Codebook

Norwegian Citizen Panel

Round 19

v-101 - 2021-02-11









Produced by ideas2evidence










Citation

Primary investigators

Name Affiliation
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten UiB
Stefan Dahlberg UiB
Erla Løvseth UiB
Hege Høivik Bye UiB
Lisa Bjånesøy UiB
Gisela Böhm UiB
Rouven Doran UiB
Dag Elgesem UiB
Thea Gregersen UiB
Anne Lise Fimreite UiB
Arjan Schakel UiB
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø NORCE
Yvette Peters UiB
Bjørn Sætrevik UiB

Scientific committee for KODEM

Name Affiliaton
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten UiB
Anne Lise Fimreite UiB
Rune Karlsen UiO
Åsta Dyrnes Nordø NORCE
Johannes Bergh ISF
Jarle Trondal UiA

Responsible for KODEM-panels

Panel Name
NMP Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
NRP Yvette Peters
NJP Erik Knudsen
NFP Jarle Trondal, Tobias Bach, Jacob Aars

Coordinating team

Name
Erla Løvseth
Ingrid Kvåle Faleide
Soran Hajo Dahl

Producers

Name Affiliation Role
Øivind Skjervheim ideas2evidence Coordinator
Olav Bjørnebekk ideas2evidence Project team member
Amund Eikrem ideas2evidence Project team member
Joachim Wettergreen ideas2evidence Project team member
Asle Høgestøl ideas2evidence Quality assurance

Study Description

Abstract

The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time in the fall of 2013, and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year.

Data collection in wave 19 differs slightly from previous iterations of the survey. Some of the questions are part of coordinated surveys (“KODEM”) which also gathers information about beliefs and convictions of elected representatives (uib.no/NRP), government employees (uib.no/NFP), and from journalists and editors (uib.no/NJP). This mode of data collection enables innovative research of groups that together comprise the political body in Norway.

The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at uib.no/medborger

Scope

Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Universe: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.

Methodology

Sampling procedure

Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in seven waves:
In wave 1, 4 870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1).
In wave 3, 5 623 members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3).
In wave 8, 4 245 new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8).
In wave 11, 2 069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11).
In wave 14, 2 036 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 14).
In wave 16, 5 163 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 16).
In wave 18, 2 048 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 18).

In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry, while in wave 8 the gross sample amounted to 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, 14, and 18, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn. In wave 16, the gross sample was 34 000.

This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.

The extracted data was a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.

Mode of Data Collection

The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment. Please refer to documentation and other information from previous waves: https://nsd.no/nsddata/serier/norsk_medborgerpanel_eng.html

In wave 19, emails were sent out on 2nd of November, 2020.

An e-mail with reminder was sent out three times, November 10th, November 13th, and November 19th, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message. Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by e-mail.

Wave 19 ended November 27th 2020.

Weighting

To compensate for observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent's geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire.

Two different weights have been calculated:

When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset.

We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample.

Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.


Change Log

Version Release date / Date changed Variable Changes and notes
v-101 2021-02-11 NA Revised release of round 19
NA 2021-02-03 r19P3_2 New variable: Constituency of parliament election 2021
v-100 2020-12-17 NA Initial release of round 19


Dataset contents

File name Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 19 - v-101.sav
# Cases 12460
# Variables 637


Variable Documentation

responseid


Variable label: responseid
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r19rekruttert


Variable label: [The wave the respondent was recruited]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-18]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Round 1 1763 14.1% 0.14149278
3 Round 3 1921 15.4% 0.15417335
8 Round 8 1832 14.7% 0.14703050
11 Round 11 1074 8.6% 0.08619583
14 Round 14 1161 9.3% 0.09317817
16 Round 16 3273 26.3% 0.26268058
18 Round 18 1436 11.5% 0.11524880


r19group


Variable label: [Partially randomized. If r18group==6 the respondent is assigned to group 4, otherwise randomly assigned to one of the remaining groups]
Technical description: [Partially randomized. If r18group==6 the respondent is assigned to group 4, otherwise randomly assigned to one of the remaining groups]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Group 1 1996 16% 0.1601926
2 Group 2 1992 16% 0.1598716
3 Group 3 2022 16.2% 0.1622793
4 Group 4 2533 20.3% 0.2032905
5 Group 5 1895 15.2% 0.1520867
6 Group 6 2022 16.2% 0.1622793


r19interview_start


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r19interview_end


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:character] [Valid:11665] [Invalid:795] [Range:-]



r19browsertype


Variable label: [Browertype used by respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r19browserversion


Variable label: [Browser version used by respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r19mobil


Variable label: [Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Mobile 5534 44.4% 0.4441413
0 Other 6926 55.6% 0.5558587


r19opplosning


Variable label: [Screen resolution of the applied device]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r19enhetstype


Variable label: [Determines respondents device type]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 PC 7080 56.8% 0.568218299
2 Touch 5342 42.9% 0.428731942
3 Generic 38 0.3% 0.003049759


r19advancedwifeaturesenabled


Variable label: [Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r19getrenderingmode


Variable label: [Detects the browsers rendering mode]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r19pk12


Variable label: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament?
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 18 & r19group = 1,2,3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 132 15.2% 0.151549943
2 To a great extent 506 58.1% 0.580941447
3 To some extent 187 21.5% 0.214695752
4 To a small extent 29 3.3% 0.033295063
5 Not at all 13 1.5% 0.014925373
97 Not answered 4 0.5% 0.004592423
98 Not asked 11589 NA


r19pk15


Variable label: Most people in general can be trusted/ cannot be careful enough when dealing with others
Literal question: Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 18 & r19group = 1,2,3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Cannot be careful enough 7 0.8% 0.008036739
1 1 3 0.3% 0.003444317
2 2 11 1.3% 0.012629162
3 3 20 2.3% 0.022962113
4 4 34 3.9% 0.039035591
5 5 67 7.7% 0.076923077
6 6 101 11.6% 0.115958668
7 7 209 24% 0.239954076
8 8 238 27.3% 0.273249139
9 9 104 11.9% 0.119402985
10 10 – Most people can be trusted 74 8.5% 0.084959816
97 Not answered 3 0.3% 0.003444317
98 Not asked 11589 NA


r19pktilfreds3


Variable label: How satisfied with the present government in Norway
Literal question: How satisfied with the present government in Norway
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 18 & r19group = 1,2,3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 60 6.9% 0.068886338
2 Satisfied 319 36.6% 0.366245695
3 Somewhat satisfied 272 31.2% 0.312284730
4 Dissatisfied 164 18.8% 0.188289323
5 Not satisfied at all 51 5.9% 0.058553387
97 Not answered 5 0.6% 0.005740528
98 Not asked 11589 NA


r19pk204


Variable label: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 1,2,3,4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 247 2.9% 0.028912560
2 The Conservative Party 1898 22.2% 0.222170198
3 The Progressive Party 609 7.1% 0.071286433
4 The Liberal Party 266 3.1% 0.031136603
5 The Socialist Left Party 757 8.9% 0.088610558
6 The Centre Party 1450 17% 0.169729603
7 The Green Party 517 6.1% 0.060517383
8 The Labour Party 1547 18.1% 0.181083928
9 The Red Party 443 5.2% 0.051855320
10 Would not vote 140 1.6% 0.016387686
11 Would cast a blank vote 192 2.2% 0.022474541
12 Not entitled to vote 179 2.1% 0.020952827
13 Other: 258 3% 0.030200164
97 Not answered 40 0.5% 0.004682196
98 Not asked 3917 NA


r19pk204_13_other


Variable label: Open: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow
Pre-question text: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Literal question: Other:
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 1,2,3,4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12460] [Range:-]



r19pkdv5


Variable label: How great an advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here
Literal question: In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very great advantage 73 3.7% 0.03664659
2 Great advantage 371 18.6% 0.18624498
3 Slightly advantageous 733 36.8% 0.36797189
4 Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage 337 16.9% 0.16917671
5 A slight disadvantage 323 16.2% 0.16214859
6 A great disadvantage 97 4.9% 0.04869478
7 Very great disadvantage 48 2.4% 0.02409639
97 Not answered 10 0.5% 0.00502008
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19tdr8_a


Variable label: Would vote for which party if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow
Literal question: Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 75 3.7% 0.037091988
2 The Conservative Party 455 22.5% 0.225024728
3 The Progressive Party 110 5.4% 0.054401583
4 The Liberal Party 67 3.3% 0.033135509
5 The Socialist Left Party 159 7.9% 0.078635015
6 The Centre Party 281 13.9% 0.138971316
7 The Green Party 146 7.2% 0.072205737
8 The Labour Party 416 20.6% 0.205736894
9 The Red Party 98 4.8% 0.048466864
10 The People’s Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) 16 0.8% 0.007912957
11 A joint party list 3 0.1% 0.001483680
12 A local list 37 1.8% 0.018298714
13 I would cast a blank vote 39 1.9% 0.019287834
14 I would not vote 49 2.4% 0.024233432
15 I do not have the right to vote 5 0.2% 0.002472799
16 Other: 54 2.7% 0.026706231
97 Not answered 12 0.6% 0.005934718
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdr8_a_16_other


Variable label: Open: Would vote for which party if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow
Pre-question text: Which political party would you vote for if municipal elections were to take place tomorrow?
Literal question: Other:
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12460] [Range:-]



r19tdr8_b


Variable label: Would vote for which party if county council elections were to take place tomorrow
Literal question: Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 76 3.8% 0.037586548
2 The Conservative Party 413 20.4% 0.204253215
3 The Progressive Party 111 5.5% 0.054896142
4 The Liberal Party 63 3.1% 0.031157270
5 The Socialist Left Party 156 7.7% 0.077151335
6 The Centre Party 300 14.8% 0.148367953
7 The Green Party 129 6.4% 0.063798220
8 The Labour Party 395 19.5% 0.195351137
9 The Red Party 99 4.9% 0.048961424
10 The People’s Movement - No to More Road Tolls (or similar road toll initiative) 15 0.7% 0.007418398
11 A joint party list 3 0.1% 0.001483680
12 A local list 12 0.6% 0.005934718
13 I would cast a blank vote 61 3% 0.030168150
14 I would not vote 105 5.2% 0.051928783
15 I do not have the right to vote 14 0.7% 0.006923838
16 Other: 51 2.5% 0.025222552
97 Not answered 19 0.9% 0.009396637
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdr8_b_16_other


Variable label: Open: Would vote for which party if county council elections were to take place tomorrow
Pre-question text: Which political party would you vote for if county council elections were to take place tomorrow?
Literal question: Other:
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12460] [Range:-]



r19_psykpr_1


Variable label: How high risk that: you will become infected by the coronavirus
Pre-question text: How high do you consider the risk that during the outbreak…
Literal question: … you will become infected by the coronavirus?
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very low 339 13.4% 0.133833399
2 Somewhat low 903 35.6% 0.356494276
3 Medium 956 37.7% 0.377418081
4 Somewhat high 269 10.6% 0.106198184
5 Very high 56 2.2% 0.022108172
97 Not answered 10 0.4% 0.003947888
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19_psykpr_2


Variable label: How high risk that: an average adult in Norway will become infected
Pre-question text: How high do you consider the risk that during the outbreak…
Literal question: … an average adult in Norway will become infected?
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very low 91 3.6% 0.03592578
2 Somewhat low 633 25% 0.24990130
3 Medium 1253 49.5% 0.49467035
4 Somewhat high 444 17.5% 0.17528622
5 Very high 81 3.2% 0.03197789
97 Not answered 31 1.2% 0.01223845
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19_psykpr_3


Variable label: How high risk that: your everyday life will change a lot during the outbreak
Pre-question text: How high do you consider the risk that during the outbreak…
Literal question: … your everyday life will change a lot from the way it is today?
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very low 246 9.7% 0.09711804
2 Somewhat low 668 26.4% 0.26371891
3 Medium 871 34.4% 0.34386103
4 Somewhat high 580 22.9% 0.22897750
5 Very high 140 5.5% 0.05527043
97 Not answered 28 1.1% 0.01105409
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19_psykpr_4


Variable label: How high risk that: you will become seriously ill
Pre-question text: How high do you consider the risk that during the outbreak…
Literal question: … you will become seriously ill?
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very low 612 24.2% 0.24161074
2 Somewhat low 939 37.1% 0.37070667
3 Medium 651 25.7% 0.25700750
4 Somewhat high 247 9.8% 0.09751283
5 Very high 57 2.3% 0.02250296
97 Not answered 27 1.1% 0.01065930
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykc1_1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I worry that I will get infected by the coronavirus
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: I worry that I will get infected by the coronavirus.
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 283 11.2% 0.111725227
2 Disagree 684 27% 0.270035531
3 Neither agree nor disagree 674 26.6% 0.266087643
4 Agree 769 30.4% 0.303592578
5 Completely agree 114 4.5% 0.045005922
97 Not answered 9 0.4% 0.003553099
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykc1_2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I worry that someone in my family will get infected by the coronavirus
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: I worry that someone in my family will get infected by the coronavirus.
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 102 4% 0.040268456
2 Disagree 365 14.4% 0.144097908
3 Neither agree nor disagree 475 18.8% 0.187524674
4 Agree 1190 47% 0.469798658
5 Completely agree 388 15.3% 0.153178050
97 Not answered 13 0.5% 0.005132254
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykre_1


Variable label: The last two weeks I have: been close to others in connection with work/school
Pre-question text: The last two weeks I have…
Literal question: been close to others in connection with work, school, or studies (for example in public transport to work/school, customer contact, open-plan office, lunch room, classroom, reading room)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 351 13.9% 0.138570865
2 Daily 374 14.8% 0.147651007
3 Less than daily 688 27.2% 0.271614686
4 Almost never 1100 43.4% 0.434267667
97 Not answered 20 0.8% 0.007895776
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykre_2


Variable label: The last two weeks I have: been close to others during leisure time
Pre-question text: The last two weeks I have…
Literal question: been close to others during leisure time (such as buying groceries, other shops, restaurants or pubs, visiting the doctor, dentist, hairdresser or similar)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 31 1.2% 0.012238452
2 Daily 332 13.1% 0.131069878
3 Less than daily 1631 64.4% 0.643900513
4 Almost never 528 20.8% 0.208448480
97 Not answered 11 0.4% 0.004342677
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykre_3


Variable label: The last two weeks I have: generally been exposed to infection
Pre-question text: The last two weeks I have…
Literal question: generally been in situations that expose me to infection
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 114 4.5% 0.045005922
2 Daily 416 16.4% 0.164232136
3 Less than daily 1178 46.5% 0.465061192
4 Almost never 813 32.1% 0.320963285
97 Not answered 12 0.5% 0.004737465
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykc2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I will deal with the challenges that I will face due to the coronavirus outbreak
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: I am optimistic that I will deal with the challenges that I will face due to the coronavirus outbreak.
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 37 1.5% 0.01460719
2 Disagree 57 2.3% 0.02250296
3 Neither agree nor disagree 434 17.1% 0.17133833
4 Agree 1499 59.2% 0.59178839
5 Completely agree 498 19.7% 0.19660482
97 Not answered 8 0.3% 0.00315831
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_trust_1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I have confidence in the way national authorities are handling the coronavirus pandemic
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: I have confidence in the way national authorities are handling and are prepared to tackle the coronavirus pandemic.
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 54 2.1% 0.021318595
2 Disagree 122 4.8% 0.048164232
3 Neither agree nor disagree 271 10.7% 0.106987762
4 Agree 1424 56.2% 0.562179234
5 Completely agree 658 26% 0.259771023
97 Not answered 4 0.2% 0.001579155
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_trust_2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I have confidence in the way my municipality and the local health services are handling the coronavirus pandemic
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: I have confidence in the way my municipality and the local health services are handling and are prepared to tackle the coronavirus pandemic.
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 48 1.9% 0.018949862
2 Disagree 115 4.5% 0.045400711
3 Neither agree nor disagree 332 13.1% 0.131069878
4 Agree 1482 58.5% 0.585076984
5 Completely agree 549 21.7% 0.216739045
97 Not answered 7 0.3% 0.002763522
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_raad_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19cov_raad]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19cov_raad]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2530] [Invalid:9930] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 there is a serious outbreak of infection in the area where you live among people in the same life situation as you, and that you will be safer if you follow all infection control advice 627 24.8% 0.2478261
2 there is a serious outbreak of infection in the area where you live among people in the same life situation as you, and that it is important that you follow all infection control advice in order to stop the outbreak 601 23.8% 0.2375494
3 only a few people are infected in the area where you live among those in the same life situation as you, and that you will be much safer if you follow all infection control advice 658 26% 0.2600791
4 only a few people are infected in the area where you live among people in the same life situation as you, and that it is important that you follow all infection control advice in order to stop the outbreak 644 25.5% 0.2545455
Sysmiss 9930 NA


r19cov_raad


Variable label: Whether you would follow the measures if [r19cov_raad_ran]
Pre-question text: Imagine that the health authorities inform people that [there is a serious outbreak of infection in the area where you live among people in the same life situation as you, and that you will be safer if you follow all infection control advice / there is a serious outbreak of infection in the area where you live among people in the same life situation as you, and that it is important that you follow all infection control advice in order to stop the outbreak / only a few people are infected in the area where you live among those in the same life situation as you, and that you will be much safer if you follow all infection control advice / only a few people are infected in the area where you live among people in the same life situation as you, and that it is important that you follow all infection control advice in order to stop the outbreak].
Literal question: How certain are you that you would follow the measures in such a situation?
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19cov_raad_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I am absolutely certain that I would always follow the measures 1073 42.4% 0.423608370
2 I am quite certain that I would always follow the measures 1060 41.8% 0.418476115
3 I think that I would always follow the measures 315 12.4% 0.124358468
4 I don’t really know whether I would follow the measures 49 1.9% 0.019344651
5 I don’t think I would follow the measures 10 0.4% 0.003947888
6 I am quite certain that I would not follow the measures 10 0.4% 0.003947888
7 I am absolutely certain that I would not follow the measures 8 0.3% 0.003158310
97 Not answered 8 0.3% 0.003158310
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_tiltak_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19cov_tiltak]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19cov_tiltak]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2529] [Invalid:9931] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 recommend that everyone should wear a face mask when using crowded public transport 612 24.2% 0.2419929
2 recommend that everyone should wear a face mask in all public indoor locations, and when using public transport 614 24.3% 0.2427837
3 make it compulsory by law that everyone must wear a face mask when using crowded public transport 651 25.7% 0.2574140
4 make it compulsory by law that everyone must wear a face mask in all public indoor locations 652 25.8% 0.2578094
Sysmiss 9931 NA


r19cov_tiltak


Variable label: Whether you would wear a face mask if [r19cov_tiltak_ran]
Pre-question text: Imagine that the health authorities at a given point in time [recommend that everyone should wear a face mask when using crowded public transport / recommend that everyone should wear a face mask in all public indoor locations, and when using public transport / make it compulsory by law that everyone must wear a face mask when using crowded public transport / make it compulsory by law that everyone must wear a face mask in all public indoor locations].
Literal question: How certain are you that you would wear a face mask in such a situation?
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19cov_tiltak_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I am absolutely certain that I would always wear a face mask in accordance with health authority recommendations 1774 70% 0.700355310
2 I am quite certain that I would always wear a face mask in accordance with health authority recommendations 521 20.6% 0.205684959
3 I think that I would always wear a face mask in accordance with health authority recommendations 126 5% 0.049743387
4 I don’t really know whether I would wear a face mask or not 45 1.8% 0.017765495
5 I don’t think that I would wear a face mask in accordance with health authority recommendations 20 0.8% 0.007895776
6 I am quite certain that I would not wear a face mask in accordance with health authority recommendations 14 0.6% 0.005527043
7 I am absolutely certain that I would not wear a face mask in accordance with health authority recommendations 20 0.8% 0.007895776
97 Not answered 13 0.5% 0.005132254
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykac1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I do my best to follow the health authorities’ advice to limit the risk of infection
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: I do my best to follow the health authorities’ advice to limit the risk of infection (wash my hands frequently, avoid travel and situations involving contact with other people, keep distance and avoid touching things).
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 119 4.7% 0.046979866
2 Disagree 14 0.6% 0.005527043
3 Neither agree nor disagree 59 2.3% 0.023292538
4 Agree 1014 40% 0.400315831
5 Completely agree 1319 52.1% 0.520726411
97 Not answered 8 0.3% 0.003158310
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykac_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19cov_psykac_1]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19cov_psykac_1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2528] [Invalid:9932] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 from all strangers 1274 50.4% 0.5039557
2 those who are not members of my closest family 1254 49.6% 0.4960443
Sysmiss 9932 NA


r19cov_psykac_1


Variable label: The last two weeks I have: washed my hands every time I have been out
Pre-question text: The last two weeks I have…
Literal question: …washed my hands every time I have been out
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Always 1478 58.3% 0.5834978287
2 Almost always 759 30% 0.2996446901
3 Often 204 8.1% 0.0805369128
4 Sometimes 68 2.7% 0.0268456376
5 Rarely 14 0.6% 0.0055270430
6 Almost never 2 0.1% 0.0007895776
7 Never 3 0.1% 0.0011843664
97 Not answered 5 0.2% 0.0019739439
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykac_2


Variable label: The last two weeks I have: kept a distance of 1 metre [from all strangers/those who are not members of my closest family]
Pre-question text: The last two weeks I have…
Literal question: …kept a distance of 1 metre [from all strangers/those who are not members of my closest family]
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19cov_psykac_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Always 903 35.6% 0.356494276
2 Almost always 1268 50.1% 0.500592183
3 Often 301 11.9% 0.118831425
4 Sometimes 32 1.3% 0.012633241
5 Rarely 10 0.4% 0.003947888
6 Almost never 5 0.2% 0.001973944
7 Never 3 0.1% 0.001184366
97 Not answered 11 0.4% 0.004342677
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykac_3


Variable label: The last two weeks I have: avoided all social situations with strangers
Pre-question text: The last two weeks I have…
Literal question: …avoided all social situations with strangers
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19cov_psykac_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Always 943 37.2% 0.372285827
2 Almost always 885 34.9% 0.349388077
3 Often 470 18.6% 0.185550730
4 Sometimes 144 5.7% 0.056849585
5 Rarely 48 1.9% 0.018949862
6 Almost never 16 0.6% 0.006316621
7 Never 14 0.6% 0.005527043
97 Not answered 13 0.5% 0.005132254
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_smittevern_1


Variable label: Less careful in relation to infection control because: unclear to me what the current advice is
Pre-question text: There may be several reasons why people are less careful than they could have been in relation to infection control. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? I have been less careful in relation to infection control because…
Literal question: … it has been unclear to me what the current advice is
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 891 35.2% 0.351756810
2 Disagree 1059 41.8% 0.418081326
3 Neither agree nor disagree 283 11.2% 0.111725227
4 Agree 246 9.7% 0.097118042
5 Completely agree 30 1.2% 0.011843664
97 Not answered 24 0.9% 0.009474931
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_smittevern_2


Variable label: Less careful in relation to infection control because: unclear how my actions affect the risk of infection
Pre-question text: There may be several reasons why people are less careful than they could have been in relation to infection control. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? I have been less careful in relation to infection control because…
Literal question: … it has been unclear to me how my actions affect the risk of infection
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 1157 45.7% 0.456770628
2 Disagree 994 39.2% 0.392420055
3 Neither agree nor disagree 250 9.9% 0.098697197
4 Agree 102 4% 0.040268456
5 Completely agree 12 0.5% 0.004737465
97 Not answered 18 0.7% 0.007106198
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_smittevern_3


Variable label: Less careful in relation to infection control because: have forgotten to follow the advice given/ been inattentive
Pre-question text: There may be several reasons why people are less careful than they could have been in relation to infection control. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? I have been less careful in relation to infection control because…
Literal question: … I have forgotten to follow the advice given, been inattentive, or followed old habits
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 711 28.1% 0.280694828
2 Disagree 1024 40.4% 0.404263719
3 Neither agree nor disagree 350 13.8% 0.138176076
4 Agree 400 15.8% 0.157915515
5 Completely agree 32 1.3% 0.012633241
97 Not answered 16 0.6% 0.006316621
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_smittevern_4


Variable label: Less careful in relation to infection control because: don’t think the advice necessarily protects from infection
Pre-question text: There may be several reasons why people are less careful than they could have been in relation to infection control. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? I have been less careful in relation to infection control because…
Literal question: … I don’t think the advice necessarily protects people from infection
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 1421 56.1% 0.560994868
2 Disagree 854 33.7% 0.337149625
3 Neither agree nor disagree 137 5.4% 0.054086064
4 Agree 75 3% 0.029609159
5 Completely agree 28 1.1% 0.011054086
97 Not answered 18 0.7% 0.007106198
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_smittevern_5


Variable label: Less careful in relation to infection control because: grown tired of following the infection control advice
Pre-question text: There may be several reasons why people are less careful than they could have been in relation to infection control. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? I have been less careful in relation to infection control because…
Literal question: … I have grown tired of following the infection control advice
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 1061 41.9% 0.418870904
2 Disagree 976 38.5% 0.385313857
3 Neither agree nor disagree 271 10.7% 0.106987762
4 Agree 173 6.8% 0.068298460
5 Completely agree 34 1.3% 0.013422819
97 Not answered 18 0.7% 0.007106198
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_smittevern_6


Variable label: Less careful in relation to infection control because: I get the impression that others do not follow the advice
Pre-question text: There may be several reasons why people are less careful than they could have been in relation to infection control. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? I have been less careful in relation to infection control because…
Literal question: … I get the impression that others do not follow the advice
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 472 18.6% 0.186340308
2 Disagree 715 28.2% 0.282273983
3 Neither agree nor disagree 730 28.8% 0.288195815
4 Agree 509 20.1% 0.200947493
5 Completely agree 94 3.7% 0.037110146
97 Not answered 13 0.5% 0.005132254
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_smittevern_7


Variable label: Less careful in relation to infection control because: have wanted to visit/socialise with friends/family
Pre-question text: There may be several reasons why people are less careful than they could have been in relation to infection control. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements? I have been less careful in relation to infection control because…
Literal question: … I have wanted to visit or socialise with friends, acquaintances or family/relations
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 4]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 422 16.7% 0.166600869
2 Disagree 794 31.3% 0.313462298
3 Neither agree nor disagree 449 17.7% 0.177260166
4 Agree 702 27.7% 0.277141729
5 Completely agree 144 5.7% 0.056849585
97 Not answered 22 0.9% 0.008685353
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_arbeidsgiver


Variable label: My employer/school has facilitated in a way that makes it easy for me to comply with infection control advice
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question: My employer, school or place of study has facilitated in a way that makes it easy for me to comply with infection control advice.
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 63 2.5% 0.02487169
2 Disagree 122 4.8% 0.04816423
3 Neither agree nor disagree 245 9.7% 0.09672325
4 Agree 600 23.7% 0.23687327
5 Completely agree 611 24.1% 0.24121595
6 Not applicable in my situation 867 34.2% 0.34228188
97 Not answered 25 1% 0.00986972
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykac3


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Difficult to follow the infection control advice as well as I would like
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: It can be difficult to follow the advice relating to the control of communicable diseases as well as I would like
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 410 16.2% 0.161863403
2 Disagree 970 38.3% 0.382945124
3 Neither agree nor disagree 365 14.4% 0.144097908
4 Agree 666 26.3% 0.262929333
5 Completely agree 106 4.2% 0.041847612
97 Not answered 16 0.6% 0.006316621
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykac4_1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I follow the infection control advice so not to become ill myself
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: I follow the advice relating to the control of communicable diseases because I am concerned about not becoming ill myself
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 52 2.1% 0.020529017
2 Disagree 133 5.3% 0.052506909
3 Neither agree nor disagree 194 7.7% 0.076589025
4 Agree 1170 46.2% 0.461902882
5 Completely agree 970 38.3% 0.382945124
97 Not answered 14 0.6% 0.005527043
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19cov_psykac4_2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I follow the infection control advice so not to infect others
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: I follow the advice relating to the control of communicable diseases because I am concerned about not infecting others
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 20 0.8% 0.007895776
2 Disagree 5 0.2% 0.001973944
3 Neither agree nor disagree 62 2.4% 0.024476905
4 Agree 977 38.6% 0.385708646
5 Completely agree 1459 57.6% 0.575996842
97 Not answered 10 0.4% 0.003947888
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19pad1


Variable label: Which political party do you feel closest to?
Pre-question text: Many people prefer a specific political party over a long period of time, even if they occasionally vote for another party.
Literal question: Which political party do you feel closest to?
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Red Party 93 4.7% 0.04659319
2 The Socialist Left Party 202 10.1% 0.10120240
3 The Norwegian Labour Party 525 26.3% 0.26302605
4 The Green Party 87 4.4% 0.04358717
5 The Liberal Party of Norway 96 4.8% 0.04809619
6 The Centre Party 259 13% 0.12975952
7 The Christian Democratic Party 85 4.3% 0.04258517
8 The Conservative Party of Norway 438 21.9% 0.21943888
9 The Progress Party 173 8.7% 0.08667335
97 Not answered 38 1.9% 0.01903808
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad2


Variable label: Is there a political party you feel furthest from?
Literal question: And is there a political party you feel furthest from?
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Red Party 458 22.9% 0.22945892
2 The Socialist Left Party 72 3.6% 0.03607214
3 The Norwegian Labour Party 22 1.1% 0.01102204
4 The Green Party 288 14.4% 0.14428858
5 The Liberal Party of Norway 32 1.6% 0.01603206
6 The Centre Party 33 1.7% 0.01653307
7 The Christian Democratic Party 169 8.5% 0.08466934
8 The Conservative Party of Norway 44 2.2% 0.02204409
9 The Progress Party 850 42.6% 0.42585170
97 Not answered 28 1.4% 0.01402806
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad1_and_2_back


Variable label: [The respondent has navigated backwards after seeing r19pad3]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1 & r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]

[The respondent has navigated backwards after seeing r19pad3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:27] [Invalid:12433] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The respondent has navigated backwarsds to R19PAD1 and/or R19PAD2 27 100% 1
Sysmiss 12433 NA


r19pad1_orginalvalue


Variable label: [Stores respondent’s original/first answer on r19pad1, in case they change their response]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1]

[Stores respondent’s original/first answer on r19pad1, in case they change their response]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1958] [Invalid:10502] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Red Party 93 4.7% 0.04749745
2 The Socialist Left Party 202 10.3% 0.10316650
3 The Norwegian Labour Party 525 26.8% 0.26813075
4 The Green Party 87 4.4% 0.04443309
5 The Liberal Party of Norway 96 4.9% 0.04902962
6 The Centre Party 259 13.2% 0.13227783
7 The Christian Democratic Party 85 4.3% 0.04341164
8 The Conservative Party of Norway 438 22.4% 0.22369765
9 The Progress Party 173 8.8% 0.08835546
Sysmiss 10502 NA


r19pad2_orginalvalue


Variable label: [Stores respondent’s original/first answer on r19pad1, in case they change their response]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1]

[Stores respondent’s original/first answer on r19pad1, in case they change their response]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1968] [Invalid:10492] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Red Party 458 23.3% 0.23272358
2 The Socialist Left Party 72 3.7% 0.03658537
3 The Norwegian Labour Party 23 1.2% 0.01168699
4 The Green Party 288 14.6% 0.14634146
5 The Liberal Party of Norway 31 1.6% 0.01575203
6 The Centre Party 33 1.7% 0.01676829
7 The Christian Democratic Party 169 8.6% 0.08587398
8 The Conservative Party of Norway 44 2.2% 0.02235772
9 The Progress Party 850 43.2% 0.43191057
Sysmiss 10492 NA


r19kmsdg


Variable label: Open: What do you think of when you hear/read ‘UN Sustainable Development Goals’?
Literal question: What do you think of when you hear or read the phrase ‘UN Sustainable Development Goals’?
Post-question: Please write down the first thing you think of. All responses are welcome, preferably a couple of sentences, or just a few words if you would prefer.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 1,4]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12460] [Range:-]



r19km_saneclim_2a


Variable label: What sector do you work in?
Literal question: Do you work in:
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The oil and gas industry 94 4.7% 0.047094188
2 The power industry (excluding oil and gas) 30 1.5% 0.015030060
3 Agriculture 32 1.6% 0.016032064
4 Fishing 9 0.5% 0.004509018
5 The travel and tourism industry 25 1.3% 0.012525050
6 Another sector 1631 81.7% 0.817134269
97 Not answered 175 8.8% 0.087675351
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19km_saneclim_2b


Variable label: How often you see the open sea
Literal question: How often do you see the open sea (for example, from where you live, where you work, when you are travelling, in your spare time)?
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Daily 686 34.4% 0.343687375
2 Weekly 327 16.4% 0.163827655
3 Monthly 369 18.5% 0.184869739
4 A couple of times each year 429 21.5% 0.214929860
5 Once a year 89 4.5% 0.044589178
6 Never 83 4.2% 0.041583166
97 Not answered 13 0.7% 0.006513026
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19km_saneclim_2c


Variable label: How often you go for a walk in the nature close to where you live
Literal question: How often do you go for a walk in nature close to where you live?
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Daily 535 26.8% 0.268036072
2 Weekly 991 49.6% 0.496492986
3 Monthly 309 15.5% 0.154809619
4 A couple of times each year 104 5.2% 0.052104208
5 Once a year 6 0.3% 0.003006012
6 Never 39 2% 0.019539078
97 Not answered 12 0.6% 0.006012024
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad3_ran1


Variable label: [Randomly chooses if respondentis asked about party selected on r19pad1 (party closest to) or 19pad2 (party most distant to).]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]

[Randomly chooses if respondentis asked about party selected on r19pad1 (party closest to) or 19pad2 (party most distant to).]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1944] [Invalid:10516] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [Value of R19PAD1] 968 49.8% 0.4979424
2 [Value of R19PAD2] 976 50.2% 0.5020576
Sysmiss 10516 NA


r19pad3_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19pad3]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19pad3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1944] [Invalid:10516] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 402 20.7% 0.2067901
2 In an interview, the politician said it was necessary to utilise such travel expense invoices to make up for money he had spent in connection with his position as a member of the Storting. 380 19.5% 0.1954733
3 In an interview, the politician said he made an unintentional administrative error when filling out the forms due to the complicated expense management system. 375 19.3% 0.1929012
4 In an interview, the politician said that his work, and what he means to his constituents, is worth much more than the total sum of the travel expenses. 400 20.6% 0.2057613
5 In an interview, the politician said that he was told by his predecessors that this was common practice during their term of office, and he got the impression that this was still the norm. 387 19.9% 0.1990741
Sysmiss 10516 NA


r19pad3


Variable label: Assess politician’s behaviour in situation where false travel bills have been revealed
Pre-question text: Please consider the following hypothetical situation: Last week, various media outlets revealed that a member of the Storting from[r19pad3_ran1] is alleged to have demanded thousands of kroner from the Storting for a number of trips that have never taken place. Apparently, this had been going on for several months. The politician claimed to have made several visits around the country to the party’s local and county committees in connection with his position as a member of the Storting. However, sources dispute the claim that he visited these places during this period. [r19pad3_ran2]
Literal question: What is your assessment of the politician’s behaviour?
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19pad3_ran1 and r19pad3_ran2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very unproblematic 41 2.1% 0.020541082
2 Quite unproblematic 8 0.4% 0.004008016
3 Unproblematic 3 0.2% 0.001503006
4 Neither problematic nor unproblematic 42 2.1% 0.021042084
5 Problematic 165 8.3% 0.082665331
6 Quite problematic 241 12.1% 0.120741483
7 Very problematic 1439 72.1% 0.720941884
97 Not answered 57 2.9% 0.028557114
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad4


Variable label: What is your assessment of politician’s explanation, in situation where false travel have been revealed
Literal question: What is your assessment of the politician’s explanation regarding his behaviour?
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad3_ran2 != 1 & r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very unbelievable 895 58% 0.580415045
2 Quite unbelievable 227 14.7% 0.147211414
3 Slightly unbelievable 276 17.9% 0.178988327
4 Neither believable nor unbelievable 89 5.8% 0.057717250
5 Believable 27 1.8% 0.017509728
6 Quite believable 14 0.9% 0.009079118
7 Very believable 3 0.2% 0.001945525
97 Not answered 11 0.7% 0.007133593
98 Not asked 10918 NA


r19pad5_1


Variable label: Should the politician have consequences for false travel bills: No
Pre-question text: Do you think the politician’s actions should have consequences?
Literal question: No, there should not be any consequences for the politician
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 15 0.8% 0.00751503
0 Not selected 1921 96.2% 0.96242485
97 Not answered 60 3% 0.03006012
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad5_2


Variable label: Should the politician have consequences for false travel bills: Yes, should pay the money back
Pre-question text: Do you think the politician’s actions should have consequences?
Literal question: Yes, the politician should pay back the money
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1028 51.5% 0.51503006
0 Not selected 908 45.5% 0.45490982
97 Not answered 60 3% 0.03006012
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad5_3


Variable label: Should the politician have consequences for false travel bills: Yes, should resign his position/office
Pre-question text: Do you think the politician’s actions should have consequences?
Literal question: Yes, the politician should resign his position/office
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 834 41.8% 0.41783567
0 Not selected 1102 55.2% 0.55210421
97 Not answered 60 3% 0.03006012
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad5_4


Variable label: Should the politician have consequences for false travel bills: Yes, should be expelled from the party
Pre-question text: Do you think the politician’s actions should have consequences?
Literal question: Yes, the politician should be expelled from the party
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 300 15% 0.15030060
0 Not selected 1636 82% 0.81963928
97 Not answered 60 3% 0.03006012
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad5_5


Variable label: Should the politician have consequences for false travel bills: Yes, should be criminally prosecuted
Pre-question text: Do you think the politician’s actions should have consequences?
Literal question: Yes, the politician should be criminally prosecuted
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Zuzana Murdoch (UiB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1 & (r19pad1 er besvart & r19pad2 er besvart)]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1076 53.9% 0.53907816
0 Not selected 860 43.1% 0.43086172
97 Not answered 60 3% 0.03006012
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19km_climlife_1


Variable label: How you relate to making climate-friendly choices in everyday life
Pre-question text: There may be different reasons why people choose or do not choose to make climate-friendly choices in their everyday lives.
Literal question: Which of the descriptions below best suits how you relate to such choices?
Post-question: You may only tick one alternative.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 1]

[Asked on the same page as r19km_climlife_1_open]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I always choose the most climate-friendly option 142 7.1% 0.071142285
2 I make climate-friendly choices when it is convenient and reasonable 1598 80.1% 0.800601202
3 I don’t think about the climate when I make my choices 121 6.1% 0.060621242
4 I have given up being concerned about what is climate-friendly 64 3.2% 0.032064128
5 Other 53 2.7% 0.026553106
97 Not answered 18 0.9% 0.009018036
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19km_climlife_1_open


Variable label: Open: How you relate to making climate-friendly choices in everyday life
Literal question: If you have any comments regarding this question, we would like you to write them here.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 1]

[Asked on the same page as r19km_climlife_1]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12460] [Range:-]



r19km_climlife_2


Variable label: Do the authorities facilitate enough to make climate-friendly choices in your everyday life?
Pre-question text: Some people believe that the authorities must better facilitate a climate-friendly way of life.
Literal question: Do you think the authorities are facilitating enough in order for you to make climate-friendly choices in your everyday life?
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 489 24.5% 0.24498998
2 No 986 49.4% 0.49398798
3 Don't know 501 25.1% 0.25100200
97 Not answered 20 1% 0.01002004
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19km_climlife_2a


Variable label: Why you think the authorities facilitate enough to make climate-friendly choices in your everyday life
Literal question: We would like to know why you think the authorities are facilitating enough in order for you to make climate-friendly choices in your everyday life.
Post-question: Tick the alternative that suits you best. You may only tick one alternative.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19km_climlife_2 = 1 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I receive the facilitation I require 162 33.1% 0.331288344
2 I have to take responsibility for my own choices 315 64.4% 0.644171779
3 Other 9 1.8% 0.018404908
97 Not answered 3 0.6% 0.006134969
98 Not asked 11971 NA


r19km_climlife_2a_3_other


Variable label: Open: Why you think the authorities facilitate enough to make climate-friendly choices in your everyday life
Pre-question text: We would like to know why you think the authorities are facilitating enough in order for you to make climate-friendly choices in your everyday life.
Literal question: Other
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19km_climlife_2 = 1 & r19group = 1]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single - Other] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12460] [Range:-]



r19km_climlife_2b_1


Variable label: The authorities are not facilitating enough for climate-friendly choices in the area: Food
Pre-question text: We would like to know the areas in which you think the authorities are not facilitating enough in order for you to make climate-friendly choices in your everyday life.
Literal question: Food
Post-question: Please rank the five areas in which you think such choices are facilitated the least. Rank them from 1 to 5, where 1 corresponds to the least amount of facilitation. To rank the options, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description: [Ranking. Asked if r19km_climlife_2 = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 307 31.1% 0.31135903
2 2 230 23.3% 0.23326572
3 3 186 18.9% 0.18864097
4 4 111 11.3% 0.11257606
5 5 79 8% 0.08012170
97 Not answered 73 7.4% 0.07403651
98 Not asked 11474 NA


r19km_climlife_2b_2


Variable label: The authorities are not facilitating enough for climate-friendly choices in the area: Transport
Literal question: Transport
Post-question: Please rank the five areas in which you think such choices are facilitated the least. Rank them from 1 to 5, where 1 corresponds to the least amount of facilitation. To rank the options, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description: [Ranking. Asked if r19km_climlife_2 = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 465 47.2% 0.47160243
2 2 272 27.6% 0.27586207
3 3 103 10.4% 0.10446247
4 4 55 5.6% 0.05578093
5 5 35 3.5% 0.03549696
97 Not answered 56 5.7% 0.05679513
98 Not asked 11474 NA


r19km_climlife_2b_3


Variable label: The authorities are not facilitating enough for climate-friendly choices in the area: Housing development
Literal question: Housing development
Post-question: Please rank the five areas in which you think such choices are facilitated the least. Rank them from 1 to 5, where 1 corresponds to the least amount of facilitation. To rank the options, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description: [Ranking. Asked if r19km_climlife_2 = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 126 12.8% 0.12778905
2 2 219 22.2% 0.22210953
3 3 265 26.9% 0.26876268
4 4 181 18.4% 0.18356998
5 5 58 5.9% 0.05882353
97 Not answered 137 13.9% 0.13894523
98 Not asked 11474 NA


r19km_climlife_2b_4


Variable label: The authorities are not facilitating enough for climate-friendly choices in the area: Recreational activities
Literal question: Recreational activities
Post-question: Please rank the five areas in which you think such choices are facilitated the least. Rank them from 1 to 5, where 1 corresponds to the least amount of facilitation. To rank the options, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description: [Ranking. Asked if r19km_climlife_2 = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 24 2.4% 0.02434077
2 2 67 6.8% 0.06795132
3 3 79 8% 0.08012170
4 4 194 19.7% 0.19675456
5 5 416 42.2% 0.42190669
97 Not answered 206 20.9% 0.20892495
98 Not asked 11474 NA


r19km_climlife_2b_5


Variable label: The authorities are not facilitating enough for climate-friendly choices in the area: Power consumption
Literal question: Power consumption
Post-question: Please rank the five areas in which you think such choices are facilitated the least. Rank them from 1 to 5, where 1 corresponds to the least amount of facilitation. To rank the options, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Kjersti Fløttum (UiB); Dag Elgesem (UiB)
Technical description: [Ranking. Asked if r19km_climlife_2 = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 52 5.3% 0.05273834
2 2 140 14.2% 0.14198783
3 3 213 21.6% 0.21602434
4 4 239 24.2% 0.24239351
5 5 179 18.2% 0.18154158
97 Not answered 163 16.5% 0.16531440
98 Not asked 11474 NA


r19pad9


Variable label: Your opinion regarding oil exploration in the Barents Sea
Literal question: What is your opinion regarding oil exploration in the Barents Sea?
Question owner: Pedro Magalhães; Miguel Perereira; Sveinung Arnesen; Henrik Bentsen; Jon Kåre Skiple
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 It should be permitted 784 39.3% 0.39278557
2 It should be prohibited 1143 57.3% 0.57264529
97 Not answered 69 3.5% 0.03456914
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19kmvestforsk1_1


