label:
|
Trust: Climate researchers
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
Climate researchers
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
148 |
18.6% |
0.18592965 |
2 |
To a great degree |
352 |
44.2% |
0.44221106 |
3 |
To some degree |
220 |
27.6% |
0.27638191 |
4 |
To a small degree |
40 |
5% |
0.05025126 |
5 |
Not at all |
14 |
1.8% |
0.01758794 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
2.8% |
0.02763819 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km9_2
Variable label:
|
Trust: Journalists
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
Journalists
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
3 |
0.4% |
0.003768844 |
2 |
To a great degree |
38 |
4.8% |
0.047738693 |
3 |
To some degree |
246 |
30.9% |
0.309045226 |
4 |
To a small degree |
323 |
40.6% |
0.405778894 |
5 |
Not at all |
161 |
20.2% |
0.202261307 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
3.1% |
0.031407035 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km9_3
Variable label:
|
Trust: Social debaters
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
Social debaters
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
4 |
0.5% |
0.005025126 |
2 |
To a great degree |
29 |
3.6% |
0.036432161 |
3 |
To some degree |
376 |
47.2% |
0.472361809 |
4 |
To a small degree |
281 |
35.3% |
0.353015075 |
5 |
Not at all |
73 |
9.2% |
0.091708543 |
97 |
No answer |
33 |
4.1% |
0.041457286 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km9_4
Variable label:
|
Trust: Environmentalists
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
Environmentalists
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
25 |
3.1% |
0.03140704 |
2 |
To a great degree |
161 |
20.2% |
0.20226131 |
3 |
To some degree |
372 |
46.7% |
0.46733668 |
4 |
To a small degree |
146 |
18.3% |
0.18341709 |
5 |
Not at all |
65 |
8.2% |
0.08165829 |
97 |
No answer |
27 |
3.4% |
0.03391960 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km9_5
Variable label:
|
Trust: Politicians
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
Politicians
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002512563 |
2 |
To a great degree |
20 |
2.5% |
0.025125628 |
3 |
To some degree |
300 |
37.7% |
0.376884422 |
4 |
To a small degree |
330 |
41.5% |
0.414572864 |
5 |
Not at all |
114 |
14.3% |
0.143216080 |
97 |
No answer |
30 |
3.8% |
0.037688442 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km9_6
Variable label:
|
Trust: Friends and family
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
Friends and family
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01130653 |
2 |
To a great degree |
57 |
7.2% |
0.07160804 |
3 |
To some degree |
397 |
49.9% |
0.49874372 |
4 |
To a small degree |
224 |
28.1% |
0.28140704 |
5 |
Not at all |
75 |
9.4% |
0.09422111 |
97 |
No answer |
34 |
4.3% |
0.04271357 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km9_7
Variable label:
|
Trust: Others, please specify who
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
Others, please specify who
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great degree |
9 |
1.1% |
0.01130653 |
2 |
To a great degree |
27 |
3.4% |
0.03391960 |
3 |
To some degree |
113 |
14.2% |
0.14195980 |
4 |
To a small degree |
47 |
5.9% |
0.05904523 |
5 |
Not at all |
65 |
8.2% |
0.08165829 |
97 |
No answer |
535 |
67.2% |
0.67211055 |
98 |
Not asked |
5501 |
|
NA |
r4km9_7_other
Variable label:
|
Trust: Others, please specify who [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you trust the following groups in respect of information about climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
Others, please specify who
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran3=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4km12
Variable label:
|
What do you think should be done about climate change? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think should be done about climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers, a couple of sentences would be nice, or just a few words if that is better for you. [Asked if U=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4ran22
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1586] [Invalid:4711] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
415 |
26.2% |
0.2616646 |
2 |
2 |
392 |
24.7% |
0.2471627 |
3 |
3 |
351 |
22.1% |
0.2213115 |
4 |
4 |
428 |
27% |
0.2698613 |
Sysmiss |
|
4711 |
|
NA |
r4km13a_1
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Tighten up the regulations governing permitted industrial CO2 emissions, quotas
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten up the regulations governing permitted industrial CO2 emissions in Norway and Europe by cutting the total number of quotas available to industry
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
5 |
1.2% |
0.01204819 |
2 |
Negative |
21 |
5.1% |
0.05060241 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
24 |
5.8% |
0.05783133 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
70 |
16.9% |
0.16867470 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
121 |
29.2% |
0.29156627 |
6 |
Positive |
116 |
28% |
0.27951807 |
7 |
Very positive |
49 |
11.8% |
0.11807229 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
2.2% |
0.02168675 |
98 |
Not asked |
5882 |
|
NA |
r4km13a_2
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
18 |
4.3% |
0.04337349 |
2 |
Negative |
28 |
6.7% |
0.06746988 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
30 |
7.2% |
0.07228916 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
159 |
38.3% |
0.38313253 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
91 |
21.9% |
0.21927711 |
6 |
Positive |
54 |
13% |
0.13012048 |
7 |
Very positive |
24 |
5.8% |
0.05783133 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.7% |
0.02650602 |
98 |
Not asked |
5882 |
|
NA |
r4km13a_3
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Tighten up the fiscal regulations which apply to oil exploration
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten up the fiscal regulations which apply to oil exploration on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
16 |
3.9% |
0.03855422 |
2 |
Negative |
46 |
11.1% |
0.11084337 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
47 |
11.3% |
0.11325301 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
123 |
29.6% |
0.29638554 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
85 |
20.5% |
0.20481928 |
6 |
Positive |
61 |
14.7% |
0.14698795 |
7 |
Very positive |
30 |
7.2% |
0.07228916 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.7% |
0.01686747 |
98 |
Not asked |
5882 |
|
NA |
r4km13a_4
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Increase funding for research on, and the development of, renewable energy
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Increase funding for research on, and the development of, renewable energy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004819277 |
2 |
Negative |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
3 |
0.7% |
0.007228916 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
20 |
4.8% |
0.048192771 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
56 |
13.5% |
0.134939759 |
6 |
Positive |
159 |
38.3% |
0.383132530 |
7 |
Very positive |
169 |
40.7% |
0.407228916 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.4% |
0.014457831 |
98 |
Not asked |
5882 |
|
NA |
r4km13b_1
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Tighten up the regulations governing permitted industrial CO2 emissions
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten up the regulations governing permitted industrial CO2 emissions in Norway and Europe by cutting the total number of quotas available to industry
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
4 |
1% |
0.01020408 |
2 |
Negative |
15 |
3.8% |
0.03826531 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
24 |
6.1% |
0.06122449 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
66 |
16.8% |
0.16836735 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
102 |
26% |
0.26020408 |
6 |
Positive |
140 |
35.7% |
0.35714286 |
7 |
Very positive |
32 |
8.2% |
0.08163265 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
2.3% |
0.02295918 |
98 |
Not asked |
5905 |
|
NA |
r4km13b_2
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
9 |
2.3% |
0.02295918 |
2 |
Negative |
29 |
7.4% |
0.07397959 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
27 |
6.9% |
0.06887755 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
138 |
35.2% |
0.35204082 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
99 |
25.3% |
0.25255102 |
6 |
Positive |
66 |
16.8% |
0.16836735 |
7 |
Very positive |
14 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
2.6% |
0.02551020 |
98 |
Not asked |
5905 |
|
NA |
r4km13b_3
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Reduce the tax benefits which apply to oil exploration
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Reduce the tax benefits which apply to oil exploration on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
15 |
3.8% |
0.03826531 |
2 |
Negative |
36 |
9.2% |
0.09183673 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
49 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
123 |
31.4% |
0.31377551 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
81 |
20.7% |
0.20663265 |
6 |
Positive |
48 |
12.2% |
0.12244898 |
7 |
Very positive |
30 |
7.7% |
0.07653061 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
2.6% |
0.02551020 |
98 |
Not asked |
5905 |
|
NA |
r4km13b_4
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Increase funding for research on, and the development of renewable energy
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Increase funding for research on, and the development of renewable energy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
2 |
0.5% |
0.005102041 |
2 |
Negative |
3 |
0.8% |
0.007653061 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
2 |
0.5% |
0.005102041 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
18 |
4.6% |
0.045918367 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
46 |
11.7% |
0.117346939 |
6 |
Positive |
153 |
39% |
0.390306122 |
7 |
Very positive |
161 |
41.1% |
0.410714286 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.8% |
0.017857143 |
98 |
Not asked |
5905 |
|
NA |
r4km13c_1
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Tighten up the regulations governing total permitted industrial CO2
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten up the regulations governing total permitted industrial CO2 emissions in Norway and Europe
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
2 |
0.6% |
0.005698006 |
2 |
Negative |
7 |
2% |
0.019943020 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
15 |
4.3% |
0.042735043 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
38 |
10.8% |
0.108262108 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
106 |
30.2% |
0.301994302 |
6 |
Positive |
133 |
37.9% |
0.378917379 |
7 |
Very positive |
43 |
12.3% |
0.122507123 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2% |
0.019943020 |
98 |
Not asked |
5946 |
|
NA |
r4km13c_2
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
9 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
2 |
Negative |
28 |
8% |
0.07977208 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
34 |
9.7% |
0.09686610 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
127 |
36.2% |
0.36182336 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
70 |
19.9% |
0.19943020 |
6 |
Positive |
53 |
15.1% |
0.15099715 |
7 |
Very positive |
16 |
4.6% |
0.04558405 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
4% |
0.03988604 |
98 |
Not asked |
5946 |
|
NA |
r4km13c_3
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Tighten up the fiscal regulations which apply to oil exploration
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten up the fiscal regulations which apply to oil exploration on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
12 |
3.4% |
0.03418803 |
2 |
Negative |
31 |
8.8% |
0.08831909 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
48 |
13.7% |
0.13675214 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
122 |
34.8% |
0.34757835 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
66 |
18.8% |
0.18803419 |
6 |
Positive |
42 |
12% |
0.11965812 |
7 |
Very positive |
17 |
4.8% |
0.04843305 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
98 |
Not asked |
5946 |
|
NA |
r4km13c_4
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Increase funding for research on, and the development of renewable energy
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Increase funding for research on, and the development of renewable energy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
2 |
0.6% |
0.005698006 |
2 |
Negative |
3 |
0.9% |
0.008547009 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
3 |
0.9% |
0.008547009 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
15 |
4.3% |
0.042735043 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
33 |
9.4% |
0.094017094 |
6 |
Positive |
136 |
38.7% |
0.387464387 |
7 |
Very positive |
152 |
43.3% |
0.433048433 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2% |
0.019943020 |
98 |
Not asked |
5946 |
|
NA |
r4km13d_1
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Tighten up the regulations governing total permitted industrial CO2, total emissions
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Tighten up the regulations governing total permitted industrial CO2 emissions in Norway and Europe
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
7 |
1.6% |
0.01635514 |
2 |
Negative |
9 |
2.1% |
0.02102804 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
21 |
4.9% |
0.04906542 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
47 |
11% |
0.10981308 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
119 |
27.8% |
0.27803738 |
6 |
Positive |
146 |
34.1% |
0.34112150 |
7 |
Very positive |
68 |
15.9% |
0.15887850 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.6% |
0.02570093 |
98 |
Not asked |
5869 |
|
NA |
r4km13d_2
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthen focus on capture and storage of CO2 beneath the seabed or underground
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
15 |
3.5% |
0.03504673 |
2 |
Negative |
24 |
5.6% |
0.05607477 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
43 |
10% |
0.10046729 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
179 |
41.8% |
0.41822430 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
83 |
19.4% |
0.19392523 |
6 |
Positive |
51 |
11.9% |
0.11915888 |
7 |
Very positive |
18 |
4.2% |
0.04205607 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
3.5% |
0.03504673 |
98 |
Not asked |
5869 |
|
NA |
r4km13d_3
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Reduce the tax benefits which apply to oil exploration
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Reduce the tax benefits which apply to oil exploration on the Norwegian Continental Shelf
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
17 |
4% |
0.03971963 |
2 |
Negative |
34 |
7.9% |
0.07943925 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
46 |
10.7% |
0.10747664 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
152 |
35.5% |
0.35514019 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
86 |
20.1% |
0.20093458 |
6 |
Positive |
51 |
11.9% |
0.11915888 |
7 |
Very positive |
29 |
6.8% |
0.06775701 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
3% |
0.03037383 |
98 |
Not asked |
5869 |
|
NA |
r4km13d_4
Variable label:
|
Positive towards: Increase funding for research on, and the development of renewable energy
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask you about your opinion on a number of measures that have been proposed in order to reduce climate change. Many experts believe that the measures mentioned below will work. However, there may be disagreement about whether or not these are good measures to implement. How positive or negative are you about the following measures:
|
Literal question:
|
Increase funding for research on, and the development of renewable energy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran22=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative |
3 |
0.7% |
0.007009346 |
2 |
Negative |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004672897 |
3 |
Somewhat negative |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004672897 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
16 |
3.7% |
0.037383178 |
5 |
Somewhat positive |
59 |
13.8% |
0.137850467 |
6 |
Positive |
153 |
35.7% |
0.357476636 |
7 |
Very positive |
184 |
43% |
0.429906542 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
2.1% |
0.021028037 |
98 |
Not asked |
5869 |
|
NA |
r4ran5
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1578] [Invalid:4719] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
520 |
33% |
0.3295311 |
2 |
2 |
554 |
35.1% |
0.3510773 |
3 |
3 |
504 |
31.9% |
0.3193916 |
Sysmiss |
|
4719 |
|
NA |
r4km14a
Variable label:
|
For or against climate agreement
|
Literal question:
|
You may well be aware that statesmen from all over the world will be meeting in Paris in November 2015 in order to negotiate a new international agreement designed to restrict climate gas emissions. Suppose that these statesmen propose an agreement under which Norway would undertake a commitment to make substantial reductions in its climate gas emissions. Would you support or oppose Norway signing such an agreement?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran5=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly in favour |
113 |
21.7% |
0.217307692 |
2 |
In favour |
198 |
38.1% |
0.380769231 |
3 |
Slightly in favour |
68 |
13.1% |
0.130769231 |
4 |
Neither for nor against |
69 |
13.3% |
0.132692308 |
5 |
Slightly against |
34 |
6.5% |
0.065384615 |
6 |
Against |
23 |
4.4% |
0.044230769 |
7 |
Strongly against |
11 |
2.1% |
0.021153846 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.8% |
0.007692308 |
98 |
Not asked |
5777 |
|
NA |
r4km14b
Variable label:
|
For or against climate agreement, China is in
|
Literal question:
|
You may well be aware that statesmen from all over the world will be meeting in Paris in November 2015 in order to negotiate a new international agreement designed to restrict climate gas emissions. Suppose that these statesmen propose an agreement under which Norway would undertake a commitment to make substantial reductions in its climate gas emissions. Furthermore, China also undertakes a similar commitment to reduce its climate gas emissions.
Would you support or oppose Norway signing such an agreement?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran5=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly in favour |
171 |
30.9% |
0.308664260 |
2 |
In favour |
224 |
40.4% |
0.404332130 |
3 |
Slightly in favour |
78 |
14.1% |
0.140794224 |
4 |
Neither for nor against |
41 |
7.4% |
0.074007220 |
5 |
Slightly against |
20 |
3.6% |
0.036101083 |
6 |
Against |
9 |
1.6% |
0.016245487 |
7 |
Strongly against |
7 |
1.3% |
0.012635379 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.7% |
0.007220217 |
98 |
Not asked |
5743 |
|
NA |
r4km14c
Variable label:
|
For or against climate agreement, China is not in
|
Literal question:
|
You may well be aware that statesmen from all over the world will be meeting in Paris in November 2015 in order to negotiate a new international agreement designed to restrict climate gas emissions. Suppose that these statesmen propose an agreement under which Norway would undertake a commitment to make substantial reductions in its climate gas emissions. However, China does not undertake a similar commitment to reduce its climate gas emissions.
Would you support or oppose Norway signing such an agreement?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran5=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly in favour |
58 |
11.5% |
0.11507937 |
2 |
In favour |
143 |
28.4% |
0.28373016 |
3 |
Slightly in favour |
73 |
14.5% |
0.14484127 |
4 |
Neither for nor against |
58 |
11.5% |
0.11507937 |
5 |
Slightly against |
54 |
10.7% |
0.10714286 |
6 |
Against |
64 |
12.7% |
0.12698413 |
7 |
Strongly against |
47 |
9.3% |
0.09325397 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.4% |
0.01388889 |
98 |
Not asked |
5793 |
|
NA |
r4km15
Variable label:
|
Does the Progress Party support measures that increase the cost of emitting greenhouse gases in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion, does the Progress Party support measures that increase the cost of emitting greenhouse gases in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
353 |
22% |
0.2195274 |
2 |
No |
1090 |
67.8% |
0.6778607 |
97 |
No answer |
165 |
10.3% |
0.1026119 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4oc1
Variable label:
|
Should Norway play an active or reduced role in international politics?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it is best for Norway in the future to play an active role in international politics, or should Norway preferably have a reduced role?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Active role in international politics |
1141 |
73.7% |
0.73708010 |
2 |
Non-active role in international politics |
386 |
24.9% |
0.24935401 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.4% |
0.01356589 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4oc25
Variable label:
|
Statement: Local news more interesting than national or international news
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements “I often feel that the news about what is taking place in my local area is more interesting than national and international news items.”
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
47 |
3% |
0.030361757 |
2 |
Agree |
201 |
13% |
0.129844961 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
341 |
22% |
0.220284238 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
290 |
18.7% |
0.187338501 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
238 |
15.4% |
0.153746770 |
6 |
Disagree |
321 |
20.7% |
0.207364341 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
106 |
6.8% |
0.068475452 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002583979 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4pad1
Variable label:
|
Attitude towards advertising on bus stops
|
Literal question:
|
We will now be asking a variety of questions about politics, public services and the media. Several Norwegian municipalities have in recent years entered into contracts with companies that provide and maintain bus shelters, city bicycles and public lavatories in return for the companies being allowed to advertise in connection with these. What is your opinion of this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and if the respondent is inhabitant in a defined group of municipalities. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I am opposed to municipal funding of bus shelters, city bicycles and public
lavatories with the aid of advertising |
221 |
28.9% |
0.28888889 |
2 |
I support municipal funding of bus shelters, city bicycles and public lavatories
with the aid of advertising |
531 |
69.4% |
0.69411765 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.7% |
0.01699346 |
98 |
Not asked |
5532 |
|
NA |
r4pad10_1
Variable label:
|
Proposal: The authorities propose merging the municipality in which you reside with one or more neighbouring municipalities
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion about the following two proposals?
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities propose merging the municipality in which you reside with one or more neighbouring municipalities
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good suggestion |
182 |
11.8% |
0.11757106 |
2 |
Good suggestion |
380 |
24.5% |
0.24547804 |
3 |
Fairly good suggestion |
301 |
19.4% |
0.19444444 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad suggestion |
247 |
16% |
0.15956072 |
5 |
Not very good suggestion |
147 |
9.5% |
0.09496124 |
6 |
Bad suggestion |
153 |
9.9% |
0.09883721 |
7 |
Very bad suggestion |
117 |
7.6% |
0.07558140 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.4% |
0.01356589 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4pad10_2
Variable label:
|
Proposal: Your municipality proposes providing more municipal services in cooperation with one or more neighbouring municipalities than it does at the moment.
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion about the following two proposals?
|
Literal question:
|
Your municipality proposes providing more municipal services in cooperation with one or more neighbouring municipalities than it does at the moment.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good suggestion |
189 |
12.2% |
0.12209302 |
2 |
Good suggestion |
464 |
30% |
0.29974160 |
3 |
Fairly good suggestion |
379 |
24.5% |
0.24483204 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad suggestion |
228 |
14.7% |
0.14728682 |
5 |
Not very good suggestion |
126 |
8.1% |
0.08139535 |
6 |
Bad suggestion |
83 |
5.4% |
0.05361757 |
7 |
Very bad suggestion |
50 |
3.2% |
0.03229974 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
1.9% |
0.01873385 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4pad11
Variable label:
|
Willing to pay more in taxes to retain current municipal structure
|
Literal question:
|
Some estimates suggest that the current municipal structure is costing society more. If you could choose, would you be willing to pay an extra NOK 1,000 in tax per year to maintain the current municipal structure?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
337 |
21.8% |
0.217700258 |
2 |
No |
824 |
53.2% |
0.532299742 |
3 |
Don't know |
375 |
24.2% |
0.242248062 |
97 |
Ikke svart |
12 |
0.8% |
0.007751938 |
98 |
Ikke spurt |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4pad12_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Inter-municipal cooperation produces better services
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following two statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Cooperation between the municipalities on the supply of services (inter-municipal cooperation) gives better quality than if individual municipalities supply the services themselves.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Totally agree |
161 |
10.4% |
0.10400517 |
2 |
Agree |
395 |
25.5% |
0.25516796 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
447 |
28.9% |
0.28875969 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
338 |
21.8% |
0.21834625 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
98 |
6.3% |
0.06330749 |
6 |
Disagree |
71 |
4.6% |
0.04586563 |
7 |
Totally disagree |
21 |
1.4% |
0.01356589 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
1.1% |
0.01098191 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4pad12_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Inter-municipal cooperation makes it harder for voters to know who is responsible
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following two statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Inter-municipal cooperation makes it harder for voters to know who is responsible for the contents of the policies that are implemented
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Totally agree |
75 |
4.8% |
0.04844961 |
2 |
Agree |
221 |
14.3% |
0.14276486 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
427 |
27.6% |
0.27583979 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
383 |
24.7% |
0.24741602 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
184 |
11.9% |
0.11886305 |
6 |
Disagree |
181 |
11.7% |
0.11692506 |
7 |
Totally disagree |
52 |
3.4% |
0.03359173 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
1.6% |
0.01614987 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4pad13
Variable label:
|
What do you think results in the best services for you and your municipality?
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think results in the best services for you and your municipality?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
That my municipality provides the services itself |
302 |
19.5% |
0.195090439 |
2 |
That my municipality cooperates more with other municipalities |
623 |
40.2% |
0.402454780 |
3 |
That my municipality merges with other municipalities |
406 |
26.2% |
0.262273902 |
4 |
Don't know |
205 |
13.2% |
0.132428941 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
0.8% |
0.007751938 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4pad14_1
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party leaders: Erna Solberg (Cons.)
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you like or dislike the following party leaders?
|
Literal question:
|
Erna Solberg (Cons.)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly dislike |
82 |
5.3% |
0.05297158 |
2 |
Significantly dislike |
129 |
8.3% |
0.08333333 |
3 |
Somewhat dislike |
243 |
15.7% |
0.15697674 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
263 |
17% |
0.16989664 |
5 |
Somewhat like |
410 |
26.5% |
0.26485788 |
6 |
Significantly like |
314 |
20.3% |
0.20284238 |
7 |
Strongly like |
85 |
5.5% |
0.05490956 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.4% |
0.01421189 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4pad14_2
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party leaders: Jonas Gahr Støre (Lab.)
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you like or dislike the following party leaders?
|
Literal question:
|
Jonas Gahr Støre (Lab.)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly dislike |
42 |
2.7% |
0.02713178 |
2 |
Significantly dislike |
66 |
4.3% |
0.04263566 |
3 |
Somewhat dislike |
144 |
9.3% |
0.09302326 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
282 |
18.2% |
0.18217054 |
5 |
Somewhat like |
399 |
25.8% |
0.25775194 |
6 |
Significantly like |
416 |
26.9% |
0.26873385 |
7 |
Strongly like |
173 |
11.2% |
0.11175711 |
97 |
No answer |
26 |
1.7% |
0.01679587 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4pad14_3
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike party leaders: Siv Jensen (Progress Party)
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you like or dislike the following party leaders?
|
Literal question:
|
Siv Jensen (Progress Party)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly dislike |
383 |
24.7% |
0.24741602 |
2 |
Significantly dislike |
261 |
16.9% |
0.16860465 |
3 |
Somewhat dislike |
298 |
19.3% |
0.19250646 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
230 |
14.9% |
0.14857881 |
5 |
Somewhat like |
221 |
14.3% |
0.14276486 |
6 |
Significantly like |
94 |
6.1% |
0.06072351 |
7 |
Strongly like |
36 |
2.3% |
0.02325581 |
97 |
No answer |
25 |
1.6% |
0.01614987 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4pad15
Variable label:
|
Local election in the fall, tight race?
|
Literal question:
|
As regards the local government elections this autumn, to what extent do you think that there will be close competition between the parties standing for election in respect of who will be elected to the Municipal Council where you live?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Extremely close competition |
93 |
6% |
0.06007752 |
2 |
Very close competition |
457 |
29.5% |
0.29521964 |
3 |
Some competition |
558 |
36% |
0.36046512 |
4 |
Not much competition |
166 |
10.7% |
0.10723514 |
5 |
No competition at all |
27 |
1.7% |
0.01744186 |
6 |
Don't know |
231 |
14.9% |
0.14922481 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
1% |
0.01033592 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4pad155_1
Variable label:
|
Local election in the fall, chosen a party yet?
|
Literal question:
|
Some people have very definite ideas about which party they will vote for during the local government elections in the autumn. Others have not made a decision yet. To what extent are you sure about which party you will end up voting for?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-99]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - I am very sure |
405 |
26.2% |
0.26162791 |
1 |
1 |
119 |
7.7% |
0.07687339 |
2 |
2 |
157 |
10.1% |
0.10142119 |
3 |
3 |
114 |
7.4% |
0.07364341 |
4 |
4 |
77 |
5% |
0.04974160 |
5 |
5 |
89 |
5.7% |
0.05749354 |
6 |
6 |
68 |
4.4% |
0.04392765 |
7 |
7 |
104 |
6.7% |
0.06718346 |
8 |
8 |
120 |
7.8% |
0.07751938 |
9 |
9 |
61 |
3.9% |
0.03940568 |
10 |
10 - I am very unsure |
127 |
8.2% |
0.08204134 |
97 |
No answer |
81 |
5.2% |
0.05232558 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
99 |
No answer |
26 |
1.7% |
0.01679587 |
r4ran7
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1542] [Invalid:4755] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
307 |
19.9% |
0.1990921 |
2 |
2 |
312 |
20.2% |
0.2023346 |
3 |
3 |
315 |
20.4% |
0.2042802 |
4 |
4 |
308 |
20% |
0.1997406 |
5 |
5 |
300 |
19.5% |
0.1945525 |
Sysmiss |
|
4755 |
|
NA |
r4pad16a
Variable label:
|
Article about NAV: Postitive or negative impression?
|
Literal question:
|
This example show the introduction to a hypothetical article about NAV (the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration) in the Norwegian newspapers. How positive or negative is your impression of NAV?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran7=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
10 |
3.3% |
0.032573290 |
2 |
Positive |
51 |
16.6% |
0.166123779 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
61 |
19.9% |
0.198697068 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
81 |
26.4% |
0.263843648 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
59 |
19.2% |
0.192182410 |
6 |
Negative |
31 |
10.1% |
0.100977199 |
7 |
Very negative |
11 |
3.6% |
0.035830619 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1% |
0.009771987 |
98 |
Not asked |
5990 |
|
NA |
r4pad16b
Variable label:
|
Article about NAV: Postitive or negative impression?
|
Literal question:
|
This example show the introduction to a hypothetical article about NAV (the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration) in the Norwegian newspapers. How positive or negative is your impression of NAV?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran7=2. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01282051 |
2 |
Positive |
45 |
14.4% |
0.14423077 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
48 |
15.4% |
0.15384615 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
66 |
21.2% |
0.21153846 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
76 |
24.4% |
0.24358974 |
6 |
Negative |
48 |
15.4% |
0.15384615 |
7 |
Very negative |
21 |
6.7% |
0.06730769 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01282051 |
98 |
Not asked |
5985 |
|
NA |
r4pad16c
Variable label:
|
Article about NAV: Postitive or negative impression?
|
Literal question:
|
This example show the introduction to a hypothetical article about NAV (the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration) in the Norwegian newspapers. How positive or negative is your impression of NAV?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran7=3. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
5 |
1.6% |
0.015873016 |
2 |
Positive |
34 |
10.8% |
0.107936508 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
35 |
11.1% |
0.111111111 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
50 |
15.9% |
0.158730159 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
101 |
32.1% |
0.320634921 |
6 |
Negative |
52 |
16.5% |
0.165079365 |
7 |
Very negative |
36 |
11.4% |
0.114285714 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.6% |
0.006349206 |
98 |
Not asked |
5982 |
|
NA |
r4pad16d
Variable label:
|
Article about NAV: Postitive or negative impression?
|
Literal question:
|
This example show the introduction to a hypothetical article about NAV (the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration) in the Norwegian newspapers. How positive or negative is your impression of NAV?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran7=4. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
24 |
7.8% |
0.077922078 |
2 |
Positive |
67 |
21.8% |
0.217532468 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
58 |
18.8% |
0.188311688 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
53 |
17.2% |
0.172077922 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
64 |
20.8% |
0.207792208 |
6 |
Negative |
27 |
8.8% |
0.087662338 |
7 |
Very negative |
14 |
4.5% |
0.045454545 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.3% |
0.003246753 |
98 |
Not asked |
5989 |
|
NA |
r4pad16e
Variable label:
|
Postitive or negative impression of NAV?
