Codebook

Norwegian Citizen Panel

Round 13

v-101 - 2020-08-28









Produced by ideas2evidence










Citation

Primary investigators

Name Affiliation
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten Coordinator, University of Bergen
Stefan Dahlberg Coordinator, UiB
Erla Løvseth UiB
Sveinung Arnesen NORCE
Susanne Bygnes UiB
Endre Tvinnereim NORCE
Yvette Peters UiB
Lise Bjånesøy UiB
Erik Knudsen UiB
Gisela Böhm UiB
Thea Gregersen UiB

Producers

Name Affiliation Role
Asle Høgestøl ideas2evidence Coordinator
Øivind Skjervheim ideas2evidence Coordinator
Olav Bjørnebekk ideas2evidence Project Team Member
Jostein Ryssevik ideas2evidence Quality Assurance

Study Description

Abstract

The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no

Scope

Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.

Methodology

Sampling procedure

Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in four waves, wave 1, wave 3, wave 8 and wave 11. In wave 1, 4.870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3, 5.623 members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8, 4245 new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8). In wave 11, 2069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11).

In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn.

This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.

In wave 11, the list from the Norwegian Tax Administration consisted of the following data: a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.

Mode of Data Collection

The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment. Please refer to the Documentation Report from Wave 11. The report is available here: http://digsscore.uib.no/download-data-and-documentation

In wave 13, emails were sent out on October 17th, 2018.

E-mail with reminder was sent out three times, October 23rd, October 29th and November 2nd, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message. Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by e-mail.

Wave 13 ended November 5th.

Weighting

To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent's geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire.

Two different weights have been calculated:

When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset.

We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample.

Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.


Change Log

Version Release date / Date changed Variable Changes and notes
v-101 2020-08-28 NA Revised release of round 13
v-101 2020-06-15 NA Revised release of round 13
NA 2019-08-12 r13polkom14a Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
NA 2019-08-12 r13polkom15a Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
NA 2019-03-26 r13km1 Added anonymized data. Available on request.
NA 2019-01-31 r13polkom2 Added anonymized data. Available on request.
NA 2019-01-21 r13pad10b_2_other Added data
NA 2019-01-21 r13pad10d_2_other Added data
NA 2019-01-21 r13km_kopris_open Added anonymized data. Available on request.
NA 2019-01-21 r13polkom1 Added anonymized data. Available on request.
NA 2019-01-21 r13kmmoral_open Added anonymized data. Available on request.
NA 2018-12-06 r13pad10d Updated norwegian value label.
NA 2018-12-06 r13pad10d_2_other Updated norwegian value label.
v-100 2018-12-03 NA Initial release of round 13


Dataset contents

File name Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 13 - v-101.sav
# Cases 7209
# Variables 320


Variable Documentation

responseid


Variable label: responseid
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13interview_start


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondentent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
Technical description: [Date and time of when the respondentent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13interview_end


Variable label: [Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
Technical description: [Date and time of when the respondentn completed the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13rekruttert


Variable label: [The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
Technical description: [The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Wave1 1808 25.1% 0.2507976
3 Wave3 2000 27.7% 0.2774310
8 Wave8 2061 28.6% 0.2858926
11 Wave11 1340 18.6% 0.1858788


r13browsertype


Variable label: [Browertype used by respondent ]
Technical description: [Browertype used by respondent ]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13browserversion


Variable label: [Browser version used by respondent ]
Technical description: [Browser version used by respondent ]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13mobil


Variable label: [Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
Technical description: [Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 annet 4546 63.1% 0.6306006
1 mobil 2663 36.9% 0.3693994


r13opplosning


Variable label: [Screen resolution of the applied device ]
Technical description: [Screen resolution of the applied device ]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13enhetstype


Variable label: [Determines respondents device type. ]
Technical description: [Determines respondents device type. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 PC 4659 64.6% 0.646275489
2 Touch 2535 35.2% 0.351643779
3 Generisk 15 0.2% 0.002080732


r13advancedwifeaturesenabled


Variable label: [Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
Technical description: [Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13getrenderingmode


Variable label: [Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
Technical description: [Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13group


Variable label: [Subgroup in wave 13. Randomized. ]
Technical description: [Subgroup in wave 12. Randomized. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 g1 1454 20.2% 0.2016923
2 g2 1482 20.6% 0.2055764
3 g3 1496 20.8% 0.2075184
4 g4 1407 19.5% 0.1951727
5 g5 1370 19% 0.1900402


r13pk6_1


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Christian Democratic Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Christian Democratic Party
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 848 11.8% 0.117630739
2 Really dislike 1184 16.4% 0.164239146
3 Dislike somewhat 1740 24.1% 0.241364960
4 Neither dislike nor like 1496 20.8% 0.207518380
5 Like somewhat 1372 19% 0.190317658
6 Really like 388 5.4% 0.053821612
7 Intensely like 114 1.6% 0.015813566
97 Not answered 67 0.9% 0.009293938


r13pk6_2


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Conservative Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Conservative Party
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 258 3.6% 0.035788598
2 Really dislike 925 12.8% 0.128311832
3 Dislike somewhat 1309 18.2% 0.181578582
4 Neither dislike nor like 877 12.2% 0.121653489
5 Like somewhat 1719 23.8% 0.238451935
6 Really like 1596 22.1% 0.221389929
7 Intensely like 469 6.5% 0.065057567
97 Not answered 56 0.8% 0.007768068


r13pk6_3


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Progress Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Progress Party
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 2136 29.6% 0.296296296
2 Really dislike 1440 20% 0.199750312
3 Dislike somewhat 967 13.4% 0.134137883
4 Neither dislike nor like 592 8.2% 0.082119573
5 Like somewhat 1122 15.6% 0.155638785
6 Really like 680 9.4% 0.094326536
7 Intensely like 209 2.9% 0.028991538
97 Not answered 63 0.9% 0.008739076


r13pk6_4


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Liberal Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Liberal Party
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 466 6.5% 0.06464142
2 Really dislike 939 13% 0.13025385
3 Dislike somewhat 1588 22% 0.22028021
4 Neither dislike nor like 1910 26.5% 0.26494659
5 Like somewhat 1702 23.6% 0.23609377
6 Really like 455 6.3% 0.06311555
7 Intensely like 71 1% 0.00984880
97 Not answered 78 1.1% 0.01081981


r13pk6_5


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Socialist Left Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Socialist Left Party
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 898 12.5% 0.12456651
2 Really dislike 1193 16.5% 0.16548758
3 Dislike somewhat 1238 17.2% 0.17172978
4 Neither dislike nor like 1230 17.1% 0.17062006
5 Like somewhat 1414 19.6% 0.19614371
6 Really like 898 12.5% 0.12456651
7 Intensely like 264 3.7% 0.03662089
97 Not answered 74 1% 0.01026495


r13pk6_6


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Centre Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Centre Party
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 321 4.5% 0.04452767
2 Really dislike 678 9.4% 0.09404911
3 Dislike somewhat 1341 18.6% 0.18601748
4 Neither dislike nor like 2011 27.9% 0.27895686
5 Like somewhat 1827 25.3% 0.25343321
6 Really like 762 10.6% 0.10570121
7 Intensely like 184 2.6% 0.02552365
97 Not answered 85 1.2% 0.01179082


r13pk6_7


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Green Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Green Party
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1207 16.7% 0.167429602
2 Really dislike 1140 15.8% 0.158135664
3 Dislike somewhat 1261 17.5% 0.174920239
4 Neither dislike nor like 1183 16.4% 0.164100430
5 Like somewhat 1569 21.8% 0.217644611
6 Really like 617 8.6% 0.085587460
7 Intensely like 160 2.2% 0.022194479
97 Not answered 72 1% 0.009987516


r13pk6_8


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Labour Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Labour Party
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 294 4.1% 0.040782355
2 Really dislike 666 9.2% 0.092384519
3 Dislike somewhat 1221 16.9% 0.169371619
4 Neither dislike nor like 998 13.8% 0.138438064
5 Like somewhat 2173 30.1% 0.301428770
6 Really like 1481 20.5% 0.205437647
7 Intensely like 310 4.3% 0.043001803
97 Not answered 66 0.9% 0.009155223


r13pk6_9


Variable label: Like/Dislike: The Red Party.
Pre-question text: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Literal question: The Red Party
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1475 20.5% 0.20460535
2 Really dislike 1207 16.7% 0.16742960
3 Dislike somewhat 1063 14.7% 0.14745457
4 Neither dislike nor like 1316 18.3% 0.18254959
5 Like somewhat 1243 17.2% 0.17242336
6 Really like 582 8.1% 0.08073242
7 Intensely like 236 3.3% 0.03273686
97 Not answered 87 1.2% 0.01206825


r13meme1_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects text element for r13meme1_1-3 ]
Technical description: [Randomly selects text element for r13meme1_1-3 ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1370] [Invalid:5839] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norway 685 50% 0.5
2 your local community 685 50% 0.5
Sysmiss 5839 NA


r13meme1_1


Variable label: Most important political issue: 1. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are, in your opinion, the main political issues or areas for [Norway/your local community]?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13meme1_2


Variable label: Most important political issue: 2. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are, in your opinion, the main political issues or areas for [Norway/your local community]?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13meme1_3


Variable label: Most important political issue: 3. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What are, in your opinion, the main political issues or areas for [Norway/your local community]?
Post-question: Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13km1


Variable label: What do you think when you hear or read “climate change” [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: What do you think when you hear or read “climate change”
Post-question: Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good or just a few words if that is better for you.
Technical description:

[Asked if r8km1 is answered]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



eips2018c_ran


Variable label: [Collects values from eips2017c_ran]
Technical description: [Collects values from eips2017c_ran]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1760] [Invalid:5449] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 355 20.2% 0.2017045
2 for you personally 357 20.3% 0.2028409
3 for Norway 358 20.3% 0.2034091
4 for Europe 338 19.2% 0.1920455
5 for the world 352 20% 0.2000000
Sysmiss 5449 NA


eips2018c


Variable label: To what degree do you see climate change as a threat [BLANK/for you personally/for Norway/for Europe/for the World].
Literal question: To what extent do you see climate change as a threat [BLANK / for you personally / for Norway / for Europe / for the world]?
Technical description: [Asked if value on eips2017c_ran]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0 No threat at all 63 3.6% 0.035795455
2 1 32 1.8% 0.018181818
3 2 81 4.6% 0.046022727
4 3 135 7.7% 0.076704545
5 4 110 6.2% 0.062500000
6 5 244 13.9% 0.138636364
7 6 217 12.3% 0.123295455
8 7 313 17.8% 0.177840909
9 8 296 16.8% 0.168181818
10 9 126 7.2% 0.071590909
11 10 Extreme threat 140 8% 0.079545455
97 Not answered 3 0.2% 0.001704545
98 Not asked 5449 NA


r13km_moral_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects text element for r13km_moral if r13group = 4 or 5]
Technical description: [Randomly selects text element for r13km_moral if r13group = 4 or 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2777] [Invalid:4432] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 B: The responsibility for emission cuts should be allocated as fairly as possible between the countries, even though it may lead to significant costs for Norway 698 25.1% 0.2513504
2 B: The countries that have up until now emitted the most greenhouse gases should make the biggest cuts, even though it may lead to significant costs for Norway 538 19.4% 0.1937342
3 B: The wealthy countries should make the biggest cuts, even though it may lead to significant costs for Norway 492 17.7% 0.1771696
4 B: All countries should reduce their emissions by the same percentage, even though it may lead to significant costs for Norway 555 20% 0.1998560
5 B: All people should be entitled to emit the same amount of Co2 greenhouse gases, with the size of a country's population determining the amount of greenhouse gases the country can emit, even though it may lead to significant costs for Norway 494 17.8% 0.1778898
Sysmiss 4432 NA


r13km_moral


Variable label: Agree with which position on allocation of emission cuts: Norwegian economic interests vs [R13KM_MORAL_RAN].
Pre-question text: The following describes two opposing positions in the question of how responsibility for emission cuts should be allocated between countries in international climate agreements.
Literal question: Which of these positions do you most agree with?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 4 or 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Agree very much more with A 123 4.4% 0.04429240
2 Agree much more with A 165 5.9% 0.05941664
3 Agree somewhat more with A 285 10.3% 0.10262874
4 Agree somewhat more with B 624 22.5% 0.22470292
5 Agree much more with B 772 27.8% 0.27799784
6 Agree very much more with B 537 19.3% 0.19337414
7 Agree with neither A nor B 240 8.6% 0.08642420
97 Not answered 31 1.1% 0.01116313
98 Not asked 4432 NA


r13kmmoral_open


Variable label: Elaboration on allocation of climate cuts between countries [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: We would like to ask you to elaborate on your opinion on how the responsibility for emission cuts should be allocated between countries.
Post-question: We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you.
Technical description:

[Asked if r13group = 4 or 5]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13kmplast


Variable label: Participated in campaigns to collect plastic from nature last 12 months.
Pre-question text: This question applies to plastic in the ocean, and organised campaigns designed to collect plastic from the countryside, e.g. on beaches, along the coast, in rivers and in lakes.
Literal question: Have you taken part in any campaigns designed to collect plastic from the countryside during the last 12 months?
Post-question: Please select the most suitable option.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes, I have participated in one or more organised campaigns designed to collect the plastic from the countryside 87 6% 0.059834938
2 I have collected plastic on my own (not as part of an organised campaign). 517 35.6% 0.355570839
3 I have wanted to collect plastic, but so far I have not done so. 277 19.1% 0.190508941
4 No. 570 39.2% 0.392022008
97 Not answered 3 0.2% 0.002063274
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13kmplast_text


Variable label: Comments to [R13KMPLAST] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: If you have any comments, please write them here.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13km30


Variable label: To what degree moral duty for individuals to contribute to prevent climate change.
Literal question: To what degree do you regard it as a moral duty for individuals to contribute towards preventing climate change?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 429 29.5% 0.295048143
2 To a great extent 588 40.4% 0.404401651
3 Somewhat 369 25.4% 0.253782669
4 To a small extent 45 3.1% 0.030949106
5 Not at all 19 1.3% 0.013067400
97 Not answered 4 0.3% 0.002751032
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13km64


Variable label: How postitive or negative will climate change be for Norway.
Pre-question text: Climate change will affect each country in different ways.
Literal question: How positive or negative do you think climate change will be for Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Only positive 16 1.1% 0.011004127
2 More positive than negative 151 10.4% 0.103851444
3 Neither positive nor negative 284 19.5% 0.195323246
4 More negative than positive 872 60% 0.599724897
5 Only negative 119 8.2% 0.081843191
97 Not answered 12 0.8% 0.008253095
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13km21_1


Variable label: Feel this about climate change: Hope.
Pre-question text: When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
Literal question: Hope
Post-question: Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all” to “very strong”.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 80 5.5% 0.05502063
2 Slightly 302 20.8% 0.20770289
3 Somewhat 760 52.3% 0.52269601
4 Strongly 243 16.7% 0.16712517
5 Very strongly 35 2.4% 0.02407153
97 Not answered 34 2.3% 0.02338377
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13km21_2


Variable label: Feel this about climate change: Sadness.
Pre-question text: When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
Literal question: Sadness
Post-question: Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all” to “very strong”.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 107 7.4% 0.07359010
2 Slightly 270 18.6% 0.18569464
3 Somewhat 593 40.8% 0.40784044
4 Strongly 347 23.9% 0.23865199
5 Very strongly 99 6.8% 0.06808803
97 Not answered 38 2.6% 0.02613480
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13km21_3


Variable label: Feel this about climate change: Fear.
Pre-question text: When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
Literal question: Fear
Post-question: Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all” to “very strong”.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 152 10.5% 0.10453920
2 Slightly 375 25.8% 0.25790922
3 Somewhat 613 42.2% 0.42159560
4 Strongly 223 15.3% 0.15337001
5 Very strongly 55 3.8% 0.03782669
97 Not answered 36 2.5% 0.02475928
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13km21_4


Variable label: Feel this about climate change: Anger.
Pre-question text: When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
Literal question: Anger
Post-question: Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all” to “very strong”.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 207 14.2% 0.14236589
2 Slightly 398 27.4% 0.27372765
3 Somewhat 537 36.9% 0.36932600
4 Strongly 212 14.6% 0.14580468
5 Very strongly 62 4.3% 0.04264099
97 Not answered 38 2.6% 0.02613480
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13km21_5


Variable label: Feel this about climate change: Guilt.
Pre-question text: When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
Literal question: Guilt
Post-question: Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all” to “very strong”.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 214 14.7% 0.14718019
2 Slightly 497 34.2% 0.34181568
3 Somewhat 583 40.1% 0.40096286
4 Strongly 111 7.6% 0.07634113
5 Very strongly 18 1.2% 0.01237964
97 Not answered 31 2.1% 0.02132050
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13km21_6


Variable label: Feel this about climate change: Tired of it.
Pre-question text: When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
Literal question: Tired of it
Post-question: Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all” to “very strong”.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 458 31.5% 0.31499312
2 Slightly 383 26.3% 0.26341128
3 Somewhat 426 29.3% 0.29298487
4 Strongly 89 6.1% 0.06121045
5 Very strongly 58 4% 0.03988996
97 Not answered 40 2.8% 0.02751032
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13kmkopris_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmkopris if r13group = 1]
Technical description: [Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmkopris if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1448] [Invalid:5761] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very negative - Very positive 708 48.9% 0.4889503
2 Very positive - Very negative 740 51.1% 0.5110497
Sysmiss 5761 NA


r13kmkopris


Variable label: Positive or negative about rush hour increases in toll ring cost.
Pre-question text: Several Norwegian cities have introduced a toll scheme which would cost more to cross the toll ring during rush hour and cost less outside of rush hour.
Literal question: Do you feel positive or negative about such a scheme?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very positive 137 9.4% 0.094222834
2 Positive 268 18.4% 0.184319120
3 Somewhat positive 238 16.4% 0.163686382
4 Neither negative nor positive 147 10.1% 0.101100413
5 Somewhat negative 203 14% 0.139614856
6 Negative 185 12.7% 0.127235213
7 Very negative 266 18.3% 0.182943604
97 Not answered 10 0.7% 0.006877579
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13km_kopris_open


