Citation
Primary investigators
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Elisabeth Ivarsflaten
|
Coordinator, University of Bergen
|
Stefan Dahlberg
|
Coordinator, UiB
|
Erla Løvseth
|
UiB
|
Sveinung Arnesen
|
NORCE
|
Susanne Bygnes
|
UiB
|
Endre Tvinnereim
|
NORCE
|
Yvette Peters
|
UiB
|
Lise Bjånesøy
|
UiB
|
Erik Knudsen
|
UiB
|
Gisela Böhm
|
UiB
|
Thea Gregersen
|
UiB
|
Producers
Name
|
Affiliation
|
Role
|
Asle Høgestøl
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Øivind Skjervheim
|
ideas2evidence
|
Coordinator
|
Olav Bjørnebekk
|
ideas2evidence
|
Project Team Member
|
Jostein Ryssevik
|
ideas2evidence
|
Quality Assurance
|
Study Description
Abstract
The Norwegian Citizen Panel is a platform for internet surveys of public opinion in important areas of society and politics in Norway. Participants are randomly recruited from the Norwegian population register, and they are encouraged to participate over time. The panel was fielded for the first time the fall of 2013 and as of 2017 the survey is carried out three times a year. The University of Bergen owns and is responsible for the Citizen panel. The company ideas2evidence recruits respondents, produces the survey, and provides documentation of the data. Data is stored and shared by the Norwegian Social Science Data services (NSD). The Norwegian Citizen Panel welcomes research proposals for survey content. More information about calls and other updates are available at www.medborger.uib.no
Scope
Geographic coverage: National geographic coverage. Counties as geographic coding.
Unit of analysis: Individuals
Univers: Norwegian Citizens above the age of 18.
Methodology
Sampling procedure
Members of the Norwegian Citizen Panel have been recruited in four waves, wave 1, wave 3, wave 8 and wave 11. In wave 1, 4.870 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 1). In wave 3, 5.623 members were recruited (see documentation from wave 3). In wave 8, 4245 new members were recruited (see documentation from wave 8). In wave 11, 2069 panel members were recruited (see documentation from wave 11).
In wave 1 and 3 a gross sample of 25 000 individuals was randomly drawn from the Norwegian National Population Registry. The sampling procedure of wave 8 equals that of wave 1 and 3, but with a gross sample of 22 000 individuals. In wave 11, a corresponding gross sample of 14 000 people was drawn.
This National Population Registry includes everyone born in Norway as well as former and current inhabitants. The Norwegian Tax Administration is responsible for the register, but the administration is partly outsourced to the private IT-company Evry. Evry drew the sample on behalf of the Citizen Panel after the necessary permissions were acquired from the Norwegian Tax Administration.
In wave 11, the list from the Norwegian Tax Administration consisted of the following data: a) last name, b) first name, c) address, d) gender, e) age, and f) phone number. The sample excluded people with no current home address in Norway.
Mode of Data Collection
The survey is based on a web-based questionnaire with postal recruitment. Please refer to the Documentation Report from Wave 11. The report is available here: http://digsscore.uib.no/download-data-and-documentation
In wave 13, emails were sent out on October 17th, 2018.
E-mail with reminder was sent out three times, October 23rd, October 29th and November 2nd, respectively, to respondents who: a) had not logged in to the survey, or b) had not completed the survey. Panel members with registered mobile numbers received the last reminder via text message. Panel members without registered phone number were reminded by e-mail.
Wave 13 ended November 5th.
Weighting
To compensate for the observed bias, a set of weights has been calculated. The weights equal the relation between a given strata in the population and the total population, divided by the relation between a given strata in the net sample and the total net sample. This procedure returns values around 1, but above 0. Respondents who are underrepresented will receive a weight above 1 and respondents who are overrepresented a weight below 1. The weights of the different stratums are listed in the documentation report. When calculating the weights, the information regarding the respondent's geographical location, gender and age are based on registry data. These attributes were included in the sample file we received from the Norwegian Population Register. Information regarding the level of education is provided by the respondents when answering the questionnaire.
Two different weights have been calculated:
-
Weight 1 based on demographic variables (age, gender and geography)
-
Weight 2 combining the demographic variables with education. Respondents with missing data on the education variable are only weighted on demography (the education component of the weight is set to 1 in these cases).
When applied, both weights will provide a weighted N equal to the number of cases in the dataset.
We will strongly recommend using weight 2 in any statistical analysis, as this weight provides the most accurate compensation for the various sources of bias in the net sample.
Note: In 2018 NCP changed the age variables in the datasets in order to make the respondents less identifiable. The weights are calculated with the old age variables, which no longer are publically available.
Change Log
Version
|
Release date / Date changed
|
Variable
|
Changes and notes
|
v-101
|
2020-08-28
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 13
|
v-101
|
2020-06-15
|
NA
|
Revised release of round 13
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r13polkom14a
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
NA
|
2019-08-12
|
r13polkom15a
|
Updated value labels from 4 (“Dissatisfied”) and 5 (“Very dissatisfied”) to 4 (“Not very satisfied”) and 5 (“Not satisfied at all”)
|
NA
|
2019-03-26
|
r13km1
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2019-01-31
|
r13polkom2
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13pad10b_2_other
|
Added data
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13pad10d_2_other
|
Added data
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13km_kopris_open
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13polkom1
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2019-01-21
|
r13kmmoral_open
|
Added anonymized data. Available on request.
|
NA
|
2018-12-06
|
r13pad10d
|
Updated norwegian value label.
|
NA
|
2018-12-06
|
r13pad10d_2_other
|
Updated norwegian value label.
|
v-100
|
2018-12-03
|
NA
|
Initial release of round 13
|
Dataset contents
File name
|
Norwegian Citizen Panel - round 13 - v-101.sav
|
# Cases
|
7209
|
# Variables
|
320
|
Variable Documentation
responseid
Variable label:
|
responseid
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13interview_start
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentent first opened the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13interview_end
Variable label:
|
[Date and time of when the respondent completed the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Date and time of when the respondentn completed the questionnaire. Excel-format. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13rekruttert
Variable label:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[The wave the respondent was recruited. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Wave1 |
1808 |
25.1% |
0.2507976 |
3 |
Wave3 |
2000 |
27.7% |
0.2774310 |
8 |
Wave8 |
2061 |
28.6% |
0.2858926 |
11 |
Wave11 |
1340 |
18.6% |
0.1858788 |
r13browsertype
Variable label:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Browertype used by respondent ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13browserversion
Variable label:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Browser version used by respondent ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13mobil
Variable label:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines if the respondents uses mobile ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
annet |
4546 |
63.1% |
0.6306006 |
1 |
mobil |
2663 |
36.9% |
0.3693994 |
r13opplosning
Variable label:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Screen resolution of the applied device ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13enhetstype
Variable label:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determines respondents device type. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
PC |
4659 |
64.6% |
0.646275489 |
2 |
Touch |
2535 |
35.2% |
0.351643779 |
3 |
Generisk |
15 |
0.2% |
0.002080732 |
r13advancedwifeaturesenabled
Variable label:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Determine whether the respondent’s browser supports Advanced WI Features that require client side scripts, such as sliders, drag-n-drop ranking, images instead of radio-buttons/check-boxes etc. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13getrenderingmode
Variable label:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Detects the browsers rendering mode ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13group
Variable label:
|
[Subgroup in wave 13. Randomized. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Subgroup in wave 12. Randomized. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
g1 |
1454 |
20.2% |
0.2016923 |
2 |
g2 |
1482 |
20.6% |
0.2055764 |
3 |
g3 |
1496 |
20.8% |
0.2075184 |
4 |
g4 |
1407 |
19.5% |
0.1951727 |
5 |
g5 |
1370 |
19% |
0.1900402 |
r13pk6_1
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Christian Democratic Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Christian Democratic Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
848 |
11.8% |
0.117630739 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1184 |
16.4% |
0.164239146 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1740 |
24.1% |
0.241364960 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1496 |
20.8% |
0.207518380 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1372 |
19% |
0.190317658 |
6 |
Really like |
388 |
5.4% |
0.053821612 |
7 |
Intensely like |
114 |
1.6% |
0.015813566 |
97 |
Not answered |
67 |
0.9% |
0.009293938 |
r13pk6_2
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Conservative Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Conservative Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
258 |
3.6% |
0.035788598 |
2 |
Really dislike |
925 |
12.8% |
0.128311832 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1309 |
18.2% |
0.181578582 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
877 |
12.2% |
0.121653489 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1719 |
23.8% |
0.238451935 |
6 |
Really like |
1596 |
22.1% |
0.221389929 |
7 |
Intensely like |
469 |
6.5% |
0.065057567 |
97 |
Not answered |
56 |
0.8% |
0.007768068 |
r13pk6_3
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Progress Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Progress Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
2136 |
29.6% |
0.296296296 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1440 |
20% |
0.199750312 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
967 |
13.4% |
0.134137883 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
592 |
8.2% |
0.082119573 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1122 |
15.6% |
0.155638785 |
6 |
Really like |
680 |
9.4% |
0.094326536 |
7 |
Intensely like |
209 |
2.9% |
0.028991538 |
97 |
Not answered |
63 |
0.9% |
0.008739076 |
r13pk6_4
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Liberal Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Liberal Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
466 |
6.5% |
0.06464142 |
2 |
Really dislike |
939 |
13% |
0.13025385 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1588 |
22% |
0.22028021 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1910 |
26.5% |
0.26494659 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1702 |
23.6% |
0.23609377 |
6 |
Really like |
455 |
6.3% |
0.06311555 |
7 |
Intensely like |
71 |
1% |
0.00984880 |
97 |
Not answered |
78 |
1.1% |
0.01081981 |
r13pk6_5
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Socialist Left Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Socialist Left Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
898 |
12.5% |
0.12456651 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1193 |
16.5% |
0.16548758 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1238 |
17.2% |
0.17172978 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1230 |
17.1% |
0.17062006 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1414 |
19.6% |
0.19614371 |
6 |
Really like |
898 |
12.5% |
0.12456651 |
7 |
Intensely like |
264 |
3.7% |
0.03662089 |
97 |
Not answered |
74 |
1% |
0.01026495 |
r13pk6_6
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Centre Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Centre Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
321 |
4.5% |
0.04452767 |
2 |
Really dislike |
678 |
9.4% |
0.09404911 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1341 |
18.6% |
0.18601748 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
2011 |
27.9% |
0.27895686 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1827 |
25.3% |
0.25343321 |
6 |
Really like |
762 |
10.6% |
0.10570121 |
7 |
Intensely like |
184 |
2.6% |
0.02552365 |
97 |
Not answered |
85 |
1.2% |
0.01179082 |
r13pk6_7
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Green Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Green Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1207 |
16.7% |
0.167429602 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1140 |
15.8% |
0.158135664 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1261 |
17.5% |
0.174920239 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1183 |
16.4% |
0.164100430 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1569 |
21.8% |
0.217644611 |
6 |
Really like |
617 |
8.6% |
0.085587460 |
7 |
Intensely like |
160 |
2.2% |
0.022194479 |
97 |
Not answered |
72 |
1% |
0.009987516 |
r13pk6_8
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Labour Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Labour Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
294 |
4.1% |
0.040782355 |
2 |
Really dislike |
666 |
9.2% |
0.092384519 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1221 |
16.9% |
0.169371619 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
998 |
13.8% |
0.138438064 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
2173 |
30.1% |
0.301428770 |
6 |
Really like |
1481 |
20.5% |
0.205437647 |
7 |
Intensely like |
310 |
4.3% |
0.043001803 |
97 |
Not answered |
66 |
0.9% |
0.009155223 |
r13pk6_9
Variable label:
|
Like/Dislike: The Red Party.
|
Pre-question text:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Literal question:
|
The Red Party
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1475 |
20.5% |
0.20460535 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1207 |
16.7% |
0.16742960 |
3 |
Dislike somewhat |
1063 |
14.7% |
0.14745457 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1316 |
18.3% |
0.18254959 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1243 |
17.2% |
0.17242336 |
6 |
Really like |
582 |
8.1% |
0.08073242 |
7 |
Intensely like |
236 |
3.3% |
0.03273686 |
97 |
Not answered |
87 |
1.2% |
0.01206825 |
r13meme1_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme1_1-3 ]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme1_1-3 ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1370] [Invalid:5839] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norway |
685 |
50% |
0.5 |
2 |
your local community |
685 |
50% |
0.5 |
Sysmiss |
|
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme1_1
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue: 1. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are, in your opinion, the main political issues or areas for [Norway/your local community]?
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13meme1_2
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue: 2. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are, in your opinion, the main political issues or areas for [Norway/your local community]?
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13meme1_3
Variable label:
|
Most important political issue: 3. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What are, in your opinion, the main political issues or areas for [Norway/your local community]?
|
Post-question:
|
Please list the three most important issues where 1 is the most important, 2 the second most important and 3 is the third most important.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 ][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13km1
Variable label:
|
What do you think when you hear or read “climate change” [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think when you hear or read “climate change”
|
Post-question:
|
Please write the first thing that comes into your mind. We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good or just a few words if that is better for you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r8km1 is answered]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
eips2018c_ran
Variable label:
|
[Collects values from eips2017c_ran]
|
Technical description:
|
[Collects values from eips2017c_ran]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1760] [Invalid:5449] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[BLANK] |
355 |
20.2% |
0.2017045 |
2 |
for you personally |
357 |
20.3% |
0.2028409 |
3 |
for Norway |
358 |
20.3% |
0.2034091 |
4 |
for Europe |
338 |
19.2% |
0.1920455 |
5 |
for the world |
352 |
20% |
0.2000000 |
Sysmiss |
|
5449 |
|
NA |
eips2018c
Variable label:
|
To what degree do you see climate change as a threat [BLANK/for you personally/for Norway/for Europe/for the World].
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you see climate change as a threat [BLANK / for you personally / for Norway / for Europe / for the world]?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if value on eips2017c_ran]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 No threat at all |
63 |
3.6% |
0.035795455 |
2 |
1 |
32 |
1.8% |
0.018181818 |
3 |
2 |
81 |
4.6% |
0.046022727 |
4 |
3 |
135 |
7.7% |
0.076704545 |
5 |
4 |
110 |
6.2% |
0.062500000 |
6 |
5 |
244 |
13.9% |
0.138636364 |
7 |
6 |
217 |
12.3% |
0.123295455 |
8 |
7 |
313 |
17.8% |
0.177840909 |
9 |
8 |
296 |
16.8% |
0.168181818 |
10 |
9 |
126 |
7.2% |
0.071590909 |
11 |
10 Extreme threat |
140 |
8% |
0.079545455 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.001704545 |
98 |
Not asked |
5449 |
|
NA |
r13km_moral_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13km_moral if r13group = 4 or 5]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13km_moral if r13group = 4 or 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2777] [Invalid:4432] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
B: The responsibility for emission cuts should be allocated as fairly as
possible between the countries, even though it may lead to significant costs for
Norway |
698 |
25.1% |
0.2513504 |
2 |
B: The countries that have up until now emitted the most greenhouse gases should
make the biggest cuts, even though it may lead to significant costs for Norway |
538 |
19.4% |
0.1937342 |
3 |
B: The wealthy countries should make the biggest cuts, even though it may lead
to significant costs for Norway |
492 |
17.7% |
0.1771696 |
4 |
B: All countries should reduce their emissions by the same percentage, even
though it may lead to significant costs for Norway |
555 |
20% |
0.1998560 |
5 |
B: All people should be entitled to emit the same amount of Co2 greenhouse
gases, with the size of a country's population determining the amount of
greenhouse gases the country can emit, even though it may lead to significant
costs for Norway |
494 |
17.8% |
0.1778898 |
Sysmiss |
|
4432 |
|
NA |
r13km_moral
Variable label:
|
Agree with which position on allocation of emission cuts: Norwegian economic interests vs [R13KM_MORAL_RAN].
|
Pre-question text:
|
The following describes two opposing positions in the question of how responsibility for emission cuts should be allocated between countries in international climate agreements.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of these positions do you most agree with?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 4 or 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Agree very much more with A |
123 |
4.4% |
0.04429240 |
2 |
Agree much more with A |
165 |
5.9% |
0.05941664 |
3 |
Agree somewhat more with A |
285 |
10.3% |
0.10262874 |
4 |
Agree somewhat more with B |
624 |
22.5% |
0.22470292 |
5 |
Agree much more with B |
772 |
27.8% |
0.27799784 |
6 |
Agree very much more with B |
537 |
19.3% |
0.19337414 |
7 |
Agree with neither A nor B |
240 |
8.6% |
0.08642420 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
1.1% |
0.01116313 |
98 |
Not asked |
4432 |
|
NA |
r13kmmoral_open
Variable label:
|
Elaboration on allocation of climate cuts between countries [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
We would like to ask you to elaborate on your opinion on how the responsibility for emission cuts should be allocated between countries.
|
Post-question:
|
We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 4 or 5]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13kmplast
Variable label:
|
Participated in campaigns to collect plastic from nature last 12 months.
|
Pre-question text:
|
This question applies to plastic in the ocean, and organised campaigns designed to collect plastic from the countryside, e.g. on beaches, along the coast, in rivers and in lakes.
|
Literal question:
|
Have you taken part in any campaigns designed to collect plastic from the countryside during the last 12 months?
|
Post-question:
|
Please select the most suitable option.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes, I have participated in one or more organised campaigns designed to collect
the plastic from the countryside |
87 |
6% |
0.059834938 |
2 |
I have collected plastic on my own (not as part of an organised campaign). |
517 |
35.6% |
0.355570839 |
3 |
I have wanted to collect plastic, but so far I have not done so. |
277 |
19.1% |
0.190508941 |
4 |
No. |
570 |
39.2% |
0.392022008 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002063274 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13kmplast_text
Variable label:
|
Comments to [R13KMPLAST] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
If you have any comments, please write them here.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13km30
Variable label:
|
To what degree moral duty for individuals to contribute to prevent climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
To what degree do you regard it as a moral duty for individuals to contribute towards preventing climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
429 |
29.5% |
0.295048143 |
2 |
To a great extent |
588 |
40.4% |
0.404401651 |
3 |
Somewhat |
369 |
25.4% |
0.253782669 |
4 |
To a small extent |
45 |
3.1% |
0.030949106 |
5 |
Not at all |
19 |
1.3% |
0.013067400 |
97 |
Not answered |
4 |
0.3% |
0.002751032 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km64
Variable label:
|
How postitive or negative will climate change be for Norway.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Climate change will affect each country in different ways.
|
Literal question:
|
How positive or negative do you think climate change will be for Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Only positive |
16 |
1.1% |
0.011004127 |
2 |
More positive than negative |
151 |
10.4% |
0.103851444 |
3 |
Neither positive nor negative |
284 |
19.5% |
0.195323246 |
4 |
More negative than positive |
872 |
60% |
0.599724897 |
5 |
Only negative |
119 |
8.2% |
0.081843191 |
97 |
Not answered |
12 |
0.8% |
0.008253095 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_1
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Hope.
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Hope
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all” to “very strong”.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
80 |
5.5% |
0.05502063 |
2 |
Slightly |
302 |
20.8% |
0.20770289 |
3 |
Somewhat |
760 |
52.3% |
0.52269601 |
4 |
Strongly |
243 |
16.7% |
0.16712517 |
5 |
Very strongly |
35 |
2.4% |
0.02407153 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
2.3% |
0.02338377 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_2
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Sadness.
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Sadness
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all” to “very strong”.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
107 |
7.4% |
0.07359010 |
2 |
Slightly |
270 |
18.6% |
0.18569464 |
3 |
Somewhat |
593 |
40.8% |
0.40784044 |
4 |
Strongly |
347 |
23.9% |
0.23865199 |
5 |
Very strongly |
99 |
6.8% |
0.06808803 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.6% |
0.02613480 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_3
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Fear.
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all” to “very strong”.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
152 |
10.5% |
0.10453920 |
2 |
Slightly |
375 |
25.8% |
0.25790922 |
3 |
Somewhat |
613 |
42.2% |
0.42159560 |
4 |
Strongly |
223 |
15.3% |
0.15337001 |
5 |
Very strongly |
55 |
3.8% |
0.03782669 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
2.5% |
0.02475928 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_4
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Anger.
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all” to “very strong”.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
207 |
14.2% |
0.14236589 |
2 |
Slightly |
398 |
27.4% |
0.27372765 |
3 |
Somewhat |
537 |
36.9% |
0.36932600 |
4 |
Strongly |
212 |
14.6% |
0.14580468 |
5 |
Very strongly |
62 |
4.3% |
0.04264099 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.6% |
0.02613480 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_5
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Guilt.