Variable label: Responsible for protection against future consequences of climate change: The municipalities
Pre-question text: Climate change is leading to more rain, more drought, and generally more extreme weather in Norway. In addition, sea levels are rising. Who do you think is responsible for protecting us from the future consequences of climate change (more storms, landslides, floods, droughts and storm surges)?
Literal question: The municipalities
Post-question: You may tick several options.
Question owner: Torbjørn Selseng (Vestlandsforsking)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1004 50.3% 0.503006012
0 Not selected 976 48.9% 0.488977956
97 Not answered 16 0.8% 0.008016032
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19kmvestforsk1_2


Variable label: Responsible for protection against future consequences of climate change: The state
Pre-question text: Climate change is leading to more rain, more drought, and generally more extreme weather in Norway. In addition, sea levels are rising. Who do you think is responsible for protecting us from the future consequences of climate change (more storms, landslides, floods, droughts and storm surges)?
Literal question: The state
Post-question: You may tick several options.
Question owner: Torbjørn Selseng (Vestlandsforsking)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1757 88% 0.880260521
0 Not selected 223 11.2% 0.111723447
97 Not answered 16 0.8% 0.008016032
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19kmvestforsk1_3


Variable label: Responsible for protection against future consequences of climate change: Private trade and industry
Pre-question text: Climate change is leading to more rain, more drought, and generally more extreme weather in Norway. In addition, sea levels are rising. Who do you think is responsible for protecting us from the future consequences of climate change (more storms, landslides, floods, droughts and storm surges)?
Literal question: Private trade and industry
Post-question: You may tick several options.
Question owner: Torbjørn Selseng (Vestlandsforsking)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 814 40.8% 0.407815631
0 Not selected 1166 58.4% 0.584168337
97 Not answered 16 0.8% 0.008016032
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19kmvestforsk1_6


Variable label: Responsible for protection against future consequences of climate change: Private households
Pre-question text: Climate change is leading to more rain, more drought, and generally more extreme weather in Norway. In addition, sea levels are rising. Who do you think is responsible for protecting us from the future consequences of climate change (more storms, landslides, floods, droughts and storm surges)?
Literal question: Private households
Post-question: You may tick several options.
Question owner: Torbjørn Selseng (Vestlandsforsking)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 751 37.6% 0.376252505
0 Not selected 1229 61.6% 0.615731463
97 Not answered 16 0.8% 0.008016032
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19kmvestforsk1_4


Variable label: Responsible for protection against future consequences of climate change: NGOs
Pre-question text: Climate change is leading to more rain, more drought, and generally more extreme weather in Norway. In addition, sea levels are rising. Who do you think is responsible for protecting us from the future consequences of climate change (more storms, landslides, floods, droughts and storm surges)?
Literal question: NGOs
Post-question: You may tick several options.
Question owner: Torbjørn Selseng (Vestlandsforsking)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 279 14% 0.139779559
0 Not selected 1701 85.2% 0.852204409
97 Not answered 16 0.8% 0.008016032
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19kmvestforsk1_5


Variable label: Responsible for protection against future consequences of climate change: Don’t know
Pre-question text: Climate change is leading to more rain, more drought, and generally more extreme weather in Norway. In addition, sea levels are rising. Who do you think is responsible for protecting us from the future consequences of climate change (more storms, landslides, floods, droughts and storm surges)?
Literal question: Don’t know
Post-question: You may tick several options.
Question owner: Torbjørn Selseng (Vestlandsforsking)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 133 6.7% 0.066633267
0 Not selected 1847 92.5% 0.925350701
97 Not answered 16 0.8% 0.008016032
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19kmvestforsk2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Can protect yourself and your property against the consequences of climate change
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that you can take measures that help protect yourself and your property against the consequences of climate change?
Question owner: Torbjørn Selseng (Vestlandsforsking)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 275 13.8% 0.13777555
2 Agree 677 33.9% 0.33917836
3 Somewhat agree 613 30.7% 0.30711423
4 Neither agree nor disagree 238 11.9% 0.11923848
5 Somewhat disagree 67 3.4% 0.03356713
6 Disagree 72 3.6% 0.03607214
7 Strongly disagree 24 1.2% 0.01202405
97 Not answered 30 1.5% 0.01503006
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19kmvestforsk3


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Increase efforts against direct local climate change, even if less money for other local objectives
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities must increase efforts to protect us against the direct local consequences of climate change (storms, landslides, floods, droughts and storm surges), even if this means there will be less money for other important local objectives?
Question owner: Torbjørn Selseng (Vestlandsforsking)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 321 16.1% 0.160821643
2 Agree 784 39.3% 0.392785571
3 Somewhat agree 549 27.5% 0.275050100
4 Neither agree nor disagree 207 10.4% 0.103707415
5 Somewhat disagree 50 2.5% 0.025050100
6 Disagree 34 1.7% 0.017034068
7 Strongly disagree 16 0.8% 0.008016032
97 Not answered 35 1.8% 0.017535070
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19kmvestforsk4


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Prevent indirect climate change, e.g. declining food production, even if food becomes more expensive
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that the authorities must increase efforts to prevent the indirect consequences of climate change, such as declining global food production, even if this means that food becomes more expensive?
Question owner: Torbjørn Selseng (Vestlandsforsking)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 412 20.6% 0.20641283
2 Agree 756 37.9% 0.37875752
3 Somewhat agree 454 22.7% 0.22745491
4 Neither agree nor disagree 194 9.7% 0.09719439
5 Somewhat disagree 65 3.3% 0.03256513
6 Disagree 38 1.9% 0.01903808
7 Strongly disagree 32 1.6% 0.01603206
97 Not answered 45 2.3% 0.02254509
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19km_saneclim_t1a


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19km_saneclim]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19km_saneclim]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1971] [Invalid:10489] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 a large solar farm in or near your municipality 672 34.1% 0.3409437
2 a large onshore wind farm in or near your municipality 648 32.9% 0.3287671
3 a large offshore wind farm near the coast 651 33% 0.3302892
Sysmiss 10489 NA


r19km_saneclim_t1b


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19km_saneclim]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19km_saneclim]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1971] [Invalid:10489] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 the solar farm 672 34.1% 0.3409437
2 the onshore wind farm 648 32.9% 0.3287671
3 the offshore wind farm near the coast 651 33% 0.3302892
Sysmiss 10489 NA


r19km_saneclim_t2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19km_saneclim]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19km_saneclim]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1971] [Invalid:10489] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 It would have madeit possible to build [r19km_saneclim_t1b]. 678 34.4% 0.3439878
2 This committee would include a representative from the affected municipality (for example, the mayor or a member of the municipal council). The committee would only permit the construction of[r19km_saneclim_t1b]if the municipality’s representative did not oppose the proposal. 626 31.8% 0.3176053
3 This committee would include a representative from the affected local industries (e.g. fishermen, farmers, the travel and tourist industry).The committee would only permit the construction of[r19km_saneclim_t1b]if the local representative did not oppose the proposal. 667 33.8% 0.3384069
Sysmiss 10489 NA


r19km_saneclim_t3


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19km_saneclim]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19km_saneclim]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1971] [Invalid:10489] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 482 24.5% 0.2445459
2 The construction of[r19km_saneclim_t1b] would be accompanied by financial compensation from the developer for any loss or damage (e.g. reduced property value or other negative impacts) to individual residents who are directly affected by the development. 504 25.6% 0.2557078
3 The construction of[r19km_saneclim_t1b] would be accompanied by a fund established by the developer to finance projects that will benefit the local community (such as transport infrastructure, recreation areas, or cultural facilities). 512 26% 0.2597666
4 The construction of[r19km_saneclim_t1b] would be accompanied by a condition stipulating that the municipality should own 20% of the facility and therefore be entitled to 20% of the resulting revenue generated from it. The municipality would be able to use this revenue to benefit the municipality’s inhabitants. 473 24% 0.2399797
Sysmiss 10489 NA


r19km_saneclim


Variable label: For/against the development of [the solar farm/ the onshore wind farm/ the offshore wind farm near the coast]?
Pre-question text:

We would like to know what you think about renewable energy production facilities, such as solar farms or wind farms.

The development of renewable energy will reduce carbon emissions and help to slow down climate change.

In Norway, the development of solar farms and wind farms is only permitted after a public hearing and an environmental impact assessment have been carried out.

Imagine that a proposal is put forward to build [r19km_saneclim_t1a].

The Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE) would then set up a committee to evaluate the developer’s proposal. [r19km_saneclim_t2]. [r19km_saneclim_t3]
Literal question: Based on this information, to what extent would you be for or against the development of [r19km_saneclim_t1b]?
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 1]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19km_saneclim_t1a, r19km_saneclim_t1b, r19km_saneclim_t2 and r19km_saneclim_t13]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly for 178 8.9% 0.08917836
2 For 499 25% 0.25000000
3 Somewhat for 427 21.4% 0.21392786
4 Neither for nor against 231 11.6% 0.11573146
5 Somewhat against 152 7.6% 0.07615230
6 Against 236 11.8% 0.11823647
7 Strongly against 231 11.6% 0.11573146
97 Not answered 42 2.1% 0.02104208
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19km_saneclim_back


Variable label: [The respondent has navigated backwards tp r19km_saneclim, after seeing r19km_saneclim_a/b]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1]

[The respondent has navigated backwards tp r19km_saneclim, after seeing r19km_saneclim_a/b]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:68] [Invalid:12392] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The respondent has navigated backwarsds to r19km_saneclim 68 100% 1
Sysmiss 12392 NA


r19km_saneclim_originalvalue


Variable label: [Stores respondent’s original/first answer on r19km_saneclim in case they change their response]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1]

[Stores respondent’s original/first answer on r19km_saneclim in case they change their response]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1954] [Invalid:10506] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly for 178 9.1% 0.09109519
2 For 500 25.6% 0.25588536
3 Somewhat for 426 21.8% 0.21801433
4 Neither for nor against 228 11.7% 0.11668373
5 Somewhat against 152 7.8% 0.07778915
6 Against 237 12.1% 0.12128966
7 Strongly against 233 11.9% 0.11924258
Sysmiss 10506 NA


r19km_saneclim_ab_mask


Variable label: [If r19km_saneclim is for, then r19km_saneclim_a. If r19km_saneclim is against, then r19km_saneclim_b. If neither for nor against, then 50/50 randomization.]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1]

[If r19km_saneclim is for, then r19km_saneclim_a. If r19km_saneclim is against, then r19km_saneclim_b. If neither for nor against, then 50/50 randomization.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1954] [Invalid:10506] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The respondent is asked r19km_saneclim_a 1226 62.7% 0.6274309
2 The respondent is asked r19km_saneclim_b 728 37.3% 0.3725691
Sysmiss 10506 NA


r19km_saneclim_a_1


Variable label: To support the construction project, would you: Sign a petition
Pre-question text: Would you consider doing something to actively support this construction project if any type of dispute occurred? How likely is it that you would do any of the following:
Literal question: Sign a petition in support of the project
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19km_saneclim_ab_mask = 1 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 88 7.2% 0.071778140
2 Likely 227 18.5% 0.185154976
3 Somewhat likely 273 22.3% 0.222675367
4 Neither likely nor unlikely 248 20.2% 0.202283850
5 Somewhat unlikely 107 8.7% 0.087275693
6 Unlikely 158 12.9% 0.128874388
7 Highly unlikely 116 9.5% 0.094616639
97 Not answered 9 0.7% 0.007340946
98 Not asked 11234 NA


r19km_saneclim_a_2


Variable label: To support the construction project, would you: Express your opinion on social media/in local newspaper
Pre-question text: Would you consider doing something to actively support this construction project if any type of dispute occurred? How likely is it that you would do any of the following:
Literal question: Express your opinions on social media or in the local newspaper in support of the project
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19km_saneclim_ab_mask = 1 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 10 0.8% 0.008156607
2 Likely 61 5% 0.049755302
3 Somewhat likely 124 10.1% 0.101141925
4 Neither likely nor unlikely 199 16.2% 0.162316476
5 Somewhat unlikely 148 12.1% 0.120717781
6 Unlikely 288 23.5% 0.234910277
7 Highly unlikely 362 29.5% 0.295269168
97 Not answered 34 2.8% 0.027732463
98 Not asked 11234 NA


r19km_saneclim_a_3


Variable label: To support the construction project, would you: Get in touch with an elected politician
Pre-question text: Would you consider doing something to actively support this construction project if any type of dispute occurred? How likely is it that you would do any of the following:
Literal question: Get in touch with an elected politician (such as a member of the municipal council or a member of the Storting)
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19km_saneclim_ab_mask = 1 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 13 1.1% 0.01060359
2 Likely 37 3% 0.03017945
3 Somewhat likely 111 9.1% 0.09053834
4 Neither likely nor unlikely 207 16.9% 0.16884176
5 Somewhat unlikely 170 13.9% 0.13866232
6 Unlikely 293 23.9% 0.23898858
7 Highly unlikely 362 29.5% 0.29526917
97 Not answered 33 2.7% 0.02691680
98 Not asked 11234 NA


r19km_saneclim_a_4


Variable label: To support the construction project, would you: Participate in a demonstration
Pre-question text: Would you consider doing something to actively support this construction project if any type of dispute occurred? How likely is it that you would do any of the following:
Literal question: Participate in a demonstration in support of the project
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19km_saneclim_ab_mask = 1 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 10 0.8% 0.008156607
2 Likely 53 4.3% 0.043230016
3 Somewhat likely 145 11.8% 0.118270799
4 Neither likely nor unlikely 204 16.6% 0.166394780
5 Somewhat unlikely 152 12.4% 0.123980424
6 Unlikely 252 20.6% 0.205546493
7 Highly unlikely 375 30.6% 0.305872757
97 Not answered 35 2.9% 0.028548124
98 Not asked 11234 NA


r19km_saneclim_a_5


Variable label: To support the construction project, would you: Donate money to a group/organisation
Pre-question text: Would you consider doing something to actively support this construction project if any type of dispute occurred? How likely is it that you would do any of the following:
Literal question: Donate money to a group or organisation in support of the project
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19km_saneclim_ab_mask = 1 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 9 0.7% 0.007340946
2 Likely 49 4% 0.039967374
3 Somewhat likely 184 15% 0.150081566
4 Neither likely nor unlikely 211 17.2% 0.172104405
5 Somewhat unlikely 140 11.4% 0.114192496
6 Unlikely 266 21.7% 0.216965742
7 Highly unlikely 333 27.2% 0.271615008
97 Not answered 34 2.8% 0.027732463
98 Not asked 11234 NA


r19km_saneclim_b_1


Variable label: To oppose the construction project, would you: Sign a petition
Pre-question text: Would you consider doing something to actively oppose this construction project? How likely is it that you would do any of the following:
Literal question: Sign a petition in protest of the project
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19km_saneclim_ab_mask = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 244 33.5% 0.33516484
2 Likely 154 21.2% 0.21153846
3 Somewhat likely 110 15.1% 0.15109890
4 Neither likely nor unlikely 80 11% 0.10989011
5 Somewhat unlikely 27 3.7% 0.03708791
6 Unlikely 60 8.2% 0.08241758
7 Highly unlikely 43 5.9% 0.05906593
97 Not answered 10 1.4% 0.01373626
98 Not asked 11732 NA


r19km_saneclim_b_2


Variable label: To oppose the construction project, would you: Express your opinions on social media/in local newspaper
Pre-question text: Would you consider doing something to actively oppose this construction project? How likely is it that you would do any of the following:
Literal question: Express your opinions on social media or in the local newspaper in protest of the project
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19km_saneclim_ab_mask = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 72 9.9% 0.09890110
2 Likely 89 12.2% 0.12225275
3 Somewhat likely 92 12.6% 0.12637363
4 Neither likely nor unlikely 103 14.1% 0.14148352
5 Somewhat unlikely 66 9.1% 0.09065934
6 Unlikely 147 20.2% 0.20192308
7 Highly unlikely 138 19% 0.18956044
97 Not answered 21 2.9% 0.02884615
98 Not asked 11732 NA


r19km_saneclim_b_3


Variable label: To oppose the construction project, would you: Get in touch with an elected politician
Pre-question text: Would you consider doing something to actively oppose this construction project? How likely is it that you would do any of the following:
Literal question: Get in touch with an elected politician (such as a member of the municipal council or a member of the Storting)
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19km_saneclim_ab_mask = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 69 9.5% 0.09478022
2 Likely 62 8.5% 0.08516484
3 Somewhat likely 105 14.4% 0.14423077
4 Neither likely nor unlikely 125 17.2% 0.17170330
5 Somewhat unlikely 79 10.9% 0.10851648
6 Unlikely 138 19% 0.18956044
7 Highly unlikely 128 17.6% 0.17582418
97 Not answered 22 3% 0.03021978
98 Not asked 11732 NA


r19km_saneclim_b_4


Variable label: To oppose the construction project, would you: Participate in a demonstration
Pre-question text: Would you consider doing something to actively oppose this construction project? How likely is it that you would do any of the following:
Literal question: Participate in a demonstration in protest of the project
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19km_saneclim_ab_mask = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 92 12.6% 0.12637363
2 Likely 106 14.6% 0.14560440
3 Somewhat likely 113 15.5% 0.15521978
4 Neither likely nor unlikely 107 14.7% 0.14697802
5 Somewhat unlikely 73 10% 0.10027473
6 Unlikely 113 15.5% 0.15521978
7 Highly unlikely 106 14.6% 0.14560440
97 Not answered 18 2.5% 0.02472527
98 Not asked 11732 NA


r19km_saneclim_b_5


Variable label: To oppose the construction project, would you: Donate money to a group/organisation
Pre-question text: Would you consider doing something to actively oppose this construction project? How likely is it that you would do any of the following:
Literal question: Donate money to a group or organisation that opposes the project
Question owner: Michaël Tatham (UiB); Lena Maria Schaffer (Unilu); Ignacio Herrera Anchustegui (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19km_saneclim_ab_mask = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 76 10.4% 0.10439560
2 Likely 73 10% 0.10027473
3 Somewhat likely 140 19.2% 0.19230769
4 Neither likely nor unlikely 136 18.7% 0.18681319
5 Somewhat unlikely 65 8.9% 0.08928571
6 Unlikely 103 14.1% 0.14148352
7 Highly unlikely 110 15.1% 0.15109890
97 Not answered 25 3.4% 0.03434066
98 Not asked 11732 NA


r19kmhydroskip_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19kmhydroskip]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19kmhydroskip]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1959] [Invalid:10501] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 So-called «gray» hydrogen uses coal, oil or natural gas, which means that the process of producing hydrogen generates large CO2 emissions. 661 33.7% 0.3374170
2 So-called «blue» hydrogen uses coal, oil or natural gas, but the CO2 gas is separated from the hydrogen and returned to where it came from. In Norway, this means storing CO2 under the seabed on the continental shelf. 664 33.9% 0.3389484
3 So-called «green» hydrogen is produced from electricity primarily generated from renewable energy sources, which generally does not involve any emissions of CO2. 634 32.4% 0.3236345
Sysmiss 10501 NA


r19kmhydroskip


Variable label: Production of hydrogen for shipping in Norway, how acceptable
Pre-question text: Hydrogen is an alternative fuel source for shipping in Norway. Among other things, hydrogen will be used to power Norway’s first hydrogen ferry, which will operate for Norled on the Hjelmeland-connection from 2021. Hydrogen can be produced in different ways. [r19kmhydroskip_ran]
Literal question: To what extent do you think it is acceptable that shipping traffic in Norway is powered by hydrogen produced in this way?
Question owner: Henrik Litlere Bentsen (NORCE)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 1]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19kmhydroskip]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 246 12.3% 0.12324649
2 To a large extent 500 25.1% 0.25050100
3 To some extent 596 29.9% 0.29859719
4 To a small extent 369 18.5% 0.18486974
5 Not acceptable at all 195 9.8% 0.09769539
97 Not answered 90 4.5% 0.04509018
98 Not asked 10464 NA


r19pad10_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses r19pad10a, r19pad10b or r19pad10d]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses r19pad10a, r19pad10b or r19pad10d]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1951] [Invalid:10509] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 R19PAD10A 644 33% 0.3300871
2 R19PAD10B 700 35.9% 0.3587904
3 R19PAD10C 607 31.1% 0.3111225
Sysmiss 10509 NA


r19pad10a


Variable label: How fair that the Supreme Court assesses resolution on oil exploration up against constitutional text/previous court cases
Pre-question text:

The Supreme Court of Norway is the country’s highest court of law and the court of last resort. The Supreme Court of Norway consists of 20 justices who are appointed by the Government. The Supreme Court of Norway has the right and the duty to ensure that laws and government decisions are interpreted and applied in accordance with the Constitution of Norway.

In 2020, the Supreme Court of Norway will decide whether the Norwegian Government’s resolution to continue oil exploration in the Barents Sea violates Article 112 of the Constitution of Norway concerning the environment. Imagine that the Supreme Court’s decision depends on whether the resolution respects the constitutional text and on how the Supreme Court of Norway has previously settled similar cases.
Literal question: How fair do you think the Supreme Court’s assessment of the resolution is?
Question owner: Pedro Magalhães; Miguel Perereira; Sveinung Arnesen; Henrik Bentsen; Jon Kåre Skiple
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad10_ran = 1 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 Not fair at all 15 2.3% 0.02329193
2 2 11 1.7% 0.01708075
3 3 23 3.6% 0.03571429
4 4 31 4.8% 0.04813665
5 5 149 23.1% 0.23136646
6 6 60 9.3% 0.09316770
7 7 93 14.4% 0.14440994
8 8 87 13.5% 0.13509317
9 9 46 7.1% 0.07142857
10 10 Totally fair 110 17.1% 0.17080745
97 Not answered 19 3% 0.02950311
98 Not asked 11816 NA


r19pad10b


Variable label: How fair that Supreme Court’s assesment of resolution on oil exploration takes environmental protection/socio-economy into account
Pre-question text:

The Supreme Court of Norway is the country’s highest court of law and the court of last resort. The Supreme Court of Norway consists of 20 justices who are appointed by the Government. The Supreme Court of Norway has the right and the duty to ensure that laws and government decisions are interpreted and applied in accordance with the Constitution of Norway.

In 2020, the Supreme Court of Norway will decide whether the Norwegian Government’s resolution to continue oil exploration in the Barents Sea violates Article 112 of the Constitution of Norway concerning the environment. Imagine that the Supreme Court’s decision depends on whether the resolution takes into account the principles that ensure the protection of nature and the environment, but also the socio-economic benefit of the resolution.
Literal question: How fair do you think the Supreme Court’s assessment of the resolution is?
Question owner: Pedro Magalhães; Miguel Perereira; Sveinung Arnesen; Henrik Bentsen; Jon Kåre Skiple
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad10_ran = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 Not fair at all 41 5.9% 0.05857143
2 2 20 2.9% 0.02857143
3 3 23 3.3% 0.03285714
4 4 28 4% 0.04000000
5 5 185 26.4% 0.26428571
6 6 65 9.3% 0.09285714
7 7 90 12.9% 0.12857143
8 8 104 14.9% 0.14857143
9 9 37 5.3% 0.05285714
10 10 Totally fair 81 11.6% 0.11571429
97 Not answered 26 3.7% 0.03714286
98 Not asked 11760 NA


r19pad10c


Variable label: How fair that the Supreme Court’s assessment of resolution on oil exploration depends on whether a conservative/socialist government appointed the justices
Pre-question text:

The Supreme Court of Norway is the country’s highest court of law and the court of last resort. The Supreme Court of Norway consists of 20 justices who are appointed by the Government. The Supreme Court of Norway has the right and the duty to ensure that laws and government decisions are interpreted and applied in accordance with the Constitution of Norway.

In 2020, the Supreme Court of Norway will decide whether the Norwegian Government’s resolution to continue oil exploration in the Barents Sea violates Article 112 of the Constitution of Norway concerning the environment. Imagine that the Supreme Court’s decision depends on whether a conservative or socialist government has appointed the majority of the Supreme Court justices.
Literal question: How fair do you think the Supreme Court’s assessment of the resolution is?
Question owner: Pedro Magalhães; Miguel Perereira; Sveinung Arnesen; Henrik Bentsen; Jon Kåre Skiple
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad10_ran = 3 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 Not fair at all 143 23.6% 0.23558484
2 2 27 4.4% 0.04448105
3 3 59 9.7% 0.09719934
4 4 29 4.8% 0.04777595
5 5 142 23.4% 0.23393740
6 6 32 5.3% 0.05271829
7 7 52 8.6% 0.08566722
8 8 50 8.2% 0.08237232
9 9 17 2.8% 0.02800659
10 10 Totally fair 46 7.6% 0.07578254
97 Not answered 10 1.6% 0.01647446
98 Not asked 11853 NA


r19pad11_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses r19pad11a or r19pad11b]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 1]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses r19pad11a or r19pad11b]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1948] [Invalid:10512] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 R19PAD11A 958 49.2% 0.4917864
2 R19PAD11B 990 50.8% 0.5082136
Sysmiss 10512 NA


r19pad11a


Variable label: How acceptable is the Supreme Court’s decision that oil exploration is not unconstitutional and can continue
Pre-question text: Imagine that a majority of Supreme Court justices finds that the Government’s resolution is not in violation of the Constitution of Norway and that oil exploration in the Barents Sea can continue.
Literal question: How acceptable do you think the Supreme Court’s decision is?
Question owner: Pedro Magalhães; Miguel Perereira; Sveinung Arnesen; Henrik Bentsen; Jon Kåre Skiple
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad11_ran = 1 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 Not acceptable at all 108 11.3% 0.11273486
2 2 54 5.6% 0.05636743
3 3 78 8.1% 0.08141962
4 4 71 7.4% 0.07411273
5 5 143 14.9% 0.14926931
6 6 50 5.2% 0.05219207
7 7 83 8.7% 0.08663883
8 8 102 10.6% 0.10647182
9 9 58 6.1% 0.06054280
10 10 Totally acceptable 183 19.1% 0.19102296
97 Not answered 28 2.9% 0.02922756
98 Not asked 11502 NA


r19pad11b


Variable label: How acceptable is the Supreme Court’s decision that oil exploration is unconstitutional and must be discontinued
Pre-question text: Imagine that a majority of Supreme Court justices finds that the Government’s resolution is in violation of the Constitution of Norway and that oil exploration in the Barents Sea must be discontinued.
Literal question: How acceptable do you think the Supreme Court’s decision is?
Question owner: Pedro Magalhães; Miguel Perereira; Sveinung Arnesen; Henrik Bentsen; Jon Kåre Skiple
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad11_ran = 2 & r19group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 Not acceptable at all 84 8.5% 0.08484848
2 2 27 2.7% 0.02727273
3 3 45 4.5% 0.04545455
4 4 29 2.9% 0.02929293
5 5 123 12.4% 0.12424242
6 6 58 5.9% 0.05858586
7 7 103 10.4% 0.10404040
8 8 137 13.8% 0.13838384
9 9 68 6.9% 0.06868687
10 10 Totally acceptable 293 29.6% 0.29595960
97 Not answered 23 2.3% 0.02323232
98 Not asked 11470 NA


r19polkom7a_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19polkom7a]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19polkom7a]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1990] [Invalid:10470] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Labour Party 695 34.9% 0.3492462
2 Progress Party 629 31.6% 0.3160804
3 the Storting 666 33.5% 0.3346734
Sysmiss 10470 NA


r19polkom7a


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Generous financial assistance to companies with a 30 percent fall in turnover or more
Pre-question text: In response to financial difficulties associated with the coronavirus, the [Labour Party/Progress Party/the Storting] supported a proposal that provides generous financial assistance to companies with a 30 percent fall in turnover or more. However, some people have criticised this by arguing that the money could have been spent better in other ways.
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the proposal to provide generous financial assistance to these companies?
Question owner: Alexander Ryan; Erik Knudsen
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19polkom7a_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 127 6.4% 0.063755020
2 Agree 545 27.4% 0.273594378
3 Somewhat agree 661 33.2% 0.331827309
4 Neither agree nor disagree 340 17.1% 0.170682731
5 Somewhat disagree 220 11% 0.110441767
6 Disagree 73 3.7% 0.036646586
7 Strongly disagree 18 0.9% 0.009036145
97 Not answered 8 0.4% 0.004016064
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19polkom7b_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19polkom7b]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19polkom7b]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1990] [Invalid:10470] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 the conservative government 953 47.9% 0.4788945
2 Norway 1037 52.1% 0.5211055
Sysmiss 10470 NA


r19polkom7b


Variable label: Agree/disagree: [the conservative government/Norway] has done a good job managing the coronavirus pandemic
Literal question: Do you agree or disagree that [the conservative government/Norway] has done a good job managing the coronavirus pandemic?
Question owner: Alexander Ryan; Erik Knudsen
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19polkom7b_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 386 19.4% 0.193775100
2 Agree 1024 51.4% 0.514056225
3 Somewhat agree 360 18.1% 0.180722892
4 Neither agree nor disagree 57 2.9% 0.028614458
5 Somewhat disagree 101 5.1% 0.050702811
6 Disagree 47 2.4% 0.023594378
7 Strongly disagree 12 0.6% 0.006024096
97 Not answered 5 0.3% 0.002510040
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19pad6_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses r19pad6a or r19pad6b]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses r19pad6a or r19pad6b]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1990] [Invalid:10470] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 R19PAD6A 995 50% 0.5
2 R19PAD6B 995 50% 0.5
Sysmiss 10470 NA


r19pad6a_1


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 100,000 (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person A: NOK 100,000 (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 1 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:893] [Invalid:11567] [Range:0-55]



r19pad6a_2


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 250,000 (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person B: NOK 250,000 (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 1 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:884] [Invalid:11576] [Range:0-35]



r19pad6a_3


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 500,000 (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person C: NOK 500,000 (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 1 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:883] [Invalid:11577] [Range:0-50]



r19pad6a_4


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 750,000 (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person D: NOK 750,000 (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 1 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:883] [Invalid:11577] [Range:0-60]



r19pad6a_5


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 1 million (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person E: NOK 1 million (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 1 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:880] [Invalid:11580] [Range:0-67]



r19pad6a_6


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 2 million (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person F: NOK 2 million (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 1 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:877] [Invalid:11583] [Range:0-80]



r19pad6a_7


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 5 million (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person G: NOK 5 million (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 1 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:874] [Invalid:11586] [Range:0-95]



r19pad6a_8


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 10 million (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person H: NOK 10 million (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 1 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:871] [Invalid:11589] [Range:0-100]



r19pad6a_9


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 50 million (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person I: NOK 50 million (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 1 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:868] [Invalid:11592] [Range:0-100]



r19pad6a_10


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 100 million (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person J: NOK 100 million (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 1 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:870] [Invalid:11590] [Range:0-100]



r19pad6b_1


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 100 million (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person J: NOK 100 million (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 2 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:842] [Invalid:11618] [Range:0-100]



r19pad6b_2


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 50 million (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person I: NOK 50 million (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 2 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:840] [Invalid:11620] [Range:0-100]



r19pad6b_3


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 10 million (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person H: NOK 10 million (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 2 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:838] [Invalid:11622] [Range:0-100]



r19pad6b_4


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 5 million (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person G: NOK 5 million (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 2 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:840] [Invalid:11620] [Range:0-100]



r19pad6b_5


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 2 million (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person F: NOK 2 million (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 2 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:840] [Invalid:11620] [Range:0-100]



r19pad6b_6


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 1 million (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person E: NOK 1 million (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 2 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:840] [Invalid:11620] [Range:0-70]



r19pad6b_7


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 750,000 (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person D: NOK 750,000 (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 2 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:845] [Invalid:11615] [Range:0-55]



r19pad6b_8


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 500,000 (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person C: NOK 500,000 (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 2 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:844] [Invalid:11616] [Range:0-50]



r19pad6b_9


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 250,000 (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person B: NOK 250,000 (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 2 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:848] [Invalid:11612] [Range:0-50]



r19pad6b_10


Variable label: What tax rate on income should be, when income is: NOK 100,000 (annually before tax)
Pre-question text: Below, we have listed a number of imaginary people who earn different annual incomes. A person’s income can come from work, investments, or other sources. For each of the imaginary people, please enter what you think the tax rate on their income should be, i.e. how much of their entire income you think they should pay in income tax. 0% will mean that you think the person should not pay any income tax.
Literal question: Person A: NOK 100,000 (annually before tax)
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19pad6_ran = 2 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:849] [Invalid:11611] [Range:0-50]



r19pad7_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19pad7_1]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19pad7_1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1967] [Invalid:10493] [Range:1-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 NOK 100,000 213 10.8% 0.10828673
2 NOK 250,000 202 10.3% 0.10269446
3 NOK 500,000 187 9.5% 0.09506863
4 NOK 750,000 207 10.5% 0.10523640
5 NOK 1 million 201 10.2% 0.10218607
6 NOK 2 million 204 10.4% 0.10371124
7 NOK 5 million 161 8.2% 0.08185053
8 NOK 10 million 207 10.5% 0.10523640
9 NOK 50 million 198 10.1% 0.10066090
10 NOK 100 million 187 9.5% 0.09506863
Sysmiss 10493 NA


r19pad7_1


Variable label: What do you think the tax rate is for a person earning [r19pad7_ran] kroner a year?
Literal question: Using the current tax system, what do you think the average tax rate is for a person earning [r19pad7_ran] kroner a year? In other words, how much of their entire income do you think the person pays in income tax?
Post-question: Here, 0% will mean that you think the person doesn’t pay any income tax on their income.
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19pad7_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Numeric List] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1849] [Invalid:10611] [Range:0-80]



r19pad8


Variable label: What is your income at the moment?
Literal question: What is your income at the moment?
Post-question: Gross annual income is:
Question owner: Ruben Berge Mathisen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 < NOK 150,000 101 5.1% 0.05070281
2 NOK 150,001 - 300,000 238 11.9% 0.11947791
3 NOK 300,001 - 400,000 303 15.2% 0.15210843
4 NOK 400,001 - 500,000 331 16.6% 0.16616466
5 NOK 500,001 - 600,000 311 15.6% 0.15612450
6 NOK 600,001 - 700,000 220 11% 0.11044177
7 NOK 700,001 - 1,000,000 296 14.9% 0.14859438
8 > NOK 1,000,000 130 6.5% 0.06526104
97 Not answered 62 3.1% 0.03112450
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme8_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses r19meme8, r19meme8a and r19meme9a, or r19meme8b and r19meme9b]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses r19meme8, r19meme8a and r19meme9a, or r19meme8b and r19meme9b]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1956] [Invalid:10504] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Group1 478 24.4% 0.2443763
2 Group2 507 25.9% 0.2592025
3 Group3 463 23.7% 0.2367076
4 Group4 508 26% 0.2597137
Sysmiss 10504 NA


r19meme8_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19meme8]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19meme8]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:985] [Invalid:11475] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Christian 504 51.2% 0.5116751
2 Islamic 481 48.8% 0.4883249
Sysmiss 11475 NA


r19meme8


Variable label: To what extent [Christian/Islamic] values conflict with democratic principles
Literal question: To what extent would you say that [Christian/Islamic] values conflict with democratic principles?
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19meme8_ran1 = 1,2 & r19group = 2]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19meme8_ran2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 116 11.8% 0.11776650
2 To a large extent 163 16.5% 0.16548223
3 To some extent 359 36.4% 0.36446701
4 To a small extent 250 25.4% 0.25380711
5 Not at all 85 8.6% 0.08629442
97 Not answered 12 1.2% 0.01218274
98 Not asked 11475 NA


r19meme8a


Variable label: To what extent Islamic values conflict with democratic principles (reference to Resett)
Pre-question text: Imagine that Resett shares the following conclusion from a Danish state study:
Literal question: To what extent would you say that Islamic values conflict with democratic principles?
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19meme8_ran1 = 3 & r19group = 2]

[Asked on the same page as r19meme9a]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 96 20.7% 0.20734341
2 To a large extent 119 25.7% 0.25701944
3 To some extent 156 33.7% 0.33693305
4 To a small extent 74 16% 0.15982721
5 Not at all 11 2.4% 0.02375810
97 Not answered 7 1.5% 0.01511879
98 Not asked 11997 NA


r19meme8b


Variable label: To what extent Islamic values conflict with democratic principles (reference to Norwegian researcher)
Pre-question text: Imagine that a Norwegian researcher shares the following conclusion from a Danish state study:
Literal question: To what extent would you say that Islamic values conflict with democratic principles?
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19meme8_ran1 = 4 & r19group = 2]

[Asked on the same page as r19meme9b]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 110 21.7% 0.216535433
2 To a large extent 125 24.6% 0.246062992
3 To some extent 199 39.2% 0.391732283
4 To a small extent 59 11.6% 0.116141732
5 Not at all 13 2.6% 0.025590551
97 Not answered 2 0.4% 0.003937008
98 Not asked 11952 NA


r19meme9a


Variable label: Are you familiar with Resett?
Literal question: Are you familiar with Resett?
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19meme8_ran1 = 3 & r19group = 2]

[Asked on the same page as r19meme8a]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 189 40.8% 0.408207343
2 No 270 58.3% 0.583153348
97 Not answered 4 0.9% 0.008639309
98 Not asked 11997 NA


r19meme9b


Variable label: Do you use Facebook?
Literal question: Do you use Facebook?
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19meme8_ran1 = 4 & r19group = 2]

[Asked on the same page as r19meme8b]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 388 76.4% 0.76377953
2 No 112 22% 0.22047244
97 Not answered 8 1.6% 0.01574803
98 Not asked 11952 NA


r19meme10


Variable label: To what extent do you think the message in the report that was shared seems reliable?
Literal question: To what extent do you think the message in the report that was shared seems reliable?
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19meme8_ran1 = 3,4 & r19group = 2]

[Asked on the same page as r19meme10_open]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 27 2.8% 0.02780639
2 To a large extent 122 12.6% 0.12564367
3 To some extent 368 37.9% 0.37899073
4 To a small extent 291 30% 0.29969104
5 Not at all 74 7.6% 0.07621009
97 Not answered 89 9.2% 0.09165808
98 Not asked 11489 NA


r19meme10_open


Variable label: Open: Would you like to elaborate why/why not?
Literal question: Would you like to elaborate why / why not?
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19meme8_ran1 = 3,4 & r19group = 2]

[Asked on the same page as r19meme10]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12460] [Range:-]



r19meme11_1


Variable label: Describes you how well: Important to be unprejudiced towards Muslims
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced towards Muslims.
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 327 16.4% 0.16415663
2 Well 746 37.4% 0.37449799
3 Somewhat well 316 15.9% 0.15863454
4 Neither well nor poorly 358 18% 0.17971888
5 Somewhat poorly 97 4.9% 0.04869478
6 Poorly 59 3% 0.02961847
7 Very poorly 24 1.2% 0.01204819
97 Not answered 65 3.3% 0.03263052
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme11_2


Variable label: Describes you how well: Feel guilty if I think negatively about Muslims
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I feel guilty if I think negatively about Muslims.
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 115 5.8% 0.05773092
2 Well 258 13% 0.12951807
3 Somewhat well 320 16.1% 0.16064257
4 Neither well nor poorly 683 34.3% 0.34287149
5 Somewhat poorly 221 11.1% 0.11094378
6 Poorly 204 10.2% 0.10240964
7 Very poorly 115 5.8% 0.05773092
97 Not answered 76 3.8% 0.03815261
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme11_3


Variable label: Describes you how well: Try to be unprejudiced towards Muslims because of my own convictions
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I try to be unprejudiced towards Muslims because of my own convictions.
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 228 11.4% 0.11445783
2 Well 563 28.3% 0.28263052
3 Somewhat well 354 17.8% 0.17771084
4 Neither well nor poorly 524 26.3% 0.26305221
5 Somewhat poorly 114 5.7% 0.05722892
6 Poorly 72 3.6% 0.03614458
7 Very poorly 61 3.1% 0.03062249
97 Not answered 76 3.8% 0.03815261
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme11_4


Variable label: Describes you how well: Don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself.
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 451 22.6% 0.22640562
2 Well 618 31% 0.31024096
3 Somewhat well 283 14.2% 0.14206827
4 Neither well nor poorly 404 20.3% 0.20281124
5 Somewhat poorly 83 4.2% 0.04166667
6 Poorly 39 2% 0.01957831
7 Very poorly 32 1.6% 0.01606426
97 Not answered 82 4.1% 0.04116466
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme12a


Variable label: During a typical week, how often du you share news/participate in discussions about politics/society on social media?
Literal question: During the course of a typical week, how often do you share news or actively participate in discussions about politics and society on social media (such as Facebook, Twitter, TikTok):
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 22 1.1% 0.01104418
2 Daily 46 2.3% 0.02309237
3 5-6 times a week 32 1.6% 0.01606426
4 3-4 times a week 58 2.9% 0.02911647
5 1-2 times a week 124 6.2% 0.06224900
6 Less frequently 610 30.6% 0.30622490
7 Never 1048 52.6% 0.52610442
97 Not answered 52 2.6% 0.02610442
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme12b


Variable label: During a typical week, how often do you come across news/discussions about politics/society on social media?
Literal question: During the course of a typical week, how often do you come across news or discussions about politics and society on social media (such as Facebook, Twitter, TikTok):
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 285 14.3% 0.14307229
2 Daily 499 25.1% 0.25050201
3 5-6 times a week 100 5% 0.05020080
4 3-4 times a week 183 9.2% 0.09186747
5 1-2 times a week 241 12.1% 0.12098394
6 Less frequently 247 12.4% 0.12399598
7 Never 364 18.3% 0.18273092
97 Not answered 73 3.7% 0.03664659
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme13_1


Variable label: Have read the following newspaper/online media the past year: Resett
Pre-question text: Have you read the following newspapers and online media during the past year?
Literal question: Resett
Post-question: Select all the alternatives you have visited or read at least once.
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 197 9.9% 0.09889558
0 Not selected 1745 87.6% 0.87600402
97 Not answered 50 2.5% 0.02510040
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme13_2


Variable label: Have read the following newspaper/online media the past year: Vårt Land
Pre-question text: Have you read the following newspapers and online media during the past year?
Literal question: Vårt Land
Post-question: Select all the alternatives you have visited or read at least once.
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 248 12.4% 0.1244980
0 Not selected 1694 85% 0.8504016
97 Not answered 50 2.5% 0.0251004
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme13_3