Variable label: Comment on [R13KMKOPRIS] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: You can write a comment here if you want:
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13km_klima_tiltak


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Unsure about what I can do to reduce climate change.
Literal question: I’m unsure what I can do in my daily life to reduce climate change.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 28 1.9% 0.019257221
2 Agree 124 8.5% 0.085281981
3 Agree somewhat 266 18.3% 0.182943604
4 Neither agree nor disagree 228 15.7% 0.156808803
5 Disagree somewhat 332 22.8% 0.228335626
6 Disagree 376 25.9% 0.258596974
7 Strongly disagree 91 6.3% 0.062585970
97 Not answered 9 0.6% 0.006189821
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13km_politisk_tiltak


Variable label: Agree/disagree: I am unsure about what policy measure are good for reducing climate change.
Literal question: I am unsure what policy measures are good for reducing climate change.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 59 4.1% 0.040577717
2 Agree 205 14.1% 0.140990371
3 Agree somewhat 384 26.4% 0.264099037
4 Neither agree nor disagree 214 14.7% 0.147180193
5 Disagree somewhat 259 17.8% 0.178129298
6 Disagree 250 17.2% 0.171939477
7 Strongly disagree 69 4.7% 0.047455296
97 Not answered 14 1% 0.009628611
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13km_politisk_tiltak_open


Variable label: Comment on [R13KM_POLITISK_TILTAK] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: If you have additional comments regarding policy measures, please write them here:
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13polkom10


Variable label: How confident that fact-checking services present facts.
Pre-question text: In Norway, we have various fact-checking services (such as Faktisk.no) that fact-check Norwegian public debate. The aim of such fact-checking services is to contribute to a fact-based public debate and prevent the spread of fictitious messages and news.
Literal question: Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have that such services present the facts?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 67 4.8% 0.04761905
2 High confidence 485 34.5% 0.34470505
3 Some confidence 637 45.3% 0.45273632
4 Little confidence 154 10.9% 0.10945274
5 No confidence at all 32 2.3% 0.02274343
97 Not answered 32 2.3% 0.02274343
98 Not asked 5802 NA


r13polkom11_parti


Variable label: [Randomly selects political party for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
Technical description: [Randomly selects political party for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1388] [Invalid:5821] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Red Party 133 9.6% 0.09582133
2 The Socialist Left Party 154 11.1% 0.11095101
3 The Labour Party 155 11.2% 0.11167147
4 The Centre Party 150 10.8% 0.10806916
5 The Green Party 170 12.2% 0.12247839
6 The Liberal Party 137 9.9% 0.09870317
7 The Christian Democrats 170 12.2% 0.12247839
8 The Conservative Party 155 11.2% 0.11167147
9 The Progress Party 164 11.8% 0.11815562
Sysmiss 5821 NA


r13polkom11_konklusjon


Variable label: [Randomly selects conclusion for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
Technical description: [Randomly selects conclusion for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1388] [Invalid:5821] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 completely true. 314 22.6% 0.2262248
2 completely wrong. 362 26.1% 0.2608069
3 completely wrong. Afterwards, key politicians from the same party agree with the conclusion of the fact-checking service. 346 24.9% 0.2492795
4 completely wrong. Afterwards, key politicians from the same party disagree with the conclusion of the fact-checking service. 366 26.4% 0.2636888
Sysmiss 5821 NA


r13polkom11


Variable label: Confidence in fact-checking service given that statement from [party] was deemed [wrong/true.]
Pre-question text: Imagine that you read a fact-check from a Norwegian fact-checking service that concludes that a statement by a politician from [The Red Party/The Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The Green Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative Party/The Progress Party] is [completely true/completely wrong/completely wrong. Afterwards, key politicians from the same party agree with the conclusion of the fact-checking service/completely wrong. Afterwards, key politicians from the same party disagree with the conclusion of the fact-checking service].
Literal question: Based on the above information, how much confidence would you have had in the conclusion of the fact-checking service on this matter?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very high confidence 83 5.9% 0.05899076
2 High confidence 464 33% 0.32977967
3 Some confidence 574 40.8% 0.40796020
4 Little confidence 194 13.8% 0.13788202
5 No confidence at all 42 3% 0.02985075
97 Not answered 50 3.6% 0.03553660
98 Not asked 5802 NA


r13kmkt_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar, r13kmktresearch and r13kmktuse]
Technical description: [Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar, r13kmktresearch and r13kmktuse]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1495] [Invalid:5714] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 727 48.6% 0.4862876
2 2 768 51.4% 0.5137124
Sysmiss 5714 NA


r13kmktfamiliar_scale


Variable label: [Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar, based on r13kmkt_ran]
Technical description: [Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar, based on r13kmkt_ran]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1495] [Invalid:5714] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No knowledge -> Good knowledge 727 48.6% 0.4862876
2 Good knowledge -> No knowledge 768 51.4% 0.5137124
Sysmiss 5714 NA


r13kmktfamiliar


Variable label: How much knowledge about climate manipulation (solar geoengineering).
Pre-question text:

The greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2) traps heat in the atmosphere. When there is more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the climate can change, which will lead to it becoming warmer, with more droughts and heat waves, a rise in sea levels and storms becoming more powerful.

One method for reducing the extent of climate change may possibly be so-called “climate manipulation” (solar geoengineering), for example by shading the sun.
Literal question: How much knowledge would you say that you have about this method?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Good knowledge 18 1.2% 0.012032086
2 Some knowledge 168 11.2% 0.112299465
3 Little knowledge 489 32.7% 0.326871658
4 No knowledge 811 54.2% 0.542112299
97 Not answered 10 0.7% 0.006684492
98 Not asked 5713 NA


r13kmktresearch_scale


Variable label: [Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktresearch, based on r13kmkt_ran]
Technical description: [Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktresearch, based on r13kmkt_ran]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1487] [Invalid:5722] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly against such research ->Strongly in favour of such research 725 48.8% 0.4875588
2 Strongly in favour of such research ->Strongly against such research 762 51.2% 0.5124412
Sysmiss 5722 NA


r13kmktresearch


Variable label: Should be research program for climate manipulation with particles in the atmosphere.
Pre-question text: Some experts have proposed a new approach to limiting climate change by shading the sun. This method will involve spreading particles such as sulphur aerosols in the atmosphere to reflect some of the sunlight back into space. By reducing the amount of sunlight coming to earth, it is expected that this method can cool down the planet and reduce several other climate changes.
Literal question: Do you think there should be an international research program to explore the benefits and risks associated with shading the sun using particles in the atmosphere?
Post-question: Please choose the option that comes closest to your view of such research:
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly in favour of such research 322 21.5% 0.21524064
2 Somewhat in favour of such research 690 46.1% 0.46122995
3 Somewhat against such research 272 18.2% 0.18181818
4 Strongly against such research 183 12.2% 0.12232620
97 Not answered 29 1.9% 0.01938503
98 Not asked 5713 NA


r13kmktuse_scale


Variable label: [Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktuse, based on r13kmkt_ran]
Technical description: [Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktuse, based on r13kmkt_ran]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1484] [Invalid:5725] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly disagree -> Strongly agree 724 48.8% 0.4878706
2 Strongly agree-> Strongly disagree 760 51.2% 0.5121294
Sysmiss 5725 NA


r13kmktuse


Variable label: Agree/disagree: Climate manipulation with particles in the atmosphere should be used to limit global warming.
Literal question:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:

“Shading the sun by using particles in the atmosphere should be used to limit global warming”
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 36 2.4% 0.02406417
2 Agree somewhat 526 35.2% 0.35160428
3 Disagree somewhat 537 35.9% 0.35895722
4 Strongly disagree 326 21.8% 0.21791444
97 Not answered 71 4.7% 0.04745989
98 Not asked 5713 NA


r13kmktresearchsecond_1


Variable label: What percentage of Norwegian population would support research into climate manipulation with particles in the atmosphere.
Literal question: What proportion of the Norwegian population do you think will support an international research programme of the type we have just mentioned? (I.e. an international research program to explore the benefits and risks associated with shading the sun using particles in the atmosphere?)
Post-question: Please enter a number from 0 (none) to 100 (all).
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1398] [Invalid:5811] [Range:0-100]



r13kmktusesecond_1


Variable label: What proportion of Norwegian population would support using climate manipulation with particles in the atmosphere.
Literal question:

What proportion of the Norwegian population do you believe will agree with this assertion:

“Shading the sun by using particles in the atmosphere should be used to limit global warming”?
Post-question: Please enter a number from 0 (none) to 100 (all).
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1378] [Invalid:5831] [Range:0-100]



r13kmktresearchopen


Variable label: Justification of response : [R13KMTRESEARCH][Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text: You replied that you were [r13kmktresearch ] an international research program to explore the benefits and risks associated with shading the sun using particles in the atmosphere.
Literal question: Can you write some words or sentences in the box below to justify your response?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 3 and if response on r13kmktresearch][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13polkom2_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects r13polkom2 or r13polkom5. Randomizes if 13group = 3]
Technical description: [Randomly selects r13polkom2 or r13polkom5. Randomizes if 13group = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1470] [Invalid:5739] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Respondent does not get R13POLKOM2 774 52.7% 0.5265306
2 Respondent gets R13POLKOM2 696 47.3% 0.4734694
Sysmiss 5739 NA


r13polkom2


Variable label: Open: Difference between real and fake news. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text: Fake news has been discussed a lot lately.
Literal question: We are interested in what you think is the difference between real and fake news?
Post-question: We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 3 and r13polkom2_ran = 2] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13polkom4_1_stilling


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person 1’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person 1’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Professor 974 34.2% 0.3423550
2 PhD Research Fellow 939 33% 0.3300527
3 Independent researcher without a PhD 932 32.8% 0.3275923
Sysmiss 4364 NA


r13polkom4_2_stilling


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person 2’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person 2’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Professor 936 32.9% 0.3289982
2 PhD Research Fellow 988 34.7% 0.3472759
3 Independent researcher without a PhD 921 32.4% 0.3237258
Sysmiss 4364 NA


r13polkom4_1_kom


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects visibility in the media for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects visibility in the media for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 frequently appears as an expert in the media 932 32.8% 0.3275923
2 rarely appears as an expert in the media 967 34% 0.3398946
3 never appears as an expert in the media 946 33.3% 0.3325132
Sysmiss 4364 NA


r13polkom4_2_kom


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects visibility in the media for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects visibility in the media for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 frequently appears as an expert in the media 972 34.2% 0.3416520
2 rarely appears as an expert in the media 915 32.2% 0.3216169
3 never appears as an expert in the media 958 33.7% 0.3367311
Sysmiss 4364 NA


r13polkom4_1_gender


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Male 1416 49.8% 0.4977153
2 Female 1429 50.2% 0.5022847
Sysmiss 4364 NA


r13polkom4_2_gender


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Male 1439 50.6% 0.5057996
2 Female 1406 49.4% 0.4942004
Sysmiss 4364 NA


r13polkom4_1_parti


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political standpoint for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political standpoint for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not known 227 8% 0.07978910
2 Politically neutral 276 9.7% 0.09701230
3 The Red Party 243 8.5% 0.08541301
4 The Socialist Left Party 256 9% 0.08998243
5 The Labour Party 279 9.8% 0.09806678
6 The Centre Party 263 9.2% 0.09244288
7 The Green Party 259 9.1% 0.09103691
8 The Liberal Party 272 9.6% 0.09560633
9 The Christian Democrats 273 9.6% 0.09595782
10 The Conservative Party 266 9.3% 0.09349736
11 The Progress Party 231 8.1% 0.08119508
Sysmiss 4364 NA


r13polkom4_2_parti


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political standpoint for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political standpoint for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not known 276 9.7% 0.09701230
2 Politically neutral 265 9.3% 0.09314587
3 The Red Party 250 8.8% 0.08787346
4 The Socialist Left Party 252 8.9% 0.08857645
5 The Labour Party 239 8.4% 0.08400703
6 The Centre Party 273 9.6% 0.09595782
7 The Green Party 267 9.4% 0.09384886
8 The Liberal Party 232 8.2% 0.08154657
9 The Christian Democrats 264 9.3% 0.09279438
10 The Conservative Party 270 9.5% 0.09490334
11 The Progress Party 257 9% 0.09033392
Sysmiss 4364 NA


r13polkom4_1_publ


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects publication for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects publication for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 in an internationally leading scientific journal 933 32.8% 0.3279438
2 in a scientific Norwegian journal 945 33.2% 0.3321617
3 as a Norwegian report 967 34% 0.3398946
Sysmiss 4364 NA


r13polkom4_2_publ


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects publication for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects publication for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 in an internationally leading scientific journal 972 34.2% 0.3416520
2 in a scientific Norwegian journal 950 33.4% 0.3339192
3 as a Norwegian report 923 32.4% 0.3244288
Sysmiss 4364 NA


r13polkom4_1_funn


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 the number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers 1484 52.2% 0.5216169
2 the number of municipalities should not be reduced further by more mergers 1361 47.8% 0.4783831
Sysmiss 4364 NA


r13polkom4_2_funn


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 the number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers 1461 51.4% 0.5135325
2 the number of municipalities should not be reduced further by more mergers 1384 48.6% 0.4864675
Sysmiss 4364 NA


r13polkom4_1_metode


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 depth interviews 982 34.5% 0.3451670
2 experiments 924 32.5% 0.3247803
3 a survey 939 33% 0.3300527
Sysmiss 4364 NA


r13polkom4_2_metode


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 depth interviews 975 34.3% 0.3427065
2 experiments 952 33.5% 0.3346221
3 a survey 918 32.3% 0.3226714
Sysmiss 4364 NA


r13polkom4_order


Variable label: [ Background variable for conjoint experiment. Specifies the order of the various properties shown in the table that is displayed to the respondent]
Technical description:

[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Specifies the order of the various properties shown in the table that is displayed to the respondent.

1 = Position and employment 2 = Visibility in the media 3 = Gender 4 = Political standpoint 5 = The person’s latest scientific article has been published… 6 = The person’s latest scientific article finds that immigration is… 7 = The person’s latest scientific article uses…]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13polkom4


Variable label: Which person gives the most credible infomration about the consequences of municipality mergers?
Pre-question text:

Below we present two hypothetical persons who research the consequences of municipal mergers in Norway. Please read the descriptions of both persons carefully and answer the question below.

[Prints out the values of r13polkom4_1_stilling, r13polkom4_2_stilling, r13polkom4_1_kom, r13polkom4_2_kom, r13polkom4_1_gender, r13polkom4_2_gender, r13polkom4_1_parti, r13polkom4_2_parti, r13polkom4_1_publ, r13polkom4_2_publ, r13polkom4_1_funn, r13polkom4_2_funn, r13polkom4_1_metode, r13polkom4_2_metode]

Let’s say you didn’t have any information other than the above.
Literal question: If you had to make a choice, which of these two do you think would give you the most credible information about the consequences of municipality mergers in Norway?
Technical description: [Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to two people with varying characteristics. Characteristics of the persons are chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 3 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Person 1 1346 46.4% 0.46365828
2 Person 2 1351 46.5% 0.46538064
97 Not answered 206 7.1% 0.07096107
98 Not asked 4306 NA


r13pad1


Variable label: For/against: Ban on begging in your municipality.
Pre-question text: Here are two issues that have been debated in local politics in Norway. We would like to hear your opinion on the issue.
Literal question: Firstly, what is your opinion on a ban on begging in your municipality?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I am in favour of a ban on begging in the municipality 1705 59% 0.59016961
2 I am against a ban on begging in the municipality 1103 38.2% 0.38179301
97 Not answered 81 2.8% 0.02803738
98 Not asked 4320 NA


r13pad2


Variable label: How important is the issue of begging bans to you?
Literal question: How important is the issue of begging bans to you?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 179 6.2% 0.06195916
2 Important 530 18.3% 0.18345448
3 Fairly important 914 31.6% 0.31637245
4 Not very important 1013 35.1% 0.35064036
5 Not at all important 197 6.8% 0.06818969
97 Not answered 56 1.9% 0.01938387
98 Not asked 4320 NA


r13pad3


Variable label: For/against: Increase in tolls for diesel cars in your municipality.
Pre-question text: The second issue is about diesel cars.
Literal question: What is your opinion on an increase in the tolls for diesel cars in your municipality?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 I am in favour of an increase in the tolls for diesel cars 705 24.4% 0.24402908
2 I am against an increase in the tolls for diesel cars 2101 72.7% 0.72724126
97 Not answered 83 2.9% 0.02872966
98 Not asked 4320 NA


r13pad4


Variable label: How important is the issue of increased tolls for diesel cars to you?
Literal question: How important is the issue of increased tolls for diesel cars to you?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very important 487 16.9% 0.16857044
2 Important 776 26.9% 0.26860505
3 Fairly important 754 26.1% 0.26098996
4 Not very important 610 21.1% 0.21114573
5 Not at all important 201 7% 0.06957425
97 Not answered 61 2.1% 0.02111457
98 Not asked 4320 NA


r13pad6_ran


Variable label: [Randomly chooses r13pad6a, r13pad7a, and r13pad8a, or r13pad6b, r13pad7b, and r13pad8b. . Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical description: [Randomly chooses r13pad6a, r13pad7a og r13pad8a, or r13pad6b, r13pad7b or r13pad8b. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Respondent gets R13PAD6A, R13PAD7A, and R13PAD8A 1483 52.2% 0.5216321
2 Respondent gets R13PAD6B, R13PAD7B, and R13PAD8B 1360 47.8% 0.4783679
Sysmiss 4366 NA


r13pad5_sak


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects issue of a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects issue of a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the “no” side). Some 1431 50.3% 0.5033415
2 in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the "Yes- side"), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some parties propose such an 1412 49.7% 0.4966585
Sysmiss 4366 NA


r13pad5_utfall


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the outcome of the issue of a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the outcome of the issue of a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Yes side won the vote 1421 50% 0.4998241
2 The No side won the vote 1422 50% 0.5001759
Sysmiss 4366 NA


r13pad5_vinnermargin


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the winning margin in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the winning margin in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 . 974 34.3% 0.3425958
2 with a slight majority. 921 32.4% 0.3239536
3 With a large majority. 948 33.3% 0.3334506
Sysmiss 4366 NA


r13pad5_vinner


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the reaction of the winner in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the reaction of the winner in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 1391 48.9% 0.4892719
2 Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed. 1452 51.1% 0.5107281
Sysmiss 4366 NA


r13pad5_avsender


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects statement made by losing side in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects statement made by losing side in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 [BLANK] 368 12.9% 0.1294407
2 The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. 428 15.1% 0.1505452
3 The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views. 425 14.9% 0.1494900
4 The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. 408 14.4% 0.1435104
5 The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. 402 14.1% 0.1413999
6 The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views. 397 14% 0.1396412
7 The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. 415 14.6% 0.1459726
Sysmiss 4366 NA


r13pad6a


Variable label: Text options: How fair was the way the decision was made.
Pre-question text:

Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that follow.

Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the “no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public, and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.

In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue.

[The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
Literal question: What do you think about the way the decision was made?
Technical description: [Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very fair 251 16.9% 0.16925152
2 Fair 864 58.3% 0.58260283
3 Quite fair 204 13.8% 0.13755900
4 Not very fair 85 5.7% 0.05731625
5 Not at all fair 46 3.1% 0.03101821
97 Not answered 33 2.2% 0.02225219
98 Not asked 5726 NA


r13pad6b


Variable label: Scale options: How fair was the way the decision was made.
Pre-question text:

Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that follow.

Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the “no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public, and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.

In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue.

[The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
Literal question: What do you think about the way the decision was made?
Post-question: Please answer on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is most fair, and 5 is not fair.
Technical description: [Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 Most fair 584 42.9% 0.42941176
2 2 413 30.4% 0.30367647
3 3 223 16.4% 0.16397059
4 4 62 4.6% 0.04558824
5 5 Not fair 55 4% 0.04044118
97 Not answered 23 1.7% 0.01691176
98 Not asked 5849 NA


r13pad7a


Variable label: Text options: How reasonable was the decision.
Pre-question text:

Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that follow.

Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the “no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public, and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.

In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
Literal question: How reasonable do you think the decision was?
Technical description: [Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very reasonable 182 12.3% 0.12272421
2 Reasonable 719 48.5% 0.48482805
3 Somewhat reasonable 247 16.7% 0.16655428
4 Not very reasonable 207 14% 0.13958193
5 Not reasonable at all 90 6.1% 0.06068780
97 Not answered 38 2.6% 0.02562374
98 Not asked 5726 NA


r13pad7b


Variable label: Scale options: How reasonable was the decision.
Pre-question text:

Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that follow.

Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the “no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public, and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.

In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
Literal question: How reasonable do you think the decision was?
Post-question: Please answer on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is most reasonable, and 5 is not reasonable.
Technical description: [Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 Most reasonable 430 31.6% 0.31617647
2 2 363 26.7% 0.26691176
3 3 313 23% 0.23014706
4 4 123 9% 0.09044118
5 5 Not reasonable 98 7.2% 0.07205882
97 Not answered 33 2.4% 0.02426471
98 Not asked 5849 NA


r13pad8a


Variable label: Text options: How willing to accept the decision.
Pre-question text:

Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that follow.

Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the “no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public, and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.

In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
Literal question: When you think about the actual outcome of the decision, how willing are you to accept the decision?
Technical description: [Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very willing 294 19.8% 0.19824680
2 Willing 740 49.9% 0.49898854
3 Fairly willing 232 15.6% 0.15643965
4 Not very willing 138 9.3% 0.09305462
5 Not at all willing 47 3.2% 0.03169252
97 Not answered 32 2.2% 0.02157788
98 Not asked 5726 NA


r13pad8b


Variable label: Scale options: How willing to accept the decision.
Pre-question text:

Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that follow.

Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the “no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public, and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.

In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
Literal question: When you think about the actual outcome of the decision, how willing are you to accept the decision?
Post-question: Please answer on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is most willing, and 5 is not willing.
Technical description: [Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 Most willing 571 42% 0.41985294
2 2 397 29.2% 0.29191176
3 3 216 15.9% 0.15882353
4 4 77 5.7% 0.05661765
5 5 Not willing 72 5.3% 0.05294118
97 Not answered 27 2% 0.01985294
98 Not asked 5849 NA


r13polkom6_parti


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects party preference for the person who posts in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects party preference for the person who posts in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1446] [Invalid:5763] [Range:1-9]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Red Party 155 10.7% 0.1071923
2 The Socialist Left Party 166 11.5% 0.1147994
3 The Labour Party 157 10.9% 0.1085754
4 The Centre Party 151 10.4% 0.1044260
5 The Green Party 181 12.5% 0.1251729
6 The Liberal Party 165 11.4% 0.1141079
7 The Christian Democrats 150 10.4% 0.1037344
8 The Conservative Party 149 10.3% 0.1030429
9 The Progress Party 172 11.9% 0.1189488
Sysmiss 5763 NA


r13polkom6_kilde


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the source of the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the source of the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1446] [Invalid:5763] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 NRK.no 369 25.5% 0.2551867
2 Aftenposten.no 349 24.1% 0.2413555
3 VG.no 359 24.8% 0.2482711
4 TV2.no 369 25.5% 0.2551867
Sysmiss 5763 NA


r13polkom6_omtale


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the persons view on the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the persons view on the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1446] [Invalid:5763] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 . 511 35.3% 0.3533887
2 and have written a negative comment about the debate article. 455 31.5% 0.3146611
3 and have written a positive comment about the debate article. 480 33.2% 0.3319502
Sysmiss 5763 NA


r13polkom6_overskrift


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the headline of the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the headline of the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1446] [Invalid:5763] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 “Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” 466 32.2% 0.3222683
2 “Immigration threatens our Norwegian values and culture” 507 35.1% 0.3506224
3 “Immigration can both threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture” 473 32.7% 0.3271093
Sysmiss 5763 NA


r13polkom6


Variable label: How likely to come across a similar situation on social media.
Pre-question text:

Imagine that you come across a post on social media that has been shared by one of your contacts who you know votes for [The Red Party/The Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The Green Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative Party/The Progress Party], is of the same gender and is about the same age as you.

Imagine that this person has shared a debate article from [NRK.no / Aftenposten.no / VG.no / TV2.no] on social media [. /and have written a negative comment about the debate article. /and have written a positive comment about the debate article. ]

The headline of the debate article that the person has shared is [“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration threatens our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration can both threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture”].
Literal question: How likely is it that you would have come across a similar situation on social media?
Technical description: [Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to hypthetical post in social media. Characteristics of the post is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 111 7.6% 0.07634113
2 Likely 249 17.1% 0.17125172
3 Somewhat likely 332 22.8% 0.22833563
4 Not very likely 401 27.6% 0.27579092
5 Not at all likely 120 8.3% 0.08253095
6 I am not on social media 221 15.2% 0.15199450
97 Not answered 20 1.4% 0.01375516
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13polkom7


Variable label: How likely to click on and read article had you come across it.
Pre-question text:

Imagine that you come across a post on social media that has been shared by one of your contacts who you know votes for [The Red Party/The Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The Green Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative Party/The Progress Party], is of the same gender and is about the same age as you.

Imagine that this person has shared a debate article from [NRK.no / Aftenposten.no / VG.no / TV2.no] on social media [. /and have written a negative comment about the debate article. /and have written a positive comment about the debate article. ]

The headline of the debate article that the person has shared is [“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration threatens our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration can both threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture”].
Literal question: How likely is it that you would have clicked on and read this debate article if you had come across this post on social media?
Technical description: [Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to hypthetical post in social media. Characteristics of the post is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 125 8.6% 0.08596974
2 Likely 301 20.7% 0.20701513
3 Somewhat likely 339 23.3% 0.23314993
4 Not very likely 338 23.2% 0.23246217
5 Not at all likely 129 8.9% 0.08872077
6 I am not on social media 199 13.7% 0.13686382
97 Not answered 23 1.6% 0.01581843
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13polkom8


Variable label: How likely to want to see more posts from that person again on social media.
Pre-question text:

Imagine that you come across a post on social media that has been shared by one of your contacts who you know votes for [The Red Party/The Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The Green Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative Party/The Progress Party], is of the same gender and is about the same age as you.

Imagine that this person has shared a debate article from [NRK.no / Aftenposten.no / VG.no / TV2.no] on social media [. /and have written a negative comment about the debate article. /and have written a positive comment about the debate article. ]

The headline of the debate article that the person has shared is [“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration threatens our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration can both threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture”].
Literal question: How likely is it that you had wanted to see more posts from that person again on social media?
Technical description: [Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to hypthetical post in social media. Characteristics of the post is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Highly likely 34 2.3% 0.02338377
2 Likely 165 11.3% 0.11348006
3 Somewhat likely 338 23.2% 0.23246217
4 Not very likely 493 33.9% 0.33906465
5 Not at all likely 194 13.3% 0.13342503
6 I am not on social media 202 13.9% 0.13892710
97 Not answered 28 1.9% 0.01925722
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13polkom9


Variable label: Based on headline, the article argues that immigration is advantage or disadvantage to Norway.
Pre-question text:

Imagine that you come across a post on social media that has been shared by one of your contacts who you know votes for [The Red Party/The Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The Green Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative Party/The Progress Party], is of the same gender and is about the same age as you.

Imagine that this person has shared a debate article from [NRK.no / Aftenposten.no / VG.no / TV2.no] on social media [. /and have written a negative comment about the debate article. /and have written a positive comment about the debate article. ]

The headline of the debate article that the person has shared is [“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration threatens our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration can both threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture”].
Literal question: Based on the headline of the debate article, to what extent would you say that the debate article argues that it is an advantage or disadvantage that immigrants come to Norway to settle here?
Technical description: [Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to hypthetical post in social media. Characteristics of the post is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very great advantage 41 2.8% 0.02819807
2 Great advantage 178 12.2% 0.12242091
3 Slightly advantageous 302 20.8% 0.20770289
4 Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage 344 23.7% 0.23658872
5 A slight disadvantage 217 14.9% 0.14924347
6 A great disadvantage 221 15.2% 0.15199450
7 Very great disadvantage 101 6.9% 0.06946355
97 Not answered 50 3.4% 0.03438790
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13polkom12_kjonn_antagonist


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the gender of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the gender of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 male 1461 50.4% 0.5039669
2 female 1438 49.6% 0.4960331
Sysmiss 4310 NA


r13polkom12_stilling_antagonist


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the position of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the position of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 manager 1455 50.2% 0.5018972
2 temporary employee 1444 49.8% 0.4981028
Sysmiss 4310 NA


r13polkom12_alder_antagonist


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the age of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the age of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 20s 1495 51.6% 0.5156951
2 50s 1404 48.4% 0.4843049
Sysmiss 4310 NA


r13polkom12_budskap


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the message of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the message of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 gives a hug to 747 25.8% 0.2576751
2 sends flirty text messages to 698 24.1% 0.2407727
3 sends text messages of a sexual nature to 724 25% 0.2497413
4 slaps the bottom of 730 25.2% 0.2518110
Sysmiss 4310 NA


r13polkom12_kjonn_offer


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the gender of the offened person in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the gender of the offened person in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 male 1456 50.2% 0.5022422
2 female 1443 49.8% 0.4977578
Sysmiss 4310 NA


r13polkom12_stilling_offer


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the position of the offened person in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the position of the offened person in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 manager 1449 50% 0.4998275
2 temporary employee 1450 50% 0.5001725
Sysmiss 4310 NA


r13polkom12_alder_offer


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the age of the offened person in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the age of the offened person in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 20s 1454 50.2% 0.5015523
2 50s 1445 49.8% 0.4984477
Sysmiss 4310 NA


r13polkom12_folelse


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the emotion of the offened person in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the emotion of the offened person in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Experience it as degrading 984 33.9% 0.3394274
2 not find it pleasant 946 32.6% 0.3263194
3 find it pleasant 969 33.4% 0.3342532
Sysmiss 4310 NA


r13polkom12_arbeidssituasjon


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the work environment of the hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the work environment of the hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 together at a university 959 33.1% 0.3308037
2 together in a company 945 32.6% 0.3259745
3 together in a political party 995 34.3% 0.3432218
Sysmiss 4310 NA


r13polkom12_sted


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the location of the hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the location of the hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 work 926 31.9% 0.3194205
2 private party 998 34.4% 0.3442566
3 work party 975 33.6% 0.3363229
Sysmiss 4310 NA


r13polkom12


Variable label: Perceives the situation as sexual harassment.
Pre-question text:

Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the question below.

A [male/female] [manager/temporary employee] aged [20s/50s] [gives a hug to/sends flirty text messages to/sends text messages of a sexual nature to/slaps the bottom of] a [male/female] [manager/temporary employee] aged [20s/50s] that [Experience it as degrading/ not find it pleasant/ find it pleasant]. They work [together at a university/together in a company/together in a political party]. The incident occurred at [work/private party/work party].
Literal question: As you perceive it, does this situation describe sexual harassment?
Technical description: [Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 1119 38.1% 0.38113079
2 No 1749 59.6% 0.59570845
97 Not answered 68 2.3% 0.02316076
98 Not asked 4273 NA


r13polkom13


Variable label: Agree/disagree: situation is problematic.
Pre-question text:

Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the question below.

A [male/female] [manager/temporary employee] aged [20s/50s] [gives a hug to/sends flirty text messages to/sends text messages of a sexual nature to/slaps the bottom of] a [male/female] [manager/temporary employee] aged [20s/50s] that [Experience it as degrading/ not find it pleasant/ find it pleasant]. They work [together at a university/together in a company/together in a political party]. The incident occurred at [work/private party/work party].
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that this describes a problematic situation?
Technical description: [Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1 or 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 442 15.1% 0.15054496
2 Agree 721 24.6% 0.24557221
3 Agree somewhat 471 16% 0.16042234
4 Neither agree nor disagree 320 10.9% 0.10899183
5 Disagree somewhat 211 7.2% 0.07186649
6 Disagree 442 15.1% 0.15054496
7 Strongly disagree 274 9.3% 0.09332425
97 Not answered 55 1.9% 0.01873297
98 Not asked 4273 NA


r13pad11_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects r13pad11a or r13pad11b. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
Technical description: [Randomly selects r13pad11a or r13pad11b. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1438] [Invalid:5771] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Respondent gets R13PAD11A 742 51.6% 0.5159944
2 Respondent gets R13PAD11B 696 48.4% 0.4840056
Sysmiss 5771 NA


r13pad11a


Variable label: Improvement or deterioration: Automatization of public services.
Pre-question text:

A growing trend is that public agencies entrust decisions to computers instead of giving the task to human beings. The computers make the decisions in accordance with a predetermined sequence (a so-called algorithm) that is determined by humans, but once it has been set, a computer makes its own decisions.

We are interested in investigating what Norwegians think about this technological development.
Literal question: Based on what you know, do you think the shift from human to automated decisions will in general lead to an improvement or deterioration in public services?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1 and r13pad11_ran = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very strong improvement 20 2.7% 0.026954178
2 Strong improvement 62 8.4% 0.083557951
3 Some improvement 180 24.3% 0.242587601
4 Neither an improvement or deterioration 148 19.9% 0.199460916
5 Some deterioration 204 27.5% 0.274932615
6 Strong deterioration 93 12.5% 0.125336927
7 Very strong deterioration 30 4% 0.040431267
97 Not answered 5 0.7% 0.006738544
98 Not asked 6467 NA


r13pad11b


Variable label: Improvement or deterioration, with examples: Automatization of public services.
Pre-question text:

A growing trend is that public agencies entrust decisions to computers instead of giving the task to human beings. The computers make the decisions in accordance with a predetermined sequence (a so-called algorithm) that is determined by humans, but once it has been set, a computer makes its own decisions. One specific example from Norway is the Directorate of Immigration (UDI), which in certain cases lets the robot Ada decide whether to grant individuals residence in Norway. A couple of examples from the USA are algorithms that produce recommendations regarding where police should patrol in order to increase the chance of catching criminals, as well as which concerns child welfare services should take seriously and which they can let pass.