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Guilt
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all” to “very strong”.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
214 |
14.7% |
0.14718019 |
2 |
Slightly |
497 |
34.2% |
0.34181568 |
3 |
Somewhat |
583 |
40.1% |
0.40096286 |
4 |
Strongly |
111 |
7.6% |
0.07634113 |
5 |
Very strongly |
18 |
1.2% |
0.01237964 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
2.1% |
0.02132050 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km21_6
Variable label:
|
Feel this about climate change: Tired of it.
|
Pre-question text:
|
When it comes to climate change and everything you associate with it, how strongly do you feel the following feelings?
|
Literal question:
|
Tired of it
|
Post-question:
|
Please rate each feeling on the given scale that goes from “not at all” to “very strong”.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
458 |
31.5% |
0.31499312 |
2 |
Slightly |
383 |
26.3% |
0.26341128 |
3 |
Somewhat |
426 |
29.3% |
0.29298487 |
4 |
Strongly |
89 |
6.1% |
0.06121045 |
5 |
Very strongly |
58 |
4% |
0.03988996 |
97 |
Not answered |
40 |
2.8% |
0.02751032 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13kmkopris_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmkopris if r13group = 1]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmkopris if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1448] [Invalid:5761] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very negative - Very positive |
708 |
48.9% |
0.4889503 |
2 |
Very positive - Very negative |
740 |
51.1% |
0.5110497 |
Sysmiss |
|
5761 |
|
NA |
r13kmkopris
Variable label:
|
Positive or negative about rush hour increases in toll ring cost.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Several Norwegian cities have introduced a toll scheme which would cost more to cross the toll ring during rush hour and cost less outside of rush hour.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you feel positive or negative about such a scheme?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very positive |
137 |
9.4% |
0.094222834 |
2 |
Positive |
268 |
18.4% |
0.184319120 |
3 |
Somewhat positive |
238 |
16.4% |
0.163686382 |
4 |
Neither negative nor positive |
147 |
10.1% |
0.101100413 |
5 |
Somewhat negative |
203 |
14% |
0.139614856 |
6 |
Negative |
185 |
12.7% |
0.127235213 |
7 |
Very negative |
266 |
18.3% |
0.182943604 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.006877579 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km_kopris_open
Variable label:
|
Comment on [R13KMKOPRIS] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
You can write a comment here if you want:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13km_klima_tiltak
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Unsure about what I can do to reduce climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
I’m unsure what I can do in my daily life to reduce climate change.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
28 |
1.9% |
0.019257221 |
2 |
Agree |
124 |
8.5% |
0.085281981 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
266 |
18.3% |
0.182943604 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
228 |
15.7% |
0.156808803 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
332 |
22.8% |
0.228335626 |
6 |
Disagree |
376 |
25.9% |
0.258596974 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
91 |
6.3% |
0.062585970 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.6% |
0.006189821 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km_politisk_tiltak
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: I am unsure about what policy measure are good for reducing climate change.
|
Literal question:
|
I am unsure what policy measures are good for reducing climate change.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
59 |
4.1% |
0.040577717 |
2 |
Agree |
205 |
14.1% |
0.140990371 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
384 |
26.4% |
0.264099037 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
214 |
14.7% |
0.147180193 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
259 |
17.8% |
0.178129298 |
6 |
Disagree |
250 |
17.2% |
0.171939477 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
69 |
4.7% |
0.047455296 |
97 |
Not answered |
14 |
1% |
0.009628611 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13km_politisk_tiltak_open
Variable label:
|
Comment on [R13KM_POLITISK_TILTAK] [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
If you have additional comments regarding policy measures, please write them here:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13polkom10
Variable label:
|
How confident that fact-checking services present facts.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In Norway, we have various fact-checking services (such as Faktisk.no) that fact-check Norwegian public debate. The aim of such fact-checking services is to contribute to a fact-based public debate and prevent the spread of fictitious messages and news.
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have that such services present the facts?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
67 |
4.8% |
0.04761905 |
2 |
High confidence |
485 |
34.5% |
0.34470505 |
3 |
Some confidence |
637 |
45.3% |
0.45273632 |
4 |
Little confidence |
154 |
10.9% |
0.10945274 |
5 |
No confidence at all |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02274343 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02274343 |
98 |
Not asked |
5802 |
|
NA |
r13polkom11_parti
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects political party for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects political party for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1388] [Invalid:5821] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Red Party |
133 |
9.6% |
0.09582133 |
2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
154 |
11.1% |
0.11095101 |
3 |
The Labour Party |
155 |
11.2% |
0.11167147 |
4 |
The Centre Party |
150 |
10.8% |
0.10806916 |
5 |
The Green Party |
170 |
12.2% |
0.12247839 |
6 |
The Liberal Party |
137 |
9.9% |
0.09870317 |
7 |
The Christian Democrats |
170 |
12.2% |
0.12247839 |
8 |
The Conservative Party |
155 |
11.2% |
0.11167147 |
9 |
The Progress Party |
164 |
11.8% |
0.11815562 |
Sysmiss |
|
5821 |
|
NA |
r13polkom11_konklusjon
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects conclusion for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects conclusion for r13polkom11 if r13group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1388] [Invalid:5821] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
completely true. |
314 |
22.6% |
0.2262248 |
2 |
completely wrong. |
362 |
26.1% |
0.2608069 |
3 |
completely wrong. Afterwards, key politicians from the same party agree with the
conclusion of the fact-checking service. |
346 |
24.9% |
0.2492795 |
4 |
completely wrong. Afterwards, key politicians from the same party disagree with
the conclusion of the fact-checking service. |
366 |
26.4% |
0.2636888 |
Sysmiss |
|
5821 |
|
NA |
r13polkom11
Variable label:
|
Confidence in fact-checking service given that statement from [party] was deemed [wrong/true.]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you read a fact-check from a Norwegian fact-checking service that concludes that a statement by a politician from [The Red Party/The Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The Green Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative Party/The Progress Party] is [completely true/completely wrong/completely wrong. Afterwards, key politicians from the same party agree with the conclusion of the fact-checking service/completely wrong. Afterwards, key politicians from the same party disagree with the conclusion of the fact-checking service].
|
Literal question:
|
Based on the above information, how much confidence would you have had in the conclusion of the fact-checking service on this matter?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very high confidence |
83 |
5.9% |
0.05899076 |
2 |
High confidence |
464 |
33% |
0.32977967 |
3 |
Some confidence |
574 |
40.8% |
0.40796020 |
4 |
Little confidence |
194 |
13.8% |
0.13788202 |
5 |
No confidence at all |
42 |
3% |
0.02985075 |
97 |
Not answered |
50 |
3.6% |
0.03553660 |
98 |
Not asked |
5802 |
|
NA |
r13kmkt_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar, r13kmktresearch and r13kmktuse]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar, r13kmktresearch and r13kmktuse]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1495] [Invalid:5714] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
727 |
48.6% |
0.4862876 |
2 |
2 |
768 |
51.4% |
0.5137124 |
Sysmiss |
|
5714 |
|
NA |
r13kmktfamiliar_scale
Variable label:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar, based on r13kmkt_ran]
|
Technical description:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktfamiliar, based on r13kmkt_ran]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1495] [Invalid:5714] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No knowledge -> Good knowledge |
727 |
48.6% |
0.4862876 |
2 |
Good knowledge -> No knowledge |
768 |
51.4% |
0.5137124 |
Sysmiss |
|
5714 |
|
NA |
r13kmktfamiliar
Variable label:
|
How much knowledge about climate manipulation (solar geoengineering).
|
Pre-question text:
|
The greenhouse gas carbon dioxide (CO2) traps heat in the atmosphere. When there is more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, the climate can change, which will lead to it becoming warmer, with more droughts and heat waves, a rise in sea levels and storms becoming more powerful.
One method for reducing the extent of climate change may possibly be so-called “climate manipulation” (solar geoengineering), for example by shading the sun.
|
Literal question:
|
How much knowledge would you say that you have about this method?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Good knowledge |
18 |
1.2% |
0.012032086 |
2 |
Some knowledge |
168 |
11.2% |
0.112299465 |
3 |
Little knowledge |
489 |
32.7% |
0.326871658 |
4 |
No knowledge |
811 |
54.2% |
0.542112299 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.7% |
0.006684492 |
98 |
Not asked |
5713 |
|
NA |
r13kmktresearch_scale
Variable label:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktresearch, based on r13kmkt_ran]
|
Technical description:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktresearch, based on r13kmkt_ran]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1487] [Invalid:5722] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly against such research ->Strongly in favour of such research |
725 |
48.8% |
0.4875588 |
2 |
Strongly in favour of such research ->Strongly against such research |
762 |
51.2% |
0.5124412 |
Sysmiss |
|
5722 |
|
NA |
r13kmktresearch
Variable label:
|
Should be research program for climate manipulation with particles in the atmosphere.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Some experts have proposed a new approach to limiting climate change by shading the sun. This method will involve spreading particles such as sulphur aerosols in the atmosphere to reflect some of the sunlight back into space. By reducing the amount of sunlight coming to earth, it is expected that this method can cool down the planet and reduce several other climate changes.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think there should be an international research program to explore the benefits and risks associated with shading the sun using particles in the atmosphere?
|
Post-question:
|
Please choose the option that comes closest to your view of such research:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly in favour of such research |
322 |
21.5% |
0.21524064 |
2 |
Somewhat in favour of such research |
690 |
46.1% |
0.46122995 |
3 |
Somewhat against such research |
272 |
18.2% |
0.18181818 |
4 |
Strongly against such research |
183 |
12.2% |
0.12232620 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
1.9% |
0.01938503 |
98 |
Not asked |
5713 |
|
NA |
r13kmktuse_scale
Variable label:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktuse, based on r13kmkt_ran]
|
Technical description:
|
[Indicates direction of response scale for r13kmktuse, based on r13kmkt_ran]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1484] [Invalid:5725] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly disagree -> Strongly agree |
724 |
48.8% |
0.4878706 |
2 |
Strongly agree-> Strongly disagree |
760 |
51.2% |
0.5121294 |
Sysmiss |
|
5725 |
|
NA |
r13kmktuse
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: Climate manipulation with particles in the atmosphere should be used to limit global warming.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:
“Shading the sun by using particles in the atmosphere should be used to limit global warming”
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
36 |
2.4% |
0.02406417 |
2 |
Agree somewhat |
526 |
35.2% |
0.35160428 |
3 |
Disagree somewhat |
537 |
35.9% |
0.35895722 |
4 |
Strongly disagree |
326 |
21.8% |
0.21791444 |
97 |
Not answered |
71 |
4.7% |
0.04745989 |
98 |
Not asked |
5713 |
|
NA |
r13kmktresearchsecond_1
Variable label:
|
What percentage of Norwegian population would support research into climate manipulation with particles in the atmosphere.
|
Literal question:
|
What proportion of the Norwegian population do you think will support an international research programme of the type we have just mentioned? (I.e. an international research program to explore the benefits and risks associated with shading the sun using particles in the atmosphere?)
|
Post-question:
|
Please enter a number from 0 (none) to 100 (all).
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1398] [Invalid:5811] [Range:0-100]
|
r13kmktusesecond_1
Variable label:
|
What proportion of Norwegian population would support using climate manipulation with particles in the atmosphere.
|
Literal question:
|
What proportion of the Norwegian population do you believe will agree with this assertion:
“Shading the sun by using particles in the atmosphere should be used to limit global warming”?
|
Post-question:
|
Please enter a number from 0 (none) to 100 (all).
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1378] [Invalid:5831] [Range:0-100]
|
r13kmktresearchopen
Variable label:
|
Justification of response : [R13KMTRESEARCH][Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
You replied that you were [r13kmktresearch ] an international research program to explore the benefits and risks associated with shading the sun using particles in the atmosphere.
|
Literal question:
|
Can you write some words or sentences in the box below to justify your response?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3 and if response on r13kmktresearch][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13polkom2_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects r13polkom2 or r13polkom5. Randomizes if 13group = 3]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects r13polkom2 or r13polkom5. Randomizes if 13group = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1470] [Invalid:5739] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Respondent does not get R13POLKOM2 |
774 |
52.7% |
0.5265306 |
2 |
Respondent gets R13POLKOM2 |
696 |
47.3% |
0.4734694 |
Sysmiss |
|
5739 |
|
NA |
r13polkom2
Variable label:
|
Open: Difference between real and fake news. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Fake news has been discussed a lot lately.
|
Literal question:
|
We are interested in what you think is the difference between real and fake news?
|
Post-question:
|
We want all types of answers; a couple of sentences would be good, or just a few words if that is better for you.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3 and r13polkom2_ran = 2] [Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13polkom4_1_stilling
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person 1’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person 1’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Professor |
974 |
34.2% |
0.3423550 |
2 |
PhD Research Fellow |
939 |
33% |
0.3300527 |
3 |
Independent researcher without a PhD |
932 |
32.8% |
0.3275923 |
Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_stilling
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person 2’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects a person 2’s position.. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Professor |
936 |
32.9% |
0.3289982 |
2 |
PhD Research Fellow |
988 |
34.7% |
0.3472759 |
3 |
Independent researcher without a PhD |
921 |
32.4% |
0.3237258 |
Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_kom
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects visibility in the media for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects visibility in the media for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
frequently appears as an expert in the media |
932 |
32.8% |
0.3275923 |
2 |
rarely appears as an expert in the media |
967 |
34% |
0.3398946 |
3 |
never appears as an expert in the media |
946 |
33.3% |
0.3325132 |
Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_kom
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects visibility in the media for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects visibility in the media for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
frequently appears as an expert in the media |
972 |
34.2% |
0.3416520 |
2 |
rarely appears as an expert in the media |
915 |
32.2% |
0.3216169 |
3 |
never appears as an expert in the media |
958 |
33.7% |
0.3367311 |
Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_gender
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Male |
1416 |
49.8% |
0.4977153 |
2 |
Female |
1429 |
50.2% |
0.5022847 |
Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_gender
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects gender for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Male |
1439 |
50.6% |
0.5057996 |
2 |
Female |
1406 |
49.4% |
0.4942004 |
Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_parti
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political standpoint for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political standpoint for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not known |
227 |
8% |
0.07978910 |
2 |
Politically neutral |
276 |
9.7% |
0.09701230 |
3 |
The Red Party |
243 |
8.5% |
0.08541301 |
4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
256 |
9% |
0.08998243 |
5 |
The Labour Party |
279 |
9.8% |
0.09806678 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
263 |
9.2% |
0.09244288 |
7 |
The Green Party |
259 |
9.1% |
0.09103691 |
8 |
The Liberal Party |
272 |
9.6% |
0.09560633 |
9 |
The Christian Democrats |
273 |
9.6% |
0.09595782 |
10 |
The Conservative Party |
266 |
9.3% |
0.09349736 |
11 |
The Progress Party |
231 |
8.1% |
0.08119508 |
Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_parti
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political standpoint for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects political standpoint for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not known |
276 |
9.7% |
0.09701230 |
2 |
Politically neutral |
265 |
9.3% |
0.09314587 |
3 |
The Red Party |
250 |
8.8% |
0.08787346 |
4 |
The Socialist Left Party |
252 |
8.9% |
0.08857645 |
5 |
The Labour Party |
239 |
8.4% |
0.08400703 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
273 |
9.6% |
0.09595782 |
7 |
The Green Party |
267 |
9.4% |
0.09384886 |
8 |
The Liberal Party |
232 |
8.2% |
0.08154657 |
9 |
The Christian Democrats |
264 |
9.3% |
0.09279438 |
10 |
The Conservative Party |
270 |
9.5% |
0.09490334 |
11 |
The Progress Party |
257 |
9% |
0.09033392 |
Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_publ
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects publication for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects publication for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
in an internationally leading scientific journal |
933 |
32.8% |
0.3279438 |
2 |
in a scientific Norwegian journal |
945 |
33.2% |
0.3321617 |
3 |
as a Norwegian report |
967 |
34% |
0.3398946 |
Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_publ
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects publication for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects publication for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
in an internationally leading scientific journal |
972 |
34.2% |
0.3416520 |
2 |
in a scientific Norwegian journal |
950 |
33.4% |
0.3339192 |
3 |
as a Norwegian report |
923 |
32.4% |
0.3244288 |
Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_funn
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
the number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers |
1484 |
52.2% |
0.5216169 |
2 |
the number of municipalities should not be reduced further by more mergers |
1361 |
47.8% |
0.4783831 |
Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_funn
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects findings for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
the number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers |
1461 |
51.4% |
0.5135325 |
2 |
the number of municipalities should not be reduced further by more mergers |
1384 |
48.6% |
0.4864675 |
Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_1_metode
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method for person 1. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
depth interviews |
982 |
34.5% |
0.3451670 |
2 |
experiments |
924 |
32.5% |
0.3247803 |
3 |
a survey |
939 |
33% |
0.3300527 |
Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_2_metode
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects method for person 2. Randomizes if r13group = 3 or 4.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2845] [Invalid:4364] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
depth interviews |
975 |
34.3% |
0.3427065 |
2 |
experiments |
952 |
33.5% |
0.3346221 |
3 |
a survey |
918 |
32.3% |
0.3226714 |
Sysmiss |
|
4364 |
|
NA |
r13polkom4_order
Variable label:
|
[ Background variable for conjoint experiment. Specifies the order of the various properties shown in the table that is displayed to the respondent]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Specifies the order of the various properties shown in the table that is displayed to the respondent.
1 = Position and employment 2 = Visibility in the media 3 = Gender 4 = Political standpoint 5 = The person’s latest scientific article has been published… 6 = The person’s latest scientific article finds that immigration is… 7 = The person’s latest scientific article uses…]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13polkom4
Variable label:
|
Which person gives the most credible infomration about the consequences of municipality mergers?
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below we present two hypothetical persons who research the consequences of municipal mergers in Norway. Please read the descriptions of both persons carefully and answer the question below.
[Prints out the values of r13polkom4_1_stilling, r13polkom4_2_stilling, r13polkom4_1_kom, r13polkom4_2_kom, r13polkom4_1_gender, r13polkom4_2_gender, r13polkom4_1_parti, r13polkom4_2_parti, r13polkom4_1_publ, r13polkom4_2_publ, r13polkom4_1_funn, r13polkom4_2_funn, r13polkom4_1_metode, r13polkom4_2_metode]
Let’s say you didn’t have any information other than the above.
|
Literal question:
|
If you had to make a choice, which of these two do you think would give you the most credible information about the consequences of municipality mergers in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to two people with varying characteristics. Characteristics of the persons are chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 3 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Person 1 |
1346 |
46.4% |
0.46365828 |
2 |
Person 2 |
1351 |
46.5% |
0.46538064 |
97 |
Not answered |
206 |
7.1% |
0.07096107 |
98 |
Not asked |
4306 |
|
NA |
r13pad1
Variable label:
|
For/against: Ban on begging in your municipality.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here are two issues that have been debated in local politics in Norway. We would like to hear your opinion on the issue.
|
Literal question:
|
Firstly, what is your opinion on a ban on begging in your municipality?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I am in favour of a ban on begging in the municipality |
1705 |
59% |
0.59016961 |
2 |
I am against a ban on begging in the municipality |
1103 |
38.2% |
0.38179301 |
97 |
Not answered |
81 |
2.8% |
0.02803738 |
98 |
Not asked |
4320 |
|
NA |
r13pad2
Variable label:
|
How important is the issue of begging bans to you?
|
Literal question:
|
How important is the issue of begging bans to you?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
179 |
6.2% |
0.06195916 |
2 |
Important |
530 |
18.3% |
0.18345448 |
3 |
Fairly important |
914 |
31.6% |
0.31637245 |
4 |
Not very important |
1013 |
35.1% |
0.35064036 |
5 |
Not at all important |
197 |
6.8% |
0.06818969 |
97 |
Not answered |
56 |
1.9% |
0.01938387 |
98 |
Not asked |
4320 |
|
NA |
r13pad3
Variable label:
|
For/against: Increase in tolls for diesel cars in your municipality.
|
Pre-question text:
|
The second issue is about diesel cars.
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on an increase in the tolls for diesel cars in your municipality?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
I am in favour of an increase in the tolls for diesel cars |
705 |
24.4% |
0.24402908 |
2 |
I am against an increase in the tolls for diesel cars |
2101 |
72.7% |
0.72724126 |
97 |
Not answered |
83 |
2.9% |
0.02872966 |
98 |
Not asked |
4320 |
|
NA |
r13pad4
Variable label:
|
How important is the issue of increased tolls for diesel cars to you?
|
Literal question:
|
How important is the issue of increased tolls for diesel cars to you?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very important |
487 |
16.9% |
0.16857044 |
2 |
Important |
776 |
26.9% |
0.26860505 |
3 |
Fairly important |
754 |
26.1% |
0.26098996 |
4 |
Not very important |
610 |
21.1% |
0.21114573 |
5 |
Not at all important |
201 |
7% |
0.06957425 |
97 |
Not answered |
61 |
2.1% |
0.02111457 |
98 |
Not asked |
4320 |
|
NA |
r13pad6_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly chooses r13pad6a, r13pad7a, and r13pad8a, or r13pad6b, r13pad7b, and r13pad8b. . Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly chooses r13pad6a, r13pad7a og r13pad8a, or r13pad6b, r13pad7b or r13pad8b. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Respondent gets R13PAD6A, R13PAD7A, and R13PAD8A |
1483 |
52.2% |
0.5216321 |
2 |
Respondent gets R13PAD6B, R13PAD7B, and R13PAD8B |
1360 |
47.8% |
0.4783679 |
Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_sak
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects issue of a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects issue of a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the
municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in
favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a
ban (the “no” side). Some |
1431 |
50.3% |
0.5033415 |
2 |
in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial
decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the "Yes-
side"), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some
parties propose such an |
1412 |
49.7% |
0.4966585 |
Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_utfall
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the outcome of the issue of a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the outcome of the issue of a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Yes side won the vote |
1421 |
50% |
0.4998241 |
2 |
The No side won the vote |
1422 |
50% |
0.5001759 |
Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_vinnermargin
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the winning margin in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the winning margin in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
. |
974 |
34.3% |
0.3425958 |
2 |
with a slight majority. |
921 |
32.4% |
0.3239536 |
3 |
With a large majority. |
948 |
33.3% |
0.3334506 |
Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_vinner
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the reaction of the winner in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the reaction of the winner in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[BLANK] |
1391 |
48.9% |
0.4892719 |
2 |
Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good
decision and that common sense prevailed. |
1452 |
51.1% |
0.5107281 |
Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad5_avsender
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects statement made by losing side in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects statement made by losing side in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2843] [Invalid:4366] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
[BLANK] |
368 |
12.9% |
0.1294407 |
2 |
The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they
are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. |
428 |
15.1% |
0.1505452 |
3 |
The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they
are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight
where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views. |
425 |
14.9% |
0.1494900 |
4 |
The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they
are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a
democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. |
408 |
14.4% |
0.1435104 |
5 |
The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial
that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. |
402 |
14.1% |
0.1413999 |
6 |
The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial
that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was
a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their
views. |
397 |
14% |
0.1396412 |
7 |
The local newspaper – which was against the decision – writes in an editorial
that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what
living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. |
415 |
14.6% |
0.1459726 |
Sysmiss |
|
4366 |
|
NA |
r13pad6a
Variable label:
|
Text options: How fair was the way the decision was made.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the “no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public, and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue.