Variable label: Have read the following newspaper/online media the past year: VG (Verdens Gang)
Pre-question text: Have you read the following newspapers and online media during the past year?
Literal question: VG (Verdens Gang)
Post-question: Select all the alternatives you have visited or read at least once.
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1656 83.1% 0.8313253
0 Not selected 286 14.4% 0.1435743
97 Not answered 50 2.5% 0.0251004
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme13_4


Variable label: Have read the following newspaper/online media the past year: Aftenposten
Pre-question text: Have you read the following newspapers and online media during the past year?
Literal question: Aftenposten
Post-question: Select all the alternatives you have visited or read at least once.
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1318 66.2% 0.6616466
0 Not selected 624 31.3% 0.3132530
97 Not answered 50 2.5% 0.0251004
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme13_5


Variable label: Have read the following newspaper/online media the past year: Manifest
Pre-question text: Have you read the following newspapers and online media during the past year?
Literal question: Manifest
Post-question: Select all the alternatives you have visited or read at least once.
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 29 1.5% 0.01455823
0 Not selected 1913 96% 0.96034137
97 Not answered 50 2.5% 0.02510040
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme13_6


Variable label: Have read the following newspaper/online media the past year: Document.no
Pre-question text: Have you read the following newspapers and online media during the past year?
Literal question: Document.no
Post-question: Select all the alternatives you have visited or read at least once.
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 152 7.6% 0.07630522
0 Not selected 1790 89.9% 0.89859438
97 Not answered 50 2.5% 0.02510040
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme14_1


Variable label: How often you visit online media to: Catch up on news that isn’t reported by traditional news media
Pre-question text: During the course of a typical week, how often do you visit so-called online alternative media or social media to…
Literal question: Catch up on news that isn’t reported by traditional news media
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 92 4.6% 0.04618474
2 Daily 267 13.4% 0.13403614
3 5-6 times a week 58 2.9% 0.02911647
4 3-4 times a week 93 4.7% 0.04668675
5 1-2 times a week 187 9.4% 0.09387550
6 Less frequently 608 30.5% 0.30522088
7 Never 615 30.9% 0.30873494
97 Not answered 72 3.6% 0.03614458
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme14_2


Variable label: How often you visit online media to: Catch up on news that provide other perspectives on social issues
Pre-question text: During the course of a typical week, how often do you visit so-called online alternative media or social media to…
Literal question: Catch up on news that provides other perspectives on important social issues
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 78 3.9% 0.03915663
2 Daily 265 13.3% 0.13303213
3 5-6 times a week 74 3.7% 0.03714859
4 3-4 times a week 135 6.8% 0.06777108
5 1-2 times a week 300 15.1% 0.15060241
6 Less frequently 602 30.2% 0.30220884
7 Never 461 23.1% 0.23142570
97 Not answered 77 3.9% 0.03865462
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme14_3


Variable label: How often you visit online media to: Check facts from the news media that I don’t really trust
Pre-question text: During the course of a typical week, how often do you visit so-called online alternative media or social media to…
Literal question: Check facts from the news media that I don’t fully trust
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 26 1.3% 0.01305221
2 Daily 145 7.3% 0.07279116
3 5-6 times a week 50 2.5% 0.02510040
4 3-4 times a week 100 5% 0.05020080
5 1-2 times a week 258 13% 0.12951807
6 Less frequently 731 36.7% 0.36696787
7 Never 597 30% 0.29969880
97 Not answered 85 4.3% 0.04267068
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme14_4


Variable label: How often you visit online media to: Catch up on news that presents social issues that corresponds with my opinions
Pre-question text: During the course of a typical week, how often do you visit so-called online alternative media or social media to…
Literal question: Catch up on news that presents social issues in a way that corresponds with my own opinions
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 32 1.6% 0.01606426
2 Daily 236 11.8% 0.11847390
3 5-6 times a week 83 4.2% 0.04166667
4 3-4 times a week 167 8.4% 0.08383534
5 1-2 times a week 241 12.1% 0.12098394
6 Less frequently 560 28.1% 0.28112450
7 Never 582 29.2% 0.29216867
97 Not answered 91 4.6% 0.04568273
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme14_5


Variable label: How often you visit online media to: Catch up on news that provides other perspectives than traditional news media
Pre-question text: During the course of a typical week, how often do you visit so-called online alternative media or social media to…
Literal question: Catch up on news that provides other perspectives on social issues compared to traditional news media
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Several times a day 29 1.5% 0.01455823
2 Daily 192 9.6% 0.09638554
3 5-6 times a week 61 3.1% 0.03062249
4 3-4 times a week 146 7.3% 0.07329317
5 1-2 times a week 347 17.4% 0.17419679
6 Less frequently 649 32.6% 0.32580321
7 Never 484 24.3% 0.24297189
97 Not answered 84 4.2% 0.04216867
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme15_1


Variable label: To what extent information from Norwegian news media can be trusted when reporting on: The coronavirus
Pre-question text: Generally speaking, to what extent do you trust information from Norwegian news media when they report on the following topics?
Literal question: The coronavirus
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 616 30.9% 0.309236948
2 To a large extent 1057 53.1% 0.530622490
3 To some extent 206 10.3% 0.103413655
4 To a small extent 41 2.1% 0.020582329
5 Not at all 7 0.4% 0.003514056
97 Not answered 65 3.3% 0.032630522
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme15_2


Variable label: To what extent information from Norwegian news media can be trusted when reporting on: Immigration
Pre-question text: Generally speaking, to what extent do you trust information from Norwegian news media when they report on the following topics?
Literal question: Immigration
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 182 9.1% 0.09136546
2 To a large extent 869 43.6% 0.43624498
3 To some extent 651 32.7% 0.32680723
4 To a small extent 165 8.3% 0.08283133
5 Not at all 55 2.8% 0.02761044
97 Not answered 70 3.5% 0.03514056
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme15_3


Variable label: To what extent information from Norwegian news media can be trusted when reporting on: The Child Welfare Service
Pre-question text: Generally speaking, to what extent do you trust information from Norwegian news media when they report on the following topics?
Literal question: The Child Welfare Service
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 146 7.3% 0.07329317
2 To a large extent 778 39.1% 0.39056225
3 To some extent 774 38.9% 0.38855422
4 To a small extent 196 9.8% 0.09839357
5 Not at all 29 1.5% 0.01455823
97 Not answered 69 3.5% 0.03463855
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme15_4


Variable label: To what extent information from Norwegian news media can be trusted when reporting on: Finance
Pre-question text: Generally speaking, to what extent do you trust information from Norwegian news media when they report on the following topics?
Literal question: Finance
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 212 10.6% 0.106425703
2 To a large extent 1081 54.3% 0.542670683
3 To some extent 557 28% 0.279618474
4 To a small extent 60 3% 0.030120482
5 Not at all 13 0.7% 0.006526104
97 Not answered 69 3.5% 0.034638554
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme4_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses r19meme4a, r19meme4b, r19meme4c or r19meme4d]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 2]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses r19meme4a, r19meme4b, r19meme4c or r19meme4d]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1933] [Invalid:10527] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 R19MEME4a 488 25.2% 0.2524573
2 R19MEME4b 459 23.7% 0.2374547
3 R19MEME4c 480 24.8% 0.2483187
4 R19MEME4d 506 26.2% 0.2617693
Sysmiss 10527 NA


r19meme4a


Variable label: To what extent do you have confidence in the Child Welfare Service safeguarding the best interests of children? (Controll)
Pre-question text: The task of the Child Welfare Service is to safeguard the interests of children. When there are concerns regarding a child’s upbringing, the Child Welfare Service must assess whether the caregiving ability of the biological family is sufficient enough to safeguard the best interests of the child.
Literal question: To what extent do you have confidence in the Child Welfare Service safeguarding the best interests of children?
Question owner: Helle Karina Johansen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19meme4_ran = 1 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 36 7.4% 0.07377049
2 To a large extent 190 38.9% 0.38934426
3 To some extent 191 39.1% 0.39139344
4 To a small extent 54 11.1% 0.11065574
5 Not at all 12 2.5% 0.02459016
97 Not answered 5 1% 0.01024590
98 Not asked 11972 NA


r19meme4b


Variable label: To what extent do you have confidence in the Child Welfare Service safeguarding the best interests of children? (Treatment 1)
Pre-question text:

The task of the Child Welfare Service is to safeguard the interests of children. When there are concerns regarding a child’s upbringing, the Child Welfare Service must assess whether the caregiving ability of the biological family is sufficient enough to safeguard the best interests of the child. Some children experience their removal from a dysfunctional family situation as being decisive regarding the possibility of living a good life. This example from an NRK report shows such a story.

[Image of news story]
Literal question: To what extent do you have confidence in the Child Welfare Service safeguarding the best interests of children?
Question owner: Helle Karina Johansen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19meme4_ran = 2 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 33 7.2% 0.07189542
2 To a large extent 228 49.7% 0.49673203
3 To some extent 160 34.9% 0.34858388
4 To a small extent 33 7.2% 0.07189542
5 Not at all 5 1.1% 0.01089325
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 12001 NA


r19meme4c


Variable label: To what extent do you have confidence in the Child Welfare Service safeguarding the best interests of children? (Treatment 2)
Pre-question text:

The task of the Child Welfare Service is to safeguard the interests of children. When there are concerns regarding a child’s upbringing, the Child Welfare Service must assess whether the caregiving ability of the biological family is sufficient enough to safeguard the best interests of the child. The Norwegian Child Welfare Service has been criticised for removing children from their biological family too early, and that a lack of interaction with biological parents after a care order has been implemented complicates a child’s return to the biological family. This is the topic of two judgments made against Norway in the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, which this article from NRK is about.

[Image of news story]
Literal question: To what extent do you have confidence in the Child Welfare Service safeguarding the best interests of children?
Question owner: Helle Karina Johansen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19meme4_ran = 3 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 28 5.8% 0.05833333
2 To a large extent 221 46% 0.46041667
3 To some extent 166 34.6% 0.34583333
4 To a small extent 54 11.2% 0.11250000
5 Not at all 11 2.3% 0.02291667
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 11980 NA


r19meme4d


Variable label: To what extent do you have confidence in the Child Welfare Service safeguarding the best interests of children? (Treatment 3)
Pre-question text:

The task of the Child Welfare Service is to safeguard the interests of children. When there are concerns regarding a child’s upbringing, the Child Welfare Service must assess whether the caregiving ability of the biological family is sufficient enough to safeguard the best interests of the child. The Norwegian Child Welfare Service has been accused of not having enough understanding of cultural differences by members of minority groups such as Pentecostalists, Romani people and immigrants. These groups claim that their culture is not understood and respected by the Child Welfare Service. These two news stories from NRK highlight this topic.

[Image of news story]
Literal question: To what extent do you have confidence in the Child Welfare Service safeguarding the best interests of children?
Question owner: Helle Karina Johansen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19meme4_ran = 4 & r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 30 5.9% 0.059288538
2 To a large extent 213 42.1% 0.420948617
3 To some extent 214 42.3% 0.422924901
4 To a small extent 37 7.3% 0.073122530
5 Not at all 7 1.4% 0.013833992
97 Not answered 5 1% 0.009881423
98 Not asked 11954 NA


r19meme5


Variable label: From which of these channels do you get your main impression of the Child Welfare Service?
Literal question: From which of these channels do you get your main impression of the Child Welfare Service?
Question owner: Helle Karina Johansen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Through direct contact, either private or professional. 354 17.8% 0.17771084
2 Indirect information through family or friends. 294 14.8% 0.14759036
3 From the authorities – such as schools, health centres or the Child Welfare Services. 166 8.3% 0.08333333
4 From traditional media, such as newspapers and TV. 1074 53.9% 0.53915663
5 Through social media, such as Facebook, blogs or alternative news sources. 29 1.5% 0.01455823
97 Not answered 75 3.8% 0.03765060
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme6


Variable label: Do you follow Facebook groups , blogs or websites that focus on criticising the Child Welfare Service?
Literal question: Are you a member of one or more Facebook groups that are critical of the Child Welfare Service, and/or do you follow blogs/websites that focus on criticising the Child Welfare Service?
Question owner: Helle Karina Johansen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 11 0.6% 0.005522088
2 No 1912 96% 0.959839357
97 Not answered 69 3.5% 0.034638554
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme7_1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: It is not good for children to grow up with gay/lesbian parents
Pre-question text: Below are a number of statements we would like you to consider.
Literal question: It is not good for children to grow up with gay or lesbian parents.
Post-question: Tick the option that indicates the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements.
Question owner: Helle Karina Johansen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 59 3% 0.02961847
2 Agree 56 2.8% 0.02811245
3 Somewhat agree 141 7.1% 0.07078313
4 Neither agree nor disagree 264 13.3% 0.13253012
5 Somewhat disagree 124 6.2% 0.06224900
6 Disagree 474 23.8% 0.23795181
7 Strongly disagree 805 40.4% 0.40411647
97 Not answered 69 3.5% 0.03463855
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme7_2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: All children should take part in the vaccination programme
Pre-question text: Below are a number of statements we would like you to consider.
Literal question: All children should take part in the vaccination programme.
Post-question: Tick the option that indicates the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements.
Question owner: Helle Karina Johansen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 1117 56.1% 0.560742972
2 Agree 603 30.3% 0.302710843
3 Somewhat agree 79 4% 0.039658635
4 Neither agree nor disagree 56 2.8% 0.028112450
5 Somewhat disagree 32 1.6% 0.016064257
6 Disagree 19 1% 0.009538153
7 Strongly disagree 17 0.9% 0.008534137
97 Not answered 69 3.5% 0.034638554
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme7_3


Variable label: Agree/disagree: It is in the best interests of children to grow up in their biological family
Pre-question text: Below are a number of statements we would like you to consider.
Literal question: It is in the best interests of children to grow up in their biological family.
Post-question: Tick the option that indicates the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements.
Question owner: Helle Karina Johansen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 209 10.5% 0.10491968
2 Agree 529 26.6% 0.26556225
3 Somewhat agree 479 24% 0.24046185
4 Neither agree nor disagree 430 21.6% 0.21586345
5 Somewhat disagree 146 7.3% 0.07329317
6 Disagree 103 5.2% 0.05170683
7 Strongly disagree 30 1.5% 0.01506024
97 Not answered 66 3.3% 0.03313253
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme7_4


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The Child Welfare Service doesn’t have enough cultural understanding in its work involving families with minority backgrounds
Pre-question text: Below are a number of statements we would like you to consider.
Literal question: The Child Welfare Service doesn’t have enough cultural understanding in its work involving families with minority backgrounds.
Post-question: Tick the option that indicates the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements.
Question owner: Helle Karina Johansen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 50 2.5% 0.02510040
2 Agree 153 7.7% 0.07680723
3 Somewhat agree 484 24.3% 0.24297189
4 Neither agree nor disagree 891 44.7% 0.44728916
5 Somewhat disagree 141 7.1% 0.07078313
6 Disagree 157 7.9% 0.07881526
7 Strongly disagree 41 2.1% 0.02058233
97 Not answered 75 3.8% 0.03765060
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme7_5


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The Child Welfare Service and the private actors have a financial interest in separating children from their biological family
Pre-question text: Below are a number of statements we would like you to consider.
Literal question: The Child Welfare Service and the private actors who run the Foster Care Service have a financial interest in separating children from their biological family.
Post-question: Tick the option that indicates the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements.
Question owner: Helle Karina Johansen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 30 1.5% 0.01506024
2 Agree 82 4.1% 0.04116466
3 Somewhat agree 195 9.8% 0.09789157
4 Neither agree nor disagree 627 31.5% 0.31475904
5 Somewhat disagree 161 8.1% 0.08082329
6 Disagree 510 25.6% 0.25602410
7 Strongly disagree 316 15.9% 0.15863454
97 Not answered 71 3.6% 0.03564257
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme7_6


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The Child Welfare Service is often too hasty in removing children from their family
Pre-question text: Below are a number of statements we would like you to consider.
Literal question: The Child Welfare Service is often too hasty in removing children from their family.
Post-question: Tick the option that indicates the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements.
Question owner: Helle Karina Johansen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 70 3.5% 0.03514056
2 Agree 143 7.2% 0.07178715
3 Somewhat agree 295 14.8% 0.14809237
4 Neither agree nor disagree 755 37.9% 0.37901606
5 Somewhat disagree 235 11.8% 0.11797189
6 Disagree 304 15.3% 0.15261044
7 Strongly disagree 112 5.6% 0.05622490
97 Not answered 78 3.9% 0.03915663
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19meme7_7


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The Child Welfare Service is often too slow in removing children from their family
Pre-question text: Below are a number of statements we would like you to consider.
Literal question: The Child Welfare Service is often too slow in removing children from their family.
Post-question: Tick the option that indicates the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements.
Question owner: Helle Karina Johansen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 55 2.8% 0.027610442
2 Agree 214 10.7% 0.107429719
3 Somewhat agree 598 30% 0.300200803
4 Neither agree nor disagree 824 41.4% 0.413654618
5 Somewhat disagree 132 6.6% 0.066265060
6 Disagree 75 3.8% 0.037650602
7 Strongly disagree 18 0.9% 0.009036145
97 Not answered 76 3.8% 0.038152610
98 Not asked 10468 NA


r19identitet1


Variable label: What type of area did you grow up in?
Literal question: What type of area did you grow up in?
Post-question: If you grew up in several places, choose the type of area you lived in the longest.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A big city 292 14.4% 0.1444114738
2 A suburb or the outskirts of a big city 348 17.2% 0.1721068249
3 A small or medium-sized city 539 26.7% 0.2665677547
4 A village 406 20.1% 0.2007912957
5 A sparsely populated area 435 21.5% 0.2151335312
97 Not answered 2 0.1% 0.0009891197
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19meme1


Variable label: How many of the pupils in your school class had parents who were immigrants or had immigrated to Norway themselves?
Pre-question text: Think back to when you were 15 years old.
Literal question: How many of the pupils in your school class had parents who were immigrants or had immigrated to Norway themselves?
Question owner: Linn Sandberg (UiB); Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 None 1319 65.2% 0.6523244313
2 One or just a few 530 26.2% 0.2621167161
3 Less than half 46 2.3% 0.0227497527
4 Half 15 0.7% 0.0074183976
5 More than half 3 0.1% 0.0014836795
6 Almost all 4 0.2% 0.0019782394
7 All 0 0% 0.0000000000
8 I can’t remember 9 0.4% 0.0044510386
9 I didn’t attend school when I was 15 years old 5 0.2% 0.0024727992
10 I didn’t live in Norway when I was 15 years old 89 4.4% 0.0440158259
97 Not answered 2 0.1% 0.0009891197
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19meme2


Variable label: Among your friends when you were 15 years old, how many had parents who were immigrants or had immigranted to Norway themselves?
Pre-question text: Once again, think back to when you were 15 years old.
Literal question: Among your friends (people you trusted and could tell a secret to), how many had parents who were immigrants or had immigrated to Norway themselves?
Question owner: Hanna Fylkesnes (UiB); Hege Høivik Bye (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19meme1 != 10 & r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 1598 82.7% 0.826694258
1 1 217 11.2% 0.112260735
2 2 75 3.9% 0.038799793
3 3 15 0.8% 0.007759959
4 4 13 0.7% 0.006725297
5 5 or more 13 0.7% 0.006725297
97 Not answered 2 0.1% 0.001034661
98 Not asked 10527 NA


r19meme3


Variable label: Among your friends today, how many had parents who were immigrants or had immigranted to Norway themselves?
Pre-question text: Think about your current friendships.
Literal question: Among your friends (people you trust and can share private thoughts and feelings with), how many have parents who are immigrants or have immigrated to Norway themselves?
Question owner: Hanna Fylkesnes (UiB); Hege Høivik Bye (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 1126 55.7% 0.55687438
1 1 328 16.2% 0.16221563
2 2 264 13.1% 0.13056380
3 3 92 4.5% 0.04549951
4 4 40 2% 0.01978239
5 5 or more 148 7.3% 0.07319486
97 Not answered 24 1.2% 0.01186944
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet2


Variable label: Generally speaking, do you consider yourself mostly as a rural person or an urban person?
Literal question: Generally speaking, do you consider yourself mostly as a rural person or an urban person?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I consider myself mostly as a rural person 865 42.8% 0.427794263
2 I consider myself mostly as an urban person 1150 56.9% 0.568743818
97 Not answered 7 0.3% 0.003461919
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet3


Variable label: Do consider yourself as a Northern/Western/Southern/Eastern Norwegian, person from Trøndelag, or citizen of Oslo?
Literal question: Generally speaking, do you consider yourself mostly as a:
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Northern Norwegian 209 10.3% 0.103363007
2 Person from Trøndelag 210 10.4% 0.103857567
3 Western Norwegian 565 27.9% 0.279426311
4 Southern Norwegian 116 5.7% 0.057368942
5 Eastern Norwegian 671 33.2% 0.331849654
6 Citizen of Oslo 240 11.9% 0.118694362
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.005440158
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet4_value


Variable label: [Fetches values from r19identitet2]
Technical description:

[Assigned if r19group = 3]

[Fetches values from r19identitet2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2015] [Invalid:10445] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 villagers 864 42.9% 0.4287841
2 townspeople 1151 57.1% 0.5712159
Sysmiss 10445 NA


r19identitet5_value


Variable label: [Fetches values from r19identitet3]
Technical description:

[Assigned if r19group = 3]

[Fetches values from r19identitet3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2011] [Invalid:10449] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 from Northern Norway 209 10.4% 0.10392839
2 from Trøndelag 210 10.4% 0.10442566
3 from Western Norway 565 28.1% 0.28095475
4 from Southern Norway 116 5.8% 0.05768274
5 from Eastern Norway 671 33.4% 0.33366484
6 in Oslo 240 11.9% 0.11934361
Sysmiss 10449 NA


r19identitet4_1


Variable label: Applies to you: About [villagers/townspeople] I usually say ‘we’ instead of ‘them’
Pre-question text: How well or poorly do the following statements apply to you:
Literal question: When I talk about [villagers/townspeople], I usually say ‘we’ instead of ‘they’.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19identitet2 er besvart & r19group = 3]

[The wording of the question depends on the assigned value in r19identitet4_value]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 540 26.7% 0.26706231
2 Well 706 34.9% 0.34915925
3 Somewhat well 441 21.8% 0.21810089
4 Somewhat poorly 156 7.7% 0.07715134
5 Poorly 93 4.6% 0.04599407
6 Very poorly 62 3.1% 0.03066271
97 Not answered 24 1.2% 0.01186944
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet4_2


Variable label: Applies to you: A personal insult when someone doesn’t take [villagers/townspeople] seriously
Pre-question text: How well or poorly do the following statements apply to you:
Literal question: When someone doesn’t take [villagers/townspeople] seriously, it feels like a personal insult.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19identitet2 er besvart & r19group = 3]

[The wording of the question depends on the assigned value in r19identitet4_value]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 112 5.5% 0.0553907
2 Well 320 15.8% 0.1582591
3 Somewhat well 469 23.2% 0.2319486
4 Somewhat poorly 366 18.1% 0.1810089
5 Poorly 426 21.1% 0.2106825
6 Very poorly 299 14.8% 0.1478734
97 Not answered 30 1.5% 0.0148368
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet4_3


Variable label: Applies to you: I have a lot in common with other [villagers/townspeople]
Pre-question text: How well or poorly do the following statements apply to you:
Literal question: I have a lot in common with other [villagers/townspeople].
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19identitet2 er besvart & r19group = 3]

[The wording of the question depends on the assigned value in r19identitet4_value]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 209 10.3% 0.10336301
2 Well 723 35.8% 0.35756677
3 Somewhat well 780 38.6% 0.38575668
4 Somewhat poorly 194 9.6% 0.09594461
5 Poorly 60 3% 0.02967359
6 Very poorly 25 1.2% 0.01236400
97 Not answered 31 1.5% 0.01533136
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet4_4


Variable label: Applies to you: Feel a sense of pride when someone talks about [villagers/townspeople] in positive terms
Pre-question text: How well or poorly do the following statements apply to you:
Literal question: When someone talks about [villagers/townspeople] in positive terms, I feel a sense of pride.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19identitet2 er besvart & r19group = 3]

[The wording of the question depends on the assigned value in r19identitet4_value]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 173 8.6% 0.08555885
2 Well 480 23.7% 0.23738872
3 Somewhat well 751 37.1% 0.37141444
4 Somewhat poorly 288 14.2% 0.14243323
5 Poorly 179 8.9% 0.08852621
6 Very poorly 118 5.8% 0.05835806
97 Not answered 33 1.6% 0.01632047
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet5_1


Variable label: Applies to you: About people from [region], I usually say ‘we’ instead of ‘they’
Pre-question text: How well or poorly do the following statements apply to you:
Literal question: When I talk about people [from Northern Norway/ from Trøndelag/ from Western Norway/ from Southern Norway/ from Eastern Norway /in Oslo], I usually say ‘we’ instead of ‘they’.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19identitet2 er besvart & r19group = 3]

[The wording of the question depends on the assigned value in r19identitet4_value]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 686 33.9% 0.33926805
2 Well 740 36.6% 0.36597428
3 Somewhat well 339 16.8% 0.16765579
4 Somewhat poorly 105 5.2% 0.05192878
5 Poorly 66 3.3% 0.03264095
6 Very poorly 43 2.1% 0.02126607
97 Not answered 43 2.1% 0.02126607
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet5_2


Variable label: Applies to you: A personal insult when someone doesn’t take people from [region] seriously
Pre-question text: How well or poorly do the following statements apply to you:
Literal question: When someone doesn’t take people [from Northern Norway/ from Trøndelag/ from Western Norway/ from Southern Norway/ from Eastern Norway /in Oslo] seriously, it feels like a personal insult.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19identitet3 er besvart & r19group = 3]

[The wording of the question depends on the assigned value in r19identitet5_value]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 167 8.3% 0.08259149
2 Well 404 20% 0.19980218
3 Somewhat well 501 24.8% 0.24777448
4 Somewhat poorly 391 19.3% 0.19337290
5 Poorly 317 15.7% 0.15677547
6 Very poorly 197 9.7% 0.09742829
97 Not answered 45 2.2% 0.02225519
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet5_3


Variable label: Applies to you: I have a lot in common with other people from [region]
Pre-question text: How well or poorly do the following statements apply to you:
Literal question: I have a lot in common with other people [from Northern Norway/ from Trøndelag/ from Western Norway/ from Southern Norway/ from Eastern Norway /in Oslo].
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19identitet3 er besvart & r19group = 3]

[The wording of the question depends on the assigned value in r19identitet5_value]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 281 13.9% 0.138971316
2 Well 788 39% 0.389713155
3 Somewhat well 705 34.9% 0.348664688
4 Somewhat poorly 147 7.3% 0.072700297
5 Poorly 40 2% 0.019782394
6 Very poorly 18 0.9% 0.008902077
97 Not answered 43 2.1% 0.021266073
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet5_4


Variable label: Applies to you: Feel a sense of pride when someone talks about people from [region] in positive terms
Pre-question text: How well or poorly do the following statements apply to you:
Literal question: When Someone talks about people [from Northern Norway/ from Trøndelag/ from Western Norway/ from Southern Norway/ from Eastern Norway /in Oslo], in positive terms, I feel a sense of pride.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19identitet3 er besvart & r19group = 3]

[The wording of the question depends on the assigned value in r19identitet5_value]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 263 13% 0.13006924
2 Well 591 29.2% 0.29228487
3 Somewhat well 689 34.1% 0.34075173
4 Somewhat poorly 241 11.9% 0.11918892
5 Poorly 127 6.3% 0.06280910
6 Very poorly 66 3.3% 0.03264095
97 Not answered 45 2.2% 0.02225519
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet6_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19identitet6]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19identitet6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2005] [Invalid:10455] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 in cities 1004 50.1% 0.5007481
2 in villages 1001 49.9% 0.4992519
Sysmiss 10455 NA


r19identitet6_ran_contra


Variable label: [Experiment. Opposite value of r19identitet6_ran]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. Opposite value of r19identitet6_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2005] [Invalid:10455] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 in cities 1001 49.9% 0.4992519
2 in villages 1004 50.1% 0.5007481
Sysmiss 10455 NA


r19identitet7_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19identitet7]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19identitet7]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2005] [Invalid:10455] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 in Oslo 982 49% 0.4897756
2 outside Oslo 1023 51% 0.5102244
Sysmiss 10455 NA


r19identitet7_ran_contra


Variable label: [Experiment. Opposite value of r19identitet7_ran]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. Opposite value of r19identitet7_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2005] [Invalid:10455] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 in Oslo 1023 51% 0.5102244
2 outside Oslo 982 49% 0.4897756
Sysmiss 10455 NA


r19identitet6_1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: People [in cities/in villages] don’t appreciate life [in villages/in cities]
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: People [in cities/in villages] don’t appreciate life [in villages/in cities].
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19identitet6_ran and r19identitet6_ran_contra]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 52 2.6% 0.02571711
2 Agree 240 11.9% 0.11869436
3 Somewhat agree 730 36.1% 0.36102868
4 Somewhat disagree 473 23.4% 0.23392681
5 Disagree 408 20.2% 0.20178042
6 Strongly disagree 89 4.4% 0.04401583
97 Not answered 30 1.5% 0.01483680
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet6_2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: People [in cities/in villages] get more than their fair share of public resources
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: Generally speaking, people [in cities/in villages] get more than their fair share of public resources.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19identitet6_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 69 3.4% 0.03412463
2 Agree 229 11.3% 0.11325420
3 Somewhat agree 458 22.7% 0.22650841
4 Somewhat disagree 483 23.9% 0.23887240
5 Disagree 544 26.9% 0.26904055
6 Strongly disagree 204 10.1% 0.10089021
97 Not answered 35 1.7% 0.01730959
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet6_3


Variable label: Agree/disagree: People [in cities/in villages] don’t work as hard as people [in villages/in cities]
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: People [in cities/in villages] don’t work as hard as people [in villages/in cities].
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19identitet6_ran and r19identitet6_ran_contra]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 28 1.4% 0.01384768
2 Agree 71 3.5% 0.03511375
3 Somewhat agree 188 9.3% 0.09297725
4 Somewhat disagree 365 18.1% 0.18051434
5 Disagree 776 38.4% 0.38377844
6 Strongly disagree 559 27.6% 0.27645895
97 Not answered 35 1.7% 0.01730959
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet6_4


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The type of work that most do [in cities/in villages] is not as productive as the work people do [in villages/in cities]
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: The type of work that most people do [in cities/in villages] is not as productive as the work people do [in villages/in cities].
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19identitet6_ran and r19identitet6_ran_contra]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 32 1.6% 0.01582591
2 Agree 54 2.7% 0.02670623
3 Somewhat agree 213 10.5% 0.10534125
4 Somewhat disagree 341 16.9% 0.16864491
5 Disagree 745 36.8% 0.36844708
6 Strongly disagree 603 29.8% 0.29821958
97 Not answered 34 1.7% 0.01681503
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet6_5


Variable label: Agree/disagree: People [in cities/in villages] think more about themselves than what is best for the nation as a whole
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: People [in cities/in villages] think more about themselves than what is best for the nation as a whole.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19identitet6_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 60 3% 0.02967359
2 Agree 142 7% 0.07022750
3 Somewhat agree 357 17.7% 0.17655786
4 Somewhat disagree 345 17.1% 0.17062315
5 Disagree 672 33.2% 0.33234421
6 Strongly disagree 409 20.2% 0.20227498
97 Not answered 37 1.8% 0.01829871
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet7_1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: People [in Oslo/outside Oslo] do not appreciate life [outside Oslo/in Oslo]
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: People [in Oslo/outside Oslo] do not appreciate life [outside Oslo/in Oslo].
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19identitet7_ran and r19identitet7_ran_contra]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 95 4.7% 0.04698318
2 Agree 264 13.1% 0.13056380
3 Somewhat agree 697 34.5% 0.34470821
4 Somewhat disagree 425 21% 0.21018793
5 Disagree 417 20.6% 0.20623145
6 Strongly disagree 82 4.1% 0.04055391
97 Not answered 42 2.1% 0.02077151
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet7_2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: People [in Oslo/outside Oslo] get more than their fair share of public resources
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: Generally speaking, people [in Oslo/outside Oslo] get more than their fair share of public resources.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19identitet7_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 111 5.5% 0.05489614
2 Agree 197 9.7% 0.09742829
3 Somewhat agree 438 21.7% 0.21661721
4 Somewhat disagree 491 24.3% 0.24282888
5 Disagree 518 25.6% 0.25618200
6 Strongly disagree 221 10.9% 0.10929773
97 Not answered 46 2.3% 0.02274975
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet7_3


Variable label: Agree/disagree: People [in Oslo/outside Oslo] don’t work as hard as people [outside Oslo/in Oslo]
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: People [in Oslo/outside Oslo] don’t work as hard as people [outside Oslo/in Oslo].
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19identitet7_ran and r19identitet7_ran_contra]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 22 1.1% 0.01088032
2 Agree 48 2.4% 0.02373887
3 Somewhat agree 152 7.5% 0.07517310
4 Somewhat disagree 439 21.7% 0.21711177
5 Disagree 845 41.8% 0.41790307
6 Strongly disagree 467 23.1% 0.23095945
97 Not answered 49 2.4% 0.02423343
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet7_4


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The type of work that most do [in Oslo/outside Oslo] is not as productive as the work people do [outside Oslo/in Oslo]
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: The type of work that most people do [in Oslo/outside Oslo] is not as productive as the work people do [outside Oslo/in Oslo].
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19identitet7_ran and r19identitet7_ran_contra]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 35 1.7% 0.01730959
2 Agree 67 3.3% 0.03313551
3 Somewhat agree 185 9.1% 0.09149357
4 Somewhat disagree 383 18.9% 0.18941642
5 Disagree 799 39.5% 0.39515331
6 Strongly disagree 506 25% 0.25024728
97 Not answered 47 2.3% 0.02324431
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet7_5


Variable label: Agree/disagree: People [in Oslo/outside Oslo] think more about themselves than what is best for the nation as a whole
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements:
Literal question: People [in Oslo/outside Oslo] think more about themselves than what is best for the nation as a whole.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19identitet7_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 84 4.2% 0.04154303
2 Agree 159 7.9% 0.07863501
3 Somewhat agree 392 19.4% 0.19386746
4 Somewhat disagree 370 18.3% 0.18298714
5 Disagree 633 31.3% 0.31305638
6 Strongly disagree 337 16.7% 0.16666667
97 Not answered 47 2.3% 0.02324431
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet8_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19identitet8]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19identitet8]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1996] [Invalid:10464] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 local authorities where you live 991 49.6% 0.496493
2 central authorities in Oslo 1005 50.4% 0.503507
Sysmiss 10464 NA


r19identitet8_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19identitet8]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19identitet8]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1996] [Invalid:10464] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 makes your trip to work shorter and safer 1024 51.3% 0.5130261
2 is not on the route you drive to work, but will lead to more traffic along your route to work 972 48.7% 0.4869739
Sysmiss 10464 NA


r19identitet8


Variable label: How willing to accept decision about a tunnel in your local area
Pre-question text: Imagine that extra money will be given to your local area in next year’s budget to stimulate the economy during these worsening economic times. The only requirement is that the money must be used to build tunnels. The decision on where the tunnel will be built has been made by [local authorities where you live/central authorities in Oslo]. Imagine that the location of the tunnel [makes your trip to work shorter and safer/is not on the route you drive to work, but will lead to more traffic along your route to work.]
Literal question: How willing are you to accept this decision?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19identitet8_ran1 and r19identitet8_ran2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very willing 265 13.1% 0.13105836
2 Willing 740 36.6% 0.36597428
3 Somewhat willing 560 27.7% 0.27695351
4 Not that willing 325 16.1% 0.16073195
5 Not willing at all 85 4.2% 0.04203759
97 Not answered 47 2.3% 0.02324431
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19identitet9ab_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses r19identitet9a or r19identitet9b]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses r19identitet9a or r19identitet9b]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1992] [Invalid:10468] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Receives r19identitet9a 979 49.1% 0.4914659
2 Receives r19identitet9b 1013 50.9% 0.5085341
Sysmiss 10468 NA


r19identitet9a


Variable label: Police unit: Small, manned 24-hours a day in each municipality or stronger, specialised in a regional centre?
Literal question: If you had to prioritise, do you think we should have a small police unit in each municipality that is manned 24-hours a day, or a stronger and more specialised police unit in a regional centre?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19identitet9ab_ran = 1 & r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I would rather have a small police unit in each municipality that is manned 24- hours a day 713 72.8% 0.7282942
2 I would rather have a stronger and more specialised police unit in a regional centre 256 26.1% 0.2614913
97 Not answered 10 1% 0.0102145
98 Not asked 11481 NA


r19identitet9b


Variable label: Doctor available around the clock in each local community, or more well-equipped emergency room attached to hospital?
Literal question: If you had to prioritise, do you think there should be a doctor available around the clock in each local community, or do you think there should be a larger and more well-equipped emergency room attached to the nearest health centre or hospital?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19identitet9ab_ran = 2 & r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I would rather have a doctor available around the clock in each local community 537 53% 0.530108588
2 I would rather have a larger and more well-equipped emergency room attached to the nearest health centre or hospital 474 46.8% 0.467917078
97 Not answered 2 0.2% 0.001974334
98 Not asked 11447 NA


r19identitet9a_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses r19identitet9a1 or r19identitet9a2]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses r19identitet9a1 or r19identitet9a2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:979] [Invalid:11481] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Receives r19identitet9a1 485 49.5% 0.4954035
2 Receives r19identitet9a2 494 50.5% 0.5045965
Sysmiss 11481 NA


r19identitet9a1


Variable label: Vote for politician from your constituency who prioritises a small police unit manned 24-hours a day?
Pre-question text: Imagine a politician from your constituency who represents a party in the general election. The politician will prioritise a small police unit in each municipality that is manned 24-hours a day rather than a stronger and more specialised police unit in a regional centre.
Literal question: How willing are you to vote for this politician’s party?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19identitet9a_ran = 1 & r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very willing 54 11.1% 0.11134021
2 Willing 140 28.9% 0.28865979
3 Somewhat willing 202 41.6% 0.41649485
4 Not that willing 68 14% 0.14020619
5 Not willing at all 16 3.3% 0.03298969
97 Not answered 5 1% 0.01030928
98 Not asked 11975 NA


r19identitet9a2


Variable label: Vote for politician from your constituency who prioritises a stronger, specialised police unit?
Pre-question text: Imagine a politician from your constituency who represents a party in the general election. The politician will prioritise a stronger and more specialised police unit in a regional centre rather than a small police unit in each municipality that is manned 24-hours a day.
Literal question: How willing are you to vote for this politician’s party?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19identitet9a_ran = 2 & r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very willing 17 3.4% 0.034412955
2 Willing 89 18% 0.180161943
3 Somewhat willing 174 35.2% 0.352226721
4 Not that willing 166 33.6% 0.336032389
5 Not willing at all 45 9.1% 0.091093117
97 Not answered 3 0.6% 0.006072874
98 Not asked 11966 NA


r19identitet9b_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses r19identitet9b1 or r19identitet9b2]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses r19identitet9b1 or r19identitet9b2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1013] [Invalid:11447] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Receives r19identitet9b1 479 47.3% 0.4728529
2 Receives r19identitet9b2 534 52.7% 0.5271471
Sysmiss 11447 NA


r19identitet9b1


Variable label: Vote for politician from your constituency who prioritises doctor available around the clock in each local community?
Pre-question text: Imagine a politician from your constituency who represents a party in the general election. The politician will prioritise having a doctor available around the clock in each local community, rather than having a larger and more well-equipped emergency room attached to the nearest health centre or hospital.
Literal question: How willing are you to vote for this politician’s party?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19identitet9b_ran = 1 & r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very willing 28 5.8% 0.05845511
2 Willing 130 27.1% 0.27139875
3 Somewhat willing 195 40.7% 0.40709812
4 Not that willing 104 21.7% 0.21711900
5 Not willing at all 17 3.5% 0.03549061
97 Not answered 5 1% 0.01043841
98 Not asked 11981 NA


r19identitet9b2


Variable label: Vote for politician from your constituency who prioritises more well-equipped emergency room attached to nearest health centre?
Pre-question text: Imagine a politician from your constituency who represents a party in the general election. The politician will prioritise having a larger and more well-equipped emergency room attached to the nearest health centre or hospital, rather than having a doctor available around the clock in each local community.
Literal question: How willing are you to vote for this politician’s party?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19identitet9b_ran = 2 & r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very willing 33 6.2% 0.061797753
2 Willing 158 29.6% 0.295880150
3 Somewhat willing 181 33.9% 0.338951311
4 Not that willing 123 23% 0.230337079
5 Not willing at all 36 6.7% 0.067415730
97 Not answered 3 0.6% 0.005617978
98 Not asked 11926 NA


r19kmframing1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: There is too much government involvement and regulation in today’s society
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: There is too much government involvement and regulation in today’s society.
Question owner: Mari Helliesen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 124 6.1% 0.06132542
2 Agree 247 12.2% 0.12215628
3 Somewhat agree 455 22.5% 0.22502473
4 Neither agree nor disagree 459 22.7% 0.22700297
5 Somewhat disagree 264 13.1% 0.13056380
6 Disagree 344 17% 0.17012859
7 Strongly disagree 91 4.5% 0.04500495
97 Not answered 38 1.9% 0.01879327
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19kmframing2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: A high level of tax is necessary to maintain important public sector services
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: A high level of tax is necessary to maintain important public sector services.
Question owner: Mari Helliesen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 306 15.1% 0.15133531
2 Agree 743 36.7% 0.36745796
3 Somewhat agree 544 26.9% 0.26904055
4 Neither agree nor disagree 137 6.8% 0.06775470
5 Somewhat disagree 154 7.6% 0.07616222
6 Disagree 63 3.1% 0.03115727
7 Strongly disagree 29 1.4% 0.01434224
97 Not answered 46 2.3% 0.02274975
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19kmframing3a_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19kmframing3a]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19kmframing3a]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1987] [Invalid:10473] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A diet consisting of fewer meat and dairy products and more plant-based products can improve Norwegian public health. 342 17.2% 0.1721188
2 A reduction in consumption of meat and dairy products can help reduce Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. 413 20.8% 0.2078510
3 A diet consisting of fewer meat and dairy products and more plant-based products can improve your personal health. 373 18.8% 0.1877202
4 A reduction in consumption of meat and dairy products can help reduce your personal greenhouse gas emissions. 430 21.6% 0.2164066
5 [BLANK] 429 21.6% 0.2159034
Sysmiss 10473 NA


r19kmframing3b_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19kmframing3b]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19kmframing3b]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1987] [Invalid:10473] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 An increase in the use of bicycles as a means of transport can improve Norwegian public health. 335 16.9% 0.1685959
2 An increase in the use of bicycles as a means of transport can help reduce Norway’s greenhouse gas emissions. 445 22.4% 0.2239557
3 An increase in the use of bicycles as a means of transport can improve your personal health 394 19.8% 0.1982889
4 An increase in the use of bicycles as a means of transport can help reduce your personal greenhouse gas emissions 373 18.8% 0.1877202
5 [BLANK] 440 22.1% 0.2214394
Sysmiss 10473 NA


r19kmframing3a


Variable label: Agree/disagree: A carbon tax should be introduced on foods with high emissions such as meat and dairy products
Pre-question text:

[r19kmframing3a_ran]

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question: A carbon tax should be introduced on foods with high emissions such as meat and dairy products.
Question owner: Mari Helliesen (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19kmframing3a_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 97 4.8% 0.04797230
2 Agree 139 6.9% 0.06874382
3 Somewhat agree 281 13.9% 0.13897132
4 Neither agree nor disagree 270 13.4% 0.13353116
5 Somewhat disagree 260 12.9% 0.12858556
6 Disagree 452 22.4% 0.22354105
7 Strongly disagree 484 23.9% 0.23936696
97 Not answered 39 1.9% 0.01928783
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19kmframing3b


Variable label: Agree/disagree: More public funding should be spent on the development of cycle lanes in Norway
Pre-question text:

[r19kmframing3b_ran]

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Literal question: More public funding should be spent on the development of cycle lanes in Norway.
Question owner: Mari Helliesen (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19kmframing3b_ran. Question order of r19kmframing3a and r19kmframing3 is random.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 313 15.5% 0.15479723
2 Agree 592 29.3% 0.29277943
3 Somewhat agree 457 22.6% 0.22601385
4 Neither agree nor disagree 222 11% 0.10979228
5 Somewhat disagree 156 7.7% 0.07715134
6 Disagree 143 7.1% 0.07072206
7 Strongly disagree 97 4.8% 0.04797230
97 Not answered 42 2.1% 0.02077151
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdr11


Variable label: Distribution of administrative tasks: Municipalities have more/fewer or keep the tasks that they have
Pre-question text: Norway received a new municipal and county structure on the 1st of January 2020. Many municipalities and county authorities have been merged. The distribution of tasks between the administrative levels may change somewhat in the future. If one level is assigned new tasks, it usually means that another level loses responsibility for those tasks. Which of the following statements is closest to your point of view.
Literal question: Municipalities:
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Asked on the same page as r19tdr12]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 should have more tasks 576 28.5% 0.28486647
2 should keep the tasks that they have 1176 58.2% 0.58160237
3 should have fewer tasks 204 10.1% 0.10089021
97 Not answered 66 3.3% 0.03264095
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdr12


Variable label: Distribution of administrative tasks: County authorities more/fewer or keep the tasks that they have
Pre-question text: Norway received a new municipal and county structure on the 1st of January 2020. Many municipalities and county authorities have been merged. The distribution of tasks between the administrative levels may change somewhat in the future. If one level is assigned new tasks, it usually means that another level loses responsibility for those tasks. Which of the following statements is closest to your point of view.
Literal question: County authorities:
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Asked on the same page as r19tdr11]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 should have more tasks 295 14.6% 0.14589515
2 should keep the tasks that they have 804 39.8% 0.39762611
3 should have fewer tasks 388 19.2% 0.19188922
4 should be closed down 467 23.1% 0.23095945
97 Not answered 68 3.4% 0.03363007
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdr16


Variable label: What is your view on the current economic situation in Norway?
Pre-question text: What is your view on the current economic situation in Norway?
Literal question: Do you think it is:
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 356 17.6% 0.176063304
2 Good 1042 51.5% 0.515331355
3 Somewhat good 328 16.2% 0.162215628
4 Neither good nor bad 109 5.4% 0.053907023
5 Somewhat bad 111 5.5% 0.054896142
6 Bad 27 1.3% 0.013353116
7 Very bad 5 0.2% 0.002472799
97 Not answered 44 2.2% 0.021760633
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdr17


Variable label: Economic situation [in your region of the country] compared with the rest of Norway
Literal question: If you compare the economic situation [in your region of the country] with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation [in your region of the country] as being better, worse or the same?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Better 443 21.9% 0.21909001
2 The same 1273 63% 0.62957468
3 Worse 251 12.4% 0.12413452
97 Not answered 55 2.7% 0.02720079
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdr19


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Financial resources should be transferred from rich to not so rich parts of the country, to ensure public services of the same quality
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree with the following statement:
Literal question: Financial resources should be transferred from the rich parts of the country to parts that are not so rich, to ensure that everyone receives public services of the same quality.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 259 12.8% 0.128090999
2 Agree 673 33.3% 0.332838773
3 Somewhat agree 644 31.8% 0.318496538
4 Neither agree nor disagree 229 11.3% 0.113254204
5 Somewhat disagree 110 5.4% 0.054401583
6 Disagree 52 2.6% 0.025717112
7 Strongly disagree 14 0.7% 0.006923838
97 Not answered 41 2% 0.020276954
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdrpreferanser_1


Variable label: Desirable with different levels of government: Power divided up between different levels
Pre-question text: Norway has a system of governance comprising of three levels – the national, the regional (counties) and the municipal (municipality) level of governance. Please state if you think each of these is a desirable feature, or an undesirable feature of having different levels of government.
Literal question: Having power divided up between different levels of government
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very desirable 709 35.1% 0.35064293
2 Somewhat desirable 973 48.1% 0.48120673
3 Somewhat undesirable 206 10.2% 0.10187933
4 Very undesirable 44 2.2% 0.02176063
97 Not answered 90 4.5% 0.04451039
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdrpreferanser_2


Variable label: Desirable with levels of government: Different laws in response to varying needs/conditions in Norway
Pre-question text: Norway has a system of governance comprising of three levels – the national, the regional (counties) and the municipal (municipality) level of governance. Please state if you think each of these is a desirable feature, or an undesirable feature of having different levels of government.
Literal question: Allowing different laws in response to varying needs and conditions in different parts of Norway
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very desirable 335 16.6% 0.16567755
2 Somewhat desirable 878 43.4% 0.43422354
3 Somewhat undesirable 379 18.7% 0.18743818
4 Very undesirable 338 16.7% 0.16716123
97 Not answered 92 4.5% 0.04549951
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdrpreferanser_3


Variable label: Desirable with different levels of government: The different levels have power to hold each other to account for problems
Pre-question text: Norway has a system of governance comprising of three levels – the national, the regional (counties) and the municipal (municipality) level of governance. Please state if you think each of these is a desirable feature, or an undesirable feature of having different levels of government.
Literal question: Different levels of government having power to hold each other to account for problems
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very desirable 467 23.1% 0.23095945
2 Somewhat desirable 943 46.6% 0.46636993
3 Somewhat undesirable 366 18.1% 0.18100890
4 Very undesirable 145 7.2% 0.07171118
97 Not answered 101 5% 0.04995054
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdrpreferanser_4


Variable label: Desirable with different levels of government: Different parts of Norway can to get involved in decision-making on national issues
Pre-question text: Norway has a system of governance comprising of three levels – the national, the regional (counties) and the municipal (municipality) level of governance. Please state if you think each of these is a desirable feature, or an undesirable feature of having different levels of government.
Literal question: Allowing the governments of different parts of Norway to get involved in decision-making on national issues
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very desirable 578 28.6% 0.28585559
2 Somewhat desirable 976 48.3% 0.48269041
3 Somewhat undesirable 294 14.5% 0.14540059
4 Very undesirable 83 4.1% 0.04104847
97 Not answered 91 4.5% 0.04500495
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdrpreferanser_5


Variable label: Desirable with different levels of government: Different governments arguing over the best way to solve a particular problem
Pre-question text: Norway has a system of governance comprising of three levels – the national, the regional (counties) and the municipal (municipality) level of governance. Please state if you think each of these is a desirable feature, or an undesirable feature of having different levels of government.
Literal question: Different governments arguing over the best way to solve a particular problem
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very desirable 886 43.8% 0.43818002
2 Somewhat desirable 903 44.7% 0.44658754
3 Somewhat undesirable 124 6.1% 0.06132542
4 Very undesirable 21 1% 0.01038576
97 Not answered 88 4.4% 0.04352127
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdrpreferanser_6


Variable label: Desirable with different levels of government: Different levels being forced to respect each other’s roles and responsibilities
Pre-question text: Norway has a system of governance comprising of three levels – the national, the regional (counties) and the municipal (municipality) level of governance. Please state if you think each of these is a desirable feature, or an undesirable feature of having different levels of government.
Literal question: Different levels of government being forced to respect each other’s roles and responsibilities when dealing with a problem
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very desirable 718 35.5% 0.35509397
2 Somewhat desirable 999 49.4% 0.49406528
3 Somewhat undesirable 186 9.2% 0.09198813
4 Very undesirable 26 1.3% 0.01285856
97 Not answered 93 4.6% 0.04599407
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdrgodta_a2_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19tdrgodta_a2]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19tdrgodta_a2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1976] [Invalid:10484] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 your county 674 34.1% 0.3410931
2 the national government 628 31.8% 0.3178138
3 your county and the national government 674 34.1% 0.3410931
Sysmiss 10484 NA


r19tdrgodta_b2_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19tdrgodta_b2]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19tdrgodta_b2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1976] [Invalid:10484] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 your municipality 697 35.3% 0.3527328
2 the national government 617 31.2% 0.3122470
3 your municipality and the national government 662 33.5% 0.3350202
Sysmiss 10484 NA


r19tdrgodta_c2_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19tdrgodta_c2]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19tdrgodta_c2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1976] [Invalid:10484] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 your municipality 642 32.5% 0.3248988
2 your county 692 35% 0.3502024
3 your municipality and your county 642 32.5% 0.3248988
Sysmiss 10484 NA


r19tdrgodta_a1


Variable label: To what extent your municipality’s decision to close down kindergarden is acceptable
Pre-question text: We will now ask you some questions about your willingness to accept decisions made by either your municipality, your county, or the national government. Imagine that your municipality must cut spending and decides to close down a kindergarten in your municipality. This will be done to preserve other public positions that would otherwise not have been retained.
Literal question: Generally speaking, to what extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 47 2.3% 0.02324431
2 To a large extent 201 9.9% 0.09940653
3 To some extent 747 36.9% 0.36943620
4 To a small extent 660 32.6% 0.32640950
5 Not at all 311 15.4% 0.15380811
97 Not answered 56 2.8% 0.02769535
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdrgodta_a2


Variable label: Municipality’s decision to close down kindergarden acceptable, if supported by [r19tdrgodta_a2_ran]
Literal question: To what extent do you think this decision is acceptable if it is supported by [r19tdrgodta_a2_ran]?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19tdrgodta_a2_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 46 2.3% 0.02274975
2 To a large extent 240 11.9% 0.11869436
3 To some extent 700 34.6% 0.34619189
4 To a small extent 646 31.9% 0.31948566
5 Not at all 324 16% 0.16023739
97 Not answered 66 3.3% 0.03264095
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdrgodta_b1


Variable label: To what extent your municipality’s decision to close down upper secondary school is acceptable
Pre-question text: Imagine that your municipality must cut spending and decides to close down an upper secondary school in your municipality. This will be done to preserve other public positions that would otherwise not have been retained.
Literal question: Generally speaking, to what extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 23 1.1% 0.01137488
2 To a large extent 126 6.2% 0.06231454
3 To some extent 581 28.7% 0.28733927
4 To a small extent 802 39.7% 0.39663699
5 Not at all 428 21.2% 0.21167161
97 Not answered 62 3.1% 0.03066271
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdrgodta_b2


Variable label: Municipality’s decision to close down upper secondary school acceptable, if supported by [r19tdrgodta_b2_ran]
Literal question: To what extent do you think this decision is acceptable if it is supported by [r19tdrgodta_b2_ran]?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19tdrgodta_b2_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 39 1.9% 0.01928783
2 To a large extent 221 10.9% 0.10929773
3 To some extent 655 32.4% 0.32393670
4 To a small extent 672 33.2% 0.33234421
5 Not at all 364 18% 0.18001978
97 Not answered 71 3.5% 0.03511375
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdrgodta_c1


Variable label: To what extent national government decision to shut down a department at a university college is acceptable
Pre-question text: Imagine that the national government must cut spending and decides to shut down a department at a university college in your municipality . This will be done to preserve other public positions that would otherwise not have been retained.
Literal question: Generally speaking, to what extent do you think this decision is acceptable?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 39 1.9% 0.01928783
2 To a large extent 198 9.8% 0.09792285
3 To some extent 788 39% 0.38971316
4 To a small extent 651 32.2% 0.32195846
5 Not at all 273 13.5% 0.13501484
97 Not answered 73 3.6% 0.03610287
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19tdrgodta_c2


Variable label: National government decision to shut down a department at a university college acceptable, if supported by [r19tdrgodta_c2_ran]
Literal question: To what extent do you think this decision is acceptable if it is supported by [r19tdrgodta_c2_ran]?
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta Eidheim (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 3]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19tdrgodta_c2_ran]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 61 3% 0.03016815
2 To a large extent 281 13.9% 0.13897132
3 To some extent 793 39.2% 0.39218595
4 To a small extent 558 27.6% 0.27596439
5 Not at all 250 12.4% 0.12363996
97 Not answered 79 3.9% 0.03907023
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19polkom2


Variable label: How often do you familiarise yourself with what is stated in the privacy terms/terms relating to cookies?
Pre-question text: When using the internet for everyday activities such as reading news, checking social media or looking for a product you are interested in, it is common to be asked to accept privacy policies or to accept that the websites use cookies.
Literal question: In your everyday use of the internet, how often do you familiarise yourself with what is stated in the privacy terms/terms relating to cookies?
Question owner: Trude Haaland Jensen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Always 46 1.8% 0.018160284
2 Often 176 6.9% 0.069482827
3 Sometimes 543 21.4% 0.214370312
4 Rarely 1049 41.4% 0.414133439
5 Never 704 27.8% 0.277931307
97 Not answered 15 0.6% 0.005921832
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19polkom3


Variable label: Do you usually accept the terms relating to privacy and cookies?
Literal question: In your everyday use of the internet, do you usually accept the terms relating to privacy and cookies?
Question owner: Trude Haaland Jensen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Generally, yes 1953 77.1% 0.771022503
2 Yes, after adjusting the settings to my preferences 381 15% 0.150414528
3 Generally, no 178 7% 0.070272404
97 Not answered 21 0.8% 0.008290565
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19polkom4


Variable label: To what extent are you concerned about privacy?
Literal question: To what extent are you concerned about privacy?
Question owner: Trude Haaland Jensen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 315 12.4% 0.124358468
2 To a large extent 987 39% 0.389656534
3 To some extent 1047 41.3% 0.413343861
4 To a small extent 140 5.5% 0.055270430
5 To a very small extent 28 1.1% 0.011054086
97 Not answered 16 0.6% 0.006316621
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19polkom5_1


Variable label: Acceptable that company uses your personal data to: Customise advertisements your interests
Pre-question text: Imagine that a company has purchased access to your personal data. What do you think is acceptable use of this information?
Literal question: Customise advertisements based on your interests
Post-question: Choose the alternatives that match your view.
Question owner: Trude Haaland Jensen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 528 20.8% 0.208448480
0 Not selected 1993 78.7% 0.786814054
97 Not answered 12 0.5% 0.004737465
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19polkom5_2


Variable label: Acceptable that company uses your personal data to: Customise news your interests
Pre-question text: Imagine that a company has purchased access to your personal data. What do you think is acceptable use of this information?
Literal question: Customise news based on your interests
Post-question: Choose the alternatives that match your view.
Question owner: Trude Haaland Jensen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 457 18% 0.180418476
0 Not selected 2064 81.5% 0.814844058
97 Not answered 12 0.5% 0.004737465
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19polkom5_3


Variable label: Acceptable that company uses your personal data to: Use the information for research projects
Pre-question text: Imagine that a company has purchased access to your personal data. What do you think is acceptable use of this information?
Literal question: Use the information for various research projects, such as in health or technological development
Post-question: Choose the alternatives that match your view.
Question owner: Trude Haaland Jensen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 892 35.2% 0.352151599
0 Not selected 1629 64.3% 0.643110936
97 Not answered 12 0.5% 0.004737465
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19polkom5_4


Variable label: Acceptable that company uses your personal data to: Customise political messages your interests
Pre-question text: Imagine that a company has purchased access to your personal data. What do you think is acceptable use of this information?
Literal question: Customise political messages based on your interests
Post-question: Choose the alternatives that match your view.
Question owner: Trude Haaland Jensen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 59 2.3% 0.023292538
0 Not selected 2462 97.2% 0.971969996
97 Not answered 12 0.5% 0.004737465
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19polkom5_5


Variable label: Acceptable that company uses your personal data to: Government surveillance
Pre-question text: Imagine that a company has purchased access to your personal data. What do you think is acceptable use of this information?
Literal question: Government surveillance, such as the police or the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration having access to your data
Post-question: Choose the alternatives that match your view.
Question owner: Trude Haaland Jensen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 225 8.9% 0.088827477
0 Not selected 2296 90.6% 0.906435057
97 Not answered 12 0.5% 0.004737465
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19polkom5_6


Variable label: Acceptable that company uses your personal data to: All types of use are unacceptable
Pre-question text: Imagine that a company has purchased access to your personal data. What do you think is acceptable use of this information?
Literal question: All types of use are unacceptable
Post-question: Choose the alternatives that match your view.
Question owner: Trude Haaland Jensen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selected 1209 47.7% 0.477299645
0 Not selected 1312 51.8% 0.517962890
97 Not answered 12 0.5% 0.004737465
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19polkom6


Variable label: Companies’ right to use information about me
Literal question: Choose the alternative that best matches your view.
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Companies should have the right to use information about me without government regulations standing in the way 17 0.7% 0.006711409
2 Companies should have the right to use information about me under certain government regulation 132 5.2% 0.052112120
3 Companies should have the right to use information about me under strict government regulation 861 34% 0.339913146
4 Companies should not have the right to use information about me for any purpose 1497 59.1% 0.590998816
97 Not answered 26 1% 0.010264508
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19polkom1a_ran


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses whether r19polkom1a should be asked or not]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 4]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses whether r19polkom1a should be asked or not]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2520] [Invalid:9940] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Receives R19POLKOM1a 1226 48.7% 0.4865079
2 Does NOT receive R19POLKOM1a 1294 51.3% 0.5134921
Sysmiss 9940 NA


r19polkom1a


Variable label: Were you aware of the incident where the SIAN leader was beaten down in Bergen?
Pre-question text: From time to time, the anti-Islamic group called Stop the Islamisation of Norway (SIAN) is in the news. Please look at the example below. News story from Verdens Gang, published 22.08.2020.
Literal question: Were you aware of this incident?
Question owner: Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19polkom1a_ran = 1 & r19group = 4]

[Experiment. Question includes a photo (.png) of an article (image + title) published by Verdens Gang, 22.08.2020. Title: SIAN leader beaten in Bergen - bleeding from the head after the incident.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 972 79.3% 0.7928221860
2 No 206 16.8% 0.1680261011
3 Don’t know 47 3.8% 0.0383360522
97 Not answered 1 0.1% 0.0008156607
98 Not asked 11234 NA


r19polkom1b


Variable label: Agree/disagree: SIAN will be allowed to rent premises to hold meeting for members/sympathisers
Pre-question text: Imagine that the anti-Islamic group called Stop the Islamisation of Norway (SIAN) has asked to rent a local community centre to hold a meeting for its members and sympathisers.
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the decision that SIAN will be allowed to rent the premises for this purpose?
Question owner: Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 183 7.2% 0.072246348
2 Agree 426 16.8% 0.168180024
3 Somewhat agree 294 11.6% 0.116067904
4 Neither agree nor disagree 437 17.3% 0.172522700
5 Somewhat disagree 228 9% 0.090011844
6 Disagree 426 16.8% 0.168180024
7 Strongly disagree 520 20.5% 0.205290170
97 Not answered 19 0.8% 0.007500987
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19kmhydro1


Variable label: Do you have a positive or negative impression of hydrogen as a fuel for cars and buses?
Literal question: Do you have a positive or negative impression of hydrogen as a fuel for cars and buses?
Question owner: Kristin Guldbrandsen Frøysa (UiB); Trygve Skjold (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positive 285 11.3% 0.112514805
2 Positive 719 28.4% 0.283853139
5 Slightly positive 351 13.9% 0.138570865
3 Neither positive nor negative 516 20.4% 0.203711015
4 Slightly negative 139 5.5% 0.054875642
6 Negative 74 2.9% 0.029214370
7 Very negative 33 1.3% 0.013028030
8 No opinion 401 15.8% 0.158310304
97 Not answered 15 0.6% 0.005921832
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19kmhydro2


Variable label: Do you have a positive/negative impression of hydrogen as a fuel for ferries/passenger ships?
Literal question: Do you have a positive or negative impression of hydrogen as a fuel for ferries and other passenger ships?
Question owner: Kristin Guldbrandsen Frøysa (UiB); Trygve Skjold (UiB)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positive 335 13.2% 0.13225424
2 Positive 767 30.3% 0.30280300
3 Slightly positive 347 13.7% 0.13699171
4 Neither positive nor negative 454 17.9% 0.17923411
5 Slightly negative 82 3.2% 0.03237268
6 Negative 54 2.1% 0.02131859
7 Very negative 32 1.3% 0.01263324
8 No opinion 432 17.1% 0.17054876
97 Not answered 30 1.2% 0.01184366
98 Not asked 9927 NA


r19k1media_1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media plays an important role in highlighting the fates of individuals 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media plays an important role in highlighting the fates of individuals 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1media_1;j1k1media_1;p4k1media_1
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 377 19.9% 0.198944591
2 Agree 872 46% 0.460158311
3 Somewhat agree 411 21.7% 0.216886544
4 Neither agree nor disagree 119 6.3% 0.062796834
5 Somewhat disagree 64 3.4% 0.033773087
6 Disagree 28 1.5% 0.014775726
7 Strongly disagree 9 0.5% 0.004749340
97 Not answered 15 0.8% 0.007915567
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1media_2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media plays an important role in revealing matters worthy of criticism 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media plays an important role in revealing matters worthy of criticism 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1media_2;j1k1media_2;p4k1media_2
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 932 49.2% 0.491820580
2 Agree 785 41.4% 0.414248021
3 Somewhat agree 123 6.5% 0.064907652
4 Neither agree nor disagree 23 1.2% 0.012137203
5 Somewhat disagree 12 0.6% 0.006332454
6 Disagree 6 0.3% 0.003166227
7 Strongly disagree 4 0.2% 0.002110818
97 Not answered 10 0.5% 0.005277045
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1media_3


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media is conflict-oriented 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media is conflict-oriented 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1media_3;j1k1media_3;p4k1media_3
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 263 13.9% 0.138786280
2 Agree 647 34.1% 0.341424802
3 Somewhat agree 620 32.7% 0.327176781
4 Neither agree nor disagree 217 11.5% 0.114511873
5 Somewhat disagree 75 4% 0.039577836
6 Disagree 41 2.2% 0.021635884
7 Strongly disagree 7 0.4% 0.003693931
97 Not answered 25 1.3% 0.013192612
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1media_4


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media sensationalises 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media sensationalises 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1media_4;j1k1media_4;p4k1media_4
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 575 30.3% 0.303430079
2 Agree 690 36.4% 0.364116095
3 Somewhat agree 466 24.6% 0.245910290
4 Neither agree nor disagree 105 5.5% 0.055408971
5 Somewhat disagree 25 1.3% 0.013192612
6 Disagree 14 0.7% 0.007387863
7 Strongly disagree 2 0.1% 0.001055409
97 Not answered 18 0.9% 0.009498681
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1media_5


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The media conveys complicated issues in an understandable way 
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: The media conveys complicated issues in an understandable way 
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1media_5;j1k1media_5;p4k1media_5
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 74 3.9% 0.039050132
2 Agree 562 29.7% 0.296569921
3 Somewhat agree 765 40.4% 0.403693931
4 Neither agree nor disagree 265 14% 0.139841689
5 Somewhat disagree 151 8% 0.079683377
6 Disagree 46 2.4% 0.024274406
7 Strongly disagree 17 0.9% 0.008970976
97 Not answered 15 0.8% 0.007915567
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1media_6


Variable label: Agree/disagree: News coverage is angled in a way that runs contrary to my own views
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements about the role of news media in Norwegian society:
Literal question: News coverage is angled in a way that runs contrary to my own views
Question owner: Tine Ustad Figenschou (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1media_6;j1k1media_6;p4k1media_6
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 53 2.8% 0.027968338
2 Agree 128 6.8% 0.067546174
3 Somewhat agree 348 18.4% 0.183641161
4 Neither agree nor disagree 859 45.3% 0.453298153
5 Somewhat disagree 201 10.6% 0.106068602
6 Disagree 262 13.8% 0.138258575
7 Strongly disagree 29 1.5% 0.015303430
97 Not answered 15 0.8% 0.007915567
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1lobby101


Variable label: Organisations lobbying journalists/politicians/public administration, more postive or negative sides?
Pre-question text: Special interest organisations and NGOs working within different areas of society often lobby journalists, politicians and public administration employees to discuss issues and make decisions that are in accordance with the organisations’ wishes and interests.
Literal question: Would you say that such attempts to influence, based on an overall assessment, have more positive or negative sides?
Question owner: Rommetvedt (NORCE); Ketil Raknes (Høyskolen Kristiania); Bernard Enjolras (ISF); Kristin Strømsnes (UiB/NORCE)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 By far more negative sides 191 10.1% 0.100791557
2 More negative than positive sides 435 23% 0.229551451
3 Equally negative and positive 973 51.3% 0.513456464
4 More positive than negative sides 267 14.1% 0.140897098
5 By far more positive sides 17 0.9% 0.008970976
97 Not answered 12 0.6% 0.006332454
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1selvstyre1_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses variant of r19k1selvstyre1]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1selvstyre1_ran1;f1k1selvstyre1_ran1;p4k1selvstyre1_ran1
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 5]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses variant of r19k1selvstyre1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1892] [Invalid:10568] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A 469 24.8% 0.2478858
2 B 470 24.8% 0.2484144
3 C 457 24.2% 0.2415433
4 D 496 26.2% 0.2621564
Sysmiss 10568 NA


r19k1selvstyre1a_1


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: Whether schools must close during a pandemic
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1a_1;j1k1selvstyre1a_1;p4k1selvstyre1a_1
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 59 12.6% 0.12579957
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 169 36% 0.36034115
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 112 23.9% 0.23880597
4 Mostly up to the state 88 18.8% 0.18763326
5 Totally up to the state 41 8.7% 0.08742004
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 11991 NA


r19k1selvstyre1a_2


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: On the development of wind power in municipalities
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1a_2;j1k1selvstyre1a_2;p4k1selvstyre1a_2
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 135 28.8% 0.287846482
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 160 34.1% 0.341151386
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 102 21.7% 0.217484009
4 Mostly up to the state 50 10.7% 0.106609808
5 Totally up to the state 20 4.3% 0.042643923
97 Not answered 2 0.4% 0.004264392
98 Not asked 11991 NA


r19k1selvstyre1a_3


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the shoreline building can take place
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1a_3;j1k1selvstyre1a_3;p4k1selvstyre1a_3
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 70 14.9% 0.1492537
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 121 25.8% 0.2579957
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 70 14.9% 0.1492537
4 Mostly up to the state 135 28.8% 0.2878465
5 Totally up to the state 73 15.6% 0.1556503
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.0000000
98 Not asked 11991 NA


r19k1selvstyre1a_4


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How large primary school classes should be
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how large primary school classes should be?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1a_4;j1k1selvstyre1a_4;p4k1selvstyre1a_4
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 1]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 50 10.7% 0.106609808
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 139 29.6% 0.296375267
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 98 20.9% 0.208955224
4 Mostly up to the state 133 28.4% 0.283582090
5 Totally up to the state 48 10.2% 0.102345416
97 Not answered 1 0.2% 0.002132196
98 Not asked 11991 NA


r19k1selvstyre1b_primer


Variable label: Should it be up to the municipalities or the state to decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
Pre-question text: Imagine that there is a severe pandemic outbreak in Norway. Infection control experts disagree on whether closing schools will slow the pandemic.
Literal question: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to decide whether schools must be closed during a pandemic?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1b_primer;j1k1selvstyre1b_primer;p4k1selvstyre1b_primer
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 26 5.5% 0.055319149
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 105 22.3% 0.223404255
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 109 23.2% 0.231914894
4 Mostly up to the state 169 36% 0.359574468
5 Totally up to the state 58 12.3% 0.123404255
97 Not answered 3 0.6% 0.006382979
98 Not asked 11990 NA


r19k1selvstyre1b_1


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: On the development of wind power in municipalities
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1b_1;j1k1selvstyre1b_1;p4k1selvstyre1b_1
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 117 24.9% 0.248936170
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 159 33.8% 0.338297872
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 114 24.3% 0.242553191
4 Mostly up to the state 59 12.6% 0.125531915
5 Totally up to the state 18 3.8% 0.038297872
97 Not answered 3 0.6% 0.006382979
98 Not asked 11990 NA


r19k1selvstyre1b_2


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the shoreline building can take place
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1b_2;j1k1selvstyre1b_2;p4k1selvstyre1b_2
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 81 17.2% 0.17234043
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 118 25.1% 0.25106383
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 104 22.1% 0.22127660
4 Mostly up to the state 117 24.9% 0.24893617
5 Totally up to the state 44 9.4% 0.09361702
97 Not answered 6 1.3% 0.01276596
98 Not asked 11990 NA


r19k1selvstyre1b_3


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How large primary school classes should be
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how large primary school classes should be?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1b_3;j1k1selvstyre1b_3;p4k1selvstyre1b_3
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 64 13.6% 0.13617021
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 114 24.3% 0.24255319
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 115 24.5% 0.24468085
4 Mostly up to the state 115 24.5% 0.24468085
5 Totally up to the state 56 11.9% 0.11914894
97 Not answered 6 1.3% 0.01276596
98 Not asked 11990 NA


r19k1selvstyre1c_primer


Variable label: Should it be up to the municipalities or up to the state to decide on the size of primary school classes?
Pre-question text: Imagine that the issue regarding the size of primary school classes is to be decided. The pedagogical community does not agree on which class size is best regarding the learning and well-being of pupils.
Literal question: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to decide on the size of primary school classes?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1c_primer;j1k1selvstyre1c_primer;p4k1selvstyre1c_primer
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 46 10.1% 0.100656455
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 131 28.7% 0.286652079
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 82 17.9% 0.179431072
4 Mostly up to the state 150 32.8% 0.328227571
5 Totally up to the state 46 10.1% 0.100656455
97 Not answered 2 0.4% 0.004376368
98 Not asked 12003 NA


r19k1selvstyre1c_1


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: On the development of wind power in municipalities
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1c_1;j1k1selvstyre1c_1;p4k1selvstyre1c_1
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 120 26.3% 0.262582057
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 157 34.4% 0.343544858
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 91 19.9% 0.199124726
4 Mostly up to the state 65 14.2% 0.142231947
5 Totally up to the state 21 4.6% 0.045951860
97 Not answered 3 0.7% 0.006564551
98 Not asked 12003 NA


r19k1selvstyre1c_2


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the shoreline building can take place
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1c_2;j1k1selvstyre1c_2;p4k1selvstyre1c_2
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 70 15.3% 0.153172867
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 109 23.9% 0.238512035
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 79 17.3% 0.172866521
4 Mostly up to the state 124 27.1% 0.271334792
5 Totally up to the state 71 15.5% 0.155361050
97 Not answered 4 0.9% 0.008752735
98 Not asked 12003 NA


r19k1selvstyre1c_3


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the get state to decide: Whether schools must close during a pandemic
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1c_3;j1k1selvstyre1c_3;p4k1selvstyre1c_3
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 56 12.3% 0.122538293
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 143 31.3% 0.312910284
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 110 24.1% 0.240700219
4 Mostly up to the state 107 23.4% 0.234135667
5 Totally up to the state 37 8.1% 0.080962801
97 Not answered 4 0.9% 0.008752735
98 Not asked 12003 NA


r19k1selvstyre1d_primer


Variable label: Should it be up to the municipalities or to the state to decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Pre-question text: Imagine that a committee proposes significant wind power development in Norway. Environmental management experts disagree on whether the value of climate-friendly energy can justify the damage to nature that will result from the development.
Literal question: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to decide on the development of wind power in individual municipalities?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1d_primer;j1k1selvstyre1d_primer;p4k1selvstyre1d_primer
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 78 15.7% 0.157258065
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 182 36.7% 0.366935484
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 123 24.8% 0.247983871
4 Mostly up to the state 93 18.8% 0.187500000
5 Totally up to the state 19 3.8% 0.038306452
97 Not answered 1 0.2% 0.002016129
98 Not asked 11964 NA


r19k1selvstyre1d_1


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: Whether schools must close during a pandemic
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide whether schools must close during a pandemic?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1d_1;j1k1selvstyre1d_1;p4k1selvstyre1d_1
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 66 13.3% 0.133064516
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 170 34.3% 0.342741935
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 108 21.8% 0.217741935
4 Mostly up to the state 120 24.2% 0.241935484
5 Totally up to the state 31 6.2% 0.062500000
97 Not answered 1 0.2% 0.002016129
98 Not asked 11964 NA


r19k1selvstyre1d_2


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How close to the shoreline building can take place
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how close to the shoreline building can take place?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1d_2;j1k1selvstyre1d_2;p4k1selvstyre1d_2
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 54 10.9% 0.108870968
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 119 24% 0.239919355
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 98 19.8% 0.197580645
4 Mostly up to the state 156 31.5% 0.314516129
5 Totally up to the state 67 13.5% 0.135080645
97 Not answered 2 0.4% 0.004032258
98 Not asked 11964 NA


r19k1selvstyre1d_3


Variable label: Should the municipalities or the state get to decide: How large primary school classes should be
Pre-question text: Do you think it should be up to the municipalities or up to the state to…
Literal question: decide how large primary school classes should be?
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre1d_3;j1k1selvstyre1d_3;p4k1selvstyre1d_3
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5 & r19k1selvstyre1_ran1 = 4]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Totally up to the municipalities 49 9.9% 0.098790323
2 Mostly up to the municipalities 129 26% 0.260080645
3 As much up to the municipalities as it is up to the state 116 23.4% 0.233870968
4 Mostly up to the state 150 30.2% 0.302419355
5 Totally up to the state 51 10.3% 0.102822581
97 Not answered 1 0.2% 0.002016129
98 Not asked 11964 NA


r19k1selvstyre2


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Norwegian democracy could have worked just as well without local self-government
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement:
Literal question: Norwegian democracy could have worked just as well without local self-government.
Question owner: Jan Erling Klausen (UiO); Marte Winsvold (IFS)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1selvstyre2;j1k1selvstyre2;p4k1selvstyre2
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 27 1.4% 0.014248021
2 Agree 60 3.2% 0.031662269
3 Somewhat agree 161 8.5% 0.084960422
4 Neither agree nor disagree 188 9.9% 0.099208443
5 Somewhat disagree 314 16.6% 0.165699208
6 Disagree 743 39.2% 0.392084433
7 Strongly disagree 395 20.8% 0.208443272
97 Not answered 7 0.4% 0.003693931
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1polkan_ran1


Variable label: [List experiment. Randomly chooses if the 7th attribute should be shown or not.]
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 5]

[List experiment. Randomly chooses if the 7th attribute should be shown or not.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1892] [Invalid:10568] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 920 48.6% 0.4862579
2 A political party list including many candidates that have an immigrant background 972 51.4% 0.5137421
Sysmiss 10568 NA


r19k1polkan


Variable label: How many of the candidates’ characteristics would make you less likely to vote for the political party?
Literal question: How many of the following candidate characteristics on a ballot paper would make you less likely to vote for the political party?
Post-question: The characteristics you can choose from are: - A political party list including few men - A political party list including many elderly people - A political party list including many poorly educated candidates - A political party list including many unknown candidates - A political party list including many previously convicted candidates - A political party list including many candidates that have little political experience. [k1polkan_ran1: A political party list including many candidates that have an immigrant background]
Question owner: Henning Finseraas (NTNU); Magnus Carlsson (Lnu); Arnfinn Midtbøen (UiO)
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[List experiment. Seven attributes if r19k1polkan_ran1 = 2. Six attributes if r19k1polkan_ran1 = 1.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 132 7% 0.06965699
2 2 196 10.3% 0.10343008
3 3 246 13% 0.12981530
4 4 366 19.3% 0.19313984
5 5 568 30% 0.29973615
6 6 167 8.8% 0.08812665
7 7 84 4.4% 0.04432718
97 Not answered 136 7.2% 0.07176781
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1dommere1


Variable label: To what extent appointment of Supreme Court justices should take into account social and cultural diversity
Pre-question text: Provided that applicants to the Supreme Court of Norway’s judicial offices have the necessary professional qualifications, applicant assessments may also take into account that the Supreme Court should reflect Norway both socially and culturally.
Literal question: To what extent do you think that the appointment of Supreme Court justices should take into account the social and cultural diversity found in society?
Question owner: Gunnar Grendstad (UiB); Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB); Jon Kåre Skiple (NORCE); Henrik Litlere Bentsen (NORCE); Ingvild Misje (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1dommere1;j1k1dommere1;p4k1dommere1
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 252 13.3% 0.132981530
2 To a large extent 646 34.1% 0.340897098
3 To some extent 633 33.4% 0.334036939
4 To a small extent 223 11.8% 0.117678100
5 Not at all 125 6.6% 0.065963061
97 Not answered 16 0.8% 0.008443272
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1dommere2


Variable label: To what extent Supreme Court justices must have ‘insight and involvement in general societal issues’
Pre-question text: The assessment of applicants to the judicial offices must follow the applicable guidelines.
Literal question: To what extent do you agree with the guidelines that say Supreme Court justices must have ‘insight and involvement in general societal issues’?
Question owner: Gunnar Grendstad (UiB); Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB); Jon Kåre Skiple (NORCE); Henrik Litlere Bentsen (NORCE); Ingvild Misje (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1dommere2;j1k1dommere2;p4k1dommere2
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 567 29.9% 0.299208443
2 To a large extent 925 48.8% 0.488126649
3 To some extent 325 17.2% 0.171503958
4 To a small extent 39 2.1% 0.020580475
5 Not at all 15 0.8% 0.007915567
97 Not answered 24 1.3% 0.012664908
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1dommere3_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1dommere3]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1dommere3_ran1;p4k1dommere3_ran1
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 5]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1dommere3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1884] [Invalid:10576] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 959 50.9% 0.5090234
2 14 out of 20 justices are born in the Oslo area, 18 out of 20 justices have been educated in Oslo, and 17 of the justices have spent at least 80 percent of their working lives in Oslo. 925 49.1% 0.4909766
Sysmiss 10576 NA


r19k1dommere3


Variable label: How important that the Supreme Court of Norway has a composition of justices that reflects Norway geographically
Pre-question text:

The Supreme Court of Norway is the judicial branch and makes an increasing number of decisions that bring the court of law closer to the Storting which is the legislative branch. [k1dommere3_ran1]

Literal question: How important do you think it is that the Supreme Court of Norway has a composition of justices that reflects Norway geographically?
Question owner: Gunnar Grendstad (UiB); Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB); Jon Kåre Skiple (NORCE); Henrik Litlere Bentsen (NORCE); Ingvild Misje (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1dommere3;j1k1dommere3;p4k1dommere3
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1dommere3_ran1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 493 26% 0.26015831
2 Important 670 35.4% 0.35356201
3 Somewhat important 453 23.9% 0.23905013
4 Not very important 197 10.4% 0.10395778
5 Not important at all 59 3.1% 0.03113456
97 Not answered 23 1.2% 0.01213720
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1ansvar1_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1ansvar1]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ansvar1_ran1;p4k1ansvar1_ran1
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 5]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1ansvar1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1883] [Invalid:10577] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 946 50.2% 0.5023898
2 Primary and lower secondary school results are very important for many people, and they have been shown to play a significant role regarding which political party people vote for. 937 49.8% 0.4976102
Sysmiss 10577 NA


r19k1ansvar1_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1ansvar1]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ansvar1_ran2;p4k1ansvar1_ran2
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 5]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1ansvar1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1883] [Invalid:10577] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 better 947 50.3% 0.5029209
2 worse 936 49.7% 0.4970791
Sysmiss 10577 NA


r19k1ansvar1_1


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Committed headteachers/school staff
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Committed headteachers and school staff.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar1_1;p4k1ansvar1_1;j1k1ansvar1_1
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1ansvar1_ran1 og r19k1ansvar1_ran2. Asked on the same page as r19k1ansvar2 and r19k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 427 22.5% 0.22532982
1 Selected 1433 75.6% 0.75620053
97 Not answered 35 1.8% 0.01846966
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1ansvar1_2


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Parents who take responsibility
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Parents who take responsibility for their children’s education.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar1_2;p4k1ansvar1_2;j1k1ansvar1_2
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1ansvar1_ran1 og r19k1ansvar1_ran2. Asked on the same page as r19k1ansvar2 and r19k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 911 48.1% 0.48073879
1 Selected 949 50.1% 0.50079156
97 Not answered 35 1.8% 0.01846966
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1ansvar1_3


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Commitment among the parties in power/the mayor’s political party
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran]] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Commitment to educational policy among the parties in power / the mayor’s political party.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar1_3;p4k1ansvar1_3;j1k1ansvar1_3
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1ansvar1_ran1 og r19k1ansvar1_ran2. Asked on the same page as r19k1ansvar2 and r19k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1372 72.4% 0.72401055
1 Selected 488 25.8% 0.25751979
97 Not answered 35 1.8% 0.01846966
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1ansvar1_4


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Commitment among the opposition
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Commitment to educational policy among the opposition / municipal councillors who are not members of the mayor’s political party.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar1_4;p4k1ansvar1_4;j1k1ansvar1_4
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1ansvar1_ran1 og r19k1ansvar1_ran2. Asked on the same page as r19k1ansvar2 and r19k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1590 83.9% 0.83905013
1 Selected 270 14.2% 0.14248021
97 Not answered 35 1.8% 0.01846966
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1ansvar1_5


Variable label: Important explanation regarding school results in your municipality: Policies and funding from the County Authority/Government
Pre-question text:

Primary and lower secondary schools in Norway are required to report detailed annual results regarding a number of factors. These include graduating grades (Year 10), and the percentage of pupils at the lowest level of mastery in national tests. [k1ansvar1_ran1] Imagine that new municipal level data show that the results from primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality are [k1ansvar1_ran2] than in comparable neighbouring municipalities regarding a number of important indicators.

