Citation
Primary investigators
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
UiB
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
UiB
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
Hege Høivik Bye
|
UiB
|
Lise Lund Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
Dag Elgesem
|
UiB
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
Anne Lise Fimreite
|
UiB
|
Arjan Hille Schakel
|
UiB
|
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø
|
NORCE
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
Soran Hajo Dahl
|
UiB
|
Ingrid Kvåle Faleide
|
UiB
|
Coordinating team
Name
|
Erla Løvseth
|
Ingrid Kvåle Faleide
|
Soran Hajo Dahl
|
Producers
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
Amund Eikrem
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
Joachim Wettergreen
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project team member
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Universe: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in seven waves:
In wave 1, 4 870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1).
In wave 3, 5 623 members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3).
In wave 8, 4 245 new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8).
In wave 11, 2 069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11).
In wave 14, 2 036 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 14).
In wave 16, 5 163 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 16).
In wave 18, 2 048 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 18).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry, while in wave 8 the gross sample amounted to 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, 14, and 18, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn. In wave 16, the gross sample was 34 000.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment. Please refer to documentation and other information from previous waves: https://nsd.no/nsddata/serier/norsk_medborgerpanel_eng.html
In wave 21, emails were sent out on 26th of May, 2021.
An e-mail with reminder was sent out three times, June 2nd, June 6th, and Juni 11th, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message. Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by e-mail.
Wave 21 ended on June 15th 2021.
Weighting
To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different strata are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent's geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset. In other words, the weights are calculated using the whole dataset. NCP has an extensive use of (randomized) sub-groups, which might alter the demographic profile of the sub-group compared to the whole dataset. If custom weights are necessary, variable columns are included in the dataset that indicates the proportion size of strata in the population.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
v-100
|
2021-07-01
|
NA
|
Initial release of round 21
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r20bk33_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r20bk33 that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r18bk21_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r18bk21 that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r17bk21_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r17bk21 that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_1_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r16k43_1 that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_2_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r16k43_2 that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16bk27_kodet
|
New variable: New version of r16bk27 that also includes coded other-statements
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r18bk21_kodet
|
Variable documentation inserted
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r17bk21_kodet
|
Variable documentation inserted
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_1_kodet
|
Variable documentation inserted
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16k43_2_kodet
|
Variable documentation inserted
|
NA
|
2021-05-12
|
r16bk27_kodet
|
Variable documentation inserted
|
NA
|
2021-02-11
|
r17oppvekstfylke
|
New variable: Aggregated variable with respondents home county at 15 years of age, based on registered municipality in r17oppvekstkom
|
NA
|
2021-02-11
|
r17oppvekstfylke
|
Variable documentation inserted
|
NA
|
2019-04-01
|
r14bk27_kodet
|
Added variable based on r14bk27.
|
NA
|
2019-03-27
|
r11bk40_recode
|
Added variable based on r11k40.
|
NA
|
2019-03-27
|
r14bk40_recode
|
Added variable based on r14k40.
|
Dataset contents
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 21 - v-100-O.sav
|
Distribution type
|
Public
|
# Cases
|
10040
|
# Variables
|
457
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r21rekruttert
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-18]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Round 1 |
1455 |
14.5% |
0.14492032 |
3 |
Round 3 |
1581 |
15.7% |
0.15747012 |
8 |
Round 8 |
1539 |
15.3% |
0.15328685 |
11 |
Round 11 |
907 |
9% |
0.09033865 |
14 |
Round 14 |
928 |
9.2% |
0.09243028 |
16 |
Round 16 |
2538 |
25.3% |
0.25278884 |
18 |
Round 18 |
1092 |
10.9% |
0.10876494 |
r21group
Variable label:
|
[Randomization of sub-groups]
|
Technical description:
|
Randomized for all respondents
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Group 1 |
1989 |
19.8% |
0.1981076 |
2 |
Group 2 |
2030 |
20.2% |
0.2021912 |
3 |
Group 3 |
1941 |
19.3% |
0.1933267 |
4 |
Group 4 |
2023 |
20.1% |
0.2014940 |
5 |
Group 5 |
2057 |
20.5% |
0.2048805 |
r21interview_start
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r21interview_end
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:9210] [Invalid:830] [Range:-]
|
r21browsertype
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r21browserversion
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r21mobil
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
Other |
5586 |
55.6% |
0.5563745 |
1 |
Mobile |
4454 |
44.4% |
0.4436255 |
r21opplosning
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r21enhetstype
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
PC |
5586 |
55.6% |
0.556374502 |
2 |
Touch |
4414 |
44% |
0.439641434 |
3 |
Generic |
40 |
0.4% |
0.003984064 |
r21advancedwifeaturesenabled
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r21getrenderingmode
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r21pk204
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if parliamentary election tomorrow
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
273 |
2.7% |
0.027191235 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
2167 |
21.6% |
0.215836653 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
662 |
6.6% |
0.065936255 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
293 |
2.9% |
0.029183267 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
964 |
9.6% |
0.096015936 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
1469 |
14.6% |
0.146314741 |
7 |
The Green Party |
523 |
5.2% |
0.052091633 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
2059 |
20.5% |
0.205079681 |
9 |
The Red Party |
581 |
5.8% |
0.057868526 |
10 |
Would not vote |
152 |
1.5% |
0.015139442 |
11 |
Would cast a blank vote |
223 |
2.2% |
0.022211155 |
12 |
Not entitled to vote |
218 |
2.2% |
0.021713147 |
13 |
Other: |
422 |
4.2% |
0.042031873 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
0.3% |
0.003386454 |
r21pk204_13_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for which party if parliamentary election tomorrow
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21tdr8a
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if municipal elections tomorrow
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
57 |
2.9% |
0.028657617 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
452 |
22.7% |
0.227249874 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
104 |
5.2% |
0.052287582 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
58 |
2.9% |
0.029160382 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
156 |
7.8% |
0.078431373 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
243 |
12.2% |
0.122171946 |
7 |
The Green Party |
146 |
7.3% |
0.073403720 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
443 |
22.3% |
0.222724987 |
9 |
The Red Party |
123 |
6.2% |
0.061840121 |
10 |
The People’s Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
11 |
0.6% |
0.005530417 |
11 |
A joint party list |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001508296 |
12 |
A local list |
33 |
1.7% |
0.016591252 |
13 |
Would not vote |
47 |
2.4% |
0.023629965 |
14 |
Would cast a blank vote |
30 |
1.5% |
0.015082956 |
15 |
Not entitled to vote |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001005530 |
16 |
Other: |
75 |
3.8% |
0.037707391 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003016591 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr8a_16_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for which party if municipal elections tomorrow
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21tdr8b
Variable label:
|
Would vote for which party if county council elections tomorrow
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
55 |
2.8% |
0.027652086 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
431 |
21.7% |
0.216691805 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
110 |
5.5% |
0.055304173 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
58 |
2.9% |
0.029160382 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
161 |
8.1% |
0.080945199 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
253 |
12.7% |
0.127199598 |
7 |
The Green Party |
140 |
7% |
0.070387129 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
393 |
19.8% |
0.197586727 |
9 |
The Red Party |
110 |
5.5% |
0.055304173 |
10 |
The People’s Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) |
13 |
0.7% |
0.006535948 |
11 |
A joint party list |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
12 |
A local list |
17 |
0.9% |
0.008547009 |
13 |
Would not vote |
59 |
3% |
0.029663147 |
14 |
Would cast a blank vote |
89 |
4.5% |
0.044746104 |
15 |
Not entitled to vote |
7 |
0.4% |
0.003519356 |
16 |
Other: |
78 |
3.9% |
0.039215686 |
97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.8% |
0.007541478 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr8b_16_other
Variable label:
|
Other: Would vote for which party if county council elections tomorrow
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
|
Literal question:
|
Other:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21pk6_1
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Christian Democrats
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1753 |
17.5% |
0.174601594 |
2 |
Really dislike |
2302 |
22.9% |
0.229282869 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2474 |
24.6% |
0.246414343 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1734 |
17.3% |
0.172709163 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1197 |
11.9% |
0.119223108 |
6 |
Really like |
369 |
3.7% |
0.036752988 |
7 |
Intensely like |
87 |
0.9% |
0.008665339 |
97 |
Not answered |
124 |
1.2% |
0.012350598 |
r21pk6_2
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Conservative Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
628 |
6.3% |
0.06254980 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1495 |
14.9% |
0.14890438 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2005 |
20% |
0.19970120 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1223 |
12.2% |
0.12181275 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2204 |
22% |
0.21952191 |
6 |
Really like |
1844 |
18.4% |
0.18366534 |
7 |
Intensely like |
516 |
5.1% |
0.05139442 |
97 |
Not answered |
125 |
1.2% |
0.01245020 |
r21pk6_3
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Progress Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
3263 |
32.5% |
0.32500000 |
2 |
Really dislike |
2098 |
20.9% |
0.20896414 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1506 |
15% |
0.15000000 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
890 |
8.9% |
0.08864542 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1267 |
12.6% |
0.12619522 |
6 |
Really like |
653 |
6.5% |
0.06503984 |
7 |
Intensely like |
240 |
2.4% |
0.02390438 |
97 |
Not answered |
123 |
1.2% |
0.01225100 |
r21pk6_4
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1043 |
10.4% |
0.103884462 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1622 |
16.2% |
0.161553785 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
2260 |
22.5% |
0.225099602 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2498 |
24.9% |
0.248804781 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1872 |
18.6% |
0.186454183 |
6 |
Really like |
507 |
5% |
0.050498008 |
7 |
Intensely like |
78 |
0.8% |
0.007768924 |
97 |
Not answered |
160 |
1.6% |
0.015936255 |
r21pk6_5
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1269 |
12.6% |
0.12639442 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1612 |
16.1% |
0.16055777 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1737 |
17.3% |
0.17300797 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1624 |
16.2% |
0.16175299 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1878 |
18.7% |
0.18705179 |
6 |
Really like |
1364 |
13.6% |
0.13585657 |
7 |
Intensely like |
425 |
4.2% |
0.04233068 |
97 |
Not answered |
131 |
1.3% |
0.01304781 |
r21pk6_6
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
542 |
5.4% |
0.05398406 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1074 |
10.7% |
0.10697211 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1803 |
18% |
0.17958167 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2082 |
20.7% |
0.20737052 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2563 |
25.5% |
0.25527888 |
6 |
Really like |
1472 |
14.7% |
0.14661355 |
7 |
Intensely like |
374 |
3.7% |
0.03725100 |
97 |
Not answered |
130 |
1.3% |
0.01294821 |
r21pk6_7
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
2351 |
23.4% |
0.23416335 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1629 |
16.2% |
0.16225100 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1604 |
16% |
0.15976096 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1285 |
12.8% |
0.12798805 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1878 |
18.7% |
0.18705179 |
6 |
Really like |
927 |
9.2% |
0.09233068 |
7 |
Intensely like |
249 |
2.5% |
0.02480080 |
97 |
Not answered |
117 |
1.2% |
0.01165339 |
r21pk6_8
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
363 |
3.6% |
0.03615538 |
2 |
Really dislike |
785 |
7.8% |
0.07818725 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1796 |
17.9% |
0.17888446 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1599 |
15.9% |
0.15926295 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2947 |
29.4% |
0.29352590 |
6 |
Really like |
2033 |
20.2% |
0.20249004 |
7 |
Intensely like |
389 |
3.9% |
0.03874502 |
97 |
Not answered |
128 |
1.3% |
0.01274900 |
r21pk6_9
Variable label:
|
Like or dislike: The Red Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
2148 |
21.4% |
0.21394422 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1671 |
16.6% |
0.16643426 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1481 |
14.8% |
0.14750996 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1573 |
15.7% |
0.15667331 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1804 |
18% |
0.17968127 |
6 |
Really like |
875 |
8.7% |
0.08715139 |
7 |
Intensely like |
335 |
3.3% |
0.03336653 |
97 |
Not answered |
153 |
1.5% |
0.01523904 |
r21meme1_1
Variable label:
|
Identify as: Norwegian
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
Literal question:
|
Norwegian
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick multiple boxes.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21meme1_2
Variable label:
|
Identify as: Sami
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
Literal question:
|
Sami
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick multiple boxes.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21meme1_3
Variable label:
|
Identify as: Kven/Norwegian Finnish
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
Literal question:
|
Kven/Norwegian Finnish
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick multiple boxes.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21meme1_4
Variable label:
|
Identify as: Forest Finn
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
Literal question:
|
Forest Finn
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick multiple boxes.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21meme1_5
Variable label:
|
Identify as: Other
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick multiple boxes.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21meme1_5_other
Variable label:
|
Identify as: Other
|
Pre-question text:
|
People have different ethnic origins. What do you identify as?
|
Literal question:
|
Other
|
Post-question:
|
You can tick multiple boxes.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi - Other] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21meme2
Variable label:
|
Open: What do you think of when you hear/read the word “Norwegianisation”?
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think of when you hear or read the word “Norwegianisation”?
|
Post-question:
|
You can be brief or write at length. We are looking for all types of answers.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21meme3
Variable label:
|
Aware that the Storting has appointed a commission to investigate the Norwegianisation policy?
|
Literal question:
|
Are you aware that the Storting (the Norwegian parliament) has appointed a special truth and reconciliation commission to investigate the Norwegianisation policy that targeted Sami, Kven/Norwegian Finn, and Forest Finn people?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
552 |
27.3% |
0.272862086 |
2 |
No |
1462 |
72.3% |
0.722689076 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.4% |
0.004448838 |
98 |
Not asked |
8017 |
|
NA |
r21meme4
Variable label:
|
How important to survey the impact of the Norwegianisation policy on Sami/Kven language/culture?
|
Pre-question text:
|
In 2018, the Storting appointed the Norwegian Truth and Reconciliation Commission to survey the impact of the Norwegianisation policy on Sami, Kven/Norwegian Finn, and Forest Finn people’s use and practice of their own language, culture, and traditional occupations.
|
Literal question:
|
How important do you think such a commission is?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
670 |
33.1% |
0.331191300 |
2 |
Quite important |
768 |
38% |
0.379634207 |
3 |
Not very important |
333 |
16.5% |
0.164607019 |
4 |
Not important |
107 |
5.3% |
0.052891745 |
5 |
Don’t know |
140 |
6.9% |
0.069204152 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002471577 |
98 |
Not asked |
8017 |
|
NA |
r21meme5
Variable label:
|
To what extent a truth and reconciliation commission reconciles minority groups and the State
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think that a truth and reconciliation commission in Norway can contribute to reconciliation between minority groups (Sami, Kven/Norwegian Finn, and Forest Finn people) and the State?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
54 |
2.7% |
0.026693030 |
2 |
To a great extent |
322 |
15.9% |
0.159169550 |
3 |
To some extent |
1012 |
50% |
0.500247158 |
4 |
To a small extent |
333 |
16.5% |
0.164607019 |
5 |
Not at all |
94 |
4.6% |
0.046465645 |
6 |
Don’t know |
198 |
9.8% |
0.097874444 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004943154 |
98 |
Not asked |
8017 |
|
NA |
r21meme6
Variable label:
|
To what extent a truth and reconciliation commission reconciles minority and majority groups
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you believe truth and reconciliation commissions have an impact on reconciliation between different minority and majority groups?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
43 |
2.1% |
0.021255561 |
2 |
To a great extent |
282 |
13.9% |
0.139396935 |
3 |
To some extent |
1000 |
49.4% |
0.494315373 |
4 |
To a small extent |
396 |
19.6% |
0.195748888 |
5 |
Not at all |
98 |
4.8% |
0.048442907 |
6 |
Don’t know |
189 |
9.3% |
0.093425606 |
97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.7% |
0.007414731 |
98 |
Not asked |
8017 |
|
NA |
r21meme7_1
Variable label:
|
Most people know about the Norwegianisation policy that targeted: Sami people
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do you think most people know about the State’s active Norwegianisation policy that targeted these groups and continued well into the second half of the 1900s?
|
Literal question:
|
Sami people
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
130 |
6.4% |
0.064260999 |
2 |
Well |
594 |
29.4% |
0.293623332 |
3 |
Not very well |
900 |
44.5% |
0.444883836 |
4 |
Not at all |
194 |
9.6% |
0.095897182 |
5 |
Don't know |
194 |
9.6% |
0.095897182 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.005437469 |
98 |
Not asked |
8017 |
|
NA |
r21meme7_2
Variable label:
|
Most people know about the Norwegianisation policy that targeted: Kven/Norwegian Finns
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do you think most people know about the State’s active Norwegianisation policy that targeted these groups and continued well into the second half of the 1900s?
|
Literal question:
|
Kven/Norwegian Finns
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
36 |
1.8% |
0.01779535 |
2 |
Well |
166 |
8.2% |
0.08205635 |
3 |
Not very well |
845 |
41.8% |
0.41769649 |
4 |
Not at all |
694 |
34.3% |
0.34305487 |
5 |
Don't know |
246 |
12.2% |
0.12160158 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
1.8% |
0.01779535 |
98 |
Not asked |
8017 |
|
NA |
r21meme7_3
Variable label:
|
Most people know about the Norwegianisation policy that targeted: Forest Finns
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do you think most people know about the State’s active Norwegianisation policy that targeted these groups and continued well into the second half of the 1900s?
|
Literal question:
|
Forest Finns
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
30 |
1.5% |
0.01482946 |
2 |
Well |
106 |
5.2% |
0.05239743 |
3 |
Not very well |
732 |
36.2% |
0.36183885 |
4 |
Not at all |
857 |
42.4% |
0.42362827 |
5 |
Don't know |
263 |
13% |
0.13000494 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.7% |
0.01730104 |
98 |
Not asked |
8017 |
|
NA |
r21meme8b_ran
Variable label:
|
NA
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2056] [Invalid:7984] [Range:3-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
3 |
construction of a new mosque |
691 |
33.6% |
0.3360895 |
4 |
that a centrally located chuch is conferted to a mosque |
693 |
33.7% |
0.3370623 |
5 |
that a centrally located existing building is converted to a mosque |
672 |
32.7% |
0.3268482 |
Sysmiss |
|
7984 |
|
NA |
r21meme8b
Variable label:
|
In favour of/against permitting [r21meme8b_ran]?
|
Pre-question text:
|
In some Norwegian municipalities there have been debates about permitting [r21meme8b_ran].
|
Literal question:
|
Are you in favour of or against allowing this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely in favour |
269 |
13.1% |
0.130772970 |
2 |
Somewhat in favour |
598 |
29.1% |
0.290714633 |
3 |
Somewhat against |
502 |
24.4% |
0.244044725 |
4 |
Completely against |
673 |
32.7% |
0.327175498 |
97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.7% |
0.007292173 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme11_ran1
Variable label:
|
NA
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2056] [Invalid:7984] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[blank] |
508 |
24.7% |
0.2470817 |
2 |
because it is important that all women learn to swim |
538 |
26.2% |
0.2616732 |
3 |
because it makes women feel safer |
528 |
25.7% |
0.2568093 |
4 |
because this enables Muslim women to adhere to conservative rules in Islam |
482 |
23.4% |
0.2344358 |
Sysmiss |
|
7984 |
|
NA |
r21meme11
Variable label:
|
Statment: Municipal swimming pools only open to women at certain times
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some people think that municipal swimming pools should only be open to women at certain times [not mentioned/because it is important that all women learn to swim/because it makes women feel safer/because this enables Muslim women to adhere to conservative rules in Islam].
|
Literal question:
|
Do you support or do you not support municipal swimming pools only being open to women at certain times?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely support |
80 |
3.9% |
0.038891590 |
2 |
Support |
556 |
27% |
0.270296548 |
3 |
Do not support |
757 |
36.8% |
0.368011667 |
4 |
Do not support at all |
644 |
31.3% |
0.313077297 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1% |
0.009722897 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme10_ran1
Variable label:
|
NA
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2056] [Invalid:7984] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
has been appointed to the council by the mayor |
673 |
32.7% |
0.3273346 |
2 |
has been elected to the council by the members of the largest Muslim
organisation in the municipality |
671 |
32.6% |
0.3263619 |
3 |
has been appointed to the council by an imam (religious leader) from the largest
mosque in the municipality |
712 |
34.6% |
0.3463035 |
Sysmiss |
|
7984 |
|
NA |
r21meme10_ran2
Variable label:
|
NA
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2056] [Invalid:7984] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
will represent the views of ordinary Muslims on the council |
1031 |
50.1% |
0.5014591 |
2 |
will contribute to improving the municipality’s decisions in such cases |
1025 |
49.9% |
0.4985409 |
Sysmiss |
|
7984 |
|
NA |
r21meme10
Variable label:
|
Confident/doubt that Muslim representative in the municipality [represents Muslims/improves decisions]
|
Pre-question text:
|
The leaders of a municipality want to appoint a council that will be consulted on issues where people with different backgrounds usually have different opinions, e.g. 17th May celebrations, 8th March commemorations, or Pride events. A Muslim representative [has been appointed to the council by the mayor/has been elected to the council by the members of the largest Muslim organisation in the municipality/has been appointed to the council by an imam (religious leader) from the largest mosque in the municipality].
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent are you confident or do you doubt that the Muslim representative [will represent the views of ordinary Muslims on the council/will contribute to improving the municipality’s decisions in such cases]?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely confident |
473 |
23% |
0.22994652 |
2 |
Somewhat confident |
892 |
43.4% |
0.43364123 |
3 |
Doubt to some extent |
468 |
22.8% |
0.22751580 |
4 |
Doubt completely |
202 |
9.8% |
0.09820126 |
97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.1% |
0.01069519 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21kmopen1
Variable label:
|
Open: What do you think when you hear or read the term “climate change”?
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read the term “climate change”?
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All responses are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you would prefer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21kmopen2_ran
Variable label:
|
Randomized text piping for r21kmopen2
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 1,3,4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5935] [Invalid:4105] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
As far as climate change is concerned, what do you think should be done? |
1904 |
32.1% |
0.3208088 |
2 |
Norway has set ambitious targets for climate cuts in the coming years. What do
you think could be obstacles to achieving the emissions targets? |
2024 |
34.1% |
0.3410278 |
3 |
Norway has set ambitious targets for climate cuts in the coming years. What do
you think could be opportunities for achieving these emissions targets? |
2007 |
33.8% |
0.3381634 |
Sysmiss |
|
4105 |
|
NA |
r21kmopen2
Variable label:
|
Open: [Obstacles/opportunities] for achieving emissions targets
|
Literal question:
|
[As far as climate change is concerned, what do you think should be done?/Norway has set ambitious targets for climate cuts in the coming years. What do you think could be obstacles to achieving the emissions targets?/Norway has set ambitious targets for climate cuts in the coming years. What do you think could be opportunities for achieving these emissions targets?]
|
Post-question:
|
Please write down the first thing you think of. All responses are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you would prefer.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1,3]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21tdr24
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Allocate more vaccine doses to areas that have had high infection rates over time
|
Pre-question text:
|
There has been a debate in Norway about whether one should allocate more vaccine doses to areas with high infection rates over time. This means that municipalities with low infection rates would get fewer vaccine doses.
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that one should allocate more vaccine doses to areas that have had high infection rates over time?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
298 |
21.4% |
0.213773314 |
2 |
Agree |
409 |
29.3% |
0.293400287 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
347 |
24.9% |
0.248923960 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
106 |
7.6% |
0.076040172 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
71 |
5.1% |
0.050932568 |
6 |
Disagree |
95 |
6.8% |
0.068149211 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
62 |
4.4% |
0.044476327 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004304161 |
98 |
Not asked |
8646 |
|
NA |
r21tdr25_1
Variable label:
|
How confident that: rural voters make good decisions
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale of 0 to 10, how confident are you…
|
Literal question:
|
that rural voters make good decisions?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 – Not at all confident |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005738881 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005021521 |
2 |
2 |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008608321 |
3 |
3 |
48 |
3.4% |
0.034433286 |
4 |
4 |
79 |
5.7% |
0.056671449 |
5 |
5 |
221 |
15.9% |
0.158536585 |
6 |
6 |
176 |
12.6% |
0.126255380 |
7 |
7 |
264 |
18.9% |
0.189383070 |
8 |
8 |
261 |
18.7% |
0.187230990 |
9 |
9 |
98 |
7% |
0.070301291 |
10 |
10 – Completely confident |
206 |
14.8% |
0.147776184 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1% |
0.010043042 |
98 |
Not asked |
8646 |
|
NA |
r21tdr25_2
Variable label:
|
How confident that: urban voters make good decisions
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale of 0 to 10, how confident are you…
|
Literal question:
|
that urban voters make good decisions?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 – Not at all confident |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008608321 |
1 |
1 |
9 |
0.6% |
0.006456241 |
2 |
2 |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009325681 |
3 |
3 |
48 |
3.4% |
0.034433286 |
4 |
4 |
78 |
5.6% |
0.055954089 |
5 |
5 |
299 |
21.4% |
0.214490674 |
6 |
6 |
212 |
15.2% |
0.152080344 |
7 |
7 |
261 |
18.7% |
0.187230990 |
8 |
8 |
230 |
16.5% |
0.164992826 |
9 |
9 |
69 |
4.9% |
0.049497848 |
10 |
10 – Completely confident |
149 |
10.7% |
0.106886657 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1% |
0.010043042 |
98 |
Not asked |
8646 |
|
NA |
r21tdr25_3
Variable label:
|
How confident that: elected rural politicians make good decisions
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale of 0 to 10, how confident are you…
|
Literal question:
|
that elected rural politicians make good decisions?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 – Not at all confident |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009325681 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005021521 |
2 |
2 |
28 |
2% |
0.020086083 |
3 |
3 |
58 |
4.2% |
0.041606887 |
4 |
4 |
83 |
6% |
0.059540890 |
5 |
5 |
268 |
19.2% |
0.192252511 |
6 |
6 |
204 |
14.6% |
0.146341463 |
7 |
7 |
274 |
19.7% |
0.196556671 |
8 |
8 |
247 |
17.7% |
0.177187948 |
9 |
9 |
88 |
6.3% |
0.063127690 |
10 |
10 – Completely confident |
111 |
8% |
0.079626973 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.9% |
0.009325681 |
98 |
Not asked |
8646 |
|
NA |
r21tdr25_4
Variable label:
|
How confident that: elected urban politicians make good decisions
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale of 0 to 10, how confident are you…
|
Literal question:
|
that elected urban politicians make good decisions?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 – Not at all confident |
18 |
1.3% |
0.012912482 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
0.8% |
0.007890961 |
2 |
2 |
34 |
2.4% |
0.024390244 |
3 |
3 |
65 |
4.7% |
0.046628407 |
4 |
4 |
101 |
7.2% |
0.072453372 |
5 |
5 |
297 |
21.3% |
0.213055954 |
6 |
6 |
216 |
15.5% |
0.154949785 |
7 |
7 |
264 |
18.9% |
0.189383070 |
8 |
8 |
220 |
15.8% |
0.157819225 |
9 |
9 |
66 |
4.7% |
0.047345768 |
10 |
10 – Completely confident |
88 |
6.3% |
0.063127690 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1% |
0.010043042 |
98 |
Not asked |
8646 |
|
NA |
r19identitet6_ran
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19identitet6]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r19group = 3]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19identitet6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1391] [Invalid:8649] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
in cities |
696 |
50% |
0.5003595 |
2 |
in villages |
695 |
50% |
0.4996405 |
Sysmiss |
|
8649 |
|
NA |
r19identitet6_ran_contra
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Opposite value of r19identitet6_ran]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r19group = 3]
[Experiment. Opposite value of r19identitet6_ran]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1391] [Invalid:8649] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
in cities |
695 |
50% |
0.4996405 |
2 |
in villages |
696 |
50% |
0.5003595 |
Sysmiss |
|
8649 |
|
NA |
r21tdr26_1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: People [in cities/in villages] don’t appreciate life [in villages/in cities]
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
People [in cities/in villages] don’t appreciate life [in villages/in cities].