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative is your impression of NAV?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran7=5. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
6 |
2% |
0.020000000 |
2 |
Positive |
34 |
11.3% |
0.113333333 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
56 |
18.7% |
0.186666667 |
4 |
Neither positive nor negative |
51 |
17% |
0.170000000 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
89 |
29.7% |
0.296666667 |
6 |
Negative |
38 |
12.7% |
0.126666667 |
7 |
Very negative |
24 |
8% |
0.080000000 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006666667 |
98 |
Not asked |
5997 |
|
NA |
r4pad17
Variable label:
|
Use more or less money on NAV
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that the government should spend more or less money on running NAV during the forthcoming years?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more money |
126 |
8.1% |
0.08139535 |
2 |
A bit more money |
413 |
26.7% |
0.26679587 |
3 |
Neither more nor less money |
722 |
46.6% |
0.46640827 |
4 |
A bit less money |
179 |
11.6% |
0.11563307 |
5 |
A lot less money |
75 |
4.8% |
0.04844961 |
97 |
No answer |
33 |
2.1% |
0.02131783 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4pad18_1
Variable label:
|
NAV in the media, what effects: you opinion of NAV?
|
Pre-question text:
|
When the media report on NAV, they often write about either how individuals experience meeting NAV (so-called “individual cases”) or about the more general aspects of NAV, where they focus on wider contexts and often refer to statistics (so-called “context cases”).
Which of these two types of news do you think has the greatest impact on…
|
Literal question:
|
… your views about NAV?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Individual cases are the only types of news which affect my views about NAV |
48 |
3.1% |
0.03100775 |
2 |
Individual cases affect my views about NAV more than context cases |
277 |
17.9% |
0.17894057 |
3 |
Both affect my views in equal measure |
742 |
47.9% |
0.47932817 |
4 |
Context cases affect my views about NAV more than individual cases |
384 |
24.8% |
0.24806202 |
5 |
Context cases are the only types of news which affect my views about NAV |
43 |
2.8% |
0.02777778 |
97 |
No answer |
54 |
3.5% |
0.03488372 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4pad18_2
Variable label:
|
NAV in the media, what effects: Norwegians opinion of NAV?
|
Pre-question text:
|
When the media report on NAV, they often write about either how individuals experience meeting NAV (so-called “individual cases”) or about the more general aspects of NAV, where they focus on wider contexts and often refer to statistics (so-called “context cases”).
Which of these two types of news do you think has the greatest impact on…
|
Literal question:
|
… other Norwegians’ views about NAV?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Individual cases are the only types of news which affect my views about NAV |
144 |
9.3% |
0.09302326 |
2 |
Individual cases affect my views about NAV more than context cases |
542 |
35% |
0.35012920 |
3 |
Both affect my views in equal measure |
596 |
38.5% |
0.38501292 |
4 |
Context cases affect my views about NAV more than individual cases |
106 |
6.8% |
0.06847545 |
5 |
Context cases are the only types of news which affect my views about NAV |
24 |
1.6% |
0.01550388 |
97 |
No answer |
136 |
8.8% |
0.08785530 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4pad19
Variable label:
|
Have you personally been in contact with NAV?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you personally been in contact with NAV?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, as a user of NAV's services |
634 |
41% |
0.409560724 |
2 |
Yes, as a NAV employee |
15 |
1% |
0.009689922 |
3 |
Yes, both as an employee and a user of NAV's services |
25 |
1.6% |
0.016149871 |
4 |
Yes, but in other ways |
338 |
21.8% |
0.218346253 |
5 |
No |
520 |
33.6% |
0.335917313 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
1% |
0.010335917 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4ran8
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1539] [Invalid:4758] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
255 |
16.6% |
0.1656920 |
2 |
2 |
250 |
16.2% |
0.1624431 |
3 |
3 |
252 |
16.4% |
0.1637427 |
4 |
4 |
268 |
17.4% |
0.1741391 |
5 |
5 |
251 |
16.3% |
0.1630929 |
6 |
6 |
263 |
17.1% |
0.1708902 |
Sysmiss |
|
4758 |
|
NA |
r4pad20a
Variable label:
|
Article in online newspaper: News or advertisement?
|
Literal question:
|
This example shows the introduction to a hypothetical article which could appear in online Norwegian papers. Based on the information provided in this case do you consider this to be a typical example of a news article (written by a journalist) or a typical example of an advertisement (written by an advertiser)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran8=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
This is a typical news article |
57 |
22.4% |
0.22352941 |
2 |
Looks more like a news article |
71 |
27.8% |
0.27843137 |
3 |
This is just as much a new article as it is an advertisement |
69 |
27.1% |
0.27058824 |
4 |
Looks more like an advertisement |
40 |
15.7% |
0.15686275 |
5 |
This is a typical advertisement |
12 |
4.7% |
0.04705882 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.4% |
0.02352941 |
98 |
Not asked |
6042 |
|
NA |
r4pad20b
Variable label:
|
Article in online newspaper: News or advertisement?
|
Literal question:
|
This example shows the introduction to a hypothetical article which could appear in online Norwegian papers. Based on the information provided in this case do you consider this to be a typical example of a news article (written by a journalist) or a typical example of an advertisement (written by an advertiser)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran8=2. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
This is a typical news article |
27 |
10.8% |
0.108 |
2 |
Looks more like a news article |
46 |
18.4% |
0.184 |
3 |
This is just as much a new article as it is an advertisement |
61 |
24.4% |
0.244 |
4 |
Looks more like an advertisement |
74 |
29.6% |
0.296 |
5 |
This is a typical advertisement |
37 |
14.8% |
0.148 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
2% |
0.020 |
98 |
Not asked |
6047 |
|
NA |
r4pad20c
Variable label:
|
Article in online newspaper: News or advertisement?
|
Literal question:
|
This example shows the introduction to a hypothetical article which could appear in online Norwegian papers. Based on the information provided in this case do you consider this to be a typical example of a news article (written by a journalist) or a typical example of an advertisement (written by an advertiser)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran8=3. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
This is a typical news article |
34 |
13.5% |
0.13492063 |
2 |
Looks more like a news article |
35 |
13.9% |
0.13888889 |
3 |
This is just as much a new article as it is an advertisement |
62 |
24.6% |
0.24603175 |
4 |
Looks more like an advertisement |
72 |
28.6% |
0.28571429 |
5 |
This is a typical advertisement |
44 |
17.5% |
0.17460317 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
2% |
0.01984127 |
98 |
Not asked |
6045 |
|
NA |
r4pad20d
Variable label:
|
Article in online newspaper: News or advertisement?
|
Literal question:
|
This example shows the introduction to a hypothetical article which could appear in online Norwegian papers. Based on the information provided in this case do you consider this to be a typical example of a news article (written by a journalist) or a typical example of an advertisement (written by an advertiser)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran8=4. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
This is a typical news article |
35 |
13.1% |
0.13059701 |
2 |
Looks more like a news article |
103 |
38.4% |
0.38432836 |
3 |
This is just as much a new article as it is an advertisement |
64 |
23.9% |
0.23880597 |
4 |
Looks more like an advertisement |
48 |
17.9% |
0.17910448 |
5 |
This is a typical advertisement |
10 |
3.7% |
0.03731343 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
3% |
0.02985075 |
98 |
Not asked |
6029 |
|
NA |
r4pad20e
Variable label:
|
Article in online newspaper: News or advertisement?
|
Literal question:
|
This example shows the introduction to a hypothetical article which could appear in online Norwegian papers. Based on the information provided in this case do you consider this to be a typical example of a news article (written by a journalist) or a typical example of an advertisement (written by an advertiser)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran8=5. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
This is a typical news article |
23 |
9.2% |
0.091633466 |
2 |
Looks more like a news article |
59 |
23.5% |
0.235059761 |
3 |
This is just as much a new article as it is an advertisement |
70 |
27.9% |
0.278884462 |
4 |
Looks more like an advertisement |
73 |
29.1% |
0.290836653 |
5 |
This is a typical advertisement |
25 |
10% |
0.099601594 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003984064 |
98 |
Not asked |
6046 |
|
NA |
r4pad20f
Variable label:
|
Article in online newspaper: News or advertisement?
|
Literal question:
|
This example shows the introduction to a hypothetical article which could appear in online Norwegian papers. Based on the information provided in this case do you consider this to be a typical example of a news article (written by a journalist) or a typical example of an advertisement (written by an advertiser)?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran8=6. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
This is a typical news article |
16 |
6.1% |
0.06083650 |
2 |
Looks more like a news article |
59 |
22.4% |
0.22433460 |
3 |
This is just as much a new article as it is an advertisement |
75 |
28.5% |
0.28517110 |
4 |
Looks more like an advertisement |
65 |
24.7% |
0.24714829 |
5 |
This is a typical advertisement |
45 |
17.1% |
0.17110266 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01140684 |
98 |
Not asked |
6034 |
|
NA |
r4pad21
Variable label:
|
Article in online newspaper: Confidence in information
|
Literal question:
|
This is also an example which shows the introduction to a hypothetical case which could appear in online Norwegian papers. How much confidence do you have in the information provided in cases of this type?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
24 |
1.6% |
0.01550388 |
2 |
High confidence |
237 |
15.3% |
0.15310078 |
3 |
Some confidence |
794 |
51.3% |
0.51291990 |
4 |
Low confidence |
398 |
25.7% |
0.25710594 |
5 |
Not much confidence |
60 |
3.9% |
0.03875969 |
97 |
No answer |
35 |
2.3% |
0.02260982 |
98 |
Not asked |
4749 |
|
NA |
r4ran9
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1536] [Invalid:4761] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
550 |
35.8% |
0.3580729 |
2 |
2 |
500 |
32.6% |
0.3255208 |
3 |
3 |
486 |
31.6% |
0.3164062 |
Sysmiss |
|
4761 |
|
NA |
r4pad22
Variable label:
|
Prize, 1000 NOK or 1800 NOK
|
Literal question:
|
As a participant in the Norwegian Citizen Panel you are being included in a draw for an extra monetary prize. If you win you can choose to receive NOK 1,000 or NOK 1,800.
Which would you choose?
|
Technical description:
|
Please tick one of the options.
[Asked if U=3 and ran9<3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes please, I would like to receive NOK 1,000 |
230 |
21.9% |
0.21904762 |
2 |
Yes please, I would like to receive NOK 1,800 |
789 |
75.1% |
0.75142857 |
97 |
No answer |
31 |
3% |
0.02952381 |
98 |
Not asked |
5247 |
|
NA |
r4pad23a
Variable label:
|
Text: Chose 1000 NOK over 1800 NOK [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
You said yes to receiving NOK 1,000 instead of receiving NOK 1,800. Can you state briefly why you selected this option?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and R4PAD22=1]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4pad23b
Variable label:
|
Text: Chose 1800 NOK over 1000 NOK [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
You said yes to receiving NOK 1,800 instead of receiving NOK 1,000. Can you state briefly why you selected this option?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and R4PAD22=2]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4ran11
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1535] [Invalid:4762] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
747 |
48.7% |
0.486645 |
2 |
2 |
788 |
51.3% |
0.513355 |
Sysmiss |
|
4762 |
|
NA |
r4oc17_1
Variable label:
|
Economic aid: Increase, keep or reduce
|
Literal question:
|
We would now like to as you a few questions about Norway’s economic aid schemes.
Some people think that the amount that the Norwegian authorities spend on economic aid should be increased, while others think it should be kept at the current level or reduced. What is your opinion. Do you think that the Norwegian authorities should increase, keep at the current level or reduce the amount spent on economic aid?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Increase |
127 |
17% |
0.17001339 |
2 |
Keep at the current level |
511 |
68.4% |
0.68406961 |
3 |
Reduce |
87 |
11.6% |
0.11646586 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
2.9% |
0.02945114 |
98 |
Not asked |
5550 |
|
NA |
r4oc17_1a
Variable label:
|
Economic aid: Increase
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think the Norwegian authorities should increase allocations for economic aid quite substantially, or just slightly?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1 & R4OC17_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Quite substantially |
76 |
59.8% |
0.5984252 |
2 |
Just slightly |
51 |
40.2% |
0.4015748 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6170 |
|
NA |
r4oc17_1b
Variable label:
|
Economic aid: Reduce
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think the Norwegian authorities should reduce allocations for economic aid quite substantially, or just slightly?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1 & R4OC17_1=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Quite substantially |
46 |
52.9% |
0.52873563 |
2 |
Just slightly |
40 |
46% |
0.45977011 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
98 |
Not asked |
6210 |
|
NA |
r4oc18_1a
Variable label:
|
Economic aid: Moral obligation to offer economic aid to the poor in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree that the Norwegian authorities have a moral obligation to offer economic aid to the poor in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1. Question is asked on the same page as R4OC18_1B]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
380 |
50.9% |
0.508701473 |
2 |
Slightly agree |
317 |
42.4% |
0.424364123 |
3 |
Slightly disagree |
36 |
4.8% |
0.048192771 |
4 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004016064 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.5% |
0.014725569 |
98 |
Not asked |
5550 |
|
NA |
r4oc18_1b
Variable label:
|
Economic aid: Moral obligation to offer economic aid to the poor in Norway or other countries
|
Literal question:
|
Who do you believe the Norwegian authorities have the greatest moral obligation to provide economic aid to?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1. Question is asked on the same page as R4OC18_1A]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The poor in other countries |
23 |
3.1% |
0.03078983 |
2 |
The poor in Norway |
354 |
47.4% |
0.47389558 |
3 |
The authorities have an equally great moral obligation to assist both |
356 |
47.7% |
0.47657296 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.9% |
0.01874163 |
98 |
Not asked |
5550 |
|
NA |
r4oc19_1
Variable label:
|
Economic aid: Effectiveness for the poor in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
How effective do you think Norway’s economic aid programmes have been for reducing poverty in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very effective |
72 |
9.6% |
0.09638554 |
2 |
Slightly effective |
388 |
51.9% |
0.51941098 |
3 |
Not very effective |
261 |
34.9% |
0.34939759 |
4 |
Not at all effective |
16 |
2.1% |
0.02141901 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.3% |
0.01338688 |
98 |
Not asked |
5550 |
|
NA |
r4oc20_1
Variable label:
|
Economic aid: Why are recipients poor
|
Literal question:
|
Why do you think most recipients of economic aid are poor?
|
Technical description:
|
Please use the scale below where 1 represents “Because they don’t work hard enough” and 7 represents “Due to circumstances beyond their control”.
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 Because they don't work hard enough |
14 |
1.9% |
0.01874163 |
2 |
2 |
27 |
3.6% |
0.03614458 |
3 |
3 |
72 |
9.6% |
0.09638554 |
4 |
4 |
193 |
25.8% |
0.25836680 |
5 |
5 |
237 |
31.7% |
0.31726908 |
6 |
6 |
101 |
13.5% |
0.13520750 |
7 |
7 Due to circumstances beyond their control |
91 |
12.2% |
0.12182062 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.6% |
0.01606426 |
98 |
Not asked |
5550 |
|
NA |
r4oc21_1
Variable label:
|
Economic aid: The poor lacked basic necessities before they got aid
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that the recipients of economic aid lacked basic necessities such as shelter and nutritious food before they received aid from Norwegian authorities?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
105 |
14.1% |
0.140562249 |
2 |
Not very likely |
396 |
53% |
0.530120482 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
221 |
29.6% |
0.295850067 |
4 |
Not at all likely |
7 |
0.9% |
0.009370817 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
2.4% |
0.024096386 |
98 |
Not asked |
5550 |
|
NA |
r4oc17_2
Variable label:
|
Development aid: Increase, keep or reduce
|
Literal question:
|
We would now like to ask you some questions about Norway’s development aid programmes.
Some people think that the amount the Norwegian authorities spend on development aid should be increased, while others think it should be kept at the current level or reduced. In your opinion, should the Norwegian authorities increase, keep at the current level or reduce the amount spent on development aid?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Increase |
164 |
20.8% |
0.20812183 |
2 |
Keep at the current level |
433 |
54.9% |
0.54949239 |
3 |
Reduce |
179 |
22.7% |
0.22715736 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.5% |
0.01522843 |
98 |
Not asked |
5509 |
|
NA |
r4oc17_2a
Variable label:
|
Development aid: Increase
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think the Norwegian authorities should increase allocations for development aid quite substantially, or just slightly?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=2 & R4OC17_2=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Quite substantially |
134 |
81.7% |
0.817073171 |
2 |
Just slightly |
29 |
17.7% |
0.176829268 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.6% |
0.006097561 |
98 |
Not asked |
6133 |
|
NA |
r4oc17_2b
Variable label:
|
Development aid: Reduce
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think the Norwegian authorities should reduce allocations for development aid quite substantially, or just slightly?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=2 & R4OC17_2=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Quite substantially |
136 |
76% |
0.7597765 |
2 |
Just slightly |
43 |
24% |
0.2402235 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6118 |
|
NA |
r4oc18_2a
Variable label:
|
Development aid: Moral obligation to offer aid to the poor in other countries
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree that the Norwegian authorities have a moral obligation to offer development aid to the poor in other countries?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=2. Question is asked on the same page as R4OC18_2B]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
337 |
42.8% |
0.427664975 |
2 |
Slightly agree |
338 |
42.9% |
0.428934010 |
3 |
Slightly disagree |
76 |
9.6% |
0.096446701 |
4 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
3.9% |
0.039340102 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
0.8% |
0.007614213 |
98 |
Not asked |
5509 |
|
NA |
r4oc18_2b
Variable label:
|
Development aid: Moral obligation to offer aid to the poor in Norway or other countries
|
Literal question:
|
Who do you believe the Norwegian authorities have the greatest moral obligation to provide development aid to?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=2. Question is asked on the same page as R4OC18_2A]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The poor in other countries |
48 |
6.1% |
0.06091371 |
2 |
The poor in Norway |
257 |
32.6% |
0.32614213 |
3 |
The authorities have an equally great moral obligation to assist both |
473 |
60% |
0.60025381 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.3% |
0.01269036 |
98 |
Not asked |
5509 |
|
NA |
r4oc19_2
Variable label:
|
Development aid: Effectiveness for the poor in other countries
|
Literal question:
|
How effective do you think Norway’s development aid programmes have been for reducing poverty in other countries?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very effective |
22 |
2.8% |
0.027918782 |
2 |
Slightly effective |
410 |
52% |
0.520304569 |
3 |
Not very effective |
280 |
35.5% |
0.355329949 |
4 |
Not at all effective |
69 |
8.8% |
0.087563452 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.9% |
0.008883249 |
98 |
Not asked |
5509 |
|
NA |
r4oc20_2
Variable label:
|
Development aid: Why are recipients poor
|
Literal question:
|
Why do you think that most recipients of development aid are poor?
|
Technical description:
|
Please use the scale below where 1 represents “Because they don’t work hard enough” and 7 represents “Due to circumstances beyond their control”. [Asked if U=3 and ran11=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 Because they don't work hard enough |
15 |
1.9% |
0.019035533 |
2 |
2 |
9 |
1.1% |
0.011421320 |
3 |
3 |
15 |
1.9% |
0.019035533 |
4 |
4 |
66 |
8.4% |
0.083756345 |
5 |
5 |
156 |
19.8% |
0.197969543 |
6 |
6 |
194 |
24.6% |
0.246192893 |
7 |
7 Due to circumstances beyond their control |
326 |
41.4% |
0.413705584 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.9% |
0.008883249 |
98 |
Not asked |
5509 |
|
NA |
r4oc21_2
Variable label:
|
Development aid: The poor lacked basic necessities before they got aid
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that the recipients of development aid lacked basic necessities such as shelter and nutritious food before they received aid from Norwegian authorities?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran11=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
314 |
39.8% |
0.398477157 |
2 |
Not very likely |
402 |
51% |
0.510152284 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
48 |
6.1% |
0.060913706 |
4 |
Not at all likely |
5 |
0.6% |
0.006345178 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
2.4% |
0.024111675 |
98 |
Not asked |
5509 |
|
NA |
r4dv45d_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced for unhealthy people
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced if the patient concerned has an unhealthy lifestyle
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran9=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
13 |
2.7% |
0.02674897 |
2 |
Agree |
31 |
6.4% |
0.06378601 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
92 |
18.9% |
0.18930041 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
83 |
17.1% |
0.17078189 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
56 |
11.5% |
0.11522634 |
6 |
Disagree |
131 |
27% |
0.26954733 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
75 |
15.4% |
0.15432099 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1% |
0.01028807 |
98 |
Not asked |
5811 |
|
NA |
r4dv45d_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Unhealthy patients must pay more in fees
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
A patient with an unhealthy lifestyle should contribute more towards treatment than a patient with a healthy lifestyle
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran9=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
10 |
2.1% |
0.02057613 |
2 |
Agree |
26 |
5.3% |
0.05349794 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
68 |
14% |
0.13991770 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
67 |
13.8% |
0.13786008 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
59 |
12.1% |
0.12139918 |
6 |
Disagree |
153 |
31.5% |
0.31481481 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
98 |
20.2% |
0.20164609 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1% |
0.01028807 |
98 |
Not asked |
5811 |
|
NA |
r4dv45d_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Taxes on booze and cigarettes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
The consumption of some products, e.g. alcohol and tobacco, increases the risk of disease and thus also overall health expenditure. Such products should therefore be taxed in order to fund the costs incurred in respect of increases in such risky behaviour
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran9=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
72 |
14.8% |
0.14814815 |
2 |
Agree |
102 |
21% |
0.20987654 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
122 |
25.1% |
0.25102881 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
55 |
11.3% |
0.11316872 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
31 |
6.4% |
0.06378601 |
6 |
Disagree |
65 |
13.4% |
0.13374486 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
33 |
6.8% |
0.06790123 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
5811 |
|
NA |
r4dv45d_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: Unhealthy patients should pay more in insurance
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
People with unhealthy lifestyles, e.g. smokers and people who consume too much alcohol, should pay more for health insurance than people with healthy lifestyles
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran9=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
30 |
6.2% |
0.06172840 |
2 |
Agree |
90 |
18.5% |
0.18518519 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
91 |
18.7% |
0.18724280 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
64 |
13.2% |
0.13168724 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
45 |
9.3% |
0.09259259 |
6 |
Disagree |
105 |
21.6% |
0.21604938 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
55 |
11.3% |
0.11316872 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.2% |
0.01234568 |
98 |
Not asked |
5811 |
|
NA |
r4dv45d_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: Unhealthy patients should be given less priority
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
If someone becomes ill, continuing to live an unhealthy lifestyle could ruin the effects of their treatment. So, if ill patients leading an unhealthy lifestyle do not change their habits, should the help they receive be given lower priority in the future than the help received by patients who have a healthy lifestyle?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran9=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
21 |
4.3% |
0.04320988 |
2 |
Agree |
55 |
11.3% |
0.11316872 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
109 |
22.4% |
0.22427984 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
61 |
12.6% |
0.12551440 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
60 |
12.3% |
0.12345679 |
6 |
Disagree |
117 |
24.1% |
0.24074074 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
58 |
11.9% |
0.11934156 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1% |
0.01028807 |
98 |
Not asked |
5811 |
|
NA |
r4dv45d_6
Variable label:
|
Statement: Unhealthy patients that does not follow agreement should be given less priority
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
If a specific agreement has been entered into between a doctor and a patient about changing the patient’s lifestyle and the patient fails to comply with the agreement, should future treatment of the patient be given lower priority than that given to patients who comply with such agreements?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran9=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
24 |
4.9% |
0.049382716 |
2 |
Agree |
71 |
14.6% |
0.146090535 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
122 |
25.1% |
0.251028807 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
68 |
14% |
0.139917695 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
56 |
11.5% |
0.115226337 |
6 |
Disagree |
97 |
20% |
0.199588477 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
44 |
9.1% |
0.090534979 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.8% |
0.008230453 |
98 |
Not asked |
5811 |
|
NA |
r4ran21
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1533] [Invalid:4764] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
178 |
11.6% |
0.1161122 |
2 |
2 |
216 |
14.1% |
0.1409002 |
3 |
3 |
205 |
13.4% |
0.1337247 |
4 |
4 |
160 |
10.4% |
0.1043705 |
5 |
5 |
195 |
12.7% |
0.1272016 |
6 |
6 |
175 |
11.4% |
0.1141553 |
7 |
7 |
212 |
13.8% |
0.1382909 |
8 |
8 |
192 |
12.5% |
0.1252446 |
Sysmiss |
|
4764 |
|
NA |
r4dv51a
Variable label:
|
Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran21=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
46 |
25.8% |
0.25842697 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
65 |
36.5% |
0.36516854 |
3 |
Don't know |
65 |
36.5% |
0.36516854 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1.1% |
0.01123596 |
98 |
Not asked |
6119 |
|
NA |
r4dv51b
Variable label:
|
Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, learned Norwegian
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have learnt Norwegian while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran21=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
78 |
36.1% |
0.3611111 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
68 |
31.5% |
0.3148148 |
3 |
Don't know |
70 |
32.4% |
0.3240741 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6081 |
|
NA |
r4dv51c
Variable label:
|
Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, got a job
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have found a job while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran21=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
101 |
49.3% |
0.49268293 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
41 |
20% |
0.20000000 |
3 |
Don't know |
60 |
29.3% |
0.29268293 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.5% |
0.01463415 |
98 |
Not asked |
6092 |
|
NA |
r4dv51d
Variable label:
|
Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, participated actively in their local communities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have participated actively in their local communities while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran21=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
60 |
37.5% |
0.375 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
44 |
27.5% |
0.275 |
3 |
Don't know |
56 |
35% |
0.350 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6137 |
|
NA |
r4dv51e
Variable label:
|
Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran21=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
33 |
16.9% |
0.16923077 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
83 |
42.6% |
0.42564103 |
3 |
Don't know |
76 |
39% |
0.38974359 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.5% |
0.01538462 |
98 |
Not asked |
6102 |
|
NA |
r4dv51f
Variable label:
|
Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, learned Norwegian
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have learnt Norwegian while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran21=6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
45 |
25.7% |
0.2571429 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
73 |
41.7% |
0.4171429 |
3 |
Don't know |
57 |
32.6% |
0.3257143 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6122 |
|
NA |
r4dv51g
Variable label:
|
Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, got a job
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have found a job while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran21=7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
69 |
32.5% |
0.32547170 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
75 |
35.4% |
0.35377358 |
3 |
Don't know |
61 |
28.8% |
0.28773585 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
3.3% |
0.03301887 |
98 |
Not asked |
6085 |
|
NA |
r4dv51h
Variable label:
|
Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, participated actively in their local communities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have participated actively in their local communities while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and ran21=8]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
66 |
34.4% |
0.3437500 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
68 |
35.4% |
0.3541667 |
3 |
Don't know |
55 |
28.6% |
0.2864583 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.6% |
0.0156250 |
98 |
Not asked |
6105 |
|
NA |
r4dv52a
Variable label:
|
How strong are your views about asylum seekers being granted residence?
|
Literal question:
|
How strong are your views about asylum seekers being granted residence?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and either of the following variables =1: R4DV51a, R4DV51b, R4DV51c, R4DV51d, R4DV51e, R4DV51f, R4DV51g=1, or R4DV51h]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very strong |
67 |
13.5% |
0.134538153 |
2 |
Strong |
174 |
34.9% |
0.349397590 |
3 |
Fairly strong |
149 |
29.9% |
0.299196787 |
4 |
Not very strong |
79 |
15.9% |
0.158634538 |
5 |
Not at all strong |
25 |
5% |
0.050200803 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.8% |
0.008032129 |
98 |
Not asked |
5799 |
|
NA |
r4dv52b
Variable label:
|
How strong are your views about asylum seekers not being granted residence?
|
Literal question:
|
How strong are your views about asylum seekers not being granted residence?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=3 and either of the following variables =1: R4DV51a, R4DV51b, R4DV51c, R4DV51d, R4DV51e, R4DV51f, R4DV51g, or R4DV51h]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very strong |
81 |
15.7% |
0.156673114 |
2 |
Strong |
142 |
27.5% |
0.274661509 |
3 |
Fairly strong |
159 |
30.8% |
0.307543520 |
4 |
Not very strong |
84 |
16.2% |
0.162475822 |
5 |
Not at all strong |
47 |
9.1% |
0.090909091 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.8% |
0.007736944 |
98 |
Not asked |
5780 |
|
NA |
r4dv1
Variable label:
|
Pro and con regarding immigrants
|
Pre-question text:
|
We will now ask a few questions about current issues in Norway today, e.g. immigration and ethnic diversity. We are interested in your own opinion on these issues and we would ask you answer these questions to the best of your ability.