[The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the way the decision was made?
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very fair |
251 |
16.9% |
0.16925152 |
2 |
Fair |
864 |
58.3% |
0.58260283 |
3 |
Quite fair |
204 |
13.8% |
0.13755900 |
4 |
Not very fair |
85 |
5.7% |
0.05731625 |
5 |
Not at all fair |
46 |
3.1% |
0.03101821 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.2% |
0.02225219 |
98 |
Not asked |
5726 |
|
NA |
r13pad6b
Variable label:
|
Scale options: How fair was the way the decision was made.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the “no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public, and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue.
[The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think about the way the decision was made?
|
Post-question:
|
Please answer on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is most fair, and 5 is not fair.
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 Most fair |
584 |
42.9% |
0.42941176 |
2 |
2 |
413 |
30.4% |
0.30367647 |
3 |
3 |
223 |
16.4% |
0.16397059 |
4 |
4 |
62 |
4.6% |
0.04558824 |
5 |
5 Not fair |
55 |
4% |
0.04044118 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.7% |
0.01691176 |
98 |
Not asked |
5849 |
|
NA |
r13pad7a
Variable label:
|
Text options: How reasonable was the decision.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the “no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public, and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
Literal question:
|
How reasonable do you think the decision was?
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very reasonable |
182 |
12.3% |
0.12272421 |
2 |
Reasonable |
719 |
48.5% |
0.48482805 |
3 |
Somewhat reasonable |
247 |
16.7% |
0.16655428 |
4 |
Not very reasonable |
207 |
14% |
0.13958193 |
5 |
Not reasonable at all |
90 |
6.1% |
0.06068780 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
2.6% |
0.02562374 |
98 |
Not asked |
5726 |
|
NA |
r13pad7b
Variable label:
|
Scale options: How reasonable was the decision.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the “no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public, and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
Literal question:
|
How reasonable do you think the decision was?
|
Post-question:
|
Please answer on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is most reasonable, and 5 is not reasonable.
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 Most reasonable |
430 |
31.6% |
0.31617647 |
2 |
2 |
363 |
26.7% |
0.26691176 |
3 |
3 |
313 |
23% |
0.23014706 |
4 |
4 |
123 |
9% |
0.09044118 |
5 |
5 Not reasonable |
98 |
7.2% |
0.07205882 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.4% |
0.02426471 |
98 |
Not asked |
5849 |
|
NA |
r13pad8a
Variable label:
|
Text options: How willing to accept the decision.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the “no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public, and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
Literal question:
|
When you think about the actual outcome of the decision, how willing are you to accept the decision?
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very willing |
294 |
19.8% |
0.19824680 |
2 |
Willing |
740 |
49.9% |
0.49898854 |
3 |
Fairly willing |
232 |
15.6% |
0.15643965 |
4 |
Not very willing |
138 |
9.3% |
0.09305462 |
5 |
Not at all willing |
47 |
3.2% |
0.03169252 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
2.2% |
0.02157788 |
98 |
Not asked |
5726 |
|
NA |
r13pad8b
Variable label:
|
Scale options: How willing to accept the decision.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the three questions that follow.
Imagine that your municipality must decide on [in the future, begging on the streets will be banned or permitted in the municipality. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strong in favour of a ban (the “yes” side), while other residents are strongly against a ban (the “no” side). Some parties propose a ban on begging./in the future, diesel cars will pay increased tolls. This is a controversial decision. Some residents are strongly in favour of such an increase (the “Yes-side”), while others are strongly against an increase (the “no” side). Some parties propose such an increase in tolls for diesel cars.]. The decision will be taken by the municipal council and follow the usual procedures. The proposal will initially be debated by the municipal council where all the members will have the opportunity to express their opinions and arguments regarding the issue. The debate will be public, and journalists will be in attendance to report on the debate.
In the end, the politicians will vote on the issue. [The Yes side won the vote/The No side won the vote] [with a slight majority/With a large majority] [blank/Following the decision, a politician on the winning side says that it was a good decision and that common sense prevailed] [blank/The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong. /The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The leader of one of the parties that was against the decision says that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong/The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that it was a fair fight where both sides had the opportunity to argue in favour of their views./The local newspaper - which was against the decision - writes in an editorial that they are disappointed and that the decision was wrong, but that is what living in a democracy is all about. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose.]
|
Literal question:
|
When you think about the actual outcome of the decision, how willing are you to accept the decision?
|
Post-question:
|
Please answer on a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 is most willing, and 5 is not willing.
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2 or 4 and r13pad6_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 Most willing |
571 |
42% |
0.41985294 |
2 |
2 |
397 |
29.2% |
0.29191176 |
3 |
3 |
216 |
15.9% |
0.15882353 |
4 |
4 |
77 |
5.7% |
0.05661765 |
5 |
5 Not willing |
72 |
5.3% |
0.05294118 |
97 |
Not answered |
27 |
2% |
0.01985294 |
98 |
Not asked |
5849 |
|
NA |
r13polkom6_parti
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects party preference for the person who posts in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects party preference for the person who posts in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1446] [Invalid:5763] [Range:1-9]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Red Party |
155 |
10.7% |
0.1071923 |
2 |
The Socialist Left Party |
166 |
11.5% |
0.1147994 |
3 |
The Labour Party |
157 |
10.9% |
0.1085754 |
4 |
The Centre Party |
151 |
10.4% |
0.1044260 |
5 |
The Green Party |
181 |
12.5% |
0.1251729 |
6 |
The Liberal Party |
165 |
11.4% |
0.1141079 |
7 |
The Christian Democrats |
150 |
10.4% |
0.1037344 |
8 |
The Conservative Party |
149 |
10.3% |
0.1030429 |
9 |
The Progress Party |
172 |
11.9% |
0.1189488 |
Sysmiss |
|
5763 |
|
NA |
r13polkom6_kilde
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the source of the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the source of the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1446] [Invalid:5763] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
NRK.no |
369 |
25.5% |
0.2551867 |
2 |
Aftenposten.no |
349 |
24.1% |
0.2413555 |
3 |
VG.no |
359 |
24.8% |
0.2482711 |
4 |
TV2.no |
369 |
25.5% |
0.2551867 |
Sysmiss |
|
5763 |
|
NA |
r13polkom6_omtale
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the persons view on the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the persons view on the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1446] [Invalid:5763] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
. |
511 |
35.3% |
0.3533887 |
2 |
and have written a negative comment about the debate article. |
455 |
31.5% |
0.3146611 |
3 |
and have written a positive comment about the debate article. |
480 |
33.2% |
0.3319502 |
Sysmiss |
|
5763 |
|
NA |
r13polkom6_overskrift
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the headline of the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the headline of the article that is shared in social media. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1446] [Invalid:5763] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” |
466 |
32.2% |
0.3222683 |
2 |
“Immigration threatens our Norwegian values and culture” |
507 |
35.1% |
0.3506224 |
3 |
“Immigration can both threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture” |
473 |
32.7% |
0.3271093 |
Sysmiss |
|
5763 |
|
NA |
r13polkom6
Variable label:
|
How likely to come across a similar situation on social media.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you come across a post on social media that has been shared by one of your contacts who you know votes for [The Red Party/The Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The Green Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative Party/The Progress Party], is of the same gender and is about the same age as you.
Imagine that this person has shared a debate article from [NRK.no / Aftenposten.no / VG.no / TV2.no] on social media [. /and have written a negative comment about the debate article. /and have written a positive comment about the debate article. ]
The headline of the debate article that the person has shared is [“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration threatens our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration can both threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture”].
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would have come across a similar situation on social media?
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to hypthetical post in social media. Characteristics of the post is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly likely |
111 |
7.6% |
0.07634113 |
2 |
Likely |
249 |
17.1% |
0.17125172 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
332 |
22.8% |
0.22833563 |
4 |
Not very likely |
401 |
27.6% |
0.27579092 |
5 |
Not at all likely |
120 |
8.3% |
0.08253095 |
6 |
I am not on social media |
221 |
15.2% |
0.15199450 |
97 |
Not answered |
20 |
1.4% |
0.01375516 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13polkom7
Variable label:
|
How likely to click on and read article had you come across it.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you come across a post on social media that has been shared by one of your contacts who you know votes for [The Red Party/The Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The Green Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative Party/The Progress Party], is of the same gender and is about the same age as you.
Imagine that this person has shared a debate article from [NRK.no / Aftenposten.no / VG.no / TV2.no] on social media [. /and have written a negative comment about the debate article. /and have written a positive comment about the debate article. ]
The headline of the debate article that the person has shared is [“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration threatens our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration can both threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture”].
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you would have clicked on and read this debate article if you had come across this post on social media?
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to hypthetical post in social media. Characteristics of the post is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly likely |
125 |
8.6% |
0.08596974 |
2 |
Likely |
301 |
20.7% |
0.20701513 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
339 |
23.3% |
0.23314993 |
4 |
Not very likely |
338 |
23.2% |
0.23246217 |
5 |
Not at all likely |
129 |
8.9% |
0.08872077 |
6 |
I am not on social media |
199 |
13.7% |
0.13686382 |
97 |
Not answered |
23 |
1.6% |
0.01581843 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13polkom8
Variable label:
|
How likely to want to see more posts from that person again on social media.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you come across a post on social media that has been shared by one of your contacts who you know votes for [The Red Party/The Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The Green Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative Party/The Progress Party], is of the same gender and is about the same age as you.
Imagine that this person has shared a debate article from [NRK.no / Aftenposten.no / VG.no / TV2.no] on social media [. /and have written a negative comment about the debate article. /and have written a positive comment about the debate article. ]
The headline of the debate article that the person has shared is [“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration threatens our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration can both threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture”].
|
Literal question:
|
How likely is it that you had wanted to see more posts from that person again on social media?
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to hypthetical post in social media. Characteristics of the post is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Highly likely |
34 |
2.3% |
0.02338377 |
2 |
Likely |
165 |
11.3% |
0.11348006 |
3 |
Somewhat likely |
338 |
23.2% |
0.23246217 |
4 |
Not very likely |
493 |
33.9% |
0.33906465 |
5 |
Not at all likely |
194 |
13.3% |
0.13342503 |
6 |
I am not on social media |
202 |
13.9% |
0.13892710 |
97 |
Not answered |
28 |
1.9% |
0.01925722 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13polkom9
Variable label:
|
Based on headline, the article argues that immigration is advantage or disadvantage to Norway.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine that you come across a post on social media that has been shared by one of your contacts who you know votes for [The Red Party/The Socialist Left Party/The Labour Party/The Centre Party/The Green Party/The Liberal Party/The Christian Democrats/The Conservative Party/The Progress Party], is of the same gender and is about the same age as you.
Imagine that this person has shared a debate article from [NRK.no / Aftenposten.no / VG.no / TV2.no] on social media [. /and have written a negative comment about the debate article. /and have written a positive comment about the debate article. ]
The headline of the debate article that the person has shared is [“Immigration enriches our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration threatens our Norwegian values and culture” /“Immigration can both threaten and enrich our Norwegian values and culture”].
|
Literal question:
|
Based on the headline of the debate article, to what extent would you say that the debate article argues that it is an advantage or disadvantage that immigrants come to Norway to settle here?
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to hypthetical post in social media. Characteristics of the post is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very great advantage |
41 |
2.8% |
0.02819807 |
2 |
Great advantage |
178 |
12.2% |
0.12242091 |
3 |
Slightly advantageous |
302 |
20.8% |
0.20770289 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
344 |
23.7% |
0.23658872 |
5 |
A slight disadvantage |
217 |
14.9% |
0.14924347 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
221 |
15.2% |
0.15199450 |
7 |
Very great disadvantage |
101 |
6.9% |
0.06946355 |
97 |
Not answered |
50 |
3.4% |
0.03438790 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_kjonn_antagonist
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the gender of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the gender of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
male |
1461 |
50.4% |
0.5039669 |
2 |
female |
1438 |
49.6% |
0.4960331 |
Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_stilling_antagonist
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the position of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the position of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
manager |
1455 |
50.2% |
0.5018972 |
2 |
temporary employee |
1444 |
49.8% |
0.4981028 |
Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_alder_antagonist
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the age of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the age of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
20s |
1495 |
51.6% |
0.5156951 |
2 |
50s |
1404 |
48.4% |
0.4843049 |
Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_budskap
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the message of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the message of the antagonist in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
gives a hug to |
747 |
25.8% |
0.2576751 |
2 |
sends flirty text messages to |
698 |
24.1% |
0.2407727 |
3 |
sends text messages of a sexual nature to |
724 |
25% |
0.2497413 |
4 |
slaps the bottom of |
730 |
25.2% |
0.2518110 |
Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_kjonn_offer
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the gender of the offened person in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the gender of the offened person in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
male |
1456 |
50.2% |
0.5022422 |
2 |
female |
1443 |
49.8% |
0.4977578 |
Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_stilling_offer
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the position of the offened person in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the position of the offened person in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
manager |
1449 |
50% |
0.4998275 |
2 |
temporary employee |
1450 |
50% |
0.5001725 |
Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_alder_offer
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the age of the offened person in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the age of the offened person in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
20s |
1454 |
50.2% |
0.5015523 |
2 |
50s |
1445 |
49.8% |
0.4984477 |
Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_folelse
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the emotion of the offened person in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the emotion of the offened person in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Experience it as degrading |
984 |
33.9% |
0.3394274 |
2 |
not find it pleasant |
946 |
32.6% |
0.3263194 |
3 |
find it pleasant |
969 |
33.4% |
0.3342532 |
Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_arbeidssituasjon
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the work environment of the hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the work environment of the hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
together at a university |
959 |
33.1% |
0.3308037 |
2 |
together in a company |
945 |
32.6% |
0.3259745 |
3 |
together in a political party |
995 |
34.3% |
0.3432218 |
Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12_sted
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the location of the hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the location of the hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:2899] [Invalid:4310] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
work |
926 |
31.9% |
0.3194205 |
2 |
private party |
998 |
34.4% |
0.3442566 |
3 |
work party |
975 |
33.6% |
0.3363229 |
Sysmiss |
|
4310 |
|
NA |
r13polkom12
Variable label:
|
Perceives the situation as sexual harassment.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the question below.
A [male/female] [manager/temporary employee] aged [20s/50s] [gives a hug to/sends flirty text messages to/sends text messages of a sexual nature to/slaps the bottom of] a [male/female] [manager/temporary employee] aged [20s/50s] that [Experience it as degrading/ not find it pleasant/ find it pleasant]. They work [together at a university/together in a company/together in a political party]. The incident occurred at [work/private party/work party].
|
Literal question:
|
As you perceive it, does this situation describe sexual harassment?
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
1119 |
38.1% |
0.38113079 |
2 |
No |
1749 |
59.6% |
0.59570845 |
97 |
Not answered |
68 |
2.3% |
0.02316076 |
98 |
Not asked |
4273 |
|
NA |
r13polkom13
Variable label:
|
Agree/disagree: situation is problematic.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Below, we have described a hypothetical situation. Please read through the situation carefully and then answer the question below.
A [male/female] [manager/temporary employee] aged [20s/50s] [gives a hug to/sends flirty text messages to/sends text messages of a sexual nature to/slaps the bottom of] a [male/female] [manager/temporary employee] aged [20s/50s] that [Experience it as degrading/ not find it pleasant/ find it pleasant]. They work [together at a university/together in a company/together in a political party]. The incident occurred at [work/private party/work party].
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that this describes a problematic situation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 1 or 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
442 |
15.1% |
0.15054496 |
2 |
Agree |
721 |
24.6% |
0.24557221 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
471 |
16% |
0.16042234 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
320 |
10.9% |
0.10899183 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
211 |
7.2% |
0.07186649 |
6 |
Disagree |
442 |
15.1% |
0.15054496 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
274 |
9.3% |
0.09332425 |
97 |
Not answered |
55 |
1.9% |
0.01873297 |
98 |
Not asked |
4273 |
|
NA |
r13pad11_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects r13pad11a or r13pad11b. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects r13pad11a or r13pad11b. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1438] [Invalid:5771] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Respondent gets R13PAD11A |
742 |
51.6% |
0.5159944 |
2 |
Respondent gets R13PAD11B |
696 |
48.4% |
0.4840056 |
Sysmiss |
|
5771 |
|
NA |
r13pad11a
Variable label:
|
Improvement or deterioration: Automatization of public services.
|
Pre-question text:
|
A growing trend is that public agencies entrust decisions to computers instead of giving the task to human beings. The computers make the decisions in accordance with a predetermined sequence (a so-called algorithm) that is determined by humans, but once it has been set, a computer makes its own decisions.
We are interested in investigating what Norwegians think about this technological development.
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, do you think the shift from human to automated decisions will in general lead to an improvement or deterioration in public services?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1 and r13pad11_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very strong improvement |
20 |
2.7% |
0.026954178 |
2 |
Strong improvement |
62 |
8.4% |
0.083557951 |
3 |
Some improvement |
180 |
24.3% |
0.242587601 |
4 |
Neither an improvement or deterioration |
148 |
19.9% |
0.199460916 |
5 |
Some deterioration |
204 |
27.5% |
0.274932615 |
6 |
Strong deterioration |
93 |
12.5% |
0.125336927 |
7 |
Very strong deterioration |
30 |
4% |
0.040431267 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.7% |
0.006738544 |
98 |
Not asked |
6467 |
|
NA |
r13pad11b
Variable label:
|
Improvement or deterioration, with examples: Automatization of public services.
|
Pre-question text:
|
A growing trend is that public agencies entrust decisions to computers instead of giving the task to human beings. The computers make the decisions in accordance with a predetermined sequence (a so-called algorithm) that is determined by humans, but once it has been set, a computer makes its own decisions. One specific example from Norway is the Directorate of Immigration (UDI), which in certain cases lets the robot Ada decide whether to grant individuals residence in Norway. A couple of examples from the USA are algorithms that produce recommendations regarding where police should patrol in order to increase the chance of catching criminals, as well as which concerns child welfare services should take seriously and which they can let pass.