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3 & r19identitet6_ran is answered]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
28 |
2% |
0.02012940 |
2 |
Agree |
150 |
10.8% |
0.10783609 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
440 |
31.6% |
0.31631919 |
4 |
Disagree somewhat |
295 |
21.2% |
0.21207764 |
5 |
Disagree |
395 |
28.4% |
0.28396837 |
6 |
Strongly disagree |
62 |
4.5% |
0.04457225 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.5% |
0.01509705 |
98 |
Not asked |
8649 |
|
NA |
r21tdr26_2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: People [in cities/in villages] get more than their fair share of public resources
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
People [in cities/in villages] get more than their fair share of public resources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3 & r19identitet6_ran is answered]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
33 |
2.4% |
0.02372394 |
2 |
Agree |
152 |
10.9% |
0.10927390 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
311 |
22.4% |
0.22358016 |
4 |
Disagree somewhat |
293 |
21.1% |
0.21063983 |
5 |
Disagree |
428 |
30.8% |
0.30769231 |
6 |
Strongly disagree |
151 |
10.9% |
0.10855500 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.7% |
0.01653487 |
98 |
Not asked |
8649 |
|
NA |
r21tdr26_3
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: People [in cities/in villages] think more about themselves than the nation as a whole
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
People [in cities/in villages] think more about themselves than what is best for the nation as a whole.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3 & r19identitet6_ran is answered]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
40 |
2.9% |
0.02875629 |
2 |
Agree |
156 |
11.2% |
0.11214953 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
339 |
24.4% |
0.24370956 |
4 |
Disagree somewhat |
271 |
19.5% |
0.19482387 |
5 |
Disagree |
397 |
28.5% |
0.28540618 |
6 |
Strongly disagree |
167 |
12% |
0.12005751 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.5% |
0.01509705 |
98 |
Not asked |
8649 |
|
NA |
r19identitet7_ran
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19identitet7]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r19group = 3]
[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19identitet7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1391] [Invalid:8649] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
in Oslo |
693 |
49.8% |
0.4982027 |
2 |
outside Oslo |
698 |
50.2% |
0.5017973 |
Sysmiss |
|
8649 |
|
NA |
r19identitet7_ran_contra
Variable label:
|
[Experiment. Opposite value of r19identitet7_ran]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r19group = 3]
[Experiment. Opposite value of r19identitet7_ran]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1391] [Invalid:8649] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
in Oslo |
698 |
50.2% |
0.5017973 |
2 |
outside Oslo |
693 |
49.8% |
0.4982027 |
Sysmiss |
|
8649 |
|
NA |
r21tdr27_1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: People [in Oslo/outside Oslo] do not appreciate life [outside Oslo/in Oslo]
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
People [in Oslo/outside Oslo] do not appreciate life [outside Oslo/in Oslo].
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3 & r19identitet7_ran is answered]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
45 |
3.2% |
0.03235083 |
2 |
Agree |
136 |
9.8% |
0.09777139 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
468 |
33.6% |
0.33644860 |
4 |
Disagree somewhat |
328 |
23.6% |
0.23580158 |
5 |
Disagree |
339 |
24.4% |
0.24370956 |
6 |
Strongly disagree |
55 |
4% |
0.03953990 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.4% |
0.01437815 |
98 |
Not asked |
8649 |
|
NA |
r21tdr27_2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: People [in Oslo/outside Oslo] get more than their fair share of public resources
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
People [in Oslo/outside Oslo] get more than their fair share of public resources.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3 & r19identitet7_ran is answered]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
51 |
3.7% |
0.03666427 |
2 |
Agree |
142 |
10.2% |
0.10208483 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
280 |
20.1% |
0.20129403 |
4 |
Disagree somewhat |
345 |
24.8% |
0.24802301 |
5 |
Disagree |
410 |
29.5% |
0.29475198 |
6 |
Strongly disagree |
141 |
10.1% |
0.10136592 |
97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.6% |
0.01581596 |
98 |
Not asked |
8649 |
|
NA |
r21tdr27_3
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: People [in Oslo/outside Oslo] think more about themselves than the nation as a whole
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
People [in Oslo/outside Oslo] think more about themselves than what is best for the nation as a whole.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3 & r19identitet7_ran is answered]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
57 |
4.1% |
0.04097771 |
2 |
Agree |
142 |
10.2% |
0.10208483 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
363 |
26.1% |
0.26096334 |
4 |
Disagree somewhat |
296 |
21.3% |
0.21279655 |
5 |
Disagree |
374 |
26.9% |
0.26887132 |
6 |
Strongly disagree |
138 |
9.9% |
0.09920920 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.5% |
0.01509705 |
98 |
Not asked |
8649 |
|
NA |
r21tdr28_1
Variable label:
|
How confident that: voters from Oslo make good decisions
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale of 0 to 10, how confident are you…
|
Literal question:
|
that voters from Oslo make good decisions?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 – Not at all confident |
37 |
2.7% |
0.02654232 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
1.4% |
0.01434720 |
2 |
2 |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02295552 |
3 |
3 |
99 |
7.1% |
0.07101865 |
4 |
4 |
127 |
9.1% |
0.09110473 |
5 |
5 |
305 |
21.9% |
0.21879484 |
6 |
6 |
191 |
13.7% |
0.13701578 |
7 |
7 |
239 |
17.1% |
0.17144907 |
8 |
8 |
186 |
13.3% |
0.13342898 |
9 |
9 |
58 |
4.2% |
0.04160689 |
10 |
10 – Completely confident |
82 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
97 |
Not answered |
18 |
1.3% |
0.01291248 |
98 |
Not asked |
8646 |
|
NA |
r21tdr28_2
Variable label:
|
How confident that: voters from your region make good decisions
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale of 0 to 10, how confident are you…
|
Literal question:
|
that voters from your region make good decisions?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 – Not at all confident |
10 |
0.7% |
0.007173601 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003586801 |
2 |
2 |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008608321 |
3 |
3 |
43 |
3.1% |
0.030846485 |
4 |
4 |
83 |
6% |
0.059540890 |
5 |
5 |
281 |
20.2% |
0.201578192 |
6 |
6 |
232 |
16.6% |
0.166427547 |
7 |
7 |
285 |
20.4% |
0.204447633 |
8 |
8 |
241 |
17.3% |
0.172883788 |
9 |
9 |
82 |
5.9% |
0.058823529 |
10 |
10 – Completely confident |
100 |
7.2% |
0.071736011 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.4% |
0.014347202 |
98 |
Not asked |
8646 |
|
NA |
r21tdr28_3
Variable label:
|
How confident that: elected politicians from Oslo make good decisions
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale of 0 to 10, how confident are you…
|
Literal question:
|
that elected politicians from Oslo make good decisions?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 – Not at all confident |
38 |
2.7% |
0.02725968 |
1 |
1 |
30 |
2.2% |
0.02152080 |
2 |
2 |
51 |
3.7% |
0.03658537 |
3 |
3 |
110 |
7.9% |
0.07890961 |
4 |
4 |
124 |
8.9% |
0.08895265 |
5 |
5 |
291 |
20.9% |
0.20875179 |
6 |
6 |
188 |
13.5% |
0.13486370 |
7 |
7 |
251 |
18% |
0.18005739 |
8 |
8 |
183 |
13.1% |
0.13127690 |
9 |
9 |
48 |
3.4% |
0.03443329 |
10 |
10 – Completely confident |
63 |
4.5% |
0.04519369 |
97 |
Not answered |
17 |
1.2% |
0.01219512 |
98 |
Not asked |
8646 |
|
NA |
r21tdr28_4
Variable label:
|
How confident that: elected politicians from your region good decisions
|
Pre-question text:
|
On a scale of 0 to 10, how confident are you…
|
Literal question:
|
that elected politicians from your region good decisions?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 – Not at all confident |
14 |
1% |
0.010043042 |
1 |
1 |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008608321 |
2 |
2 |
22 |
1.6% |
0.015781923 |
3 |
3 |
66 |
4.7% |
0.047345768 |
4 |
4 |
96 |
6.9% |
0.068866571 |
5 |
5 |
272 |
19.5% |
0.195121951 |
6 |
6 |
219 |
15.7% |
0.157101865 |
7 |
7 |
309 |
22.2% |
0.221664275 |
8 |
8 |
222 |
15.9% |
0.159253945 |
9 |
9 |
74 |
5.3% |
0.053084648 |
10 |
10 – Completely confident |
69 |
4.9% |
0.049497848 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.4% |
0.013629842 |
98 |
Not asked |
8646 |
|
NA |
r21tdr29_1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: People in rural areas have too much say in Norwegian politics
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
People in rural areas have too much say in Norwegian politics.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
16 |
1.1% |
0.01147776 |
2 |
Agree |
78 |
5.6% |
0.05595409 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
210 |
15.1% |
0.15064562 |
4 |
Disagree somewhat |
347 |
24.9% |
0.24892396 |
5 |
Disagree |
547 |
39.2% |
0.39239598 |
6 |
Strongly disagree |
177 |
12.7% |
0.12697274 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1.4% |
0.01362984 |
98 |
Not asked |
8646 |
|
NA |
r21tdr29_2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: People in urban areas have too much say in Norwegian politics
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
People in urban areas have too much say in Norwegian politics.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
46 |
3.3% |
0.03299857 |
2 |
Agree |
162 |
11.6% |
0.11621234 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
363 |
26% |
0.26040172 |
4 |
Disagree somewhat |
397 |
28.5% |
0.28479197 |
5 |
Disagree |
342 |
24.5% |
0.24533716 |
6 |
Strongly disagree |
62 |
4.4% |
0.04447633 |
97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.6% |
0.01578192 |
98 |
Not asked |
8646 |
|
NA |
r21tdr30_1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: People in Oslo have too much say in Norwegian politics
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
People in Oslo have too much say in Norwegian politics.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
90 |
6.5% |
0.06456241 |
2 |
Agree |
209 |
15% |
0.14992826 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
438 |
31.4% |
0.31420373 |
4 |
Disagree somewhat |
307 |
22% |
0.22022956 |
5 |
Disagree |
267 |
19.2% |
0.19153515 |
6 |
Strongly disagree |
47 |
3.4% |
0.03371593 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
2.6% |
0.02582496 |
98 |
Not asked |
8646 |
|
NA |
r21tdr30_2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: People outside Oslo have too much say in Norwegian politics
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
|
Literal question:
|
People outside Oslo have too much say in Norwegian politics.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r19group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
16 |
1.1% |
0.01147776 |
2 |
Agree |
42 |
3% |
0.03012912 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
198 |
14.2% |
0.14203730 |
4 |
Disagree somewhat |
551 |
39.5% |
0.39526542 |
5 |
Disagree |
461 |
33.1% |
0.33070301 |
6 |
Strongly disagree |
92 |
6.6% |
0.06599713 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
2.4% |
0.02439024 |
98 |
Not asked |
8646 |
|
NA |
r21_psykpr1
Variable label:
|
How high do you consider the risk to become infected by the coronavirus?
|
Literal question:
|
How high do you consider the risk that during the outbreak you will become infected by the coronavirus?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very low |
751 |
38% |
0.3802531646 |
2 |
Somewhat low |
667 |
33.8% |
0.3377215190 |
3 |
Medium |
432 |
21.9% |
0.2187341772 |
4 |
Somewhat high |
97 |
4.9% |
0.0491139241 |
5 |
Very high |
27 |
1.4% |
0.0136708861 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0005063291 |
98 |
Not asked |
8065 |
|
NA |
r21_covid_plager_1
Variable label:
|
Experienced to feel, during the Covid-19 pandemic: Scared/anxious
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of various ailments. To what extent have you experienced any of this during the Covid-19 pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
Feeling scared or anxious
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21_covid_plager_2
Variable label:
|
Experienced to feel, during the Covid-19 pandemic: Nervous, inner turmoil
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of various ailments. To what extent have you experienced any of this during the Covid-19 pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
Nervous, inner turmoil
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21_covid_plager_3
Variable label:
|
Experienced to feel, during the Covid-19 pandemic: Depressed, low (sad)
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of various ailments. To what extent have you experienced any of this during the Covid-19 pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
Feeling depressed, low (sad)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21_covid_plager_4
Variable label:
|
Experienced to feel, during the Covid-19 pandemic: Worrying too much
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of various ailments. To what extent have you experienced any of this during the Covid-19 pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
Worrying too much
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21_covid_plager_5
Variable label:
|
Experienced to feel, during the Covid-19 pandemic: Hopelessness about the future
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below you will find a list of various ailments. To what extent have you experienced any of this during the Covid-19 pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
Feelings of hopelessness about the future
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21covid1
Variable label:
|
Are you or have you been infected with the coronavirus?
|
Literal question:
|
Are you or have you been infected with the coronavirus?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21covid2
Variable label:
|
Have you been unsure if you may be infected with the coronavirus?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you at any point been unsure if you may be infected with the coronavirus?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21covid1 = 3 & r20group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21covid3
Variable label:
|
Have you been tested for possible Covid-19 infection or contacted a doctor due to suspicion?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you been tested for possible Covid-19 infection or contacted a doctor because you suspected you might be infected?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21covid3_1_other
Variable label:
|
How many times: Tested for/contacted doctor due to possible Covid-19 infection?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you been tested for possible Covid-19 infection or contacted a doctor because you suspected you might be infected?
|
Literal question:
|
times
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21covid4_1
Variable label:
|
Have you during the pandemic been in: Isolation
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you been in quarantine or isolation during the pandemic?
Explanation of the different terms:
Isolation means staying at home or another appropriate place all of the time and not going out, with the exception of your own garden or a private outside area, that you must stay at home at all times (or another appropriate place) and are only allowed to be in your own garden or outside area.
Quarantine means staying at home or another appropriate place and avoiding anywhere you cannot maintain your distance from others, that you must stay at home (or another appropriate place) and must avoid anywhere you cannot maintain your distance from others.
Temporary quarantine is a temporary period where you stay at home while waiting for the test results of a close contact who has possibly been infected, when you must stay at home while waiting for the test results of a close contact who may possibly have been infected.
|
Literal question:
|
Isolation (imposed by the health authorities)
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21covid4_2
Variable label:
|
Have you during the pandemic been in: Voluntary isolation
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you been in quarantine or isolation during the pandemic?
Explanation of the different terms:
Isolation means staying at home or another appropriate place all of the time and not going out, with the exception of your own garden or a private outside area, that you must stay at home at all times (or another appropriate place) and are only allowed to be in your own garden or outside area.
Quarantine means staying at home or another appropriate place and avoiding anywhere you cannot maintain your distance from others, that you must stay at home (or another appropriate place) and must avoid anywhere you cannot maintain your distance from others.
Temporary quarantine is a temporary period where you stay at home while waiting for the test results of a close contact who has possibly been infected, when you must stay at home while waiting for the test results of a close contact who may possibly have been infected.
|
Literal question:
|
Voluntary isolation
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21covid4_3
Variable label:
|
Have you during the pandemic been in: Quarantine/temporary quarantine
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you been in quarantine or isolation during the pandemic?
Explanation of the different terms:
Isolation means staying at home or another appropriate place all of the time and not going out, with the exception of your own garden or a private outside area, that you must stay at home at all times (or another appropriate place) and are only allowed to be in your own garden or outside area.
Quarantine means staying at home or another appropriate place and avoiding anywhere you cannot maintain your distance from others, that you must stay at home (or another appropriate place) and must avoid anywhere you cannot maintain your distance from others.
Temporary quarantine is a temporary period where you stay at home while waiting for the test results of a close contact who has possibly been infected, when you must stay at home while waiting for the test results of a close contact who may possibly have been infected.
|
Literal question:
|
Quarantine or temporary quarantine (imposed by the health authorities)
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21covid4_4
Variable label:
|
Have you during the pandemic been in: Voluntary/temporary quarantine
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you been in quarantine or isolation during the pandemic?
Explanation of the different terms:
Isolation means staying at home or another appropriate place all of the time and not going out, with the exception of your own garden or a private outside area, that you must stay at home at all times (or another appropriate place) and are only allowed to be in your own garden or outside area.
Quarantine means staying at home or another appropriate place and avoiding anywhere you cannot maintain your distance from others, that you must stay at home (or another appropriate place) and must avoid anywhere you cannot maintain your distance from others.
Temporary quarantine is a temporary period where you stay at home while waiting for the test results of a close contact who has possibly been infected, when you must stay at home while waiting for the test results of a close contact who may possibly have been infected.
|
Literal question:
|
Voluntary quarantine or temporary quarantine
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21covid4_5
Variable label:
|
Have you during the pandemic been in: quarantine/isolation
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you been in quarantine or isolation during the pandemic?
Explanation of the different terms:
Isolation means staying at home or another appropriate place all of the time and not going out, with the exception of your own garden or a private outside area, that you must stay at home at all times (or another appropriate place) and are only allowed to be in your own garden or outside area.
Quarantine means staying at home or another appropriate place and avoiding anywhere you cannot maintain your distance from others, that you must stay at home (or another appropriate place) and must avoid anywhere you cannot maintain your distance from others.
Temporary quarantine is a temporary period where you stay at home while waiting for the test results of a close contact who has possibly been infected, when you must stay at home while waiting for the test results of a close contact who may possibly have been infected.
|
Literal question:
|
No, I have not been in quarantine or isolation
|
Post-question:
|
Tick all that are relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21cov_psykac1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Do my best to follow the health authorities’ advice to limit the risk of infection
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
I do my best to follow the health authorities’ advice to limit the risk of infection (wash my hands frequently, avoid travel and situations involving contact with other people, keep distance and avoid touching things).
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r20group = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
71 |
3.6% |
0.035949367 |
2 |
Disagree |
10 |
0.5% |
0.005063291 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
40 |
2% |
0.020253165 |
4 |
Agree |
623 |
31.5% |
0.315443038 |
5 |
Completely agree |
1229 |
62.2% |
0.622278481 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001012658 |
98 |
Not asked |
8065 |
|
NA |
r21meme_skatt1_ran1
Variable label:
|
NA
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5132] [Invalid:4908] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
income |
1345 |
26.2% |
0.2620811 |
2 |
share dividends |
1237 |
24.1% |
0.2410366 |
4 |
wealth |
1291 |
25.2% |
0.2515588 |
5 |
inheritance |
1259 |
24.5% |
0.2453235 |
Sysmiss |
|
4908 |
|
NA |
r21meme_skatt1_ran2
Variable label:
|
NA
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5132] [Invalid:4908] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[blank] |
2612 |
50.9% |
0.5089634 |
2 |
for the richest |
2520 |
49.1% |
0.4910366 |
Sysmiss |
|
4908 |
|
NA |
r21meme_skatt1a
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Increase [different types of taxes] [/for the richest]
|
Literal question:
|
How good or bad do you think the proposal is?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Good proposal |
1335 |
26% |
0.26033541 |
2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
1287 |
25.1% |
0.25097504 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
850 |
16.6% |
0.16575663 |
4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
716 |
14% |
0.13962559 |
5 |
Bad proposal |
931 |
18.2% |
0.18155226 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.2% |
0.00175507 |
98 |
Not asked |
4912 |
|
NA |
r21meme_skatt1b
Variable label:
|
How likely to vote for party that made proposal for [increased taxes]
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely is it that you would vote for a party that made such a proposal?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly probable |
632 |
12.3% |
0.123244930 |
2 |
Likely |
918 |
17.9% |
0.179017161 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
879 |
17.1% |
0.171411856 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
1082 |
21.1% |
0.210998440 |
5 |
Somewhat unlikely |
481 |
9.4% |
0.093798752 |
6 |
Unlikely |
487 |
9.5% |
0.094968799 |
7 |
Highly unlikely |
635 |
12.4% |
0.123829953 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.3% |
0.002730109 |
98 |
Not asked |
4912 |
|
NA |
r21meme_skatt2_ran1
Variable label:
|
NA
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5130] [Invalid:4910] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Inheritance tax should be reintroduced. |
985 |
19.2% |
0.1920078 |
2 |
Inheritance tax should be reintroduced in such a way that only those who inherit
large amounts must pay. |
1028 |
20% |
0.2003899 |
3 |
Inheritance tax should be reintroduced in such a way that only the rich have to
pay. |
1047 |
20.4% |
0.2040936 |
4 |
Inheritance tax should be reintroduced in such a way that only the richest have
to pay. |
1047 |
20.4% |
0.2040936 |
5 |
Inheritance tax should be reintroduced so that the State can spend the money on
reducing tax on income. |
1023 |
19.9% |
0.1994152 |
Sysmiss |
|
4910 |
|
NA |
r21meme_skatt2
Variable label:
|
How good/bad is proposal for [inherance tax]?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Look at the following political proposals:
Inheritance tax should be reintroduced [NA/in such a way that only those who inherit large amounts must pay/in such a way that only the rich have to pay/in such a way that only the richest have to pay/so that the State can spend the money on reducing tax on income].
|
Literal question:
|
How good or bad do you think the proposal is?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Good proposal |
940 |
18.4% |
0.183522062 |
2 |
Somewhat good proposal |
1126 |
22% |
0.219836002 |
3 |
Neither a good nor bad proposal |
812 |
15.9% |
0.158531824 |
4 |
Somewhat bad proposal |
842 |
16.4% |
0.164388911 |
5 |
Bad proposal |
1387 |
27.1% |
0.270792659 |
97 |
Not answered |
15 |
0.3% |
0.002928544 |
98 |
Not asked |
4918 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_ran1_1
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Man 1: Religion
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
[The alternatives ‘Christian’ and ‘Married by arranged marriage’ was excluded as valid combination in randomisation.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Muslim |
2610 |
50.9% |
0.5088711 |
2 |
Christian |
2519 |
49.1% |
0.4911289 |
Sysmiss |
|
4911 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_ran1_2
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Man 2: Religion
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
[The alternatives ‘Christian’ and ‘Married by arranged marriage’ was excluded as valid combination in randomisation.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Muslim |
2588 |
50.5% |
0.5045818 |
2 |
Christian |
2541 |
49.5% |
0.4954182 |
Sysmiss |
|
4911 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_ran2_1
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Man 1: Marital status
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
[The alternatives ‘Christian’ and ‘Married by arranged marriage’ was excluded as valid combination in randomisation.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Unmarried |
2158 |
42.1% |
0.4207448 |
2 |
Married by love |
2088 |
40.7% |
0.4070969 |
3 |
Married by arranged marriage |
883 |
17.2% |
0.1721583 |
Sysmiss |
|
4911 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_ran2_2
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Man 2: Marital status
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
[The alternatives ‘Christian’ and ‘Married by arranged marriage’ was excluded as valid combination in randomisation.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Unmarried |
2118 |
41.3% |
0.4129460 |
2 |
Married by love |
2154 |
42% |
0.4199649 |
3 |
Married by arranged marriage |
857 |
16.7% |
0.1670891 |
Sysmiss |
|
4911 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_ran3_1
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Man 1: Birth country
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Born in Norway |
1719 |
33.5% |
0.3351531 |
2 |
Born in Bosnia |
1735 |
33.8% |
0.3382726 |
3 |
Born in Syria |
1675 |
32.7% |
0.3265744 |
Sysmiss |
|
4911 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_ran3_2
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Man 2: Birth country
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Born in Norway |
1683 |
32.8% |
0.3281341 |
2 |
Born in Bosnia |
1682 |
32.8% |
0.3279392 |
3 |
Born in Syria |
1764 |
34.4% |
0.3439267 |
Sysmiss |
|
4911 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_ran4_1
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Man 1: Education level
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
did not complete upper secondary school |
1802 |
35.1% |
0.3513355 |
2 |
upper secondary school education |
1647 |
32.1% |
0.3211152 |
3 |
university graduate |
1680 |
32.8% |
0.3275492 |
Sysmiss |
|
4911 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_ran4_2
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Man 2: Education level
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
did not complete upper secondary school |
1676 |
32.7% |
0.3267694 |
2 |
upper secondary school education |
1775 |
34.6% |
0.3460714 |
3 |
university graduate |
1678 |
32.7% |
0.3271593 |
Sysmiss |
|
4911 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_ran5_1
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Man 1: Religiosity
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
is not religious |
1777 |
34.6% |
0.3464613 |
2 |
prays occasionally |
1600 |
31.2% |
0.3119516 |
3 |
prays several times a day |
1752 |
34.2% |
0.3415871 |
Sysmiss |
|
4911 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_ran5_2
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Man 2: Religiosity
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
is not religious |
1765 |
34.4% |
0.3441217 |
2 |
prays occasionally |
1640 |
32% |
0.3197504 |
3 |
prays several times a day |
1724 |
33.6% |
0.3361279 |
Sysmiss |
|
4911 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_ran6_1
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Man 1: Gay marriage
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
supports same-sex marriage |
2594 |
50.6% |
0.5057516 |
2 |
is against same-sex marriage |
2535 |
49.4% |
0.4942484 |
Sysmiss |
|
4911 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_ran6_2
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Man 2: Gay marriage
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
supports same-sex marriage |
2526 |
49.2% |
0.4924937 |
2 |
is against same-sex marriage |
2603 |
50.8% |
0.5075063 |
Sysmiss |
|
4911 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_ran7_1
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Man 1: Gender roles
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
believes women should obey their men |
1702 |
33.2% |
0.3318386 |
2 |
believes men and women should be equal |
1728 |
33.7% |
0.3369078 |
3 |
believes women should dress conservatively |
1699 |
33.1% |
0.3312537 |
Sysmiss |
|
4911 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_ran7_2
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Man 2: Gender roles
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
believes women should obey their men |
1753 |
34.2% |
0.3417820 |
2 |
believes men and women should be equal |
1740 |
33.9% |
0.3392474 |
3 |
believes women should dress conservatively |
1636 |
31.9% |
0.3189706 |
Sysmiss |
|
4911 |
|
NA |
r21oc1_order_1
Variable label:
|
Experiment. First attribute to be listed.
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:-]
|
r21oc1_order_2
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Second attribute to be listed.
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:-]
|
r21oc1_order_3
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Third attribute to be listed.
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:-]
|
r21oc1_order_4
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Fourth attribute to be listed.
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:-]
|
r21oc1_order_5
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Fifth attribute to be listed.
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:-]
|
r21oc1_order_6
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Sixth attribute to be listed.
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:-]
|
r21oc1_order_7
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Seventh attribute to be listed.
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:5129] [Invalid:4911] [Range:-]
|
r21oc1
Variable label:
|
Which of two men would you rather have as a colleague?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please consider the two profiles below carefully. Once you have considered both profiles, you can answer the question below. You will see a total of two profiles.
[The respondent was shown two randomized profiles based on r21oc1_ran1 through r21oc1_ran7]
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the two men would you rather have as a colleague?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Man 1 |
2440 |
48.4% |
0.48422306 |
2 |
Man 2 |
2339 |
46.4% |
0.46417940 |
97 |
Not answered |
260 |
5.2% |
0.05159754 |
98 |
Not asked |
5001 |
|
NA |
r21oc2
Variable label:
|
How would you feel about having man 1 as a colleague?