In your opinion, what are the most important explanations regarding the primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Policies and funding from the County Authority/Government.
Post-question: Select all the alternatives that apply.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar1_5;p4k1ansvar1_5;j1k1ansvar1_5
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1ansvar1_ran1 og r19k1ansvar1_ran2. Asked on the same page as r19k1ansvar2 and r19k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Multi] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 Not selected 1227 64.7% 0.64749340
1 Selected 633 33.4% 0.33403694
97 Not answered 35 1.8% 0.01846966
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1ansvar2_1


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: Headteachers and school staff
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Headteachers and school staff
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar2_1;j1k1ansvar2_1;p4k1ansvar2_1
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as r19k1ansvar1 and r19k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 1162 61.3% 0.61319261
2 2 381 20.1% 0.20105541
3 3 139 7.3% 0.07335092
97 Not answered 213 11.2% 0.11240106
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1ansvar2_2


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: Public sector employees/municipal administration
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Public sector employees / municipal administration
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar2_2;j1k1ansvar2_2;p4k1ansvar2_2
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as r19k1ansvar1 and r19k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 80 4.2% 0.04221636
2 2 201 10.6% 0.10606860
3 3 401 21.2% 0.21160950
97 Not answered 1213 64% 0.64010554
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1ansvar2_3


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: Parents
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: Parents
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar2_3;j1k1ansvar2_3;p4k1ansvar2_3
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as r19k1ansvar1 and r19k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 261 13.8% 0.1377309
2 2 690 36.4% 0.3641161
3 3 319 16.8% 0.1683377
97 Not answered 625 33% 0.3298153
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1ansvar2_4


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: The parties in power/The mayor’s political party
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: The parties in power/ The mayor’s political party
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar2_4;j1k1ansvar2_4;p4k1ansvar2_4
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as r19k1ansvar1 and r19k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 88 4.6% 0.04643799
2 2 186 9.8% 0.09815303
3 3 262 13.8% 0.13825858
97 Not answered 1359 71.7% 0.71715040
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1ansvar2_5


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: The opposition/Municipal councillors who are not members of the mayor’s political party
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: The opposition / Municipal councillors who are not members of the mayor’s political party
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar2_5;j1k1ansvar2_5;p4k1ansvar2_5
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as r19k1ansvar1 and r19k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 9 0.5% 0.00474934
2 2 29 1.5% 0.01530343
3 3 74 3.9% 0.03905013
97 Not answered 1783 94.1% 0.94089710
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1ansvar2_6


Variable label: Most responsible for school results in your municipality: The county authority/ National government
Pre-question text: In what order would you rank the following actors in terms of who you think is most responsible for these primary and lower secondary school results in your municipality?
Literal question: The county authority/ National government
Post-question: Please rank three actors. The alternative that you consider most important should be ranked as number 1. To rank the alternatives, click on them in the preferred order. If you change your mind, you can click on them again to remove the ticks.
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar2_6;j1k1ansvar2_6;p4k1ansvar2_6
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]

[Asked on the same page as r19k1ansvar1 and r19k1ansvar3.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Ranking] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 214 11.3% 0.11292876
2 2 174 9.2% 0.09182058
3 3 381 20.1% 0.20105541
97 Not answered 1126 59.4% 0.59419525
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1ansvar3


Variable label: Whether new results for schools would have affected the voter turnout for the mayor’s political party
Literal question: Do you think these new results for primary and lower secondary schools in your municipality would have affected the voter turnout for the mayor’s political party at the next local election?
Question owner: Nanna Lauritz Schönhage (VUB); Martin Bækgaard (AU); Benny Geys (BI)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ansvar3;j1k1ansvar3;p4k1ansvar3
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[Asked on the same page as r19k1ansvar1 and r19k1ansvar2.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly unlikely 105 5.5% 0.055408971
2 Quite unlikely 240 12.7% 0.126649077
3 Unlikely 326 17.2% 0.172031662
4 Neutral 668 35.3% 0.352506596
5 Likely 381 20.1% 0.201055409
6 Quite likely 92 4.9% 0.048548813
7 Highly likely 8 0.4% 0.004221636
97 Not answered 75 4% 0.039577836
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1udidir1_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1udidir1]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1udidir1_ran1;p4k1udidir1_ran1;f1k1udidir1_ran1
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 5]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1udidir1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:1860] [Invalid:10600] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The new director has several years of experience in the field of immigration. Hansen has extensive political experience and has recently been a state secretary (deputy minister) in the Ministry of Justice and Public Security. 435 23.4% 0.2338710
2 The new director does not have experience in the field of immigration. Hansen has extensive political experience and has recently been a state secretary (deputy minister) in the Ministry of Transport. 460 24.7% 0.2473118
3 The new director has several years of experience in the field of immigration. Hansen arrives after leaving his position as Director General (administrative deputy) in the Ministry of Justice and Public Security. He has also held several other positions in central administration. 464 24.9% 0.2494624
4 The new director does not have experience in the field of immigration. Hansen arrives after leaving his position as Director General (administrative deputy) in the Ministry of Transport. He has also held several other positions in central administration. 501 26.9% 0.2693548
Sysmiss 10600 NA


r19k1udidir1


Variable label: How well qualified is Jan Hansen regarding the position of director at the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration?
Pre-question text: Imagine a case where a person, Jan Hansen, is employed as the new director of the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (UDI). The Norwegian Directorate of Immigration is governed by the Ministry of Justice and Public Security and implements the Government’s refugee and immigration policies. [k1udidir1_ran1]
Literal question: How well qualified do you think Jan Hansen is regarding the position of director at the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration?
Question owner: Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: p4k1udidir1;j1k1udidir1;f1k1udidir1
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 5]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1udidir1_ran1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well qualified 99 5.2% 0.05224274
2 Well qualified 505 26.6% 0.26649077
3 Somewhat qualified 338 17.8% 0.17836412
4 Neither well nor poorly qualified 355 18.7% 0.18733509
5 Somewhat poorly qualified 294 15.5% 0.15514512
6 Poorly qualified 206 10.9% 0.10870712
7 Very poorly qualified 41 2.2% 0.02163588
97 Not answered 57 3% 0.03007916
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1udidir2


Variable label: What advice do you think UDI’s Director Hansen will give the minister on how the case should be handled politically?
Pre-question text: Imagine a case emerging where government policy is clearly in violation of a recommendation set out by experts from the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration. The Minister of Justice and Public Security is aware of the professional recommendation, but still asks UDI’s Director Jan Hansen for advice on how the case should be handled politically.
Literal question: What advice do you think Hansen will give the minister?
Question owner: Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1udidir2;j1k1udidir2;p4k1udidir2
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To fully follow the professional recommendation 200 10.6% 0.10554090
2 To follow the professional recommendation to a large extent 713 37.6% 0.37625330
3 To follow the professional recommendation to some extent 316 16.7% 0.16675462
4 Follow both in equal measures 194 10.2% 0.10237467
5 To follow the Government’s original policy to some extent 147 7.8% 0.07757256
6 To follow the Government’s original policy to a large extent 177 9.3% 0.09340369
7 To fully follow the Government’s original policy 58 3.1% 0.03060686
97 Not answered 90 4.7% 0.04749340
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1udidir3


Variable label: How do you think UDI’s Director Hansen will resolve this case practically?
Pre-question text: The Minister of Justice and Public Security decides to disregard the professional recommendation. As Director of UDI, Jan Hansen can still influence how the case is practically resolved.  
Literal question: How do you think Hansen will resolve this case?
Post-question: He will…:
Question owner: Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1udidir3;j1k1udidir3;p4k1udidir3
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Fully follow the professional recommendation 106 5.6% 0.05593668
2 Follow the professional recommendation to a large extent 352 18.6% 0.18575198
3 Follow the professional recommendation to some extent 307 16.2% 0.16200528
4 Follow the professional recommendation and the political decision in equal measures 353 18.6% 0.18627968
5 Follow government policy to some extent 253 13.4% 0.13350923
6 Follow government policy to a large extent 292 15.4% 0.15408971
7 Fully follow government policy 110 5.8% 0.05804749
97 Not answered 122 6.4% 0.06437995
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1udidir4


Variable label: How UDI’s Director Hansen will manage the new government’s less restrictive refugee and immigration policy
Pre-question text: Imagine that there is a change of government and the new government has a new, less restrictive refugee and immigration policy.  
Literal question: How do you think Hansen as UDI’s Director will manage the new government policy?
Post-question: He will…
Question owner: Jostein Askim (UiO); Tobias Bach (UiO); Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1udidir4;j1k1udidir4;p4k1udidir4
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Fully implement the new government policy 236 12.5% 0.12453826
2 Implement the new government policy to a large extent 539 28.4% 0.28443272
3 Implement the new government policy to some extent 330 17.4% 0.17414248
4 Try to find solutions that are halfway between the new government policy and the old, more restrictive policy 503 26.5% 0.26543536
5 Retain the old, restrictive policy to some extent 102 5.4% 0.05382586
6 Retain the old, restrictive policy to a large extent 44 2.3% 0.02321900
7 Fully retain the old, restrictive policy 21 1.1% 0.01108179
97 Not answered 120 6.3% 0.06332454
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1demtech1_1


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Public sector bureaucrats
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Public sector bureaucrats
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech1_1;j1k1demtech1_1;p4k1demtech1_1
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 99 5.2% 0.05224274
2 To a large extent 662 34.9% 0.34934037
3 To some extent 716 37.8% 0.37783641
4 To a small extent 274 14.5% 0.14459103
5 Not at all 65 3.4% 0.03430079
97 Not answered 79 4.2% 0.04168865
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1demtech1_2


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Teachers
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Teachers
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech1_2;j1k1demtech1_2;p4k1demtech1_2
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 201 10.6% 0.10606860
2 To a large extent 856 45.2% 0.45171504
3 To some extent 565 29.8% 0.29815303
4 To a small extent 162 8.5% 0.08548813
5 Not at all 34 1.8% 0.01794195
97 Not answered 77 4.1% 0.04063325
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1demtech1_3


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Journalists
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Journalists
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech1_3;j1k1demtech1_3;p4k1demtech1_3
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 47 2.5% 0.02480211
2 To a large extent 413 21.8% 0.21794195
3 To some extent 727 38.4% 0.38364116
4 To a small extent 486 25.6% 0.25646438
5 Not at all 140 7.4% 0.07387863
97 Not answered 82 4.3% 0.04327177
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1demtech1_4


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Researchers
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Researchers
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech1_4;j1k1demtech1_4;p4k1demtech1_4
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 339 17.9% 0.17889182
2 To a large extent 788 41.6% 0.41583113
3 To some extent 497 26.2% 0.26226913
4 To a small extent 151 8% 0.07968338
5 Not at all 41 2.2% 0.02163588
97 Not answered 79 4.2% 0.04168865
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1demtech1_5


Variable label: Do their job without being influenced by their own political views: Judges
Pre-question text: To what extent do you think you can trust people in the following professions to do their job without being influenced by their own political views?
Literal question: Judges
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech1_5;j1k1demtech1_5;p4k1demtech1_5
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very large extent 450 23.7% 0.23746702
2 To a large extent 834 44% 0.44010554
3 To some extent 371 19.6% 0.19577836
4 To a small extent 123 6.5% 0.06490765
5 Not at all 42 2.2% 0.02216359
97 Not answered 75 4% 0.03957784
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1demtech2_1


Variable label: Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Crisis management
Pre-question text: The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence. Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
Literal question: Crisis management
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech2_1;j1k1demtech2_1;p4k1demtech2_1
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Politicians should have full influence over the issue 52 2.7% 0.02744063
2 Politicians should have much more influence than experts 56 3% 0.02955145
3 Politicians should have more influence than experts 177 9.3% 0.09340369
4 Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence 473 25% 0.24960422
5 Experts should have more influence than politicians 586 30.9% 0.30923483
6 Experts should have much more influence than politicians 368 19.4% 0.19419525
7 Experts should have full influence over the issue 108 5.7% 0.05699208
97 Not answered 75 4% 0.03957784
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1demtech2_2


Variable label: Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Finance
Pre-question text: The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence. Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
Literal question: Finance
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech2_2;j1k1demtech2_2;p4k1demtech2_2
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Politicians should have full influence over the issue 56 3% 0.02955145
2 Politicians should have much more influence than experts 135 7.1% 0.07124011
3 Politicians should have more influence than experts 363 19.2% 0.19155673
4 Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence 552 29.1% 0.29129288
5 Experts should have more influence than politicians 453 23.9% 0.23905013
6 Experts should have much more influence than politicians 220 11.6% 0.11609499
7 Experts should have full influence over the issue 38 2% 0.02005277
97 Not answered 78 4.1% 0.04116095
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1demtech2_3


Variable label: Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Immigration
Pre-question text: The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence. Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
Literal question: Immigration
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech2_3;j1k1demtech2_3;p4k1demtech2_3
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Politicians should have full influence over the issue 106 5.6% 0.05593668
2 Politicians should have much more influence than experts 195 10.3% 0.10290237
3 Politicians should have more influence than experts 398 21% 0.21002639
4 Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence 582 30.7% 0.30712401
5 Experts should have more influence than politicians 325 17.2% 0.17150396
6 Experts should have much more influence than politicians 156 8.2% 0.08232190
7 Experts should have full influence over the issue 53 2.8% 0.02796834
97 Not answered 80 4.2% 0.04221636
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1demtech2_4


Variable label: Should experts or politicians have the most influence on: Criminal policy
Pre-question text: The amount of influence that experts and elected politicians have on different areas of society varies. In some areas, experts have the most influence, while in other areas, politicians have the most influence. Who do you think should have the most influence on the following areas?
Literal question: Criminal policy
Question owner: Jonas Linde (UiB); Lars Erik Berntzen (UiB); Andrej Kokkonen (GU)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1demtech2_4;j1k1demtech2_4;p4k1demtech2_4
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Politicians should have full influence over the issue 64 3.4% 0.03377309
2 Politicians should have much more influence than experts 118 6.2% 0.06226913
3 Politicians should have more influence than experts 278 14.7% 0.14670185
4 Politicians and experts should have the same amount of influence 461 24.3% 0.24327177
5 Experts should have more influence than politicians 511 27% 0.26965699
6 Experts should have much more influence than politicians 297 15.7% 0.15672823
7 Experts should have full influence over the issue 84 4.4% 0.04432718
97 Not answered 82 4.3% 0.04327177
98 Not asked 10565 NA


r19k1sentral1


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Central authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway
Pre-question text:

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:

Literal question: Central authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1sentral1;j1k1sentral1;p4k1sentral1
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 319 15.8% 0.157764590
2 Agree 467 23.1% 0.230959446
3 Somewhat agree 588 29.1% 0.290801187
4 Neither agree nor disagree 321 15.9% 0.158753709
5 Somewhat disagree 143 7.1% 0.070722057
6 Disagree 134 6.6% 0.066271019
7 Strongly disagree 44 2.2% 0.021760633
97 Not answered 6 0.3% 0.002967359
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1sentral2


Variable label: Where do you think it is best for children to grow up? 
Literal question: Where do you think it is best for children to grow up? 
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1sentral2;j1k1sentral2;p4k1sentral2
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A big city 19 0.9% 0.009396637
2 A suburb or the outskirts of a big city 263 13% 0.130069238
3 A small or medium-sized city 805 39.8% 0.398120673
4 A village 393 19.4% 0.194362018
5 A sparsely populated area 106 5.2% 0.052423343
6 It does not matter 427 21.1% 0.211177052
97 Not answered 9 0.4% 0.004451039
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1sentral3_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses r19k1sentral3a or r19k1sentral3b]
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1sentral3_ran1;j1k1sentral3_ran1;p4k1sentral3_ran1
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 6]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses r19k1sentral3a or r19k1sentral3b]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2020] [Invalid:10440] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Selects k1sentral3a 1068 52.9% 0.5287129
2 Selects k1sentral3b 952 47.1% 0.4712871
Sysmiss 10440 NA


r19k1sentral3a


Variable label: What do you agree with the most: Public institutions should be A) larger/fewer or B) smaller/several
Pre-question text: Generally speaking, which of the following statements do you agree with the most:
Literal question:

A: There should be larger and fewer public institutions, such as municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police districts.

B: There should be smaller and more public institutions, such as municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police districts.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1sentral3a;j1k1sentral3a;p4k1sentral3a
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6 & r19k1sentral3_ran1 = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree with A 59 5.5% 0.055243446
2 Agree much more with A 79 7.4% 0.073970037
3 Agree somewhat more with A 166 15.5% 0.155430712
4 Equally agree with A and B 99 9.3% 0.092696629
5 Agree somewhat more with B 332 31.1% 0.310861423
6 Agree much more with B 204 19.1% 0.191011236
7 Completely agree with B 127 11.9% 0.118913858
97 Not answered 2 0.2% 0.001872659
98 Not asked 11392 NA


r19k1sentral3b


Variable label: What do you agree with the most: Public institutions should be A) smaller/several or B) larger/fewer
Pre-question text: Generally speaking, which of the following statements do you agree with the most:
Literal question:

A: There should be smaller and more public institutions, such as municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police districts.

B: There should be larger and fewer public institutions, such as municipalities, hospitals, educational institutions and police districts.
Question owner: Anne Lise Fimreite (UiB); Kiran Auerbach (UiB); Marta R. Eidheim (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1sentral3b;j1k1sentral3b;p4k1sentral3b
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6 & r19k1sentral3_ran1 = 2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely agree with A 185 19.4% 0.194327731
2 Agree much more with A 193 20.3% 0.202731092
3 Agree somewhat more with A 218 22.9% 0.228991597
4 Equally agree with A and B 122 12.8% 0.128151261
5 Agree somewhat more with B 128 13.4% 0.134453782
6 Agree much more with B 67 7% 0.070378151
7 Completely agree with B 34 3.6% 0.035714286
97 Not answered 5 0.5% 0.005252101
98 Not asked 11508 NA


r19k1ulikhet1_1


Variable label: To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to: Hard work
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
Literal question: Hard work
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ulikhet1_1;j1k1ulikhet1_1;p4k1ulikhet1_1
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 832 41.1% 0.411473788
2 Agree 834 41.2% 0.412462908
3 Somewhat agree 206 10.2% 0.101879327
4 Neither agree nor disagree 89 4.4% 0.044015826
5 Somewhat disagree 23 1.1% 0.011374876
6 Disagree 16 0.8% 0.007912957
7 Strongly disagree 9 0.4% 0.004451039
97 Not answered 13 0.6% 0.006429278
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1ulikhet1_2


Variable label: To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to: Luck
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
Literal question: Luck
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ulikhet1_2;j1k1ulikhet1_2;p4k1ulikhet1_2
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 198 9.8% 0.09792285
2 Agree 410 20.3% 0.20276954
3 Somewhat agree 345 17.1% 0.17062315
4 Neither agree nor disagree 601 29.7% 0.29723046
5 Somewhat disagree 137 6.8% 0.06775470
6 Disagree 136 6.7% 0.06726014
7 Strongly disagree 76 3.8% 0.03758655
97 Not answered 119 5.9% 0.05885262
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1ulikhet1_3


Variable label: To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to: Talent
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
Literal question: Talent
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ulikhet1_3;j1k1ulikhet1_3;p4k1ulikhet1_3
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 452 22.4% 0.223541048
2 Agree 830 41% 0.410484669
3 Somewhat agree 391 19.3% 0.193372898
4 Neither agree nor disagree 194 9.6% 0.095944609
5 Somewhat disagree 32 1.6% 0.015825915
6 Disagree 15 0.7% 0.007418398
7 Strongly disagree 11 0.5% 0.005440158
97 Not answered 97 4.8% 0.047972305
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1ulikhet1_4


Variable label: To what extent fair that a person has high level of wealth due to: Family
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is fair that a person has a high level of wealth due to the following reasons?
Literal question: Family
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ulikhet1_4;j1k1ulikhet1_4;p4k1ulikhet1_4
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 225 11.1% 0.11127596
2 Agree 459 22.7% 0.22700297
3 Somewhat agree 404 20% 0.19980218
4 Neither agree nor disagree 426 21.1% 0.21068249
5 Somewhat disagree 180 8.9% 0.08902077
6 Disagree 153 7.6% 0.07566766
7 Strongly disagree 68 3.4% 0.03363007
97 Not answered 107 5.3% 0.05291790
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1ulikhet2_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1ulikhet2]
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ulikhet2_ran1;p4k1ulikhet2_ran1;f1k1ulikhet2_ran1
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 6]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1ulikhet2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2020] [Invalid:10440] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 679 33.6% 0.3361386
2 In Norway, the richest 10 percent of households own half of Norway’s private wealth. 705 34.9% 0.3490099
3 In Norway today, the poorest 50 percent of households own 5 percent of Norway’s private wealth. 636 31.5% 0.3148515
Sysmiss 10440 NA


r19k1ulikhet2_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1ulikhet2]
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ulikhet2_ran2;p4k1ulikhet2_ran2;f1k1ulikhet2_ran2
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 6]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1ulikhet2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2020] [Invalid:10440] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 unequal political influence and power 507 25.1% 0.2509901
2 unequal life opportunities 509 25.2% 0.2519802
3 increased crime 490 24.3% 0.2425743
4 greater economic differences between men and women 514 25.4% 0.2544554
Sysmiss 10440 NA


r19k1ulikhet2_ran3


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1ulikhet2]
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1ulikhet2_ran3;p4k1ulikhet2_ran3;f1k1ulikhet2_ran3
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 6]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1ulikhet2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2020] [Invalid:10440] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Reintroducing inheritance tax 491 24.3% 0.2430693
2 Increasing wealth tax 491 24.3% 0.2430693
3 Raising taxes on very high incomes 515 25.5% 0.2549505
4 State capital transfers of approximately NOK 1 million to all Norwegian citizens when they turn 27 years old 523 25.9% 0.2589109
Sysmiss 10440 NA


r19k1ulikhet2


Variable label: Your opinion on political propsal aimed at reducing wealth inequality
Pre-question text:

We would like to know your opinion on a political proposal aimed at reducing wealth inequality. [k1ulikhet2_ran1] Although wealth inequality may be fair for various reasons, it may lead to [k1ulikhet2_ran2].

[k1ulikhet2_ran3] may reduce wealth inequality.
Literal question: To what extent would you oppose or support such a proposal?
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ulikhet2;p4k1ulikhet2;j1k1ulikhet2;f1k1ulikhet2
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 6]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1ulikhet2_ran1, r19k1ulikhet2_ran2 and r19k1ulikhet2_ran3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very strongly oppose 230 11.4% 0.113748764
2 Strongly oppose 284 14% 0.140454995
3 Somewhat oppose 324 16% 0.160237389
4 Neither oppose nor support 288 14.2% 0.142433234
5 Somewhat support 437 21.6% 0.216122651
6 Support strongly 292 14.4% 0.144411474
7 Very strongly support 159 7.9% 0.078635015
97 Not answered 8 0.4% 0.003956479
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1miljo2


Variable label: Overall, what do you think about the efforts being made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Norway?
Pre-question text: Norway has set itself the objective of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to prevent harmful climate change. In order to achieve the objective of reducing emissions, a number of measures have been initiated.
Literal question: Overall, what do you think about the efforts being made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in Norway?
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1miljo2;j1k1miljo2;p4k1miljo2
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 6]

[Answer list display order: Flip]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The efforts are too small 848 41.9% 0.419386746
2 The efforts are appropriate 893 44.2% 0.441641939
3 The efforts are too great 270 13.4% 0.133531157
97 Not answered 11 0.5% 0.005440158
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1miljo3


Variable label: What do you think about the technology used to limit climate change?
Pre-question text: One of the measures that Norway has worked on to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is the capture and storage of CO2 (carbon dioxide). On a large scale, the technology can play an important role in limiting climate change.
Literal question: What do you think about this technology?
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1miljo3;j1k1miljo3;p4k1miljo3
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 6]

[Answer list display order: Flip]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very negative 94 4.6% 0.046488625
2 Slightly negative 155 7.7% 0.076656775
3 Slightly positive 628 31.1% 0.310583581
4 Very positive 810 40.1% 0.400593472
5 No opinion / do not know 327 16.2% 0.161721068
97 Not answered 8 0.4% 0.003956479
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1sm1


Variable label: Do politicians or the media primarily decide which issues are put on the agenda?
Pre-question text: In your opinion…
Literal question: do politicians or the media primarily decide which issues are put on the agenda?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1sm1;p4k1sm1
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Primarily politicians 80 4% 0.039564787
2 Politicians, to a greater extent 145 7.2% 0.071711177
3 Politicians, to a somewhat greater extent 263 13% 0.130069238
4 The media and politicians have equal influence 485 24% 0.239861523
5 The media, to a somewhat greater extent 605 29.9% 0.299208704
6 The media, to a greater extent 335 16.6% 0.165677547
7 Primarily the media 104 5.1% 0.051434224
97 Not answered 5 0.2% 0.002472799
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1sm2


Variable label: Does traditional media or social media matter most regarding which issues are put on the agenda?
Pre-question text: In your opinion…
Literal question: does traditional media or social media matter most regarding which issues are put on the agenda?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1sm2;p4k1sm2
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Primarily traditional media 275 13.6% 0.13600396
2 Traditional media, to a greater extent 395 19.5% 0.19535114
3 Traditional media, to a somewhat greater extent 483 23.9% 0.23887240
4 Traditional and social media have equal influence 436 21.6% 0.21562809
5 Social media, to a somewhat greater extent 292 14.4% 0.14441147
6 Social media, to a greater extent 88 4.4% 0.04352127
7 Primarily social media 22 1.1% 0.01088032
97 Not answered 31 1.5% 0.01533136
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1sm3


Variable label: Politicians’ agenda in social media, to brag about themselves and their own policies or to make contact/dialogue?
Pre-question text: In your opinion…
Literal question: are politicians who post issues on social media mostly just concerned with bragging about themselves and their own policies, or do you think they want to make contact and create a dialogue?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1sm3;p4k1sm3
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Primarily concerned with bragging about themselves and their own policies 358 17.7% 0.17705242
2 Concerned to a greater extent with bragging about themselves and their own policies 455 22.5% 0.22502473
3 Concerned to a somewhat greater extent with bragging about themselves and their own policies 475 23.5% 0.23491592
4 Equally concerned with bragging about themselves and their own policies as wanting to make contact and create a dialogue 393 19.4% 0.19436202
5 To a somewhat greater extent, want to make contact and create a dialogue 202 10% 0.09990109
6 To a greater extent, want to make contact and create a dialogue 74 3.7% 0.03659743
7 Primarily, want to make contact and create a dialogue 37 1.8% 0.01829871
97 Not answered 28 1.4% 0.01384768
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1sm4


Variable label: Social media as enriching or detrimental to the public debate?
Pre-question text: In your opinion…
Literal question: is social media essentially enriching the public political debate, or is social media essentially detrimental to the public political debate?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1sm4;p4k1sm4
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Social media is very enriching 40 2% 0.01978239
2 Social media is quite enriching 170 8.4% 0.08407517
3 Social media is somewhat enriching 404 20% 0.19980218
4 Equally enriching as it is detrimental to the public political debate 494 24.4% 0.24431256
5 Social media is somewhat detrimental 517 25.6% 0.25568744
6 Social media is quite detrimental 299 14.8% 0.14787339
7 Social media is very detrimental 73 3.6% 0.03610287
97 Not answered 25 1.2% 0.01236400
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1sm101


Variable label: The importance of politicians in social media for you to keep up to date with political news stories
Literal question: How much does politicians’ social media activity mean to you when it comes to keeping up to date with important political news stories?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A lot 35 1.7% 0.017309594
2 Quite a lot 186 9.2% 0.091988131
3 A little 369 18.2% 0.182492582
4 Neither a lot nor not a lot 228 11.3% 0.112759644
5 Not a lot 379 18.7% 0.187438180
6 Very little 431 21.3% 0.213155292
7 Nothing at all 382 18.9% 0.188921860
97 Not answered 12 0.6% 0.005934718
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1sm102_1


Variable label: Experience how often: Politicians discuss issues on social media that are not covered in traditional media
Pre-question text: How often would you say you…
Literal question: experience politicians discussing issues on social media that are not covered in traditional media?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Never 95 4.7% 0.04698318
2 Very rarely 244 12.1% 0.12067260
3 Rarely 333 16.5% 0.16468843
4 Sometimes 455 22.5% 0.22502473
5 Often 126 6.2% 0.06231454
6 Very often 27 1.3% 0.01335312
7 I don’t read content written by politicians on social media 714 35.3% 0.35311573
97 Not answered 28 1.4% 0.01384768
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1sm102_2


Variable label: Experience how often: Politicians on social media offering a new angle to a news story
Pre-question text: How often would you say you…
Literal question: experience politicians on social media offering a new angle to a news story?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Never 81 4% 0.04005935
2 Very rarely 220 10.9% 0.10880317
3 Rarely 349 17.3% 0.17260138
4 Sometimes 491 24.3% 0.24282888
5 Often 123 6.1% 0.06083086
6 Very often 27 1.3% 0.01335312
7 I don’t read content written by politicians on social media 690 34.1% 0.34124629
97 Not answered 41 2% 0.02027695
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1sm102_3


Variable label: Experience how often: Learn something from what politicians write on social media
Pre-question text: How often would you say you…
Literal question: learn something from what politicians write on social media?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Never 133 6.6% 0.065776459
2 Very rarely 280 13.8% 0.138476756
3 Rarely 350 17.3% 0.173095945
4 Sometimes 448 22.2% 0.221562809
5 Often 77 3.8% 0.038081108
6 Very often 17 0.8% 0.008407517
7 I don’t read content written by politicians on social media 675 33.4% 0.333827893
97 Not answered 42 2.1% 0.020771513
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1sm102_4


Variable label: Experience how often: Adjust your points of view after reading something politicians write on social media
Pre-question text: How often would you say you…
Literal question: adjust your points of view after reading something politicians write on social media?
Question owner: Kari Steen-Johnsen (ISF); Audun Beyer (ISF); Rune Karlsen (UiO)
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Never 218 10.8% 0.107814045
2 Very rarely 361 17.9% 0.178536103
3 Rarely 363 18% 0.179525223
4 Sometimes 338 16.7% 0.167161227
5 Often 19 0.9% 0.009396637
6 Very often 6 0.3% 0.002967359
7 I don’t read content written by politicians on social media 675 33.4% 0.333827893
97 Not answered 42 2.1% 0.020771513
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1fb1_imgnames_1


Variable label: [Image drawn randomly for “News story 1”. Used i r19k1fb1.]
Question owner: Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO), Rune Karlsen (UiO), Erik Knudsen (UiB/DIGSSCORE), Damian Trilling (University of Amsterdam)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1fb1_imgnames_1;p4k1fb1_imgnames_1
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 6]

[Image drawn randomly for “News story 1”. Used i r19k1fb1.]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:2015] [Invalid:10445] [Range:-]



r19k1fb1_imgnames_2


Variable label: [Image drawn randomly for “News story 2”. Used i r19k1fb1.]
Question owner: Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO), Rune Karlsen (UiO), Erik Knudsen (UiB/DIGSSCORE), Damian Trilling (University of Amsterdam)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1fb1_imgnames_2;p4k1fb1_imgnames_2
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 6]

[Image drawn randomly for “News story 2”. Used i r19k1fb1.]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open Text List] [Format:character] [Valid:2015] [Invalid:10445] [Range:-]



r19k1fb1


Variable label: Which of two news stories you most likely would share on Facebook
Pre-question text:

Below, we will present two imaginary news stories similar to those one comes across on Facebook. Please look closely at each of the two imaginary news stories.

[Simulert Facebook-innlegg]
Literal question: If you had to choose one of them, which news story would you have chosen to share on Facebook?
Post-question: We are interested in responses from everyone, including those who do not usually share content on Facebook or do not have a Facebook account.
Question owner: Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO), Rune Karlsen (UiO), Erik Knudsen (UiB/DIGSSCORE), Damian Trilling (University of Amsterdam)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1fb1;p4k1fb1
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 6]

[Experiment where the respondent is exposed to two unique images of simulated Facebook posts. See background variables. Please contact Erik Knudsen () for more information. Asked on the same page as r19k1fb2 and r19k1fb3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I would share news story 1 959 47.4% 0.47428289
2 I would share news story 2 901 44.6% 0.44559842
97 Not answered 162 8% 0.08011869
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1fb2


Variable label: How likely is it that you would have shared News story 1 on Facebook?
Literal question: On a scale from 1 to 5, how likely is it that you would have shared News story 1 on Facebook?
Question owner: Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO); Rune Karlsen (UiO); Erik Knudsen (UiB); Damian Trilling (UvA)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1fb2;p4k1fb2
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 6]

[Asked on the same page as r19k1fb1 and r19k1fb3]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Not at all likely 1222 60.4% 0.604352127
2 2 - Not very likely 492 24.3% 0.243323442
3 3 - Somewhat likely 186 9.2% 0.091988131
4 4 - Likely 49 2.4% 0.024233432
5 5 - Highly likely 17 0.8% 0.008407517
97 Not answered 56 2.8% 0.027695351
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1fb3


Variable label: How likely is it that you would have shared News story 2 on Facebook?
Literal question: Using the same scale, how likely is it that you would have shared News story 2 on Facebook?
Question owner: Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO); Rune Karlsen (UiO); Erik Knudsen (UiB); Damian Trilling (UvA)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1fb3;p4k1fb3
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 6]

[Asked on the same page as r19k1fb1 and r19k1fb2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Not at all likely 1195 59.1% 0.59099901
2 2 - Not very likely 450 22.3% 0.22255193
3 3 - Somewhat likely 210 10.4% 0.10385757
4 4 - Likely 73 3.6% 0.03610287
5 5 - Highly likely 37 1.8% 0.01829871
97 Not answered 57 2.8% 0.02818991
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1mi1_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1mi1_1 and r19k1mi1_2]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi1_ran1;p4k1mi1_ran1;f1k1mi1_ran1
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 6]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1mi1_1 and r19k1mi1_2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2003] [Invalid:10457] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Islamic values 1009 50.4% 0.5037444
2 conservative notions about the position of women in Islam 994 49.6% 0.4962556
Sysmiss 10457 NA


r19k1mi1_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses r19k1mi1_1 or r19k1mi1_2]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi1_ran2;p4k1mi1_ran2;f1k1mi1_ran2
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 6]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses r19k1mi1_1 or r19k1mi1_2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2003] [Invalid:10457] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 k1mi1_1 976 48.7% 0.4872691
2 k1mi1_2 1027 51.3% 0.5127309
Sysmiss 10457 NA


r19k1mi1_1


Variable label: Should Norwegian Muslims be allowed to hold an event to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about the position of women in Islam]?
Pre-question text: Some Norwegian Muslims have asked for permission to hold a public event in order to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about the position of women in Islam].
Literal question: Do you think they should be allowed to hold such an event?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi1_1;j1k1mi1_1;p4k1mi1_1
Technical description:

[Asked if r19k1mi1_ran2 = 1 & r19group = 6]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1mi1_ran1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 508 52% 0.52049180
2 No 457 46.8% 0.46823770
97 Not answered 11 1.1% 0.01127049
98 Not asked 11484 NA


r19k1mi1_2


Variable label: Does a majority/minority in Norway that muslims should be allowed to hold an event to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about the position of women in Islam]?
Pre-question text: Some Norwegian Muslims have asked for permission to hold a public event in order to proclaim [Islamic values/ conservative notions about the position of women in Islam]. What is your assessment:
Literal question: Is there a majority or a minority in Norway who thinks that they should be allowed to hold such an event?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi1_2;j1k1mi1_2;p4k1mi1_2
Technical description:

[Asked if r19k1mi1_ran2 = 2 & r19group = 6]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1mi1_ran1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A majortiy 318 31% 0.309639727
2 A minority 704 68.5% 0.685491723
97 Not answered 5 0.5% 0.004868549
98 Not asked 11433 NA


r19k1mi2_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1mi2_1 and r19k1mi2_2]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi2_ran1;p4k1mi2_ran1;f1k1mi2_ran1
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 6]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1mi2_1 and r19k1mi2_2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2002] [Invalid:10458] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 be publicly recognised 984 49.2% 0.4915085
2 receive support from the state 1018 50.8% 0.5084915
Sysmiss 10458 NA


r19k1mi2_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses r19k1mi2_1 or r19k1mi2_2]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi2_ran2;p4k1mi2_ran2;f1k1mi2_ran2
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 6]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses r19k1mi2_1 or r19k1mi2_2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2002] [Invalid:10458] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 k1mi2_1 948 47.4% 0.4735265
2 k1mi2_2 1054 52.6% 0.5264735
Sysmiss 10458 NA


r19k1mi2_1


Variable label: Do you think that Muslim traditions should [be publicly recognised/receive support from the state] in this country?
Literal question: Do you think that Muslim traditions and cultures should [be publicly recognised/receive support from the state] in this country?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi2_1;j1k1mi2_1;p4k1mi2_1
Technical description:

[Asked if r19k1mi2_ran2 = 1 & r19group = 6]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1mi2_ran1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 473 49.9% 0.49894515
2 No 462 48.7% 0.48734177
97 Not answered 13 1.4% 0.01371308
98 Not asked 11512 NA


r19k1mi2_2


Variable label: Does a majority/minority think that Muslim traditions should [be publicly recognised/receive support from the state]in this country?
Pre-question text: What is your assessment:
Literal question: Is there a majority or a minority in Norway who thinks that Muslim traditions and cultures should [be publicly recognised/receive support from the state]in this country?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi2_2;j1k1mi2_2;p4k1mi2_2
Technical description:

[Asked if r19k1mi2_ran2 = 2 & r19group = 6]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1mi2_ran1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A majortiy 329 31.2% 0.31214421
2 A minority 712 67.6% 0.67552182
97 Not answered 13 1.2% 0.01233397
98 Not asked 11406 NA


r19k1mi3_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1mi3_1 and r19k1mi3_2]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi3_ran1;p4k1mi3_ran1;f1k1mi3_ran1
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 6]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1mi3_1 and r19k1mi3_2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2002] [Invalid:10458] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Muslim local politicians 1013 50.6% 0.505994
2 Muslim religious leaders 989 49.4% 0.494006
Sysmiss 10458 NA


r19k1mi3_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses r19k1mi3_1 or r19k1mi3_2]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi3_ran2;p4k1mi3_ran2;f1k1mi3_ran2
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 6]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses r19k1mi3_1 or r19k1mi3_2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2002] [Invalid:10458] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 k1mi3_1 967 48.3% 0.483017
2 k1mi3_2 1035 51.7% 0.516983
Sysmiss 10458 NA


r19k1mi3_1


Variable label: Trust/distrust Muslim [local politicians/religious leaders] when they say they want to be part of Norwegian society?
Literal question: Do you trust or distrust [Muslim local politicians/Muslim religious leaders] when they say they want to be part of Norwegian society?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi3_1;j1k1mi3_1;p4k1mi3_1
Technical description:

[Asked if r19k1mi3_ran2 = 1 & r19group = 6]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1mi3_ran1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Trust 590 61% 0.61013444
2 Distrust 364 37.6% 0.37642192
97 Not answered 13 1.3% 0.01344364
98 Not asked 11493 NA


r19k1mi3_2


Variable label: Does majority/minority trust/distrust [Muslim local politicians/Muslim religious leaders] when they say they want to be part of Norwegian society?
Pre-question text: What is your assessment:
Literal question: Does the majority in Norway trust or distrust [Muslim local politicians/Muslim religious leaders] when they say they want to be part of Norwegian society?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi3_2;j1k1mi3_2;p4k1mi3_2
Technical description:

[Asked if r19k1mi3_ran2 = 2 & r19group = 6]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1mi3_ran1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The majority trusts 503 48.6% 0.48599034
2 The majority distrusts 516 49.9% 0.49855072
97 Not answered 16 1.5% 0.01545894
98 Not asked 11425 NA


r19k1mi4_ran1


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1mi4_1 and r19k1mi4_2]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi4_ran1;p4k1mi4_ran1;f1k1mi4_ran1
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 6]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses an alternative for text piping in r19k1mi4_1 and r19k1mi4_2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2002] [Invalid:10458] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 reflect 975 48.7% 0.487013
2 place less emphasis on 1027 51.3% 0.512987
Sysmiss 10458 NA


r19k1mi4_ran2


Variable label: [Experiment. Randomly chooses r19k1mi4_1 or r19k1mi4_2]
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1mi4_ran2;p4k1mi4_ran2;f1k1mi4_ran2
Technical description:

[Randomized if r19group = 6]

[Experiment. Randomly chooses r19k1mi4_1 or r19k1mi4_2]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:2002] [Invalid:10458] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 k1mi4_1 998 49.9% 0.4985015
2 k1mi4_2 1004 50.1% 0.5014985
Sysmiss 10458 NA


r19k1mi4_1


Variable label: Should school textbooks [reflect/place less emphasis on] the religious/cultural diversity in Norway?
Literal question: Do you think primary and lower secondary school textbooks should be written so that they [reflect/place less emphasis on] the religious and cultural diversity in Norway?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi4_1;j1k1mi4_1;p4k1mi4_1
Technical description:

[Asked if r19k1mi4_ran2 = 1 & r19group = 6]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1mi4_ran1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 494 49.5% 0.49498998
2 No 492 49.3% 0.49298597
97 Not answered 12 1.2% 0.01202405
98 Not asked 11462 NA


r19k1mi4_2


Variable label: Does a majority/minority think that school textbooks should [reflect/place less emphasis on] religious/cultural diversity?
Pre-question text: What is your assessment:
Literal question: Is there a majority or a minority in Norway who thinks that primary and lower secondary school textbooks should be written so that they [reflect/place less emphasis on] the religious and cultural diversity in Norway?
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1mi4_2;j1k1mi4_2;p4k1mi4_2
Technical description:

[Asked if r19k1mi4_ran2 = 2 & r19group = 6]

[Experiment. The wording of the question depends on randomized /assigned values in r19k1mi4_ran1]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A majortiy 519 51.7% 0.51693227
2 A minority 463 46.1% 0.46115538
97 Not answered 22 2.2% 0.02191235
98 Not asked 11456 NA


r19k1miljo1_1


Variable label: Statement: People have the right to change the natural environment so that it satisfies their needs
Pre-question text: Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
Literal question: People have the right to change the natural environment so that it satisfies their needs
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1miljo1_1;j1k1miljo1_1;p4k1miljo1_1
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 6]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 16 0.8% 0.007912957
2 Agree 95 4.7% 0.046983185
3 Somewhat agree 474 23.4% 0.234421365
4 Do not agree that much 828 40.9% 0.409495549
5 Do not agree at all 562 27.8% 0.277942631
97 Not answered 47 2.3% 0.023244313
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1miljo1_2


Variable label: Statement: We must take environmental considerations into account, even if it reduces economic growth
Pre-question text: Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
Literal question: We must take environmental considerations into account, even if it reduces economic growth
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1miljo1_2;j1k1miljo1_2;p4k1miljo1_2
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 6]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 507 25.1% 0.25074184
2 Agree 766 37.9% 0.37883284
3 Somewhat agree 506 25% 0.25024728
4 Do not agree that much 158 7.8% 0.07814045
5 Do not agree at all 44 2.2% 0.02176063
97 Not answered 41 2% 0.02027695
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1miljo1_3


Variable label: Statement: Norwegian environmental policy needs the same kind of urgent response as shown in the coronavirus crisis
Pre-question text: Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
Literal question: Norwegian environmental policy needs to see the same kind of urgent response that was shown in relation to the coronavirus crisis
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1miljo1_3;j1k1miljo1_3;p4k1miljo1_3
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 6]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 349 17.3% 0.17260138
2 Agree 601 29.7% 0.29723046
3 Somewhat agree 556 27.5% 0.27497527
4 Do not agree that much 319 15.8% 0.15776459
5 Do not agree at all 156 7.7% 0.07715134
97 Not answered 41 2% 0.02027695
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1miljo1_4