We are interested in investigating what Norwegians think about this technological development.
|
Literal question:
|
Based on what you know, do you think the shift from human to automated decisions will in general lead to an improvement or deterioration in public services?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1 and r13pad11_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very strong improvement |
12 |
1.7% |
0.01724138 |
2 |
Strong improvement |
45 |
6.5% |
0.06465517 |
3 |
Some improvement |
175 |
25.1% |
0.25143678 |
4 |
Neither an improvement or deterioration |
137 |
19.7% |
0.19683908 |
5 |
Some deterioration |
156 |
22.4% |
0.22413793 |
6 |
Strong deterioration |
118 |
17% |
0.16954023 |
7 |
Very strong deterioration |
47 |
6.8% |
0.06752874 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.9% |
0.00862069 |
98 |
Not asked |
6513 |
|
NA |
r13pad12
Variable label:
|
Reason [R13PAD11][Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Can you give the reasons for your answer?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13pad13_1
Variable label:
|
Automatization of public services leads to what in: Verifiability.
|
Pre-question text:
|
What do you think a transition from human to automated decision making in the public sector will lead to when it comes to the following points?
|
Literal question:
|
Verifiability: Opportunity for those affected by a decision to be given an explanation for it
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very much greater |
53 |
3.6% |
0.03645117 |
2 |
Greater |
156 |
10.7% |
0.10729023 |
3 |
Somewhat greater |
217 |
14.9% |
0.14924347 |
4 |
Neither greater or less |
274 |
18.8% |
0.18844567 |
5 |
Somewhat less |
213 |
14.6% |
0.14649243 |
6 |
Less |
315 |
21.7% |
0.21664374 |
7 |
Very much less |
172 |
11.8% |
0.11829436 |
97 |
Not answered |
54 |
3.7% |
0.03713893 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13pad13_2
Variable label:
|
Automatization of public services leads to what in: Impartiality.
|
Pre-question text:
|
What do you think a transition from human to automated decision making in the public sector will lead to when it comes to the following points?
|
Literal question:
|
Impartiality: Opportunity for citizens to be treated equally by the authorities
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very much greater |
137 |
9.4% |
0.09422283 |
2 |
Greater |
360 |
24.8% |
0.24759285 |
3 |
Somewhat greater |
429 |
29.5% |
0.29504814 |
4 |
Neither greater or less |
279 |
19.2% |
0.19188446 |
5 |
Somewhat less |
77 |
5.3% |
0.05295736 |
6 |
Less |
76 |
5.2% |
0.05226960 |
7 |
Very much less |
39 |
2.7% |
0.02682256 |
97 |
Not answered |
57 |
3.9% |
0.03920220 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13pad13_3
Variable label:
|
Automatization of public services leads to what in: Legitimacy.
|
Pre-question text:
|
What do you think a transition from human to automated decision making in the public sector will lead to when it comes to the following points?
|
Literal question:
|
Legitimacy: The probability that citizens comply voluntarily with the decisions of the authorities
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very much greater |
23 |
1.6% |
0.01581843 |
2 |
Greater |
79 |
5.4% |
0.05433287 |
3 |
Somewhat greater |
188 |
12.9% |
0.12929849 |
4 |
Neither greater or less |
582 |
40% |
0.40027510 |
5 |
Somewhat less |
255 |
17.5% |
0.17537827 |
6 |
Less |
196 |
13.5% |
0.13480055 |
7 |
Very much less |
72 |
5% |
0.04951857 |
97 |
Not answered |
59 |
4.1% |
0.04057772 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13pad14
Variable label:
|
How much knowledge about automated decisions in public sector.
|
Literal question:
|
How much knowledge would you say that you have about automated decisions in the public sector?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good knowledge |
17 |
1.2% |
0.01169188 |
2 |
Good knowledge |
94 |
6.5% |
0.06464924 |
3 |
Some knowledge |
375 |
25.8% |
0.25790922 |
4 |
Little knowledge |
640 |
44% |
0.44016506 |
5 |
No knowledge at all |
295 |
20.3% |
0.20288858 |
97 |
Not answered |
33 |
2.3% |
0.02269601 |
98 |
Not asked |
5755 |
|
NA |
r13polkom5
Variable label:
|
Reason for why one person is more credible than the other [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
Please give reasons for why you think one person is more credible than the other.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 3, r13polkom2 = 1 and response on r13polkom4][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13polkom5_back
Variable label:
|
[Logs movement backward in the questionnaire, from r13polkom5 to r13polkom 4.. Tracks if r13group = 3, r13polkom2 = 1 and response on r13polkom4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Logs movement backward in the questionnaire, from r13polkom5 to r13polkom 4.. Tracks if r13group = 3, r13polkom2 = 1 and response on r13polkom4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:201] [Invalid:7008] [Range:1-1]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Has used return button to go back to R13POLKOM4 |
201 |
100% |
1 |
Sysmiss |
|
7008 |
|
NA |
r13meme3_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme3. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme3. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1342] [Invalid:5867] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
your local community |
442 |
32.9% |
0.3293592 |
2 |
your municipality |
459 |
34.2% |
0.3420268 |
3 |
Norway |
441 |
32.9% |
0.3286140 |
Sysmiss |
|
5867 |
|
NA |
r13meme3
Variable label:
|
How is the integration of refugees in [your local community/municipality/Norway] going.
|
Literal question:
|
How do you think that the integration of refugees who are residing in [your local community/your municipality/Norway] is going?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
32 |
2.3% |
0.02335766 |
2 |
Well |
438 |
32% |
0.31970803 |
3 |
Quite well |
423 |
30.9% |
0.30875912 |
4 |
Neither well nor badly |
150 |
10.9% |
0.10948905 |
5 |
Quite badly |
163 |
11.9% |
0.11897810 |
6 |
Badly |
93 |
6.8% |
0.06788321 |
7 |
Very badly |
36 |
2.6% |
0.02627737 |
97 |
Not answered |
35 |
2.6% |
0.02554745 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme4_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme4. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme4. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1340] [Invalid:5869] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
national |
662 |
49.4% |
0.4940299 |
2 |
local |
678 |
50.6% |
0.5059701 |
Sysmiss |
|
5869 |
|
NA |
r13meme4
Variable label:
|
How good/bad did [local/national] authorities handle arrival of refugees to Norway in 2015.
|
Literal question:
|
How well or poorly do you think [national/local] authorities handled the arrival of refugees in Norway in 2015?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very well |
25 |
1.8% |
0.01824818 |
2 |
Well |
196 |
14.3% |
0.14306569 |
3 |
Quite well |
336 |
24.5% |
0.24525547 |
4 |
Neither well nor badly |
239 |
17.4% |
0.17445255 |
5 |
Quite badly |
293 |
21.4% |
0.21386861 |
6 |
Badly |
164 |
12% |
0.11970803 |
7 |
Very badly |
69 |
5% |
0.05036496 |
97 |
Not answered |
48 |
3.5% |
0.03503650 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme5_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme5. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme5. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1339] [Invalid:5870] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
in your municipality |
645 |
48.2% |
0.4817028 |
2 |
in Norway |
694 |
51.8% |
0.5182972 |
Sysmiss |
|
5870 |
|
NA |
r13meme5
Variable label:
|
How much say did representatives in [your municipality/Norway] have on amount of refugees coming to [municipality/Norway].
|
Literal question:
|
How much say do you think elected representatives [in your municipality/in Norway] have had on the number of refugees who have come [to the municipality/to Norway]?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A great deal |
143 |
10.4% |
0.10437956 |
2 |
Quite a bit |
459 |
33.5% |
0.33503650 |
3 |
Some |
446 |
32.6% |
0.32554745 |
4 |
Not much |
238 |
17.4% |
0.17372263 |
5 |
None at all |
41 |
3% |
0.02992701 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
3.1% |
0.03138686 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme6_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme6. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme6. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1338] [Invalid:5871] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian authorities / municipalities |
638 |
47.7% |
0.4768311 |
2 |
UN / Parliament |
700 |
52.3% |
0.5231689 |
Sysmiss |
|
5871 |
|
NA |
r13meme6
Variable label:
|
Representatives in [your municipality/Norway] should accept how many refugees.
|
Pre-question text:
|
The [Norwegian authorities/UN] request each year that [municipalities/Norway] accept refugees.
[The Municipal Council/Parliament] do not have to comply with the request, but can decide themselves how many refugees [the municipality/Norway] will take.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you think that the elected representatives [in your municipality/Norway] should do?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
More than we are asked |
180 |
13.1% |
0.13138686 |
2 |
As many as we are asked |
777 |
56.7% |
0.56715328 |
3 |
Fewer than we are asked |
310 |
22.6% |
0.22627737 |
4 |
None at all |
62 |
4.5% |
0.04525547 |
97 |
Not answered |
41 |
3% |
0.02992701 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme10_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme10a, r13meme10b and r13meme10c.. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects text element for r13meme10a, r13meme10b and r13meme10c.. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1337] [Invalid:5872] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norway |
450 |
33.7% |
0.3365744 |
2 |
your municipality |
447 |
33.4% |
0.3343306 |
3 |
your local community |
440 |
32.9% |
0.3290950 |
Sysmiss |
|
5872 |
|
NA |
r13meme10a
Variable label:
|
How much are issues of refugees and immigration discussed in [Norway/your municipality/your local community] these days.
|
Literal question:
|
How much would you say that issues relating to refugees and immigration are discussed in [Norway/your municipality/your local community] these days?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very little |
239 |
17.4% |
0.17445255 |
2 |
A little |
459 |
33.5% |
0.33503650 |
3 |
Somewhat |
411 |
30% |
0.30000000 |
4 |
Quite a bit |
171 |
12.5% |
0.12481752 |
5 |
Very much |
47 |
3.4% |
0.03430657 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
3.1% |
0.03138686 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme10b_1
Variable label:
|
Discussions on refugees and immigration in [Norway/municipality/local community] are: Calm-heated.
|
Literal question:
|
How would you characterise the discussions about refugees and immigration in [Norway/your municipality/ your local community]?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Calm |
201 |
14.7% |
0.14671533 |
7 |
Heated |
27 |
2% |
0.01970803 |
97 |
Not answered |
102 |
7.4% |
0.07445255 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
2 |
|
237 |
17.3% |
0.17299270 |
3 |
|
225 |
16.4% |
0.16423358 |
4 |
|
286 |
20.9% |
0.20875912 |
5 |
|
193 |
14.1% |
0.14087591 |
6 |
|
99 |
7.2% |
0.07226277 |
r13meme10b_2
Variable label:
|
Discussions on refugees and immigration in [Norway/municipality/local community] are: Objective-non-objective.
|
Literal question:
|
How would you characterise the discussions about refugees and immigration in [Norway/your municipality/ your local community]?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Objective |
127 |
9.3% |
0.09270073 |
7 |
Non-objective |
28 |
2% |
0.02043796 |
97 |
Not answered |
103 |
7.5% |
0.07518248 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
2 |
|
214 |
15.6% |
0.15620438 |
3 |
|
267 |
19.5% |
0.19489051 |
4 |
|
300 |
21.9% |
0.21897810 |
5 |
|
231 |
16.9% |
0.16861314 |
6 |
|
100 |
7.3% |
0.07299270 |
r13meme10b_3
Variable label:
|
Discussions on refugees and immigration in [Norway/municipality/local community] are: A source of conflict-Solution oriented.
|
Literal question:
|
How would you characterise the discussions about refugees and immigration in [Norway/your municipality/ your local community]?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Solution oriented |
81 |
5.9% |
0.05912409 |
7 |
A source of conflict |
44 |
3.2% |
0.03211679 |
97 |
Not answered |
114 |
8.3% |
0.08321168 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
2 |
|
155 |
11.3% |
0.11313869 |
3 |
|
259 |
18.9% |
0.18905109 |
4 |
|
362 |
26.4% |
0.26423358 |
5 |
|
237 |
17.3% |
0.17299270 |
6 |
|
118 |
8.6% |
0.08613139 |
r13meme10b_4
Variable label:
|
Diiscussions on refugees and immigration in [Norway/municipality/local community] are: Interesting-Boring.
|
Literal question:
|
How would you characterise the discussions about refugees and immigration in [Norway/your municipality/ your local community]?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Interesting |
26 |
1.9% |
0.01897810 |
7 |
Boring |
65 |
4.7% |
0.04744526 |
97 |
Not answered |
128 |
9.3% |
0.09343066 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
2 |
|
91 |
6.6% |
0.06642336 |
3 |
|
200 |
14.6% |
0.14598540 |
4 |
|
557 |
40.7% |
0.40656934 |
5 |
|
204 |
14.9% |
0.14890511 |
6 |
|
99 |
7.2% |
0.07226277 |
r13meme10c_1
Variable label:
|
Get information about refugees/immigration in [Norway/municipality/local community]: 1. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
How do you get information about refugees and immigration in [Norway/your municipality/your local community]?
|
Post-question:
|
Please reply in the text boxes below. Examples of answers can be family, friends, TV, social media, local newspapers, research etc.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13meme10c_2
Variable label:
|
Get information about refugees/immigration in [Norway/municipality/local community]: 2. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
How do you get information about refugees and immigration in [Norway/your municipality/your local community]?
|
Post-question:
|
Please reply in the text boxes below. Examples of answers can be family, friends, TV, social media, local newspapers, research etc.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13meme10c_3
Variable label:
|
Get information about refugees/immigration in [Norway/municipality/local community]: 3. [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Literal question:
|
How do you get information about refugees and immigration in [Norway/your municipality/your local community]?
|
Post-question:
|
Please reply in the text boxes below. Examples of answers can be family, friends, TV, social media, local newspapers, research etc.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5][Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13meme2
Variable label:
|
Refugees live in your loal community.
|
Literal question:
|
Do refugees reside in your local community?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Yes |
889 |
64.9% |
0.64890511 |
2 |
No |
212 |
15.5% |
0.15474453 |
3 |
Do not know |
227 |
16.6% |
0.16569343 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
3.1% |
0.03065693 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme9_organisasjon
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects an organisation in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects an organisation in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
An organisation |
915 |
21.5% |
0.2148392 |
2 |
An organisation associated with a connection to a foreign country. |
786 |
18.5% |
0.1845504 |
3 |
A political party that is in government. |
855 |
20.1% |
0.2007514 |
4 |
A political party that has registered to participate in elections. |
868 |
20.4% |
0.2038037 |
5 |
A political party that actively participates in elections. |
835 |
19.6% |
0.1960554 |
Sysmiss |
|
2950 |
|
NA |
r13meme9_event
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the event in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the event in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
speech |
1410 |
33.1% |
0.3310636 |
2 |
stand |
1412 |
33.2% |
0.3315332 |
3 |
demonstration |
1437 |
33.7% |
0.3374031 |
Sysmiss |
|
2950 |
|
NA |
r13meme9_sted
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the location in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the location in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
a local event |
1424 |
33.4% |
0.3343508 |
2 |
an upper secondary school |
1392 |
32.7% |
0.3268373 |
3 |
a known public space |
1443 |
33.9% |
0.3388119 |
Sysmiss |
|
2950 |
|
NA |
r13meme9_budskap
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the message in a hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the message in a hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norway needs a more rigorous asylum policy. |
1471 |
34.5% |
0.3453862 |
2 |
Islam poses a serious threat to democratic values and the rights of women and
homosexuals. |
1346 |
31.6% |
0.3160366 |
3 |
Norway must preserve its white cultural heritage |
1442 |
33.9% |
0.3385771 |
Sysmiss |
|
2950 |
|
NA |
r13meme9_arv
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the heritage of the organsation in the hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects the heritage of the organsation in the hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
They were founded as a neo-Nazi organisation |
1393 |
32.7% |
0.3270721 |
2 |
They were founded as a revolt against asylum policy. |
1432 |
33.6% |
0.3362292 |
3 |
They were founded through revolt at district level in several parts of the
country. |
1434 |
33.7% |
0.3366988 |
Sysmiss |
|
2950 |
|
NA |
r13meme9_benekter
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects if the organisation denies right wing extremism in the hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects if the organisation denies right wing extremism in the hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
They currently distance themselves from anything to do with right-wing extremism |
2054 |
48.2% |
0.4822728 |
2 |
. |
2205 |
51.8% |
0.5177272 |
Sysmiss |
|
2950 |
|
NA |
r13meme9_motbevis
Variable label:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects characteristics of some members in organisation in the hypothetical situation. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical description:
|
[Background variable for conjoint experiment. Randomly selects characteristics of some members in organisation in the hypothetical situation.. Randomizes if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:4259] [Invalid:2950] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
- It turns out that [the organisation/the party] has a key member who has been
convicted of making racist statements, but who has now been forced to leave [the
organisation/the party]. |
1483 |
34.8% |
0.3482038 |
2 |
- It turns out that [the organisation/the party] has a key member who has been
convicted of making racist statements. |
1365 |
32% |
0.3204978 |
3 |
- It turns out that [the organisation/the party] has some members who deny the
Holocaust. |
1411 |
33.1% |
0.3312984 |
Sysmiss |
|
2950 |
|
NA |
r13meme9a
Variable label:
|
Organisation should be given permission to hold event.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine [An organisation. / An organisation associated with a connection to a foreign country. / A political party that is in government. / A political party that has registered to participate in elections. /A political party that actively participates in elections. ][They were founded as a neo-Nazi organisation. / They were founded as a revolt against asylum policy./ They were founded through revolt at district level in several parts of the country.] [They currently distance themselves from anything to do with right-wing extremism./blank][It turns out that [the organization/the party] has a key member who has been convicted of making racist statements, but who has now been forced to leave [the organization/the party]. /It turns out that [the organization/the party] has a key member who has been convicted of making racist statements, but who has now been forced to leave [the organization/the party]./ It turns out that [the organization/the party] has some members who deny the Holocaust.] [The organization/The party] has now asked if they can have a [speech/stand/demonstration] at [a local event/an upper secondary school/a known public place] in order to communicate their message that [Norway needs a more rigorous asylum policy/Islam poses a serious threat to democratic values and the rights of women and homosexuals/Norway must preserve its white cultural heritage].
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that they should be given permission to do so?
|
Technical description:
|
[Conjoint experiment. Respondents are exposed to a hypthetical situtation. Characteristics of the situation is chosen randomly. See background variables.. Asked if r13group = 2, 3 or 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
405 |
9.2% |
0.09236032 |
2 |
Agree |
879 |
20% |
0.20045610 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
688 |
15.7% |
0.15689852 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
380 |
8.7% |
0.08665906 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
408 |
9.3% |
0.09304447 |
6 |
Disagree |
741 |
16.9% |
0.16898518 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
720 |
16.4% |
0.16419612 |
97 |
Not answered |
164 |
3.7% |
0.03740023 |
98 |
Not asked |
2824 |
|
NA |
r13meme9b
Variable label:
|
Organisation poses a threat to democracy.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Imagine [An organisation. / An organisation associated with a connection to a foreign country. / A political party that is in government. / A political party that has registered to participate in elections. /A political party that actively participates in elections. ][They were founded as a neo-Nazi organisation. / They were founded as a revolt against asylum policy./ They were founded through revolt at district level in several parts of the country.] [They currently distance themselves from anything to do with right-wing extremism./blank][It turns out that [the organization/the party] has a key member who has been convicted of making racist statements, but who has now been forced to leave [the organization/the party]. /It turns out that [the organization/the party] has a key member who has been convicted of making racist statements, but who has now been forced to leave [the organization/the party]./ It turns out that [the organization/the party] has some members who deny the Holocaust.] [The organization/The party] has now asked if they can have a [speech/stand/demonstration] at [a local event/an upper secondary school/a known public place] in order to communicate their message that [Norway needs a more rigorous asylum policy/Islam poses a serious threat to democratic values and the rights of women and homosexuals/Norway must preserve its white cultural heritage].
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree that the organisation described above poses a threat to democracy?