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 0 to 100, how would you feel about having man 1 as a colleague?
|
Post-question:
|
Scores between 50 and 100 mean that you feel warmth and goodwill towards him; scores between 0 and 50 mean you do not feel goodwill towards him and did not think much of him. If you do not feel particularly warm or cold towards him, you can give him a score of 50.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4802] [Invalid:5238] [Range:0-100]
|
r21oc3
Variable label:
|
How would you feel about having man 2 as a colleague?
|
Literal question:
|
On a scale of 0 to 100, how would you feel about having man 2 as a colleague?
|
Post-question:
|
Scores between 50 and 100 mean that you feel warmth and goodwill towards him; scores between 0 and 50 mean you do not feel goodwill towards him and did not think much of him. If you do not feel particularly warm or cold towards him, you can give him a score of 50.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if (r19group != 3 & r20group != 6 & r16group != 6,7)]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:4793] [Invalid:5247] [Range:0-100]
|
r21padkom1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The will of the majority should govern, even at the expense of minorities
|
Literal question:
|
In Norway, the will of the majority should always govern, even at the expense of the rights of minorities.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6,7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
218 |
8.7% |
0.087409783 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
773 |
31% |
0.309943865 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
504 |
20.2% |
0.202085004 |
4 |
Somewhat disagree |
659 |
26.4% |
0.264234162 |
5 |
Completely disagree |
323 |
13% |
0.129510826 |
97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.7% |
0.006816359 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r21padkom2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: A strong political leader is good, even if rules are bend to get things done
|
Literal question:
|
A strong political leader is good for Norway, even if the leader bends the rules to get things done.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6,7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
99 |
4% |
0.03969527 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
463 |
18.6% |
0.18564555 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
322 |
12.9% |
0.12910986 |
4 |
Somewhat disagree |
865 |
34.7% |
0.34683240 |
5 |
Completely disagree |
720 |
28.9% |
0.28869286 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1% |
0.01002406 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r21padkom3
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Norwegian citizens should have the last word in important decisions via referendums
|
Literal question:
|
In Norway, Norwegian citizens should have the last word in important political decisions via referendums.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6,7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
668 |
26.8% |
0.267842823 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
789 |
31.6% |
0.316359262 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
442 |
17.7% |
0.177225341 |
4 |
Somewhat disagree |
436 |
17.5% |
0.174819567 |
5 |
Completely disagree |
139 |
5.6% |
0.055733761 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.8% |
0.008019246 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r21padkom4
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Courts must be able to stop the government if it oversteps its authority
|
Literal question:
|
In Norway, courts must be able to stop the government if it oversteps its authority.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6,7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
1417 |
56.8% |
0.568163593 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
708 |
28.4% |
0.283881315 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
211 |
8.5% |
0.084603047 |
4 |
Somewhat disagree |
93 |
3.7% |
0.037289495 |
5 |
Completely disagree |
44 |
1.8% |
0.017642342 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.8% |
0.008420209 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r21padkom5
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: If the majority in Norway change their minds, the government should change its policy
|
Literal question:
|
If the majority in Norway change their minds, the government should change its policy.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6,7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
375 |
15% |
0.15036087 |
2 |
Somewhat agree |
889 |
35.6% |
0.35645549 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
662 |
26.5% |
0.26543705 |
4 |
Somewhat disagree |
390 |
15.6% |
0.15637530 |
5 |
Completely disagree |
151 |
6.1% |
0.06054531 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.1% |
0.01082598 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r21tdr16
Variable label:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
Pre-question text:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
508 |
25.5% |
0.255404726 |
2 |
Good |
1031 |
51.8% |
0.518350930 |
3 |
Quite good |
259 |
13% |
0.130216189 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
93 |
4.7% |
0.046757164 |
5 |
Quite bad |
70 |
3.5% |
0.035193565 |
6 |
Bad |
15 |
0.8% |
0.007541478 |
7 |
Very bad |
7 |
0.4% |
0.003519356 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.3% |
0.003016591 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr17
Variable label:
|
Economic situation in [region] compared to [region]
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation in [region] with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation in [region] as better, worse or the same?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Better |
484 |
24.3% |
0.2433384 |
2 |
The same |
1212 |
60.9% |
0.6093514 |
3 |
Worse |
270 |
13.6% |
0.1357466 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.2% |
0.0115636 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr1_1
Variable label:
|
How strong connection to: The municipality you live in
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
Literal question:
|
The municipality you live in
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong connection |
690 |
34.7% |
0.346907994 |
2 |
Connection |
774 |
38.9% |
0.389140271 |
3 |
Some connection |
357 |
17.9% |
0.179487179 |
4 |
Small connection |
134 |
6.7% |
0.067370538 |
5 |
No connection |
20 |
1% |
0.010055304 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.7% |
0.007038713 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr1_2
Variable label:
|
How strong connection to: The county you live in
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
Literal question:
|
The county you live in
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong connection |
427 |
21.5% |
0.21468074 |
2 |
Connection |
694 |
34.9% |
0.34891905 |
3 |
Some connection |
442 |
22.2% |
0.22222222 |
4 |
Small connection |
289 |
14.5% |
0.14529915 |
5 |
No connection |
114 |
5.7% |
0.05731523 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.2% |
0.01156360 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr1_3
Variable label:
|
How strong connection to: Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
How strong is your connection to:
|
Literal question:
|
Norway
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strong connection |
1397 |
70.2% |
0.702362996 |
2 |
Connection |
467 |
23.5% |
0.234791352 |
3 |
Some connection |
78 |
3.9% |
0.039215686 |
4 |
Small connection |
22 |
1.1% |
0.011060835 |
5 |
No connection |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002011061 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1.1% |
0.010558069 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr19
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Should transfer resources from rich to poor parts of the country
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Economic resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
291 |
14.6% |
0.146304676 |
2 |
Agree |
688 |
34.6% |
0.345902464 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
608 |
30.6% |
0.305681247 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
203 |
10.2% |
0.102061337 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
92 |
4.6% |
0.046254399 |
6 |
Disagree |
72 |
3.6% |
0.036199095 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
22 |
1.1% |
0.011060835 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.7% |
0.006535948 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr20_1
Variable label:
|
Wins at least one district seat in your constituency: The Christian Democrats
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will win at least one district seat in your constituency?
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
Post-question:
|
The 19 former counties make up the constituencies.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
120 |
6% |
0.06033183 |
2 |
Unlikely |
329 |
16.5% |
0.16540975 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
351 |
17.6% |
0.17647059 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
506 |
25.4% |
0.25439920 |
5 |
Quite likely |
349 |
17.5% |
0.17546506 |
6 |
Likely |
149 |
7.5% |
0.07491202 |
7 |
Definitely |
65 |
3.3% |
0.03267974 |
97 |
Not answered |
120 |
6% |
0.06033183 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr20_2
Variable label:
|
Wins at least one district seat in your constituency: The Conservative Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will win at least one district seat in your constituency?
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
Post-question:
|
The 19 former counties make up the constituencies.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
28 |
1.4% |
0.01407743 |
2 |
Unlikely |
36 |
1.8% |
0.01809955 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
98 |
4.9% |
0.04927099 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
201 |
10.1% |
0.10105581 |
5 |
Quite likely |
416 |
20.9% |
0.20915033 |
6 |
Likely |
423 |
21.3% |
0.21266968 |
7 |
Definitely |
685 |
34.4% |
0.34439417 |
97 |
Not answered |
102 |
5.1% |
0.05128205 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr20_3
Variable label:
|
Wins at least one district seat in your constituency: The Progressive Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will win at least one district seat in your constituency?
|
Literal question:
|
The Progressive Party
|
Post-question:
|
The 19 former counties make up the constituencies.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
54 |
2.7% |
0.02714932 |
2 |
Unlikely |
107 |
5.4% |
0.05379588 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
208 |
10.5% |
0.10457516 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
356 |
17.9% |
0.17898441 |
5 |
Quite likely |
528 |
26.5% |
0.26546003 |
6 |
Likely |
350 |
17.6% |
0.17596782 |
7 |
Definitely |
271 |
13.6% |
0.13624937 |
97 |
Not answered |
115 |
5.8% |
0.05781800 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr20_4
Variable label:
|
Wins at least one district seat in your constituency: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will win at least one district seat in your constituency?
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Post-question:
|
The 19 former counties make up the constituencies.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
118 |
5.9% |
0.05932629 |
2 |
Unlikely |
300 |
15.1% |
0.15082956 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
368 |
18.5% |
0.18501760 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
564 |
28.4% |
0.28355958 |
5 |
Quite likely |
340 |
17.1% |
0.17094017 |
6 |
Likely |
118 |
5.9% |
0.05932629 |
7 |
Definitely |
53 |
2.7% |
0.02664656 |
97 |
Not answered |
128 |
6.4% |
0.06435395 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr20_5
Variable label:
|
Wins at least one district seat in your constituency: The Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will win at least one district seat in your constituency?
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Post-question:
|
The 19 former counties make up the constituencies.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
32 |
1.6% |
0.01608849 |
2 |
Unlikely |
67 |
3.4% |
0.03368527 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
129 |
6.5% |
0.06485671 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
295 |
14.8% |
0.14831574 |
5 |
Quite likely |
532 |
26.7% |
0.26747109 |
6 |
Likely |
444 |
22.3% |
0.22322775 |
7 |
Definitely |
384 |
19.3% |
0.19306184 |
97 |
Not answered |
106 |
5.3% |
0.05329311 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr20_6
Variable label:
|
Wins at least one district seat in your constituency: The Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will win at least one district seat in your constituency?
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Post-question:
|
The 19 former counties make up the constituencies.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
89 |
4.5% |
0.04474610 |
2 |
Unlikely |
157 |
7.9% |
0.07893414 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
249 |
12.5% |
0.12518854 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
465 |
23.4% |
0.23378582 |
5 |
Quite likely |
471 |
23.7% |
0.23680241 |
6 |
Likely |
262 |
13.2% |
0.13172448 |
7 |
Definitely |
172 |
8.6% |
0.08647562 |
97 |
Not answered |
124 |
6.2% |
0.06234289 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr20_7
Variable label:
|
Wins at least one district seat in your constituency: The Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will win at least one district seat in your constituency?
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Post-question:
|
The 19 former counties make up the constituencies.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
206 |
10.4% |
0.10356963 |
2 |
Unlikely |
318 |
16% |
0.15987934 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
285 |
14.3% |
0.14328808 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
448 |
22.5% |
0.22523881 |
5 |
Quite likely |
356 |
17.9% |
0.17898441 |
6 |
Likely |
179 |
9% |
0.08999497 |
7 |
Definitely |
79 |
4% |
0.03971845 |
97 |
Not answered |
118 |
5.9% |
0.05932629 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr20_8
Variable label:
|
Wins at least one district seat in your constituency: The Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will win at least one district seat in your constituency?
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Post-question:
|
The 19 former counties make up the constituencies.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
26 |
1.3% |
0.01307190 |
2 |
Unlikely |
23 |
1.2% |
0.01156360 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
52 |
2.6% |
0.02614379 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
165 |
8.3% |
0.08295626 |
5 |
Quite likely |
439 |
22.1% |
0.22071393 |
6 |
Likely |
460 |
23.1% |
0.23127200 |
7 |
Definitely |
728 |
36.6% |
0.36601307 |
97 |
Not answered |
96 |
4.8% |
0.04826546 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr20_9
Variable label:
|
Wins at least one district seat in your constituency: The Red Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will win at least one district seat in your constituency?
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Post-question:
|
The 19 former counties make up the constituencies.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
235 |
11.8% |
0.11814982 |
2 |
Unlikely |
418 |
21% |
0.21015586 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
391 |
19.7% |
0.19658120 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
411 |
20.7% |
0.20663650 |
5 |
Quite likely |
239 |
12% |
0.12016088 |
6 |
Likely |
125 |
6.3% |
0.06284565 |
7 |
Definitely |
42 |
2.1% |
0.02111614 |
97 |
Not answered |
128 |
6.4% |
0.06435395 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr21_1
Variable label:
|
The following party will cross the election threshold: The Christian Democrats
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will cross the election threshold (4% of the votes nationwide)?
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
78 |
3.9% |
0.03921569 |
2 |
Unlikely |
227 |
11.4% |
0.11412770 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
420 |
21.1% |
0.21116139 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
623 |
31.3% |
0.31322272 |
5 |
Quite likely |
428 |
21.5% |
0.21518351 |
6 |
Likely |
111 |
5.6% |
0.05580694 |
7 |
Definitely |
30 |
1.5% |
0.01508296 |
97 |
Not answered |
72 |
3.6% |
0.03619910 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr21_2
Variable label:
|
The following party will cross the election threshold: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will cross the election threshold (4% of the votes nationwide)?
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
82 |
4.1% |
0.04122675 |
2 |
Unlikely |
205 |
10.3% |
0.10306687 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
458 |
23% |
0.23026647 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
646 |
32.5% |
0.32478632 |
5 |
Quite likely |
368 |
18.5% |
0.18501760 |
6 |
Likely |
130 |
6.5% |
0.06535948 |
7 |
Definitely |
23 |
1.2% |
0.01156360 |
97 |
Not answered |
77 |
3.9% |
0.03871292 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr21_3
Variable label:
|
The following party will cross the election threshold: The Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will cross the election threshold (4% of the votes nationwide)?
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
20 |
1% |
0.01005530 |
2 |
Unlikely |
67 |
3.4% |
0.03368527 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
141 |
7.1% |
0.07088989 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
301 |
15.1% |
0.15133233 |
5 |
Quite likely |
607 |
30.5% |
0.30517848 |
6 |
Likely |
420 |
21.1% |
0.21116139 |
7 |
Definitely |
354 |
17.8% |
0.17797888 |
97 |
Not answered |
79 |
4% |
0.03971845 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr21_4
Variable label:
|
The following party will cross the election threshold: The Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will cross the election threshold (4% of the votes nationwide)?
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
103 |
5.2% |
0.05178482 |
2 |
Unlikely |
174 |
8.7% |
0.08748115 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
277 |
13.9% |
0.13926596 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
471 |
23.7% |
0.23680241 |
5 |
Quite likely |
599 |
30.1% |
0.30115636 |
6 |
Likely |
230 |
11.6% |
0.11563600 |
7 |
Definitely |
64 |
3.2% |
0.03217697 |
97 |
Not answered |
71 |
3.6% |
0.03569633 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr21_5
Variable label:
|
The following party will cross the election threshold: The Red Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will cross the election threshold (4% of the votes nationwide)?
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
106 |
5.3% |
0.05329311 |
2 |
Unlikely |
252 |
12.7% |
0.12669683 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
410 |
20.6% |
0.20613374 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
536 |
26.9% |
0.26948215 |
5 |
Quite likely |
419 |
21.1% |
0.21065862 |
6 |
Likely |
159 |
8% |
0.07993967 |
7 |
Definitely |
27 |
1.4% |
0.01357466 |
97 |
Not answered |
80 |
4% |
0.04022122 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr22_1
Variable label:
|
Want the following party to enter government after the election: The Christian Democrats
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you want the following parties to enter government after the parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not desirable at all |
593 |
29.8% |
0.29813977 |
2 |
Undesirable |
311 |
15.6% |
0.15635998 |
3 |
Somewhat undesirable |
240 |
12.1% |
0.12066365 |
4 |
Neither desirable nor undesirable |
336 |
16.9% |
0.16892911 |
5 |
Somewhat desirable |
207 |
10.4% |
0.10407240 |
6 |
Desirable |
130 |
6.5% |
0.06535948 |
7 |
Highly desirable |
61 |
3.1% |
0.03066868 |
97 |
Not answered |
111 |
5.6% |
0.05580694 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr22_2
Variable label:
|
Want the following party to enter government after the election: The Conservative Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you want the following parties to enter government after the parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not desirable at all |
340 |
17.1% |
0.17094017 |
2 |
Undesirable |
221 |
11.1% |
0.11111111 |
3 |
Somewhat undesirable |
207 |
10.4% |
0.10407240 |
4 |
Neither desirable nor undesirable |
207 |
10.4% |
0.10407240 |
5 |
Somewhat desirable |
249 |
12.5% |
0.12518854 |
6 |
Desirable |
326 |
16.4% |
0.16390146 |
7 |
Highly desirable |
334 |
16.8% |
0.16792358 |
97 |
Not answered |
105 |
5.3% |
0.05279035 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr22_3
Variable label:
|
Want the following party to enter government after the election: The Progress Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you want the following parties to enter government after the parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Progressive Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not desirable at all |
825 |
41.5% |
0.41478130 |
2 |
Undesirable |
257 |
12.9% |
0.12921066 |
3 |
Somewhat undesirable |
149 |
7.5% |
0.07491202 |
4 |
Neither desirable nor undesirable |
194 |
9.8% |
0.09753645 |
5 |
Somewhat desirable |
202 |
10.2% |
0.10155857 |
6 |
Desirable |
141 |
7.1% |
0.07088989 |
7 |
Highly desirable |
110 |
5.5% |
0.05530417 |
97 |
Not answered |
111 |
5.6% |
0.05580694 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr22_4
Variable label:
|
Want the following party to enter government after the election: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you want the following parties to enter government after the parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not desirable at all |
420 |
21.1% |
0.21116139 |
2 |
Undesirable |
244 |
12.3% |
0.12267471 |
3 |
Somewhat undesirable |
228 |
11.5% |
0.11463047 |
4 |
Neither desirable nor undesirable |
410 |
20.6% |
0.20613374 |
5 |
Somewhat desirable |
296 |
14.9% |
0.14881850 |
6 |
Desirable |
204 |
10.3% |
0.10256410 |
7 |
Highly desirable |
76 |
3.8% |
0.03821016 |
97 |
Not answered |
111 |
5.6% |
0.05580694 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr22_5
Variable label:
|
Want the following party to enter government after the election: The Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you want the following parties to enter government after the parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not desirable at all |
188 |
9.5% |
0.09451986 |
2 |
Undesirable |
141 |
7.1% |
0.07088989 |
3 |
Somewhat undesirable |
183 |
9.2% |
0.09200603 |
4 |
Neither desirable nor undesirable |
319 |
16% |
0.16038210 |
5 |
Somewhat desirable |
437 |
22% |
0.21970840 |
6 |
Desirable |
372 |
18.7% |
0.18702866 |
7 |
Highly desirable |
265 |
13.3% |
0.13323278 |
97 |
Not answered |
84 |
4.2% |
0.04223228 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr22_6
Variable label:
|
Want the following party to enter government after the election: The Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you want the following parties to enter government after the parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not desirable at all |
362 |
18.2% |
0.18200101 |
2 |
Undesirable |
214 |
10.8% |
0.10759175 |
3 |
Somewhat undesirable |
201 |
10.1% |
0.10105581 |
4 |
Neither desirable nor undesirable |
294 |
14.8% |
0.14781297 |
5 |
Somewhat desirable |
291 |
14.6% |
0.14630468 |
6 |
Desirable |
272 |
13.7% |
0.13675214 |
7 |
Highly desirable |
251 |
12.6% |
0.12619407 |
97 |
Not answered |
104 |
5.2% |
0.05228758 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr22_7
Variable label:
|
Want the following party to enter government after the election: The Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you want the following parties to enter government after the parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not desirable at all |
587 |
29.5% |
0.29512318 |
2 |
Undesirable |
242 |
12.2% |
0.12166918 |
3 |
Somewhat undesirable |
187 |
9.4% |
0.09401709 |
4 |
Neither desirable nor undesirable |
239 |
12% |
0.12016088 |
5 |
Somewhat desirable |
287 |
14.4% |
0.14429361 |
6 |
Desirable |
203 |
10.2% |
0.10206134 |
7 |
Highly desirable |
125 |
6.3% |
0.06284565 |
97 |
Not answered |
119 |
6% |
0.05982906 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr22_8
Variable label:
|
Want the following party to enter government after the election: The Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you want the following parties to enter government after the parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not desirable at all |
124 |
6.2% |
0.06234289 |
2 |
Undesirable |
118 |
5.9% |
0.05932629 |
3 |
Somewhat undesirable |
158 |
7.9% |
0.07943690 |
4 |
Neither desirable nor undesirable |
246 |
12.4% |
0.12368024 |
5 |
Somewhat desirable |
331 |
16.6% |
0.16641528 |
6 |
Desirable |
477 |
24% |
0.23981900 |
7 |
Highly desirable |
449 |
22.6% |
0.22574158 |
97 |
Not answered |
86 |
4.3% |
0.04323781 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr22_9
Variable label:
|
Want the following party to enter government after the election: The Red Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you want the following parties to enter government after the parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not desirable at all |
619 |
31.1% |
0.31121166 |
2 |
Undesirable |
257 |
12.9% |
0.12921066 |
3 |
Somewhat undesirable |
198 |
10% |
0.09954751 |
4 |
Neither desirable nor undesirable |
289 |
14.5% |
0.14529915 |
5 |
Somewhat desirable |
245 |
12.3% |
0.12317748 |
6 |
Desirable |
149 |
7.5% |
0.07491202 |
7 |
Highly desirable |
111 |
5.6% |
0.05580694 |
97 |
Not answered |
121 |
6.1% |
0.06083459 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr23_1
Variable label:
|
Following party will actually enter government after the election: The Christian Democrats
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will actually enter government after the upcoming parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democrats
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
274 |
13.8% |
0.137757667 |
2 |
Unlikely |
427 |
21.5% |
0.214680744 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
436 |
21.9% |
0.219205631 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
431 |
21.7% |
0.216691805 |
5 |
Quite likely |
189 |
9.5% |
0.095022624 |
6 |
Likely |
57 |
2.9% |
0.028657617 |
7 |
Definitely |
16 |
0.8% |
0.008044243 |
97 |
Not answered |
159 |
8% |
0.079939668 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr23_2
Variable label:
|
Following party will actually enter government after the election: The Conservative Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will actually enter government after the upcoming parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
196 |
9.9% |
0.09854198 |
2 |
Unlikely |
257 |
12.9% |
0.12921066 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
419 |
21.1% |
0.21065862 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
363 |
18.3% |
0.18250377 |
5 |
Quite likely |
297 |
14.9% |
0.14932127 |
6 |
Likely |
236 |
11.9% |
0.11865259 |
7 |
Definitely |
64 |
3.2% |
0.03217697 |
97 |
Not answered |
157 |
7.9% |
0.07893414 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr23_3
Variable label:
|
Following party will actually enter government after the election: The Progressive Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will actually enter government after the upcoming parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Progressive Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
416 |
20.9% |
0.20915033 |
2 |
Unlikely |
472 |
23.7% |
0.23730518 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
376 |
18.9% |
0.18903972 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
295 |
14.8% |
0.14831574 |
5 |
Quite likely |
172 |
8.6% |
0.08647562 |
6 |
Likely |
77 |
3.9% |
0.03871292 |
7 |
Definitely |
22 |
1.1% |
0.01106083 |
97 |
Not answered |
159 |
8% |
0.07993967 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr23_4
Variable label:
|
Following party will actually enter government after the election: The Liberal Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will actually enter government after the upcoming parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
260 |
13.1% |
0.130718954 |
2 |
Unlikely |
387 |
19.5% |
0.194570136 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
471 |
23.7% |
0.236802413 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
430 |
21.6% |
0.216189040 |
5 |
Quite likely |
196 |
9.9% |
0.098541981 |
6 |
Likely |
67 |
3.4% |
0.033685269 |
7 |
Definitely |
15 |
0.8% |
0.007541478 |
97 |
Not answered |
163 |
8.2% |
0.081950729 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr23_5
Variable label:
|
Following party will actually enter government after the election: The Centre Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will actually enter government after the upcoming parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
18 |
0.9% |
0.009049774 |
2 |
Unlikely |
26 |
1.3% |
0.013071895 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
56 |
2.8% |
0.028154852 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
257 |
12.9% |
0.129210659 |
5 |
Quite likely |
642 |
32.3% |
0.322775264 |
6 |
Likely |
644 |
32.4% |
0.323780794 |
7 |
Definitely |
252 |
12.7% |
0.126696833 |
97 |
Not answered |
94 |
4.7% |
0.047259930 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr23_6
Variable label:
|
Following party will actually enter government after the election: The Socialist Left Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will actually enter government after the upcoming parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
62 |
3.1% |
0.03117144 |
2 |
Unlikely |
121 |
6.1% |
0.06083459 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
234 |
11.8% |
0.11764706 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
437 |
22% |
0.21970840 |
5 |
Quite likely |
600 |
30.2% |
0.30165913 |
6 |
Likely |
341 |
17.1% |
0.17144294 |
7 |
Definitely |
75 |
3.8% |
0.03770739 |
97 |
Not answered |
119 |
6% |
0.05982906 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr23_7
Variable label:
|
Following party will actually enter government after the election: The Green Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will actually enter government after the upcoming parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
313 |
15.7% |
0.157365510 |
2 |
Unlikely |
363 |
18.3% |
0.182503771 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
380 |
19.1% |
0.191050779 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
437 |
22% |
0.219708396 |
5 |
Quite likely |
240 |
12.1% |
0.120663650 |
6 |
Likely |
77 |
3.9% |
0.038712921 |
7 |
Definitely |
15 |
0.8% |
0.007541478 |
97 |
Not answered |
164 |
8.2% |
0.082453494 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr23_8
Variable label:
|
Following party will actually enter government after the election: The Labour Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will actually enter government after the upcoming parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
20 |
1% |
0.010055304 |
2 |
Unlikely |
17 |
0.9% |
0.008547009 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
39 |
2% |
0.019607843 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
173 |
8.7% |
0.086978381 |
5 |
Quite likely |
541 |
27.2% |
0.271995978 |
6 |
Likely |
738 |
37.1% |
0.371040724 |
7 |
Definitely |
371 |
18.7% |
0.186525892 |
97 |
Not answered |
90 |
4.5% |
0.045248869 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21tdr23_9
Variable label:
|
Following party will actually enter government after the election: The Red Party
|
Pre-question text:
|
How likely do you think it is that the following parties will actually enter government after the upcoming parliamentary election?
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 1]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Definitely not |
465 |
23.4% |
0.233785822 |
2 |
Unlikely |
442 |
22.2% |
0.222222222 |
3 |
Quite unlikely |
391 |
19.7% |
0.196581197 |
4 |
Neither likely nor unlikely |
380 |
19.1% |
0.191050779 |
5 |
Quite likely |
96 |
4.8% |
0.048265460 |
6 |
Likely |
42 |
2.1% |
0.021116139 |
7 |
Definitely |
8 |
0.4% |
0.004022122 |
97 |
Not answered |
165 |
8.3% |
0.082956259 |
98 |
Not asked |
8051 |
|
NA |
r21km_ansvar_1
Variable label:
|
Responsible for cutting greenhouse gas emissions: The international community
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you think the following stakeholders are responsible for cutting greenhouse gas emissions?
|
Literal question:
|
The international community
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
19 |
0.9% |
0.009359606 |
2 |
To a small extent |
29 |
1.4% |
0.014285714 |
3 |
To some extent |
175 |
8.6% |
0.086206897 |
4 |
To a large extent |
759 |
37.4% |
0.373891626 |
5 |
To a very large extent |
1031 |
50.8% |
0.507881773 |
97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.8% |
0.008374384 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21km_ansvar_2
Variable label:
|
Responsible for cutting greenhouse gas emissions: National authorities
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you think the following stakeholders are responsible for cutting greenhouse gas emissions?
|
Literal question:
|
National authorities (the State)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
25 |
1.2% |
0.01231527 |
2 |
To a small extent |
48 |
2.4% |
0.02364532 |
3 |
To some extent |
316 |
15.6% |
0.15566502 |
4 |
To a large extent |
806 |
39.7% |
0.39704433 |
5 |
To a very large extent |
810 |
39.9% |
0.39901478 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.2% |
0.01231527 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21km_ansvar_3
Variable label:
|
Responsible for cutting greenhouse gas emissions: Local/regional authorities
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you think the following stakeholders are responsible for cutting greenhouse gas emissions?
|
Literal question:
|
Local and regional authorities (municipality and county)
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
42 |
2.1% |
0.02068966 |
2 |
To a small extent |
131 |
6.5% |
0.06453202 |
3 |
To some extent |
535 |
26.4% |
0.26354680 |
4 |
To a large extent |
797 |
39.3% |
0.39261084 |
5 |
To a very large extent |
499 |
24.6% |
0.24581281 |
97 |
Not answered |
26 |
1.3% |
0.01280788 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21km_ansvar_4
Variable label:
|
Responsible for cutting greenhouse gas emissions: Private trade and industry
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you think the following stakeholders are responsible for cutting greenhouse gas emissions?
|
Literal question:
|
Private trade and industry
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
32 |
1.6% |
0.01576355 |
2 |
To a small extent |
75 |
3.7% |
0.03694581 |
3 |
To some extent |
435 |
21.4% |
0.21428571 |
4 |
To a large extent |
840 |
41.4% |
0.41379310 |
5 |
To a very large extent |
620 |
30.5% |
0.30541872 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.4% |
0.01379310 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21km_ansvar_5
Variable label:
|
Responsible for cutting greenhouse gas emissions: Individuals
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you think the following stakeholders are responsible for cutting greenhouse gas emissions?
|
Literal question:
|
Individuals
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
66 |
3.3% |
0.03251232 |
2 |
To a small extent |
230 |
11.3% |
0.11330049 |
3 |
To some extent |
637 |
31.4% |
0.31379310 |
4 |
To a large extent |
673 |
33.2% |
0.33152709 |
5 |
To a very large extent |
399 |
19.7% |
0.19655172 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.2% |
0.01231527 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom13_1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I am able to get all public benifits I am entitled to
|
Pre-question text:
|
In general, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
I am able to obtain all public benefits, services and permits that I am entitled to.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
131 |
6.5% |
0.064532020 |
2 |
Agree |
625 |
30.8% |
0.307881773 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
514 |
25.3% |
0.253201970 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
276 |
13.6% |
0.135960591 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
310 |
15.3% |
0.152709360 |
6 |
Disagree |
117 |
5.8% |
0.057635468 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
40 |
2% |
0.019704433 |
97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.8% |
0.008374384 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom13_2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Public admistration is too complicated for people like me to understand.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In general, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
The public administration is so complicated that people like me are unable to understand what is going on within varios agencies, directorates, municipalities, and so on.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
149 |
7.3% |
0.07339901 |
2 |
Agree |
388 |
19.1% |
0.19113300 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
693 |
34.1% |
0.34137931 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
198 |
9.8% |
0.09753695 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
260 |
12.8% |
0.12807882 |
6 |
Disagree |
268 |
13.2% |
0.13201970 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
53 |
2.6% |
0.02610837 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1% |
0.01034483 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom14_1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Public servants do not care about the needs of people like med
|
Pre-question text:
|
In general, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Those who work in the public administration do not care about the needs of people like me.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
87 |
4.3% |
0.04285714 |
2 |
Agree |
196 |
9.7% |
0.09655172 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
419 |
20.6% |
0.20640394 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
450 |
22.2% |
0.22167488 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
333 |
16.4% |
0.16403941 |
6 |
Disagree |
440 |
21.7% |
0.21674877 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
82 |
4% |
0.04039409 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.1% |
0.01133005 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom14_2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Caseworkers in public administration care only about technical aspects of cases.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In general, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
|
Literal question:
|
Caseworkers in the public administration are only interested in the technical aspects of the case, not what those affected actually want.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
116 |
5.7% |
0.05714286 |
2 |
Agree |
249 |
12.3% |
0.12266010 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
558 |
27.5% |
0.27487685 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
442 |
21.8% |
0.21773399 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
277 |
13.6% |
0.13645320 |
6 |
Disagree |
316 |
15.6% |
0.15566502 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
47 |
2.3% |
0.02315271 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
1.2% |
0.01231527 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom15
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in NAV as an institution?