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very great advantage |
57 |
3.6% |
0.035984848 |
2 |
Great advantage |
306 |
19.3% |
0.193181818 |
3 |
Slightly advantageous |
673 |
42.5% |
0.424873737 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
202 |
12.8% |
0.127525253 |
5 |
A slight disadvantage |
222 |
14% |
0.140151515 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
77 |
4.9% |
0.048611111 |
7 |
Very great disadvantage |
36 |
2.3% |
0.022727273 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
0.7% |
0.006944444 |
98 |
Not asked |
4713 |
|
NA |
r4dv4
Variable label:
|
How important is immigration policy to you personally?
|
Literal question:
|
How important is immigration policy to you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
181 |
11.4% |
0.114267677 |
2 |
Important |
579 |
36.6% |
0.365530303 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
602 |
38% |
0.380050505 |
4 |
Not very important |
192 |
12.1% |
0.121212121 |
5 |
Not important at all |
23 |
1.5% |
0.014520202 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.4% |
0.004419192 |
98 |
Not asked |
4713 |
|
NA |
r4dv6
Variable label:
|
Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
|
Literal question:
|
Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Labour Party |
322 |
20.3% |
0.203282828 |
2 |
The Progress Party |
282 |
17.8% |
0.178030303 |
3 |
The Conservative Party |
265 |
16.7% |
0.167297980 |
4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
100 |
6.3% |
0.063131313 |
5 |
The Centre Party |
21 |
1.3% |
0.013257576 |
6 |
The Christian Democrats |
97 |
6.1% |
0.061237374 |
7 |
The Liberal Party |
99 |
6.2% |
0.062500000 |
8 |
The Red Party |
33 |
2.1% |
0.020833333 |
9 |
The Green Party |
13 |
0.8% |
0.008207071 |
10 |
Other (please state which) |
16 |
1% |
0.010101010 |
11 |
None |
301 |
19% |
0.190025253 |
97 |
No answer |
35 |
2.2% |
0.022095960 |
98 |
Not asked |
4713 |
|
NA |
r4dv6_10_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Which party do you think has the best immigration policy? [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which party do you think has the best immigration policy?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4dv41
Variable label:
|
Statement: Men are more entitled to jobs than women during a downturn in the labour market.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Men are more entitled to jobs than women during a downturn in the labour market.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
30 |
1.9% |
0.018939394 |
2 |
Agree |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009469697 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
48 |
3% |
0.030303030 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
108 |
6.8% |
0.068181818 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
50 |
3.2% |
0.031565657 |
6 |
Disagree |
322 |
20.3% |
0.203282828 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
998 |
63% |
0.630050505 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
0.8% |
0.008207071 |
98 |
Not asked |
4713 |
|
NA |
r4ran13
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1583] [Invalid:4714] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
302 |
19.1% |
0.1907770 |
2 |
2 |
307 |
19.4% |
0.1939356 |
3 |
3 |
302 |
19.1% |
0.1907770 |
4 |
4 |
339 |
21.4% |
0.2141503 |
5 |
5 |
333 |
21% |
0.2103601 |
Sysmiss |
|
4714 |
|
NA |
r4dv42a
Variable label:
|
Allow stand at local shopping centre: An anti-Islamic group
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that an anti-Islamic group has asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that such a group should be allowed to do this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran13=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
18 |
6% |
0.059602649 |
2 |
Agree |
41 |
13.6% |
0.135761589 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
44 |
14.6% |
0.145695364 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
46 |
15.2% |
0.152317881 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
26 |
8.6% |
0.086092715 |
6 |
Disagree |
56 |
18.5% |
0.185430464 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
69 |
22.8% |
0.228476821 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006622517 |
98 |
Not asked |
5995 |
|
NA |
r4dv42b
Variable label:
|
Allow stand at local shopping centre: A right wing extremist group
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that a right wing extremist group has asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that such a group should be allowed to do this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran13=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
17 |
5.5% |
0.05537459 |
2 |
Agree |
44 |
14.3% |
0.14332248 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
41 |
13.4% |
0.13355049 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
28 |
9.1% |
0.09120521 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
24 |
7.8% |
0.07817590 |
6 |
Disagree |
45 |
14.7% |
0.14657980 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
102 |
33.2% |
0.33224756 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2% |
0.01954397 |
98 |
Not asked |
5990 |
|
NA |
r4dv42c
Variable label:
|
Allow stand at local shopping centre: The Progress Party
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that the Progress Party has asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that this party should be allowed to do this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran13=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
90 |
29.8% |
0.298013245 |
2 |
Agree |
95 |
31.5% |
0.314569536 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
19 |
6.3% |
0.062913907 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
56 |
18.5% |
0.185430464 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
6 |
2% |
0.019867550 |
6 |
Disagree |
17 |
5.6% |
0.056291391 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
5.3% |
0.052980132 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1% |
0.009933775 |
98 |
Not asked |
5995 |
|
NA |
r4dv42d
Variable label:
|
Allow stand at local shopping centre: The Liberal Party
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that the Liberal Party has asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that this party should be allowed to do this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran13=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
84 |
24.8% |
0.24778761 |
2 |
Agree |
108 |
31.9% |
0.31858407 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
33 |
9.7% |
0.09734513 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
79 |
23.3% |
0.23303835 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
9 |
2.7% |
0.02654867 |
6 |
Disagree |
12 |
3.5% |
0.03539823 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
10 |
2.9% |
0.02949853 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.2% |
0.01179941 |
98 |
Not asked |
5958 |
|
NA |
r4dv42e_1
Variable label:
|
Allow stand at local shopping centre: An anti-Islamic group
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that an anti-Islamic group, a right wing extremist group, the Progress Party and the Liberal Party have asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that these groups should be allowed to do this?
|
Literal question:
|
An anti-Islamic group
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran13=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
30 |
9% |
0.09009009 |
2 |
Agree |
50 |
15% |
0.15015015 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
38 |
11.4% |
0.11411411 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
40 |
12% |
0.12012012 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
20 |
6% |
0.06006006 |
6 |
Disagree |
48 |
14.4% |
0.14414414 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
100 |
30% |
0.30030030 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.1% |
0.02102102 |
98 |
Not asked |
5964 |
|
NA |
r4dv42e_2
Variable label:
|
Allow stand at local shopping centre: A right wing extremist group
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that an anti-Islamic group, a right wing extremist group, the Progress Party and the Liberal Party have asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that these groups should be allowed to do this?
|
Literal question:
|
A right wing extremist group
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran13=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
25 |
7.5% |
0.07507508 |
2 |
Agree |
41 |
12.3% |
0.12312312 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
28 |
8.4% |
0.08408408 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
36 |
10.8% |
0.10810811 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
17 |
5.1% |
0.05105105 |
6 |
Disagree |
57 |
17.1% |
0.17117117 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
120 |
36% |
0.36036036 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
2.7% |
0.02702703 |
98 |
Not asked |
5964 |
|
NA |
r4dv42e_3
Variable label:
|
Allow stand at local shopping centre: The Progress Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that an anti-Islamic group, a right wing extremist group, the Progress Party and the Liberal Party have asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that these groups should be allowed to do this?
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran13=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
69 |
20.7% |
0.20720721 |
2 |
Agree |
90 |
27% |
0.27027027 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
34 |
10.2% |
0.10210210 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
57 |
17.1% |
0.17117117 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
17 |
5.1% |
0.05105105 |
6 |
Disagree |
23 |
6.9% |
0.06906907 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
30 |
9% |
0.09009009 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
3.9% |
0.03903904 |
98 |
Not asked |
5964 |
|
NA |
r4dv42e_4
Variable label:
|
Allow stand at local shopping centre: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that an anti-Islamic group, a right wing extremist group, the Progress Party and the Liberal Party have asked for permission to have a stand for spreading their views at your local shopping centre. To what extent do you agree or disagree that these groups should be allowed to do this?
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran13=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
71 |
21.3% |
0.21321321 |
2 |
Agree |
97 |
29.1% |
0.29129129 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
32 |
9.6% |
0.09609610 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
61 |
18.3% |
0.18318318 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
16 |
4.8% |
0.04804805 |
6 |
Disagree |
18 |
5.4% |
0.05405405 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
24 |
7.2% |
0.07207207 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
4.2% |
0.04204204 |
98 |
Not asked |
5964 |
|
NA |
r4ran14
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1581] [Invalid:4716] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
276 |
17.5% |
0.1745731 |
2 |
2 |
257 |
16.3% |
0.1625553 |
3 |
3 |
284 |
18% |
0.1796331 |
4 |
4 |
274 |
17.3% |
0.1733080 |
5 |
5 |
247 |
15.6% |
0.1562302 |
6 |
6 |
243 |
15.4% |
0.1537002 |
Sysmiss |
|
4716 |
|
NA |
r4dv43a
Variable label:
|
Allow rental of local meeting room: Prophet’s Ummah
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that the Muslim fundamentalist group, Prophet’s Ummah, has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the Prophet’s Ummah should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran14=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
12 |
4.3% |
0.04347826 |
2 |
Agree |
44 |
15.9% |
0.15942029 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
16 |
5.8% |
0.05797101 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
40 |
14.5% |
0.14492754 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
29 |
10.5% |
0.10507246 |
6 |
Disagree |
51 |
18.5% |
0.18478261 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
77 |
27.9% |
0.27898551 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.5% |
0.02536232 |
98 |
Not asked |
6021 |
|
NA |
r4dv43b
Variable label:
|
Allow rental of local meeting room: SIAN
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that the anti-Islamic group, Stop the Islamisation of Norway (SIAN), has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers. To what extent do you agree or disagree that SIAN should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran14=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
34 |
13.2% |
0.13229572 |
2 |
Agree |
47 |
18.3% |
0.18287938 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
36 |
14% |
0.14007782 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
42 |
16.3% |
0.16342412 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
22 |
8.6% |
0.08560311 |
6 |
Disagree |
36 |
14% |
0.14007782 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
35 |
13.6% |
0.13618677 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.9% |
0.01945525 |
98 |
Not asked |
6040 |
|
NA |
r4dv43c
Variable label:
|
Allow rental of local meeting room: The Progress Party
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that the Progress Party has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the Progress Party should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran14=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
87 |
30.6% |
0.30633803 |
2 |
Agree |
113 |
39.8% |
0.39788732 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
19 |
6.7% |
0.06690141 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
50 |
17.6% |
0.17605634 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
6 |
2.1% |
0.02112676 |
6 |
Disagree |
5 |
1.8% |
0.01760563 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01408451 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6013 |
|
NA |
r4dv43d
Variable label:
|
Allow rental of local meeting room: Muslims
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that a Muslim congregation has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers. To what extent do you agree or disagree that such a Muslim congregation should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran14=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
52 |
19% |
0.18978102 |
2 |
Agree |
117 |
42.7% |
0.42700730 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
32 |
11.7% |
0.11678832 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
35 |
12.8% |
0.12773723 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
18 |
6.6% |
0.06569343 |
6 |
Disagree |
9 |
3.3% |
0.03284672 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
3.3% |
0.03284672 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.00729927 |
98 |
Not asked |
6023 |
|
NA |
r4dv43e
Variable label:
|
Allow rental of local meeting room: Free Church
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that a Free Church congregation has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers. To what extent do you agree or disagree that such a Free Church congregation should be allowed to rent premises for this purpose?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran14=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
42 |
17% |
0.17004049 |
2 |
Agree |
85 |
34.4% |
0.34412955 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
35 |
14.2% |
0.14170040 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
52 |
21.1% |
0.21052632 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
9 |
3.6% |
0.03643725 |
6 |
Disagree |
6 |
2.4% |
0.02429150 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
3.6% |
0.03643725 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
3.6% |
0.03643725 |
98 |
Not asked |
6050 |
|
NA |
r4dv43f
Variable label:
|
Allow rental of local meeting room: The Liberal Party
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that the Liberal Party has asked to hire a local meeting room in order to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the Liberal Party should be allowed to do this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran14=6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
84 |
34.6% |
0.345679012 |
2 |
Agree |
94 |
38.7% |
0.386831276 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
15 |
6.2% |
0.061728395 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
42 |
17.3% |
0.172839506 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
4 |
1.6% |
0.016460905 |
6 |
Disagree |
2 |
0.8% |
0.008230453 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1 |
0.4% |
0.004115226 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.004115226 |
98 |
Not asked |
6054 |
|
NA |
r4ran16
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1580] [Invalid:4717] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
249 |
15.8% |
0.1575949 |
2 |
2 |
283 |
17.9% |
0.1791139 |
3 |
3 |
253 |
16% |
0.1601266 |
4 |
4 |
264 |
16.7% |
0.1670886 |
5 |
5 |
266 |
16.8% |
0.1683544 |
6 |
6 |
265 |
16.8% |
0.1677215 |
Sysmiss |
|
4717 |
|
NA |
r4dv47a
Variable label:
|
Limit work immigration: Some of the poorest are from Romania
|
Literal question:
|
The financial crisis has caused considerable poverty in Europe. Some of the poorest Europeans are the Roma people from Romania and some of them come to Norway to seek work so that their families can have a better life. To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce agreements designed to limit this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran16=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
31 |
12.4% |
0.124497992 |
2 |
Agree |
54 |
21.7% |
0.216867470 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
48 |
19.3% |
0.192771084 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
38 |
15.3% |
0.152610442 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
26 |
10.4% |
0.104417671 |
6 |
Disagree |
43 |
17.3% |
0.172690763 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
7 |
2.8% |
0.028112450 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.8% |
0.008032129 |
98 |
Not asked |
6048 |
|
NA |
r4dv47b
Variable label:
|
Limit work immigration: Some of the poorest are from Spain
|
Literal question:
|
The financial crisis has caused considerable poverty in Europe. Some of the poorest Europeans are from Spain and some of them come to Norway to seek work so that their families can have a better life. To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce agreements designed to limit this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran16=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
10 |
3.5% |
0.03533569 |
2 |
Agree |
28 |
9.9% |
0.09893993 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
48 |
17% |
0.16961131 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
57 |
20.1% |
0.20141343 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
46 |
16.3% |
0.16254417 |
6 |
Disagree |
63 |
22.3% |
0.22261484 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
26 |
9.2% |
0.09187279 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.8% |
0.01766784 |
98 |
Not asked |
6014 |
|
NA |
r4dv47c
Variable label:
|
Limit work immigration: Some of the poorest are from Poland
|
Literal question:
|
The financial crisis has caused considerable poverty in Europe. Some of the poorest Europeans are from Poland and some of them come to Norway to seek work so that their families can have a better life. To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce agreements designed to limit this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran16=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
12 |
4.7% |
0.04743083 |
2 |
Agree |
26 |
10.3% |
0.10276680 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
57 |
22.5% |
0.22529644 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
44 |
17.4% |
0.17391304 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
51 |
20.2% |
0.20158103 |
6 |
Disagree |
47 |
18.6% |
0.18577075 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
12 |
4.7% |
0.04743083 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.6% |
0.01581028 |
98 |
Not asked |
6044 |
|
NA |
r4dv47d
Variable label:
|
Limit immigration for beggars: Some of the poorest are from Romania
|
Literal question:
|
The financial crisis has caused considerable poverty in Europe. Some of the poorest Europeans are the Roma people from Romania and some of them come to Norway to beg so that their families can have a better life. To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce agreements designed to limit this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran16=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
62 |
23.5% |
0.23484848 |
2 |
Agree |
79 |
29.9% |
0.29924242 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
53 |
20.1% |
0.20075758 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
28 |
10.6% |
0.10606061 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
16 |
6.1% |
0.06060606 |
6 |
Disagree |
14 |
5.3% |
0.05303030 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
3.4% |
0.03409091 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01136364 |
98 |
Not asked |
6033 |
|
NA |
r4dv47e
Variable label:
|
Limit immigration for beggars: Some of the poorest are from Spain
|
Literal question:
|
The financial crisis has caused considerable poverty in Europe. Some of the poorest Europeans are from Spain and some of them come to Norway to beg so that their families can have a better life. To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce agreements designed to limit this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran16=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
35 |
13.2% |
0.13157895 |
2 |
Agree |
71 |
26.7% |
0.26691729 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
56 |
21.1% |
0.21052632 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
43 |
16.2% |
0.16165414 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
19 |
7.1% |
0.07142857 |
6 |
Disagree |
29 |
10.9% |
0.10902256 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
9 |
3.4% |
0.03383459 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.5% |
0.01503759 |
98 |
Not asked |
6031 |
|
NA |
r4dv47f
Variable label:
|
Limit immigration for beggars: Some of the poorest are from Poland
|
Literal question:
|
The financial crisis has caused considerable poverty in Europe. Some of the poorest Europeans are from Poland and some of them come to Norway to beg so that their families can have a better life. To what extent do you agree or disagree that Norway should introduce agreements designed to limit this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran16=6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
50 |
18.9% |
0.18867925 |
2 |
Agree |
67 |
25.3% |
0.25283019 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
55 |
20.8% |
0.20754717 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
35 |
13.2% |
0.13207547 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
26 |
9.8% |
0.09811321 |
6 |
Disagree |
25 |
9.4% |
0.09433962 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
1.9% |
0.01886792 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.8% |
0.00754717 |
98 |
Not asked |
6032 |
|
NA |
r4ran18
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1576] [Invalid:4721] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
274 |
17.4% |
0.1738579 |
2 |
2 |
268 |
17% |
0.1700508 |
3 |
3 |
276 |
17.5% |
0.1751269 |
4 |
4 |
270 |
17.1% |
0.1713198 |
5 |
5 |
222 |
14.1% |
0.1408629 |
6 |
6 |
266 |
16.9% |
0.1687817 |
Sysmiss |
|
4721 |
|
NA |
r4dv48a
Variable label:
|
Statement: Schools should allow Muslim pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
Literal question:
|
Schools should allow Muslim pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran18=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
20 |
7.3% |
0.07299270 |
2 |
Agree |
64 |
23.4% |
0.23357664 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
64 |
23.4% |
0.23357664 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
44 |
16.1% |
0.16058394 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
23 |
8.4% |
0.08394161 |
6 |
Disagree |
31 |
11.3% |
0.11313869 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
25 |
9.1% |
0.09124088 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01094891 |
98 |
Not asked |
6023 |
|
NA |
r4dv48b
Variable label:
|
Statement: Schools should allow all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
Literal question:
|
Schools should allow all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran18=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
12 |
4.5% |
0.04477612 |
2 |
Agree |
46 |
17.2% |
0.17164179 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
38 |
14.2% |
0.14179104 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
42 |
15.7% |
0.15671642 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
40 |
14.9% |
0.14925373 |
6 |
Disagree |
56 |
20.9% |
0.20895522 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
31 |
11.6% |
0.11567164 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01119403 |
98 |
Not asked |
6029 |
|
NA |
r4dv48c
Variable label:
|
Statement: Schools should encourage muslim pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
Literal question:
|
Schools should encourage Muslim pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran18=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
6 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
2 |
Agree |
28 |
10.1% |
0.10144928 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
29 |
10.5% |
0.10507246 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
91 |
33% |
0.32971014 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
29 |
10.5% |
0.10507246 |
6 |
Disagree |
55 |
19.9% |
0.19927536 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
34 |
12.3% |
0.12318841 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.4% |
0.01449275 |
98 |
Not asked |
6021 |
|
NA |
r4dv48d
Variable label:
|
Statement: Schools should encourage all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
Literal question:
|
Schools should encourage all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals in school districts which have a lot of Muslim pupils?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran18=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
4 |
1.5% |
0.014814815 |
2 |
Agree |
19 |
7% |
0.070370370 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
33 |
12.2% |
0.122222222 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
47 |
17.4% |
0.174074074 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
30 |
11.1% |
0.111111111 |
6 |
Disagree |
71 |
26.3% |
0.262962963 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
64 |
23.7% |
0.237037037 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.007407407 |
98 |
Not asked |
6027 |
|
NA |
r4dv48e
Variable label:
|
Statement: Schools should allow all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
Literal question:
|
Schools should allow all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran18=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
18 |
8.1% |
0.081081081 |
2 |
Agree |
43 |
19.4% |
0.193693694 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
31 |
14% |
0.139639640 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
45 |
20.3% |
0.202702703 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
28 |
12.6% |
0.126126126 |
6 |
Disagree |
34 |
15.3% |
0.153153153 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
22 |
9.9% |
0.099099099 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004504505 |
98 |
Not asked |
6075 |
|
NA |
r4dv48f
Variable label:
|
Statement: Schools should encourage all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
|
Literal question:
|
Schools should encourage all pupils to celebrate Muslim festivals.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran18=6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
4 |
1.5% |
0.015037594 |
2 |
Agree |
6 |
2.3% |
0.022556391 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
9 |
3.4% |
0.033834586 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
34 |
12.8% |
0.127819549 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
26 |
9.8% |
0.097744361 |
6 |
Disagree |
97 |
36.5% |
0.364661654 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
88 |
33.1% |
0.330827068 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.8% |
0.007518797 |
98 |
Not asked |
6031 |
|
NA |
r4ran19
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1576] [Invalid:4721] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
387 |
24.6% |
0.2455584 |
2 |
2 |
371 |
23.5% |
0.2354061 |
3 |
3 |
435 |
27.6% |
0.2760152 |
4 |
4 |
383 |
24.3% |
0.2430203 |
Sysmiss |
|
4721 |
|
NA |
r4dv49a
Variable label:
|
How long should immigrants live in Norway for before they obtain full access to welfare benefits?
|
Literal question:
|
How long should immigrants live in Norway for before they obtain full access to welfare benefits?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran19=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
They should have full access immediately |
53 |
13.7% |
0.136950904 |
2 |
1 years |
41 |
10.6% |
0.105943152 |
3 |
2 years |
28 |
7.2% |
0.072351421 |
4 |
3 years |
58 |
15% |
0.149870801 |
5 |
4 years |
12 |
3.1% |
0.031007752 |
6 |
5 years |
91 |
23.5% |
0.235142119 |
7 |
6 years |
6 |
1.6% |
0.015503876 |
8 |
7 years |
16 |
4.1% |
0.041343669 |
9 |
8 years |
3 |
0.8% |
0.007751938 |
10 |
9 years |
1 |
0.3% |
0.002583979 |
11 |
10 years |
38 |
9.8% |
0.098191214 |
12 |
They should never have full access |
21 |
5.4% |
0.054263566 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
4.9% |
0.049095607 |
98 |
Not asked |
5910 |
|
NA |
r4dv49b
Variable label:
|
How long should immigrants work for in Norway before they obtain full access to welfare benefits?
|
Literal question:
|
How long should immigrants work for in Norway before they obtain full access to welfare benefits?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran19=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
They should have full access immediately |
62 |
16.7% |
0.167115903 |
2 |
1 years |
53 |
14.3% |
0.142857143 |
3 |
2 years |
31 |
8.4% |
0.083557951 |
4 |
3 years |
59 |
15.9% |
0.159029650 |
5 |
4 years |
12 |
3.2% |
0.032345013 |
6 |
5 years |
78 |
21% |
0.210242588 |
7 |
6 years |
6 |
1.6% |
0.016172507 |
8 |
7 years |
10 |
2.7% |
0.026954178 |
9 |
8 years |
3 |
0.8% |
0.008086253 |
10 |
9 years |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
11 |
10 years |
36 |
9.7% |
0.097035040 |
12 |
They should never have full access |
12 |
3.2% |
0.032345013 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
2.4% |
0.024258760 |
98 |
Not asked |
5926 |
|
NA |
r4dv49c
Variable label:
|
How long should immigrants work for and pay tax in Norway before they obtain full access to welfare benefits
|
Literal question:
|
How long should immigrants work for and pay tax in Norway before they obtain full access to welfare benefits?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran19=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
They should have full access immediately |
74 |
17% |
0.170114943 |
2 |
1 years |
74 |
17% |
0.170114943 |
3 |
2 years |
48 |
11% |
0.110344828 |
4 |
3 years |
58 |
13.3% |
0.133333333 |
5 |
4 years |
14 |
3.2% |
0.032183908 |
6 |
5 years |
90 |
20.7% |
0.206896552 |
7 |
6 years |
8 |
1.8% |
0.018390805 |
8 |
7 years |
12 |
2.8% |
0.027586207 |
9 |
8 years |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002298851 |
10 |
9 years |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
11 |
10 years |
30 |
6.9% |
0.068965517 |
12 |
They should never have full access |
11 |
2.5% |
0.025287356 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
3.4% |
0.034482759 |
98 |
Not asked |
5862 |
|
NA |
r4dv49d
Variable label:
|
How long should immigrants work for in Norway and contribute towards Norwegian society before they obtain full access to welfare benefits?
|
Literal question:
|
How long should immigrants work for in Norway and contribute towards Norwegian society before they obtain full access to welfare benefits?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran19=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
They should have full access immediately |
59 |
15.4% |
0.154046997 |
2 |
1 years |
64 |
16.7% |
0.167101828 |
3 |
2 years |
44 |
11.5% |
0.114882507 |
4 |
3 years |
46 |
12% |
0.120104439 |
5 |
4 years |
13 |
3.4% |
0.033942559 |
6 |
5 years |
72 |
18.8% |
0.187989556 |
7 |
6 years |
2 |
0.5% |
0.005221932 |
8 |
7 years |
15 |
3.9% |
0.039164491 |
9 |
8 years |
4 |
1% |
0.010443864 |
10 |
9 years |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
11 |
10 years |
35 |
9.1% |
0.091383812 |
12 |
They should never have full access |
16 |
4.2% |
0.041775457 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
3.4% |
0.033942559 |
98 |
Not asked |
5914 |
|
NA |
r4ran20
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1576] [Invalid:4721] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
403 |
25.6% |
0.2557107 |
2 |
2 |
384 |
24.4% |
0.2436548 |
3 |
3 |
394 |
25% |
0.2500000 |
4 |
4 |
395 |
25.1% |
0.2506345 |
Sysmiss |
|
4721 |
|
NA |
r4dv50a
Variable label:
|
Agree or disagree: Muslim ideas about how women should behave in their private lives should be respected.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that…
|
Literal question:
|
…people have different views, but Muslim ideas about how women should behave in their private lives should be respected.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
11 |
2.7% |
0.027295285 |
2 |
Agree |
45 |
11.2% |
0.111662531 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
54 |
13.4% |
0.133995037 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
84 |
20.8% |
0.208436725 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
63 |
15.6% |
0.156327543 |
6 |
Disagree |
75 |
18.6% |
0.186104218 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
67 |
16.6% |
0.166253102 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1% |
0.009925558 |
98 |
Not asked |
5894 |
|
NA |
r4dv50b
Variable label:
|
Agree or disagree: Muslim ideas about how women should behave should be respected.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that…
|
Literal question:
|
…people have different views, but Muslim ideas about how women should behave should be respected.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran20=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
6 |
1.6% |
0.01562500 |
2 |
Agree |
18 |
4.7% |
0.04687500 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
21 |
5.5% |
0.05468750 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
49 |
12.8% |
0.12760417 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
62 |
16.1% |
0.16145833 |
6 |
Disagree |
94 |
24.5% |
0.24479167 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
129 |
33.6% |
0.33593750 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1.3% |
0.01302083 |
98 |
Not asked |
5913 |
|
NA |
r4dv50c
Variable label:
|
Agree or disagree: Muslim ideas about how women should behave in their private lives should be respected.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that…
|
Literal question:
|
…Muslim ideas about how women should behave in their private lives should be respected.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran20=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
9 |
2.3% |
0.02284264 |
2 |
Agree |
41 |
10.4% |
0.10406091 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
33 |
8.4% |
0.08375635 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
80 |
20.3% |
0.20304569 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
58 |
14.7% |
0.14720812 |
6 |
Disagree |
63 |
16% |
0.15989848 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
106 |
26.9% |
0.26903553 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1% |
0.01015228 |
98 |
Not asked |
5903 |
|
NA |
r4dv50d
Variable label:
|
Agree or disagree: Muslim ideas about how women should behave should be respected.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that…
|
Literal question:
|
…Muslim ideas about how women should behave should be respected.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran20=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
8 |
2% |
0.02025316 |
2 |
Agree |
8 |
2% |
0.02025316 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
18 |
4.6% |
0.04556962 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
39 |
9.9% |
0.09873418 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
43 |
10.9% |
0.10886076 |
6 |
Disagree |
131 |
33.2% |
0.33164557 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
144 |
36.5% |
0.36455696 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1% |
0.01012658 |
98 |
Not asked |
5902 |
|
NA |
r4ran28
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1575] [Invalid:4722] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
193 |
12.3% |
0.1225397 |
2 |
2 |
203 |
12.9% |
0.1288889 |
3 |
3 |
193 |
12.3% |
0.1225397 |
4 |
4 |
199 |
12.6% |
0.1263492 |
5 |
5 |
198 |
12.6% |
0.1257143 |
6 |
6 |
188 |
11.9% |
0.1193651 |
7 |
7 |
188 |
11.9% |
0.1193651 |
8 |
8 |
213 |
13.5% |
0.1352381 |
Sysmiss |
|
4722 |
|
NA |
r4dv51a_2
Variable label:
|
Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
50 |
25.9% |
0.259067358 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
78 |
40.4% |
0.404145078 |
3 |
Don't know |
64 |
33.2% |
0.331606218 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005181347 |
98 |
Not asked |
6104 |
|
NA |
r4dv51b_2
Variable label:
|
Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, learned Norwegian
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have learnt Norwegian while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
63 |
31% |
0.310344828 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
79 |
38.9% |
0.389162562 |
3 |
Don't know |
60 |
29.6% |
0.295566502 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.5% |
0.004926108 |
98 |
Not asked |
6094 |
|
NA |
r4dv51c_2
Variable label:
|
Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, got a job
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have found a job while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
71 |
36.8% |
0.3678756 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
66 |
34.2% |
0.3419689 |
3 |
Don't know |
56 |
29% |
0.2901554 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6104 |
|
NA |
r4dv51d_2
Variable label:
|
Asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, participated actively in their local communities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have participated actively in their local communities while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
69 |
34.7% |
0.3467337 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
51 |
25.6% |
0.2562814 |
3 |
Don't know |
79 |
39.7% |
0.3969849 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6098 |
|
NA |
r4dv51e_2
Variable label:
|
Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
40 |
20.2% |
0.20202020 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
95 |
48% |
0.47979798 |
3 |
Don't know |
61 |
30.8% |
0.30808081 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
1% |
0.01010101 |
98 |
Not asked |
6099 |
|
NA |
r4dv51f_2
Variable label:
|
Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, learned Norwegian
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have learnt Norwegian while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
40 |
21.3% |
0.21276596 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
71 |
37.8% |
0.37765957 |
3 |
Don't know |
74 |
39.4% |
0.39361702 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.6% |
0.01595745 |
98 |
Not asked |
6109 |
|
NA |
r4dv51g_2
Variable label:
|
Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, got a job
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have found a job while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
68 |
36.2% |
0.3617021 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
48 |
25.5% |
0.2553191 |
3 |
Don't know |
68 |
36.2% |
0.3617021 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
2.1% |
0.0212766 |
98 |
Not asked |
6109 |
|
NA |
r4dv51h_2
Variable label:
|
Muslim asylum seekers: Lived in Norway for many years, participated actively in their local communities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Every year Norway rejects many asylum seekers. Asylum seekers are entitled to appeal about such decisions and some of them do appeal. Sometimes it takes several years before a final decision is made.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that Muslim asylum seekers who have been living in Norway for several years and have participated actively in their local communities while they are waiting for a decision to be made should be granted residence, even if their appeals are rejected? Or do you think that they should not be allowed to stay?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran28=8]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Should be allowed to stay |
74 |
34.7% |
0.34741784 |
2 |
Should not be allowed to stay |
61 |
28.6% |
0.28638498 |
3 |
Don't know |
75 |
35.2% |
0.35211268 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.4% |
0.01408451 |
98 |
Not asked |
6084 |
|
NA |
r4dv52a_2
Variable label:
|
Opinion about asylum seekers being granted residence
|
Literal question:
|
How strong are your views about asylum seekers being granted residence?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and either of the following variables =1: R4DV51a_2, R4DV51b_2, R4DV51c_2, R4DV51d_2=1, R4DV51e_2, R4DV51f_2, R4DV51g_2, or R4DV51h_2 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very strong |
46 |
9.7% |
0.096842105 |
2 |
Strong |
157 |
33.1% |
0.330526316 |
3 |
Fairly strong |
143 |
30.1% |
0.301052632 |
4 |
Not very strong |
92 |
19.4% |
0.193684211 |
5 |
Not at all strong |
33 |
6.9% |
0.069473684 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.8% |
0.008421053 |
98 |
Not asked |
5822 |
|
NA |
r4dv52b_2
Variable label:
|
Opinion about asylum seekers not being granted residence
|
Literal question:
|
How strong are your views about asylum seekers not being granted residence?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and either of the following variables =1: R4DV51a_2, R4DV51b_2, R4DV51c_2, R4DV51d_2, R4DV51e_2, R4DV51f_2, R4DV51g_2, or R4DV51h_2=2 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very strong |
87 |
15.8% |
0.15846995 |
2 |
Strong |
148 |
27% |
0.26958106 |
3 |
Fairly strong |
123 |
22.4% |
0.22404372 |
4 |
Not very strong |
108 |
19.7% |
0.19672131 |
5 |
Not at all strong |
76 |
13.8% |
0.13843352 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.3% |
0.01275046 |
98 |
Not asked |
5748 |
|
NA |
r4ran27
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1574] [Invalid:4723] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
281 |
17.9% |
0.1785260 |
2 |
2 |
269 |
17.1% |
0.1709022 |
3 |
3 |
281 |
17.9% |
0.1785260 |
4 |
4 |
258 |
16.4% |
0.1639136 |
5 |
5 |
258 |
16.4% |
0.1639136 |
6 |
6 |
227 |
14.4% |
0.1442186 |
Sysmiss |
|
4723 |
|
NA |
r4dv53a
Variable label:
|
Caricatures poking fun: Muslims
|
Literal question:
|
Some people think that it is wrong if the newspapers publish caricatures which poke fun at the religious beliefs of Muslims. Others think that it is right for newspapers to publish such caricatures.