|
Technical description:
|
[Del av conjoint-eksperiment. En tenkt situasjon presenteres for respondenten. Den tenkte situasjonen har ulike egenskaper basert på bakgrunnsvariablene r13meme9_event - r13meme9_motbevis. Spurt dersom r13group = 2, 3 eller 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
454 |
10.4% |
0.10353478 |
2 |
Agree |
728 |
16.6% |
0.16602052 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
812 |
18.5% |
0.18517674 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
715 |
16.3% |
0.16305587 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
481 |
11% |
0.10969213 |
6 |
Disagree |
743 |
16.9% |
0.16944128 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
282 |
6.4% |
0.06431015 |
97 |
Not answered |
170 |
3.9% |
0.03876853 |
98 |
Not asked |
2824 |
|
NA |
r13meme8a_1
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Contempt.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Contempt
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
702 |
51.2% |
0.512408759 |
2 |
To a small degree |
410 |
29.9% |
0.299270073 |
3 |
To some degree |
127 |
9.3% |
0.092700730 |
4 |
To a great degree |
16 |
1.2% |
0.011678832 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
1 |
0.1% |
0.000729927 |
97 |
Not answered |
114 |
8.3% |
0.083211679 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8a_2
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Admiration.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
58 |
4.2% |
0.04233577 |
2 |
To a small degree |
310 |
22.6% |
0.22627737 |
3 |
To some degree |
602 |
43.9% |
0.43941606 |
4 |
To a great degree |
250 |
18.2% |
0.18248175 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
43 |
3.1% |
0.03138686 |
97 |
Not answered |
107 |
7.8% |
0.07810219 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8a_3
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Compassion.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
37 |
2.7% |
0.02700730 |
2 |
To a small degree |
162 |
11.8% |
0.11824818 |
3 |
To some degree |
605 |
44.2% |
0.44160584 |
4 |
To a great degree |
387 |
28.2% |
0.28248175 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
81 |
5.9% |
0.05912409 |
97 |
Not answered |
98 |
7.2% |
0.07153285 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8a_4
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Envy.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
514 |
37.5% |
0.375182482 |
2 |
To a small degree |
488 |
35.6% |
0.356204380 |
3 |
To some degree |
233 |
17% |
0.170072993 |
4 |
To a great degree |
21 |
1.5% |
0.015328467 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001459854 |
97 |
Not answered |
112 |
8.2% |
0.081751825 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8a_5
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Anger.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
696 |
50.8% |
0.508029197 |
2 |
To a small degree |
422 |
30.8% |
0.308029197 |
3 |
To some degree |
117 |
8.5% |
0.085401460 |
4 |
To a great degree |
18 |
1.3% |
0.013138686 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002189781 |
97 |
Not answered |
114 |
8.3% |
0.083211679 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8a_6
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Fear.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
810 |
59.1% |
0.591240876 |
2 |
To a small degree |
343 |
25% |
0.250364964 |
3 |
To some degree |
83 |
6.1% |
0.060583942 |
4 |
To a great degree |
12 |
0.9% |
0.008759124 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
5 |
0.4% |
0.003649635 |
97 |
Not answered |
117 |
8.5% |
0.085401460 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8a_7
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about the elderly as a group: Feel sorry for them.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about elderly people To what extent do people have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Feel sorry for them
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
88 |
6.4% |
0.06423358 |
2 |
To a small degree |
276 |
20.1% |
0.20145985 |
3 |
To some degree |
645 |
47.1% |
0.47080292 |
4 |
To a great degree |
200 |
14.6% |
0.14598540 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
50 |
3.6% |
0.03649635 |
97 |
Not answered |
111 |
8.1% |
0.08102190 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8b_1
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Contempt.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Contempt
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
1133 |
82.7% |
0.827007299 |
2 |
To a small degree |
101 |
7.4% |
0.073722628 |
3 |
To some degree |
26 |
1.9% |
0.018978102 |
4 |
To a great degree |
8 |
0.6% |
0.005839416 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004379562 |
97 |
Not answered |
96 |
7% |
0.070072993 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8b_2
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Admiration
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
59 |
4.3% |
0.04306569 |
2 |
To a small degree |
121 |
8.8% |
0.08832117 |
3 |
To some degree |
499 |
36.4% |
0.36423358 |
4 |
To a great degree |
461 |
33.6% |
0.33649635 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
149 |
10.9% |
0.10875912 |
97 |
Not answered |
81 |
5.9% |
0.05912409 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8b_3
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Compassion
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
52 |
3.8% |
0.03795620 |
2 |
To a small degree |
118 |
8.6% |
0.08613139 |
3 |
To some degree |
466 |
34% |
0.34014599 |
4 |
To a great degree |
473 |
34.5% |
0.34525547 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
171 |
12.5% |
0.12481752 |
97 |
Not answered |
90 |
6.6% |
0.06569343 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8b_4
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Envy
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
987 |
72% |
0.720437956 |
2 |
To a small degree |
219 |
16% |
0.159854015 |
3 |
To some degree |
52 |
3.8% |
0.037956204 |
4 |
To a great degree |
15 |
1.1% |
0.010948905 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005109489 |
97 |
Not answered |
90 |
6.6% |
0.065693431 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8b_5
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Anger
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
1068 |
78% |
0.779562044 |
2 |
To a small degree |
147 |
10.7% |
0.107299270 |
3 |
To some degree |
51 |
3.7% |
0.037226277 |
4 |
To a great degree |
9 |
0.7% |
0.006569343 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
6 |
0.4% |
0.004379562 |
97 |
Not answered |
89 |
6.5% |
0.064963504 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8b_6
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Fear
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
1112 |
81.2% |
0.811678832 |
2 |
To a small degree |
119 |
8.7% |
0.086861314 |
3 |
To some degree |
35 |
2.6% |
0.025547445 |
4 |
To a great degree |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008029197 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
3 |
0.2% |
0.002189781 |
97 |
Not answered |
90 |
6.6% |
0.065693431 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme8b_7
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about the elderly as a group: Feel sorry for them
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about elderly people. To what extent do you have the following feelings about the elderly as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Feel sorry for them
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
159 |
11.6% |
0.11605839 |
2 |
To a small degree |
330 |
24.1% |
0.24087591 |
3 |
To some degree |
580 |
42.3% |
0.42335766 |
4 |
To a great degree |
157 |
11.5% |
0.11459854 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
57 |
4.2% |
0.04160584 |
97 |
Not answered |
87 |
6.4% |
0.06350365 |
98 |
Not asked |
5839 |
|
NA |
r13meme7a_1
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Contempt.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Contempt
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
174 |
7.9% |
0.078911565 |
2 |
To a small degree |
681 |
30.9% |
0.308843537 |
3 |
To some degree |
1010 |
45.8% |
0.458049887 |
4 |
To a great degree |
148 |
6.7% |
0.067120181 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
20 |
0.9% |
0.009070295 |
97 |
Not answered |
172 |
7.8% |
0.078004535 |
98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7a_2
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Admiration
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
407 |
18.5% |
0.1845804989 |
2 |
To a small degree |
1025 |
46.5% |
0.4648526077 |
3 |
To some degree |
555 |
25.2% |
0.2517006803 |
4 |
To a great degree |
40 |
1.8% |
0.0181405896 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009070295 |
97 |
Not answered |
176 |
8% |
0.0798185941 |
98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7a_3
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Compassion
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
47 |
2.1% |
0.02131519 |
2 |
To a small degree |
256 |
11.6% |
0.11609977 |
3 |
To some degree |
1181 |
53.6% |
0.53560091 |
4 |
To a great degree |
526 |
23.9% |
0.23854875 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
41 |
1.9% |
0.01859410 |
97 |
Not answered |
154 |
7% |
0.06984127 |
98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7a_4
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Envy
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
1027 |
46.6% |
0.465759637 |
2 |
To a small degree |
596 |
27% |
0.270294785 |
3 |
To some degree |
338 |
15.3% |
0.153287982 |
4 |
To a great degree |
61 |
2.8% |
0.027664399 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
7 |
0.3% |
0.003174603 |
97 |
Not answered |
176 |
8% |
0.079818594 |
98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7a_5
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Anger
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
211 |
9.6% |
0.09569161 |
2 |
To a small degree |
632 |
28.7% |
0.28662132 |
3 |
To some degree |
951 |
43.1% |
0.43129252 |
4 |
To a great degree |
209 |
9.5% |
0.09478458 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
29 |
1.3% |
0.01315193 |
97 |
Not answered |
173 |
7.8% |
0.07845805 |
98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7a_6
Variable label:
|
People feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Fear
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what people generally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do people have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
91 |
4.1% |
0.04126984 |
2 |
To a small degree |
326 |
14.8% |
0.14784580 |
3 |
To some degree |
1055 |
47.8% |
0.47845805 |
4 |
To a great degree |
464 |
21% |
0.21043084 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
100 |
4.5% |
0.04535147 |
97 |
Not answered |
169 |
7.7% |
0.07664399 |
98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7b_1
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Contempt.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Contempt.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
1255 |
56.9% |
0.569160998 |
2 |
To a small degree |
562 |
25.5% |
0.254875283 |
3 |
To some degree |
217 |
9.8% |
0.098412698 |
4 |
To a great degree |
32 |
1.5% |
0.014512472 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
11 |
0.5% |
0.004988662 |
97 |
Not answered |
128 |
5.8% |
0.058049887 |
98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7b_2
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Admiration
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Admiration
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
407 |
18.5% |
0.18458050 |
2 |
To a small degree |
624 |
28.3% |
0.28299320 |
3 |
To some degree |
797 |
36.1% |
0.36145125 |
4 |
To a great degree |
219 |
9.9% |
0.09931973 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
25 |
1.1% |
0.01133787 |
97 |
Not answered |
133 |
6% |
0.06031746 |
98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7b_3
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Compassion
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Compassion
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
68 |
3.1% |
0.03083900 |
2 |
To a small degree |
176 |
8% |
0.07981859 |
3 |
To some degree |
803 |
36.4% |
0.36417234 |
4 |
To a great degree |
837 |
38% |
0.37959184 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
210 |
9.5% |
0.09523810 |
97 |
Not answered |
111 |
5% |
0.05034014 |
98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7b_4
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Envy
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Envy
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
1786 |
81% |
0.8099773243 |
2 |
To a small degree |
230 |
10.4% |
0.1043083900 |
3 |
To some degree |
42 |
1.9% |
0.0190476190 |
4 |
To a great degree |
15 |
0.7% |
0.0068027211 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
2 |
0.1% |
0.0009070295 |
97 |
Not answered |
130 |
5.9% |
0.0589569161 |
98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7b_5
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Anger
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Anger
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
1372 |
62.2% |
0.622222222 |
2 |
To a small degree |
478 |
21.7% |
0.216780045 |
3 |
To some degree |
171 |
7.8% |
0.077551020 |
4 |
To a great degree |
38 |
1.7% |
0.017233560 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
16 |
0.7% |
0.007256236 |
97 |
Not answered |
130 |
5.9% |
0.058956916 |
98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme7b_6
Variable label:
|
You feel the following about asylum seekers as a group: Fear
|
Pre-question text:
|
Next up are a few questions about what you personally feel about asylum seekers. To what extent do you have the following feelings about asylum seekers as a group?
|
Literal question:
|
Fear
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 || 3 and no response on r12dv12/r6dv12ba and r6dv12bB]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
717 |
32.5% |
0.32517007 |
2 |
To a small degree |
807 |
36.6% |
0.36598639 |
3 |
To some degree |
417 |
18.9% |
0.18911565 |
4 |
To a great degree |
101 |
4.6% |
0.04580499 |
5 |
To a very great degree |
36 |
1.6% |
0.01632653 |
97 |
Not answered |
127 |
5.8% |
0.05759637 |
98 |
Not asked |
5004 |
|
NA |
r13meme11_1
Variable label:
|
How good or poor description of you: Important to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for me personally to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if no response on r13meme5 and if the respondent was asked r13meme8 or r13meme7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
571 |
22.2% |
0.22191994 |
2 |
Good |
941 |
36.6% |
0.36572095 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
440 |
17.1% |
0.17100661 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
395 |
15.4% |
0.15351729 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
89 |
3.5% |
0.03458997 |
6 |
Bad |
54 |
2.1% |
0.02098717 |
7 |
Very bad |
35 |
1.4% |
0.01360280 |
97 |
Not answered |
48 |
1.9% |
0.01865527 |
98 |
Not asked |
4636 |
|
NA |
r13meme11_2
Variable label:
|
How good or poor description of you: Do not want to appear racist, even to myself.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I do not want to appear to be racist, not even to myself.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if no response on r13meme5 and if the respondent was asked r13meme8 or r13meme7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
744 |
28.9% |
0.28915663 |
2 |
Good |
849 |
33% |
0.32996502 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
309 |
12% |
0.12009328 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
394 |
15.3% |
0.15312864 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
108 |
4.2% |
0.04197435 |
6 |
Bad |
66 |
2.6% |
0.02565099 |
7 |
Very bad |
47 |
1.8% |
0.01826661 |
97 |
Not answered |
56 |
2.2% |
0.02176448 |
98 |
Not asked |
4636 |
|
NA |
r13meme11_3
Variable label:
|
How good or poor description of you: Feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I feel guilty if I think negatively about immigrants.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if no response on r13meme5 and if the respondent was asked r13meme8 or r13meme7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
181 |
7% |
0.07034590 |
2 |
Good |
442 |
17.2% |
0.17178391 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
421 |
16.4% |
0.16362223 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
727 |
28.3% |
0.28254955 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
237 |
9.2% |
0.09211038 |
6 |
Bad |
317 |
12.3% |
0.12320249 |
7 |
Very bad |
185 |
7.2% |
0.07190051 |
97 |
Not answered |
63 |
2.4% |
0.02448504 |
98 |
Not asked |
4636 |
|
NA |
r13meme11_4
Variable label:
|
How good or poor description of you: Try to be unprejudiced about immigrants due to my own convictions.
|
Pre-question text:
|
How well or poorly would you say that the following descriptions apply to you:
|
Literal question:
|
I try to be unprejudiced in regard to immigrants due to my own convictions.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if no response on r13meme5 and if the respondent was asked r13meme8 or r13meme7]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
519 |
20.2% |
0.20171007 |
2 |
Good |
985 |
38.3% |
0.38282161 |
3 |
Somewhat good |
433 |
16.8% |
0.16828605 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
398 |
15.5% |
0.15468325 |
5 |
Somewhat bad |
86 |
3.3% |
0.03342402 |
6 |
Bad |
58 |
2.3% |
0.02254178 |
7 |
Very bad |
36 |
1.4% |
0.01399145 |
97 |
Not answered |
58 |
2.3% |
0.02254178 |
98 |
Not asked |
4636 |
|
NA |
ocr13mat_ran
Variable label:
|
[If value on r7ran24 it is used. If not, a random value is selected. ]
|
Technical description:
|
[If value on r7ran24 it is used. If not, a random value is selected. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:6980] [Invalid:229] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
1173 |
16.8% |
0.1680516 |
2 |
2 |
1197 |
17.1% |
0.1714900 |
3 |
3 |
1124 |
16.1% |
0.1610315 |
4 |
4 |
1192 |
17.1% |
0.1707736 |
5 |
5 |
1167 |
16.7% |
0.1671920 |
6 |
6 |
1127 |
16.1% |
0.1614613 |
Sysmiss |
|
229 |
|
NA |
ocr13mat_ran_1
Variable label:
|
[If value on r7ran24_1 it is used. If not, a random value is selected if ocr13mat_ran = 1]
|
Technical description:
|
[If value on r7ran24_1 it is used. If not, a random value is selected if ocr13mat_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1173] [Invalid:6036] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 |
389 |
33.2% |
0.3316283 |
2 |
2 |
394 |
33.6% |
0.3358909 |
3 |
3 |
390 |
33.2% |
0.3324808 |
Sysmiss |
|
6036 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc1
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of three statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution.
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 |
59 |
15.2% |
0.151670951 |
2 |
1 |
239 |
61.4% |
0.614395887 |
3 |
2 |
85 |
21.9% |
0.218508997 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
1% |
0.010282776 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.5% |
0.005141388 |
98 |
Not asked |
6820 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc1a
Variable label:
|
Norway should let people from Muslim countries come and live here.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think Norway should allow people from Muslim countries to come and live here?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
allow to come and live here |
249 |
64% |
0.64010283 |
2 |
do not allow to come and live here |
121 |
31.1% |
0.31105398 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
4.9% |
0.04884319 |
98 |
Not asked |
6820 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc2
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of three statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution.
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 |
183 |
15.3% |
0.152882206 |
2 |
1 |
733 |
61.2% |
0.612364244 |
3 |
2 |
266 |
22.2% |
0.222222222 |
4 |
3 |
8 |
0.7% |
0.006683375 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.6% |
0.005847953 |
98 |
Not asked |
6012 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc2a
Variable label:
|
Norway should let people from Easter European countries come and live here.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think Norway should allow people from Eastern European countries to come and live here?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
allow to come and live here |
746 |
62.3% |
0.62322473 |
2 |
do not allow to come and live here |
400 |
33.4% |
0.33416876 |
97 |
Not answered |
51 |
4.3% |
0.04260652 |
98 |
Not asked |
6012 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc3
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of three statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution.
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 |
67 |
17% |
0.170050761 |
2 |
1 |
242 |
61.4% |
0.614213198 |
3 |
2 |
77 |
19.5% |
0.195431472 |
4 |
3 |
6 |
1.5% |
0.015228426 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.5% |
0.005076142 |
98 |
Not asked |
6815 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc3a
Variable label:
|
Norway should let immigrants from Muslim countries come and live here.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think Norway should allow immigrants from Muslim countries to come and live here?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
allow to come and live here |
261 |
66.2% |
0.66243655 |
2 |
do not allow to come and live here |
114 |
28.9% |
0.28934010 |
97 |
Not answered |
19 |
4.8% |
0.04822335 |
98 |
Not asked |
6815 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc4
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of three statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution.
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following three statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 |
75 |
19.2% |
0.192307692 |
2 |
1 |
229 |
58.7% |
0.587179487 |
3 |
2 |
82 |
21% |
0.210256410 |
4 |
3 |
3 |
0.8% |
0.007692308 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.3% |
0.002564103 |
98 |
Not asked |
6819 |
|
NA |
ocr13matc4a
Variable label:
|
Norway should let refugees from muslim countries come and live here.
|
Literal question:
|
Do you think Norway should allow refugees from Muslim countries to come and live here?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran_1 = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
allow to come and live here |
262 |
67.2% |
0.67179487 |
2 |
do not allow to come and live here |
112 |
28.7% |
0.28717949 |
97 |
Not answered |
16 |
4.1% |
0.04102564 |
98 |
Not asked |
6819 |
|
NA |
ocr13matt1
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of four statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution, people from Muslim countries.
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment Norway should allow people from Muslim countries to come and live here
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 |
100 |
8.9% |
0.088967972 |
2 |
1 |
377 |
33.5% |
0.335409253 |
3 |
2 |
530 |
47.2% |
0.471530249 |
4 |
3 |
97 |
8.6% |
0.086298932 |
5 |
4 |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008896797 |
97 |
Not answered |
10 |
0.9% |
0.008896797 |
98 |
Not asked |
6085 |
|
NA |
ocr13matt2
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of four statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution, people from Eastern Europe.
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment Norway should allow people from Eastern European countries to come and live here
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 |
108 |
9.1% |
0.090604027 |
2 |
1 |
498 |
41.8% |
0.417785235 |
3 |
2 |
505 |
42.4% |
0.423657718 |
4 |
3 |
63 |
5.3% |
0.052852349 |
5 |
4 |
12 |
1% |
0.010067114 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005033557 |
98 |
Not asked |
6017 |
|
NA |
ocr13matt3
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of four statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution, immigrants from Muslim countries.
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment Norway should allow immigrants from Muslim countries to come and live here
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 |
108 |
9.3% |
0.092544987 |
2 |
1 |
429 |
36.8% |
0.367609254 |
3 |
2 |
527 |
45.2% |
0.451585261 |
4 |
3 |
92 |
7.9% |
0.078834619 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
0.5% |
0.005141388 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
0.4% |
0.004284490 |
98 |
Not asked |
6042 |
|
NA |
ocr13matt4
Variable label:
|
Agree with how many of four statements: Assistance to poor, petrol/diesel tax, pollution, refugees from Muslim countries.
|
Literal question:
|
Of the following four statements, how many of them do you agree with? We don’t want to know which statements, just how many.
Norway should increase in assistance to the poor Norway should decrease the tax on petrol and diesel Norway should allow large corporations to pollute the environment Norway should allow refugees from Muslim countries to come and live here
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if OCR13Mat_ran = 6]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 |
72 |
6.4% |
0.063886424 |
2 |
1 |
364 |
32.3% |
0.322981366 |
3 |
2 |
578 |
51.3% |
0.512866016 |
4 |
3 |
92 |
8.2% |
0.081632653 |
5 |
4 |
12 |
1.1% |
0.010647737 |
97 |
Not answered |
9 |
0.8% |
0.007985803 |
98 |
Not asked |
6082 |
|
NA |
r13polkom1
Variable label:
|
Open: Which values are important for Norwegian society and identity [Data withheld for the sake of anonymity]
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics and in the news there has been a lot of writing and discussion about Norwegian values. We are interested in your opinions on what Norwegian values are.
|
Literal question:
|
What values do you think are most important for Norwegian society and identity?
|
Post-question:
|
Type key words.
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 4]
[Text data will not be distributed due to privacy considerations. However, data can be made available for researchers after contacting The Norwegian Citizen Panel at University of Bergen.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:character] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:-]
|
r13polkom14_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects between r13polkom14a-c, and then r13polkom14a-c. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects between r13polkom14a-c, and then r13polkom14a-c. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1321] [Invalid:5888] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
satisfied |
442 |
33.5% |
0.334595 |
2 |
pleased |
440 |
33.3% |
0.333081 |
3 |
enthusiastic |
439 |
33.2% |
0.332324 |
Sysmiss |
|
5888 |
|
NA |
r13polkom14a
Variable label:
|
The way democracy works in Norway: How satisfied.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how satisfied are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
69 |
15.6% |
0.1561086 |
2 |
Satisfied |
261 |
59% |
0.5904977 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
75 |
17% |
0.1696833 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
30 |
6.8% |
0.0678733 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
7 |
1.6% |
0.0158371 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.0000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
6767 |
|
NA |
r13polkom14b
Variable label:
|
The way democracy works in Norway: How pleased.
|
Literal question:
|
All things considered, how pleased are you with the way democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very pleased |
62 |
14.1% |
0.140909091 |
2 |
Pleased |
227 |
51.6% |
0.515909091 |
3 |
Somewhat pleased |
109 |
24.8% |
0.247727273 |
4 |
Not very pleased |
35 |
8% |
0.079545455 |
5 |
Not pleased at all |
6 |
1.4% |
0.013636364 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002272727 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r13polkom14c
Variable label:
|
The way democracy works in Norway: How enthusiastic.
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how enthusiastic are you about the way democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very enthusiastic |
30 |
6.8% |
0.068337130 |
2 |
Enthusiastic |
204 |
46.5% |
0.464692483 |
3 |
Somewhat enthusiastic |
149 |
33.9% |
0.339407745 |
4 |
Not very enthusiastic |
38 |
8.7% |
0.086560364 |
5 |
Not at all enthusiastic |
17 |
3.9% |
0.038724374 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002277904 |
98 |
Not asked |
6770 |
|
NA |
r13polkom15a
Variable label:
|
Your current personal financial situation: How satisfied.
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with your current personal financial situation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
91 |
20.6% |
0.205882353 |
2 |
Satisfied |
228 |
51.6% |
0.515837104 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
88 |
19.9% |
0.199095023 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
28 |
6.3% |
0.063348416 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
6 |
1.4% |
0.013574661 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002262443 |
98 |
Not asked |
6767 |
|
NA |
r13polkom15b
Variable label:
|
Your current personal financial situation: How pleased.
|
Literal question:
|
How pleased are you with your current personal financial situation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very pleased |
73 |
16.6% |
0.165909091 |
2 |
Pleased |
242 |
55% |
0.550000000 |
3 |
Somewhat pleased |
87 |
19.8% |
0.197727273 |
4 |
Not very pleased |
20 |
4.5% |
0.045454545 |
5 |
Not pleased at all |
16 |
3.6% |
0.036363636 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.5% |
0.004545455 |
98 |
Not asked |
6769 |
|
NA |
r13polkom15c
Variable label:
|
Your current personal financial situation: How enthusiastic.
|
Literal question:
|
How enthusiastic are you about your current personal financial situation?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom14_ran = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very enthusiastic |
30 |
6.8% |
0.068337130 |
2 |
Enthusiastic |
148 |
33.7% |
0.337129841 |
3 |
Somewhat enthusiastic |
186 |
42.4% |
0.423690205 |
4 |
Not very enthusiastic |
58 |
13.2% |
0.132118451 |
5 |
Not at all enthusiastic |
16 |
3.6% |
0.036446469 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002277904 |
98 |
Not asked |
6770 |
|
NA |
r13polkom16_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects between r13polkom16a-c. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects between r13polkom16a-c. Randomizes if r13group = 5]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1321] [Invalid:5888] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
fortunate |
469 |
35.5% |
0.3550341 |
2 |
happy |
432 |
32.7% |
0.3270250 |
3 |
privileged |
420 |
31.8% |
0.3179410 |
Sysmiss |
|
5888 |
|
NA |
r13polkom16a
Variable label:
|
How fortunate would you say you are.
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how fortunate would you say you are?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom16_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very unfortunate |
5 |
1.1% |
0.010660981 |
2 |
Unfortunate |
3 |
0.6% |
0.006396588 |
3 |
Somewhat unfortunate |
20 |
4.3% |
0.042643923 |
4 |
Neither fortunate nor unfortunate |
38 |
8.1% |
0.081023454 |
5 |
Somewhat fortunate |
73 |
15.6% |
0.155650320 |
6 |
Fortunate |
196 |
41.8% |
0.417910448 |
7 |
Very fortunate |
133 |
28.4% |
0.283582090 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002132196 |
98 |
Not asked |
6740 |
|
NA |
r13polkom16b
Variable label:
|
How happy would you say you are.