We are interested in investigating what Norwegians think about this technological development.
Literal question: Based on what you know, do you think the shift from human to automated decisions will in general lead to an improvement or deterioration in public services?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1 and r13pad11_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very strong improvement 12 1.7% 0.01724138
2 Strong improvement 45 6.5% 0.06465517
3 Some improvement 175 25.1% 0.25143678
4 Neither an improvement or deterioration 137 19.7% 0.19683908
5 Some deterioration 156 22.4% 0.22413793
6 Strong deterioration 118 17% 0.16954023
7 Very strong deterioration 47 6.8% 0.06752874
97 Not answered 6 0.9% 0.00862069
98 Not asked 6513 NA


r13pad12


Variable label: Reason [R13PAD11][Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Can you give the reasons for your answer?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13pad13_1


Variable label: Automatization of public services leads to what in: Verifiability.
Pre-question text: What do you think a transition from human to automated decision making in the public sector will lead to when it comes to the following points?
Literal question: Verifiability: Opportunity for those affected by a decision to be given an explanation for it
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very much greater 53 3.6% 0.03645117
2 Greater 156 10.7% 0.10729023
3 Somewhat greater 217 14.9% 0.14924347
4 Neither greater or less 274 18.8% 0.18844567
5 Somewhat less 213 14.6% 0.14649243
6 Less 315 21.7% 0.21664374
7 Very much less 172 11.8% 0.11829436
97 Not answered 54 3.7% 0.03713893
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13pad13_2


Variable label: Automatization of public services leads to what in: Impartiality.
Pre-question text: What do you think a transition from human to automated decision making in the public sector will lead to when it comes to the following points?
Literal question: Impartiality: Opportunity for citizens to be treated equally by the authorities
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very much greater 137 9.4% 0.09422283
2 Greater 360 24.8% 0.24759285
3 Somewhat greater 429 29.5% 0.29504814
4 Neither greater or less 279 19.2% 0.19188446
5 Somewhat less 77 5.3% 0.05295736
6 Less 76 5.2% 0.05226960
7 Very much less 39 2.7% 0.02682256
97 Not answered 57 3.9% 0.03920220
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13pad13_3


Variable label: Automatization of public services leads to what in: Legitimacy.
Pre-question text: What do you think a transition from human to automated decision making in the public sector will lead to when it comes to the following points?
Literal question: Legitimacy: The probability that citizens comply voluntarily with the decisions of the authorities
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very much greater 23 1.6% 0.01581843
2 Greater 79 5.4% 0.05433287
3 Somewhat greater 188 12.9% 0.12929849
4 Neither greater or less 582 40% 0.40027510
5 Somewhat less 255 17.5% 0.17537827
6 Less 196 13.5% 0.13480055
7 Very much less 72 5% 0.04951857
97 Not answered 59 4.1% 0.04057772
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13pad14


Variable label: How much knowledge about automated decisions in public sector.
Literal question: How much knowledge would you say that you have about automated decisions in the public sector?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good knowledge 17 1.2% 0.01169188
2 Good knowledge 94 6.5% 0.06464924
3 Some knowledge 375 25.8% 0.25790922
4 Little knowledge 640 44% 0.44016506
5 No knowledge at all 295 20.3% 0.20288858
97 Not answered 33 2.3% 0.02269601
98 Not asked 5755 NA


r13polkom5


Variable label: Reason for why one person is more credible than the other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: Please give reasons for why you think one person is more credible than the other.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 3, r13polkom2 = 1 and response on r13polkom4][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13polkom5_back


Variable label: [Logs movement backward in the questionnaire, from r13polkom5 to r13polkom 4.. Tracks if r13group = 3, r13polkom2 = 1 and response on r13polkom4]
Technical description: [Logs movement backward in the questionnaire, from r13polkom5 to r13polkom 4.. Tracks if r13group = 3, r13polkom2 = 1 and response on r13polkom4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:201] [Invalid:7008] [Range:1-1]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Has used return button to go back to R13POLKOM4 201 100% 1
Sysmiss 7008 NA


r13meme3_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects text element for r13meme3. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
Technical description: [Randomly selects text element for r13meme3. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1342] [Invalid:5867] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 your local community 442 32.9% 0.3293592
2 your municipality 459 34.2% 0.3420268
3 Norway 441 32.9% 0.3286140
Sysmiss 5867 NA


r13meme3


Variable label: How is the integration of refugees in [your local community/municipality/Norway] going.
Literal question: How do you think that the integration of refugees who are residing in [your local community/your municipality/Norway] is going?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 32 2.3% 0.02335766
2 Well 438 32% 0.31970803
3 Quite well 423 30.9% 0.30875912
4 Neither well nor badly 150 10.9% 0.10948905
5 Quite badly 163 11.9% 0.11897810
6 Badly 93 6.8% 0.06788321
7 Very badly 36 2.6% 0.02627737
97 Not answered 35 2.6% 0.02554745
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme4_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects text element for r13meme4. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
Technical description: [Randomly selects text element for r13meme4. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:5869] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 national 662 49.4% 0.4940299
2 local 678 50.6% 0.5059701
Sysmiss 5869 NA


r13meme4


Variable label: How good/bad did [local/national] authorities handle arrival of refugees to Norway in 2015.
Literal question: How well or poorly do you think [national/local] authorities handled the arrival of refugees in Norway in 2015?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very well 25 1.8% 0.01824818
2 Well 196 14.3% 0.14306569
3 Quite well 336 24.5% 0.24525547
4 Neither well nor badly 239 17.4% 0.17445255
5 Quite badly 293 21.4% 0.21386861
6 Badly 164 12% 0.11970803
7 Very badly 69 5% 0.05036496
97 Not answered 48 3.5% 0.03503650
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme5_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects text element for r13meme5. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
Technical description: [Randomly selects text element for r13meme5. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1339] [Invalid:5870] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 in your municipality 645 48.2% 0.4817028
2 in Norway 694 51.8% 0.5182972
Sysmiss 5870 NA


r13meme5


Variable label: How much say did representatives in [your municipality/Norway] have on amount of refugees coming to [municipality/Norway].
Literal question: How much say do you think elected representatives [in your municipality/in Norway] have had on the number of refugees who have come [to the municipality/to Norway]?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A great deal 143 10.4% 0.10437956
2 Quite a bit 459 33.5% 0.33503650
3 Some 446 32.6% 0.32554745
4 Not much 238 17.4% 0.17372263
5 None at all 41 3% 0.02992701
97 Not answered 43 3.1% 0.03138686
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme6_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects text element for r13meme6. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
Technical description: [Randomly selects text element for r13meme6. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1338] [Invalid:5871] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian authorities / municipalities 638 47.7% 0.4768311
2 UN / Parliament 700 52.3% 0.5231689
Sysmiss 5871 NA


r13meme6


Variable label: Representatives in [your municipality/Norway] should accept how many refugees.
Pre-question text: The [Norwegian authorities/UN] request each year that [municipalities/Norway] accept refugees.
[The Municipal Council/Parliament] do not have to comply with the request, but can decide themselves how many refugees [the municipality/Norway] will take.
Literal question: What do you think that the elected representatives [in your municipality/Norway] should do?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 More than we are asked 180 13.1% 0.13138686
2 As many as we are asked 777 56.7% 0.56715328
3 Fewer than we are asked 310 22.6% 0.22627737
4 None at all 62 4.5% 0.04525547
97 Not answered 41 3% 0.02992701
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme10_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects text element for r13meme10a, r13meme10b and r13meme10c.. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
Technical description: [Randomly selects text element for r13meme10a, r13meme10b and r13meme10c.. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1337] [Invalid:5872] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norway 450 33.7% 0.3365744
2 your municipality 447 33.4% 0.3343306
3 your local community 440 32.9% 0.3290950
Sysmiss 5872 NA


r13meme10a


Variable label: How much are issues of refugees and immigration discussed in [Norway/your municipality/your local community] these days.
Literal question: How much would you say that issues relating to refugees and immigration are discussed in [Norway/your municipality/your local community] these days?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very little 239 17.4% 0.17445255
2 A little 459 33.5% 0.33503650
3 Somewhat 411 30% 0.30000000
4 Quite a bit 171 12.5% 0.12481752
5 Very much 47 3.4% 0.03430657
97 Not answered 43 3.1% 0.03138686
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme10b_1


Variable label: Discussions on refugees and immigration in [Norway/municipality/local community] are: Calm-heated.
Literal question: How would you characterise the discussions about refugees and immigration in [Norway/your municipality/ your local community]?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Calm 201 14.7% 0.14671533
7 Heated 27 2% 0.01970803
97 Not answered 102 7.4% 0.07445255
98 Not asked 5839 NA
2 237 17.3% 0.17299270
3 225 16.4% 0.16423358
4 286 20.9% 0.20875912
5 193 14.1% 0.14087591
6 99 7.2% 0.07226277


r13meme10b_2


Variable label: Discussions on refugees and immigration in [Norway/municipality/local community] are: Objective-non-objective.
Literal question: How would you characterise the discussions about refugees and immigration in [Norway/your municipality/ your local community]?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Objective 127 9.3% 0.09270073
7 Non-objective 28 2% 0.02043796
97 Not answered 103 7.5% 0.07518248
98 Not asked 5839 NA
2 214 15.6% 0.15620438
3 267 19.5% 0.19489051
4 300 21.9% 0.21897810
5 231 16.9% 0.16861314
6 100 7.3% 0.07299270


r13meme10b_3


Variable label: Discussions on refugees and immigration in [Norway/municipality/local community] are: A source of conflict-Solution oriented.
Literal question: How would you characterise the discussions about refugees and immigration in [Norway/your municipality/ your local community]?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Solution oriented 81 5.9% 0.05912409
7 A source of conflict 44 3.2% 0.03211679
97 Not answered 114 8.3% 0.08321168
98 Not asked 5839 NA
2 155 11.3% 0.11313869
3 259 18.9% 0.18905109
4 362 26.4% 0.26423358
5 237 17.3% 0.17299270
6 118 8.6% 0.08613139


r13meme10b_4


Variable label: Diiscussions on refugees and immigration in [Norway/municipality/local community] are: Interesting-Boring.
Literal question: How would you characterise the discussions about refugees and immigration in [Norway/your municipality/ your local community]?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Interesting 26 1.9% 0.01897810
7 Boring 65 4.7% 0.04744526
97 Not answered 128 9.3% 0.09343066
98 Not asked 5839 NA
2 91 6.6% 0.06642336
3 200 14.6% 0.14598540
4 557 40.7% 0.40656934
5 204 14.9% 0.14890511
6 99 7.2% 0.07226277


r13meme10c_1


Variable label: Get information about refugees/immigration in [Norway/municipality/local community]: 1. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: How do you get information about refugees and immigration in [Norway/your municipality/your local community]?
Post-question: Please reply in the text boxes below. Examples of answers can be family, friends, TV, social media, local newspapers, research etc.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13meme10c_2


Variable label: Get information about refugees/immigration in [Norway/municipality/local community]: 2. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: How do you get information about refugees and immigration in [Norway/your municipality/your local community]?
Post-question: Please reply in the text boxes below. Examples of answers can be family, friends, TV, social media, local newspapers, research etc.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13meme10c_3


Variable label: Get information about refugees/immigration in [Norway/municipality/local community]: 3. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Literal question: How do you get information about refugees and immigration in [Norway/your municipality/your local community]?
Post-question: Please reply in the text boxes below. Examples of answers can be family, friends, TV, social media, local newspapers, research etc.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13meme2


Variable label: Refugees live in your loal community.
Literal question: Do refugees reside in your local community?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Yes 889 64.9% 0.64890511
2 No 212 15.5% 0.15474453
3 Do not know 227 16.6% 0.16569343
97 Not answered 42 3.1% 0.03065693
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme9_organisasjon


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects an organisation in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects an organisation in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 An organisation 915 21.5% 0.2148392
2 An organisation associated with a connection to a foreign country. 786 18.5% 0.1845504
3 A political party that is in government. 855 20.1% 0.2007514
4 A political party that has registered to participate in elections. 868 20.4% 0.2038037
5 A political party that actively participates in elections. 835 19.6% 0.1960554
Sysmiss 2950 NA


r13meme9_event


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the event in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the event in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 speech 1410 33.1% 0.3310636
2 stand 1412 33.2% 0.3315332
3 demonstration 1437 33.7% 0.3374031
Sysmiss 2950 NA


r13meme9_sted


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the location in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the location in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 a local event 1424 33.4% 0.3343508
2 an upper secondary school 1392 32.7% 0.3268373
3 a known public space 1443 33.9% 0.3388119
Sysmiss 2950 NA


r13meme9_budskap


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the message in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the message in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norway needs a more rigorous asylum policy. 1471 34.5% 0.3453862
2 Islam poses a serious threat to democratic values and the rights of women and homosexuals. 1346 31.6% 0.3160366
3 Norway must preserve its white cultural heritage 1442 33.9% 0.3385771
Sysmiss 2950 NA


r13meme9_arv


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the heritage of the organsation in the hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the heritage of the organsation in the hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 They were founded as a neo-Nazi organisation 1393 32.7% 0.3270721
2 They were founded as a revolt against asylum policy. 1432 33.6% 0.3362292
3 They were founded through revolt at district level in several parts of the country. 1434 33.7% 0.3366988
Sysmiss 2950 NA


r13meme9_benekter


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects if the organisation denies right wing extremism in the hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects if the organisation denies right wing extremism in the hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 They currently distance themselves from anything to do with right-wing extremism 2054 48.2% 0.4822728
2 . 2205 51.8% 0.5177272
Sysmiss 2950 NA


r13meme9_motbevis


Variable label: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects characteristics of some members in organisation in the hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical description: [Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects characteristics of some members in organisation in the hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 - It turns out that [the organisation/the party] has a key member who has been convicted of making racist statements, but who has now been forced to leave [the organisation/the party]. 1483 34.8% 0.3482038
2 - It turns out that [the organisation/the party] has a key member who has been convicted of making racist statements. 1365 32% 0.3204978
3 - It turns out that [the organisation/the party] has some members who deny the Holocaust. 1411 33.1% 0.3312984
Sysmiss 2950 NA


r13meme9a


Variable label: Organisation should be given permission to hold event.
Pre-question text: Imagine [An organisation. / An organisation associated with a connection to a foreign country. / A political party that is in government. / A political party that has registered to participate in elections. /A political party that actively participates in elections. ][They were founded as a neo-Nazi organisation. / They were founded as a revolt against asylum policy./ They were founded through revolt at district level in several parts of the country.] [They currently distance themselves from anything to do with right-wing extremism./blank][It turns out that [the organization/the party] has a key member who has been convicted of making racist statements, but who has now been forced to leave [the organization/the party]. /It turns out that [the organization/the party] has a key member who has been convicted of making racist statements, but who has now been forced to leave [the organization/the party]./ It turns out that [the organization/the party] has some members who deny the Holocaust.] [The organization/The party] has now asked if they can have a [speech/stand/demonstration] at [a local event/an upper secondary school/a known public place] in order to communicate their message that [Norway needs a more rigorous asylum policy/Islam poses a serious threat to democratic values and the rights of women and homosexuals/Norway must preserve its white cultural heritage].
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should be given permission to do so?
Technical description: [Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 405 9.2% 0.09236032
2 Agree 879 20% 0.20045610
3 Agree somewhat 688 15.7% 0.15689852
4 Neither agree nor disagree 380 8.7% 0.08665906
5 Disagree somewhat 408 9.3% 0.09304447
6 Disagree 741 16.9% 0.16898518
7 Strongly disagree 720 16.4% 0.16419612
97 Not answered 164 3.7% 0.03740023
98 Not asked 2824 NA


r13meme9b


Variable label: Organisation poses a threat to democracy.
Pre-question text: Imagine [An organisation. / An organisation associated with a connection to a foreign country. / A political party that is in government. / A political party that has registered to participate in elections. /A political party that actively participates in elections. ][They were founded as a neo-Nazi organisation. / They were founded as a revolt against asylum policy./ They were founded through revolt at district level in several parts of the country.] [They currently distance themselves from anything to do with right-wing extremism./blank][It turns out that [the organization/the party] has a key member who has been convicted of making racist statements, but who has now been forced to leave [the organization/the party]. /It turns out that [the organization/the party] has a key member who has been convicted of making racist statements, but who has now been forced to leave [the organization/the party]./ It turns out that [the organization/the party] has some members who deny the Holocaust.] [The organization/The party] has now asked if they can have a [speech/stand/demonstration] at [a local event/an upper secondary school/a known public place] in order to communicate their message that [Norway needs a more rigorous asylum policy/Islam poses a serious threat to democratic values and the rights of women and homosexuals/Norway must preserve its white cultural heritage].
Literal question: To what extent do you agree or disagree that the organisation described above poses a threat to democracy?
Technical description: [Del av conjoint-eksperiment. En tenkt situasjon presenteres for respondenten. Den tenkte situasjonen har ulike egenskaper basert på bakgrunnsvariablene r13meme9_event - r13meme9_motbevis. Spurt dersom r13group = 2, 3 eller 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 454 10.4% 0.10353478
2 Agree 728 16.6% 0.16602052
3 Agree somewhat 812 18.5% 0.18517674
4 Neither agree nor disagree 715 16.3% 0.16305587
5 Disagree somewhat 481 11% 0.10969213
6 Disagree 743 16.9% 0.16944128
7 Strongly disagree 282 6.4% 0.06431015
97 Not answered 170 3.9% 0.03876853
98 Not asked 2824 NA


r13meme8a_1


Variable label: People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Contempt.
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
Literal question: Contempt
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 702 51.2% 0.512408759
2 To a small degree 410 29.9% 0.299270073
3 To some degree 127 9.3% 0.092700730
4 To a great degree 16 1.2% 0.011678832
5 To a very great degree 1 0.1% 0.000729927
97 Not answered 114 8.3% 0.083211679
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme8a_2


Variable label: People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Admiration.
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
Literal question: Admiration
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 58 4.2% 0.04233577
2 To a small degree 310 22.6% 0.22627737
3 To some degree 602 43.9% 0.43941606
4 To a great degree 250 18.2% 0.18248175
5 To a very great degree 43 3.1% 0.03138686
97 Not answered 107 7.8% 0.07810219
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme8a_3


Variable label: People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Compassion.
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
Literal question: Compassion
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 37 2.7% 0.02700730
2 To a small degree 162 11.8% 0.11824818
3 To some degree 605 44.2% 0.44160584
4 To a great degree 387 28.2% 0.28248175
5 To a very great degree 81 5.9% 0.05912409
97 Not answered 98 7.2% 0.07153285
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme8a_4


Variable label: People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Envy.
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
Literal question: Envy
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 514 37.5% 0.375182482
2 To a small degree 488 35.6% 0.356204380
3 To some degree 233 17% 0.170072993
4 To a great degree 21 1.5% 0.015328467
5 To a very great degree 2 0.1% 0.001459854
97 Not answered 112 8.2% 0.081751825
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme8a_5


Variable label: People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Anger.
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
Literal question: Anger
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 696 50.8% 0.508029197
2 To a small degree 422 30.8% 0.308029197
3 To some degree 117 8.5% 0.085401460
4 To a great degree 18 1.3% 0.013138686
5 To a very great degree 3 0.2% 0.002189781
97 Not answered 114 8.3% 0.083211679
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme8a_6


Variable label: People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Fear.
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
Literal question: Fear
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 810 59.1% 0.591240876
2 To a small degree 343 25% 0.250364964
3 To some degree 83 6.1% 0.060583942
4 To a great degree 12 0.9% 0.008759124
5 To a very great degree 5 0.4% 0.003649635
97 Not answered 117 8.5% 0.085401460
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme8a_7