What is your personal opinion?
It is…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
completely wrong to publish such caricatures |
30 |
10.7% |
0.106761566 |
2 |
wrong |
20 |
7.1% |
0.071174377 |
3 |
slightly wrong |
37 |
13.2% |
0.131672598 |
4 |
neither right nor wrong |
64 |
22.8% |
0.227758007 |
5 |
slightly right |
41 |
14.6% |
0.145907473 |
6 |
right |
44 |
15.7% |
0.156583630 |
7 |
completely right to publish such caricatures |
44 |
15.7% |
0.156583630 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.003558719 |
98 |
Not asked |
6016 |
|
NA |
r4dv53b
Variable label:
|
Caricatures poking fun: Jews
|
Literal question:
|
Some people think that it is wrong if the newspapers publish caricatures which poke fun at the religious beliefs of Jews. Others think that it is right for newspapers to publish such caricatures.
What is your personal opinion?
It is…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
completely wrong to publish such caricatures |
19 |
7.1% |
0.07063197 |
2 |
wrong |
28 |
10.4% |
0.10408922 |
3 |
slightly wrong |
41 |
15.2% |
0.15241636 |
4 |
neither right nor wrong |
57 |
21.2% |
0.21189591 |
5 |
slightly right |
36 |
13.4% |
0.13382900 |
6 |
right |
38 |
14.1% |
0.14126394 |
7 |
completely right to publish such caricatures |
47 |
17.5% |
0.17472119 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.1% |
0.01115242 |
98 |
Not asked |
6028 |
|
NA |
r4dv53c
Variable label:
|
Caricatures poking fun: Religious beliefs
|
Literal question:
|
Some people think that it is wrong if the newspapers publish caricatures which poke fun at the religious beliefs of people with deeply held beliefs. Others think that it is right for newspapers to publish such caricatures.
What is your personal opinion?
It is…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
completely wrong to publish such caricatures |
32 |
11.4% |
0.113879004 |
2 |
wrong |
32 |
11.4% |
0.113879004 |
3 |
slightly wrong |
43 |
15.3% |
0.153024911 |
4 |
neither right nor wrong |
59 |
21% |
0.209964413 |
5 |
slightly right |
29 |
10.3% |
0.103202847 |
6 |
right |
33 |
11.7% |
0.117437722 |
7 |
completely right to publish such caricatures |
51 |
18.1% |
0.181494662 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.007117438 |
98 |
Not asked |
6016 |
|
NA |
r4dv53d
Variable label:
|
Caricatures mocking: Muslims
|
Literal question:
|
Some people think that it is wrong if the newspapers publish caricatures which mock the religious beliefs of Muslims. Others think that it is right for newspapers to publish such caricatures.
What is your personal opinion?
It is…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
completely wrong to publish such caricatures |
23 |
8.9% |
0.089147287 |
2 |
wrong |
25 |
9.7% |
0.096899225 |
3 |
slightly wrong |
45 |
17.4% |
0.174418605 |
4 |
neither right nor wrong |
63 |
24.4% |
0.244186047 |
5 |
slightly right |
27 |
10.5% |
0.104651163 |
6 |
right |
34 |
13.2% |
0.131782946 |
7 |
completely right to publish such caricatures |
39 |
15.1% |
0.151162791 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.8% |
0.007751938 |
98 |
Not asked |
6039 |
|
NA |
r4dv53e
Variable label:
|
Caricatures mocking: Jews
|
Literal question:
|
Some people think that it is wrong if the newspapers publish caricatures which mock the religious beliefs of Jews. Others think that it is right for newspapers to publish such caricatures.
What is your personal opinion?
It is…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
completely wrong to publish such caricatures |
19 |
7.4% |
0.073643411 |
2 |
wrong |
36 |
14% |
0.139534884 |
3 |
slightly wrong |
37 |
14.3% |
0.143410853 |
4 |
neither right nor wrong |
57 |
22.1% |
0.220930233 |
5 |
slightly right |
37 |
14.3% |
0.143410853 |
6 |
right |
32 |
12.4% |
0.124031008 |
7 |
completely right to publish such caricatures |
38 |
14.7% |
0.147286822 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.8% |
0.007751938 |
98 |
Not asked |
6039 |
|
NA |
r4dv53f
Variable label:
|
Caricatures mocking: Religious beliefs
|
Literal question:
|
Some people think that it is wrong if the newspapers publish caricatures which mock the religious beliefs of people with deeply held beliefs. Others think that it is right for newspapers to publish such caricatures.
What is your personal opinion?
It is…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran27=6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
completely wrong to publish such caricatures |
18 |
7.9% |
0.07929515 |
2 |
wrong |
28 |
12.3% |
0.12334802 |
3 |
slightly wrong |
26 |
11.5% |
0.11453744 |
4 |
neither right nor wrong |
52 |
22.9% |
0.22907489 |
5 |
slightly right |
29 |
12.8% |
0.12775330 |
6 |
right |
30 |
13.2% |
0.13215859 |
7 |
completely right to publish such caricatures |
41 |
18.1% |
0.18061674 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.3% |
0.01321586 |
98 |
Not asked |
6070 |
|
NA |
r4ran23
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1574] [Invalid:4723] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
253 |
16.1% |
0.1607370 |
2 |
2 |
276 |
17.5% |
0.1753494 |
3 |
3 |
279 |
17.7% |
0.1772554 |
4 |
4 |
248 |
15.8% |
0.1575604 |
5 |
5 |
247 |
15.7% |
0.1569250 |
6 |
6 |
271 |
17.2% |
0.1721728 |
Sysmiss |
|
4723 |
|
NA |
r4mi5a
Variable label:
|
Ban on sexual services: For or against
|
Literal question:
|
In 2008 the Norwegian Parliament (the Storting) passed the Norwegian law prohibiting the buying of sexual services. What do you think about the ban on purchasing sexual services in Norway?
I am…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran23=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely in favour of the ban |
47 |
18.6% |
0.18577075 |
2 |
In favour of the ban |
77 |
30.4% |
0.30434783 |
3 |
Slightly in favour of the ban |
15 |
5.9% |
0.05928854 |
4 |
Neither for nor against the ban |
55 |
21.7% |
0.21739130 |
5 |
Slightly against the ban |
17 |
6.7% |
0.06719368 |
6 |
Against the ban |
25 |
9.9% |
0.09881423 |
7 |
Completely against the ban |
14 |
5.5% |
0.05533597 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1.2% |
0.01185771 |
98 |
Not asked |
6044 |
|
NA |
r4mi5b
Variable label:
|
Ban on sexual services: Makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse
|
Literal question:
|
In 2008 the Norwegian Parliament (the Storting) passed the Norwegian law prohibiting the buying of sexual services. Some people have opposed the ban because it makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse and consequently puts their lives and health in danger. What do you think about the ban on purchasing sexual services in Norway?
I am…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran23=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely in favour of the ban |
38 |
13.8% |
0.13768116 |
2 |
In favour of the ban |
78 |
28.3% |
0.28260870 |
3 |
Slightly in favour of the ban |
22 |
8% |
0.07971014 |
4 |
Neither for nor against the ban |
63 |
22.8% |
0.22826087 |
5 |
Slightly against the ban |
30 |
10.9% |
0.10869565 |
6 |
Against the ban |
27 |
9.8% |
0.09782609 |
7 |
Completely against the ban |
11 |
4% |
0.03985507 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.5% |
0.02536232 |
98 |
Not asked |
6021 |
|
NA |
r4mi5c
Variable label:
|
Ban on sexual services: ECHR may invalidate ban
|
Literal question:
|
In 2008 the Norwegian Parliament (the Storting) passed the Norwegian law prohibiting the buying of sexual services. The European Court of Human Rights may declare the ban to be invalid. What do you think about the ban on purchasing sexual services in Norway?
I am…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran23=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely in favour of the ban |
40 |
14.3% |
0.143369176 |
2 |
In favour of the ban |
82 |
29.4% |
0.293906810 |
3 |
Slightly in favour of the ban |
27 |
9.7% |
0.096774194 |
4 |
Neither for nor against the ban |
65 |
23.3% |
0.232974910 |
5 |
Slightly against the ban |
24 |
8.6% |
0.086021505 |
6 |
Against the ban |
30 |
10.8% |
0.107526882 |
7 |
Completely against the ban |
9 |
3.2% |
0.032258065 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.007168459 |
98 |
Not asked |
6018 |
|
NA |
r4mi5d
Variable label:
|
Ban on sexual services: ECHR may invalidate ban, makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse
|
Literal question:
|
In 2008 the Norwegian Parliament (the Storting) passed the Norwegian law prohibiting the buying of sexual services. The European Court of Human Rights may declare the ban to be invalid because it makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse and consequently puts their lives and health in danger. What do you think about the ban on purchasing sexual services in Norway?
I am…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran23=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely in favour of the ban |
22 |
8.9% |
0.08870968 |
2 |
In favour of the ban |
68 |
27.4% |
0.27419355 |
3 |
Slightly in favour of the ban |
25 |
10.1% |
0.10080645 |
4 |
Neither for nor against the ban |
65 |
26.2% |
0.26209677 |
5 |
Slightly against the ban |
23 |
9.3% |
0.09274194 |
6 |
Against the ban |
28 |
11.3% |
0.11290323 |
7 |
Completely against the ban |
10 |
4% |
0.04032258 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.8% |
0.02822581 |
98 |
Not asked |
6049 |
|
NA |
r4mi5e
Variable label:
|
Ban on sexual services: Supreme Court of Canada declared a similar ban to be invalid
|
Literal question:
|
In 2008 the Norwegian Parliament (the Storting) passed the Norwegian law prohibiting the buying of sexual services. In 2013 the Supreme Court of Canada declared a similar ban to be invalid because it makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse and consequently puts their lives and health in danger. What do you think about the ban on purchasing sexual services in Norway?
I am…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran23=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely in favour of the ban |
27 |
10.9% |
0.109311741 |
2 |
In favour of the ban |
60 |
24.3% |
0.242914980 |
3 |
Slightly in favour of the ban |
29 |
11.7% |
0.117408907 |
4 |
Neither for nor against the ban |
56 |
22.7% |
0.226720648 |
5 |
Slightly against the ban |
33 |
13.4% |
0.133603239 |
6 |
Against the ban |
31 |
12.6% |
0.125506073 |
7 |
Completely against the ban |
10 |
4% |
0.040485830 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.4% |
0.004048583 |
98 |
Not asked |
6050 |
|
NA |
r4mi5f
Variable label:
|
Ban on sexual services: The Norwegian Supreme Court may declare the ban to be invalid
|
Literal question:
|
In 2008 the Norwegian Parliament (the Storting) passed the Norwegian law prohibiting the buying of sexual services. The Norwegian Supreme Court may declare the ban to be invalid because it makes prostitutes more vulnerable to abuse and consequently puts their lives and health in danger. What do you think about the ban on purchasing sexual services in Norway?
I am…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran23=6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely in favour of the ban |
25 |
9.2% |
0.09225092 |
2 |
In favour of the ban |
66 |
24.4% |
0.24354244 |
3 |
Slightly in favour of the ban |
29 |
10.7% |
0.10701107 |
4 |
Neither for nor against the ban |
65 |
24% |
0.23985240 |
5 |
Slightly against the ban |
38 |
14% |
0.14022140 |
6 |
Against the ban |
33 |
12.2% |
0.12177122 |
7 |
Completely against the ban |
9 |
3.3% |
0.03321033 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.2% |
0.02214022 |
98 |
Not asked |
6026 |
|
NA |
r4ran17
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1573] [Invalid:4724] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
522 |
33.2% |
0.3318500 |
2 |
2 |
520 |
33.1% |
0.3305785 |
3 |
3 |
531 |
33.8% |
0.3375715 |
Sysmiss |
|
4724 |
|
NA |
r4dv45a_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced for unhealthy people
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
Access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced if the patient concerned has an unhealthy lifestyle
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
11 |
2.1% |
0.021072797 |
2 |
Agree |
29 |
5.6% |
0.055555556 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
89 |
17% |
0.170498084 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
80 |
15.3% |
0.153256705 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
56 |
10.7% |
0.107279693 |
6 |
Disagree |
173 |
33.1% |
0.331417625 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
79 |
15.1% |
0.151340996 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1% |
0.009578544 |
98 |
Not asked |
5775 |
|
NA |
r4dv45a_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Unhealthy patients must pay more in fees
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
A patient with an unhealthy lifestyle should contribute more towards treatment than a patient with a healthy lifestyle
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
7 |
1.3% |
0.01340996 |
2 |
Agree |
20 |
3.8% |
0.03831418 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
53 |
10.2% |
0.10153257 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
59 |
11.3% |
0.11302682 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
60 |
11.5% |
0.11494253 |
6 |
Disagree |
194 |
37.2% |
0.37164751 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
122 |
23.4% |
0.23371648 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.3% |
0.01340996 |
98 |
Not asked |
5775 |
|
NA |
r4dv45a_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Taxes on booze and cigarettes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
The consumption of some products, e.g. alcohol and tobacco, increases the risk of disease and thus also overall health expenditure. Such products should therefore be taxed in order to fund the costs incurred in respect of increases in such risky behaviour
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
66 |
12.6% |
0.12643678 |
2 |
Agree |
108 |
20.7% |
0.20689655 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
136 |
26.1% |
0.26053640 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
57 |
10.9% |
0.10919540 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
46 |
8.8% |
0.08812261 |
6 |
Disagree |
75 |
14.4% |
0.14367816 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
28 |
5.4% |
0.05363985 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
98 |
Not asked |
5775 |
|
NA |
r4dv45a_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: Unhealthy patients should pay more in insurance
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
People with unhealthy lifestyles, e.g. smokers and people who consume too much alcohol, should pay more for health insurance than people with healthy lifestyles
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
33 |
6.3% |
0.06321839 |
2 |
Agree |
67 |
12.8% |
0.12835249 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
116 |
22.2% |
0.22222222 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
57 |
10.9% |
0.10919540 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
46 |
8.8% |
0.08812261 |
6 |
Disagree |
132 |
25.3% |
0.25287356 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
65 |
12.5% |
0.12452107 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
98 |
Not asked |
5775 |
|
NA |
r4dv45a_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: Unhealthy patients should be given less priority
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
If someone becomes ill, continuing to live an unhealthy lifestyle could ruin the effects of their treatment. So, if ill patients leading an unhealthy lifestyle do not change their habits, should the help they receive be given lower priority in the future than the help received by patients who have a healthy lifestyle?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
15 |
2.9% |
0.02873563 |
2 |
Agree |
52 |
10% |
0.09961686 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
136 |
26.1% |
0.26053640 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
56 |
10.7% |
0.10727969 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
62 |
11.9% |
0.11877395 |
6 |
Disagree |
118 |
22.6% |
0.22605364 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
77 |
14.8% |
0.14750958 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
98 |
Not asked |
5775 |
|
NA |
r4dv45a_6
Variable label:
|
Statement: Unhealthy patients that does not follow agreement should be given less priority
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
If a specific agreement has been entered into between a doctor and a patient about changing the patient’s lifestyle and the patient fails to comply with the agreement, should future treatment of the patient be given lower priority than that given to patients who comply with such agreements?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
21 |
4% |
0.04022989 |
2 |
Agree |
63 |
12.1% |
0.12068966 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
127 |
24.3% |
0.24329502 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
80 |
15.3% |
0.15325670 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
61 |
11.7% |
0.11685824 |
6 |
Disagree |
110 |
21.1% |
0.21072797 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
54 |
10.3% |
0.10344828 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.1% |
0.01149425 |
98 |
Not asked |
5775 |
|
NA |
r4dv45b_1
Variable label:
|
Just statement: Access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced for unhealthy people
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
It is fair that access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced if the patient concerned has an unhealthy lifestyle
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
2.7% |
0.02692308 |
2 |
Agree |
37 |
7.1% |
0.07115385 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
105 |
20.2% |
0.20192308 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
79 |
15.2% |
0.15192308 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
64 |
12.3% |
0.12307692 |
6 |
Disagree |
145 |
27.9% |
0.27884615 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
69 |
13.3% |
0.13269231 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.3% |
0.01346154 |
98 |
Not asked |
5777 |
|
NA |
r4dv45b_2
Variable label:
|
Just statement: Unhealthy patients must pay more in fees
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
It is fair that a patient with an unhealthy lifestyle should contribute more towards treatment than a patient with a healthy lifestyle
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
9 |
1.7% |
0.01730769 |
2 |
Agree |
23 |
4.4% |
0.04423077 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
67 |
12.9% |
0.12884615 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
67 |
12.9% |
0.12884615 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
71 |
13.7% |
0.13653846 |
6 |
Disagree |
185 |
35.6% |
0.35576923 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
92 |
17.7% |
0.17692308 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.2% |
0.01153846 |
98 |
Not asked |
5777 |
|
NA |
r4dv45b_3
Variable label:
|
Just statement: Taxes on booze and cigarettes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
The consumption of some products, e.g. alcohol and tobacco, increases the risk of disease and thus also overall health expenditure. It is therefore fair that such products should be taxed in order to fund the costs incurred in respect of increases in such risky behaviour
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
90 |
17.3% |
0.17307692 |
2 |
Agree |
160 |
30.8% |
0.30769231 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
119 |
22.9% |
0.22884615 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
43 |
8.3% |
0.08269231 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
39 |
7.5% |
0.07500000 |
6 |
Disagree |
41 |
7.9% |
0.07884615 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
4% |
0.04038462 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.3% |
0.01346154 |
98 |
Not asked |
5777 |
|
NA |
r4dv45b_4
Variable label:
|
Just statement: Unhealthy patients should pay more in insurance
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
It is fair that people with unhealthy lifestyles, e.g. smokers and people who consume too much alcohol, should pay more for health insurance than people with healthy lifestyles
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
37 |
7.1% |
0.07115385 |
2 |
Agree |
82 |
15.8% |
0.15769231 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
120 |
23.1% |
0.23076923 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
74 |
14.2% |
0.14230769 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
52 |
10% |
0.10000000 |
6 |
Disagree |
93 |
17.9% |
0.17884615 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
55 |
10.6% |
0.10576923 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.3% |
0.01346154 |
98 |
Not asked |
5777 |
|
NA |
r4dv45b_5
Variable label:
|
Just statement: Unhealthy patients should be given less priority
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
If someone becomes ill, continuing to live an unhealthy lifestyle could ruin the effects of their treatment. So, if ill patients leading an unhealthy lifestyle do not change their habits, is it fair that the help they receive should be given lower priority in the future than the help received by patients who have a healthy lifestyle?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
12 |
2.3% |
0.02307692 |
2 |
Agree |
59 |
11.3% |
0.11346154 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
127 |
24.4% |
0.24423077 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
65 |
12.5% |
0.12500000 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
61 |
11.7% |
0.11730769 |
6 |
Disagree |
124 |
23.8% |
0.23846154 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
63 |
12.1% |
0.12115385 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.7% |
0.01730769 |
98 |
Not asked |
5777 |
|
NA |
r4dv45b_6
Variable label:
|
Just statement: Unhealthy patients that does not follow agreement should be given less priority
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
If a specific agreement has been entered into between a doctor and a patient about changing the patient’s lifestyle and the patient fails to comply with the agreement, is it fair that future treatment of the patient should be given lower priority than that given to patients who comply with such agreements?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
17 |
3.3% |
0.03269231 |
2 |
Agree |
84 |
16.2% |
0.16153846 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
135 |
26% |
0.25961538 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
66 |
12.7% |
0.12692308 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
60 |
11.5% |
0.11538462 |
6 |
Disagree |
89 |
17.1% |
0.17115385 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
58 |
11.2% |
0.11153846 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.1% |
0.02115385 |
98 |
Not asked |
5777 |
|
NA |
r4dv45c_1
Variable label:
|
Unsertain about cause of illness: Access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced for unhealthy people
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. There is often considerable uncertainty about the determination of whether or not a patient’s lifestyle is actually the cause of their state of health. The extent to which the patient concerned is able to avoid his/her unhealthy lifestyle is also often unclear. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
It is fair that access to very limited benefits such as organ transplants should be reduced if the patient concerned has an unhealthy lifestyle
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
2.6% |
0.026365348 |
2 |
Agree |
39 |
7.3% |
0.073446328 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
122 |
23% |
0.229755179 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
71 |
13.4% |
0.133709981 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
55 |
10.4% |
0.103578154 |
6 |
Disagree |
159 |
29.9% |
0.299435028 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
67 |
12.6% |
0.126177024 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.8% |
0.007532957 |
98 |
Not asked |
5766 |
|
NA |
r4dv45c_2
Variable label:
|
Unsertain about cause of illness: Unhealthy patients must pay more in fees
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. There is often considerable uncertainty about the determination of whether or not a patient’s lifestyle is actually the cause of their state of health. The extent to which the patient concerned is able to avoid his/her unhealthy lifestyle is also often unclear. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
It is fair that a patient with an unhealthy lifestyle should contribute more towards treatment than a patient with a healthy lifestyle
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
7 |
1.3% |
0.013182674 |
2 |
Agree |
21 |
4% |
0.039548023 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
64 |
12.1% |
0.120527307 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
67 |
12.6% |
0.126177024 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
73 |
13.7% |
0.137476460 |
6 |
Disagree |
175 |
33% |
0.329566855 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
121 |
22.8% |
0.227871940 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.6% |
0.005649718 |
98 |
Not asked |
5766 |
|
NA |
r4dv45c_3
Variable label:
|
Unsertain about cause of illness: Taxes on booze and cigarettes
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. There is often considerable uncertainty about the determination of whether or not a patient’s lifestyle is actually the cause of their state of health. The extent to which the patient concerned is able to avoid his/her unhealthy lifestyle is also often unclear. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
The consumption of some products, e.g. alcohol and tobacco, increases the risk of disease and thus also overall health expenditure. It is therefore fair that such products should be taxed in order to fund the costs incurred in respect of increases in such risky behaviour
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
92 |
17.3% |
0.173258004 |
2 |
Agree |
179 |
33.7% |
0.337099812 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
111 |
20.9% |
0.209039548 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
47 |
8.9% |
0.088512241 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
31 |
5.8% |
0.058380414 |
6 |
Disagree |
39 |
7.3% |
0.073446328 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
28 |
5.3% |
0.052730697 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.8% |
0.007532957 |
98 |
Not asked |
5766 |
|
NA |
r4dv45c_4
Variable label:
|
Unsertain about cause of illness: Unhealthy patients should pay more in insurance
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. There is often considerable uncertainty about the determination of whether or not a patient’s lifestyle is actually the cause of their state of health. The extent to which the patient concerned is able to avoid his/her unhealthy lifestyle is also often unclear. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
It is fair that people with unhealthy lifestyles, e.g. smokers and people who consume too much alcohol, should pay more for health insurance than people with healthy lifestyles
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
39 |
7.3% |
0.073446328 |
2 |
Agree |
87 |
16.4% |
0.163841808 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
117 |
22% |
0.220338983 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
73 |
13.7% |
0.137476460 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
50 |
9.4% |
0.094161959 |
6 |
Disagree |
93 |
17.5% |
0.175141243 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
69 |
13% |
0.129943503 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.6% |
0.005649718 |
98 |
Not asked |
5766 |
|
NA |
r4dv45c_5
Variable label:
|
Unsertain about cause of illness: Unhealthy patients should be given less priority
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. There is often considerable uncertainty about the determination of whether or not a patient’s lifestyle is actually the cause of their state of health. The extent to which the patient concerned is able to avoid his/her unhealthy lifestyle is also often unclear. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
If someone becomes ill, continuing to live an unhealthy lifestyle could ruin the effects of their treatment. So, if ill patients leading an unhealthy lifestyle do not change their habits, is it fair that the help they receive should be given lower priority in the future than the help received by patients who have a healthy lifestyle?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
24 |
4.5% |
0.045197740 |
2 |
Agree |
62 |
11.7% |
0.116760829 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
112 |
21.1% |
0.210922787 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
69 |
13% |
0.129943503 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
63 |
11.9% |
0.118644068 |
6 |
Disagree |
125 |
23.5% |
0.235404896 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
73 |
13.7% |
0.137476460 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.6% |
0.005649718 |
98 |
Not asked |
5766 |
|
NA |
r4dv45c_6
Variable label:
|
Unsertain about cause of illness: Unhealthy patients that does not follow agreement should be given less priority
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now have a few questions about health which we would like you to consider. There is often considerable uncertainty about the determination of whether or not a patient’s lifestyle is actually the cause of their state of health. The extent to which the patient concerned is able to avoid his/her unhealthy lifestyle is also often unclear. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
If a specific agreement has been entered into between a doctor and a patient about changing the patient’s lifestyle and the patient fails to comply with the agreement, is it fair that future treatment of the patient should be given lower priority than that given to patients who comply with such agreements?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran17=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
23 |
4.3% |
0.043314501 |
2 |
Agree |
86 |
16.2% |
0.161958569 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
118 |
22.2% |
0.222222222 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
64 |
12.1% |
0.120527307 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
75 |
14.1% |
0.141242938 |
6 |
Disagree |
108 |
20.3% |
0.203389831 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
54 |
10.2% |
0.101694915 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.6% |
0.005649718 |
98 |
Not asked |
5766 |
|
NA |
r4ran15
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1568] [Invalid:4729] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
823 |
52.5% |
0.5248724 |
2 |
2 |
745 |
47.5% |
0.4751276 |
Sysmiss |
|
4729 |
|
NA |
r4dv46a_2
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of health care: Overweight/obesity
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
Overweight/obesity
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
66 |
8% |
0.080194411 |
2 |
No |
650 |
79% |
0.789793439 |
3 |
Don't know |
100 |
12.2% |
0.121506683 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.9% |
0.008505468 |
98 |
Not asked |
5474 |
|
NA |
r4dv46a_3
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of health care: Smoking
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
Smoking
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
209 |
25.4% |
0.25394897 |
2 |
No |
526 |
63.9% |
0.63912515 |
3 |
Don't know |
77 |
9.4% |
0.09356015 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01336574 |
98 |
Not asked |
5474 |
|
NA |
r4dv46a_4
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of health care: High alcohol consumption
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
High alcohol consumption
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
199 |
24.2% |
0.24179830 |
2 |
No |
523 |
63.5% |
0.63547995 |
3 |
Don't know |
91 |
11.1% |
0.11057108 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.2% |
0.01215067 |
98 |
Not asked |
5474 |
|
NA |
r4dv46a_5
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of health care: Abuse of medication/drugs
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
Abuse of medication/drugs
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
221 |
26.9% |
0.26852977 |
2 |
No |
492 |
59.8% |
0.59781288 |
3 |
Don't know |
99 |
12% |
0.12029162 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01336574 |
98 |
Not asked |
5474 |
|
NA |
r4dv46a_6
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of health care: Lack of physical activity
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
Lack of physical activity
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
92 |
11.2% |
0.1117861 |
2 |
No |
626 |
76.1% |
0.7606318 |
3 |
Don't know |
93 |
11.3% |
0.1130012 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.5% |
0.0145808 |
98 |
Not asked |
5474 |
|
NA |
r4dv46a_7
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of health care: Hazardous sports which result in illness of injury
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
Hazardous sports which result in illness of injury
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
202 |
24.5% |
0.2454435 |
2 |
No |
479 |
58.2% |
0.5820170 |
3 |
Don't know |
130 |
15.8% |
0.1579587 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.5% |
0.0145808 |
98 |
Not asked |
5474 |
|
NA |
r4dv46a_8
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of health care: Poor diet
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
Poor diet
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
67 |
8.1% |
0.08140948 |
2 |
No |
631 |
76.7% |
0.76670717 |
3 |