Variable label: Statement: Technological innovations will solve climate problems
Pre-question text: Below are some statements about climate and environmental issues. We would like to know your opinion regarding these statements.
Literal question: Technological innovations will solve climate problems
Question owner: Gisle Andersen (NORCE); Christine Merk (IFW); Åsta D. Nordø, (NORCE)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1miljo1_4;j1k1miljo1_4;p4k1miljo1_4
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 6]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 110 5.4% 0.05440158
2 Agree 465 23% 0.22997033
3 Somewhat agree 1017 50.3% 0.50296736
4 Do not agree that much 293 14.5% 0.14490603
5 Do not agree at all 94 4.6% 0.04648863
97 Not answered 43 2.1% 0.02126607
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1ulikhet3


Variable label: The main reason why some people are poor in Norway
Literal question: The main reason why some people are poor in Norway is…
Post-question: Please select the reason that you think is most important.
Question owner: Ragnhild Muriaas (UiB); Cornelius Cappelen (UiB); Yvette Peters (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1ulikhet3;j1k1ulikhet3;p4k1ulikhet3
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 ... that some of them are generally lazy and work-shy 179 8.9% 0.08852621
2 ... that some of them are unfortunate 489 24.2% 0.24183976
3 ... that some of them come from an underprivileged family 654 32.3% 0.32344214
4 ... that some of them are underpaid 422 20.9% 0.20870425
5 ... that some of them lack innate abilities that are important in working life 222 11% 0.10979228
97 Not answered 56 2.8% 0.02769535
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1fb4


Variable label: Your opinion about refugees who seek asylum in Norway and their opportunity to be granted residence here
Literal question: What is your opinion about refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is today, do you think it should be:
Question owner: Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO); Rune Karlsen (UiO); Erik Knudsen (UiB); Damian Trilling (UvA)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1fb4;p4k1fb4
Technical description: [Asked if pkmeme9besvart != 1 & r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much easier 36 3.9% 0.03934426
2 Easier 115 12.6% 0.12568306
3 Somewhat easier 178 19.5% 0.19453552
4 Same as today 302 33% 0.33005464
5 Slightly more difficult 113 12.3% 0.12349727
6 More difficult 71 7.8% 0.07759563
7 Much more difficult 85 9.3% 0.09289617
97 Not answered 15 1.6% 0.01639344
98 Not asked 11545 NA


r19k1fb5


Variable label: Agree/disagree: The Government should work to reduce income inequality in society
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following suggestion:
Literal question: The Government should work to reduce income inequality in society to greater extent.
Question owner: Kristoffer Kolltveit (UiO); Rune Karlsen (UiO); Erik Knudsen (UiB); Damian Trilling (UvA)
Equivalent in others panels: j1k1fb5;p4k1fb5
Technical description: [Asked if pk60besvart != 1 & r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 254 27.7% 0.27699019
2 Agree 291 31.7% 0.31733915
3 Somewhat agree 207 22.6% 0.22573610
4 Neither agree nor disagree 75 8.2% 0.08178844
5 Somewhat disagree 32 3.5% 0.03489640
6 Disagree 30 3.3% 0.03271538
7 Strongly disagree 8 0.9% 0.00872410
97 Not answered 20 2.2% 0.02181025
98 Not asked 11543 NA


r19k1imcp_1


Variable label: Describes you how well: Important for me to be unprejudiced towards immigrants
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced towards immigrants.
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1imcp_1;j1k1imcp_1;p4k1imcp_1
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 6]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 459 22.7% 0.22700297
2 Good 803 39.7% 0.39713155
3 Somewhat well 291 14.4% 0.14391691
4 Neither well nor poorly 299 14.8% 0.14787339
5 Somewhat poorly 57 2.8% 0.02818991
6 Poorly 39 1.9% 0.01928783
7 Very poorly 32 1.6% 0.01582591
97 Not answered 42 2.1% 0.02077151
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1imcp_2


Variable label: Describes you how well: Don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I don’t want to appear racist, not even to myself.
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1imcp_2;j1k1imcp_2;p4k1imcp_2
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 6]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 511 25.3% 0.25272008
2 Good 756 37.4% 0.37388724
3 Somewhat well 256 12.7% 0.12660732
4 Neither well nor poorly 317 15.7% 0.15677547
5 Somewhat poorly 52 2.6% 0.02571711
6 Poorly 45 2.2% 0.02225519
7 Very poorly 39 1.9% 0.01928783
97 Not answered 46 2.3% 0.02274975
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1imcp_3


Variable label: Describes you how well: Feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1imcp_3;j1k1imcp_3;p4k1imcp_3
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 6]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 192 9.5% 0.09495549
2 Good 407 20.1% 0.20128586
3 Somewhat well 346 17.1% 0.17111771
4 Neither well nor poorly 572 28.3% 0.28288823
5 Somewhat poorly 150 7.4% 0.07418398
6 Poorly 185 9.1% 0.09149357
7 Very poorly 120 5.9% 0.05934718
97 Not answered 50 2.5% 0.02472799
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1imcp_4


Variable label: Describes you how well: Try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of own convictions
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I try to be unprejudiced towards immigrants because of my own convictions.
Question owner: Elisabeth Ivarsflaten (UiB); Paul Sniderman (UiB)
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1imcp_4;j1k1imcp_4;p4k1imcp_4
Technical description:

[Asked if r19group = 6]

[Answer list display order: Randomize]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Grid] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 392 19.4% 0.19386746
2 Good 805 39.8% 0.39812067
3 Somewhat well 343 17% 0.16963403
4 Neither well nor poorly 312 15.4% 0.15430267
5 Somewhat poorly 55 2.7% 0.02720079
6 Poorly 31 1.5% 0.01533136
7 Very poorly 40 2% 0.01978239
97 Not answered 44 2.2% 0.02176063
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19k1kj112


Variable label: Gross annual income
Literal question: What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
Equivalent in others panels: f1k1kj112;j1k1kj112;p4k1kj112
Technical description: [Asked if r19group = 6]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Single] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Less than 150 000 86 4.3% 0.04253215
2 150 001 – 300 000 224 11.1% 0.11078140
3 300 001 – 400 000 282 13.9% 0.13946588
4 400 001 – 500 000 322 15.9% 0.15924827
5 500 001 – 600 000 365 18.1% 0.18051434
6 600 001 – 700 000 237 11.7% 0.11721068
7 700 001 – 800 000 160 7.9% 0.07912957
8 800 001 – 900 000 86 4.3% 0.04253215
9 900 001 – 1 000 000 54 2.7% 0.02670623
10 1 000 001 – 1 100 000 54 2.7% 0.02670623
11 More than 1 100 000 92 4.5% 0.04549951
97 Not answered 60 3% 0.02967359
98 Not asked 10438 NA


r19avslutt


Variable label: Feedback about the survey
Literal question: Do you wish to provide feedback about the survey?
Post-question: If so, write below.
Technical description:

[All respondents asked]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type:Open] [Format:character] [Valid:0] [Invalid:12460] [Range:-]



r19P1


Variable label: Gender
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Male 6150 49.4% 0.4935795
2 Female 6310 50.6% 0.5064205


r19P2


Variable label: Region
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Oslo 1952 15.7% 0.15666132
2 Østlandet 4545 36.5% 0.36476726
3 Sørlandet 617 5% 0.04951846
4 Vestlandet 3364 27% 0.26998395
5 Trøndelag 1022 8.2% 0.08202247
6 Nord-Norge 960 7.7% 0.07704655


r19P3


Variable label: County
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:3-54]

Value Label Cases Percentage
3 Oslo 1952 15.7% 0.15666132
11 Rogaland 1178 9.5% 0.09454254
15 Møre og Romsdal 492 3.9% 0.03948636
18 Nordland 473 3.8% 0.03796148
30 Viken 2955 23.7% 0.23715891
34 Innlandet 684 5.5% 0.05489567
38 Vestfold og Telemark 906 7.3% 0.07271268
42 Agder 617 5% 0.04951846
46 Vestland 1694 13.6% 0.13595506
50 Trøndelag 1022 8.2% 0.08202247
54 Troms og Finnmark 487 3.9% 0.03908507


r19P3_2


Variable label: Constituencies parliament election 2021
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12459] [Invalid:1] [Range:1-19]

Value Label Cases Percentage
3 Østfold 599 4.8% 0.04807769
1 Akershus 1779 14.3% 0.14278835
2 Oslo 1952 15.7% 0.15667389
5 Hedmark 385 3.1% 0.03090136
6 Oppland 299 2.4% 0.02399872
7 Buskerud 577 4.6% 0.04631190
4 Vestfold 578 4.6% 0.04639217
8 Telemark 328 2.6% 0.02632635
10 Aust-Agder 224 1.8% 0.01797897
9 Vest-Agder 392 3.1% 0.03146320
11 Rogaland 1178 9.5% 0.09455012
12 Hordaland 1483 11.9% 0.11903042
13 Sogn og Fjordane 211 1.7% 0.01693555
14 Møre og Romsdal 492 3.9% 0.03948953
16 Sør-Trøndelag 808 6.5% 0.06485272
15 Nord-Trøndelag 214 1.7% 0.01717634
17 Nordland 473 3.8% 0.03796452
18 Troms 356 2.9% 0.02857372
19 Finnmark 131 1.1% 0.01051449
Sysmiss 1 NA


r19P4_1


Variable label: Highest completed education
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No education/elementary school 665 5.3% 0.05337079
2 Upper secondary education 3842 30.8% 0.30834671
3 University/University college 7664 61.5% 0.61508828
97 Not answered 289 2.3% 0.02319422


r19P4_2


Variable label: Highest completed education
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No completed education 19 0.2% 0.00152488
2 Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7- year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) 646 5.2% 0.05184591
3 Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2, VG3, High School) 1120 9% 0.08988764
4 Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) 1591 12.8% 0.12768860
5 Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical college) 1125 9% 0.09028892
6 University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ years) 1035 8.3% 0.08306581
7 College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college, school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) 2645 21.2% 0.21227929
8 University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) 888 7.1% 0.07126806
9 College-5-6 year education (Master, major) 850 6.8% 0.06821830
10 University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education (MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economic 1936 15.5% 0.15537721
11 Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) 310 2.5% 0.02487961
12 None of the above (please enter): 166 1.3% 0.01332263
97 Not answered 129 1% 0.01035313


r19P5_1


Variable label: Year of birth
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1939 or earlier 329 2.6% 0.02640449
2 1940-1949 2067 16.6% 0.16589085
3 1950-1959 3025 24.3% 0.24277689
4 1960-1969 2812 22.6% 0.22568218
5 1970-1979 1961 15.7% 0.15738363
6 1980-1989 1299 10.4% 0.10425361
7 1990 or later 967 7.8% 0.07760835


r19P5_2


Variable label: Year of birth
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1959 or earlier 5421 43.5% 0.43507223
2 1960-1989 6072 48.7% 0.48731942
3 1990 or later 967 7.8% 0.07760835


r19Weight1


Variable label: Weight based on variables P2, P5_2, and P1. See documentation report.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]



r19Weight2


Variable label: Weight based on variables P2, P5_2, P4, and P1. See documentation report.
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-50]



w01_k28


Variable label: Citizenship
Literal question: Citizenship. Are you:
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 1657 94.2% 0.94201251
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country 70 4% 0.03979534
97 No answer 32 1.8% 0.01819215
98 Not asked 10701 NA


w03_r3k28


Variable label: Citizenship
Literal question: Citizenship. Are you:
Technical description: [Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 1798 94.7% 0.947312961
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country 87 4.6% 0.045837724
97 No answer 13 0.7% 0.006849315
98 Not asked 10562 NA


w01_k3


Variable label: Voted for following party
Literal question: Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democratic Party 99 6.1% 0.060960591
2 The Conservative Party 435 26.8% 0.267857143
3 The Progress Party 183 11.3% 0.112684729
4 The Liberal Party 129 7.9% 0.079433498
5 The Socialist Left Party 119 7.3% 0.073275862
6 The Centre Party 71 4.4% 0.043719212
7 The Green Party 73 4.5% 0.044950739
8 The Labour Party 444 27.3% 0.273399015
9 Red 34 2.1% 0.020935961
10 Other: 21 1.3% 0.012931034
97 No answer 16 1% 0.009852217
98 Not asked 10836 NA


w03_r3k3


Variable label: Voted for following party last parliamentary election [Combined data from w03_r3k3_1, w03_r3k3_2]
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 98 5.2% 0.05246253
2 The Conservative Party of Norway 494 26.4% 0.26445396
3 The Progress Party 163 8.7% 0.08725910
4 The Liberal Party 121 6.5% 0.06477516
5 The Socialist Left Party 154 8.2% 0.08244111
6 The Centre Party 76 4.1% 0.04068522
7 The Green Party 69 3.7% 0.03693790
8 The Labour Party 509 27.2% 0.27248394
9 The Red Party 36 1.9% 0.01927195
10 Did not vote 44 2.4% 0.02355460
11 Was not entitled to vote 77 4.1% 0.04122056
12 Other 22 1.2% 0.01177730
97 No answer 5 0.3% 0.00267666
98 Not asked 10592 NA


c3k3


Variable label: Voted for following party parliamentary election 2013 [Most recent available data from w01_k3, w03_r3k3_1, w03_r3k3_2]
Technical description: [Composite variable. There are minor differences in question language.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 197 5.6% 0.056414662
2 The Conservative Party of Norway 929 26.6% 0.266036655
3 The Progress Party 346 9.9% 0.099083620
4 The Liberal Party 250 7.2% 0.071592211
5 The Socialist Left Party 273 7.8% 0.078178694
6 The Centre Party 147 4.2% 0.042096220
7 The Green Party 142 4.1% 0.040664376
8 The Labour Party 953 27.3% 0.272909507
9 The Red Party 70 2% 0.020045819
10 Did not vote 65 1.9% 0.018613975
11 Was not entitled to vote 77 2.2% 0.022050401
12 Other 22 0.6% 0.006300115
97 No answer 21 0.6% 0.006013746
98 Not asked 8968 NA


r4k28


Variable label: Nationality
Literal question: Nationality: Are you:
Technical description: [Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A Norwegian citizen 28 87.5% 0.87500
2 A citizen of another country. Please state which 3 9.4% 0.09375
97 No answer 1 3.1% 0.03125
98 Not asked 12428 NA


r5k28


Variable label: Nationality
Literal question: Nationality: Are you:
Technical description: [Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A Norwegian citizen 15 88.2% 0.88235294
2 A citizen of another country. Please state which 1 5.9% 0.05882353
97 No answer 1 5.9% 0.05882353
98 Not asked 12443 NA


r8k28


Variable label: Citizenship
Pre-question text: Citizenship.
Literal question: Are you:
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 1697 94.3% 0.943301834
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: 85 4.7% 0.047248471
97 No answer 17 0.9% 0.009449694
98 Not asked 10661 NA


r11bk28


Variable label: Citizenship
Literal question: Citizenship. Are you:
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 985 93.6% 0.936311787
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: 60 5.7% 0.057034221
97 Not answered 7 0.7% 0.006653992
98 Not asked 11408 NA


r14bk28


Variable label: Citizenship. Are you:
Literal question: Citizenship. Are you:
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 1 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 1067 93.8% 0.937609842
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: 63 5.5% 0.055360281
97 Not answered 8 0.7% 0.007029877
98 Not asked 11322 NA


r16bk28


Variable label: Your citizenship
Literal question: Citizenship. Are you:
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 3017 94% 0.9404613466
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: 190 5.9% 0.0592269327
97 Not answered 1 0% 0.0003117207
98 Not asked 9252 NA


r18bk28


Variable label: Citizenship
Literal question: Citizenship.
Post-question: Are you:
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 1347 94% 0.939986043
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: 76 5.3% 0.053035590
97 Not answered 10 0.7% 0.006978367
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18bk28


Variable label: Your citizenship [Most recent available data from w01_k28, w03_r3k28, r4k28, r5k28, r8k28, r11bk28, r14bk28, r16bk28, r18bk28]
Pre-question text: Citizenship. Are you:
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 11611 94.4% 0.943830272
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: 635 5.2% 0.051617623
97 Not answered 56 0.5% 0.004552105
98 Not asked 158 NA


w01_k29


Variable label: Parents immigrated to Norway
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 1594 90.6% 0.906196703
2 I have immigrated to Norway myself 70 4% 0.039795338
3 Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway 9 0.5% 0.005116543
4 Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated 31 1.8% 0.017623650
5 Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated 22 1.3% 0.012507106
97 No answer 33 1.9% 0.018760659
98 Not asked 10701 NA


w03_r3k29


Variable label: Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description: [Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 1742 91.7% 0.916842105
2 I have immigrated to Norway myself 84 4.4% 0.044210526
3 Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway 5 0.3% 0.002631579
4 Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated 29 1.5% 0.015263158
5 Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated 24 1.3% 0.012631579
97 No answer 16 0.8% 0.008421053
98 Not asked 10560 NA


r4k29


Variable label: Mother or father immigrated to Norway
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description: [Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 31 88.6% 0.88571429
2 I have immigrated to Norway 2 5.7% 0.05714286
3 Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway 0 0% 0.00000000
4 My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not 2 5.7% 0.05714286
5 My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not 0 0% 0.00000000
97 No answer 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 12425 NA


r5k29


Variable label: Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description: [Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 13 81.2% 0.8125
2 I have immigrated to Norway 1 6.2% 0.0625
3 Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway 0 0% 0.0000
4 My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not 0 0% 0.0000
5 My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not 1 6.2% 0.0625
97 No answer 1 6.2% 0.0625
98 Not asked 12444 NA


r11bk29


Variable label: Immigration background
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 3 or rekruttert = 4. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 2363 91% 0.909896034
2 I myself have immigrated to Norway 149 5.7% 0.057373893
3 Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway 6 0.2% 0.002310358
4 My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated 43 1.7% 0.016557566
5 My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated 24 0.9% 0.009241432
97 Not answered 12 0.5% 0.004620716
98 Not asked 9863 NA


r14bk29


Variable label: Have you or any of your parents immigrated to Norway.
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 1 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 1006 88.4% 0.884007030
2 I myself have immigrated to Norway 75 6.6% 0.065905097
3 Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway 9 0.8% 0.007908612
4 My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated 27 2.4% 0.023725835
5 My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated 13 1.1% 0.011423550
97 Not answered 8 0.7% 0.007029877
98 Not asked 11322 NA


r16bk29


Variable label: Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 2888 90% 0.9002493766
2 I myself have immigrated to Norway 206 6.4% 0.0642144638
3 Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway 12 0.4% 0.0037406484
4 My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated 48 1.5% 0.0149625935
5 My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated 53 1.7% 0.0165211970
97 Not answered 1 0% 0.0003117207
98 Not asked 9252 NA


r18bk29


Variable label: Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 1274 88.9% 0.889043964
2 I myself have immigrated to Norway 95 6.6% 0.066294487
3 Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway 9 0.6% 0.006280530
4 My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated 25 1.7% 0.017445918
5 My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated 17 1.2% 0.011863224
97 Not answered 13 0.9% 0.009071877
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18bk29


Variable label: Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway? [Most recent available data from w01_k29, w03_r3k29, r4k29, r5k29, r11bk29, r14bk29, r16bk29, r18bk29]
Pre-question text: Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 10911 90.6% 0.905627490
2 I myself have immigrated to Norway 682 5.7% 0.056606906
3 Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway 50 0.4% 0.004150066
4 My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated 205 1.7% 0.017015272
5 My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated 154 1.3% 0.012782205
97 Not answered 46 0.4% 0.003818061
98 Not asked 412 NA


r10k3


Variable label: Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election.
Literal question: Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 209 4.6% 0.045813240
2 The Conservative Party 1066 23.4% 0.233669443
3 The Progress Party 482 10.6% 0.105655414
4 The Liberal Party 240 5.3% 0.052608505
5 The Socialist Left Party 410 9% 0.089872863
6 The Centre Party 403 8.8% 0.088338448
7 The Green Party 191 4.2% 0.041867602
8 The Labour Party 1032 22.6% 0.226216572
9 The Red Party 177 3.9% 0.038798772
10 Did not vote 90 2% 0.019728189
11 Not entitled to vote 158 3.5% 0.034633932
12 Other: 82 1.8% 0.017974573
97 No answer 22 0.5% 0.004822446
98 Not asked 7898 NA


r10k3_kodet


Variable label: Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election [coded]
Literal question: Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
Technical description:

[All respondents asked.]

[This variable contains the values of r10k3 plus coded values of r10k3_12_other]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 209 4.6% 0.045813240
2 The Conservative Party 1066 23.4% 0.233669443
3 The Progress Party 482 10.6% 0.105655414
4 The Liberal Party 240 5.3% 0.052608505
5 The Socialist Left Party 410 9% 0.089872863
6 The Centre Party 403 8.8% 0.088338448
7 The Green Party 191 4.2% 0.041867602
8 The Labour Party 1032 22.6% 0.226216572
9 The Red Party 177 3.9% 0.038798772
10 Did not vote 90 2% 0.019728189
11 Not entitled to vote 160 3.5% 0.035072337
12 Other: 80 1.8% 0.017536168
97 No answer 22 0.5% 0.004822446
98 Not asked 7898 NA


r11bk3


Variable label: Voted this party in parliamentary elections of 2017
Literal question: Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections in 2017?
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 42 4% 0.039923954
2 The Conservative Party 262 24.9% 0.249049430
3 The Progress Party 95 9% 0.090304183
4 The Liberal Party 64 6.1% 0.060836502
5 The Soialist Left Party 75 7.1% 0.071292776
6 The Centre Party 89 8.5% 0.084600760
7 The Green Party 47 4.5% 0.044676806
8 The Labour Party 228 21.7% 0.216730038
9 The Red Party 38 3.6% 0.036121673
10 Did not vote 31 2.9% 0.029467681
11 Not entitled to vote 54 5.1% 0.051330798
12 Other: 22 2.1% 0.020912548
97 Not answered 5 0.5% 0.004752852
98 Not asked 11408 NA


c11bk3


Variable label: Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election. [Most recent available data from r10k3_kodet, r11bk3]
Pre-question text:
Literal question: Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
Technical description: [Composite variable. There are minor differences in question language.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 251 4.5% 0.044709654
2 The Conservative Party 1328 23.7% 0.236551478
3 The Progress Party 577 10.3% 0.102778767
4 The Liberal Party 304 5.4% 0.054150338
5 The Soialist Left Party 485 8.6% 0.086391165
6 The Centre Party 492 8.8% 0.087638048
7 The Green Party 238 4.2% 0.042394015
8 The Labour Party 1260 22.4% 0.224438903
9 The Red Party 215 3.8% 0.038297114
10 Did not vote 121 2.2% 0.021553260
11 Not entitled to vote 214 3.8% 0.038118988
12 Other: 102 1.8% 0.018168864
97 Not answered 27 0.5% 0.004809405
98 Not asked 6846 NA


r11bktivi_1


Variable label: Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 153 2.7% 0.027439024
2 2 - Does not resemble me 459 8.2% 0.082317073
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 996 17.9% 0.178622669
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2074 37.2% 0.371951220
5 5 - Resembles me 1400 25.1% 0.251076040
6 6 - Very much resembles me 444 8% 0.079626973
97 Not answered 50 0.9% 0.008967001
98 Not asked 6884 NA


r17bktivi_1


Variable label: Resembles you: Respect for parents and for older people is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: [He/She] believes that [he/she] should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]

[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 135 3.4% 0.03437739
2 2 - Does not resemble me 338 8.6% 0.08607079
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 715 18.2% 0.18207283
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1504 38.3% 0.38298956
5 5 - Resembles me 860 21.9% 0.21899669
6 6 - Very much resembles me 334 8.5% 0.08505220
97 Not answered 41 1% 0.01044054
98 Not asked 8533 NA


c17bktivi_1


Variable label: Resembles you: Respect for parents and for older people is important [Most recent available data from r11bktivi_1, r17bktivi_1]
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: [He/She] believes that [he/she] should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 288 3% 0.030306219
2 2 - Does not resemble me 797 8.4% 0.083868252
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1711 18% 0.180048406
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 3578 37.7% 0.376512680
5 5 - Resembles me 2260 23.8% 0.237819636
6 6 - Very much resembles me 778 8.2% 0.081868884
97 Not answered 91 1% 0.009575923
98 Not asked 2957 NA


r11bktivi_2


Variable label: Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 2705 48.5% 0.485114778
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1168 20.9% 0.209469154
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 782 14% 0.140243902
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 539 9.7% 0.096664275
5 5 - Resembles me 238 4.3% 0.042682927
6 6 - Very much resembles me 107 1.9% 0.019189383
97 Not answered 37 0.7% 0.006635581
98 Not asked 6884 NA


r17bktivi_2


Variable label: Resembles you: Religious faith is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]

[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 2097 53.4% 0.533995416
2 2 - Does not resemble me 756 19.3% 0.192513369
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 481 12.2% 0.122485358
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 357 9.1% 0.090909091
5 5 - Resembles me 125 3.2% 0.031830914
6 6 - Very much resembles me 75 1.9% 0.019098549
97 Not answered 36 0.9% 0.009167303
98 Not asked 8533 NA


c17bktivi_2


Variable label: Resembles you: Religious faith is important [Most recent available data from r11bktivi_2, r17bktivi_2]
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 4802 50.5% 0.505314111
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1924 20.2% 0.202462380
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1263 13.3% 0.132905398
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 896 9.4% 0.094286015
5 5 - Resembles me 363 3.8% 0.038198464
6 6 - Very much resembles me 182 1.9% 0.019151847
97 Not answered 73 0.8% 0.007681785
98 Not asked 2957 NA


r11bktivi_3


Variable label: Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her]. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 18 0.3% 0.003228121
2 2 - Does not resemble me 58 1% 0.010401722
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 356 6.4% 0.063845050
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2096 37.6% 0.375896700
5 5 - Resembles me 2098 37.6% 0.376255380
6 6 - Very much resembles me 912 16.4% 0.163558106
97 Not answered 38 0.7% 0.006814921
98 Not asked 6884 NA


r17bktivi_3


Variable label: Resembles you: To help people around you is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]

[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 4 0.1% 0.001018589
2 2 - Does not resemble me 46 1.2% 0.011713776
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 196 5% 0.049910873
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1446 36.8% 0.368220015
5 5 - Resembles me 1486 37.8% 0.378405908
6 6 - Very much resembles me 714 18.2% 0.181818182
97 Not answered 35 0.9% 0.008912656
98 Not asked 8533 NA


c17bktivi_3


Variable label: Resembles you: To help people around you is important [Most recent available data from r11bktivi_3, r17bktivi_3]
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around him. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 22 0.2% 0.002315058
2 2 - Does not resemble me 104 1.1% 0.010943912
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 552 5.8% 0.058086920
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 3542 37.3% 0.372724403
5 5 - Resembles me 3584 37.7% 0.377144060
6 6 - Very much resembles me 1626 17.1% 0.171103862
97 Not answered 73 0.8% 0.007681785
98 Not asked 2957 NA


r11bktivi_4


Variable label: Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 45 0.8% 0.008070301
2 2 - Does not resemble me 157 2.8% 0.028156385
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 358 6.4% 0.064203730
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1604 28.8% 0.287661406
5 5 - Resembles me 2091 37.5% 0.375000000
6 6 - Very much resembles me 1282 23% 0.229913917
97 Not answered 39 0.7% 0.006994261
98 Not asked 6884 NA


r17bktivi_4


Variable label: Resembles you: To have all people in the world be treated equally is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: [He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]

[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 23 0.6% 0.005856888
2 2 - Does not resemble me 91 2.3% 0.023172906
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 208 5.3% 0.052966641
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1052 26.8% 0.267888974
5 5 - Resembles me 1443 36.7% 0.367456073
6 6 - Very much resembles me 1073 27.3% 0.273236567
97 Not answered 37 0.9% 0.009421951
98 Not asked 8533 NA


c17bktivi_4


Variable label: Resembles you: To have all people in the world be treated equally is important [Most recent available data from r11bktivi_4, r17bktivi_4]
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: [He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 68 0.7% 0.007155635
2 2 - Does not resemble me 248 2.6% 0.026097022
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 566 6% 0.059560139
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2656 27.9% 0.279490687
5 5 - Resembles me 3534 37.2% 0.371882563
6 6 - Very much resembles me 2355 24.8% 0.247816479
97 Not answered 76 0.8% 0.007997474
98 Not asked 2957 NA


r11bktivi_5


Variable label: Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand things
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 24 0.4% 0.004304161
2 2 - Does not resemble me 105 1.9% 0.018830703
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 447 8% 0.080164993
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2003 35.9% 0.359218077
5 5 - Resembles me 1962 35.2% 0.351865136
6 6 - Very much resembles me 1000 17.9% 0.179340029
97 Not answered 35 0.6% 0.006276901
98 Not asked 6884 NA


r17bktivi_5


Variable label: Resembles you: To be interested in things and to be curious is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: [He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]

[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 17 0.4% 0.004329004
2 2 - Does not resemble me 74 1.9% 0.018843901
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 348 8.9% 0.088617265
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1276 32.5% 0.324929972
5 5 - Resembles me 1381 35.2% 0.351667940
6 6 - Very much resembles me 796 20.3% 0.202699262
97 Not answered 35 0.9% 0.008912656
98 Not asked 8533 NA


c17bktivi_5


Variable label: Resembles you: To be interested in things and to be curious is important [Most recent available data from r11bktivi_5, r17bktivi_5]
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: [He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 41 0.4% 0.004314427
2 2 - Does not resemble me 179 1.9% 0.018836157
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 795 8.4% 0.083657792
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 3279 34.5% 0.345048932
5 5 - Resembles me 3343 35.2% 0.351783647
6 6 - Very much resembles me 1796 18.9% 0.188992950
97 Not answered 70 0.7% 0.007366095
98 Not asked 2957 NA


r11bktivi_6


Variable label: Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 527 9.5% 0.094512195
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1200 21.5% 0.215208034
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1932 34.6% 0.346484935
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1389 24.9% 0.249103300
5 5 - Resembles me 404 7.2% 0.072453372
6 6 - Very much resembles me 91 1.6% 0.016319943
97 Not answered 33 0.6% 0.005918221
98 Not asked 6884 NA


r17bktivi_6


Variable label: Resembles you: To take risks and look for new experiences is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: [He/She] likes to take risks. [He’s/she’s] always looking for new experiences.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]

[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 400 10.2% 0.101858925
2 2 - Does not resemble me 866 22.1% 0.220524573
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1372 34.9% 0.349376114
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 906 23.1% 0.230710466
5 5 - Resembles me 287 7.3% 0.073083779
6 6 - Very much resembles me 61 1.6% 0.015533486
97 Not answered 35 0.9% 0.008912656
98 Not asked 8533 NA


c17bktivi_6


Variable label: Resembles you: To take risks and look for new experiences is important [Most recent available data from r11bktivi_6, r17bktivi_6]
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: [He/She] likes to take risks. [He’s/she’s] always looking for new experiences.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 927 9.8% 0.097548143
2 2 - Does not resemble me 2066 21.7% 0.217405030
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 3304 34.8% 0.347679680
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2295 24.2% 0.241502683
5 5 - Resembles me 691 7.3% 0.072713880
6 6 - Very much resembles me 152 1.6% 0.015994949
97 Not answered 68 0.7% 0.007155635
98 Not asked 2957 NA


r11bktivi_7


Variable label: Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 209 3.7% 0.037482066
2 2 - Does not resemble me 713 12.8% 0.127869440
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1640 29.4% 0.294117647
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2122 38.1% 0.380559541
5 5 - Resembles me 701 12.6% 0.125717360
6 6 - Very much resembles me 156 2.8% 0.027977044
97 Not answered 35 0.6% 0.006276901
98 Not asked 6884 NA


r17bktivi_7


Variable label: Resembles you: To seek out opportunites to have fun is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: [He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]

[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 140 3.6% 0.035650624
2 2 - Does not resemble me 497 12.7% 0.126559715
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1204 30.7% 0.306595365
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1434 36.5% 0.365164248
5 5 - Resembles me 461 11.7% 0.117392412
6 6 - Very much resembles me 152 3.9% 0.038706392
97 Not answered 39 1% 0.009931245
98 Not asked 8533 NA


c17bktivi_7


Variable label: Resembles you: To seek out opportunites to have fun is important [Most recent available data from r11bktivi_7, r17bktivi_7]
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: [He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 349 3.7% 0.036725245
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1210 12.7% 0.127328212
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 2844 29.9% 0.299273914
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 3556 37.4% 0.374197622
5 5 - Resembles me 1162 12.2% 0.122277176
6 6 - Very much resembles me 308 3.2% 0.032410818
97 Not answered 74 0.8% 0.007787015
98 Not asked 2957 NA


r11bktivi_8


Variable label: Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 596 10.7% 0.106886657
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1241 22.3% 0.222560976
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1856 33.3% 0.332855093
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1367 24.5% 0.245157819
5 5 - Resembles me 386 6.9% 0.069225251
6 6 - Very much resembles me 92 1.6% 0.016499283
97 Not answered 38 0.7% 0.006814921
98 Not asked 6884 NA


r17bktivi_8


Variable label: Resembles you: To be sucessful and to impress other people is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]

[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 433 11% 0.110262287
2 2 - Does not resemble me 848 21.6% 0.215940922
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1376 35% 0.350394703
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 859 21.9% 0.218742042
5 5 - Resembles me 285 7.3% 0.072574484
6 6 - Very much resembles me 91 2.3% 0.023172906
97 Not answered 35 0.9% 0.008912656
98 Not asked 8533 NA


c17bktivi_8


Variable label: Resembles you: To be sucessful and to impress other people is important [Most recent available data from r11bktivi_8, r17bktivi_8]
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 1029 10.8% 0.108281595
2 2 - Does not resemble me 2089 22% 0.219825318
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 3232 34% 0.340103125
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2226 23.4% 0.234241818
5 5 - Resembles me 671 7.1% 0.070609281
6 6 - Very much resembles me 183 1.9% 0.019257077
97 Not answered 73 0.8% 0.007681785
98 Not asked 2957 NA


r11bktivi_9


Variable label: Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 589 10.6% 0.105631277
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1137 20.4% 0.203909613
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1856 33.3% 0.332855093
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1505 27% 0.269906743
5 5 - Resembles me 389 7% 0.069763271
6 6 - Very much resembles me 62 1.1% 0.011119082
97 Not answered 38 0.7% 0.006814921
98 Not asked 6884 NA


r17bktivi_9


Variable label: Resembles you: To take the lead and tell others what to do is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]

[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 458 11.7% 0.116628470
2 2 - Does not resemble me 855 21.8% 0.217723453
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1262 32.1% 0.321364910
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1030 26.2% 0.262286733
5 5 - Resembles me 239 6.1% 0.060860708
6 6 - Very much resembles me 49 1.2% 0.012477718
97 Not answered 34 0.9% 0.008658009
98 Not asked 8533 NA


c17bktivi_9


Variable label: Resembles you: To take the lead and tell others what to do is important [Most recent available data from r11bktivi_9, r17bktivi_9]
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 1047 11% 0.110175734
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1992 21% 0.209618015
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 3118 32.8% 0.328106914
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2535 26.7% 0.266757866
5 5 - Resembles me 628 6.6% 0.066084394
6 6 - Very much resembles me 111 1.2% 0.011680522
97 Not answered 72 0.8% 0.007576555
98 Not asked 2957 NA


r11bktivi_10


Variable label: Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 85 1.5% 0.015243902
2 2 - Does not resemble me 299 5.4% 0.053622669
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 801 14.4% 0.143651363
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1962 35.2% 0.351865136
5 5 - Resembles me 1626 29.2% 0.291606887
6 6 - Very much resembles me 772 13.8% 0.138450502
97 Not answered 31 0.6% 0.005559541
98 Not asked 6884 NA


r17bktivi_10


Variable label: Resembles you: To have things tidy and clean is important
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert = 14 or 16]

[Question text depends on the gender of the respondent]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 57 1.5% 0.014514897
2 2 - Does not resemble me 213 5.4% 0.054239878
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 535 13.6% 0.136236313
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1397 35.6% 0.355742297
5 5 - Resembles me 1091 27.8% 0.277820219
6 6 - Very much resembles me 599 15.3% 0.152533741
97 Not answered 35 0.9% 0.008912656
98 Not asked 8533 NA


c17bktivi_10


Variable label: Resembles you: To have things tidy and clean is important [Most recent available data from r11bktivi_10, r17bktivi_10]
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you.
Literal question: It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
Post-question: For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 142 1.5% 0.014942650
2 2 - Does not resemble me 512 5.4% 0.053877723
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1336 14.1% 0.140587183
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 3359 35.3% 0.353467326
5 5 - Resembles me 2717 28.6% 0.285909713
6 6 - Very much resembles me 1371 14.4% 0.144270230
97 Not answered 66 0.7% 0.006945175
98 Not asked 2957 NA


r16bk42


Variable label: Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
Literal question: Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 None 2504 78.1% 0.7805486284
1 1 290 9% 0.0903990025
2 2 302 9.4% 0.0941396509
3 3 86 2.7% 0.0268079800
4 4 12 0.4% 0.0037406484
5 5 1 0% 0.0003117207
6 6 or more 0 0% 0.0000000000
97 Not answered 13 0.4% 0.0040523691
98 Not asked 9252 NA


r17bk42


Variable label: Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
Literal question: Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert < 15]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 None 5164 80.9% 0.8088972431
1 1 531 8.3% 0.0831766917
2 2 514 8.1% 0.0805137845
3 3 119 1.9% 0.0186403509
4 4 14 0.2% 0.0021929825
5 5 2 0% 0.0003132832
6 6 or more 1 0% 0.0001566416
97 Not answered 39 0.6% 0.0061090226
98 Not asked 6076 NA


r18bk42


Variable label: Do you have children under the age of 16 at home living with you, in that case how many?
Literal question: Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 None 1103 77% 0.7697138870
1 1 129 9% 0.0900209351
2 2 137 9.6% 0.0956036288
3 3 45 3.1% 0.0314026518
4 4 6 0.4% 0.0041870202
5 5 1 0.1% 0.0006978367
6 6 or more 0 0% 0.0000000000
97 Not answered 12 0.8% 0.0083740405
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18bk42


Variable label: Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many? [Most recent available data from r16bk42, r17bk42, r18bk42]
Literal question: Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 None 8771 79.6% 0.79555555556
1 1 950 8.6% 0.08616780045
2 2 953 8.6% 0.08643990930
3 3 250 2.3% 0.02267573696
4 4 32 0.3% 0.00290249433
5 5 4 0% 0.00036281179
6 6 or more 1 0% 0.00009070295
97 Not answered 64 0.6% 0.00580498866
98 Not asked 1435 NA


r11bk40_recode


Variable label: Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [recoded]
Literal question: Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
Technical description:

[All respondents asked. ]

[Recoded from source variable r11bk40]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Church of Norway 3637 65.2% 0.652259684
2 The Catholic Church 62 1.1% 0.011119082
3 Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) 202 3.6% 0.036226686
4 Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) 41 0.7% 0.007352941
5 Islam 18 0.3% 0.003228121
6 I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. 1578 28.3% 0.282998565
97 No answer 38 0.7% 0.006814921
98 Not asked 6884 NA


r14bk40_recode


Variable label: Belong to a religion or religious denomination. [Recoded]
Literal question: Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
Technical description:

[Asked if r14group = 1 ]

[Recoded from source variable r14bk40]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Church of Norway 719 63.2% 0.631810193
2 The Catholic Church 17 1.5% 0.014938489
3 Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) 44 3.9% 0.038664323
4 Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) 5 0.4% 0.004393673
5 Islam 11 1% 0.009666081
6 I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. 331 29.1% 0.290861160
97 No answer 11 1% 0.009666081
98 Not asked 11322 NA


r16bk40_recode


Variable label: Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
Literal question: Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. Recoded from source variable r16bk40]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Church of Norway 2006 62.5% 0.625311721
2 The Catholic Church 49 1.5% 0.015274314
3 Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) 127 4% 0.039588529
4 Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) 26 0.8% 0.008104738
5 Islam 27 0.8% 0.008416459
6 I don't belong to any religion or religious communities 967 30.1% 0.301433915
97 No answer 6 0.2% 0.001870324
98 Not asked 9252 NA


r18bk40_recode


Variable label: Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Recoded]
Literal question: Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
Technical description: [Recoded from source variable r18bk40. Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Church of Norway 861 60.1% 0.60083740
2 The Catholic Church 12 0.8% 0.00837404
3 Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) 58 4% 0.04047453
4 Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) 12 0.8% 0.00837404
5 Islam 19 1.3% 0.01325890
6 I don't belong to any religion or religious communities 455 31.8% 0.31751570
97 No answer 16 1.1% 0.01116539
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18bk40_recode


Variable label: Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination? [Most recent available data from r11bk40_recode, r14bk40_recode, r16bk40_recode, r18bk40_recode]
Pre-question text: Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Church of Norway 7223 63.6% 0.636107442
2 The Catholic Church 140 1.2% 0.012329370
3 Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) 431 3.8% 0.037956847
4 Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) 84 0.7% 0.007397622
5 Islam 75 0.7% 0.006605020
6 I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. 3331 29.3% 0.293350947
97 No answer 71 0.6% 0.006252752
98 Not asked 1105 NA


r11bk41


Variable label: Attends religious meetings
Literal question: Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Every day 7 0.1% 0.001255380
2 More than once a week 91 1.6% 0.016319943
3 Once a week 146 2.6% 0.026183644
4 At least once a month 270 4.8% 0.048421808
5 Only on special religious holidays 972 17.4% 0.174318508
6 Less frequently 1207 21.6% 0.216463415
7 Never 2847 51.1% 0.510581062
97 Not answered 36 0.6% 0.006456241
98 Not asked 6884 NA


r14bk41


Variable label: How often attend religious meetings, aside from special occasions.
Literal question: Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 1 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Every day 1 0.1% 0.0008787346
2 More than once a week 13 1.1% 0.0114235501
3 Once a week 40 3.5% 0.0351493849
4 At least once a month 69 6.1% 0.0606326889
5 Only on special religious holidays 200 17.6% 0.1757469244
6 Less frequently 262 23% 0.2302284710
7 Never 543 47.7% 0.4771528998
97 Not answered 10 0.9% 0.0087873462
98 Not asked 11322 NA


r16bk41


Variable label: How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
Literal question: Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Every day 1 0% 0.0003117207
2 More than once a week 55 1.7% 0.0171446384
3 Once a week 61 1.9% 0.0190149626
4 Once or a few times a month 107 3.3% 0.0333541147
5 Several times a year 332 10.3% 0.1034912718
6 Once a year 452 14.1% 0.1408977556
7 Less than once a year 534 16.6% 0.1664588529
8 Never 1660 51.7% 0.5174563591
97 Not answered 6 0.2% 0.0018703242
98 Not asked 9252 NA


r18bk41


Variable label: How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
Literal question: Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:2-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Every day 0 0% 0.000000000
2 More than once a week 15 1% 0.010467551
3 Once a week 28 2% 0.019539428
4 Once or a few times a month 48 3.3% 0.033496162
5 Several times a year 136 9.5% 0.094905792
6 Once a year 225 15.7% 0.157013259
7 Less than once a year 242 16.9% 0.168876483
8 Never 726 50.7% 0.506629449
97 Not answered 13 0.9% 0.009071877
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18bk41