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how happy would you say you are?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom16_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very unhappy |
6 |
1.4% |
0.013888889 |
2 |
Unhappy |
6 |
1.4% |
0.013888889 |
3 |
Somewhat unhappy |
14 |
3.2% |
0.032407407 |
4 |
Neither happy nor unhappy |
43 |
10% |
0.099537037 |
5 |
Somewhat happy |
101 |
23.4% |
0.233796296 |
6 |
Happy |
201 |
46.5% |
0.465277778 |
7 |
Very happy |
58 |
13.4% |
0.134259259 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.7% |
0.006944444 |
98 |
Not asked |
6777 |
|
NA |
r13polkom16c
Variable label:
|
How privileged would you say you are.
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how privileged would you say you are?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13polkom16_ran = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very unprivileged |
10 |
2.4% |
0.023809524 |
2 |
Unprivileged |
8 |
1.9% |
0.019047619 |
3 |
Somewhat unprivileged |
17 |
4% |
0.040476190 |
4 |
Neither privileged or unprivileged |
39 |
9.3% |
0.092857143 |
5 |
Somewhat privileged |
88 |
21% |
0.209523810 |
6 |
Privileged |
165 |
39.3% |
0.392857143 |
7 |
Very privileged |
92 |
21.9% |
0.219047619 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.2% |
0.002380952 |
98 |
Not asked |
6789 |
|
NA |
r13pad10_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects between r13pad10a-d. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects between r13pad10a-d. Randomizes if r13group = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1422] [Invalid:5787] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Respondent gets R13PAD10A |
357 |
25.1% |
0.2510549 |
2 |
Respondent gets R13PAD10B |
369 |
25.9% |
0.2594937 |
3 |
Respondent gets R13PAD10C |
340 |
23.9% |
0.2390999 |
4 |
Respondent gets R13PAD10D |
356 |
25% |
0.2503516 |
Sysmiss |
|
5787 |
|
NA |
r13pad10a_1
Variable label:
|
Give amount of NOK if you are decision maker.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be the recipient.
If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker, you will receive NOK 2,000 KR and must choose how much you will give to the recipient. What you give, the recipient will receive. You keep the rest.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you choose? I choose to give NOK:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:349] [Invalid:6860] [Range:0-2000]
|
r13pad10b
Variable label:
|
Give money or refrain if you are decision maker.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be the recipient.
If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker, you will receive NOK 2,000 and must choose if you will give to the recipient, and if so how much you will give. What you give, the recipient will receive. You keep the rest. You can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case, you keep your NOK 2,000 while the recipient gets nothing.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you choose?
I choose to:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Refrain from making a choice. |
80 |
21.7% |
0.21680217 |
2 |
Give NOK: |
284 |
77% |
0.76964770 |
97 |
Not answered |
5 |
1.4% |
0.01355014 |
98 |
Not asked |
6840 |
|
NA |
r13pad10b_2_other
Variable label:
|
Give amount of NOK if you are decision maker, can refrain
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be the recipient.
If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker, you will receive NOK 2,000 and must choose if you will give to the recipient, and if so how much you will give. What you give, the recipient will receive. You keep the rest. You can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case, you keep your NOK 2,000 while the recipient gets nothing.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you choose?
I choose to: Give NOK…
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:284] [Invalid:6925] [Range:0-2000]
|
r13pad10c_1
Variable label:
|
Take amount of NOK if you are decision maker.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be the recipient.
If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker, you must choose how much you will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received. What you do not take is kept by the recipient. What you take, you get.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you choose? I choose to take NOK:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:322] [Invalid:6887] [Range:0-2000]
|
r13pad10d
Variable label:
|
Take money or refrain if you are decision maker.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be the recipient.
If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker , you must choose if you will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much you will take. What you do not take is kept by the recipient. What you take, you get. You can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case you get nothing, while the receiver keeps their NOK 2,000.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you choose? I choose to:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Refrain from making a choice. |
166 |
46.6% |
0.46629213 |
2 |
Take NOK: |
183 |
51.4% |
0.51404494 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
2% |
0.01966292 |
98 |
Not asked |
6853 |
|
NA |
r13pad10d_2_other
Variable label:
|
Take amount of NOK if you are decision maker, can refrain.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One participant will be drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other person who is drawn out will be the recipient.
If you are randomly selected to be a decision maker , you must choose if you will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much you will take. What you do not take is kept by the recipient. What you take, you get. You can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case you get nothing, while the receiver keeps their NOK 2,000.
|
Literal question:
|
What do you choose?
I choose to: Take NOK …
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 5 and r13pad10_ran = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:180] [Invalid:7029] [Range:0-2000]
|
r13pad9_ran
Variable label:
|
[Randomly selects between r13pad9a-d. Randomizes if r13group = 2]
|
Technical description:
|
[Randomly selects between r13pad9a-d. Randomizes if r13group = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:1452] [Invalid:5757] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Respondent gets R13PAD9A |
360 |
24.8% |
0.2479339 |
2 |
Respondent gets R13PAD9B |
366 |
25.2% |
0.2520661 |
3 |
Respondent gets R13PAD9C |
374 |
25.8% |
0.2575758 |
4 |
Respondent gets R13PAD9D |
352 |
24.2% |
0.2424242 |
Sysmiss |
|
5757 |
|
NA |
r13pad9a_1
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 0
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
|
Literal question:
|
0 NOK
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
231 |
64.2% |
0.64166667 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
37 |
10.3% |
0.10277778 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
11 |
3.1% |
0.03055556 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
12 |
3.3% |
0.03333333 |
97 |
Not answered |
69 |
19.2% |
0.19166667 |
98 |
Not asked |
6849 |
|
NA |
r13pad9a_2
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 500
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
|
Literal question:
|
500 NOK
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
75 |
20.8% |
0.20833333 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
125 |
34.7% |
0.34722222 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
74 |
20.6% |
0.20555556 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
17 |
4.7% |
0.04722222 |
97 |
Not answered |
69 |
19.2% |
0.19166667 |
98 |
Not asked |
6849 |
|
NA |
r13pad9a_3
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 1000
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
|
Literal question:
|
1000 NOK
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
16 |
4.4% |
0.04444444 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
15 |
4.2% |
0.04166667 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
82 |
22.8% |
0.22777778 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
204 |
56.7% |
0.56666667 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
11.9% |
0.11944444 |
98 |
Not asked |
6849 |
|
NA |
r13pad9a_4
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 1500
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
|
Literal question:
|
1500 NOK
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
30 |
8.3% |
0.08333333 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
44 |
12.2% |
0.12222222 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
115 |
31.9% |
0.31944444 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
100 |
27.8% |
0.27777778 |
97 |
Not answered |
71 |
19.7% |
0.19722222 |
98 |
Not asked |
6849 |
|
NA |
r13pad9a_5
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 2000
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose how much he or she will give to the recipient. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to give to the recipient…
|
Literal question:
|
2000 NOK
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 1]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
55 |
15.3% |
0.1527778 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
45 |
12.5% |
0.1250000 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
65 |
18.1% |
0.1805556 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
138 |
38.3% |
0.3833333 |
97 |
Not answered |
57 |
15.8% |
0.1583333 |
98 |
Not asked |
6849 |
|
NA |
r13pad9b_1
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to refrain from giving.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets nothing.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
Literal question:
|
Refrain from taking a choice
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
107 |
29.2% |
0.29234973 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
76 |
20.8% |
0.20765027 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
57 |
15.6% |
0.15573770 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
23 |
6.3% |
0.06284153 |
97 |
Not answered |
103 |
28.1% |
0.28142077 |
98 |
Not asked |
6843 |
|
NA |
r13pad9b_2
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 0, can refrain.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets nothing.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
Literal question:
|
Give to the recipient: NOK 0
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
214 |
58.5% |
0.58469945 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
55 |
15% |
0.15027322 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
23 |
6.3% |
0.06284153 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
21 |
5.7% |
0.05737705 |
97 |
Not answered |
53 |
14.5% |
0.14480874 |
98 |
Not asked |
6843 |
|
NA |
r13pad9b_3
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 500, can refrain.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets nothing.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
Literal question:
|
Give to the recipient: NOK 500
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
60 |
16.4% |
0.16393443 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
155 |
42.3% |
0.42349727 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
72 |
19.7% |
0.19672131 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
27 |
7.4% |
0.07377049 |
97 |
Not answered |
52 |
14.2% |
0.14207650 |
98 |
Not asked |
6843 |
|
NA |
r13pad9b_4
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 1000, can refrain.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets nothing.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
Literal question:
|
Give to the recipient: NOK 1,000
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
11 |
3% |
0.03005464 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
26 |
7.1% |
0.07103825 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
81 |
22.1% |
0.22131148 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
216 |
59% |
0.59016393 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
8.7% |
0.08743169 |
98 |
Not asked |
6843 |
|
NA |
r13pad9b_5
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 1500, can refrain.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets nothing.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
Literal question:
|
Give to the recipient: NOK 1,500
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
22 |
6% |
0.06010929 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
64 |
17.5% |
0.17486339 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
120 |
32.8% |
0.32786885 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
105 |
28.7% |
0.28688525 |
97 |
Not answered |
55 |
15% |
0.15027322 |
98 |
Not asked |
6843 |
|
NA |
r13pad9b_6
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to give NOK: 2000, can refrain.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker gets NOK 2,000 and must choose if he or she will give to the beneficiary and if so how much. What the decision maker gives, the recipient will receive.
The decision maker can choose between giving the recipient nothing (NOK 0), NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker keeps their NOK 2,000, while the recipient gets nothing.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
Literal question:
|
Give to the recipient: NOK 2,000
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 2]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
46 |
12.6% |
0.1256831 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
64 |
17.5% |
0.1748634 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
82 |
22.4% |
0.2240437 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
119 |
32.5% |
0.3251366 |
97 |
Not answered |
55 |
15% |
0.1502732 |
98 |
Not asked |
6843 |
|
NA |
r13pad9c_1
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 0
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 0
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
41 |
11% |
0.10962567 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
19 |
5.1% |
0.05080214 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
40 |
10.7% |
0.10695187 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
237 |
63.4% |
0.63368984 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
9.9% |
0.09893048 |
98 |
Not asked |
6835 |
|
NA |
r13pad9c_2
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 500
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 500
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
60 |
16% |
0.1604278 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
48 |
12.8% |
0.1283422 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
138 |
36.9% |
0.3689840 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
84 |
22.5% |
0.2245989 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
11.8% |
0.1176471 |
98 |
Not asked |
6835 |
|
NA |
r13pad9c_3
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 1000
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 1,000
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
86 |
23% |
0.2299465 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
58 |
15.5% |
0.1550802 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
95 |
25.4% |
0.2540107 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
103 |
27.5% |
0.2754011 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
8.6% |
0.0855615 |
98 |
Not asked |
6835 |
|
NA |
r13pad9c_4
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 1500
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 1,500
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
206 |
55.1% |
0.55080214 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
90 |
24.1% |
0.24064171 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
19 |
5.1% |
0.05080214 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
8 |
2.1% |
0.02139037 |
97 |
Not answered |
51 |
13.6% |
0.13636364 |
98 |
Not asked |
6835 |
|
NA |
r13pad9c_5
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 2000
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose how much he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000).
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think that each of the five choices is? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the five choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to take from the recipient…
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 2,000
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 3]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
287 |
76.7% |
0.76737968 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
18 |
4.8% |
0.04812834 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
8 |
2.1% |
0.02139037 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
11 |
2.9% |
0.02941176 |
97 |
Not answered |
50 |
13.4% |
0.13368984 |
98 |
Not asked |
6835 |
|
NA |
r13pad9d_1
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to refrain from taking.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their NOK 2,000.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
Literal question:
|
Refrain from taking a choice
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
38 |
10.8% |
0.1079545 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
43 |
12.2% |
0.1221591 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
66 |
18.8% |
0.1875000 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
106 |
30.1% |
0.3011364 |
97 |
Not answered |
99 |
28.1% |
0.2812500 |
98 |
Not asked |
6857 |
|
NA |
r13pad9d_2
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 0, can refrain.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their NOK 2,000.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out. The decision maker chooses to…
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 0
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
38 |
10.8% |
0.10795455 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
18 |
5.1% |
0.05113636 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
38 |
10.8% |
0.10795455 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
195 |
55.4% |
0.55397727 |
97 |
Not answered |
63 |
17.9% |
0.17897727 |
98 |
Not asked |
6857 |
|
NA |
r13pad9d_3
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 500, can refrain.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their NOK 2,000.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 500
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
59 |
16.8% |
0.1676136 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
39 |
11.1% |
0.1107955 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
114 |
32.4% |
0.3238636 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
56 |
15.9% |
0.1590909 |
97 |
Not answered |
84 |
23.9% |
0.2386364 |
98 |
Not asked |
6857 |
|
NA |
r13pad9d_4
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 1000, can refrain.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their NOK 2,000.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 1000
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
67 |
19% |
0.1903409 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
41 |
11.6% |
0.1164773 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
81 |
23% |
0.2301136 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
88 |
25% |
0.2500000 |
97 |
Not answered |
75 |
21.3% |
0.2130682 |
98 |
Not asked |
6857 |
|
NA |
r13pad9d_5
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 1500, can refrain.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their NOK 2,000.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 1500
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
157 |
44.6% |
0.44602273 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
82 |
23.3% |
0.23295455 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
16 |
4.5% |
0.04545455 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
8 |
2.3% |
0.02272727 |
97 |
Not answered |
89 |
25.3% |
0.25284091 |
98 |
Not asked |
6857 |
|
NA |
r13pad9d_6
Variable label:
|
How socially acceptable to take NOK: 2000, can refrain.
|
Pre-question text:
|
Two participants in the Norwegian Citizen Panel will be drawn out to participate in an experiment. One of them is drawn randomly to be the decision-maker while the other is drawn randomly to be the recipient. The decision maker must choose if he or she will take from the NOK 2,000 the recipient has received, and if so how much. What the decision maker does not take, is kept by the recipient.
The decision maker can choose between taking nothing (NOK 0) from the recipient, NOK 500, NOK 1,000, NOK 1,500 or everything (NOK 2,000). The decision maker can also choose to refrain from making a choice. In this case the decision maker gets nothing, while the recipient keeps their NOK 2,000.
The table below shows the different choices the decision maker can make. How socially acceptable do you think each of the six choices are? In this context “socially acceptable” means “complying with moral or appropriate social behaviour”. If your evaluation is the same as the majority of the other participants in the experiment for one of the six choices, you will be entered into a draw to receive NOK 500. Four people will be drawn out.
The decision maker chooses to…
|
Literal question:
|
NOK 2000
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r13group = 2 and r13pad9_ran = 4]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-4]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very socially unacceptable |
233 |
66.2% |
0.66193182 |
2 |
Somewhat socially unacceptable |
18 |
5.1% |
0.05113636 |
3 |
Somewhat socially acceptable |
12 |
3.4% |
0.03409091 |
4 |
Very socially acceptable |
8 |
2.3% |
0.02272727 |
97 |
Not answered |
81 |
23% |
0.23011364 |
98 |
Not asked |
6857 |
|
NA |
r13P1
Variable label:
|
Gender
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Male |
3588 |
49.8% |
0.4977112 |
2 |
Female |
3621 |
50.2% |
0.5022888 |
r13P2
Variable label:
|
Region
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Oslo/Akershus |
2040 |
28.3% |
0.28297961 |
2 |
Eastern Norway |
1654 |
22.9% |
0.22943543 |
3 |
Southern Norway |
366 |
5.1% |
0.05076987 |
4 |
Western Norway |
1944 |
27% |
0.26966292 |
5 |
Trøndelag |
638 |
8.9% |
0.08850049 |
6 |
Northern Norway |
567 |
7.9% |
0.07865169 |
r13P3
Variable label:
|
County
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-18]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Akershus |
909 |
12.6% |
0.12609238 |
2 |
Oslo |
1131 |
15.7% |
0.15688722 |
3 |
Østfold |
347 |
4.8% |
0.04813428 |
4 |
Vestfold |
322 |
4.5% |
0.04466639 |
5 |
Hedmark |
222 |
3.1% |
0.03079484 |
6 |
Oppland |
208 |
2.9% |
0.02885282 |
7 |
Buskerud |
364 |
5% |
0.05049244 |
8 |
Telemark |
191 |
2.6% |
0.02649466 |
9 |
Vest-Agder |
228 |
3.2% |
0.03162713 |
10 |
Aust-Agder |
138 |
1.9% |
0.01914274 |
11 |
Rogaland |
642 |
8.9% |
0.08905535 |
12 |
Hordaland |
869 |
12.1% |
0.12054376 |
13 |
Sogn og Fjordane |
135 |
1.9% |
0.01872659 |
14 |
Møre og Romsdal |
298 |
4.1% |
0.04133722 |
15 |
Trøndelag |
638 |
8.9% |
0.08850049 |
16 |
Nordland |
277 |
3.8% |
0.03842419 |
17 |
Troms |
212 |
2.9% |
0.02940768 |
18 |
Finmark |
78 |
1.1% |
0.01081981 |
r13P4_1
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No education/elementary school |
526 |
7.3% |
0.07296435 |
2 |
Upper secondary education |
2019 |
28% |
0.28006658 |
3 |
University/University college |
4392 |
60.9% |
0.60923845 |
97 |
Not answered |
272 |
3.8% |
0.03773061 |
r13P4_2
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
25 |
0.3% |
0.003467887 |
2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
501 |
6.9% |
0.069496463 |
3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
819 |
11.4% |
0.113607990 |
4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
854 |
11.8% |
0.118463032 |
5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
346 |
4.8% |
0.047995561 |
6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
692 |
9.6% |
0.095991122 |
7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
1491 |
20.7% |
0.206824802 |
8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
533 |
7.4% |
0.073935359 |
9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
485 |
6.7% |
0.067277015 |
10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economic |
1032 |
14.3% |
0.143154390 |
11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
159 |
2.2% |
0.022055764 |
12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
185 |
2.6% |
0.025662366 |
97 |
Not answered |
87 |
1.2% |
0.012068248 |
r13P5_1
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1939 or earlier |
219 |
3% |
0.03037869 |
2 |
1940-1949 |
1261 |
17.5% |
0.17492024 |
3 |
1950-1959 |
1726 |
23.9% |
0.23942294 |
4 |
1960-1969 |
1539 |
21.3% |
0.21348315 |
5 |
1970-1979 |
1096 |
15.2% |
0.15203218 |
6 |
1980-1989 |
803 |
11.1% |
0.11138854 |
7 |
1990 or later |
565 |
7.8% |
0.07837425 |
r13P5_2
Variable label:
|
Year of birth
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-3]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1959 or earlier |
3206 |
44.5% |
0.44472188 |
2 |
1960-1989 |
3438 |
47.7% |
0.47690387 |
3 |
1990 or later |
565 |
7.8% |
0.07837425 |
r13Weight1
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, and P1. See documentation report.
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-4]
|
r13Weight2
Variable label:
|
Weight based on variables P3, P5_2, P4, and P1. See documentation report
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-31]
|
w01_k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1705 |
94.4% |
0.94407530 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
69 |
3.8% |
0.03820598 |
97 |
No answer |
32 |
1.8% |
0.01771872 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5403 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1859 |
93.8% |
0.93841494 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country |
102 |
5.1% |
0.05148915 |
97 |
No answer |
20 |
1% |
0.01009591 |
98 |
Not asked |
5228 |
|
NA |
r4k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
31 |
86.1% |
0.86111111 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
3 |
8.3% |
0.08333333 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
5.6% |
0.05555556 |
98 |
Not asked |
7173 |
|
NA |
r5k28
Variable label:
|
Nationality
|
Literal question:
|
Nationality: Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A Norwegian citizen |
14 |
87.5% |
0.8750 |
2 |
A citizen of another country. Please state which |
1 |
6.2% |
0.0625 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
6.2% |
0.0625 |
98 |
Not asked |
7193 |
|
NA |
r8k28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Pre-question text:
|
Citizenship.
|
Literal question:
|
Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert=8. Demographical background questions asked only to newly recruited respondents. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1898 |
93.7% |
0.93682132 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
104 |
5.1% |
0.05133268 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
1.2% |
0.01184600 |
98 |
Not asked |
5183 |
|
NA |
r11bk28
Variable label:
|
Citizenship
|
Literal question:
|
Citizenship. Are you:
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
1224 |
93.3% |
0.932926829 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
82 |
6.2% |
0.062500000 |
97 |
Not answered |
6 |
0.5% |
0.004573171 |
98 |
Not asked |
5897 |
|
NA |
c11bk28
Variable label:
|
Personal placement on political axis left-right [Most recent available data from w01_k28, w03_r3k28, r4k28, r5k28, r8k28, r11bk28]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Norwegian citizen |
6731 |
94.3% |
0.943245516 |
2 |
Citizen of a different country. Please indicate which country: |
361 |
5.1% |
0.050588565 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
0.6% |
0.006165919 |
98 |
Not asked |
73 |
|
NA |
w01_k29
Variable label:
|
Parents immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1631 |
90.3% |
0.903100775 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
79 |
4.4% |
0.043743079 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
10 |
0.6% |
0.005537099 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
30 |
1.7% |
0.016611296 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
24 |
1.3% |
0.013289037 |
97 |
No answer |
32 |
1.8% |
0.017718715 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
5403 |
|
NA |
w03_r3k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Only asked new respondents, and old respondents where information was missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
1794 |
90.5% |
0.905146317 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway myself |
100 |
5% |
0.050454087 |
3 |
Both of my parents immigrated to Norway, but I am born in Norway |
10 |
0.5% |
0.005045409 |
4 |
Mother immigrated to Norway, but I and my father have not immigrated |
32 |
1.6% |
0.016145308 |
5 |
Father immigrated to Norway, but I and my mother have not immigrated |
25 |
1.3% |
0.012613522 |
97 |
No answer |
21 |
1.1% |
0.010595358 |
98 |
Not asked |
5227 |
|
NA |
r4k29
Variable label:
|
Mother or father immigrated to Norway
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents where information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
30 |
78.9% |
0.78947368 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
3 |
7.9% |
0.07894737 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
2 |
5.3% |
0.05263158 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
1 |
2.6% |
0.02631579 |
97 |
No answer |
2 |
5.3% |
0.05263158 |
98 |
Not asked |
7171 |
|
NA |
r5k29
Variable label:
|
Have you or your parents immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked respondents if background information is missing]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
14 |
87.5% |
0.8750 |
2 |
I have immigrated to Norway |
1 |
6.2% |
0.0625 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
4 |
My mother immigrated to Norway, but my father and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
5 |
My father immigrated to Norway, but my mother and I did not |
0 |
0% |
0.0000 |
97 |
No answer |
1 |
6.2% |
0.0625 |
98 |
Not asked |
7193 |
|
NA |
r11bk29
Variable label:
|
Immigration background
|
Literal question:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 3 or rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
2765 |
90.3% |
0.903004572 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
178 |
5.8% |
0.058131940 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
16 |
0.5% |
0.005225343 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
55 |
1.8% |
0.017962116 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
35 |
1.1% |
0.011430438 |
97 |
Not answered |
13 |
0.4% |
0.004245591 |
98 |
Not asked |
4147 |
|
NA |
c11bk29
Variable label:
|
Voted this party in parliamentary elections of 2017 [Most recent available data from w01_k29, w03_r3k29, r4k29, r5k29, r11bk29]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections in 2017?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No |
6234 |
90.9% |
0.908746356 |
2 |
I myself have immigrated to Norway |
361 |
5.3% |
0.052623907 |
3 |
Both my parents have immigrated to Norway, but I was born in Norway |
36 |
0.5% |
0.005247813 |
4 |
My mother has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my father have not immigrated |
119 |
1.7% |
0.017346939 |
5 |
My father has immigrated to Norway, but myself and my mother have not immigrated |
85 |
1.2% |
0.012390671 |
97 |
Not answered |
25 |
0.4% |
0.003644315 |
98 |
Not asked |
349 |
|
NA |
r10k8_1
Variable label:
|
Personal placement on political axis left-right.