Don't know |
114 |
13.9% |
0.13851762 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01336574 |
98 |
Not asked |
5474 |
|
NA |
r4dv46a_9
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of health care: A combination of these
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
A combination of these
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
112 |
13.6% |
0.13608748 |
2 |
No |
533 |
64.8% |
0.64763062 |
3 |
Don't know |
167 |
20.3% |
0.20291616 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.3% |
0.01336574 |
98 |
Not asked |
5474 |
|
NA |
r4dv46a_10
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of health care: Failure to comply with an agreement about changing one’s lifestyle
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help people receive with their health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if the state of health of the person concerned can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
Failure to comply with an agreement about changing one’s lifestyle
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
256 |
31.1% |
0.31105711 |
2 |
No |
404 |
49.1% |
0.49088700 |
3 |
Don't know |
153 |
18.6% |
0.18590522 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.2% |
0.01215067 |
98 |
Not asked |
5474 |
|
NA |
r4dv46b_1
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of personal health care: Overweight/obesity
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
Overweight/obesity
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
121 |
16.2% |
0.16241611 |
2 |
No |
509 |
68.3% |
0.68322148 |
3 |
Don't know |
101 |
13.6% |
0.13557047 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.9% |
0.01879195 |
98 |
Not asked |
5552 |
|
NA |
r4dv46b_2
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of personal health care: Smoking
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
Smoking
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
243 |
32.6% |
0.32617450 |
2 |
No |
411 |
55.2% |
0.55167785 |
3 |
Don't know |
79 |
10.6% |
0.10604027 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
1.6% |
0.01610738 |
98 |
Not asked |
5552 |
|
NA |
r4dv46b_3
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of personal health care: High alcohol consumption
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
High alcohol consumption
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
238 |
31.9% |
0.31946309 |
2 |
No |
411 |
55.2% |
0.55167785 |
3 |
Don't know |
83 |
11.1% |
0.11140940 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.7% |
0.01744966 |
98 |
Not asked |
5552 |
|
NA |
r4dv46b_4
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of personal health care: Abuse of medication/drugs
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
Abuse of medication/drugs
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
239 |
32.1% |
0.32080537 |
2 |
No |
397 |
53.3% |
0.53288591 |
3 |
Don't know |
96 |
12.9% |
0.12885906 |
97 |
No answer |
13 |
1.7% |
0.01744966 |
98 |
Not asked |
5552 |
|
NA |
r4dv46b_5
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of personal health care: Lack of physical activity
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
Lack of physical activity
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
123 |
16.5% |
0.16510067 |
2 |
No |
522 |
70.1% |
0.70067114 |
3 |
Don't know |
86 |
11.5% |
0.11543624 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.9% |
0.01879195 |
98 |
Not asked |
5552 |
|
NA |
r4dv46b_6
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of personal health care: Hazardous sports which result in illness of injury
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
Hazardous sports which result in illness of injury
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
198 |
26.6% |
0.26577181 |
2 |
No |
425 |
57% |
0.57046980 |
3 |
Don't know |
107 |
14.4% |
0.14362416 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
2% |
0.02013423 |
98 |
Not asked |
5552 |
|
NA |
r4dv46b_7
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of personal health care: Poor diet
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
Poor diet
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
115 |
15.4% |
0.15436242 |
2 |
No |
524 |
70.3% |
0.70335570 |
3 |
Don't know |
90 |
12.1% |
0.12080537 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
2.1% |
0.02147651 |
98 |
Not asked |
5552 |
|
NA |
r4dv46b_8
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of personal health care: A combination of these
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
A combination of these
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
165 |
22.1% |
0.22147651 |
2 |
No |
436 |
58.5% |
0.58523490 |
3 |
Don't know |
115 |
15.4% |
0.15436242 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
3.9% |
0.03892617 |
98 |
Not asked |
5552 |
|
NA |
r4dv46b_9
Variable label:
|
Lower priority of personal health care: Failure to comply with an agreement about changing one’s lifestyle
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you think that the help you receive with your health should be given a lower priority when compared to that received by others if your state of health can be seen to be linked to the following lifestyle choices:
|
Literal question:
|
Failure to comply with an agreement about changing one’s lifestyle
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran15=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
260 |
34.9% |
0.34899329 |
2 |
No |
349 |
46.8% |
0.46845638 |
3 |
Don't know |
122 |
16.4% |
0.16375839 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.9% |
0.01879195 |
98 |
Not asked |
5552 |
|
NA |
r4ran24
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1565] [Invalid:4732] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
342 |
21.9% |
0.2185304 |
2 |
2 |
391 |
25% |
0.2498403 |
3 |
3 |
404 |
25.8% |
0.2581470 |
4 |
4 |
428 |
27.3% |
0.2734824 |
Sysmiss |
|
4732 |
|
NA |
r4dv55a
Variable label:
|
Allow religious schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it should be possible to send one’s children to religious schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran24=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
14 |
4.1% |
0.040935673 |
2 |
Agree |
73 |
21.3% |
0.213450292 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
52 |
15.2% |
0.152046784 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
70 |
20.5% |
0.204678363 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
31 |
9.1% |
0.090643275 |
6 |
Disagree |
55 |
16.1% |
0.160818713 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
13.5% |
0.134502924 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.3% |
0.002923977 |
98 |
Not asked |
5955 |
|
NA |
r4dv55b
Variable label:
|
Allow Christian schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it should be possible to send one’s children to Christian schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran24=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
47 |
12% |
0.12020460 |
2 |
Agree |
110 |
28.1% |
0.28132992 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
65 |
16.6% |
0.16624041 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
75 |
19.2% |
0.19181586 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
28 |
7.2% |
0.07161125 |
6 |
Disagree |
33 |
8.4% |
0.08439898 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
29 |
7.4% |
0.07416880 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1% |
0.01023018 |
98 |
Not asked |
5906 |
|
NA |
r4dv55c
Variable label:
|
Allow Muslim schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it should be possible to send one’s children to Muslim schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran24=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
12 |
3% |
0.02970297 |
2 |
Agree |
61 |
15.1% |
0.15099010 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
59 |
14.6% |
0.14603960 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
75 |
18.6% |
0.18564356 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
36 |
8.9% |
0.08910891 |
6 |
Disagree |
79 |
19.6% |
0.19554455 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
78 |
19.3% |
0.19306931 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1% |
0.00990099 |
98 |
Not asked |
5893 |
|
NA |
r4dv55d
Variable label:
|
Allow private schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it should be possible to send one’s children to private schools which follow the Norwegian curriculum?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran24=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
79 |
18.5% |
0.184579439 |
2 |
Agree |
125 |
29.2% |
0.292056075 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
64 |
15% |
0.149532710 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
54 |
12.6% |
0.126168224 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
48 |
11.2% |
0.112149533 |
6 |
Disagree |
36 |
8.4% |
0.084112150 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
21 |
4.9% |
0.049065421 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002336449 |
98 |
Not asked |
5869 |
|
NA |
r4ran25
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1564] [Invalid:4733] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
539 |
34.5% |
0.3446292 |
2 |
2 |
514 |
32.9% |
0.3286445 |
3 |
3 |
511 |
32.7% |
0.3267263 |
Sysmiss |
|
4733 |
|
NA |
r4dv56a
Variable label:
|
Do you think that begging should be made illegal?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that begging should be made illegal?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran25=1. Respondents are not exposed to vizual stimulation.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
236 |
43.8% |
0.437847866 |
2 |
No |
196 |
36.4% |
0.363636364 |
3 |
Don't know |
106 |
19.7% |
0.196660482 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001855288 |
98 |
Not asked |
5758 |
|
NA |
r4dv56b
Variable label:
|
Picture of beggar: Do you think that begging should be made illegal?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here is a picture of someone begging.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that begging should be made illegal?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran25=2. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
233 |
45.3% |
0.453307393 |
2 |
No |
185 |
36% |
0.359922179 |
3 |
Don't know |
95 |
18.5% |
0.184824903 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001945525 |
98 |
Not asked |
5783 |
|
NA |
r4dv56c
Variable label:
|
Picture of beggar: Do you think that begging should be made illegal?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here is a picture of someone begging.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that begging should be made illegal?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran25=3. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. See appendix.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
230 |
45% |
0.450097847 |
2 |
No |
176 |
34.4% |
0.344422701 |
3 |
Don't know |
103 |
20.2% |
0.201565558 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.4% |
0.003913894 |
98 |
Not asked |
5786 |
|
NA |
r4ran45
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1564] [Invalid:4733] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
540 |
34.5% |
0.3452685 |
2 |
2 |
508 |
32.5% |
0.3248082 |
3 |
3 |
516 |
33% |
0.3299233 |
Sysmiss |
|
4733 |
|
NA |
r4dv35a_1
Variable label:
|
Description: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran45=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
91 |
16.9% |
0.168518519 |
2 |
Good |
192 |
35.6% |
0.355555556 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
105 |
19.4% |
0.194444444 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
107 |
19.8% |
0.198148148 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
24 |
4.4% |
0.044444444 |
6 |
Bad |
10 |
1.9% |
0.018518519 |
7 |
Very bad |
6 |
1.1% |
0.011111111 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.9% |
0.009259259 |
98 |
Not asked |
5757 |
|
NA |
r4dv35a_2
Variable label:
|
Description: I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran45=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
39 |
7.2% |
0.072222222 |
2 |
Good |
84 |
15.6% |
0.155555556 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
102 |
18.9% |
0.188888889 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
176 |
32.6% |
0.325925926 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
32 |
5.9% |
0.059259259 |
6 |
Bad |
63 |
11.7% |
0.116666667 |
7 |
Very bad |
39 |
7.2% |
0.072222222 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.9% |
0.009259259 |
98 |
Not asked |
5757 |
|
NA |
r4dv35a_3
Variable label:
|
Description: I try to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants due to my own convictions.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants due to my own convictions.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran45=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
88 |
16.3% |
0.162962963 |
2 |
Good |
197 |
36.5% |
0.364814815 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
113 |
20.9% |
0.209259259 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
102 |
18.9% |
0.188888889 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
21 |
3.9% |
0.038888889 |
6 |
Bad |
11 |
2% |
0.020370370 |
7 |
Very bad |
5 |
0.9% |
0.009259259 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.6% |
0.005555556 |
98 |
Not asked |
5757 |
|
NA |
r4dv35a_4
Variable label:
|
Description: I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran45=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
105 |
19.4% |
0.194444444 |
2 |
Good |
191 |
35.4% |
0.353703704 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
82 |
15.2% |
0.151851852 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
98 |
18.1% |
0.181481481 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
30 |
5.6% |
0.055555556 |
6 |
Bad |
21 |
3.9% |
0.038888889 |
7 |
Very bad |
9 |
1.7% |
0.016666667 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.7% |
0.007407407 |
98 |
Not asked |
5757 |
|
NA |
r4dv35b_1
Variable label:
|
Description: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to Roma people.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to Roma people.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran45=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
45 |
8.9% |
0.08858268 |
2 |
Good |
123 |
24.2% |
0.24212598 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
93 |
18.3% |
0.18307087 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
136 |
26.8% |
0.26771654 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
49 |
9.6% |
0.09645669 |
6 |
Bad |
36 |
7.1% |
0.07086614 |
7 |
Very bad |
17 |
3.3% |
0.03346457 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.8% |
0.01771654 |
98 |
Not asked |
5789 |
|
NA |
r4dv35b_2
Variable label:
|
Description: I feel guilty if I think negatively about Roma people.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about Roma people.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran45=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
33 |
6.5% |
0.06496063 |
2 |
Good |
80 |
15.7% |
0.15748031 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
81 |
15.9% |
0.15944882 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
143 |
28.1% |
0.28149606 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
50 |
9.8% |
0.09842520 |
6 |
Bad |
70 |
13.8% |
0.13779528 |
7 |
Very bad |
42 |
8.3% |
0.08267717 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.8% |
0.01771654 |
98 |
Not asked |
5789 |
|
NA |
r4dv35b_3
Variable label:
|
Description: I try to be unprejudiced in regard to Roma people due to my own convictions.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced in regard to Roma people due to my own convictions.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran45=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
38 |
7.5% |
0.07480315 |
2 |
Good |
127 |
25% |
0.25000000 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
100 |
19.7% |
0.19685039 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
129 |
25.4% |
0.25393701 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
55 |
10.8% |
0.10826772 |
6 |
Bad |
31 |
6.1% |
0.06102362 |
7 |
Very bad |
17 |
3.3% |
0.03346457 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
2.2% |
0.02165354 |
98 |
Not asked |
5789 |
|
NA |
r4dv35b_4
Variable label:
|
Description: I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran45=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
92 |
18.1% |
0.18110236 |
2 |
Good |
160 |
31.5% |
0.31496063 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
88 |
17.3% |
0.17322835 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
107 |
21.1% |
0.21062992 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
26 |
5.1% |
0.05118110 |
6 |
Bad |
16 |
3.1% |
0.03149606 |
7 |
Very bad |
10 |
2% |
0.01968504 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
1.8% |
0.01771654 |
98 |
Not asked |
5789 |
|
NA |
r4dv35c_1
Variable label:
|
Description: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to Muslims.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to Muslims.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran45=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
67 |
13% |
0.12984496 |
2 |
Good |
166 |
32.2% |
0.32170543 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
86 |
16.7% |
0.16666667 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
121 |
23.4% |
0.23449612 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
29 |
5.6% |
0.05620155 |
6 |
Bad |
25 |
4.8% |
0.04844961 |
7 |
Very bad |
15 |
2.9% |
0.02906977 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.4% |
0.01356589 |
98 |
Not asked |
5781 |
|
NA |
r4dv35c_2
Variable label:
|
Description: I feel guilty if I think negatively about Muslims.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about Muslims.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran45=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
19 |
3.7% |
0.03682171 |
2 |
Good |
66 |
12.8% |
0.12790698 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
67 |
13% |
0.12984496 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
160 |
31% |
0.31007752 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
55 |
10.7% |
0.10658915 |
6 |
Bad |
83 |
16.1% |
0.16085271 |
7 |
Very bad |
60 |
11.6% |
0.11627907 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.2% |
0.01162791 |
98 |
Not asked |
5781 |
|
NA |
r4dv35c_3
Variable label:
|
Description: I try to be unprejudiced in regard to Muslims due to my own convictions.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced in regard to Muslims due to my own convictions.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran45=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
54 |
10.5% |
0.104651163 |
2 |
Good |
166 |
32.2% |
0.321705426 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
97 |
18.8% |
0.187984496 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
137 |
26.6% |
0.265503876 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
24 |
4.7% |
0.046511628 |
6 |
Bad |
15 |
2.9% |
0.029069767 |
7 |
Very bad |
19 |
3.7% |
0.036821705 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.8% |
0.007751938 |
98 |
Not asked |
5781 |
|
NA |
r4dv35c_4
Variable label:
|
Description: I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=4 and ran45=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
80 |
15.5% |
0.155038760 |
2 |
Good |
175 |
33.9% |
0.339147287 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
84 |
16.3% |
0.162790698 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
102 |
19.8% |
0.197674419 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
38 |
7.4% |
0.073643411 |
6 |
Bad |
17 |
3.3% |
0.032945736 |
7 |
Very bad |
15 |
2.9% |
0.029069767 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
1% |
0.009689922 |
98 |
Not asked |
5781 |
|
NA |
r4dv40
Variable label:
|
Most important measure for preventing or punishing foreign fighters
|
Literal question:
|
In order to prevent Norwegians from participating in war on behalf of other countries some people think that it is important to have stricter penalties for foreign fighters. Others think that it is important to prevent radicalisation at an early stage. What do you think is most important?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Stricter penalties |
369 |
5.9% |
0.05859933 |
2 |
Prevention |
1103 |
17.5% |
0.17516278 |
3 |
Neither of these |
74 |
1.2% |
0.01175163 |
97 |
No answer |
4751 |
75.4% |
0.75448626 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
r4ran26
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=0]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1564] [Invalid:4733] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
509 |
32.5% |
0.3254476 |
2 |
2 |
567 |
36.3% |
0.3625320 |
3 |
3 |
488 |
31.2% |
0.3120205 |
Sysmiss |
|
4733 |
|
NA |
r4oc24a
Variable label:
|
Statement: The government should introduce measures designed to reduce income disparity.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statement and insert a tick to show the extent to which you agree or disagree with it.
|
Literal question:
|
The government should introduce measures designed to reduce income disparity.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=0 and ran26=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
100 |
19.6% |
0.196463654 |
2 |
Agree |
200 |
39.3% |
0.392927308 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
116 |
22.8% |
0.227897839 |
4 |
Disagree |
74 |
14.5% |
0.145383104 |
5 |
Strongly disagree |
18 |
3.5% |
0.035363458 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
0.2% |
0.001964637 |
98 |
Not asked |
5788 |
|
NA |
r4oc24b
Variable label:
|
Statement: The government should not introduce measures designed to reduce income disparity.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statement and insert a tick to show the extent to which you agree or disagree with it.
|
Literal question:
|
The government should not introduce measures designed to reduce income disparity.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=0 and ran26=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
25 |
4.4% |
0.04409171 |
2 |
Agree |
97 |
17.1% |
0.17107584 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
100 |
17.6% |
0.17636684 |
4 |
Disagree |
234 |
41.3% |
0.41269841 |
5 |
Strongly disagree |
105 |
18.5% |
0.18518519 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.1% |
0.01058201 |
98 |
Not asked |
5730 |
|
NA |
r4oc24c
Variable label:
|
Do you think that the government should or should not introduce measures designed to reduce income disparity?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that the government should or should not introduce measures designed to reduce income disparity?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=0 and ran26=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
It definitely should |
151 |
30.9% |
0.30942623 |
2 |
It probably should |
156 |
32% |
0.31967213 |
3 |
I do not have an opinion about this |
71 |
14.5% |
0.14549180 |
4 |
It probably should not |
79 |
16.2% |
0.16188525 |
5 |
It definitely should not |
25 |
5.1% |
0.05122951 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.2% |
0.01229508 |
98 |
Not asked |
5809 |
|
NA |
r4km1
Variable label:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and or if the respondents answered r3KM23 in wave 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very concerned |
254 |
12.4% |
0.12444880 |
2 |
Concerned |
663 |
32.5% |
0.32484076 |
3 |
Slightly concerned |
697 |
34.1% |
0.34149927 |
4 |
Not very concerned |
321 |
15.7% |
0.15727585 |
5 |
Not at all concerned |
58 |
2.8% |
0.02841744 |
97 |
No answer |
48 |
2.4% |
0.02351788 |
98 |
Not asked |
4256 |
|
NA |
r4km10
Variable label:
|
Global warming and consequences for the weather
|
Literal question:
|
If nothing is done to prevent it, do you believe global warming will lead to more harmful extreme weather over the next 100 years, or do you believe global warming will not lead to this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and or if the respondent answered km2017 in wave 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Global warming will lead to more harmful extreme weather |
1774 |
85% |
0.85002396 |
2 |
Global warming will not lead to more harmful extreme weather |
229 |
11% |
0.10972688 |
97 |
No answer |
84 |
4% |
0.04024916 |
98 |
Not asked |
4210 |
|
NA |
r4km11_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Technological innovations will resolve our climate problems.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Technological innovations will resolve our climate problems.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent answered km41 in wave 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
96 |
3.2% |
0.03193613 |
2 |
Agree |
401 |
13.3% |
0.13339987 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1178 |
39.2% |
0.39188290 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
624 |
20.8% |
0.20758483 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
357 |
11.9% |
0.11876248 |
6 |
Disagree |
243 |
8.1% |
0.08083832 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
59 |
2% |
0.01962741 |
97 |
No answer |
48 |
1.6% |
0.01596806 |
98 |
Not asked |
3291 |
|
NA |
r4km11_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: The citizens of rich countries like Norway should cut their consumption as part of the solution to the challenging climate changes facing us.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statements below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
The citizens of rich countries like Norway should cut their consumption as part of the solution to the challenging climate changes facing us.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if the respondent answered km41 in wave 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
504 |
16.8% |
0.16766467 |
2 |
Agree |
981 |
32.6% |
0.32634731 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
872 |
29% |
0.29008649 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
275 |
9.1% |
0.09148370 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
151 |
5% |
0.05023287 |
6 |
Disagree |
133 |
4.4% |
0.04424484 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
54 |
1.8% |
0.01796407 |
97 |
No answer |
36 |
1.2% |
0.01197605 |
98 |
Not asked |
3291 |
|
NA |
r4oc2
Variable label:
|
View on climate change
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following statements best describes your views on climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
Choose one option.
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I believe that the climate is not changing. |
12 |
0.4% |
0.004465947 |
2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
169 |
6.3% |
0.062895422 |
3 |
I think that the climate is changing, but that it has only been slightly
affected by humans. |
668 |
24.9% |
0.248604392 |
4 |
I think that the climate is changing, mainly as a result of human influences. |
1793 |
66.7% |
0.667286937 |
97 |
No answer |
45 |
1.7% |
0.016747302 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4oc3
Variable label:
|
Winter (2014-15): warmer, colder or normal?
|
Literal question:
|
Has the winter (2014-15) where you live been warmer than normal, colder than normal, or normal?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Colder |
29 |
1.1% |
0.01079271 |
2 |
Normal |
553 |
20.6% |
0.20580573 |
3 |
Warmer |
2071 |
77.1% |
0.77074805 |
97 |
No answer |
34 |
1.3% |
0.01265352 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4oc4
Variable label:
|
Winter (2013–14): warmer, colder or normal?
|
Literal question:
|
When you consider the previous winter (2013-14), was it warmer than normal, colder than normal, or normal where you live?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Colder |
299 |
11.1% |
0.11127652 |
2 |
No different |
1015 |
37.8% |
0.37774470 |
3 |
Warmer |
1306 |
48.6% |
0.48604392 |
97 |
No answer |
67 |
2.5% |
0.02493487 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4oc5
Variable label:
|
Winter (2014–15): More or less precipitation?
|
Literal question:
|
Was there more precipitation, less precipitation or normal precipitation this winter (2014-15) where you live?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Less precipitation |
717 |
26.7% |
0.2668403 |
2 |
Normal |
1056 |
39.3% |
0.3930033 |
3 |
More precipitation |
853 |
31.7% |
0.3174544 |
97 |
No answer |
61 |
2.3% |
0.0227019 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4oc6
Variable label:
|
Winter (2013–14): More or less precipitation?
|
Literal question:
|
When you consider the previous winter (2013-14), was there more precipitation, less precipitation or normal precipitation where you live?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Less precipitation |
629 |
23.4% |
0.23409006 |
2 |
Normal |
1319 |
49.1% |
0.49088202 |
3 |
More precipitation |
664 |
24.7% |
0.24711574 |
97 |
No answer |
75 |
2.8% |
0.02791217 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4oc7_1
Variable label:
|
Experienced extreme weather: Extreme snow storm
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
|
Literal question:
|
Extreme snow storm
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
206 |
7.7% |
0.07666543 |
2 |
No |
2179 |
81.1% |
0.81094157 |
97 |
No answer |
302 |
11.2% |
0.11239300 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4oc7_2
Variable label:
|
Experienced extreme weather: Extreme cold
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
|
Literal question:
|
Extreme cold
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
122 |
4.5% |
0.0454038 |
2 |
No |
2250 |
83.7% |
0.8373651 |
97 |
No answer |
315 |
11.7% |
0.1172311 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4oc7_3
Variable label:
|
Experienced extreme weather: Extreme high winds
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
|
Literal question:
|
Extreme high winds
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1463 |
54.4% |
0.54447339 |
2 |
No |
1097 |
40.8% |
0.40826200 |
97 |
No answer |
127 |
4.7% |
0.04726461 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4oc7_4
Variable label:
|
Experienced extreme weather: Extreme rainstorm
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
|
Literal question:
|
Extreme rainstorm
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1144 |
42.6% |
0.42575363 |
2 |
No |
1361 |
50.7% |
0.50651284 |
97 |
No answer |
182 |
6.8% |
0.06773353 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4oc7_5
Variable label:
|
Experienced extreme weather: Extreme heat wave
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
|
Literal question:
|
Extreme heat wave
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
544 |
20.2% |
0.2024563 |
2 |
No |
1862 |
69.3% |
0.6929661 |
97 |
No answer |
281 |
10.5% |
0.1045776 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4oc7_6
Variable label:
|
Experienced extreme weather: Flood
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
|
Literal question:
|
Flood
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
339 |
12.6% |
0.1261630 |
2 |
No |
2043 |
76% |
0.7603275 |
97 |
No answer |
305 |
11.4% |
0.1135095 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4oc7_7
Variable label:
|
Experienced extreme weather: Wildfire
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
|
Literal question:
|
Wildfire
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
67 |
2.5% |
0.02493487 |
2 |
No |
2291 |
85.3% |
0.85262374 |
97 |
No answer |
329 |
12.2% |
0.12244138 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4oc7_8
Variable label:
|
Experienced extreme weather: Drought
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
|
Literal question:
|
Drought
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
343 |
12.8% |
0.1276517 |
2 |
No |
2036 |
75.8% |
0.7577224 |
97 |
No answer |
308 |
11.5% |
0.1146260 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4oc7_9
Variable label:
|
Experienced extreme weather: Other unusual weather
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
|
Literal question:
|
Other unusual weather
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
157 |
5.8% |
0.05842948 |
2 |
No |
1364 |
50.8% |
0.50762933 |
97 |
No answer |
1166 |
43.4% |
0.43394120 |
98 |
Not asked |
3610 |
|
NA |
r4oc7_9_other
Variable label:
|
Experienced extreme weather: Other unusual weather [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you personally during the past year experienced the various forms of extreme weather or natural disasters listed below?
|
Literal question:
|
Other unusual weather
|
Technical description:
|
[Only respondents recruited in wave 1 are asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4ran6
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1576] [Invalid:4721] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
800 |
50.8% |
0.5076142 |
2 |
2 |
776 |
49.2% |
0.4923858 |
Sysmiss |
|
4721 |
|
NA |
r4oc22a
Variable label:
|
Woman working with people, tired and depressed: Sick-leave fine?
|
Literal question:
|
Gunn is 40 years old. In her job she meets many people, but she also works quite a lot on a computer. When she visits her doctor she says that she feels tired and depressed. Do you think that it would be reasonable for Guun to be signed off sick for a couple of weeks?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran6=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, definitely |
20 |
2.5% |
0.02500 |
2 |
Yes, probably |
183 |
22.9% |
0.22875 |
3 |
No, probably not |
457 |
57.1% |
0.57125 |
4 |
No, definitely not |
136 |
17% |
0.17000 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.5% |
0.00500 |
98 |
Not asked |
5497 |
|
NA |
r4oc22b
Variable label:
|
Man working with computers, tired and depressed: Sick-leave fine?