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in NAV as an institution?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
45 |
2.2% |
0.02216749 |
2 |
High confidence |
761 |
37.5% |
0.37487685 |
3 |
Some confidence |
879 |
43.3% |
0.43300493 |
4 |
Little confidence |
265 |
13.1% |
0.13054187 |
5 |
No confidence at all |
59 |
2.9% |
0.02906404 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
1% |
0.01034483 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom16
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much would you say you know about NAV?
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much would you say you know about NAV?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A great deal |
99 |
4.9% |
0.04876847 |
2 |
A lot |
339 |
16.7% |
0.16699507 |
3 |
Quite a lot |
748 |
36.8% |
0.36847291 |
4 |
Not much |
775 |
38.2% |
0.38177340 |
5 |
Nothing at all |
34 |
1.7% |
0.01674877 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.7% |
0.01724138 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom17_1_1
Variable label:
|
Personal experience with NAV in the area: Family
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Family (child benefit, parental benefit, cash grants for families with small children, benefits for single parents, child support payments)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_1_2
Variable label:
|
Experience with NAV as next of kin in the area: Family
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Family (child benefit, parental benefit, cash grants for families with small children, benefits for single parents, child support payments)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_1_3
Variable label:
|
No experience with NAV in the area: Family
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Family (child benefit, parental benefit, cash grants for families with small children, benefits for single parents, child support payments)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_2_1
Variable label:
|
Personal experience with NAV in the area: Illness and injury
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Illness and injury (temporary disability benefit, rehabilitation allowance, sickness benefit)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_2_2
Variable label:
|
Experience with NAV as next of kin in the area: Illness and injury
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Illness and injury (temporary disability benefit, rehabilitation allowance, sickness benefit)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_2_3
Variable label:
|
No experience with NAV in the area: Illness and injury
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Illness and injury (temporary disability benefit, rehabilitation allowance, sickness benefit)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_3_1
Variable label:
|
Personal experience with NAV in the area: Unemployment
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment (unemployment benefit, job searches, registration card, industrial rehabilitation)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_3_2
Variable label:
|
Experience with NAV as next of kin in the area: Unemployment
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment (unemployment benefit, job searches, registration card, industrial rehabilitation)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_3_3
Variable label:
|
No experience with NAV in the area: Unemployment
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Unemployment (unemployment benefit, job searches, registration card, industrial rehabilitation)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_4_1
Variable label:
|
Personal experience with NAV in the area: Old age and disability
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Old age and disability (disability pension, retirement pension)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_4_2
Variable label:
|
Experience with NAV as next of kin in the area: Old age and disability
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Old age and disability (disability pension, retirement pension)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_4_3
Variable label:
|
No experience with NAV in the area: Old age and disability
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Old age and disability (disability pension, retirement pension)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_5_1
Variable label:
|
Personal experience with NAV in the area: Social services
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Social services (social assistance, financial advice, qualification programme)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_5_2
Variable label:
|
Experience with NAV as next of kin in the area: Social services
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Social services (social assistance, financial advice, qualification programme)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_5_3
Variable label:
|
No experience with NAV in the area: Social services
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Social services (social assistance, financial advice, qualification programme)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_6_1
Variable label:
|
Personal experience with NAV in the area: Health services
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Health services (exemption card scheme, aids, travel allowance)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_6_2
Variable label:
|
Experience with NAV as next of kin in the area: Health services
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Health services (exemption card scheme, aids, travel allowance)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_6_3
Variable label:
|
No experience with NAV in the area: Health services
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Health services (exemption card scheme, aids, travel allowance)
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_7_1
Variable label:
|
Personal experience with NAV in the area: Other matters
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Other matters
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_7_2
Variable label:
|
Experience with NAV as next of kin in the area: Other matters
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Other matters
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom17_7_3
Variable label:
|
No experience with NAV in the area: Other matters
|
Pre-question text:
|
Do you have any experience with NAV, personally or as next of kin, in the following areas?
|
Literal question:
|
Other matters
|
Post-question:
|
Please tick every relevant box.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Data withheld due to privacy considerations.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Multi Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom18
Variable label:
|
Have you ever been in personal contact with a case officer in NAV?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you ever been in personal contact with a case officer in NAV?
|
Post-question:
|
Online chats do not count.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1154 |
56.8% |
0.56847291 |
2 |
No |
850 |
41.9% |
0.41871921 |
97 |
Not answered |
26 |
1.3% |
0.01280788 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom19_ran
Variable label:
|
Experiments. Randomly selects alternative for r21padkom19
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2012] [Invalid:8028] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Family (child benefit, parental benefit, cash grants for families with small
children, benefits for single parents, child support payments) |
345 |
17.1% |
0.1714712 |
2 |
Illness and injury (temporary disability benefit, rehabilitation allowance,
sickness benefit) |
349 |
17.3% |
0.1734592 |
3 |
Unemployment (unemployment benefit, job searches, registration card, industrial
rehabilitation) |
317 |
15.8% |
0.1575547 |
4 |
Old age and disability (disability pension, retirement pension) |
337 |
16.7% |
0.1674950 |
5 |
Social services (social assistance, financial advice, qualification programme) |
303 |
15.1% |
0.1505964 |
6 |
Health services (exemption card scheme, aids, travel allowance) |
361 |
17.9% |
0.1794235 |
Sysmiss |
|
8028 |
|
NA |
r21padkom19
Variable label:
|
To what extent case officers in NAV are influenced by personal attitudes in cases regarding [different areas]
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think that case officers in NAV let themselves be influenced by their own personal attitudes when they make decisions in cases about [family (child benefit, parental benefit, cash grants for families with small children, benefits for single parents, child support payments/illness and injury (temporary disability benefit, rehabilitation allowance, sickness benefit)/unemployment (unemployment benefit, job searches, registration card, industrial rehabilitation)/old age and disability (disability pension, retirement pension)/social services (social assistance, financial advice, qualification programme)/health services (exemption card scheme, aids, travel allowance)]?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
63 |
3.1% |
0.03103448 |
2 |
To a great extent |
215 |
10.6% |
0.10591133 |
3 |
To some extent |
863 |
42.5% |
0.42512315 |
4 |
To a small extent |
758 |
37.3% |
0.37339901 |
5 |
Not at all |
96 |
4.7% |
0.04729064 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.7% |
0.01724138 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom20
Variable label:
|
How much would you say you know about machine learning and artificial intelligence?
|
Pre-question text:
|
We now want to ask about your attitudes towards the use of machine learning in public administration. Machine learning is also often referred to as artificial intelligence.
Using machine learning involves getting computers to learn how to solve tasks based on data. Computers can often become extremely accurate, although this typically requires a lot of data. Today, machine learning provides the basis for everything from automatic voice recognition to driverless cars.
In some cases, public agencies, including NAV, uses machine learning to help make decisions in cases for which they are responsible. The aim is to reduce costs and processing time, and to make decisions better and more accurate. One example might be to teach a computer to predict approximately how long a person will be on sick leave based on information about the disease and the person. A case officer can then use this to choose appropriate measures.
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much would you say you know about machine learning and artificial intelligence?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A great deal |
110 |
2.8% |
0.027721774 |
2 |
A lot |
432 |
10.9% |
0.108870968 |
3 |
Quite a lot |
897 |
22.6% |
0.226058468 |
4 |
Not much |
2055 |
51.8% |
0.517893145 |
5 |
Nothing at all |
449 |
11.3% |
0.113155242 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.6% |
0.006300403 |
98 |
Not asked |
6072 |
|
NA |
r21padkom21
Variable label:
|
Are your interests better/worse safeguarded if machine learning is used in NAV?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let’s say that you were in a situation where you had to apply to NAV for financial support.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think that your interests would be safeguarded better or worse if the case officer used machine learning and artificial intelligence as help in making a decision about financial support?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very much better |
11 |
0.5% |
0.005418719 |
2 |
Much better |
91 |
4.5% |
0.044827586 |
3 |
Somewhat better |
412 |
20.3% |
0.202955665 |
4 |
Neither better nor worse |
830 |
40.9% |
0.408866995 |
5 |
Somewhat worse |
407 |
20% |
0.200492611 |
6 |
Much worse |
174 |
8.6% |
0.085714286 |
7 |
Very much worse |
62 |
3.1% |
0.030541872 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
2.1% |
0.021182266 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom24
Variable label:
|
Would you accept a work preparation course offered by NAV?
|
Pre-question text:
|
First, we ask you to imagine that you are in a situation where, as a job seeker registered with NAV, you are offered a work preparation course.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think you would accept it?
|
Post-question:
|
If you are not sure, please choose the option that is most likely.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, I would have accepted a work preparation course |
1666 |
82.1% |
0.8206897 |
2 |
No, I wouldn't have accepted a work preparation course |
309 |
15.2% |
0.1522167 |
97 |
Not answered |
55 |
2.7% |
0.0270936 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom25_1
Variable label:
|
Machine learning in NAV may use: Data about job seeker’s health issues
|
Pre-question text:
|
Access to job-oriented measures is needs-based. The case officer will decide which measures a job seeker will be offered based on an individual assessment of their needs. Such assessments have previously been made by the case officer alone. Today, NAV is testing machine learning as a means of assisting case officers with proposals in such assessments.
Given that this helps to ensure that proposals are more accurate, how appropriate do you think it is that in connection with machine learning a computer will process the following data about the job seeker?
|
Literal question:
|
The extent to which the job seeker states that they have health issues
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly appropriate |
272 |
13.4% |
0.13399015 |
2 |
Appropriate |
589 |
29% |
0.29014778 |
3 |
Somewhat appropriate |
584 |
28.8% |
0.28768473 |
4 |
Not very appropriate |
316 |
15.6% |
0.15566502 |
5 |
Not appropriate at all |
152 |
7.5% |
0.07487685 |
97 |
Not answered |
117 |
5.8% |
0.05763547 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom25_2
Variable label:
|
Machine learning in NAV may use: Data about job seeker’s other issues
|
Pre-question text:
|
Access to job-oriented measures is needs-based. The case officer will decide which measures a job seeker will be offered based on an individual assessment of their needs. Such assessments have previously been made by the case officer alone. Today, NAV is testing machine learning as a means of assisting case officers with proposals in such assessments.
Given that this helps to ensure that proposals are more accurate, how appropriate do you think it is that in connection with machine learning a computer will process the following data about the job seeker?
|
Literal question:
|
The extent to which the job seeker states that they have other issues that prevent them from working
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly appropriate |
309 |
15.2% |
0.15221675 |
2 |
Appropriate |
655 |
32.3% |
0.32266010 |
3 |
Somewhat appropriate |
543 |
26.7% |
0.26748768 |
4 |
Not very appropriate |
278 |
13.7% |
0.13694581 |
5 |
Not appropriate at all |
127 |
6.3% |
0.06256158 |
97 |
Not answered |
118 |
5.8% |
0.05812808 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom25_3
Variable label:
|
Machine learning in NAV may use: Data about job seeker’s education
|
Pre-question text:
|
Access to job-oriented measures is needs-based. The case officer will decide which measures a job seeker will be offered based on an individual assessment of their needs. Such assessments have previously been made by the case officer alone. Today, NAV is testing machine learning as a means of assisting case officers with proposals in such assessments.
Given that this helps to ensure that proposals are more accurate, how appropriate do you think it is that in connection with machine learning a computer will process the following data about the job seeker?
|
Literal question:
|
Education: The extent to which the job seeker has completed approved education in Norway
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly appropriate |
619 |
30.5% |
0.30492611 |
2 |
Appropriate |
783 |
38.6% |
0.38571429 |
3 |
Somewhat appropriate |
359 |
17.7% |
0.17684729 |
4 |
Not very appropriate |
107 |
5.3% |
0.05270936 |
5 |
Not appropriate at all |
53 |
2.6% |
0.02610837 |
97 |
Not answered |
109 |
5.4% |
0.05369458 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom25_4
Variable label:
|
Machine learning in NAV may use: Data about job seeker’s work history
|
Pre-question text:
|
Access to job-oriented measures is needs-based. The case officer will decide which measures a job seeker will be offered based on an individual assessment of their needs. Such assessments have previously been made by the case officer alone. Today, NAV is testing machine learning as a means of assisting case officers with proposals in such assessments.
Given that this helps to ensure that proposals are more accurate, how appropriate do you think it is that in connection with machine learning a computer will process the following data about the job seeker?
|
Literal question:
|
Work history: Has the job seeker been in continuous work for 6 months in the last 12 months?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly appropriate |
389 |
19.2% |
0.19162562 |
2 |
Appropriate |
724 |
35.7% |
0.35665025 |
3 |
Somewhat appropriate |
519 |
25.6% |
0.25566502 |
4 |
Not very appropriate |
195 |
9.6% |
0.09605911 |
5 |
Not appropriate at all |
89 |
4.4% |
0.04384236 |
97 |
Not answered |
114 |
5.6% |
0.05615764 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom25_5
Variable label:
|
Machine learning in NAV may use: Data about job seeker’s age
|
Pre-question text:
|
Access to job-oriented measures is needs-based. The case officer will decide which measures a job seeker will be offered based on an individual assessment of their needs. Such assessments have previously been made by the case officer alone. Today, NAV is testing machine learning as a means of assisting case officers with proposals in such assessments.
Given that this helps to ensure that proposals are more accurate, how appropriate do you think it is that in connection with machine learning a computer will process the following data about the job seeker?
|
Literal question:
|
Age
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly appropriate |
345 |
17% |
0.16995074 |
2 |
Appropriate |
591 |
29.1% |
0.29113300 |
3 |
Somewhat appropriate |
563 |
27.7% |
0.27733990 |
4 |
Not very appropriate |
289 |
14.2% |
0.14236453 |
5 |
Not appropriate at all |
125 |
6.2% |
0.06157635 |
97 |
Not answered |
117 |
5.8% |
0.05763547 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom25_6
Variable label:
|
Machine learning in NAV may use: Data about job seeker’s sex
|
Pre-question text:
|
Access to job-oriented measures is needs-based. The case officer will decide which measures a job seeker will be offered based on an individual assessment of their needs. Such assessments have previously been made by the case officer alone. Today, NAV is testing machine learning as a means of assisting case officers with proposals in such assessments.
Given that this helps to ensure that proposals are more accurate, how appropriate do you think it is that in connection with machine learning a computer will process the following data about the job seeker?
|
Literal question:
|
Sex
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly appropriate |
279 |
13.7% |
0.13743842 |
2 |
Appropriate |
425 |
20.9% |
0.20935961 |
3 |
Somewhat appropriate |
436 |
21.5% |
0.21477833 |
4 |
Not very appropriate |
387 |
19.1% |
0.19064039 |
5 |
Not appropriate at all |
387 |
19.1% |
0.19064039 |
97 |
Not answered |
116 |
5.7% |
0.05714286 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom25_7
Variable label:
|
Machine learning in NAV may use: Data about job seeker’s nationality
|
Pre-question text:
|
Access to job-oriented measures is needs-based. The case officer will decide which measures a job seeker will be offered based on an individual assessment of their needs. Such assessments have previously been made by the case officer alone. Today, NAV is testing machine learning as a means of assisting case officers with proposals in such assessments.
Given that this helps to ensure that proposals are more accurate, how appropriate do you think it is that in connection with machine learning a computer will process the following data about the job seeker?
|
Literal question:
|
The job seeker’s nationality
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly appropriate |
219 |
10.8% |
0.10788177 |
2 |
Appropriate |
423 |
20.8% |
0.20837438 |
3 |
Somewhat appropriate |
523 |
25.8% |
0.25763547 |
4 |
Not very appropriate |
455 |
22.4% |
0.22413793 |
5 |
Not appropriate at all |
293 |
14.4% |
0.14433498 |
97 |
Not answered |
117 |
5.8% |
0.05763547 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom25_8
Variable label:
|
Machine learning in NAV may use: Data about job seeker’s place of residence
|
Pre-question text:
|
Access to job-oriented measures is needs-based. The case officer will decide which measures a job seeker will be offered based on an individual assessment of their needs. Such assessments have previously been made by the case officer alone. Today, NAV is testing machine learning as a means of assisting case officers with proposals in such assessments.
Given that this helps to ensure that proposals are more accurate, how appropriate do you think it is that in connection with machine learning a computer will process the following data about the job seeker?
|
Literal question:
|
Place of residence: Where in the country does the job seeker live?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly appropriate |
476 |
23.4% |
0.23448276 |
2 |
Appropriate |
696 |
34.3% |
0.34285714 |
3 |
Somewhat appropriate |
441 |
21.7% |
0.21724138 |
4 |
Not very appropriate |
179 |
8.8% |
0.08817734 |
5 |
Not appropriate at all |
120 |
5.9% |
0.05911330 |
97 |
Not answered |
118 |
5.8% |
0.05812808 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom25_9
Variable label:
|
Machine learning in NAV may use: Data about job seeker’s criminal record
|
Pre-question text:
|
Access to job-oriented measures is needs-based. The case officer will decide which measures a job seeker will be offered based on an individual assessment of their needs. Such assessments have previously been made by the case officer alone. Today, NAV is testing machine learning as a means of assisting case officers with proposals in such assessments.
Given that this helps to ensure that proposals are more accurate, how appropriate do you think it is that in connection with machine learning a computer will process the following data about the job seeker?
|
Literal question:
|
Criminal record: Has the job seeker been convicted of criminal acts?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly appropriate |
424 |
20.9% |
0.20886700 |
2 |
Appropriate |
562 |
27.7% |
0.27684729 |
3 |
Somewhat appropriate |
473 |
23.3% |
0.23300493 |
4 |
Not very appropriate |
303 |
14.9% |
0.14926108 |
5 |
Not appropriate at all |
149 |
7.3% |
0.07339901 |
97 |
Not answered |
119 |
5.9% |
0.05862069 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom29_ran
Variable label:
|
NA
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1982] [Invalid:8058] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
As support in the decision-making process, the case officer uses artificial
intelligence, based on machine learning, which recommends who should receive
support. |
1043 |
52.6% |
0.5262361 |
2 |
[blank] |
939 |
47.4% |
0.4737639 |
Sysmiss |
|
8058 |
|
NA |
r21padkom29_1
Variable label:
|
How important that case officer in NAV has: Same level of education as you
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let’s say that you were in a situation where you had to apply to NAV for financial support. If you could choose a case officer to safeguard your interests in NAV, how important do you think it would be for the person to have the following characteristics?
[blank / As support in the decision-making process, the case officer uses artificial intelligence, based on machine learning, which recommends who should receive support.]
|
Literal question:
|
Same level of education as you
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
109 |
5.4% |
0.05369458 |
2 |
Important |
382 |
18.8% |
0.18817734 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
519 |
25.6% |
0.25566502 |
4 |
Not very important |
555 |
27.3% |
0.27339901 |
5 |
Not important at all |
368 |
18.1% |
0.18128079 |
97 |
Not answered |
97 |
4.8% |
0.04778325 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom29_2
Variable label:
|
How important that case officer in NAV is: From the same region as you
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let’s say that you were in a situation where you had to apply to NAV for financial support. If you could choose a case officer to safeguard your interests in NAV, how important do you think it would be for the person to have the following characteristics?
[blank / As support in the decision-making process, the case officer uses artificial intelligence, based on machine learning, which recommends who should receive support.]
|
Literal question:
|
From the same region as you
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
38 |
1.9% |
0.01871921 |
2 |
Important |
162 |
8% |
0.07980296 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
277 |
13.6% |
0.13645320 |
4 |
Not very important |
717 |
35.3% |
0.35320197 |
5 |
Not important at all |
737 |
36.3% |
0.36305419 |
97 |
Not answered |
99 |
4.9% |
0.04876847 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom29_3
Variable label:
|
How important that case officer in NAV has: Same sex as you
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let’s say that you were in a situation where you had to apply to NAV for financial support. If you could choose a case officer to safeguard your interests in NAV, how important do you think it would be for the person to have the following characteristics?
[blank / As support in the decision-making process, the case officer uses artificial intelligence, based on machine learning, which recommends who should receive support.]
|
Literal question:
|
Same sex as you
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
16 |
0.8% |
0.007881773 |
2 |
Important |
76 |
3.7% |
0.037438424 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
211 |
10.4% |
0.103940887 |
4 |
Not very important |
721 |
35.5% |
0.355172414 |
5 |
Not important at all |
899 |
44.3% |
0.442857143 |
97 |
Not answered |
107 |
5.3% |
0.052709360 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom29_4
Variable label:
|
How important that case officer in NAV has: Same religious fatih as you
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let’s say that you were in a situation where you had to apply to NAV for financial support. If you could choose a case officer to safeguard your interests in NAV, how important do you think it would be for the person to have the following characteristics?
[blank / As support in the decision-making process, the case officer uses artificial intelligence, based on machine learning, which recommends who should receive support.]
|
Literal question:
|
Same religious faith as you
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
30 |
1.5% |
0.01477833 |
2 |
Important |
65 |
3.2% |
0.03201970 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
163 |
8% |
0.08029557 |
4 |
Not very important |
658 |
32.4% |
0.32413793 |
5 |
Not important at all |
1014 |
50% |
0.49950739 |
97 |
Not answered |
100 |
4.9% |
0.04926108 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom29_5
Variable label:
|
How important that case officer in NAV is: About the same age as you
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let’s say that you were in a situation where you had to apply to NAV for financial support. If you could choose a case officer to safeguard your interests in NAV, how important do you think it would be for the person to have the following characteristics?
[blank / As support in the decision-making process, the case officer uses artificial intelligence, based on machine learning, which recommends who should receive support.]
|
Literal question:
|
About the same age as you
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
18 |
0.9% |
0.008866995 |
2 |
Important |
112 |
5.5% |
0.055172414 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
421 |
20.7% |
0.207389163 |
4 |
Not very important |
676 |
33.3% |
0.333004926 |
5 |
Not important at all |
699 |
34.4% |
0.344334975 |
97 |
Not answered |
104 |
5.1% |
0.051231527 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom29_6
Variable label:
|
How important that case officer in NAV has: Same ethnic origin as you
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let’s say that you were in a situation where you had to apply to NAV for financial support. If you could choose a case officer to safeguard your interests in NAV, how important do you think it would be for the person to have the following characteristics?
[blank / As support in the decision-making process, the case officer uses artificial intelligence, based on machine learning, which recommends who should receive support.]
|
Literal question:
|
Same ethnic origin as you
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
51 |
2.5% |
0.02512315 |
2 |
Important |
143 |
7% |
0.07044335 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
308 |
15.2% |
0.15172414 |
4 |
Not very important |
612 |
30.1% |
0.30147783 |
5 |
Not important at all |
812 |
40% |
0.40000000 |
97 |
Not answered |
104 |
5.1% |
0.05123153 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom29_7
Variable label:
|
How important that case officer in NAV has: Same political standpoint as you
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let’s say that you were in a situation where you had to apply to NAV for financial support. If you could choose a case officer to safeguard your interests in NAV, how important do you think it would be for the person to have the following characteristics?
[blank / As support in the decision-making process, the case officer uses artificial intelligence, based on machine learning, which recommends who should receive support.]
|
Literal question:
|
Same political standpoint as you
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
13 |
0.6% |
0.006403941 |
2 |
Important |
53 |
2.6% |
0.026108374 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
224 |
11% |
0.110344828 |
4 |
Not very important |
713 |
35.1% |
0.351231527 |
5 |
Not important at all |
920 |
45.3% |
0.453201970 |
97 |
Not answered |
107 |
5.3% |
0.052709360 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom29_8
Variable label:
|
How important that case officer in NAV has: Same type of work experience as you
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let’s say that you were in a situation where you had to apply to NAV for financial support. If you could choose a case officer to safeguard your interests in NAV, how important do you think it would be for the person to have the following characteristics?
[blank / As support in the decision-making process, the case officer uses artificial intelligence, based on machine learning, which recommends who should receive support.]
|
Literal question:
|
Same type of work experience as you
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
43 |
2.1% |
0.02118227 |
2 |
Important |
201 |
9.9% |
0.09901478 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
479 |
23.6% |
0.23596059 |
4 |
Not very important |
593 |
29.2% |
0.29211823 |
5 |
Not important at all |
615 |
30.3% |
0.30295567 |
97 |
Not answered |
99 |
4.9% |
0.04876847 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom29_9
Variable label:
|
How important that case officer in NAV has: Same sexual orientation as you
|
Pre-question text:
|
Let’s say that you were in a situation where you had to apply to NAV for financial support. If you could choose a case officer to safeguard your interests in NAV, how important do you think it would be for the person to have the following characteristics?
[blank / As support in the decision-making process, the case officer uses artificial intelligence, based on machine learning, which recommends who should receive support.]
|
Literal question:
|
Same sexual orientation as you
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004926108 |
2 |
Important |
45 |
2.2% |
0.022167488 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
77 |
3.8% |
0.037931034 |
4 |
Not very important |
459 |
22.6% |
0.226108374 |
5 |
Not important at all |
1334 |
65.7% |
0.657142857 |
97 |
Not answered |
105 |
5.2% |
0.051724138 |
98 |
Not asked |
8010 |
|
NA |
r21padkom22
Variable label:
|
How concerned about the use of machine learning in public administration?
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about the use of machine learning and artificial intelligence in public administration?
|
Post-question:
|
You will have the opportunity to justify your answer in the next page.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very concerned |
103 |
5.3% |
0.05306543 |
2 |
Concerned |
360 |
18.5% |
0.18547141 |
3 |
Somewhat concerned |
806 |
41.5% |
0.41524987 |
4 |
Not particularly concerned |
563 |
29% |
0.29005667 |
5 |
Not at all concerned |
97 |
5% |
0.04997424 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.6% |
0.00618238 |
98 |
Not asked |
8099 |
|
NA |
r21padkom23
Variable label:
|
Open: Why you answered like you did to [R21PADKOM22]
|
Pre-question text:
|
In the previous question you answered that you were [R21PADKOM22_] about the use of machine learning and artificial intelligence in public administration.
|
Literal question:
|
Why is that?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 3 & r21padkom22 is answered]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom26_ran
Variable label:
|
Randomly selects alternative for r21PADKOM26
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1941] [Invalid:8099] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
men than women |
965 |
49.7% |
0.4971664 |
1 |
women than men |
976 |
50.3% |
0.5028336 |
Sysmiss |
|
8099 |
|
NA |
r21padkom26_ran_contra
Variable label:
|
The opposite of av r21PADKOM26_ran
|
Technical description:
|
[Takes the oposite value of r21padkom26_ran]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1941] [Invalid:8099] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
men than women |
976 |
50.3% |
0.5028336 |
0 |
women than men |
965 |
49.7% |
0.4971664 |
Sysmiss |
|
8099 |
|
NA |
r21padkom26
Variable label:
|
Which of two machine learning models in NAV seems the fairest?
|
Pre-question text:
|
A realistic example of where machine learning can be used in public administration is when NAV decides which people on sick leave will be offered a dialogue meeting with NAV. A dialogue meeting is a conversation between NAV and the person on sick leave that is regarded as positive for the person on sick leave’s chances of returning to work.