Variable label: How often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months? [Most recent available data from r11bk41, r14bk41, r16bk41, r18bk41]
Pre-question text: Apart from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often have you participated in religious meetings during the last 12 months?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Every day 9 0.1% 0.0007926024
2 More than once a week 174 1.5% 0.0153236460
3 Once a week 275 2.4% 0.0242184060
4 Once or a few times a month 494 4.4% 0.0435050638
5 Several times a year 1640 14.4% 0.1444297666
6 Once a year 2146 18.9% 0.1889916336
7 Less than once a year 4166 36.7% 0.3668868340
8 Never 2386 21% 0.2101276970
97 Not answered 65 0.6% 0.0057243505
98 Not asked 1105 NA


r11pkklasse


Variable label: Social class, self-placement
Pre-question text: We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
Literal question: If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Lower class 44 0.8% 0.007890961
2 Working class 680 12.2% 0.121951220
3 Lower middle class 518 9.3% 0.092898135
4 Middle class 3028 54.3% 0.543041607
5 Upper middle class 1089 19.5% 0.195301291
6 Upper class 34 0.6% 0.006097561
7 Don't know 150 2.7% 0.026901004
97 Not answered 33 0.6% 0.005918221
98 Not asked 6884 NA


r14pkklasse


Variable label: To which social class do you belong.
Pre-question text: We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
Literal question: If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
Technical description: [Asked if r14group = 1 ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Lower class 4 0.4% 0.003514938
2 Working class 154 13.5% 0.135325132
3 Lower middle class 121 10.6% 0.106326889
4 Middle class 624 54.8% 0.548330404
5 Upper middle class 190 16.7% 0.166959578
6 Upper class 3 0.3% 0.002636204
7 Don't know 34 3% 0.029876977
97 Not answered 8 0.7% 0.007029877
98 Not asked 11322 NA


r16pkklasse


Variable label: Place yourself in a social class
Pre-question text: We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
Literal question: If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Lower class 33 1% 0.010286783
2 Working class 403 12.6% 0.125623441
3 Lower middle class 317 9.9% 0.098815461
4 Middle class 1732 54% 0.539900249
5 Upper middle class 584 18.2% 0.182044888
6 Upper class 13 0.4% 0.004052369
7 Don't know 121 3.8% 0.037718204
97 Not answered 5 0.2% 0.001558603
98 Not asked 9252 NA


r18pkklasse


Variable label: Placing yourself in which social class?
Pre-question text: We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
Literal question: If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Lower class 14 1% 0.009769714
2 Working class 196 13.7% 0.136775994
3 Lower middle class 127 8.9% 0.088625262
4 Middle class 780 54.4% 0.544312631
5 Upper middle class 243 17% 0.169574320
6 Upper class 4 0.3% 0.002791347
7 Don't know 52 3.6% 0.036287509
97 Not answered 17 1.2% 0.011863224
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pkklasse


Variable label: Place yourself in a social class [Most recent available data from r11pkklasse, r14pkklasse, r16pkklasse, r18pkklasse]
Pre-question text: If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Lower class 95 0.8% 0.008366358
2 Working class 1433 12.6% 0.126199912
3 Lower middle class 1083 9.5% 0.095376486
4 Middle class 6164 54.3% 0.542844562
5 Upper middle class 2106 18.5% 0.185468956
6 Upper class 54 0.5% 0.004755614
7 Don't know 357 3.1% 0.031439894
97 Not answered 63 0.6% 0.005548217
98 Not asked 1105 NA


r14bk35


Variable label: Description of the area you live in.
Literal question: Which description best fits the area you live in?
Post-question: We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A city 1498 22.8% 0.22842330
2 A suburb or the outskirts of a city 1478 22.5% 0.22537359
3 A small or medium sized town 1740 26.5% 0.26532479
4 A village 1102 16.8% 0.16803904
5 A sparsely inhabited area 731 11.1% 0.11146691
97 Not answered 9 0.1% 0.00137237
98 Not asked 5902 NA


r16bk35


Variable label: Which description best fits the area you live in?
Literal question: Which description best fits the area you live in?
Post-question: We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A city 789 24.6% 0.245947631
2 A suburb or the outskirts of a city 649 20.2% 0.202306733
3 A small or medium sized town 900 28.1% 0.280548628
4 A village 509 15.9% 0.158665835
5 A sparsely inhabited area 356 11.1% 0.110972569
97 Not answered 5 0.2% 0.001558603
98 Not asked 9252 NA


r18bk35


Variable label: Which description best fits the area you live in?
Literal question: Which description best fits the area you live in?
Post-question: We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A city 360 25.1% 0.251221214
2 A suburb or the outskirts of a city 295 20.6% 0.205861828
3 A small or medium sized town 421 29.4% 0.293789253
4 A village 212 14.8% 0.147941382
5 A sparsely inhabited area 131 9.1% 0.091416609
97 Not answered 14 1% 0.009769714
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18bk35


Variable label: Which description best fits the area you live in? [Most recent available data from r14bk35, r16bk35, r18bk35]
Pre-question text: Which description best fits the area you live in?
Literal question: We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A city 2647 23.6% 0.236360389
2 A suburb or the outskirts of a city 2422 21.6% 0.216269310
3 A small or medium sized town 3061 27.3% 0.273327976
4 A village 1823 16.3% 0.162782391
5 A sparsely inhabited area 1218 10.9% 0.108759711
97 Not answered 28 0.3% 0.002500223
98 Not asked 1261 NA


r14bk27


Variable label: Marital status.
Literal question: Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Single 739 11.3% 0.112686795
2 Non-domestic relationship 334 5.1% 0.050930162
3 Cohabitant 1058 16.1% 0.161329674
4 Married/legally registered partner 3814 58.2% 0.581579750
5 Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner 347 5.3% 0.052912473
6 Widow/widower 214 3.3% 0.032631900
7 Other: 15 0.2% 0.002287283
97 Not answered 37 0.6% 0.005641964
98 Not asked 5902 NA


r16bk27


Variable label: Martial status
Literal question: Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Single 394 12.3% 0.122817955
2 Non-domestic relationship 168 5.2% 0.052369077
3 Cohabitant 510 15.9% 0.158977556
4 Married/legally registered partner 1814 56.5% 0.565461347
5 Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner 197 6.1% 0.061408978
6 Widow/widower 107 3.3% 0.033354115
7 Other 11 0.3% 0.003428928
97 Not answered 7 0.2% 0.002182045
98 Not asked 9252 NA


r18bk27


Variable label: Civil status
Literal question: Civil status.
Post-question: Click on the one that is most relevant
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Single 231 16.1% 0.161200279
2 Non-domestic relationship 56 3.9% 0.039078856
3 Cohabitant 238 16.6% 0.166085136
4 Married/legally registered partner 758 52.9% 0.528960223
5 Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner 86 6% 0.060013957
6 Widow/widower 49 3.4% 0.034193999
7 Other: 4 0.3% 0.002791347
97 Not answered 11 0.8% 0.007676204
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18bk27


Variable label: Martial status [Most recent available data from r14bk27, r16bk27, r18bk27]
Pre-question text: Civil status. Click on the one that is most relevant
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Single 1364 12.2% 0.121796589
2 Non-domestic relationship 558 5% 0.049825877
3 Cohabitant 1806 16.1% 0.161264399
4 Married/legally registered partner 6386 57% 0.570229485
5 Divorced/separated/formerly legally registered partner 630 5.6% 0.056255023
6 Widow/widower 370 3.3% 0.033038664
7 Other 30 0.3% 0.002678811
97 Not answered 55 0.5% 0.004911153
98 Not asked 1261 NA


r14bkhelse


Variable label: How is your health.
Literal question: In general, would you say your health is:
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Excellent 1007 15.4% 0.153552912
2 Very good 2437 37.2% 0.371607197
3 Good 2188 33.4% 0.333638304
4 Somewhat good 716 10.9% 0.109179628
5 Poor 179 2.7% 0.027294907
97 Not answered 31 0.5% 0.004727051
98 Not asked 5902 NA


r16bkhelse


Variable label: In general, how would you say your health is?
Literal question: In general, would you say your health is:
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Excellent 526 16.4% 0.163965087
2 Very good 1189 37.1% 0.370635910
3 Good 952 29.7% 0.296758105
4 Somewhat good 422 13.2% 0.131546135
5 Poor 114 3.6% 0.035536160
97 Not answered 5 0.2% 0.001558603
98 Not asked 9252 NA


r18bkhelse


Variable label: Your health, in general
Literal question: In general, would you say your health is:
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Excellent 241 16.8% 0.168178646
2 Very good 554 38.7% 0.386601535
3 Good 421 29.4% 0.293789253
4 Somewhat good 159 11.1% 0.110956036
5 Poor 47 3.3% 0.032798325
97 Not answered 11 0.8% 0.007676204
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18bkhelse


Variable label: In general, how would you say your health is? [Most recent available data from r14bkhelse, r16bkhelse, r18bkhelse]
Pre-question text: In general, would you say your health is:
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Excellent 1774 15.8% 0.158407001
2 Very good 4180 37.3% 0.373247611
3 Good 3561 31.8% 0.317974819
4 Somewhat good 1297 11.6% 0.115813912
5 Poor 340 3% 0.030359854
97 Not answered 47 0.4% 0.004196803
98 Not asked 1261 NA


r15bfi10_1


Variable label: Describes you how well: Reserved.
Pre-question text:

How well does the following statement describe your personality?

I see myself as someone who …
Literal question: … is reserved
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 1120 17.7% 0.17665615
2 Disagree a little 1496 23.6% 0.23596215
3 Neither agree nor disagree 1023 16.1% 0.16135647
4 Agree a little 2184 34.4% 0.34447950
5 Agree strongly 367 5.8% 0.05788644
97 Not answered 150 2.4% 0.02365931
98 Not asked 6120 NA


r16bfi10_1


Variable label: I see myself as: Reserved
Pre-question text: How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question: …is reserved
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 635 19.8% 0.19794264
2 Disagree a little 783 24.4% 0.24407731
3 Neither agree nor disagree 511 15.9% 0.15928928
4 Agree a little 1002 31.2% 0.31234414
5 Agree strongly 197 6.1% 0.06140898
97 Not answered 80 2.5% 0.02493766
98 Not asked 9252 NA


c16bfi10_1


Variable label: I see myself as: Reserved [Most recent available data from r15bfi10_1, r16bfi10_1]
Pre-question text: …is reserved
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 1755 18.4% 0.18380813
2 Disagree a little 2279 23.9% 0.23868873
3 Neither agree nor disagree 1534 16.1% 0.16066192
4 Agree a little 3186 33.4% 0.33368245
5 Agree strongly 564 5.9% 0.05906996
97 Not answered 230 2.4% 0.02408881
98 Not asked 2912 NA


r15bfi10_2


Variable label: Describes you how well: Generally trusting.
Pre-question text:

How well does the following statement describe your personality?

I see myself as someone who …
Literal question: … is generally trusting
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 131 2.1% 0.02066246
2 Disagree a little 530 8.4% 0.08359621
3 Neither agree nor disagree 747 11.8% 0.11782334
4 Agree a little 3042 48% 0.47981073
5 Agree strongly 1774 28% 0.27981073
97 Not answered 116 1.8% 0.01829653
98 Not asked 6120 NA


r16bfi10_2


Variable label: I see myself as: Generally trusting
Pre-question text: How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question: …is generally trusting
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 82 2.6% 0.02556110
2 Disagree a little 272 8.5% 0.08478803
3 Neither agree nor disagree 360 11.2% 0.11221945
4 Agree a little 1441 44.9% 0.44918953
5 Agree strongly 1003 31.3% 0.31265586
97 Not answered 50 1.6% 0.01558603
98 Not asked 9252 NA


c16bfi10_2


Variable label: I see myself as: Generally trusting [Most recent available data from r15bfi10_2, r16bfi10_2]
Pre-question text: …is generally trusting
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 213 2.2% 0.02230834
2 Disagree a little 802 8.4% 0.08399665
3 Neither agree nor disagree 1107 11.6% 0.11594051
4 Agree a little 4483 47% 0.46952241
5 Agree strongly 2777 29.1% 0.29084625
97 Not answered 166 1.7% 0.01738584
98 Not asked 2912 NA


r15bfi10_3


Variable label: Describes you how well: Tendency to be lazy.
Pre-question text:

How well does the following statement describe your personality?

I see myself as someone who …
Literal question: … tend to be lazy
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 2162 34.1% 0.34100946
2 Disagree a little 1729 27.3% 0.27271293
3 Neither agree nor disagree 1029 16.2% 0.16230284
4 Agree a little 1122 17.7% 0.17697161
5 Agree strongly 176 2.8% 0.02776025
97 Not answered 122 1.9% 0.01924290
98 Not asked 6120 NA


r16bfi10_3


Variable label: I see myself as: Tends to be lazy
Pre-question text: How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question: …tends to be lazy
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 1190 37.1% 0.37094763
2 Disagree a little 836 26.1% 0.26059850
3 Neither agree nor disagree 500 15.6% 0.15586035
4 Agree a little 501 15.6% 0.15617207
5 Agree strongly 121 3.8% 0.03771820
97 Not answered 60 1.9% 0.01870324
98 Not asked 9252 NA


c16bfi10_3


Variable label: I see myself as: Tends to be lazy [Most recent available data from r15bfi10_3, r16bfi10_3]
Pre-question text: …tends to be lazy
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 3352 35.1% 0.35106829
2 Disagree a little 2565 26.9% 0.26864265
3 Neither agree nor disagree 1529 16% 0.16013825
4 Agree a little 1623 17% 0.16998324
5 Agree strongly 297 3.1% 0.03110599
97 Not answered 182 1.9% 0.01906158
98 Not asked 2912 NA


r15bfi10_4


Variable label: Describes you how well: Relaxed, handles stress well.
Pre-question text:

How well does the following statement describe your personality?

I see myself as someone who …
Literal question: … is relaxed, handles stress well
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 258 4.1% 0.04069401
2 Disagree somewhat 1186 18.7% 0.18706625
3 Neither agree nor disagree 1063 16.8% 0.16766562
4 Agree somewhat 2567 40.5% 0.40488959
5 Completely agree 1145 18.1% 0.18059937
97 Not answered 121 1.9% 0.01908517
98 Not asked 6120 NA


r16bfi10_4


Variable label: I see myself as: Relaxed, handles stress well
Pre-question text: How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question: … is relaxed, handles stress well
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 134 4.2% 0.04177057
2 Disagree a little 563 17.5% 0.17549875
3 Neither agree nor disagree 493 15.4% 0.15367830
4 Agree a little 1280 39.9% 0.39900249
5 Agree strongly 686 21.4% 0.21384040
97 Not answered 52 1.6% 0.01620948
98 Not asked 9252 NA


c16bfi10_4


Variable label: I see myself as: Relaxed, handles stress well [Most recent available data from r15bfi10_4, r16bfi10_4]
Pre-question text: … is relaxed, handles stress well
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 392 4.1% 0.04105572
2 Disagree a little 1749 18.3% 0.18317972
3 Neither agree nor disagree 1556 16.3% 0.16296607
4 Agree a little 3847 40.3% 0.40291160
5 Agree strongly 1831 19.2% 0.19176791
97 Not answered 173 1.8% 0.01811898
98 Not asked 2912 NA


r15bfi10_5


Variable label: Describes you how well: Few artistic interests.
Pre-question text:

How well does the following statement describe your personality?

I see myself as someone who …
Literal question: … has few artistic interests
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 1815 28.6% 0.28627760
2 Disagree somewhat 1983 31.3% 0.31277603
3 Neither agree nor disagree 993 15.7% 0.15662461
4 Agree somewhat 1120 17.7% 0.17665615
5 Completely agree 309 4.9% 0.04873817
97 Not answered 120 1.9% 0.01892744
98 Not asked 6120 NA


r16bfi10_5


Variable label: I see myself as: Has few artistic interests
Pre-question text: How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question: … has few artistic interests
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 956 29.8% 0.29800499
2 Disagree a little 923 28.8% 0.28771820
3 Neither agree nor disagree 508 15.8% 0.15835411
4 Agree a little 556 17.3% 0.17331671
5 Agree strongly 208 6.5% 0.06483791
97 Not answered 57 1.8% 0.01776808
98 Not asked 9252 NA


c16bfi10_5


Variable label: I see myself as: Has few artistic interests [Most recent available data from r15bfi10_5, r16bfi10_5]
Pre-question text: … has few artistic interests
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 2771 29% 0.29021785
2 Disagree a little 2906 30.4% 0.30435693
3 Neither agree nor disagree 1501 15.7% 0.15720570
4 Agree a little 1676 17.6% 0.17553414
5 Agree strongly 517 5.4% 0.05414747
97 Not answered 177 1.9% 0.01853791
98 Not asked 2912 NA


r15bfi10_6


Variable label: Describes you how well: Outgoing, sociable.
Pre-question text:

How well does the following statement describe your personality?

I see myself as someone who …
Literal question: … is outgoing, sociable
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 262 4.1% 0.04132492
2 Disagree somewhat 998 15.7% 0.15741325
3 Neither agree nor disagree 998 15.7% 0.15741325
4 Agree somewhat 2368 37.4% 0.37350158
5 Completely agree 1605 25.3% 0.25315457
97 Not answered 109 1.7% 0.01719243
98 Not asked 6120 NA


r16bfi10_6


Variable label: I see myself as: Outgoing, sociable
Pre-question text: How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question: … is outgoing, sociable
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 152 4.7% 0.04738155
2 Disagree a little 430 13.4% 0.13403990
3 Neither agree nor disagree 501 15.6% 0.15617207
4 Agree a little 1133 35.3% 0.35317955
5 Agree strongly 950 29.6% 0.29613466
97 Not answered 42 1.3% 0.01309227
98 Not asked 9252 NA


c16bfi10_6


Variable label: I see myself as: Outgoing, sociable [Most recent available data from r15bfi10_6, r16bfi10_6]
Pre-question text: … is outgoing, sociable
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 414 4.3% 0.04335987
2 Disagree a little 1428 15% 0.14956012
3 Neither agree nor disagree 1499 15.7% 0.15699623
4 Agree a little 3501 36.7% 0.36667365
5 Agree strongly 2555 26.8% 0.26759531
97 Not answered 151 1.6% 0.01581483
98 Not asked 2912 NA


r15bfi10_7


Variable label: Describes you how well: Tends to find fault with others.
Pre-question text:

How well does the following statement describe your personality?

I see myself as someone who …
Literal question: … tends to find fault with others
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 1052 16.6% 0.16593060
2 Disagree somewhat 1872 29.5% 0.29526814
3 Neither agree nor disagree 1787 28.2% 0.28186120
4 Agree somewhat 1376 21.7% 0.21703470
5 Completely agree 139 2.2% 0.02192429
97 Not answered 114 1.8% 0.01798107
98 Not asked 6120 NA


r16bfi10_7


Variable label: I see myself as: Tends to find fault with others
Pre-question text: How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question: … tends to find fault with others
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 554 17.3% 0.17269327
2 Disagree a little 957 29.8% 0.29831671
3 Neither agree nor disagree 900 28.1% 0.28054863
4 Agree a little 647 20.2% 0.20168329
5 Agree strongly 88 2.7% 0.02743142
97 Not answered 62 1.9% 0.01932668
98 Not asked 9252 NA


c16bfi10_7


Variable label: I see myself as: Tends to find fault with others [Most recent available data from r15bfi10_7, r16bfi10_7]
Pre-question text: … tends to find fault with others
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 1606 16.8% 0.16820276
2 Disagree a little 2829 29.6% 0.29629242
3 Neither agree nor disagree 2687 28.1% 0.28142019
4 Agree a little 2023 21.2% 0.21187683
5 Agree strongly 227 2.4% 0.02377461
97 Not answered 176 1.8% 0.01843318
98 Not asked 2912 NA


r15bfi10_8


Variable label: Describes you how well: Does a thorough job.
Pre-question text:

How well does the following statement describe your personality?

I see myself as someone who …
Literal question: … do a thorough job
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 94 1.5% 0.01482650
2 Disagree somewhat 141 2.2% 0.02223975
3 Neither agree nor disagree 576 9.1% 0.09085174
4 Agree somewhat 2640 41.6% 0.41640379
5 Completely agree 2779 43.8% 0.43832808
97 Not answered 110 1.7% 0.01735016
98 Not asked 6120 NA


r16bfi10_8


Variable label: I see myself as: Does a thorough job
Pre-question text: How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question: … does a thorough job
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 53 1.7% 0.01652120
2 Disagree a little 53 1.7% 0.01652120
3 Neither agree nor disagree 230 7.2% 0.07169576
4 Agree a little 1202 37.5% 0.37468828
5 Agree strongly 1618 50.4% 0.50436409
97 Not answered 52 1.6% 0.01620948
98 Not asked 9252 NA


c16bfi10_8


Variable label: I see myself as: Does a thorough job [Most recent available data from r15bfi10_8, r16bfi10_8]
Pre-question text: … does a thorough job
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 147 1.5% 0.01539589
2 Disagree a little 194 2% 0.02031839
3 Neither agree nor disagree 806 8.4% 0.08441558
4 Agree a little 3842 40.2% 0.40238793
5 Agree strongly 4397 46.1% 0.46051529
97 Not answered 162 1.7% 0.01696690
98 Not asked 2912 NA


r15bfi10_9


Variable label: Describes you how well: Easily nervous.
Pre-question text:

How well does the following statement describe your personality?

I see myself as someone who …
Literal question: … get nervous easily
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Completely disagree 1884 29.7% 0.29716088
2 Disagree somewhat 1854 29.2% 0.29242902
3 Neither agree nor disagree 1129 17.8% 0.17807571
4 Agree somewhat 1102 17.4% 0.17381703
5 Completely agree 247 3.9% 0.03895899
97 Not answered 124 2% 0.01955836
98 Not asked 6120 NA


r16bfi10_9


Variable label: I see myself as: Get nervous easily
Pre-question text: How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question: … get nervous easily
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 945 29.5% 0.29457606
2 Disagree a little 874 27.2% 0.27244389
3 Neither agree nor disagree 587 18.3% 0.18298005
4 Agree a little 609 19% 0.18983791
5 Agree strongly 137 4.3% 0.04270574
97 Not answered 56 1.7% 0.01745636
98 Not asked 9252 NA


c16bfi10_9


Variable label: I see myself as: Get nervous easily [Most recent available data from r15bfi10_9, r16bfi10_9]
Pre-question text: … get nervous easily
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 2829 29.6% 0.29629242
2 Disagree a little 2728 28.6% 0.28571429
3 Neither agree nor disagree 1716 18% 0.17972350
4 Agree a little 1711 17.9% 0.17919983
5 Agree strongly 384 4% 0.04021785
97 Not answered 180 1.9% 0.01885212
98 Not asked 2912 NA


r15bfi10_10


Variable label: Describes you how well: Active imagination.
Pre-question text:

How well does the following statement describe your personality?

I see myself as someone who …
Literal question: … has an active imagination
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 385 6.1% 0.06072555
2 Disagree a little 920 14.5% 0.14511041
3 Neither agree nor disagree 1635 25.8% 0.25788644
4 Agree a little 2143 33.8% 0.33801262
5 Agree strongly 1148 18.1% 0.18107256
97 Not answered 109 1.7% 0.01719243
98 Not asked 6120 NA


r16bfi10_10


Variable label: I see myself as: Has an active imagination
Pre-question text: How well do the following statements describe your personality? I see myself as someone who…
Literal question: … has an active imagination
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 261 8.1% 0.08135910
2 Disagree a little 411 12.8% 0.12811721
3 Neither agree nor disagree 789 24.6% 0.24594763
4 Agree a little 1051 32.8% 0.32761845
5 Agree strongly 637 19.9% 0.19856608
97 Not answered 59 1.8% 0.01839152
98 Not asked 9252 NA


c16bfi10_10


Variable label: I see myself as: Has an active imagination [Most recent available data from r15bfi10_10, r16bfi10_10]
Pre-question text: … has an active imagination
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Disagree strongly 646 6.8% 0.06765815
2 Disagree a little 1331 13.9% 0.13940092
3 Neither agree nor disagree 2424 25.4% 0.25387516
4 Agree a little 3194 33.5% 0.33452032
5 Agree strongly 1785 18.7% 0.18695015
97 Not answered 168 1.8% 0.01759531
98 Not asked 2912 NA


r16k43_1


Variable label: Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections this autumn?
Literal question: Which political party/party list did you vote for in the local elections this autumn?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. The order of the response options is randomized. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 329 3.4% 0.034086200
2 The Conservative Party 1939 20.1% 0.200891007
3 The Progress Party 506 5.2% 0.052424368
4 The Liberal Party 361 3.7% 0.037401575
5 The Socialist Left Party 801 8.3% 0.082987982
6 The Centre Party 1180 12.2% 0.122254455
7 The Green Party 853 8.8% 0.088375466
8 The Labour Party 1988 20.6% 0.205967675
9 The Red Party 458 4.7% 0.047451305
10 The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative) 204 2.1% 0.021135516
11 A joint party list 16 0.2% 0.001657688
12 A local party list 164 1.7% 0.016991297
13 Voted blank 74 0.8% 0.007666805
14 Did not vote 514 5.3% 0.053253212
15 Not entitled to vote 26 0.3% 0.002693742
16 Other: 203 2.1% 0.021031910
97 Not answered 36 0.4% 0.003729797
98 Not asked 2808 NA


r16k43_2


Variable label: Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council election this autumn?
Literal question: Which political party/party list did you vote for in the county council election this autumn?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. The order of the response options is randomized (but adhers to the order of r16k43_1).]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-16]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 340 3.5% 0.0352258599
2 The Conservative Party 1899 19.7% 0.1967467882
3 The Progress Party 524 5.4% 0.0542892665
4 The Liberal Party 327 3.4% 0.0338789888
5 The Socialist Left Party 756 7.8% 0.0783257356
6 The Centre Party 1246 12.9% 0.1290924161
7 The Green Party 824 8.5% 0.0853709076
8 The Labour Party 1836 19% 0.1902196436
9 The Red Party 441 4.6% 0.0456900124
10 The People’s Movement No to More Road Tolls (or similar toll initiative) 181 1.9% 0.0187525901
11 A joint party list 7 0.1% 0.0007252383
12 A local party list 46 0.5% 0.0047658516
13 Voted blank 124 1.3% 0.0128470783
14 Did not vote 760 7.9% 0.0787401575
15 Not entitled to vote 65 0.7% 0.0067343556
16 Other: 197 2% 0.0204102777
97 Not answered 79 0.8% 0.0081848322
98 Not asked 2808 NA


r16polint


Variable label: How interested are you in politics?
Literal question: How interested are you in politics?
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 466 14.5% 0.1452618454
2 Quite interested 1587 49.5% 0.4947007481
3 Slightly interested 1085 33.8% 0.3382169576
4 Not interested at all 67 2.1% 0.0208852868
97 Not answered 3 0.1% 0.0009351621
98 Not asked 9252 NA


r14pk8_1


Variable label: Placement political left-right scale.
Pre-question text: In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
Literal question: Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0 - Left 70 1.1% 0.010673986
2 1 278 4.2% 0.042390973
3 2 774 11.8% 0.118023788
4 3 1036 15.8% 0.157974992
5 4 782 11.9% 0.119243672
6 5 946 14.4% 0.144251296
7 6 701 10.7% 0.106892345
8 7 872 13.3% 0.132967368
9 8 698 10.6% 0.106434889
10 9 213 3.2% 0.032479414
11 10 - Right 133 2% 0.020280573
97 Not answered 55 0.8% 0.008386703
98 Not asked 5902 NA


r16pk8_1


Variable label: Your position on the political left-right scale
Pre-question text: People often talk about “left wing” and “right wing” politics. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are very much politically left wing, while 10 represents those who are very much politically right wing.
Literal question: Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0 - Left wing 51 1.6% 0.015897756
2 1 133 4.1% 0.041458853
3 2 416 13% 0.129675810
4 3 532 16.6% 0.165835411
5 4 357 11.1% 0.111284289
6 5 494 15.4% 0.153990025
7 6 348 10.8% 0.108478803
8 7 420 13.1% 0.130922693
9 8 308 9.6% 0.096009975
10 9 87 2.7% 0.027119701
11 10 - Right wing 46 1.4% 0.014339152
97 Not answered 16 0.5% 0.004987531
98 Not asked 9252 NA


r18pk8


Variable label: Place yourself on the political left-wing/right-wing scale
Pre-question text: In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing.” Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are on the far left politically, while 10 represents those who are on the far right.
Literal question: Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Left 49 3.4% 0.03419400
1 1 82 5.7% 0.05722261
2 2 153 10.7% 0.10676902
3 3 214 14.9% 0.14933706
4 4 153 10.7% 0.10676902
5 5 227 15.8% 0.15840893
6 6 146 10.2% 0.10188416
7 7 184 12.8% 0.12840195
8 8 141 9.8% 0.09839498
9 9 43 3% 0.03000698
10 10 - Right 26 1.8% 0.01814375
97 Not answered 15 1% 0.01046755
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk8


Variable label: Your position on the political left-right scale [Most recent available data from r14pk8_1, r16pk8_1, r18pk8]
Pre-question text: People often talk about “left wing” and “right wing” politics. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are very much politically left wing, while 10 represents those who are very much politically right wing.
Literal question: Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Left wing 49 0.4% 0.004375391
1 1 203 1.8% 0.018126618
2 2 564 5% 0.050361639
3 3 1404 12.5% 0.125368336
4 4 1721 15.4% 0.153674435
5 5 1366 12.2% 0.121975176
6 6 1586 14.2% 0.141619787
7 7 1233 11% 0.110099116
8 8 1433 12.8% 0.127957853
9 9 1049 9.4% 0.093669078
10 10 - Right wing 326 2.9% 0.029109742
97 Not answered 86 0.8% 0.007679257
98 Not asked 1261 NA
11 179 1.6% 0.015983570


r17pkby2


Variable label: Whether your local environment has become safer the last couple of years
Pre-question text: Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
Literal question: How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much safer 151 1.6% 0.016189557
2 Somewhat safer 711 7.6% 0.076230299
3 No change in safety 5473 58.7% 0.586791037
4 Somewhat more unsafe 2591 27.8% 0.277795647
5 Much more unsafe 346 3.7% 0.037096601
97 Not answered 55 0.6% 0.005896859
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pkby2


Variable label: How much safer/unsafe has your local environment become the past years?
Pre-question text: Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
Literal question: How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much safer 35 2.4% 0.024424285
2 Somewhat safer 135 9.4% 0.094207955
3 No change in safety 930 64.9% 0.648988137
4 Somewhat more unsafe 293 20.4% 0.204466155
5 Much more unsafe 29 2% 0.020237264
97 Not answered 11 0.8% 0.007676204
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pkby2


Variable label: How much safer/unsafe has your local environment become the past years? [Most recent available data from r17pkby2, r18pkby2]
Pre-question text: Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
Literal question: How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much safer 186 1.7% 0.017286245
2 Somewhat safer 846 7.9% 0.078624535
3 No change in safety 6403 59.5% 0.595074349
4 Somewhat more unsafe 2884 26.8% 0.268029740
5 Much more unsafe 375 3.5% 0.034851301
97 Not answered 66 0.6% 0.006133829
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r11bk25


Variable label: Gross annual income
Literal question: What is your current income?
Post-question: Gross annual income is:
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 < 150 000 303 5.4% 0.05434003
2 150 001 - 300 000 679 12.2% 0.12177188
3 300 001 - 400 000 860 15.4% 0.15423242
4 400 001 - 500 000 1026 18.4% 0.18400287
5 500 001 - 600 000 959 17.2% 0.17198709
6 600 001 - 700 000 637 11.4% 0.11423960
7 700 001 - 1 000 000 668 12% 0.11979914
8 > 1 000 000 328 5.9% 0.05882353
97 Not answered 116 2.1% 0.02080344
98 Not asked 6884 NA


r14bk25


Variable label: What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
Literal question: What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 <150 000 292 4.5% 0.04452577
2 150 001 - 300 000 822 12.5% 0.12534309
3 300 001 - 400 000 1045 15.9% 0.15934736
4 400 001 - 500 000 1181 18% 0.18008539
5 500 001 - 600 000 1096 16.7% 0.16712412
6 600 001 - 700 000 748 11.4% 0.11405916
7 700 001 - 1 000 000 865 13.2% 0.13189997
8 >1 000 000 376 5.7% 0.05733455
97 Not answered 133 2% 0.02028057
98 Not asked 5902 NA


r16bk25


Variable label: What is your current income? (Gross annual income)
Literal question: What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
Technical description: [Asked if r16group = 6 or 7. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 < 150 000 188 5.9% 0.05860349
2 150 001 - 300 000 368 11.5% 0.11471322
3 300 001 - 400 000 460 14.3% 0.14339152
4 400 001 - 500 000 561 17.5% 0.17487531
5 500 001 - 600 000 550 17.1% 0.17144638
6 600 001 - 700 000 370 11.5% 0.11533666
7 700 001 - 1 000 000 453 14.1% 0.14120948
8 > 1 000 000 220 6.9% 0.06857855
97 Not answered 38 1.2% 0.01184539
98 Not asked 9252 NA


r17bk25


Variable label: Your gross annual income
Pre-question text: What is your current income?
Literal question: Gross annual income is:
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert < 15]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 <150 000 231 3.6% 0.03618421
2 150 000 - 300 000 763 12% 0.11951754
3 300 001 - 400 000 984 15.4% 0.15413534
4 400 001 - 500 000 1070 16.8% 0.16760652
5 500 001 - 600 000 1090 17.1% 0.17073935
6 600 001 - 700 000 786 12.3% 0.12312030
7 700 001 - 1 000 000 875 13.7% 0.13706140
8 >1 000 000 424 6.6% 0.06641604
97 Not answered 161 2.5% 0.02521930
98 Not asked 6076 NA


r18bk25


Variable label: What is your current income?
Literal question: What is your current income?
Post-question: Gross annual income is:
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 <150 000 97 6.8% 0.06769016
2 150 001 - 300 000 158 11% 0.11025820
3 300 001 - 400 000 201 14% 0.14026518
4 400 001 - 500 000 234 16.3% 0.16329379
5 500 001 - 600 000 266 18.6% 0.18562456
6 600 001 - 700 000 170 11.9% 0.11863224
7 700 001 - 1 000 000 198 13.8% 0.13817167
8 >1 000 000 87 6.1% 0.06071179
97 Not answered 22 1.5% 0.01535241
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18bk25


Variable label: What is your current income? Gross annual income is: [Most recent available data from w01_k25, r3k25, r4k25, r5k25, r8k25, r9k25, r11bk25, r14bk25, r16bk25, r18bk25]
Literal question: What is your current income? Gross annual income is:
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 <150 000 683 5.5% 0.05530364
2 150 001 - 300 000 1514 12.3% 0.12259109
3 300 001 - 400 000 1889 15.3% 0.15295547
4 400 001 - 500 000 2188 17.7% 0.17716599
5 500 001 - 600 000 2112 17.1% 0.17101215
6 600 001 - 700 000 1413 11.4% 0.11441296
7 700 001 - 1 000 000 1655 13.4% 0.13400810
8 >1 000 000 749 6.1% 0.06064777
97 Not answered 147 1.2% 0.01190283
98 Not asked 110 NA


r17bk21


Variable label: Which type of business do you work/worked in?
Literal question: [Which type of business do you work in?/ What was the kind of business where you worked in your previous main occupation?]
Technical description: [Not asked to those who answered r12arbeid. Neither asked retirees (r12arbeid==8). Further conditions: r17bk33 != 9 and (r17bk33 = 6|7|8|9|10|11 OR (r17bk33 = 5 and respondent above the age of 28 years))]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 State, county or municipal administration 829 11.1% 0.110917849
2 Public sector (e.g. school and health services) 2233 29.9% 0.298769066
3 Publicly owned enterprise 463 6.2% 0.061948087
4 Private business 3087 41.3% 0.413031844
5 Family business 96 1.3% 0.012844528
6 Self-employed 460 6.2% 0.061546695
7 Other: 252 3.4% 0.033716885
97 Not answered 54 0.7% 0.007225047
98 Not asked 4986 NA


r18bk21


Variable label: Which type of business do you work in?
Literal question: Which type of business do you work in?
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7 and r18bk21 = 1, 2 or 3]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 State, county or municipal administration 85 10.5% 0.104938272
2 Public sector (e.g. school and health services) 276 34.1% 0.340740741
3 Publicly owned enterprise 48 5.9% 0.059259259
4 Private business 370 45.7% 0.456790123
5 Self-employed 6 0.7% 0.007407407
6 Other: 25 3.1% 0.030864198
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.000000000
98 Not asked 11650 NA


c18bk21


Variable label: Which type of business do you work in? [Most recent available data from r17bk21, r18bk21]
Literal question: Which type of business do you work in?
Technical description: [Composite variable. The alternative “Family business” from r17bk21 is excluded.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 State, county or municipal administration 914 11% 0.11033317
2 Public sector (e.g. school and health services) 2509 30.3% 0.30287301
3 Publicly owned enterprise 511 6.2% 0.06168518
4 Private business 3457 41.7% 0.41731048
5 Self-employed 102 1.2% 0.01231289
6 Other: 485 5.9% 0.05854660
97 Not answered 54 0.7% 0.00651859
98 Not asked 4176 NA
7 252 3% 0.03042009


r17bk33


Variable label: Work status, the last 7 days
Literal question: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) 4198 45% 0.4500911333
2 In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more 386 4.1% 0.0413852257
3 In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week 308 3.3% 0.0330224081
4 Self-employed 403 4.3% 0.0432078911
5 In education (not paid by an employer) 265 2.8% 0.0284121368
6 Unemployed and actively seeking a job 72 0.8% 0.0077195240
7 Unemployed and not actively seeking a job 32 0.3% 0.0034308995
8 Permanently ill or disabled 486 5.2% 0.0521067867
9 Retired 2835 30.4% 0.3039562560
10 In military service 4 0% 0.0004288624
11 Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons 42 0.5% 0.0045030556
12 Other: 238 2.6% 0.0255173153
97 Not answered 58 0.6% 0.0062185054
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18bk33


Variable label: Which description best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days?
Literal question: Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.
Post-question: Tick one of the options.
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) 698 48.7% 0.487090021
2 In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more 52 3.6% 0.036287509
3 In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week 60 4.2% 0.041870202
4 Self-employed 45 3.1% 0.031402652
5 In education (not paid by an employer) 65 4.5% 0.045359386
6 Unemployed and actively seeking a job 28 2% 0.019539428
7 Unemployed and not actively seeking a job 11 0.8% 0.007676204
8 Permanently ill or disabled 65 4.5% 0.045359386
9 Retired 357 24.9% 0.249127704
10 In military service 0 0% 0.000000000
11 Working at home, minding children or providing care to other Persons 3 0.2% 0.002093510
12 Other: 37 2.6% 0.025819958
97 Not answered 12 0.8% 0.008374040
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18bk33


Variable label: Which description best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days? [Most recent available data from r17bk33, r18bk33]
Literal question:

Which of the following descriptions best applies to what you have been doing for the last 7 days.