|
Literal question:
|
Lars is 40 years old. In his job he meets many people, but he also works quite a lot on a computer. When he visits his doctor he says that he feels tired and depressed. Do you think that is would be reasonable for Lars to be signed off sick for a couple of weeks?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2 and ran6=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, definitely |
24 |
3.1% |
0.03092784 |
2 |
Yes, probably |
186 |
24% |
0.23969072 |
3 |
No, probably not |
417 |
53.7% |
0.53737113 |
4 |
No, definitely not |
135 |
17.4% |
0.17396907 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
1.8% |
0.01804124 |
98 |
Not asked |
5521 |
|
NA |
r4oc23_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: People suffering from depression can pull themselves together if they want to
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
People suffering from depression can pull themselves together if they want to
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very true |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009328358 |
2 |
2 |
98 |
6.1% |
0.060945274 |
3 |
3 |
297 |
18.5% |
0.184701493 |
4 |
4 |
558 |
34.7% |
0.347014925 |
5 |
5 - Completely untrue |
596 |
37.1% |
0.370646766 |
97 |
No answer |
44 |
2.7% |
0.027363184 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4oc23_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Depression is a sign of weakness
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Depression is a sign of weakness
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very true |
15 |
0.9% |
0.009328358 |
2 |
2 |
43 |
2.7% |
0.026741294 |
3 |
3 |
111 |
6.9% |
0.069029851 |
4 |
4 |
342 |
21.3% |
0.212686567 |
5 |
5 - Completely untrue |
1054 |
65.5% |
0.655472637 |
97 |
No answer |
43 |
2.7% |
0.026741294 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4oc23_3
Variable label:
|
Statement: Depression is not a proper medical condition
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Depression is not a proper medical condition
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very true |
42 |
2.6% |
0.02611940 |
2 |
2 |
84 |
5.2% |
0.05223881 |
3 |
3 |
186 |
11.6% |
0.11567164 |
4 |
4 |
330 |
20.5% |
0.20522388 |
5 |
5 - Completely untrue |
918 |
57.1% |
0.57089552 |
97 |
No answer |
48 |
3% |
0.02985075 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4oc23_4
Variable label:
|
Statement: People suffering from depression are dangerous
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
People suffering from depression are dangerous
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very true |
21 |
1.3% |
0.01305970 |
2 |
2 |
71 |
4.4% |
0.04415423 |
3 |
3 |
223 |
13.9% |
0.13868159 |
4 |
4 |
431 |
26.8% |
0.26803483 |
5 |
5 - Completely untrue |
816 |
50.7% |
0.50746269 |
97 |
No answer |
46 |
2.9% |
0.02860697 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4oc23_5
Variable label:
|
Statement: It is best to avoid people who are suffering from depression
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
It is best to avoid people who are suffering from depression in order to prevent oneself from becoming depressed too
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very true |
9 |
0.6% |
0.005597015 |
2 |
2 |
44 |
2.7% |
0.027363184 |
3 |
3 |
114 |
7.1% |
0.070895522 |
4 |
4 |
362 |
22.5% |
0.225124378 |
5 |
5 - Completely untrue |
1037 |
64.5% |
0.644900498 |
97 |
No answer |
42 |
2.6% |
0.026119403 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4oc23_6
Variable label:
|
Statement: People suffering from depression are unpredictable
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
People suffering from depression are unpredictable
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very true |
30 |
1.9% |
0.01865672 |
2 |
2 |
197 |
12.3% |
0.12251244 |
3 |
3 |
423 |
26.3% |
0.26305970 |
4 |
4 |
520 |
32.3% |
0.32338308 |
5 |
5 - Completely untrue |
390 |
24.3% |
0.24253731 |
97 |
No answer |
48 |
3% |
0.02985075 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4oc23_7
Variable label:
|
Statement: If I was suffering from depression I would not tell anyone
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
If I was suffering from depression I would not tell anyone
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very true |
66 |
4.1% |
0.04104478 |
2 |
2 |
251 |
15.6% |
0.15609453 |
3 |
3 |
327 |
20.3% |
0.20335821 |
4 |
4 |
442 |
27.5% |
0.27487562 |
5 |
5 - Completely untrue |
476 |
29.6% |
0.29601990 |
97 |
No answer |
46 |
2.9% |
0.02860697 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4oc23_8
Variable label:
|
Statement: I would not employ anyone who I knew had been depressed
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I would not employ anyone who I knew had been depressed
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very true |
54 |
3.4% |
0.03358209 |
2 |
2 |
131 |
8.1% |
0.08146766 |
3 |
3 |
326 |
20.3% |
0.20273632 |
4 |
4 |
442 |
27.5% |
0.27487562 |
5 |
5 - Completely untrue |
609 |
37.9% |
0.37873134 |
97 |
No answer |
46 |
2.9% |
0.02860697 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4oc23_9
Variable label:
|
Statement: I would not vote for a politician who I knew had been depressed
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I would not vote for a politician who I knew had been depressed
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if U=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Very true |
56 |
3.5% |
0.03482587 |
2 |
2 |
79 |
4.9% |
0.04912935 |
3 |
3 |
193 |
12% |
0.12002488 |
4 |
4 |
393 |
24.4% |
0.24440299 |
5 |
5 - Completely untrue |
838 |
52.1% |
0.52114428 |
97 |
No answer |
49 |
3% |
0.03047264 |
98 |
Not asked |
4689 |
|
NA |
r4mobil_bw
Variable label:
|
[Selecting non-mobile users for Bandwagon experiment (PAD2 and PAD6)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6206] [Invalid:91] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Non-mobile |
4992 |
80.4% |
0.8043829 |
1 |
Mobile |
1214 |
19.6% |
0.1956171 |
Sysmiss |
|
91 |
|
NA |
r4ran30
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes non-mobile users to either PAD2 or PAD6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4992] [Invalid:1305] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
2534 |
50.8% |
0.5076122 |
2 |
2 |
2458 |
49.2% |
0.4923878 |
Sysmiss |
|
1305 |
|
NA |
r4qcount_1
Variable label:
|
[Stores aggregated distribution for each groups defined in BW_groupsPAD2. Stores if ran30=1Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4bw_groupspad2
Variable label:
|
[Allocates respondents in groups. First 15 respondents gets the value 0. Subsequent respondents are chronologically defined in groups of 425. Defines groups if ran30=1.Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2534] [Invalid:3763] [Range:0-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Group 0 |
15 |
0.6% |
0.005919495 |
1 |
Group 1 |
426 |
16.8% |
0.168113654 |
2 |
Group 2 |
422 |
16.7% |
0.166535122 |
3 |
Group 3 |
426 |
16.8% |
0.168113654 |
4 |
Group 4 |
424 |
16.7% |
0.167324388 |
5 |
Group 5 |
423 |
16.7% |
0.166929755 |
6 |
Group 6 |
398 |
15.7% |
0.157063931 |
7 |
Group 7 |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
Sysmiss |
|
3763 |
|
NA |
r4pad2start
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=0. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:15] [Invalid:6282] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
7 |
46.7% |
0.46666667 |
2 |
Agree |
3 |
20% |
0.20000000 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
3 |
20% |
0.20000000 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1 |
6.7% |
0.06666667 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
6 |
Disagree |
1 |
6.7% |
0.06666667 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6282 |
|
NA |
r4pad2start_recode
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD2start. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=0. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:14] [Invalid:6283] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree |
1 |
7.1% |
0.07142857 |
2 |
Agree |
13 |
92.9% |
0.92857143 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6283 |
|
NA |
r4bw_ran1
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=1. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:426] [Invalid:5871] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
191 |
44.8% |
0.4483568 |
2 |
2 |
235 |
55.2% |
0.5516432 |
Sysmiss |
|
5871 |
|
NA |
r4pad2a1
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=1 and BW_ran1=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:190] [Invalid:6107] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
82 |
43.2% |
0.43157895 |
2 |
Agree |
61 |
32.1% |
0.32105263 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
22 |
11.6% |
0.11578947 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
8 |
4.2% |
0.04210526 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
10 |
5.3% |
0.05263158 |
6 |
Disagree |
3 |
1.6% |
0.01578947 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
4 |
2.1% |
0.02105263 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6107 |
|
NA |
r4pad2a2
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=1 and BW_ran1=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:235] [Invalid:6062] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
93 |
39.6% |
0.39574468 |
2 |
Agree |
75 |
31.9% |
0.31914894 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
22 |
9.4% |
0.09361702 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
18 |
7.7% |
0.07659574 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
3 |
1.3% |
0.01276596 |
6 |
Disagree |
13 |
5.5% |
0.05531915 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
11 |
4.7% |
0.04680851 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6062 |
|
NA |
r4pad2a1_recode
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD2A1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=1. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:182] [Invalid:6115] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree |
17 |
9.3% |
0.09340659 |
2 |
Agree |
165 |
90.7% |
0.90659341 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6115 |
|
NA |
r4bw_ran2
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:422] [Invalid:5875] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
216 |
51.2% |
0.5118483 |
2 |
2 |
206 |
48.8% |
0.4881517 |
Sysmiss |
|
5875 |
|
NA |
r4pad2b1
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=2 and BW_ran2=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:216] [Invalid:6081] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
99 |
45.8% |
0.45833333 |
2 |
Agree |
66 |
30.6% |
0.30555556 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
24 |
11.1% |
0.11111111 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
8 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
10 |
4.6% |
0.04629630 |
6 |
Disagree |
8 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1 |
0.5% |
0.00462963 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6081 |
|
NA |
r4pad2b2
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=2 and BW_ran2=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:205] [Invalid:6092] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
78 |
38% |
0.38048780 |
2 |
Agree |
70 |
34.1% |
0.34146341 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
29 |
14.1% |
0.14146341 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
11 |
5.4% |
0.05365854 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
8 |
3.9% |
0.03902439 |
6 |
Disagree |
5 |
2.4% |
0.02439024 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
4 |
2% |
0.01951220 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6092 |
|
NA |
r4pad2b1_recode
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD2B1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:208] [Invalid:6089] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree |
19 |
9.1% |
0.09134615 |
2 |
Agree |
189 |
90.9% |
0.90865385 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6089 |
|
NA |
r4bw_ran3
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=3. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:426] [Invalid:5871] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
219 |
51.4% |
0.5140845 |
2 |
2 |
207 |
48.6% |
0.4859155 |
Sysmiss |
|
5871 |
|
NA |
r4pad2c1
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=3 and BW_ran3=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:216] [Invalid:6081] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
96 |
44.4% |
0.44444444 |
2 |
Agree |
60 |
27.8% |
0.27777778 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
33 |
15.3% |
0.15277778 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
8 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
8 |
3.7% |
0.03703704 |
6 |
Disagree |
6 |
2.8% |
0.02777778 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
5 |
2.3% |
0.02314815 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6081 |
|
NA |
r4pad2c2
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=3 and BW_ran3=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:207] [Invalid:6090] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
84 |
40.6% |
0.405797101 |
2 |
Agree |
70 |
33.8% |
0.338164251 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
24 |
11.6% |
0.115942029 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
13 |
6.3% |
0.062801932 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
7 |
3.4% |
0.033816425 |
6 |
Disagree |
7 |
3.4% |
0.033816425 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
2 |
1% |
0.009661836 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6090 |
|
NA |
r4pad2c1_recode
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD2C1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=3. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:208] [Invalid:6089] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree |
19 |
9.1% |
0.09134615 |
2 |
Agree |
189 |
90.9% |
0.90865385 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6089 |
|
NA |
r4bw_ran4
Variable label:
|
Randomizes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=4. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:424] [Invalid:5873] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
197 |
46.5% |
0.4646226 |
2 |
2 |
227 |
53.5% |
0.5353774 |
Sysmiss |
|
5873 |
|
NA |
r4pad2d1
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=4 and BW_ran4=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:197] [Invalid:6100] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
88 |
44.7% |
0.446700508 |
2 |
Agree |
65 |
33% |
0.329949239 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
19 |
9.6% |
0.096446701 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
14 |
7.1% |
0.071065990 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
7 |
3.6% |
0.035532995 |
6 |
Disagree |
3 |
1.5% |
0.015228426 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005076142 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6100 |
|
NA |
r4pad2d2
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=4 and BW_ran4=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:226] [Invalid:6071] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
89 |
39.4% |
0.39380531 |
2 |
Agree |
73 |
32.3% |
0.32300885 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
31 |
13.7% |
0.13716814 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
13 |
5.8% |
0.05752212 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
5 |
2.2% |
0.02212389 |
6 |
Disagree |
8 |
3.5% |
0.03539823 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
7 |
3.1% |
0.03097345 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6071 |
|
NA |
r4pad2d1_recode
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD2D1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=4. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:183] [Invalid:6114] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree |
11 |
6% |
0.06010929 |
2 |
Agree |
172 |
94% |
0.93989071 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6114 |
|
NA |
r4bw_ran5
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=5. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:423] [Invalid:5874] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
192 |
45.4% |
0.4539007 |
2 |
2 |
231 |
54.6% |
0.5460993 |
Sysmiss |
|
5874 |
|
NA |
r4pad2e1
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=5 and BW_ran5=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:192] [Invalid:6105] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
74 |
38.5% |
0.38541667 |
2 |
Agree |
68 |
35.4% |
0.35416667 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
20 |
10.4% |
0.10416667 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
11 |
5.7% |
0.05729167 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
8 |
4.2% |
0.04166667 |
6 |
Disagree |
8 |
4.2% |
0.04166667 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
3 |
1.6% |
0.01562500 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6105 |
|
NA |
r4pad2e2
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=5 and BW_ran5=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:231] [Invalid:6066] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
96 |
41.6% |
0.41558442 |
2 |
Agree |
70 |
30.3% |
0.30303030 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
21 |
9.1% |
0.09090909 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
26 |
11.3% |
0.11255411 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
5 |
2.2% |
0.02164502 |
6 |
Disagree |
9 |
3.9% |
0.03896104 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
4 |
1.7% |
0.01731602 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6066 |
|
NA |
r4pad2e1_recode
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD2E1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=5. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:181] [Invalid:6116] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree |
19 |
10.5% |
0.1049724 |
2 |
Agree |
162 |
89.5% |
0.8950276 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6116 |
|
NA |
r4bw_ran6
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=6. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:398] [Invalid:5899] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
194 |
48.7% |
0.4874372 |
2 |
2 |
204 |
51.3% |
0.5125628 |
Sysmiss |
|
5899 |
|
NA |
r4pad2f1
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=6 and BW_ran6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:192] [Invalid:6105] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
77 |
40.1% |
0.401041667 |
2 |
Agree |
64 |
33.3% |
0.333333333 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
23 |
12% |
0.119791667 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
16 |
8.3% |
0.083333333 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
6 |
3.1% |
0.031250000 |
6 |
Disagree |
5 |
2.6% |
0.026041667 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1 |
0.5% |
0.005208333 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6105 |
|
NA |
r4pad2f2
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=6 and BW_ran6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:201] [Invalid:6096] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
87 |
43.3% |
0.43283582 |
2 |
Agree |
53 |
26.4% |
0.26368159 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
29 |
14.4% |
0.14427861 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
11 |
5.5% |
0.05472637 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
7 |
3.5% |
0.03482587 |
6 |
Disagree |
7 |
3.5% |
0.03482587 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
7 |
3.5% |
0.03482587 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6096 |
|
NA |
r4pad2f1_recode
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD2F1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=6. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:176] [Invalid:6121] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree |
12 |
6.8% |
0.06818182 |
2 |
Agree |
164 |
93.2% |
0.93181818 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6121 |
|
NA |
r4bw_ran7
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=7. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]
|
r4pad2g1
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=7 and BW_ran7=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]
|
r4pad2g2
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1, BW_groupsPAD2=7 and BW_ran7=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]
|
r4pad2g1_recode
Variable label:
|
Mandatory measles vaccine for all children
|
Literal question:
|
The vaccination of children has been heavily debated by the media recently. Some people think that it should be compulsory for all children to have measles vaccinations. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD2G1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount_1. Recodes if ran30=1 and BW_groupsPAD2=7. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]
|
r4pad3
Variable label:
|
How strong is your opinion on the vaccine issue?
|
Literal question:
|
How strong are your views about this question?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2504] [Invalid:3793] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very strong |
553 |
22.1% |
0.22084665 |
2 |
Strong |
934 |
37.3% |
0.37300319 |
3 |
Fairly strong |
669 |
26.7% |
0.26717252 |
4 |
Weak |
236 |
9.4% |
0.09424920 |
5 |
I do not have an opinion about this |
112 |
4.5% |
0.04472843 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
3793 |
|
NA |
r4pad4
Variable label:
|
How good do you feel that your knowledge about the vaccine-topic is?
|
Literal question:
|
How good do you feel that your knowledge about this subject is?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2481] [Invalid:3816] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
240 |
9.7% |
0.09673519 |
2 |
Good |
969 |
39.1% |
0.39056832 |
3 |
Some knowledge |
968 |
39% |
0.39016526 |
4 |
Not much knowledge |
264 |
10.6% |
0.10640871 |
5 |
No knowledge at all |
40 |
1.6% |
0.01612253 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
3816 |
|
NA |
r4pad5
Variable label:
|
Estimates of Norwegians attitude mandatory vaccinations
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to make a guess, how many citizens in Norway do you think would agree that it should be compulsory for all children to be vaccinated against measles.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=1. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2504] [Invalid:3793] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Almost everyone |
697 |
27.8% |
0.27835463 |
2 |
Around 2 out of 3 |
1187 |
47.4% |
0.47404153 |
3 |
Around half |
408 |
16.3% |
0.16293930 |
4 |
Around 1 out of 3 |
167 |
6.7% |
0.06669329 |
5 |
Almost no-one |
45 |
1.8% |
0.01797125 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
3793 |
|
NA |
r4qcount2_1
Variable label:
|
[Stores aggregated distribution for each groups defined in BW_groupsPAD6. Stores if ran30=2Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4bw_groupspad6
Variable label:
|
[Allocates respondents in groups. First 15 respondents gets the value 0. Subsequent respondents are chronologically defined in groups of 425. Defines groups if ran30=1.Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical description:
|
[Allokerer respondenter inn i grupper. Første 15 får verdien 0. Påfølgende respondenter kronologisk definert i grupper på 425. Definerer grupper dersom ran30=1.En del av Bogwagon eksperimentet. Se skjermbilde i appendiks]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2458] [Invalid:3839] [Range:0-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Group 0 |
15 |
0.6% |
0.006102522 |
1 |
Group 1 |
422 |
17.2% |
0.171684296 |
2 |
Group 2 |
422 |
17.2% |
0.171684296 |
3 |
Group 3 |
425 |
17.3% |
0.172904801 |
4 |
Group 4 |
419 |
17% |
0.170463792 |
5 |
Group 5 |
422 |
17.2% |
0.171684296 |
6 |
Group 6 |
333 |
13.5% |
0.135475997 |
7 |
Group 7 |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
Sysmiss |
|
3839 |
|
NA |
r4pad6start
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=0. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:15] [Invalid:6282] [Range:2-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
2 |
Agree |
2 |
13.3% |
0.13333333 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
2 |
13.3% |
0.13333333 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
8 |
53.3% |
0.53333333 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
2 |
13.3% |
0.13333333 |
6 |
Disagree |
1 |
6.7% |
0.06666667 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6282 |
|
NA |
r4pad6start_recode
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD6start. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount2_1. Recodes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=0. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7] [Invalid:6290] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree |
3 |
42.9% |
0.4285714 |
2 |
Agree |
4 |
57.1% |
0.5714286 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6290 |
|
NA |
r4bw_ran1pad6
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=1. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:422] [Invalid:5875] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
199 |
47.2% |
0.471564 |
2 |
2 |
223 |
52.8% |
0.528436 |
Sysmiss |
|
5875 |
|
NA |
r4pad6a1
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=1 and BW_ran1PAD6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:199] [Invalid:6098] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
26 |
13.1% |
0.13065327 |
2 |
Agree |
45 |
22.6% |
0.22613065 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
37 |
18.6% |
0.18592965 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
35 |
17.6% |
0.17587940 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
11 |
5.5% |
0.05527638 |
6 |
Disagree |
25 |
12.6% |
0.12562814 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
20 |
10.1% |
0.10050251 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6098 |
|
NA |
r4pad6a2
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=1 and BW_ran1PAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:221] [Invalid:6076] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
32 |
14.5% |
0.14479638 |
2 |
Agree |
29 |
13.1% |
0.13122172 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
41 |
18.6% |
0.18552036 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
62 |
28.1% |
0.28054299 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
11 |
5% |
0.04977376 |
6 |
Disagree |
27 |
12.2% |
0.12217195 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
19 |
8.6% |
0.08597285 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6076 |
|
NA |
r4pad6a1_recode
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD6A1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount2_1. Recodes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=1. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:164] [Invalid:6133] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree |
56 |
34.1% |
0.3414634 |
2 |
Agree |
108 |
65.9% |
0.6585366 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6133 |
|
NA |
r4bw_ran2pad6
Variable label:
|
[Randomiserer dersom ran30=2 og BW_groupsPAD6=2. En del av Bogwagon eksperimentet. Se skjermbilde i appendiks]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:422] [Invalid:5875] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
223 |
52.8% |
0.528436 |
2 |
2 |
199 |
47.2% |
0.471564 |
Sysmiss |
|
5875 |
|
NA |
r4pad6b1
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=2 and BW_ran2PAD6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:221] [Invalid:6076] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
29 |
13.1% |
0.13122172 |
2 |
Agree |
36 |
16.3% |
0.16289593 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
48 |
21.7% |
0.21719457 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
47 |
21.3% |
0.21266968 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
22 |
10% |
0.09954751 |
6 |
Disagree |
21 |
9.5% |
0.09502262 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
18 |
8.1% |
0.08144796 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6076 |
|
NA |
r4pad6b2
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=2 and BW_ran2PAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:196] [Invalid:6101] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
23 |
11.7% |
0.11734694 |
2 |
Agree |
39 |
19.9% |
0.19897959 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
47 |
24% |
0.23979592 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
35 |
17.9% |
0.17857143 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
18 |
9.2% |
0.09183673 |
6 |
Disagree |
18 |
9.2% |
0.09183673 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
8.2% |
0.08163265 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6101 |
|
NA |
r4pad6b1_recode
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD6B1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount2_1. Recodes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:174] [Invalid:6123] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree |
61 |
35.1% |
0.3505747 |
2 |
Agree |
113 |
64.9% |
0.6494253 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6123 |
|
NA |
r4bw_ran3pad6
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix][Randomizes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:425] [Invalid:5872] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
201 |
47.3% |
0.4729412 |
2 |
2 |
224 |
52.7% |
0.5270588 |
Sysmiss |
|
5872 |
|
NA |
r4pad6c1
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=3 and BW_ran3PAD6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:199] [Invalid:6098] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
34 |
17.1% |
0.17085427 |
2 |
Agree |
26 |
13.1% |
0.13065327 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
41 |
20.6% |
0.20603015 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
39 |
19.6% |
0.19597990 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
19 |
9.5% |
0.09547739 |
6 |
Disagree |
23 |
11.6% |
0.11557789 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
17 |
8.5% |
0.08542714 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6098 |
|
NA |
r4pad6c2
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=3 and BW_ran3PAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:220] [Invalid:6077] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
40 |
18.2% |
0.18181818 |
2 |
Agree |
41 |
18.6% |
0.18636364 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
48 |
21.8% |
0.21818182 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
45 |
20.5% |
0.20454545 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
9 |
4.1% |
0.04090909 |
6 |
Disagree |
21 |
9.5% |
0.09545455 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
7.3% |
0.07272727 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6077 |
|
NA |
r4pad6c1_recode
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD6C1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount2_1. Recodes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=3. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:160] [Invalid:6137] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree |
59 |
36.9% |
0.36875 |
2 |
Agree |
101 |
63.1% |
0.63125 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6137 |
|
NA |
r4bw_ran4pad6
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=4. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:419] [Invalid:5878] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
199 |
47.5% |
0.4749403 |
2 |
2 |
220 |
52.5% |
0.5250597 |
Sysmiss |
|
5878 |
|
NA |
r4pad6d1
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=4 and BW_ran4PAD6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:197] [Invalid:6100] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
28 |
14.2% |
0.14213198 |
2 |
Agree |
35 |
17.8% |
0.17766497 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
49 |
24.9% |
0.24873096 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
35 |
17.8% |
0.17766497 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
8 |
4.1% |
0.04060914 |
6 |
Disagree |
24 |
12.2% |
0.12182741 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
18 |
9.1% |
0.09137056 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6100 |
|
NA |
r4pad6d2
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=4 and BW_ran4PAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:216] [Invalid:6081] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
31 |
14.4% |
0.14351852 |
2 |
Agree |
42 |
19.4% |
0.19444444 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
33 |
15.3% |
0.15277778 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
56 |
25.9% |
0.25925926 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
13 |
6% |
0.06018519 |
6 |
Disagree |
21 |
9.7% |
0.09722222 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
20 |
9.3% |
0.09259259 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6081 |
|
NA |
r4pad6d1_recode
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD6D1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount2_1. Recodes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=4. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:162] [Invalid:6135] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree |
50 |
30.9% |
0.308642 |
2 |
Agree |
112 |
69.1% |
0.691358 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6135 |
|
NA |
r4bw_ran5pad6
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=5. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:422] [Invalid:5875] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
205 |
48.6% |
0.485782 |
2 |
2 |
217 |
51.4% |
0.514218 |
Sysmiss |
|
5875 |
|
NA |
r4pad6e1
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=5 and BW_ran5PAD6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:202] [Invalid:6095] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
23 |
11.4% |
0.11386139 |
2 |
Agree |
36 |
17.8% |
0.17821782 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
40 |
19.8% |
0.19801980 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
44 |
21.8% |
0.21782178 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
17 |
8.4% |
0.08415842 |
6 |
Disagree |
26 |
12.9% |
0.12871287 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
16 |
7.9% |
0.07920792 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6095 |
|
NA |
r4pad6e2
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=5 and BW_ran5PAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:212] [Invalid:6085] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
27 |
12.7% |
0.12735849 |
2 |
Agree |
27 |
12.7% |
0.12735849 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
36 |
17% |
0.16981132 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
68 |
32.1% |
0.32075472 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
11 |
5.2% |
0.05188679 |
6 |
Disagree |
21 |
9.9% |
0.09905660 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
22 |
10.4% |
0.10377358 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6085 |
|
NA |
r4pad6e1_recode
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD6E1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount2_1. Recodes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=5. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:158] [Invalid:6139] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree |
59 |
37.3% |
0.3734177 |
2 |
Agree |
99 |
62.7% |
0.6265823 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6139 |
|
NA |
r4bw_ran6pad6
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=6. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:333] [Invalid:5964] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
163 |
48.9% |
0.4894895 |
2 |
2 |
170 |
51.1% |
0.5105105 |
Sysmiss |
|
5964 |
|
NA |
r4pad6f1
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=6 and BW_ran6PAD6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:160] [Invalid:6137] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
20 |
12.5% |
0.12500 |
2 |
Agree |
35 |
21.9% |
0.21875 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
27 |
16.9% |
0.16875 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
31 |
19.4% |
0.19375 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
12 |
7.5% |
0.07500 |
6 |
Disagree |
24 |
15% |
0.15000 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
11 |
6.9% |
0.06875 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6137 |
|
NA |
r4pad6f2
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=6 and BW_ran6PAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:168] [Invalid:6129] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
29 |
17.3% |
0.17261905 |
2 |
Agree |
26 |
15.5% |
0.15476190 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
31 |
18.5% |
0.18452381 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
48 |
28.6% |
0.28571429 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
12 |
7.1% |
0.07142857 |
6 |
Disagree |
11 |
6.5% |
0.06547619 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
11 |
6.5% |
0.06547619 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6129 |
|
NA |
r4pad6f1_recode
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recodes R4PAD6F1. Stores group value [disagree,agree] in qcount2_1. Recodes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=6. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:129] [Invalid:6168] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree |
47 |
36.4% |
0.3643411 |
2 |
Agree |
82 |
63.6% |
0.6356589 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
6168 |
|
NA |
r4bw_ran7pad6
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran30=2 and BW_groupsPAD6=7. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]
|
r4pad6g1
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=7 and BW_ran7PAD6=1. Respondents are exposed to vizual stimulation. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]
|
r4pad6g2
Variable label:
|
Support for academic boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
Certain universities and academic organisations have supported an academic boycott of Israel due to Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. To what extent do you agree or disagree about such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2, BW_groupsPAD6=7 and BW_ran7PAD6=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. See screenshot in appendix. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]
|
r4pad7
Variable label:
|
How strong is your opinion on the question of boycott?
|
Literal question:
|
How strong are your views about this question?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2408] [Invalid:3889] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very strong |
244 |
10.1% |
0.1013289 |
2 |
Strong |
531 |
22.1% |
0.2205150 |
3 |
Fairly strong |
784 |
32.6% |
0.3255814 |
4 |
Weak |
529 |
22% |
0.2196844 |
5 |
I do not have an opinion about this |
320 |
13.3% |
0.1328904 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
3889 |
|
NA |
r4pad8
Variable label:
|
How good do you feel that your knowledge about the issue of boycott?