Imagine we can choose between two alternative machine learning models for choosing who will be offered a dialogue meeting.
Neither of the models is perfect but they are imperfect in different ways.
The first model is the most accurate. However, from among those who need a dialogue meeting, more [women than men/men than women] are offered a dialogue meeting. Thus, the proportion who need a dialogue meeting but are not offered one is greater among [men than women/ women than men].
The second model ensures that the proportion of women and men on sick leave called in for a dialogue meeting is the same. However, it is less accurate overall, such that fewer people who need a dialogue meeting are called in. This applies to both women and men.
|
Literal question:
|
If the choice was between these two models only, which seems the fairest to you?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The first model seems the fairest |
870 |
44.8% |
0.44822257 |
2 |
The second model seems the fairest |
957 |
49.3% |
0.49304482 |
97 |
Not answered |
114 |
5.9% |
0.05873261 |
98 |
Not asked |
8099 |
|
NA |
r21padkom27
Variable label:
|
Open: Can you give the reasons for your answer to [r21PADKOM26]?
|
Literal question:
|
Can you give the reasons for your answer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 3 & r21padkom26 is answered]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom28
Variable label:
|
Use of artificial intelligence in public administration or not, given the consequences in sum and for groups?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Many decisions in public administration require the exercise of judgement based on an overall assessment of the individual case. If artificial intelligence is adopted, decisions made with the assistance of machine learning will probably be more accurate, thereby increasing the proportion of correct decisions. At the same time, a computer cannot be completely accurate either. There is also reason to believe that the remaining proportion of incorrect decisions disproportionately affects some groups in society when one uses machine learning and artificial intelligence. This is due to the great variation in how human case officers exercise judgement, while for a computer there is no variation.
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, which do you prefer in such situations? Using artificial intelligence (which leads to many more correct decisions in exchange for the fact that it is always the same ones who are subject to incorrect decisions), or not using artificial intelligence (which leads to many fewer correct decisions in exchange for the ones who are subject to incorrect decisions varying).
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 3]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Use artificial intelligence |
871 |
44.9% |
0.44873776 |
2 |
Do not use artificial intelligence |
978 |
50.4% |
0.50386399 |
97 |
Not answered |
92 |
4.7% |
0.04739825 |
98 |
Not asked |
8099 |
|
NA |
r21padkom32_ran
Variable label:
|
Randomly selects alternative for r21PADKOM32.
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1925] [Invalid:8115] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
promoting a message that the so-called gay lobby is destroying Norwegian society |
478 |
24.8% |
0.2483117 |
2 |
promoting a message that multiculturalism is destroying Norwegian society |
422 |
21.9% |
0.2192208 |
3 |
promoting a message that Islam and Muslim immigration pose a threat to the
rights of women and gays |
538 |
27.9% |
0.2794805 |
4 |
burning the Koran |
487 |
25.3% |
0.2529870 |
Sysmiss |
|
8115 |
|
NA |
r21padkom32
Variable label:
|
How acceptable that counter-demonstrators physically attack to prevent far right activists?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine the following scenario. During a public demonstration, a group of counter-demonstrators physically attack activists from the far right to prevent them from [promoting a message that the so-called gay lobby is destroying Norwegian society/promoting a message that multiculturalism is destroying Norwegian society/promoting a message that Islam and Muslim immigration pose a threat to the rights of women and gays/burning the Koran].
|
Literal question:
|
How acceptable or unacceptable do you think it is for the counter-demonstrators to physically attack activists from the far right to prevent them from doing this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21padkom32_ran = 1,2,3,4 & r21group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly acceptable |
35 |
1.8% |
0.01818182 |
2 |
Acceptable |
31 |
1.6% |
0.01610390 |
3 |
Somewhat acceptable |
75 |
3.9% |
0.03896104 |
4 |
Neither acceptable nor unacceptable |
84 |
4.4% |
0.04363636 |
5 |
Somewhat unacceptable |
107 |
5.6% |
0.05558442 |
6 |
Unacceptable |
698 |
36.3% |
0.36259740 |
7 |
Highly unacceptable |
876 |
45.5% |
0.45506494 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
1% |
0.00987013 |
98 |
Not asked |
8115 |
|
NA |
r21padkom33
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Far right activists should be allowed to rent community centres in my area to hold meetings
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Activist groups from the far right should be allowed to rent community centres in my local area to hold meetings for their members and sympathisers.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
115 |
5.9% |
0.05924781 |
2 |
Agree |
314 |
16.2% |
0.16177228 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
249 |
12.8% |
0.12828439 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
331 |
17.1% |
0.17053065 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
237 |
12.2% |
0.12210201 |
6 |
Disagree |
368 |
19% |
0.18959299 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
288 |
14.8% |
0.14837713 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
2% |
0.02009274 |
98 |
Not asked |
8099 |
|
NA |
r21padkom6
Variable label:
|
By how much do you think Norway has cut its greenhouse gas emissions from 1990 to 2019?
|
Pre-question text:
|
On the next question, please give us your best guess and do not look up the answer. The government’s goal is for Norwegian greenhouse gas emissions to be 50% lower than they were in 1990 by 2030.
|
Literal question:
|
By how much do you think Norway has cut its greenhouse gas emissions so far from 1990 to 2019?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1943] [Invalid:8097] [Range:0-100]
|
r21padkom7_ran
Variable label:
|
NA
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1984] [Invalid:8056] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
We also want to ask you about an item that has been in the news recently. The
news item was about a report that was recently published about global warming
and Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. |
523 |
26.4% |
0.2636089 |
2 |
We also want to ask you about an item that has been in the news recently. The
news item was about a report that was recently published about global warming
and Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. The report said that in 2019 Norway’s
emissions were about the same as in 1990. Norway has only cut about 3% of its
greenhouse gas emissions in the past 30 years. |
491 |
24.7% |
0.2474798 |
3 |
We also want to ask you about an item that has been in the news recently. The
news item was about a report that was recently published about global warming
and Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. The report said that in 2019 Norway’s
emissions were about the same as in 1990. Norway has only cut about 3% of its
greenhouse gas emissions in the past 30 years. Over the same time period, Sweden
has cut 30% of its emissions, and the EU countries have cut an average of 26%. |
473 |
23.8% |
0.2384073 |
4 |
We also want to ask you about an item that has been in the news recently. The
news item was about a report that was recently published about global warming
and Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. The report said that about 97% of climate
scientists now agree that rising global temperatures are mainly due to human
activity. The expected consequences of global warming include an increase in
extreme weather events, such as droughts, floods, and storms. |
497 |
25.1% |
0.2505040 |
Sysmiss |
|
8056 |
|
NA |
r21padkom7
Variable label:
|
Have you heard about recent item in the news about [report about greenhouse gas emissions]?
|
Pre-question text:
|
[We also want to ask you about an item that has been in the news recently. The news item was about a report that was recently published about global warming and Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions./ We also want to ask you about an item that has been in the news recently. The news item was about a report that was recently published about global warming and Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. The report said that in 2019 Norway’s emissions were about the same as in 1990. Norway has only cut about 3% of its greenhouse gas emissions in the past 30 years./ We also want to ask you about an item that has been in the news recently. The news item was about a report that was recently published about global warming and Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. The report said that in 2019 Norway’s emissions were about the same as in 1990. Norway has only cut about 3% of its greenhouse gas emissions in the past 30 years. Over the same time period, Sweden has cut 30% of its emissions, and the EU countries have cut an average of 26%./ We also want to ask you about an item that has been in the news recently. The news item was about a report that was recently published about global warming and Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. The report said that about 97% of climate scientists now agree that rising global temperatures are mainly due to human activity. The expected consequences of global warming include an increase in extreme weather events, such as droughts, floods, and storms.]
|
Literal question:
|
Have you heard about a news item like this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
794 |
39.2% |
0.39248641 |
2 |
No |
857 |
42.4% |
0.42362827 |
3 |
Don't know |
323 |
16% |
0.15966387 |
97 |
Not answered |
49 |
2.4% |
0.02422145 |
98 |
Not asked |
8017 |
|
NA |
r21padkom8_1
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The government is doing enough to cut Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements on climate policy and state the extent to which you agree or disagree with them:
|
Literal question:
|
The government is doing enough to cut Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
121 |
6% |
0.05981216 |
2 |
Agree |
532 |
26.3% |
0.26297578 |
3 |
Disagree |
780 |
38.6% |
0.38556599 |
4 |
Strongly disagree |
390 |
19.3% |
0.19278300 |
5 |
Don't know |
150 |
7.4% |
0.07414731 |
97 |
Not answered |
50 |
2.5% |
0.02471577 |
98 |
Not asked |
8017 |
|
NA |
r21padkom8_2
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The carbon tax should be tripled by 2030, making it considerably more expensive to emit CO2
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements on climate policy and state the extent to which you agree or disagree with them:
|
Literal question:
|
The carbon tax should be tripled by 2030, making it considerably more expensive to emit CO2.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
170 |
8.4% |
0.08403361 |
2 |
Agree |
664 |
32.8% |
0.32822541 |
3 |
Disagree |
561 |
27.7% |
0.27731092 |
4 |
Strongly disagree |
334 |
16.5% |
0.16510133 |
5 |
Don't know |
240 |
11.9% |
0.11863569 |
97 |
Not answered |
54 |
2.7% |
0.02669303 |
98 |
Not asked |
8017 |
|
NA |
r21padkom8_3
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: The Norwegian oil and gas industry should be phased out within the next 15 years
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements on climate policy and state the extent to which you agree or disagree with them:
|
Literal question:
|
The Norwegian oil and gas industry should be phased out within the next 15 years.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
172 |
8.5% |
0.08502224 |
2 |
Agree |
422 |
20.9% |
0.20860109 |
3 |
Disagree |
623 |
30.8% |
0.30795848 |
4 |
Strongly disagree |
537 |
26.5% |
0.26544736 |
5 |
Don't know |
215 |
10.6% |
0.10627781 |
97 |
Not answered |
54 |
2.7% |
0.02669303 |
98 |
Not asked |
8017 |
|
NA |
r21padkom8_4
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Could take part in a demonstration to get the government to take action on the climate
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please read the following statements on climate policy and state the extent to which you agree or disagree with them:
|
Literal question:
|
I could take part in a demonstration to get the government to take more action on the climate.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
119 |
5.9% |
0.05882353 |
2 |
Agree |
334 |
16.5% |
0.16510133 |
3 |
Disagree |
542 |
26.8% |
0.26791893 |
4 |
Strongly disagree |
679 |
33.6% |
0.33564014 |
5 |
Don't know |
297 |
14.7% |
0.14681167 |
97 |
Not answered |
52 |
2.6% |
0.02570440 |
98 |
Not asked |
8017 |
|
NA |
r21padkom10_articles
Variable label:
|
Experiment: List of articles shown
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles carefully before the time runs out.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:3280] [Invalid:6760] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_position
Variable label:
|
Experiment: Article display order
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles carefully before the time runs out.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_time_1
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 1: Time spent reading articles
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles carefully before the time runs out.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:3186] [Invalid:6854] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_time_2
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 2: Time spent reading articles
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles carefully before the time runs out.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:250] [Invalid:9790] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_time_3
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 3: Time spent reading articles
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles carefully before the time runs out.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:49] [Invalid:9991] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_time_fp_1
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 1: Time spent on front page
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles carefully before the time runs out.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:character] [Valid:3186] [Invalid:6854] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_time_fp_2
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 2: Time spent on front page
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles carefully before the time runs out.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:character] [Valid:250] [Invalid:9790] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_time_fp_3
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 3: Time spent on front page
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles carefully before the time runs out.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Numeric] [Format:character] [Valid:49] [Invalid:9991] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_click_order_session_1
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 1: Article click order
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles carefully before the time runs out.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:2690] [Invalid:7350] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_click_order_session_2
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 2: Article click order
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles carefully before the time runs out.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:189] [Invalid:9851] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_click_order_session_3
Variable label:
|
Experiment session 3: Article click order
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Literal question:
|
For the next two minutes, you will be able to click on and read news on a news site reminiscent of an ordinary Norwegian news site. The news items are reminiscent of and based on real items in Norwegian online newspapers.
Please click on and read the items you want to read like you normally would when you read news online. Click on the headlines to read the articles and “To front page” to return to the front page.
The survey will automatically move on to the next question when two minutes have passed. You will not have time to read all of the articles carefully before the time runs out.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:26] [Invalid:10014] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_clock_sessiondata_1
Variable label:
|
Time left upon ending experiment. First session
|
Pre-question text:
|
Time left upon ending experiment. First session
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:3186] [Invalid:6854] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_clock_sessiondata_2
Variable label:
|
Time left upon ending experiment. Second session
|
Pre-question text:
|
Time left upon ending experiment. Second session
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:250] [Invalid:9790] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_clock_sessiondata_3
Variable label:
|
Time left upon ending experiment. Last session
|
Pre-question text:
|
Time left upon ending experiment. Last session
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:49] [Invalid:9991] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_endby_sessiondata_1
Variable label:
|
Reason for ending experiment. First session
|
Pre-question text:
|
Reason for ending experiment. First session
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:3202] [Invalid:6838] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_endby_sessiondata_2
Variable label:
|
Reason for ending experiment. Second session
|
Pre-question text:
|
Reason for ending experiment. Second session
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:251] [Invalid:9789] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_endby_sessiondata_3
Variable label:
|
Reason for ending experiment. Last session
|
Pre-question text:
|
Reason for ending experiment. Last session
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:49] [Invalid:9991] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom10_group
Variable label:
|
Treatment group assigned at random.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. Treatment group assigned at random.
|
Literal question:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 3,4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3284] [Invalid:6756] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Group 1 - Baseline |
348 |
10.6% |
0.1059683 |
2 |
Group 2 - Negative relevant |
343 |
10.4% |
0.1044458 |
3 |
Group 3 - Positive relevant |
357 |
10.9% |
0.1087089 |
4 |
Group 4 - Negative visible |
378 |
11.5% |
0.1151035 |
5 |
Group 5 - Positive visible |
388 |
11.8% |
0.1181486 |
6 |
Group 6 - Negative relevant visible |
389 |
11.8% |
0.1184531 |
7 |
Group 7 - Positive relevant visible |
352 |
10.7% |
0.1071864 |
8 |
Group 8 - Negative visible + other article relevant |
350 |
10.7% |
0.1065773 |
9 |
Group 9 - Positive visible + other article relevant |
379 |
11.5% |
0.1154080 |
Sysmiss |
|
6756 |
|
NA |
r21padkom10_angle
Variable label:
|
Indicates whether the treatment article has a negative or positive angle.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. Indicates whether the treatment article has a negative or positive angle.
Based on r21padkom10_group:
positive [3, 5, 7, 9]
negative [2, 4, 6, 8]
|
Literal question:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2936] [Invalid:7104] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Positive |
1476 |
50.3% |
0.5027248 |
2 |
Negative |
1460 |
49.7% |
0.4972752 |
Sysmiss |
|
7104 |
|
NA |
r21padkom10_relevance
Variable label:
|
Indicates whether the treatment article is geographically relevant to the respondent.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. Indicates whether the treatment article is geographically relevant to the respondent.
Based on r21padkom10_group:
Relevant [2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Not relevant [1, 4, 5]
|
Literal question:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3284] [Invalid:6756] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes - relevance in treatment (geography) |
1441 |
43.9% |
0.4387942 |
0 |
No - relevance not in treatment (geography) |
1843 |
56.1% |
0.5612058 |
Sysmiss |
|
6756 |
|
NA |
r21padkom10_enlarged
Variable label:
|
Indicates whether the treatment article was highlited with a large image on the front page.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. Indicates whether the treatment article was highlited with a large image on the front page.
Based on r21padkom10_group:
Large image [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Small image [0, 1, 2, 3]
|
Literal question:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3284] [Invalid:6756] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes - enhanced visibility |
2236 |
68.1% |
0.680877 |
0 |
No - not enhanced visibility |
1048 |
31.9% |
0.319123 |
Sysmiss |
|
6756 |
|
NA |
r21padkom10_order_option
Variable label:
|
Indicates the method for sorting the news articles.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Experiment. Indicates the method for sorting the news articles.
Based on r21padkom10_group:
Random order [0, 1, 2, 3]
Treatment article was displayed first [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
|
Literal question:
|
Experiment. The respondents were shown a «news site» with eight fictitious news articles. Two of the articles ere treatment articles, one negative and one positive. The rest were neutral.
The respondents were assigned at random to one of nine groups, varying on article sorting method, visual prominence of the treatment articles on the front page and geographic relevance for the respondent.
The respondents could click and read the articles as they wished, and could at any time return to the front page. Two minutes into the experiment, the respondents were automatically sent to the next question. The respondents could enter the question as many times as they wished, with the first, second and last session being saved.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:3284] [Invalid:6756] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Group 0, 1, 2, 3: All in random order |
1048 |
31.9% |
0.319123 |
2 |
Group 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 og 9: Treatment-article on top of page |
2236 |
68.1% |
0.680877 |
Sysmiss |
|
6756 |
|
NA |
r21padkom11
Variable label:
|
How close to/far from is the place mentioned in [r21padkom10_header] from here you live?
|
Pre-question text:
|
The title of the article below mentions a place.
|
Literal question:
|
How close to or far from where you live is this?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21padkom10_relevance = 1 & r21group = 3,4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very close/I live here |
943 |
65.4% |
0.65440666 |
2 |
Somewhat close |
186 |
12.9% |
0.12907703 |
3 |
Neither close nor far away |
130 |
9% |
0.09021513 |
4 |
Somewhat far away |
62 |
4.3% |
0.04302568 |
5 |
Very far away |
33 |
2.3% |
0.02290076 |
6 |
I haven't heard of this place. |
65 |
4.5% |
0.04510756 |
97 |
Not answered |
22 |
1.5% |
0.01526718 |
98 |
Not asked |
8599 |
|
NA |
r21padkom12_ran
Variable label:
|
Randomly selects if the respondents is shown a negative or positive article.
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 3,4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1843] [Invalid:8197] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Positive |
929 |
50.4% |
0.5040695 |
2 |
Negative |
914 |
49.6% |
0.4959305 |
Sysmiss |
|
8197 |
|
NA |
r21padkom12_articleheader
Variable label:
|
Randomly selected headline for r21padkom12
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 3,4]
[Text data witheld due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting DIGSSCORE/University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21padkom12
Variable label:
|
To what extent does [r21padkom12_articleheader] portray immigration in a negative/positive way?
|
Pre-question text:
|
[r21padkom12_articleheader]
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think the title of the article below portrays immigration in a negative or positive way?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21padkom10_relevance = 0 & r21group = 3,4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Portrays immigration in a very positive way |
74 |
4% |
0.04015193 |
2 |
Portrays immigration in a positive way |
532 |
28.9% |
0.28865979 |
3 |
Portrays immigration in neither a positive nor a negative way |
692 |
37.5% |
0.37547477 |
4 |
Portrays immigration in a negative way |
410 |
22.2% |
0.22246337 |
5 |
Portrays immigration in a very negative way |
82 |
4.4% |
0.04449267 |
97 |
Not answered |
53 |
2.9% |
0.02875746 |
98 |
Not asked |
8197 |
|
NA |
r21km_fly
Variable label:
|
How often did you travel by air in connection with holiday travel before the Covid-19 pandemic?
|
Literal question:
|
If you think back to before the Covid-19 pandemic, how often would you estimate that you travelled by air in connection with holiday travel?
|
Post-question:
|
If you choose the top option, please enter the number of flights in the open field/on the line yourself.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
About ___ holiday flights (round-trip flights) a year |
1401 |
68.1% |
0.681088965 |
2 |
I flew less than once a year |
515 |
25% |
0.250364609 |
3 |
I never flew |
130 |
6.3% |
0.063198833 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.005347594 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21km_fly_1_other
Variable label:
|
Open: How often did you travel by air in connection with holiday travel before the Covid-19 pandemic?
|
Pre-question text:
|
If you think back to before the Covid-19 pandemic, how often would you estimate that you travelled by air in connection with holiday travel?
|
Literal question:
|
[Open]
|
Post-question:
|
If you choose the top option, please enter the number of flights in the open field/on the line yourself.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single - Other] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1401] [Invalid:8639] [Range:1-120]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
|
324 |
23.1% |
0.2312633833 |
2 |
|
526 |
37.5% |
0.3754461099 |
3 |
|
245 |
17.5% |
0.1748750892 |
4 |
|
159 |
11.3% |
0.1134903640 |
5 |
|
67 |
4.8% |
0.0478229836 |
6 |
|
41 |
2.9% |
0.0292648108 |
7 |
|
5 |
0.4% |
0.0035688794 |
8 |
|
8 |
0.6% |
0.0057102070 |
9 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007137759 |
10 |
|
16 |
1.1% |
0.0114204140 |
11 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007137759 |
12 |
|
4 |
0.3% |
0.0028551035 |
25 |
|
2 |
0.1% |
0.0014275517 |
30 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007137759 |
120 |
|
1 |
0.1% |
0.0007137759 |
Sysmiss |
|
8639 |
|
NA |
r21km_fly2
Variable label:
|
Travel more/less by air in connection with holiday travel after the pandemic than before?
|
Literal question:
|
When the Covid-19 pandemic is over, do you think you will travel by air in connection with holiday travel more often or less frequently than before the pandemic?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much more frequently |
14 |
0.7% |
0.006806028 |
2 |
More frequently |
38 |
1.8% |
0.018473505 |
3 |
A little more frequently |
82 |
4% |
0.039863879 |
4 |
About the same |
1365 |
66.4% |
0.663587749 |
5 |
A little less frequently |
284 |
13.8% |
0.138065143 |
6 |
Less frequently |
181 |
8.8% |
0.087992222 |
7 |
Much less frequently |
77 |
3.7% |
0.037433155 |
97 |
Not answered |
16 |
0.8% |
0.007778318 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21km_fly4
Variable label:
|
Fits you: Most people I know associate holidays with flights abroad
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
|
Literal question:
|
Most people I know associate holidays with flights abroad.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very large extent |
112 |
5.4% |
0.054448226 |
2 |
To a large extent |
568 |
27.6% |
0.276130287 |
3 |
To some extent |
906 |
44% |
0.440447253 |
4 |
To a small extent |
394 |
19.2% |
0.191541079 |
5 |
Not at all |
66 |
3.2% |
0.032085561 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.5% |
0.005347594 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme8a_ran
Variable label:
|
Randomly selects alternative for r21meme8a
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2054] [Invalid:7986] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway has been debating whether or not to sell some buildings. A
proposal has now been made that involves a centrally located church being sold
and converted into a hotel run by a multinational commercial company |
390 |
19% |
0.1898734 |
2 |
The Church of Norway has been debating whether or not to sell some buildings. A
proposal has now been made that involves a centrally located church being sold
and converted into a mosque. |
420 |
20.4% |
0.2044791 |
3 |
The Church of Norway has been debating whether or not to sell some buildings. A
proposal has now been made that involves a centrally located church being sold
and converted into a mosque. The church spire will be replaced by a minaret. |
428 |
20.8% |
0.2083739 |
4 |
The Church of Norway has been debating whether or not to sell some buildings. A
proposal has now been made that involves a centrally located church being sold
and converted into a mosque. The conversion is being financed by Saudi Arabia. |
415 |
20.2% |
0.2020448 |
5 |
The Church of Norway has been debating whether or not to sell some buildings. A
proposal has now been made that involves a centrally located church being sold
and converted into a mosque. The church spire will be replaced by a minaret. The
conversion is being financed by Saudi Arabia. |
401 |
19.5% |
0.1952288 |
Sysmiss |
|
7986 |
|
NA |
r21meme8a
Variable label:
|
For or against proposal: Sell and convert church into [hotel/mosque]
|
Pre-question text:
|
The Church of Norway has been debating whether or not to sell some buildings. A proposal has now been made that involves a centrally located church being sold and converted into [a hotel run by a multinational commercial company/a mosque]. [NO MENTION/ the church spire will be replaced by a minaret]. The conversion [NO MENTION/is being financed by Saudi Arabia].
|
Literal question:
|
Are you in favour of or against the proposal to sell the church?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely in favour |
169 |
8.2% |
0.08215848 |
2 |
Somewhat in favour |
431 |
21% |
0.20952844 |
3 |
Somewhat against |
548 |
26.6% |
0.26640739 |
4 |
Completely against |
886 |
43.1% |
0.43072436 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.1% |
0.01118133 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme9_ran1
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects alternative for r21meme9
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2053] [Invalid:7987] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
leaders of Muslim communities |
1030 |
50.2% |
0.5017048 |
2 |
animal rights activists |
1023 |
49.8% |
0.4982952 |
Sysmiss |
|
7987 |
|
NA |
r21meme9_ran2
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects alternative for r21meme9
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2053] [Invalid:7987] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
if they are suspected of extremism |
696 |
33.9% |
0.3390161 |
2 |
if they apply for public funding |
683 |
33.3% |
0.3326839 |
3 |
to safeguard core values of society |
674 |
32.8% |
0.3283000 |
Sysmiss |
|
7987 |
|
NA |
r21meme9
Variable label:
|
For/against: The Government let PST monitor [Muslim leaders/animal right activists] [if they are suspected of extremism/if they apply for public funding/to safeguard core values of society]
|
Literal question:
|
Are you for or against the government allowing the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) to monitor the private lives of [leaders of Muslim communities/animal rights activists] [if they are suspected of extremism/ if they apply for public funding/to safeguard core values of society]?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely in favour |
538 |
26.2% |
0.261545941 |
2 |
Somewhat in favour |
660 |
32.1% |
0.320855615 |
3 |
Somewhat against |
475 |
23.1% |
0.230918814 |
4 |
Completely against |
364 |
17.7% |
0.176956733 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1% |
0.009722897 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme12_ran1
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects alternative for r21meme12
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2051] [Invalid:7989] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
for Norway to function as it should |
718 |
35% |
0.3500731 |
2 |
to protect core Norwegian values |
692 |
33.7% |
0.3373964 |
3 |
to help stop global warming |
641 |
31.3% |
0.3125305 |
Sysmiss |
|
7989 |
|
NA |
r21meme12_ran2
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects alternative for r21meme12
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2051] [Invalid:7989] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[blank] |
1052 |
51.3% |
0.5129205 |
2 |
– regardless of whether it is legal or not |
999 |
48.7% |
0.4870795 |
Sysmiss |
|
7989 |
|
NA |
r21meme12
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Must [protect Norwegian values/stop global warming][even if illegal]
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Given what the world looks like today, people have to do what it takes [for Norway to function as it should/to protect core Norwegian values/to help stop global warming] [not mentioned/- regardless of whether it is legal or not].