Variable label: People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Feel sorry for them.
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
Literal question: Feel sorry for them
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 88 6.4% 0.06423358
2 To a small degree 276 20.1% 0.20145985
3 To some degree 645 47.1% 0.47080292
4 To a great degree 200 14.6% 0.14598540
5 To a very great degree 50 3.6% 0.03649635
97 Not answered 111 8.1% 0.08102190
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme8b_1


Variable label: You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Contempt.
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
Literal question: Contempt
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 1133 82.7% 0.827007299
2 To a small degree 101 7.4% 0.073722628
3 To some degree 26 1.9% 0.018978102
4 To a great degree 8 0.6% 0.005839416
5 To a very great degree 6 0.4% 0.004379562
97 Not answered 96 7% 0.070072993
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme8b_2


Variable label: You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Admiration
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
Literal question: Admiration
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 59 4.3% 0.04306569
2 To a small degree 121 8.8% 0.08832117
3 To some degree 499 36.4% 0.36423358
4 To a great degree 461 33.6% 0.33649635
5 To a very great degree 149 10.9% 0.10875912
97 Not answered 81 5.9% 0.05912409
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme8b_3


Variable label: You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Compassion
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
Literal question: Compassion
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 52 3.8% 0.03795620
2 To a small degree 118 8.6% 0.08613139
3 To some degree 466 34% 0.34014599
4 To a great degree 473 34.5% 0.34525547
5 To a very great degree 171 12.5% 0.12481752
97 Not answered 90 6.6% 0.06569343
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme8b_4


Variable label: You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Envy
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
Literal question: Envy
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 987 72% 0.720437956
2 To a small degree 219 16% 0.159854015
3 To some degree 52 3.8% 0.037956204
4 To a great degree 15 1.1% 0.010948905
5 To a very great degree 7 0.5% 0.005109489
97 Not answered 90 6.6% 0.065693431
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme8b_5


Variable label: You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Anger
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
Literal question: Anger
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 1068 78% 0.779562044
2 To a small degree 147 10.7% 0.107299270
3 To some degree 51 3.7% 0.037226277
4 To a great degree 9 0.7% 0.006569343
5 To a very great degree 6 0.4% 0.004379562
97 Not answered 89 6.5% 0.064963504
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme8b_6


Variable label: You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Fear
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
Literal question: Fear
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 1112 81.2% 0.811678832
2 To a small degree 119 8.7% 0.086861314
3 To some degree 35 2.6% 0.025547445
4 To a great degree 11 0.8% 0.008029197
5 To a very great degree 3 0.2% 0.002189781
97 Not answered 90 6.6% 0.065693431
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme8b_7


Variable label: You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Feel sorry for them
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
Literal question: Feel sorry for them
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 159 11.6% 0.11605839
2 To a small degree 330 24.1% 0.24087591
3 To some degree 580 42.3% 0.42335766
4 To a great degree 157 11.5% 0.11459854
5 To a very great degree 57 4.2% 0.04160584
97 Not answered 87 6.4% 0.06350365
98 Not asked 5839 NA


r13meme7a_1


Variable label: People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Contempt.
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
Literal question: Contempt
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 174 7.9% 0.078911565
2 To a small degree 681 30.9% 0.308843537
3 To some degree 1010 45.8% 0.458049887
4 To a great degree 148 6.7% 0.067120181
5 To a very great degree 20 0.9% 0.009070295
97 Not answered 172 7.8% 0.078004535
98 Not asked 5004 NA


r13meme7a_2


Variable label: People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Admiration
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
Literal question: Admiration
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 407 18.5% 0.1845804989
2 To a small degree 1025 46.5% 0.4648526077
3 To some degree 555 25.2% 0.2517006803
4 To a great degree 40 1.8% 0.0181405896
5 To a very great degree 2 0.1% 0.0009070295
97 Not answered 176 8% 0.0798185941
98 Not asked 5004 NA


r13meme7a_3


Variable label: People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Compassion
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
Literal question: Compassion
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 47 2.1% 0.02131519
2 To a small degree 256 11.6% 0.11609977
3 To some degree 1181 53.6% 0.53560091
4 To a great degree 526 23.9% 0.23854875
5 To a very great degree 41 1.9% 0.01859410
97 Not answered 154 7% 0.06984127
98 Not asked 5004 NA


r13meme7a_4


Variable label: People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Envy
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
Literal question: Envy
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 1027 46.6% 0.465759637
2 To a small degree 596 27% 0.270294785
3 To some degree 338 15.3% 0.153287982
4 To a great degree 61 2.8% 0.027664399
5 To a very great degree 7 0.3% 0.003174603
97 Not answered 176 8% 0.079818594
98 Not asked 5004 NA


r13meme7a_5


Variable label: People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Anger
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
Literal question: Anger
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 211 9.6% 0.09569161
2 To a small degree 632 28.7% 0.28662132
3 To some degree 951 43.1% 0.43129252
4 To a great degree 209 9.5% 0.09478458
5 To a very great degree 29 1.3% 0.01315193
97 Not answered 173 7.8% 0.07845805
98 Not asked 5004 NA


r13meme7a_6


Variable label: People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Fear
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
Literal question: Fear
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 91 4.1% 0.04126984
2 To a small degree 326 14.8% 0.14784580
3 To some degree 1055 47.8% 0.47845805
4 To a great degree 464 21% 0.21043084
5 To a very great degree 100 4.5% 0.04535147
97 Not answered 169 7.7% 0.07664399
98 Not asked 5004 NA


r13meme7b_1


Variable label: You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Contempt.
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
Literal question: Contempt.
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 1255 56.9% 0.569160998
2 To a small degree 562 25.5% 0.254875283
3 To some degree 217 9.8% 0.098412698
4 To a great degree 32 1.5% 0.014512472
5 To a very great degree 11 0.5% 0.004988662
97 Not answered 128 5.8% 0.058049887
98 Not asked 5004 NA


r13meme7b_2


Variable label: You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Admiration
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
Literal question: Admiration
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 407 18.5% 0.18458050
2 To a small degree 624 28.3% 0.28299320
3 To some degree 797 36.1% 0.36145125
4 To a great degree 219 9.9% 0.09931973
5 To a very great degree 25 1.1% 0.01133787
97 Not answered 133 6% 0.06031746
98 Not asked 5004 NA


r13meme7b_3


Variable label: You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Compassion
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
Literal question: Compassion
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 68 3.1% 0.03083900
2 To a small degree 176 8% 0.07981859
3 To some degree 803 36.4% 0.36417234
4 To a great degree 837 38% 0.37959184
5 To a very great degree 210 9.5% 0.09523810
97 Not answered 111 5% 0.05034014
98 Not asked 5004 NA


r13meme7b_4


Variable label: You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Envy
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
Literal question: Envy
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 1786 81% 0.8099773243
2 To a small degree 230 10.4% 0.1043083900
3 To some degree 42 1.9% 0.0190476190
4 To a great degree 15 0.7% 0.0068027211
5 To a very great degree 2 0.1% 0.0009070295
97 Not answered 130 5.9% 0.0589569161
98 Not asked 5004 NA


r13meme7b_5


Variable label: You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Anger
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
Literal question: Anger
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 1372 62.2% 0.622222222
2 To a small degree 478 21.7% 0.216780045
3 To some degree 171 7.8% 0.077551020
4 To a great degree 38 1.7% 0.017233560
5 To a very great degree 16 0.7% 0.007256236
97 Not answered 130 5.9% 0.058956916
98 Not asked 5004 NA


r13meme7b_6


Variable label: You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Fear
Pre-question text: Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
Literal question: Fear
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 717 32.5% 0.32517007
2 To a small degree 807 36.6% 0.36598639
3 To some degree 417 18.9% 0.18911565
4 To a great degree 101 4.6% 0.04580499
5 To a very great degree 36 1.6% 0.01632653
97 Not answered 127 5.8% 0.05759637
98 Not asked 5004 NA


r13meme11_1


Variable label: How good or poor description of you: Important to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants.
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants
Technical description: [Asked if no response on r13meme5 and if the respondent was asked r13meme8 or r13meme7]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 571 22.2% 0.22191994
2 Good 941 36.6% 0.36572095
3 Somewhat good 440 17.1% 0.17100661
4 Neither good nor bad 395 15.4% 0.15351729
5 Somewhat bad 89 3.5% 0.03458997
6 Bad 54 2.1% 0.02098717
7 Very bad 35 1.4% 0.01360280
97 Not answered 48 1.9% 0.01865527
98 Not asked 4636 NA


r13meme11_2


Variable label: How good or poor description of you: Do not want to appear racist, even to myself.
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
Technical description: [Asked if no response on r13meme5 and if the respondent was asked r13meme8 or r13meme7]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 744 28.9% 0.28915663
2 Good 849 33% 0.32996502
3 Somewhat good 309 12% 0.12009328
4 Neither good nor bad 394 15.3% 0.15312864
5 Somewhat bad 108 4.2% 0.04197435
6 Bad 66 2.6% 0.02565099
7 Very bad 47 1.8% 0.01826661
97 Not answered 56 2.2% 0.02176448
98 Not asked 4636 NA


r13meme11_3


Variable label: How good or poor description of you: Feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
Technical description: [Asked if no response on r13meme5 and if the respondent was asked r13meme8 or r13meme7]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 181 7% 0.07034590
2 Good 442 17.2% 0.17178391
3 Somewhat good 421 16.4% 0.16362223
4 Neither good nor bad 727 28.3% 0.28254955
5 Somewhat bad 237 9.2% 0.09211038
6 Bad 317 12.3% 0.12320249
7 Very bad 185 7.2% 0.07190051
97 Not answered 63 2.4% 0.02448504
98 Not asked 4636 NA


r13meme11_4


Variable label: How good or poor description of you: Try to be unprejudiced about immigrants due to my own convictions.
Pre-question text: How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
Literal question: I try to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants due to my own convictions.
Technical description: [Asked if no response on r13meme5 and if the respondent was asked r13meme8 or r13meme7]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 519 20.2% 0.20171007
2 Good 985 38.3% 0.38282161
3 Somewhat good 433 16.8% 0.16828605
4 Neither good nor bad 398 15.5% 0.15468325
5 Somewhat bad 86 3.3% 0.03342402
6 Bad 58 2.3% 0.02254178
7 Very bad 36 1.4% 0.01399145
97 Not answered 58 2.3% 0.02254178
98 Not asked 4636 NA


ocr13mat_ran


Variable label: [If value on r7ran24 it is used. If not, a random value is selected. ]
Technical description: [If value on r7ran24 it is used. If not, a random value is selected. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:6980] [Invalid:229] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 1173 16.8% 0.1680516
2 2 1197 17.1% 0.1714900
3 3 1124 16.1% 0.1610315
4 4 1192 17.1% 0.1707736
5 5 1167 16.7% 0.1671920
6 6 1127 16.1% 0.1614613
Sysmiss 229 NA


ocr13mat_ran_1


Variable label: [If value on r7ran24_1 it is used. If not, a random value is selected if ocr13mat_ran = 1]
Technical description: [If value on r7ran24_1 it is used. If not, a random value is selected if ocr13mat_ran = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1173] [Invalid:6036] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 389 33.2% 0.3316283
2 2 394 33.6% 0.3358909
3 3 390 33.2% 0.3324808
Sysmiss 6036 NA


ocr13matc1


Variable label: Agree with how many of three statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution.
Literal question:

Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.

Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment
Technical description: [Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0 59 15.2% 0.151670951
2 1 239 61.4% 0.614395887
3 2 85 21.9% 0.218508997
4 3 4 1% 0.010282776
97 Not answered 2 0.5% 0.005141388
98 Not asked 6820 NA


ocr13matc1a


Variable label: Norway should let people from Muslim countries come and live here.
Literal question: Do you think Norway should allow people from Muslim countries to come and live here?
Technical description: [Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 allow to come and live here 249 64% 0.64010283
2 do not allow to come and live here 121 31.1% 0.31105398
97 Not answered 19 4.9% 0.04884319
98 Not asked 6820 NA


ocr13matc2


Variable label: Agree with how many of three statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution.
Literal question:

Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.

Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment
Technical description: [Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0 183 15.3% 0.152882206
2 1 733 61.2% 0.612364244
3 2 266 22.2% 0.222222222
4 3 8 0.7% 0.006683375
97 Not answered 7 0.6% 0.005847953
98 Not asked 6012 NA


ocr13matc2a


Variable label: Norway should let people from Easter European countries come and live here.
Literal question: Do you think Norway should allow people from Eastern European countries to come and live here?
Technical description: [Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 allow to come and live here 746 62.3% 0.62322473
2 do not allow to come and live here 400 33.4% 0.33416876
97 Not answered 51 4.3% 0.04260652
98 Not asked 6012 NA


ocr13matc3


Variable label: Agree with how many of three statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution.
Literal question:

Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.

Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment
Technical description: [Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0 67 17% 0.170050761
2 1 242 61.4% 0.614213198
3 2 77 19.5% 0.195431472
4 3 6 1.5% 0.015228426
97 Not answered 2 0.5% 0.005076142
98 Not asked 6815 NA


ocr13matc3a


Variable label: Norway should let immigrants from Muslim countries come and live here.
Literal question: Do you think Norway should allow immigrants from Muslim countries to come and live here?
Technical description: [Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 allow to come and live here 261 66.2% 0.66243655
2 do not allow to come and live here 114 28.9% 0.28934010
97 Not answered 19 4.8% 0.04822335
98 Not asked 6815 NA


ocr13matc4


Variable label: Agree with how many of three statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution.
Literal question:

Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.

Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment
Technical description: [Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0 75 19.2% 0.192307692
2 1 229 58.7% 0.587179487
3 2 82 21% 0.210256410
4 3 3 0.8% 0.007692308
97 Not answered 1 0.3% 0.002564103
98 Not asked 6819 NA


ocr13matc4a


Variable label: Norway should let refugees from muslim countries come and live here.
Literal question: Do you think Norway should allow refugees from Muslim countries to come and live here?
Technical description: [Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 allow to come and live here 262 67.2% 0.67179487
2 do not allow to come and live here 112 28.7% 0.28717949
97 Not answered 16 4.1% 0.04102564
98 Not asked 6819 NA


ocr13matt1


Variable label: Agree with how many of four statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution, people from Muslim countries.
Literal question:

Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.

Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment Norway should allow people from Muslim countries to come and live here
Technical description: [Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0 100 8.9% 0.088967972
2 1 377 33.5% 0.335409253
3 2 530 47.2% 0.471530249
4 3 97 8.6% 0.086298932
5 4 10 0.9% 0.008896797
97 Not answered 10 0.9% 0.008896797
98 Not asked 6085 NA


ocr13matt2


Variable label: Agree with how many of four statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution, people from Eastern Europe.
Literal question:

Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.

Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment Norway should allow people from Eastern European countries to come and live here
Technical description: [Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0 108 9.1% 0.090604027
2 1 498 41.8% 0.417785235
3 2 505 42.4% 0.423657718
4 3 63 5.3% 0.052852349
5 4 12 1% 0.010067114
97 Not answered 6 0.5% 0.005033557
98 Not asked 6017 NA


ocr13matt3


Variable label: Agree with how many of four statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution, immigrants from Muslim countries.
Literal question:

Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.

Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment Norway should allow immigrants from Muslim countries to come and live here
Technical description: [Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0 108 9.3% 0.092544987
2 1 429 36.8% 0.367609254
3 2 527 45.2% 0.451585261
4 3 92 7.9% 0.078834619
5 4 6 0.5% 0.005141388
97 Not answered 5 0.4% 0.004284490
98 Not asked 6042 NA


ocr13matt4


Variable label: Agree with how many of four statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution, refugees from Muslim countries.
Literal question:

Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.

Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment Norway should allow refugees from Muslim countries to come and live here
Technical description: [Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 6]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0 72 6.4% 0.063886424
2 1 364 32.3% 0.322981366
3 2 578 51.3% 0.512866016
4 3 92 8.2% 0.081632653
5 4 12 1.1% 0.010647737
97 Not answered 9 0.8% 0.007985803
98 Not asked 6082 NA


r13polkom1


Variable label: Open: Which values are important for Norwegian society and identity [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
Pre-question text: In politics and in the news there has been a lot of writing and discussion about Norwegian values. We are interested in your opinions on what Norwegian values are.
Literal question: What values do you think are most important for Norwegian society and identity?
Post-question: Type key words.
Technical description:

[Asked if r13group = 4]

[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
Technical attributes: [Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]



r13polkom14_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects between r13polkom14a-c, and then r13polkom14a-c. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
Technical description: [Randomly selects between r13polkom14a-c, and then r13polkom14a-c. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1321] [Invalid:5888] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 satisfied 442 33.5% 0.334595
2 pleased 440 33.3% 0.333081
3 enthusiastic 439 33.2% 0.332324
Sysmiss 5888 NA


r13polkom14a


Variable label: The way democracy works in Norway: How satisfied.
Literal question: All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 69 15.6% 0.1561086
2 Satisfied 261 59% 0.5904977
3 Somewhat satisfied 75 17% 0.1696833
4 Not very satisfied 30 6.8% 0.0678733
5 Not satisfied at all 7 1.6% 0.0158371
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.0000000
98 Not asked 6767 NA


r13polkom14b


Variable label: The way democracy works in Norway: How pleased.
Literal question: All things considered, how pleased are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very pleased 62 14.1% 0.140909091
2 Pleased 227 51.6% 0.515909091
3 Somewhat pleased 109 24.8% 0.247727273
4 Not very pleased 35 8% 0.079545455
5 Not pleased at all 6 1.4% 0.013636364
97 Not answered 1 0.2% 0.002272727
98 Not asked 6769 NA


r13polkom14c


Variable label: The way democracy works in Norway: How enthusiastic.
Literal question: All in all, how enthusiastic are you about the way democracy works in Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very enthusiastic 30 6.8% 0.068337130
2 Enthusiastic 204 46.5% 0.464692483
3 Somewhat enthusiastic 149 33.9% 0.339407745
4 Not very enthusiastic 38 8.7% 0.086560364
5 Not at all enthusiastic 17 3.9% 0.038724374
97 Not answered 1 0.2% 0.002277904
98 Not asked 6770 NA


r13polkom15a


Variable label: Your current personal financial situation: How satisfied.
Literal question: How satisfied are you with your current personal financial situation?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 91 20.6% 0.205882353
2 Satisfied 228 51.6% 0.515837104
3 Somewhat satisfied 88 19.9% 0.199095023
4 Not very satisfied 28 6.3% 0.063348416
5 Not satisfied at all 6 1.4% 0.013574661
97 Not answered 1 0.2% 0.002262443
98 Not asked 6767 NA


r13polkom15b


Variable label: Your current personal financial situation: How pleased.
Literal question: How pleased are you with your current personal financial situation?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very pleased 73 16.6% 0.165909091
2 Pleased 242 55% 0.550000000
3 Somewhat pleased 87 19.8% 0.197727273
4 Not very pleased 20 4.5% 0.045454545
5 Not pleased at all 16 3.6% 0.036363636
97 Not answered 2 0.5% 0.004545455
98 Not asked 6769 NA


r13polkom15c


Variable label: Your current personal financial situation: How enthusiastic.
Literal question: How enthusiastic are you about your current personal financial situation?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very enthusiastic 30 6.8% 0.068337130
2 Enthusiastic 148 33.7% 0.337129841
3 Somewhat enthusiastic 186 42.4% 0.423690205
4 Not very enthusiastic 58 13.2% 0.132118451
5 Not at all enthusiastic 16 3.6% 0.036446469
97 Not answered 1 0.2% 0.002277904
98 Not asked 6770 NA


r13polkom16_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects between r13polkom16a-c. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
Technical description: [Randomly selects between r13polkom16a-c. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1321] [Invalid:5888] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 fortunate 469 35.5% 0.3550341
2 happy 432 32.7% 0.3270250
3 privileged 420 31.8% 0.3179410
Sysmiss 5888 NA


r13polkom16a


Variable label: How fortunate would you say you are.
Literal question: All in all, how fortunate would you say you are?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom16_ran = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very unfortunate 5 1.1% 0.010660981
2 Unfortunate 3 0.6% 0.006396588
3 Somewhat unfortunate 20 4.3% 0.042643923
4 Neither fortunate nor unfortunate 38 8.1% 0.081023454
5 Somewhat fortunate 73 15.6% 0.155650320
6 Fortunate 196 41.8% 0.417910448
7 Very fortunate 133 28.4% 0.283582090
97 Not answered 1 0.2% 0.002132196
98 Not asked 6740 NA


r13polkom16b


Variable label: How happy would you say you are.
Literal question: All in all, how happy would you say you are?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom16_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very unhappy 6 1.4% 0.013888889
2 Unhappy 6 1.4% 0.013888889
3 Somewhat unhappy 14 3.2% 0.032407407
4 Neither happy nor unhappy 43 10% 0.099537037
5 Somewhat happy 101 23.4% 0.233796296
6 Happy 201 46.5% 0.465277778
7 Very happy 58 13.4% 0.134259259
97 Not answered 3 0.7% 0.006944444
98 Not asked 6777 NA


r13polkom16c


Variable label: How privileged would you say you are.
Literal question: All in all, how privileged would you say you are?
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom16_ran = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very unprivileged 10 2.4% 0.023809524
2 Unprivileged 8 1.9% 0.019047619
3 Somewhat unprivileged 17 4% 0.040476190
4 Neither privileged or unprivileged 39 9.3% 0.092857143
5 Somewhat privileged 88 21% 0.209523810
6 Privileged 165 39.3% 0.392857143
7 Very privileged 92 21.9% 0.219047619
97 Not answered 1 0.2% 0.002380952
98 Not asked 6789 NA


r13pad10_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects between r13pad10a-d. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
Technical description: [Randomly selects between r13pad10a-d. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1422] [Invalid:5787] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Respondent gets R13PAD10A 357 25.1% 0.2510549
2 Respondent gets R13PAD10B 369 25.9% 0.2594937
3 Respondent gets R13PAD10C 340 23.9% 0.2390999
4 Respondent gets R13PAD10D 356 25% 0.2503516
Sysmiss 5787 NA


r13pad10a_1


Variable label: Give amount of NOK if you are decision maker.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be the recipient.

If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker, you will receive NOK 2,000 KR and must choose how much you will give to the recipient. What you give, the recipient will receive. You keep the rest.
Literal question: What do you choose? I choose to give NOK:
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:349] [Invalid:6860] [Range:0-2000]



r13pad10b


Variable label: Give money or refrain if you are decision maker.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be the recipient.

If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker, you will receive NOK 2,000 and must choose if you will give to the recipient, and if so how much you will give. What you give, the recipient will receive. You keep the rest. You can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case, you keep your NOK 2,000 while the recipient gets nothing.
Literal question:

What do you choose?

I choose to:
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Refrain from making a choice. 80 21.7% 0.21680217
2 Give NOK: 284 77% 0.76964770
97 Not answered 5 1.4% 0.01355014
98 Not asked 6840 NA


r13pad10b_2_other


Variable label: Give amount of NOK if you are decision maker, can refrain
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be the recipient.

If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker, you will receive NOK 2,000 and must choose if you will give to the recipient, and if so how much you will give. What you give, the recipient will receive. You keep the rest. You can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case, you keep your NOK 2,000 while the recipient gets nothing.
Literal question:

What do you choose?

I choose to: Give NOK…
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:284] [Invalid:6925] [Range:0-2000]



r13pad10c_1


Variable label: Take amount of NOK if you are decision maker.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be the recipient.

If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker, you must choose how much you will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received. What you do not take is kept by the recipient. What you take, you get.
Literal question: What do you choose? I choose to take NOK:
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:322] [Invalid:6887] [Range:0-2000]



r13pad10d


Variable label: Take money or refrain if you are decision maker.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be the recipient.

If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker , you must choose if you will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much you will take. What you do not take is kept by the recipient. What you take, you get. You can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case you get nothing, while the receiver keeps their NOK 2,000.
Literal question: What do you choose? I choose to:
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Refrain from making a choice. 166 46.6% 0.46629213
2 Take NOK: 183 51.4% 0.51404494
97 Not answered 7 2% 0.01966292
98 Not asked 6853 NA


r13pad10d_2_other


Variable label: Take amount of NOK if you are decision maker, can refrain.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be the recipient.

If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker , you must choose if you will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much you will take. What you do not take is kept by the recipient. What you take, you get. You can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case you get nothing, while the receiver keeps their NOK 2,000.
Literal question:

What do you choose?

I choose to: Take NOK …
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:180] [Invalid:7029] [Range:0-2000]



r13pad9_ran


Variable label: [Randomly selects between r13pad9a-d. Randomizes if r13group = 2]
Technical description: [Randomly selects between r13pad9a-d. Randomizes if r13group = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:1452] [Invalid:5757] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Respondent gets R13PAD9A 360 24.8% 0.2479339
2 Respondent gets R13PAD9B 366 25.2% 0.2520661
3 Respondent gets R13PAD9C 374 25.8% 0.2575758
4 Respondent gets R13PAD9D 352 24.2% 0.2424242
Sysmiss 5757 NA


r13pad9a_1


Variable label: How socially acceptable to give NOK: 0
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.

The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
Literal question: 0 NOK
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 231 64.2% 0.64166667
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 37 10.3% 0.10277778
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 11 3.1% 0.03055556
4 Very socially acceptable 12 3.3% 0.03333333
97 Not answered 69 19.2% 0.19166667
98 Not asked 6849 NA


r13pad9a_2


Variable label: How socially acceptable to give NOK: 500
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.

The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
Literal question: 500 NOK
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 75 20.8% 0.20833333
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 125 34.7% 0.34722222
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 74 20.6% 0.20555556
4 Very socially acceptable 17 4.7% 0.04722222
97 Not answered 69 19.2% 0.19166667
98 Not asked 6849 NA


r13pad9a_3


Variable label: How socially acceptable to give NOK: 1000
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.

The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
Literal question: 1000 NOK
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 16 4.4% 0.04444444
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 15 4.2% 0.04166667
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 82 22.8% 0.22777778
4 Very socially acceptable 204 56.7% 0.56666667
97 Not answered 43 11.9% 0.11944444
98 Not asked 6849 NA


r13pad9a_4


Variable label: How socially acceptable to give NOK: 1500
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.

The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
Literal question: 1500 NOK
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 30 8.3% 0.08333333
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 44 12.2% 0.12222222
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 115 31.9% 0.31944444
4 Very socially acceptable 100 27.8% 0.27777778
97 Not answered 71 19.7% 0.19722222
98 Not asked 6849 NA


r13pad9a_5


Variable label: How socially acceptable to give NOK: 2000
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.

The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
Literal question: 2000 NOK
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 55 15.3% 0.1527778
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 45 12.5% 0.1250000
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 65 18.1% 0.1805556
4 Very socially acceptable 138 38.3% 0.3833333
97 Not answered 57 15.8% 0.1583333
98 Not asked 6849 NA


r13pad9b_1


Variable label: How socially acceptable to refrain from giving.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.

The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets nothing.

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to…
Literal question: Refrain from taking a choice
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 107 29.2% 0.29234973
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 76 20.8% 0.20765027
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 57 15.6% 0.15573770
4 Very socially acceptable 23 6.3% 0.06284153
97 Not answered 103 28.1% 0.28142077
98 Not asked 6843 NA


r13pad9b_2


Variable label: How socially acceptable to give NOK: 0, can refrain.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.

The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets nothing.

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to…
Literal question: Give to the recipient: NOK 0
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 214 58.5% 0.58469945
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 55 15% 0.15027322
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 23 6.3% 0.06284153
4 Very socially acceptable 21 5.7% 0.05737705
97 Not answered 53 14.5% 0.14480874
98 Not asked 6843 NA


r13pad9b_3


Variable label: How socially acceptable to give NOK: 500, can refrain.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.

The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets nothing.

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to…
Literal question: Give to the recipient: NOK 500
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 60 16.4% 0.16393443
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 155 42.3% 0.42349727
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 72 19.7% 0.19672131
4 Very socially acceptable 27 7.4% 0.07377049
97 Not answered 52 14.2% 0.14207650
98 Not asked 6843 NA


r13pad9b_4


Variable label: How socially acceptable to give NOK: 1000, can refrain.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.

The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets nothing.

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to…
Literal question: Give to the recipient: NOK 1,000
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 11 3% 0.03005464
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 26 7.1% 0.07103825
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 81 22.1% 0.22131148
4 Very socially acceptable 216 59% 0.59016393
97 Not answered 32 8.7% 0.08743169
98 Not asked 6843 NA


r13pad9b_5


Variable label: How socially acceptable to give NOK: 1500, can refrain.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.

The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets nothing.

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to…
Literal question: Give to the recipient: NOK 1,500
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 22 6% 0.06010929
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 64 17.5% 0.17486339
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 120 32.8% 0.32786885
4 Very socially acceptable 105 28.7% 0.28688525
97 Not answered 55 15% 0.15027322
98 Not asked 6843 NA


r13pad9b_6


Variable label: How socially acceptable to give NOK: 2000, can refrain.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.

The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets nothing.

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to…
Literal question: Give to the recipient: NOK 2,000
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 46 12.6% 0.1256831
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 64 17.5% 0.1748634
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 82 22.4% 0.2240437
4 Very socially acceptable 119 32.5% 0.3251366
97 Not answered 55 15% 0.1502732
98 Not asked 6843 NA


r13pad9c_1


Variable label: How socially acceptable to take NOK: 0
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.

The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
Literal question: NOK 0
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 41 11% 0.10962567
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 19 5.1% 0.05080214
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 40 10.7% 0.10695187
4 Very socially acceptable 237 63.4% 0.63368984
97 Not answered 37 9.9% 0.09893048
98 Not asked 6835 NA


r13pad9c_2


Variable label: How socially acceptable to take NOK: 500
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.

The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
Literal question: NOK 500
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 60 16% 0.1604278
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 48 12.8% 0.1283422
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 138 36.9% 0.3689840
4 Very socially acceptable 84 22.5% 0.2245989
97 Not answered 44 11.8% 0.1176471
98 Not asked 6835 NA


r13pad9c_3


Variable label: How socially acceptable to take NOK: 1000
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.

The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
Literal question: NOK 1,000
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 86 23% 0.2299465
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 58 15.5% 0.1550802
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 95 25.4% 0.2540107
4 Very socially acceptable 103 27.5% 0.2754011
97 Not answered 32 8.6% 0.0855615
98 Not asked 6835 NA


r13pad9c_4


Variable label: How socially acceptable to take NOK: 1500
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.

The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
Literal question: NOK 1,500
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 206 55.1% 0.55080214
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 90 24.1% 0.24064171
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 19 5.1% 0.05080214
4 Very socially acceptable 8 2.1% 0.02139037
97 Not answered 51 13.6% 0.13636364
98 Not asked 6835 NA


r13pad9c_5


Variable label: How socially acceptable to take NOK: 2000
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.

The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
Literal question: NOK 2,000
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 287 76.7% 0.76737968
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 18 4.8% 0.04812834
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 8 2.1% 0.02139037
4 Very socially acceptable 11 2.9% 0.02941176
97 Not answered 50 13.4% 0.13368984
98 Not asked 6835 NA


r13pad9d_1


Variable label: How socially acceptable to refrain from taking.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.

The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their NOK 2,000.

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to…
Literal question: Refrain from taking a choice
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 38 10.8% 0.1079545
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 43 12.2% 0.1221591
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 66 18.8% 0.1875000
4 Very socially acceptable 106 30.1% 0.3011364
97 Not answered 99 28.1% 0.2812500
98 Not asked 6857 NA


r13pad9d_2


Variable label: How socially acceptable to take NOK: 0, can refrain.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.

The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their NOK 2,000.

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out. The decision maker chooses to…
Literal question: NOK 0
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 38 10.8% 0.10795455
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 18 5.1% 0.05113636
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 38 10.8% 0.10795455
4 Very socially acceptable 195 55.4% 0.55397727
97 Not answered 63 17.9% 0.17897727
98 Not asked 6857 NA


r13pad9d_3


Variable label: How socially acceptable to take NOK: 500, can refrain.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.

The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their NOK 2,000.

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to…
Literal question: NOK 500
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 59 16.8% 0.1676136
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 39 11.1% 0.1107955
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 114 32.4% 0.3238636
4 Very socially acceptable 56 15.9% 0.1590909
97 Not answered 84 23.9% 0.2386364
98 Not asked 6857 NA


r13pad9d_4


Variable label: How socially acceptable to take NOK: 1000, can refrain.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.

The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their NOK 2,000.

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to…
Literal question: NOK 1000
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 67 19% 0.1903409
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 41 11.6% 0.1164773
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 81 23% 0.2301136
4 Very socially acceptable 88 25% 0.2500000
97 Not answered 75 21.3% 0.2130682
98 Not asked 6857 NA


r13pad9d_5


Variable label: How socially acceptable to take NOK: 1500, can refrain.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.

The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their NOK 2,000.

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to…
Literal question: NOK 1500
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 157 44.6% 0.44602273
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 82 23.3% 0.23295455
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 16 4.5% 0.04545455
4 Very socially acceptable 8 2.3% 0.02272727
97 Not answered 89 25.3% 0.25284091
98 Not asked 6857 NA


r13pad9d_6


Variable label: How socially acceptable to take NOK: 2000, can refrain.
Pre-question text:

Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.

The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their NOK 2,000.

The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.