|
Literal question:
|
How good do you feel that your knowledge about this subject is?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2404] [Invalid:3893] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
108 |
4.5% |
0.04492512 |
2 |
Good |
661 |
27.5% |
0.27495840 |
3 |
Some knowledge |
1074 |
44.7% |
0.44675541 |
4 |
Not much knowledge |
478 |
19.9% |
0.19883527 |
5 |
No knowledge at all |
83 |
3.5% |
0.03452579 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
3893 |
|
NA |
r4pad9
Variable label:
|
Estimates of Norwegians attitude towards boycott of Israel
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to make a guess, how many citizens in Norway do you think would agree with such an academic boycott of Israel?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran30=2. Part of the Bandwagon experiment. Contact Sveinung Arnesen for information about the experiment.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2394] [Invalid:3903] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Almost everyone |
22 |
0.9% |
0.009189641 |
2 |
Around 2 out of 3 |
450 |
18.8% |
0.187969925 |
3 |
Around half |
807 |
33.7% |
0.337092732 |
4 |
Around 1 out of 3 |
893 |
37.3% |
0.373015873 |
5 |
Almost no-one |
222 |
9.3% |
0.092731830 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
0 |
|
NA |
Sysmiss |
|
3903 |
|
NA |
r4ran1
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6201] [Invalid:96] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
3109 |
50.1% |
0.5013707 |
2 |
2 |
3092 |
49.9% |
0.4986293 |
Sysmiss |
|
96 |
|
NA |
r4ran1_1
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:3109] [Invalid:3188] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
428 |
13.8% |
0.1376648 |
2 |
2 |
429 |
13.8% |
0.1379865 |
3 |
3 |
444 |
14.3% |
0.1428112 |
4 |
4 |
425 |
13.7% |
0.1366999 |
5 |
5 |
483 |
15.5% |
0.1553554 |
6 |
6 |
454 |
14.6% |
0.1460277 |
7 |
7 |
446 |
14.3% |
0.1434545 |
Sysmiss |
|
3188 |
|
NA |
r4dv44a
Variable label:
|
Renting out apartment: Likelihood of inviting a young muslim
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you own a flat and that you want to rent it out. A young Muslim calls you expressing interest. How likely is it that you would invite the person concerned to come and view it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran1=1 and ran1_1=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
75 |
17.5% |
0.175233645 |
2 |
Likely |
176 |
41.1% |
0.411214953 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
92 |
21.5% |
0.214953271 |
4 |
Not very likely |
59 |
13.8% |
0.137850467 |
5 |
Not likely at all |
23 |
5.4% |
0.053738318 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.7% |
0.007009346 |
98 |
Not asked |
5869 |
|
NA |
r4dv44b
Variable label:
|
Renting out apartment: Likelihood of inviting a young Roma
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you own a flat and that you want to rent it out. A young Roma person calls you expressing interest. How likely is it that you would invite the person concerned to come and view it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran1=1 and ran1_1=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
27 |
6.3% |
0.062937063 |
2 |
Likely |
80 |
18.6% |
0.186480186 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
97 |
22.6% |
0.226107226 |
4 |
Not very likely |
134 |
31.2% |
0.312354312 |
5 |
Not likely at all |
87 |
20.3% |
0.202797203 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.9% |
0.009324009 |
98 |
Not asked |
5868 |
|
NA |
r4dv44c
Variable label:
|
Renting out apartment: Likelihood of inviting a young Progress Party politician
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you own a flat and that you want to rent it out. A young Progress Party politician calls you expressing interest. How likely is it that you would invite the person concerned to come and view it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran1=1 and ran1_1=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
155 |
34.9% |
0.34909910 |
2 |
Likely |
193 |
43.5% |
0.43468468 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
57 |
12.8% |
0.12837838 |
4 |
Not very likely |
23 |
5.2% |
0.05180180 |
5 |
Not likely at all |
9 |
2% |
0.02027027 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
1.6% |
0.01576577 |
98 |
Not asked |
5853 |
|
NA |
r4dv44d
Variable label:
|
Renting out apartment: Likelihood of inviting a young member of the Hells Angels
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you own a flat and that you want to rent it out. A young member of the Hells Angels calls you expressing interest. How likely is it that you would invite the person concerned to come and view it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran1=1 and ran1_1=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
9 |
2.1% |
0.02117647 |
2 |
Likely |
53 |
12.5% |
0.12470588 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
56 |
13.2% |
0.13176471 |
4 |
Not very likely |
159 |
37.4% |
0.37411765 |
5 |
Not likely at all |
142 |
33.4% |
0.33411765 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.4% |
0.01411765 |
98 |
Not asked |
5872 |
|
NA |
r4dv44e
Variable label:
|
Renting out apartment: Likelihood of inviting a young member of the Prophet’s Ummah
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you own a flat and that you want to rent it out. A young member of the fundamentalist group, the Prophet’s Ummah, calls you expressing interest. How likely is it that you would invite the person concerned to come and view it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran1=1 and ran1_1=5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
4 |
0.8% |
0.008281573 |
2 |
Likely |
34 |
7% |
0.070393375 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
36 |
7.5% |
0.074534161 |
4 |
Not very likely |
152 |
31.5% |
0.314699793 |
5 |
Not likely at all |
251 |
52% |
0.519668737 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
1.2% |
0.012422360 |
98 |
Not asked |
5814 |
|
NA |
r4dv44f
Variable label:
|
Renting out apartment: Likelihood of inviting a Roma person
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you own a flat and that you want to rent it out. A Roma person calls you expressing interest. How likely is it that you would invite the person concerned to come and view it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran1=1 and ran1_1=6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
22 |
4.8% |
0.048458150 |
2 |
Likely |
74 |
16.3% |
0.162995595 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
82 |
18.1% |
0.180616740 |
4 |
Not very likely |
156 |
34.4% |
0.343612335 |
5 |
Not likely at all |
116 |
25.6% |
0.255506608 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
0.9% |
0.008810573 |
98 |
Not asked |
5843 |
|
NA |
r4dv44g
Variable label:
|
Renting out apartment: Likelihood of inviting a young nursing student
|
Literal question:
|
Imagine that you own a flat and that you want to rent it out. A young nursing student calls you expressing interest. How likely is it that you would invite the person concerned to come and view it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran1=1 and ran1_1=7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very likely |
182 |
40.8% |
0.408071749 |
2 |
Likely |
225 |
50.4% |
0.504484305 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
22 |
4.9% |
0.049327354 |
4 |
Not very likely |
8 |
1.8% |
0.017937220 |
5 |
Not likely at all |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002242152 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.8% |
0.017937220 |
98 |
Not asked |
5851 |
|
NA |
r4ran32
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:3539] [Invalid:2758] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
1220 |
34.5% |
0.3447301 |
2 |
2 |
1151 |
32.5% |
0.3252331 |
3 |
3 |
1168 |
33% |
0.3300367 |
Sysmiss |
|
2758 |
|
NA |
r4ran33
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:5077] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
307 |
25.2% |
0.2516393 |
2 |
2 |
304 |
24.9% |
0.2491803 |
3 |
3 |
299 |
24.5% |
0.2450820 |
4 |
4 |
310 |
25.4% |
0.2540984 |
Sysmiss |
|
5077 |
|
NA |
r4oc8a
Variable label:
|
Enough oil for about 25 years or depleted in 15 years
|
Literal question:
|
Some people say that we will still have plenty of oil 25 years from now. Others say that at the rate we are using our oil, it will all be used up in 15 years. Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran33=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
There will be plenty of oil in 25 years |
233 |
75.9% |
0.75895765 |
2 |
Oil will be used up in 15 years |
65 |
21.2% |
0.21172638 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
2.9% |
0.02931596 |
98 |
Not asked |
5990 |
|
NA |
r4oc8b
Variable label:
|
Exhausted oil reserves in about 15 years or enough oil in 25 years
|
Literal question:
|
Some people say that that at the rate we are using our oil, it will be all used up in 15 years. Others say that we will still have plenty of oil 25 years from now. Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran33=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oil will be used up in 15 years |
57 |
18.8% |
0.18750000 |
2 |
There will be plenty of oil in 25 years |
240 |
78.9% |
0.78947368 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.3% |
0.02302632 |
98 |
Not asked |
5993 |
|
NA |
r4oc8c
Variable label:
|
Enough oil for about 25 years or depleted in 15 years
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right? We will still have plenty of oil 25 years from now, or at the rate we are using our oil, it will all be used up in 15 years.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran33=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
There will be plenty of oil in 25 years |
230 |
76.9% |
0.76923077 |
2 |
Oil will be used up in 15 years |
63 |
21.1% |
0.21070234 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2% |
0.02006689 |
98 |
Not asked |
5998 |
|
NA |
r4oc8d
Variable label:
|
Exhausted oil reserves for about 15 years or enough oil in 25 years
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these ideas would you guess is most nearly right? At the rate we are using our oil, it will be all used up in 15 years, or we will still have plenty of oil 25 years from now.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran33=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oil will be used up in 15 years |
78 |
25.2% |
0.251612903 |
2 |
There will be plenty of oil in 25 years |
229 |
73.9% |
0.738709677 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
1% |
0.009677419 |
98 |
Not asked |
5987 |
|
NA |
r4ran34
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:5077] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
362 |
29.7% |
0.2967213 |
2 |
2 |
294 |
24.1% |
0.2409836 |
3 |
3 |
294 |
24.1% |
0.2409836 |
4 |
4 |
270 |
22.1% |
0.2213115 |
Sysmiss |
|
5077 |
|
NA |
r4oc9a
Variable label:
|
Cause of crime: individuals or social conditions
|
Literal question:
|
Which in your opinion is more to blame for crime and lawlessness in this country - individuals or social conditions?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran34=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Individuals more to blame |
183 |
50.6% |
0.50552486 |
2 |
Social conditions more to blame |
171 |
47.2% |
0.47237569 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.2% |
0.02209945 |
98 |
Not asked |
5935 |
|
NA |
r4oc9b
Variable label:
|
Cause of crime: social factors or individuals
|
Literal question:
|
Which in your opinion is more to blame for crime and lawlessness in this country - social conditions or individuals?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran34=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Social conditions more to blame |
155 |
52.7% |
0.52721088 |
2 |
Individuals more to blame |
131 |
44.6% |
0.44557823 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.7% |
0.02721088 |
98 |
Not asked |
6003 |
|
NA |
r4oc9c
Variable label:
|
Statement: Individuals are more to blame than social conditions for crime and lawlessness in this country.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Individuals are more to blame than social conditions for crime and lawlessness in this country.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran34=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agree |
147 |
50% |
0.50000000 |
2 |
Disagree |
141 |
48% |
0.47959184 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2% |
0.02040816 |
98 |
Not asked |
6003 |
|
NA |
r4oc9d
Variable label:
|
Statement: Social conditions are more to blame than individuals for crime and lawlessness in this country.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Social conditions are more to blame than individuals for crime and lawlessness in this country.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran34=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agree |
158 |
58.5% |
0.58518519 |
2 |
Disagree |
105 |
38.9% |
0.38888889 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
2.6% |
0.02592593 |
98 |
Not asked |
6027 |
|
NA |
r4ran35
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1220] [Invalid:5077] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
269 |
22% |
0.2204918 |
2 |
2 |
304 |
24.9% |
0.2491803 |
3 |
3 |
310 |
25.4% |
0.2540984 |
4 |
4 |
337 |
27.6% |
0.2762295 |
Sysmiss |
|
5077 |
|
NA |
r4oc10a
Variable label:
|
Do you think the government should or should not see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think the government should or should not see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran35=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Government should see to it |
186 |
69.1% |
0.69144981 |
2 |
Government should not see to it |
73 |
27.1% |
0.27137546 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
3.7% |
0.03717472 |
98 |
Not asked |
6028 |
|
NA |
r4oc10b
Variable label:
|
Statement: The government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? The government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran35=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agree |
179 |
58.9% |
0.58881579 |
2 |
Disagree |
121 |
39.8% |
0.39802632 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01315789 |
98 |
Not asked |
5993 |
|
NA |
r4oc10c
Variable label:
|
Statement: The government should not see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? The government should not see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran35=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agree |
70 |
22.6% |
0.22580645 |
2 |
Disagree |
231 |
74.5% |
0.74516129 |
97 |
No answer |
9 |
2.9% |
0.02903226 |
98 |
Not asked |
5987 |
|
NA |
r4oc10d
Variable label:
|
Do you think the government should not or should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think the government should not or should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran35=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Government should not see to it |
101 |
30% |
0.29970326 |
2 |
Government should see to it |
215 |
63.8% |
0.63798220 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
6.2% |
0.06231454 |
98 |
Not asked |
5960 |
|
NA |
r4ran36
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1219] [Invalid:5078] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
625 |
51.3% |
0.5127153 |
2 |
2 |
594 |
48.7% |
0.4872847 |
Sysmiss |
|
5078 |
|
NA |
r4oc11a
Variable label:
|
Statements: Politics is complicated
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Sometimes politics and government seem so complicated that a person like me can’t really understand what’s going on.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran36=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agree |
289 |
46.2% |
0.4624 |
2 |
Disagree |
321 |
51.4% |
0.5136 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
2.4% |
0.0240 |
98 |
Not asked |
5672 |
|
NA |
r4oc11b
Variable label:
|
Politics is so complicated that you can not understand what is happening
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that sometimes politics and government seem so complicated that a person like you can’t really understand what’s going on, or that you really can understand what’s going on?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran36=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Sometimes so complicated can't understand |
403 |
67.8% |
0.67845118 |
2 |
Can understand all the time |
180 |
30.3% |
0.30303030 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
1.9% |
0.01851852 |
98 |
Not asked |
5703 |
|
NA |
r4ran37
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1218] [Invalid:5079] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
304 |
25% |
0.2495895 |
2 |
2 |
315 |
25.9% |
0.2586207 |
3 |
3 |
286 |
23.5% |
0.2348112 |
4 |
4 |
313 |
25.7% |
0.2569787 |
Sysmiss |
|
5079 |
|
NA |
r4oc12a
Variable label:
|
Courts: Strict enough towards criminals, no perception
|
Literal question:
|
In general, do you think the courts in this area deal too harshly or not harshly enough with criminals, or do you not have an opinion on that?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran37=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Too harshly |
4 |
1.3% |
0.013157895 |
2 |
Not harshly enough |
189 |
62.2% |
0.621710526 |
3 |
No opinion |
109 |
35.9% |
0.358552632 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006578947 |
98 |
Not asked |
5993 |
|
NA |
r4oc12b
Variable label:
|
Courts: Strict enough towards criminals, missing information
|
Literal question:
|
In general, do you think the courts in this area deal too harshly or not harshly enough with criminals, or don’t you have enough information about the courts to say?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran37=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Too harshly |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01269841 |
2 |
Not harshly enough |
158 |
50.2% |
0.50158730 |
3 |
Don’t have enough information to say |
149 |
47.3% |
0.47301587 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01269841 |
98 |
Not asked |
5982 |
|
NA |
r4oc12c
Variable label:
|
Courts: Strict enough towards criminals, do not know
|
Literal question:
|
In general, do you think the courts in this area deal too harshly or not harshly enough with criminals, or don’t you know?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran37=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Too harshly |
2 |
0.7% |
0.006993007 |
2 |
Not harshly enough |
159 |
55.6% |
0.555944056 |
3 |
I don’t know |
119 |
41.6% |
0.416083916 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2.1% |
0.020979021 |
98 |
Not asked |
6011 |
|
NA |
r4oc12d
Variable label:
|
Courts: Strict enough towards criminals
|
Literal question:
|
In general, do you think the courts in this area deal too harshly or not harshly enough with criminals, or don’t you know?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran37=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Too harshly |
16 |
5.1% |
0.05111821 |
2 |
Not harshly enough |
269 |
85.9% |
0.85942492 |
97 |
No answer |
28 |
8.9% |
0.08945687 |
98 |
Not asked |
5984 |
|
NA |
r4ran38
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1217] [Invalid:5080] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
272 |
22.4% |
0.2235004 |
2 |
2 |
316 |
26% |
0.2596549 |
3 |
3 |
316 |
26% |
0.2596549 |
4 |
4 |
313 |
25.7% |
0.2571898 |
Sysmiss |
|
5080 |
|
NA |
r4oc13a
Variable label:
|
Those who work in government are smart people or people who do not know what they are doing, no opinion
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel that almost all of the people running the government are smart people, or do you think that quite a few of them don’t seem to know what they are doing, or do you not have an opinion on that?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran38=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Are smart |
72 |
26.5% |
0.26470588 |
2 |
They don’t know what they’re doing |
90 |
33.1% |
0.33088235 |
3 |
No opinion |
102 |
37.5% |
0.37500000 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
2.9% |
0.02941176 |
98 |
Not asked |
6025 |
|
NA |
r4oc13b
Variable label:
|
Those who work in government are people who do not know what they are doing or smart people
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that quite a few of the people running the government don’t seem to know what they are doing, or do you feel that almost all of them are smart people?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran38=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
They don’t know what they’re doing |
159 |
50.3% |
0.50316456 |
2 |
Are smart |
138 |
43.7% |
0.43670886 |
97 |
No answer |
19 |
6% |
0.06012658 |
98 |
Not asked |
5981 |
|
NA |
r4oc13c
Variable label:
|
Those who work in government are smart people or people who do not know what they’re doing, do not know
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel that almost all of the people running the government are smart people, or do you think that quite a few of them don’t seem to know what they are doing, or don’t you know?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran38=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Are smart |
83 |
26.3% |
0.26265823 |
2 |
They don’t know what they’re doing |
104 |
32.9% |
0.32911392 |
3 |
Don’t know |
125 |
39.6% |
0.39556962 |
97 |
No answer |
4 |
1.3% |
0.01265823 |
98 |
Not asked |
5981 |
|
NA |
r4oc13d
Variable label:
|
Those who work in government are smart people or people who do not know what they’re doing
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel that almost all of the people running the government are smart people, or do you think that quite a few of them don’t seem to know what they are doing?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran38=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Are smart |
157 |
50.2% |
0.5015974 |
2 |
They don’t know what they’re doing |
139 |
44.4% |
0.4440895 |
97 |
No answer |
17 |
5.4% |
0.0543131 |
98 |
Not asked |
5984 |
|
NA |
r4ran39
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1217] [Invalid:5080] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
294 |
24.2% |
0.2415776 |
2 |
2 |
300 |
24.7% |
0.2465078 |
3 |
3 |
316 |
26% |
0.2596549 |
4 |
4 |
307 |
25.2% |
0.2522597 |
Sysmiss |
|
5080 |
|
NA |
r4oc14a
Variable label:
|
Mandatory labor union membership, or against
|
Literal question:
|
If there is a union at a particular company or business, do you think that all the workers there should be required to be union members, or are you opposed to this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran39=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, all in union |
103 |
35% |
0.35034014 |
2 |
No, oppose |
180 |
61.2% |
0.61224490 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
3.7% |
0.03741497 |
98 |
Not asked |
6003 |
|
NA |
r4oc14b
Variable label:
|
Mandatory labor union membership
|
Literal question:
|
If there is a union at a particular company or business, do you think that all the workers there should be required to be union members?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran39=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
76 |
25.3% |
0.2533333 |
2 |
No |
218 |
72.7% |
0.7266667 |
97 |
No answer |
6 |
2% |
0.0200000 |
98 |
Not asked |
5997 |
|
NA |
r4oc14c
Variable label:
|
Mandatory labor union membership, or up to each individual to decide
|
Literal question:
|
If there is a union at a particular company or business, do you think that all the workers there should be required to be union members, or should it be left to the individuals to decide whether or not he wants to be in the union?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran39=3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
All should be required |
52 |
16.5% |
0.164556962 |
2 |
Left to individuals |
262 |
82.9% |
0.829113924 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.6% |
0.006329114 |
98 |
Not asked |
5981 |
|
NA |
r4oc14d
Variable label:
|
Against mandatory labor union membership, or for it
|
Literal question:
|
If there is a union at a particular company or business, are you opposed to all the workers there being required to be union members, or do you think that all the workers there should be required to be union members?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran39=4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oppose |
181 |
59% |
0.58957655 |
2 |
All in union |
112 |
36.5% |
0.36482085 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
4.6% |
0.04560261 |
98 |
Not asked |
5990 |
|
NA |
r4ran40
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1215] [Invalid:5082] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
585 |
48.1% |
0.4814815 |
2 |
2 |
630 |
51.9% |
0.5185185 |
Sysmiss |
|
5082 |
|
NA |
r4oc15aa
Variable label:
|
Allow labor unions to spend money in support to select or beat candidates for political positions
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think labor unions should be permitted to spend their money to help elect or defeat candidates for political offices?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
141 |
24.1% |
0.24102564 |
2 |
No |
424 |
72.5% |
0.72478632 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
3.4% |
0.03418803 |
98 |
Not asked |
5712 |
|
NA |
r4oc15ab
Variable label:
|
Allow businesses to spend money to support select or beat candidates for political positions
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think businesses should be permitted to spend their money to help elect or defeat candidates for political offices?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran40=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
131 |
22.4% |
0.22393162 |
2 |
No |
430 |
73.5% |
0.73504274 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
4.1% |
0.04102564 |
98 |
Not asked |
5712 |
|
NA |
r4oc15ba
Variable label:
|
Allow businesses to spend money to support select or beat candidates for political positions
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think businesses should be permitted to spend their money to help elect or defeat candidates for political offices?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran40=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
125 |
19.8% |
0.19841270 |
2 |
No |
481 |
76.3% |
0.76349206 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
3.8% |
0.03809524 |
98 |
Not asked |
5667 |
|
NA |
r4oc15bb
Variable label:
|
Allow labor unions to spend money in support to select or beat candidates for political positions
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think labor unions should be permitted to spend their money to help elect or defeat candidates for political offices?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran40=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
137 |
21.7% |
0.21746032 |
2 |
No |
464 |
73.7% |
0.73650794 |
97 |
No answer |
29 |
4.6% |
0.04603175 |
98 |
Not asked |
5667 |
|
NA |
r4ran41
Variable label:
|
[Randomizes if ran32=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1213] [Invalid:5084] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
612 |
50.5% |
0.5045342 |
2 |
2 |
601 |
49.5% |
0.4954658 |
Sysmiss |
|
5084 |
|
NA |
r4oc16a
Variable label:
|
Can trust others, or cant’t be too careful
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you can’t be too careful in dealing with people?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran41=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Most people can be trusted |
465 |
76% |
0.75980392 |
2 |
Can’t be too careful |
137 |
22.4% |
0.22385621 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.6% |
0.01633987 |
98 |
Not asked |
5685 |
|
NA |
r4oc16b
Variable label:
|
Can’t be too careful, or can trust others
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, would you say that you can’t be too careful in dealing with people or that most people can be trusted?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if ran32=1 and ran41=2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Can’t be too careful |
152 |
25.3% |
0.25291181 |
2 |
Most people can be trusted |
441 |
73.4% |
0.73377704 |
97 |
No answer |
8 |
1.3% |
0.01331115 |
98 |
Not asked |
5696 |
|
NA |
r4k20
Variable label:
|
Description of life situation or occupation
|
Literal question:
|
We will now ask you some questions about your background.
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Paid work (or temporarily absent) |
74 |
56.1% |
0.560606061 |
2 |
Studying (not paid for by an employer) |
5 |
3.8% |
0.037878788 |
3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
2 |
1.5% |
0.015151515 |
4 |
Unemployed, wanting a job, but not actively seeking work |
4 |
3% |
0.030303030 |
5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
3 |
2.3% |
0.022727273 |
6 |
Retired |
15 |
11.4% |
0.113636364 |
7 |
Civilian or military service |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
8 |
At home, looking after children or others |
1 |
0.8% |
0.007575758 |
9 |
Other |
12 |
9.1% |
0.090909091 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
12.1% |
0.121212121 |
98 |
Not asked |
6165 |
|
NA |
r4k21
Variable label:
|
Works in following business
|
Literal question:
|
What type of company do you work for?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Government, county or municipal administration |
10 |
13.5% |
0.13513514 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school or the health service) |
15 |
20.3% |
0.20270270 |
3 |
Publicly owned company |
4 |
5.4% |
0.05405405 |
4 |
Private company |
37 |
50% |
0.50000000 |
5 |
Self-employed |
7 |
9.5% |
0.09459459 |
6 |
Other: |
1 |
1.4% |
0.01351351 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6223 |
|
NA |
r4k21_6_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Works in following business [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What type of company do you work for?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4k323
Variable label:
|
Title of main occupation [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What is the name or title of your main profession? Please enter your full job title. Please be as specific as possible.
|
Technical description:
|
Here are a few examples: Nurse. 6th form college teacher. Shop assistant.
[Asked respondents where information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4k323a
Variable label:
|
Main tasks or duties in main occupation [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are your main tasks or duties in your main profession? Please provide as many details as possible.
|
Technical description:
|
Here are a few examples: Provide assistance and administer medication at an old people’s home. Prepare teaching material. Teach Norwegian and mathematics and mark exams. Sell shoes and help customers in a shop.
[Asked respondents where information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4k23b
Variable label:
|
Responsible for directing other employees in the main job
|
Literal question:
|
Are you responsible for managing the work of other employees in your main job?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
53 |
71.6% |
0.7162162 |
2 |
Yes, I manage 10 or more employees. |
11 |
14.9% |
0.1486486 |
3 |
Yes, I manage less than 10 employees. |
10 |
13.5% |
0.1351351 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6223 |
|
NA |
r4k24
Variable label:
|
Workplace in oil or gas industry, or closely linked to it
|
Literal question:
|
Is your workplace in the oil and gas industry, or closely associated with it?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, I work for the oil and gas industry |
4 |
5.4% |
0.05405405 |
2 |
Yes, my work is closely associated with the oil and gas industry |
4 |
5.4% |
0.05405405 |
3 |
No |
66 |
89.2% |
0.89189189 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6223 |
|
NA |
r4k25
Variable label:
|
Current income
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
< 150 000 |
37 |
15.2% |
0.15226337 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
33 |
13.6% |
0.13580247 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
29 |
11.9% |
0.11934156 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
19 |
7.8% |
0.07818930 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
31 |
12.8% |
0.12757202 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
6 |
2.5% |
0.02469136 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
7 |
2.9% |
0.02880658 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
8 |
3.3% |
0.03292181 |
97 |
No answer |
73 |
30% |
0.30041152 |
98 |
Not asked |
6054 |
|
NA |
r4k26
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest level of completed education?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
4 |
2.7% |
0.027397260 |
2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
1 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
3 |
Secondary school (grunnskole, 7-årig folkeskole, framhaldskole, realskole) |
6 |
4.1% |
0.041095890 |
4 |
County college certificate |
1 |
0.7% |
0.006849315 |
5 |
6th form college/end of formal schooling, humanities subjects, university
preparatory course, 1-year Post-leaving Certificate course (VK2, VG stage 3,
gymnas) |
15 |
10.3% |
0.102739726 |
6 |
6th form college/end of formal schooling, vocational subjects/courses (VK2, VK3,
VG stage 3, vocational certificate, journeyman's certificate) |
16 |
11% |
0.109589041 |
7 |
Preliminary course for university/college without credits |
2 |
1.4% |
0.013698630 |
8 |
Certificate for additional further education (technical college) |
3 |
2.1% |
0.020547945 |
9 |
University/college, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (2 and 2½ year
associate degree) |
11 |
7.5% |
0.075342466 |
10 |
Completed 3-4 years of college education (Bachelor, BA, B.Sc., teacher's
training college, nursing college, nursery teacher, engineer, business
economist, etc.) |
30 |
20.5% |
0.205479452 |
11 |
Completed 3-4 years of university education (Bachelor, BA, B.Sc.) |
11 |
7.5% |
0.075342466 |
12 |
Completed 5-6 years of college education (Masters, main subject) |
6 |
4.1% |
0.041095890 |
13 |
Completed 5-6 years of university education (Masters, main subject), longer
professional education (Bachelor of Divinity, Bachelor of Psychology, Bachelor
of Medicine, Bachelor of Veterinary Medicine, Master of Science, architect,
business economist (13) |
8 |
5.5% |
0.054794521 |
14 |
Researcher (Ph.D) |
3 |
2.1% |
0.020547945 |
15 |
None of these |
3 |
2.1% |
0.020547945 |
97 |
No answer |
26 |
17.8% |
0.178082192 |
98 |
Not asked |
6151 |
|
NA |
r4k27
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Please click whichever alternative is most applicable.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Never been married, had a partner or legally registered partner |
14 |
10.3% |
0.102941176 |
2 |
Married |
50 |
36.8% |
0.367647059 |
3 |
Legally registered partner |
1 |
0.7% |
0.007352941 |
4 |
Partner |
31 |
22.8% |
0.227941176 |
5 |
Divorced/separated |
12 |
8.8% |
0.088235294 |
6 |
Former partner |
3 |
2.2% |
0.022058824 |
7 |
Former legally registered partner |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
8 |
Widow/widower |
5 |
3.7% |
0.036764706 |
9 |
Other: |
2 |
1.5% |
0.014705882 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
13.2% |
0.132352941 |
98 |
Not asked |
6161 |
|
NA |
r4k27_9_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Marital status [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Please click whichever alternative is most applicable.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
97 |
69.8% |
0.6978417 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
24 |
17.3% |
0.1726619 |
97 |
No answer |
18 |
12.9% |
0.1294964 |
98 |
Not asked |
6158 |
|
NA |
r4k28_2_other
Variable label:
|
Citizen of another country [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Statsborger i annet land. Vennligst skriv hvilket
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4k29
Variable label:
|
Mother or father immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
99 |
71.7% |
0.71739130 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
13 |
9.4% |
0.09420290 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
3 |
2.2% |
0.02173913 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
5 |
3.6% |
0.03623188 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
2 |
1.4% |
0.01449275 |
97 |
No answer |
16 |
11.6% |
0.11594203 |
98 |
Not asked |
6159 |
|
NA |
r4k30_1
Variable label:
|
Country before immigration [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Which country did you live in before you immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4k30_2_1
Variable label:
|
Mothers country of origin [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which country did your parents (mother, father or both) live in before they immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Mother:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4k30_2_2
Variable label:
|
Fathers country of origin [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Hvilket land bodde dine foreldre (mor, far eller begge) i før de innvandret?
|
Literal question:
|
Father:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r4k40
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious community?