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
356 |
17.3% |
0.17306757 |
2 |
Agree |
701 |
34.1% |
0.34078755 |
3 |
Disagree |
683 |
33.2% |
0.33203695 |
4 |
Do not agree at all |
271 |
13.2% |
0.13174526 |
97 |
Not answered |
46 |
2.2% |
0.02236266 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme13_ran1
Variable label:
|
Experiment. Randomly selects alternative for r21meme13
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2048] [Invalid:7992] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
basic human rights |
694 |
33.9% |
0.3388672 |
2 |
the future of the earth |
690 |
33.7% |
0.3369141 |
3 |
Norwegian core values |
664 |
32.4% |
0.3242188 |
Sysmiss |
|
7992 |
|
NA |
r21meme13
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Must work outside of democratic channels when [human rights/values] are at stake
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes people have to take matters into their own hands instead of using the formal democratic channels when [basic human rights/the future of the earth/Norwegian core values] are at stake.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely agree |
87 |
4.2% |
0.04229460 |
2 |
Agree |
496 |
24.1% |
0.24112786 |
3 |
Disagree |
976 |
47.4% |
0.47447739 |
4 |
Do not agree at all |
452 |
22% |
0.21973748 |
97 |
Not answered |
46 |
2.2% |
0.02236266 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme14_1
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Dramatically stricter sentences for criminals
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
Literal question:
|
Dramatically stricter sentences for criminals
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good proposal |
373 |
18.1% |
0.18133204 |
2 |
Fairly good proposal |
609 |
29.6% |
0.29606223 |
3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
636 |
30.9% |
0.30918814 |
4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
319 |
15.5% |
0.15508021 |
5 |
Very bad proposal |
93 |
4.5% |
0.04521147 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
1.3% |
0.01312591 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme14_2
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Reduce income inequalities in society
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
Literal question:
|
Reduce income inequalities in society
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good proposal |
687 |
33.4% |
0.33398153 |
2 |
Fairly good proposal |
789 |
38.4% |
0.38356830 |
3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
381 |
18.5% |
0.18522120 |
4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
139 |
6.8% |
0.06757414 |
5 |
Very bad proposal |
32 |
1.6% |
0.01555664 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.4% |
0.01409820 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme14_3
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Reserve more parental leave days for the father/co-mother
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
Literal question:
|
Reserve more parental leave days for the father/co-mother
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good proposal |
119 |
5.8% |
0.05785124 |
2 |
Fairly good proposal |
393 |
19.1% |
0.19105493 |
3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
937 |
45.6% |
0.45551774 |
4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
383 |
18.6% |
0.18619349 |
5 |
Very bad proposal |
186 |
9% |
0.09042295 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
1.9% |
0.01895965 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme14_4
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Work to strengthen private entrepreneurship/market economy
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
Literal question:
|
Work to strengthen private entrepreneurship and the market economy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good proposal |
265 |
12.9% |
0.12882839 |
2 |
Fairly good proposal |
734 |
35.7% |
0.35683034 |
3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
697 |
33.9% |
0.33884298 |
4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
267 |
13% |
0.12980068 |
5 |
Very bad proposal |
63 |
3.1% |
0.03062713 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.5% |
0.01507049 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme14_5
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Make more space for Christian cultural heritage in Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
Literal question:
|
Make more space for Christian cultural heritage in Norway
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good proposal |
201 |
9.8% |
0.09771512 |
2 |
Fairly good proposal |
440 |
21.4% |
0.21390374 |
3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
748 |
36.4% |
0.36363636 |
4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
398 |
19.3% |
0.19348566 |
5 |
Very bad proposal |
241 |
11.7% |
0.11716091 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.4% |
0.01409820 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme14_6
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Strengthening the State’s control over business and industry
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
Literal question:
|
Strengthening the State’s control over business and industry
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good proposal |
119 |
5.8% |
0.05785124 |
2 |
Fairly good proposal |
532 |
25.9% |
0.25862907 |
3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
704 |
34.2% |
0.34224599 |
4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
519 |
25.2% |
0.25230919 |
5 |
Very bad proposal |
148 |
7.2% |
0.07194944 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.7% |
0.01701507 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme14_7
Variable label:
|
Good/bad proposal: Accept fewer refugees
|
Pre-question text:
|
What is your opinion of the following proposals?
|
Literal question:
|
Accept fewer refugees
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good proposal |
254 |
12.3% |
0.12348080 |
2 |
Fairly good proposal |
336 |
16.3% |
0.16334468 |
3 |
Neither a good nor a bad proposal |
617 |
30% |
0.29995139 |
4 |
Fairly bad proposal |
568 |
27.6% |
0.27613029 |
5 |
Very bad proposal |
247 |
12% |
0.12007778 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
1.7% |
0.01701507 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme15_1
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Important to be unprejudiced towards Muslims
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced towards Muslims.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
333 |
16.2% |
0.16188624 |
2 |
Well |
754 |
36.7% |
0.36655323 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
401 |
19.5% |
0.19494409 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
389 |
18.9% |
0.18911035 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
78 |
3.8% |
0.03791930 |
6 |
Poorly |
40 |
1.9% |
0.01944579 |
7 |
Very poorly |
34 |
1.7% |
0.01652893 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.4% |
0.01361206 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme15_2
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
146 |
7.1% |
0.07097715 |
2 |
Well |
368 |
17.9% |
0.17890131 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
351 |
17.1% |
0.17063685 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
643 |
31.3% |
0.31259115 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
207 |
10.1% |
0.10063199 |
6 |
Poorly |
180 |
8.8% |
0.08750608 |
7 |
Very poorly |
124 |
6% |
0.06028196 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
1.8% |
0.01847351 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme15_3
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of my own convictions
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of my own convictions.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
295 |
14.3% |
0.14341274 |
2 |
Well |
697 |
33.9% |
0.33884298 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
423 |
20.6% |
0.20563928 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
447 |
21.7% |
0.21730676 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
75 |
3.6% |
0.03646087 |
6 |
Poorly |
50 |
2.4% |
0.02430724 |
7 |
Very poorly |
33 |
1.6% |
0.01604278 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
1.8% |
0.01798736 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21meme15_4
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
479 |
23.3% |
0.23286339 |
2 |
Well |
679 |
33% |
0.33009237 |
3 |
Somewhat well |
298 |
14.5% |
0.14487117 |
4 |
Neither well nor poorly |
408 |
19.8% |
0.19834711 |
5 |
Somewhat poorly |
77 |
3.7% |
0.03743316 |
6 |
Poorly |
44 |
2.1% |
0.02139037 |
7 |
Very poorly |
41 |
2% |
0.01993194 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.5% |
0.01507049 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21km_oljefremtid_ran
Variable label:
|
Randomly selects whether alternatives in r21km_oljefremtid are shown in reverse order
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2040] [Invalid:8000] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Normal |
1017 |
49.9% |
0.4985294 |
2 |
Flipped |
1023 |
50.1% |
0.5014706 |
Sysmiss |
|
8000 |
|
NA |
r21km_oljefremtid
Variable label:
|
Statement: In 20-30 years, the oil and gas industry should be more/less developed
|
Pre-question text:
|
Production of oil and gas is an important industry for Norway. The industry provides many jobs and considerable income for society. At the same time, burning fossil energy is the main cause of climate change. Opening new areas is also controversial because it can affect life in the sea and at the ice edge. There are frequent debates about how the oil and gas industry in Norway should be developed over the next 20 to 30 years.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following alternatives is closest to your view?
|
Post-question:
|
In 20 to 30 years, the industry should be…
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
As developed as possible |
88 |
4.3% |
0.043307087 |
2 |
More developed than today |
79 |
3.9% |
0.038877953 |
3 |
As developed as today |
503 |
24.8% |
0.247539370 |
4 |
Less developed than it is today |
839 |
41.3% |
0.412893701 |
5 |
As little as possible |
516 |
25.4% |
0.253937008 |
97 |
|
7 |
0.3% |
0.003444882 |
98 |
|
8008 |
|
NA |
r21km_trusselpersonlig
Variable label:
|
How serious a threat is climate change to you personally?
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat is climate change to you personally?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
[Randomised question order with r21km_trusselsamlet.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very serious |
190 |
9.2% |
0.09236753 |
2 |
Serious |
536 |
26.1% |
0.26057365 |
3 |
Somewhat serious |
649 |
31.6% |
0.31550802 |
4 |
Not very serious |
458 |
22.3% |
0.22265435 |
5 |
Not a threat |
194 |
9.4% |
0.09431211 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
1.5% |
0.01458435 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21km_trusselsamlet
Variable label:
|
How serious a threat is climate change overall?
|
Literal question:
|
How serious a threat is climate change overall?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
[Randomised question order with r21km_trusselpersonlig.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very serious |
723 |
35.1% |
0.35148274 |
2 |
Serious |
717 |
34.9% |
0.34856587 |
3 |
Somewhat serious |
411 |
20% |
0.19980554 |
4 |
Not very serious |
112 |
5.4% |
0.05444823 |
5 |
Not a threat |
63 |
3.1% |
0.03062713 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.5% |
0.01507049 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21km_fly3
Variable label:
|
Can reducing your own flights can help limit climate change?
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you think reducing your own flights can help limit climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
61 |
3% |
0.02965484 |
2 |
To a great extent |
163 |
7.9% |
0.07924161 |
3 |
To some extent |
675 |
32.8% |
0.32814779 |
4 |
To a small extent |
720 |
35% |
0.35002431 |
5 |
Not at all |
405 |
19.7% |
0.19688867 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
1.6% |
0.01604278 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21km_fly5
Variable label:
|
Agree: Most people I know believe that we should reduce the number of flights
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree with this statement?
|
Literal question:
|
Most people I know believe that we should reduce the number of flights for climate reasons.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
54 |
2.6% |
0.02625182 |
2 |
To a great extent |
262 |
12.7% |
0.12736996 |
3 |
To some extent |
848 |
41.2% |
0.41225085 |
4 |
To a small extent |
663 |
32.2% |
0.32231405 |
5 |
Not at all |
190 |
9.2% |
0.09236753 |
97 |
Not answered |
40 |
1.9% |
0.01944579 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21km_fly6
Variable label:
|
Does the pandemic make it easier/more difficult to reduce flights for climate reasons in the future?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Fewer flights can help limit climate change. During the Covid-19 pandemic, we have had to reduce the number of flights.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think this experience from the Covid-19 pandemic may make it easier or more difficult to reduce flights for climate reasons in the future?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very much easier |
72 |
3.5% |
0.035002431 |
2 |
Much easier |
387 |
18.8% |
0.188138065 |
3 |
A bit easier |
943 |
45.8% |
0.458434614 |
4 |
No difference |
540 |
26.3% |
0.262518230 |
5 |
A bit harder |
64 |
3.1% |
0.031113272 |
6 |
Much harder |
12 |
0.6% |
0.005833738 |
7 |
Very much harder |
6 |
0.3% |
0.002916869 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
1.6% |
0.016042781 |
98 |
Not asked |
7983 |
|
NA |
r21padkom9_ran
Variable label:
|
Randomly selects r21PADKOM9a, r21PADKOM9b or r21PADKOM9c.
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomized if r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2032] [Invalid:8008] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
r21PADKOM9a |
679 |
33.4% |
0.3341535 |
2 |
r21PADKOM9b |
688 |
33.9% |
0.3385827 |
3 |
r21PADKOM9c |
665 |
32.7% |
0.3272638 |
Sysmiss |
|
8008 |
|
NA |
r21padkom9a
Variable label:
|
How to redistribute payment that was first determined by lottery?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that two individuals are recruited to do a job, let’s call them Worker A and Worker B. They are told that their payment will be determined by a lottery. The worker who wins the lottery will earn NOK 6,000 for the work, and the other worker will earn nothing.
You will have the opportunity to determine how much each of them receive. The workers will not be told the result of the lottery but will be told that another person will determine their payment for the work.
Imagine that Worker A wins the lottery.
|
Literal question:
|
Please specify which of the following options would you choose.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21padkom9_ran = 1 & r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Worker A would receive NOK 6,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 0 |
54 |
8% |
0.079528719 |
2 |
Worker A would receive NOK 5,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 1,000 |
12 |
1.8% |
0.017673049 |
3 |
Worker A would receive NOK 4,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 2,000 |
42 |
6.2% |
0.061855670 |
4 |
Worker A would receive NOK 3,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 3,000 |
546 |
80.4% |
0.804123711 |
5 |
Worker A would receive NOK 2,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 4,000 |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002945508 |
6 |
Worker A would receive NOK 1,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 5,000 |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001472754 |
7 |
Worker A would receive NOK 0 and Worker B would receive NOK 6,000 |
3 |
0.4% |
0.004418262 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
2.8% |
0.027982327 |
98 |
Not asked |
9361 |
|
NA |
r21padkom9b
Variable label:
|
How to redistribute payment that was first determined by productivity?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that two individuals are recruited to do a job, let’s call them Worker A and Worker B. They are told that their payment for their work will be determined by their productivity. The most productive worker will earn NOK 6,000 for the work and the least productive will earn nothing.
You will have the opportunity to determine how much each of them receive. The workers will not be told who was the most productive but will be told that another person will determine their payment for the work.
Imagine that Worker A was the most productive.
You will have the opportunity to determine how much each of them receive. The workers will not be told who was the most productive but will be told that another person will determine their payment for the work.
Imagine that Worker A was the most productive.
|
Literal question:
|
Please specify which of the following options would you choose.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21padkom9_ran = 2 & r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Worker A would receive NOK 6,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 0 |
39 |
5.7% |
0.056686047 |
2 |
Worker A would receive NOK 5,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 1,000 |
45 |
6.5% |
0.065406977 |
3 |
Worker A would receive NOK 4,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 2,000 |
368 |
53.5% |
0.534883721 |
4 |
Worker A would receive NOK 3,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 3,000 |
216 |
31.4% |
0.313953488 |
5 |
Worker A would receive NOK 2,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 4,000 |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
6 |
Worker A would receive NOK 1,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 5,000 |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002906977 |
7 |
Worker A would receive NOK 0 and Worker B would receive NOK 6,000 |
2 |
0.3% |
0.002906977 |
97 |
Not answered |
16 |
2.3% |
0.023255814 |
98 |
Not asked |
9352 |
|
NA |
r21padkom9c
Variable label:
|
How to redistribute lottery-determined payment, when it entails a cost for the lottery’s winner?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that two individuals are recruited to do a job, let’s call them Worker A and Worker B. They are told that their payment will be determined by a lottery. The worker who wins the lottery will earn NOK 6,000 for the work, and the other worker will earn nothing.
You will have the opportunity to determine how much each of them receive, although this will entail a cost. If you choose to redistribute, a NOK 1,000 increase in Worker B’s payment will result in a NOK 2,000 reduction in Worker A’s payment.
The workers will not be told the result of the lottery but will be told that another person will determine their payment for the work.
Imagine that Worker A wins the lottery.
|
Literal question:
|
Please specify which of the following options would you choose.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21padkom9_ran = 3 & r21group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Worker A would receive NOK 6,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 0 |
58 |
8.7% |
0.087218045 |
2 |
Worker A would receive NOK 4,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 1,000 |
43 |
6.5% |
0.064661654 |
3 |
Worker A would receive NOK 2,000 and Worker B would receive NOK 2,000 |
540 |
81.2% |
0.812030075 |
4 |
Worker A would receive NOK 0 and Worker B would receive NOK 3,000 |
2 |
0.3% |
0.003007519 |
97 |
Not answered |
22 |
3.3% |
0.033082707 |
98 |
Not asked |
9375 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_1
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for his parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
57 |
5.2% |
0.05219780 |
5 |
5 Resembles me |
231 |
21.2% |
0.21153846 |
4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
419 |
38.4% |
0.38369963 |
3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
211 |
19.3% |
0.19322344 |
2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
104 |
9.5% |
0.09523810 |
1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
42 |
3.8% |
0.03846154 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
98 |
Not asked |
8948 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_2
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
9 |
0.8% |
0.008241758 |
5 |
5 Resembles me |
34 |
3.1% |
0.031135531 |
4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
90 |
8.2% |
0.082417582 |
3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
150 |
13.7% |
0.137362637 |
2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
214 |
19.6% |
0.195970696 |
1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
567 |
51.9% |
0.519230769 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
2.6% |
0.025641026 |
98 |
Not asked |
8948 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_3
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
179 |
16.4% |
0.1639194139 |
5 |
5 Resembles me |
423 |
38.7% |
0.3873626374 |
4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
377 |
34.5% |
0.3452380952 |
3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
73 |
6.7% |
0.0668498168 |
2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
9 |
0.8% |
0.0082417582 |
1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0009157509 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
2.7% |
0.0274725275 |
98 |
Not asked |
8948 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_4
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
287 |
26.3% |
0.262820513 |
5 |
5 Resembles me |
399 |
36.5% |
0.365384615 |
4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
299 |
27.4% |
0.273809524 |
3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
64 |
5.9% |
0.058608059 |
2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
13 |
1.2% |
0.011904762 |
1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001831502 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
2.6% |
0.025641026 |
98 |
Not asked |
8948 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_5
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand things
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
219 |
20.1% |
0.200549451 |
5 |
5 Resembles me |
365 |
33.4% |
0.334249084 |
4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
358 |
32.8% |
0.327838828 |
3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
95 |
8.7% |
0.086996337 |
2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
25 |
2.3% |
0.022893773 |
1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
2 |
0.2% |
0.001831502 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
2.6% |
0.025641026 |
98 |
Not asked |
8948 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_6
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
26 |
2.4% |
0.02380952 |
5 |
5 Resembles me |
86 |
7.9% |
0.07875458 |
4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
256 |
23.4% |
0.23443223 |
3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
374 |
34.2% |
0.34249084 |
2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
223 |
20.4% |
0.20421245 |
1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
97 |
8.9% |
0.08882784 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
2.7% |
0.02747253 |
98 |
Not asked |
8948 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_7
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for him to do things that give him pleasure.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
39 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
5 |
5 Resembles me |
133 |
12.2% |
0.12179487 |
4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
399 |
36.5% |
0.36538462 |
3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
335 |
30.7% |
0.30677656 |
2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
112 |
10.3% |
0.10256410 |
1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
48 |
4.4% |
0.04395604 |
97 |
Not answered |
26 |
2.4% |
0.02380952 |
98 |
Not asked |
8948 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_8
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
17 |
1.6% |
0.01556777 |
5 |
5 Resembles me |
97 |
8.9% |
0.08882784 |
4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
276 |
25.3% |
0.25274725 |
3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
374 |
34.2% |
0.34249084 |
2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
195 |
17.9% |
0.17857143 |
1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
105 |
9.6% |
0.09615385 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
2.6% |
0.02564103 |
98 |
Not asked |
8948 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_9
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for him to take the lead and tell others what to do. He wants people to do as he says.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005494505 |
5 |
5 Resembles me |
61 |
5.6% |
0.055860806 |
4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
298 |
27.3% |
0.272893773 |
3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
349 |
32% |
0.319597070 |
2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
225 |
20.6% |
0.206043956 |
1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
126 |
11.5% |
0.115384615 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
2.5% |
0.024725275 |
98 |
Not asked |
8948 |
|
NA |
r21bktivi_10
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
[Answer list display order: Randomize]
[The person described in the question has the same gender as the respondent.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
6 |
6 Very much resembles me |
141 |
12.9% |
0.12912088 |
5 |
5 Resembles me |
278 |
25.5% |
0.25457875 |
4 |
4 Somewhat resembles me |
383 |
35.1% |
0.35073260 |
3 |
3 Slightly resembles me |
161 |
14.7% |
0.14743590 |
2 |
2 Does not resemble me |
79 |
7.2% |
0.07234432 |
1 |
1 Does not resemble me at all |
23 |
2.1% |
0.02106227 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
2.5% |
0.02472527 |
98 |
Not asked |
8948 |
|
NA |
r21padkom34
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Tend to exploit others for my own gain
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
I tend to exploit others for my own gain.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r21group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002060793 |
2 |
Agree |
4 |
0.2% |
0.002060793 |
3 |
Somewhat agree |
47 |
2.4% |
0.024214323 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
105 |
5.4% |
0.054095827 |
5 |
Somewhat disagree |
102 |
5.3% |
0.052550232 |
6 |
Disagree |
640 |
33% |
0.329726945 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
995 |
51.3% |
0.512622360 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
2.3% |
0.022668727 |
98 |
Not asked |
8099 |
|
NA |
r21avslutt
Variable label:
|
Open: Feedback about the survey
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:10040] [Range:-]
|
r21P1
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Male |
5116 |
51% |
0.5095618 |
2 |
Female |
4924 |
49% |
0.4904382 |
r21P2
Variable label:
|
Region
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oslo |
1602 |
16% |
0.15956175 |
2 |
Østlandet |
3628 |
36.1% |
0.36135458 |
3 |
Sørlandet |
502 |
5% |
0.05000000 |
4 |
Vestlandet |
2715 |
27% |
0.27041833 |
5 |
Trøndelag |
805 |
8% |
0.08017928 |
6 |
Nord-Norge |
788 |
7.8% |
0.07848606 |
r21P3
Variable label:
|
County
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:3-54]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
3 |
Oslo |
1602 |
16% |
0.15956175 |
11 |
Rogaland |
934 |
9.3% |
0.09302789 |
15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
412 |
4.1% |
0.04103586 |
18 |
Nordland |
385 |
3.8% |
0.03834661 |
30 |
Viken |
2348 |
23.4% |
0.23386454 |
34 |
Innlandet |
539 |
5.4% |
0.05368526 |
38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
741 |
7.4% |
0.07380478 |
42 |
Agder |
502 |
5% |
0.05000000 |
46 |
Vestland |
1369 |
13.6% |
0.13635458 |
50 |
Trøndelag |
805 |
8% |
0.08017928 |
54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
403 |
4% |
0.04013944 |
r21P3_2
Variable label:
|
Constituencies parliament election 2021
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-19]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
3 |
Østfold |
475 |
4.7% |
0.04731076 |
1 |
Akershus |
1407 |
14% |
0.14013944 |
2 |
Oslo |
1602 |
16% |
0.15956175 |
5 |
Hedmark |
299 |
3% |
0.02978088 |
6 |
Oppland |
240 |
2.4% |
0.02390438 |
7 |
Buskerud |
466 |
4.6% |
0.04641434 |
4 |
Vestfold |
473 |
4.7% |
0.04711155 |
8 |
Telemark |
268 |
2.7% |
0.02669323 |
10 |
Aust-Agder |
178 |
1.8% |
0.01772908 |
9 |
Vest-Agder |
324 |
3.2% |
0.03227092 |
11 |
Rogaland |
934 |
9.3% |
0.09302789 |
12 |
Hordaland |
1209 |
12% |
0.12041833 |
13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
160 |
1.6% |
0.01593625 |
14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
412 |
4.1% |
0.04103586 |
16 |
Sør-Trøndelag |
639 |
6.4% |
0.06364542 |
15 |
Nord-Trøndelag |
166 |
1.7% |
0.01653386 |
17 |
Nordland |
385 |
3.8% |
0.03834661 |
18 |
Troms |
300 |
3% |
0.02988048 |
19 |
Finnmark |
103 |
1% |
0.01025896 |
r21P4_1
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No education/elementary school |
470 |
4.7% |
0.04681275 |
2 |
Upper secondary education |
3016 |
30% |
0.30039841 |
3 |
University/University college |
6386 |
63.6% |
0.63605578 |
97 |
Not answered |
168 |
1.7% |
0.01673307 |
r21P4_2
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
22 |
0.2% |
0.002191235 |
2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
448 |
4.5% |
0.044621514 |
3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
907 |
9% |
0.090338645 |
4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
1179 |
11.7% |
0.117430279 |
5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
927 |
9.2% |
0.092330677 |
6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
837 |
8.3% |
0.083366534 |
7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
2121 |
21.1% |
0.211254980 |
8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
720 |
7.2% |
0.071713147 |
9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
742 |
7.4% |
0.073904382 |
10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
1694 |
16.9% |
0.168725100 |
11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
272 |
2.7% |
0.027091633 |
12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
134 |
1.3% |
0.013346614 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.4% |
0.003685259 |
r21P5_1
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1939 or earlier |
261 |
2.6% |
0.02599602 |
2 |
1940-1949 |
1712 |
17.1% |
0.17051793 |
3 |
1950-1959 |
2554 |
25.4% |
0.25438247 |
4 |
1960-1969 |
2251 |
22.4% |
0.22420319 |
5 |
1970-1979 |
1517 |
15.1% |
0.15109562 |
6 |
1980-1989 |
1026 |
10.2% |
0.10219124 |
7 |
1990 or later |
719 |
7.2% |
0.07161355 |
r21P5_2
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1959 or earlier |
4527 |
45.1% |
0.45089641 |
2 |
1960-1989 |
4794 |
47.7% |
0.47749004 |
3 |
1990 or later |
719 |
7.2% |
0.07161355 |
r21Weight1_stratapop
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata constructed with P1, P2, and age
|
Technical description:
|
[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation report.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-0]
|
r21Weight1
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, and age. See documentation report.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]
|
r21Weight2_stratapop
Variable label:
|
Indicates the proportion size of strata in the population. Strata constructed with P1, P2, P4_1, and age
|
Technical description:
|
[Can be used for calculating custom weights. Please see documentation report.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:9872] [Invalid:168] [Range:0-0]
|
r21Weight2
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P1, P2, P4_1, and age. See documentation report.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-66]
|
r17oppvekstfylke
Variable label:
|
Respondents home county at 15 years of age
|
Technical description:
|
[Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r17oppvekstkom]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
3 |
Oslo |
733 |
10.8% |
0.10806428 |
11 |
Rogaland |
591 |
8.7% |
0.08712959 |
15 |
Møre og Romsdal |
408 |
6% |
0.06015038 |
18 |
Nordland |
391 |
5.8% |
0.05764411 |
30 |
Viken |
1377 |
20.3% |
0.20300752 |
34 |
Innlandet |
441 |
6.5% |
0.06501548 |
38 |
Vestfold og Telemark |
533 |
7.9% |
0.07857880 |
42 |
Agder |
354 |
5.2% |
0.05218930 |
46 |
Vestland |
1034 |
15.2% |
0.15243992 |
50 |
Trøndelag |
594 |
8.8% |
0.08757187 |
54 |
Troms og Finnmark |
327 |
4.8% |
0.04820876 |
98 |
|
3257 |
|
NA |
r20bk25
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income?
|
Post-question:
|
Gross annual income is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
<150 000 |
300 |
3.6% |
0.03562945 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
929 |
11% |
0.11033254 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
1314 |
15.6% |
0.15605701 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1340 |
15.9% |
0.15914489 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
1403 |
16.7% |
0.16662708 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
1072 |
12.7% |
0.12731591 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
1256 |
14.9% |
0.14916865 |
8 |
>1 000 000 |
616 |
7.3% |
0.07315914 |
97 |
Not answered |
190 |
2.3% |
0.02256532 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r14bk27_kodet
Variable label:
|
Marital status. [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[This variable contains the values of r14bk27 plus coded values of r14bk27_7_other]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Single |
653 |
11.7% |
0.1169203223 |
2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
290 |
5.2% |
0.0519247986 |
3 |
Cohabitant |
881 |
15.8% |
0.1577439570 |
4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
3246 |
58.1% |
0.5811996419 |
5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
294 |
5.3% |
0.0526410027 |
6 |
Widow/widower |
189 |
3.4% |
0.0338406446 |
7 |
Other: |
5 |
0.1% |
0.0008952551 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.5% |
0.0048343778 |
98 |
Not asked |
4455 |
|
NA |
r16bk27_kodet
Variable label:
|
Martial status [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom r16group = 6 eller 7. ]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Single |
296 |
11.9% |
0.118684844 |
2 |
Non-domestic relationship |
138 |
5.5% |
0.055332799 |
3 |
Cohabitant |
375 |
15% |
0.150360866 |
4 |
Married/legally registered partner |
1431 |
57.4% |
0.573777065 |
5 |
Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner |
153 |
6.1% |
0.061347233 |
6 |
Widow/widower |
89 |
3.6% |
0.035685646 |
7 |
Other |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002405774 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.2% |
0.002405774 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
w01_k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1367 |
94.2% |
0.94210889 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
63 |
4.3% |
0.04341833 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.4% |
0.01447278 |
98 |
Not asked |
8589 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1485 |
94.8% |
0.947670708 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
71 |
4.5% |
0.045309509 |
97 |
No answer |
11 |
0.7% |
0.007019783 |
98 |
Not asked |
8473 |
|
NA |
r4k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
24 |
96% |
0.96 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
1 |
4% |
0.04 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00 |
98 |
Not asked |
10015 |
|
NA |
r5k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
8 |
100% |
1 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
0 |
0% |
0 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
10032 |
|
NA |
r8k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship.
|
Literal question:
|
Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1433 |
94.5% |
0.945250660 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
69 |
4.6% |
0.045514512 |
97 |
No answer |
14 |
0.9% |
0.009234828 |
98 |
Not asked |
8524 |
|
NA |
r11bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
840 |
94.3% |
0.942760943 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
47 |
5.3% |
0.052749719 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.4% |
0.004489338 |
98 |
Not asked |
9149 |
|
NA |
r14bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
864 |
94.3% |
0.943231441 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
46 |
5% |
0.050218341 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.7% |
0.006550218 |
98 |
Not asked |
9124 |
|
NA |
r16bk28
Variable label:
|
Your citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
2345 |
94% |
0.94025662 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
149 |
6% |
0.05974338 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r18bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship.
|
Post-question:
|
Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1030 |
94.5% |
0.944954128 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
57 |
5.2% |
0.052293578 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002752294 |
98 |
Not asked |
8950 |
|
NA |
w01_k29
Variable label:
|
Parents immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1317 |
90.8% |
0.907649897 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
62 |
4.3% |
0.042729152 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004135079 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
25 |
1.7% |
0.017229497 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
19 |
1.3% |
0.013094418 |
97 |
No answer |
22 |
1.5% |
0.015161957 |
98 |
Not asked |
8589 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1436 |
91.6% |
0.915816327 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
67 |
4.3% |
0.042729592 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
7 |
0.4% |
0.004464286 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
25 |
1.6% |
0.015943878 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
18 |
1.1% |
0.011479592 |
97 |
No answer |
15 |
1% |
0.009566327 |
98 |
Not asked |
8472 |
|
NA |
r4k29
Variable label:
|
Mother or father immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
23 |
79.3% |
0.79310345 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
2 |
6.9% |
0.06896552 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
3 |
10.3% |
0.10344828 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
1 |
3.4% |
0.03448276 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
10011 |
|
NA |
r5k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
8 |
100% |
1 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
0 |
0% |
0 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
0 |
0% |
0 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0 |
97 |
No answer |
0 |
0% |
0 |
98 |
Not asked |
10032 |
|
NA |
r11bk29
Variable label:
|
Immigration background
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 3 or rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
2030 |
91.7% |
0.916892502 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
111 |
5% |
0.050135501 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002258356 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
37 |
1.7% |
0.016711834 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
21 |
0.9% |
0.009485095 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.5% |
0.004516712 |
98 |
Not asked |
7826 |
|
NA |
r14bk29
Variable label:
|
Have you or any of your parents immigrated to Norway.