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are politically on the far left, and 10 represents those who are politically on the far right.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
73 |
1.5% |
0.014904042 |
2 |
1 |
155 |
3.2% |
0.031645570 |
3 |
2 |
439 |
9% |
0.089628420 |
4 |
3 |
742 |
15.1% |
0.151490404 |
5 |
4 |
622 |
12.7% |
0.126990608 |
6 |
5 |
702 |
14.3% |
0.143323806 |
7 |
6 |
592 |
12.1% |
0.120865659 |
8 |
7 |
708 |
14.5% |
0.144548795 |
9 |
8 |
564 |
11.5% |
0.115149040 |
10 |
9 |
159 |
3.2% |
0.032462229 |
11 |
10 Right |
95 |
1.9% |
0.019395672 |
97 |
No answer |
47 |
1% |
0.009595753 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2311 |
|
NA |
r11pk8_1
Variable label:
|
Personal placement on political axis left-right
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are politically on the far left, and 10 represents those who are politically on the far right.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
17 |
1.3% |
0.012957317 |
2 |
1 |
52 |
4% |
0.039634146 |
3 |
2 |
132 |
10.1% |
0.100609756 |
4 |
3 |
192 |
14.6% |
0.146341463 |
5 |
4 |
156 |
11.9% |
0.118902439 |
6 |
5 |
213 |
16.2% |
0.162347561 |
7 |
6 |
134 |
10.2% |
0.102134146 |
8 |
7 |
184 |
14% |
0.140243902 |
9 |
8 |
161 |
12.3% |
0.122713415 |
10 |
9 |
41 |
3.1% |
0.031250000 |
11 |
10 Right |
19 |
1.4% |
0.014481707 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.8% |
0.008384146 |
98 |
Not asked |
5897 |
|
NA |
c11pk8
Variable label:
|
Personal placement on political axis left-right [Most recent available data from r10k8, r11pk8_1]
|
Pre-question text:
|
In politics people often talk about the “left wing” and the “right wing”. Below is a scale where 0 represents those who are politically on the far left, and 10 represents those who are politically on the far right.
|
Literal question:
|
Where would you place yourself on such a scale?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
0 Left |
90 |
1.4% |
0.014492754 |
2 |
1 |
207 |
3.3% |
0.033333333 |
3 |
2 |
571 |
9.2% |
0.091948470 |
4 |
3 |
934 |
15% |
0.150402576 |
5 |
4 |
778 |
12.5% |
0.125281804 |
6 |
5 |
915 |
14.7% |
0.147342995 |
7 |
6 |
726 |
11.7% |
0.116908213 |
8 |
7 |
892 |
14.4% |
0.143639291 |
9 |
8 |
725 |
11.7% |
0.116747182 |
10 |
9 |
200 |
3.2% |
0.032206119 |
11 |
10 Right |
114 |
1.8% |
0.018357488 |
97 |
Not answered |
58 |
0.9% |
0.009339775 |
98 |
Not asked |
999 |
|
NA |
r10k3
Variable label:
|
Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election.
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
209 |
4.3% |
0.042670478 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1130 |
23.1% |
0.230706411 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
528 |
10.8% |
0.107799102 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
263 |
5.4% |
0.053695386 |
5 |
The Socialist Left Party |
435 |
8.9% |
0.088811760 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
429 |
8.8% |
0.087586770 |
7 |
The Green Party |
211 |
4.3% |
0.043078808 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1101 |
22.5% |
0.224785627 |
9 |
The Red Party |
194 |
4% |
0.039608003 |
10 |
Did not vote |
109 |
2.2% |
0.022253981 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
176 |
3.6% |
0.035933034 |
12 |
Other: |
89 |
1.8% |
0.018170682 |
97 |
No answer |
24 |
0.5% |
0.004899959 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
2311 |
|
NA |
r11bk3
Variable label:
|
Voted this party in parliamentary elections of 2017
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections in 2017?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if rekruttert = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
43 |
3.3% |
0.032774390 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
319 |
24.3% |
0.243140244 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
114 |
8.7% |
0.086890244 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
81 |
6.2% |
0.061737805 |
5 |
The Soialist Left Party |
89 |
6.8% |
0.067835366 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
106 |
8.1% |
0.080792683 |
7 |
The Green Party |
71 |
5.4% |
0.054115854 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
283 |
21.6% |
0.215701220 |
9 |
The Red Party |
53 |
4% |
0.040396341 |
10 |
Did not vote |
45 |
3.4% |
0.034298780 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
75 |
5.7% |
0.057164634 |
12 |
Other: |
26 |
2% |
0.019817073 |
97 |
Not answered |
7 |
0.5% |
0.005335366 |
98 |
Not asked |
5897 |
|
NA |
c11bk3
Variable label:
|
Voted for this party in 2017 parliamentary election. [Most recent available data from r10k3, r11bk3]
|
Pre-question text:
|
Have you or your parents (mother, father, or both parents) immigrated to Norway?
|
Literal question:
|
Which party did you vote for at the parliamentary elections?
|
Technical description:
|
[Composite variable. There are minor differences in question language.]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
252 |
4.1% |
0.040579710 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1449 |
23.3% |
0.233333333 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
642 |
10.3% |
0.103381643 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
344 |
5.5% |
0.055394525 |
5 |
The Soialist Left Party |
524 |
8.4% |
0.084380032 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
535 |
8.6% |
0.086151369 |
7 |
The Green Party |
282 |
4.5% |
0.045410628 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1384 |
22.3% |
0.222866345 |
9 |
The Red Party |
247 |
4% |
0.039774557 |
10 |
Did not vote |
154 |
2.5% |
0.024798712 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
251 |
4% |
0.040418680 |
12 |
Other: |
115 |
1.9% |
0.018518519 |
97 |
Not answered |
31 |
0.5% |
0.004991948 |
98 |
Not asked |
999 |
|
NA |
r11pk1
Variable label:
|
Interest in politics
|
Literal question:
|
In general, how interested are you in politics?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very interested |
899 |
14.3% |
0.143084514 |
2 |
Interested |
3144 |
50% |
0.500397899 |
3 |
Somewhat interested |
1820 |
29% |
0.289670540 |
4 |
Not very interested |
362 |
5.8% |
0.057615789 |
5 |
Not interested at all |
47 |
0.7% |
0.007480503 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.2% |
0.001750756 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk10
Variable label:
|
Perception of today’s economic situation in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
How do you perceive the current economic situation to be in Norway? Do you think it is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very good |
1692 |
26.9% |
0.2692981060 |
2 |
Good |
3601 |
57.3% |
0.5731338533 |
3 |
Quite good |
691 |
11% |
0.1099793092 |
4 |
Neither good nor bad |
184 |
2.9% |
0.0292853732 |
5 |
Quite bad |
79 |
1.3% |
0.0125736113 |
6 |
Bad |
24 |
0.4% |
0.0038198313 |
7 |
Very bad |
9 |
0.1% |
0.0014324367 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0% |
0.0004774789 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pktilfreds3
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: the Norwegian government
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the present government in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
436 |
6.9% |
0.069393602 |
2 |
Satisfied |
2126 |
33.8% |
0.338373389 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1927 |
30.7% |
0.306700621 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
1291 |
20.5% |
0.205475092 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
492 |
7.8% |
0.078306541 |
97 |
Not answered |
11 |
0.2% |
0.001750756 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pktilfreds4
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: the way democracy works in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
How satisfied are you with the way in which democracy works in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
913 |
14.5% |
0.145312749 |
2 |
Satisfied |
3447 |
54.9% |
0.548623269 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
1412 |
22.5% |
0.224733408 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
411 |
6.5% |
0.065414611 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
64 |
1% |
0.010186217 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
0.6% |
0.005729747 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk204
Variable label:
|
Would vote this party if parliamentary elections held tomorrow
|
Literal question:
|
Which party would you vote for if there were a parliamentary election tomorrow?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Christian Democrats |
227 |
3.6% |
0.036129238 |
2 |
The Conservative Party |
1620 |
25.8% |
0.257838612 |
3 |
The Progress Party |
572 |
9.1% |
0.091039312 |
4 |
The Liberal Party |
304 |
4.8% |
0.048384530 |
5 |
The Soialist Left Party |
629 |
10% |
0.100111412 |
6 |
The Centre Party |
617 |
9.8% |
0.098201496 |
7 |
The Green Party |
268 |
4.3% |
0.042654783 |
8 |
The Labour Party |
1218 |
19.4% |
0.193856438 |
9 |
The Red Party |
312 |
5% |
0.049657807 |
10 |
Did not vote |
161 |
2.6% |
0.025624702 |
11 |
Not entitled to vote |
124 |
2% |
0.019735795 |
12 |
Other: |
192 |
3.1% |
0.030558650 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.6% |
0.006207226 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk6_1
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Christian Democrats
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
656 |
10.4% |
0.10440872 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1069 |
17% |
0.17014165 |
3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1589 |
25.3% |
0.25290466 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1450 |
23.1% |
0.23078147 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1060 |
16.9% |
0.16870922 |
6 |
Really like |
306 |
4.9% |
0.04870285 |
7 |
Intensely like |
74 |
1.2% |
0.01177781 |
97 |
Not answered |
79 |
1.3% |
0.01257361 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk6_2
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Conservative Party
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
256 |
4.1% |
0.04074487 |
2 |
Really dislike |
797 |
12.7% |
0.12685023 |
3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1138 |
18.1% |
0.18112367 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
684 |
10.9% |
0.10886519 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1450 |
23.1% |
0.23078147 |
6 |
Really like |
1454 |
23.1% |
0.23141811 |
7 |
Intensely like |
440 |
7% |
0.07003024 |
97 |
Not answered |
64 |
1% |
0.01018622 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk6_3
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Progress Party
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
2032 |
32.3% |
0.323412383 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1092 |
17.4% |
0.173802324 |
3 |
Dislike somwehat |
801 |
12.7% |
0.127486869 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
524 |
8.3% |
0.083399650 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
957 |
15.2% |
0.152315773 |
6 |
Really like |
603 |
9.6% |
0.095973261 |
7 |
Intensely like |
215 |
3.4% |
0.034219322 |
97 |
Not answered |
59 |
0.9% |
0.009390419 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk6_4
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Liberal Party
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
577 |
9.2% |
0.09183511 |
2 |
Really dislike |
963 |
15.3% |
0.15327073 |
3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1422 |
22.6% |
0.22632500 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1474 |
23.5% |
0.23460131 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1291 |
20.5% |
0.20547509 |
6 |
Really like |
402 |
6.4% |
0.06398217 |
7 |
Intensely like |
66 |
1.1% |
0.01050454 |
97 |
Not answered |
88 |
1.4% |
0.01400605 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk6_5
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Social Left Party
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
852 |
13.6% |
0.13560401 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1031 |
16.4% |
0.16409359 |
3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1035 |
16.5% |
0.16473022 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1038 |
16.5% |
0.16520770 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1166 |
18.6% |
0.18558014 |
6 |
Really like |
833 |
13.3% |
0.13257998 |
7 |
Intensely like |
239 |
3.8% |
0.03803915 |
97 |
Not answered |
89 |
1.4% |
0.01416521 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk6_6
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Centre Party
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
355 |
5.7% |
0.05650167 |
2 |
Really dislike |
666 |
10.6% |
0.10600032 |
3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1151 |
18.3% |
0.18319274 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1559 |
24.8% |
0.24812987 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1579 |
25.1% |
0.25131307 |
6 |
Really like |
709 |
11.3% |
0.11284418 |
7 |
Intensely like |
186 |
3% |
0.02960369 |
97 |
Not answered |
78 |
1.2% |
0.01241445 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk6_7
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Green Party
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1284 |
20.4% |
0.20436097 |
2 |
Really dislike |
924 |
14.7% |
0.14706350 |
3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1044 |
16.6% |
0.16616266 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
991 |
15.8% |
0.15772720 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1254 |
20% |
0.19958618 |
6 |
Really like |
564 |
9% |
0.08976604 |
7 |
Intensely like |
141 |
2.2% |
0.02244151 |
97 |
Not answered |
81 |
1.3% |
0.01289193 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk6_8
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Labour Party
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
347 |
5.5% |
0.055228394 |
2 |
Really dislike |
667 |
10.6% |
0.106159478 |
3 |
Dislike somwehat |
1130 |
18% |
0.179850390 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
957 |
15.2% |
0.152315773 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1768 |
28.1% |
0.281394238 |
6 |
Really like |
1117 |
17.8% |
0.177781315 |
7 |
Intensely like |
236 |
3.8% |
0.037561674 |
97 |
Not answered |
61 |
1% |
0.009708738 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk6_9
Variable label:
|
Like/dislike: The Red Party
|
Literal question:
|
We would like you to rate how much you like or dislike the various Norwegian political parties.
|
Post-question:
|
Select one option.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Intensely dislike |
1370 |
21.8% |
0.21804870 |
2 |
Really dislike |
1031 |
16.4% |
0.16409359 |
3 |
Dislike somwehat |
876 |
13.9% |
0.13942384 |
4 |
Neither dislike nor like |
1170 |
18.6% |
0.18621678 |
5 |
Like somewhat |
1020 |
16.2% |
0.16234283 |
6 |
Really like |
510 |
8.1% |
0.08117141 |
7 |
Intensely like |
196 |
3.1% |
0.03119529 |
97 |
Not answered |
110 |
1.8% |
0.01750756 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pktilfreds1
Variable label:
|
How satisfied with: Life in general
|
Literal question:
|
All in all, how satisfied are you with life?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very satisfied |
2157 |
34.3% |
0.343307337 |
2 |
Satisfied |
3415 |
54.4% |
0.543530161 |
3 |
Somewhat satisfied |
576 |
9.2% |
0.091675951 |
4 |
Not very satisfied |
91 |
1.4% |
0.014483527 |
5 |
Not satisfied at all |
27 |
0.4% |
0.004297310 |
97 |
Not answered |
17 |
0.3% |
0.002705714 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk15_1
Variable label:
|
Other people’s trustworthiness
|
Literal question:
|
Would you say that most people in general can be trusted, or do you think that one cannot be careful enough when dealing with others?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:0-10]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
0 |
0 - Cannot be careful enough |
61 |
1% |
0.009708738 |
1 |
1 |
45 |
0.7% |
0.007162184 |
2 |
2 |
111 |
1.8% |
0.017666720 |
3 |
3 |
207 |
3.3% |
0.032946045 |
4 |
4 |
245 |
3.9% |
0.038994111 |
5 |
5 |
544 |
8.7% |
0.086582843 |
6 |
6 |
629 |
10% |
0.100111412 |
7 |
7 |
1472 |
23.4% |
0.234282986 |
8 |
8 |
1607 |
25.6% |
0.255769537 |
9 |
9 |
751 |
12% |
0.119528887 |
10 |
10 – Most people can be trusted |
603 |
9.6% |
0.095973261 |
97 |
Not answered |
8 |
0.1% |
0.001273277 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_1
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Respect for parents and elders, obedience
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] believes that he should always show respect for [his/her] parents and for older people. It’s important to [him/her] to be obedient.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
170 |
2.7% |
0.027057138 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
505 |
8% |
0.080375617 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1106 |
17.6% |
0.176030559 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2332 |
37.1% |
0.371160274 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1581 |
25.2% |
0.251631386 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
531 |
8.5% |
0.084513767 |
97 |
Not answered |
58 |
0.9% |
0.009231259 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_2
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Religion important, fulfills religious requirements
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
Religious faith is important to [him/her]. [He/She] endeavours to do what [his/her] religion requires.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
3070 |
48.9% |
0.488620086 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1303 |
20.7% |
0.207385007 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
882 |
14% |
0.140378800 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
599 |
9.5% |
0.095336623 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
265 |
4.2% |
0.042177304 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
121 |
1.9% |
0.019258316 |
97 |
Not answered |
43 |
0.7% |
0.006843864 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_3
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to help people, wants to make others do well
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s very important to [him/her] to help the people around [him/her]. [He/She] wants to do something to make sure they are doing well.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
18 |
0.3% |
0.002864873 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
76 |
1.2% |
0.012096132 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
391 |
6.2% |
0.062231418 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2322 |
37% |
0.369568677 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
2351 |
37.4% |
0.374184307 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1079 |
17.2% |
0.171733248 |
97 |
Not answered |
46 |
0.7% |
0.007321343 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_4
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Treat people equally, equal opportunities
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important that all people in the world be treated equally. [He/She] thinks everyone should have equal opportunities in life.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
56 |
0.9% |
0.008912940 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
167 |
2.7% |
0.026579659 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
403 |
6.4% |
0.064141334 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1783 |
28.4% |
0.283781633 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
2348 |
37.4% |
0.373706828 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1481 |
23.6% |
0.235715423 |
97 |
Not answered |
45 |
0.7% |
0.007162184 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_5
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Interest important, likes to be curious and understand things
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] thinks it’s important to be interested in things. [He/She] likes to be curious and tries to understand all sorts of issues.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
32 |
0.5% |
0.005093108 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
117 |
1.9% |
0.018621678 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
522 |
8.3% |
0.083081331 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2217 |
35.3% |
0.352856915 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
2184 |
34.8% |
0.347604647 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
1169 |
18.6% |
0.186057616 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006684705 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_6
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes risks, looks for new experiences
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] likes to take risks. [He/She]’s always looking for new experiences.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
607 |
9.7% |
0.096609900 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1346 |
21.4% |
0.214228872 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
2142 |
34.1% |
0.340919943 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1568 |
25% |
0.249562311 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
476 |
7.6% |
0.075759987 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
102 |
1.6% |
0.016234283 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006684705 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_7
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Seeks out fun, important to do things that brings pleasure
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
[He/She] seeks out any opportunity to have fun. It is important for [him/her] to do things that give [him/her] pleasure.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
235 |
3.7% |
0.037402515 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
782 |
12.4% |
0.124462836 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
1827 |
29.1% |
0.290784657 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2404 |
38.3% |
0.382619768 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
801 |
12.7% |
0.127486869 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
190 |
3% |
0.030240331 |
97 |
Not answered |
44 |
0.7% |
0.007003024 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_8
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Important to be successful, likes to impress
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] to be successful. [He/She] likes to impress other people.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
682 |
10.9% |
0.108546873 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1352 |
21.5% |
0.215183829 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
2050 |
32.6% |
0.326277256 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1526 |
24.3% |
0.242877606 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
494 |
7.9% |
0.078624861 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
134 |
2.1% |
0.021327391 |
97 |
Not answered |
45 |
0.7% |
0.007162184 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_9
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Likes to lead, wants others to do as they say
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It is important for [him/her] to take the lead and tell others what to do. [He/She] wants people to do as he says.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
679 |
10.8% |
0.108069394 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
1279 |
20.4% |
0.203565176 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
2077 |
33.1% |
0.330574566 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
1685 |
26.8% |
0.268183989 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
444 |
7.1% |
0.070666879 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
77 |
1.2% |
0.012255292 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006684705 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bktivi_10
Variable label:
|
Resembles me: Tidiness and cleanliness important, doesn’t like mess
|
Pre-question text:
|
Here we briefly describe some people. Read each description, and think about how much this person resembles you. For each person described, check the form for how much this person resembles or does not resemble you.
|
Literal question:
|
It’s important to [him/her] that things are tidy and clean. [He/She] really doesn’t like things to be messy.