|
Technical description:
|
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:6297] [Range:-]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
0 |
|
NaN |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
0 |
|
NaN |
3 |
An orthodox church (Greek, Russian, other) |
0 |
|
NaN |
4 |
Other protestant faiths (e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists,
etc.) |
0 |
|
NaN |
5 |
Other Christian faiths (e.g. Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons) |
0 |
|
NaN |
6 |
The Mosaic faith (Jewish) |
0 |
|
NaN |
7 |
Islam (Muslim) |
0 |
|
NaN |
8 |
Eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism,
Confucianism) |
0 |
|
NaN |
9 |
Other non-Christian religions |
0 |
|
NaN |
10 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
0 |
|
NaN |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
|
NaN |
Sysmiss |
|
6297 |
|
NA |
r4k40_recode
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Tilhører du en religion eller et religiøst kirkesamfunn?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recoded from source variable r4k40.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
4110 |
65.3% |
0.652691758 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
97 |
1.5% |
0.015404161 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
252 |
4% |
0.040019057 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
64 |
1% |
0.010163570 |
5 |
Islam |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006669843 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
1583 |
25.1% |
0.251389551 |
97 |
No answer |
149 |
2.4% |
0.023662061 |
r4k41
Variable label:
|
Attending religious meetings
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say that you attend religions meetings at the moment?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6155] [Invalid:142] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Daily |
13 |
0.2% |
0.002112104 |
2 |
More than once a week |
96 |
1.6% |
0.015597076 |
3 |
Once a week |
192 |
3.1% |
0.031194151 |
4 |
At least once a month |
302 |
4.9% |
0.049065800 |
5 |
Only at special festivals |
1308 |
21.3% |
0.212510154 |
6 |
Less often |
1513 |
24.6% |
0.245816409 |
7 |
Never |
2731 |
44.4% |
0.443704305 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
Sysmiss |
|
142 |
|
NA |
r4k42
Variable label:
|
Living with children under 16 years
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have any children under the age of 16 who live at home with you, and if so, how many?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6126] [Invalid:171] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
None |
4542 |
74.1% |
0.7414299706 |
2 |
1 |
672 |
11% |
0.1096963761 |
3 |
2 |
679 |
11.1% |
0.1108390467 |
4 |
3 |
205 |
3.3% |
0.0334639243 |
5 |
4 |
25 |
0.4% |
0.0040809664 |
6 |
5 |
1 |
0% |
0.0001632387 |
7 |
6 or more |
2 |
0% |
0.0003264773 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000000 |
Sysmiss |
|
171 |
|
NA |
r4P1
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Male |
3144 |
49.9% |
0.4992854 |
2 |
Female |
3153 |
50.1% |
0.5007146 |
r4P2
Variable label:
|
Region
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
1761 |
28% |
0.27965698 |
2 |
Østlandet |
1538 |
24.4% |
0.24424329 |
3 |
Sørlandet |
306 |
4.9% |
0.04859457 |
4 |
Vestlandet |
1658 |
26.3% |
0.26329998 |
5 |
Trøndelag |
545 |
8.7% |
0.08654915 |
6 |
Nord-Norge |
489 |
7.8% |
0.07765603 |
r4P3
Variable label:
|
County
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-19]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Akershus |
790 |
12.5% |
0.125456567 |
2 |
Oslo |
971 |
15.4% |
0.154200413 |
3 |
Østfold |
327 |
5.2% |
0.051929490 |
4 |
Vestfold |
322 |
5.1% |
0.051135461 |
5 |
Hedmark |
190 |
3% |
0.030173098 |
6 |
Oppland |
191 |
3% |
0.030331904 |
7 |
Buskerud |
323 |
5.1% |
0.051294267 |
8 |
Telemark |
185 |
2.9% |
0.029379069 |
9 |
Vest-Agder |
196 |
3.1% |
0.031125933 |
10 |
Aust-Agder |
110 |
1.7% |
0.017468636 |
11 |
Rogaland |
556 |
8.8% |
0.088296014 |
12 |
Hordaland |
729 |
11.6% |
0.115769414 |
13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
104 |
1.7% |
0.016515801 |
14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
269 |
4.3% |
0.042718755 |
15 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
429 |
6.8% |
0.068127680 |
16 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
116 |
1.8% |
0.018421471 |
17 |
Nordland |
249 |
4% |
0.039542639 |
18 |
Troms |
185 |
2.9% |
0.029379069 |
19 |
Finmark |
55 |
0.9% |
0.008734318 |
r4P4_1
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No education/elementary school |
619 |
9.8% |
0.09830078 |
2 |
Upper secondary eduction |
1908 |
30.3% |
0.30300143 |
3 |
University/university college |
3514 |
55.8% |
0.55804351 |
97 |
No answer |
256 |
4.1% |
0.04065428 |
r4P4_2
Variable label:
|
Highest level of completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-15]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
28 |
0.4% |
0.004446562 |
2 |
Primary school (first part of compulsory education) |
41 |
0.7% |
0.006511037 |
3 |
Elementary school (primary, 7 year elementary school, continuation school,
secondary school) |
550 |
8.7% |
0.087343179 |
4 |
College certificate |
50 |
0.8% |
0.007940289 |
5 |
Completed upper secondary education, general studies/preparatory education
programme, one-year post admission |
812 |
12.9% |
0.128950294 |
6 |
Completed upper secondary eduction, vocational subjects/education programmes
(qualifying examination, apprenticeship examination) |
798 |
12.7% |
0.126727013 |
7 |
Pre-university/college course that does not give credits |
80 |
1.3% |
0.012704462 |
8 |
Diploma from addition to upper secondary education (vocational, technical
college) |
218 |
3.5% |
0.034619660 |
9 |
University/university college, less than three years, but at least 2 years
(university college graduate 2 and 2½ year) |
587 |
9.3% |
0.093218993 |
10 |
Completed 3-4 year education from university college (Bachelor, teacher's
college, nursing college, pre-school teacher, engineer, business economist,
etc.) |
1254 |
19.9% |
0.199142449 |
11 |
Completed 3-4 year education from University (Bachelor) |
423 |
6.7% |
0.067174845 |
12 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university college (Master) |
445 |
7.1% |
0.070668572 |
13 |
Completed 5-6 year education from university (master, graduate), further
professional education (theologist, psychologist, physician, veterinarian,
engineer, architect, senior business economist) |
688 |
10.9% |
0.109258377 |
14 |
Research level (Ph.D.) |
117 |
1.9% |
0.018580276 |
15 |
None of these |
176 |
2.8% |
0.027949817 |
97 |
No answer |
30 |
0.5% |
0.004764173 |
r4P5_1
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1939 or earlier |
232 |
3.7% |
0.03684294 |
2 |
1940-1949 |
1060 |
16.8% |
0.16833413 |
3 |
1950-1959 |
1416 |
22.5% |
0.22486899 |
4 |
1960-1969 |
1303 |
20.7% |
0.20692393 |
5 |
1970-1979 |
1016 |
16.1% |
0.16134667 |
6 |
1980-1989 |
828 |
13.1% |
0.13149119 |
7 |
1990 or later |
442 |
7% |
0.07019215 |
r4P5_2
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1959 or earlier |
2708 |
43% |
0.43004605 |
2 |
1960-1989 |
3147 |
50% |
0.49976179 |
3 |
1990 or later |
442 |
7% |
0.07019215 |
r4_Weight_1
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2 and P1. See documentation report
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-2]
|
r4_Weight_2
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4_1 and P1. See documentation report
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-7]
|
w01_k3
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democratic Party |
132 |
5.4% |
0.054388133 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
656 |
27% |
0.270292542 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
275 |
11.3% |
0.113308611 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
187 |
7.7% |
0.077049856 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
170 |
7% |
0.070045323 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
100 |
4.1% |
0.041203131 |
7 |
The Green Party |
117 |
4.8% |
0.048207664 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
690 |
28.4% |
0.284301607 |
9 |
Red |
47 |
1.9% |
0.019365472 |
10 |
Other: |
31 |
1.3% |
0.012772971 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
0.9% |
0.009064689 |
98 |
Not asked |
3870 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k3_1
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party last parliamentary election
|
Literal question:
|
What party did you vote for at the last parliamentary election?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents were ran1=1 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
89 |
5% |
0.050453515 |
2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
466 |
26.4% |
0.264172336 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
158 |
9% |
0.089569161 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
111 |
6.3% |
0.062925170 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
110 |
6.2% |
0.062358277 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
65 |
3.7% |
0.036848073 |
7 |
The Green Party |
61 |
3.5% |
0.034580499 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
476 |
27% |
0.269841270 |
9 |
The Red Party |
40 |
2.3% |
0.022675737 |
10 |
Did not vote |
71 |
4% |
0.040249433 |
11 |
Was not entitled to vote |
82 |
4.6% |
0.046485261 |
12 |
Other |
23 |
1.3% |
0.013038549 |
97 |
No answer |
12 |
0.7% |
0.006802721 |
98 |
Not asked |
4533 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k3_2
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party last parliamentary election
|
Literal question:
|
What party did you vote for at the last parliamentary election?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only newly recruited respondents where ran1=2 are asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
75 |
4.3% |
0.04285714 |
2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
455 |
26% |
0.26000000 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
145 |
8.3% |
0.08285714 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
133 |
7.6% |
0.07600000 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
114 |
6.5% |
0.06514286 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
69 |
3.9% |
0.03942857 |
7 |
The Green Party |
60 |
3.4% |
0.03428571 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
479 |
27.4% |
0.27371429 |
9 |
The Red Party |
25 |
1.4% |
0.01428571 |
10 |
Did not vote |
76 |
4.3% |
0.04342857 |
11 |
Was not entitled to vote |
97 |
5.5% |
0.05542857 |
12 |
Other |
22 |
1.3% |
0.01257143 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
4547 |
|
NA |
c3k3
Variable label:
|
Voted for following party last parliamentary election [Most recent available data from w01_k3, w03_r3k3_1, w03_r3k3_2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable. There are minor differences in question language.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
296 |
5% |
0.049823262 |
2 |
The Conservative Party of Norway |
1577 |
26.5% |
0.265443528 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
578 |
9.7% |
0.097290019 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
431 |
7.3% |
0.072546709 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
394 |
6.6% |
0.066318802 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
234 |
3.9% |
0.039387309 |
7 |
The Green Party |
238 |
4% |
0.040060596 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1645 |
27.7% |
0.276889413 |
9 |
The Red Party |
112 |
1.9% |
0.018852045 |
10 |
Did not vote |
178 |
3% |
0.029961286 |
11 |
Was not entitled to vote |
179 |
3% |
0.030129608 |
12 |
Other |
45 |
0.8% |
0.007574482 |
97 |
No answer |
34 |
0.6% |
0.005722942 |
98 |
Not asked |
356 |
|
NA |
w01_k14_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politics is complicated
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me have no understanding of what it’s about.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
106 |
4% |
0.03958178 |
2 |
Agree |
322 |
12% |
0.12023898 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
750 |
28% |
0.28005975 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
229 |
8.6% |
0.08551158 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
414 |
15.5% |
0.15459298 |
6 |
Disagree |
610 |
22.8% |
0.22778193 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
212 |
7.9% |
0.07916355 |
97 |
No answer |
35 |
1.3% |
0.01306945 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
3619 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k14_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politics is sometimes so convoluted that people like me do not understand what it is about
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
Politics is sometimes so convoluted that people like me do not understand what it is about.
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
164 |
4.6% |
0.046406338 |
2 |
Agree |
400 |
11.3% |
0.113186191 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
1017 |
28.8% |
0.287775891 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
283 |
8% |
0.080079230 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
531 |
15% |
0.150254669 |
6 |
Disagree |
830 |
23.5% |
0.234861347 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
274 |
7.8% |
0.077532541 |
97 |
No answer |
35 |
1% |
0.009903792 |
98 |
Not asked |
2763 |
|
NA |
c3k14_1
Variable label:
|
Statement: Politics is sometimes so convoluted that people like me do not understand what it is about [Most recent available data from w01_k14_1, w03_r3k14_1]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Politics is sometimes so convoluted that people like me do not understand what it is about.
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
270 |
4.3% |
0.04346426 |
2 |
Agree |
722 |
11.6% |
0.11622666 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
1767 |
28.4% |
0.28444945 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
512 |
8.2% |
0.08242112 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
945 |
15.2% |
0.15212492 |
6 |
Disagree |
1440 |
23.2% |
0.23180940 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
486 |
7.8% |
0.07823567 |
97 |
No answer |
70 |
1.1% |
0.01126851 |
98 |
Not asked |
85 |
|
NA |
w01_k14_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: Can vote, not much else to influence
|
Pre-question text:
|
Consider the statements below. To which extent do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
People like me can vote, but there is nothing else we can do to influence politics.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
110 |
4.1% |
0.04107543 |
2 |
Agree |
315 |
11.8% |
0.11762509 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
398 |
14.9% |
0.14861837 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
181 |
6.8% |
0.06758775 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
599 |
22.4% |
0.22367438 |
6 |
Disagree |
738 |
27.6% |
0.27557879 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
302 |
11.3% |
0.11277072 |
97 |
No answer |
35 |
1.3% |
0.01306945 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
3619 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k14_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: People like me can probably vote, but we cannot do anything else to influence politics
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the statements below. How much do you agree or disagree with them?
|
Literal question:
|
People like me can probably vote, but we cannot do anything else to influence politics.
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
211 |
6% |
0.05970572 |
2 |
Agree |
401 |
11.3% |
0.11346916 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
515 |
14.6% |
0.14572722 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
251 |
7.1% |
0.07102434 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
762 |
21.6% |
0.21561969 |
6 |
Disagree |
970 |
27.4% |
0.27447651 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
380 |
10.8% |
0.10752688 |
97 |
No answer |
44 |
1.2% |
0.01245048 |
98 |
Not asked |
2763 |
|
NA |
c3k14_2
Variable label:
|
Statement: People like me can probably vote, but we cannot do anything else to influence politics [Most recent available data from w01_k14_2, w03_r3k14_2]
|
Pre-question text:
|
People like me can probably vote, but we cannot do anything else to influence politics.
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
321 |
5.2% |
0.05167418 |
2 |
Agree |
716 |
11.5% |
0.11526079 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
913 |
14.7% |
0.14697360 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
432 |
7% |
0.06954282 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
1361 |
21.9% |
0.21909208 |
6 |
Disagree |
1708 |
27.5% |
0.27495171 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
682 |
11% |
0.10978751 |
97 |
No answer |
79 |
1.3% |
0.01271732 |
98 |
Not asked |
85 |
|
NA |
w01_k15_99
Variable label:
|
Trust people
|
Pre-question text:
|
Now to a more general question:
|
Literal question:
|
Would you agree that most people in general can be trusted, or do you believe that one can’t be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
Technical description:
|
0 means “Can’t be careful enough” and 10 means “Most people can be trusted.”
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Can't be careful enough |
42 |
1.6% |
0.015683346 |
1 |
1 |
23 |
0.9% |
0.008588499 |
2 |
2 |
47 |
1.8% |
0.017550411 |
3 |
3 |
107 |
4% |
0.039955190 |
4 |
4 |
138 |
5.2% |
0.051530993 |
5 |
5 |
246 |
9.2% |
0.091859597 |
6 |
6 |
294 |
11% |
0.109783420 |
7 |
7 |
617 |
23% |
0.230395818 |
8 |
8 |
603 |
22.5% |
0.225168036 |
9 |
9 |
269 |
10% |
0.100448096 |
10 |
10 - Most people can be trusted |
241 |
9% |
0.089992532 |
97 |
No answer |
51 |
1.9% |
0.019044063 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
3619 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k15
Variable label:
|
Most people can be trusted
|
Literal question:
|
And now a more general question. Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
Technical description:
|
0 means “Cannot be careful enough” and 10 means “Most people can be trusted”.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Cannot be careful enough |
54 |
1.5% |
0.015280136 |
2 |
1 |
31 |
0.9% |
0.008771930 |
3 |
2 |
64 |
1.8% |
0.018109791 |
4 |
3 |
167 |
4.7% |
0.047255235 |
5 |
4 |
191 |
5.4% |
0.054046406 |
6 |
5 |
401 |
11.3% |
0.113469157 |
7 |
6 |
413 |
11.7% |
0.116864743 |
8 |
7 |
824 |
23.3% |
0.233163554 |
9 |
8 |
727 |
20.6% |
0.205715903 |
10 |
9 |
295 |
8.3% |
0.083474816 |
11 |
10 Most people can be trusted |
360 |
10.2% |
0.101867572 |
97 |
No answer |
7 |
0.2% |
0.001980758 |
98 |
Not asked |
2763 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k15_w04scale
Variable label:
|
Most people can be trusted [Recoded version of w03_r3k15]
|
Literal question:
|
And now a more general question.
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
54 |
1.5% |
0.015280136 |
1 |
1 |
31 |
0.9% |
0.008771930 |
2 |
2 |
64 |
1.8% |
0.018109791 |
3 |
3 |
167 |
4.7% |
0.047255235 |
4 |
4 |
191 |
5.4% |
0.054046406 |
5 |
5 |
401 |
11.3% |
0.113469157 |
6 |
6 |
413 |
11.7% |
0.116864743 |
7 |
7 |
824 |
23.3% |
0.233163554 |
8 |
8 |
727 |
20.6% |
0.205715903 |
9 |
9 |
295 |
8.3% |
0.083474816 |
10 |
10 – Most people can be trusted |
360 |
10.2% |
0.101867572 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.2% |
0.001980758 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2763 |
|
NA |
c3k15
Variable label:
|
Most people can be trusted [Most recent available data from w01_k15_99, w03_r3k15]
|
Pre-question text:
|
And now a more general question.
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
0 means “Cannot be careful enough” and 10 means “Most people can be trusted”.
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable. Scales are harmonized.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 Cannot be careful enough |
96 |
1.5% |
0.015453960 |
1 |
1 |
54 |
0.9% |
0.008692853 |
2 |
2 |
111 |
1.8% |
0.017868641 |
3 |
3 |
274 |
4.4% |
0.044108178 |
4 |
4 |
329 |
5.3% |
0.052962009 |
5 |
5 |
647 |
10.4% |
0.104153252 |
6 |
6 |
707 |
11.4% |
0.113811977 |
7 |
7 |
1441 |
23.2% |
0.231970380 |
8 |
8 |
1330 |
21.4% |
0.214101739 |
9 |
9 |
564 |
9.1% |
0.090792015 |
10 |
10 Most people can be trusted |
601 |
9.7% |
0.096748229 |
97 |
No answer |
58 |
0.9% |
0.009336768 |
98 |
Not asked |
85 |
|
NA |
w01_k20
Variable label:
|
Description of employment
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the descriptions fits best with what you have done for the past 7 days?
|
Technical description:
|
Check one option.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In paid work (or temporarily absent) |
1669 |
62.3% |
0.623226288 |
2 |
In education (not paid for by employer) |
196 |
7.3% |
0.073188947 |
3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
25 |
0.9% |
0.009335325 |
4 |
Unemployed, want a job but not actively seeking work |
15 |
0.6% |
0.005601195 |
5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
94 |
3.5% |
0.035100822 |
6 |
Retired |
482 |
18% |
0.179985063 |
7 |
In civilian national service or military service |
4 |
0.1% |
0.001493652 |
8 |
Staying at home, looking after children or other persons |
44 |
1.6% |
0.016430172 |
9 |
Other |
94 |
3.5% |
0.035100822 |
97 |
No answer |
55 |
2.1% |
0.020537715 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
3619 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k20
Variable label:
|
Respondents background
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the descriptions fits best with what you have done for the past 7 days?
|
Technical description:
|
Check one option.
[Only asked new respondents, and old respodents where the information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In paid work (or temporarily absent) |
2296 |
64.2% |
0.641878669 |
2 |
In education (not paid for by employer) |
238 |
6.7% |
0.066536204 |
3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
62 |
1.7% |
0.017332961 |
4 |
Unemployed, want a job but not actively seeking work |
19 |
0.5% |
0.005311714 |
5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
118 |
3.3% |
0.032988538 |
6 |
Retired |
663 |
18.5% |
0.185350853 |
7 |
In civilian national service or military service |
4 |
0.1% |
0.001118256 |
8 |
Staying at home, looking after children or other persons |
42 |
1.2% |
0.011741683 |
9 |
Other |
96 |
2.7% |
0.026838133 |
97 |
No answer |
39 |
1.1% |
0.010902991 |
98 |
Not asked |
2720 |
|
NA |
c3k20
Variable label:
|
Respondents background [Most recent available data from w01_k20, w03_r3k20]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which of the descriptions fits best with what you have done for the past 7 days?
Check one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable. There are minor differences in question language.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In paid work (or temporarily absent) |
3965 |
63.8% |
0.637767412 |
2 |
In education (not paid for by employer) |
434 |
7% |
0.069808589 |
3 |
Unemployed and actively seeking work |
87 |
1.4% |
0.013993888 |
4 |
Unemployed, want a job but not actively seeking work |
34 |
0.5% |
0.005468876 |
5 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
212 |
3.4% |
0.034100048 |
6 |
Retired |
1145 |
18.4% |
0.184172430 |
7 |
In civilian national service or military service |
8 |
0.1% |
0.001286794 |
8 |
Staying at home, looking after children or other persons |
86 |
1.4% |
0.013833038 |
9 |
Other |
190 |
3.1% |
0.030561364 |
97 |
No answer |
56 |
0.9% |
0.009007560 |
98 |
Not asked |
80 |
|
NA |
w01_k21
Variable label:
|
Type of business
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
141 |
8.4% |
0.084481726 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
495 |
29.7% |
0.296584781 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
108 |
6.5% |
0.064709407 |
4 |
Private business |
757 |
45.4% |
0.453565009 |
5 |
Self-employed |
104 |
6.2% |
0.062312762 |
6 |
Other: |
62 |
3.7% |
0.037147993 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001198322 |
98 |
Not asked |
4628 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k21
Variable label:
|
Respondents business
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if R3K20=1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
233 |
10.1% |
0.10148084 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
701 |
30.5% |
0.30531359 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
120 |
5.2% |
0.05226481 |
4 |
Private business |
1038 |
45.2% |
0.45209059 |
5 |
Private business |
136 |
5.9% |
0.05923345 |
6 |
Other: |
65 |
2.8% |
0.02831010 |
97 |
No answer |
3 |
0.1% |
0.00130662 |
98 |
Not asked |
4001 |
|
NA |
c3k21
Variable label:
|
Respondents business [Most recent available data from w01_k21, w03_r3k21]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
374 |
9.4% |
0.094325347 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1196 |
30.2% |
0.301639344 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
228 |
5.8% |
0.057503153 |
4 |
Private business |
1795 |
45.3% |
0.452711223 |
5 |
Private business |
240 |
6.1% |
0.060529634 |
6 |
Other: |
127 |
3.2% |
0.032030265 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.1% |
0.001261034 |
98 |
Not asked |
2332 |
|
NA |
w01_k25_1
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your current income?
|
Literal question:
|
Gross annual income is:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-8500000]
|
w01_k25_recode
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income [Recoded from continuous to discrete scale: w01_k25]
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:integer] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
< 150 000 |
254 |
9.5% |
0.09484690 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
387 |
14.5% |
0.14451083 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
445 |
16.6% |
0.16616878 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
524 |
19.6% |
0.19566841 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
320 |
11.9% |
0.11949216 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
181 |
6.8% |
0.06758775 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
219 |
8.2% |
0.08177745 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
90 |
3.4% |
0.03360717 |
97 |
No answer |
258 |
9.6% |
0.09634055 |
98 |
Not asked |
3619 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k25
Variable label:
|
Current income
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
< 150 000 |
396 |
10.5% |
0.10465116 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
564 |
14.9% |
0.14904863 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
667 |
17.6% |
0.17626850 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
740 |
19.6% |
0.19556025 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
515 |
13.6% |
0.13609937 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
259 |
6.8% |
0.06844609 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
310 |
8.2% |
0.08192389 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
122 |
3.2% |
0.03224101 |
97 |
No answer |
211 |
5.6% |
0.05576110 |
98 |
Not asked |
2513 |
|
NA |
c3k25
Variable label:
|
Current income [Most recent available data from w01_k25, w03_r3k25]
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your current income?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable. w01_k25 recoded to discrete scale.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
< 150 000 |
615 |
9.9% |
0.09892231 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
951 |
15.3% |
0.15296767 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
1112 |
17.9% |
0.17886440 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1264 |
20.3% |
0.20331350 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
835 |
13.4% |
0.13430915 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
440 |
7.1% |
0.07077369 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
529 |
8.5% |
0.08508927 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
212 |
3.4% |
0.03410005 |
97 |
No answer |
259 |
4.2% |
0.04165996 |
98 |
Not asked |
80 |
|
NA |
w01_k27
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Are/have you:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Never been married |
336 |
12.5% |
0.125466766 |
2 |
Married |
1497 |
55.9% |
0.558999253 |
3 |
Legally registered partner |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001867065 |
4 |
Cohabitant |
449 |
16.8% |
0.167662435 |
5 |
Divorces/separated |
180 |
6.7% |
0.067214339 |
6 |
Former cohabitant |
68 |
2.5% |
0.025392084 |
7 |
Former legally registered partner |
1 |
0% |
0.000373413 |
8 |
Widow/widower |
58 |
2.2% |
0.021657954 |
9 |
Other |
29 |
1.1% |
0.010828977 |
97 |
No answer |
55 |
2.1% |
0.020537715 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
3619 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k27
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status. Click on what is most suitable to you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Never been married |
420 |
11.7% |
0.1174496644 |
2 |
Married |
1935 |
54.1% |
0.5411073826 |
3 |
Legally registered partner |
10 |
0.3% |
0.0027964206 |
4 |
Cohabitant |
631 |
17.6% |
0.1764541387 |
5 |
Divorced/separated |
262 |
7.3% |
0.0732662192 |
6 |
Former cohabitant |
144 |
4% |
0.0402684564 |
7 |
Former legally registered partner |
3 |
0.1% |
0.0008389262 |
8 |
Widow/widower |
89 |
2.5% |
0.0248881432 |
9 |
Other: |
40 |
1.1% |
0.0111856823 |
97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.2% |
0.0117449664 |
98 |
Not asked |
2721 |
|
NA |
c3k27
Variable label:
|
Marital status [Most recent available data from w01_k27, w03_r3k27]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Marital status. Click on what is most suitable to you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable. There are minor differences in question language.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Never been married |
756 |
12.2% |
0.1216020589 |
2 |
Married |
3432 |
55.2% |
0.5520347434 |
3 |
Legally registered partner |
15 |
0.2% |
0.0024127393 |
4 |
Cohabitant |
1080 |
17.4% |
0.1737172270 |
5 |
Divorced/separated |
442 |
7.1% |
0.0710953836 |
6 |
Former cohabitant |
212 |
3.4% |
0.0341000483 |
7 |
Former legally registered partner |
4 |
0.1% |
0.0006433971 |
8 |
Widow/widower |
147 |
2.4% |
0.0236448448 |
9 |
Other: |
69 |
1.1% |
0.0110986006 |
97 |
No answer |
60 |
1% |
0.0096509571 |
98 |
Not asked |
80 |
|
NA |
w01_k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
2497 |
93.2% |
0.93241225 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
130 |
4.9% |
0.04854369 |
97 |
No answer |
51 |
1.9% |
0.01904406 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
3619 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
3327 |
93.2% |
0.93167180 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
200 |
5.6% |
0.05600672 |
97 |
No answer |
44 |
1.2% |
0.01232148 |
98 |
Not asked |
2726 |
|
NA |
c3k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship [Most recent available data from w01_k28, w03_r3k28]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable. There are minor differences in question language.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
5824 |
93.7% |
0.93678623 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
330 |
5.3% |
0.05308026 |
97 |
No answer |
63 |
1% |
0.01013350 |
98 |
Not asked |
80 |
|
NA |
w01_k29
Variable label:
|
Parents immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
2380 |
88.9% |
0.888722928 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
150 |
5.6% |
0.056011949 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
14 |
0.5% |
0.005227782 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
42 |
1.6% |
0.015683346 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
37 |
1.4% |
0.013816281 |
97 |
No answer |
55 |
2.1% |
0.020537715 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
3619 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
3201 |
89.5% |
0.895384615 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
204 |
5.7% |
0.057062937 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
21 |
0.6% |
0.005874126 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
61 |
1.7% |
0.017062937 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
45 |
1.3% |
0.012587413 |
97 |
No answer |
43 |
1.2% |
0.012027972 |
98 |
Not asked |
2722 |
|
NA |
c3k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway? [Most recent available data from w01_k29, w03_r3k29]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
5581 |
89.8% |
0.897699855 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
354 |
5.7% |
0.056940647 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
35 |
0.6% |
0.005629725 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
103 |
1.7% |
0.016567476 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
82 |
1.3% |
0.013189641 |
97 |
No answer |
62 |
1% |
0.009972656 |
98 |
Not asked |
80 |
|
NA |
w02_hp1
Variable label:
|
About health condition
|
Literal question:
|
Finally, we would like to ask you a few questions about yourself: In general, would you say your health is:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
343 |
14.3% |
0.142501039 |
2 |
Very good |
952 |
39.6% |
0.395513087 |
3 |
Good |
794 |
33% |
0.329871209 |
4 |
Somewhat good |
241 |
10% |
0.100124636 |
5 |
Poor |
62 |
2.6% |
0.025758205 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
0.6% |
0.006231824 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
3890 |
|
NA |
w03_r3hp1
Variable label:
|
Health condition
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, would you say that your health is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
730 |
20.7% |
0.20656480 |
2 |
Very good |
1383 |
39.1% |
0.39134126 |
3 |
Good |
951 |
26.9% |
0.26910017 |
4 |
Quite good |
308 |
8.7% |
0.08715337 |
5 |
Poor |
120 |
3.4% |
0.03395586 |
97 |
No answer |
42 |
1.2% |
0.01188455 |
98 |
Not asked |
2763 |
|
NA |
c3hp1
Variable label:
|
Health condition [Most recent available data from w02_hp1, w03_r3hp1]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Generally speaking, would you say that your health is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable. There are minor differences in question language.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6297] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
1073 |
18.1% |
0.180609325 |
2 |
Very good |
2335 |
39.3% |
0.393031476 |
3 |
Good |
1745 |
29.4% |
0.293721596 |
4 |
Quite good |
549 |
9.2% |
0.092408685 |
5 |
Poor |
182 |
3.1% |
0.030634573 |
97 |
No answer |
57 |
1% |
0.009594344 |
98 |
Not asked |
356 |
|
NA |