Post-question: Tick one of the options.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In full-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) 4896 45.5% 0.4550185874
2 In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) with working hours of 30 hours per week or more 438 4.1% 0.0407063197
3 In part-time paid work (or on temporary leave such as vacation leave or leave of absence/maternity leave) with working hours of less than 30 hours per week 368 3.4% 0.0342007435
4 Self-employed 448 4.2% 0.0416356877
5 In education (not paid by an employer) 330 3.1% 0.0306691450
6 Unemployed and actively seeking a job 100 0.9% 0.0092936803
7 Unemployed and not actively seeking a job 43 0.4% 0.0039962825
8 Permanently ill or disabled 551 5.1% 0.0512081784
9 Retired 3192 29.7% 0.2966542751
10 In military service 4 0% 0.0003717472
11 Working at home, minding children or providing care to other Persons 45 0.4% 0.0041821561
12 Other: 275 2.6% 0.0255576208
97 Not answered 70 0.7% 0.0065055762
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17sdo7_1


Variable label: Assertion: Ideally some groups in society should be on top and others on the bottom
Pre-question text: Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question: An ideal society requires some groups to be on top and others to be on the bottom
Post-question: You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Strongly oppose 1690 31.3% 0.312962963
2 2 - Somewhat oppose 1022 18.9% 0.189259259
3 3 - Slightly oppose 708 13.1% 0.131111111
4 4 - Neutral 726 13.4% 0.134444444
5 5 - Slightly favor 674 12.5% 0.124814815
6 6 - Somewhat favor 439 8.1% 0.081296296
7 7 - Strongly favor 95 1.8% 0.017592593
97 Not answered 46 0.9% 0.008518519
98 Not asked 7060 NA


r17sdo7_2


Variable label: Assertion: Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups
Pre-question text: Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question: Some groups of people are simply inferior to other groups.
Post-question: You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Strongly oppose 3190 59.1% 0.590740741
2 2 - Somewhat oppose 625 11.6% 0.115740741
3 3 - Slightly oppose 355 6.6% 0.065740741
4 4 - Neutral 597 11.1% 0.110555556
5 5 - Slightly favor 387 7.2% 0.071666667
6 6 - Somewhat favor 171 3.2% 0.031666667
7 7 - Strongly favor 27 0.5% 0.005000000
97 Not answered 48 0.9% 0.008888889
98 Not asked 7060 NA


r17sdo7_3


Variable label: Assertion: No one group should dominate in society
Pre-question text: Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question: No one group should dominate in society.
Post-question: You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Strongly oppose 417 7.7% 0.077222222
2 2 - Somewhat oppose 299 5.5% 0.055370370
3 3 - Slightly oppose 329 6.1% 0.060925926
4 4 - Neutral 564 10.4% 0.104444444
5 5 - Slightly favor 510 9.4% 0.094444444
6 6 - Somewhat favor 994 18.4% 0.184074074
7 7 - Strongly favor 2237 41.4% 0.414259259
97 Not answered 50 0.9% 0.009259259
98 Not asked 7060 NA


r17sdo7_4


Variable label: Assertion: Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top
Pre-question text: Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question: Groups at the bottom are just as deserving as groups at the top.
Post-question: You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Strongly oppose 242 4.5% 0.04481481
2 2 - Somewhat oppose 406 7.5% 0.07518519
3 3 - Slightly oppose 521 9.6% 0.09648148
4 4 - Neutral 757 14% 0.14018519
5 5 - Slightly favor 600 11.1% 0.11111111
6 6 - Somewhat favor 1115 20.6% 0.20648148
7 7 - Strongly favor 1690 31.3% 0.31296296
97 Not answered 69 1.3% 0.01277778
98 Not asked 7060 NA


r17sdo7_5


Variable label: Assertion: Equality between groups should not be our main goal
Pre-question text: Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question: Equality between groups should not be our main goal.
Post-question: You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Strongly oppose 1157 21.4% 0.21425926
2 2 - Somewhat oppose 1084 20.1% 0.20074074
3 3 - Slightly oppose 605 11.2% 0.11203704
4 4 - Neutral 917 17% 0.16981481
5 5 - Slightly favor 770 14.3% 0.14259259
6 6 - Somewhat favor 528 9.8% 0.09777778
7 7 - Strongly favor 273 5.1% 0.05055556
97 Not answered 66 1.2% 0.01222222
98 Not asked 7060 NA


r17sdo7_6


Variable label: Assertion: It is unjust to try to make groups equal
Pre-question text: Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question: It is unjust to try to make groups equal.
Post-question: You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Strongly oppose 1248 23.1% 0.23111111
2 2 - Somewhat oppose 971 18% 0.17981481
3 3 - Slightly oppose 600 11.1% 0.11111111
4 4 - Neutral 1131 20.9% 0.20944444
5 5 - Slightly favor 702 13% 0.13000000
6 6 - Somewhat favor 465 8.6% 0.08611111
7 7 - Strongly favor 203 3.8% 0.03759259
97 Not answered 80 1.5% 0.01481481
98 Not asked 7060 NA


r17sdo7_7


Variable label: Assertion: We should equalize conditions for different groups
Pre-question text: Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question: We should do what we can to equalize conditions for different groups.
Post-question: You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Strongly oppose 46 0.9% 0.008518519
2 2 - Somewhat oppose 142 2.6% 0.026296296
3 3 - Slightly oppose 308 5.7% 0.057037037
4 4 - Neutral 543 10.1% 0.100555556
5 5 - Slightly favor 1007 18.6% 0.186481481
6 6 - Somewhat favor 1293 23.9% 0.239444444
7 7 - Strongly favor 2004 37.1% 0.371111111
97 Not answered 57 1.1% 0.010555556
98 Not asked 7060 NA


r17sdo7_8


Variable label: Assertion: We should give all groups an equal chance to succeed
Pre-question text: Indicate how strongly you support or oppose the following assertions by selecting a number from 1 to 7 on the scale.
Literal question: We should work to give all groups an equal chance to succeed.
Post-question: You can look through the assertions quickly, your first assessment is usually the best.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert <= 11]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Strongly oppose 22 0.4% 0.004074074
2 2 - Somewhat oppose 27 0.5% 0.005000000
3 3 - Slightly oppose 47 0.9% 0.008703704
4 4 - Neutral 246 4.6% 0.045555556
5 5 - Slightly favor 489 9.1% 0.090555556
6 6 - Somewhat favor 1034 19.1% 0.191481481
7 7 - Strongly favor 3489 64.6% 0.646111111
97 Not answered 46 0.9% 0.008518519
98 Not asked 7060 NA


r14pk14


Variable label: Agree/Disagree: Sometimes politics is so complicated people like me do not understand it.
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 233 3.6% 0.035529125
2 Agree 682 10.4% 0.103995120
3 Agree somewhat 2002 30.5% 0.305275999
4 Neither agree nor disagree 645 9.8% 0.098353156
5 Disagree somewhat 865 13.2% 0.131899970
6 Disagree 1591 24.3% 0.242604453
7 Strongly disagree 524 8% 0.079902409
97 Not answered 16 0.2% 0.002439768
98 Not asked 5902 NA


r17pk14


Variable label: Assertion: Sometimes politics is so complicated that it’s hard to understand
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert = 16]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 162 5.5% 0.055045872
2 Agree 395 13.4% 0.134216786
3 Agree somewhat 786 26.7% 0.267074414
4 Neither agree nor disagree 289 9.8% 0.098199117
5 Disagree somewhat 373 12.7% 0.126741420
6 Disagree 640 21.7% 0.217465172
7 Strongly disagree 275 9.3% 0.093442066
97 Not answered 23 0.8% 0.007815155
98 Not asked 9517 NA


c17pk14


Variable label: Assertion: Sometimes politics is so complicated that it’s hard to understand [Most recent available data from r14pk14, r17pk14]
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
Literal question: Sometimes politics is so complicated that people like me do not understand what it’s about.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 395 4.2% 0.041574571
2 Agree 1077 11.3% 0.113356489
3 Agree somewhat 2788 29.3% 0.293442795
4 Neither agree nor disagree 934 9.8% 0.098305442
5 Disagree somewhat 1238 13% 0.130302073
6 Disagree 2231 23.5% 0.234817388
7 Strongly disagree 799 8.4% 0.084096411
97 Not answered 39 0.4% 0.004104831
98 Not asked 2959 NA


r17pk15


Variable label: Whether people in general can be trusted
Literal question: Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Cannot be careful enough 76 0.8% 0.0081483864
1 1 34 0.4% 0.0036453308
2 2 124 1.3% 0.0132947357
3 3 281 3% 0.0301275866
4 4 321 3.4% 0.0344162110
5 5 864 9.3% 0.0926342876
6 6 836 9% 0.0896322505
7 7 2133 22.9% 0.2286908974
8 8 2528 27.1% 0.2710410636
9 9 1011 10.8% 0.1083949823
10 10 - Most people can be trusted 1111 11.9% 0.1191165434
97 Not answered 8 0.1% 0.0008577249
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk15


Variable label: Whether most people in general can be trusted
Literal question: Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Cannot be careful enough 13 0.9% 0.009071877
1 1 3 0.2% 0.002093510
2 2 15 1% 0.010467551
3 3 42 2.9% 0.029309142
4 4 49 3.4% 0.034193999
5 5 120 8.4% 0.083740405
6 6 130 9.1% 0.090718772
7 7 334 23.3% 0.233077460
8 8 370 25.8% 0.258199581
9 9 151 10.5% 0.105373343
10 10 - Most people can be trusted 206 14.4% 0.143754361
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.000000000
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk15


Variable label: Whether most people in general can be trusted [Most recent available data from r17pk15, r18pk15]
Literal question: Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Cannot be careful enough 89 0.8% 0.0082713755
1 1 37 0.3% 0.0034386617
2 2 139 1.3% 0.0129182156
3 3 323 3% 0.0300185874
4 4 370 3.4% 0.0343866171
5 5 984 9.1% 0.0914498141
6 6 966 9% 0.0897769517
7 7 2467 22.9% 0.2292750929
8 8 2898 26.9% 0.2693308550
9 9 1162 10.8% 0.1079925651
10 10 - Most people can be trusted 1317 12.2% 0.1223977695
97 Not answered 8 0.1% 0.0007434944
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r14pk13


Variable label: How much say in what the government does does the political system in Norway allow people like you.
Literal question: How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 46 0.7% 0.007014334
2 To a great extent 705 10.8% 0.107502287
3 To some extent 2893 44.1% 0.441140592
4 To a small extent 2393 36.5% 0.364897835
5 Not at all 496 7.6% 0.075632815
97 Not answered 25 0.4% 0.003812138
98 Not asked 5902 NA


r17pk13


Variable label: Whether the political system in Norway allow you to have a say
Literal question: How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
Technical description: [Asked if r17rekruttert = 16]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 24 0.8% 0.008154944
2 To a great extent 317 10.8% 0.107713218
3 To some extent 1335 45.4% 0.453618756
4 To a small extent 982 33.4% 0.333673123
5 Not at all 257 8.7% 0.087325858
97 Not answered 28 1% 0.009514101
98 Not asked 9517 NA


c17pk13


Variable label: Whether the political system in Norway allow you to have a say [Most recent available data from r14pk13, r17pk13]
Literal question: How much would you say the political system in Norway allows people like you to have a say in what the government does?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 70 0.7% 0.007367646
2 To a great extent 1022 10.8% 0.107567624
3 To some extent 4228 44.5% 0.445005789
4 To a small extent 3375 35.5% 0.355225766
5 Not at all 753 7.9% 0.079254815
97 Not answered 53 0.6% 0.005578360
98 Not asked 2959 NA


r17pk9_1


Variable label: Open: The most important political issues for you personally (1) [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
98 12460 NA


r18pk9_1


Variable label: Open: The most important political issues for you personally (1) [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
98 12460 NA


c18pk9_1


Variable label: Open: The most important political issues for you personally (1) [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity] [Most recent available data from r17pk9_1, r18pk9_1]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
Sysmiss 0 NA
98 12460 NA


r17pk9_2


Variable label: Open: The most important political issues for you personally (2) [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
98 12460 NA


r18pk9_2


Variable label: Open: The second most important political issues for you personally (2) [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
98 12460 NA


c18pk9_2


Variable label: Open: The second most important political issues for you personally (2) [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity] [Most recent available data from r17pk9_2, r18pk9_2]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
Sysmiss 0 NA
98 12460 NA


r17pk9_3


Variable label: Open: The most important political issues for you personally (3) [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
98 12460 NA


r18pk9_3


Variable label: Open: The third most important political issues for you personally (3) [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
98 12460 NA


c18pk9_3


Variable label: Open: The third most important political issues for you personally (3) [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity] [Most recent available data from r17pk9_3, r18pk9_3]
Literal question: What are the most important political issues or areas for you personally?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
Sysmiss 0 NA
98 12460 NA


r17pktilfreds1


Variable label: All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
Literal question: All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 2890 31% 0.309853115
2 Satisfied 5186 55.6% 0.556020157
3 Somewhat satisfied 1016 10.9% 0.108931060
4 Dissatisfied 196 2.1% 0.021014260
5 Very dissatisfied 24 0.3% 0.002573175
97 Not answered 15 0.2% 0.001608234
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pktilfreds1


Variable label: All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
Literal question: All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 497 34.7% 0.346824843
2 Satisfied 749 52.3% 0.522679693
3 Somewhat satisfied 139 9.7% 0.096999302
4 Dissatisfied 43 3% 0.030006978
5 Very dissatisfied 5 0.3% 0.003489184
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.000000000
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pktilfreds1


Variable label: All in all, how satisfied are you with life? [Most recent available data from r17pktilfreds1, r18pktilfreds1]
Literal question: All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 3387 31.5% 0.314776952
2 Satisfied 5935 55.2% 0.551579926
3 Somewhat satisfied 1155 10.7% 0.107342007
4 Dissatisfied 239 2.2% 0.022211896
5 Very dissatisfied 29 0.3% 0.002695167
97 Not answered 15 0.1% 0.001394052
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pk10


Variable label: How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
Literal question: How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
Post-question: Do you think it is:
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 2669 28.6% 0.286158465
2 Good 4801 51.5% 0.514742146
3 Quite good 1114 11.9% 0.119438190
4 Neither good nor bad 394 4.2% 0.042242951
5 Quite bad 224 2.4% 0.024016297
6 Bad 88 0.9% 0.009434974
7 Very Bad 24 0.3% 0.002573175
97 Not answered 13 0.1% 0.001393803
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk10


Variable label: How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
Literal question: How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
Post-question: Do you think it is:
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 296 20.7% 0.206559665
2 Good 705 49.2% 0.491974878
3 Quite good 214 14.9% 0.149337055
4 Neither good nor bad 85 5.9% 0.059316120
5 Quite bad 98 6.8% 0.068387997
6 Bad 26 1.8% 0.018143754
7 Very bad 7 0.5% 0.004884857
97 Not answered 2 0.1% 0.001395673
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk10


Variable label: How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway? [Most recent available data from r17pk10, r18pk10]
Literal question: How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway?
Post-question: Do you think it is:
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 2965 27.6% 0.275557621
2 Good 5506 51.2% 0.511710037
3 Quite good 1328 12.3% 0.123420074
4 Neither good nor bad 479 4.5% 0.044516729
5 Quite bad 322 3% 0.029925651
6 Bad 114 1.1% 0.010594796
7 Very bad 31 0.3% 0.002881041
97 Not answered 15 0.1% 0.001394052
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17tdr17


Variable label: The economic situation in your region of the country compared to the rest of Norway
Literal question: If you compare the economic situation [in your region of the country] with the rest of Norway, do you consider the situation [in your region of the country] as better, worse or the same?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Better 2723 29.2% 0.291948108
2 Worse 1272 13.6% 0.136378257
3 The same 5253 56.3% 0.563203602
97 Not answered 79 0.8% 0.008470033
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17pktilfreds4


Variable label: How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 939 10.1% 0.100675458
2 Satisfied 4858 52.1% 0.520853436
3 Somewhat satisfied 2425 26% 0.259997856
4 Dissatisfied 883 9.5% 0.094671384
5 Very dissatisfied 191 2% 0.020478182
97 Not answered 31 0.3% 0.003323684
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pktilfreds4


Variable label: How satisfied with democracy in Norway
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 279 19.5% 0.194696441
2 Satisfied 803 56% 0.560362875
3 Somewhat satisfied 262 18.3% 0.182833217
4 Dissatisfied 73 5.1% 0.050942080
5 Very dissatisfied 14 1% 0.009769714
97 Not answered 2 0.1% 0.001395673
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pktilfreds4


Variable label: How satisfied with democracy in Norway [Most recent available data from r17pktilfreds4, r18pktilfreds4]
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 1218 11.3% 0.113197026
2 Satisfied 5661 52.6% 0.526115242
3 Somewhat satisfied 2687 25% 0.249721190
4 Dissatisfied 956 8.9% 0.088847584
5 Very dissatisfied 205 1.9% 0.019052045
97 Not answered 33 0.3% 0.003066914
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pktilfreds3


Variable label: How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 203 2.2% 0.021764769
2 Satisfied 2001 21.5% 0.214538437
3 Somewhat satisfied 2974 31.9% 0.318859226
4 Dissatisfied 2769 29.7% 0.296880026
5 Very dissatisfied 1290 13.8% 0.138308138
97 Not answered 90 1% 0.009649405
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pktilfreds3


Variable label: How satisfied with the present government in Norway
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 112 7.8% 0.07815771
2 Satisfied 482 33.6% 0.33635729
3 Somewhat satisfied 484 33.8% 0.33775297
4 Dissatisfied 271 18.9% 0.18911375
5 Very dissatisfied 78 5.4% 0.05443126
97 Not answered 6 0.4% 0.00418702
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pktilfreds3


Variable label: How satisfied with the present government in Norway [Most recent available data from r17pktilfreds3, r18pktilfreds3]
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 315 2.9% 0.029275093
2 Satisfied 2483 23.1% 0.230762082
3 Somewhat satisfied 3458 32.1% 0.321375465
4 Dissatisfied 3040 28.3% 0.282527881
5 Very dissatisfied 1368 12.7% 0.127137546
97 Not answered 96 0.9% 0.008921933
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pk204


Variable label: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 284 3% 0.030449233
2 The Conservative Party 1815 19.5% 0.194596333
3 The Progress Party 762 8.2% 0.081698295
4 The Liberal Party 258 2.8% 0.027661628
5 The Socialist Left Party 879 9.4% 0.094242522
6 The Centre Party 1435 15.4% 0.153854401
7 The Green Party 698 7.5% 0.074836496
8 The Labour Party 1863 20% 0.199742683
9 The Red Party 496 5.3% 0.053178943
10 Would not vote 156 1.7% 0.016725635
11 Would cast a blank vote 238 2.6% 0.025517315
12 Not entitled to vote 157 1.7% 0.016832851
13 Other: 237 2.5% 0.025410100
97 Not answered 49 0.5% 0.005253565
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk204


Variable label: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 1, 3, 4 or 5]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 194 3.4% 0.034136900
2 The Conservative Party 1353 23.8% 0.238078480
3 The Progressive Party 421 7.4% 0.074080591
4 The Liberal Party 158 2.8% 0.027802217
5 The Socialist Left Party 537 9.4% 0.094492346
6 The Centre Party 781 13.7% 0.137427415
7 The Green Party 355 6.2% 0.062467007
8 The Labour Party 1078 19% 0.189688545
9 The Red Party 300 5.3% 0.052789020
10 Would not vote 91 1.6% 0.016012669
11 Would cast a blank vote 132 2.3% 0.023227169
12 Not entitled to vote 118 2.1% 0.020763681
13 Other: 139 2.4% 0.024458913
97 Not answered 26 0.5% 0.004575048
98 Not asked 6777 NA


c18pk204


Variable label: Would vote for which party if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow [Most recent available data from r17pk204, r18pk204]
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-13]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 315 3.2% 0.032067596
2 The Conservative Party 2166 22.1% 0.220502901
3 The Progressive Party 751 7.6% 0.076453222
4 The Liberal Party 273 2.8% 0.027791917
5 The Socialist Left Party 920 9.4% 0.093657742
6 The Centre Party 1407 14.3% 0.143235264
7 The Green Party 686 7% 0.069836099
8 The Labour Party 1913 19.5% 0.194747022
9 The Red Party 527 5.4% 0.053649598
10 Would not vote 160 1.6% 0.016288303
11 Would cast a blank vote 238 2.4% 0.024228851
12 Not entitled to vote 182 1.9% 0.018527945
13 Other: 250 2.5% 0.025450473
97 Not answered 35 0.4% 0.003563066
98 Not asked 2637 NA


r17pk6_1


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Christian Democratic Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Christian Democratic Party
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1603 17.2% 0.171866624
2 Really dislike 1995 21.4% 0.213895143
3 Dislike somewhat 2277 24.4% 0.244129945
4 Neither dislike nor like 1680 18% 0.180122226
5 Like somewhat 1235 13.2% 0.132411279
6 Really like 339 3.6% 0.036346092
7 Intensely like 92 1% 0.009863836
97 Not answered 106 1.1% 0.011364855
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk6_1


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Christian Democratic Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Christian Democratic Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 228 15.9% 0.15910677
2 Really dislike 338 23.6% 0.23586881
3 Dislike somewhat 320 22.3% 0.22330775
4 Neither dislike nor like 248 17.3% 0.17306350
5 Like somewhat 199 13.9% 0.13886950
6 Really like 53 3.7% 0.03698535
7 Intensely like 19 1.3% 0.01325890
97 Not answered 28 2% 0.01953943
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk6_1


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Christian Democratic Party [Most recent available data from r17pk6_1, r18pk6_1]
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Christian Democratic Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1831 17% 0.17016729
2 Really dislike 2333 21.7% 0.21682156
3 Dislike somewhat 2597 24.1% 0.24135688
4 Neither dislike nor like 1928 17.9% 0.17918216
5 Like somewhat 1434 13.3% 0.13327138
6 Really like 392 3.6% 0.03643123
7 Intensely like 111 1% 0.01031599
97 Not answered 134 1.2% 0.01245353
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pk6_2


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Conservative Party
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 535 5.7% 0.05736035
2 Really dislike 1384 14.8% 0.14838641
3 Dislike somewhat 1879 20.1% 0.20145813
4 Neither dislike nor like 1158 12.4% 0.12415568
5 Like somewhat 2221 23.8% 0.23812587
6 Really like 1681 18% 0.18022944
7 Intensely like 357 3.8% 0.03827597
97 Not answered 112 1.2% 0.01200815
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk6_2


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Conservative Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 52 3.6% 0.03628751
2 Really dislike 168 11.7% 0.11723657
3 Dislike somewhat 265 18.5% 0.18492673
4 Neither dislike nor like 208 14.5% 0.14515003
5 Like somewhat 364 25.4% 0.25401256
6 Really like 295 20.6% 0.20586183
7 Intensely like 63 4.4% 0.04396371
97 Not answered 18 1.3% 0.01256106
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk6_2


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Conservative Party [Most recent available data from r17pk6_2, r18pk6_2]
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Conservative Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 587 5.5% 0.05455390
2 Really dislike 1552 14.4% 0.14423792
3 Dislike somewhat 2144 19.9% 0.19925651
4 Neither dislike nor like 1366 12.7% 0.12695167
5 Like somewhat 2585 24% 0.24024164
6 Really like 1976 18.4% 0.18364312
7 Intensely like 420 3.9% 0.03903346
97 Not answered 130 1.2% 0.01208178
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pk6_3


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Progress Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Progress Party
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 3145 33.7% 0.33719310
2 Really dislike 1738 18.6% 0.18634073
3 Dislike somewhat 1313 14.1% 0.14077410
4 Neither dislike nor like 764 8.2% 0.08191273
5 Like somewhat 1311 14.1% 0.14055967
6 Really like 710 7.6% 0.07612308
7 Intensely like 244 2.6% 0.02616061
97 Not answered 102 1.1% 0.01093599
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk6_3


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Progress Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Progress Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 482 33.6% 0.33635729
2 Really dislike 291 20.3% 0.20307048
3 Dislike somewhat 194 13.5% 0.13538032
4 Neither dislike nor like 132 9.2% 0.09211445
5 Like somewhat 190 13.3% 0.13258897
6 Really like 87 6.1% 0.06071179
7 Intensely like 30 2.1% 0.02093510
97 Not answered 27 1.9% 0.01884159
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk6_3


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Progress Party [Most recent available data from r17pk6_3, r18pk6_3]
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Progress Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 3627 33.7% 0.33708178
2 Really dislike 2029 18.9% 0.18856877
3 Dislike somewhat 1507 14% 0.14005576
4 Neither dislike nor like 896 8.3% 0.08327138
5 Like somewhat 1501 13.9% 0.13949814
6 Really like 797 7.4% 0.07407063
7 Intensely like 274 2.5% 0.02546468
97 Not answered 129 1.2% 0.01198885
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pk6_4


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Liberal Party
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1211 13% 0.12983810
2 Really dislike 1589 17% 0.17036561
3 Dislike somewhat 2045 21.9% 0.21925592
4 Neither dislike nor like 2154 23.1% 0.23094243
5 Like somewhat 1673 17.9% 0.17937172
6 Really like 465 5% 0.04985526
7 Intensely like 66 0.7% 0.00707623
97 Not answered 124 1.3% 0.01329474
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk6_4


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Liberal Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 118 8.2% 0.082344731
2 Really dislike 184 12.8% 0.128401954
3 Dislike somewhat 277 19.3% 0.193300768
4 Neither dislike nor like 390 27.2% 0.272156315
5 Like somewhat 323 22.5% 0.225401256
6 Really like 101 7% 0.070481507
7 Intensely like 10 0.7% 0.006978367
97 Not answered 30 2.1% 0.020935101
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk6_4


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Liberal Party [Most recent available data from r17pk6_4, r18pk6_4]
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Liberal Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1329 12.4% 0.123513011
2 Really dislike 1773 16.5% 0.164776952
3 Dislike somewhat 2322 21.6% 0.215799257
4 Neither dislike nor like 2544 23.6% 0.236431227
5 Like somewhat 1996 18.6% 0.185501859
6 Really like 566 5.3% 0.052602230
7 Intensely like 76 0.7% 0.007063197
97 Not answered 154 1.4% 0.014312268
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pk6_5


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Socialist Left Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Socialist Left Party
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1214 13% 0.13015975
2 Really dislike 1482 15.9% 0.15889353
3 Dislike somewhat 1419 15.2% 0.15213895
4 Neither dislike nor like 1561 16.7% 0.16736357
5 Like somewhat 1822 19.5% 0.19534684
6 Really like 1293 13.9% 0.13862978
7 Intensely like 414 4.4% 0.04438726
97 Not answered 122 1.3% 0.01308030
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk6_5


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Socialist Left Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Socialist Left Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 139 9.7% 0.09699930
2 Really dislike 184 12.8% 0.12840195
3 Dislike somewhat 226 15.8% 0.15771110
4 Neither dislike nor like 262 18.3% 0.18283322
5 Like somewhat 312 21.8% 0.21772505
6 Really like 213 14.9% 0.14863922
7 Intensely like 64 4.5% 0.04466155
97 Not answered 33 2.3% 0.02302861
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk6_5


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Socialist Left Party [Most recent available data from r17pk6_5, r18pk6_5]
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Socialist Left Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1353 12.6% 0.12574349
2 Really dislike 1666 15.5% 0.15483271
3 Dislike somewhat 1645 15.3% 0.15288104
4 Neither dislike nor like 1823 16.9% 0.16942379
5 Like somewhat 2134 19.8% 0.19832714
6 Really like 1506 14% 0.13996283
7 Intensely like 478 4.4% 0.04442379
97 Not answered 155 1.4% 0.01440520
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pk6_6


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Centre Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Centre Party
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 408 4.4% 0.04374397
2 Really dislike 858 9.2% 0.09199099
3 Dislike somewhat 1495 16% 0.16028734
4 Neither dislike nor like 2008 21.5% 0.21528895
5 Like somewhat 2576 27.6% 0.27618741
6 Really like 1480 15.9% 0.15867910
7 Intensely like 377 4% 0.04042029
97 Not answered 125 1.3% 0.01340195
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk6_6


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Centre Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Centre Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 66 4.6% 0.04605722
2 Really dislike 113 7.9% 0.07885555
3 Dislike somewhat 209 14.6% 0.14584787
4 Neither dislike nor like 364 25.4% 0.25401256
5 Like somewhat 426 29.7% 0.29727844
6 Really like 181 12.6% 0.12630844
7 Intensely like 38 2.7% 0.02651779
97 Not answered 36 2.5% 0.02512212
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk6_6


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Centre Party [Most recent available data from r17pk6_6, r18pk6_6]
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Centre Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 474 4.4% 0.04405204
2 Really dislike 971 9% 0.09024164
3 Dislike somewhat 1704 15.8% 0.15836431
4 Neither dislike nor like 2372 22% 0.22044610
5 Like somewhat 3002 27.9% 0.27899628
6 Really like 1661 15.4% 0.15436803
7 Intensely like 415 3.9% 0.03856877
97 Not answered 161 1.5% 0.01496283
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pk6_7


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Green Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Green Party
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1721 18.5% 0.18451807
2 Really dislike 1319 14.1% 0.14141739
3 Dislike somewhat 1416 15.2% 0.15181730
4 Neither dislike nor like 1267 13.6% 0.13584218
5 Like somewhat 2007 21.5% 0.21518173
6 Really like 1143 12.3% 0.12254744
7 Intensely like 357 3.8% 0.03827597
97 Not answered 97 1% 0.01039991
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk6_7


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Green Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Green Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 205 14.3% 0.14305652
2 Really dislike 183 12.8% 0.12770412
3 Dislike somewhat 234 16.3% 0.16329379
4 Neither dislike nor like 194 13.5% 0.13538032
5 Like somewhat 336 23.4% 0.23447313
6 Really like 206 14.4% 0.14375436
7 Intensely like 47 3.3% 0.03279833
97 Not answered 28 2% 0.01953943
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk6_7


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Green Party [Most recent available data from r17pk6_7, r18pk6_7]
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Green Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1926 17.9% 0.17899628
2 Really dislike 1502 14% 0.13959108
3 Dislike somewhat 1650 15.3% 0.15334572
4 Neither dislike nor like 1461 13.6% 0.13578067
5 Like somewhat 2343 21.8% 0.21775093
6 Really like 1349 12.5% 0.12537175
7 Intensely like 404 3.8% 0.03754647
97 Not answered 125 1.2% 0.01161710
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pk6_8


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Labour Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Labour Party
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 406 4.4% 0.04352954
2 Really dislike 746 8% 0.07998285
3 Dislike somewhat 1601 17.2% 0.17165219
4 Neither dislike nor like 1444 15.5% 0.15481934
5 Like somewhat 2827 30.3% 0.30309853
6 Really like 1835 19.7% 0.19674065
7 Intensely like 359 3.8% 0.03849040
97 Not answered 109 1.2% 0.01168650
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk6_8


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Labour Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Labour Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 42 2.9% 0.02930914
2 Really dislike 83 5.8% 0.05792045
3 Dislike somewhat 185 12.9% 0.12909979
4 Neither dislike nor like 218 15.2% 0.15212840
5 Like somewhat 474 33.1% 0.33077460
6 Really like 353 24.6% 0.24633636
7 Intensely like 58 4% 0.04047453
97 Not answered 20 1.4% 0.01395673
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk6_8


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Labour Party [Most recent available data from r17pk6_8, r18pk6_8]
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Labour Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 448 4.2% 0.04163569
2 Really dislike 829 7.7% 0.07704461
3 Dislike somewhat 1786 16.6% 0.16598513
4 Neither dislike nor like 1662 15.4% 0.15446097
5 Like somewhat 3301 30.7% 0.30678439
6 Really like 2188 20.3% 0.20334572
7 Intensely like 417 3.9% 0.03875465
97 Not answered 129 1.2% 0.01198885
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pk6_9


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Red Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Red Party
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1963 21% 0.21046424
2 Really dislike 1401 15% 0.15020907
3 Dislike somewhat 1288 13.8% 0.13809371
4 Neither dislike nor like 1567 16.8% 0.16800686
5 Like somewhat 1774 19% 0.19020049
6 Really like 872 9.3% 0.09349201
7 Intensely like 325 3.5% 0.03484507
97 Not answered 137 1.5% 0.01468854
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk6_9


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Red Party
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Red Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 268 18.7% 0.18702024
2 Really dislike 196 13.7% 0.13677599
3 Dislike somewhat 198 13.8% 0.13817167
4 Neither dislike nor like 285 19.9% 0.19888346
5 Like somewhat 264 18.4% 0.18422889
6 Really like 145 10.1% 0.10118632
7 Intensely like 44 3.1% 0.03070482
97 Not answered 33 2.3% 0.02302861
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk6_9


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Red Party [Most recent available data from r17pk6_9, r18pk6_9]
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Red Party
Post-question: Click on you desired answer
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 2231 20.7% 0.20734201
2 Really dislike 1597 14.8% 0.14842007
3 Dislike somewhat 1486 13.8% 0.13810409
4 Neither dislike nor like 1852 17.2% 0.17211896
5 Like somewhat 2038 18.9% 0.18940520
6 Really like 1017 9.5% 0.09451673
7 Intensely like 369 3.4% 0.03429368
97 Not answered 170 1.6% 0.01579926
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pkdv5


Variable label: Advantage/disadvantage for Norway that immigrants come to live here
Literal question: In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very great advantage 368 3.9% 0.03945534
2 Great advantage 1690 18.1% 0.18119438
3 Slightly advantageous 3580 38.4% 0.38383189
4 Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage 1362 14.6% 0.14602766
5 A slight disadvantage 1455 15.6% 0.15599871
6 A great disadvantage 513 5.5% 0.05500161
7 Very great disadvantage 334 3.6% 0.03581001
97 Not answered 25 0.3% 0.00268039
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17pkmeme9


Variable label: Your opinion on refugees’ opportunity to be granted residence in Norway
Literal question: What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much easier 251 2.7% 0.026911118
2 Easier 1120 12% 0.120081484
3 Somewhat easier 2037 21.8% 0.218398199
4 Same as today 3251 34.9% 0.348557950
5 Slightly more difficult 1249 13.4% 0.133912298
6 More difficult 708 7.6% 0.075908652
7 Much more difficult 660 7.1% 0.070762303
97 Not answered 51 0.5% 0.005467996
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17pk101


Variable label: Your opinion on Norway’s preconditions for integrating refugees
Literal question: As you see it, how good or poor are the preconditions in Norwegian society for integrating refugees?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 590 6.3% 0.063257210
2 Good 2620 28.1% 0.280904900
3 Somewhat good 2029 21.8% 0.217540474
4 Neither good nor bad 1081 11.6% 0.115900075
5 Somewhat poor 1709 18.3% 0.183231479
6 Poor 937 10% 0.100461027
7 Very poor 306 3.3% 0.032807977
97 Not answered 55 0.6% 0.005896859
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17pk12


Variable label: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 473 5.1% 0.050712984
2 To a great extent 4002 42.9% 0.429076874
3 To some extent 3684 39.5% 0.394982309
4 To a small extent 957 10.3% 0.102605339
5 Not at all 191 2% 0.020478182
97 Not answered 20 0.2% 0.002144312
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk12


Variable label: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 167 11.7% 0.11653873
2 To a great extent 800 55.8% 0.55826936
3 To some extent 388 27.1% 0.27076064
4 To a small extent 60 4.2% 0.04187020
5 Not at all 15 1% 0.01046755
97 Not answered 3 0.2% 0.00209351
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk12


Variable label: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)? [Most recent available data from r17pk12, r18pk12]
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 640 5.9% 0.059479554
2 To a great extent 4802 44.6% 0.446282528
3 To some extent 4072 37.8% 0.378438662
4 To a small extent 1017 9.5% 0.094516729
5 Not at all 206 1.9% 0.019144981
97 Not answered 23 0.2% 0.002137546
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pk53


Variable label: Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Literal question: Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 99 1.1% 0.010614345
2 To a great extent 2485 26.6% 0.266430792
3 To some extent 4824 51.7% 0.517208106
4 To a small extent 1579 16.9% 0.169293449
5 Not at all 286 3.1% 0.030663665
97 Not answered 54 0.6% 0.005789643
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk53


Variable label: Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Literal question: Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 53 3.7% 0.036985345
2 To a great extent 619 43.2% 0.431960921
3 To some extent 608 42.4% 0.424284717
4 To a small extent 115 8% 0.080251221
5 Not at all 25 1.7% 0.017445918
97 Not answered 13 0.9% 0.009071877
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk53


Variable label: Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians? [Most recent available data from r17pk53, r18pk53]
Literal question: Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 152 1.4% 0.014126394
2 To a great extent 3104 28.8% 0.288475836
3 To some extent 5432 50.5% 0.504832714
4 To a small extent 1694 15.7% 0.157434944
5 Not at all 311 2.9% 0.028903346
97 Not answered 67 0.6% 0.006226766
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pk54


Variable label: Generally speaking, what degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Literal question: Generally speaking, what degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 343 3.7% 0.03677495
2 To a great extent 3392 36.4% 0.36367535
3 To some extent 4224 45.3% 0.45287874
4 To a small extent 1039 11.1% 0.11139702
5 Not at all 272 2.9% 0.02916265
97 Not answered 57 0.6% 0.00611129
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r18pk54


Variable label: Degree of confidence in the Norwegian news media
Literal question: Generally speaking, what degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Technical description: [Asked if r18group = 7]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 95 6.6% 0.066294487
2 To a great extent 709 49.5% 0.494766225
3 To some extent 504 35.2% 0.351709700
4 To a small extent 100 7% 0.069783671
5 Not at all 23 1.6% 0.016050244
97 Not answered 2 0.1% 0.001395673
98 Not asked 11027 NA


c18pk54


Variable label: Degree of confidence in the Norwegian news media [Most recent available data from r17pk54, r18pk54]
Literal question: Generally speaking, what degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 438 4.1% 0.040706320
2 To a great extent 4101 38.1% 0.381133829
3 To some extent 4728 43.9% 0.439405204
4 To a small extent 1139 10.6% 0.105855019
5 Not at all 295 2.7% 0.027416357
97 Not answered 59 0.5% 0.005483271
98 Not asked 1700 NA


r17pk_sentral


Variable label: Assertion: Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
Literal question: Government authorities show little consideration for non-urban/rural Norway.
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 1983 21.3% 0.212608556
2 Agree 2627 28.2% 0.281655409
3 Agree somewhat 2481 26.6% 0.266001930
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1040 11.2% 0.111504235
5 Disagree somewhat 569 6.1% 0.061005682
6 Disagree 495 5.3% 0.053071727
7 Strongly disagree 112 1.2% 0.012008148
97 Not answered 20 0.2% 0.002144312
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17pk55


Variable label: Assertion: The number of municipalities should be reduced further
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertions:
Literal question: Norway now has 356 municipalities instead of 422 as before. The number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers.
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 827 8.9% 0.088667310
2 Agree 1437 15.4% 0.154068832
3 Agree somewhat 1522 16.3% 0.163182159
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1722 18.5% 0.184625281
5 Disagree somewhat 1055 11.3% 0.113112469
6 Disagree 1594 17.1% 0.170901683
7 Strongly disagree 1131 12.1% 0.121260856
97 Not answered 39 0.4% 0.004181409
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17pkdv55


Variable label: Assertion: It should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools
Pre-question text: Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Christian faith.
Literal question: How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 147 1.6% 0.01576069
2 Agree 710 7.6% 0.07612308
3 Agree somewhat 982 10.5% 0.10528573
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1107 11.9% 0.11868768
5 Disagree somewhat 948 10.2% 0.10164040
6 Disagree 1362 14.6% 0.14602766
7 Strongly disagree 1571 16.8% 0.16843572
8 Neither of these should be possible 2468 26.5% 0.26460813
97 Not answered 32 0.3% 0.00343090
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17pk60


Variable label: Proposition: The Government should work more to significantly reduce income differences
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
Literal question: The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income differences in society.
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 2919 31.3% 0.312962367
2 Agree 2748 29.5% 0.294628498
3 Agree somewhat 1833 19.7% 0.196526214
4 Neither agree nor disagree 810 8.7% 0.086844645
5 Disagree somewhat 512 5.5% 0.054894393
6 Disagree 363 3.9% 0.038919267
7 Strongly disagree 113 1.2% 0.012115364
97 Not answered 29 0.3% 0.003109253
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17pkmeme21


Variable label: Assertion: It is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that it is women’s own responsibility to avoid unwanted sexual attention?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 134 1.4% 0.01436689
2 Agree 399 4.3% 0.04277903
3 Agree somewhat 1285 13.8% 0.13777206
4 Neither agree nor disagree 895 9.6% 0.09595797
5 Disagree somewhat 1117 12% 0.11975984
6 Disagree 2673 28.7% 0.28658733
7 Strongly disagree 2783 29.8% 0.29838104
97 Not answered 41 0.4% 0.00439584
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17pk103


Variable label: How much of an advantage or disadvantage would you say the EEA Agreement represents for Norway?
Literal question: How much of an advantage or disadvantage would you say the EEA Agreement represents for Norway?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A very great advantage 806 8.6% 0.08641578
2 A great advantage 2282 24.5% 0.24466602
3 An advantage to some extent 2920 31.3% 0.31306958
4 Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage 1161 12.4% 0.12447732
5 A disadvantage to some extent 1183 12.7% 0.12683607
6 A great disadvantage 555 6% 0.05950466
7 A very great disadvantage 303 3.2% 0.03248633
97 Not answered 117 1.3% 0.01254423
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17skepsis


Variable label: Your view on climate change
Literal question: [Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes your view on climate change?/ You may have heard that the global climate is changing due to the increase in temperature over the last 100 years. Based on what you know, which of the following assertions best describes your view on climate change?]
Technical description: [All respondents asked. The wording depends on r17skepsis_qtext.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I don’t believe that the climate is changing 57 0.6% 0.006111290
2 I don't know whether the climate is changing or not 427 4.6% 0.045781066
3 I believe that the climate is changing, but that it is only to a small extent due to human action 2160 23.2% 0.231585719
4 I believe that the climate is changing, and that it is to a large extent due to human action 6615 70.9% 0.709231264
97 Not answered 68 0.7% 0.007290662
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17pkkm2


Variable label: How concerned are you about climate change?
Literal question: How concerned are you about climate change?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all concerned 431 4.6% 0.046209928
2 Not very concerned 1264 13.6% 0.135520532
3 Slightly concerned 2779 29.8% 0.297952182
4 Very concerned 2983 32% 0.319824166
5 Extremely concerned 1839 19.7% 0.197169508
97 Not answered 31 0.3% 0.003323684
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17pkkm42


Variable label: Proposal: From 2025, all new private vehicles should be either electric or run on hydrogen
Pre-question text: The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
Literal question: Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
Technical description: [Asked if r17pkKM42_ask = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In 2025 all new private vehicles that are sold should either be electric or run on hydrogen 2027 33.1% 0.330938776
2 In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars which run on diesel or petrol. 4046 66.1% 0.660571429
97 Not answered 52 0.8% 0.008489796
98 Not asked 6335 NA


r17pkkm4


Variable label: Whether we should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja areas
Pre-question text: Please look at the statement below. To what extent do you agree/disagree with this?
Literal question: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja areas.
Technical description: [Asked if r17pkKM4_ask = 1]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 1982 32.1% 0.32076388
2 Agree 1051 17% 0.17009225
3 Agree somewhat 690 11.2% 0.11166855
4 Neither agree nor disagree 826 13.4% 0.13367859
5 Disagree somewhat 583 9.4% 0.09435184
6 Disagree 616 10% 0.09969251
7 Strongly disagree 418 6.8% 0.06764849
97 Not answered 13 0.2% 0.00210390
98 Not asked 6281 NA


r17pk_vekst


Variable label: Assertion: Economic growth should be safeguarded through industry, regardless of environmental interests
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following assertion?
Literal question: Economic growth should be safeguarded through the development of industry, even if it comes into conflict with environmental interests.
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 348 3.7% 0.03731103
2 Agree 898 9.6% 0.09627962
3 Agree somewhat 1908 20.5% 0.20456739
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1119 12% 0.11997427
5 Disagree somewhat 2136 22.9% 0.22901254
6 Disagree 1834 19.7% 0.19663343
7 Strongly disagree 1027 11% 0.11011043
97 Not answered 57 0.6% 0.00611129
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17pkby3


Variable label: To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
Literal question: To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 443 4.7% 0.047496515
2 To a great extent 1465 15.7% 0.157070870
3 Somewhat 4161 44.6% 0.446124156
4 Slightly 2868 30.7% 0.307494371
5 Not at all 360 3.9% 0.038597620
97 Not answered 30 0.3% 0.003216468
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17pk52


Variable label: Agree/disagree: More measures to protect citizens from terrorist threats, even at the expense of privacy
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
Literal question: The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:numeric] [Valid:12460] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 889 9.5% 0.095314678
2 Agree 1998 21.4% 0.214216790
3 Agree somewhat 2667 28.6% 0.285944033
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1091 11.7% 0.116972231
5 Disagree somewhat 1103 11.8% 0.118258818
6 Disagree 1070 11.5% 0.114720703
7 Strongly disagree 475 5.1% 0.050927415
97 Not answered 34 0.4% 0.003645331
98 Not asked 3133 NA


r17oppvekstfylke


Variable label: Respondents home county at 15 years of age
Technical description: [Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r17oppvekstkom]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:8034] [Invalid:4426] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
3 Oslo 855 10.6% 0.10642270
11 Rogaland 705 8.8% 0.08775205
15 Møre og Romsdal 455 5.7% 0.05663430
18 Nordland 462 5.8% 0.05750560
30 Viken 1610 20% 0.20039831
34 Innlandet 533 6.6% 0.06634304
38 Vestfold og Telemark 625 7.8% 0.07779437
42 Agder 401 5% 0.04991287
46 Vestland 1254 15.6% 0.15608663
50 Trøndelag 742 9.2% 0.09235748
54 Troms og Finnmark 392 4.9% 0.04879263
Sysmiss 4426 NA


r18oppvekstfylke


Variable label: Respondents home county at 15 years of age
Technical description: [Aggregated variable based on registered municipality in r18oppvekstkom]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:1258] [Invalid:11202] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
3 Oslo 125 9.9% 0.09936407
11 Rogaland 118 9.4% 0.09379968
15 Møre og Romsdal 75 6% 0.05961844
18 Nordland 81 6.4% 0.06438792
30 Viken 254 20.2% 0.20190779
34 Innlandet 96 7.6% 0.07631161
38 Vestfold og Telemark 99 7.9% 0.07869634
42 Agder 69 5.5% 0.05484897
46 Vestland 184 14.6% 0.14626391
50 Trøndelag 99 7.9% 0.07869634
54 Troms og Finnmark 58 4.6% 0.04610493
Sysmiss 11202 NA


c18oppvekstfylke


Variable label: Respondents home county at 15 years of age [Most recent available data from r17oppvekstfylke, r18oppvekstfylke]
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Question type: -] [Format:integer] [Valid:9292] [Invalid:3168] [Range:-]

Value Label Cases Percentage
3 Oslo 980 10.5% 0.10546707
11 Rogaland 823 8.9% 0.08857081
15 Møre og Romsdal 530 5.7% 0.05703831
18 Nordland 543 5.8% 0.05843737
30 Viken 1864 20.1% 0.20060267
34 Innlandet 629 6.8% 0.06769264
38 Vestfold og Telemark 724 7.8% 0.07791649
42 Agder 470 5.1% 0.05058115
46 Vestland 1438 15.5% 0.15475678
50 Trøndelag 841 9.1% 0.09050796
54 Troms og Finnmark 450 4.8% 0.04842876
Sysmiss 3168 NA