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
808 |
88.2% |
0.882096070 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
59 |
6.4% |
0.064410480 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
7 |
0.8% |
0.007641921 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
27 |
2.9% |
0.029475983 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
9 |
1% |
0.009825328 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.7% |
0.006550218 |
98 |
Not asked |
9124 |
|
NA |
r16bk29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
2247 |
90.1% |
0.9009623095 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
155 |
6.2% |
0.0621491580 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
10 |
0.4% |
0.0040096231 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
40 |
1.6% |
0.0160384924 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
41 |
1.6% |
0.0164394547 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0% |
0.0004009623 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r18bk29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
980 |
89.9% |
0.899082569 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
65 |
6% |
0.059633028 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
5 |
0.5% |
0.004587156 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
19 |
1.7% |
0.017431193 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
14 |
1.3% |
0.012844037 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006422018 |
98 |
Not asked |
8950 |
|
NA |
r20bkhelse
Variable label:
|
In general, how would you say your health is?
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
1141 |
13.6% |
0.13551069 |
2 |
Very good |
3000 |
35.6% |
0.35629454 |
3 |
Good |
2979 |
35.4% |
0.35380048 |
4 |
Somewhat good |
1032 |
12.3% |
0.12256532 |
5 |
Poor |
233 |
2.8% |
0.02767221 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
0.4% |
0.00415677 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r18bk35
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A city |
298 |
27.3% |
0.273394495 |
2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
205 |
18.8% |
0.188073394 |
3 |
A small or medium sized town |
319 |
29.3% |
0.292660550 |
4 |
A village |
157 |
14.4% |
0.144036697 |
5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
105 |
9.6% |
0.096330275 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.6% |
0.005504587 |
98 |
Not asked |
8950 |
|
NA |
r20bk35
Variable label:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 18]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A city |
1924 |
25.7% |
0.257391304 |
2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
1519 |
20.3% |
0.203210702 |
3 |
A small or medium sized town |
2049 |
27.4% |
0.274113712 |
4 |
A village |
1152 |
15.4% |
0.154113712 |
5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
805 |
10.8% |
0.107692308 |
97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.3% |
0.003478261 |
98 |
Not asked |
2565 |
|
NA |
r10k3_kodet
Variable label:
|
Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
[This variable contains the values of r10k3 plus coded values of r10k3_12_other]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
166 |
4.3% |
0.042761463 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
926 |
23.9% |
0.238536837 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
424 |
10.9% |
0.109222050 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
212 |
5.5% |
0.054611025 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
343 |
8.8% |
0.088356517 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
333 |
8.6% |
0.085780526 |
7 |
The Green Party |
185 |
4.8% |
0.047655848 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
850 |
21.9% |
0.218959299 |
9 |
The Red Party |
156 |
4% |
0.040185471 |
10 |
Did not vote |
64 |
1.6% |
0.016486347 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
138 |
3.6% |
0.035548686 |
12 |
Other: |
65 |
1.7% |
0.016743946 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
0.5% |
0.005151984 |
98 |
Not asked |
6158 |
|
NA |
r16k43_1_kodet
Variable label:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections this autumn? [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections this autumn?
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondentene spurt. Rekkefølgen på svaralternativene er randomisert. ]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
262 |
3.3% |
0.032713198 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1621 |
20.2% |
0.202397303 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
406 |
5.1% |
0.050692970 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
312 |
3.9% |
0.038956174 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
697 |
8.7% |
0.087027095 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
995 |
12.4% |
0.124235235 |
7 |
The Green Party |
724 |
9% |
0.090398302 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1623 |
20.3% |
0.202647022 |
9 |
The Red Party |
377 |
4.7% |
0.047072044 |
10 |
The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative) |
169 |
2.1% |
0.021101261 |
11 |
A joint party list |
12 |
0.1% |
0.001498314 |
12 |
A local party list |
159 |
2% |
0.019852666 |
13 |
Voted blank |
61 |
0.8% |
0.007616432 |
14 |
Did not vote |
397 |
5% |
0.049569235 |
15 |
Not entitled to vote |
19 |
0.2% |
0.002372331 |
16 |
Other: |
149 |
1.9% |
0.018604070 |
97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.3% |
0.003246348 |
98 |
Not asked |
2031 |
|
NA |
r16k43_2_kodet
Variable label:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council election this autumn? [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council election this autumn?
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondentene spurt. Rekkefølgen på svaralternativene er randomisert (men tilsvarer rekkefølgen til r16k43_1).]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
269 |
3.4% |
0.0335872144 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1591 |
19.9% |
0.1986515170 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
435 |
5.4% |
0.0543138969 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
284 |
3.5% |
0.0354601074 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
670 |
8.4% |
0.0836558871 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
1048 |
13.1% |
0.1308527906 |
7 |
The Green Party |
700 |
8.7% |
0.0874016731 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1496 |
18.7% |
0.1867898614 |
9 |
The Red Party |
366 |
4.6% |
0.0456985891 |
10 |
The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative) |
145 |
1.8% |
0.0181046323 |
11 |
A joint party list |
6 |
0.1% |
0.0007491572 |
12 |
A local party list |
44 |
0.5% |
0.0054938195 |
13 |
Voted blank |
93 |
1.2% |
0.0116119366 |
14 |
Did not vote |
591 |
7.4% |
0.0737919840 |
15 |
Not entitled to vote |
54 |
0.7% |
0.0067424148 |
16 |
Other: |
156 |
1.9% |
0.0194780872 |
97 |
Not answered |
61 |
0.8% |
0.0076164315 |
98 |
Not asked |
2031 |
|
NA |
r20pk12
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very high degree |
1043 |
12.4% |
0.123871734 |
2 |
A high degree |
4648 |
55.2% |
0.552019002 |
3 |
Some degree |
2202 |
26.2% |
0.261520190 |
4 |
A low degree |
416 |
4.9% |
0.049406176 |
5 |
Not at all |
97 |
1.2% |
0.011520190 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.2% |
0.001662708 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r20pk53
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very high degree |
346 |
4.1% |
0.041092637 |
2 |
A high degree |
3593 |
42.7% |
0.426722090 |
3 |
Some degree |
3541 |
42.1% |
0.420546318 |
4 |
A low degree |
741 |
8.8% |
0.088004751 |
5 |
Not at all |
169 |
2% |
0.020071259 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
0.4% |
0.003562945 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r20pk54
Variable label:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very high degree |
596 |
7.1% |
0.070783848 |
2 |
A high degree |
3845 |
45.7% |
0.456650831 |
3 |
Some degree |
3037 |
36.1% |
0.360688836 |
4 |
A low degree |
695 |
8.3% |
0.082541568 |
5 |
Not at all |
219 |
2.6% |
0.026009501 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.3% |
0.003325416 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r20pk15
Variable label:
|
Whether people in general can be trusted
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
54 |
0.6% |
0.006413302 |
1 |
1 |
38 |
0.5% |
0.004513064 |
2 |
2 |
116 |
1.4% |
0.013776722 |
3 |
3 |
186 |
2.2% |
0.022090261 |
4 |
4 |
265 |
3.1% |
0.031472684 |
5 |
5 |
687 |
8.2% |
0.081591449 |
6 |
6 |
690 |
8.2% |
0.081947743 |
7 |
7 |
1858 |
22.1% |
0.220665083 |
8 |
8 |
2376 |
28.2% |
0.282185273 |
9 |
9 |
1049 |
12.5% |
0.124584323 |
10 |
10 - Most people can be trusted |
1024 |
12.2% |
0.121615202 |
97 |
Not answered |
77 |
0.9% |
0.009144893 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r20pktilfreds1
Variable label:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
2327 |
27.6% |
0.276365796 |
2 |
Satisfied |
4870 |
57.8% |
0.578384798 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
965 |
11.5% |
0.114608076 |
4 |
Dissatisfied |
201 |
2.4% |
0.023871734 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
29 |
0.3% |
0.003444181 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.3% |
0.003325416 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r20pk60
Variable label:
|
Proposition: The Government should work more to significantly reduce income differences
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income differences in society.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2534 |
30.1% |
0.300950119 |
2 |
Agree |
2444 |
29% |
0.290261283 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1789 |
21.2% |
0.212470309 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
819 |
9.7% |
0.097268409 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
460 |
5.5% |
0.054631829 |
6 |
Disagree |
269 |
3.2% |
0.031947743 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
73 |
0.9% |
0.008669834 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.4% |
0.003800475 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r20bk33_kodet
Variable label:
|
Which description best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days? [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
Technical description:
|
[Alle respondenter spurt]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-14]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
100% furloughed by employer |
42 |
0.5% |
0.0049881235 |
2 |
Partially furloughed by employer |
41 |
0.5% |
0.0048693587 |
3 |
In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) |
3668 |
43.6% |
0.4356294537 |
4 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more |
250 |
3% |
0.0296912114 |
5 |
In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of
absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week |
283 |
3.4% |
0.0336104513 |
6 |
Self-employed |
350 |
4.2% |
0.0415676960 |
7 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
198 |
2.4% |
0.0235154394 |
8 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
86 |
1% |
0.0102137767 |
9 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
39 |
0.5% |
0.0046318290 |
10 |
Permanently ill or disabled |
449 |
5.3% |
0.0533254157 |
11 |
Retired |
2890 |
34.3% |
0.3432304038 |
12 |
In military service |
4 |
0% |
0.0004750594 |
13 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
41 |
0.5% |
0.0048693587 |
14 |
Other: |
40 |
0.5% |
0.0047505938 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.5% |
0.0046318290 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r17bk21_kodet
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work/worked in? [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
[Which type of business do you work in?/ What was the kind of business where you worked in your previous main occupation?]
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom Ikke stilt til de som har svart på r12arbeid. Heller ikke stilt til dem som oppga at de er pensjonster (r12arbeid==8) Videre vilkår: r17bk33 != 9 og (r17bk33 = 6|7|8|9|10|11 ELLER (r17bk33 = 5 og respondent over 28 år))]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
704 |
11.3% |
0.113274336 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1888 |
30.4% |
0.303781175 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
408 |
6.6% |
0.065647627 |
4 |
Private business |
2587 |
41.6% |
0.416251006 |
5 |
Family business |
87 |
1.4% |
0.013998391 |
6 |
Self-employed |
377 |
6.1% |
0.060659694 |
7 |
Other: |
106 |
1.7% |
0.017055511 |
97 |
Not answered |
57 |
0.9% |
0.009171360 |
98 |
Not asked |
3825 |
|
NA |
9 |
|
1 |
0% |
0.000160901 |
r18bk21_kodet
Variable label:
|
Which type of business do you work in? [coded]
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Spurt dersom r18group = 7 og r18bk21 = 1, 2 eller 3]
[Lagt til omokdede verdier fra _other-variabler]
[Added recoded values from _other-variables]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
62 |
10.2% |
0.101973684 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
201 |
33.1% |
0.330592105 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
35 |
5.8% |
0.057565789 |
4 |
Private business |
287 |
47.2% |
0.472039474 |
5 |
Self-employed |
4 |
0.7% |
0.006578947 |
6 |
Other: |
19 |
3.1% |
0.031250000 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
9432 |
|
NA |
r20pk10
Variable label:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
|
Post-question:
|
Do you think it is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
1723 |
20.5% |
0.204631829 |
2 |
Good |
4330 |
51.4% |
0.514251781 |
3 |
Quite good |
1339 |
15.9% |
0.159026128 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
503 |
6% |
0.059738717 |
5 |
Quite bad |
383 |
4.5% |
0.045486936 |
6 |
Bad |
113 |
1.3% |
0.013420428 |
7 |
Very bad |
12 |
0.1% |
0.001425178 |
97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.2% |
0.002019002 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r20tdr17
Variable label:
|
Economic situation in [region] compared with the rest of Norway
|
Literal question:
|
If you compare the economic situation in [region] with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation in [region] as better, worse or the same?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Better |
1997 |
23.7% |
0.23717340 |
2 |
Worse |
1303 |
15.5% |
0.15475059 |
3 |
The same |
5034 |
59.8% |
0.59786223 |
97 |
Not answered |
86 |
1% |
0.01021378 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r11pkklasse
Variable label:
|
Social class, self-placement
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
37 |
0.8% |
0.007738967 |
2 |
Working class |
552 |
11.5% |
0.115457017 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
454 |
9.5% |
0.094959214 |
4 |
Middle class |
2614 |
54.7% |
0.546747542 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
944 |
19.7% |
0.197448233 |
6 |
Upper class |
26 |
0.5% |
0.005438193 |
7 |
Don't know |
129 |
2.7% |
0.026981803 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.5% |
0.005229032 |
98 |
Not asked |
5259 |
|
NA |
r14pkklasse
Variable label:
|
To which social class do you belong.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
7 |
0.8% |
0.007641921 |
2 |
Working class |
120 |
13.1% |
0.131004367 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
87 |
9.5% |
0.094978166 |
4 |
Middle class |
503 |
54.9% |
0.549126638 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
161 |
17.6% |
0.175764192 |
6 |
Upper class |
3 |
0.3% |
0.003275109 |
7 |
Don't know |
29 |
3.2% |
0.031659389 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.7% |
0.006550218 |
98 |
Not asked |
9124 |
|
NA |
r16pkklasse
Variable label:
|
Place yourself in a social class
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
30 |
1.2% |
0.012028869 |
2 |
Working class |
292 |
11.7% |
0.117080994 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
249 |
10% |
0.099839615 |
4 |
Middle class |
1355 |
54.3% |
0.543303929 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
468 |
18.8% |
0.187650361 |
6 |
Upper class |
9 |
0.4% |
0.003608661 |
7 |
Don't know |
87 |
3.5% |
0.034883721 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.2% |
0.001603849 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r18pkklasse
Variable label:
|
Placing yourself in which social class?
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
15 |
1.4% |
0.013761468 |
2 |
Working class |
129 |
11.8% |
0.118348624 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
94 |
8.6% |
0.086238532 |
4 |
Middle class |
616 |
56.5% |
0.565137615 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
187 |
17.2% |
0.171559633 |
6 |
Upper class |
4 |
0.4% |
0.003669725 |
7 |
Don't know |
34 |
3.1% |
0.031192661 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
1% |
0.010091743 |
98 |
Not asked |
8950 |
|
NA |
r20pk1
Variable label:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
1362 |
16.2% |
0.161757720 |
2 |
Interested |
3886 |
46.2% |
0.461520190 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
2531 |
30.1% |
0.300593824 |
4 |
Not very interested |
526 |
6.2% |
0.062470309 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
76 |
0.9% |
0.009026128 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.5% |
0.004631829 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r18pk8
Variable label:
|
Place yourself on the political left-wing/right-wing scale
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Left |
38 |
3.5% |
0.034862385 |
1 |
1 |
67 |
6.1% |
0.061467890 |
2 |
2 |
118 |
10.8% |
0.108256881 |
3 |
3 |
161 |
14.8% |
0.147706422 |
4 |
4 |
121 |
11.1% |
0.111009174 |
5 |
5 |
154 |
14.1% |
0.141284404 |
6 |
6 |
103 |
9.4% |
0.094495413 |
7 |
7 |
144 |
13.2% |
0.132110092 |
8 |
8 |
115 |
10.6% |
0.105504587 |
9 |
9 |
37 |
3.4% |
0.033944954 |
10 |
10 - Right |
22 |
2% |
0.020183486 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.009174312 |
98 |
Not asked |
8950 |
|
NA |
r20pk8
Variable label:
|
Your position on the political left-right scale
|
Pre-question text:
|
People often talk about “left wing” and “right wing” politics. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are very much politically left wing, while 10 represents those who are very much politically right wing.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert != 18]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Left wing |
121 |
1.6% |
0.01618729 |
1 |
1 |
320 |
4.3% |
0.04280936 |
2 |
2 |
848 |
11.3% |
0.11344482 |
3 |
3 |
1100 |
14.7% |
0.14715719 |
4 |
4 |
869 |
11.6% |
0.11625418 |
5 |
5 |
1035 |
13.8% |
0.13846154 |
6 |
6 |
873 |
11.7% |
0.11678930 |
7 |
7 |
1068 |
14.3% |
0.14287625 |
8 |
8 |
854 |
11.4% |
0.11424749 |
9 |
9 |
196 |
2.6% |
0.02622074 |
10 |
10 - Right wing |
106 |
1.4% |
0.01418060 |
97 |
Not answered |
85 |
1.1% |
0.01137124 |
98 |
Not asked |
2565 |
|
NA |
r20pk9_1
Variable label:
|
Open: The most important political issues for you personally (1)
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Post-question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:integer] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
98 |
|
10040 |
|
NA |
r20pk9_2
Variable label:
|
Open: The second most important political issues for you personally (2)
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Post-question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:integer] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
98 |
|
10040 |
|
NA |
r20pk9_3
Variable label:
|
Open: The third most important political issues for you personally (3)
|
Literal question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
|
Post-question:
|
What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Open Text List] [Format:integer] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
98 |
|
10040 |
|
NA |
r14pk14
Variable label:
|
Agree/Disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated people like me do not understand it.
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
183 |
3.3% |
0.032766338 |
2 |
Agree |
554 |
9.9% |
0.099194270 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1687 |
30.2% |
0.302059087 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
546 |
9.8% |
0.097761862 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
732 |
13.1% |
0.131065354 |
6 |
Disagree |
1411 |
25.3% |
0.252641003 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
460 |
8.2% |
0.082363474 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.2% |
0.002148612 |
98 |
Not asked |
4455 |
|
NA |
r17pk14
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Sometimes politics is so complicated that it’s hard to understand
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 16]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
127 |
5.4% |
0.05411163 |
2 |
Agree |
294 |
12.5% |
0.12526630 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
609 |
25.9% |
0.25948019 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
225 |
9.6% |
0.09586706 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
310 |
13.2% |
0.13208351 |
6 |
Disagree |
530 |
22.6% |
0.22582020 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
240 |
10.2% |
0.10225820 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.5% |
0.00511291 |
98 |
Not asked |
7693 |
|
NA |
r20pk14
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Sometimes politics is so complicated that it’s hard to understand
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
|
Literal question:
|
Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
30 |
3.2% |
0.031746032 |
2 |
Agree |
82 |
8.7% |
0.086772487 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
235 |
24.9% |
0.248677249 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
80 |
8.5% |
0.084656085 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
123 |
13% |
0.130158730 |
6 |
Disagree |
272 |
28.8% |
0.287830688 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
118 |
12.5% |
0.124867725 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.5% |
0.005291005 |
98 |
Not asked |
9095 |
|
NA |
r14pk13
Variable label:
|
How much say in what the government does does the political system in Norway allow people like you.
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
36 |
0.6% |
0.006445837 |
2 |
To a great extent |
629 |
11.3% |
0.112623098 |
3 |
To some extent |
2462 |
44.1% |
0.440823635 |
4 |
To a small extent |
2017 |
36.1% |
0.361145927 |
5 |
Not at all |
421 |
7.5% |
0.075380483 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
0.4% |
0.003581021 |
98 |
Not asked |
4455 |
|
NA |
r17pk13
Variable label:
|
Whether the political system in Norway allow you to have a say
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 16]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
18 |
0.8% |
0.007669365 |
2 |
To a great extent |
252 |
10.7% |
0.107371112 |
3 |
To some extent |
1083 |
46.1% |
0.461440136 |
4 |
To a small extent |
768 |
32.7% |
0.327226246 |
5 |
Not at all |
212 |
9% |
0.090328078 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
0.6% |
0.005965062 |
98 |
Not asked |
7693 |
|
NA |
r20pk13
Variable label:
|
Whether the political system in Norway allows you to have a say
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very high degree |
11 |
1.2% |
0.01164021 |
2 |
A high degree |
128 |
13.5% |
0.13544974 |
3 |
Some degree |
454 |
48% |
0.48042328 |
4 |
A low degree |
291 |
30.8% |
0.30793651 |
5 |
Not at all |
52 |
5.5% |
0.05502646 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
1% |
0.00952381 |
98 |
Not asked |
9095 |
|
NA |
r20pktilfreds3
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with the present government in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
777 |
9.2% |
0.092280285 |
2 |
Satisfied |
2895 |
34.4% |
0.343824228 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
2717 |
32.3% |
0.322684086 |
4 |
Dissatisfied |
1487 |
17.7% |
0.176603325 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
491 |
5.8% |
0.058313539 |
97 |
Not answered |
53 |
0.6% |
0.006294537 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r20pktilfreds4
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with democracy in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
1477 |
17.5% |
0.175415677 |
2 |
Satisfied |
4792 |
56.9% |
0.569121140 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1564 |
18.6% |
0.185748219 |
4 |
Dissatisfied |
453 |
5.4% |
0.053800475 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
109 |
1.3% |
0.012945368 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.3% |
0.002969121 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_1
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
139 |
2.9% |
0.029073416 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
405 |
8.5% |
0.084710312 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
875 |
18.3% |
0.183016105 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1775 |
37.1% |
0.371261242 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1182 |
24.7% |
0.247228613 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
366 |
7.7% |
0.076553022 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.8% |
0.008157289 |
98 |
Not asked |
5259 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_2
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
2333 |
48.8% |
0.48797323 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1001 |
20.9% |
0.20937042 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
660 |
13.8% |
0.13804643 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
460 |
9.6% |
0.09621418 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
210 |
4.4% |
0.04392387 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
85 |
1.8% |
0.01777871 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.7% |
0.00669316 |
98 |
Not asked |
5259 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_3
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her]. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
15 |
0.3% |
0.003137419 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
56 |
1.2% |
0.011713031 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
310 |
6.5% |
0.064839992 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1814 |
37.9% |
0.379418532 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1787 |
37.4% |
0.373771178 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
769 |
16.1% |
0.160845012 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
0.6% |
0.006274838 |
98 |
Not asked |
5259 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_4
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
41 |
0.9% |
0.008575612 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
128 |
2.7% |
0.026772642 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
312 |
6.5% |
0.065258314 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1377 |
28.8% |
0.288015060 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1785 |
37.3% |
0.373352855 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1109 |
23.2% |
0.231959841 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
0.6% |
0.006065677 |
98 |
Not asked |
5259 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_5
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand things
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
15 |
0.3% |
0.003137419 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
90 |
1.9% |
0.018824514 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
374 |
7.8% |
0.078226312 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1696 |
35.5% |
0.354737503 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1687 |
35.3% |
0.352855051 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
892 |
18.7% |
0.186571847 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.6% |
0.005647354 |
98 |
Not asked |
5259 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_6
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
442 |
9.2% |
0.09244928 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1043 |
21.8% |
0.21815520 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1658 |
34.7% |
0.34678937 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1195 |
25% |
0.24994771 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
339 |
7.1% |
0.07090567 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
80 |
1.7% |
0.01673290 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.5% |
0.00501987 |
98 |
Not asked |
5259 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_7
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
171 |
3.6% |
0.035766576 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
622 |
13% |
0.130098306 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1438 |
30.1% |
0.300773897 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1823 |
38.1% |
0.381300983 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
582 |
12.2% |
0.121731855 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
120 |
2.5% |
0.025099352 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.5% |
0.005229032 |
98 |
Not asked |
5259 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_8
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
506 |
10.6% |
0.105835599 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1080 |
22.6% |
0.225894164 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1577 |
33% |
0.329847312 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1181 |
24.7% |
0.247019452 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
332 |
6.9% |
0.069441539 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
74 |
1.5% |
0.015477933 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
0.6% |
0.006483999 |
98 |
Not asked |
5259 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_9
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
497 |
10.4% |
0.103953148 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
970 |
20.3% |
0.202886425 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1599 |
33.4% |
0.334448860 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1297 |
27.1% |
0.271282159 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
338 |
7.1% |
0.070696507 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
52 |
1.1% |
0.010876386 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
0.6% |
0.005856515 |
98 |
Not asked |
5259 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_10
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
73 |
1.5% |
0.015268772 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
239 |
5% |
0.049989542 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
714 |
14.9% |
0.149341142 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1707 |
35.7% |
0.357038277 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1358 |
28.4% |
0.284040996 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
665 |
13.9% |
0.139092240 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.5% |
0.005229032 |
98 |
Not asked |
5259 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_1
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: Respect for parents and for older people is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that [he/she] should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
111 |
3.5% |
0.035204567 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
293 |
9.3% |
0.092927371 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
607 |
19.3% |
0.192515065 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1225 |
38.9% |
0.388518871 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
655 |
20.8% |
0.207738662 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
235 |
7.5% |
0.074532192 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.9% |
0.008563273 |
98 |
Not asked |
6887 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_2
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: Religious faith is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
1687 |
53.5% |
0.535045988 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
610 |
19.3% |
0.193466540 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
380 |
12.1% |
0.120520140 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
297 |
9.4% |
0.094196004 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
99 |
3.1% |
0.031398668 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
59 |
1.9% |
0.018712337 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.7% |
0.006660324 |
98 |
Not asked |
6887 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_3
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To help people around you is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
5 |
0.2% |
0.001585791 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
38 |
1.2% |
0.012052014 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
171 |
5.4% |
0.054234063 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1179 |
37.4% |
0.373929591 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1179 |
37.4% |
0.373929591 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
557 |
17.7% |
0.176657152 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.8% |
0.007611798 |
98 |
Not asked |
6887 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_4
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To have all people in the world be treated equally is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
20 |
0.6% |
0.006343165 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
73 |
2.3% |
0.023152553 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
165 |
5.2% |
0.052331113 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
820 |
26% |
0.260069775 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1187 |
37.6% |
0.376466857 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
865 |
27.4% |
0.274341897 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
0.7% |
0.007294640 |
98 |
Not asked |
6887 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_5
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To be interested in things and to be curious is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
12 |
0.4% |
0.003805899 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
56 |
1.8% |
0.017760863 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
271 |
8.6% |
0.085949889 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1005 |
31.9% |
0.318744053 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1104 |
35% |
0.350142721 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
681 |
21.6% |
0.215984776 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.8% |
0.007611798 |
98 |
Not asked |
6887 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_6
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To take risks and look for new experiences is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He’s/she’s] always looking for new experiences.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
330 |
10.5% |
0.10466223 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
711 |
22.5% |
0.22549952 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1074 |
34.1% |
0.34062797 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
745 |
23.6% |
0.23628291 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
218 |
6.9% |
0.06914050 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
52 |
1.6% |
0.01649223 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
0.7% |
0.00729464 |
98 |
Not asked |
6887 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_7
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To seek out opportunites to have fun is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
120 |
3.8% |
0.038058991 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
397 |
12.6% |
0.125911830 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
974 |
30.9% |
0.308912147 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1142 |
36.2% |
0.362194735 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
374 |
11.9% |
0.118617190 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
119 |
3.8% |
0.037741833 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.9% |
0.008563273 |
98 |
Not asked |
6887 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_8
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To be sucessful and to impress other people is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
365 |
11.6% |
0.115762766 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
688 |
21.8% |
0.218204884 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1101 |
34.9% |
0.349191246 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
682 |
21.6% |
0.216301935 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
227 |
7.2% |
0.071994925 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
66 |
2.1% |
0.020932445 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.8% |
0.007611798 |
98 |
Not asked |
6887 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_9
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To take the lead and tell others what to do is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
360 |
11.4% |
0.114176974 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
688 |
21.8% |
0.218204884 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
998 |
31.7% |
0.316523945 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
855 |
27.1% |
0.271170314 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
191 |
6.1% |
0.060577228 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
39 |
1.2% |
0.012369172 |
97 |
Not answered |
22 |
0.7% |
0.006977482 |
98 |
Not asked |
6887 |
|
NA |
r17bktivi_10
Variable label:
|
Resembles you: To have things tidy and clean is important
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
Post-question:
|
For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]
[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
49 |
1.6% |
0.015540755 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
160 |
5.1% |
0.050745322 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
452 |
14.3% |
0.143355534 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1151 |
36.5% |
0.365049160 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
856 |
27.1% |
0.271487472 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
461 |
14.6% |
0.146209959 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.8% |
0.007611798 |
98 |
Not asked |
6887 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_1
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Reserved.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is reserved
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
972 |
17.9% |
0.17920354 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
1272 |
23.5% |
0.23451327 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
873 |
16.1% |
0.16095133 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1865 |
34.4% |
0.34384218 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
324 |
6% |
0.05973451 |
97 |
Not answered |
118 |
2.2% |
0.02175516 |
98 |
Not asked |
4616 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_2
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Generally trusting.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is generally trusting
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
107 |
2% |
0.01972714 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
454 |
8.4% |
0.08370206 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
633 |
11.7% |
0.11670354 |
4 |
Agree a little |
2611 |
48.1% |
0.48137906 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
1528 |
28.2% |
0.28171091 |
97 |
Not answered |
91 |
1.7% |
0.01677729 |
98 |
Not asked |
4616 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_3
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Tendency to be lazy.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… tend to be lazy
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
1821 |
33.6% |
0.33573009 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
1494 |
27.5% |
0.27544248 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
882 |
16.3% |
0.16261062 |
4 |
Agree a little |
977 |
18% |
0.18012537 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
159 |
2.9% |
0.02931416 |
97 |
Not answered |
91 |
1.7% |
0.01677729 |
98 |
Not asked |
4616 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_4
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Relaxed, handles stress well.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is relaxed, handles stress well
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
225 |
4.1% |
0.04148230 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1023 |
18.9% |
0.18860619 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
885 |
16.3% |
0.16316372 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
2216 |
40.9% |
0.40855457 |
5 |
Completely agree |
983 |
18.1% |
0.18123156 |
97 |
Not answered |
92 |
1.7% |
0.01696165 |
98 |
Not asked |
4616 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_5
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Few artistic interests.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… has few artistic interests
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
1557 |
28.7% |
0.28705752 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1696 |
31.3% |
0.31268437 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
847 |
15.6% |
0.15615782 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
967 |
17.8% |
0.17828171 |
5 |
Completely agree |
265 |
4.9% |
0.04885693 |
97 |
Not answered |
92 |
1.7% |
0.01696165 |
98 |
Not asked |
4616 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_6
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Outgoing, sociable.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… is outgoing, sociable
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
230 |
4.2% |
0.04240413 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
870 |
16% |
0.16039823 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
868 |
16% |
0.16002950 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
2010 |
37.1% |
0.37057522 |
5 |
Completely agree |
1358 |
25% |
0.25036873 |
97 |
Not answered |
88 |
1.6% |
0.01622419 |
98 |
Not asked |
4616 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_7
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Tends to find fault with others.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… tends to find fault with others
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
884 |
16.3% |
0.16297935 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1608 |
29.6% |
0.29646018 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1531 |
28.2% |
0.28226401 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
1195 |
22% |
0.22031711 |
5 |
Completely agree |
120 |
2.2% |
0.02212389 |
97 |
Not answered |
86 |
1.6% |
0.01585546 |
98 |
Not asked |
4616 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_8
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Does a thorough job.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… do a thorough job
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
75 |
1.4% |
0.01382743 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
115 |
2.1% |
0.02120206 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
492 |
9.1% |
0.09070796 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
2279 |
42% |
0.42016962 |
5 |
Completely agree |
2379 |
43.9% |
0.43860619 |
97 |
Not answered |
84 |
1.5% |
0.01548673 |
98 |
Not asked |
4616 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_9
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Easily nervous.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… get nervous easily
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Completely disagree |
1624 |
29.9% |
0.29941003 |
2 |
Disagree somewhat |
1613 |
29.7% |
0.29738201 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
945 |
17.4% |
0.17422566 |
4 |
Agree somewhat |
941 |
17.3% |
0.17348820 |
5 |
Completely agree |
212 |
3.9% |
0.03908555 |
97 |
Not answered |
89 |
1.6% |
0.01640855 |
98 |
Not asked |
4616 |
|
NA |
r15bfi10_10
Variable label:
|
Describes you how well: Active imagination.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well does the following statement describe your personality?