|
Technical description:
|
[Question with text substitution. Respondents are presented with personal characteristics where the gender pronoun in the text corresponds to the respondent’s own gender. The order of r11bktiv is randomized. All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
1 - Does not resemble me at all |
101 |
1.6% |
0.016075123 |
2 |
2 - Does not resemble me |
340 |
5.4% |
0.054114277 |
3 |
3 - Slightly resembles me |
887 |
14.1% |
0.141174598 |
4 |
4 - Somewhat resembles me |
2204 |
35.1% |
0.350787840 |
5 |
5 - Resembles me |
1807 |
28.8% |
0.287601464 |
6 |
6 - Very much resembles me |
907 |
14.4% |
0.144357791 |
97 |
Not answered |
37 |
0.6% |
0.005888907 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk53
Variable label:
|
Confidence in Norwegian politicians
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, how much confidence do you have in Norwegian politicians?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
68 |
1.1% |
0.010822855 |
2 |
To a great extent |
1713 |
27.3% |
0.272640458 |
3 |
To some extent |
3434 |
54.7% |
0.546554194 |
4 |
To a small extent |
918 |
14.6% |
0.146108547 |
5 |
Not at all |
129 |
2.1% |
0.020531593 |
97 |
Not answered |
21 |
0.3% |
0.003342352 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk54
Variable label:
|
Confidence in Norwegian news media
|
Literal question:
|
Generally speaking, what degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian news media?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
179 |
2.8% |
0.028489575 |
2 |
To a great extent |
2275 |
36.2% |
0.362088174 |
3 |
To some extent |
2996 |
47.7% |
0.476842273 |
4 |
To a small extent |
642 |
10.2% |
0.102180487 |
5 |
Not at all |
144 |
2.3% |
0.022918988 |
97 |
Not answered |
47 |
0.7% |
0.007480503 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk12
Variable label:
|
Confidence in Norwegian parliament
|
Literal question:
|
What degree of confidence do you have in the Norwegian Parliament (Stortinget)?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
To a very great extent |
234 |
3.7% |
0.037243355 |
2 |
To a great extent |
2531 |
40.3% |
0.402833042 |
3 |
To some extent |
2800 |
44.6% |
0.445646984 |
4 |
To a small extent |
569 |
9.1% |
0.090561834 |
5 |
Not at all |
111 |
1.8% |
0.017666720 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
0.6% |
0.006048066 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk55
Variable label:
|
The number of municipalities should be reduced further by merging
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
From the year 2020, Norway will have 356 municipalities instead of 422 as of today. The number of municipalities should be reduced further by more mergers.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
705 |
11.2% |
0.112207544 |
2 |
Agree |
1102 |
17.5% |
0.175393920 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1154 |
18.4% |
0.183670221 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1131 |
18% |
0.180009550 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
764 |
12.2% |
0.121597963 |
6 |
Disagree |
805 |
12.8% |
0.128123508 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
592 |
9.4% |
0.094222505 |
97 |
Not answered |
30 |
0.5% |
0.004774789 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk60
Variable label:
|
The government should work towards recuding income differences
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
The Government should work more to significantly reduce the income differences in society.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
1694 |
27% |
0.269616425 |
2 |
Agree |
2004 |
31.9% |
0.318955913 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1429 |
22.7% |
0.227439121 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
510 |
8.1% |
0.081171415 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
363 |
5.8% |
0.057774948 |
6 |
Disagree |
196 |
3.1% |
0.031195289 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
46 |
0.7% |
0.007321343 |
97 |
Not answered |
41 |
0.7% |
0.006525545 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pkby3
Variable label:
|
Fears new terrorist attack in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
To what extent do you fear that there will be a new terrorist attack in Norway?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all |
397 |
6.3% |
0.063186376 |
2 |
Slightly |
2477 |
39.4% |
0.394238421 |
3 |
Somewhat |
2468 |
39.3% |
0.392805984 |
4 |
To a great extent |
741 |
11.8% |
0.117937291 |
5 |
To a very great extent |
171 |
2.7% |
0.027216298 |
97 |
Not answered |
29 |
0.5% |
0.004615629 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pk52
Variable label:
|
Government should protect citizens from terrorism even at expense of privacy
|
Pre-question text:
|
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following proposition:
|
Literal question:
|
The authorities should introduce more measures to protect citizens from potential terrorist threats, even though this may be at the expense of privacy.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
510 |
8.1% |
0.081171415 |
2 |
Agree |
1321 |
21% |
0.210249881 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
1734 |
27.6% |
0.275982811 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
772 |
12.3% |
0.122871240 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
846 |
13.5% |
0.134649053 |
6 |
Disagree |
729 |
11.6% |
0.116027375 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
347 |
5.5% |
0.055228394 |
97 |
Not answered |
24 |
0.4% |
0.003819831 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pkkm2_1
Variable label:
|
How concerned about climate change: Variant 1
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3, and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran =1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all concerned |
66 |
4.2% |
0.041984733 |
2 |
Not particularly concerned |
291 |
18.5% |
0.185114504 |
3 |
Somewhat concerned |
469 |
29.8% |
0.298346056 |
4 |
Concerned |
514 |
32.7% |
0.326972010 |
5 |
Very concerned |
230 |
14.6% |
0.146310433 |
97 |
Not answered |
2 |
0.1% |
0.001272265 |
98 |
Not asked |
5637 |
|
NA |
r11pkkm2_2
Variable label:
|
How concerned about climate change: Variant 2
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3, and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran = 2. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all concerned |
66 |
4.2% |
0.04158790 |
2 |
Not very concerned |
337 |
21.2% |
0.21235035 |
3 |
Slightly concerned |
658 |
41.5% |
0.41461878 |
4 |
Very concerned |
463 |
29.2% |
0.29174543 |
5 |
Extremely concerned |
63 |
4% |
0.03969754 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
5622 |
|
NA |
r11pkkm2_3
Variable label:
|
How concerned about climate change: Variant 3
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3, and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran = 3. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all concerned |
61 |
4% |
0.0401315789 |
2 |
Not particularly concerned |
273 |
18% |
0.1796052632 |
3 |
Slightly concerned |
666 |
43.8% |
0.4381578947 |
4 |
Very concerned |
468 |
30.8% |
0.3078947368 |
5 |
Extremely concerned |
51 |
3.4% |
0.0335526316 |
97 |
Not answered |
1 |
0.1% |
0.0006578947 |
98 |
Not asked |
5689 |
|
NA |
r11pkkm2_4
Variable label:
|
How concerned about climate change: Variant 4
|
Literal question:
|
How concerned are you about climate change?
|
Technical description:
|
[Experiment. Same question text in r11pkkm2_1, r11pkkm2_2, r11pkkm2_3, and r11pkkm2_4, but different answer options. Asked if r11pkkm2_ran = 4. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Not at all concerned |
68 |
4.3% |
0.04290221 |
2 |
Not particularly concerned |
245 |
15.5% |
0.15457413 |
3 |
Slightly concerned |
629 |
39.7% |
0.39684543 |
4 |
Rather concerned |
458 |
28.9% |
0.28895899 |
5 |
Very concerned |
185 |
11.7% |
0.11671924 |
97 |
Not answered |
0 |
0% |
0.00000000 |
98 |
Not asked |
5624 |
|
NA |
r11pkkm42
Variable label:
|
Should/should not be possible to buy diesel- and petrol cars after 2025
|
Pre-question text:
|
The National Transport Plan for 2018-29 proposes that all new private vehicles should either be electric or run on hydrogen with effect from 2025.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the following statements most closely reflects your views:
|
Post-question:
|
Link: Look at “Nasjonal Transportplan 2018-2029”, p. 16, available here (external link)
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-2]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In 2025 all new private vehicles sold should either be electric or run on
hydrogen |
2665 |
42.4% |
0.42416043 |
2 |
In 2025, people should still have the opportunity to purchase new private cars
which run on diesel or petrol |
3525 |
56.1% |
0.56103772 |
97 |
Not answered |
93 |
1.5% |
0.01480185 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pkkm4
Variable label:
|
Should/should not allow oil and gas extraction in Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja
|
Pre-question text:
|
Please look at the statement below.
|
Literal question:
|
We should not allow oil and gas extraction in the Lofoten, Vesterålen and Senja areas. To what extent do you agree/disagree with this?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
2034 |
32.4% |
0.323730702 |
2 |
Agree |
1084 |
17.3% |
0.172529047 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
732 |
11.7% |
0.116504854 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
900 |
14.3% |
0.143243673 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
579 |
9.2% |
0.092153430 |
6 |
Disagree |
574 |
9.1% |
0.091357632 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
348 |
5.5% |
0.055387554 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.5% |
0.005093108 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pkmeme9
Variable label:
|
Access to asylum in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
What is your opinion on refugees who come to Norway and seek asylum and their opportunity to be granted residence here? Compared to how it is today, do you mean it should be:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much easier |
164 |
2.6% |
0.026102180 |
2 |
Easier |
676 |
10.8% |
0.107591915 |
3 |
Somewhat easier |
1226 |
19.5% |
0.195129715 |
4 |
Same as today |
2145 |
34.1% |
0.341397422 |
5 |
Slightly more difficult |
867 |
13.8% |
0.137991405 |
6 |
More difficult |
638 |
10.2% |
0.101543848 |
7 |
Much more difficult |
521 |
8.3% |
0.082922171 |
97 |
Not answered |
46 |
0.7% |
0.007321343 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pkdv5
Variable label:
|
How good or bad that immigrants come to live in Norway
|
Literal question:
|
In your opinion how great an advantage or disadvantage is it for Norway that immigrants come to live here?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Very great advantage |
154 |
2.5% |
0.024510584 |
2 |
Great advantage |
833 |
13.3% |
0.132579978 |
3 |
Slightly advantageous |
2217 |
35.3% |
0.352856915 |
4 |
Neither an advantage nor a disadvantage |
1137 |
18.1% |
0.180964507 |
5 |
A slight disadvantage |
1222 |
19.4% |
0.194493077 |
6 |
A great disadvantage |
437 |
7% |
0.069552761 |
7 |
Very great disadvantage |
237 |
3.8% |
0.037720834 |
97 |
Not answered |
46 |
0.7% |
0.007321343 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pkdv55
Variable label:
|
Muslim religious schools should be possible
|
Pre-question text:
|
Today, it is possible for parents to send their children to Christian schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Christian faith.
|
Literal question:
|
How much do you agree or disagree that it should be possible for parents to send their children to Muslim schools that follow the national curriculum, but also teach the Islamic faith?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Strongly agree |
138 |
2.2% |
0.021964030 |
2 |
Agree |
575 |
9.2% |
0.091516791 |
3 |
Agree somewhat |
755 |
12% |
0.120165526 |
4 |
Neither agree nor disagree |
1067 |
17% |
0.169823333 |
5 |
Disagree somewhat |
823 |
13.1% |
0.130988381 |
6 |
Disagree |
1307 |
20.8% |
0.208021646 |
7 |
Strongly disagree |
1579 |
25.1% |
0.251313067 |
97 |
Not answered |
39 |
0.6% |
0.006207226 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pkby2
Variable label:
|
Safety in local environment past few years
|
Pre-question text:
|
Think about your local environment and how it has evolved over the past couple of years.
|
Literal question:
|
How much safer or more unsafe has it become?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Much safer |
59 |
0.9% |
0.009390419 |
2 |
Somewhat safer |
294 |
4.7% |
0.046792933 |
3 |
No change in safety |
4525 |
72% |
0.720197358 |
4 |
Somewhat more unsafe |
1198 |
19.1% |
0.190673245 |
5 |
Much more unsafe |
171 |
2.7% |
0.027216298 |
97 |
Not answered |
36 |
0.6% |
0.005729747 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11pkklasse
Variable label:
|
Social class, self-placement
|
Pre-question text:
|
We sometimes talk about whether or not there are different social groups or classes.
|
Literal question:
|
If you were to place yourself in such a social class, which one would it be?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Lower class |
57 |
0.9% |
0.009072099 |
2 |
Working class |
796 |
12.7% |
0.126691071 |
3 |
Lower middle class |
610 |
9.7% |
0.097087379 |
4 |
Middle class |
3372 |
53.7% |
0.536686296 |
5 |
Upper middle class |
1197 |
19.1% |
0.190514086 |
6 |
Upper class |
37 |
0.6% |
0.005888907 |
7 |
Don't know |
176 |
2.8% |
0.028012096 |
97 |
Not answered |
38 |
0.6% |
0.006048066 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bk21
Variable label:
|
Works in what type of business
|
Literal question:
|
Which type of business do you work in?
|
Technical description:
|
[Asked if r11bk33 = 1. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
State, county or municipal administration |
401 |
11.4% |
0.1137266024 |
2 |
Public sector (e.g. school and health services) |
1083 |
30.7% |
0.3071469087 |
3 |
Publicly owned enterprise |
224 |
6.4% |
0.0635280771 |
4 |
Private business |
1547 |
43.9% |
0.4387407828 |
5 |
Self employed |
184 |
5.2% |
0.0521837777 |
6 |
Other: |
84 |
2.4% |
0.0238230289 |
97 |
Not answered |
3 |
0.1% |
0.0008508225 |
98 |
Not asked |
3683 |
|
NA |
r11bk26
Variable label:
|
Highest completed education
|
Literal question:
|
What is your highest completed education?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-12]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
No completed education |
19 |
0.3% |
0.003024033 |
2 |
Primary and lower secondary school (completed either the first part of
compulsory education (elementary school), primary and lower secondary school, 7-
year elementary school, secondary modern school or lower secondary school) |
430 |
6.8% |
0.068438644 |
3 |
Secondary education-general studies/programme for general studies, one-year
supplementary study for university and college admission certification (VK2,
VG3, High School) |
688 |
11% |
0.109501830 |
4 |
Secondary education-vocational line of study/education programme (VK2, VK3, VG3,
apprenticeship examination, apprentices’ final exam ) |
729 |
11.6% |
0.116027375 |
5 |
Diploma from supplementary programme for general university and college
admissions certification (tertiary vocational education, vocational technical
college) |
320 |
5.1% |
0.050931084 |
6 |
University/College, less than 3 years, but at least 2 years (university college
graduate 2 and 2½ years) |
595 |
9.5% |
0.094699984 |
7 |
College-3-4 year education (Bachelor-, cand.mag., teacher training college,
school of nursing, preschool teacher, engineer, business graduate, etc.) |
1313 |
20.9% |
0.208976604 |
8 |
University-3-4 year education (Bachelor, cand.mag.) |
472 |
7.5% |
0.075123349 |
9 |
College-5-6 year education (Master, major) |
416 |
6.6% |
0.066210409 |
10 |
University 5-6 year education (Master, majors (longer professional education
(MA in Theology., MA in Psychology., Doctor of Medicine, Doctor of Veterinary
Medicine, chartered engineer, graduate in architecture, Master of Science in
Business and Economy) |
945 |
15% |
0.150405857 |
11 |
Researcher level (Doctorate, Ph.d.) |
141 |
2.2% |
0.022441509 |
12 |
None of the above (please enter): |
168 |
2.7% |
0.026738819 |
97 |
Not answered |
47 |
0.7% |
0.007480503 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bk27
Variable label:
|
Marital status
|
Literal question:
|
Marital status.
|
Post-question:
|
Click on the one that is most relevant.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Unmarried/not cohabiting |
911 |
14.5% |
0.144994429 |
2 |
Cohabitant |
1072 |
17.1% |
0.170619131 |
3 |
Married/legally registered partner |
3552 |
56.5% |
0.565335031 |
4 |
Divorced/separated/formally registered partner |
474 |
7.5% |
0.075441668 |
5 |
Widow/widower |
202 |
3.2% |
0.032150247 |
6 |
Other: |
40 |
0.6% |
0.006366385 |
97 |
Not answered |
32 |
0.5% |
0.005093108 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bk25
Variable label:
|
Gross annual income
|
Literal question:
|
What is your current income?
|
Post-question:
|
Gross annual income is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-8]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
< 150 000 |
407 |
6.5% |
0.06477797 |
2 |
150 001 - 300 000 |
801 |
12.7% |
0.12748687 |
3 |
300 001 - 400 000 |
950 |
15.1% |
0.15120166 |
4 |
400 001 - 500 000 |
1173 |
18.7% |
0.18669425 |
5 |
500 001 - 600 000 |
1074 |
17.1% |
0.17093745 |
6 |
600 001 - 700 000 |
682 |
10.9% |
0.10854687 |
7 |
700 001 - 1 000 000 |
704 |
11.2% |
0.11204838 |
8 |
> 1 000 000 |
352 |
5.6% |
0.05602419 |
97 |
Not answered |
140 |
2.2% |
0.02228235 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bk35
Variable label:
|
Type of living area
|
Literal question:
|
Which description best fits the area you live in?
|
Post-question:
|
We are thinking about Norwegian conditions here.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
A city |
1479 |
23.5% |
0.235397103 |
2 |
A suburb or the outskirts of a city |
1340 |
21.3% |
0.213273914 |
3 |
A small or medium sized town |
1709 |
27.2% |
0.272003820 |
4 |
A village |
1053 |
16.8% |
0.167595098 |
5 |
A sparsely inhabited area |
668 |
10.6% |
0.106318638 |
97 |
Not answered |
34 |
0.5% |
0.005411428 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bkhelse
Variable label:
|
General health
|
Literal question:
|
In general, would you say your health is:
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-5]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Excellent |
873 |
13.9% |
0.138946363 |
2 |
Very good |
2268 |
36.1% |
0.360974057 |
3 |
Good |
2111 |
33.6% |
0.335985994 |
4 |
Somewhat good |
767 |
12.2% |
0.122075442 |
5 |
Poor |
224 |
3.6% |
0.035651759 |
97 |
Not answered |
40 |
0.6% |
0.006366385 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bk42
Variable label:
|
How many children under 16 living at home
|
Literal question:
|
Do you have children under the age of 16 living at home with you, and in that case how many?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
None |
4909 |
78.1% |
0.7813146586 |
2 |
1 |
601 |
9.6% |
0.0956549419 |
3 |
2 |
569 |
9.1% |
0.0905618335 |
4 |
3 |
142 |
2.3% |
0.0226006685 |
5 |
4 |
16 |
0.3% |
0.0025465542 |
6 |
5 |
2 |
0% |
0.0003183193 |
7 |
6 or more |
2 |
0% |
0.0003183193 |
97 |
Not answered |
42 |
0.7% |
0.0066847048 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bk40_recode
Variable label:
|
Belongs to a religion or a religious denomination [recoded]
|
Literal question:
|
Do you belong to a religion or a religious denomination?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
[Recoded from source variable r11bk40]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-6]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
The Church of Norway |
4070 |
64.8% |
0.647779723 |
2 |
The Catholic Church |
83 |
1.3% |
0.013210250 |
3 |
Other Christian faiths (Orthodox church, and other christian faiths, e.g. free
churches, Anglican church, Pentecostalists, Jehovah's Witnesses, and Mormons) |
225 |
3.6% |
0.035810918 |
4 |
Other non-Christian religions (The Mosaic faith, eastern religions (e.g.
Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikh, Shintoism, Taoism, Confucianism), and others) |
42 |
0.7% |
0.006684705 |
5 |
Islam |
30 |
0.5% |
0.004774789 |
6 |
I don't belong to any religion or religious communities. |
1793 |
28.5% |
0.285373229 |
97 |
No answer |
40 |
0.6% |
0.006366385 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r11bk41
Variable label:
|
Attends religious meetings
|
Literal question:
|
Aside from special occasions such as weddings and funerals, how often would you say you currently attend religious meetings?
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-7]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
Every day |
8 |
0.1% |
0.001273277 |
2 |
More than once a week |
95 |
1.5% |
0.015120166 |
3 |
Once a week |
163 |
2.6% |
0.025943021 |
4 |
At least once a month |
302 |
4.8% |
0.048066210 |
5 |
Only on special religious holidays |
1083 |
17.2% |
0.172369887 |
6 |
Less frequently |
1364 |
21.7% |
0.217093745 |
7 |
Never |
3227 |
51.4% |
0.513608149 |
97 |
Not answered |
41 |
0.7% |
0.006525545 |
98 |
Not asked (imputed) |
926 |
|
NA |
r12arbeid
Variable label:
|
Main activity (occupational status) last seven days.
|
Literal question:
|
Which of the descriptions below best fits what you have been doing over the past 7 days?
|
Post-question:
|
Tick one of the options.
|
Technical description:
|
[All respondents asked. ]
|
Technical attributes:
|
[Format:numeric] [Valid:7209] [Invalid:0] [Range:1-11]
|
Value |
Label |
Cases |
Percentage |
|
1 |
In full-time paid work (or temporarily absent) |
2847 |
48.2% |
0.4822971370 |
2 |
In part-time paid work (or temporarily absent) working 30 hours or more per week |
287 |
4.9% |
0.0486193461 |
3 |
In part-time paid work (or temporarily absent) working less than 30 hours per
week |
239 |
4% |
0.0404878875 |
4 |
In education (not paid by an employer) |
217 |
3.7% |
0.0367609690 |
5 |
Unemployed and actively seeking a job |
49 |
0.8% |
0.0083008640 |
6 |
Unemployed and not actively seeking a job |
28 |
0.5% |
0.0047433508 |
7 |
Permanently sick or disabled |
227 |
3.8% |
0.0384550229 |
8 |
Retired |
1644 |
27.9% |
0.2785024564 |
9 |
In military service |
4 |
0.1% |
0.0006776215 |
10 |
Working at home, minding children or providing care to other persons |
42 |
0.7% |
0.0071150263 |
11 |
Other: |
271 |
4.6% |
0.0459088599 |
97 |
Not answered |
48 |
0.8% |
0.0081314586 |
98 |
Not asked |
1306 |
|
NA |