The decision maker chooses to…
Literal question: NOK 2000
Technical description: [Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very socially unacceptable 233 66.2% 0.66193182
2 Somewhat socially unacceptable 18 5.1% 0.05113636
3 Somewhat socially acceptable 12 3.4% 0.03409091
4 Very socially acceptable 8 2.3% 0.02272727
97 Not answered 81 23% 0.23011364
98 Not asked 6857 NA


r13P1


Variable label: Gender
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Male 3588 49.8% 0.4977112
2 Female 3621 50.2% 0.5022888


r13P2


Variable label: Region
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Oslo/Akershus 2040 28.3% 0.28297961
2 Eastern Norway 1654 22.9% 0.22943543
3 Southern Norway 366 5.1% 0.05076987
4 Western Norway 1944 27% 0.26966292
5 Trøndelag 638 8.9% 0.08850049
6 Northern Norway 567 7.9% 0.07865169


r13P3


Variable label: County
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-18]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Akershus 909 12.6% 0.12609238
2 Oslo 1131 15.7% 0.15688722
3 Østfold 347 4.8% 0.04813428
4 Vestfold 322 4.5% 0.04466639
5 Hedmark 222 3.1% 0.03079484
6 Oppland 208 2.9% 0.02885282
7 Buskerud 364 5% 0.05049244
8 Telemark 191 2.6% 0.02649466
9 Vest-Agder 228 3.2% 0.03162713
10 Aust-Agder 138 1.9% 0.01914274
11 Rogaland 642 8.9% 0.08905535
12 Hordaland 869 12.1% 0.12054376
13 Sogn og Fjordane 135 1.9% 0.01872659
14 Møre og Romsdal 298 4.1% 0.04133722
15 Trøndelag 638 8.9% 0.08850049
16 Nordland 277 3.8% 0.03842419
17 Troms 212 2.9% 0.02940768
18 Finmark 78 1.1% 0.01081981


r13P4_1


Variable label: Highest completed education
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No education/elementary school 526 7.3% 0.07296435
2 Upper secondary education 2019 28% 0.28006658
3 University/University college 4392 60.9% 0.60923845
97 Not answered 272 3.8% 0.03773061


r13P4_2


Variable label: Highest completed education
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No completed education 25 0.3% 0.003467887
2 Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7- year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) 501 6.9% 0.069496463
3 Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2, VG3, High School) 819 11.4% 0.113607990
4 Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) 854 11.8% 0.118463032
5 Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical college) 346 4.8% 0.047995561
6 University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ years) 692 9.6% 0.095991122
7 College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college, school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) 1491 20.7% 0.206824802
8 University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) 533 7.4% 0.073935359
9 College-5-6 year education (Master, major) 485 6.7% 0.067277015
10 University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education (MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economic 1032 14.3% 0.143154390
11 Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) 159 2.2% 0.022055764
12 None of the above (please enter): 185 2.6% 0.025662366
97 Not answered 87 1.2% 0.012068248


r13P5_1


Variable label: Year of birth
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1939 or earlier 219 3% 0.03037869
2 1940-1949 1261 17.5% 0.17492024
3 1950-1959 1726 23.9% 0.23942294
4 1960-1969 1539 21.3% 0.21348315
5 1970-1979 1096 15.2% 0.15203218
6 1980-1989 803 11.1% 0.11138854
7 1990 or later 565 7.8% 0.07837425


r13P5_2


Variable label: Year of birth
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1959 or earlier 3206 44.5% 0.44472188
2 1960-1989 3438 47.7% 0.47690387
3 1990 or later 565 7.8% 0.07837425


r13Weight1


Variable label: Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, and P1. See documentation report.
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-4]



r13Weight2


Variable label: Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4, and P1. See documentation report
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-31]



w01_k28


Variable label: Citizenship
Literal question: Citizenship. Are you:
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 1705 94.4% 0.94407530
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country 69 3.8% 0.03820598
97 No answer 32 1.8% 0.01771872
98 Not asked (imputed) 5403 NA


w03_r3k28


Variable label: Citizenship
Literal question: Citizenship. Are you:
Technical description: [Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 1859 93.8% 0.93841494
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country 102 5.1% 0.05148915
97 No answer 20 1% 0.01009591
98 Not asked 5228 NA


r4k28


Variable label: Nationality
Literal question: Nationality: Are you:
Technical description: [Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A Norwegian citizen 31 86.1% 0.86111111
2 A citizen of another country. Please state which 3 8.3% 0.08333333
97 No answer 2 5.6% 0.05555556
98 Not asked 7173 NA


r5k28


Variable label: Nationality
Literal question: Nationality: Are you:
Technical description: [Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A Norwegian citizen 14 87.5% 0.8750
2 A citizen of another country. Please state which 1 6.2% 0.0625
97 No answer 1 6.2% 0.0625
98 Not asked 7193 NA


r8k28


Variable label: Citizenship
Pre-question text: Citizenship.
Literal question: Are you:
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 1898 93.7% 0.93682132
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: 104 5.1% 0.05133268
97 No answer 24 1.2% 0.01184600
98 Not asked 5183 NA


r11bk28


Variable label: Citizenship
Literal question: Citizenship. Are you:
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 1224 93.3% 0.932926829
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: 82 6.2% 0.062500000
97 Not answered 6 0.5% 0.004573171
98 Not asked 5897 NA


c11bk28


Variable label: Personal placement on political axis left-right [Most recent available data from w01_k28, w03_r3k28, r4k28, r5k28, r8k28, r11bk28]
Pre-question text: Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Norwegian citizen 6731 94.3% 0.943245516
2 Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: 361 5.1% 0.050588565
97 Not answered 44 0.6% 0.006165919
98 Not asked 73 NA


w01_k29


Variable label: Parents immigrated to Norway
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 1631 90.3% 0.903100775
2 I have immigrated to Norway myself 79 4.4% 0.043743079
3 Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway 10 0.6% 0.005537099
4 Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated 30 1.7% 0.016611296
5 Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated 24 1.3% 0.013289037
97 No answer 32 1.8% 0.017718715
98 Not asked (imputed) 5403 NA


w03_r3k29


Variable label: Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description: [Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 1794 90.5% 0.905146317
2 I have immigrated to Norway myself 100 5% 0.050454087
3 Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway 10 0.5% 0.005045409
4 Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated 32 1.6% 0.016145308
5 Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated 25 1.3% 0.012613522
97 No answer 21 1.1% 0.010595358
98 Not asked 5227 NA


r4k29


Variable label: Mother or father immigrated to Norway
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description: [Asked respondents where information is missing]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 30 78.9% 0.78947368
2 I have immigrated to Norway 3 7.9% 0.07894737
3 Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway 0 0% 0.00000000
4 My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not 2 5.3% 0.05263158
5 My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not 1 2.6% 0.02631579
97 No answer 2 5.3% 0.05263158
98 Not asked 7171 NA


r5k29


Variable label: Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description: [Asked respondents if background information is missing]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 14 87.5% 0.8750
2 I have immigrated to Norway 1 6.2% 0.0625
3 Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway 0 0% 0.0000
4 My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not 0 0% 0.0000
5 My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not 0 0% 0.0000
97 No answer 1 6.2% 0.0625
98 Not asked 7193 NA


r11bk29


Variable label: Immigration background
Literal question: Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 3 or rekruttert = 4. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 2765 90.3% 0.903004572
2 I myself have immigrated to Norway 178 5.8% 0.058131940
3 Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway 16 0.5% 0.005225343
4 My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated 55 1.8% 0.017962116
5 My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated 35 1.1% 0.011430438
97 Not answered 13 0.4% 0.004245591
98 Not asked 4147 NA


c11bk29


Variable label: Voted this party in parliamentary elections of 2017 [Most recent available data from w01_k29, w03_r3k29, r4k29, r5k29, r11bk29]
Pre-question text: Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections in 2017?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No 6234 90.9% 0.908746356
2 I myself have immigrated to Norway 361 5.3% 0.052623907
3 Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway 36 0.5% 0.005247813
4 My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated 119 1.7% 0.017346939
5 My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated 85 1.2% 0.012390671
97 Not answered 25 0.4% 0.003644315
98 Not asked 349 NA


r10k8_1


Variable label: Personal placement on political axis left-right.
Pre-question text: In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are politically on the far left, and 10 represents those who are politically on the far right.
Literal question: Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0  Left 73 1.5% 0.014904042
2 1 155 3.2% 0.031645570
3 2 439 9% 0.089628420
4 3 742 15.1% 0.151490404
5 4 622 12.7% 0.126990608
6 5 702 14.3% 0.143323806
7 6 592 12.1% 0.120865659
8 7 708 14.5% 0.144548795
9 8 564 11.5% 0.115149040
10 9 159 3.2% 0.032462229
11 10  Right 95 1.9% 0.019395672
97 No answer 47 1% 0.009595753
98 Not asked (imputed) 2311 NA


r11pk8_1


Variable label: Personal placement on political axis left-right
Pre-question text: In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are politically on the far left, and 10 represents those who are politically on the far right.
Literal question: Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0 Left 17 1.3% 0.012957317
2 1 52 4% 0.039634146
3 2 132 10.1% 0.100609756
4 3 192 14.6% 0.146341463
5 4 156 11.9% 0.118902439
6 5 213 16.2% 0.162347561
7 6 134 10.2% 0.102134146
8 7 184 14% 0.140243902
9 8 161 12.3% 0.122713415
10 9 41 3.1% 0.031250000
11 10 Right 19 1.4% 0.014481707
97 Not answered 11 0.8% 0.008384146
98 Not asked 5897 NA


c11pk8


Variable label: Personal placement on political axis left-right [Most recent available data from r10k8, r11pk8_1]
Pre-question text: In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are politically on the far left, and 10 represents those who are politically on the far right.
Literal question: Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
Technical description: [Composite variable]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 0 Left 90 1.4% 0.014492754
2 1 207 3.3% 0.033333333
3 2 571 9.2% 0.091948470
4 3 934 15% 0.150402576
5 4 778 12.5% 0.125281804
6 5 915 14.7% 0.147342995
7 6 726 11.7% 0.116908213
8 7 892 14.4% 0.143639291
9 8 725 11.7% 0.116747182
10 9 200 3.2% 0.032206119
11 10 Right 114 1.8% 0.018357488
97 Not answered 58 0.9% 0.009339775
98 Not asked 999 NA


r10k3


Variable label: Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election.
Literal question: Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
Technical description: [All respondents asked.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 209 4.3% 0.042670478
2 The Conservative Party 1130 23.1% 0.230706411
3 The Progress Party 528 10.8% 0.107799102
4 The Liberal Party 263 5.4% 0.053695386
5 The Socialist Left Party 435 8.9% 0.088811760
6 The Centre Party 429 8.8% 0.087586770
7 The Green Party 211 4.3% 0.043078808
8 The Labour Party 1101 22.5% 0.224785627
9 The Red Party 194 4% 0.039608003
10 Did not vote 109 2.2% 0.022253981
11 Not entitled to vote 176 3.6% 0.035933034
12 Other: 89 1.8% 0.018170682
97 No answer 24 0.5% 0.004899959
98 Not asked (imputed) 2311 NA


r11bk3


Variable label: Voted this party in parliamentary elections of 2017
Literal question: Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections in 2017?
Technical description: [Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 43 3.3% 0.032774390
2 The Conservative Party 319 24.3% 0.243140244
3 The Progress Party 114 8.7% 0.086890244
4 The Liberal Party 81 6.2% 0.061737805
5 The Soialist Left Party 89 6.8% 0.067835366
6 The Centre Party 106 8.1% 0.080792683
7 The Green Party 71 5.4% 0.054115854
8 The Labour Party 283 21.6% 0.215701220
9 The Red Party 53 4% 0.040396341
10 Did not vote 45 3.4% 0.034298780
11 Not entitled to vote 75 5.7% 0.057164634
12 Other: 26 2% 0.019817073
97 Not answered 7 0.5% 0.005335366
98 Not asked 5897 NA


c11bk3


Variable label: Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election. [Most recent available data from r10k3, r11bk3]
Pre-question text: Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
Literal question: Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
Technical description: [Composite variable. There are minor differences in question language.]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 252 4.1% 0.040579710
2 The Conservative Party 1449 23.3% 0.233333333
3 The Progress Party 642 10.3% 0.103381643
4 The Liberal Party 344 5.5% 0.055394525
5 The Soialist Left Party 524 8.4% 0.084380032
6 The Centre Party 535 8.6% 0.086151369
7 The Green Party 282 4.5% 0.045410628
8 The Labour Party 1384 22.3% 0.222866345
9 The Red Party 247 4% 0.039774557
10 Did not vote 154 2.5% 0.024798712
11 Not entitled to vote 251 4% 0.040418680
12 Other: 115 1.9% 0.018518519
97 Not answered 31 0.5% 0.004991948
98 Not asked 999 NA


r11pk1


Variable label: Interest in politics
Literal question: In general, how interested are you in politics?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very interested 899 14.3% 0.143084514
2 Interested 3144 50% 0.500397899
3 Somewhat interested 1820 29% 0.289670540
4 Not very interested 362 5.8% 0.057615789
5 Not interested at all 47 0.7% 0.007480503
97 Not answered 11 0.2% 0.001750756
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk10


Variable label: Perception of today’s economic situation in Norway
Literal question: How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway? Do you think it is:
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very good 1692 26.9% 0.2692981060
2 Good 3601 57.3% 0.5731338533
3 Quite good 691 11% 0.1099793092
4 Neither good nor bad 184 2.9% 0.0292853732
5 Quite bad 79 1.3% 0.0125736113
6 Bad 24 0.4% 0.0038198313
7 Very bad 9 0.1% 0.0014324367
97 Not answered 3 0% 0.0004774789
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pktilfreds3


Variable label: How satisfied with: the Norwegian government
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 436 6.9% 0.069393602
2 Satisfied 2126 33.8% 0.338373389
3 Somewhat satisfied 1927 30.7% 0.306700621
4 Not very satisfied 1291 20.5% 0.205475092
5 Not satisfied at all 492 7.8% 0.078306541
97 Not answered 11 0.2% 0.001750756
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pktilfreds4


Variable label: How satisfied with: the way democracy works in Norway
Literal question: How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 913 14.5% 0.145312749
2 Satisfied 3447 54.9% 0.548623269
3 Somewhat satisfied 1412 22.5% 0.224733408
4 Not very satisfied 411 6.5% 0.065414611
5 Not satisfied at all 64 1% 0.010186217
97 Not answered 36 0.6% 0.005729747
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk204


Variable label: Would vote this party if parliamentary elections held tomorrow
Literal question: Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Christian Democrats 227 3.6% 0.036129238
2 The Conservative Party 1620 25.8% 0.257838612
3 The Progress Party 572 9.1% 0.091039312
4 The Liberal Party 304 4.8% 0.048384530
5 The Soialist Left Party 629 10% 0.100111412
6 The Centre Party 617 9.8% 0.098201496
7 The Green Party 268 4.3% 0.042654783
8 The Labour Party 1218 19.4% 0.193856438
9 The Red Party 312 5% 0.049657807
10 Did not vote 161 2.6% 0.025624702
11 Not entitled to vote 124 2% 0.019735795
12 Other: 192 3.1% 0.030558650
97 Not answered 39 0.6% 0.006207226
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk6_1


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Christian Democrats
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 656 10.4% 0.10440872
2 Really dislike 1069 17% 0.17014165
3 Dislike somwehat 1589 25.3% 0.25290466
4 Neither dislike nor like 1450 23.1% 0.23078147
5 Like somewhat 1060 16.9% 0.16870922
6 Really like 306 4.9% 0.04870285
7 Intensely like 74 1.2% 0.01177781
97 Not answered 79 1.3% 0.01257361
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk6_2


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 256 4.1% 0.04074487
2 Really dislike 797 12.7% 0.12685023
3 Dislike somwehat 1138 18.1% 0.18112367
4 Neither dislike nor like 684 10.9% 0.10886519
5 Like somewhat 1450 23.1% 0.23078147
6 Really like 1454 23.1% 0.23141811
7 Intensely like 440 7% 0.07003024
97 Not answered 64 1% 0.01018622
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk6_3


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Progress Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 2032 32.3% 0.323412383
2 Really dislike 1092 17.4% 0.173802324
3 Dislike somwehat 801 12.7% 0.127486869
4 Neither dislike nor like 524 8.3% 0.083399650
5 Like somewhat 957 15.2% 0.152315773
6 Really like 603 9.6% 0.095973261
7 Intensely like 215 3.4% 0.034219322
97 Not answered 59 0.9% 0.009390419
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk6_4


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 577 9.2% 0.09183511
2 Really dislike 963 15.3% 0.15327073
3 Dislike somwehat 1422 22.6% 0.22632500
4 Neither dislike nor like 1474 23.5% 0.23460131
5 Like somewhat 1291 20.5% 0.20547509
6 Really like 402 6.4% 0.06398217
7 Intensely like 66 1.1% 0.01050454
97 Not answered 88 1.4% 0.01400605
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk6_5


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Social Left Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 852 13.6% 0.13560401
2 Really dislike 1031 16.4% 0.16409359
3 Dislike somwehat 1035 16.5% 0.16473022
4 Neither dislike nor like 1038 16.5% 0.16520770
5 Like somewhat 1166 18.6% 0.18558014
6 Really like 833 13.3% 0.13257998
7 Intensely like 239 3.8% 0.03803915
97 Not answered 89 1.4% 0.01416521
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk6_6


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Centre Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 355 5.7% 0.05650167
2 Really dislike 666 10.6% 0.10600032
3 Dislike somwehat 1151 18.3% 0.18319274
4 Neither dislike nor like 1559 24.8% 0.24812987
5 Like somewhat 1579 25.1% 0.25131307
6 Really like 709 11.3% 0.11284418
7 Intensely like 186 3% 0.02960369
97 Not answered 78 1.2% 0.01241445
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk6_7


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Green Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1284 20.4% 0.20436097
2 Really dislike 924 14.7% 0.14706350
3 Dislike somwehat 1044 16.6% 0.16616266
4 Neither dislike nor like 991 15.8% 0.15772720
5 Like somewhat 1254 20% 0.19958618
6 Really like 564 9% 0.08976604
7 Intensely like 141 2.2% 0.02244151
97 Not answered 81 1.3% 0.01289193
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk6_8


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Labour Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 347 5.5% 0.055228394
2 Really dislike 667 10.6% 0.106159478
3 Dislike somwehat 1130 18% 0.179850390
4 Neither dislike nor like 957 15.2% 0.152315773
5 Like somewhat 1768 28.1% 0.281394238
6 Really like 1117 17.8% 0.177781315
7 Intensely like 236 3.8% 0.037561674
97 Not answered 61 1% 0.009708738
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk6_9


Variable label: Like/dislike: The Red Party
Literal question: We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
Post-question: Select one option.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Intensely dislike 1370 21.8% 0.21804870
2 Really dislike 1031 16.4% 0.16409359
3 Dislike somwehat 876 13.9% 0.13942384
4 Neither dislike nor like 1170 18.6% 0.18621678
5 Like somewhat 1020 16.2% 0.16234283
6 Really like 510 8.1% 0.08117141
7 Intensely like 196 3.1% 0.03119529
97 Not answered 110 1.8% 0.01750756
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pktilfreds1


Variable label: How satisfied with: Life in general
Literal question: All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very satisfied 2157 34.3% 0.343307337
2 Satisfied 3415 54.4% 0.543530161
3 Somewhat satisfied 576 9.2% 0.091675951
4 Not very satisfied 91 1.4% 0.014483527
5 Not satisfied at all 27 0.4% 0.004297310
97 Not answered 17 0.3% 0.002705714
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk15_1


Variable label: Other people’s trustworthiness
Literal question: Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]

Value Label Cases Percentage
0 0 - Cannot be careful enough 61 1% 0.009708738
1 1 45 0.7% 0.007162184
2 2 111 1.8% 0.017666720
3 3 207 3.3% 0.032946045
4 4 245 3.9% 0.038994111
5 5 544 8.7% 0.086582843
6 6 629 10% 0.100111412
7 7 1472 23.4% 0.234282986
8 8 1607 25.6% 0.255769537
9 9 751 12% 0.119528887
10 10 – Most people can be trusted 603 9.6% 0.095973261
97 Not answered 8 0.1% 0.001273277
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bktivi_1


Variable label: Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 170 2.7% 0.027057138
2 2 - Does not resemble me 505 8% 0.080375617
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1106 17.6% 0.176030559
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2332 37.1% 0.371160274
5 5 - Resembles me 1581 25.2% 0.251631386
6 6 - Very much resembles me 531 8.5% 0.084513767
97 Not answered 58 0.9% 0.009231259
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bktivi_2