I see myself as someone who …
|
Literal question:
|
… has an active imagination
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
330 |
6.1% |
0.06084071 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
790 |
14.6% |
0.14564897 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1369 |
25.2% |
0.25239676 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1848 |
34.1% |
0.34070796 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
1004 |
18.5% |
0.18510324 |
97 |
Not answered |
83 |
1.5% |
0.01530236 |
98 |
Not asked |
4616 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_1
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Reserved
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
…is reserved
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
508 |
20.4% |
0.20368885 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
603 |
24.2% |
0.24178027 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
403 |
16.2% |
0.16158781 |
4 |
Agree a little |
758 |
30.4% |
0.30392943 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
162 |
6.5% |
0.06495589 |
97 |
Not answered |
60 |
2.4% |
0.02405774 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_2
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Generally trusting
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
…is generally trusting
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
72 |
2.9% |
0.02886929 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
212 |
8.5% |
0.08500401 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
291 |
11.7% |
0.11668003 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1116 |
44.7% |
0.44747394 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
765 |
30.7% |
0.30673617 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
1.5% |
0.01523657 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_3
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Tends to be lazy
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
…tends to be lazy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
920 |
36.9% |
0.36888532 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
649 |
26% |
0.26022454 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
396 |
15.9% |
0.15878107 |
4 |
Agree a little |
389 |
15.6% |
0.15597434 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
96 |
3.8% |
0.03849238 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
1.8% |
0.01764234 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_4
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Relaxed, handles stress well
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… is relaxed, handles stress well
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
94 |
3.8% |
0.03769046 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
425 |
17% |
0.17040898 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
386 |
15.5% |
0.15477145 |
4 |
Agree a little |
1014 |
40.7% |
0.40657578 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
537 |
21.5% |
0.21531676 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
1.5% |
0.01523657 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_5
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Has few artistic interests
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… has few artistic interests
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
757 |
30.4% |
0.30352847 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
737 |
29.6% |
0.29550922 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
385 |
15.4% |
0.15437049 |
4 |
Agree a little |
419 |
16.8% |
0.16800321 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
156 |
6.3% |
0.06255012 |
97 |
Not answered |
40 |
1.6% |
0.01603849 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_6
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Outgoing, sociable
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… is outgoing, sociable
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
113 |
4.5% |
0.04530874 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
343 |
13.8% |
0.13753007 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
388 |
15.6% |
0.15557338 |
4 |
Agree a little |
886 |
35.5% |
0.35525261 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
732 |
29.4% |
0.29350441 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
1.3% |
0.01283079 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_7
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Tends to find fault with others
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… tends to find fault with others
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
439 |
17.6% |
0.17602245 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
731 |
29.3% |
0.29310345 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
731 |
29.3% |
0.29310345 |
4 |
Agree a little |
472 |
18.9% |
0.18925421 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
77 |
3.1% |
0.03087410 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
1.8% |
0.01764234 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_8
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Does a thorough job
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… does a thorough job
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
43 |
1.7% |
0.01724138 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
50 |
2% |
0.02004812 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
172 |
6.9% |
0.06896552 |
4 |
Agree a little |
934 |
37.4% |
0.37449880 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
1256 |
50.4% |
0.50360866 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
1.6% |
0.01563753 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_9
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Get nervous easily
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… get nervous easily
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
760 |
30.5% |
0.30473136 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
709 |
28.4% |
0.28428228 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
445 |
17.8% |
0.17842823 |
4 |
Agree a little |
444 |
17.8% |
0.17802727 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
92 |
3.7% |
0.03688853 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
1.8% |
0.01764234 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r16bfi10_10
Variable label:
|
I see myself as: Has an active imagination
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
|
Literal question:
|
… has an active imagination
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Disagree strongly |
191 |
7.7% |
0.07658380 |
2 |
Disagree a little |
321 |
12.9% |
0.12870890 |
3 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
606 |
24.3% |
0.24298316 |
4 |
Agree a little |
826 |
33.1% |
0.33119487 |
5 |
Agree strongly |
507 |
20.3% |
0.20328789 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
1.7% |
0.01724138 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_1
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Ideally some groups in society should be on top and others on the bottom
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
An ideal society requires some groups to be on top and others to be on the bottom
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
1479 |
31.8% |
0.31820138 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
868 |
18.7% |
0.18674699 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
608 |
13.1% |
0.13080895 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
625 |
13.4% |
0.13446644 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
579 |
12.5% |
0.12456971 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
380 |
8.2% |
0.08175559 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
82 |
1.8% |
0.01764200 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.6% |
0.00580895 |
98 |
Not asked |
5392 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_2
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups.
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
2776 |
59.7% |
0.597246127 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
551 |
11.9% |
0.118545611 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
286 |
6.2% |
0.061531842 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
511 |
11% |
0.109939759 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
325 |
7% |
0.069922547 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
145 |
3.1% |
0.031196213 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
24 |
0.5% |
0.005163511 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
0.6% |
0.006454389 |
98 |
Not asked |
5392 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_3
Variable label:
|
Assertion: No one group should dominate in society
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
No one group should dominate in society.
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
356 |
7.7% |
0.076592083 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
253 |
5.4% |
0.054432014 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
285 |
6.1% |
0.061316695 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
487 |
10.5% |
0.104776248 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
424 |
9.1% |
0.091222031 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
867 |
18.7% |
0.186531842 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
1944 |
41.8% |
0.418244406 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.7% |
0.006884682 |
98 |
Not asked |
5392 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_4
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top.
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
196 |
4.2% |
0.04216867 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
354 |
7.6% |
0.07616179 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
456 |
9.8% |
0.09810671 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
651 |
14% |
0.14006024 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
500 |
10.8% |
0.10757315 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
968 |
20.8% |
0.20826162 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
1473 |
31.7% |
0.31691050 |
97 |
Not answered |
50 |
1.1% |
0.01075731 |
98 |
Not asked |
5392 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_5
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Equality between groups should not be our main goal
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
Equality between groups should not be our main goal.
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
978 |
21% |
0.21041308 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
947 |
20.4% |
0.20374355 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
527 |
11.3% |
0.11338210 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
802 |
17.3% |
0.17254733 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
648 |
13.9% |
0.13941480 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
462 |
9.9% |
0.09939759 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
238 |
5.1% |
0.05120482 |
97 |
Not answered |
46 |
1% |
0.00989673 |
98 |
Not asked |
5392 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_6
Variable label:
|
Assertion: It is unjust to try to make groups equal
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
It is unjust to try to make groups equal.
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
1073 |
23.1% |
0.23085198 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
855 |
18.4% |
0.18395009 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
518 |
11.1% |
0.11144578 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
969 |
20.8% |
0.20847676 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
598 |
12.9% |
0.12865749 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
408 |
8.8% |
0.08777969 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
166 |
3.6% |
0.03571429 |
97 |
Not answered |
61 |
1.3% |
0.01312392 |
98 |
Not asked |
5392 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_7
Variable label:
|
Assertion: We should equalize conditions for different groups
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
We should do what we can to equalize conditions for different groups.
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
40 |
0.9% |
0.008605852 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
121 |
2.6% |
0.026032702 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
274 |
5.9% |
0.058950086 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
459 |
9.9% |
0.098752151 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
861 |
18.5% |
0.185240964 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
1133 |
24.4% |
0.243760757 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
1725 |
37.1% |
0.371127367 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
0.8% |
0.007530120 |
98 |
Not asked |
5392 |
|
NA |
r17sdo7_8
Variable label:
|
Assertion: We should give all groups an equal chance to succeed
|
Pre-question text:
|
Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
|
Literal question:
|
We should work to give all groups an equal chance to succeed.
|
Post-question:
|
You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Strongly oppose |
19 |
0.4% |
0.004087780 |
2 |
2 - Somewhat oppose |
22 |
0.5% |
0.004733219 |
3 |
3 - Slightly oppose |
41 |
0.9% |
0.008820998 |
4 |
4 - Neutral |
213 |
4.6% |
0.045826162 |
5 |
5 - Slightly favor |
412 |
8.9% |
0.088640275 |
6 |
6 - Somewhat favor |
900 |
19.4% |
0.193631670 |
7 |
7 - Strongly favor |
3012 |
64.8% |
0.648020654 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
0.6% |
0.006239243 |
98 |
Not asked |
5392 |
|
NA |
r16bk42
Variable label:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
None |
1995 |
80% |
0.7999198075 |
1 |
1 |
203 |
8.1% |
0.0813953488 |
2 |
2 |
206 |
8.3% |
0.0825982358 |
3 |
3 |
67 |
2.7% |
0.0268644747 |
4 |
4 |
11 |
0.4% |
0.0044105854 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
0% |
0.0004009623 |
6 |
6 or more |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000000 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.4% |
0.0044105854 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r17bk42
Variable label:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r17rekruttert < 15]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
None |
4440 |
81.4% |
0.8140814081 |
1 |
1 |
440 |
8.1% |
0.0806747341 |
2 |
2 |
426 |
7.8% |
0.0781078108 |
3 |
3 |
103 |
1.9% |
0.0188852219 |
4 |
4 |
11 |
0.2% |
0.0020168684 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
0% |
0.0001833517 |
6 |
6 or more |
1 |
0% |
0.0001833517 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.6% |
0.0058672534 |
98 |
Not asked |
4586 |
|
NA |
r18bk42
Variable label:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 at home living with you, in that case how many?
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
None |
859 |
78.8% |
0.7880733945 |
1 |
1 |
94 |
8.6% |
0.0862385321 |
2 |
2 |
95 |
8.7% |
0.0871559633 |
3 |
3 |
32 |
2.9% |
0.0293577982 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
0.4% |
0.0036697248 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0009174312 |
6 |
6 or more |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000000 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.5% |
0.0045871560 |
98 |
Not asked |
8950 |
|
NA |
r11bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Recoded from source variable r11bk40]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
3091 |
64.7% |
0.646517465 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
55 |
1.2% |
0.011503869 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
179 |
3.7% |
0.037439866 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
29 |
0.6% |
0.006065677 |
5 |
Islam |
11 |
0.2% |
0.002300774 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
1392 |
29.1% |
0.291152479 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
0.5% |
0.005019870 |
98 |
Not asked |
5259 |
|
NA |
r14bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Belong to a religion or religious denomination. [Recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
[Recoded from source variable r14bk40]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
575 |
62.8% |
0.627729258 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
14 |
1.5% |
0.015283843 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
36 |
3.9% |
0.039301310 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
3 |
0.3% |
0.003275109 |
5 |
Islam |
8 |
0.9% |
0.008733624 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
270 |
29.5% |
0.294759825 |
97 |
No answer |
10 |
1.1% |
0.010917031 |
98 |
Not asked |
9124 |
|
NA |
r16bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. Recoded from source variable r16bk40]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
1560 |
62.6% |
0.625501203 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
31 |
1.2% |
0.012429832 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
91 |
3.6% |
0.036487570 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
20 |
0.8% |
0.008019246 |
5 |
Islam |
20 |
0.8% |
0.008019246 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities |
767 |
30.8% |
0.307538091 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.2% |
0.002004812 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r18bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[Recoded from source variable r18bk40. Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
660 |
60.6% |
0.605504587 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
10 |
0.9% |
0.009174312 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
44 |
4% |
0.040366972 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
7 |
0.6% |
0.006422018 |
5 |
Islam |
11 |
1% |
0.010091743 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities |
353 |
32.4% |
0.323853211 |
97 |
No answer |
5 |
0.5% |
0.004587156 |
98 |
Not asked |
8950 |
|
NA |
r11bk41
Variable label:
|
Attends religious meetings
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
6 |
0.1% |
0.001254968 |
2 |
More than once a week |
75 |
1.6% |
0.015687095 |
3 |
Once a week |
122 |
2.6% |
0.025517674 |
4 |
At least once a month |
233 |
4.9% |
0.048734574 |
5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
830 |
17.4% |
0.173603849 |
6 |
Less frequently |
1053 |
22% |
0.220246810 |
7 |
Never |
2437 |
51% |
0.509725999 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.5% |
0.005229032 |
98 |
Not asked |
5259 |
|
NA |
r14bk41
Variable label:
|
How often attend religious meetings, aside from special occasions.
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r14group = 1 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
1 |
0.1% |
0.001091703 |
2 |
More than once a week |
6 |
0.7% |
0.006550218 |
3 |
Once a week |
34 |
3.7% |
0.037117904 |
4 |
At least once a month |
60 |
6.6% |
0.065502183 |
5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
159 |
17.4% |
0.173580786 |
6 |
Less frequently |
209 |
22.8% |
0.228165939 |
7 |
Never |
439 |
47.9% |
0.479257642 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.9% |
0.008733624 |
98 |
Not asked |
9124 |
|
NA |
r16bk41
Variable label:
|
How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
1 |
0% |
0.0004009623 |
2 |
More than once a week |
43 |
1.7% |
0.0172413793 |
3 |
Once a week |
49 |
2% |
0.0196471532 |
4 |
Once or a few times a month |
79 |
3.2% |
0.0316760225 |
5 |
Several times a year |
263 |
10.5% |
0.1054530874 |
6 |
Once a year |
348 |
14% |
0.1395348837 |
7 |
Less than once a year |
406 |
16.3% |
0.1627906977 |
8 |
Never |
1299 |
52.1% |
0.5208500401 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.2% |
0.0024057739 |
98 |
Not asked |
7546 |
|
NA |
r18bk41
Variable label:
|
How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
Literal question:
|
Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r18group = 7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
0 |
0% |
0.000000000 |
2 |
More than once a week |
8 |
0.7% |
0.007339450 |
3 |
Once a week |
22 |
2% |
0.020183486 |
4 |
Once or a few times a month |
41 |
3.8% |
0.037614679 |
5 |
Several times a year |
94 |
8.6% |
0.086238532 |
6 |
Once a year |
176 |
16.1% |
0.161467890 |
7 |
Less than once a year |
186 |
17.1% |
0.170642202 |
8 |
Never |
557 |
51.1% |
0.511009174 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.6% |
0.005504587 |
98 |
Not asked |
8950 |
|
NA |
r20pkmeme21
Variable label:
|
Assertion: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
113 |
1.3% |
0.013420428 |
2 |
Agree |
280 |
3.3% |
0.033254157 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1089 |
12.9% |
0.129334917 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
854 |
10.1% |
0.101425178 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
963 |
11.4% |
0.114370546 |
6 |
Disagree |
2504 |
29.7% |
0.297387173 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
2590 |
30.8% |
0.307600950 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.3% |
0.003206651 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r17pkby2
Variable label:
|
Whether your local environment has become safer the last couple of years
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much safer |
120 |
1.5% |
0.01538264 |
2 |
Somewhat safer |
587 |
7.5% |
0.07524676 |
3 |
No change in safety |
4658 |
59.7% |
0.59710294 |
4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
2109 |
27% |
0.27034996 |
5 |
Much more unsafe |
289 |
3.7% |
0.03704653 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
0.5% |
0.00487117 |
98 |
Not asked |
2239 |
|
NA |
r18pkby2
Variable label:
|
How much safer/unsafe has your local environment become the past years?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much safer |
29 |
2.7% |
0.026605505 |
2 |
Somewhat safer |
106 |
9.7% |
0.097247706 |
3 |
No change in safety |
712 |
65.3% |
0.653211009 |
4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
215 |
19.7% |
0.197247706 |
5 |
Much more unsafe |
25 |
2.3% |
0.022935780 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.3% |
0.002752294 |
98 |
Not asked |
8950 |
|
NA |
r20pkby3
Variable label:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very high degree |
215 |
2.6% |
0.025534442 |
2 |
A high degree |
986 |
11.7% |
0.117102138 |
3 |
Some degree |
3808 |
45.2% |
0.452256532 |
4 |
A low degree |
3005 |
35.7% |
0.356888361 |
5 |
Not at all |
380 |
4.5% |
0.045130641 |
97 |
Not answered |
26 |
0.3% |
0.003087886 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r17pk52
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More measures to protect citizens from terrorist threats, even at the expense of privacy
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
733 |
9.4% |
0.093962313 |
2 |
Agree |
1664 |
21.3% |
0.213305986 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
2227 |
28.5% |
0.285476221 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
870 |
11.2% |
0.111524164 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
943 |
12.1% |
0.120881938 |
6 |
Disagree |
916 |
11.7% |
0.117420843 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
426 |
5.5% |
0.054608384 |
97 |
Not answered |
22 |
0.3% |
0.002820151 |
98 |
Not asked |
2239 |
|
NA |
r20pk52
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: More measures to protect citizens from terrorist threats, even at the expense of privacy
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
85 |
9% |
0.089947090 |
2 |
Agree |
203 |
21.5% |
0.214814815 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
287 |
30.4% |
0.303703704 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
132 |
14% |
0.139682540 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
119 |
12.6% |
0.125925926 |
6 |
Disagree |
81 |
8.6% |
0.085714286 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
34 |
3.6% |
0.035978836 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.4% |
0.004232804 |
98 |
Not asked |
9095 |
|
NA |
r20pkdv5
Variable label:
|
How great an advantage/disadvantage that immigrants come to live in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very great advantage |
424 |
5% |
0.050356295 |
2 |
A great advantage |
1749 |
20.8% |
0.207719715 |
3 |
A slight advantage |
3227 |
38.3% |
0.383254157 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1191 |
14.1% |
0.141448931 |
5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1152 |
13.7% |
0.136817102 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
412 |
4.9% |
0.048931116 |
7 |
A very great disadvantage |
248 |
2.9% |
0.029453682 |
97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.2% |
0.002019002 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r20pkmeme9
Variable label:
|
Should be easier/harder for refugees to be granted residence in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here?
|
Post-question:
|
Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much easier |
338 |
4% |
0.040142518 |
2 |
Easier |
1166 |
13.8% |
0.138479810 |
3 |
Somewhat easier |
1917 |
22.8% |
0.227672209 |
4 |
Same as today |
2751 |
32.7% |
0.326722090 |
5 |
Slightly more difficult |
1021 |
12.1% |
0.121258907 |
6 |
More difficult |
633 |
7.5% |
0.075178147 |
7 |
Much more difficult |
550 |
6.5% |
0.065320665 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
0.5% |
0.005225653 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r17pkdv55
Variable label:
|
Assertion: It should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools
|
Pre-question text:
|
Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Christian faith.
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
124 |
1.6% |
0.01589540 |
2 |
Agree |
615 |
7.9% |
0.07883605 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
824 |
10.6% |
0.10562748 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
900 |
11.5% |
0.11536982 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
785 |
10.1% |
0.10062812 |
6 |
Disagree |
1109 |
14.2% |
0.14216126 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1321 |
16.9% |
0.16933726 |
8 |
Neither of these should be possible |
2100 |
26.9% |
0.26919626 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
0.3% |
0.00294834 |
98 |
Not asked |
2239 |
|
NA |
r20pk101
Variable label:
|
Your opinion on Norway’s preconditions for integrating refugees
|
Literal question:
|
As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
646 |
7.7% |
0.076722090 |
2 |
Good |
2623 |
31.2% |
0.311520190 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
1803 |
21.4% |
0.214133017 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
883 |
10.5% |
0.104869359 |
5 |
Somewhat poor |
1374 |
16.3% |
0.163182898 |
6 |
Poor |
768 |
9.1% |
0.091211401 |
7 |
Very poor |
275 |
3.3% |
0.032660333 |
97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.6% |
0.005700713 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r20meme50
Variable label:
|
Generally speaking, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much do you like or dislike immigrants in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 18]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
8 |
0.8% |
0.008465608 |
2 |
Really dislike |
22 |
2.3% |
0.023280423 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
75 |
7.9% |
0.079365079 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
287 |
30.4% |
0.303703704 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
246 |
26% |
0.260317460 |
6 |
Really like |
236 |
25% |
0.249735450 |
7 |
Intensely like |
65 |
6.9% |
0.068783069 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.6% |
0.006349206 |
98 |
Not asked |
9095 |
|
NA |
r20pk_sentral
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1325 |
15.7% |
0.157363420 |
2 |
Agree |
2145 |
25.5% |
0.254750594 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
2374 |
28.2% |
0.281947743 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1165 |
13.8% |
0.138361045 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
630 |
7.5% |
0.074821853 |
6 |
Disagree |
590 |
7% |
0.070071259 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
164 |
1.9% |
0.019477435 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
0.3% |
0.003206651 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r17pk55
Variable label:
|
Assertion: The number of municipalities should be reduced further
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions:
|
Literal question:
|
Norway now has 356 municipalities instead of 422 as before. The number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
716 |
9.2% |
0.09178310 |
2 |
Agree |
1209 |
15.5% |
0.15498013 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1279 |
16.4% |
0.16395334 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1408 |
18% |
0.18048968 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
894 |
11.5% |
0.11460069 |
6 |
Disagree |
1322 |
16.9% |
0.16946545 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
942 |
12.1% |
0.12075375 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
0.4% |
0.00397385 |
98 |
Not asked |
2239 |
|
NA |
r20pk103
Variable label:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
How great advantage or disadvantage is the EEA Agreement for Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A very great advantage |
956 |
11.4% |
0.113539192 |
2 |
A great advantage |
2484 |
29.5% |
0.295011876 |
3 |
A slight advantage |
2642 |
31.4% |
0.313776722 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
863 |
10.2% |
0.102494062 |
5 |
A slight disadvantage |
811 |
9.6% |
0.096318290 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
402 |
4.8% |
0.047743468 |
7 |
A very great disadvantage |
188 |
2.2% |
0.022327791 |
97 |
Not answered |
74 |
0.9% |
0.008788599 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r20skepsis
Variable label:
|
Your view on climate change
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes your view on climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I don’t believe that the climate is changing. |
47 |
0.6% |
0.005581948 |
2 |
I don't know whether the climate is changing or not. |
310 |
3.7% |
0.036817102 |
3 |
I believe that the climate is changing, but that it is only to a small extent
due to human action |
1903 |
22.6% |
0.226009501 |
4 |
I believe that the climate is changing, and that it is to a large extent due to
human action. |
6099 |
72.4% |
0.724346793 |
97 |
Not answered |
61 |
0.7% |
0.007244656 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |
r20pk_vekst
Variable label:
|
Assertion: Economic growth should be safeguarded through development of industry, regardless of environmental interests
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
|
Literal question:
|
Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:10040] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
237 |
2.8% |
0.028147268 |
2 |
Agree |
696 |
8.3% |
0.082660333 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1683 |
20% |
0.199881235 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1021 |
12.1% |
0.121258907 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
1871 |
22.2% |
0.222209026 |
6 |
Disagree |
1885 |
22.4% |
0.223871734 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
985 |
11.7% |
0.116983373 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.5% |
0.004988124 |
98 |
Not asked |
1620 |
|
NA |