Variable label: Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 3070 48.9% 0.488620086
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1303 20.7% 0.207385007
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 882 14% 0.140378800
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 599 9.5% 0.095336623
5 5 - Resembles me 265 4.2% 0.042177304
6 6 - Very much resembles me 121 1.9% 0.019258316
97 Not answered 43 0.7% 0.006843864
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bktivi_3


Variable label: Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her]. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 18 0.3% 0.002864873
2 2 - Does not resemble me 76 1.2% 0.012096132
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 391 6.2% 0.062231418
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2322 37% 0.369568677
5 5 - Resembles me 2351 37.4% 0.374184307
6 6 - Very much resembles me 1079 17.2% 0.171733248
97 Not answered 46 0.7% 0.007321343
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bktivi_4


Variable label: Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 56 0.9% 0.008912940
2 2 - Does not resemble me 167 2.7% 0.026579659
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 403 6.4% 0.064141334
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1783 28.4% 0.283781633
5 5 - Resembles me 2348 37.4% 0.373706828
6 6 - Very much resembles me 1481 23.6% 0.235715423
97 Not answered 45 0.7% 0.007162184
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bktivi_5


Variable label: Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand things
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 32 0.5% 0.005093108
2 2 - Does not resemble me 117 1.9% 0.018621678
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 522 8.3% 0.083081331
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2217 35.3% 0.352856915
5 5 - Resembles me 2184 34.8% 0.347604647
6 6 - Very much resembles me 1169 18.6% 0.186057616
97 Not answered 42 0.7% 0.006684705
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bktivi_6


Variable label: Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 607 9.7% 0.096609900
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1346 21.4% 0.214228872
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 2142 34.1% 0.340919943
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1568 25% 0.249562311
5 5 - Resembles me 476 7.6% 0.075759987
6 6 - Very much resembles me 102 1.6% 0.016234283
97 Not answered 42 0.7% 0.006684705
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bktivi_7


Variable label: Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: [He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 235 3.7% 0.037402515
2 2 - Does not resemble me 782 12.4% 0.124462836
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 1827 29.1% 0.290784657
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2404 38.3% 0.382619768
5 5 - Resembles me 801 12.7% 0.127486869
6 6 - Very much resembles me 190 3% 0.030240331
97 Not answered 44 0.7% 0.007003024
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bktivi_8


Variable label: Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 682 10.9% 0.108546873
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1352 21.5% 0.215183829
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 2050 32.6% 0.326277256
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1526 24.3% 0.242877606
5 5 - Resembles me 494 7.9% 0.078624861
6 6 - Very much resembles me 134 2.1% 0.021327391
97 Not answered 45 0.7% 0.007162184
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bktivi_9


Variable label: Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 679 10.8% 0.108069394
2 2 - Does not resemble me 1279 20.4% 0.203565176
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 2077 33.1% 0.330574566
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 1685 26.8% 0.268183989
5 5 - Resembles me 444 7.1% 0.070666879
6 6 - Very much resembles me 77 1.2% 0.012255292
97 Not answered 42 0.7% 0.006684705
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bktivi_10


Variable label: Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
Pre-question text: Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
Literal question: It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
Technical description: [Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 1 - Does not resemble me at all 101 1.6% 0.016075123
2 2 - Does not resemble me 340 5.4% 0.054114277
3 3 - Slightly resembles me 887 14.1% 0.141174598
4 4 - Somewhat resembles me 2204 35.1% 0.350787840
5 5 - Resembles me 1807 28.8% 0.287601464
6 6 - Very much resembles me 907 14.4% 0.144357791
97 Not answered 37 0.6% 0.005888907
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk53


Variable label: Confidence in Norwegian politicians
Literal question: Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 68 1.1% 0.010822855
2 To a great extent 1713 27.3% 0.272640458
3 To some extent 3434 54.7% 0.546554194
4 To a small extent 918 14.6% 0.146108547
5 Not at all 129 2.1% 0.020531593
97 Not answered 21 0.3% 0.003342352
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk54


Variable label: Confidence in Norwegian news media
Literal question: Generally speaking, what degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 179 2.8% 0.028489575
2 To a great extent 2275 36.2% 0.362088174
3 To some extent 2996 47.7% 0.476842273
4 To a small extent 642 10.2% 0.102180487
5 Not at all 144 2.3% 0.022918988
97 Not answered 47 0.7% 0.007480503
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk12


Variable label: Confidence in Norwegian parliament
Literal question: What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 To a very great extent 234 3.7% 0.037243355
2 To a great extent 2531 40.3% 0.402833042
3 To some extent 2800 44.6% 0.445646984
4 To a small extent 569 9.1% 0.090561834
5 Not at all 111 1.8% 0.017666720
97 Not answered 38 0.6% 0.006048066
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk55


Variable label: The number of municipalities should be reduced further by merging
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
Literal question: From the year 2020, Norway will have 356 municipalities instead of 422 as of today. The number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 705 11.2% 0.112207544
2 Agree 1102 17.5% 0.175393920
3 Agree somewhat 1154 18.4% 0.183670221
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1131 18% 0.180009550
5 Disagree somewhat 764 12.2% 0.121597963
6 Disagree 805 12.8% 0.128123508
7 Strongly disagree 592 9.4% 0.094222505
97 Not answered 30 0.5% 0.004774789
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk60


Variable label: The government should work towards recuding income differences
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
Literal question: The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income differences in society.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 1694 27% 0.269616425
2 Agree 2004 31.9% 0.318955913
3 Agree somewhat 1429 22.7% 0.227439121
4 Neither agree nor disagree 510 8.1% 0.081171415
5 Disagree somewhat 363 5.8% 0.057774948
6 Disagree 196 3.1% 0.031195289
7 Strongly disagree 46 0.7% 0.007321343
97 Not answered 41 0.7% 0.006525545
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pkby3


Variable label: Fears new terrorist attack in Norway
Literal question: To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all 397 6.3% 0.063186376
2 Slightly 2477 39.4% 0.394238421
3 Somewhat 2468 39.3% 0.392805984
4 To a great extent 741 11.8% 0.117937291
5 To a very great extent 171 2.7% 0.027216298
97 Not answered 29 0.5% 0.004615629
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pk52


Variable label: Government should protect citizens from terrorism even at expense of privacy
Pre-question text: To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
Literal question: The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 510 8.1% 0.081171415
2 Agree 1321 21% 0.210249881
3 Agree somewhat 1734 27.6% 0.275982811
4 Neither agree nor disagree 772 12.3% 0.122871240
5 Disagree somewhat 846 13.5% 0.134649053
6 Disagree 729 11.6% 0.116027375
7 Strongly disagree 347 5.5% 0.055228394
97 Not answered 24 0.4% 0.003819831
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pkkm2_1


Variable label: How concerned about climate change: Variant 1
Literal question: How concerned are you about climate change?
Technical description: [Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3, and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran =1. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all concerned 66 4.2% 0.041984733
2 Not particularly concerned 291 18.5% 0.185114504
3 Somewhat concerned 469 29.8% 0.298346056
4 Concerned 514 32.7% 0.326972010
5 Very concerned 230 14.6% 0.146310433
97 Not answered 2 0.1% 0.001272265
98 Not asked 5637 NA


r11pkkm2_2


Variable label: How concerned about climate change: Variant 2
Literal question: How concerned are you about climate change?
Technical description: [Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3, and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran = 2. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all concerned 66 4.2% 0.04158790
2 Not very concerned 337 21.2% 0.21235035
3 Slightly concerned 658 41.5% 0.41461878
4 Very concerned 463 29.2% 0.29174543
5 Extremely concerned 63 4% 0.03969754
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 5622 NA


r11pkkm2_3


Variable label: How concerned about climate change: Variant 3
Literal question: How concerned are you about climate change?
Technical description: [Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3, and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran = 3. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all concerned 61 4% 0.0401315789
2 Not particularly concerned 273 18% 0.1796052632
3 Slightly concerned 666 43.8% 0.4381578947
4 Very concerned 468 30.8% 0.3078947368
5 Extremely concerned 51 3.4% 0.0335526316
97 Not answered 1 0.1% 0.0006578947
98 Not asked 5689 NA


r11pkkm2_4


Variable label: How concerned about climate change: Variant 4
Literal question: How concerned are you about climate change?
Technical description: [Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3, and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran = 4. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Not at all concerned 68 4.3% 0.04290221
2 Not particularly concerned 245 15.5% 0.15457413
3 Slightly concerned 629 39.7% 0.39684543
4 Rather concerned 458 28.9% 0.28895899
5 Very concerned 185 11.7% 0.11671924
97 Not answered 0 0% 0.00000000
98 Not asked 5624 NA


r11pkkm42


Variable label: Should/should not be possible to buy diesel- and petrol cars after 2025
Pre-question text: The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
Literal question: Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
Post-question: Link: Look at “Nasjonal Transportplan 2018-2029”, p. 16, available here (external link)
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In 2025 all new private vehicles sold should either be electric or run on hydrogen 2665 42.4% 0.42416043
2 In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars which run on diesel or petrol 3525 56.1% 0.56103772
97 Not answered 93 1.5% 0.01480185
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pkkm4


Variable label: Should/should not allow oil and gas extraction in Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja
Pre-question text: Please look at the statement below.
Literal question: We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja areas. To what extent do you agree/disagree with this?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 2034 32.4% 0.323730702
2 Agree 1084 17.3% 0.172529047
3 Agree somewhat 732 11.7% 0.116504854
4 Neither agree nor disagree 900 14.3% 0.143243673
5 Disagree somewhat 579 9.2% 0.092153430
6 Disagree 574 9.1% 0.091357632
7 Strongly disagree 348 5.5% 0.055387554
97 Not answered 32 0.5% 0.005093108
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pkmeme9


Variable label: Access to asylum in Norway
Literal question: What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much easier 164 2.6% 0.026102180
2 Easier 676 10.8% 0.107591915
3 Somewhat easier 1226 19.5% 0.195129715
4 Same as today 2145 34.1% 0.341397422
5 Slightly more difficult 867 13.8% 0.137991405
6 More difficult 638 10.2% 0.101543848
7 Much more difficult 521 8.3% 0.082922171
97 Not answered 46 0.7% 0.007321343
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pkdv5


Variable label: How good or bad that immigrants come to live in Norway
Literal question: In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Very great advantage 154 2.5% 0.024510584
2 Great advantage 833 13.3% 0.132579978
3 Slightly advantageous 2217 35.3% 0.352856915
4 Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage 1137 18.1% 0.180964507
5 A slight disadvantage 1222 19.4% 0.194493077
6 A great disadvantage 437 7% 0.069552761
7 Very great disadvantage 237 3.8% 0.037720834
97 Not answered 46 0.7% 0.007321343
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pkdv55


Variable label: Muslim religious schools should be possible
Pre-question text: Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Christian faith.
Literal question: How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Strongly agree 138 2.2% 0.021964030
2 Agree 575 9.2% 0.091516791
3 Agree somewhat 755 12% 0.120165526
4 Neither agree nor disagree 1067 17% 0.169823333
5 Disagree somewhat 823 13.1% 0.130988381
6 Disagree 1307 20.8% 0.208021646
7 Strongly disagree 1579 25.1% 0.251313067
97 Not answered 39 0.6% 0.006207226
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pkby2


Variable label: Safety in local environment past few years
Pre-question text: Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
Literal question: How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Much safer 59 0.9% 0.009390419
2 Somewhat safer 294 4.7% 0.046792933
3 No change in safety 4525 72% 0.720197358
4 Somewhat more unsafe 1198 19.1% 0.190673245
5 Much more unsafe 171 2.7% 0.027216298
97 Not answered 36 0.6% 0.005729747
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11pkklasse


Variable label: Social class, self-placement
Pre-question text: We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
Literal question: If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Lower class 57 0.9% 0.009072099
2 Working class 796 12.7% 0.126691071
3 Lower middle class 610 9.7% 0.097087379
4 Middle class 3372 53.7% 0.536686296
5 Upper middle class 1197 19.1% 0.190514086
6 Upper class 37 0.6% 0.005888907
7 Don't know 176 2.8% 0.028012096
97 Not answered 38 0.6% 0.006048066
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bk21


Variable label: Works in what type of business
Literal question: Which type of business do you work in?
Technical description: [Asked if r11bk33 = 1. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 State, county or municipal administration 401 11.4% 0.1137266024
2 Public sector (e.g. school and health services) 1083 30.7% 0.3071469087
3 Publicly owned enterprise 224 6.4% 0.0635280771
4 Private business 1547 43.9% 0.4387407828
5 Self employed 184 5.2% 0.0521837777
6 Other: 84 2.4% 0.0238230289
97 Not answered 3 0.1% 0.0008508225
98 Not asked 3683 NA


r11bk26


Variable label: Highest completed education
Literal question: What is your highest completed education?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 No completed education 19 0.3% 0.003024033
2 Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7- year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) 430 6.8% 0.068438644
3 Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2, VG3, High School) 688 11% 0.109501830
4 Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3, apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) 729 11.6% 0.116027375
5 Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical college) 320 5.1% 0.050931084
6 University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college graduate 2 and 2½ years) 595 9.5% 0.094699984
7 College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college, school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) 1313 20.9% 0.208976604
8 University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) 472 7.5% 0.075123349
9 College-5-6 year education (Master, major) 416 6.6% 0.066210409
10 University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education (MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in Business and Economy) 945 15% 0.150405857
11 Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) 141 2.2% 0.022441509
12 None of the above (please enter): 168 2.7% 0.026738819
97 Not answered 47 0.7% 0.007480503
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bk27


Variable label: Marital status
Literal question: Marital status.
Post-question: Click on the one that is most relevant.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Unmarried/not cohabiting 911 14.5% 0.144994429
2 Cohabitant 1072 17.1% 0.170619131
3 Married/legally registered partner 3552 56.5% 0.565335031
4 Divorced/separated/formally registered partner 474 7.5% 0.075441668
5 Widow/widower 202 3.2% 0.032150247
6 Other: 40 0.6% 0.006366385
97 Not answered 32 0.5% 0.005093108
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bk25


Variable label: Gross annual income
Literal question: What is your current income?
Post-question: Gross annual income is:
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 < 150 000 407 6.5% 0.06477797
2 150 001 - 300 000 801 12.7% 0.12748687
3 300 001 - 400 000 950 15.1% 0.15120166
4 400 001 - 500 000 1173 18.7% 0.18669425
5 500 001 - 600 000 1074 17.1% 0.17093745
6 600 001 - 700 000 682 10.9% 0.10854687
7 700 001 - 1 000 000 704 11.2% 0.11204838
8 > 1 000 000 352 5.6% 0.05602419
97 Not answered 140 2.2% 0.02228235
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bk35


Variable label: Type of living area
Literal question: Which description best fits the area you live in?
Post-question: We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 A city 1479 23.5% 0.235397103
2 A suburb or the outskirts of a city 1340 21.3% 0.213273914
3 A small or medium sized town 1709 27.2% 0.272003820
4 A village 1053 16.8% 0.167595098
5 A sparsely inhabited area 668 10.6% 0.106318638
97 Not answered 34 0.5% 0.005411428
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bkhelse


Variable label: General health
Literal question: In general, would you say your health is:
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Excellent 873 13.9% 0.138946363
2 Very good 2268 36.1% 0.360974057
3 Good 2111 33.6% 0.335985994
4 Somewhat good 767 12.2% 0.122075442
5 Poor 224 3.6% 0.035651759
97 Not answered 40 0.6% 0.006366385
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bk42


Variable label: How many children under 16 living at home
Literal question: Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 None 4909 78.1% 0.7813146586
2 1 601 9.6% 0.0956549419
3 2 569 9.1% 0.0905618335
4 3 142 2.3% 0.0226006685
5 4 16 0.3% 0.0025465542
6 5 2 0% 0.0003183193
7 6 or more 2 0% 0.0003183193
97 Not answered 42 0.7% 0.0066847048
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bk40_recode


Variable label: Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [recoded]
Literal question: Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
Technical description:

[All respondents asked. ]

[Recoded from source variable r11bk40]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 The Church of Norway 4070 64.8% 0.647779723
2 The Catholic Church 83 1.3% 0.013210250
3 Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) 225 3.6% 0.035810918
4 Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g. Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) 42 0.7% 0.006684705
5 Islam 30 0.5% 0.004774789
6 I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. 1793 28.5% 0.285373229
97 No answer 40 0.6% 0.006366385
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r11bk41


Variable label: Attends religious meetings
Literal question: Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 Every day 8 0.1% 0.001273277
2 More than once a week 95 1.5% 0.015120166
3 Once a week 163 2.6% 0.025943021
4 At least once a month 302 4.8% 0.048066210
5 Only on special religious holidays 1083 17.2% 0.172369887
6 Less frequently 1364 21.7% 0.217093745
7 Never 3227 51.4% 0.513608149
97 Not answered 41 0.7% 0.006525545
98 Not asked (imputed) 926 NA


r12arbeid


Variable label: Main activity (occupational status) last seven days.
Literal question: Which of the descriptions below best fits what you have been doing over the past 7 days?
Post-question: Tick one of the options.
Technical description: [All respondents asked. ]
Technical attributes: [Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]

Value Label Cases Percentage
1 In full-time paid work (or temporarily absent) 2847 48.2% 0.4822971370
2 In part-time paid work (or temporarily absent) working 30 hours or more per week 287 4.9% 0.0486193461
3 In part-time paid work (or temporarily absent) working less than 30 hours per week 239 4% 0.0404878875
4 In education (not paid by an employer) 217 3.7% 0.0367609690
5 Unemployed and actively seeking a job 49 0.8% 0.0083008640
6 Unemployed and not actively seeking a job 28 0.5% 0.0047433508
7 Permanently sick or disabled 227 3.8% 0.0384550229
8 Retired 1644 27.9% 0.2785024564
9 In military service 4 0.1% 0.0006776215
10 Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons 42 0.7% 0.0071150263
11 Other: 271 4.6% 0.0459088599
97 Not answered 48 0.8% 0.0081314586
98 Not asked 1306 NA